alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 994

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the United States border station located in

Pharr, Texas, as the ‘‘Kika de la Garza United States

Border Station’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 994 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States border station located in Pharr,

3 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Kika de

4 la Garza United States Border Station’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the border

8 station referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a

9 reference to the ‘‘Kika de la Garza United States Border

10 Station’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 23,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By JEFF TRANDAHL,

Deputy Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-KSB/A to the Annual Report of Vistula Communications Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the
year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George R. Vaughn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my
best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | /s/GEORGE R. VAUGHNGeorge R. Vaughn
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------

Dated:
January 30, 2006

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Vistula Communications Services, Inc. and will be retained by Vistula
Communications Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the
Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-K Report") that:

       (1)    the 10-K Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    the information contained in the 10-K Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

                                                 Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc.
Date:  March 31, 2010
                                                               By: /s/ Jack Chen
                                                --------------------------------
                                                                       Jack Chen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 31, 2010
                                                            By: /S/ Maggie Zhang
                                                      --------------------------
                                                                    Maggie Zhang
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer
ILND 450 (Rev. 10/13) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Dominique Henderson,

Plaintiff(s), 

v. 

DeKalb Community Unit School District 428, et 

al., 

Defendant(s).

Case No. 3:20 CV 50124 

Judge Iain D. Johnston 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box):

in favor of plaintiff(s) 

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ , 

which includes pre–judgment interest. 

 does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

in favor of defendant(s) DeKalb Community Unit School District 428; Jamie Craven; Cristy 

Meyer; Tim Vincent; Brant Boyer; John Panek; Amanda Baum; Jennie Gammelgaard; Kyle Gerdes; Sharon 

Carani; Doe Bus Driver 

and against plaintiff(s) Dominque Hendersen

.

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

other: 

This action was (check one): 

 tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

 tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

 decided by Judge Iain D. Johnston on a motion for summary judgment. 

Date: 6/30/2021 

Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court 

Yvonne Pedroza , Deputy Clerk 

Case: 3:20-cv-50124 Document #: 52 Filed: 06/30/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:365
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

****We consent to theincorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form** **S-3 (Nos. 333-152310, 333-141100 and 333-164889), Form S-8 (Nos. 333-1267574, 333-130337 and 333-161409) and Form S-11 (No. 333-121883) of MedicalProperties Trust, Inc. of our report****dated May 1, 2012, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related consolidated statements ofincome, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is included in this Annual Report of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP 

Irvine, California

September 21, 2012
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katherine Schauer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ksschaue\/","title":"Laser Terminal Bound for Space Station Arrives at NASA Goddard for Testing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TsQzfIlFbs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/tech-demonstration\/laser-terminal-bound-for-space-station-arrives-at-nasa-goddard-for-testing\/\">Laser Terminal Bound for Space Station Arrives at NASA Goddard for Testing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/tech-demonstration\/laser-terminal-bound-for-space-station-arrives-at-nasa-goddard-for-testing\/embed\/#?secret=TsQzfIlFbs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Laser Terminal Bound for Space Station Arrives at NASA Goddard for Testing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TsQzfIlFbs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/compressedillumat.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### The State *v.*Armstrong.

*Scire facias*against a surety on a forfeited recognizance for the principal’s appearance to an indictment. Previously to judgment on the *scire facias,*the principal was surrendered in discharge of his bail, and judgment was rendered against the surety, conformably to the statute, for the costs. *Held,*that the prosecuting attorney’s fee, in such case, is 2 dollars and 50 cents.

ERROR to the *Dearborn*Circuit Court.

Blackford, *J.*

Armstrong entered into a recognizance for the appearance of a person indicted for an assault and battery. The defendant in the indictment made default, the recognizance was declared forfeited, and a *scire facias*was issued *43requiring *Armstrong*to show cause why execution should not issue against him. Previously to judgment on the *scire facias,*the person indicted was surrendered in discharge of his bail; and judgment was rendered, conformably to the statute, against *Armstrong*for the costs (1). The execution and fee bill, which issued against Armstrong, contained a charge of 5 dollars as a fee to the prosecuting attorney. The Circuit Court, on motion, struck that charge out of the fee bill.

*H. Brown,*for the state.

*A. Lane,*for the defendant.

The statute regulating the fees of different officers, gives to the prosecuting attorney a fee of 5 dollars-for every conviction on an indictment, or presentment, and. a fee of 3 dollars on every unsuccessful application for a divorce. This statute gives, also, a fee of 2 dollars and 59 cents as an attorney’s fee in all civil actions at law, when the title to land does not come in question, and of 5 dollars when it does (2). The recognizance under consideration is an obligation of record, with a pecuniary penalty. The proceeding by *scire facias*against the recognizor, after the forfeiture of the recognizance, is to recover the penalty, and is entirely of a civil nature. The defendant in the *scire facias,*therefore, in becoming fixed for the costs, is liable to pay as an attorney’s fee, not 5 dollars due on a conviction by presentment or indictment, but 2 dollars and 59 cents, given to the successful party in every civil case.

The Circuit Court were right in striking out the fee of 5 dollars, but they committed an error in not allowing the ,2 dollars and 59 cents.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, with instructions, &e.

(1)

 Rev. Code, 1831, p. 316, 409.

(2)

 Rev. Code, 1831, p. 246.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66370-66371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26435]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10440, Alabama Trust Bank, National Association 
Sylacauga, Alabama

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (``FDIC'') as Receiver for Alabama Trust Bank, National 
Association, Sylacauga, Alabama (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate 
its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver 
of Alabama Trust Bank, National Association on May 18, 2012. The 
liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the 
extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the 
Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose.

[[Page 66371]]

Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: November 3, 2014.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26435 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"New Research Heading to Space Station Aboard 14th SpaceX Resupply Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SmkXz9HPzc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/new-research-heading-to-space-station-aboard-14th-spacex-resupply-mission\/\">New Research Heading to Space Station Aboard 14th SpaceX Resupply Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/new-research-heading-to-space-station-aboard-14th-spacex-resupply-mission\/embed\/#?secret=SmkXz9HPzc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Research Heading to Space Station Aboard 14th SpaceX Resupply Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SmkXz9HPzc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/04\/spacex_crs-14_launch_co.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT A. GRATE, JR., a/k/a Lloyd, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-95-13) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert A. Grate, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Watkins, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert A. Grate, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis, which was properly construed as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grate , No. CR-95-13 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The National Science Board's                     *ad hoc*                     Working Group on Administrative Burdens (AB), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:                

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, November 5, 10:00-11:00 a.m., EST.

# SUBJECT MATTER:

                        Chairman's updates on implementation of previous Board recommendations; and discussion of the scope of work for the                         *ad hoc*                         Working Group on Administrative Burdens.                    

# STATUS:

Open.

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference. A public listening line will be available. Members of the public must contact the Board Office (call 703-292-7000 or send an email message to                         *nationalsciencebrd@nsf.gov*) at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference for the public listening number. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) which may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.*                         Point of contact for this meeting is Jacqueline Meszaros at                         *jmeszaro@nsf.gov.*

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-25891 Filed 10-28-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Order filed June 9, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00325-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF J.N.L., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-45052

ORDER

This appeal is from an order signed January 14, 2016. Appellant filed a notice 

of appeal on February 8, 2016. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence on May 12, 

2016. 

No contest was filed. “Unless a contest is timely filed, no hearing will be 

conducted, the affidavit’s allegations will be deemed true, and the party will be 

allowed to proceed without advance payments of costs.” See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(f). 

Accordingly, the official court reporter for the 257th District Court is directed 

to file the reporter’s record within 30 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-35","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"N89eRhOWUe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-35\/\">STS-35<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-35\/embed\/#?secret=N89eRhOWUe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-35” — NASA\" data-secret=\"N89eRhOWUe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/sts-35-crew-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Leslie Building Products, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-97702, No. 33-97704) on Form S-8 of Leslie Building Products, Inc. of our
report dated February 18, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Leslie Building Products, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 1997, and related financial statement schedule, appearing in the
December 31, 1997, annual report on Form 10-K of Leslie Building Products, Inc.


                                     /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 27, 1998