alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4

ZFLep | Lopeep

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT — | == RECEIVED ___ COPY
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

—

MAGRO, et al. JAN 2°8 2016
ae aa a U S DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s), CASE NO: 2:16-cv-00186-ESW IRIGT OF ARIZONA
vs. wr BEB
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC., RICHARD C. ADKERSON, | Application of Attorney For Admission To
and KATHLEEN L. QUIRK, Vice Pursuant to LRCiv 83.1(b)(2)

Defendant(s)/Respondent(s)
NOTICE: $35.00 APPLICATION FEE REQUIRED!

1, 2: Alexander Hood hereby apply to the Court under LRCiv 83.1(b)(2) for pro hac vice

admission to appear and practice in this action on behalf of. Plaintiff, Dean Magro

City and State of Principal Residence: New York, New York

Firm Name;  POMERANTZ LLP

Address: 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor Suite:
City: New York State: NY zip: 10016
Firm/Business Phone: —_( 212 ) 661-1100

Firm Fax Phone: (212 __) 661-8665 E-mail Address: _2hood@pomlaw.com

I am admitted to practice before the following courts, (attach additional sheets if necessary)
TITLE OF COURT DATE OF ADMISSION IN GOOD STANDING?
Supreme Court, State of New York, Third Department 03/29/2012 oO No*

United States District Court, Southern District of New York 08/13/2015 Oo No*

Elves [J No*

* Explain:

(An Original Certificate of Good Standing froma FEDERAL BAR in which an applicant has been adnitted dated no more than 45 days
prior to submission of this application is required.)

Ihave concurrently, or within 1 year of this application, made pro hac vice applications to this Court in the following actions (attach
additional sheets if necessary):
Case Number Title of Action Date Granted or Denied*

* Explain:
ALL APPLICANTS ARE REQUIRED TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.
Ifyou answer YES to either of the following questions, please explain all circumstances on a separate page.

Are you currently the subject of a disciplinary investigation or proceeding by any Bar or Court? Yes No

Have you ever been disbarred from practice in any Court? oO Yes No
Ideclare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is trueand correct; that I am not a resident of, nor anf regularly employed, engaged in business, professional
or other activities in the State of Arizona; and that Lam not currently suspended, disbarred or subject to disciplinary proceedings in any court, I certify that I
have read and will ascribe to the Standards for Professional Conduct, will comply with the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the
District of Arizona (“Local Ruks”), and will subscribe to receive court notices as reaulred by LBC 83.1(c).

2+ Jeol

iN
Date 5 Signature of Applicant

Fee Receipt # plu ep f

(Rev. 04/12)

x
ue



CSDNY (05/2010) Certificate of Good Standing

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Certificate of
Good Standing
1, Ruby J. Krajick,C lerk of this Court, certify that
JOSEPH ALEXANDER HOOD Il , Bar # JA4625

was duly admitted to practice in this Court on

AUGUST 13th, 2015 , and is in good standing as a member of the Bar of this
Court.

500 Pearl Street
Dated at New York, New York on DECEMBER 21st, 2015
- Tes Ce ~
Ruby J. Krajick by LLC ps NEO Pye

Clerk (Deputy Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Dr. Kurt Vogel","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Zdf4VV5UAj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/dr-kurt-vogel-associate-administrator-space-technology\/\">Dr. Kurt Vogel<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/dr-kurt-vogel-associate-administrator-space-technology\/embed\/#?secret=Zdf4VV5UAj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Dr. Kurt Vogel” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Zdf4VV5UAj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/vogel.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Sue Stiegler

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02020

Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Joseph Bonkowski, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, January 6, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Pursuant to the

parties' Stipulation [63] this case is dismissed without prejudice until 1/15/2022. If a

motion to reinstate is not filed on or before 1/15/2022, the dismissal will automatically

convert to with prejudice without further order of court. The parties shall bear their own

costs and attorneys' fees. Telephonic status hearing set for 1/6/2022 is stricken. All

pending motions [49] are terminated. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (cn).

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02020 Document #: 64 Filed: 01/06/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:273
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 10

Authorizing the Speaker’s designee to administer the oath of office to

Representative-Elect Frank Tejeda.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. GEPHART submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the Speaker’s designee to administer the oath

of office to Representative-Elect Frank Tejeda.

