alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ngai Keung Luk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ngai Keung Luk
-------------------------
Ngai Keung Luk
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

August 22, 2005


<PAGE>

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Darrie Lam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Darrie Lam
-------------------------
Darrie Lam
Chief Financial Officer

August 22, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Edward Trinidad

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02996

Honorable Maria Valdez

Andrew Marshall Saul

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, December 15, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Maria Valdez: Defendant's Unopposed

Motion for First Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief [19] is granted.

Defendant's responsive filing is now due 1/27/21, and Plaintiff's reply is due 2/10/21.

Mailed notice (lp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02996 Document #: 20 Filed: 12/15/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:642
Land Lease with Hsinchu Science Park Administration



 Exhibit 4.13 
  
 (English Summary) 
  
 LEASE 
  
 Parties:

  
 SCIENCE PARK ADMINISTRATION (the “Lessor”)

  
 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED (the
“Lessee”) 
  
 Leased Premises: 
  
 The government-owned land containing 38,000 square meters, located on
SciencePark at lot no. 255-27, Jinshan, Hsinchu. 
  
 Lease Term:

  
 Commencing May 1, 2001 and expiring on December 31, 2020.

  
 Rental: 
  
 The rental shall be forty-seven New Taiwan Dollars and thirty cents (NT$47.30) per square meter per month. 
  
 The total amount of monthly rent shall be one million seven hundred
ninety-seven thousand and four hundred New Taiwan Dollars (NT$1,797,400). 
  
 Lessee shall pay the rental amount of NT$1,797,400 each month. The first month’s rent shall be paid to Lessor on the commencement date of this Lease. Lessee shall pay the rent to Lessor each month thereafter in
accordance with the procedures set forth by Lessor in this Lease and shall separately calculate and pay business tax. 
  
 During the term of the Lease, should the government adjust the land price in accordance with relevant regulations, Lessee agrees to a proportionate
adjustment of the rent by the Lessor, the adjustment of which is to be made effective in the month following the adjustment by the government. 
  









 Termination by Lessor: 
  

Lessor may terminate the Lease at any time if any of following shall happen: 
  
 a. Lessee is disqualified from operating in or ordered by the Lessor to withdraw from the Science Park; 
  
 b. Lessee violates any term or provision of this Lease pertaining to the
use of the land; 
  
 c. Lessee has defaulted in the payment of
the monthly rent for two or more years; 
  
 d. Lessee fails to
apply for a construction licence within three months from execution of this Lease; after the Lessor has set a time limit for such application and the Lessee fails to apply for such licence within such time limit; or the application is inadequate and
the Lessee has been ordered to supplement the application and fails to do so within such time limit; or 
  
 e. Lessee violates any term or provision of this Lease pertaining to construction measures. 
  
 Miscellaneous: 
  
 Upon expiration, Lessee shall sell its buildings, equipment and permanent fixtures on the leased property or shall dismantle such buildings, equipment and
permanent fixtures and abandon all facilities inside of such premises, and return the land to Lessor. 
  
 This Lease shall be effective from the commencement date, which shall be the earlier of the execution date of the Lease, or the starting date of the
Lease. 
  
 Should any suit arise from this Lease, Lessor and
Lessee agree that the governing law shall be the laws of the Republic of China and the Taiwan Hsinchu District Court shall be the competent court of jurisdiction in the first instance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4

Eastern Division

G G (a minor), et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02335

Honorable Andrea R. Wood

Salesforce.com, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, February 23, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Andrea R. Wood: Telephonic status hearing

held on 2/23/2022. Plaintiff having filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) [100] the claims against Defendant Backpage.com, LLC are

dismissed without prejudice. Telephonic status hearing set for 4/8/2022 at 10:00 AM. To

ensure public access to court proceedings, members of the public and media may call in to

listen to telephonic hearings. The call−in number is (888) 557−8511 and the access code

is 3547847. Counsel of record will receive an email 30 minutes prior to the start of the

telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted remote access to

proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and

rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in

sanctions, including removal of court−issued media credentials, restricted entry to future

hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by

the Court. Mailed notice (dal, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02335 Document #: 101 Filed: 02/23/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1214
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE NORTHERN 

DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN 

DIVISION

Prinzo & Associates, LLC, on behalf of itself and 

 all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

BMO Harris Bank N.A.; BMO Financial Corp., a 

Delaware corporation; and Does 1-100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

 Case No. 1:20-cv-3256 

Hon. Gary S. Feinerman 

NOTICE OF MOTION 

Please take notice that on Thursday, August 20, 2020 at 9:00 a.m., or as soon 

thereafter as I may be heard, I shall appear telephonically pursuant to the Fifth 

Amended General Order 20-0012 before the Honorable Judge Gary S. Feinerman or 

any judge sitting in his stead and shall then and there present Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/Jeffrey E. Jamison 

BMO Harris Bank N.A. & BMO Financial Corp. 

Jeffrey E. Jamison 

Julie Rodriguez Aldort 

BMO Harris Bank N.A. 

111 West Monroe 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Tel. (312) 461-4694 

Email: jeffrey.jamison@bmo.com 

Email: julie.aldort@bmo.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-03256 Document #: 28 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:142
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned attorney hereby certifies that the aforementioned document 

was filed through the Court’s CM/ECF system on August 14, 2020. Parties of record 

may obtain a copy through the Court’s CM/ECF system. The undersigned certifies 

that no party of record requires service of documents through any means other than 

the CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Jeffrey E. Jamison

Case: 1:20-cv-03256 Document #: 28 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:143
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BOBBETH MORGAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-804

[February 8, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Michael I. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-

11899CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and James W. McIntire, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, (withdrawn as counsel after filing 

brief), and Michael J. Entin, P.A., and Frank A. Maister, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard 

Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., GROSS and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2019

No. 04-19-00474-CV

IN THE INTEREST B.J.A., A CHILD,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00541

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. The appellant’s brief was originally due on September 3, 2019. Appellant has filed a 

motion for a 13-day extension of time to file the brief until September 23, 2019. The motion is 

GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due no later than September 23, 2019. Given the time 

constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will 

be disfavored.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.1

 

 

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

 

The undersigned, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), with respect to CorTSTrust II For Goldman Sachs Capital I, on whose behalf  Structured Products Corp. has prepared this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”), certifies as follows:

 

1.         The Trustee is the trustee under the trust agreement.

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, for the periods included in the year covered by the Annual Report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations, including any servicing obligations, under the trust agreement.

 

 

 

            /s/ Janet P. O'Hara          

Name:   Janet P. O'Hara

Title:     Vice President

Date:     March 14, 2011

 

 

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

h0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148603

MARILYNNE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 148603

COA: 311240

Wayne CC: 09-031957-NI

TAMMY SCHOONOVER and LYLE

SCHOONOVER,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2901

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Kobyashi Jones, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 27, 2008 Filed: December 4, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kobyashi Jones pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He was sentenced to 180 months’ imprisonment as an armed career criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) after the district court found that Jones had three prior violent felonies, one for committing the Missouri offense of tampering in the first degree based upon his conduct in operating a vehicle without the owner’s consent. See United States v. Jones , 224 Fed. Appx. 548 (8th Cir. 2007). Following our affirmance of Jones’s sent ence, the United States Supreme Court granted Jones’s petition for certiorari, vacat ed our judgment, and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Begay v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 1581 (2008). SeeJones v. United States , 128 S. Ct. 2047 (2008).-2- We recently held that the Missouri cr ime of tampering does not qualify as a “crime of violence” for purposes of U.S. Se ntencing Guideline § 2K2.1(a)(2), United States v. Williams , 537 F.3d 969, 974-75 (8th Cir. 2008), a term we recognize as synonymous with the term “violent felony” for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, seeUnited States v. Johnson , 417 F.3d 990, 996 (8th Cir. 2007) (“The statutory definition of ‘violent felony’ is viewed as interchangeable with the guidelines definition of ‘crime of violence.’”).
Based on the holding in Williams , we vacate Jones’s sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing.

