alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

STUDIO PEYO S.A.,

 Plaintiff,

v.

DONGGUAN AI CHENG TOYS CO., LTD, et 

al.

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-01562

Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on June 30, 2020 [49], in favor of 

Plaintiff Studio Peyo S.A.'s ("Studio Peyo" or "Plaintiff') and against the Defendants Identified in

Schedule A in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per Defaulting Defendant

for willful use of counterfeit Studio Peyo Trademarks in connection with the offer for sale and/or 

sale of products through at least the Online Marketplaces, and Studio Peyo acknowledges payment 

of an agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release this judgment and 

hereby fully and completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

ZorluteksHome Store 25

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendant is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment.

Case: 1:20-cv-01562 Document #: 51 Filed: 07/15/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1423
2

Dated this 15th day of July 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jake M. Christensen

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Jake M. Christensen

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

jchristensen@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Studio Peyo S.A.

.

Case: 1:20-cv-01562 Document #: 51 Filed: 07/15/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1424
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kaitlyn Adams","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kaitlyn-e-adamsnasa-gov\/","title":"Surprisingly STEM: Thermal Blanket Technician","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uuuuze2kYf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/surprisingly-stem-thermal-blanket-technician\/\">Surprisingly STEM: Thermal Blanket Technician<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/surprisingly-stem-thermal-blanket-technician\/embed\/#?secret=uuuuze2kYf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Surprisingly STEM: Thermal Blanket Technician” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uuuuze2kYf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/paula-cain.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
Exhibit 12.1



I, Seamus Young, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of: Logan Resources Ltd.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the

statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements

were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this

Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined

in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,

to ensure that material information relating to the company, including

its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within

those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is

being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and

procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the

effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end

of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control

over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the

annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to

materially affect, the companys internal control over financial

reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of

directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or

operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,

process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other

employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control

over financial reporting.





Date: October 17, 2006



Seamus Young

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I,
Penni F. Roll, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ares Capital Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 24, 2016

/s/ PENNI F. ROLL Penni F. Roll Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)


---



QuickLinks
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42899

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

SCOTT DOUGLAS BRASSFIELD ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 746

Filed: December 4, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Thomas F. Neville , District Judge.

Order relinquishing jurisdiction and executing modified sentence

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Scott Douglas Brassfield pled guilty to felony driving under the influence

. Idaho Code

§ § 18

- 8004, 18

- 8005(6) . The district court sentenced Brassfield to a unified term of ten years

with three years determinate and retained jurisdiction

. Following the period of retained
jurisdiction, the district court suspended Brassfield’s sentence and placed him on probation for a period of ten years. Subsequently, Brassfield admitted to violating his probation and the district

court r evoked his probation, ordered Brassfield’s sentence executed

, and again r etained

jurisdiction. After this second period of retained jurisdiction, the district court reli nquished
jurisdiction and reduced Brassfield’s underlying sentence to ten years with two and one

- half2

years determinate. Brassfield appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by

failing to place him on probation following his second p eriod of retained jurisdiction.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district

court and will not be overturned on appea l absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood , 102

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594, 596

- 97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the

infor mation before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Brassfield

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.

Brassfield argues that all of the relevant goals of sentencing could have been

accomplished with probation. As noted above, however, the district court found that probation

was not an appropriate course of action in Brassfield ’s case. The record does not indicate that

the district court abused its discretion in se ntencing.

The order of the district court relinquishing jurisdiction and reducing Brassfield ’s

sentence are affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

 

COMPUTATION OF PER SHAREEARNINGS

 
|                                                                 |   | **Three  Months Ended  September 30,** |    | **Nine  Months Ended  September 30,** |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|---------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                 |   | **2003**                               |    | **2002**                              |   | **2003** |   | **2002** |   |
| Diluted net  income per share:                                       |   |                                   |    |                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income to  common shareholders                                   |   | $                                      | 554,000 |                                  | $      | 1,650,000 |   | $ | 4,800,000 |   | $ | 11,807,000 |   |
|                                                                 |   |                                   |    |                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Average number of shares outstanding                                 |   | 8,670,575                              |    | 9,764,343                             |   | 8,585,550 |   | 9,997,472 |   |
| Net effect of dilutive stock options based  on treasury stock method |   | 1,075,666                              |    | 13,500                                |   | 1,075,666 |   | 13,500 |   |
| Net effect of dilutive put option  agreements based on the reverse   |   | —                                 |    | 129,722                               |   | — |   | 110,540 |   |
| Total average shares                                                 |   | 9,746,241                              |    | 9,907,565                             |   | 9,661,216 |   | 10,121,512 |   |
|                                                                 |   |                                   |    |                                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted net  income per share                                        |   | $                                      | 0.06    |                                  | $      | 0.17 |   | $ | 0.50 |   | $ | 1.17 |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. RELICH, P.C.

Kelly E. Relich, Esq.

Arizona State Bar No. 12430

8230 East Broadway Boulevard, Suite E-8

Tucson, Arizona 85710

(520) 382-2800

ker@relich.com

Attorney for Defendant Metro Fitness, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ronald Lopez, a married man,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Metro Fitness, Inc., an Arizona

Corporation,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 4:15-cv-00552-EJM

STIPULATION TO

PARTICIPATE IN

SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE

The parties, by and through counsel, pursuant to ADR Local Rule 7, hereby stipulate to

participate in a settlement conference with a magistrate judge, and hereby stipulate to continue all

deadlines pending the outcome of the settlement conference, and request that the Court Order that

a Settlement Conference be scheduled and continue the deadlines outlined in its’ Rule 16 Scheduling

Order dated February 16, 2016 pending the outcome of the settlement conference.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of September , 2016.

