alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Students in California to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sT7hQsOUme\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/students-in-california-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-on-space-station\/\">Students in California to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/students-in-california-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-on-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=sT7hQsOUme\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Students in California to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"sT7hQsOUme\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/edu_follow_teacher_on_board_joe_acaba.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
Exhibit 32.3 – Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added bysection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tarpon CoastBancorp, Inc., the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: July 26, 2004 /s/ George E. Cline   George E. Cline   Chief Financial Officer   
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tarpon CoastBancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Tarpon Coast Bancorp, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Peter Andrew Hershfeldt, ) CV 98-0940-PHX-PGR

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) ORDER

)

)

)

George Herman, et al. )

)

Respondents. )

____________________________)

 Currently pending before the Court is the Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, or Alternatively, Motion to Reinstate Original Habeas

Petition (Doc. 34). The Court now rules on the motion. 

On May 22, 2001, this Court entered an order adopting the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mathis which denied the Petitioner's

Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The District Court held that the Petitioner had

exhausted his federal claims in the Arizona courts as required by the Anti-Terrorism and

Effective Death Penalty Act, but rejected the petition on the merits. The Petitioner later

appealed this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth

Circuit affirmed the District Court's dismissal of the Petitioner's writ for habeas corpus, but

did so on different grounds. Specifically, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the Petitioner had

not properly exhausted his federal claims; therefore, the federal appeals court was precluded

Case 2:98-cv-00940-PGR Document 35 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 The Court has reviewed the lodged copy of the amended petition and confirmed that it is

essentially identical to the original which was filed in July of 1998.

- 2 -

from reaching the merits of his habeas petition. Accordingly, the Petitioner returned to the

Arizona state court to properly exhaust his state remedies in order to have his petition for writ

of habeas corpus reviewed by the federal courts. 

At this time, the Petitioner seeks to reinstate his original habeas petition. Through his

motion, the Petitioner informs the Court that he is not filing a second, successive or a new

habeas petition, but simply seeking to reinstate the petition which was previously dismissed.1

However, this Court reached the merits of the Petitioner's writ for habeas corpus in May of

2001 and concluded that the Petitioner's claims should be denied. As such, the fact that the

Petitioner has since properly exhausted his claims in state court does not change this Court's

previous analysis in dismissing the petition on the merits. Therefore, the Petitioner's motion

to either reinstate or amend his previous petition is denied as the Court concludes that the

prior order's sound analysis still stands. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend Petition for Writ

of Habeas Corpus, or Alternatively, Motion to Reinstate Original Habeas Petition (Doc. 34)

is DENIED. 

DATED this 7th day of November, 2005.

Case 2:98-cv-00940-PGR Document 35 Filed 11/07/05 Page 2 of 2
IV

House Calendar No. 42

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 161

[Report No. 105–118]

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect to consideration

of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 4, 1997

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI with respect

to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the

Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 4(b) of rule

2 XI for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported before June 7, 1997, providing for consideration

6 or disposition of the bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency

7 supplemental appropriations for recovery from natural dis-
2

HRES 161 RH

1 asters, and for overseas peacekeeping efforts, including

2 those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September 30,

3 1997, and for other purposes, an amendment thereto, a

4 conference report thereon, or an amendment reported in

5 disagreement from a conference thereon.

House Calendar No. 42

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 161

[Report No. 105–118]

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 4(b) of rule XI

tions reported from the Committee on Rules.with respect to consideration of certain resoluJUNE 4, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### Holmes, Appellee, *v.*Holmes, Appellant.

(No. 6910

Decided February 9, 1948.)

*Mr. Arthur C. Friclce*and *Miss Ruth Nieclerlehner,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Rosen & Rosen,*for appellant.

By the Court.

Tlie trial court granted the plaintiff a divorce from the defendant on the ground of wilful absence for three years.

On this appeal, many reasons are assigned for reversing that judgment. .

(1) It is said that the plaintiff never provided a home and that, therefore, the defendant’s absence was not wilful.

It is true that during the 16 years this marriage subsisted, no permanent home was established. This resulted from the fact that their occupations were in different localities practically all the time. The failure to establish a home was attributable as much to the defendant as to the plaintiff.

We do not understand that wilful absence can exist only when a permanent home is established.

(2) It is said that divorce proceedings were pending during much of the time covered by the period of absence and that this time cannot be included in computing the time no matter how wilful and unjustified the absence may have been and no matter how unrelated the absence was to the grounds upon which the pending divorce case was predicated.

We do not find any such inflexible rule. Whether the time covered by the pendency of the divorce case *34may be included in calculating the duration of the wilful absence depends upon circumstances. 17 American Jurisprudence, 208, Section 109.

