alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1999 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,441
<SECURITIES>                                   172,386
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,659
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,765
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,415)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,045
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,615
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    579
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                579
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       579
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Karl B. Hille","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/khille\/","title":"Goddard Physicist Inducted to NASA Inventors Hall of Fame","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2GIX0XSe6h\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/goddard-people\/physicist-inducted-to-nasa-inventors-hall-of-fame\/\">Goddard Physicist Inducted to NASA Inventors Hall of Fame<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/goddard-people\/physicist-inducted-to-nasa-inventors-hall-of-fame\/embed\/#?secret=2GIX0XSe6h\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Goddard Physicist Inducted to NASA Inventors Hall of Fame” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2GIX0XSe6h\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/1_wollack_ed_sed_4863.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":427}
Prepared and filed by St Ives Burrups



  Exhibit 10.8I












	           	 GlaxoSmithKline
      

      One Franklin Plaza 

      P.O. Box 7929 

      Philadelphia, PA 

      19101-7929

      

      Tel. 215 751 4000

      Fax. 215 751 3400 

      www.gsk.com




	         	August 1, 2001


NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

  420 Chipeta Way

  Salt Lake City, Utah 84108

RE: Amendment Agreement to Amend the January 24, 2000 Amendment Agreement

Dear Sirs:

This Amendment Agreement
  to amend the January 24, 2000 Amendment Agreement will confirm that the Letter
  Agreement dated November 26, 1997 between NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a corporation
  of the state of Delaware, having a place of business at 420 Chipeta Way, Salt
  Lake City, Utah 84108, U.S.A. (herein referred to as “NPS”) and
  SmithKline Beecham Corporation, a GlaxoSmithKline Company, a corporation of
  the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, having a place of business at One Franklin
  Plaza, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101, U.S.A. (hereinafter referred to as
  “GSK”) shall be amended, effective as of the date of NPS’
  signature below, as follows: 


  •   In the second bullet, delete the
    “fifth, sixth, and seventh RESEARCH years” and insert therefor
    the words “fifth and sixth RESEARCH years, and at a level of one hundred
    seventy five thousand U.S. dollars (U.S. $175,000) per NPS FTE who is a lab
    personnel and at a level of one hundred fifty thousand U.S. dollars (U.S.
    $150,000) per NPS FTE who is a non-lab based consultant for the seventh RESEARCH
    year and at a level of two hundred twenty five thousand U.S. dollars (U.S.
    $225,000) per NPS FTE who is a non-lab based consultant for the eighth RESEARCH
    year, provided that it is understood that there will only be a total of two
    (2) NPS FTE’s during the seventh RESEARCH year and only a total of four
    (4) NPS FTE’s during the eighth RESEARCH year, and the levels outlined
    above will be applied on a pro-rata basis depending on the type of NPS FTE
    utilized.

  •   This Amendment Agreement shall be retroactively
    effective as of November 1, 2000.



•   All other terms
  and conditions of the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







  
  
    Please indicate your acceptance of this January
      24, 2000 Amendment Agreement by signing and dating the duplicate copies
      of this letter below and returning one such fully executed copy to GSK.

    

  



	 	Very truly yours,
	 	SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
      

      (a GlaxoSmithKline Company)
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ Donald F. Parman
	 	 	     Donald
      F. Parman
	 	 Title: 	Secretary
	 	Date:	August 1, 2001




	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED: 

      NPS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ E. F. Nemith	 
	 	     E. F. Nemith	 
	Title:	CSO	 
	Date:	7 Aug 2001
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: January 7, 2010

| |     |                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                     
| | By: | /s/ JOHN J. JOYCE                                                                                   
| |     | John J. Joyce                                                                                       
| |     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)

A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael P. O’Donnell, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Xerium Technologies, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the“Registrant”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a. Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

March 1, 2006 

/s/ Michael P. O’Donnell 

Michael P. O’Donnell 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Aeronautics Experts Help Prepare Ingenuity to Fly on Mars","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NVyt7clex2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/nasas-aeronautics-experts-help-prepare-ingenuity-to-fly-on-mars\/\">NASA\u2019s Aeronautics Experts Help Prepare Ingenuity to Fly on Mars<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/nasas-aeronautics-experts-help-prepare-ingenuity-to-fly-on-mars\/embed\/#?secret=NVyt7clex2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Aeronautics Experts Help Prepare Ingenuity to Fly on Mars” — NASA\" data-secret=\"NVyt7clex2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/helicopter_still_image.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
#### The State, ex rel. Church of the Nazarene, *v.*Fogo, Registrar.

(No. 4024

Decided June 20, 1947.)

*Mr. Clarence J. Stewart,*for relator.

*Mr. Hugh S. Jenkins,*attorney general, and *Mr. Joseph S. Gill,*for respondent.

By the Court.

This is an action in mandamus wherein the relator seeks a writ directing the respondent, Edward T. Fogo, as registrar of motor vehicles, to issue to it license plates for an alleged “school bus” without the payment of the annual motor vehicle license tax as provided in Section 6295-1, General Code. The petition alleges that the “school bus” in question is used to transport children to Sunday school 'and Bible school and to school functions connected therewith, all of which are operated in connection with a church. A general demurrer is filed to the petition.

The question presented is whether a bus used for such purposes is a. “school bus” as that term is used in Section 6295-1, General Code, which provides in part as follows:

“No school bus as hereinafter defined shall be re*239quired to pay the annual license tax provided for in Section 6291 of the General Code. The term ‘school bus’ as used herein shall be construed to mean any vehicle, however owned, used exclusively to transport school children, either to and/or from school, or to and/or from any school function, having a seating capacity of more than five persons exclusive of the driver. ’ ’

It is an elementary rule of statutory construction that words used in a statute should be given their usual and ordinary meaning unless the context requires a different interpretation. Consequently, it is necessary to ascertain the ordinary meaning of the words “school” and “Sunday school.” We think that the term “school” as so used denotes an institution of learning wherein a course of general.education and mental training is offered for children similar to that offered in the public schools.

The term “Sunday school” as ordinarily used refers to a school held on Sunday for the study of the Bible and for religious instruction. The terms “school” and “Sunday school” are not synonymous, as ordinarily used, each having a distinct and different meaning. We, therefore, hold that a “Sunday school” does'not constitute a “school” as that term is defined, and consequently a bus used in connection therewith would not constitute a “school bus” as1 that term is used in Section 6295-1, General Code.

The demurrer will be sustained.

*•Demiirrer sustained.*

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Chief of Staff LLC

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−03169

Honorable Gary Feinerman

Hiscox Insurance Company Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, May 24, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gary Feinerman:Plaintiff has filed a notice

of voluntary dismissal [67], the terms of which are set forth therein. Motion to strike [63]

is denied as moot. The status hearing set for 6/24/2021 [66] is stricken. Civil case

closed.Mailed notice.(jlj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-03169 Document #: 68 Filed: 05/24/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1060
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          FRANKLIN FINANCE CORPORATION
                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

Net income for basic income per share is computed by subtracting from the
applicable income the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
income applicable to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Six Months Ended                   Three Months Ended
                                                            ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     June 30,                           June 30,
                                                                2000           1999             2000                 1999
                                                            ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>             <C>            <C>                 <C>
INCOME
Net income                                                  $1,398,132      $1,180,362     $    713,093        $    565,751
Less: preferred stock dividend requirements                    900,450         900,450          450,225             450,225
                                                            ----------      ----------     ------------        ------------
Net income applicable to common stock                       $  497,682      $  279,912     $    262,868        $    115,526

SHARES
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding            22,077          22,077           22,077              22,077

NET INCOME PER SHARE                                        $    22.54      $    12.68     $      11.91        $       5.23

</TABLE>

14
9366.

#### Simplex Machine Company *v.*Greenberg & Bond Company.

Beoyles, JP. J.

1. An answer to a summons of garnishment, made at the proper term of court, is amendable. *Burrus*v. *Moore,*63 *Ga.*405; *Plant*v. *Mutual Life Ins. Co.,*92 *Ga.*636 (19 S. E. 719); *Dannenberg Co.*v. *Adler-May Co.,*137 *Ga.*111 (72 S. E. 906).

2.. The original answer of the garnishee in "this case was as follows: “Georgia, Eulton County. Now comes garnishee in above-stated case, and in answer to the summons of garnishment served on said garnishee says: (1) Since the service of saifl summons of garnishment said defendant has filed his voluntary petition in bankruptcy in the U. S. court in and for the Northern District of Georgia, and has been adjudicated a bankrupt; and said proceedings are now pending in said bankrupt court, and are not finally determined. (2) The account sued on by above-named plaintiff is duly scheduled in said bankrupt’s schedule with his said petition in bankruptcy, and same is a dischargeable debt, and when debtor obtains his final discharge in bankruptcy, will be discharged and relieved from liability on said account sued on, and no valid judgment can be rendered in said garnishment proceedings. Wherefore garnishee prays that said garnishment proceedings be stayed until the final determination of the question of defendant’s discharge in bankruptcy. W. J. Laney, Atty. for Garnishee.” This answer was defective for the reason that' it was not verified. It was also incomplete and insufficient in that it failed to comply with the provisions of the various code sections bearing upon the subject. There was, however, enough in the answer to amend by, and the trial judge did not err in allowing the amendment offered by the garnishee at a subsequent term of the court. The answer as amended was inepmplete and subject to *69exception, since it failed to comply .witli the provisions of section 5298 of the Civil Code of 1910 as amended by the act of the General Assembly, approved August 14, 1914 (Acts 1914, p. 62). No exception, however, to the amended answer having been filed, and it not having been traversed, the trial court did not err in rendering judgment in favor of the garnishee. *Fitzpatrick*v. *Shepherd,*ante, 44 (95 S. E. 530).

Decided March 14, 1918.

Certiorari; from Fulton' superior court—Judge Bell. October 3, 1917.

*James J. Slaton, W. B. Hartsfield,*for plaintiff in error.

*Burr ess & Dillard,*contra.

It follows that the judge of the superior court erred in sustaining the certiorari and in rendering judgment against the garnishee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*