alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14175 and #14176]


New Mexico Disaster #NM-00047

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-
4199-DR), dated 10/29/2014.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 09/15/2014 through 09/26/2014.

DATES: Effective Date: 10/29/2014.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2014.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/29/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 10/29/2014, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Colfax, Eddy, Lea, Lincoln, Otero, San Miguel, Santa 
Fe, Sierra.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14175B 
and for economic injury is 14176B

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-26577 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 6, 2014 518711 

________________________________

In the Matter of RAMON PEQUERO,

Petitioner,

v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner 

of Corrections and Community 

Supervision, et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 16, 2014

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Ramon Pequero, Wallkill, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H.

Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to

review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections

and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of

violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After a correction officer gave a five-minute warning to a

religious group that their one-hour service was to be completed,

the group's inmate facilitator approached the officer and claimed

that their time was being cut short and made certain remarks to

the group that the officers were "cutting our time" and "we need

to take care of this sh*t." In response, all of the inmates,

including petitioner, stood up and joined in the demonstration,

clapping and talking loudly. Petitioner was charged in a

misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, interference with
-2- 518711 

an employee and leading inmates in actions detrimental to the

facility. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner

was found guilty of creating a disturbance and not guilty of the

other charges, and a penalty was imposed, which was upheld on

administrative review. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report and testimony of its

author, the correction officer who gave the warning and observed

the group's response, constituted substantial evidence to support

the determination (see Matter of Wilson v Artus, 71 AD3d 1294,

1294-1295 [2010]). The officer's testimony established that

petitioner was present in the group, as petitioner conceded, and

that, after the facilitator's remarks to the group, all of the

inmates, including petitioner, stood up and started saying things

loudly and clapping, disturbing the order of the program area. 

The fact that the officer did not specifically see petitioner

talking or recall what he said did not undermine the finding that

he participated in creating a disturbance. Contrary to

petitioner's claim, the misbehavior report was sufficiently

specific and indicated the role he played in the disturbance (see

7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [c] [1-4]), and the charge of creating a

disturbance did not require that the particular words spoken by

petitioner be identified (see 7 NYCRR 104.13). The remaining

contentions are either unpreserved or without merit.

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, Garry, Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 821

To provide for an increase in the supplemental security insurance benefit

standard for long–term care recipients based on the cost of living adjustment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To provide for an increase in the supplemental security insurance benefit standard for long–term care recipients based

on the cost of living adjustment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COST OF LIVING INCREASE.

4 Section 1611(e)(1) of the Social Security Act (42

5 U.S.C 1382(e)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the

6 following:

7 ‘‘(I) At the beginning of each calendar

8 year after December 30, 1997, the Commis9 sioner of Social Security shall adjust the rates
2

•HR 821 IH

1 applicable under subparagraph (B) by the per2 centage increase which is applicable to the pri3 mary insurance amount under section 215(i) of

4 the Social Security Act effective for benefits

5 payable in January of such calendar year.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Jack Chen and Klaus Shen, jointly and severally,
as his attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any
and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Report on Form 10-KSB and to
file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes may do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this Form 10-KSB has
been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:

      Signature                            Title                        Date

    /s/ Jack Chen        Chief Executive Officer and Director      April 1, 2008
-------------------
      Jack Chen

   /s/ Klaus Shen               Chief Financial Officer            April 1, 2008
-------------------
     Klaus Shen
Order entered March 11, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00165-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.B., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-30017-2018

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 6, 2019 motion to extend time to file her opening

brief. Because this is an accelerated appeal in a parental termination case, we GRANT the 

motion to the extent we ORDER appellant’s opening brief filed no later than April 1, 2019. We 

caution appellant that further extension requests will be disfavored. 

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                            EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Marisa Christina Incorporated:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 33-91078) and Form S-8 (No. 33-91080) of Marisa Christina,
Incorporated of our report dated March 8, 1998, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Marisa Christina, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December
31, 1996 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the
December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Marisa Christina, Incorporated.


                                                         KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 1998
#### Jesse Fishback *v.*Isaac S. Crouch.

Bills and Notes—

Fraud in assignment of note, when order given for part of same known not to have been accepted.

APPEAL FROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 9, 1870.

*Hanson, for appellant.*

*Davis, for appellee.*

Opinion oe ti-ie Court by

Judge Kobertson :

As the appellant, on the representation by the appellee, that he was the assignee and owner of the note on James Henry, paid him $215 for an order on the said James for that amount. If that representation was false, the appellee was guilty of a fraud which made him liable, on an implied promise, to refund the money so paid to him by the appellant. And if the appellee *was*assignee and owner of the note, he was guilty of a fraud in collecting the whole amount of the note, or contriving to have it paid to the obligee’s widow when he knew that his order had not been accepted, even if the order had been a bill of exchange ahd he had no notice of its non-acceptance; because he could have lost nothing for want of notice, whether he owned the note or not, and, on that hypothesis also, the law implied a promise of restitution to the appellant.

The circuit court therefore erred in its instruction for the appellee, inconsistent with this opinion. Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 117 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 18
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 117

                          [Report No. 105-57]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 1997

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on Wednesday, April 
23, 1997, or on Thursday, April 24, 1997, for the Speaker to entertain 
motions that the House suspend the rules. The object of any motion to 
suspend the rules shall be announced from the floor at least one hour 
prior to its consideration. The Speaker or his designee shall consult 
with the minority leader or his designee on the designation of any 
matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution.




                                                  House Calendar No. 18

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 117

                          [Report No. 105-57]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 16, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25993]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation

Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. I), notice is hereby given of a meeting 
of the Advisory Board of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development 
Corporation (SLSDC), to be held from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. (EDT) on 
Thursday, December 4, 2014 via conference call. The agenda for this 
meeting will be as follows: Opening Remarks; Consideration of Minutes 
of Past Meeting; Quarterly Report; Old and New Business; Closing 
Discussion; Adjournment.
    Attendance at the meeting is open to the interested public but 
limited to the space available. With the approval of the Administrator, 
members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. 
Persons wishing further information should contact, not later than 
Friday, November 28, 2014, Anita K. Blackman, Senior Advisor to the 
Administrator, Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; 202-366-0091.
    Any member of the public may present a written statement to the 
Advisory Board at any time.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on October 28, 2014.
Carrie Lavigne,
Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-25993 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-61-P
```
9740.

#### Grigg *v.*The State.

Decided October 9, 1918.

Indictment for misdemeanor; from Ben Hill superior .court— Judge Crum. March 30, 1918.

*O. H. Elkins, J. H. Dodgen,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Jesse Grantham,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The 1st, 2d, 3d and 4th grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, being expressly disapproved, by the trial judge, can not be considered.

2. Where, in the presence of jurors selected and - empanelled in the trial of a criminal ease, the judge makes remarks to counsel which are of such a character as to prejudice the minds of the jurors against the defendant, a motion for a mistrial should be made; and upon the judge’s refusal to grant the motion, his ruling would be subject to review. If no such motion is made and the trial proceeds without objection, counsel can not, after verdict, raise in a motion for a new trial the question as to the prejudicial nature of the remarks complained of. *Perdue*v. *State,*135 *Ga.*277 (69 S. E. 184); *Stapleton v. State,*19 *Ga. App.*36 (13), 38 (90 S. E. 1029). Under this ruling the 5th ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial' is without merit.

3. In the instructions excepted to there is no material error, when they are considered in the light of the entire charge of the court- and of the facts of the case.

4. In the absence of a timely written request for more specific instructions on theories of the defense elaborated in the 8th ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, the court did not err in failing to give such instructions to the jury.

5. The plaintiff in error must affirmatively show error. The fact that after the trial and on the same or the next day one of the jurors, when called as .a juror in another case, asked the court to excuse him from further service, stating that he was too hard of hearing to understand the evidence in a case, and the fact that the court thereupon excused him from further jury service, do not affirmatively show that he did not hear and understand the evidence in the instant case. The court did not err in overruling the ground of the motion for, a new trial based upon these facts.

6. The conviction of the defendant was authorized by the evidence and has been approved by the trial judge.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodwortlt and Harwell, JJ., eóneur.*
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

LKQ CORPORATION, and ) Case No. 1:20-cv-2753 

KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE ) 

INDUSTRIES, INC. ) Honorable Jeffrey Cole 

 ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

 ) 

GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, ) 

GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY ) 

OPERATIONS, LLC, and ) 

GENERAL MOTORS, LLC ) 

 ) 

Defendants. ) 

STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO THE COURT’S PROTECIVE ORDER 

Plaintiffs’ LKQ Corporation and Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (collectively 

“LKQ”) and GM Global Technology Operations, LLC, and General Motors, LLC (collectively 

“GM”) (together “the Parties”) jointly agree and stipulate that Paragraph 3 of the Protective Order 

(Dkt. No. 63) in this case is hereby amended to reflect that non-parties are also covered by this 

paragraph and may produce and designate documents under the protection of this Protective Order. 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02753 Document #: 163-1 Filed: 10/19/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:3273
2

Dated: October 19, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Michael P. Bregenzer 

Barry F. Irwin, P.C. 

Michael P. Bregenzer 

Robyn Bowland 

IRWIN IP LLC 

180 N Wacker Dr, Ste 400 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

(312) 667-6080 

birwin@irwinip.com 

mbregenzer@irwinip.com 

rbowland@irwinip.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs LKQ Corporation & 

Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. 

/s/ Joseph A. Herriges 

John C. Adkisson (pro hac vice) 

adkisson@fr.com 

Joseph A. Herriges (pro hac vice) 

herriges@fr.com 

Conrad A. Gosen (pro hac vice) 

gosen@fr.com 

Brianna L. Chamberlin (pro hac vice) 

chamberlin@fr.com 

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 

3200 RBC Plaza 

60 South 6th Street 

Minneapolis, MN 55402 

Telephone: (612) 335-5070 

Facsimile: (612) 288-9696 

Steven McMahon Zeller (IL 6238416) 

szeller@dykema.com 

DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC 

10 South Wacker Drive 

Suite 2300 

Chicago, IL 60606 

Telephone: (312) 627-2272 

Attorneys for Defendants General Motors 

Company, GM Global Technology 

Operations, LLC and General Motors, LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-02753 Document #: 163-1 Filed: 10/19/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:3274
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served via ECF on October 19, 2021 

upon all counsel of record. 

/s/Nicholas K. Wheeler 

Nicholas K. Wheeler 

Case: 1:20-cv-02753 Document #: 163-1 Filed: 10/19/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:3275
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Deniz Burnham","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OfnakltRDz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nasa-astronaut-deniz-burnham\/\">NASA Astronaut Deniz Burnham<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nasa-astronaut-deniz-burnham\/embed\/#?secret=OfnakltRDz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Deniz Burnham” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OfnakltRDz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/astronaut_candidate_deniz_burnham.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 31


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Andrew J. Cederoth, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
    containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
    included in the year covered by this annual report of Navistar Financial
    2002-A Owner Trust;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
    does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
    material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
    the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
    be provided to the trustee by the Servicer under the pooling and servicing
    agreement, for inclusion in these reports, is included in these reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
    the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance with
    the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in
    the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
    agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant  deficiencies relating to the
    Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
    report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
    review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
    Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and
    Servicing Agreement, that is included in these reports.

6.  In giving the  certifications  above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Owner
    Trustee.


By: /s/ ANDREW J. CEDEROTH
Andrew J. Cederoth
Vice President and Treasurer
Navistar Financial Corporation
January 31, 2005