(3) It is said that the plaintiff has been guilty of adultery and that that is a bar to a divorce. The evidence shows that the plaintiff went through the form of 'a marriage with another woman with whom he lived and to whom a child was born.

That fact does not necessarily constitute adultery. 17 American Jurisprudence, 170, Section 37. There is evidence in this case that a divorce had been granted when plaintiff entered into the marital relation with this other woman, that this divorce was later set aside, and that as soon as he was notified of it, he discontinued his relation with the other woman.

(4) If the plaintiff and his witnesses were believed, the defendant wilfully and voluntarily left him in 1940, declaring that the separation was final and that she never returned or offered to return. The trial court believed this testimony. The defendant was, therefore, found to have been wilfully absent for more than three years, and the court awarded a divorce on that ground'.

The trial court found that the plaintiff’s conduct was not a bar to the granting of a divorce, and that nothing was shown to reduce the period of wilful absence to less than three years.

We find substantial evidence in the record to support the finding of the court.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Matthews, P. J., Ross and Hildebrant, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 14 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 14

Electing Representative Sanders of Vermont to the Committee on Banking 
      and Financial Services and Government Reform and Oversight.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Electing Representative Sanders of Vermont to the Committee on Banking 
      and Financial Services and Government Reform and Oversight.

    Resolved, That the following named Member be and is hereby elected to the 
following standing committees:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: Bernard Sanders of Vermont.
    Committee on Government Reform and Oversight: Bernard Sanders of Vermont.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Physical Property Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ngai Keung Luk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ngai Keung Luk


Ngai Keung Luk


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





August 12, 2010
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-40388 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Geronimo Confesor Gonzalez-Nivar, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:23-CR-171-1 

______________________________ 

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Geronimo 

Confesor Gonzalez-Nivar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a 

brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United 

States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Nivar has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

March 11, 2024 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-40388 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2024
No. 23-40388 

2 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-40388 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/11/2024
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00417

- CV

CITY OF ALAMO v. JERONIMO IBARRA FLORES
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 9 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 20

- 2188

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal will be taxed against the party incurring the same

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Jun e 30, 2022
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"President\u2019s NASA FY 2025 Funding Supports US Space, Climate Leadership","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"W6u9eXBdyS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/presidents-nasa-fy-2025-funding-supports-us-space-climate-leadership\/\">President\u2019s NASA FY 2025 Funding Supports US Space, Climate Leadership<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/presidents-nasa-fy-2025-funding-supports-us-space-climate-leadership\/embed\/#?secret=W6u9eXBdyS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“President\u2019s NASA FY 2025 Funding Supports US Space, Climate Leadership” — NASA\" data-secret=\"W6u9eXBdyS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/nasa-meaball-logo-1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6338
THOMAS BLEVINS, a/k/a Tommy Ray Blevins , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DANNY KING, Jail Administrator; FERNIE HYMAN, Food Service Manager , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:22

- ct

- 03064

- D )

Submitted : August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Thomas Blevins, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley O. Wood, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON (US) LLP, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina; Steven Andrew Bade r, Marshall Wall, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6338 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Thomas Blevins appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant s’ motion to
dismiss Blevins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action . Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse
of discretion

. See Mey v. Phillips , 71 F.4th 203 , 217 (4th Cir. 2023) (“A district court has wide latitude in controlling discovery, and its rulings will not be overturned absent a showing of clear abuse of discretion.” (cleaned up)). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Blevins v. King , No. 5:22

- ct

- 03064

- D ( E .D.N.C. Mar. 2 3 , 2023). We deny Blevins’ request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6338 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danielle Sempsrott","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/danielle-c-sempsrottnasa-gov\/","title":"Michael Ravenscroft","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"J9Xt7PyCgj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/michael-ravenscroft\/\">Michael Ravenscroft<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/michael-ravenscroft\/embed\/#?secret=J9Xt7PyCgj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Michael Ravenscroft” — NASA\" data-secret=\"J9Xt7PyCgj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/mike-ravenscroft.jpg?w=479","thumbnail_width":479,"thumbnail_height":480}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Activity Two: Propelling the Payload With Electric Propulsion","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BQMYNgQas4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/activity-two-propelling-the-payload-with-electric-propulsion\/\">Activity Two: Propelling the Payload With Electric Propulsion<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/activity-two-propelling-the-payload-with-electric-propulsion\/embed\/#?secret=BQMYNgQas4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Activity Two: Propelling the Payload With Electric Propulsion” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BQMYNgQas4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/edu_uas_activity_two_propelling_the_payload.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":289}