alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Worldwide Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report), I, Richard A. Lyew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ RICHARD A. LYEW                                                                                                              
|Richard A. Lyew Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting
officer) August 14, 2006
May 23, 2016 

Clerk's Office 

New Castle County Superior Court 

500 N. King St. #3500 

Wilmington, DE 19801 

ATTN: Civil File Counter 

RE: REMAND TO NEW CASTLE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 

 District Court Case Number: CV-16-336-PHX-DGC 

 Superior Court Case Numbers: N15C-09-207-CLS 

Dear Clerk of Court: 

Enclosed is a certified copy of the Order entered in this Court on May 23, 2016, 

remanding the above case to New Castle County Superior Court for the State of 

Delaware. 

Sincerely, 

BRIAN D. KARTH, DCE/CLERK OF COURT 

 S/M. Pruneau 

Deputy Clerk 

Enclosure 

cc: all counsel

 

United States District Court District of Arizona Office of the Clerk

 

Brian D. Karth 

District Court Executive / Clerk Of Court 

Sandra Day O'Connor U. S. Courthouse, Suite 130 

401 West Washington Street, SPC 1 

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2118

Michael S. O’Brien 

Chief Deputy Clerk 

Evo A. DeConcini U.S. Courthouse 

405 W. Congress, Suite 1500 

Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

Debra D. Lucas 

Chief Deputy Clerk 

Sandra Day O’Connor U. S. Courthouse, Suite 130

401 West Washington Street, SPC 1 

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2118 

Case 2:16-cv-00336-DGC Document 26-1 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Aeronautics: Flight Log Experience","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LmVkOBgb32\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/flight-log-experience\/\">Aeronautics: Flight Log Experience<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/flight-log-experience\/embed\/#?secret=LmVkOBgb32\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Aeronautics: Flight Log Experience” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LmVkOBgb32\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/flight-log_0.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FogCutter Capital Group Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”),I, R. Scott Stevenson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of FogCutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Fog Cutter Capital GroupInc.

 

Thiswritten statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionas an exhibit to the Report.

 

 
| November 14,  2005 |                             | /s/ R. Scott  Stevenson |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date                    | R. Scott  Stevenson              |
|                    | Senior Vice  President and Chief |
|                    | Financial  Officer               |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by § 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C HANDR

AM A M ISHR

A, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. SAM UEL S. START TON VA M EDIC AL C ENTER ; U.S. DEPARTM ENT OF VETER ANS AFFAIR S, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-35719 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-00561-M JP M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington M arsha J. Pe c hm an, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. C ha ndram a M i shra a p p e a ls pro sefrom

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dism issing for lac k of subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion his ac tion a lle ging a c la im re late d to his a ppointm e nt a

n d pa y for a position with the De p artm e nt of Ve te rans Affa i rs.



# FIL ED JUL 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e hav e jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. Mangano v .

Unite d State s , 529 F.3d 1243, 1245 n.2 (9th C ir. 2008). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly dismisse d M ishra ’ s a c tion be c a use it is pre c lude d by the C ivil Se rvic e R e form Ac t (“ C SR

A” ). Se eid. at 1247-48 (C SR A lim its fe de ra l e m

p loy e e s c ha lle nging “

prohibite d pe rsonne l pra c tic e s ,” de fine d a s a ny

“ pe rsonne l a c tion” ta

ke n for a n im prope r m otive , to a

n a dm inistra

tive re m e d ia l sy ste m (c iting 5 U.S.C . § 2302)); Saul v . Unite d State s , 928 F.2d 829, 834 (9th C ir. 1991) (broa dly

c onstruing the

de finition of “

p e rsonne l a c tion” ). The distric t c ourt prope rly de nie d M ishra ’ s m otion for de fa ult judgme nt be c a use de fe nda

nts file d a tim e ly re sponse to his c om

pla int. Se e Fe d. R . C iv. P. 12(a )(2), (3), an d

(4); Eite l v . Mc C

o ol , 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th C i r. 1986) (se tting forth sta

nda rd of re vie w ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 3 5 7 1 9 2
#### Stephen P. Hogg *v.*A. J. Fraizer, etc.

Sheriffs and Constable — Neglect of Official Duty — Motion—Jurisdiction.

The question of jurisdiction is the only question involved in this appeal and that was settled in the cases cited below.

APPEAL FROM OWSLEY CIRCUIT COURT.

April 12, 1871.

*Hogg, for appellant.*

*Lilly, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

This was a motion instituted by appellant against Appellee Fraizier, constable of Breathitt county, and his sureties in the Owsley quarterly court, for -neglect of official duty on the part of Fraizier in Breathitt county.

The quarterly court having rendered judgment for appellant for the amount claimed, Fraizier appealed to the circuit court, and there the motion was dismissed, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The question of jurisdiction is the only one involved in this appeal and that is settled by this court in two recent cases, after being elaborately argued and maturely considered, adversely to appellant. The first is *Groom’s Administration v.*Pickett, 4 Bush 372, and second, *Foster, etc., v. Wade and the Commonwealth,*lb. 628. It had been previously adjudicated by this court in *Bank of Ky. v. Harrison, etc.,*1 Bush 384, but at the solicitation of counsel the question was again considered in the cases cited and the last named decision approved.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 22, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1113

Lower Tribunal No. 18-12194

________________

Paulo Cesar Mantegazza Pomelli, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Paola Mantegazza Pomelli, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C. 

Miller, Judge.

Giasi Law, P.A., and Melissa A. Giasi (Tampa), for appellants.

Kobre & Kim LLP, and Gabriela Ruiz, for appellee, Kobre & Kim LLP; 

Nelson Mullins Broad and Cassel, and Kimberly J. Freedman, Amy Steele 

Donner, and Erin K. Kolmansberger1, for appellee, Paola Mantegazza 

Pomelli.

Before EMAS, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

1

 A Notice of Waiver of Answer Brief has been filed by appellee Paola 

Mantegazza Pomelli.
2

Affirmed. See Afrazeh v. Miami Elevator Co. of Am., 769 So. 2d 399, 

401 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (stating a trial court’s award of attorney’s fees made 

pursuant to a charging lien will not be disturbed “absent a clear abuse of 

discretion”); Lopez v. Hernandez, 291 So. 3d 1007, 1009 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2020) (“We review a trial court’s decision to award a charging lien to an 

attorney for abuse of discretion.”); Bateman v. Serv. Ins. Co., 836 So. 2d 

1109, 1111 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (reasoning that where an evidentiary hearing 

is held and the “record contains some competent substantial evidence 

supporting the fee[,] . . . [including] testimony from the attorney performing 

the services,” a trial court does not abuse its discretion by awarding 

attorney’s fees).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark Brnovich

Attorney General

James Driscoll-MacEachron, Bar No. 027828

Kara M. Karlson, Bar No. 029407

Assistants Attorney General

1275 W. Washington

Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2997

Telephone: (602) 542-8137

Fax: (602) 542-8308

James.Driscoll-MacEachron@azag.gov

Kara.karlson@azag.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brian Edward Malnes,

Plaintiff,

vs.

State of Arizona; Michele Reagan,

Defendants.

Case No: 3:16-cv-08008-GMS

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Defendants the State of Arizona and Arizona Secretary of State Michele Reagan 

respectfully request this Court deny Plaintiff Brian Edward Malnes’ Motion to Strike to 

Defendants’ Improper Filing [Doc #24], because Defendants’ Response was timely filed.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 

(“Motion”) was filed with this Court on March 1, 2016. According to Rule 7.2(c), Loc. 

Fed. R. Civ. P., responding parties generally have at least fourteen days to respond to 

motions like the one filed by Plaintiff. Rule 6(d) also provides for an additional three 

days whenever a motion is served “under Rule 5(b)(2)(C), (D), (E), or (F).” Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 6(d). Plaintiff’s Motion was served upon Defendants pursuant to Rule 5(b)(2)(E) on 

March 1, 2016. Therefore, Defendants’ deadline to file their Response to Plaintiff’s 

Motion was March 18, 2016. 

Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 27 Filed 03/22/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

As the record shows, Defendants’ Response was filed on March 17, 2016— a day 

before the deadline. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike is improper and should be 

denied. 

Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of March, 2016.

Mark Brnovich

Attorney General

 s/ Kara M. Karlson

James Driscoll-MacEachron

Kara M. Karlson 

Assistants Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

I certify that I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk’s 

Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic

Filing to the following, if CM/ECF registrants, and mailed a copy of same if nonregistrants, this 22nd day of March, 2016:

Brian Edward Malnes

2157 W. Alaska Ave.

Flagstaff, AZ 86001

Plaintiff pro per

 s/ Maureen Riordan

#4977988 

Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 27 Filed 03/22/16 Page 2 of 2
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 892

To redesignate the Federal building located at 223 Sharkey Street in

Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Aaron Henry United States Post Office’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 27, 1997

Mr. THOMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To redesignate the Federal building located at 223 Sharkey

Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Aaron Henry

United States Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

4 The Federal building located at 223 Sharkey Street

5 in Clarksdale, Mississippi, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Aaron Henry United States Post Office Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

10 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be
2

•HR 892 IH

1 a reference to the ‘‘Aaron Henry United States Post

2 Office’’.

Æ
H. R. 63

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

An Act

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the Central Valley project,

California, as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRINITY LAKE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The reservoir created by Trinity Dam in

the Central Valley project, California, and designated as ‘‘Clair

Engle Lake’’ by Public Law 88–662 (78 Stat. 1093) is hereby

redesignated as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regulation,

document, record, map, or other paper of the United States to

the reservoir referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to

be a reference to ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

(c) REPEAL OF EARLIER DESIGNATION.—Public Law 88–662 (78

Stat. 1093) is repealed.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 1

Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:1223
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 2 of 12 PageID #:1224
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 3 of 12 PageID #:1225
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 4 of 12 PageID #:1226
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 5 of 12 PageID #:1227
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 6 of 12 PageID #:1228
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 7 of 12 PageID #:1229
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 8 of 12 PageID #:1230
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 9 of 12 PageID #:1231
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 10 of 12 PageID #:1232
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 11 of 12 PageID #:1233
Case: 1:20-cv-03378 Document #: 38-1 Filed: 04/21/21 Page 12 of 12 PageID #:1234
**Exhibit 32.2**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity asindicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Registrant.   November 5, 2004 */s/ Lester C. Johnson* Lester C. Johnson Principal Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated, as general partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
exv4w2w3



 






EXHIBIT 4.2.3




CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

OF

SECOND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY




     Newfield Exploration Company, a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY:



FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Newfield
Exploration Company, resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a
proposed amendment of the Second Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of such corporation, declaring such amendment to be
advisable and in the best interest of such corporation and
providing for the submission of such amendment to the stockholders
of such corporation for consideration thereof. The resolutions
setting forth the proposed amendment are as follows:



            “RESOLVED, that the Board of deems it advisable
and in the best interest of the Company to increase
the number of shares of common stock, par value $.01
per share, of the Company authorized for issuance from
100,000,000 shares to 200,000,000 shares;



            RESOLVED, that, to effect such increase, the
first paragraph of article FOURTH of the Company’s
Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation shall be
amended (the “Amendment”) to read in its entirety as
follows:



            ‘FOURTH: The aggregate number of
shares that the corporation shall have
authority to issue is 205,000,000 shares,
of which 5,000,000 shall be shares of
preferred stock, par value $.01 per share
(“Preferred Stock”), and 200,000,000 shall
be shares of common stock, par value $.01
per share (“Common Stock”).’



            RESOLVED, that the Amendment be submitted to the
stockholders of the Company for approval at the Annual
Meeting.”



SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, an annual meeting of the stockholders of such
corporation was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance
with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of



 









 






the State of Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number of
shares as required by statute were voted in favor of such
amendment.



THIRD: That such amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Newfield Exploration Company has caused this
certificate to be signed by Terry W. Rathert, its Secretary, this 12th day of
May, 2004.

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	NEWFIELD EXPLORATION COMPANY

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Terry W. Rathert
 	 
	 	 	Terry W. Rathert 	 
	 	 	Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Michael Kortas

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Kortas,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 

an Ohio corporation,

Equifax Information Services, LLC

a Georgia corporation, and

WebBank, a Utah corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: CV-16-00380-PHX-SRB

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., 

ONLY

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff and Defendant, Experian 

Information Solutions, Inc., in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement. 

Case 2:16-cv-00380-SRB Document 38 Filed 06/25/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The parties anticipate filing a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Experian 

Information Solutions, Inc., ONLY, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) within 60 days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 25

th day of June, 2016.

 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Michael Kortas

Case 2:16-cv-00380-SRB Document 38 Filed 06/25/16 Page 2 of 2
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 22

Congratulating the people of India on the occasion of the 50th anniversary

of their nation’s independence.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. STEARNS (for himself and Mr. PALLONE) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the people of India on the occasion of the

50th anniversary of their nation’s independence.

Whereas on August 15, 1947, the people of India were granted their independence from the British Empire;

Whereas the people of India have maintained a free and

democratic nation for 49 years;

Whereas the Republic of India is the largest democracy in the

world;

Whereas the people of the United States seek to maintain

friendly ties with the democratic nations of the world;

and

Whereas the recent decline in world tensions offers new opportunities for international cooperation at every level:

Now, therefore, be it
2

•HRES 22 IH

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) congratulates the people of India on the oc3 casion of the 50th anniversary of India’s independ4 ence from the British Empire, which will be cele5 brated on August 14, 1997; and

6 (2) looks forward to the continuance of friendly

7 relations between the people of the United States

8 and the people of India.

Æ