alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Tongue Depressor Harmonica","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zl8ya4nDzA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/tongue-depressor-harmonica\/\">Tongue Depressor Harmonica<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/tongue-depressor-harmonica\/embed\/#?secret=zl8ya4nDzA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Tongue Depressor Harmonica” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zl8ya4nDzA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/harmonica.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":320}
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §            906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| May 8, 2009 | /s/Andrew J. Welch                        |   |
|------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|             | Andrew J. Welch                           |
|             | Chief Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging |
|             | Trust Incorporated, as general partner of |
|             | FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership        |
|                  |                                           |        |  |
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 651 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.651

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  eight

                                 An Act

 
To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for the construction 
 of a hydroelectric project located in the State of Washington, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 8864, the Commission shall, upon the request of the project 
licensee, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures 
under that section, extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence construction of the project for not more than 3 
consecutive 2-year periods.
    (b) Applicability.--An extension under subsection (a) shall take 
effect for a project upon the expiration of the extension, issued by 
the Commission under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
806), of the period required for commencement of construction of the 
project.
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the license for the 
project referred to in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license 
effective as of the date of its expiration and extend the time required 
for commencement of construction of the project as provided in 
subsection (a) for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods, the 
first of which shall commence on the date of such expiration.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00279-CR

Filiberto SIERRA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR8109

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED June 17, 2015.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
# HRM

HORNE ROTA MOOS

JOSHUA C. ANDERSON janderson@hrmlawyers.com 

## October 9, 2015 Mr. Christopher A. Prine 

## ViaE-File Clerk, Fourteenth Court ofAppeals 301 Fannin, Room 245 Houston, TX 77002 Re: NO. 14-1500706-CV; 

## Jorge Robles and Werner Robles, Individually and as Heirs ofZoila Robles vs. Pinnacle Health Facilities XV, LP d/b/a Woodridge Nursing andRehabilitation Dear Mr. Prine: Per this Court's Order of August 21, 2015, please be advised that the trial court denied Pinnacle Health Facilities XV, LP d/b/a Woodridge Nursing and Rehabilitation's Motion to Reconsider Overruling of Objections to Plaintiffs' Amended Chapter 74 Expert Report and Motion to Dismiss on October 5, 2015. A copy ofthe trial court's order is enclosed. If 

## you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, HORNE ROTA Moos, LLP 

## IslJoshua C. 

## Anderson 

## Joshua C. Anderson JCA/lec/27502/appeals 

# HR M HORNE ROTA MOOS LLP
HOUSTON Tl:'.XAS l'-IE\'V 01-iLF:ANS LOUISIAl'-i/\
2777 Allen Parkwuy Suite 1200 / Houscon**T,~xas** 77019-2'1-·11 713 3:03 4500 80:)**2~53** 2703 F 713 333 .:1600 HPMI**A.\VYf-::Ps.cory~** ACCEPTED 14-15-00706-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/12/2015 12:07:23 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK9/21/2015 3:17:04 PM Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No: 7019265 By: GENTRY, EUNIECY M Filed: 9/21/2015 3:17:04 PM CAUSE NO. 2015-11057 JORGE ROBLES and WERNER § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROBLES, Individually and as Heirs of ZOILA ROBLES



