alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries



|                                                |  |                              
|----------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                                            |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition Corp. II        |  | Delaware                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition Corp.           |  | Delaware                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp.            |  | Delaware                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Maryland Liquor, Inc.       |  | Maryland                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition I Texas, Inc.   |  | Texas                        
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition II Texas, Inc.  |  | Delaware                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition Texas, LP       |  | Texas                        
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Acquisition III Texas, Inc. |  | Texas                        
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmicks Hackensack, LLC           |  | Delaware                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmicks Atlanta II, LLC           |  | Delaware                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Orlando, LLC                |  | Delaware                     
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Dallas, LP                  |  | Texas                        
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Dallas Liquor, Inc.         |  | Texas                        
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Austin, LP                  |  | Texas                        
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Austin Liquor, Inc.         |  | Texas                        
|                                                | 
|McCormick & Schmick Promotions, LLC             |  | Virginia                     
|                                                | 
|The Boathouse Restaurants of Canada, Inc.       |  | British Columbia, Canada
Order entered January 2, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00904-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.P.B. AND D.Z.B., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-05-12682

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

By order dated November 7, 2017, we abated this appeal pending resolution of 

appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus. On December 19, 2017, the Court conditionally 

granted the petition for writ of mandamus and directed the trial court to issue a ruling vacating 

the June 16, 2017 default contempt order. The trial court has complied. Because the order that 

is the subject of this appeal has now been vacated, it appears this appeal is now moot. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file, within ten days, a motion to dismiss this appeal or a 

letter explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed. We caution appellant that failure to 

comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      495
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,972
<PP&E>                                          16,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,015
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,117
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,015
<SALES>                                         17,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,964
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                       308
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,313
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (86)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,227
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
## NO. 12

- 15

- 00272

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLANT

V.

DERON BOWLDS,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 123R D

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SHELBY COUNTY, TEXAS

M EMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant , the State of Texas, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. No decision has

been delivered in this appeal. Accordingly, Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the

appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered November 18, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 1 8 , 2015

NO . 12

- 15

- 00272

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant

V.

DERON BOWLDS,

Appellee

Appeal from the 123rd District Court

of Shelby County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 15

- CV

- 33,300)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, a nd the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel con sisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

# AGENCY:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled.

# ACTION:

Proposed Addition to the Procurement List.

# SUMMARY:

The Committee is proposing to add a service to the Procurement List that will be provided by a nonprofit agency employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

Comments Must Be Received on Or Before: 12/8/2014.

# ADDRESSES:

Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia, 22202-4149.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT:

                        Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email                         *CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is published pursuant to 41 USC 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed action.

## Addition

If the Committee approves the proposed addition, the entity of the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to procure the service listed below from the nonprofit agency employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

The following service is proposed for addition to the Procurement List for provision by the nonprofit agency listed:

### Service

*Service Type/Location:*                         Custodial Service, US Army Engineer District, Wilmington District, Engineer Repair Yard, 232 Battleship Road, Wilmington, NC.                    

*NPA:*                         Coastal Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc., Jacksonville, NC.                    

*Contracting Activity:*                         Dept of the Army, W074 ENDIST WILMINGTON, Wilmington, NC.                    

Barry S. Lineback,

Director, Business Operations.

[FR Doc. 2014-26483 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups


Exhibit 10.12d 






THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE
  – EXPANSION 

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is executed at
  Salt Lake City, Utah between Salt Lake Research Park Associates, a New
  Mexico Limited Partnership, by BGK Realty. Inc, a Delaware Corporation, as General
  Partner, Landlord, and NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Tenant,
  for the premises located at 420 Chipeta Way, Suites 140, 200 & 202 Salt
  Lake Citv, Utah 84108.

Landlord and Tenant being parties
  to that certain Lease dated June 3, 1994 hereby express their mutual
  desire and intent to increase the rentable area of the Leased Premises by 604
  square feet (hereafter referred to as “Expansion Space”) effective
  March 1, 1997 and amend by this writing those terms, covenants as hereinafter
  provided.


  Section 2. Leased Premises and
    Rentable Area. This Section shall be adjusted to provide as follows: That
    portion of the 1st floor of the building more fully shown on the Floor Plan
    attached hereto as Exhibit “A” – Expansion Space. The Rentable
    Area of the Premises shall hereafter mean: approximately 44,791 square
    feet.

  Section 4. Term. The term for the
    Expansion Space shall be coterminous with the existing Lease.

  Section 5. Rent. This Section shall
    be adjusted to provide as follows: The Rent for the Expansion Space shall
    be Six Thousand Forty and No/100 Dollars ($6,040.00) per annum, payable in
    monthly installments in the amount of Five Hundred Three and 33/100 Dollars
    ($503.33) in lawful money of the United States.

  Section 7. Operating Expenses. Tenant's
    Proportionate Share shall be adjusted to 39.9%.

  Tenant agrees to accept the Expansion
    Space in its “as is” condition, except that Landlord will provide
    Tenant with an improvement allowance of $3.00 per square foot or $1,812.00
    for the purpose of making improvements to the Expansion Space. All costs in
    excess of the $3.00 improvement allowance shall be the sole responsibility
    of Tenant.



Except as modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Office Lease shall remain in full force and effect.

	Landlord:
	Tenant:

	 	 
	Salt Lake Research Park
        Associates, 

        a New Mexico Limited Partnership
	NPS Pharmaceuticals,
        Inc., a

      Delaware Corporation

	 	 
	By: BGK Realty, Inc.
	 
	Its: General Partner
	 
	 	 
	By: /s/ Cheryl S. Willoughby	By: /s/ Robert K. [Illegible]
	Title: Senior Vice President	Title: Vice President, Finance
	Execution Date: March 6, 1997	Execution Date: March 3, 1997
|                            |                                                                                                                                   |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |

|                            |                                                                                                                                                         |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

|                  |                                                                                                                              |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| November 3, 2010 | /s/Andrew J. Welch                                                                                                           |
|             | Andrew J. Welch                                                                                                              |
|             | Chief Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging T rust Incorporated, as general partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership |
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 261 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                 House Calendar No. 105
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 261

                          [Report No. 105-311]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2158) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans 
 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
 agencies, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 1997

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2158) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans 
 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
 agencies, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2158) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and 
Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent agencies, 
commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.
                                     





                                                 House Calendar No. 105

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 261

                          [Report No. 105-311]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2158) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans 
 Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent 
 agencies, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 7, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danielle Sempsrott","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/danielle-c-sempsrottnasa-gov\/","title":"Carla Koch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0j9czktHRz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/carla-koch\/\">Carla Koch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/carla-koch\/embed\/#?secret=0j9czktHRz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Carla Koch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0j9czktHRz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/cropped-nasa_meatball.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Jobs","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BqyarRXigO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-jobs\/\">NASA Jobs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-jobs\/embed\/#?secret=BqyarRXigO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Jobs” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BqyarRXigO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-20170609-PH_KLS01_0036\/KSC-20170609-PH_KLS01_0036~large.jpg?w=600&h=1280&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1280}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6353
RICHARD A. SCHMIDT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-536-N) Submitted: September 12, 1995 Decided: January 16, 1996 Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard A. Schmidt, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Kathryn Grill Graeff, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Schmidt v. Smith , No. CA-94-536-N (D. Md. Feb. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED