alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William T. Bromage, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webster Preferred CapitalCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:November 7, 2005      /s/ William T. Bromage   William T. Bromage  President  Principal Executive Officer  
17
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Low-Dose CT Imaging (U01) 
(2015/05).
    Date: February 6, 2015.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, Suite 
920, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: John K. Hayes, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-3398, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2149405844524b614c40484d0f4f48490f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a424b534f59406a474b434604444342044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 29, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-26207 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Margaret K. Chambers

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02588

Honorable Steven C. Seeger

Navient Solutions, LLC, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, June 8, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: The status hearing

previously set for July 29, 2020 (Dckt. No. [5]) is stricken. The parties shall file the Joint

Initial Status Report on the docket and shall submit a Word version of the proposed

scheduling order to the Court's proposed order inbox by August 12, 2020. Mailed notice.

(jjr, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02588 Document #: 14 Filed: 06/08/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:49
**Exhibit21.1**

 

SUBSIDIARIESOF MRS. FIELDS FAMOUS BRANDS, LLC

 

The subsidiaries of Mrs. Fields FamousBrands, LLC* and their respective state or jurisdiction of incorporation ororganization are as follows:

 
| Mrs. Fields Financing  Company, Inc.            | Delaware |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------|
|                                            |     |
| Mrs. Fields Franchising,  LLC                   | Delaware |
|                                            |     |
| Great American Cookie  Company Franchising, LLC | Delaware |
|                                            |     |
| Pretzelmaker Franchising,  LLC                  | Delaware |
|                                            |     |
| Pretzel Time Franchising,  LLC                  | Delaware |
|                                            |     |
| Great American  Manufacturing, LLC              | Delaware |
|                                            |     |
| TCBY Systems, LLC                               | Delaware |
|                                            |     |
| The Mrs. Fields’ Brand,  Inc.              | Delaware |
|                                            |     |
| Mrs. Fields Gifts, Inc.                         | Utah     |
|                                            |     |
| Mrs. Fields Cookies  Australia                  | Utah     |
|                                            |     |
| TCBY International, Inc.                        | Utah     |
|                                            |     |
| TCBY of Texas, Inc.                             | Texas    |

 

Each of these subsidiaries does businessunder its respective corporate name.

----

*Excludes subsidiaries which, considered inthe aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the end offiscal year 2004.

 

----
EXHIBIT 10(bn)

                              FIRST AMENDMENT TO

                      HALLMARK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

                 1994 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN


      1.   Introduction.    Resolutions   amending  the  Hallmark   Financial
 Services, Inc.  1994  Non-Employee Director  Stock  Option Plan  (the  "1994
 Director Plan") were adopted by the Board of Directors on January 30,  1996,
 and approved at  the Annual Meeting  of Shareholders  of Hallmark  Financial
 Services, Inc. on May 21, 1996.

      2.   Amendment to Section 2.  In accordance with Section 10 of the 1994
 Director Plan, Section  2 of  the 1994 Director  Plan is  hereby amended  by
 deleting the  number  "700,000"  and  inserting  in  its  place  the  number
 "1,375,000".

      3.   Amendment to Subsection 5(d).   In accordance  with Section 10  of
 the 1994 Director Plan, Subsection 5(d) of the 1994 Director Plan is  hereby
 amended by  deleting the  number "75,000"  and inserting  in its  place  the
 number "125,000".

      4.   Addition of Subsection 5(f).  In accordance with Section 10 of the
 1994 Director Plan, Section 5 of the 1994 Director Plan is hereby amended by
 adding the following Subsection (f):

           "(f) Notwithstanding Section 5(e) hereof, effective as of  January
      9, 1996,  the  following  Eligible  Persons  are  hereby  granted  non-
      qualified options to purchase the number of shares of the Common  Stock
      set forth opposite their respective names and at the exercise price  so
      indicated (as determined in accordance with Section 3 hereof):

                               No. of Shares for
      Name                   which Options Granted    Exercise Price
      ----                   ---------------------    --------------
      Jack R. Daugherty              50,000                $1.00
      Kenneth H. Jones, Jr.          50,000                $1.00
      Samuel W. Rizzo                50,000                $1.00
      A. R. Dike                     50,000                $1.00
      James H. Graves                50,000                $1.00
      George R. Manser               50,000                $1.00
      C. Jeffrey Rogers              50,000                $1.00

      5.   Effect on Other Provisions.   Except as expressly amended  hereby,
 the 1994 Director Plan shall remain  in full force and effect as  originally
 adopted.
EXHIBIT 99.1.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



Date: November 15, 2002



Avani International Group, Inc.



/s/ Robert Wang
Robert Wang

President, and

Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Dennis Robinson

Dennis Robinson

Treasurer, and

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

RANDY LIEBICH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PAUL SEVERIN, et al.

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Case No. 20-cv-2368

Hon. M. David Weisman

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Randy Liebich, Plaintiff-Appellant in the abovecaptioned case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Seventh Circuit from the Memorandum Opinion and Order and Judgment in a Civil 

Case of the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern 

Division, entered in this action on August 9, 2023 (Dkts. 331, 332) dismissing 

Plaintiff-Appellant’s complaint. Plaintiff-Appellant Randy Liebich also appeals from 

all other orders made appealable by entry of final judgment.

By this appeal, Plaintiff-Appellant Randy Liebich will ask the Court of 

Appeals to reverse the judgment, orders, and rulings of the District Court and grant 

such other relief as he may be entitled to on this appeal.

RANDY LIEBICH

By: /s/ Sam Heppell

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys
2

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Arthur Loevy 

Jon Loevy

Sam Heppell

Megan Pierce

Wallace Hilke

LOEVY & LOEVY 

311 N. Aberdeen St.

Third Floor

Chicago, IL 60607

(312) 243-5900

(312) 243-5902 (fax)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Sam Heppell, an attorney, hereby certify that on September 8, 2023, I 

caused the foregoing document to be filed using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which 

effected service on all counsel of record.

By: /s/ Sam Heppell

One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF MRS. FIELDS FAMOUS BRANDS, LLC

 

Thesubsidiaries of Mrs. Fields Famous Brands, LLC* and their respective stateor jurisdiction of incorporation or organization are as follows:

|  

Mrs. Fields  Financing Company, Inc. |  

Delaware |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------|
|  

Mrs. Fields  Franchising, LLC             |  

Delaware |
|  

GACCF,  LLC                                    |  

Delaware |
|  

PMF,  LLC                                      |  

Delaware |
|  

PTF,  LLC                                      |  

Delaware |
|  

GAMAN,  LLC                                    |  

Delaware |
|  

TCBY  Systems, LLC                             |  

Delaware |
|  

The  Mrs. Fields’ Brand, Inc.   |  

Delaware |
|  

Mrs. Fields  Gifts, Inc.             |  

Utah     |
|  

Mrs. Fields  Cookies Australia, Inc. |  

Utah     |
|  

TCBY  International, Inc.                 |  

Utah     |
|  

TCBY  of Texas, Inc.                      |  

Texas    |

 

Eachof these subsidiaries does business under its respective corporate name.

----

*Excludessubsidiaries which are not guarantors under the Company’s Indenture, and which,considered in the aggregate, would not constitute a significant subsidiary asof the end of the Company’s 2007 fiscal year.

 

 

----
NO. 07-04-0002-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	FEBRUARY 26, 2004

	______________________________

	BETTY ANN NEWBY, APPELLANT

	V.

	SHERIA EVANS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF

	THE ESTATE OF GEORGE RALPH NEWBY, JR., DECEASED,

	DAN MOSER AND MOSER INVESTMENTS, APPELLEES

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 84TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUTCHINSON COUNTY;

	NO. 35,150; HONORABLE JACK YOUNG, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	On January 2, 2004, the clerk of this court received a copy of a Notice of Appeal  filed on behalf of appellant Betty Ann Newby.  By letter dated January 6, 2004, the clerk advised appellant that a filing fee had not been received, see Tex. R. App. P. 5.  The clerk’s letter likewise advised that no further action would be taken on the appeal by this Court until a filing fee had been paid and that failure to pay the filing fee may result in dismissal of the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. 

