alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity asindicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.        May 10, 2006   /s/ Richard A. Smith   Richard A. Smith   Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Workforce Investment Act: Native American Employment and Training 
Council

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of 
Labor.

ACTION: Cancellation notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following Federal Advisory Committee Act meeting has been 
cancelled. No earlier announcement of the cancellation was possible.

DATES: The meeting previously scheduled to convene on November 5-6, 
2014, has been cancelled and will be re-scheduled at a later date. This 
notice was published in the Federal Register on September 10, 2014, 
Volume 79, Number 175, page 53787.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Athena R. Brown, Designated 
Federal Officer, Division of Indian and Native American Programs, 
Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 
S-4209, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone 
number (202) 693-3737 (VOICE) (this is not a toll-free number).

Portia Wu,
Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-26168 Filed 11-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4501-FR-P
NO. 07-03-0357-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JULY 7, 2004

	______________________________

	NAVIN PATEL AND SEJAL PATEL, APPELLANT

	V.

	BIPIN PATEL AND MINAXI PATEL, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 159TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY;

	NO. 33,117-00-5; HONORABLE PAUL E. WHITE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellants Navin Patel and Sejal Patel appeal from a judgment following a bench trial, that appellees Bipin Patel and Minaxi Patel recover $53,493.98, plus attorney’s fees in the amount of $17,613.00 from them.  We abate the appeal and remand with directions to the trial court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law.

	Without the assistance of counsel, the parties signed a written contract for the sale of a convenience store, its inventory, and certain real estate.  Before the contract was closed, appellants took possession and commenced operating the store; however, the transaction was never closed.  Appellees filed suit seeking  possession of the property and money damages.  The case was tried on the merits on August 29, 2002, and on May 19, 2003, the trial court signed the judgment.  Appellants requested the trial court file findings of fact and conclusions of law on May 28, 2003, and on June 28, 2003, gave written notice of past due findings of fact and conclusions of law.  However, none were made nor filed. 

	By their first issue, appellants complain of the trial court’s failure to make and file findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Citing  Brooks v. Housing Authority of City of El Paso, 926 S.W.2d 316, 319 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1996, no writ), appellees acknowledge that abatement and remand is the appropriate remedy, 

	Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand this cause to the trial court.  On remand, the trial court is directed to file findings of fact and conclusions of law on or before September 6, 2004, which date shall be deemed to be the 20th day after a timely request for findings and conclusion for purposes of Tex. R. Civ. P. 297, 298, and 299a, which rules shall apply to further proceedings in the trial court pursuant to this order. The trial court is further directed to cause the trial court clerk to prepare and file a supplemental appellate record which includes its findings of fact and conclusions of law.  

	Leave is granted to appellants to file an amended brief within 20 days after the findings of fact and conclusions of law are filed in the trial court.  Also, appellees may file a reply brief to appellants’ amended brief within 20 days of the date appellants file their brief.  

	Except as specifically set out otherwise, the provisions of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure shall apply to further proceedings.  Because the case was previously submitted by oral argument, no further oral argument will be permitted, except upon motion setting forth good cause.

	It is so ordered.

								Per Curiam
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QST FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,712,285
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,736,907
<PP&E>                                          73,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,835,137
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,923
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,983
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,795,231
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,835,137
<SALES>                                          9,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,259
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254,878
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (244,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (244,957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (244,957)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

James Smith

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02350

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

Greatbanc Trust Company, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, September 21, 2021:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Plaintiff's unopposed

motion to lift the stay on litigation [67] is denied without prejudice. While the Court of

Appeals has issued a decision, it has not yet issued the mandate. This Court will issue an

appropriate scheduling order once it receives the mandate. Mailed notice. (kp, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02350 Document #: 68 Filed: 09/21/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:457
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 7, 2011

0131 

# Order

February 7, 2011

141954

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141954 COA: 291418 Emmet CC: 07-009780-CF COLOR MINI CAMERA, SWANN D 14 TWIN PACK CAMERA, 5.1 PHILLIPS BRAND SURROUND SOUND SPEAKERS, CURTIS MATHES COLOR FLAT SCREEN TELEVISION, SONY BRAND BIG SCREEN TELEVISION SN 9714363, DELL BRAND COMPUTER TOWER, KEY BOARD, LCD MONITOR & MOUSE, KODAK EASY SHARE 2612 DIGITAL CAMERA WITH DOCKING STATION, SONY BRAND STEREO RECE IVER SN 8854606, VIDEO ROUTER WITH FOUR CHANNELS, DELPHI XM RADIO RECEIVER, 2000 GMC PICKUP BLACK WITH CAB VIN 1GTGK24U7YE146315, YARD MACHINE SNOW BLOWER #1K045B70430, LAWN BOY PUSH MOWER # 2500 12863, RYOBI LAWN TRIMMER #A40743824, POULON BRAND CHAIN SAW SN 00333D300, COMMERCIAL SERIES CHAR-BROIL GRILL GAS SN 80004330, RYOBI TABLE SAW SN X052795649, RYOBI CHOP SAW SN V0449 and $878, Defendants, and

TINA SOCOLOVITCH and ANDREW M. KOSACK, Claimants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 14, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### James Ewing *v.*Commonwealth.

Indictment — Allegation of Time.

An indictment for a misdemeanor is sufficient if it alleges that the offense was committed in a certain month, without giving the day of the month.

APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

December 6, 1871.

*610
      *Belden &*Cleaver, *for appellant.*

*Atorney*General, *for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

J udg-e Pryor :

We perceive no error in the judgment of the court below. The indictment alleges that tbe accused on the day of April, 1870, unlawfully carried concealed on his person a deadly weapon, a pistol, at James Spalding’s magistrates court. This is not material in a case like this except to show that it was previous to the finding of the indictment. If the indictment had alleged that he carried concealed this pistol in the month of April, 1870, it would have been sufficient. The proof shows that it was carried at Spalding’s magistrates court, and whether it was at the regular court or not is immaterial. This proof authorized the instructions given.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of B&G  Foods,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
L.  Wenner,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David L. Wenner
----------------------------
David L. Wenner
Chief Executive Officer
July 23, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

NIKE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

WELLSRIRING STORE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02619

Judge John F. Kness

Magistrate Judge Maria Valdez

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on August 19, 2020 [51], in favor 

of Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Nike”) and against the Defendants Identified in Schedule A 

in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) per Defaulting Defendant for willful 

use of counterfeit Nike Trademarks in connection with the offer for sale and/or sale of products 

through at least the Defendant Internet Stores, and Nike acknowledges payment of an agreed upon 

damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release this judgment and hereby fully and 

completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No. 

ZPCAILT Official Store 14

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendant are hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment.

Case: 1:20-cv-02619 Document #: 53 Filed: 09/03/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3765
2

Dated this 3rd day of September 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

Jake M. Christensen

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

jchristensen@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Nike, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-02619 Document #: 53 Filed: 09/03/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3766
#### D. Beatty & Wife *v.*A. A. Curtis.

Husband and Wife — Wife’s Note Not Obligatory.

Arthusa Beatty was, at the time she executed the note, the wife of Decatur Beatty, and by reason of her disability the writing was not obligatory on her.

APPEAL RROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT.

January 22, 1872.

*Biddle & Fluty, for appellants.*

Opinion or the Court by

Judge Peters:

It appears from tbe amended petition that Artbusa Beatty was at tbe time sbe executed tbe note, and still is, tbe wife of Decater Beatty, and by reason of her disability tbe writing was not obligatory on her, and as to Decatur eBatty it is not alleged that be executed tbe note, or was in any way bound for tbe debt, and no cause of action is shown to exist against him. And the mere agreement of Oldham did not authorize a judgment against Beatty and wife.

Wherefore, as to Beatty and wife, tbe judgment is reversed, and tbe cause remanded, with directions to dismiss tbe action as to them.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 248

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that India should

be a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 26, 1997

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. BEREUTER,

Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida,

Mr. HORN, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms.

JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mrs. CLAYTON,

Mr. BORSKI, Mr. FILNER, and Mr. SHERMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

India should be a permanent member of the United

Nations Security Council.

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that India should be a permanent member of

3 the United Nations Security Council.

Æ
BE IT REMEMBERED:

THAT at the term of the Honorable Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of the State of 

Texas, held at Waco on the 1st day of January, 2016, present Chief Justice TOM GRAY Justices 

REX D. DAVIS and AL SCOGGINS

In the cause

No. 10-16-00288-CV

IN RE CCI GULF COAST UPSTREAM, LLC.

Original Proceeding

the following order was entered on the 27th day of September, 2016:

“A response to the petition for writ of mandamus is requested. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). 

Any response shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 21 days from the date of this order.”

I, SHARRI ROESSLER, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth District of Texas, at 

the City of Waco, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order entered herein by 

this Court in the above entitled and numbered cause as appears of record in Minute Book 13, Page 

915.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand 

and affix the seal of said Court at Waco, this day of 

A.D. 2016.

SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By: ___________________________

Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 7, 1997.
    Resolved, That Robin H. Carle, of the Commonwealth of Virginia, be, and she 
is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives;
    That Wilson S. Livingood, of the Commonwealth of Virginia, be, and he is 
hereby, chosen Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives; and
    That Reverend James David Ford, of the Commonwealth of Virginia, be, and he 
is hereby, chosen Chaplain of the House of Representatives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1750

___________

Carolyn Sue Parnell, Administratrix of *

the Estate of Melissa Ann Witt, *

Deceased, *

 *

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the 

v. * Western District of Arkansas.

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

C & N Bowl Corporation, Inc. doing *

business as Bowling World of Fort *

Smith, Arkansas, *

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: September 3, 1997

 Filed: September 10, 1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Ann Witt was attacked on and abducted from the parking lot of C&N

Bowl Corporation d/b/a Bowling World (Bowling World) in Ft. Smith, Arkansas, on

December 1, 1994, and subsequently murdered elsewhere. Carolyn Sue Parnell, as

administratrix of Witt’s estate, brought this diversity action seeking to recover damages
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1

for the Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

for the wrongful death of Witt, contending that previous criminal activity on the parking

lot created a legal duty on the part of Bowling World to protect Witt from the attack

and abduction. The district court granted summary judgment to Bowling World,

1

concluding that Witt’s assault and abduction was “sudden, unexpected and

unforeseeable,” and that as a matter of law Bowling World owed no duty to Witt. We

affirm.

Because this is a diversity case, the substantive issues are governed by state law,

and we review the district court’s interpretation of state law de novo. See Dupps v.

Travelers Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 312, 313 (8th Cir. 1996). We also review the grant of

summary judgment de novo. See Allen v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 81 F.3d 793,

795 (8th Cir. 1996). 

The incidents that occurred on the Bowling World parking lot during the eighteen

months prior to Witt’s abuduction involved minor altercations, loitering, property

damage, and car thefts. We agree with the district court that these incidents were not

of a nature that created a legal duty on the part of Bowling World to protect Witt from

the type of criminal activity that led to her abduction and death. See Boren v. Worthen

Nat’l Bank, 921 S.W.2d 934, 941 (Ark. 1996); Twin City Amusement Co. v. Salater,

372 S.W.2d 224, 226 (Ark. 1963). 

Likewise, we conclude that the district court did not err in refusing to impose

liability upon Bowling World on Parnell’s alternative theory of liability under Section

324A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965).

The judgment is affirmed.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42899

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SCOTT DOUGLAS BRASSFIELD,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 746

Filed: December 4, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Thomas F. Neville, District Judge. 

Order relinquishing jurisdiction and executing modified sentence, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Scott Douglas Brassfield pled guilty to felony driving under the influence. Idaho Code

§§ 18-8004, 18-8005(6). The district court sentenced Brassfield to a unified term of ten years 

with three years determinate and retained jurisdiction. Following the period of retained 

jurisdiction, the district court suspended Brassfield’s sentence and placed him on probation for a 

period of ten years. Subsequently, Brassfield admitted to violating his probation and the district 

court revoked his probation, ordered Brassfield’s sentence executed, and again retained 

jurisdiction. After this second period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished 

jurisdiction and reduced Brassfield’s underlying sentence to ten years with two and one-half 
2

years determinate. Brassfield appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by 

failing to place him on probation following his second period of retained jurisdiction.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the 

information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Brassfield

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.

Brassfield argues that all of the relevant goals of sentencing could have been 

accomplished with probation. As noted above, however, the district court found that probation 

was not an appropriate course of action in Brassfield’s case. The record does not indicate that 

the district court abused its discretion in sentencing. 

The order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction and reducing Brassfield’s 

sentence are affirmed.