alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 26, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

                    1.                     *First Savings Financial Group, Inc.,*                     Clarksville, Indiana; to become a bank holding company through the conversion of its wholly owned subsidiary, First Savings Bank, FSB, Clarksville, Indiana, from a federal savings bank to a state-chartered commercial bank.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 28, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-25964 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Zerita Kensey, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

RevSolve Incorporated, 

Defendant.

No. CV-16-00209-PHX-BSB

ORDER 

 On June 1, 2016, following Plaintiff’s failure to participate in the preparation of 

proposed case management plan, and her failure to attend the Case Management 

Conference, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why this matter should 

not be dismissed against Defendant RevSolve Incorporated, within fourteen days of the 

date of the Court’s order, for lack of prosecution. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff’s response to the 

order to show cause was due by June 16, 2016. (See id.) Plaintiff has not responded to 

the order to show cause and the time to do so has passed. 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against RevSolve Incorporated are 

dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

 Dated this 5th day of July, 2016. 

Case 2:16-cv-00209-BSB Document 18 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Jessica Lamb

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02634

Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama

Iball Entertainment, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, February 26, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Young B. Kim: On January 23, 2021, the

court ordered the parties to, among other things, "email the court

(settlement_statement_kim@ilnd.uscourts.gov) jointly or separately by noon on February

26, 2021, whether they wish to discuss settlement with the court's assistance. Parties are to

also advise the court in the same email whether they require expert discovery." (R. 21.)

Parties did not email the court as ordered. As such, the court presumes that the parties are

not interested in exploring settlement options with the assistance of this court and that

they do not require expert discovery. All discovery is now closed. All matters relating to

the referral of this action having been concluded, the referral is closed and the case is

returned to the assigned District Judge. Mailed notice (ma,)

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02634 Document #: 22 Filed: 02/26/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:77
9529.

#### Lane *v.*The State.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Accusation of sale of intoxicating liquór; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. January 14, 1918.

*J. W. Powell,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. L. Jackson, solicitor,*contra.

Bbotles, P. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence was purely cumulative, and the court did not err in overruling the grounds .of the motion for a new trial based thereon.

2. There was some evidence which authorized the defendant’s conviction,, and, the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Sarwell, JJ., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA, SpaceX Launch First Flight Test of Space System Designed for Crew","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"x0Zrz6h2zX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-spacex-launch-first-flight-test-of-space-system-designed-for-crew\/\">NASA, SpaceX Launch First Flight Test of Space System Designed for Crew<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-spacex-launch-first-flight-test-of-space-system-designed-for-crew\/embed\/#?secret=x0Zrz6h2zX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA, SpaceX Launch First Flight Test of Space System Designed for Crew” — NASA\" data-secret=\"x0Zrz6h2zX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/screen_shot_2019-03-02_at_3.04.41_am.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":375}
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U. S. C. SECTION1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Vistula CommunicationsServices, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year endedDecember 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rupert Galliers-Pratt, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)             the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2)             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Rupert Galliers-Pratt |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Rupert Galliers-Pratt     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

Dated: March 31, 2006

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to VistulaCommunications Services, Inc. and will be retained by VistulaCommunications Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Mays, et al. v. Dart

20-cv-2134 Anthony Mays, et al., PlaintiffsSteven Grimes Winston & Strawn LLP 35 W. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60601 6287847 312-558-8317 SGrimes@Winston.com 4/17/2020 ✔

✔

✔

✔

Steven Grimes

Case: 1:20-cv-02134 Document #: 60 Filed: 04/17/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1646
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 63","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8g3WvJThGB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-63\/\">Expedition 63<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-63\/embed\/#?secret=8g3WvJThGB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 63” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8g3WvJThGB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss063-s-002a.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
Exhibit 23.2

LOGO



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM
ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS



As independent petroleum
engineers and geologists, we consent to the references to our firm in the W&T Offshore, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and to the incorporation by reference in this Form 10-K to our estimates of
reserves and value of reserves, and to the use of our reports on reserves and the incorporation of the reports on reserves for the years ended 2005, 2004 and 2003 included in the W&T Offshore, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005. We further consent to the incorporation by reference of information contained in our reports as of December 31, 2005 in the W&T Offshore, Inc. Registration Statement Nos. 333-126251 and 333-126252 on Form S-8.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/S/    FREDERIC D.
SEWELLFrederic D. SewellChairman and Chief Executive Officer




Dallas, Texas

March 31, 2006
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.10

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                        THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                             UTILITY PROPANE COMPANY

                       PURSUANT TO SEC. 14A:9-2(4) OF THE

                      NEW JERSEY BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT.

                                    * * * * *

         UTILITY PROPANE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, does
hereby certify that:

         (a) The name of the corporation is:

             UTILITY PROPANE COMPANY

         (b) On October 26, 1989 the directors did, by resolution, amend the
Certificate of Incorporation by eliminating the present Article "FIRST" and
substituting in place thereof the following:

             "FIRST: The name of the corporation is:

             PROLIQ, INC."

         (c) On October 26, 1989, the aforesaid amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation was unanimously consented to by the shareholders of the
corporation, pursuant to Sec. 14A:5-6(1) of the New Jersey Business Corporation
Act.

         (d) On October 26, 1989, three thousand (3,000) shares of the capital
stock of UTILITY PROPANE COMPANY were outstanding, were entitled to vote and
were voted for the aforesaid amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF UTILITY PROPANE COMPANY has executed this
certificate this 9th day of November, 1989.

                                              UTILITY PROPANE COMPANY



                                              By: /s/ JAMES W. CHRISTMAS
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 JAMES W. CHRISTMAS,
                                                 Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.2: Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Nutek Oil, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/Afor the period ending December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jason F. Griffith,
Chief  Financial  Officer of  the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, and that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                         /s/ Jason F. Griffith, CPA
                         ------------------------------------------
                         JASON F. GRIFFITH, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: October 7, 2005
EXHIBIT 4.4

                       WAIVER OF CONTINGENT CONSIDERATION

      The undersigned party to a Merger Agreement dated as of December 23, 2003
by and between Xechem International, Inc. ("Xechem"), Ceptor Acquisition, Inc.,
and Ceptor Corporation (the "Merger Agreement") pursuant to which, in Section
1.7 thereof, the undersigned is entitled to payment of certain Contingent
Consideration upon the occurrence of certain Award Events, as such terms are
defined in the Merger Agreement. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants
that he has neither pledged or assigned his rights in the Contingent
Consideration and hereby waives and releases Xechem from any and all obligation
with respect to payment of the Contingent Consideration on the basis of the
representation of Ceptor to provide the undersigned with reasonably equivalent
benefits, provided, however, that such benefits shall be payable in shares of
the common stock of Ceptor, and that such release of Xechem is not conditioned
upon Ceptor's provision of such replacement benefits or that the undersigned
shall be satisfied with the terms and conditions or value thereof.


Date:____________                       ________________________________________


                                       1
#### Throgmorton *v.*Davis and Wife.

In an action of slander by a husband and wife, the declaration must not conclude to the damage of the wife only, but to the damage of the husband and wife.

ERROR to the *Franklin*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

This was an action of slander brought by *Asa Davis*and *Susanna*his wife, against *Joseph*Throgmorton. The words, for which the action was brought, are charged in the declaration to have been spoken by *Throgmorton*concerning the wife of *Davis.*The declaration concludes as follows:— “By means of the committing of the said several grievances by the said *Throgmorton,*she the said *Susanna*is greatly injured in her good name, fame, credit, and reputation, amongst her neighbors, and hath sustained damages to the amount of 1,000 dollars, therefore they sue,” &c. The defendant pleaded the general issue and the statute of limitations. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

*384O. *H. Smith,*for the plaintiff.

G. *H. Dunn*and J. *Test,*jun. for the defendants.

This judgment cannot be supported. The action is brought by the husband and wife for a personal wrong to the wife; and the declaration should have concluded to their damage, and not to the damage only of the wife. It has been decided, that if, in cases like the present, the declaration conclude .to the damage of the husband, instead of to the damage of the husband and wife, the conclusion is wrong, and the objection may be made in arrest of judgment. *Newton et ux.*v. Hatter, 2 Ld. Raym. 1208. The reason of this is, that the damages will survive to the; wife, if the husband die before they are received. 1 Selw. N. P. 232. If that be the law, it follows, *a fortiori,*that where, as in the present case, the action is by the husband and wife for the slander of the wife, and the declaration concludes to the damages of the wife alone, the judgment for the plaintiffs must be erroneous. *Davis*may, at any time during his life, receive the damages recovered in-this action; and, should he survive his wife and die without receiving them, they could be received by his personal representatives. The declaration should have, alleged the damages to have been sustained by *Davis*as well as by his wife. That is not done, and the judgment for the plaintiffs must consequently be reversed.'

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

HUMBERTO MORAN-TORRES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10002

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00231-EJG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Humberto Moran-Torres appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for being a deported

alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Moran-Torres’s counsel has filed a

FILED

JUN 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10002

brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. Moran-Torres has filed pro se supplemental opening and

reply briefs, and the government has filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.