alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Steven D. Hunt, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-K of U.S. Premium Beef, Ltd.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant's othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosedin this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant's othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

a) allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|     |  |                                           |
|-----|--|-------------------------------------------|
| By: |  |  /s/ Steven D. Hunt                  |
|     |  | Steven D. Hunt

*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: November 23, 2004 

** **

----
9100.

#### Chastain *et al. v.*Winn *et al.,*commissioners, for use, etc.

Decided March 14, 1918.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Ellis. July 3, 1917.

*Frank L. Haralson, Gober & Jackson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Moore & Pom'eroy, D. K. Johnston,*contra.

Wade, C. J.

Suit was brought in the name of the commissioners of roads and revenues of Fulton county, for the use of Jones, against one. Stephens (a constable) as principal, and Chastain and Pearce as sureties, on a constable’s bond payable to the said commissioners, alleging that Stephens was insolvent, and that, in his official capacity he had collected certain funds belonging to Jones and' failed ’ and refused to pay over the same. Chastain and Pearce demurred upon the ground that the authority of the commissioners to institute or maintain the action in behalf of Jones did not appear, and no cause of action against them was set out; and each defendant filed a separate plea, admitting the execution of the bond, but denying liability thereon and all other allegations in the petition. Stephens made no appearance: *Held:*

*(а)*“Suit upon the bond of a constable may be brought in the name of any person" aggrieved by the official misconduct of the officer, against him and his sureties, without bringing against him any preliminary action to settle his liability to' the' aggrieved party for his alleged misconduct.” *McClain*v. Bonner, 122 *Ga.*842 (3) (51 S. E. 36).

(б) It was wholly immaterial whether or not Jones, prior to the bringing of the action now under review, had brought suit a'gainst Stephens individually; and the admission of evidence touching the former suit, and of the judgment therein recovered, constitutes no ground for a reversal, in view of the undisputed testimony otherwise establishing the existence of the liability—Stephens, the principal of the bond, being a party to the action on trial and interposing no defense.

(c) The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari. *Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Claire A. O'Shea","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/claireaoshea\/","title":"NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bvnc6c6H7h\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/boeing-crewflighttest\/\">NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/boeing-crewflighttest\/embed\/#?secret=bvnc6c6H7h\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s Boeing Crew Flight Test” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bvnc6c6H7h\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/52095126237-5a3bc0296a-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Stefon Harrison v. Ronald 

Watts, et al. 

Case Number: 20 CV 2918 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

City of Chicago, Philip Cline, Debra Kirby and Karen Rowan 

Attorney name (type or print): Terrence M. Burns 

Firm: Reiter Burns LLP 

Street address: 311 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 5200 

City/State/Zip: Chicago, IL 60606 

Bar ID Number: 3122331 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Telephone Number: 312 982-0090 

 

Email Address: tburns@reiterburns.com 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? Yes No 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? Yes No 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? Yes No 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

 Appointed Counsel 

 If appointed counsel, are you a 

 

 Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this Court an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this Court’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 U.S.C.§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on June 26, 2020 

Attorney signature: S/ Terrence M. Burns 

 (Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

 Revised 8/1/2015 

Case: 1:20-cv-02918 Document #: 27 Filed: 06/26/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:75
Exhibit 10-40






EXHIBIT 10.40 




AMENDMENT NO. 1 

TO THE 

NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 

2004 PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN 




1.         Section VI(3) is hereby replaced in its entirety by the following: 




    (3) The Committee shall have the discretion to adjust the determination of the degree of attainment of the preestablished goals; provided that the Awards that are designated to qualify for Performance-Based Exception may not be adjusted upward (although the Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such Awards downward). In no event shall the Performance Period for any performance-based equity Award be less than one year. 


















































































E-8
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 751

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for research on the

disease known as lymphangioleiomyomatosis (commonly known as LAM).

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr.

CUNNINGHAM, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mrs. MINK

of Hawaii, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Ms. NORTON, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. BROWN of Ohio, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. OLVER, Mr. RAHALL, Mrs.

