alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries



|                                                   |  |                              
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition Corp. II           |  | Delaware                     
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition Corp.              |  | Delaware                     
|McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.               |  | Delaware                     
|McCormick & Schmick Maryland Liquor, Inc.          |  | Maryland                     
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition I Texas, Inc.      |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition II Texas, Inc.     |  | Delaware                     
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition Texas, LP          |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition III Texas, Inc.    |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmicks Hackensack, LLC              |  | Delaware                     
|McCormick & Schmicks Atlanta II, LLC              |  | Delaware                     
|McCormick & Schmick Orlando, LLC                   |  | Delaware                     
|McCormick & Schmick Dallas, LP                     |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Dallas Liquor, Inc.            |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Austin, LP                     |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Austin Liquor, Inc.            |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Promotions, LLC                |  | Virginia                     
|McCormick & Schmick Houston Pavilions, LP          |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Houston Pavilions Liquor, Inc. |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Austin Domain, LP              |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Austin Domain Liquor, Inc.     |  | Texas                        
|The Boathouse Restaurants of Canada, Inc.          |  | British Columbia, Canada     
|McCormick & Schmick Seafood Markets, Inc.          |  | Virginia                     
|McCormick & Schmick Texas, Inc.                    |  | Texas                        
|McCormick & Schmick Annapolis Liquor, Inc          |  | Maryland                     
|McCormick & Schmick National Harbor Liquor, Inc.   |  | Maryland
9067.

#### Branch *et al. v.*American Agricultural Chemical Co.

Decided March 14, 1918.

Mortgage foreclosure; from Worth superior court—Judge Eve. June 11, 1917.

*R. 8. Roy,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Claude Payton, Pope & Bennet,*contra

Wade, C. J.

1.' Where the, defendant admits a prima facie case in favor of the plaintiff, and sets up an affirmative defense, such as a plea of confession 'and avoidance, he assumes the burden of establishing a *complete*defense. Civil Code (1910), § 5746; *Hawkins*v. *Davie,*136 *Ga.*550, 552 (71 S. E. 873) ; *Red Cypress Lumber Co.*v. *Perry,*118 *Ga.*876 (2) (45 S. E. 674).

*(a)*The execution of the note and mortgage, the basis of the instant suit, and the possession thereof by the plaintiff, being admitted, the burden was upon the defendants to prove *every essential element*of their defense.

2. It being admitted .that the note and mortgage were in the possession of the plaintiff, who introduced the same in evidence, the presumption arises that the plaintiff was in lawful possession, and the onus was on the defendants to rebut this presumption. See *Cox*v. *Adams,*2 *Ga.*160 (2).

3. The only question raised by the record which commands our attention is whether or not the court erred in directing a verdict in favor of plaintiff. Applying the preceding elementary principles, the court did not err in so directing, since, the onus standing as it did, a finding in favor ’of the plaintiff was demanded by the evidence.

*(а)*It is true that the evidence was in conflict as to whether or not there was a condition attached to the delivery of the note and mortgage to the plaintiff’s agent, but this did not make it mandatoi-y upon the trial judge to submit the case to a jury, since this was insufficient to constitute a *complete*defense to the suit, in the absence of proof (the burden being upon the defendants not only to prove the existence of said condition but also the breach thereof) that the condition attached to said delivery was in fact breached.

(b) The burden of showing tljat the condition attached to the delivery of the note and mortgage was breached was not carried by evidence to #that effect from only two of the three defendants, since it was' absolutely and obviously necessary that *all three defendants*should negative the presumption that the said condition was complied with, especially in view of direct positive evidence on the part of the plaintiff that the plaintiff had complied with said.condition.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ‘., concur.*
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 817

To require the appointment of the Chief of the Forest Service by the

President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mrs. CHENOWETH (for herself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. BOB SCHAFFER

of Colorado, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. PETERSON of Pennsylvania, Mr. HILL,

and Mr. RADANOVICH) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To require the appointment of the Chief of the Forest Service

by the President, by and with the advice and consent

of the Senate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPOINTMENT OF CHIEF OF THE FOREST

4 SERVICE.

5 (a) PRESIDENTIAL APPOINTMENT.—The Depart6 ment of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 is amend7 ed by inserting after section 247 (7 U.S.C. 6963), relating

8 to the reorganization of the Forest Service, the following

9 new section:
2

•HR 817 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 248. APPOINTMENT OF CHIEF OF THE FOREST SERV2 ICE.

3 ‘‘The Chief of the Forest Service, Department of Ag4 riculture, shall be appointed by the President, by and with

5 the advice and consent of the Senate. The Chief shall be

6 appointed from among persons who have substantial expe7 rience and demonstrated competence in forest land man8 agement and natural resources conservation.’’.

9 (b) EFFECT ON CURRENT CHIEF.—The person serv10 ing as Chief of the Forest Service on the date of the enact11 ment of this Act may continue to serve in the position

12 pursuant to existing law until the earlier of the following:

13 (1) The end of the six-month period beginning

14 on the date of the enactment of this Act.

15 (2) The date on which the person is re16 appointed, or a replacement is first appointed, to the

17 position pursuant to section 248 of the Department

18 of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, as added

19 by subsection (a).

Æ
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 Date: February 9, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Michael J. CalielMichael J. CalielPresident and Chief Executive Officer
----

|                                                                            |   | Three Months Ended June 30, |       |   | Six Months Ended June 30, |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                            |   | 2009                             |       |   | 2008                           |   |   | 2009 |   |   | 2008 |   |
| Diluted net loss per share from continuing operations:                          |   |                             |       |   |                           |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net  loss from continuing operations available to common shareholders |   | $                                | (1,786,000 | )      |                           | $      | (3,959,000 | ) |   | $ | (4,044,000 | ) |   | $ | (8,293,000 | ) |
|                                                                            |   |                             |       |   |                           |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average number of shares outstanding                                   |   |                             | 7,954,928  |   |                           |   | 7,954,928 |   |   |   | 7,954,928 |   |   |   | 7,954,928 |   |
| Net effect of dilutive stock options based on treasury stock method             |   |                             | -          |   |                           |   | - |   |   |   | - |   |   |   | - |   |
| Total average shares                                                            |   |                             | 7,954,928  |   |                           |   | 7,954,928 |   |   |   | 7,954,928 |   |   |   | 7,954,928 |   |
|                                                                            |   |                             |       |   |                           |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fully diluted net loss per share from continuing operations                     |   | $                                | (0.22      | )      |                           | $      | (0.50 | ) |   | $ | (0.51 | ) |   | $ | (1.04 | ) |

----
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Triclawps, LLC, an Arizona limited 

liability company, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Shadow Tech LLC, a Kansas limited 

liability company, and Joshua E. Stabler, an 

individual, 

Defendants. 

____________________________________ 

Shadow Tech LLC, a Kansas limited liability 

company, and Joshua E. Stabler, an 

individual, 

 Counter-Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Triclawps, LLC, an Arizona limited liability 

company, 

 Counter-Defendants. 

No. CV-16-00106-PHX-NVW

ORDER 

 

 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal of Action 

(Doc. 74), and good cause appearing. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the parties’ Stipulation (Doc. 74). 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this action, including all claims and 

counterclaims with prejudice. The parties each to bear their own costs and fees. 

 The Clerk shall terminate this case. 

 Dated this 26th day of October, 2017.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 118

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 16, 1997

Mr. RUSH submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 that he is hereby, elected to the following standing com3 mittee of the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES:

5 Mr. Torres.

Æ
#### R. G. Sharp's Admr. *v.*Daniel Warper.

Depositions — Provisions—Presence of Examiner.

The failure of an examiner to state that the depositions of the witnesses were subscribed by them in his presence is error, authorizing a reversal.

APPEAL PROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

September 12, 1871.

*Stone, for appellant.*

*N. P. Reid, for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Pryor:

In this case the only question presented to the court, is, as to the right of the appellee Warper to the proceeds of the judgment rendered on the note of Boyd. The appellee introduced several witnesses in support of his claim and their depositions were each and all excepted to by the appellant on account of a defect in the certificate of the examiner appended thereto. The certificate fails to relate either that the depositions were read to the witness by the examiner or subscribed by the witnesses in his, the examiner’s presence. The first objection should not be well taken as the witnesses wrote their own depositions, but the failure to state that the depositions were subscribed by the witnesses is a fatal defect. The exceptions should have been sustained by the court and for this error the judgment is reversed arid the cause remanded with directions to the court' below to sustain the exceptions and give to appellees the right to retake the depositions.
{"id":10532,"count":27,"description":"This UAS Traffic Management project has concluded. This content is being kept online for historical purposes, but is no longer being updated.","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aosp\/armd-aosp-utm\/","name":"UAS Traffic Management","slug":"armd-aosp-utm","taxonomy":"category","parent":3307,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/10532"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/3307"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=10532"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=10532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
Exhibit 10.10
 
 DATE OF GRANT
 NAME AND ADDRESS OF EMPLOYEE
 EMPLOYEE NAME
 DATE OF GRANT NUMBER is
not
  1. Option Exercise Price
 PRICE
 2. Term of Option
 DATE
 3. Exercisability of Option




---



##### 



Vesting Date
    
    Cumulative Percentage of Shares as to Which Option is
Exercisable
   4. Exercise of Option
  5. Satisfaction of Option Price
 Payment of Cash.
 Payment of Common Stock.
 2




---



##### 



Broker-Assisted Cashless Exercise.
 Net Share Exercise.
 6. Termination of Employment
 General.
 Termination of Employment for Cause.
 Voluntary Termination of Employment.
 Termination Without Cause.
 3




---



##### 



Retirement.
 Death or Disability.
 Certain Transactions.
 Acceleration and Adjustments of Exercise Period.
 Committee Determinations.
 4




---



##### 



7. Change of Control
  8. Tax Withholding
    9. Administration of the Plan
  5




---



##### 



10. Non-transferability of Option
  11. Amendment and Adjustments to your Option
  12. Effect on Other Benefits
  13. Regulatory Compliance
  14. Data Privacy
  15. Consent to Jurisdiction
   6




---



##### 



Very truly yours,Lawrence PembleChief Financial Officer 7
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Hosts Virtual Destination Station with Astronaut Christina Koch, Scientists","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DEhKaG4bmx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-hosts-virtual-destination-station-with-astronaut-christina-koch-scientists\/\">NASA Hosts Virtual Destination Station with Astronaut Christina Koch, Scientists<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-hosts-virtual-destination-station-with-astronaut-christina-koch-scientists\/embed\/#?secret=DEhKaG4bmx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Hosts Virtual Destination Station with Astronaut Christina Koch, Scientists” — NASA\" data-secret=\"DEhKaG4bmx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/49464133183_f5a6af3bd0_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 913

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide greater planting

flexibility.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1997

Mr. COMBEST (for himself, Mr. STENHOLM, Mr. THORNBERRY, Mr. LUCAS

of Oklahoma, Mr. CHAMBLISS, and Mr. EDWARDS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide

greater planting flexibility.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED PLANTING FLEXIBILITY ON CON4 TRACT ACREAGE.

5 Section 118(b)(2) of the Agricultural Market Transi6 tion Act (7 U.S.C. 7218(b)(2)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’; at the end of subpara8 graph (B);

9 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub10 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and
2

•HR 913 IH

1 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(D) on contract acreage following the fail4 ure of a crop on that contract acreage due to

5 conditions beyond the control of the producer.’’.

Æ
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. Exhibit 4.6



Exhibit 4.6


THIRD AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.

AND

NATIONAL CITY BANK, AS SUCCESSOR RIGHTS AGENT


                    This Third Amendment to Rights Agreement (the "Amendment") amends the Rights Agreement between WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC. ("Wolverine") and NATIONAL CITY BANK ("National City"), as successor Rights Agent, dated April 17, 1997 (the "Rights Agreement").  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings set forth in the Rights Agreement.


                    WHEREAS, under Section 26 of the Rights Agreement, Wolverine may amend any provision of the Rights Agreement to cure any ambiguity or correct or supplement any provision that is defective;  


                    THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


          1.          Section 1(d) of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended following subsection (iii) to read as follows:




"provided, however, that: (A) nothing in this paragraph (d) shall cause a person engaged in business as an underwriter of securities to be the "Beneficial Owner" of, or to "beneficially own," any securities acquired through such person's participation in good faith in a firm commitment underwriting until the expiration of forty days after the date of such acquisition; and (B) for purposes of the definition of Acquiring Person and for purposes of Section 11(a)(ii)(B) of this Agreement, nothing in this paragraph (d) shall cause a person who has reported or is permitted to report ownership of the Company's Common Stock on Schedule 13G under the Exchange Act (or any successor report) and who does not have any intention to and has not reserved the right to control or influence the control, management or policies of the Company to be the "Beneficial Owner" of, or to "beneficially own," any shares of Company Common Stock that the person has reported or is permitted to report on Schedule 13G."






          2.          Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, all terms and conditions as set forth in the Rights Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


                    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be effective as of December 10, 2002.












 


	
Attest:
	 	
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.

	 	 	 
	
/s/ James D. Zwiers

	 	
/s/ Blake W. Krueger


	
James D. Zwiers

Associate General Counsel and

Assistant Secretary
	 	
Blake W. Krueger

Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary

	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
Attest:
	 	
NATIONAL CITY BANK

	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	
/s/ Sherry L. Damore

	 	
/s/ Laura Kress


	
Name Sherry L. Damore

Its Vice President
	 	
Name Laura Kress

Its Vice President