alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Section 906 Certification
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR
 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Andrew A. Wiederhorn, Chief Executive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.
 
 This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.
 
 
 March 30, 2010

/s/ Andrew A. WiederhornDate

Andrew A. WiederhornChief Executive Officer
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00250-CR

IN RE RUSSELL WADE EASON

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Russell Wade Eason, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. There are 

numerous procedural problems with the petition, but we use Rule 2 to look beyond 

those problems and deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed July 21, 2010

Do not publish

[OT06]
GENERAL PROXY

To the Board of Directors of XML-Global Technologies, Inc.:

I hereby constitute and appoint Peter Shandro or Simon Anderson, either one of them, and in place of either, in case of substitution, his substitute, attorneys and agents for me and in my name, place and stead, to vote as my proxy at any Regular or Special Meeting, and at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, of the Stockholders of XML-Global Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") upon any question which may be brought before such meeting, including the election of directors, any and all shares of voting securities of the Company that I should be entitled to vote if then personally present, with full power to each of my said attorneys to appoint a substitute in his place.

This proxy shall remain in full force and effect until revoked in writing, by the undersigned, but this proxy shall be irrevocable until January 31, 2005. The undersigned acknowledges that this proxy is coupled with an interest within the meaning of CRS Section 7-107-203(5)(e) inasmuch as it is given in connection with a voting agreement entered into concurrently herewith.

|Dated:_____________________________ | Paradigm Group II, LLC            
|----------------------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                                    | By and through its General Partner
|                                    | By:_______________________        
|                                    | Name:_____________________        
|                                    | Managing Member
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 3, 2010 | /s/Richard A. Smith                       |
|-------------|-------------------------------------------|
|        | Richard A. Smith                          |
|        | Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging |
|        | Trust Incorporated, as general partner of |
|        | FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership        |
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Air Taxi Design Challenge","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7MrAUMvulb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/air-taxi-design-challenge\/\">Air Taxi Design Challenge<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/air-taxi-design-challenge\/embed\/#?secret=7MrAUMvulb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Air Taxi Design Challenge” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7MrAUMvulb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/air-taxi.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
[783 NYS2d 744]

#### 111 on 11 Realty Corp., Appellant, v William Norton, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department,

July 21, 2004

*29APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jeffrey H. Roth,*New York City, for appellant. *Silberman & Rhine, LLP,*New York City *(Arthur Rhine*of counsel), for William Norton, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Appeal from order unanimously dismissed.

Final judgment unanimously reversed without costs, petition reinstated, and matter remanded to the court below for entry of a final judgment in favor of landlord after a hearing to determine the amount of use and occupancy owed.

No appeal as of right lies from an order which does not decide a motion made on notice (CCA 1702 [a] [2]). A motion on notice is made when an order to show cause or notice of motion is served (CPLR 2211).

Upon a review of the record, it is the view of this court that tenant Norton and the other tenants in the building concealed the fact that the premises were being used residentially and that landlord’s principal and landlord’s predecessor credibly testified that they were unaware of the residential use of the premises. We note that the fact that tenants paid the superintendent to assist them with the conversion work cannot, in the circumstances presented, provide a basis to impute the superintendent’s knowledge to landlord.

Pesce, PJ., Patterson and Golia, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ngai Keung Luk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ngai Keung Luk
-------------------------
Ngai Keung Luk
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30061 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANDRE ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-30018-ALL

-------------------- July 30, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Andre Adams has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Adams has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Adams’s opposition discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3, 4 AND 5 OF THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,671
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            50
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,721)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information financial information for Marisa
Christina, Incorporated's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1999 and
the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year then ended and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company's Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         346,006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,877,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                   253,264
<INVENTORY>                                 10,522,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,882,523
<PP&E>                                       3,861,586
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,843,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,531,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,647,733
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,868
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,798,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,531,700
<SALES>                                     62,507,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,507,833
<CGS>                                       46,719,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,719,629
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,035,812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               211,324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             752,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,127,908)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (5,151,372)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (8,279,280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (8,279,280)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.07)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.                                        
<ARTICLE>                                              5
<CIK>                                                  0001048644
<NAME>                                                 MPEL HOLDINGS CORP.
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     713,145
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            7,187,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                              6,974,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                     670,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          15,546,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            0
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                    94,085
<OTHER-SE>                                                  65,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            15,546,696
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         7,497,435
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         8,704,097
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         1,291,896
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (2,498,558)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (2,498,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (2,498,558)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Butler, &c., *v.*Melinda Butler.

Descent and Distribution — Death—Subsequent Legislation.

The right of the widow and heirs in and to the estate of the decedent vested in them, at his death, and no subsequent legislation can divest them of the interest they acquired.

Dower — Failure of Heirs to Allot Cost.

It is the duty of heirs to have the widow’s dower alloted her and upon their failure to do so, it was right and proper for her to institute proceedings against them, for that purpose, and the cost of such a proceeding must be paid by the heirs.

*654APPEAL PROM JESSAMINE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 9, 1872.

Bronaugh, *for appellants.*

McKee, *for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Chiee Justice Pryor:

The act of the Legislature approved the 17th of March, 1870, entitled “An Act for the benefit of the widows and orphans, of this State,” does not apply to the claim set up by the widow of John Butler, deceased. The right of the widow and heirs, in and to the estate of the decedent vested in them, at his death, and no subsequent legislation can divest them of the interest they acquired. It was the duty of the heirs to have the widow’s dower allotted her, and upon their failure to do so, it was right and proper for her to institute proceedings against them for that purpose, and the costs of such a proceeding must be paid by the heirs. The judgment of the court below, so far as it allows the widow, one hundred and sixty-five dollars in lieu of the property she claims by reason of the act of March, 1870, is reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
VII

Private Calendar No. 5

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 998

[Report No. 105–223]

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1995

Mr. DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 31, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

4 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

5 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of Fairfax, Virginia, the

7 sum of $253,488.
2

•HR 998 RH

1 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

2 shall be to compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries

3 sustained by him as a result of the administration to him,

4 without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by

5 United States Army personnel in 1957.

6 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

7 The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in

8 full satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have

9 against the United States for any injury described in such

10 section.

11 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

12 Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1,

13 Lloyd B. Gamble shall not be eligible for any compensa14 tion or benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs

15 or the Department of Defense for any injury described in

16 such section.

17 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

18 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

19 percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be

20 paid to or received by any agent or attorney for any service

21 rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in connection with the bene22 fits provided by this Act. Any person who violates this sec23 tion shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject

24 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

25 Code.

Private Calendar No. 

5

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 998

[Report No. 105–223]

A BILL

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

JULY 31, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed