alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, KUO-AN WANG, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Kid Castle Educational Corporation (the "Registrant"), certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the
"Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                          /s/ Kuo-An Wang
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Kuo-An Wang
                                    Date: November 15, 2004

Exhibit 32.1

                                      - 1 -
8930.

#### AKIN *v.*CAMP.

The charge of the court having fully and fairly submitted to the jury the contentions of the parties, and the evidence authorizing if not demanding the verdict, it was not error to refuse a new trial.

Decided March 13, 1918.

*17Lien foreclosure; -from Oconee superior court—Judge Cobb. April 12, 1917.

*0. J. Tolnas,*for plaintiff in error.

*It. B. Burger, W. M. Smith,*contra.

Luke, J.

Akin as landlord and Camp as cropper undertook to make a crop beginning on January 1. In the following June a disagreement resulted in Camp’s surrendering the crop. Akin, in writing, agreed to pay him for his services one hundred dollars-in November, and to discharge him from all claims. Aki-n defaulted in the payment of the one hundred dollars, and Camp foreclosed a laborer’s lien on the crop. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and this ruling is excepted to. The charge of the court, which was full and fair, submitted the contentions of the parties; and the evidence of the defendant authorized, if it did not demand, a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel, are you 

a 

 Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Case: 1:20-cv-02922 Document #: 21 Filed: 06/29/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:66
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,522
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,950
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     72,198
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,774
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            13,654
<LOANS>                                        442,695
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 573,412
<DEPOSITS>                                     386,208
<SHORT-TERM>                                    38,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,601
<LONG-TERM>                                     95,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 573,412
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,300
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,473
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,773
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,312
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,199
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,574
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  13
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,572
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,572
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.53
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,533
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,437
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,678
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 8,848
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,335
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,313
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,313
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,777
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Emilio Chato Haddo, 

Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 Case No. CR16-08012-001-PCT-PGR 

TEMPORARY DETENTION ORDER 

FOR INTAKE ASSESSMENT 

Defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. '3141 et seq. a 

detention hearing was held. Upon recommendation of Pretrial Services, the defendant is 

ordered detained pending an intake assessment for placement at inpatient treatment facility 

in Phoenix or Tucson, Arizona or other facility as designated by Pretrial Services. Should 

defendant qualify for such placement, defendant shall be released upon conditions set by 

this Court, including pretrial residency at said facility, as conditions do exist which would 

reasonably assure the safety of others and the appearance of the defendant. Should 

defendant not so qualify, the release conditions set by this Court shall be vacated and 

defendant shall be detained pending trial as there are no conditions or combination of 

conditions which would reasonably assure the safety of others or the appearance of the 

defendant. 

Case 3:16-cr-08012-PGR Document 20 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 If Defendant is accepted into a facility, successfully completes the program, and is 

otherwise in compliance with his pretrial release conditions, the Defendant may be 

transitioned into the community including back to the Yavapai-Apache Nation, but not 

within the vicinity of or in same community as where the alleged victim resides absent 

further order of this Court. 

The Pretrial Services Officer is ordered to timely notify this Court of the defendant's 

intake assessment results, and if found acceptable, the date and time the facility will 

provide transportation from the Sandra Day O=Connor Courthouse for defendant. 

 Dated this 8th day of February, 2016. 

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cr-08012-PGR Document 20 Filed 02/09/16 Page 2 of 2
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 160 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 41
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 160

                          [Report No. 105-117]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 84) establishing the congressional 
   budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 1998 and 
setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 
                            2001, and 2002.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 1997

   Mr. Solomon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 84) establishing the congressional 
   budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 1998 and 
setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 
                            2001, and 2002.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the concurrent 
resolution (H. Con. Res. 84) establishing the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for fiscal year 1998 and setting forth 
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 
2002. All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read. The conference report shall be debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on the Budget.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 41

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 160

                          [Report No. 105-117]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 84) establishing the congressional 
   budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 1998 and 
setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 
                            2001, and 2002.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 4, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATION
OF TRANSITION REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
OF
PAWNMART, INC.

FOR
THE INTERIM PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

The
undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of PawnMart, Inc. (the "Registrant"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the interim period ended June 30, 2002.

We
certify that such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

This
Certification is executed as of August 19, 2002.

/s/John
R. Boudreau
John R. Boudreau
Chief Executive Officer

/s/Robert
W. Schleizer
Robert W. Schleizer
Chief Financial Officer

This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
9617.

#### Allen *v.*The State.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Wrightsville— Judge Blount. February 23, 1918.

*Fairclofh & Claxton,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. C. Brinson, solicitor,*contra.

Bboyles, P. J.

In a prosecution under sections 715, 716 of the Penal Code of 1910 (known as the “labor-contract act”), the burden is upon the State to show affirmatively that the accused failed to perform the services contracted for, or failed to return the money advanced on the strength of the contract, “without good and sufficient'cause.” *Jones*v. *State,*16 *Ga. App.*216 (84 S. E. 988), and cases there cited. In the instant case this material proof was lacking, and the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Dianne Dearmon

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02543

Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

Lilly Dermatology, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, October 13, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Telephonic status

hearing held. This case is dismissed without prejudice to convert to a dismissal with

prejudice on 1/11/2021 without further order of court. Civil case terminated. Mailed

notice(vcf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02543 Document #: 23 Filed: 10/13/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:110
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1859

FANTU A. KERKERO, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A96-281-611) Submitted: April 18, 2007 Decided: May 1, 2007 Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Solomon Bekele, LAW OFFICES OF SOLOMON & ASSOCIATES, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Larry D. Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Fantu A. Kerkero, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s denial of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Kerkero fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to establish eligibility for asylum, Kerkero cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, our review discloses that Kerkero did not show eligibility for CAT relief because she did not demonstrate that it is more likely than not that she will be tortured if removed to Ethiopia. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50291

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ALBERTO SALAYANDIA-REYES 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-2277-ALL

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alberto Salayandia-Reyes

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. The Government's motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated May 26, 2004
in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-115446) and
related Prospectus of Claymore Securities Defined Portfolios, Series 180.


                                         /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                         ------------------------
                                         GRANT THORNTON LLP


Chicago, Illinois
May 26, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISLE OF
CAPRI BLACK HAWK LLC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO SAID
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1997
<CASH>                                             739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      351
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,090
<PP&E>                                          19,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,138
<BONDS>                                         75,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,355
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (788)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (788)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes Bonds payable of $75 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

[REDACTED, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

[REDACTED], 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-02421 

Judge Robert W. Gettleman 

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

NOTICE OF MOTION 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, May 12, 2020, at 9:15 a.m., Plaintiff, by its

counsel, shall appear before the Honorable Judge Robert W. Gettleman in Courtroom 1703 at the 

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 

Illinois, and present Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, 

including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Transfer of the Domain Names, a Temporary 

Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery, and Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant 

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). 

Dated this 23rd day of April 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio_____________ 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

 aziegler@gbc.law 

 jgaudio@gbc.law 

 amartin@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case: 1:20-cv-02421 Document #: 23 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2979
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Dau Pham

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−01988

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Greif, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 10, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: Pursuant to the parties'

stipulation of dismissal [26], the Court dismisses this matter with prejudice and with each

party to bear its own costs and fees. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.