alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Douglas C. Morrison, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
         Citibank Omni-S Master Trust (formerly known as Sears Credit Account
         Master Trust II);

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
         in the annual report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
         accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar,
         agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
         fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these
         reports.


Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ Douglas C. Morrison
-----------------------------
Douglas C. Morrison
President
Citi Omni-S Finance LLC
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11

FRANKLIN FINANCE CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

Net income for basic income per share are computed by subtracting from the
applicable income the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
income applicable to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         Three Months Ended
                                                           March 31, 1998
                                                         -------------------
<S>                                                           <C>     
INCOME
Net income                                                    $745,617
Less: preferred stock dividend requirements                    450,772
                                                              --------
Net income applicable to common stock                          294,845

SHARES
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding            22,077

NET INCOME PER SHARE                                          $  13.36

</TABLE>
#### Mary S. Yantis et al. *v.*B. F. Duncan’s Admr. et al.

Fraudulent Conveyance — Parent to Child.

Deed to daughter held fraudulent.

May 10, 1871.

Dwnlap, *Durham &*Jacobs, *for appellant.*

McKee, VanWinhle, *for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

The two deeds under which Mrs. Yantis claims the property adjudged by the court to be sold in satisfaction of appellees’ judgment, present upon their faces intrinsic evidence that her father is the real owner of the property, and that her name is only being used to protect him in the enjoyment of the same. In addition to this, the proof in the case, even that of the father himself, when considered in connection with the evasive and unsatisfactory answer of Mrs. Yantis and husband, can leave no doubt but that the father caused the lots to be conveyed to his daughter for the fraudulent purpose of protecting it from his creditors.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Mark J. Morabito, Chief Executive Officer of Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (4) | the annual report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended April 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |     |  | /s/ Mark J. Morabito   
|Date: October 31, 2006 |  | By: |  | Mark J. Morabito,      
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Jesus

Case 2:15-cr-01451-NVW Document 3 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01451-NVW Document 3 Filed 10/26/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01451-NVW Document 3 Filed 10/26/15 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01878-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01878-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01878-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Beth Ridgeway","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/angela-b-ridgewaynasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Project Manager Helps Makes Impact in Southeast Asia with SERVIR","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Na50VIgJuK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/servir\/nasa-project-manager-helps-makes-impact-in-southeast-asia-with-servir\/\">NASA Project Manager Helps Makes Impact in Southeast Asia with SERVIR<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/servir\/nasa-project-manager-helps-makes-impact-in-southeast-asia-with-servir\/embed\/#?secret=Na50VIgJuK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Project Manager Helps Makes Impact in Southeast Asia with SERVIR” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Na50VIgJuK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/8e18c06e-bd99-4b1b-afe5-edbe70f30273-1-105-c.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":451}
NUMBER 13-22-00113-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

MANUEL MARTINEZ III, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

Order Per Curiam

This appeal is before the Court on the State’s motion to abate this appeal. 

According to the motion, the State discovered that the presentence investigation report

(PSI) was not included in the appellate record, and the State requires that document in 

order to complete its brief in this matter. The State requests that we “abate the appeal for 

the purpose of allowing the trial court to unseal the PSI for purposes of including said PSI 

in the appellate record.” 
2

We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. The trial court shall 

cause a hearing to be held to determine: (1) if the PSI was part of the trial court’s record;

(2) whether it should be submitted as part of the clerk’s record or reporter’s record in this 

appeal; and (3) if any part of the reporter’s record is missing, lost, destroyed, or otherwise 

inaccessible. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), (d); id. R. 34.6(d), (e), (f). We note that this 

abatement should be used for the purpose of correcting and completing the appellate 

record in this case and should not be construed as to allow for the creation of a new trial 

court record. See, e.g., Williams v. State, 937 S.W.2d 479, 487 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); 

see also In re J.R., No. 07-18-00240-CV, 2018 WL 7488914, at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 

Sept. 26, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) (collecting cases); Gerdes v. Marion State Bank, 774 

S.W.2d 63, 65–66 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1989, writ denied). 

The trial court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure the prompt 

preparation of any supplemental records and shall enter any orders required to avoid 

further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. The trial court shall cause its findings, 

together with any orders it may enter, to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record. 

Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter’s record of any 

proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s 

record shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days 

from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

28th day of October, 2022.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**

I,Gregory K. Barber, certify that:

1.                     I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC;

2.                     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15eand 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)                    All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)                   Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: March 20, 2007 |   | /s/ Gregory K. Barber   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                 |   | Gregory K. Barber       |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer |

** **

----
Exhibit 31.4

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, David G. Maffucci, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;

Date: April 26, 2010



|                                                                                                     |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ David G. Maffucci                                                                                |  | 
|David G. Maffucci
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4








---

Exhibit 99.4
No. 91-280 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1991

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF BRUCE LEE TRYAN, Petitioner and Respondent, -vs- 

### NOV 

## 14599%

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, In and for the County of Daniels, The Honorable M. James Sorte, Judge presiding.

COUNSEL OF RECORD: For Appellant: Loren J.

. 'Toole;O'Toole & O'Toole, Plentywood, Montana. For Respondent: Francis J. McCarvel, Attorney at Law, Glasgow, Montana.

Filed: Submitted on briefs: October 3, 1991 Decided: November 14, 1991Justice Fred J. Weber delivered the Opinion of the Court.
On April 3, 1991, the Fifteenth Judicial District Court in Gallatin County held the appellant Teresa Ann Jagiello (Jagiello) in contempt for refusing the visitation rights of the natural father,Bruce Lee Tryan (Tryan). 

### Ms. Jagiello appeals. We dismiss the appeal. Ms. Jagiello and Mr. Tryan were granted a dissolution on October 14, 1987. The District Court granted Ms. Jagiello permanent custody of their two minor children subject to Mr. Tryan's reasonable visitation rights. In August 1990, the court terminated Mr. Tryan's visitation. December 21, 1990, after a hearing on thematter, the court issued an order restoring his visitation rights. February 25, 1991, Mr. Tryan filed apetition moving the court to hold Ms. Jagiello in contempt for failing to comply with the visitation order. At a show cause hearing held on March 20, 1991, Ms. Jagiello admitted she knew of the court order restoring Mr. Tryan's visitation. Ms. Jagiello stated that despite the order, she refused to allow Mr. Tryan visitation. Pursuant to this hearing the court entered an order dated April 3, 1991, which foundMs. Jagiello in contempt and ordered her to pay $1,000 to Mr. Tryan as punishment and $1,168.75 in attorney's fees. Mr. Tryan contends that the order of the District Court holdingMs. Jagiello in contempt for failureto allowvisitation is not an appealable order. 2Section 3

-1

-52?, MCA, states: The judgment and orders of the court or judge made in cases of contempt are final and conclusive. There is no appeal, but the action of a district court or judge can be reviewed on a writ of certiorari by the supreme court or a judge thereof

## ... We agree that under § 3-1-523,MCA, and In Re theMarriage of O'Neill 

### v. O'Neill, (1979), 184 Mont. 415, 603 P.2d 257, this appeal should be dismissed. The proper procedure for review of a contempt order is through a writ of certiorari. We dismiss this appeal. Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 1988 Internal Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and shall be published by its filing as a public document with the Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result to the West Publishing Company.

We Concur:

3November 14,

### 1991 CERTIFICATEOFSERVICE Ihereby certify that the followingorderwas sentby United States mail, prepaid, to the following named:
LorenJ.O’Toole,I1 O’Toole&O’Toole P.O. Box529 Plentywood,MT 59254

-0529 FrancisJ.McCarvel Attorney at Law P.O. Box388 Glasgow,MT 59230 EDSMITH CLERKOFTHESUPREME COURT
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 72

To amend title 17, United States Code, to allow the making of a copy

of a computer program in connection with the maintenance or repair

of a computer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. KNOLLENBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 17, United States Code, to allow the making

of a copy of a computer program in connection with

the maintenance or repair of a computer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Computer Maintenance

5 Competition Assurance Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS; COMPUTER

7 PROGRAMS.

8 Section 117 of title 17, United States Code, is

9 amended—
2

•HR 72 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Notwithstanding’’ and inserting the

2 following:

3 ‘‘(a) MAKING OF ADDITIONAL COPY OR ADAPTATION

4 BY OWNER OF COPY.—Notwithstanding’’;

5 (2) by striking ‘‘Any exact’’ and inserting the follow6 ing:

7 ‘‘(b) LEASE, SALE, OR OTHER TRANSFER OF ADDI8 TIONAL COPY OR ADAPTATION.—Any exact’’; and

9 (3) by adding at the end the following:

10 ‘‘(c) MACHINE MAINTENANCE OR REPAIR.—Notwith11 standing the provisions of section 106, it is not an in12 fringement for the owner or lessee of a machine to make

13 or authorize the making of a copy of a computer program

14 if such copy is made solely by virtue of the activation of

15 a machine that lawfully contains an authorized copy of

16 the computer program, for purposes only of maintenance

17 or repair of that machine, if—

18 ‘‘(1) such new copy is used in no other manner

19 and is destroyed immediately after the maintenance

20 or repair is completed; and

21 ‘‘(2) with respect to any computer program or

22 part thereof that is not necessary for that machine

23 to be activated, such program or part thereof is not

24 accessed or used other than to make such new copy

25 by virtue of the activation of the machine.
3

•HR 72 IH

1 ‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—

2 ‘‘(1) the ‘maintenance’ of a machine means

3 servicing the machine in order to make it work in

4 accordance with its original specifications and any

5 changes to those specifications authorized for that

6 machine; and

7 ‘‘(2) the ‘repair’ of a machine means restoring

8 it to the state of working in accordance with its

9 original specifications and any changes to those

10 specifications authorized for that machine.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS DATED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          41,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,628,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,812,395
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,701,687
<PP&E>                                         573,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,275,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,949,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,394
<OTHER-SE>                                     317,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,275,315
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,378,044
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,330,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,234,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             438,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (625,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (625,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (625,433)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>