alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
f

[_Veceo ____ LODGED
—FRECEWED ___ Copy

JAN 2 8 2016
WAIVER OF INDICTMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a
FOR THE
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
United States of America, CR-16-00130-PHX-SPL

Plaintiff,

Freida Battise-Moore,
Defendant.

Freida_Battise-Moore, the above-named defendant, who is accused of
Embezzlement/Theft from Indian Tribal Organization, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 1163, being advised of the nature of the charge and of her rights,
waives in open court prosecution by indictment and consents that the proceeding may be

by information instead of by indictment.

ce endant
= a= Bragg

Counsel for Defendant

Date L2h- WA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

DAVE KNECHT HOMES, LLC and 

BANKERS STANDARD INSURANCE 

COMPANY a/s/o VANN A. AVEDISIAN, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 1:20-cv-03177 

The Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman 

ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT DAVE KNECHT 

HOMES, LLC 

Before the Court is Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company’s (“Nautilus) Motion for Default 

Judgment against Defendant Dave Knecht Homes, LLC (“DKH”). (Doc. 15.) 

On May 29, 2020, Nautilus initiated this action by filing a Complaint for Declaratory 

Judgment (“Complaint”). (Doc. 1.) The Complaint seeks a declaration that Nautilus owed and 

owes no duty to defend and/or indemnify DKH in connection with an underlying lawsuit entitled 

Bankers Standard Insurance Company a/s/o Vann A. Avedisian v. Highlander Construction, Inc., 

Bryan D. Ogdon Ltd., Arc Insulation, Inc., Northridge Builders, Inc., and Dave Knecht Homes, 

LLC, which was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, under Case Number 2018 L 

10952 (“Avedisian Lawsuit”). (Doc. 1.) The Avedisian Lawsuit was subsequently dismissed on 

September 15, 2020 pursuant to a settlement reached therein. 

After DKH was properly served in this action and failed to appear, answer, or otherwise 

plead, this Court entered an Order of Default against DKH on September 2, 2020. (Doc. 12.) 

Now, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), Nautilus moves for entry of default 

judgment against DKH, including a specific declaration that Nautilus has and had no duty under 

Case: 1:20-cv-03177 Document #: 20 Filed: 09/28/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:152
to defend DKH in the Avedisian Lawsuit, or to indemnify DKH for any judgment or settlement 

entered therein. Nautilus seeks no monetary relief and seeks only a declaratory judgment. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company’s Motion for 

Default Judgment against Defendant Dave Knecht Homes, LLC (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. Nautilus 

has and had no duty to defend Dave Knecht Homes, LLC in the Avedisian Lawsuit, or to indemnify 

Dave Knecht Homes, LLC for any judgment or settlement entered therein. 

DATED: 9/28/2020 

 The Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman 

 United States District Judge 

Case: 1:20-cv-03177 Document #: 20 Filed: 09/28/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:153
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard L. Browdy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
          by the Report.

Date: March 30, 2007                 /s/ Richard L. Browdy
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Richard L. Browdy, Chief Financial Officer
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SIMON PFEIFER, ISABEL BOTELLO, and 

KARI WHALEN, Individually and on Behalf 

of All Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v.

LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO,

Defendant.

Case No. 20-cv-03116 

Honorable Robert W. Gettleman 

PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs Simon Pfeifer, Isabel Botello, and Kari Whalen (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)

respectfully move the Court for an Order granting final approval the Parties’ settlement, and 

approving the Settlement Fund distributions. Defendant does not oppose the relief sought in this 

Motion.

Dated: January 12, 2024 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Ellen T. Noteware

Ellen T. Noteware

BERGER MONTAGUE PC

1818 Market Street, Suite 3600

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Tel: (215) 875-3000

Email: enoteware@bm.net

Richard Schwartz (ARDC# 6323474)

BERGER MONTAGUE PC

1720 W Division

Chicago, IL 60622

Tel: 773-257-0255

Email: rschwartz@bm.net

Case: 1:20-cv-03116 Document #: 77 Filed: 01/12/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:4823
2

E. Michelle Drake

BERGER MONTAGUE PC

1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 205

Minneapolis, MN 55413

Tel: (612) 594-5999

Email: emdrake@bm.net

Elizabeth A. Fegan

Fegan Scott LLC

150 S. Wacker Dr., 24th Floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: (312) 741-1019

Email: beth@feganscott.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class

Case: 1:20-cv-03116 Document #: 77 Filed: 01/12/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:4824
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 13

- 00269

- CR

ROBIN LYNN PRINCE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
Appeal from the 182nd District Court of Harris County.

(Tr. Ct. No. 1266918 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on March 26, 2013. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reve rsible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered August 2 5 , 2015.

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice Massengale.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity asindicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
May 9, 2005    /s/ Richard A. Smith   Richard A. Smith Chief Financial Officer of FelCor LodgingTrust Incorporated, as general partner ofFelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 267 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 5, 1998.
Whereas recently released statistics demonstrate that America is not winning the 
        battle to keep young Americans drug-free;
Whereas the results of these studies show that 29 percent of high school 
        students state that a student in their school died from a drug-related 
        or an alcohol-related incident in the last year;
Whereas 76 percent of high school students and 46 percent of middle school 
        students claim drugs are kept, used, or sold on their school grounds;
Whereas studies show that 61 percent of high school students claim they can buy 
        drugs within 1 day and 35 percent claim they can buy drugs within 1 hour 
        or less;
Whereas it is reported that the use of heroin is increasing and that 90 percent 
        of new heroin users are under 26 years old;
Whereas the use of drugs at a young age dramatically increases the risk of 
        failure to complete high school, increases the likelihood of committing 
        crimes, and reduces future prospects in education, athletics, and 
        careers;
Whereas it is known that safe, drug-free, and orderly classrooms are key to an 
        effective learning environment;
Whereas parental involvement is critical to helping young Americans resist the 
        temptations of drugs and to establishing a healthy learning environment;
Whereas violent crime rates across the United States have declined due to strong 
        parental involvement and cooperation among local, State, and Federal law 
        enforcement agencies;
Whereas the same unified effort and commitment are needed to fight drugs in our 
        schools, playgrounds, and communities; and
Whereas Congress has the unique ability to provide leadership on this issue by 
        raising awareness of the dangers of drugs in schools in every community 
        across this great Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) all schools should be drug-free;
            (2) the distribution, sale, and use of illegal drugs in the Nation's 
        schools is unacceptable;
            (3) all Federal, State, and local drug fighting agencies should work 
        together with schools and parents to ensure that a renewed effort is 
        made to fight the distribution, sale, and use of illegal drugs in our 
        schools and to America's youth;
            (4) all governmental leaders, educators, and parents share a role in 
        raising the awareness of this issue and offering constructive 
        alternatives to illegal drug use; and
            (5) Congress and the President should work to end the distribution, 
        sale, and use of illegal drugs in the Nation's schools and, work with 
        local communities, schools, and parents to implement meaningful 
        policies.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
{"id":11782,"count":33,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/oiir\/","name":"Office of International and Interagency Relations (OIIR)","slug":"oiir","taxonomy":"category","parent":2667,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/11782"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/2667"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=11782"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=11782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
| 200 Witmer Road  -  P.O. Box 1015  -  Horsham, PA  19044-8015 GMAC **Commercial Mortgage**Annual Statement as to Compliance For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 **********GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.****Series 2003-C2**Pursuant to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced transaction, I hereby attest that: i.A review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation as  Master Servicer during the period, and of its performance under this Trust and Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision. ii.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation as Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the period. iii.GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corporation, as Servicer, has received no notice regarding qualifications, or challenging the status, of any REMIC Pool as a REMIC or the status of either Grantor Trust Pool as a Grantor Trust or otherwise asserting a tax on the income or assets of any portion of the Trust Fund from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body. GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION /s/Brian T Stauffer By:   Brian T. Stauffer Title:   Senior Vice President Date:   February 20, 2005 **.72A** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc
Suite 501, 55 University Avenue, Toronto, ON  M5J 2H7

T(416) 947-0907F(416) 947-0395

www.scottwilson.com
  EXHIBIT 15.8


CONSENT OF AUTHOR
 
 To:
Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp.

British Columbia Securities Commission

Alberta Securities Commission

Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission (Securities Division)

Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

New Brunswick Securities Commission

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Newfoundland and Labrador, Securities Division

Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 
 AND TO:
Toronto Stock Exchange

NYSE Amex Equities
 RE:
Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp. (“Crosshair”) -

Consent under National Instrument 43-101




Reference is made to the NI 43-101 technical report entitled “Technical Report on the Bootheel Uranium Property, Shirley Basin Mining District, Albany County, Wyoming, USA” dated September 8, 2009 (the “Technical Report”) which the undersigned has prepared for Crosshair.
 
 I have reviewed and approved the summaries of and extracts from the Technical Report prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form) of Crosshair (fiscal year ended April 30, 2010) and confirm that such summaries and extracts fairly and accurately represent the information in the Technical Report.  I hereby consent to public filing of the Technical Report as an Exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form) of Crosshair and to the written disclosure of my name, and reference to and incorporation by reference of, the Technical Report in the public filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form) of Crosshair with the regulatory authorities referred to above.
 
 I certify that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form) being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from the Technical Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services performed by me in connection with the Technical Report .


Dated:  the 29th day of July, 2010.




(Signed) “William E. Roscoe”William E. Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6563

BILL BARNES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; MIKE EASLEY,

Superintendent,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-711-3)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bill Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Barnes v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-96-711-3

(M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1997).We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### J. W. Hazelrigg *v.*J. T. Williams.

Vendor and Purchaser — Title Bond — Specific Performance — Purchase Money Must Be Paid Before Deed Is Made.

In equity a vendor can not be forced to convey, in conformity with bis title bond, until be is paid tbe full amount of tbe agreed purchase price for tbe real estate sold.

Judicial Sale — Encumbered Property — Necessary Parties — Resale.

Tbe fact that tbe property did not sell for an amount sufficient to • satisfy tbe prior lien does not prove that, upon a second sale, after tbe rights of all tbe parties shall have been adjudicated, and bidders *354can be assured that the title they are asked to take can never be disturbed, a larger amount may not be realized.

It is a universal rule of equity that encumbered property shall not be sold until all the parties having claims upon the same are before the court.

APPEAL PROM MORGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

April 13, 1871.

Opinion by

Judge Lindsay :

The legal title to the town property remained in Williams, even after he surrendered the note of Tutt, and accepted in lieu of the same the note executed by Taulbee. By this transaction he accepted the personal undertaking of Taulbee instead of that of Tutt, but in equity he cannot be forced to convey in conformity with his title bond until he received the full amount of the agreed purchase price for the real estate sold by him to Tutt. “The circuit court therefore correctly adjudged that the lien of Williams was superior to that of Hazelrigg.”

Still, as Hazelrigg had a lien upon the same property, to secure the payment of his debt, and as Williams fails to deny that he had knowledge of that fact, at the time of the institution of his suit, Hazelrigg had the right to object to the confirmation of the sale made under the judgment in favor of Williams, and to ask that the property be resold to satisfy both of their debts.

It is true the property did not sell for an amount sufficient to satisfy the judgment of Williams but the fact does not prove that upon a second sale, after the rights of Hazelrigg shall have been adjudicated, and bidders can be assured that the title they are asked to take under the proposed sale can never be disturbed by him that a much larger amount may not be realized.

It is a universal rule of equity, that encumbered property shall not be sold, until all the parties having claims upon the same are before the court.

Williams should have made Hazelrigg a party to the suit. He having failed to do so, the latter had a right to interplead, and as he *done*so before, the sale under the judgment of Williams was confirmed. The same should have been set aside, and the property resold to satisfy the claims of both parties.

*355
      *Scott, for appellant.*

*Cooper, for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.