alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-05-0009-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 8, 2005

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.N., K.S., AND B.R.S., JR., CHILDREN

_________________________________

FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARTLEY COUNTY;

NO. 4128-H; HONORABLE RON ENNS, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 26, 2005, appellant filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal signed by both

appellant and appellant’s attorney. 

Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’s Motion to Dismiss

Appeal is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Rule 42.1(a). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

Phil Johnson

Chief Justice
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00722

- CR

JORUAM C. OLIVARES

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 6 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CR

- 11

- 10772

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 26, 2014
9551.

#### Holland *v.*The State.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Conviction of manslaughter; from Laurens, superior court— Judge Kent. December 8, 1917.

*S. P. New,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. L. Stephens, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyt.es, P. J.

1. In charging the jury upon' the law of manslaughter the judge did not err in failing to instruct them as to the punishment ' prescribed by the statute for that offense. *Meeks*v. *State,*57 *Ga.*329.

2. Under the facts of the ease the law of involuntary manslaughter was not involved, and the judge did not err in failing to charge it.

3. It does not appear that the court abused its discretion in allowing the State to introduce, over the objection of the defendant, additional testimony, after the State and the defendant had closed, although such testimony may .not have been strictly in rebuttal.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the. court did not err in overruling the metion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and ^Harwell, JJ., concur.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Granite City Food & Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Monica A. Underwood, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controllerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: | December 21, 2004 | By     | /s/ Monica A. Underwood                                     |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   | Monica A. Underwood                                         |
|   |              |   | Interim Chief Financial  Officer and   Corporate Controller |

 

----
EXHIBIT
15.1




CONSENT
OF AUTHOR





To:
            Crosshair
      Exploration & Mining Corp.British
      Columbia Securities CommissionAlberta
      Securities CommissionSaskatchewan
      Financial Services Commission (Securities Division)Manitoba
      Securities CommissionOntario
      Securities CommissionNew
      Brunswick Securities CommissionNova
      Scotia Securities CommissionNewfoundland
      and Labrador, Securities DivisionRegistrar
      of Securities, Prince Edward IslandUnited
      States Securities and Exchange CommissionAND
      TO:
            Toronto
      Stock ExchangeNYSE
      Amex EquitiesRE:
            Crosshair
      Exploration & Mining Corp. (“Crosshair”) -Consent
      under National Instrument 43-101







Reference
is made to the technical report entitled “Form 43-101 Technical Report on the
Shirley Basin Uranium Properties, Wyoming” dated July 8, 2007 (the
“Technical Report “) which the undersigned has prepared for Target Exploration
and Mining Corp., now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crosshair.





I have
reviewed and approved the summaries of and extracts from the Technical Report
prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information
Form) of Crosshair (fiscal year ended April 30, 2009) and confirm that such
summaries and extracts fairly and accurately represent the information in the
Technical Report.  I hereby consent to public filing of the Technical
Report as an Exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form)
of Crosshair and to the written disclosure of my name, and reference to and
incorporation by reference of, the Technical Report in the public filing of the
Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form) of Crosshair with the
regulatory authorities referred to above.





I certify
that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form)
being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from
the Technical Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services
performed by me in connection with the Technical Report.





Dated:  June
25, 2009.















“Thomas C. Pool”Thomas
      C. Pool, P.E.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kas filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert R. Foley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ ROBERT R. FOLEY    |                    |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:                  | Robert R. Foley         |   |
| Title:                 | Chief Financial Officer |   |
| February 28, 2007 |                    |
|                        |                         |        |  |

 

----
Petition for Writ of Mandamus D ismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 10 ,

2012

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00561

- CV

IN RE TED LAWRENCE R OBERTSON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2001

- 35725



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On June 18, 2012 , relator Ted Lawrence Robertson filed a petition for writ of
mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 ( West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator ask s this Court to compel the Honorable Robert
H inojosa , former judge of the 312th District Court of Harris C ounty , to vacate a protective order entered at a default hearing on Augu st 15, 2001

. Relator was subsequently convicted of violation of the protective order and claims the protective
order is void.2

Robert Hinojosa is no longer the judge of the 312th District Court. A writ of
mandamus will not issue against the new judge of a court for the action of a former judge

. Rather Rule of Appellate procedure 7.2 requires abatement of a pending original proceeding so that the successor judge may consider the complained

- of order of his or her predecessor. Tex. R. App. P. 7.2; See In re Ba ylor Medical Center at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) (orig.proceeding). Here, since the record does not reflect
the motion was presented to the current trial judge, there is nothing for him to reconsider.
Relator's application for writ of manda mus against a former district judge is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221(b)(1) (West 2004) (providing that court of appeals may issue writ of mandamus against “a judge of a district or county court in the court of appea ls district”).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher and Jamison.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Jose Luis Hernandez-Acosta, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01501-015-PHX-SRB

DETENTION ORDER 

 On May 23, 2018, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 23rd day of May, 2018. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
EXHIBIT 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Martin E. Welch III, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/    MARTIN E. WELCH III
|Martin E. Welch III       
|Chief Financial Officer   

October 28, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA Partners with American Companies on Key Moon, Exploration Tech","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eLPygeu5Hz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-partners-with-american-companies-on-key-moon-exploration-tech\/\">NASA Partners with American Companies on Key Moon, Exploration Tech<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-partners-with-american-companies-on-key-moon-exploration-tech\/embed\/#?secret=eLPygeu5Hz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Partners with American Companies on Key Moon, Exploration Tech” — NASA\" data-secret=\"eLPygeu5Hz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/9_loftid_rv_on_ship_deck_beauty_shot_0.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":448}
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2004 (the
Report), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Thad BrownThad Brown Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 845 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 845

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a minimum mandatory 
 penalty for conveying false bomb threats through instrumentalities of 
                    interstate and foreign commerce.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 1997

 Mrs. Kennelly of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a minimum mandatory 
 penalty for conveying false bomb threats through instrumentalities of 
                    interstate and foreign commerce.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``False Bomb Threat Penalty Act of 
1997''.

SEC. 2. FALSE BOMB THREATS.

    Section 844(e) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``for not more than'' and all that follows through ``, or 
both.'' and inserting ``for not less than one year nor more than 10 
years and fined under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Cheryl Quinn","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FaFiFY5dyY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/cheryl-quinn\/\">Cheryl Quinn<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/cheryl-quinn\/embed\/#?secret=FaFiFY5dyY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Cheryl Quinn” — NASA\" data-secret=\"FaFiFY5dyY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/cheryl-quinn2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1999 10-Q OF FELCOR LODGING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
STATEMENT OF OPERATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED JUNE 30, 1999 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          50,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,893
<PP&E>                                       4,289,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                 251,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,280,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,302
<BONDS>                                      1,712,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    295,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,100,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,280,626
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,104
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,172
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,521
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,521
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,113
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,408
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95


</TABLE>