Whereas, Frank Tejeda, a Representative-elect from the 28th

District of the State of Texas, has been unable from illness to appear in person to be sworn as a Member of the

House, and there being no contest or question as to his

election; Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Speaker, or deputy named by him, is

hereby authorized to administer the oath of office to the Honorable Frank Tejeda at San Antonio, Texas, and that such

oath be accepted and received by the House as the oath of

office of the Honorable Frank Tejeda.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 130 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 24, 1997.
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. LUMP SUM ALLOWANCE FOR CORRECTIONS CALENDAR OFFICE.

    There shall be a lump sum allowance of $300,000 per fiscal year for the 
salaries and expenses of the Corrections Calendar Office, established by House 
Resolution 7, One Hundred Fifth Congress, agreed to January 7, 1997. Such amount 
shall be allocated between the majority party and the minority party as 
determined by the Speaker, in consultation with the minority leader.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The allowance under section 1--
            (1) shall be available beginning with the month of May 1997;
            (2) through the end of September 1997, shall be paid from the 
        applicable accounts of the House of Representatives on a pro rata basis; 
        and
            (3) beginning with fiscal year 1998, shall be paid as provided in 
        appropriations Acts.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
H. Res. 230

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 18, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the resolution (H. Res. 168) to implement the recommendations of the bipartisan House Ethics Reform Task Force. The

first reading of the resolution shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the resolution and shall not

exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by Representative Livingston of Louisiana and Representative Cardin of

Maryland or their designees. After general debate the resolution shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. The resolution shall be considered as read. No amendment shall be in order except those printed in the report of

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each

amendment may be considered only in the order printed in

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for
2

•HRES 230 EH

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled

by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole. At the conclusion of consideration of the resolution

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the resolution to the House with such amendments as may have been

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the resolution and amendments thereto to final adoption

without intervening motion or demand for division of the

question except one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - EYI Industries, Inc. - Exhibit 10.24






 ADDENDUM TO THE DISTRIBUTION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT EXECUTED
  BETWEEN THE PARTIES ON JUNE 30TH, 2002 AT 3 P.M., P.D.T
   

 BETWEEN:

NUTRI-DIEM INC., a
  company duly incorporated under the laws of the Quebec companies Act,
  part 1A, having its registered office and principal place of business at 1421,
  Nobel street, in the City of Sainte- Julie, Province of Quebec, J3E 1Z4 herein
  acting and represented by Michel Grisé, its President duly authorized
  for purposes hereof, as they so declare. 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Licensor”)


 AND:

ESSENTIALLY YOURS INDUSTRIES,
  INC. a company duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada,
  having its registered office and principal place of business at 3960 Howard
  Hughes Parkway, suite 500, in the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, 89145, herein acting
  and represented by Jay Sargeant, its President duly authorized for purposes
  hereof, as they so declare. 

(hereinafter referred to as the “Licensee”)





RECITALS 


 WHEREAS the Parties have executed a Distribution and License
  Agreement on June 30th, 2002 (the “Agreement”). 

 WHEREAS subsection 5.2 of the Agreement provides the requirements,
  of the Licensee, to purchase a minimum amount of product each year, from the
  Licensor, during the term of the Agreement. 

 WHEREAS the set requirements cannot be obtained within the
  time provided, the Licensee has requested a change in the set requirements for
  each year. 

 WHEREAS the Licensor has agreed to change the set requirements
  as set out in subsection 5.2; 








 NOW THEREFORE IN CONSIDERATION OF THE SUM OF ONE ($1.00) DOLLAR,
  THE RECEIPT AND SUFFICIENCY OF WHICH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED. THE PARTIES AGREE
  AS FOLLOWS: 

	1.	LOWERING OF PURCHASING
        THERSHOLD:

       The Licensor hereby agrees that the requirements of
        5.2 should be changed as set out below:

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	5.2.2 
	For the year from June 1, 2003 to May
        31, 2004 the minimum amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00); 

	 	 	5.2.3 
	For the year from June 1, 2004 to May
        31, 2005 the minimum amount of five million dollars ($5,000,000.00); 

	 	 	5.2.4 
	For each year thereafter during the
        term of this agreement the minimum amount of seven million dollars ($7,000,000.00).

	 	 	 	 
	2.	OTHER PROVISIONS

       The other provisions of the Agreement remain unchanged
        and shall continue to apply between the parties. Without limiting the
        generality of the foregoing, the provisions of the present Agreement shall
        not in any way be interpreted in a manner to affect the obligations of
        the Licensee provided for in Section 5 of the Agreement.

	 	 	 	 
	3.	DEFINITIONS

       The definitions used in the Agreement shall have the
        same meaning in the present Addendum.




THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS ADDENDUM AS OF APRIL 30, 2004.


	 	NUTRI-DIEM INC.	 	ESSENTIALLY YOURS INDUSTRIES, INC.
	 	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Michel Grisé	 	/s/ Jay Sargeant
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Michel Grisé	 	Jay Sargeant
	 	President	 	President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  | /s/ Mark Buller                      
|                     |  | Mark Buller  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 180

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 9, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 858) to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to

conduct a pilot project on designated lands within Plumas,

Lassen, and Tahoe National Forests in the State of California to demonstrate the effectiveness of the resource management activities proposed by the Quincy Library Group and to

amend current land and resource management plans for these

national forests to consider the incorporation of these resource management activities. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to

the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

the Committee on Resources. After general debate the bill

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Commit-
2

•HRES 180 EH

tee on Resources now printed in the bill, it shall be in order

to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment

under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of

a substitute printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to clause 6 of rule XXIII. That amendment

shall be considered as read. Points of order against that

amendment for failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI

or clause 5(a) of rule XXI are waived. No amendment to that

amendment shall be in order except an amendment printed

in the Congressional Record pursuant to clause 6 of rule

XXIII, which may be offered only by Representative Miller of

California or his designee, shall be considered as read, shall

be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by

the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to

amendment. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted.

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to

the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute

made in order as original text. The previous question shall be

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to
3

•HRES 180 EH

final passage without intervening motion except one motion

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ELIZABETH GONZALEZ, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

JANET DHILLON, Chair of the U.S. Equal 

Employment Opportunity Commission, 

 Defendant. 

 No. 1:20-cv-02111 

 Judge Matthew F. Kennelly 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL 

 Plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez requests leave of court to withdraw Brian Watson as 

appointed counsel under Local Rules 83.17, 83.38, 83.50, and 83.39 and Illinois Rule of 

Professional Conduct 1.16. In support of withdrawal, Plaintiff states that: 

 1. The Court appointed Brian Watson as counsel under Local Rule 83.37, and Brian 

Watson entered an appearance on November 2, 2020. ECF No. 21. 

 2. Plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez has requested that Brian Watson withdraw as 

appointed counsel. 

 3. Plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez also does not consent to produce medical records in 

an unredacted format. 

4. Local Rules 83.17, 83.38, 83.50, and 83.39 and Illinois Rule of Professional 

Conduct 1.16 require withdrawal of counsel under these circumstances. 

5. Plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez has received a copy of this motion and can receive a 

copy of CM/ECF notice at elizabeth_gonz2@hotmail.com. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 105 Filed: 10/27/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3878
2 

 For these reasons, Plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez requests leave of court to withdraw Brian 

Watson as appointed counsel. 

 Dated: October 27, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Brian O. Watson 

Brian O. Watson 

RILEY SAFER HOLMES & CANCILA LLP 

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 2900 

Chicago, Illinois 60602 

(312) 471-8700 

bwatson@rshc-law.com 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez 

4874-6793-2476, v. 1

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 105 Filed: 10/27/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3879
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Karl B. Hille","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/khille\/","title":"NASA Researcher Honored by Goddard Tech Office for Earth Science Work","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"u876CcQjQK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/goddard-people\/gambacorta-irad-innovation-leader\/\">NASA Researcher Honored by Goddard Tech Office for Earth Science Work<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/goddard-people\/gambacorta-irad-innovation-leader\/embed\/#?secret=u876CcQjQK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Researcher Honored by Goddard Tech Office for Earth Science Work” — NASA\" data-secret=\"u876CcQjQK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/antonia2.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":377}
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Report of Physical Property Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ngai Keung Luk,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:








1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Ngai Keung
Luk


Ngai
Keung Luk


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer





May 15,
2009