alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Francisco Irra-Pereda, 

Defendant. 

NO. CR-15-01602-001-PHX-DLR

ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING 

DISPOSITION (PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. § 3143) 

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3143, a detention hearing was 

submitted on 3/22/2018. Defendant was present and was represented by counsel. The 

defendant has not rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee if 

released. 

FINDINGS OF FACT 

I find by a preponderance of the evidence that: 

☒ The defendant is not a citizen of the United States or lawfully admitted for 

permanent residence. 

☒ The defendant, at the time of the charged offense, was in the United States 

illegally. 

☒ The defendant has a prior criminal history. 

☒ The defendant has been ordered detained on the underlying 8 USC 1326(a)&(b)(1) 

charged in Case No: 18-1214MJ. 

The Court incorporates by reference the material findings of the Pretrial Services Agency 

which were reviewed by the Court at the time of the hearing in this matter, except as 

noted in the record. 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

1. There is a serious risk that the defendant will flee. 

2. No condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance 

of the defendant as required. 

DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court 

proceeding. 

APPEALS AND THIRD PARTY RELEASE 

 IT IS ORDERED that should an appeal of this detention order be filed with the 

District Court, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion for 

review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing set before 

the District Court. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

before the District Court to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and 

investigate the potential third party custodian. 

DATE: 3/22/2018
9352.

#### Raskin *v.*The State.

Decided March 13, 1918.

Accusation of unlawful possession of liquor j from city. court of Savannah—Judge Freeman. • September 29, 1917.

*Robert L. Golding,*for plaintiff: in error.

*Walter G. Hartridge, solicitor-general,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence is sufficient to authorize tire conviction under the accusation in this case, which charges that the accused “did unlawfully have, control, and possess- certain spirituous liquors.” No error of law is complained of; and the judgment must be

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., eoneur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Employee Panel Logic Puzzle","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5jIcnbbmGK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-employee-panel-logic-puzzle\/\">NASA Employee Panel Logic Puzzle<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-employee-panel-logic-puzzle\/embed\/#?secret=5jIcnbbmGK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Employee Panel Logic Puzzle” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5jIcnbbmGK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/edu_srch_nasa_employee_panel_logic_puzzle.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":525}
#### NEWARK FARMERS MARKET, INC., RESPONDENT, v. STATE BOARD OF TAX APPEALS ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Submitted May 25, 1945

Decided September 27, 1945.

Por the respondent, *Harrison & Roche ck Darby.*

Por the appellants, *Philip J. Schotland.*

Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered bj7 Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Case, Bodinb. Donges, Coltb, Oliphant, Wells, Rafferty, Thompson. Dill, Pbeund, McGeehan, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
#### Alex Lucas, Admr. *v.*Malvina Taylor.

Appeal and Error — Successful Party Appealing Must' Pay Cost.

Where the successful party appeals alone he must pay the cost of the appeal on the reversal of the case.

APPEAL PROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

June 15, 1870.

Shepherd, *for appellant.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

As the appellant in whose favor the judgment in this case was rendered seeks by this appeal to reverse it because it was rendered before the infant defendants had answered by guardian *ad*litem, and the judgment against them in that state of the case was unauthorized, the same is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to set aside said judgment, and for further proceedings consistent with the rights of the parties. But appellant must pay the costs of this appeal.
Case: 1:20-cv-01917 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 03/21/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:21
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods covered in the Report.
  /s/ Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

h0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

142882

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142882 COA: 298584 Wayne CC: 94-009145 ANTONIO ROBERTSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 11, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 10.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-103609) pertaining to the AMVESCAP Executive Share Option
Scheme, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-98037) pertaining to the
AMVESCAP Sharesave Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-11596)
pertaining to the AMVESCAP Sharesave Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-11428) pertaining to the AMVESCAP 401(k) Plan, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-10602) pertaining to the AMVESCAP Global Stock Plan,
the Executive Share Option Scheme, the AIM Option Plans and the AMVESCAP
Sharesave Plan, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-8962)
pertaining to the AMVESCAP Global Stock Plan, Executive Share Option Scheme and
the AIM Option Plans, of our report dated February 28, 2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of AMVESCAP PLC included in the Annual Report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

London, England
March 26, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I, James R. Lattanzi, Chief Financial Officer of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
         (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


                                             /s/ James R. Lattanzi
Date:  August 14, 2003                       --------------------------
                                             James R. Lattanzi
                                             Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

ERNEST LANEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE, Individually and as actual or 

apparent agent of UBER TECHNOLOGIES, 

INC. and/or LYFT, INC.; UBER 

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation; and LYFT, INC., a Delaware 

Corporation, also d/b/a LYFT ILLINOIS, INC.,

Defendants.

Case Number 20-cv-02811

Judge Charles P. Kocoras

NOTICE OF STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT, LYFT, INC.

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, ERNEST LANEY, by and through his attorney GREG 

OLMSTEAD, of the Dertany and Kosner, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), states 

as follows:

1. Plaintiff, ERNEST LANEY, hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant, LYFT, 

INC., from this matter, without prejudice. 

Respectfully submitted,

ERNEST LANEY

By: s/ Gregory Olmstead

His Attorney

Gregory Olmstead

Deratany & Kosner

221 N. LaSalle, Suite 2200

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 857-7285

olmstead@lawinjury.com

9548427

Case: 1:20-cv-02811 Document #: 18 Filed: 07/28/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:76
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fred Crandell, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-15-02354-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 The Court has been advised that Plaintiff has reached a settlement with Defendant 

Trans Union, LLC, only. (Doc. 82.) 

 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Trans Union LLC only, will, without further 

Order of this Court, be dismissed within 60 days of the date of this order unless a 

stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate 

Defendant Trans Union LLC only on September 15, 2016 without further leave of Court. 

 Dated this 14th day of July, 2016. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-02354-DLR Document 83 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of California Petroleum Transport Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank B. Bilotta, President and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.




Date: March 23, 2011




/s/ Frank B. Bilotta


Frank B. Bilotta


Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

*CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite City Food &Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James G. Gilbertson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: | August 14,  2009 |   | By:    | /s/ James G. Gilbertson  |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |                  |   |   | James G. Gilbertson      |
|   |                  |   |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6228
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JEROME ALLEN, a/k/a D.L., a/k/a Jason Jones, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-19; CA-03-8-5) Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey M. Brandt, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jerome Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Allen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Doe, on the Demise of Gallion, *v.*Griffin.

ERROR to the *Decatur*Circuit Court.

In ejectment, if the declaration be filed, notice given to the defendant, and a copy of the declaration served on him, ten days before the next term, the plaintiff must be ready at that term for trial, unless he can show a good cause of continuance.

*J.*Test, for the plaintiff.

*G. H. Dunn*and *A. Lane,*for the defendant.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lauren E. Low","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lelow\/","title":"Media Invited to NASA\u2019s Student Launch Challenge in Alabama","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"leBA5sNG2p\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/media-invited-to-nasas-student-launch-challenge-in-alabama\/\">Media Invited to NASA\u2019s Student Launch Challenge in Alabama<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/media-invited-to-nasas-student-launch-challenge-in-alabama\/embed\/#?secret=leBA5sNG2p\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Media Invited to NASA\u2019s Student Launch Challenge in Alabama” — NASA\" data-secret=\"leBA5sNG2p\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/studentlaunch.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":417}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Zachary J. Pohto","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/zacharypohto-2\/","title":"Ken Newton","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6iNIyVBhUD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/ken-newton\/\">Ken Newton<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/ken-newton\/embed\/#?secret=6iNIyVBhUD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ken Newton” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6iNIyVBhUD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/ken-newton.jpg?w=139","thumbnail_width":139,"thumbnail_height":169}
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2022

No. 04-22-00766-CR

Matthew Hernandez YANEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR10156

Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on November 14, 2022. After the due date, on November 

28, 2022, court reporter Erminia Uviedo filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting 

until December 20, 2022, to complete the record, and stating that she did not receive notice of 

the appeal until November 18, 2022. 

The court reporter’s request is granted. The reporter’s record is due on December 20, 

2022.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY