alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1257 

CAF 13-00988 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF DELIA S., JESUS S. AND 

SKYLETT A. 

------------------------------------------ MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

DESIREE S., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

JOSEPH T. JARZEMBEK, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

DAVID C. SCHOPP, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF

BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CHARLES D. HALVORSEN OF COUNSEL).

SHARON ANSCOMBE OSGOOD, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M.

LoVallo, J.), entered May 13, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Social

Services Law § 384-b. The order terminated respondent’s parental

rights with respect to the subject children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal insofar as it concerns

respondent’s older child is unanimously dismissed and the order is

affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order terminating

her parental rights with respect to the subject children on the ground

of mental illness. We dismiss as moot the appeal from the order

insofar as it concerns the mother’s older child because she has

attained the age of majority (see Matter of Anthony M., 56 AD3d 1124,

1124, lv denied 12 NY3d 702). Contrary to the mother’s contention,

petitioner met its burden of demonstrating by clear and convincing

evidence that the mother is “presently and for the foreseeable future

unable, by reason of mental illness . . . , to provide proper and

adequate care for” the remaining subject children (Social Services Law

§ 384-b [4] [c]; see § 384-b [6] [a]; Matter of Christopher B., Jr.

[Christopher B., Sr.], 104 AD3d 1188, 1188). The testimony of

petitioner’s witnesses, including a psychologist, “established that

the [mother] was so disturbed in [her] behavior, feeling, thinking and

judgment that, if the [remaining subject children] were returned to

[her] custody, [they] would be in danger of becoming” neglected 
-2- 1257 

CAF 13-00988 

children (Christopher B., Jr., 104 AD3d at 1188; see § 384-b [6] [a]). 

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, 

INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AUKUR-US, et al.,

 Defendants,

Case No. 20-cv-03128

Judge John F. Kness

Magistrate Judge Young B. Kim

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Volkswagen 

Group of America, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) hereby dismisses this action, with leave to reinstate within 

one hundred and eighty (180) days, as to the following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

CARPAPA 3

RISHENG KEJI 13

sholer 14

Auto Parts 55

lidewang 76

xiangyiqiu 101

Case: 1:20-cv-03128 Document #: 52 Filed: 08/10/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2707
2

Dated this 10th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Allyson M. Martin____________

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson M. Martin

Thomas J. Juettner

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

amartin@gbc.law

tjjuettner@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of 

America, Inc. 

Case: 1:20-cv-03128 Document #: 52 Filed: 08/10/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2708
#### JOSEPH ORIFICE, ASSIGNEE OF EDMUND BAUM AND MYRON BAUM, TRADING AS PENNSYLVANIA TEXTILE CO., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AYVAD WATER WINGS, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 2, 1945

Decided October 4, 1945.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker and Oliphant.

Eor the plaintiff-respondent, *Fredman & Fredman (Jacob J. Levey,*of counsel).

Eor the defendant-appellant, *Lichtenstein, & Engel (Julius Lichtenstein,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Hudson County Court of Common Pleas which denied its application for an extension of time within which to file an affidavit of merits and answer and also from the judgment entered against it as the result of said order.

There was no abuse of discretion by Judge Ziegener, who heard the motion. There is nothing in the record upon which the court could have abused its discretion, it was never called upon to exercise it. There was no testimony or proof upon which the court could have made a determination in favor *288of the defendant. Neither was there any proof by which the defendant explained its failure to file an affidavit of merits, that it had been surprised or that it had a meritorious defense.

The defendant elected at the hearing before the court below to rely on oral argument and an *ex parte*affidavit which could not properly be used. *Peer*v. *Bloxham,*82 *N. J. L.*288; *Goldstein,*v. *Weir,*124 *Id. 327.*Proper practice dictated that the defendant obtain a rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and an opportunity given to file an affidavit of merits and answer. Depositions should then have been taken for use on the argument of the rule.

The order and judgment appealed from are affirmed, with costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4862 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4862

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to guarantee that 
   Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare+Choice plans offering 
prescription drug coverage have access to a Medigap policy that offers 
  similar prescription drug coverage in the event the Medicare+Choice 
 plan terminates service in the area in which the beneficiary resides.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1998

  Mr. Cardin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to guarantee that 
   Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare+Choice plans offering 
prescription drug coverage have access to a Medigap policy that offers 
  similar prescription drug coverage in the event the Medicare+Choice 
 plan terminates service in the area in which the beneficiary resides.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medigap Access Protection for 
Seniors Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. GUARANTEED ACCESS FOR CERTAIN MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES TO MEDIGAP 
              POLICIES OFFERING DRUG BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1882(s)(3)(C) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395ss(s)(3)(C)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``Subject to clauses (ii) 
        and (iii),'' and inserting ``Subject to clauses (ii), (iii), 
        and (v),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``(v)(I) In the case of an individual who is enrolled with an 
organization described in subclause (II), a Medicare supplemental 
policy described in this subparagraph includes a Medicare supplemental 
policy which has a benefit package classified as ``H'', ``I'', or ``J'' 
under the standards established under subsection (p)(2), or in the case 
of a State described in subsection (p)(6), a Medicare supplemental 
policy offered in such State that includes in its benefits package 
coverage of outpatient prescription drugs.
    ``(II) For purposes of subclause (I), an organization described in 
this subclause is a Medicare+Choice organization under a 
Medicare+Choice plan under part C or an eligible organization under a 
contract under section 1876 that provided as a part of its benefits 
package coverage of outpatient prescription drugs, and that terminates 
such enrollment with respect to all individuals in the area in which 
the individual resides.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Daniel Gand *v.*Henry Green.

Bills and Notes — Verbal Assignment — Warranty—Petition—Demurrer.

