alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curtis L. Garner, Jr., Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:


1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




/s/
                Curtis L. Garner, Jr.Curtis
                L. Garner, Jr.
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              March 15,
                2007


*A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

The Securities and Exchange Commission hereby withdraws the trading suspension order as to the securities of Icon Public Ltd. Co. (“ICLR”) entered October 22, 2014 (“October 22, 2014 Order”).

This order shall be effective immediately.

By the Commission.

Kevin M. O'Neill,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-25576 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Stefon Harrison v. Ronald 

Watts, et al. 

Case Number: 20 CV 2918 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

City of Chicago, Philip Cline, Debra Kirby and Karen Rowan 

Attorney name (type or print): Daniel M. Noland 

Firm: Reiter Burns LLP 

Street address: 311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5200 

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60606 

Bar ID Number: 6231175 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Telephone Number: 312 982-0090 

 

Email Address: dnoland@reiterburns.com 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

 Appointed Counsel 

 If appointed counsel, are you a 

 

 Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on June 26, 2020 

Attorney signature: S/ Daniel M. Noland 

 (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

 Revised 8/1/2015 

Case: 1:20-cv-02918 Document #: 28 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:76
9562.

#### Adams *v.*The State.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. January 7, 1918.

*.E. T. Steed, J. H. Hudson, 1. N. Cheney,*for plaintiff in error.

*Willis Smith, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles^ P. *J.*

1. A ground of a motion for a new trial which complains of the admission of specified testimony must state the name of the witness whose testimony is complained of. *Hayes*v. *State,*18 *Ga. App.*68 (88 S. E. 752); *Peeples*v. *Butler, 21 Ga. App.*310 (94 S. E. 278). Under this ruling the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial can not be considered.

2. As the proof showed that the offense of having, controlling, and possessing intoxicating liquors was committed solely in October, 1917, after the passage of the prohibition law of 1917 (Ga. L. 1917, Ex. session, p. 7, 8), which became effective on March 28, 1917, and the trial having occurred on December 3, 1917, it was not harmful to the accused that the court charged the jury that the offense could be proved at any time within two years prior to the filing of the charge against him.

3. The affidavit of the defendant in support of the ground of his motion for a new trial based, upon alleged newly discovered evidence shows that much of this evidence was known to him before his trial, although he did not then know it was material evidence, and that he failed to inform his counsel concerning it. See in this connection *Carlisle v. Tidwell,*16 *Ga.*33. Moreover, this evidence was cumulative in its character, and the brief of, evidence clearly shows that substantially all of it j;hat would have been relevant was known to the defendant, or could have been discovered by him with the use of ordinary diligence, before his trial. In addition, the supporting affidavits as to the good character, etc., of the newly discovered witnesses are defective, in that they fail to show their associates or means of knowledge. Civil Code (1910), § 6086; *Young*v. *State,*56 *Ga.*403, 406. Under such circumstances it was not error for the judge to overrule this ground of the motion for a new trial.

4. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6228 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEROME ALLEN, a/k/a D.L., a/k/a Jason Jones,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-01-19; CA-03-8-5)

Submitted: March 25, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004

Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey M. Brandt, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellant. Samuel Gerald

Nazzaro, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Allen seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Allen has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 

SHA-POPPIN GOURMET POPCORN LLC, 

an Illinois limited liability company, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., an Ohio 

corporation, and 

PHUNWARE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-02523 

AJIRA AI LLC, an Illinois limited liability 

company, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., an Ohio 

corporation, and 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-04428 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW DANIEL SCHNEIDER’S 

APPEARANCE AS ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF 

 

Edelson PC respectfully moves this Court pursuant to Local Rule 83.17 for leave to 

withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff Sha-Poppin Gourmet Popcorn LLC (“Plaintiff”). In 

support of this Motion, Edelson PC states as follows: 

1. As of January 1, 2021, Mr. Schneider no longer works with the law firm Edelson 

PC, which has been retained to represent Plaintiff in this matter. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02523 Document #: 80 Filed: 01/26/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:821
2 

2. Although Mr. Schneider will no longer be working with Edelson PC and will no 

longer represent Plaintiff in this action, Plaintiff will continue to be represented by other 

attorneys at Edelson PC, including Benjamin Richman, Ari Scharg, Benjamin Thomassen and 

Christopher Dore. Plaintiff will, therefore, not be prejudiced by Mr. Schneider’s withdrawal. 

WHEREFORE, Edelson PC respectfully requests that the Court enter an order granting 

leave to withdraw Daniel Schneider as one of the attorneys of record for Plaintiff. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: January 26, 2021 By:/s/Benjamin Richman 

Benjamin Richman 

brichman@edelson.com 

EDELSON PC

350 North LaSalle Street, 14th Floor 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Tel: 312.589.6370 

Fax: 312.589.6378 

Case: 1:20-cv-02523 Document #: 80 Filed: 01/26/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:822
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 221

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 5, 1997

Mr. FAZIO submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERV5 ICES: Mr. Sherman of California.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-60,332-05

IN RE SIMON LEE RILEY, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. B-02-0291-S IN THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Tom Green County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Tom Green County, shall forward Relator’s habeas

application to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Tom Green

County, or forward a copyof an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting

the date the State received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(c) and (d); TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall

comply with this order within thirty days from the date of this order.
2

Filed: August 25, 2021

Do not publish
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.15.2

[NANOSYS LETTERHEAD]          2625 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, CA 94304
                              650.331.2100, 650.331.2101 fax, www.nanosysinc.com

May 17, 2004

Dr. James Romine
Director
DuPont Materials Science & Engineering
Experimental Station 328/407
Wilmington, DE 19880-0328

     Re: DuPont/Nanosys Collaboration Agreement

Dear Jim:

The following represents our understanding of the status of our agreement with
DuPont (the "Agreement"):

Pursuant to section 10.2, of the Agreement, the Agreement is scheduled to
terminate three months after the Commencement Date of the Agreement, which, as
amended in Amendment A to the Agreement, is May 17th, 2004, unless the Parties
have agreed in writing to continue the collaboration under the Agreement.

At present, both Parties hereby agree to continue the Collaboration under the
Agreement. As a next step, the Parties will work expeditiously together to
formulate mutually acceptable Statements of Work, based on the learnings to
date. These Statements of Work will provide the sole basis for determining the
appropriate timing and level of ongoing funding for future tasks.

Please indicate DuPont's agreement by signing and returning this letter to my
attention via facsimile at (650) 331-2101.

Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ CALVIN CHOW
---------------
Calvin Chow
CEO, Nanosys, Inc.

Accepted and agreed:

By:     /s/ JAMES C. ROMINE
        -------------------
Name:   James C. Romine
        -------------------
Title:  Science Director
        -------------------
Date:   5/20/04
        -------------------
#### BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY v. ESS et al., Appellants.

In Banc,

November 13, 1900.

Appeal from Jackson Circuit *Court.*— Mon. *J. M. Slover,*Judge.

Affirmed.

*Ess & Georgen*and *Gage, Ladd & Small*for appellants.

*Scarritt, Griffith & J ones*for respondent.

GANTT, C. J.

This case was submitted on the same argument and along with Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. French et al., page 534, this volume. For the reasons therein given the judgment of the circuit court of Jackson county is affirmed.

All concur, except *Burgess, J.,*absent.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 220

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the

failure of the Executive to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 4, 1997

Mr. BARR of Georgia (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. GRAHAM,

Mr. SOLOMON, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr.

KINGSTON, Mrs. CUBIN, and Mrs. LINDA SMITH of Washington) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

respect to the failure of the Executive to take care that

the laws be faithfully executed.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that—

3 (1) the refusal of the Attorney General to seek

4 application for an independent counsel pursuant to

5 a request for the same from the majority of the

6 members of the House Committee on the Judiciary

7 in letters dated March 12, 1997, and September 3,

8 1997, has undermined the confidence of Congress in
2

•HRES 220 IH

1 the effectiveness of Federal law enforcement in those

2 investigations; and

3 (2) the failure to send to the Senate a nomina4 tion for the now vacant office of Assistant Attorney

5 General for the Criminal Division of the Department

6 of Justice, while allowing the functions of that As7 sistant Attorney General to be carried out by a per8 son acting in apparent violation of the Vacancies

9 Act, has resulted in the absence of prosecutors ac10 countable to Congress as well as the Executive with

11 respect to criminal-law-related investigations of Ex12 ecutive branch officials;

13 (3) this pattern of conduct constitutes a failure

14 to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1   LIONS PETROLEUM, INC.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Lions Petroleum, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley 
Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lions Petroleum, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial 
condition and results of operations of Lions Petroleum, Inc.     Date: February 19, 2007 /s/ Gordon L. Wiltse Gordon L. Wiltse Chief Financial Officer Principal Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kaitlyn Adams","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kaitlyn-e-adamsnasa-gov\/","title":"Surprisingly STEM: Space Food Scientist","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Rdn9shJHoB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/surprisingly-stem-space-food-scientist\/\">Surprisingly STEM: Space Food Scientist<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/surprisingly-stem-space-food-scientist\/embed\/#?secret=Rdn9shJHoB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Surprisingly STEM: Space Food Scientist” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Rdn9shJHoB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/xulei-wu.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION  I, John Swallow, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Timberline Resources Corporation, as amended;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 24, 2007.  /s/ John Swallow John Swallow (CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors)