alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 153

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 21, 1997.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule

XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 408) to amend the Marine Mammal Protection

Act of 1972 to support the International Dolphin Conservation Program in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, and for

other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to the bill and

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee

on Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the

amendment recommended by the Committee on Resources

now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an

original bill for the purpose of amendment under the fiveminute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute

printed in the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursu-
2

•HRES 153 EH

ant to clause 6 of rule XXIII. That amendment shall be considered as read. Points of order against that amendment for

failure to comply with clause 7 of rule XVI are waived. No

amendment to that amendment shall be in order except the

amendment printed in the Congressional Record pursuant to

clause 6 of rule XXIII, which may be offered only by Representative Miller of California or his designee, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and

shall not be subject to amendment. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### PORTER HARNDEN v. HENRY F. MILLER.1

January 23, 1920.

No. 21,570.

Contributory negligence of driver of motor — charge incorrect.

Action for injury to plaintiff’s automobile from a collision with defendant’s car. Defendant denied negligence and charged contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff’s wife, who was driving his car. The court charged the jury that plaintiff could not recover if the evidence showed plaintiff contributed to the injury. “Contributory negligence is such acts or things done by plaintiff that help to produce the injury or damage complained of. In order to defeat a recovery by plaintiff on the ground of contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part, it must be shown by the testimony in the case that the plaintiff did nothing that was unlawful or wrong in the premises.” *Held:*This is not a proper definition of contributory negligence. It omits entirely the want of ordinary care and subjects plaintiff to the same consequences for cautious as for negligent acts. [Reporter.]

Action in the district court for Martin county to recover $700. The answer alleged negligence on the part of the driver of the wrecked car. The case was tried before Dean, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

Reversed.

*Haycraft & McCune,*for appellant.

*Paul C. Cooper,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 175 N. W. 891.

Peb Cubiam.

Plaintiff’s wife was driving his automobile west on a country road. Defendant was driving an automobile east on the same road. They came into collision. Plaintiff’s car was damaged and he brings this action to recover his loss. Plaintiff claimed on the trial that the collision was caused by defendant’s negligence. Defendant denied negligence and charged contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff’s wife. Both questions were submitted to the jury. The jury found for defendant. Plaintiff appeals and relies for reversal on alleged errors in the charge.

The court instructed the jury as follows:

> “I have stated that the defendant has pleaded contributory negligence. *484And if you find from the evidence that the plaintiff contributed to the injury, then the plaintiff could not recover in this action. Now, contributory negligence is such acts or things done by plaintiff that help to produce the injury or damage complained of. In order to defeat a recovery by plaintiff on the ground of contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part, it must be shown by the testimony in the case that the plaintiff did nothing that was unlawful or wrong in the premises.”

This is not a proper definition of contributory negligence. The first part omits entirely the elements of want of ordinary care and subjects plaintiff to the same consequences for cautious as for negligent acts. The last sentence is contradictory and confusing and we think does not remedy the error.

Defendant contends that plaintiff’s case is so clearly without merit that this error could not affect the result. We regard the case as one presenting a question of fact for a jury.

Order reversed.
#### Joseph Warner *v.*T. F. Hazelrigg’s Admr.

Appeal and Error — Final Orders — Exceptions to Commissioner’s Report.

The overruling of exceptions to a commissioner’s report, rejecting the claim of the litigant, is not a final order, from which an appeal will be allowed.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT OOURT.

October 12, 1871.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Pryor:

The commissioner in his report in this case (it being a petition in equity for the settlement of the estate of Hazelrigg) reports adversely to the claim- of the appellant Warner. Exceptions were filed by Warner to that part of the report excluding his claim and those exceptions were overruled. From the order overruling the exceptions, this appeal is prosecuted. An appeal cannot be prosecuted from a judgment or order that is not final and in the case of *Apperson v. Bondurant, 4 Metcalf, page 30,*this court decided that although a question of law and fact relating to final relief had been decided, still to make it complete the judgment must give the relief asked for. In the case, supra, the court adjudges that, “upon all the bills where Bondurant was an original party, whether as drawer or endorser, he must share equally the loss with Anderson and such is the judgment of the court upon the question involved.” This court held that such a judgment was not final and dismissed the appeal in the case of *Philips v. Alcorn, 4 J. J. Marshall, page*
      *51
      *38.*Alcorn filed Ms bill in chancery to foreclose a mortgage and the court below adjudged that PMlips should pay the money due Alcorn on or before the 1st day of the succeeding term of the court. Philips appealed to this court and his appeal was dismissed, the court deciding that it was within the power of the court .below, at the succeeding term to set aside the interlocutory judgment and refuse to foreclose the mortgage, and therefore the judgment was not final. In the present case there has been no confirmation of the commissioner’s report and if there had been, the circuit judge in making a final disposition of the case in the court below, upon becoming satisfied that the exceptions were improperly overruled would have the power to grant the relief, and allow the claim. It is the duty of the court below to reject all claims improperly allowed by the commissioner although there are no exceptions filed and this court will reverse a cause where the commissioner has improperly allowed claims although exceptions were taken in the court below. The order in this case not being final, the appeal is dismissed.