PHILLIPS DAYES LAW FIRM PC LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. RELICH, P.C.

By S/ Sean Davis By S/ Kelly E. Relich 

 Sean Davis, Esq. Kelly E. Relich, Esq.

 Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant

 **ELECTRONIC FILING**

ORIGINAL of the foregoing filed through NEF 

this 19 day of September, 2016, with: th

U.S. District Court of Arizona

COPY of the foregoing through NEF 

this 19 day of September, 2016 to: th

Case 4:15-cv-00552-EJM Document 36 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Sean Davis, Esq.

Seand@phillipsdayeslaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Lopez

Copy mailed this 19 day of September, 2016, th

by first class mail to:

Sean Davis, Esq.

Phillips Dayes Law Firm, P.C.

3101 North Central Avenue, #1500

Phoenix, Arizona 85712

Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Lopez

s/S. Grant 

Case 4:15-cv-00552-EJM Document 36 Filed 09/19/16 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Wendy K. Avedisian","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/wavedisi\/","title":"NASA Remembers Former NASA Johnson Director George W. S. Abbey","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jfqtVYLrii\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-remembers-former-nasa-johnson-director-george-w-s-abbey\/\">NASA Remembers Former NASA Johnson Director George W. S. Abbey<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-remembers-former-nasa-johnson-director-george-w-s-abbey\/embed\/#?secret=jfqtVYLrii\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Remembers Former NASA Johnson Director George W. S. Abbey” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jfqtVYLrii\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/abbey-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":754}
Case: 1:20-cv-02455 Document #: 1-2 Filed: 04/22/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:35
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

Libertarian Party of Illinois, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02112

Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr.

J.B. Pritzker, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, April 21, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Telephone motion

hearing. For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiffs' motions for preliminary injunction

and/or temporary restraining order [2] and [10] are granted in part and denied in part.

Parties shall submit a proposed order to this court's proposed order email address,

modified as directed by the court. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02112 Document #: 24 Filed: 04/21/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:349
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 989

To prohibit the distribution or receipt of restricted explosives without a

Federal permit, and to require applications for such permits to include

a photograph and the fingerprints of the applicant.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1997

Mr. QUINN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the distribution or receipt of restricted explosives

without a Federal permit, and to require applications

for such permits to include a photograph and the fingerprints of the applicant.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restricted Explosives

5 Control Act of 1997’’.
2

HR 989 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST THE DISTRIBUTION OR RE2 CEIPT OF RESTRICTED EXPLOSIVES WITH3 OUT A FEDERAL PERMIT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 842 of title 18, United

5 States Code, is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (a)(3)—

7 (A) in subparagraph (A)—

8 (i) by inserting ‘‘that are not re9 stricted explosives’’ after ‘‘explosive mate10 rials’’ the 2nd place such term appears;

11 and

12 (ii) by striking ‘‘or’’ after the semi13 colon;

14 (B) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as

15 subparagraph (C) and inserting after subpara16 graph (A) the following:

17 ‘‘(B) to distribute restricted explosives to

18 any person other than a licensee or permitee;

19 or’’; and

20 (C) in subparagraph (C) (as so redesig21 nated), by inserting ‘‘that are not restricted ex22 plosives’’ after ‘‘explosive materials’’; and

23 (2) in subsection (b)(3), by inserting ‘‘if the ex24 plosive materials are not restricted explosives,’’ be25 fore ‘‘a resident’’.
3

HR 989 IH

1 (b) RESTRICTED EXPLOSIVES DEFINED.—Section

2 841 of such title is amended by adding at the end the

3 following:

4 ‘‘(r) ‘Restricted explosives’ means high explosives,

5 blasting agents, detonators, and more than 50 pounds of

6 black powder.’’.

7 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT THAT APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL

8 EXPLOSIVES LICENSE OR PERMIT INCLUDE A

9 PHOTOGRAPH AND SET OF FINGERPRINTS

10 OF THE APPLICANT.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 843(a) of title 18, United

12 States Code, is amended in the 1st sentence by inserting

13 ‘‘shall include the applicant’s photograph and set of fin14 gerprints, which shall be taken and transmitted to the Sec15 retary by the chief law enforcement officer of the appli16 cant’s place of residence, and’’ before ‘‘shall be’’.

17 (b) CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DE18 FINED.—Section 841 of such title, as amended by section

19 2(b) of this Act, is amended by adding at the end the

20 following:

21 ‘‘(s) ‘Chief law enforcement officer’ means the chief

22 of police, the sheriff, or an equivalent officer or the des23 ignee of any such individual.’’.
4

HR 989 IH

1 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to con3 duct engaged in after the 180-day period that begins with

4 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Order entered October 22, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00589
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF L .M.T., A CHILD On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 18
- 19417



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 18, 2019 motion for extension of time to file his brief

. Appellant explains the extension is necessary because the clerk’s record does not include plaintiff ’s original petition. We rule as follows.
We GRANT the motion. We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than November 1, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a copy of plaintiff’s original petition. We further OR DER appellant to file his brief within thirty days of the filing of the supplemental clerk’s record. We note appellant’s motion does not include the c ertificate of conference required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.1( a)(5). Any further motions shall includ e a certificate of conference

. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Pitre and the parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE