alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Orville the Flying Squirrel Coloring Page","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nNz52gYU0x\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/orville-the-flying-squirrel-coloring-page\/\">Orville the Flying Squirrel Coloring Page<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/orville-the-flying-squirrel-coloring-page\/embed\/#?secret=nNz52gYU0x\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Orville the Flying Squirrel Coloring Page” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nNz52gYU0x\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/orville-coloringsm.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":603}
<PAGE>
                               EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
                        MILLER EXPLORATION COMPANY
                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
<CAPTION>
                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED             SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                       JUNE 30, 1998                 JUNE 30, 1998
                                                   ---------------------         ---------------------
                                                   (In thousands, except         (In thousands, except
                                                      per share data)                per share data)
<S>                                                       <C>                           <C>
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER 
   SHARE
Net income (loss)                                          $   601                       $(4,979)
Shares
   Weighted average shares outstanding                      12,493                         9,791
                                                           -------                       -------
Basic earnings (loss) per share                            $   .05                       $ (.51)
                                                           =======                       =======

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER
   SHARE
Net income (loss)                                          $   601                       $(4,979)
Shares
   Weighted average shares outstanding                      12,676                         9,791
                                                           -------                       -------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share                          $   .05                       $ (.51)
                                                           =======                       =======
</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Craft Stick Aircraft","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ipeBTU9nxw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/craft-stick-aircraft\/\">Craft Stick Aircraft<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/craft-stick-aircraft\/embed\/#?secret=ipeBTU9nxw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Craft Stick Aircraft” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ipeBTU9nxw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/craft-stick-aircraft.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
# ELECTRONICRECORD \%H*l m /*/
COA # 14-14-00060-CR OFFENSE: Aggravated Robbery STYLE: Hugh Audrie Carter. Ill v The State ofTexas COUNTY: Harris COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 338th District Court DATE: October 21. 2014 Publish: No TC CASE #:1366763

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS STYLE: Hugh Audrie Carter. Ill v The State ofTexas CCA# • 

### PRO SE Petition CCA Disposition: FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCAIS: DATE: 

# itJ&*#;iW>W ffgy^' 

# DATE: OljlillMtS JUDGE: f.to (jfAAAfa-, JUDGE: _ SIGNED:. PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: MOTION FOR
ELECTRONIC RECORD
9497.

#### Goldberg *v.*The State.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah— Judge Rourke. December 22, 1917.

*Shelby Myriolc, Robert L.*Golding, for plaintiff in error.

*Walter G.*Eartridge, solicitor-general, contra.

Beoyles, P. J.

1. An indictment must allege a certain time within the statute of limitations, but on the trial the date may be established by circumstantial evidence. Ordinarily, when a month is referred to, it will be understood to be of the current year, unless from the connection it appear that another is intended. *Tipton*v. *State,*119 *Ga.*304 (46 S. E. 436).

2. The accusation alleged that the offense was committed on the 27th day of October, 1917. The case was tried in November, 1917. Upon the trial there was testimony that the defendant committed the offense on “the 27th day of October.'” It is evident from the record that both the State and the accused understood that the proof went to establish the commission of the act on the day charged in the indictment, and a new trial will not be-granted on the ground that the evidence left uncertain the time when the offense was committed. *Tipton*v. *State,*supra; *Jordan*v *State,*119 *Ga.*443 (46 S. E. 679).

3. Under the facts of the case it was not error for the court to refuse the request to charge the jury the law as to positive and negative testimony, as embodied in section 5751 of the Civil Code of 1910.

4. “In every case it is largely within the discretion of the trial judge, at any stage of the proceedings, to permit the case to be opened and new evidence submitted by either party; and this court will not reverse the court below in the exercise of such discretion, unless it appears that from an abuse thereof the plaintiff in error has lost some substantia] right, the allowance of which probably would have affected the verdict rendered.” *Powell*v. *State,*101 *Ga.*9 (3), 18 (29 S. E. 309, 65 A. S. R. 277). When this ruling is applied to the facts of the instant case it does not appear that the court erred in allowing the case to be reopened by the State, over the defendant’s objections, after the arguments had been made and the judge had commenced his charge. Nor was this action of the court erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.

5. There was an attempt to impeach a witness for the defense solely because of alleged contradictory statements previously made by him as to a material issue in the case. It was therefore not cause for a new trial that the judge did not qualify his instructions to the jury on the subject by informing them that a witness might be impeached by proof of such contradictory statements *only as related to matters relevant to his testimony and to the case on trial. Tucker*v. *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.,*122 *Ga. 387*(50 S. E. 128). The charge on the'subject of impeachment of witnesses was not erroneous for any other reason assigned.

6. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
**Exhibit 99.8**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the accompanying Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for thequarter ended March 31, 2003, I, R. Scott Stevenson, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) such Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as aseparate disclosure document.

 
| May 1, 2003 |               | /s/  R. Scott Stevenson    |   |
|-------------|--------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
| Date        | R. Scott Stevenson |
|        |               | Senior Vice President and Chief |
|        |               | Financial Officer               |

 

----
-1/2-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

TO: Counsel of record

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 11, 2020 at 9:45 AM CDT, the 

undersigned counsel shall appear before the Honorable District Judge Sharon J. Coleman, 

or any judge appearing in his stead, at Courtroom 1241 of the U.S. District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois, 219 South Dearborn, Chicago, Illinois 60604, and then there 

present Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, which has been filed in 

conjunction with this Notice and is hereby served on you. 

Respectfully submitted this 6

th day of August 2020. 

By: s/Syed Hussain

Syed H. Hussain, Esq. 

Bar Number: Illinois 6331378

Attorney for Plaintiff Tiffany Laura

Price Law Group, APC

440 N. McClurg Ct. #803

Chicago, IL 60611

Telephone: (954) 225-4934

Email: syed@pricelawgroup.com

TIFFANY LAURA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.

 Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-01573

NOTICE OF MOTION

Case: 1:20-cv-01573 Document #: 26 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:227
-2/2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 6, 2020 I electronically filed the foregoing with the 

Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notice of such filing to all 

attorneys of record in this matter.

/s/Jacey Gutierrez

Case: 1:20-cv-01573 Document #: 26 Filed: 08/06/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:228
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danny Baird","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dsbaird\/","title":"27. DSN – The Ultimate Classroom | NASA’s The Invisible Network Pod","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dlw5rzdKjY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/invisible-network\/27-deep-space-network-the-ultimate-classroom-nasas-the-invisible-network-podcast\/\">27. DSN – The Ultimate Classroom | NASA’s The Invisible Network Pod<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/invisible-network\/27-deep-space-network-the-ultimate-classroom-nasas-the-invisible-network-podcast\/embed\/#?secret=dlw5rzdKjY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“27. DSN – The Ultimate Classroom | NASA’s The Invisible Network Pod” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dlw5rzdKjY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/in_socialmedia.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
Sherry Radack • ChiefJustice Terry Jennings Evelyn Keyes Laura Carter Higley Jane Bland Michael Massengale Harvey Brown Rebeca Huddle Russell Lloyd Justices 

## Court of Appeals First District ofTexas 301 Fannin Street 

### Houston, Texas 77002-2066 January 22,2015 Lydell Elliott Grant TDCJ #01835671 Alfred HughesJJnit Route 2 Box 4400 Gatesville, TN 76597 

### RE: Court ofAppeals Number: 01-12-01173-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1288802 Style: Lydell Grant v. The State ofTexas 

### We are forwarding the following via United States Postal): A copy ofthe Opinion in your appeal Please sign below and return to show receipt.Sincerely, Christopher A. Prine Clerk ofthe Court Janet Williams

ChiefStaff Attorney Phone: 713-274-2700 Fax: 713-755-8131 www.txcoarts.gov/lstcoa.aspx

