alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 6 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00150

- CV

LAURA CARACIO, Appellant

V.

JOHN DOE, INDIVIDUAL LY AND A S NEXT FRIEND OF JOHN DOE, JR., A MINOR

AND JANE DOE, INDIVI DUALLY AND A S NEXT FRIEND OF

JOHN DOE, JR., A MIN OR, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 17

- 16679



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 4, 2019 motion f or an extension of time to file her

brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to April 8, 2019

.

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

Exhibit 31

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ngai Keung Luk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ngai Keung Luk
-------------------------
Ngai Keung Luk
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

May 20, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Scrambled Words","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"taMjiRUsH5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/scrambled-words\/\">Scrambled Words<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/scrambled-words\/embed\/#?secret=taMjiRUsH5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Scrambled Words” — NASA\" data-secret=\"taMjiRUsH5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/edu_srch_scrambled_words.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":696}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

CHRISTIAN DIOR COUTURE, S.A., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHINABRANDMALL.COM, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-02421 

Judge Robert W. Gettleman 

Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC 

SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(f)(3) 

Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. (“Plaintiff” or “Dior”) seeks this Court’s 

authorization to effectuate service of process by e-mail and/or electronic publication in an action 

arising out of 15 U.S.C. § 1114; Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); and the 

U.S. Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. A Memorandum of Law in Support is filed 

concurrently with this Motion. 

Dated this 23rd day of April 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio_______________ 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

Allyson M. Martin 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

amartin@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff Christian Dior Couture, S.A. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02421 Document #: 20 Filed: 04/23/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:2899
Exhibit 31.3

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen R. Light, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. [Intentionally
omitted];

4. [Intentionally omitted];

5. [Intentionally
omitted].



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2008                                  
|                                                      
|/s/ Stephen R. Light                                  
|Stephen R. Light President and Chief Executive
Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ALEXIS TAYLOR,

1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

GREG POWELL,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 215, 2015

§

§ Court Below—Family Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ File No. CN02-9338

§ Petition No. 14-20199

§

§

Submitted: May 18, 2015

Decided: May 20, 2015

Before HOLLAND, VALIHURA, and VAUGHN, Justices.

ORDER

This 20th day of May 2015, it appears to the Court that:

(1) On April 29, 2015, the Court received the appellant’s notice of appeal 

from a January 21, 2015 Family Court order finding the appellant in contempt of a 

consent support order. Under Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(i), a timely notice of 

appeal should have been filed on or before February 20, 2015.

(2) On April 30, 2015, the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing 

the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely 

filed under Supreme Court Rule 6. In her response to the notice to show cause, the 

 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

appellant stated that the January 21, 2015 order did not include information 

regarding the appeal process or the deadline for filing an appeal. The appellant 

further stated that she sent a letter to the Family Court judge within the thirty day 

time period, but did not receive a response.

(3) Time is a jurisdictional requirement.2 A notice of appeal must be 

received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court within the applicable time period 

in order to be effective.3 An appellant’s pro se status does not excuse a failure to 

comply strictly with the jurisdictional requirements of Supreme Court Rule 6.4 

Unless an appellant can demonstrate that the failure to file a timely notice of 

appeal is attributable to court-related personnel, an untimely appeal cannot be 

considered.5

(4) There is nothing in the record before us reflecting that the appellant's 

failure to file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel. 

Consequently, this case does not fall within the exception to the general rule that 

 

2 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989).

3

Supr. Ct. R. 10(a).

4 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d at 779. See also Oliver v. State, 2011 WL 6016240, at *1 (Del. Dec. 2, 

2011) (dismissing appeal as untimely filed where appellant argued that he was representing 

himself and unaware of deadline for filing timely notice of appeal). 

5

Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979).
3

mandates the timely filing of a notice of appeal. Thus, the Court concludes that 

this appeal must be dismissed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Monaghan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-b-monaghannasa-gov\/","title":"Robyn Gatens","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"r7XFH5CCLh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/robyn-gatens\/\">Robyn Gatens<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/robyn-gatens\/embed\/#?secret=r7XFH5CCLh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Robyn Gatens” — NASA\" data-secret=\"r7XFH5CCLh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/gatens_robin.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":99999}
# National Adoption Month, 2014

Every year, adoptive parents welcome tens of thousands of children and teenagers into supportive and loving families. These mothers and fathers provide their sons and daughters with the security and stability of a safe environment and the opportunity to learn, grow, and achieve their full potential. During National Adoption Month, we honor those who have opened their hearts and their homes, and we recommit to supporting all children still in need of a place to call their own.

Over the past decade, more than 500,000 children have been adopted. However, there are still too many children waiting to be part of an adoptive family. This month—on the Saturday before Thanksgiving—we will observe the 15th annual National Adoption Day, a nationwide celebration that brings together policymakers, practitioners, and advocates to finalize thousands of adoptions and to raise awareness of those still in need of permanent homes.

To help ensure there is a permanent home for every child, my Administration is investing in programs to reduce the amount of time children in foster care wait for adoption and to educate adoptive families about the diverse needs of their children, helping ensure stability and permanency. We are equipping State and local adoption organizations with tools to provide quality mental health services to children who need them, and—because we know the importance of sibling relationships—we are encouraging efforts to keep brothers and sisters together. Additionally, last year I was proud to permanently extend the Adoption Tax Credit to provide relief to adoptive families. By supporting policies that remove barriers to adoption, we give hope to children across America. For all those who yearn for the comfort of family, we must continue our work to increase the opportunities for adoption and make sure all capable and loving caregivers have the ability to bring a child into their life, regardless of their race, religion, sexual orientation, or marital status.

Throughout November, we recognize the thousands of parents and kids who have expanded their families to welcome a new child or sibling, as well as the professionals who offer guidance, resources, and counseling every day. Let us reaffirm our commitment to provide all children with every chance to reach their dreams and realize their highest aspirations.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2014 as National Adoption Month. I encourage all Americans to observe this month by answering the call to find a permanent and caring family for every child in need, and by supporting the families who care for them.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand fourteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-ninth.

[FR Doc. 2014-26480

Billing code 3295-F5
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of President  of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I,
Michael J. Arougheti, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ares Capital Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 28, 2012

/s/ MICHAEL J. AROUGHETI Michael J. Arougheti President(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

DAVID EVANS III, RASHID MUHAMMAD,

MONTA SERVANT, FELISHA PARNELL, 

TIMOTHY PARKER, DWIGHT ANDERSON,

JOSEPH TINOCO, and FRANK DONIS on behalf of 

themselves and all others similarly-situated,

Case No. 20-cv-2453

Plaintiffs, 

The Honorable Judge

v. Rebecca Pallmeyer

THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Magistrate Judge Kim

and the COUNTY OF COOK, ILLINOIS, a unit of 

local government as joint employer for FLSA

purposes and as indemnitor, RAMON D. WILLIAMS 

(Individual Capacity), and ANTHONY MCGEE JURY DEMANDED

(Individual Capacity),

Defendants.

NOTICE OF MOTION

TO: Mona Lawton, Esq. mona.lawton@cookcountyil.gov

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT ON July 16, 2020 at 8:45 a.m., I shall appear 

before the Honorable Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer, Courtroom 2541, Everett McKinley 

Dirksen Federal Courthouse, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604 and present 

the attached Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave to File Second Amended Complaint in the abovecaptioned matter. A copy is included herewith.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Cass T. Casper

Plaintiffs’ Attorney

Cass T. Casper (ARDC # 6303022)

TALON LAW, LLC

105 West Madison Street, Suite 1350

Chicago, Illinois 60602

P: (312) 351-2478

F: (312) 276-4930

E: ctc@talonlaw.com

Case: 1:20-cv-02453 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/26/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:160
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned, an attorney, hereby certifies that the foregoing document and all attachments 

thereto were served upon counsel for Defendants Thomas J. Dart and Cook County via email, and 

that such counsels are registered e-filers.

/s/Cass T. Casper

Case: 1:20-cv-02453 Document #: 14 Filed: 05/26/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:161
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Graf","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/agraf\/","title":"Plant Water Management","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mrc11gGqyq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/plant-water-management\/\">Plant Water Management<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/plant-water-management\/embed\/#?secret=mrc11gGqyq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Plant Water Management” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mrc11gGqyq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/iss065e074654.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6898

ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; JOHN MCCARTHY, State Attorney; 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,

 Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02065-RDB)

Submitted: November 29, 2018 Decided: December 7, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. Parties to a 

civil action are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of 

appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007). 

The district court entered its final judgment on the docket on April 26, 2018. 

Kelly filed his notice of appeal, at the earliest, on July 11, 2018, after the 30-day appeal 

period expired. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1). However, Kelly’s notice of appeal requested 

information on his appeal, and his informal brief references an earlier-filed notice that is 

not reflected on the docket sheet. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited 

purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether Kelly timely filed a notice of 

appeal. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further 

consideration. We deny Kelly’s motion for release or bail pending appeal.

REMANDED
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND , TEXAS
JUDGMENT

Pamela Marie Ybarra
, * From the 161st District Court of E ctor County, Trial Court No. B

- 19

- 0 156

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 021

- CR * April 30 , 20 2 4

The State of Texas
, * Memorand um Opinion by Trotter , J. (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J., Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.