alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Snell & Wilmer

 L.L.P.

LAW OFFICES 

One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren, Suite 1900 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 

602.382.6000 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Leslie Belsanti, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Equifax Information Services LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV16-08001-PCT DGC 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Having considered the parties’ stipulation of dismissal. Doc. 105. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 105) is granted; 

2. Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC is dismissed with 

prejudice; the Clerk of Court shall terminate Defendant Equifax Information 

Services LLC as a party in this action; 

3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees; 

 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action in its entirety. 

 Dated this 22nd day of December, 2016. 

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 106 Filed 12/22/16 Page 1 of 1
Case: 1:20-cv-02587 Document #: 9 Filed: 05/05/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:55
Case: 1:20-cv-02587 Document #: 9 Filed: 05/05/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:56
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 10

- 00015

- CV

IN RE C.D.S. ENTER PRISES, INC.

D/B/A TEXCON GENERAL CONTRACTORS,

JOE SCHULTZ AND CIVIL DEVELOPMEN T, LTD.:

AND MAIN STREET HOME S

- CS, LTD.

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators ha ve f iled “Relators’ Agreed Voluntary Dismissal Motion” in this

original proceeding and state that they no longer wish to pursue this original

proceeding. We grant the motion, and the petition is dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS

JusticeIn re C.D.S. Enterprises, Inc. Page 2

Before Chief Justi ce Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Motion granted; petition dismissed

Opini on delivered and filed May 19 , 2010

[OT 06]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# AGENCY:

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Health Resources and Services Administration published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                        , FR 2014-25199 (October 23, 2014), announcing the meeting for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Advisory Committee on HIV, Viral Hepatitis and STD Prevention and Treatment. The action is to provide correction to the virtual meeting audio access code.                    

*Correction:*                         In the                         **Federal Register**                        ,  FR 2014-25199 (October 23, 2014), please make the following corrections:                    

*Join the meeting by:*

*1. (Audio Portion) Calling the Toll free Phone Number 1-888-942-8515 and providing the Participant Pass Code 9582370, and*

*2. (Visual Portion) Connecting to the Advisory Committee Adobe Connect Pro Meeting using the following URL: https://hrsa.connectsolutions.com/​cdchrsa_​advcmt/​.*

Dated: October 29, 2014.

Jackie Painter,

Acting Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.

[FR Doc. 2014-26225 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Thomas F. Foley, Deceased.

■ Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

February 24, 1926.

Executors and administrators — application by attorney íor letters of administration c. t. a. under claim he is creditor of estate — decedent’s daughter rather than attorney is entitled to letters of administration — decree should not contain provision directing-payment of counsel fees to attorney —• fees may be fixed on petition under Surrogate’s Court Act, § 231-a.

Petitioner, an attorney, who claims to be a creditor of decedent’s estate, is not entitled to letters of administration c. t. a. where, upon the hearing of his application decedent’s daughter and sole legatee under his will applied for letters of administration. Nor should the decree appointing said daughter as administratrix contain a provision directing the payment of counsel fees to the attorney. If an agreement as to counsel fees cannot be arranged between the attorney and the administratrix, said attorney may petition under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act for an order fixing his fees.

Cross-applications for letters of administration c. t. a.

*Arthur M. Farrell,*for Maria McKaigney.

*Gustav Goodmann,*for the petitioner.

O’Brien, S.

Cross-applications for letters of administration c. t. a. are made first by an attorney who claims to be a creditor and, upon the hearing of his application, by the daughter of decedent and sole legatee under the will. The attorney asks that the decree appointing such administrator contain a provision directing the payment of his counsel fees. This latter application is denied as well as his application for letters which will be granted to the daughter and sole legatee. If an agreement as to fees cannot be arranged by said attorney and the administratrix, he may petition under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act for an order fixing his fees at which time his authority to act, the services _ rendered and compensation may be inquired into. Submit decree" on notice.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-4 to Discuss Mission After Returning to Earth","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4pSu8UL1H6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-4-to-discuss-mission-after-returning-to-earth\/\">NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-4 to Discuss Mission After Returning to Earth<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-4-to-discuss-mission-after-returning-to-earth\/embed\/#?secret=4pSu8UL1H6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-4 to Discuss Mission After Returning to Earth” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4pSu8UL1H6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/crew_4_new.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO PAINTERS ) 

AND DECORATORS PENSION FUND, ) 

TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO PAINTERS ) 

AND DECORATORS WELFARE FUND, ) 

TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO PAINTERS ) 

AND DECORATORS DEFERRED SAVINGS ) 

FUND, TRUSTEES OFTHE CHICAGO ) 

PAINTERS AND DECORATORS ) No. 20-cv-2378 

APPRENTICESHIP FUND, TRUSTEES OF ) 

THE CHICAGO PAINTERS AND ) 

DECORATORS SCHOLARSHIP FUND, ) 

AND TRUSTEES OF THE CHICAGO ) Judge John J. Tharp, Jr. 

PAINTERS AND DECORATORS JOINT ) 

COOPERATION TRUST FUND, ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

 v. ) 

ALLY CONSTRUCTION, INC., an Illinois ) 

 ) 

Corporation; and HUGO VALDIVIA, Individually. ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

JUDGMENT ORDER 

This matter coming before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgement, 

due notice being given, and the Court advised in the premises, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED; 

2. Defendant Ally Construction, Inc. (“Ally”) is in default; and 

3. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Ally only in the amount 

of $51,048.87 for the audit period of November 7, 2018 through May 31, 

2020. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02378 Document #: 25 Filed: 02/05/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:89
Date: February 5, 2021 John J. Tharp, Jr.

United States District Judge 

Case: 1:20-cv-02378 Document #: 25 Filed: 02/05/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:90
<FN>





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of XFormity Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Christopher Ball, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Jack Rabin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/  Christopher
Ball


Christopher
Ball


Chief
Executive Officer


February
5, 2010





/s/  Jack
Rabin


Jack
Rabin


Chief
Financial Officer


February
5, 2010





1
#### FARMLAND DAIRIES, RESPONDENT, v. ALBERT VAN TOL ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Submitted May 25, 1945

Decided September 27, 1945.

For the respondent, *A. Leo Bohl.*

For the appellants, *Andrew Mainardi (Archibald Kreiger,*of counsel).

*314Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, Freund, McGebhan, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— None.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 704

To require the general application of the antitrust laws to major league

baseball, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. BUNNING (for himself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To require the general application of the antitrust laws to

major league baseball, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Major League Baseball

5 Antitrust Reform Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF THE ANTITRUST LAWS TO PRO7 FESSIONAL MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL.

8 The Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.) is amended

9 by adding at the end the following new section:
2

•HR 704 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 27. (a) Subject to subsection (b), the antitrust

2 laws shall apply to the business of professional major

3 league baseball.

4 ‘‘(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to af5 fect—

6 ‘‘(1) the applicability or nonapplicability of the

7 antitrust laws to professional baseball’s amateur

8 draft, the minor league reserve clause, the Profes9 sional Baseball Agreement, or any other matter re10 lating to the minor leagues;

11 ‘‘(2) the applicability or nonapplicability of the

12 antitrust laws to any restraint by professional base13 ball on franchise relocation; or

14 ‘‘(3) the application of Public Law 87–331 (15

15 U.S.C. 1291 et seq.) (commonly known as the

16 Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961).’’.

Æ
IV

★

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 140

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that ‘‘Sugar’’ Ray

Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and commitment to young people.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 1, 1997

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that

‘‘Sugar’’ Ray Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and commitment to young people.

Whereas ‘‘Sugar’’ Ray Robinson was born in Detroit, Michigan, on May 3, 1920;

Whereas in 1932 he moved to New York City where he started boxing as an amateur, going undefeated in 89 bouts,

and winning the Golden Gloves featherweight title in

1939;

Whereas in 1940 he turned professional and fought at New

York City’s Madison Square Garden for the first time;

Whereas in 1946 he won his first world title as a

welterweight, and then held the middleweight title for 5

years between 1951 and 1960;
2

•HRES 140 IH1S

Whereas after retiring for a time he returned to box a series

of exciting matches before permanently retiring on December 10, 1965;

Whereas in a career spanning 25 years, he won 175 of 202

bouts with 109 knockouts;

Whereas his grace, speed, power, and mastery of the ring

earned him international acclaim as one of the greatest

fighters in boxing history;

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was elected into the Boxing

Hall of Fame in 1967;

Whereas in 1969 he established the Sugar Ray Robinson

Youth Foundation; and

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson died in Culver City, California,

on April 12, 1989, at the age of 68: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recog3 nized as one of history’s greatest professional fighters,

4 whose dedication to boxing and commitment to young peo5 ple have earned him a permanent place in sports history.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 205 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 205

  Calling for the prosecution of Pol Pot for crimes against humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 1997

 Mr. Lampson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Calling for the prosecution of Pol Pot for crimes against humanity.

Whereas the Khmer Rouge government of Democratic Kampuchea (Cambodia) carried 
        out as governmental policy the systematic genocide of the Cambodian 
        people between 1975 and 1979;
Whereas that government engaged in torture and the murder of civilians as state 
        policy;
Whereas that government was responsible for the murder of between one to two 
        million Cambodians from 1975 to 1979; and
Whereas Pol Pot, as leader of the Khmer Rouge during this period, was directly 
        responsible for the planning and implementation of this state directed 
        policy of genocide: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) urges the Secretary of State to take actions, 
        consistent with the Cambodian Genocide Justice Act (22 U.S.C. 
        2656 note), that lead to the prosecution of Pol Pot for crimes 
        against humanity;
            (2) calls upon the international community, through the 
        United Nations Security Council and other appropriate 
        international governmental bodies, to convene an international 
        tribunal for the adjudication of the case of Pol Pot; and
            (3) recommends that the Secretary of State take all 
        feasible steps to create an international tribunal for the 
        prosecution of Pol Pot if such a tribunal has not been 
        established by an international organization by January 30, 
        1998.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Worldwide Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shawkat Raslan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    SHAWKAT
RASLAN                                                                                                      
|Shawkat Raslan Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) November 14, 2006
EXHIBIT 11
                      COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (1)

                                          Three months ended
                                              June 30,
                                              --------
                                          2002         2001
                                       ----------   ----------
Net  Income                            $1,889,000   $1,166,000
                                       ==========   ==========
Average shares outstanding              4,627,461    4,901,199
                                       ==========   ==========
Basic earnings per share               $     0.41   $     0.24
                                       ==========   ==========

Net Income                             $1,889,000   $1,166,000
                                       ==========   ==========
Average shares outstanding              4,627,461    4,901,199
Net effect of dilutive stock options      396,678      262,506
                                       ----------   ----------
Adjusted shares outstanding             5,024,139    5,163,705
                                       ==========   ==========
Diluted earnings per share             $     0.38   $     0.23
                                       ==========   ==========

(1)   Restated for a 3 for 1 stock split declared on July 25, 2002.


                                    Page 19
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 924 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.924

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to give further assurance to the 
  right of victims of crime to attend and observe the trials of those 
                          accused of the crime.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Victim Rights Clarification Act of 
1997''.

SEC. 2. RIGHTS OF VICTIMS TO ATTEND AND OBSERVE TRIAL.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 223 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 3510. Rights of victims to attend and observe trial.

    ``(a) Non-Capital Cases.--Notwithstanding any statute, rule, or 
other provision of law, a United States district court shall not order 
any victim of an offense excluded from the trial of a defendant accused 
of that offense because such victim may, during the sentencing hearing, 
make a statement or present any information in relation to the 
sentence.
    ``(b) Capital Cases.--Notwithstanding any statute, rule, or other 
provision of law, a United States district court shall not order any 
victim of an offense excluded from the trial of a defendant accused of 
that offense because such victim may, during the sentencing hearing, 
testify as to the effect of the offense on the victim and the victim's 
family or as to any other factor for which notice is required under 
section 3593(a).
    ``(c) Definition.--As used in this section, the term `victim' 
includes all persons defined as victims in section 503(e)(2) of the 
Victims' Rights and Restitution Act of 1990.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 223 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:
``3510. Rights of victims to attend and observe trial.''.

    (c) Clarification of Grounds for Exclusion.--Section 3593(c) of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``For the 
purposes of the preceding sentence, the fact that a victim, as defined 
in section 3510, attended or observed the trial shall not be construed 
to pose a danger of creating unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, or 
misleading the jury.'' after ``misleading the jury.''.
    (d) Effect on Pending Cases.--The amendments made by this section 
shall apply in cases pending on the date of the enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Case: 1:20-cv-02587 Document #: 10 Filed: 05/05/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:57
Case: 1:20-cv-02587 Document #: 10 Filed: 05/05/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:58