A petition contained no averment of any agreement, or undertaking in writing or parol, by the defendant that he would warrant the solvency of Mallory's estate, the alleged “Verbal Assignment” importing no more than a mere sale and delivery of the note, without assigning it. Held, that a verbal assignment of a note devolves no responsibility on the seller, for the solvency of the obligor in the debt.

Same.

The petition must allege facts showing diligence in'the prosecuting of the claim against the maker, as a pre-requisite to a 'suit against the assignor.

APPEAL PROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

June 15, 1870.

Opinion op- the Court by

Judge Hardin :

The petition contains no averment of any agreement or undertaking in writing, or parol by the defendant that he would warrant the solvency of Mallory’s estate, the alleged “verbal assignment” importing no more than a mere sale and delivery of the note, without assigning it, which has been repeatedly held to develope no responsibility on.the seller, for the solvency of the obligor in the debt, without some express contract to that effect. Nor does the petition allege such diligence in prosecuting the claim against Mallory’s estate as was necessary as a prerequisite to the suit for recourse against an assignor.

Whether more than fifteen per cent, of the debt could have *288been realized, should have been ascertained by judicial proceedings, and the mere presentation of the claim in a suit to settle Mallory’s estate, without any conclusive result was not sufficient to establish a right of action against the defendant, if he was otherwise bound as assignor of the note.

Stevenson, *for appellant.*

*Gantrill for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to sustain the demurrer to the petition, and for other proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Darith Yim","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darith-s-yimnasa-gov\/","title":"Commercial Lunar Payload Services","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"b6GTg3MmXW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/commercial-lunar-payload-services\/\">Commercial Lunar Payload Services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/commercial-lunar-payload-services\/embed\/#?secret=b6GTg3MmXW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Commercial Lunar Payload Services” — NASA\" data-secret=\"b6GTg3MmXW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/clps-screengrab.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":247}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,449
<SECURITIES>                                    35,709
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (746)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,678
<PP&E>                                          11,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,828)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,799
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,059
<SALES>                                          5,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,061
<CGS>                                            1,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (8)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (676)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    436
<INCOME-TAX>                                       144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       292
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
[If you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.]

U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Appearance Form for Pro Se Litigants

Information entered on this form is required for any person filing a case in this court as a pro se 

party (that is, without an attorney). Please PRINT legibly.

Benefit Cosmetics LLC (Plaintiff) v. The 

Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations 

Identified on Schedule "A" (Defendants).

Case Title:

 20-cv-02552

______________________ Case Number: _____________________

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as a pro se litigant:

Louai Saleh Taan

Name: _____________________________________________________________

Suliman Al Nabulsi Street

Street Address: _____________________________________________________________

Amman, Jordan

City/State/Zip: _____________________________________________________________

Phone Number: _____________________________________________________________

/s/ Louai Saleh Taan September 6, 2021

_____________________________________________ _______________________

 Signature Executed(date)on

REQUEST TO RECEIVE NOTICE THROUGH E-MAIL

If you check the box below and provide an e-mail address in the space provided, you will receive notice 

via e-mail. By checking the box and providing an e-mail address, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

5(b)2(E) you are waiving your right to receive a paper copy of documents filed electronically in this case. 

You should not provide an e-mail address if you do not check it frequently.

√ I request to be sent notices from the court via e-mail. I understand that by making this request, I 

am waiving the right to receive a paper copy of any electronically filed document in this case. I 

understand that if my e-mail address changes I must promptly notify the Court in writing.

online2sell4you@gmail.com _____________________________________________

E-Mail Address (Please PRINT legibly .)

Rev. 06/23/2016

[If you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.]

FILED 9/7/2021

THOMAS G. BRUTON CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

NG

Case: 1:20-cv-02552 Document #: 85 Filed: 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1537
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-2037

___________________________

Abdul Karim Hassan

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

State of Iowa; Matt Schultz, Secretary of State

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

 Submitted: November 7, 2012

Filed: November 21, 2012

[Unpublished] 

____________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Abdul Hassan appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1

complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). After careful review, see

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the

1

Southern District of Iowa.
Butler v. Bank of Am., 690 F.3d 959, 961 (8th Cir. 2012), we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and deny Hassan’s motion for

publication of this opinion.

______________________________

-2-
9125.

#### Rogers *v.*Jackson.

Decided April 10, 1918.

Action upon contract; from Barrow superior court—Judge Cobb. July 13, 1917.

P. *Cooley, Lewis C. Russell,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. A. Johns,*contra.

Luke, J.

This case is here upon the first.grant of a new trial. The evidence did not demand the verdict, and it was not error for the court to grant the motion for a new trial upon the' grounds stated.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danielle Sempsrott","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/danielle-c-sempsrottnasa-gov\/","title":"Jeremy W. Parsons","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9YOlnjcWhj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-parsons-jeremy\/\">Jeremy W. Parsons<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-parsons-jeremy\/embed\/#?secret=9YOlnjcWhj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Jeremy W. Parsons” — NASA\" data-secret=\"9YOlnjcWhj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/ksc-3079490_0091_-_jeremy_parsons.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00290-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF XAVIER GOMEZ

III, DECEASED

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Probate Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (2019-PR00979-2)

July 21, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

It is further ordered that Appellee Jackson Construction, Ltd. shall pay all costs 

of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Monaghan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-b-monaghannasa-gov\/","title":"Tonya McNair","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KaggVohb9u\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/tonya-mcnair\/\">Tonya McNair<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/tonya-mcnair\/embed\/#?secret=KaggVohb9u\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Tonya McNair” — NASA\" data-secret=\"KaggVohb9u\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/tonya_work_photo.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":400}