alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 1

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 06/30/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:350
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ANDREW J. MAXWELL, not individually, 

but as Trustee for the estate of Eduardo Garcia 

and Julia Escamilla (nka Julia Garcia), et al.,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 1:20-cv-02402

Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Judge Heather K. McShain

DECLARATION OF ANGELA A. SMEDLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES

I, Angela A. Smedley, hereby declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of New York, have been 

admitted pro hac vice in the State of Illinois, and am a partner with Winston & Strawn LLP, 

counsel for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Defendant”) in the above-captioned matter. 

2. On June 23, 2021, I requested a 30-day extension for Wells Fargo to respond to 

Plaintiff’s written discovery requests. Counsel for Plaintiff did not consent to a 30-day extension 

of the discovery deadlines. On June 24, 2021, I reduced the request for an extension from 30 

days to 21 days, and, later that day, counsel for Plaintiff refused to agree to a 21-day extension of 

the discovery deadlines. 

I hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements made by me 

are true and correct.

Dated: June 30, 2021 /s/ Angela A. Smedley

Angela A. Smedley

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 06/30/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:351
Certificate of Service

The undersigned, an attorney, hereby certifies that on the 30th day of June, 2021, the 

foregoing Declaration of Angela A. Smedley in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Extend 

Discovery Deadlines was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court for the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and was served by operation of that Court’s 

electronic filing system on all parties of record. 

Dated: June 30, 2021 /s/ Angela A. Smedley

Angela A. Smedley

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 35-1 Filed: 06/30/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:352
Form of Letter Agreement Between Sand Hill Security, LLC and Registrant




 Exhibit 10.11 
 SAND HILL IT SECURITY ACQUISITION CORP. 
  
                          , 2004 
  
 Sand Hill Security LLC 
 3000 Sand Hill Road

 Building 1, Suite 240 
 Menlo Park, California 94025

  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the
registration statement for the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp. (“TAC”) and continuing for a period of the earlier of (i) twenty-four (24) months or (ii) until the
consummation by TAC of a “Business Combination” (as described in TAC’s IPO prospectus), Sand Hill Security LLC shall make available to TAC certain office and secretarial services as may be required by TAC from time to time, situated
at 3000 Sand Hill Road, Building 1, Suite 240, Menlo Park, California 94025. In exchange therefore, TAC shall pay Sand Hill Security LLC the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,
  
 SAND HILL IT SECURITY ACQUISITION CORP.

		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	

	 Name:
	 	 Humphrey P. Polanen

	 Title:
	 	 Chairman of the Board



  

			
	 AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
  
 SAND HILL SECURITY LLC

		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	

	Name:	 	 
	 	 	

	Title:
#### C. W. FLOYD COFFIN, SOLE SURVIVING EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF HARRIET D. COFFIN, DECEASED, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM D. KELLY, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. IN THE MATTER OF THE TRANSFER INHERITANCE TAX IN THE ESTATE OF HARRIET D. COFFIN, DECEASED.

Submitted May 25, 1945

Decided September 27, 1945.

For the prosecutor-appellant, Morrison, *Lloyd*cf; *Morrison (.Francis V. D. Lloyd).*

For the defendant-respondent, *Waller D. Van*Riper, Attorney-General, and *William A. Moore.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Chief Justice Brogan. That opinion appears to adopt the..reasoning of the opinion in the Prerogative Court, 133 *N. J. Eq.*188, as to the effect of the probable continuance of the period of enjoyment under the deeds of trust beyond the normal expectancj’' of life of the donor. We are left in some doubt as to whether the Vice-Ordinary regarded the creation of a trust to remain effective for a period beyond the probable duration of the life of the donor as creating a legal presumption that the transfer was made in contemplation of death. While the provisions of the trust in that and every other respect were a part of the body of proof from which the court was authorized to, and did, find the fact regarding the donor’s intention, the likelihood of continued enjoyment by the beneficiaries of the donor’s gifts for a period beyond the normal expectancy of life of the *253donor did not as a matter of *law*establish the transactions as transfers made in contemplation of death. It is important to distinguish between purely factual findings and findings that involve the applications of legal presumptions or other forms of legal principles. The practical bearing is that in such matters this court accepts without review a finding of fact made by the Supreme Court where there is evidence to sustain it, *Dommerich*v. Kelly, 132 *N. J. L.*141; but a finding of law, or an application of a legal principle to a finding of fact, is, of course, reviewable by us. We understand that the basis of determination by both the Prerogative Court and the Supreme Court was a strict finding of the facts as such.

*For affirmance*— Parker, Case, Donges, Heiter, Peksjkie, Oliphant, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McG-eeuan, . JJ. 11.

*For reversal*— Mone.
#### Mitchell *v.*Likens.

If the names of the petit jurors have not been recorded by the clerk, conformably to the statute, it is a good cause of challenge to the array.

APPEAL from the *Harrison*Circuit Court. *Likens*was' the plaintiff in the Circuit Court, and *Mitchell the*defendant. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

*J. H. Farnham*and *H. P. Thornton,*for the appellant.

*C. Dewey,*for the appellee.

Stevens, J.

There is but one objection raised to the record, judgment, and proceedings in this case, and that is exhibited in a bill of exceptions.

It appears that when the cause was called for trial in the Circuit Court, and the jury were about to be sworn, the defendant challenged the array for misconduct, neglect, or default in the clerk, in not having recorded the panel, as he'is, by the 1st-section of the act regulating the mode of “summoning and impanelling grand and petit jurors,” of the 29th day of *January,*1831, required to do; and that the Court'overruled the challenge, and the jury were sworn.

We think that this challenge was well taken, and that it should have prevailed. It is settled in the case of *Jones*v. *The State,*decided at the *May*term, 1832, of this Court (1), that the array may be challenged and the panel quashed, for any partiality or *default .of the*hoard doing county business, or of the clerk in selecting or arraying the panel. *Gardner*v. *Turner,*9 Johns. Rep. *260.*—Eaton v. *The Commonwealth,*6 Binn. Rep. 447.

We think it is one of the essential requisites of the statute, that the clerk, so soon as the several jurors’ names are drawn and written on the panels to which they belong, shall record them without delay, and before any *venire facias*issues thereon, in the order-book as required by the act.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the verdict set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 Ante, p. 37.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25932]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS14-10]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: Federal Reserve Board--International Square location, 
1850 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    Date: November 12, 2014.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Reports

Chairman
Executive Director
Delegated State Compliance Reviews
Financial Report
Appraisal Subcommittee Advisory Committee

Action Items

September 10, 2014 minutes--Open Session
FY15 Appraisal Foundation Grant Proposal

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    If you plan to attend the meeting in person, we ask that you notify 
the Federal Reserve Board via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5233222220333b21333e7f23273721263b3d3c21123420307c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e584959597848c968489c894908096918c8a8b96a5839787cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>, 
requesting a return meeting registration email. The Federal Reserve Law 
Enforcement Unit will then send an email message with a Web link where 
you may provide your date of birth and social security number through 
their encrypted system. You may register until close of business 
November 6, 2014. You will also be asked to provide identifying 
information, including a valid government-issued photo ID, before being 
admitted to the meeting. Alternatively, you can contact Kevin Wilson at 
202-452-2362 for other registration options. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: October 27, 2014.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-25932 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Dickson *v.*Kelsey, on Appeal.

*DICKSOJV*and *Kelsey*having bought lands and built mills in partnership, executed á written agreement, stating that *Dickson*had bought *Kelsey’s*interest in the mills and land adjoining them, and was to pay him for the-same 500 dollars. In a suit by *Kelsey*against *Dickson*on this agreement, *Dickson*demanded,, by way of set-off, a certain sum of money which he alleged he had advanced for *Ke}sey,*in building the mills. '

*Held, that Kelsey*might introduce a.‘witness tó prove, in opposition to *Dickson’s*demand, that *Dickson*had acknowledged, after the dáte of the written agreement, that the money mentioned in that agreement, was to be over and above the expenses of building the mills.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the accompanying Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for thequarter ended September 30, 2003, I, Andrew A. Wiederhorn, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) such Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) theinformation contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

 

This writtenstatement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-Q.

 

 
| November   13, 2003 |   | /s/   Andrew A. Wiederhorn      |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Date                     |   | Andrew A. Wiederhorn                 |
|                     |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cynthia L. Dunn,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03879-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8426 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
9699.

#### Eggler *v.*Southern Railway Company.

Decided October 16, 1918.

Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Eeid. April 2, 1918.

*B. B. Arnold,,*for plaintiff. *McDaniel & Blade,*for defendant.

Wade, C. J.

1. Exception was taken to the ruling of the trial judge that this case came under the provisions, of the Federal employer’s liability act, but in the reply brief of counsel for plaintiff in error this exception is expressly abandoned, and it is there agreed that the case be determined undbr the terms of that act. The merits of the exception therefore will not be considered.

' 2. The case being determined under the Federal employer’s liability act, there was no presumption of negligence against the railroad company upon proof of the killing of the plaintiff’s husband. The burden was upon the plaintiff to make out her case by proof of every essential element. This burden.was not carried; for a consideration of the entire evidence adduced, together with all reasonable inferences that might be drawn therefrom, compels the conclusion that the deceased did not come to his death as a result of negligence of the defendant.

3. The trial judge did not err in awarding a nonsuit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenlcins and Lulce, JJ., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Graf","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/agraf\/","title":"Axiom Mission 3","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZPkPTFy21U\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/axiom-mission-3\/\">Axiom Mission 3<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/axiom-mission-3\/embed\/#?secret=ZPkPTFy21U\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Axiom Mission 3” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ZPkPTFy21U\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ax3-featured-image.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"About the Office of the General Counsel","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"K9CuF5f05Q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/about-the-office-of-the-general-counsel\/\">About the Office of the General Counsel<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/about-the-office-of-the-general-counsel\/embed\/#?secret=K9CuF5f05Q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“About the Office of the General Counsel” — NASA\" data-secret=\"K9CuF5f05Q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 23(a)

                       CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



<PAGE>


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the registration  statement of
Giant Cement Holding, Inc. on Form S-8 (filed May 16, 1995) of our reports dated
February 5, 1998 (except as to Note 14, for which the date is March 23, 1998) on
our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements  and financial  statement
schedule of Giant Cement Holding,  Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which reports are
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Charlotte, North Carolina
March 30, 1998




<PAGE>
H. Res. 122

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 8, 1997.

Whereas currency is used by virtually everyone in everyday

life, including blind and visually impaired persons;

Whereas the Federal reserve notes of the United States are

inaccessible to individuals with visual disabilities;

Whereas the Americans with Disabilities Act enhances the

economic independence and equal opportunity for full

participation in society for individuals with disabilities;

Whereas most blind and visually impaired persons are therefore required to rely upon others to determine denominations of such currency;

Whereas this constitutes a serious impediment to independence in everyday living;

Whereas electronic means of bill identification will always be

more fallible than purely tactile means;

Whereas tactile currency already exists in 23 countries worldwide; and

Whereas the currency of the United States is presently undergoing significant changes for security purposes: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
2

•HRES 122 EH

(1) endorses the efforts recently begun by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to upgrade the currency

for security reasons; and

(2) strongly encourages the Secretary of the Treasury and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing to incorporate cost-effective, tactile features into the design

changes, thereby including the blind and visually impaired community in independent currency usage.

Attest:

Clerk.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danielle Sempsrott","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/danielle-c-sempsrottnasa-gov\/","title":"Kim Ess","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"J1Fxadscz7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kim-ess\/\">Kim Ess<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kim-ess\/embed\/#?secret=J1Fxadscz7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Kim Ess” — NASA\" data-secret=\"J1Fxadscz7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/kim-ess-bio.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":736}