alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.64



 




Exhibit 10.64


ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Addendum (the “Addendum”) is made effective as of the 12th day of
December, 2002 and is intended to amend a certain Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”) by and between Erie Indemnity Company and Philip A. Garcia
effective as of December 16, 1997.


     WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of the
Company and its Shareholders to secure the continued employment of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and


     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has previously considered
and agreed to extend the term of the Agreement from its original term; and


     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting of December
10, 2002 has again agreed to extend the term of the Agreement for a period of
one (1) additional year as contained herein; and


     WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.


     NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as
follows:


     1.     Paragraph 1 of the Agreement with respect to the Term is hereby amended
by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2004.


     2.     All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	 	ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/	 	
Jan R. Van Gorder

Jan R. Van Gorder

Secretary
	 	By:
	 	/s/
	 	F. William Hirt

F. William Hirt

Chairman of the Board
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	WITNESS:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/	 	
Cori Coccarelli

Cori Coccarelli

Executive Secretary
	 	 	 	/s/
	 	Philip A. Garcia

Philip A. Garcia

786 Stockbridge Drive

Erie, PA 16505



76
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Lesser-Known Stories of Apollo 11","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"D5T3MsHqVp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/lesser-known-stories-of-apollo-11\/\">Lesser-Known Stories of Apollo 11<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/lesser-known-stories-of-apollo-11\/embed\/#?secret=D5T3MsHqVp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Lesser-Known Stories of Apollo 11” — NASA\" data-secret=\"D5T3MsHqVp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/lesser_known_stories_apollo_11-_resize.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, KUO-AN WANG, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Kid Castle Educational Corporation (the "Registrant"), certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                         /s/ Kuo-An Wang
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   Name: Kuo-An Wang
                                                   Date: August 16, 2004

Exhibit 32.1                          -1-
NUMBER 13-09-00593-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

KNAPP MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL, Appellant,

v.

ARACELY RAMOS, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR JUAN RAMOS,

OFELIA RAMOS, AND AMANDA RAMOS, Appellees.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Knapp Medical Center Hospital, perfected an appeal from an interlocutory

“Order Denying Dr. Loan Vu and Knapp Medical Center’s Objections to Plaintiffs’ 120-Day

Expert Reports and Motion to Dismiss” rendered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo
2

County, Texas, on October 6, 2009, in trial court cause number C-765-09-1. Appellant has

now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the appellees have agreed to

voluntarily dismiss all direct negligence claims against it. Appellant requests that this Court

dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See id. 42.1(d) (“Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

20th day of May, 2010.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA Selects Companies to Advance Moon Mobility for Artemis Missions","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ySspAQZk5j\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-selects-companies-to-advance-moon-mobility-for-artemis-missions\/\">NASA Selects Companies to Advance Moon Mobility for Artemis Missions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-selects-companies-to-advance-moon-mobility-for-artemis-missions\/embed\/#?secret=ySspAQZk5j\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Selects Companies to Advance Moon Mobility for Artemis Missions” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ySspAQZk5j\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/ltv-2022-closeup-final-1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Barrett J. O’Connor, certify that:

 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof EFC Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”);

 

Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

----

 

The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| August 12,  2005         |
|-------------------------------|
| /s/ Barrett  J. O’Connor |   |
| Barrett J.  O’Connor     |
| **Chief Executive Officer**   |

 

----
## NUMBER 13 - 2 2 - 00 113 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

MANUEL MARTINEZ III , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , A ppellee

.

On a ppeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam This appeal is before the Court on the State’s motion to abate this appeal. According to the motion, the State discovered that the presentence investigation report (PSI) was not included in the appellate record, and the State requires that document in order to complete its brief in this matter. The S t ate requests that we “abate the appeal for the purpose of allowing the trial court to unseal the PSI for purposes of including said PSI in the appellate record.”2 We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. The trial court shall

cause a he aring to be held to determine : (1) if the PSI was part of the trial court’s record ; (2) whether it should be submitted as part of the clerk’s record or reporter’s record in this appeal ; and (3) if any part of the reporter ’ s record is missing, lost, destroyed , or otherwise inaccessible

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 34.5 (c), (d); id. R. 34.6 (d), (e), (f). We note that this abatement should be used for the purpose of correcting and completing the appellate record in this case and should not be construed as to allow for the creation of a new trial court record. See, e.g. , Williams v. State , 937 S.W.2d 479, 487 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) ; see also In re J.R. , No. 07

- 18

- 00240

- CV, 2018 WL 7488914, at *2 (Tex. App.

—Amarillo Sept. 26, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) (collecting cases); Gerdes v. Marion State Bank , 774 S.W.2d 63, 65

– 66 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1989, writ denied)

. T he trial court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure the prompt preparation of any supplemental records and shall enter any orders required to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights. The trial court shall cause its findings, together with any orders it may enter, to be included in a supplemental clerk ’ s record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter ’ s re cord of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk ’ s record and supplemental reporter ’ s record shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order. PER CURIAM
Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 28th day of October , 202 2.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated January 20, 1999, for Virbac, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year
ended December 31, 1998 included in this Virbac Corporation's Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2000, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-86880, 33-86892, 33-93340, 333-3192,
333-48069, and 333-48073). It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent
to December 31, 1998, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to January
20, 1999, the date of our report.


                                                  /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Fort Worth, Texas
March 19, 2001
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"Peggy A. Whitson (PH.D.)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"o8cYSJTGxf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/peggy-a-whitson\/\">Peggy A. Whitson (PH.D.)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/peggy-a-whitson\/embed\/#?secret=o8cYSJTGxf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Peggy A. Whitson (PH.D.)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"o8cYSJTGxf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/9415019527_aff06dd838_o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-4506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHRIS L. ADKINS, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-98-325) Submitted: February 15, 2000 Decided: March 17, 2000Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Charles A. Gavin, WHITE, BLACKBURN & CONTE, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Stephen W. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Chris Adkins appeals the district court’s order denying hismotion to withdraw his guilty plea. Adkins argues that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to withdraw his guilty plea and requests that the case be remanded to the district court for a trial by jury. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Adkins’ motion to withdraw. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e); United States v. Moore , 931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir. 1991).Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Otelco Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
      for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Weaver, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




/s/
                Michael D. WeaverMichael
                D. Weaver
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              March 15,
                2007




*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-126420) pertaining to the Xerium Technologies, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan of our reports dated February 28, 2007, except for Note 19, as to which the date is August 22, 2007 with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Xerium Technologies, Inc., and our report dated February 28, 2007 (except for the effects of the material weakness described in the sixth paragraph of that report, as to which the date is August 22, 2007) withrespect to Xerium Technologies, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Xerium Technologies, Inc., included in theAnnual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

August 22, 2007