alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

As independent
consultants, Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of W&T Offshore, Inc. to be filed on or about March 4, 2011, of information from our reserve
report with respect to the reserves of W&T Offshore, Inc. dated January 27, 2011, and entitled Estimate of Reserves and Future Revenue to the W&T Offshore, Inc. Interest in Certain Oil and Gas Properties Located in State Waters
Offshore Louisiana and Texas and Federal Waters in the Gulf of Mexico as of December 31, 2010, and to the use of our reports on reserves and the incorporation of the reports on reserves for the years ended 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. We
further consent to the incorporation by reference of information contained in our reports dated January 27, 2011 in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-157793) of W&T Offshore, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-159005) pertaining to the W&T Offshore, Inc. Long-Term Compensation Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126252) pertaining to the W&T Offshore, Inc. Directors Compensation
Plan. . We also consent to W&Ts use of the phrase independent petroleum consultant as referencing Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

/s/    C.H. (SCOTT) REES III,
P.E.C.H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas

February 28, 2011
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Record-Setting Astronaut Lopez-Alegria Departs NASA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tn8iUAqSo2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/record-setting-astronaut-lopez-alegria-departs-nasa\/\">Record-Setting Astronaut Lopez-Alegria Departs NASA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/record-setting-astronaut-lopez-alegria-departs-nasa\/embed\/#?secret=tn8iUAqSo2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Record-Setting Astronaut Lopez-Alegria Departs NASA” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tn8iUAqSo2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/s132-e-007808.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":410}
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Marisa Christina Incorporated:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-91708 and 33-91080) on Form S-8 of Marisa Christina, Incorporated of our
report dated February 29, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Marisa Christina, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1999
and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the
December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Marisa Christina, Incorporated.



/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2000
[lf you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.]

District Court for the Northern District Of lllinois

Appearance Form for Pro Se Litigants

lnformation entered on this form is required for any person filing a case in this court as a pro se

party (that is, without an attorney). Please PRINT legibly.

Case Title: Case Number:

Lti?-oqL+h q@h[]l q4, C,tnai Y ),,, t\ ,tJlfra*Jif;. 'J'flra-.qtx,o ,,rnrv,issi,,r

An appearince is hereby filed by the undersigned as a pro se litigant:

Etizafu*ln Cqon?-a,leL

Street Address:

Phone Number:

B(3ol>olo

Executed on (date)

REQUEST TO RECEIVE NOTICE THROUGH E.MAIL

lf you check the box below and provide an e-mail address in the space provided, you will receive notice

via e-mail. By checking the box and providing an e-mail address, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

5(b)2(E) you are waiving your right to receive a paper copy of documents filed electronically in this case.

You should not provide an e-mail address if you do not check it frequently.

n I request to be sent notices from the court via e-mail. I understand that by making this request, I

am waiving the right to receive a paper copy of any electronically filed document in this case. I

understand that if my e-mail address changes I must promptly notify the Court in writing.

E-Mail Address (Please PRINT legibly.)

Rev. 0612312016

[lf you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.]

FILED

3/31/2020

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

20CV2111

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 3 Filed: 03/31/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:106
# r IIt!

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

HELENA,MONTANA 59620-3003 Supreme Court No. DA 20-0156 TOWN OF FROMBERG,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LLOYD MACKENZIE and SARAH MACKENZIE,

Defendants, Third-Party Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SHIRLEY MILLER,NATE CANTON,BILL GRUEL, TIM NOTTINGHAM and JAMES PERKINS,

Third-Party Defendants and Appellees. GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under M. R. App.P. 26(1), Appellant is given an extension of time until June 19, 2020, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's brief. DATED this May 19, 2020
owen Gre = nwood Clerk of the Supreme Court
PO BOX 203003 •

HELENA MT •

59620-3003 •TELEPHONE:(406)444-3858 •FAX: (406)444-5705 05/19/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0156
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"Matthew Dominick","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jfOlYHBQhY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/matthew-dominick\/\">Matthew Dominick<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/matthew-dominick\/embed\/#?secret=jfOlYHBQhY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Matthew Dominick” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jfOlYHBQhY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jsc2017e114835_0-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
9559.

#### Sorrells *v.*Fitzpatrick Company.

Decided May 14, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of Madison—Judge Anderson. January 28, 1918.

The H. H. Fitzpatrick Company brought suit .against Sorrells for $198.40 principal, and $95.22 interest, alleging that the debt *298was evidenced by a promissory note, a copy of which was attached to the petition. The copy attached was of a note for $225 principal, besides interest, and in the same instrument was a mortgage on certain crops. The court, over the objection of the defendant, 'allowed an amendment changing the principal of the note to $725. A note described in the amendment as “the original note sued on” was attached to it, and the petition as amended showed certain credits thereon, amounting to $537.51. The amendment was demurred to on the ground that it added a new and distinct cause of action. At' the trial the original note attached to the amendment was introduced in evidence, and the secretary of the plaintiff corporation testified: “The note sued on was not given in liquidation or settlement of any account or for value received at the time it was given. Value had been in part received, inasmuch as part of the account had been made at the time the note was given. It was given to secure that and a future account still to be made. I do not know how much of the account had been made. Nothing was said'about that. It was just a mortgage note we are in the habit of taking to secure an account when We run anybody. It was not in whole for what he bought or what he was going to buy. The note don't show Avhat lie bought or what he owed us. We had to go to the account to ascertain that.” There was no further evidence. The defendant moved that a verdict be directed in his favor, “on the ground that the testimony. showed that the note Avas not given in liquidation and settlement of an account owed, nor for a present or past Araluable consideration, but in part at least for a future valuable consideration; and on the further ground that the note itself did not and could not show the indebtedness of defendant to plaintiff, but recourse to the account as stated on the books of plaintiff was necessary to ascertain the alleged indebtedness, and that therefore there could be no judgment on 'the note, said indebtedness being on account.” This motion was overruled, and a motion to dismiss the suit was also overruled, and the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted, .assigning error on each of the rulings stated.

*297Broyles, P. J.

1. There was no error in overruling the demurrer to the ’ amendment to the original petition.

2. Under the evidence and the pleadings the court did not err in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, or in refusing to dismiss the'suit, or in directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*

*298
      *E. H. George,*for plaintiff in err,or.

*M. 0. Few,*contra.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,515
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,205
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     52,611
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,881
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,818
<LOANS>                                        513,330
<ALLOWANCE>                                     10,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 617,285
<DEPOSITS>                                     398,585
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,297
<LONG-TERM>                                    159,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,480
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 617,285
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,457
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,136
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,593
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,535
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,682
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,911
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      718
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,493
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,169
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,448
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,212
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,982
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,771
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,909
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      243
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               10,384
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            10,384
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          9,288
        

</TABLE>
9757.

#### Southern Railway Company *v.*Sims.

Decided October 15, 1918.

Appeal; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. April 27, 1918.

*Q. L. Carey, Maddóx, McCamy & Shumate,*for plaintiff error.

*Denny & Wright,*contra.

Wade, C. J.

1. The only special grounds of the motion for a new trial, not being referred to in the briefs of the counsel for the plaintiff in error, will be treated as abandoned.

2. Under all the facts and circumstances appearing in this ease, this court can not say, as a matter of law, that the presumption of negligence on the part of the defendant was wholly rebutted, and therefore that the finding of the jury in favor of the plaintiff was unauthorized. There was some conilict in the testimony touching the question whether the engineer could have seen the cow approaching the track sooner than he actually did discover her proximity and her evident intention to cross it, and consequently whether or not he was in the' exercise of full diligence at the'time. Likewise, it appears that the engineer neither blew the whistle nor did anything else, because in his judgment it would have been unavailing to do either, and in fact made no attempt to avoid the killing. The verdict had the approval of the trial judge, and, being supported by some testimony, can not be set aside on the general grounds only.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY __)
as Subrogee of SHIRA HAMANN, )
Plaintiff, )
-v- ) NO. 20-CV 02349
)
DELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) Honorable Martha M. Pacold

WORLDWIDE TECH SERVICES, LLC., )
and SIMPLO TECHNOLOGY COMPANY,) Magistrate Judge Jeffery Cummings
LTD. )

Defendants. )

AGREED ORDER
This cause coming before the court pursuant to an agreement between the parties to enter a
dismissal order with prejudice with the Court being duly advised in the premises;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
That this complaint and all cross-claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice
with each party to bear its own fees and costs pursuant to an agreed upon settlement with the Court

retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of settlement. Any future dates are hereby stricken.

ENTERED: 7 IE i/20

Wradte WA. Cre

Judge
McFADDEN LAW GROUP, P.C.
180 W. Washington Street
Suite 310
Chicago, IL 60602
(312) 641-9830
ARDC No. 6229815

ipmcfadden@mcfaddenlawgroup.com
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lauren E. Low","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lelow\/","title":"NASA Science, Hardware Aboard SpaceX\u2019s 30th Resupply Launch to Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PJGuuoYSu3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-science-hardware-aboard-spacexs-30th-resupply-launch-to-station\/\">NASA Science, Hardware Aboard SpaceX\u2019s 30th Resupply Launch to Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-science-hardware-aboard-spacexs-30th-resupply-launch-to-station\/embed\/#?secret=PJGuuoYSu3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Science, Hardware Aboard SpaceX\u2019s 30th Resupply Launch to Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"PJGuuoYSu3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/boeing.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Battista, Chief Executive Officer of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.
(the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 14, 2008



| |  |                              
| |  | -----------------------------
| |  | /s/ Richard Battista         
| |  | Richard Battista             
| |  | Chief Executive Officer      
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.