alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER 13

- 1 9

- 00 6 03

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRIST I

- EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant,

v.
CHRISTOPHER TUMLINSON , Appellee.

On appeal from the 28 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.



## ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contrer a s and Justices Longoria and Perkes Order Per Curiam

The State perfected an appeal from an order granting a motion to suppress entered
by the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 19FC

- 2529

- A. The

State filed a motion to abate and remand to the trial court for findings of fact and

conc lusions of law.2

On November 5 , 20 1 9, the trial court issued an order granting a motion to
suppress. On November 22 , 20 1 9, the State filed a timely request for findings of fact and
conclusions of law. The trial court has not made its findings o f fact and conclusions of law
in support of its decision to grant the appellee ’ s motion to suppress.
Upon the request of the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial
court must make findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provid e an appellate
court with a basis up on which to review the trial court ’ s application of the law to the facts.

State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). If the trial court does not
enter the findings of fact and conclusions of law within t wenty days from its ruling on the
motion to suppress, the intermediate appellate court must exercise its authority under
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 44.4, and remand the case to the trial court and order
the trial court to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. T EX

. R. A PP

. P ROC

. 44.4;

Cullen , 195 S.W.3d at 698

- 700.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and the State ’ s motion, is of
the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we GRANT counsel ’ s motion
to abate the present appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is
ABATED, and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.
Upon remand, the trial court is instructed to make and file findings of fact and

conclusions of law consistent with the holding in Cullen

. A supplemental record
containing these findings of fact and conclusions of law should be included in a
supplemental clerk's record which should be submitted to the Clerk of this Court within
thirty days from the date of this or der.3

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Order delivered and filed this the 29 th day of January , 2020.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 148 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 148

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 1997

 Mr. Fazio of California submitted the following resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are 
hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Hinojosa and Mr. Berry.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Rodriguez.
                                 <all>
```
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 206 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 78
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 206

                          [Report No. 105-221]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2014) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections 
   (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 1998.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 1997

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2014) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections 
   (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 1998.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2014) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections (b)(2) and 
(d) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for 
fiscal year 1998. All points of order agaisnt the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read. The conference report shall be debatable for two 
and one half hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 78

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 206

                          [Report No. 105-221]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2014) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections 
   (b)(2) and (d) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Invites Media to Upcoming Launch of Science to Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7Jg4kPrPoW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-invites-media-to-upcoming-launch-of-science-to-space-station\/\">NASA Invites Media to Upcoming Launch of Science to Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-invites-media-to-upcoming-launch-of-science-to-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=7Jg4kPrPoW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Invites Media to Upcoming Launch of Science to Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7Jg4kPrPoW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/m18-080_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 2 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 3 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 4 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 5 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 6 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 7 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 8 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 9 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 10 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 11 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 12 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 13 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 14 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 15 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 16 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 17 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 18 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 19 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 20 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 21 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 22 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 23 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 24 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 25 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 26 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 27 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 28 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 29 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 30 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 31 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 32 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 33 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 34 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 35 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 36 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 37 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 38 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 39 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 40 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 41 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 42 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 43 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 44 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02485-JJT Document 1-1 Filed 12/07/15 Page 45 of 45
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

EDDY PEREZ,
Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2022

- 2126

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 20

- 7436, Judge William S. Greenberg.

______________________

ORDER

______________________

Before P ROST

, H UGHES

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges

.

P ER C URIAM

.
Mr. Eddy Perez did not raise his arguments on appeal in his clear and unmistakable error (“CUE”) claim at the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office

. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review th o se issues.

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 22-2126 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 03/08/2024PEREZ v. MCDONOUGH 2

This case is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

March 8, 2024

Date F OR THE C OURT Case: 22-2126 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 03/08/2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Tod R. Hamachek, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 30, 2003                                /s/ Tod R. Hamacheck
                                                       --------------------
                                                       Tod R. Hamachek
                                                       Chairman of the Board and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       21
Exhibit
10.9(b)
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewal
   
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    SB Bristol Energy Fund LP
    
    CMF SandRidge Master Fund L.P.
    
    Bohdan Mysko
    
    CMF SandRidge Feeder (Cayman) Ltd.
    
    UDC International
    
    Citigroup Energy Advisors Portfolio L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
   CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & DirectorSANDRIDGE CAPITAL, L.P.By:
    
    /s/ Andrew M. RowePrint Name: Andrew M. RoweJM/sr
#### MORRONE v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.

No. 6092.

District Court, S. D. California, C. D.

June 25, 1947.

See also 7 F.R.D. 214; 72 F.Supp. 286.

Culbert L. Olson and John W. Olson, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

C. W. Cornell, O. O. Collins, Malcolm Archbald and John R. Allport, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant.

O’CONNOR, District Judge.

The court has carefully considered the motion for a new trial filed b)' plaintiff in the above-entitled action in this court on May 22nd, 1947, and the briefs of attorneys and has further re-examined the instructions given by the court to the jury.

In the supplemental memorandum in opposition to motion for a new trial, filed by defendant’s attorneys, the case of Cedzo v. Bergen, 53 Cal.App.2d 667, 128 P.2d 683, 688, decided in 19-12, is cited, wherein the following language is quoted from the court’s opinion: “As a general rule it is proper for the court to state to the jury the issues raised by the pleadings (24 Cal.Jur. 825) and it is also true that a party is estopped to assert error in an instruction requested * * * by an adversary if they merely invoke the same proposition which lias been asserted by the party complaining (citing cases)”.

This court is hound by the rulings of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In Ballard v. United States, 9 Cir., 138 F.2d 540, at page 544, the Circuit Court quotes (paragraph 45) an instruction given by the trial Court. While the opinion does not state the fact, the record in the case shows that the defendants, prior to the trial, agreed to this instruction and twice during the trial, which was rather protracted, they requested the court to again advise the jury the substance of this instruction. The Circuit Court said that this was not a correct statement of the issues. It is clear, therefore, that, even an instruction requested by a party may be considered by the Circuit Court and found to be error. The instruction given by the court, in the cases cited, was subsequently found by the Supreme Court of the United States to be a correct statement of the law. United States v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78, 64 S.Ct. 882, 88 L.Ed. 1148.

The Government, in its brief to the Circuit Court, page 67, called the Court’s attention to the fact that the particular instruction cited as error was brought to the attention of the defendants prior to the trial and, at the request of the defendants, it was repeated during the trial to the jury.

It is clear, therefore, that if the Circuit Court finds that, in its opinion, an instruction requested was erroneously given, the verdict may be set aside.

*286The Court finds that the evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict, and further the Court finds that there were no errors of law occurring at the trial.

Motion for new trial is denied, and exception allowed the plaintiffs.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

CHARLES ELMER ROUSH,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 10500

D.C. No. 2:16

- cr

- 00236

- LRH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 10, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER , and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Charles Elmer Roush appeals from the district court ’s judgment and

challenges his guilty

- plea conviction and 60

- month sentence for violation of the

Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act, 1 8 U.S.C. § 2250(a). Pursuant

to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Roush ’s counsel has filed a bri ef

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 12 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 10500

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

counsel of record. We have provided Roush the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Roush waived his right to appeal his conviction and any aspect of his

sentence other than his above

- Guidelines custodial sentence and supervised release

term. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to the custodial sentence

or the term of supervision. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the

remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v.

Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
IV

House Calendar No. 76

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 202

[Report No. 105–218]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2015) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections

(b)(1) and (c) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the budget

for fiscal year 1998.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 30, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2015) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections (b)(1) and (c) of section

105 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal

year 1998.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2015) to provide for reconciliation

4 pursuant to subsections (b)(1) and (c) of section 105 of

5 the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year
2

HRES 202 RH

1 1998. All points of order against the conference report and

2 against its consideration are waived. The conference re3 port shall be considered as read. The conference report

4 shall be debatable for ninety minutes equally divided and

5 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member

6 of the Committee on the Budget.

House Calendar No. 76

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 202

[Report No. 105–218]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reresolution on the budget for fiscal year 1998. (b)(1) and (c) of section 105 of the concurrent vide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2015) to proJULY 30, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Graf","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/agraf\/","title":"Valkyrie","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"G1YNDs5LMv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/valkyrie\/\">Valkyrie<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/valkyrie\/embed\/#?secret=G1YNDs5LMv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Valkyrie” — NASA\" data-secret=\"G1YNDs5LMv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/jsc2017e024400-alt.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### The Governor *v.*Kennerly and Others, in Error.

HELD, that it is not the duty of a justice of the peace, under the statute, to issue a scire facias against a constable for failing to return an execution, unless the scire facias be ordered by the plaintiff (1).

(1)

. Stat. 1817, p. 215; — 1823, p. 245.