J

- S89036

- 16

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JHILEEL BURTON Appellant No. 1055 EDA 2016

Appeal from the PCRA Order March 11, 2016 in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County Criminal Division

at No(s): CP

- 46

- CR

- 0000116

- 2013
BEFORE: SHOGAN, MOULTON , and FITZGERALD, * JJ. JUDGMENT ORDER BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED APRIL 07, 2017 Appellant, Jhileel Burton, appeals from the order of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas denying his Post Conviction Relief Act 1 (“PCRA”) petition. Appellant’s counsel, John W. Aitchison, Esq., has filed an Anders brief, 2 which w e shall regard as a Turner / Finley brief. 3 We remand

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541

- 9546.

2 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

3 Commonwealth v. Turner , 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988); Commonwealth v. Finley , 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) ( en banc ). We reiterate that “[c]ounsel petitioning to withdraw from PCRA representation must proceed not under Anders but under [ Turner and Finley ].” Commonwealth v. Wrecks , 931 A.2d 717, 721 (Pa. Super. 2007) (emphasis added). However, “[b]ecause an Anders brief provides greater protection to a defendant, this Court may accept an Anders brief in lieu of a Turner / Finley letter.” Commonwealth v. Widgins , 29 A.3d 816, 817 n.2 (Pa. Super. 2011) (citation omitted).J

- S89036

- 16

- 2

-

the record in this matter and direct counsel to file a separate petition to withdraw from representation in this Court. Instantly, Appellant’s counsel has not filed a separate petition to withdraw as c ounsel in this Court. Counsel’s brief includes, as appendices, a petition to withdraw from representation and a copy of a letter informing Appellant of his right to proceed pro se or with new counsel. App. D & Ex. A. to “ Anders ” Brief. The petition to w ithdraw refers to an attached certificate of service. Although counsel has certified that he served a copy of the brief, which would presumably include the appendix and exhibit, we cannot find a copy of a separate certificate of service for counsel’s peti tion to withdraw or his letter to Appellant. It is well settled that PCRA counsel seeking to withdraw contemporaneously forward to the petitioner a copy of the application to withdraw that includes (i) a copy of both the “no

- merit” letter, and (ii) a sta tement advising the PCRA petitioner that . . . the petitioner has the right to proceed pro se , or with the assistance of privately retained counsel. Widgins , 29 A.3d at 818 (citations omitted). Thus, when confronted with the filing of a no

- merit brief an d a request to withdraw in this Court, this Court’s threshold duty is to ensure that the appellant has been provided with adequate notice of his counsel’s intent to withdraw from representation. See id. Accordingly, in an abundance of caution to ensure p roper notice to Appellant, we direct counsel to file a separate petition to withdraw in this Court and inform Appellant of his rightsJ

- S89036

- 16

- 3

-

on appeal. See Widgins , 29 A.2d at 818. Counsel shall also submit a certification that Appellant has been served with th e petition, counsel’s no

merit brief, and a letter informing Appellant of his right to proceed immediately either pro se or with private counsel. Counsel shall comply with within fourteen days of this decision. Appellant shall have thirty days from the d ate of counsel’s service of his petition and accompanying documents to respond or seek an extension of time to respond in this Court. The record shall be remanded to the trial court for a period not to exceed forty

- five days. Record remanded with instru ctions. Panel jurisdiction retained. Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary
Date: 4/7/2017