alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, KENNETH GALPIN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: June 14, 2005 | /s/  Kenneth GalpinKenneth Galpin
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.8.3

                     THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE RETIREMENT PLAN
                               FOR OFFICERS OF NCR

     AMENDMENT TO THE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR OFFICERS OF NCR (the "Plan") as
restated and in effect January 1, 1997 by NCR Corporation ("NCR").

     WHEREAS, the Plan was amended and restated effective January 1, 1997,
amended by a First Amendment executed August 15, 1997 and a Second Amendment
executed October 24, 2001; and

     WHEREAS, NCR desires to amend the Plan to admit no new participants to the
Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, NCR does hereby amend the Plan, effective June 1, 2002, as
follows:

     1. ARTICLE V is hereby amended by the addition of the following new
paragraph:

     Notwithstanding the above, effective June 1, 2002, no new participants will
be admitted to the Plan.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NCR has caused this amendment to the Plan to be
executed this 31st day of July, 2002.

                                    FOR NCR CORPORATION


                                    By: /s/ Wilbert Buiter
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Wilbert Buiter
                                        Senior Vice President, Human Resources
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Virginia Silva, Appellant, v<br><br>against<br><br>David Lee, Respondent. Appellate Term Docket No. 2015-02343 Q C Lower Court # 3227/14 Stephen David Fink, Esq., for appellant. David Lee, respondent pro se (no brief filed).</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered April 1, 2015. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the action.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Plaintiff commenced this small claims action to recover the principal sum of $5,000 for a breach of contract that had allegedly occurred in February of 2013. At a nonjury trial, plaintiff testified that, by virtue of actions taken by defendant, her landlord, she was forced to go to a hotel for three months commencing in February of 2013. Defendant indicated to the court that plaintiff had previously filed a small claims action against him for $5,000 for a breach of a lease which had occurred in February of 2013. Defendant stated that, in the prior action, in July of 2014, an arbitrator had awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $700. Defendant gave the court copies of the prior court papers.</p><p>Following the trial, the Civil Court dismissed the action, noting that the exact same case had already been adjudicated.</p><p>The doctrine of res judicata prevents the relitigation of plaintiff's claim (<a href="../2011/2011_50988.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Gerstman v Fountain Terrace Owners Corp.</i>, 31 Misc 3d 148</a>[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 50988[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2011]). While plaintiff argues that, pursuant to CCA 1808, a small claims judgment cannot have res judicata effect, that provision was intended to divest the small claims judgment only of its issue preclusion use, otherwise known as collateral estoppel, a subset of res judicata (<i>see Omara v Polise</i>, 163 Misc 2d 989 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d &amp; 11th Jud Dists 1995]). Where, as here, a plaintiff obtains a small claims judgment against a defendant, the judgment precludes the plaintiff from suing defendant again on the very same claim (<a href="../2007/2007_52362.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Chorekchan v Forman</i>, 18 Misc 3d 127</a>[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 52362[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d &amp; 11th Jud Dists 2007]).</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.</p><p>Paul Kenny</p><br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 29, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

DECKERS OUTDOOR CORPORATION, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

0ESHOP-2014, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02930

Judge Thomas M. Durkin

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Deckers 

Outdoor Corporation (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismiss this action with prejudice as to the following 

Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

Alliteration 2 specially sold cowboys 45

changyubao 69

Dailey sonme well down latey 80

dynamomee 88

Is A Hero 135

JH4218 139

jingmai003 147

jingman 148

LIN Supermarket 175

ling ling 123 177

maguangbo 189

MIN2 STORE 195

SMX 235

Trend square 255

tuikmf 256

vdibjtoy 261

WanliFly 264

Yikai8686 289

Zixin International Trade 303

Case: 1:20-cv-02930 Document #: 45 Filed: 07/24/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:11298
2

Dated this 24th day of July 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation

Case: 1:20-cv-02930 Document #: 45 Filed: 07/24/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:11299
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 36 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 36 Filed 05/25/16 Page 2 of 2
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Louis Atkins

, * From the 10 4th District Court

of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 20106B

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 056

- CR * March 19 , 20 20

The Sta te of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright

, S.C. J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
### **EXHIBIT 11.1**

### ** **

**COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMONSHARE**

 
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **Three Months Ended June 30,** | ** ** | **Six Months Ended June 30,** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                            | ** ** | **2008**                                            | ** ** | **2007**                                          | ** ** | **2008** | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** |
| Diluted net loss  per share from continuing operations:               |       |                                                |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |
| Net loss from  continuing operations available to common shareholders |       | $                                                   | (3,959,000 | )                                                 | $          | (2,996,000 | ) | $ | (8,293,000 | ) | $ | (8,612,000 | ) |
|                                                                  |       |                                                |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted average  number of shares outstanding                        |       | 7,954,928                                           |       | 7,957,428                                         |       | 7,954,928 |   | 7,957,428 |   |
| Net effect of  dilutive stock options based on treasury stock method  |       | —                                              |       | —                                            |       | — |   | — |   |
| Total average  shares                                                 |       | 7,954,928                                           |       | 7,957,428                                         |       | 7,954,928 |   | 7,957,428 |   |
|                                                                  |       |                                                |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |
| Fully diluted  net loss per share from continuing operations          |       | $                                                   | (0.50      | )                                                 | $          | (0.38 | ) | $ | (1.04 | ) | $ | (1.08 | ) |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"Michael Reed Barratt","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1a1rflB1A3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/michael-reed-barratt\/\">Michael Reed Barratt<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/michael-reed-barratt\/embed\/#?secret=1a1rflB1A3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Michael Reed Barratt” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1a1rflB1A3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/9368636071_1ef077531c_o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"My Travel Log Book","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5gXQAfj23J\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/travel-log-book\/\">My Travel Log Book<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/travel-log-book\/embed\/#?secret=5gXQAfj23J\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“My Travel Log Book” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5gXQAfj23J\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/travel-log-book.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6082

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JERITON LAVAR CURRY, a/k/a Cheese , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cr - 00074

- MOC

- DSC

- 2; 3:19

- cv 00292

- MOC )

Submitted : June 30, 2021 Decided: July 8, 2021

Before KING, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jeriton Lavar Curry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jeriton Lavar Curry seeks to appeal the distri ct court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a s ubstantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessme nt of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Curry has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we grant Curry’s motion to amend and supplement the informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispens e with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### Elias Bernstein and Others, Copartners, etc., Respondents, *v.*Harry Hakim, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 10, 1926.

Process —■ summons — service accomplished by fraud and deceit set aside — judgment predicated thereon reversed — defendant appeared specially on motion to vacate.

Defendant’s motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint herein, procured by fraud and deceit on the part of the plaintiff, should be granted *583and the judgment predicated thereon should be reversed for the reason that the court never acquired jurisdiction of the defendant who appeared specially on the motion.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District, denying a motion to vacate the service of a summons and complaint and from a judgment entered in this action.

*Droege & Rao*[O. *H. Droege*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Silberman & Steinfeld [Louis R. Bick*of counsel], for the respondents.

Per Curiam.

The appearance of the defendant on the motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint in this action was in substance a special appearance. Moreover, the court below acquired no jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, as the service of the summons and complaint was procured by fraud and deceit on the part of the plaintiff. Judgment and order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint is granted, with ten dollars costs.

All concur; present, Bijur, Delehanty and Wagner, JJ.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"STEM Essay Contest Winners Earn Close-Encounter Visit to NASA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"URMLXKC5l6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/rps\/stem-essay-contest-winners-earn-close-encounter-visit-to-nasa\/\">STEM Essay Contest Winners Earn Close-Encounter Visit to NASA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/rps\/stem-essay-contest-winners-earn-close-encounter-visit-to-nasa\/embed\/#?secret=URMLXKC5l6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STEM Essay Contest Winners Earn Close-Encounter Visit to NASA” — NASA\" data-secret=\"URMLXKC5l6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/img_0467.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":309}