alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF C.J.P., A 

JUVENILE.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-11-00183-CV

Appeal from the

65th Judicial District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 1000222) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 10, 2011, Appellant, a juvenile, entered a written stipulation wherein 

he admitted all of the allegations of delinquent conduct set forth in Count I (engaging in 

graffiti causing a loss less than $20,000) and Count II (theft over $50 but less than $500) of 

the State’s third-amended petition. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 51.03(a)(1) (West 2008). 

The juvenile court conducted a disposition hearing on March 3, 2011. The juvenile court 

thereafter entered an order of adjudication and placed Appellant on supervised juvenile 

probation until Appellant’s 18th birthday. Appellant appeals from the juvenile court’s 

denial of Appellant’s motion for new trial. We affirm.
2

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded 

that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 

924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says 

might arguably support the appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 

S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1969); see also In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 298 (Tex. 1998)(Texas Supreme Court held 

that the Anders procedure applies to juvenile appeals and noted that, although 

juvenile-delinquency proceedings are classified as civil, their nature is quasi-criminal). A 

copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of 

his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been 

filed.

The record reflects that Appellant executed in writing a waiver and consent in open 

court with the consent of Appellant’s attorney in accordance with TEX. FAM. CODE 

ANN. § 51.09, and Appellant made a judicial confession admitting his guilt.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might

arguably support the appeal. A discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel’s brief 

would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
3

The judgment is affirmed.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

February 8, 2012

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.
Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

December 20, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00719-CV

BUG STATE PEST CONTROL, INC., Appellant

V.

ACCUTROL EXTERMINATING & MOSQUITO SYSTEMS, LLC; 

ACCUTROL PEST MANAGEMENT, LLC; AND BRYAN ZENTKOVICH, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-51567

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a final judgment signed August 30, 2021. On 

November 30, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a). The motion is granted.
2

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
**Exhibit 32.2**

*CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite City Food &Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter P. Hausback, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

1.                                       the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated: November 13, 2006 | By:                     | /s/ Peter P. Hausback |   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                     | Peter P. Hausback       |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

JOSHUA WRIGHT ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 22

- 1928 LT Case No. 2016

- CF

- 10248

- A

- O STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed October 14, 2022 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County , Renee A. Roche , Judge. Joshua Wright, Bowling Green, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM. This Court previously affirmed the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief in Orange County Circuit Court Case Number 2016

- CF

- 10248

- A

- O . Because it appears that Appellant’s postconviction filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is caut ioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting2

claims stemming from Orange County Circuit Court Case No . 2016

- CF

10248

- A

- O may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) ; State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)

. APPELLANT CAUTIONED. SASSO , TRAVER and WOZNIAK , JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALROY JARVIS LAWRENCE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-90-195, CA-01-401-1)

Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 25, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alroy Jarvis Lawrence, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Benjamin H. White, Jr., OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Alroy Jarvis Lawrence seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Lawrence, Nos. CR-90-195; CA-01-401-1

(M.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Updated Dates Announced for Space Station U.S. Spacewalks","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0Nd0UiNZIa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/updated-dates-announced-for-space-station-u-s-spacewalks\/\">Updated Dates Announced for Space Station U.S. Spacewalks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/updated-dates-announced-for-space-station-u-s-spacewalks\/embed\/#?secret=0Nd0UiNZIa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Updated Dates Announced for Space Station U.S. Spacewalks” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0Nd0UiNZIa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/m15-026a_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":398}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

0125 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139753 

ROBERT S. MOSER, II, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139753 

 COA: 283922 

Wayne CC: 06-629396-NP 

CITY OF DETROIT and WAYNE COUNTY, 

Defendants, 

and 

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Advanced Air Mobility STEM Learning Module","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jigMGY0b19\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/advanced-air-mobility-stem-learning-module\/\">Advanced Air Mobility STEM Learning Module<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/advanced-air-mobility-stem-learning-module\/embed\/#?secret=jigMGY0b19\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Advanced Air Mobility STEM Learning Module” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jigMGY0b19\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/aam.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BAYSTATE BANCORP, INC. AT AND FOR THE  NINE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         5,711
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            98
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               1,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   33,093
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           596
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             595
<LOANS>                                      382,612
<ALLOWANCE>                                    3,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               449,954
<DEPOSITS>                                   222,622
<SHORT-TERM>                                 167,481
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3,974
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          25
<OTHER-SE>                                    55,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               449,954
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               20,431
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,051
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              22,482
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             6,530
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,174
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         10,778
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    650
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                7,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,061
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     3,061
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,980
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  7.63
<LOANS-NON>                                    1,800
<LOANS-PAST>                                       0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3,027
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      1
<RECOVERIES>                                      15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              3,691
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           3,691
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0



</TABLE>
Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 1 of 32 PageID #:14

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 2 of 32 PageID #:15

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 3 of 32 PageID #:16

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 4 of 32 PageID #:17

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 5 of 32 PageID #:18

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 6 of 32 PageID #:19

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 7 of 32 PageID #:20

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 8 of 32 PageID #:21

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 9 of 32 PageID #:22

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 10 of 32 PageID #:23

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 11 of 32 PageID #:24

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 12 of 32 PageID #:25

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 13 of 32 PageID #:26

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 14 of 32 PageID #:27

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 15 of 32 PageID #:28

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 16 of 32 PageID #:29

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 17 of 32 PageID #:30

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 18 of 32 PageID #:31

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 19 of 32 PageID #:32

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 20 of 32 PageID #:33

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 21 of 32 PageID #:34

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 22 of 32 PageID #:35

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 23 of 32 PageID #:36

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 24 of 32 PageID #:37

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 25 of 32 PageID #:38

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 26 of 32 PageID #:39

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 27 of 32 PageID #:40

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 28 of 32 PageID #:41

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 29 of 32 PageID #:42

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 30 of 32 PageID #:43

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 31 of 32 PageID #:44

Case: 1:20-cv-03073 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 05/22/20 Page 32 of 32 PageID #:45
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Texas Students to Hear from NASA Astronauts Aboard Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"00hxrVVTjB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/texas-students-to-hear-from-nasa-astronauts-aboard-space-station-2\/\">Texas Students to Hear from NASA Astronauts Aboard Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/texas-students-to-hear-from-nasa-astronauts-aboard-space-station-2\/embed\/#?secret=00hxrVVTjB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Texas Students to Hear from NASA Astronauts Aboard Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"00hxrVVTjB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/iss067e065648_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":401}
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 19, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128883 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN Maura D. Corrigan 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 128883 Justices 

 COA: 253766 

Wayne CC: 02-003910 

DANIEL NEWBY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

t1012 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 19, 2005 

Clerk