Interim Decision #1587 

MATTER of Ram 

In Deportation Proceedings 

A-13513296 

Decided by Board May 18,1980 

Since respondent, a native and citizen of Jamaica, is a special immigrant as 

defined:in section 101(a) (27) (A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 

as amended by the Act of October 3, 1965 99-226) and there has been 

no showing he Is Ineligible to obtain a special immigrant visa, he is precluded by the provisions of section 244(f) from e,stab)inhing statutory eligibility for suspension of deportation under section 244(a) (1) of the Act 

because he is a native of an adjacent island as defined by section 10f(b) (5). 

CHARGE: 

Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (2) )—Remained 

longer—nonimmigrant 

This case comes forward on appeal from an order entered by the 

special inquiry officer on February 16, 1966 denying the respondent's application for suspension of deportation and his application 

for voluntary departure. The respondent, a 50-year-old married 

male, native and citizen of Jamaica, .has resided continuously in 

the United States-since last entering at Detioit, Michigan sometime 

during January 1952 as a nonimmigrant visitor authorized to remain in the United States for a period of several hours. Deportation proceedings were instituted against the respondent on April 

15, 1965. Hearings in deportation proceedings were' held at Cleveland, Ohio on April 27, 1965, May 26, 1965 and January 19, 1966. 

The special inquiry officer on motion of the trial attorney with the 

consent and approval of respondent's counsel orally amended ails? 

gations 3, 4 and 5 in the order to show cause. Allegation No. 3 

was amended to read that the respondent entered the United States 

at Detroit, Michigan in January 1952. Allegation No: 4 was 

amended to read that he was then admitted as a nonimmigrant 

visitor for pleasure and authorized to remain in the United States 

for a period of several hours and allegation No. 5 was amended 
Interim Decision #1587 

to read that he has remained in the United States for a longer 

period than several hours (pp. 3 & 4). Counsel admitted the truth 

of allegations 1 and "2 and amended allegations 3 and 5 (p. 4). 

The record convincingly establishes that the respondent was last 

admitted to the United States as a visitor at Detroit, Michigan for 

a period of several hours sometime during January 1952. He has 

remained in the United States -without authority since the latter 

date. On the basis of the evidence present in this record, he is 

Subject to deportation wider the provisions of section 241(a) (2) 

of the Immigration and Nationality Act, in that, after admission 

as a nonimmigrant under section 101(a) (15) of the Act, he remained in the United States fur a longer time than permitted. 

On examination of the record we find the respondent was initially admitted to the United States at Miami, Florida on or about 

May 20, 1944 under section 5(g) as an agricultural worker for a 

period of one year. His status was changed to that of a nonimmigrant visitor. Deportation proceedings were instituted against 

him on January 11, 1951 when a warrant for his arrest was issued. 

Upon conclusion of the deportation hearing held. at New York, 

New York on February 13, 1951, the hearing officer recommended 

that he be deported from the United States. The Acting Assistant 

Commissions; Adjudications Division, in a decision dated March 

• 28, 1951 denied the respondent's .application for voluntary departure and directed that he be deported from the United. States pursuant to law under the Immigration Act of 1924, as amended, 

remained longer, visitor. 

The respondent departed from the United. States to Canada sometime during April- or May 1951. where he remained until he last 

entered at Detroit, Michigan in January 1952. The facts detailing 

the respondent's marrying one Lela MacKenzie in Jamaica on or 

about May 17, 1944 and his being the father of two children born 

out of wedlock as a result of his intimacies with one Iris Murray, 

both of whom are adults and his having illicit sexual relations with 

Mrs. Harriet Pulley, a:widow, while a roomer at her home between 

.1961 and March 1965 as" well as his marriage to Lela MacKenzie 

never having been lawfully terminated have been fully and adequately covered by the special inquiry officer in his decision of 

February 16, 1966 and need no further discussion herein. A communication dated December 2, 1965 and identified herein as Exhibit 8 states a search was made of the records of the Supreme 

Conti of Kingston, Jamaica, West Indies on December 16, 1965; 

that no trace was found of any divorce proceeding between the 

respondent to Lela MacKenzie (Kr. 8). 

619 
Interim Decision #1587 

The special inquiry officer has denied the respondent's applications 

for suspension of deportation under section 244(a) of the Immigration. and•Nationality Act and for voluntary departure on the ground 

that he is statutorily ineligible therefor since he has failed to 

establish good moral character for the period required. by statute 

under the provisions of section 101(f) (2) of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act. His reasons therefor, -which are concurred in by 

this Board, are clearly set forth in. his decision of February 16, 

1966. In any event the respondent is statutorily ineligible for 

suspension of deportation under section 244(a) of the Iminigration 

and Natimality Act," as amended, because he is a native and citizen 

of Jamaica which is an adjacent island as defined in section 101(b) 

(5) of the-Immigration and Nationality Act. Under the provisions 

of section 244(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act the 

provisions • of section 244(a) shall not be applicable to an alien who 

is- a native of any country contiguous to the United States- or any 

adjacent island named in section 101(b) (5) : Provided, that the 

Attorney General may in his discretion agree to the granting of 

suspension of deportation to an alien as specified in clause (3) of 

section .241(f) if such alien establishes to the satisfaction of the 

Attorney General that he is ineligible to obtain a nonquota (special 

immigrant visa) immigrant visa. The respondent is a special im-

. migrant,a,s that term is defined in section 101(a) (27) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as amended by the Act of October 3, 

1965 (Public Law 89-236). Since there has been' no showing that 

the respondent herein is ineligible to obtain a special immigrant 

visa the relief provided in section 244(a) (1) of the Immigration 

and Nationality Act is not applicable to the respondent herein 

because he is a native of an adjacent island named in section 101 

(b) (5). For the reasons hereinbefore set forth, the following order 

will be entered. 

ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal be dismissed. 

620