66354 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 216 / Friday, November 7, 2014 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730– 

774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401– 

2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the 

EAA has been in lapse and the President, through 

Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 

2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended 

by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent 

being that of August 7, 2014 (79 Fed. Reg. 46959 

(August 11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations 

in effect under IEEPA. 

addressed to the FTZ Board’s Executive 

Secretary at the address below. The 

closing period for their receipt is 

December 17, 2014. 

A copy of the notification will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 

21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 

1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230–0002, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the FTZ 

Board’s Web site, which is accessible 

via www.trade.gov/ftz. 

For further information, contact Pierre 

Duy at Pierre.Duy@trade.gov or (202) 

482–1378. 

Dated: November 3, 2014. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26514 Filed 11–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Lisong Ma, a/k/a Ma 

Li, Inmate Number—80644–053, 

Moshannon Valley, Correctional 

Institution, 555 Geo Drive, Philipsburg, 

PA 16866; Order Denying Export 

Privileges 

On May 27, 2014, in the U.S. District 

Court for the Eastern District of New 

York, Lisong Ma a/k/a Ma Li (‘‘Ma’’) was 

convicted of violating the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 

U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. IV 

2010)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). Specifically, Ma 

knowingly, intentionally, and willfully 

attempted to export from the United 

States to China one or more spools of 

Toray type T–800–HB12000–50B carbon 

fiber, without first having obtained the 

required license from the Department of 

Commerce. Ma was sentenced to 46 

months in prison and a $100 

assessment. 

Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent 

part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the Export 

Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR, 

or any order, license or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license, or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of 

the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 

CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of 

the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 2410(h). The 

denial of export privileges under this 

provision may be for a period of up to 

10 years from the date of the conviction. 

15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 

app. 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 

of the Regulations states that the Bureau 

of Industry and Security’s Office of 

Exporter Services may revoke any 

Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) 

licenses previously issued in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

his conviction. 

BIS has received notice of Ma’s 

conviction for violating IEEPA, and in 

accordance with Section 766.25 of the 

Regulations, BIS has provided notice 

and an opportunity for Ma to make a 

written submission to BIS. BIS has not 

received a submission from Ma. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Ma’s export 

privileges under the Regulations for a 

period of 10 years from the date of Ma’s 

conviction. I have also decided to 

revoke all licenses issued pursuant to 

the Act or Regulations in which Ma had 

an interest at the time of his conviction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

May 27, 2024, Lisong Ma, a/k/a Ma Li, 

with a last known address of Inmate 

Number—80644–053, Moshannon 

Valley, Correctional Institution, 555 Geo 

Drive, Philipsburg, PA 16866, and when 

acting for or on his behalf, his 

successors, assigns, employees, agents 

or representatives (the ‘‘Denied 

Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Ma by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 216 / Friday, November 7, 2014 / Notices 66355 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China; Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 33723 (June 12, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). 

2Also adopted as part of the preliminary results 

was the Memorandum to Paul Piquado entitled 

‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review: 

Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated June 6, 2014 

(‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’). 

3See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping New Shipper Reviews; 2012–2013, 78 

FR 46318 (July 31, 2013) for an explanation of the 

different PORs. 

4See 19 CFR 351.214(f)(2)(ii). 

5For a complete description of the Scope of the 

Order, see Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen 

entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Final Results in the Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review, 2012–2013: Multilayered Wood 

Flooring from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated November 3, 2014 (‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum’’). 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Ma may file an appeal 

of this Order with the Under Secretary 

of Commerce for Industry and Security. 

The appeal must be filed within 45 days 

from the date of this Order and must 

comply with the provisions of Part 756 

of the Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Ma. This Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until May 27, 2024. 

Issued this 31st day of October, 2014. 

Karen H. Nies-Vogel, 

Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26492 Filed 11–6–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Reviews; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 7, 

2014. 

SUMMARY: On June 12, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published the 

preliminary results of antidumping duty 

new shipper reviews of multilayered 

wood flooring (‘‘MLWF’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1

We invited interested parties to 

comment on our preliminary results. 

Following our analysis of the comments, 

we made no changes to our preliminary 

margin calculations for new shippers 

Dalian Huade Wood Product Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Huade’’), Linyi Bonn Flooring 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Bonn 

Flooring’’), and Zhejiang Fuerjia 

Wooden Co., Ltd. (‘‘Fuerjia’’), and we 

continue to find that Huade, Bonn 

Flooring, and Fuerjia did not make sales 

of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Magd Zalok or James Martinelli, AD/

CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4162 or (202) 482– 

2923, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Case History 

The Department published the 

Preliminary Results on June 12, 2014.2

On July 14, 2014, The Coalition for 

American Hardwood Parity (‘‘CAHP’’) 

submitted its case brief, and on July 21, 

2014, Bonn Flooring submitted a 

rebuttal brief. 

Period of Review 

The period of review (‘‘POR’’) for 

Bonn Flooring and Fuerjia is December 

1, 2012 through May 31, 2013. The POR 

for Huade is December 1, 2012 through 

June 30, 2013.3 Huade’s sale of subject 

merchandise was made during the POR 

specified by the Department’s 

regulations, but the shipment entered 

within thirty days after the end of that 

POR. When the sale of the subject 

merchandise occurs within the POR 

specified by the Department’s 

regulations, but the entry occurs after 

the POR, the specified POR may be 

extended unless it would be likely to 

prevent the completion of the review 

within the time limits set by the 

Department’s regulations.4 This POR 

corresponds to the period from the date 

of suspension of liquidation to the end 

of the month immediately preceding the 

first semiannual anniversary month 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(g)(1)(ii)(B). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes MLWF, subject to certain 

exceptions.5 The subject merchandise is 

currently classifiable under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 4412.31.0520; 

4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; 

4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 

4412.31.4040; 4412.31.4050; 

4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 

4412.31.4075; 4412.31.4080; 

4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135; 

4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 

4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; 

4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; 

4412.32.0560; 4412.32.0565; 

4412.32.0570; 4412.32.2510; 

4412.32.2520; 4412.32.2525; 

4412.32.2530; 4412.32.3125; 

4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 

4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 

4412.32.3185; 4412.32.5600; 

4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 

4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; 

4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 

4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 

4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; 

4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 

4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; 

4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 

4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 

4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; 

4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 

4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141; 

4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 

4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; 

4412.94.6000; 4412.94.7000; 

4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 

4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600; 

4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 

4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 

4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; 

4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 

4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; 

4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 

4412.99.5105; 4412.99.5115; 

4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; 

4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 

4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; 

4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; 

4418.72.2000; and 4418.72.9500; and 

9801.00.2500. 

The HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes 

only; the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs by parties to these new 

shipper reviews are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

which is hereby adopted by this notice. 

A list of the issues which parties raised 

and to which we respond in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

to this notice as an Appendix. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 

Access to IA ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central 

Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main 

Department of Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum can 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES