alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

THE FINAL CO. LLC, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

16BEAUTYDAY, et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-02640 

Judge Harry D. Leinenweber 

Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez 

NOTICE OF FILING 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff, by its counsel, has filed Plaintiff’s Entry of a 

Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Pursuant to Fourth Amended General Order 20-0012 [28], 

Plaintiff has not noticed the Motion for a hearing, but Plaintiff is available for a telephonic hearing 

if requested by the Court. 

Dated this 11th day of June 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio 

Amy Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

Jake M. Christensen 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

amartin@gbc.law 

jchristensen@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff The Final Co. LLC

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02640 Document #: 35 Filed: 06/11/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6326
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 11th day of June 2020, I will electronically file the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, I will electronically publish the documents 

on a website, and I will send an e-mail to the e-mail addresses identified in Exhibit 2 to the 

Declaration of Kelly Frazier and any e-mail addresses provided for Defendants by third parties 

that includes a link to said website. 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio 

Amy Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

Jake M. Christensen 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

amartin@gbc.law 

jchristensen@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff The Final Co. LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-02640 Document #: 35 Filed: 06/11/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:6327
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 216 (Friday, November 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66383]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26511]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee 
(HICPAC)

    In accordance with section 10(a) (2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the following meeting for the aforementioned 
committee:

Times and Dates

9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., December 4, 2014
9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., December 5, 2014

    Place: Emory Conference Center, The Silverbell Pavilion, 1615 
Clifton Rd, Atlanta, Georgia, 30329.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
Please register for the meeting at www.cdc.gov/hicpac.
    Purpose: The Committee is charged with providing advice and 
guidance to the Director, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, 
the Director, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious 
Diseases (NCEZID), the Director, CDC, the Secretary, Health and 
Human Services regarding (1) the practice of healthcare infection 
prevention and control; (2) strategies for surveillance, prevention, 
and control of infections, antimicrobial resistance, and related 
events in settings where healthcare is provided; and (3) periodic 
updating of CDC guidelines and other policy statements regarding 
prevention of healthcare-associated infections and healthcare-
related conditions.
    Matters for Discussion: The agenda will include updates on CDC's 
activities for prevention of healthcare associated infections 
(HAIs), updates on antimicrobial resistance, an update on Draft 
Guidelines, and updates on healthcare preparedness and emerging 
infections.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Erin Stone, M.S., HICPAC, 
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, NCEZID, CDC, l600 Clifton 
Road NE., Mailstop A-07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333 Telephone (404) 639-
4045. Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e36373d2e3f3d1e3d3a3d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="30585953405153705354531e575f46">[email protected]</span></a>
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Claudette Grant,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 2014-26511 Filed 11-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TM: 599856 / 20410017 / 11/4/20 -1- 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

CENTRAL STATES, SOUTHEAST AND ) 

SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND; ) 

and CHARLES A. WHOBREY, as Trustee, ) 

 ) Case No. 20 C 2470

 Plaintiffs, )

 v. ) Honorable Charles P. Kocoras

 ) District Judge

C. C. DILLON CO., ) 

a Missouri corporation, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. )

PLAINTIFFS’ AGREED MOTION

FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (the 

“Pension Fund”), and Charles A. Whobrey, as Trustee, hereby move this Court to enter 

a consent judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, C. C. Dillon Co. (“Dillon”). 

In support of this agreed motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:

1. Plaintiffs filed the Complaint to collect withdrawal liability, interest and 

penalties from Dillon under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 

(“ERISA”) as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, 29 

U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. 

2. The parties have agreed to the entry of a consent judgment in favor of the 

Pension Fund and against Dillon. A copy of the proposed Consent Judgment is attached 

hereto as Exhibit 1. The proposed Consent Judgment will also be submitted electronically 

to the Court’s e-mail address for proposed orders.

Case: 1:20-cv-02470 Document #: 16 Filed: 11/04/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:60
TM: 599856 / 20410017 / 11/4/20 -2- 

3. Prior to the filing of this motion, Plaintiffs’ counsel, Anthony E. Napoli, 

communicated with Defendant’s counsel, Timm W. Schowalter, who stated that he 

agreed to the granting of this motion.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension 

Fund and Charles A. Whobrey, as Trustee, respectfully request that the Court enter the 

Consent Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/Anthony E. Napoli 

Anthony E. Napoli

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Central States Funds 

8647 W. Higgins Road, 8th Floor

Rosemont, Illinois 60631

(847) 939-2469

ARDC # 06210910

November 4, 2020 tnapoli@centralstates.org

Case: 1:20-cv-02470 Document #: 16 Filed: 11/04/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:61
TM: 599856 / 20410017 / 11/4/20 -3- 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Anthony E. Napoli, one of the attorneys for the Plaintiffs, certify that on November 

4, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing Plaintiffs’ Agreed Motion for Entry of Consent 

Judgment with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system. This filing was served on all 

parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt via the ECF system.