# vs. PINNACLE HEALTH FACILITIES XV, LP d/b/a WOODRIDGE NURSING AND REHABILITATION § § § § HARRIS**COUNT~~EXAS**

# ~**~~** § 

# u § 55TH**DIST~T** COURT**o~Cjf** 

### ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO

## ~ISS**O~,J** On this day, came on to be heard Defendant,

# PINNAC~ALTH FACILITIES XV, LP

o (WD" d/b/a WOODRIDGE NURSING AND

### REHABILITATIO~"'Motion to Reconsider Oven-uling 

## C/j; of Objections to Plaintiffs' Amended Chapter 74

### E~ Report and Motion to Dismiss (the "Motion") and the Court, having heard the

# argu~~~ counsel is of the opinion that Defendant's Motion should be in all things, DENIED.

# It~ Yrefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

# ,~~REED that Defendant, PINNACLE HEALTH 

# 1£»'0' FACILITIES XV, LP d/b/a

# WO~GE NURSING AND REHABILITATION's Motion is hereby DENIED;**~**

## ~G> IT IS FURTHER

### ~RED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the discovery stay order previously issued by

## tp~urt will stay in place pending the resolution ofany appeal taken ofthis 

# gs order or until

## sue~ as the time to file an appeal of this order has expired.

# ~rg

# ~ SIGNED this

____ day of

_______ , 2015.


### Signed: 

### 10/5/2015

1 JUDGE PRESIDING 

### Pgs-1 DIS MY
### **EXHIBIT 11.1**

**COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMONSHARE**
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **Three months ended June 30,** | ** ** | **Six months ended June 30,** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **2007**                                            | ** ** | **2006**                                          | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** |
| Diluted net loss per  share from continuing operations:               |       |                                                |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |
| Net loss from  continuing operations available to common shareholders |       | $                                                   | (3,405,000 | )                                                 | $          | (1,732,000 | ) | $ | (9,570,000 | ) | $ | (2,802,000 | ) |
|                                                                  |       |                                                |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average  number of shares outstanding                        |       | 7,957,428                                           |       | 7,957,428                                         |       | 7,957,428 |   | 7,957,428 |   |
| Net effect of  dilutive stock options based on treasury stock method  |       | —                                              |       | —                                            |       | — |   | — |   |
| Total average  shares                                                 |       | 7,957,428                                           |       | 7,957,428                                         |       | 7,957,428 |   | 7,957,428 |   |
|                                                                  |       |                                                |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |
| Fully diluted net loss  per share from continuing operations          |       | $                                                   | (0.43      | )                                                 | $          | (0.22 | ) | $ | (1.20 | ) | $ | (0.35 | ) |

 

 

----
9264.

#### McLeod *v.*The State.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah— Judge Kourke. October 3, 1917.

Bloodwobth, J.

1. Under the opinion of the Supreme Court in answer to certified questions in the ease of *Cieucevich*v. *State,*147 *Ga.*816 (95 S. E. 670), the trial judge did not err in overruling the challenge to the array of jurors. See also 22 *Ga. App.*240 (95 S. E. 933).

2. When read in connection with the entire charge of the court, no error warranting a new trial appears in the excerpts of which complaint is made.

3. Under the explanatory note of the trial judge, no error was committed in refusing to allow the witnesses to testify as complained of in grounds . 4 to 15 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

4. The motion for a new trial complains that “the sentence is excessive,” and that “the court'in sentencing the defendant did not exercise his legal discretion.” “Objection that a sentence imposed in a criminal case is for any reason illegal or irregular can not be made the ground of a motion for a new trial.” *Elzie*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*501 (94 S. E. 627). And see *Weldon*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*332 (9) (94 S. E. 327).

5. It is complained that the solicitor-general used “improper language” and “improper argument” in his speech to the jury, and that upon motion .promptly made the court declined to declare a mistrial. The parts of the argument complained of are proper and legitimate “inferences and deductions from the facts.” “All reasonable latitude should be allowed attorneys in their arguments to the jury on the facts, and on inferences and deductions from the facts.” *Martin*v. *State,*5 *Ga. App.*606 (2) (63 S. E. 605); *Walker*v. *State,*5 *Ga. App.*367 (63 S. E. 142). “ Flights of oratory and false logic do not call for mistrials, or rebuke. It is the introduction of facts not in evidence that requires the application of such remedies.” *Patterson*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*408 (52 S. E. 534); *Western & Atlantic R. Co.*v. *York*128 *Ga.*687 (2) (58 S. E. 183). Civil Code (1910), § 4957. Besides, the evidence demanded the verdict rendered. *Moore*v. *State,*10 *Ga. App.*805 (2) (74 S. E. 315).

6. Before it will be held the trial judge erred in refusing a request to charge to the jury on a stated subject, it must appear that a proper request was made in writing and presented to the judge before the jury retired “to consider of - their yerdiet.” Penal Code (1910), § 1087; Civil Code (1910), § 6084. It does not so appear in the 20th ground of the amendment to the motion for new trial in this case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P-. J., and Harwell, J., ooncur.*

*242*Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter 0. Hartridge, solicitor-general,*contra.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2011 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                      
|                     |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  | (Chief Accounting Officer)            

A signed original of this
written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kenneth Galpin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Scott Munro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: June 14, 2005  | /s/  Kenneth GalpinKenneth Galpin
President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  June 14, 2005 | /s/ Scott MunroScott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer   

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Most Home Corp. and will be retained by Most Home Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Tiernan P. Doyle","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/tdoyle1\/","title":"New NASA Strategy Envisions Sustainable Future for Space Operations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"49dPV9gi9B\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/new-nasa-strategy-envisions-sustainable-future-for-space-operations\/\">New NASA Strategy Envisions Sustainable Future for Space Operations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/new-nasa-strategy-envisions-sustainable-future-for-space-operations\/embed\/#?secret=49dPV9gi9B\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New NASA Strategy Envisions Sustainable Future for Space Operations” — NASA\" data-secret=\"49dPV9gi9B\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/space-debris.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 914 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 914

 To make certain technical corrections in the Higher Education Act of 
             1965 relating to graduation data disclosures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1997

Mr. McKeon (for himself and Mr. Kildee) introduced the following bill; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make certain technical corrections in the Higher Education Act of 
             1965 relating to graduation data disclosures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATING TO DISCLOSURES REQUIRED WITH 
              RESPECT TO GRADUATION RATES.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 485 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1092) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3)(B), by striking ``June 30'' and 
        inserting ``August 31''; and
            (2) in subsection (e)(9), by striking ``August 30'' and 
        inserting ``August 31''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective with respect to disclosures required to be made for academic 
years beginning on or after July 1, 1998, except that compliance by any 
institution with such amendments before such date shall not be be 
treated as a failure to comply with subsections (a)(3)(B) and (e)(9) of 
section 485 of such Act as in effect on the day before the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```