	The filing fee was not paid.  By letter dated February 12, 2004, the clerk advised counsel for appellant that the filing fee had still not been paid, and that unless the filing fee was received on or before February 23, 2004, the appeal would be subject to dismissal. 

 	The filing fee has not been paid.  Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

						Phil Johnson

						Chief Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
                     This schedule contains summary financial extracted from the
                     financial  statements  of RB Asset,  Inc.  for the 6 months
                     ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
                     reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                     0001047958
<NAME>                                    RB Asset, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         42,866
<SECURITIES>                                    1,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                  79,734
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,677
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,407
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                192,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                        10,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                       985
<COMMON>                                        7,100
<OTHER-SE>                                     89,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  192,561
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,076
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   6,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                      314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               692
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.10
        



</TABLE>
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 658

To provide for the conveyance to the City of Bangor, Maine, of unused

military family housing located in the City.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 10, 1997

Mr. BALDACCI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To provide for the conveyance to the City of Bangor, Maine,

of unused military family housing located in the City.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, CHARLESTON FAMILY

4 HOUSING COMPLEX, BANGOR, MAINE.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.—(1) The Secretary of

6 the Air Force shall convey, without consideration, to the

7 City of Bangor, Maine (in this section referred to as the

8 ‘‘City’’), all right, title, and interest of the United States

9 in and to a parcel of real property, consisting of 51 single
2

•HR 658 IH

1 family housing units, located in Bangor, Maine, and

2 known as the Charleston Family Housing Complex.

3 (2) In the event that jurisdiction over the real prop4 erty to be conveyed under paragraph (1) is transferred to

5 the administrative control of another Federal agency be6 fore the date of the enactment of this Act, then the head

7 of such agency shall make the conveyance required by

8 paragraph (1).

9 (b) PURPOSE OF CONVEYANCE.—The purpose of the

10 conveyance under subsection (a) is to facilitate the reuse

11 of the real property, currently unoccupied, which the City

12 proposes to use to provide housing opportunities for first13 time home buyers.

14 (c) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage

15 and legal description of the real property to be conveyed

16 under subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satis17 factory to the Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be

18 borne by the City.

19 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The

20 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi21 tions in connection with the conveyance under subsection

22 (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the

23 interests of the United States.

Æ
IV

House Calendar No. 91

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 230

[Report No. 105–250]

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 168) to implement

the recommendations of the bipartisan House Ethics Reform Task Force.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 17, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 168)

to implement the recommendations of the bipartisan

House Ethics Reform Task Force.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the resolution (H. Res. 168) to implement the

6 recommendations of the bipartisan House Ethics Reform

7 Task Force. The first reading of the resolution shall be
2

HRES 230 RH

1 dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the

2 resolution and shall not exceed one hour equally divided

3 and controlled by Representative Livingston of Louisiana

4 and Representative Cardin of Maryland or their designees.

5 After general debate the resolution shall be considered for

6 amendment under the five-minute rule. The resolution

7 shall be considered as read. No amendment shall be in

8 order except those printed in the report of the Committee

9 on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each amendment

10 may be considered only in the order printed in the report,

11 may be offered only by a Member designated in the report,

12 shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time

13 specified in the report equally divided and controlled by

14 the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to

15 amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for divi16 sion of the question in the House or in the Committee

17 of the Whole. At the conclusion of consideration of the

18 resolution for amendment the Committee shall rise and

19 report the resolution to the House with such amendments

20 as may have been adopted. The previous question shall

21 be considered as ordered on the resolution and amend22 ments thereto to final adoption without intervening motion

23 or demand for division of the question except one motion

24 to recommit.

House Calendar No. 91

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 230

[Report No. 105–250]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H.

the bipartisan House Ethics Reform Task Force.Res. 168) to implement the recommendations of

SEPTEMBER 17, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed