alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

# AGENCY:

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

# ACTION:

Extension of hearing record closure date.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 25, 2014, (79 FR 57543) concerning notice of a public hearing and meeting on October 7, 2014, regarding safety culture at Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities. The Board stated in that notice that the hearing record would remain open until November 7, 2014, for the receipt of additional materials. The Board made the same representation at the conclusion of the hearing on October 7, 2014.                    

# DATES:

The Board now extends the period of time for which the hearing record will remain open to November 21, 2014, to accommodate the submission of additional documents to the hearing record.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark Welch, General Manager, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004-2901, (800) 788-4016. This is a toll-free number.

Dated: November 4, 2014.

Peter S. Winokur,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 2014-26616 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3670-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the matter of J.B.

Appellate case number: 01-13-00844-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-02490J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

On January 29, 2014, this Court ordered appellant to work with the trial court clerk to 

obtain a copy of a certification of a right to appeal. On February 10, 2014, appellant filed a 

notice of compliance, indicating the trial court signed a certification that day, and that he had 

requested the trial court clerk to supplement the record with the certification. On March 18, the 

trial court clerk filed an information sheet indicating “[a]s of this date the Certificate mentioned 

in the Appellants Notice of Compliance has yet to be found or imaged. Said document is not in 

the physical file either. Although we are working with the court to see that it is found, we have 

no way to determine when the Supplemental Clerk’s Record will be done.”

We ORDER the supplemental record to be filed within 10 days of the date of this order. 

If the certification referenced in appellant’s notice of compliance cannot be found, the trial court 

shall prepare a replacement certification within the same 10 day period. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 1, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                           0001049011
<NAME>                          Omni Doors, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         55767
<OTHER-SE>                                      (55767)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (14911)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (14911)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (14911)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

CF Entertainment, Inc.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02393

Honorable Steven C. Seeger

The Nielsen Company (US), LLC

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, October 10, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The agreed motion to stay

the filing of an answer (Dckt. No. [80]) is hereby granted. The Court stays the obligation

to answer the complaint, pending the anticipated filing of a motion for leave to file an

amended complaint. Nielsen seeks an extension until "fourteen (14) days after the Court

adjudicates CF Entertainment's anticipated motion for leave to amend its complaint." But

if CF Entertainment files a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and the Court

grants it, then CF Entertainment would file an amended complaint. And that filing would

trigger a new set of deadlines under the Federal Rules. And it might lead to a motion to

dismiss, not an answer. So, fourteen days after the Court rules on a motion for leave to

amend the complaint does not seem like the right deadline, because it would inevitably

lead to another round of moving the goalposts. The motion for entry of the stipulated

briefing schedule (Dckt. No. [83]) is hereby granted. CF Entertainment's motion for leave

to file an amended complaint is due by October 9, 2023. A response is due by October 30,

and a reply is due by November 13. Nielsen's obligation to answer the complaint is stayed

in the meantime. If the Court grants the motion for leave to file an amended complaint,

then the run−of−the−mill deadlines under the Federal Rules will apply for a motion to

dismiss and/or an answer. If the Court denies the motion for leave to file an amended

complaint, then the answer will be due 14 days later. Mailed notice(jjr, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02393 Document #: 85 Filed: 10/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:826
1 The HONORABLE DONALD E. O’BRIEN, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2186

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Northern District of Iowa. * Helen Duffy, also known as Helen * [UNPUBLISHED] Authier, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 21, 2001 Filed: December 4, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Helen Duffy was convicted after a jury trial of acquiring cocaine through misrepresentation, deception, and subterfuge, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(a)(3), and of possessing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844(a). The district court 1 sentenced her to 5 months imprisonment and one year supervised release (including 5 months home detention). On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw under Anders-2- v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and has filed a brief arguing that Duffy’s convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence. The evidence at trial, examined in the light most favorable to the jury verdict, see United States v. Robinson , 217 F.3d 560, 564 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 999 (2000), showed that Duffy, by virtue of her job responsibilities, was the only pharmacy employee with the ability to order cocaine (by having her manager sign blank order forms), to authorize payment for the cocaine, and to receive the cocaine when it was shipped. This evidence was sufficient to support both guilty verdicts. SeeUnited States v. Wilbur , 58 F.3d 1291, 1292 (8th Cir. 1995); United States v. Hill , 589 F.2d 1344, 1350 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 442 U.S. 919 (1979). We have conducted an independent review under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and conclude that there are no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm, and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 8, 2009 

0408 

Order 

 

April 8, 2009 

137749 

RICHARD R. ROBERTS and STACEY D. 

ROBERTS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 137749 

 COA: 275458 

Leelanau CC: 05-007063-CK 

ROBERT L. SAFFELL and JOANNE O. 

SAFFELL, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address: (1) whether the Court of 

Appeals erred by holding that innocent misrepresentation is not a viable theory of 

liability under the Seller Disclosure Act (SDA), MCL 565.951 et seq.; (2) if not, whether 

the plaintiffs could nevertheless proceed with their claim to the extent an issue presented 

to the jury was whether the defendants knew of the termite infestation and intentionally 

withheld the information from the plaintiffs; (3) whether the defendants failed to preserve 

the argument that a claim for innocent misrepresentation cannot legally be maintained 

under the SDA by failing to expressly present it at the Court of Appeals; and (4) if so, 

whether this failure to preserve the issue acted as a waiver of this defense or acted as a 

bar to the Court of Appeals consideration of the issue. The parties may file supplemental 

briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere 

restatements of their application papers.
IV

House Calendar No. 54

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 176

[Report No. 105–154]

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House and Senate for the Independence Day district work

period.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 25, 1997

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resolution providing for adjournment of the House and Senate for the

Independence Day district work period.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary

3 notwithstanding, to consider a concurrent resolution pro4 viding for adjournment of the House and Senate for the

5 Independence Day district work period.
House Calendar No. 54

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 176

[Report No. 105–154]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of a concurrent resoluperiod. Senate for the Independence Day district work tion providing for adjournment of the House and

JUNE 25, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
EXHIBIT 31.2
         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Au E-Mun hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K-SB/A of Thai One On,
Inc. and its wholly-owned Subsidiary, Thai Pasta Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.

2. Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the annual report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the annual report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the annual report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
    material information relating to Thai One On, Inc., including
    its subsidiaries, if any, is made known to us by others within
    those entities, particularly during the period in which this
    annual report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
    filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
    our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)  that there were no significant deficiencies in the design or
    operation of internal controls which could adversely affect our
    ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
    and have further advised our auditors that there we are not aware
    of any material weaknesses in our internal controls; and

b)  that there was no fraud, whether or not material, that involved
    our management or other employees who have a significant role in
    our internal controls; and

6.  The other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual
that there were no significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation.

                                   THAI ONE ON, INC., Registrant

Dated: June 16, 2005                /s/ Au E-Mun
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   By: Au E-Mun, Chief Financial Officer,
                                   Treasurer, Principal Accounting
                                   Officer and Director
9711.

#### Harwell *v.*Childs.

Decided October 22, 1918.

Complaint; 'from .New’ton superior court—Judge Smith. March *21,*Í918.

*Rogers & Knox,*for plaintiff in error.

Broyles, P. J.

In this case, as stated in the brief of counsel, for the plaintiff in error, “no disputed questions of law are involved.” The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and has been approved by the trial judge.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
---



Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Swallow, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Timberline Resources Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.







Date: January 13, 2006.



/s/ John Swallow

_______________________

John Swallow

(CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ann M. Harkey","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aharkey\/","title":"Planets Take Virtual Shape on Earth with NASA Knowledge and Imagery","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eLuvl9j8bK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/tech-transfer-spinoffs\/planets-take-virtual-shape-on-earth-with-nasa-knowledge-and-imagery\/\">Planets Take Virtual Shape on Earth with NASA Knowledge and Imagery<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/tech-transfer-spinoffs\/planets-take-virtual-shape-on-earth-with-nasa-knowledge-and-imagery\/embed\/#?secret=eLuvl9j8bK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Planets Take Virtual Shape on Earth with NASA Knowledge and Imagery” — NASA\" data-secret=\"eLuvl9j8bK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/accessmarsmap.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":409}