alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 853 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 853

  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to study the 
effect that a tax system comprised of a 10 percent Federal consumption 
tax and a 10 percent flat Federal income tax would have on the Federal 
               Government and the United States economy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 1997

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to study the 
effect that a tax system comprised of a 10 percent Federal consumption 
tax and a 10 percent flat Federal income tax would have on the Federal 
               Government and the United States economy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY OF TAX SYSTEM COMPRISED OF CONSUMPTION TAX AND FLAT 
              INCOME TAX.

    (a) In General.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
study the effect that a tax system comprised of a 10 percent Federal 
consumption tax and a 10 percent flat Federal income tax would have 
on--
            (1) revenues to the United States Government, including the 
        effect on the annual budget deficit, and
            (2) the economy of the United States.
    (b) Matters Affecting the Study.--In conducting the study under 
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall assume no exclusions, 
deductions, or credits other than those in connection with a trade or 
business and the standard deduction, the personal exemption, interest 
on indebtedness to acquire a principal residence, and payments made for 
college tuition.
    (c) Variance of Rates.--For purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2) of 
subsection (a), the Comptroller General shall also study the effect if 
the rates of tax referred to in subsection (a) are varied over time but 
raise the same revenue as the tax system in effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Submission to Congress.--Not later than one year after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to 
the Congress a report concerning the study under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Board of
Directors
 China
Architectural Engineering, Inc.
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby
consent to your disclosure of our audit report dated May 14, 2010 covering three
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 for the consolidated statements of
income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and two years at December 31, 2009
and 2008 for the consolidated balance sheets included in the Form 10-K/A No. 4
of China Architectural Engineering, Inc.
 
 For the
purpose of the aforesaid Form 10-K/A No. 4, we also consent to the reference of
our firm as "Experts" under the 'Experts' caption, which, in so far as
applicable to our firm means accounting experts.
 
 South
      San Francisco, California
                June
      1, 2010
              Samuel
      H. Wong & Co., LLP
                Certified
      Public Accountants
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 178 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          July 8, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2016) making appropriations for military construction, family 
housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with 
clause 2 or 6 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 6 of rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. The Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may: (1) postpone until a time 
during further consideration in the Committee of the Whole a request for a 
recorded vote on any amendment; and (2) reduce to five minutes the minimum time 
for electronic voting on any postponed question that follows another electronic 
vote without intervening business, provided that the minimum time for electronic 
voting on the first in any series of questions shall be fifteen minutes. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to 
recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 87-1468.

#### Phillips *v.*Miner.

Ct. App. La., 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-10167

Summary Calendar

__________________

JOHN MCCOY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ANN RICHARDS; GEORGE W. BUSH; JOHN DOE;

DAN MORALES, Attorney General; JAMES A. COLLINS;

WAYNE SCOTT, Director; S.O. WOODS; 

RICHARD BELENGER, Warden; JAMES DUKE; CARL RAGSDALE,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:95-CV-179

- - - - - - - - - -

May 8, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John McCoy seeks review of three orders of the district

court. First, he appeals the denial of his motion for

appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and McCoy's

brief and AFFIRM the district court's denial of the motion

essentially for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy

v. Richards, No. 1:95-CV-179-C (N.D. Tex., Jan. 19, 1996).
No. 96-10167

-2-

Second, McCoy appeals the denial of his motion for

preliminary injunction. McCoy has not shown irreparable injury

warranting a preliminary injuction, and the district court did

not abuse its discretion in denying his motion. See Black Fire

Fighters Ass'n v. City of Dallas, 905 F.2d 63, 65 (5th Cir.

1990). The denial of the motion is AFFIRMED.

Third, McCoy seeks to appeal the denial of his motion to

protect exhibits. The order denying this motion is not

appealable. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1292(a); Lakedreams v.

Taylor, 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991). The appeal of the

denial of this motion is DISMISSED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the directio n of the Court.

Dec ember 9 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk Dec ember 9 , 2019

148981 ( 52 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 148981

v COA: 319642

Muskegon CC: 12

- 062665

- FH

PAUL J. BETTS, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant

.

_________ _____________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the third motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the

time for filing hi s brief is GRANTED. The brief will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before Dec ember 2 0 , 201 9

.
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity asindicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.        May 10, 2006   /s/ Andrew J. Welch   Andrew J. Welch   Chief Financial Officer of FelCor Lodging
#### John Westerman *v.*Gottlieb Letterle, &c.

Pleadings — Guardians and Ward — Eight to Bring Action.

A petition by a ward to ascertain how funds were being held by a guardian, what disposition had been made of the same, the amount due each ward, and to enforce payment, held, sufficient allegations to authority bringing the action, and uphold a judgment for the true amount when ascertained, against the guardian and his. sureties.

APPEAL PROM JEPPERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION.

June 26, 1871.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

The ground mainly relied upon for a reversal of the judgment in this case is that it was not authorized by the pleadings.

• The petition charges that a portion of the money or funds which came to the hands of Billings as administrator he had charged himself with as guardian of plaintiffs and the balance he still retained as administrator of the father of plaintiffs, but that they had no means of ascertaining the respective amounts.

It is certainly true according to the evidence that the portion *388of the funds to which appellee John M. Letterle was entitled, Billings held as administrator, for it does not appear that he ever had a guardian, and he had attained the age of 21 years before Billings settled his accounts with the county court, and the portion of the funds to which the wards of Billings were entitled he had charged himself with as guardian; but that they were so held by him, it does not .appear that the wards .knew. This suit was brought to ascertain how they were held, the amount due to each ■of the appellees, and to enforce payment.

*Muir & Bijwr, Gaertmell, for appellant.*

*T. W. Gibson, for appellee.*

The allegations must be regarded as altogether sufficient to institute an investigation to ascertain in what character Billings held the funds and to uphold a judgment for the true amount when ascertained against Billings and his sureties respectively for the amount held by him as guardian against him as such and the surety on his guardian bond, and for the .amount held by him as administrator, against him as such, with his surety on his administration bond, and so the judgment was rendered.

The facts stated in the affidavits filed by appellant for a rehearing of the case, if admitted, do not constitute a good defense to this action, for having charged himself as guardian with the funds, whatever disposition Billings may have made of them after that, could make no difference, his surety as guardian would be responsible to his wards; but whether or not Driesback would be responsible to appellant, if the money of the wards was put into the late firm of Billings *&*Driesback and used by that firm and Driesback knew at the time it was their money, is a question not made by the pleadings, and not before us for determination.

The allegations of the petition being sufficient to uphold the judgment, which is fully sustained by the evidence, it must be *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"Kate Rubins","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qzxYUuHNJd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kathleen-kate-rubins\/\">Kate Rubins<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kathleen-kate-rubins\/embed\/#?secret=qzxYUuHNJd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Kate Rubins” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qzxYUuHNJd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/jsc2018e066417_alt.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Logan Resources Ltd., a company organized under the Business Corporation Act (British Columbia)(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Seamus Young, President/CEO/Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ Seamus Young

Seamus Young, President/CEO/Director



Date: October 17, 2006
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Naomi Hartono","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/naomi-hartonojpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Scientists Gear Up for Solar Storms at Mars","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hwSkyyqDSS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/planets\/mars\/nasa-scientists-gear-up-for-solar-storms-at-mars\/\">NASA Scientists Gear Up for Solar Storms at Mars<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/planets\/mars\/nasa-scientists-gear-up-for-solar-storms-at-mars\/embed\/#?secret=hwSkyyqDSS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Scientists Gear Up for Solar Storms at Mars” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hwSkyyqDSS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1-coronal-mass-ejection-captured-by-sdo-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 156

Relating to the disposition of Senate amendments to the concurrent resolution

(H. Con. Res. 84) establishing the congressional budget for the United

States Government for fiscal year 1998 and setting forth appropriate

budgetary levels for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Relating to the disposition of Senate amendments to the

concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 84) establishing the

congressional budget for the United States Government

for fiscal year 1998 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

1 Resolved, That, upon receipt of a message from the

2 Senate transmitting House Concurrent Resolution 84 with

3 Senate amendments thereto, the House shall be considered

4 either to have concurred in the Senate amendments, or

5 to have concurred therein with an amendment, whichever

6 may be necessary to achieve the end that the text of the

7 concurrent resolution thereby finally adopted, or the
2

HRES 156 IH

1 text thereby proposed by the House amendment to the

2 Senate amendment, is the text of House Concurrent Reso3 lution 86.

Æ
#### Franklin C. Rance and Larry W. Thurston *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 1-1074A155.

Filed July 23, 1975.]

*154
      *R. Steven Keck, Palmer, Hinkle, Brenton & Keck,*of Dan-ville, *William R. Jones,*of counsel, of Indianapolis, for appellants.

*Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *Walter F. Lockhart,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Per Curiam

The only issue presented by this appeal which is necessary to our decision is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain Franklin C. Ranee’s conviction of Second Degree Burglary1 and Larry W. Thurston’s conviction of Entering to Commit a Felony.2

We reverse.

The evidence viewed most favorably to the State shows the following:

Sometime between 11:00 p.m. on December 9, 1973 and 6:30 a.m. on December 10, 1973, the Moose Lodge in Dan-ville, Indiana was entered by means of a hole chopped in the roof with an ax or pry bar. Among other things, several locked bank money bags full of cash were taken.

At about 11:30 p.m. on December 12, 1973, a car driven by Ranee with Thurston, the owner, as a passenger was stopped for a traffic violation near Brownstown, Indiana. A grocery sack containing the money bags taken in the Moose Lodge burglary were found in the unlockable trunk of the car. The bags had all been cut or torn open and were empty.

On appeal, Ranee and Thurston contend the evidence established only their constructive possession of stolen property, which, under the circumstances of this case, is not sufficient to permit an inference that they committed the burglary.

*155
      *154Convictions of both second degree burglary and entering *155to commit a felony may be sustained on evidence that is wholly circumstantial. *Parsons*v. *State*(1973), 159 Ind. App. 160, 304 N.E.2d 802; *Chapman*v. *State*(1975), 163 Ind. App. 137, 321 N.E.2d 863. In considering the sufficiency of this evidence, we must examine it, not for the purpose of determining whether it is adequate to negate every reasonable hypothesis of innocence, but rather to decide whether an inference may be drawn therefrom that the defendants are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. *Giles*v. *State*(1974), 162 Ind. App. 639, 320 N.E.2d 806.

Evidence of unexplained possession of recently stolen property will support a conviction of the theft of that property. *Vaughn*v. *State*(1971), 255 Ind. 678, 266 N.E.2d 219. However, these defendants were convicted of second degree burglary and entering to commit a felony, rather than theft. As to these crimes, evidence of unexplained possession of recently stolen property may support a conviction, but only if other evidence is adduced to link the defendants with the crime. *Chapman, supra, Giles, supra.*No such evidence was presented in this case and therefore, the convictions of Ranee and Thurston must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Note. — Reported at 331 N.E.2d 40.

. IC 1971, 35-13-4-4, Ind. Ann. Stat. §10-701 (Burns 1956).

. IC 1971, 35-13-4-5, Ind. Ann. Stat. §10-704 (Burns 1956),