Christopher A. Prine, Clerk ofthe Court By Jesse Rodriguez, Deputy Clerk IV

RETURN RECEIPT 

### Received by_ 

# jfjj^fdtMMmL DateReceived ,(• kmtMlljlfifi)L\ 

# \L\M GlW^OfiffiWII mcoSS? IW.2.i)O*440Q FEB 12 20,5


# (M&46tain/ , ./

6Wk: Widl IW i/til &M, t$4n& 

# ^b(li)rt(/feffi^OWioA) iWd<L RfA do Metik, W Assist Arid A«terf*iE '1^4

J

# At^dlltaS\k< 

# ftr.l fta^OD

RECEIVED FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS

FEB 1 2 2015 CHhiS.o. nuc, A. PRINF. CLERK

___ RIO GRANDE DISTRICT rES 2015 PM 3 L

liWs



# jiLtA,^S;11D0l-2i)lob ii'i"'!'!!'!'1"' i»'lHlilili|li'Ml'l,nili|lilil,il»'|iH'
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in thecapacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.        November 8, 2005 */s/ Richard A. Smith*   Richard A. Smith   Chief Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-6788 BYRON CARLTON CUMBER, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-88-26, CA-96-48-7-BR) Submitted: December 24, 1996 Decided: January 10, 1997 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Bryon Carlton Cumber, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Byron Carlton Cumber filed this motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death PenaltyAct of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, attacking the revocation of his term of supervised release. Upon revocation, the districtcourt sentenced Cumber to twenty-four months imprisonment consecutive to a state sentence he was serving, and ordered all restitution due. This Court affirmed the revocation on appeal. United States v. Cumber , No. 95-5024 (4th Cir. Sept. 25, 1995) (unpublished). In this § 2255 pro ceeding, Cumber raises four challenges to the original sentence and revocation of supervised release. We find merit in none of them. Cumber attacks the original sentence on nonconstitutional grounds. We decline to review these claims in a collateral attack, as they do not raise a fundamental defect resulting in a miscarriage of justice. United States v. Addonizio , 442 U.S. 178, 185 (1979). His allegation that the sentence imposed on revocation of supervised release violates the Double Jeopardy Clause lacks merit, as supervised release and its revocation are all part of the punishment for the original offense. United States v. Woodrup , 86 F.3d 359, 362 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 3294 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1996) (No. 96-6025). We do not find that Cumber's sentence was excessive, as it was well within the bounds set forth in 18 U.S.C.A.§ 3583(e)(3) (West Supp. 1996), and U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3 (1995). In addition, the district court properly clarified the ambiguous oral judgment by stating in the judgment and commitment order that the sentence would be served consecutive to the state sentence Cumber was serving, as required by U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f). Therefore, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4

Eastern Division

Eduardo Garcia, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02402

Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 19, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Telephonic status

hearing held. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Motion To Compel Independent Medical

Examination of Plaintiffs [77] is granted; by agreement, the IME will be scheduled at a

time consistent with their physical restrictions. Written status report date is stricken and

reset to 05/20/2022. Emailed notice (yt)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 81 Filed: 04/19/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:846
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DR. ROBERT GERBER, , )

)

Plaintiff, )

) No. 20 CV 02298

v. )

) Judge Chang

CAREPOINT HEALTHCARE, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

NOW COME the Parties, by and through their respective attorneys, and pursuant to Fed

R. Civ. Proc. 41(a), hereby stipulate to the dismissal of Plaintiff's individual claims with prejudice 

and without costs. The claims of the putative class are dismissed without prejudice and without 

costs. Plaintiff dismisses its claims against John Does 1-10 without prejudice and without costs.

Respectfully submitted,

PLAINTIFF

DR. ROBERT GERBER

s/ Dulijaza Clark

By one of his attorneys

Dulijaza (Julie) Clark

Edelman, Combs, Latturner & Goodwin LLC

20 S. Clark St., Suite 1500

Chicago, IL 60603

312-739-4200

DEFENDANT

CAREPOINT HEATLHCARE, LLC

s/Bart T. Murphy (with permission)

By one of its attorneys

Bart T. Murphy

Ice Miller, LLP

2300 Cabot Dr., Ste. 455

Lisle, IL 60532

630-955-6392

Case: 1:20-cv-02298 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:62
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Dulijaza Clark, hereby certify that on June 2, 2020, I electronically filed this document 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such 

filing(s) to all attorneys of record.

s/Dulijaza Clark

Dulijaza Clark

Daniel A. Edelman 

Cathleen M. Combs

Dulijaza Clark

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER & GOODWIN, LLC

20 S. Clark Street, Suite 1500

Chicago, IL 60603

(312)739-4200

Case: 1:20-cv-02298 Document #: 13 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:63