alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jerome E. Natoli, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NexPrise, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
November 05, 2004         By:                                               /s/ Jerome E. Natoli    Jerome E. Natoli    Chief Financial Officer
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1456

MARC RICHARD ADAMS,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER, NEW HAMPSHIRE

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Torruella, Selya and Lipez,

Circuit Judges.

Marc Richard Adams on brief pro se.

Peter W. Heed, Attorney General and Nancy J. Smith, Senior

Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.

November 17, 2003
-2-

Per Curiam. Pro se inmate Marc Adams appeals the district

court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies, as required by the Prisoner

Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 42 U.S.C § 1997e(a). We have

reviewed the record and the parties' submissions and conclude that,

contrary to appellant's contentions, the district court applied the

proper standards of law and correctly concluded that appellant had

failed to exhaust his PLRA remedies. To the extent appellant

argues that defendants waived or should have been estopped from

asserting the failure-to-exhaust defense, his arguments are legally

and factually unfounded. 

Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27(c).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Space Station Crew Lands with Olympic Torch; Finishes 166 Days in Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OsKi2Qnn6D\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/space-station-crew-lands-with-olympic-torch-finishes-166-days-in-space\/\">Space Station Crew Lands with Olympic Torch; Finishes 166 Days in Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/space-station-crew-lands-with-olympic-torch-finishes-166-days-in-space\/embed\/#?secret=OsKi2Qnn6D\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Station Crew Lands with Olympic Torch; Finishes 166 Days in Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OsKi2Qnn6D\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/international_space_station.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO HORACIO SALAZAR

ARVIZU, Petitioner,

v. ROBERT M. WILKINSON , Acting Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 72939 Agency No. A200

- 947

- 490

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted March 2, 2021 * * Phoenix, Arizona Before: BEA and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and CARDONE, ** * District Judge. Armando Salazar

- Arvizu, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA”) decision denying his motion

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

MAR 5 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

to reissue its earlier decision dismissing his appeal of the IJ’s finding that he is inadmissible and not eligible to adjust his status to l awful permanent resident . We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the
BIA’s denial of a motion to reissue its earlier decision

. Hernandez

- Velasquez v. Holder , 611 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Lainez

– Ortiz v. I

. N

. S

. , 96 F.3d 393, 395 (9th Cir.1996) )

. The BIA abuses its discretion when it acts “arbitrar[ily], irrational[ly], or contrary to law.” Ontiveros

– Lopez v. I

. N

. S

. , 213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir.2000). W e deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reissue its earlier decision because the BIA duly considered the evidence of non

- receipt of its earlier decision and concluded that it was insufficient to rebut the presumption the BIA fulfilled its duty of service by proper mailing of its earlier decision

. See Hernandez

- Velasquez , 611 F.3d at 1078 (citing Singh v. Gonzalez , 494 F.3d 1170,
1172

– 73 (9th Cir. 2007)). Further, the BIA did not act arbitrarily, irrationally, or contrary to law in reaching this conclusion . C ounsel’s letter of non

- receipt was unsworn and , although Salazar

- Arvizu submitted a sworn affidavit, he had moved
to a new address prior to the issua nce of the decision without notifying the BIA as instructed on the Notice of Appeal form and as required by regulation. Cf. Singh v. I

. N

. S

. , 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002) (reversing denial of motion to reopen if arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law). DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of W&T Offshore, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2007 |  | /S/    TRACY W.
KROHN                
|                    |  | Tracy W. Krohn                       
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer and President



|                    |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2007 |  | /S/    JOHN D.
GIBBONS                           
|                    |  | John D. Gibbons                                  
|                    |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
In connection with the Quarterly Report of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership(the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity asindicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of Registrant.   November 5, 2004 */s/ Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr.* Thomas J. Corcoran, Jr. Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated, as general partner of FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fred Crandell, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-15-02354-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 The Court has reviewed the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice of 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., only. (Doc. 97.) For good cause shown, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., only, is 

dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs 

included herein. 

 Dated this 8th day of September, 2016. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-02354-DLR Document 100 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Tamara E. Fraser (MI State Bar No. P51997)

WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, RATTNER & 

PLUNKETT, P.C.

380 N. Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 300

Birmingham, Michigan 48009

Telephone: 248-642-0333

Fax: 248-642-0856 

tefraser@wwrplaw.com

Counsel for Defendant Experian Information 

Solutions, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Burggraf,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.,

Equifax Information Services, LLC and

Bank of America, N.A.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:16-cv-00378-SRB

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 

WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”), through 

counsel undersigned and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate that Defendant 

Experian be dismissed with prejudice from the above-captioned action, with each party to bear 

its own attorneys’ fees and costs, in accordance with the form of dismissal order filed 

concurrently herewith.

DATED: October 19, 2016

Case 2:16-cv-00378-SRB Document 47 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 3
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 /s/ Trinette G. Kent (by consent) /s/ Tamara E. Fraser

TRINETTE G. KENT TAMARA E. FRASER

KENT LAW OFFICES WILLIAMS, WILLIAMS, 

10645 North Tatum Boulevard RATTNER & PLUNKETT, P.C.

Suite 200-192 380 N. Old Woodward Avenue

Phoenix, Arizona 85028 Suite 300

Attorney for Plaintiff Birmingham, Michigan 48009

Attorney for Defendant Experian

Case 2:16-cv-00378-SRB Document 47 Filed 10/19/16 Page 2 of 3
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 19, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and for transmittal of 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Trinette G. Kent, Esq.

tkent@kentlawpc.com

Jonathan Adam Dessaules, Esq.

jdessaules@dessauleslaw.com

Robert W. Shely, Esq. 

rwshely@bryancave.com

Carl Schwartz, Esq.

carl@micreditlawyer.com

Teresa Pauline Meece, Esq.

teresa.meece@bryancave.com

Shayna Fernandez Watts, Esq.

shayna.watts@bryancave.com

/s/ Stephanie L. Nelem

Stephanie L. Nelem

Case 2:16-cv-00378-SRB Document 47 Filed 10/19/16 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126420) pertaining to the Xerium Technologies, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 26, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Xerium Technologies, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Xerium Technologies, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2009.



|                      |  | 
|--------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |  | 

Raleigh, North Carolina

March 26, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Sancon Resources Recovery, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis Bok, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: July 21, 2016

 

 

 

/s/ Francis Bok

Francis Bok

Director

(Chief Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Lester C. Johnson, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FelCorLodging Limited Partnership;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.   Date: August 5, 2004   */s/Lester C. Johnson*  Lester C. Johnson Principal Financial Officer ofFelCor Lodging TrustIncorporated,as general partner ofFelCor Lodging LimitedPartnership
EXHIBIT 31.3



CERTIFICATION



I, Roger M. Cozzi, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “registrant”);
and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 27, 2012



| | By: | /s/ ROGER M. COZZI             
| | --- | -------------------------------
| |     | Name:  Roger M. Cozzi          
| |     | Title:  Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30667 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARRY H. PRICE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-CR-314-D

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Larry H. Price, federal prisoner number # 23189-034, appealsthe district court’s resentencing on the remaining drugtrafficking counts of conviction after vacating his 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) firearms conviction pursuant to Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). He contends that the district court was without authority to order resentencing and that resentencing violated double jeopardy and due process. Contrary to Price'sNo. 96-30667 -2- assertions, the district court had the authority to resentence. United States v. Hernandez , 116 F.3d 725, 727-28 (5th Cir. 1997). Further, resentencing did not implicate double jeopardy or due
process concerns. United States v. Rodriguez , 114 F.3d 46, 47-48 (5th Cir. 1997); see also United States v. Benbrook , 119 F.3d 338, 339-41 (5th Cir. 1997).
AFFIRMED.
Case 2:16-mj-60038-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-60038-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/26/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-60038-JFM Document 3 Filed 01/26/16 Page 3 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Maira Maldonado, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Fidelity Care Home Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-594-TUC-FRZ

ORDER 

 The parties in this action filed this date a Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement 

Agreement and Order for Dismissal of Claims with Prejudice with a copy of the executed 

Settlement Agreement for the Court’s consideration. Upon review of the Joint Motion 

and proposed Settlement Agreement and Release, and a finding of good cause therefore, 

 IT IS ORDERED that this case is hereby dismissed, with prejudice; each party to 

bear their respective attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 Dated this 23rd day of March, 2016. 

 

Case 4:15-cv-00594-FRZ Document 12 Filed 03/23/16 Page 1 of 1