alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THOMAS A. FRASER ET AL., PROSECUTORS, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION AND BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS.

Submitted January 16, 1945

Decided April 30, 1945.

Before Justices Case, Bobine and Porter.

For the prosecutors, *Eisenberg & Spicer.*

For the respondents, *Robert H. Doherty.*

The op inion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

A writ was allowed in this case for the determination of two questions. 132 *N. J. L.*248.

1. Do teachers in a school system, who have acquired tenure, have a right to the increases provided by an existing- salary schedule when the time for such increases occur? We think not. If the reasoning in *Greenway*v. *Board of Education of Camden,*129 *N. J. L.*461, is somewhat extended, as we think it should be, board action is necessary to implement every increase.

2. May the recommendation by the persons named in the schedule be arbitrarily withheld ? We can find nothing in the proofs beyond inaction. There is nothing to indicate that it was arbitrary. To decide otherwise it is admitted would necessitate overruling the reasoning in the Greenway case, *supra.*This we cannot do.

The judgment of the State Board of Education will be affirmed.
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

### **MRS. FIELDS FAMOUS BRANDS, LLC**

### **COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXEDCHARGES**

 
| ** **                                                         | ** ** | **For the Fiscal Year Ended** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                         | ** ** | **December 31,**                             | ** ** | **January 1,** | ** ** | **January 3,** | ** ** | **December 28,** | ** ** | **December 29,** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                         | ** ** | **2005**                                          | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                         | ** ** | **(Dollars in thousands)**              | ** ** |
| Fixed Charges:                                                     |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest on debt and capitalized leases                            |       | $                                                 | 21,482     |   | $ | 25,073 |   | $ | 25,080 |   | $ | 25,363 |   | $ | 25,194 |   |
| Interest in rental expenses                                        |       | 169                                               |       | 145 |   | 157 |   | 124 |   | 134 |   |
| Total Fixed Charges                                                |       | $                                                 | 21,651     |   | $ | 25,218 |   | $ | 25,237 |   | $ | 25,487 |   | $ | 25,328 |   |
| Earnings:                                                          |       |                                              |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Pretax income (loss) from continuing  operations                   |       | $                                                 | (40,716    | ) | $ | 4,816 |   | $ | 6,916 |   | $ | 10,881 |   | $ | (8,237 | ) |
| Fixed charges                                                      |       | 21,651                                            |       | 25,218 |   | 25,237 |   | 25,487 |   | 25,328 |   |
| Total Earnings (Loss)                                              |       | $                                                 | (19,065    | ) | $ | 30,034 |   | $ | 32,153 |   | $ | 36,368 |   | $ | 17,091 |   |
| Ratio of Earnings (Loss) to Fixed Charges                          |       | N/A                                               |       | 1.19 |   | 1.27 |   | 1.43 |   | N/A |   |
| Amount by Which Earnings Were Insufficient  to Cover Fixed Charges |       | $                                                 | 40,716     |   | N/A |   | N/A |   | N/A |   | $ | 8,327 |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 875 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 875

 To adjust, and provide a procedure for the future adjustment of, the 
                      salaries of Federal judges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 1997

 Mr. Hyde (for himself and Mr. Conyers) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To adjust, and provide a procedure for the future adjustment of, the 
                      salaries of Federal judges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF SALARIES OF FEDERAL JUDGES.

    (a) Initial Adjustment.--The annual salary rates of the Chief 
Justice of the United States, the associate justices of the Supreme 
Court of the United States, the judges of the United States courts of 
appeals, the judges of the United States district courts, and the 
judges of the United States Court of International Trade, are increased 
by an amount equal to 9.6 percent of their respective existing salary 
rates, rounded to the nearest multiple of $100 (or if midway between 
multiples of $100, to the next higher multiple of $100), effective as 
of the first day of the first applicable pay period beginning on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Special Rule.--For purposes of sections 153(a) and 634(a) of 
title 28, United States Code, the increase under subsection (a) shall 
be deemed to have been determined pursuant to section 135 of such 
title.
    (c) Future Adjustments.--Section 461(a) of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) Effective as of the first day of the applicable pay period 
beginning on or after the date on which an adjustment takes effect 
under section 5303 of title 5 in the rates of basic pay under the 
General Schedule (or under any other provision of law in lieu thereof), 
each salary rate which is subject to an adjustment under this section 
shall be adjusted by an amount equal to the percentage of the 
adjustment under such section 5303, rounded to the nearest multiple of 
$100 (or if midway between multiples of $100, to the next higher 
multiple of $100).''.
    (d) Repeal.--Section 140 of Public Law 97-92 (95 Stat. 1200; 28 
U.S.C. 461 note) is repealed.
    (2) Coordination Rule.--If the salary increase under subsection (a) 
is to be made as of the same date as a pay adjustment under section 461 
of title 28, United States Code, as amended by subsection (c), the 
increase under subsection (a) shall be made first.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2015

d0518 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2015

149329(71)

MARK CLARK,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 149329

COA: 309438

Wayne CC: 10

- 006750

- NO

NATIONAL CITY BANK and PNC

BANK,

Defendants

- Appellees.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

25, 2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getty Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 906), that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), as amended; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is being furnished solely for the purposes of Section 906.

Date:
August 8, 2007



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    JONATHAN D. KLEIN              
|Jonathan D. Klein                     
|Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 960

AN ACT

To validate certain conveyances in the City of

purposes.Tulare, Tulare County, California, and for other
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 960

AN ACT

To validate certain conveyances in the City of Tulare, Tulare

County, California, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds that:
2

•HR 960 EH

1 (1) It is in the Federal Government’s interest

2 to facilitate local development of jobs in areas of

3 high unemployment.

4 (2) Railroad interests in rights-of-way prevent

5 local communities from obtaining clear title to prop6 erty for development unless the city also obtains the

7 Federal reversionary interest in those rights-of-way.

8 (3) For development purposes, in order to se9 cure needed financing, the City of Tulare Redevelop10 ment Agency requires clear title to certain parcels of

11 land within the city’s business corridor that are part

12 of a railroad right-of-way.

13 SEC. 2. TULARE CONVEYANCE.

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (c) and (d),

15 all conveyances to the Redevelopment Agency of the City

16 of Tulare, California, of lands described in subsection (b),

17 heretofore or hereafter, made directly by the Southern Pa18 cific Transportation Company, or its successors, are here19 by validated to the extent that the conveyances would be

20 legal or valid if all right, title, and interest of the United

21 States, except minerals, were held by the Southern Pacific

22 Transportation Company.

23 (b) LANDS DESCRIBED.—The lands referred to in

24 subsection (a) are the parcels shown on the map entitled

25 ‘‘Tulare Redevelopment Agency-Railroad Parcels Pro-
3

•HR 960 EH

1 posed to be Acquired’’, dated 5/29/97, that formed part

2 of a railroad right-of-way granted to the Southern Pacific

3 Railroad Company, or its successors, agents, or assigns,

4 by the Federal Government (including the right-of-way ap5 proved by an Act of Congress on July 27, 1866). The map

6 referred to in this subsection shall be on file and available

7 for public inspection in the offices of the Director of the

8 Bureau of Land Management.

9 (c) PRESERVATION OF EXISTING RIGHTS OF AC10 CESS.—Nothing in this section shall impair any existing

11 rights of access in favor of the public or any owner of

12 adjacent lands over, under or across the lands which are

13 referred to in subsection (a).

14 (d) MINERALS.—The United States disclaims any

15 and all right of surface entry to the mineral estate of lands

16 described in subsection (b).

Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
### Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 29, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00809

- CR

RUDY DICKERSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MD

- 356127

MEMORANDUM OPINION A jury convicted appellant of assault of a family member causing bodily injury. The trial court sentenced appellant to confinement fo r 180 days in the Galveston County jail and assessed a fine of $1,000. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on September 17, 2015.
On November 20, 2015, this court ordered a hearing to determine why appellant
had not filed the clerk ’ s or reporter ’ s record s in this appeal. On December 8 , 201 5 , the trial court conducted the hearing, and the court ’ s findings were filed in this court on2 December 17, 2015

. At the hearing, appellant ’ s appointed attorney, James Bennett, and the State ’ s attorney appeared, but appe llant failed to appear . Bennett stated that jail officials told him appellant had served his sentence and ha d been released from jail. Bennett also informed the court he was unable to locate appellant, the most recent phone number for appellant
had been disconnected, and a voice message left on an old telephone number was not
returned. The trial court concluded “ that appellant no longer desires to pursue his appeal.”
Appellant has not filed a written motion to withdraw the appeal or a written
motion to di smiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). However, based upon the finding of the trial court that appellant does not want to continue his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See Tex. R. App . P. 2.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Donovan, and Brown.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

Getten Credit Company

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02651

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman

Fair Isaac Corporation

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, May 6, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman: Attorney Daniel E.

Hedlund's motion for leave to appear pro hac vice [8] on behalf of the plaintiff is granted.

Mailed notice (is, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02651 Document #: 11 Filed: 05/06/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:58
H. Res. 227

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 11, 1997.

Whereas the House of Representatives has heard with great

sorrow of the death of Mother Teresa of Calcutta;

Whereas Mother Teresa of Calcutta dedicated her life to

helping the sick, the dying, the unborn, and the poorest

of the poor for a half century;

Whereas Mother Teresa founded the Missionaries of Charity,

which now comprises over 3,000 members in 25 countries

who are engaged in caring for the sick, dying, and poor;

Whereas Mother Teresa’s humanitarian work and the inspiration she provided to others has been recognized by the

award of the first Pope John XXIII Peace Prize in 1971,

the Jawaharal Nehru Award for International Understanding in 1972, the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979, and

the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1985;

Whereas in 1997, pursuant to Public Law 105-16, Mother

Teresa was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal; and

Whereas Mother Teresa’s life-long example of selfless dedication to humanitarian work has inspired millions of people

around the world: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses

its admiration and respect for the life and work of Mother
2

•HRES 227 EH

Teresa, and its sympathy to the Missionaries of Charity on

their loss.

SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall

transmit a copy of this resolution to the General Mother

House of the Missionaries of Charity in Calcutta, India.

Attest:

Clerk.
★

H. Res. 108

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 9, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT: Mr. Portman.

Attest:

Clerk.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      4, 2009 | /s/Andrew      J. Welch                        |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Andrew      J. Welch                           |
|                  | Chief      Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging |
|                  | Trust      Incorporated, as general partner of |
|                  | FelCor      Lodging Limited Partnership        |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5
<CIK>                 0001048275
<NAME>                PMCC FINANCIAL CORP.
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1,655,493
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       65,003,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    80,123,615
<PP&E>                                                 318,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      80,441,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               69,490,388
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                37,500
<OTHER-SE>                                          10,913,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        80,441,730
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    12,157,891
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       10,498,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     900,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        758,799
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,128,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (369,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (369,201)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.14


        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Frederick W. Smith, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of FedEx Corporation (the registrant); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|Date: February 18, 2014                   
|                                          
|/s/ Frederick W. Smith                    
|Frederick W. Smith Chairman, President
and
|Chief Executive Officer