______________________________
**Exhibit10(zz)**

 

**ASSIGNMENT**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Maker of this instrument, TLMHOLDINGS CORP. (hereinafter referred to as the “Assignor”), has assigned, transferred, and delivered, and by these presents does assign, transfer, and deliver, unto ACCESS WORLDWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (hereinafter referred to as the“Assignee”), all of the Assignor’s right, title, and interest in the Consulting Agreement dated June 24, 1999, as amended from time to time (the “Agreement”), and the Assignee hereby accepts said assignment and agrees to bebound by and perform all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under and pursuant to the Agreement. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have hereunto caused their hands and seals to be affixed as of this 1st day of January, 2003.
Exhibit
      32





ENERGENX,
      INC.





SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, GARY A. BEDINI,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
      solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
      Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:
      April 21, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Gary A.
                BediniGary
                A. Bedini





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RICK M. STREET,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
      solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
      Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:
      April 21, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Rick M.
                StreetRick
                M. Street
{"id":11324,"count":25,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/asteroids\/near-earth-asteroid\/","name":"Near-Earth Asteroid (NEA)","slug":"near-earth-asteroid","taxonomy":"category","parent":3241,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/11324"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/3241"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=11324"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=11324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
**!**

**. -** 

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**
**AUSTIN**

Mr. James E. Kilday,Xreotor Motor Trtmwortation Zivislon X8llrood Cor~s6ion of Teres Austin, Texae January 11, 1939

Dear Xr. Kilday: GpinlonHo. 042

Your letter of J Attomiry Genertdof ‘iexsa Of thiS department tO~3th tinant portion of

has been in d in wverfiled aith t!liu

TAviuiorr

an 63~~1io~~t:on, covtmod by our Loc.-.et i;o. &LB, by mioh h8 aska for a ho?jricg on tha q'lestion

of his obtnininc;

cerr;rin

&ut::ority

from tiio KAlrozd tonz,lsslm,:Aich said a,;~licctlon ia stoxi on our dookat wLmt as followe:. -

Mr. Jamea IL Kllday, January 11, 1939, Page 2

'Applioation

of A. IL HoConald L!otor

FreightLime for a certificateauthorizing operationof a comon oarrier motor oarrisr service over tne fOllOWirving

POUt88: NO. 1 - Houston, Tex29, to TexasOklahone Statfl idne near Denison, TB~zES,

via U.S. X&way 7J; NO. 2 - IIouston; Texas, to San hntonio,Texas, via iJ. si. Highway 90; No. 3 - ban hatania, Texas, to Port Xorth and Dallas,Texes, via U. j. Hi&hvfay

81, sl?n

Antcnio to Fort Xorth, ead C. 5. 3igAwoys 81 and 77, San Antonio to Sallas; NO. 4 - Eouston to Lellas end ifort

**iiorth,** via ikC0 enci G’

. S. liighuraya

290 and 190, iIouston to ?1+3c0

U. b. i:iC;?;;;ay

77, Waao to DallasU.S. Zi&-tiay dl, 'Uaco to Fort 'ibrth;

Ko. 5 - Mania to Fort i;orth, via. State Zig+ way 34; l,;or

6 - Tort i'iorth

to Dallas,via State Eiyh'.tiay 15. All routeswith say aad all other routes. Interstateservice only. Using ten trucks.'

"In V18W of this situationyour plmlpt advice is requestedon the followingqueatlona:
"1. Xl11 the granting of a hearing by the hallroadComission GU tts aforesaid applicationin my my jeopardizethe rights of the Ltato in tne litigation above elmtioned?
"2. In view of the eiitire situationes reflectedby your fih.6 in the afOresaid 1ltlgs;ionend other::ioe, is :.:r. XLonda now entitledto a hecriw on the al'oresaid applicrtion*:"
Sin08 your letterWaS r8C8iYed**by** this de>artmsnt, the 5uprcmeCourt of the kitec: titates overruledttie

motion for rehearing in the I'.cDonald case, this boiry; the case, itMr. Jez~l, E. Kilde7, January 11, 1939, ?a60 3

is unneoeaoeryto **e.nsmr** the first question.

In answer to the seoond question in 7our latter, It is ny opinion and you era so advised that the hpplicmt in zpestionwoould

be entitled to 6 kmring on the qplication cow pmdln,; beforeyour **departnuct provldlnp**  the a??licant has coqlied with ~rov1sionsof Article Ollb, F.cvlsed Civil Ytstutes of Texts.

BY Assistant . - L

OK-6.H.L.