alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9642.

#### Walker *v.*The State.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Accusation of violation of prohibition law; from city court of Dublin—Judge Flynt. .March 13, 1918.

*Fred Kea,*for plaintiff in error. *8. P. New, solicitor,*contra.

Harwell, J.

The demurrer to the plea in abatement, based upon the ground of alleged former jeopardy or autrefois convict, was properly sustained by the judge of the city court; the judgment and sentence in the former case being rendered by the judge of the superior court in a county other than that in which the crime was committed, and being void and a nullity for want of jurisdiction. The decision herein is controlled by the ruling of this court in *Barrs*v. *State,*ante, 644.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Cole, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    ROBERT K.
COLERobert K. Cole Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 16, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sarah Frazier","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sfrazie2\/","title":"Eclipse 2017 Shines Light on the Sun-Earth Connection","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QFDR6dpXgX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/skywatching\/eclipses\/solar-eclipses\/eclipse-2017-shines-light-on-the-sun-earth-connection\/\">Eclipse 2017 Shines Light on the Sun-Earth Connection<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/skywatching\/eclipses\/solar-eclipses\/eclipse-2017-shines-light-on-the-sun-earth-connection\/embed\/#?secret=QFDR6dpXgX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Eclipse 2017 Shines Light on the Sun-Earth Connection” — NASA\" data-secret=\"QFDR6dpXgX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/polarization.gif?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I A N L. CO RM I ER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. E R I C J . S I E G L E R , o f

T e m e c u la ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 56649 D . C. N o . 2 : 1 1 - c v - 0 4 9 0 7 - A BCM LG ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A udr e y B . C ol l i ns , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 18, 2013 ** B efo re: T A L L M A N , M . S M IT H , an d H U R W IT Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I a n L . C o rm ie rap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is r e q u e s t to p r o c e e din f

o rm ap au p e r is ( “I F P ” ) in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo the de t e rm i na t i on tha tac om pl a i ntl a c ks a r guabl e s ubs t a nc e i n l a w orf a c t , a nd f ora n abus e of 

# FI LED JU N 20 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 56649 2 d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

le a v e to p r o c e e d I F P . T ri p a t iv. Fi rst

N a t ’l B a n k & T

ru st , 8 2 1 F. 2 d 1 3 6 8 , 1 3 6 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 8 7 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i d n o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y d en yi n g C o rm i er’ s req u est t o p ro ceed IF P b ecau se i tp ro p erl y co n cl u d ed th atC o rm i er’ s act i o n w as fri v o l o u s, fa i l ed t o st at e acl ai m , and sou gh tm on et ary r el i ef fr om defe nd ant s w ho di d n otac t u n d e rc o lo ro f

s ta te la w o rw e r e im m u n e f r o m liab ility . Se e i d. at13 70 (“ A di stri ct c our tm a y de ny l e a ve t o pr oc e e d i n f orm apaupe r i s a tthe out s e ti f i tappe a r s f

r om the fa ce of the prop osed com pl ai ntthatthe ac t i on i s f ri vo l ou s or w i tho utm er i t . ”) ; s e e al s o P olk C ount y v . D ods on , 45 4 U . S . 31 2, 31 8 n . 7 (19 81 ) ( no t i ng thatan a tt o rn e y d o e s n o ta c tu n d e rth e c o l o ro f s t a t e l a w f

o rth e p u rp o s e s o f

4 2 U . S. C. § 1 98 3 w hen p er form i ng the tra di t i on al rol e of a n att orney) ; Hi rs h v . J us t i c e s of the Su p rem e C o u rt , 67 F . 3d 70 8, 71 5 (9th C i r. 19 95 ) ( the S t at e B arof C al i forni a i s an a rm o f th e s ta te an d is e n title d to E le v e n th A m e n d m e n t im m u n ity ) ; A shelm an v. P ope , 7 9 3 F . 2 d 1 0 7 2 , 1 0 7 5 (9 th C i r. 1 9 8 6 ) (en b an c) (“Ju d g es an d th o se pe r f orm i ng j udge - l i ke f

unc t i ons a r e abs ol ut e l y i m m une f r om da m a ge l i abi l i ty f

or a c ts p e r f o rm e d in th e iro f

f ic ia l c ap a c itie s .” ) . AF F I RME D.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

GALE CLAPPER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and ABC

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No.: 1:20-CV-02635

 Judge Manish S. Shah

 Magistrate Judge María Valdez

Jury Trial Demanded

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Gale Clapper (“Clapper” or “Plaintiff”), by and through her counsel, 

Nathaniel Cade, Jr., of Cade Law Group LLC, moved for an unopposed ten (10) day 

extension of time to file her response to Defendant United Airlines, Inc.’s Motion for 