MEEK of Florida, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, and Ms. JACKSON-LEE

of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for

research on the disease known as

lymphangioleiomyomatosis (commonly known as LAM).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘LAM Disease Research

5 Act of 1997’’.
2

HR 751 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF RESEARCH ON LAM DISEASE.

2 Section 421 of the Public Health Service Act (42

3 U.S.C. 285b–3) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing subsection:

5 ‘‘(c)(1) The Program shall provide for the conduct

6 or support of research on the disease

7 lymphangioleiomyomatosis (referred to in this subsection

8 as ‘LAM’). The Program may provide for the conduct or

9 support of training, health information dissemination, and

10 other programs with respect to LAM. Activities under this

11 paragraph may include the establishment and operation

12 of a registry with respect to the disease.

13 ‘‘(2) For the purpose of carrying out paragraph (1),

14 there is authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for fis15 cal year 1998.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 99.2

**** 

**** 

**** 

**Independent Accountant’s Report**

**** 

**** 

Structured Products Corp., as Depositor

390 Greenwich Street, 1st Floor 

New York, New York 10013

 

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee

Corporate Trust Department

100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

 

Re:       CorTS Trust III for Verizon Global Funding Notes (the “Trust”)         

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have examined management’s assertions that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of December 15, 2000, as supplemented by the CorTS Trust III for Verizon Global Funding Notes Series Supplement, dated as of April 26, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertions based on our examination.

 

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

/s/ Aston Bell CPA

 

New York, New York

March 22, 2011

 

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ibrahim K. Awwad","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/iawwad\/","title":"Kaiser Adeni","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7TmEl3bpR5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kaiser-adeni-3\/\">Kaiser Adeni<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kaiser-adeni-3\/embed\/#?secret=7TmEl3bpR5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Kaiser Adeni” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7TmEl3bpR5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-51646 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. GUILLERMO FARIAS-HERNANDEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-2086-ALL Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Guillermo Farias-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torresv. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007). The Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment ofthe district court is AFFIRMED.
9409.

#### Mayor and Council of Gainesville *v.*Gaines.

Broyles, P. J.

1. Under .the facts disclosed by the record the cause of action was not' barred by the statute of limitations.

2. Where a nuisance is not of a permanent nature, but one that may be abated at any time, and upon its abatement no further injury would result, the person whose land is injured by the nuisance is not entitled to recover damages for both past and prospective injuries to'the land, but can recover damages for only such injuries as were actually sustained, within the period prescribed by the statute of limitations, before the suit was brought, *Langley*v. *Augusta,*118 *Ga.*590 (45 S. E. 486, 98 Am. St. R. 133).

3. In this case the suit was for permanent injuries to land, alleged, to have *491been caused by a nuisance of a permanent nature, and damages for both past and prospective injuries were sought. -The defendant, the Mayor and Council of the City of Gainesville, introduced no. evidence. The. undisputed evidence introduced by the plaintiff showed that the nuisance was one that could be abated at any time, and that upon its abatement no further injury would result to his land. Under these facts, and the ruling stated above, the verdict, finding damages for both past and prospective injuries,to the land, was contrary to law and the evidence, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.'

Decided July 10, 1918.

Action-for damages; from city court of Hall county—Judge Wheeler. November 8, *1917.*

*C. N. Davie, W. B. Sloan,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. H. Perry, W. A, Charters, W. N. Oliver,*contra.

4. It is unnecessary to consider the assignments of error.other than those dealt with above.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Inland Real Estate Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Mark E. Zalatoris certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:March 25, 2016By:/s/ MARK E. ZALATORISName:  Mark E. ZalatorisTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-94","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qNG8lBIiEg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-94\/\">STS-94<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-94\/embed\/#?secret=qNG8lBIiEg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-94” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qNG8lBIiEg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/9701384\/9701384~large.jpg?w=600&h=1537&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1537}
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") by Tag-It
Pacific, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.



Dated:  August 14, 2006           /S/ STEPHEN P. FORTE
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Stephen P. Forte
                                  Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 14, 2006           /S/ LONNIE D. SCHNELL
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Lonnie D. Schnell
                                  Chief Financial Officer