alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Worm Logo","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Poh21fzZLs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-earth-information-center-ribbon-cutting-9\/\">NASA\u2019s Worm Logo<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-earth-information-center-ribbon-cutting-9\/embed\/#?secret=Poh21fzZLs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Worm Logo” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Poh21fzZLs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/nhq202306210039orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":380}
No. 87-1246.

#### Arizona *v.*Feld et al.

Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
 or
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition
period from to
 Metalico, Inc.
  Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    001-32453(Commission file number)
    
    52-2169780(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)186 North Avenue East 
Cranford, NJ(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    07016(Zip Code)
    
    (908) 497-9610(Registrants Telephone Number)
 þ o
  Large accelerated filer
o
    
    Accelerated filer
þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXPLANATORY NOTEPART IIItem 6. ExhibitsSIGNATURESCertification of Chief Executive OfficerCertification of Chief Financial OfficerCertification of Chief Executive OfficerCertification of Chief Financial Officer    Table of Contents  
 EXPLANATORY NOTE
  METALICO, INC.
Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
Table of Contents
 
  Item 6.
    
    Exhibits.
    
    
    
    Page XX
 
 Item 6. Exhibits.
  31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Metalico, Inc. pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended31.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Metalico, Inc. pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended32.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Metalico, Inc. pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code32.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Metalico, Inc. pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code
 
 
   METALICO, INC.
(Registrant)Date:  May 9, 2008
    By:
    /s/ CARLOS E. AGÜEROCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief
Executive OfficerDate:  May 9, 2008
    By:
    /s/ ERIC W. FINLAYSONEric W. FinlaysonSenior Vice President and Chief
     Financial Officer (Principal Financial
     Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) 2
9330.

#### Baker *v.*City of Atlanta.

Decided July 10, 1918.

Action for damages; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pen-' dleton. October 16, 1917:

*T. J. Bipley, W. M. Bailey,*for plaintiff.

*J. L. ■Mayson, D. Hewlett,*for defendant.

Beoyles, P. J.

The court overruled the general ground of the demurrer to the petition, but sustained all of the special grounds of the demurrer', and allowed the plaintiff ten days within which to amend his petition to meet these special grounds. To this ruling no exception was taken, nor is error assigned thereon in the bill of exceptions. Therefore the ruling that the petition was subject to these special demurrers became the law of the ease. The plaintiff, within the ten days allowed, filed a purported amendment to his petition. This amendment, however, was in all substantial respects merely a reiteration of the various allegations contained-in the original petition, and clearly failed to meet the objections raised by the special grounds of the demurrer. No further amendment was offered in the ten days allowed in the court’s order. Under these facts the court did not err in dismissing the plaintiff’s ease. *Hinson*v. *Mutual Fertilizer Co.,*19 *Ga. App.*121 (91 S. E. 241).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworfh and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Awards Accelerate Small Business Tech for Earth and Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qJNZiokv1I\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/nasa-awards-accelerate-small-business-tech-for-earth-and-space\/\">NASA Awards Accelerate Small Business Tech for Earth and Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/nasa-awards-accelerate-small-business-tech-for-earth-and-space\/embed\/#?secret=qJNZiokv1I\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Awards Accelerate Small Business Tech for Earth and Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qJNZiokv1I\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/ltv-climbinghill-viper_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
Exhibit
10.159


 


AMENDMENT TO

MEDICARE+CHOICE PHYSICIAN GROUP SERVICE AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment is entered into effective December 1,
1999, by and between California Physicians’ Service, Inc. dba Blue Shield of California (“Health Plan”)
and NorthWest Orange County Medical Group (“Physician
Group”) in order to modify the Medicare+ Choice Physician Group Service
Agreement, which was effective September 1, 1990, as amended.


 


In
consideration of the recitals, covenants, conditions and promises contained in
the Agreement, the parties agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as
follows.


 


1.                                       Effective September 1, 1999, Anaheim
Memorial Medical Center purchased Martin Luther Hospital. Anaheim Memorial
Medical Center incorporated Martin Luther Hospital into its State license on a
retroactive basis effective September 1, 1999.  As of December 1, 1999, all
references to “Martin Luther Hospital” in the Agreement shall now be references
to “Anaheim Memorial Medical Center.”


 


2.                                       All other provisions of the Agreement or its
Amendments or Addendums not inconsistent herein shall remain in full force and
effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date
and year first written above.


 


	
  BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA

  	
  NORTHWEST ORANGE COUNTY

  
	
   

  	
  MEDICAL GROUP

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
    /s/ Lisa
  Rubino

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
    /s/  Pratibha Patel

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
    Lisa Rubino

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
    Pratibha
  Patel

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Title

  	
    Chief
  Executive Officer – Medicare Region

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
    President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
    7/13/??

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
    11/8/99

  



 


1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10477

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RONALD H. RIVA, III,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:04-CR-47-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ronald H. Riva, III,

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Riva has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 4, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10477 Document: 00512825813 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
No. 14-10477

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10477 Document: 00512825813 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SE PTEMBER 25, 2019

NO. 03

- 19

- 00566

- CV

Frederick

- Omoyuma Silver, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOOD WIN, BAKER, AND KELL Y DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on August 16, 2019

.

Having reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

.

Therefore, the C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is in dige nt

and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 65909-65910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26405]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 573

[Docket No. FDA-2014-F-1669]


The Iams Company; Filing of Food Additive Petition (Animal Use)

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that The 
Iams Company has filed a petition proposing that the food additive 
regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of a Salmonella-
specific bacteriophage preparation as a food additive as an 
antimicrobial processing aid to reduce Salmonella in the production of 
dry dog and cat pet food.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the petitioner's 
request for categorical exclusion from preparing an environmental 
assessment or environmental impact statement by December 8, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, 
Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chelsea Trull, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, 
MD 20855, 240-276-8225.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act

[[Page 65910]]

(section 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), notice is given that a food 
additive petition (FAP 2289) has been filed by The Iams Company, 315 
Cool Springs Blvd., Franklin, TN 37067. The petition proposes to amend 
Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in part 573 Food 
Additives Permitted in Feed and Drinking Water of Animals (21 CFR part 
573) to provide for the safe use of a Salmonella-specific bacteriophage 
preparation as a food additive as an antimicrobial processing aid to 
reduce Salmonella in the production of dry dog and cat pet food. The 
petitioner has requested a categorical exclusion from preparing an 
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under 21 CFR 
25.32(r).
    Interested persons may submit either electronic or written comments 
regarding this request for categorical exclusion to the Division of 
Dockets Management (see DATES and ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to 
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number 
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments 
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: November 3, 2014.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2014-26405 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
FILED 6/2/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

&5

Case: 1:20-cr-00259 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:1
Case: 1:20-cr-00259 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cr-00259 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cr-00259 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cr-00259 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #:5
Case: 1:20-cr-00259 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/02/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #:6
#### Bradfield *v.*M’Cormick, Assignee.

An instrument of writing executed with a scroll, instead of with a wafer or wax seal, is-a sealed instrument.

If a note under seal for money be payable on demand, a suit lies on it without making a' previous demand.

If in an action on a sealed note for the payment of a sum. certain, there-be a demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the plaintiff, — the Court may assess the damages.

*162ERROR to the *Tippecanoe*Circuit Court. The judgment in this case was affirmed during this term; and, on a petition for a re-hearing, the following opinion was delivered:

M’Kinney, J.

This is an action of debt brought on a writing obligatory. The declaration demands 142 dollars and 18i cents, balance due. The defendant craved *oyer*of the instrument declared on, and filed a demurrer to the declaration. On joinder, the demurrer was overruled, and judgment rendered in favour of the plaintiff for 142 dollars and 18i cents debt, and 16 dollars and 50 cents damages and costs. The following instrument was set out on *oyer*— “On demand, we or either of us promise to pay *Joseph*Williamson, or order, the just sum of 150 dollars, for value received of him, as witness our hands this 16th day of November, *1829.*— John Bradfield, [L. S.] *Benjamin*Bradfield, [L. S.]” Three points are made by the plaintiff in error: — 1. The instrument declared on is not a writing obligatory; 2. The declaration is defective for want of an averment of a special demand, as the amount of the note was payable on demand; 3. The Court erred in not calling a jury to assess the damages.

The first question was decided by this Court in the case of *Vanblaricum et al.*v. Yeo, *adm'r. of M'Kay, November*term, 1830. We regard the decision in that case as founded upon a sound •cópstruction of the statute.

As to the second point, the plaintiff demands 142 dollars and 18f cents, and avers in the declaration a credit to be endorsed on the note, reducing it from 150 dollars to the amount claimed. When the credit was entered on the note does not appear. In support of the judgment, we will presume it made about the time the note was executed. The demand is not necessary to sustain the action; it could only affect the amount of demand. The demand of payment should relate back to the time of the credit endorsed. A calculation of interest, founded on this presumption, gives an amount varying but a few cents from *the*damages given in the Circuit Court. We think *the*second objection cannot be sustained (1).

The third point was settled by this Court in the case of *Tannehill*v. Thomas, 1 Blackf. R. 144. The statute of 1831, regulating the practice in suits at law, sec. 41, expressly authorises the course pursued by the Circuit Court.

*163C. *Fletcher*and *W. M. Jenners,*for the plaintiff.

*A. S.*White, for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with 5 *per cent.*_ -i . damages and costs.

(1)

 If a bond, bill of exchange, or promissory note, be payable on demand, interest runs from the day of the demand: if no day of payment be specified, the money is due immediately, and interest is calculated from the date. 2 Stark. Ev. 419.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 8, 2008 | /s/Andrew J. Welch |  
 
Andrew J. Welch

 
 
Chief Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging

 
Trust Incorporated, as general partner of

 
FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership

 

 

  |
|-------------|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Harlow *v.*Becktle.

UPON an affidavit showing the plaintiff in error to be a nonresident, a rule was granted calling on him to show cause why the suit should not be dismissed for want of security for costs.— The security was afterwards given, and the rule discharged (1).

(1)

 Acc. *Harlin's heirs v. Eastland,*Hard. 310. Vide *Lewis*v. *Ovens,*5 Barn, & Ald. 265. In an original suit, a non-resident plaintiff must give security for costs, if required by the defendant. *Cox*v. *Hunt,*ante, p. 146, and note.