Summary Judgment (Docket No. 77) up to and including May 16, 2022. In support of this 

motion, Plaintiff states as follows:

1. United Airlines filed its motion for summary judgment on April 1, 2022;

2. Pursuant to the Rules for the Northern District of Illinois and this Court’s 

Order of March 23, 2022 (Docket No. 75), Plaintiff’s response to the motion is due on or 

before May 6, 2022;

3. Attorney Carlos Pastrana previously handled this matter, including all but 

one deposition and discovery. Attorney Pastrana left the employment of Cade Law Group, 

counsel for Plaintiff, on December 10, 2021;

4. Plaintiff’s current counsel, Nathaniel Cade, Jr., requires additional time to 

Case: 1:20-cv-02635 Document #: 79 Filed: 04/28/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:1442
2

become acquainted with the file and the multiple depositions.

5. Plaintiff therefore requests a brief extension of ten days, up to and including

May 16, 2022, to respond to United Airlines’ motion for summary judgment.

6. Counsel for United Airlines, Sean Herring, indicated by email on April 28, 

2022 that he has no objection to the extension and does not oppose this motion.

7. Plaintiff and her counsel does not bring this motion for purposes of delay or 

for any other improper purpose. Plaintiff simply requires an extension to respond 

meaningfully.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Gale Clapper respectfully requests that the Court grant her 

unopposed motion and extend the deadline for her to respond to United Airlines’ Motion 

for summary Judgment by 10 days, or to May 16, 2022.

Dated this 28th day of April, 2022.

CADE LAW GROUP LLC

By: s/ Nathaniel Cade, Jr.

Nathaniel Cade, Jr.

P.O. Box 170887

Milwaukee, WI 53217

(414) 255-3802 (phone)

nate@cade-law.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Gale Clapper

Case: 1:20-cv-02635 Document #: 79 Filed: 04/28/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:1443
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on April 28, 2022, a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT was filed with 

the Court by electronic filing protocols, and that same will therefore be electronically 

served upon all attorneys of record registered with the Court’s ECF/CM system. 

s/ Nathaniel Cade, Jr.

Case: 1:20-cv-02635 Document #: 79 Filed: 04/28/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:1444
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                                                 
|                     |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer (Chief Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Order entered August 14 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00648
- CV
GEORGE MAAYEH , ET AL., Appellant s

V. EFFIOM ARCHIBONG, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. CC
- 14
- 05534
- B



### O RDER
We GRANT the August 12, 2015 motion of Lanetta Williams, Official Court Reporter for the County Court at Law No. 2, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed wit hin THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2   CERTIFICATION  I, Michael P. Wilson, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Timberline Resources Corporation, as amended;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: January 24, 2007.  /s/ Michael P. Wilson Michael P. Wilson (CFO)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

*CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite City Food &Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period endedMarch 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven J. Wagenheim, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 
| Dated: | December 21,  2004 | By                                     | /s/ Steven J.  Wagenheim |   |
|--------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |                    | Steven J.  Wagenheim                   |
|   |                    | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
9692.

#### Stinson *et al. v.*Weaver.

Decided October 16, 1918.

Levy and claim; fropi Talbot superior court—Judge Howard. March 6, 1918.

J. J. *Bull & Son,*for plaintiffs in error.

*J. A. Smith, J. H. McGehee,*contra.

Dtjke, J.

1, Upon the trial of a claim case, after the introduction of testimony by the plaintiff in fi. fa., showing possession of the property levied upon to have been in the defendant in fi. fa., the claimant can not have the opening' and conclusion by then admitting possession of the property in defendant at the time of levy.

2. The evidence demanded a finding in favor of the plaintiff in fi. fa., and the court did not err in directing the jury so to find.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and Jenhins, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**Certificateof the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Xponential, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert W. Schleizer, the ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: February 16,  2004 |   | /s/ Robert W. Schleizer             |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Robert W. Schleizer                 |
|                          |   | Executive Vice  President and Chief |
|                          |   | Financial Officer                   |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

JAMES SMITH

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02350

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

GREATBANC TRUST COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 28, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: In lieu of an initial

status hearing, the Court directs the parties to, within 45 days of the filing of the complaint

or within 14 days of this order if the 45−day time period has already elapsed, confer to

discuss the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt

settlement or resolution of the case. The parties shall also discuss deadlines for Rule

26(a)(1) disclosures and a proposed discovery plan. A written initial status report and

proposed discovery plan shall be filed within 7 days of conferring as provided herein.

Plaintiff is responsible for initiating such a meeting, and all lead counsel for all parties are

required to participate. Failure or refusal to participate in such a meeting or to cooperate in

the preparation of the written report may constitute a basis for sanctions. The Court will

thereafter issue an order setting a discovery schedule. Mailed notice(is, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02350 Document #: 17 Filed: 04/28/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:78