alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3764

___________________________

James E. Butler

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Connie Hubbard, APN, Varner Unit, ADC; Jacqueline Carswell, APN, Varner

Unit, ADC; Massey, Dr., Varner Unit, ADC; Anderson, Dr., Varner Unit, ADC;

Estella Murray, Nurse Practitioner, Cummins Unit, ADC; Corizon

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

____________

 Submitted: July 24, 2014

Filed: July 25, 2014

[Unpublished]

____________

Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate James E. Butler appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 

Upon de novo review, this court finds that Butler fell short of establishing a jury

issue of deliberate indifference on the part of Corizon or advanced nurse practitioners

Connie Hubbard and Estella Murray.2 See Mason v. Corr. Med. Servs., Inc., 559 F.3d

880, 884-85 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); Frevert v. Ford Motor Co., 614

F.3d 466, 473-74 (8th Cir. 2010) (nonmoving party must substantiate allegations with

sufficient probative evidence that would allow finding in his favor); Popoalii v. Corr.

Med. Servs., 512 F.3d 488, 499 (8th Cir. 2008) (deliberate indifference, which is akin

to criminal negligence, requires more than negligent misconduct); CrumpleyPatterson v. Trinity Lutheran Hosp., 388 F.3d 588, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2004) (corporate

liability under § 1983). 

The judgment is affirmed. 

______________________________

1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas.

2

Butler waived his claims against the other medical professionals he named. 

See Freitas v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc., 703 F.3d 436, 438 n.3 (8th Cir. 2013). 

-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE, S.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHINABRANDMALL.COM, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-02421 

Judge Robert W. Gettleman 

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 

Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. (“Plaintiff” or “Dior”) hereby moves this 

Honorable Court for entry of a Preliminary Injunction. The scope of the Preliminary Injunction is 

substantially identical to the Temporary Restraining Order entered May 15, 2020. [29]. In 

support of its Motion, Dior files herewith a Memorandum of Law and a further Declaration of 

Justin R. Gaudio. 

Dated this 22nd day of June 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio_______ 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

amartin@gbc.law 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. 

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02421 Document #: 37 Filed: 06/22/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3036
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 22nd day of June 2020, I will electronically file the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, I will electronically publish the 

documents on a website to which the Domain Names that have been transferred to Dior’s control 

now redirect, and I will send an e-mail to the e-mail addresses identified in Exhibits 5 and 6 to 

the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert and any e-mail addresses provided for Defendants by third 

parties that includes a link to said website. 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio__________ 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

amartin@gbc.law 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02421 Document #: 37 Filed: 06/22/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3037
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

*CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Granite City Food & BreweryLtd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 28,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Steven J. Wagenheim, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.                                       the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: |  November 9,  2010 | By:    | /s/  Steven J. Wagenheim               |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                         |   | Steven  J. Wagenheim                   |
|   |                         |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
9158.

#### Gaines *v.*Continental Aid Association.

Decided April 10, 1918.

Petition for certiorari; from Bibb superior court—.Judge Mathews. August 3, 1917.

Gaines sued the Continental Aid Association, in the municipal court of Macon. On the first trial of the case the judge directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled; a certiorari was sustained; and on the second trial the jury found for the plaintiff. The defend*180ant then made a motion for a new trial, which the judge of the municipal court granted, and a petition for certiorari, assigning error thereon, was presented by the plaintiff to the judge of the superior court, he refused to sanction the certiorari, and the plaintiff excepted.

*179Harwell, J.

1. The contention of the plaintiff in error in his brief, that this was virtually the *second*grant of a new trial by the judge of the municipal court, and was unauthorized, under the provisions of the act of the General Assembly creating the municipal court of Macon (Ga. L. 1913, p. 252), was not made in the petition for certiorari, and can not be considered by this court. Civil Code (1910), § 5199; *Perry*v. *Brunswick*& *Western Ry. Co.,*119 *Ga.*819 (47 S. E. 172); *Richards*v. *Little,*88 *Ga.*176 (14 S. E. 207); *Western & Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Jackson,*81 *Ga.*478 (8 S. E. 209); *Callaway*v. *Atlanta,*6 *Ga. App.*355 (64 S. E. 1105).

2. The evidence being in conflict, it was within the discretion of the judge of the municipal court to grant a new trial, and the judge of the superior court did not err in refusing to sanction a certiorari, under the facts of the case.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J. and Bloodworth, J., concur.*

*180*S. L. Wisenberg, H. F. Bawls,*for plaintiff.

*Napier & Maynard, G. M. Nottingham,*for defendant.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 25, 2016

s0414p

Order 

Clerk

April 25, 2016

150569

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150569

COA: 316063

Wayne CC: 12-008623-FC

ERIC MELVIN SULLIVAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Beth Ridgeway","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/angela-b-ridgewaynasa-gov\/","title":"Joseph Pelfrey","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JRhVQKUpym\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/joseph-pelfrey\/\">Joseph Pelfrey<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/joseph-pelfrey\/embed\/#?secret=JRhVQKUpym\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Joseph Pelfrey” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JRhVQKUpym\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/mic_3118cropped.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
---

Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp.
(the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Shaun Heinrichs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: April 13, 2011 | By: | /s/ Shaun Heinrichs                               
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                                   
|                     |     | Shaun Heinrichs                                   
|                     |     | Chief Financial Officer                           
|                     |     | (principal financial and
      accounting officer)

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of King Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. I, James R. Lattanzi, Chief Financial Officer of King Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Date:  November 14, 2002                              /s/ James R. Lattanzi
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     James R. Lattanzi
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Announce Major Eco-Friendly Aviation Project Update","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"igEaVydltY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-announce-major-eco-friendly-aviation-project-update\/\">NASA to Announce Major Eco-Friendly Aviation Project Update<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-announce-major-eco-friendly-aviation-project-update\/embed\/#?secret=igEaVydltY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Announce Major Eco-Friendly Aviation Project Update” — NASA\" data-secret=\"igEaVydltY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 844

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the disposition of a

firearm to, and the possession of a firearm by, non-permanent resident aliens.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 26, 1997

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the disposition of a firearm to, and the possession of a firearm

by, non-permanent resident aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION AGAINST THE DISPOSITION OF A

4 FIREARM TO, AND THE POSSESSION OF A

5 FIREARM BY, NON-PERMANENT RESIDENT

6 ALIENS.

7 (a) PROHIBITIONS.—Paragraph (5) of each of sub8 sections (d) and (g) of section 922 of title 18, United

9 States Code, is amended by inserting

10 ‘‘, or is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence in
2

•HR 844 IH

1 the United States under the Immigration and Nationality

2 Act’’ before the semicolon.

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

4 922(s)(3)(B)(v) of such title is amended by inserting

5 ‘‘, or not lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the

6 United States under the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act’’ before the semicolon.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Televise Expansion Operations for Bigelow Expandable Activity Module","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rKHFCyQViF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-televise-expansion-operations-for-bigelow-expandable-activity-module\/\">NASA to Televise Expansion Operations for Bigelow Expandable Activity Module<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-televise-expansion-operations-for-bigelow-expandable-activity-module\/embed\/#?secret=rKHFCyQViF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Televise Expansion Operations for Bigelow Expandable Activity Module” — NASA\" data-secret=\"rKHFCyQViF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/beam-install.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":322}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators

Pension Fund, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.:

1:20−cv−02471

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Three−D Enterprises, Inc.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, September 21, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis: The Court strikes the

telephonic status hearing set for 9/22/2020 and resets it to 10/27/2020 at 9:30 a.m. to

allow the parties to continue their settlement discussions. If the parties file a stipulation of

dismissal prior to the next status date, no appearance is required. Throughout the

telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record

before speaking. Please note that the conference call−in will be used by all cases that are

on the court's calendar for the said date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on

the line and must have the telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the

public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing. The call−in number is

(866) 434−5269 and the access code is 8087837. Counsel of record will receive an email

the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. Persons granted

remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against

photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these

prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials,

restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions

deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02471 Document #: 16 Filed: 09/21/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:63