alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:168
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 2 of 23 PageID #:169
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 3 of 23 PageID #:170
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 4 of 23 PageID #:171
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 5 of 23 PageID #:172
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 6 of 23 PageID #:173
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 7 of 23 PageID #:174
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 8 of 23 PageID #:175
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 9 of 23 PageID #:176
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 10 of 23 PageID #:177
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 11 of 23 PageID #:178
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 12 of 23 PageID #:179
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 13 of 23 PageID #:180
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 14 of 23 PageID #:181
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 15 of 23 PageID #:182
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 16 of 23 PageID #:183
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 17 of 23 PageID #:184
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 18 of 23 PageID #:185
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 19 of 23 PageID #:186
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 20 of 23 PageID #:187
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 21 of 23 PageID #:188
Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 22 of 23 PageID #:189
April 28, 2021

Case: 1:20-cr-00232 Document #: 65 Filed: 04/28/21 Page 23 of 23 PageID #:190
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26281]



[[Page 65757]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8938]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Display of Sixteen Hellenistic Silver Objects From 
the Republic of Italy, Sicily Region'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Display of Sixteen Hellenistic Silver 
Objects from the Republic of Italy, Sicily Region,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about December 1, 2014, 
until on or about December 1, 2018, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 29, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-26281 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
H. Res. 198

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 29, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 2266) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1998, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill

shall be dispensed with. Points of order against consideration

of the bill for failure to comply with clause 2(l)(6) of rule XI,

clause 7 of rule XXI, or section 306 of the Congressional

Budget Act of 1974 are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute

rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure

to comply with clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived. During

consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the
2

•HRES 198 EH

Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition

on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment

has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of rule

XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read.

The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a recorded vote on any

amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum

time for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic vote without intervening business,

provided that the minimum time for electronic voting on the

first in any series of questions shall be fifteen minutes. At

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2005 (the
Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ Joseph Lloyd McAdamsJoseph Lloyd McAdamsChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA Seeks Student Ideas for 2024 Human Exploration Rover Challenge","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lSn0VzMo8Z\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-seeks-student-ideas-for-2024-human-exploration-rover-challenge\/\">NASA Seeks Student Ideas for 2024 Human Exploration Rover Challenge<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-seeks-student-ideas-for-2024-human-exploration-rover-challenge\/embed\/#?secret=lSn0VzMo8Z\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Seeks Student Ideas for 2024 Human Exploration Rover Challenge” — NASA\" data-secret=\"lSn0VzMo8Z\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/52958346134_528915401c_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":465}
#### Jacob T. Burkhead *v.*E. S. Stuart et ux.

Husband and Wife — Separate Estate — Proof.'

A married woman, to escape liability for an incumbrance of her estate by herself and husband, must show by proof, by an exhibition of her title to same, as her separate estate.

APPEAL PROM JEEEERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION.

October 6, 1870.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin :

The incorrect statement in the note of Stuart and wife to Hays' that the consideration was “for necessaries” furnished, seems to have been the result of some purpose to evade the statute exempting the estates of married women from liability under their ordinary simple contracts; but it clearly does not appear that Mrs. Stuart was deceived as to the object of this device, nor that she did not understand and approve of it as a means of raising money by creating a debt which might be enforced. But she had a right to unite with her husband in an ordinary mortgage of her general property even for a debt of her husband, as this court has heretofore expressly decided, and although it is alleged in her answer that the land embraced by the mortgage was her separate estate, she wholly failed to show that fact, by any exhibition of her title, and the absence of such evidence this court must presume that the title to the land was such as the grantor might lawfully convey by mortgage.

The judgment must, therefore, be reversed; but further preparation should be allowed on the return of the case.

*376
      *I. B. Greene, for appellant.*

*Sanders, for appellees.*

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                                        Quarter Ended
                                                          March 31,
                                                   -------------------------

                                                      2000          1999
                                                   -----------   -----------
Diluted net income per share:

   Net income to common shareholders               $ 2,540,000   $ 1,767,000

   Average number of shares outstanding             10,507,313    11,500,000
   Net effect of dilutive stock options-based on
     treasury stock method                                 N/A           N/A

                                                   -----------   -----------
   Total average shares                             10,507,313    11,500,000
                                                   ===========   ===========


   Diluted net income per share                    $      0.24   $      0.15


                                       23
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. and OAKLEY, 

INC., 

 Plaintiffs,

v.

RBZXR.COM, et al., 

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02297

Judge Marvin E. Aspen

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Luxottica 

Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) hereby dismiss this action with prejudice as to the 

following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

HGWXX7 231

Dated this 11th day of June 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Allyson M. Martin

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson M. Martin

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

amartin@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-02297 Document #: 56 Filed: 06/11/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3676
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 66744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26589]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act 
of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, 
Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#236260625346514e4a5750634d50450d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="febfbdbf8e9b8c93978a8dbe908d98d0999188">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 30, 2014 the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on October 31, 2014 to:

Lockheed Martin Corporation--Permit No. 2015-010

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-26589 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          36,979
<SECURITIES>                                    14,210
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (746)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,717
<PP&E>                                          12,056
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,556)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,369
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,256
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,785
<SALES>                                         10,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,430
<CGS>                                            2,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (12)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,364)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,060
<INCOME-TAX>                                       350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                710
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       710
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
March 21, 1988

No. 87-1074.

#### First Union National Bank of Florida et al. *v.*Florida Department of Revenue et al.

Appeal

from Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Justice Blackmun would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
#### Abraham Levy and Another, Copartners Trading as Levy & Abrams, Respondents, *v.*Harry Gerzog and Others, Trading as Gerzog, Caroll *&*Cohen, Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 10, 1926.

Judgments — res adjudicata — action for rent — judgment in prior action not res adjudicata.

A judgment in an action for the December rent of premises on the ground that the rent had become due prior to the alleged surrender of the lease, is not *res adjudicata*in an action for the January rent of the same premises.

Appeal by defendants from judgment of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District, in favor of the plaintiffs.

*John T. Fenlon,*for the appellants.

*Melvin L. Krulewitch,*for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The order made by Mr. Justice Hoyer in the prior, second, action for the January rent seems to have been made on the theory that the judgment in the first action for the December rent, affirmed by this court, was *res adjudicata*in the second action. As the judgment in the first action was affirmed solely on the ground that the rent had become due prior to the alleged surrender there was no basis for such a finding. Further, the order of Mr. Justice Hoyer was not an appealable one, and under the circumstances such order does not prevent a consideration of the merits in this action. *(Dwight*v. *St. John,*25 N. Y. 203; *Riggs*v. *Pursell,*74 id. 370.)

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellants to abide the event.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"The Space Network: Cell Towers for Astronauts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AX9w362evG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/the-space-network-cell-towers-for-astronauts\/\">The Space Network: Cell Towers for Astronauts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/the-space-network-cell-towers-for-astronauts\/embed\/#?secret=AX9w362evG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Space Network: Cell Towers for Astronauts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AX9w362evG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/relay_satellite_graphic_1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":464}
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-90,904-02

EX P ARTE F REDRICK JACK SON, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1546498-A IN THE 179 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Applican t was convicted of possession of a prohibited wea pon and sentenc ed to eig hteen y ear s’ i mprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of hab ea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On J une 7, 2019, the tri al co u rt en t ered an order desig nating issues. The district cler k proper ly forwa

rded this ap p l i ca t i on to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the application was forwa rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and
co n cl u sions of law. We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evide n t i ar y investiga tion and make f

indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. The t ri al court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s fromthe date of this order
. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, propose d finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: MAY 12, 2021 Do not publish