 

/s/ Anthony E. Napoli 

 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS

Case: 1:20-cv-02470 Document #: 16 Filed: 11/04/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:62
9927.

#### BISHOP *v.*THE STATE.

“The solicitor of a city court, before the trial of a criminal case and before the selection of a jury, can at any time amend the accusation as he may deem proper.” *Conley y. State,*83 *Ga.*496, 499 (10 S. E. 123) ; *Goldsmith*v. *State,*2 *Ga. App.*283, 286 (58 8. E. 486).

*(a)*The solicitor- of a city court may amend an accusation at any time before the defendant therein has pleaded to the merits, provided the affidavit of the prosecutor will support the accusation as amended, unless such amendment is forbidden by the act creating the court. *Goldsmith y. State,*supra.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Accusation of assault and battery; from city court of Bainbridge—Judge Spooner. June 19, 1918.

*Hartsfield & Conger,*for plaintiff in error.

Broyles, P. J.

The affidavit and the accusation as originally *785drawn cbaiged “Cy” Bishop with having committed -the offense of assault and - battery. Upon the call of the case for trial and after both the State and the defendant had announced ready for trial, the solicitor erased from the accusation the name “Cy” and inserted in lieu thereof the name “Corry.” Likewise the officer before whom the affidavit (the basis’of the accusation) was made erased, in the presence of the prosecutor, the name “Cy” in the affidavit and inserted in lieu thereof the name “Corry.” These amendments were allowed by the trial judge over the objection of the accused that they could not be then'made'in that form and manner. The defendant then moved to quash the amended accusation, and this motion was overruled.

While the proper procedure would have been _for the judge to sign a formal order amending the affidavit and accusation, the slight irregularity in the form and method of the amendment in this case was not error. Especially is this true as no other conclusion can be -drawn from the pleadings than that “Cy” and “Corry” were one and the same person. “Cy” or “Corry” was present and defending, and the accusation as originally drawn was good, there being no plea of misnomer. • *>*

It is not shown that the defendant hud. pleaded to the merits of the case, but merely -that the case had been called for trial and that both sides had announced ready. Under these circumstances the court committed no error, either in allowing the amendment or thereafter in refusing to quash the accusation as amended.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ.,*concur,
#### Usher *v.*Whitinger.

In an action for a malicious prosecution," the declaration alleged that ihif plaintiff had been arrested on a charge made by the defendant of stealing his goods. Tho defendant’s affidavit before the magistrate did not state to whom the goods stolen belonged. *Held,*that the variance was not sufficient to exclude the affidavit as evidence.

ERROR to the *Wayne*Circuit Court. — This was an action on uie cage for a malicious prosecution. The declaration contained two counts. The first alleged that the defendant had falsely, *Set.*before *I. Esleb,*a magistrate, &c. charged the plaintiff with having stolen out of the defendant’s mill seven bushels and a half of the defendant’s wheat; and had procured the magistrate to issue his warrant, *Set.*The second count stated that the defendant had falsely, &o. charged the plaintiff &c. with larceny, and on, *Sec.*procured him to be arrested, &c. Plea, not guilty. At the trial, the plaintiff offered in evidence the affidavit made by the defendant before the magistrate, Charging the plaintiff with having stolen the wheat out of the defendant’s mill; hut it did not state to whom the wheat belonged. The defendant objected to the affidavit as evidence, 'on the ground of a variance.between it and the declaration; as the one stated to whom the wheat belonged, and the other did not. The Circuit Court sustained the objection. Verdict and judgment for the defendant.

*Test*and Rariden, for the plaintiff.

Caswell, for the defendant.

Scott, J.

This affidavit was good evidence to show, that the defendant instituted the prosecution and procured the arrest; and, for this purpose, it ought to have been admitted (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the verdict set aside, with *costs.*Cause remanded for further proceedings.

(1)

 The substance of the affidavit need only be stated in the declaration. Thus, where the declaration averred that the defendant had charged the plaintiff with' felony; and the information before the magistrate alleged that *251certain goods had been stolen from the defendant, and that he *suspected*and believed, and had good reason to *suspect*and believe, thatthe plaintiff had stolen them; it was held, Bayley, J. dissentiente, that the information supported the averment. Davis v. *Noah,*1 Stark. R. 377. But an averment that larceny had been charged, is not supported by proving a charge to have been made, amounting only to a tortious conversion; *Leigh*v. Webb, 3 Esp. R. 165; nor by the production of an affidavit, alleging only a concealing of the goods. *M'Neely*v. *Driskill, May*term, 1829, post. Vide 2 Phill. Ev. 114, 115. — 2 Stark. Ev. 908, 9.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Tiernan P. Doyle","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/tdoyle1\/","title":"NASA to Host a Pair of Briefings for Starliner Crew Flight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mcu0Ie3qZM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-host-a-pair-of-briefings-for-starliner-crew-flight\/\">NASA to Host a Pair of Briefings for Starliner Crew Flight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-host-a-pair-of-briefings-for-starliner-crew-flight\/embed\/#?secret=mcu0Ie3qZM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Host a Pair of Briefings for Starliner Crew Flight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mcu0Ie3qZM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/starliner-crew.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"id":10835,"count":34,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-colleges-universities\/nasa-stem-projects\/in-flight-education-downlinks\/","name":"In-flight Education Downlinks","slug":"in-flight-education-downlinks","taxonomy":"category","parent":3298,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/10835"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/3298"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=10835"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=10835"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
OFFICE **OF** THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN 

### . . 469

**Thank you**  

### rot $o eura of the 17th, fs in ordu that we nisht 

### tlm

### oplaloa

of 

### thisde aontalnsd In this co 19th, in rrogonso tlonal Mormatloa 

### or-stay 84th ior atand your nquer8 to bo adrissd wita6 10 fn approvlna elaitu JansOtlon rlah the untf Child blfere Unit purposes of ths lppra
### theraat that a9 600 ha8 MI@' court 

### for 4xa.a llxntial sums to tba city-county 

## Child e8 la aoaeerned with what crrldeaoe b in perforpatng your ??tatfesin audltt&t ttrr i~~neys have bean spent only appropriucttan. It 

### ir em clleabatiar~ ruleof law thatbeton a sooni& ~lonal%’ oourt way unllertake any projoot tt eIu8t be able to Bolnt to 8tatutory authorfaation r0r its aatlon.

, 1s Y. B. (IX) rjSSa U 

### Ter. Sux., -9&F page We hwre been **unable** to find **any atatutor**  authorization for **Gziah** 

### county

## to oooperate with thacity of fy I ex in th8 f&illkanar of a C%tg-County Health Unit axid, we sdtlae you %hat for 

### tb reasonsgivenin Opinion IIo. 04WS, a oopfoi **uhloh** 

### $8 borerith oaalorwd, **84th** 

### Ccuntfhas no suoh 

### authority,

,

,We hare 

### also beea tUMb& to iin4 

### StntUtoTy lUfhOriU

### t&u for ljtith County 

### to eoopuete 

### Jsr ths 

### foristatioa 

### 8~14

datw0e.or a point CitpCoitaty chlia welrara unit. 56oti0n 4 of jlrtlole 60&i, B.k.C.8 

### ., **auttmlar4 tha**  **aoado8loaurl~ 6murt**  to 

### uppoint

nvaa por8ono who rhall oomtitute 8 Child %lierr &azb 

## ror tin oouaty, end 

### Oeotloa 40 of iirtlaio 09Su, V.A.C.S., 

### l awrlr8 ths 

### oowaioofonero~ oour0 to 8ppropriate from it8 

### tJo~.rral

**ihad, or**  **any** 

### other**rtailabto ionb,**  **mn.7** 

### for the e&a&- grtratl@n of 8uoh 8 CountJ Chtld 

### #eMare Bosrr4, **but** nelthrir $hot ertiolo nor Art1018 608a w~thoriaeo the 00saioolonero~ 

### setat eit her tol 

### atrbllmh

or aate dhith0 0r tb 0itit urb 00dr. 

### rpproprlatlonr, r~r ttio 

### jotnt



### Youn vary truly **ATTORWEY**

**OEtti3RaL OF**  **‘ E&U8**
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                      STATE OF INCORPORATION
                ------------------                      ----------------------
                <S>                                     <C>
                KNOLOGY of Montgomery, Inc.             Alabama

                KNOLOGY of Columbus, Inc.               Delaware

                KNOLOGY of Panama City, Inc.            Florida

                KNOLOGY of Augusta, Inc.                Delaware

                KNOLOGY of Charleston, Inc.             Delaware

                KNOLOGY of Alabama, Inc.                Delaware

                KNOLOGY of Georgia, Inc.                Delaware

                KNOLOGY of South Carolina, Inc.         Delaware

                KNOLOGY of Florida, Inc.                Delaware
</TABLE>
FILED

8/14/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

BG
NUMBER 13-10-00530-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HARLON C. REMUS, DECEASED

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Janice Remus, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 

County Court at Law No. 3 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2009-CPC-21. 

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and requests that this Court dismiss the 

appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to 

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.
2

P. 42.1(a). Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent 

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having 

dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, 

and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

17th day of February, 2011.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-98","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TZm6yiBKHD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-98\/\">STS-98<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-98\/embed\/#?secret=TZm6yiBKHD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-98” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TZm6yiBKHD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/STS098-S-002\/STS098-S-002~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}