alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

DR. JENNY H. CONVISER and 

ASCEND CONSULTATION IN 

HEALTH CARE, LLC, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

DEPAUL UNIVERSITY, 

 Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.: 20-cv-03094 

Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY APPEARANCE 

 Christina Egan, counsel for DePaul University (“DePaul”), and attorney at McGuireWoods 

LLP, moves as follows pursuant to Local Rule 83.17 of the Northern District of Illinois. 

1. DePaul is currently represented by Christina M. Egan, Amy Starinieri Gilbert, 

Heidi E. Siegmund, and Melissa M. Weiss of McGuireWoods LLP. 

2. R. Craig Wood retired from McGuireWoods LLP and the practice of law on 

December 31, 2021. 

3. Christina M. Egan, Amy Starinieri Gilbert, Heidi E. Siegmund, and Melissa M. 

Weiss of McGuireWoods LLP will continue to represent DePaul in this action. 

WHEREFORE, the undersigned counsel respectfully moves this Honorable court for an 

Order permitting R. Craig Wood to withdraw his appearance as counsel for DePaul and that the 

minute order direct the District Court Clerk to delete him from the service list. 

Date: January 5, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

 By: /s/ Christina Egan 

 

 Christina M. Egan 

 Amy Starinieri Gilbert 

Case: 1:20-cv-03094 Document #: 56 Filed: 01/05/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:428
1 

 Melissa Marie Weiss 

 McGuireWoods LLP 

77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 4100 

 Chicago, Illinois 60601-1815 

 cegan@mcguirewoods.com 

agilbert@mcguirewoods.com 

mweiss@mcguirewoods.com 

 Telephone: 312.849.8100 

 Fax: 312.849.3690 

Heidi E. Siegmund (pro hac vice) 

McGuireWoods LLP 

Gateway Plaza 

800 East Canal Street 

Richmond, VA 23219-3916 

Telephone: 804.775.1049 

Fax: 804.698.2315 

hsiegmund@mcguirewoods.com 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-03094 Document #: 56 Filed: 01/05/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:429
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on January 5, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing Motion 

to Withdraw Attorney Appearance with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which 

will serve a copy upon all counsel of record. 

/s/ Christina Egan 

 One of Defendant’s Attorneys 

Case: 1:20-cv-03094 Document #: 56 Filed: 01/05/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:430
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 63

AN ACT

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam

‘‘Trinity Lake’’.in the Central Valley project, California, as
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 63

AN ACT

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the

Central Valley project, California, as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 63 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRINITY LAKE.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The reservoir created by Trinity

3 Dam in the Central Valley project, California, and des4 ignated as ‘‘Clair Engle Lake’’ by Public Law 88–662 (78

5 Stat. 1093) is hereby redesignated as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula7 tion, document, record, map, or other paper of the United

8 States to the reservoir referred to in subsection (a) shall

9 be considered to be a reference to ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

10 (c) REPEAL OF EARLIER DESIGNATION.—Public

11 Law 88–662 (78 Stat. 1093) is repealed.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"Wayne Michael Ringelberg","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8ZpuNdmFo2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/wayne-michael-ringelberg\/\">Wayne Michael Ringelberg<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/wayne-michael-ringelberg\/embed\/#?secret=8ZpuNdmFo2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Wayne Michael Ringelberg” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8ZpuNdmFo2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/ringelberg.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":828}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-2000
<CASH>                                       2,827,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,903,958
<PP&E>                                       3,878,894
<DEPRECIATION>                               (292,568)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,669,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,074
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,035,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,669,871
<SALES>                                      2,928,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,928,465
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,581,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               275,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              94,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,946)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,946)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00251-CV

Pedro I. SAENZ III,

Appellant

v.

LAREDO KIP, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CVI-000951-C3

Honorable Victor Villarreal, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of court for this appeal are taxed against Pedro I. Saenz III. 

SIGNED August 3, 2022.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Margeline Thomas","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mthoma22\/","title":"Stacy Houston","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CFjR4k6G4k\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/stacy-houston\/\">Stacy Houston<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/stacy-houston\/embed\/#?secret=CFjR4k6G4k\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Stacy Houston” — NASA\" data-secret=\"CFjR4k6G4k\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
---

Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark J. Morabito, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Crosshair
Exploration & Mining Corp., as amended by Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 1);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Mark J.
Morabito
By:   Mark J. Morabito
         Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 25, 2008

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26441]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8939]

Fine Arts Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Fine Arts Committee of the Department of State will meet on 
November 14, 2014 at 8:30 a.m. in the Henry Clay Room of the Harry S. 
Truman Building, 2201 C Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will 
last until approximately 3:00 p.m. and is open to the public.
    The agenda for the committee meeting will include a summary of the 
work of the Fine Arts Office since its last meeting on April 23, 2014 
and the announcement of gifts and loans of furnishings as well as 
financial contributions from April 23, 2014 through October 30, 2014.
    Public access to the Department of State is strictly controlled and 
space is limited. Members of the public wishing to take part in the 
meeting should telephone the Fine Arts Office at (202) 647-1990 or send 
an email to [email protected] by November 5th to make arrangements to 
enter the building. The public may take part in the discussion as long 
as time permits and at the discretion of the chairman.

    Dated: October 30, 2014.
Marcee Craighill,
Fine Arts Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-26441 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1369

DAN C. GRAMATIC , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00903

- CMH

- TCB )

Submitted : October 18, 2022 Decided: October 20, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Dan C. Gramatic, Appellant Pro Se. Meghan Elizabeth Loftus, Assistant United States Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria , Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1369 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Dan C. Gramatic seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his self

- styled motion to continue disability benefit payment s and the district court’s order transferring his case to the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S. C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order s Gramatic seeks to appeal are neither final order s nor appealable interlocutory or collateral order s
. See TechnoSteel, LLC v. Beers
Constr. Co. , 271 F.3d 151, 160

- 161 (4th Cir. 2001) (holding that court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to review transfer order once case file is transferred to court outside circuit and nonappealable interlocutory or collateral decisions also transfer with case )

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1369 Doc: 19 Filed: 10/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
10079.

#### Cæsar *v.*The State.

Bloodworth, J.

1. “Under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, a ground of a motion for a new trial must be complete in itself. When it is so incomplete as to require this court to refer to the pleadings or to the brief of evidence, it will not be considered.” *Bridges*v. *Griffin,*20 *Ga. App.*598 (2), 599 (93 S. E. 170). See also *Copeland*v. *Ruff,*20 *Ga. App.*217 (2) (92 S. E. 955); *Head*v. *State,*144 *Ga.*383 (87 S. E. 273); *Smiley v. Smiley,*144 *Ga.*546 (2) (87 S. E. 668). Under the rulings in these cases none of the special *797grounds oí the motion for new trial in this ease can be considered by ' this court. Each ground refers to some road, but fails to show whether it is the road mentioned in the indictment, and this can not be determined without reference to other parts of the record, *i*

Decided November 1, 1918.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Colquitt superior court— Judge Thomas. íuly 16, 1918.

*Parker &*Gibson> for plaintiff in error.

*Clifford E. Hay, solicitor-general,*contra.

2. There is ample evidence to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., conctvr.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1955

DAVID P. SHURLAND,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DARLENE EDWARDS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00092-REP)

Submitted: January 23, 2019 Decided: January 27, 2020

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David P. Shurland, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

David Shurland appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion 

to dismiss his complaint asserting violations of the Federal Tort Claims Act, violations of 

the False Claims Act, and age and disability discrimination. On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because 

Shurland’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, 

Shurland has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 

775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under 

Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order and deny Shurland’s motion for a hearing. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.1(ii)
                                                                 ---------------


                            Description of Securities
                            -------------------------

Pursuant to an Amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation dated
October 30, 2003 the par value of the Company's common stock was reduced from
$0.01 to $0.001 per share.

General
-------

The Company's authorized capital stock consists of 99,000,000 shares of voting
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, and 1,000,000 shares of Preferred
Stock, $0.0001 par value per share.

Common Stock
------------

The authorized Common Stock of the Company is 99,000,000 shares, $0.01 par
value. As of the date of this filing, 44,965,724 Common Shares are issued and
outstanding. The holders of Common Shares (i) have equal rights to dividends
from funds legally available therefore, when, as and if declared by the Board of
Directors of the Company; (ii) are entitled to share ratably in all of the
assets of the Company available for distribution to holders of Common Shares
upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company; (iii)
do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no
redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable thereto; and (iv) are entitled
to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters which stockholders may vote
on at all meetings of Shareholders. All of thee Common Shares now issued an
outstanding are fully paid and non-assessable. Holders of Common Shares of the
Company do not have cumulative voting rights.

Preferred Stock
---------------

The Company has authorized 1,000,000 Preferred Shares of Class A Preferred
Stock, $0.01 par value. As of the date of this filing, no Preferred Shares are
issued or outstanding.

Dividend Policy
---------------

The present policy of the Company is to utilize earnings to fund its ongoing
business. The Company has not declared or paid cash dividends on its Shares and
does not anticipate that it will do so in the future.
EXHIBIT 10 (bp)


                               October 31, 2002




 Dorinco Reinsurance Company
 1320 Waldo Avenue, Suite 200
 Midland, Michigan  48642

 Attention:  David E. Chamberlain

 RE:  Loan Agreement dated  March 10,  1997, as  amended by  Amendment No.  1
      executed August  14, 1998,  Amendment No.  2 effective  March 5,  1999,
      Amendment No.  3  effective November  19,  1999, and  Amendment  No.  4
      effective November  8, 2001  (the  "Loan Agreement")  between  Hallmark
      Financial Services, Inc. ("Borrower")  and Dorinco Reinsurance  Company
      ("Lender")

 Dear Mr. Chamberlain:

 The purpose of this letter is to obtain the express prior written consent of
 Lender pursuant  to  Section  7.j.(i) of  the  Loan  Agreement  to  Borrower
 creating indebtedness for borrowed money in the original principal amount of
 up to $9,000,000 to be evidenced  by a promissory note in substantially  the
 form attached hereto.  The purpose  of this borrowing is to provide  interim
 financing for a proposed acquisition by  Borrower, which we have  previously
 discussed with you on a confidential basis.

 As you are  aware, the  payee of  the promissory  note, Newcastle  Partners,
 L.P., is an  affiliate of  Mark E.  Schwarz, the  Chairman of  the Board  of
 Directors  of  Borrower.  In  accordance  with  Section  6.p.  of  the  Loan
 Agreement, a  special  committee  of  the Board  of  Directors  of  Borrower
 consisting solely of disinterested independent directors has determined that
 this proposed interim  loan transaction is  in good  faith and  commercially
 reasonable.

 Please acknowledge Lender's  consent to  this proposed  loan transaction  by
 executing and returning to the  undersigned the enclosed duplicate  original
 of this letter.  Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.

 Very truly yours,



 Linda H. Sleeper
 President and CEO




 CONSENTED TO AND AGREED AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2002:

 DORINCO REINSURANCE COMPANY



 By:  ______________________________

      Name:_________________________

      Title:__________________________