*Simpson, Brock, Turner & Oornelison, for appellant.*

*Hazelrigg, Apperson & Reid, for appellee.*
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for:

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

 Yes No

(See item 3 in instructions)

Email Address:

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case?

Are you acting as local counsel in this case?

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar?

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel are you 

a Federal Defender

 CJA Panel Attorney

______________________________________________________________________

In order to appear before this &ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this &ourt’s

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 8.6.&§1746, this

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath.

Executed on

Attorney signature: S/

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.)

Revised 8/1/2015

Big Onion Tavern Group, LLC,

et al., v. Society Insurance, Inc.

20-cv-02005

See attached.

Christopher J. O'Malley

King & Spalding LLP

353 N. Clark, Suite 1200

Chicago, IL 60654

6297319 312-995-6333

comalley@kslaw.com

March 27, 2020

✔

✔

✔

✔

Christopher J. O'Malley

Case: 1:20-cv-02005 Document #: 18 Filed: 03/27/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:181
Big Onion Tavern Group, LLC; 

Headquarters Beercade LLC; 

Machine 1846 LLC; 

The New 400 LLC; 

Harper Theater LLC; 

Welcome Back LLC; 

Legacy Hospitality LLC; 

Mcbrides Aurora Inc.; 

Mcbride’s Pub Inc.; 

Mcbride’s On 52 Inc.; 

Homeslyce Is Where The Heart Is LLC; 

3458 Norclark Restaurant LLC; 

Happy Camper Pizzeria LLC; 

1913 Northco LLC. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02005 Document #: 18 Filed: 03/27/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:182
Order entered July 11, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00206 - CV H. JONATHAN COOKE, I NDIVIDUALLY AND ON B EHALF OF ESCROW PARTNERS DALL AS, L.P., ET AL., Appe llant s V. ROBERT C. KARLSENG, ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 06 - 02783 - L



### O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ July 9, 2018 unopposed motion for an extension of time to f ile a brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to July 25, 2018

. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 951

AN ACT

To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange

certain lands located in Hinsdale, Colorado.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 951

AN ACT

To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain

lands located in Hinsdale, Colorado.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 951 EH

1 SECTION 1. LARSON AND FRIENDS CREEK EXCHANGE.

2 In exchange for conveyance to the United States of

3 an equal value of offered lands acceptable to the Secretary

4 of the Interior which lie within, or in proximity to, the

5 Handies Peak or Red Cloud Peak Wilderness Study Areas

6 or the Alpine Loop Backcountry Bi-way in Hinsdale Coun7 ty, Colorado, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to

8 Lake City Ranches, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (in

9 this section referred to as ‘‘LCR’’), approximately 560

10 acres of selected land located in the same county and gen11 erally depicted on a map entitled ‘‘Larson and Friends

12 Creek Exchange’’, dated June 1996. The exchange shall

13 be contingent upon LCR granting the Secretary a perma14 nent conservation easement on the approximate 440 acre

15 Larson Creek portion of the selected lands (as depicted

16 on the map) which limits future use of such lands to agri17 cultural, wildlife, recreational, or open space purposes.

18 The exchange shall also be subject to the standard ap19 praisal requirements and equalization payment limitations

20 set forth in section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and

21 Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716), and to re22 views and approvals relating to threatened species and en23 dangered species, cultural and historic resources, and haz24 ardous materials under other Federal laws. The costs of

25 such appraisals and reviews shall be paid by LCR. The

26 Secretary may credit such payments against the value of
3

•HR 951 EH

1 the selected land, if appropriate, pursuant to section

2 206(f) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act

3 of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(f)).

Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"Axiom Space Private Astronauts Headed to International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ln5ewC6BoL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/axiom-space-private-astronauts-headed-to-international-space-station\/\">Axiom Space Private Astronauts Headed to International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/axiom-space-private-astronauts-headed-to-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=Ln5ewC6BoL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Axiom Space Private Astronauts Headed to International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ln5ewC6BoL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/axiom_2_launch_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":248}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 187 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 17, 1997.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1853) to amend the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology 
Education Act. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Points of 
order against consideration of the bill for failure to comply with clause 
2(l)(6) of rule XI are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 
shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Education and the Workforce now printed in the 
bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
as read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 6 of 
rule XXIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Televise Return of Three Space Station Crew Members","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rXRaP8NiZs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-televise-return-of-three-space-station-crew-members\/\">NASA to Televise Return of Three Space Station Crew Members<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-televise-return-of-three-space-station-crew-members\/embed\/#?secret=rXRaP8NiZs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Televise Return of Three Space Station Crew Members” — NASA\" data-secret=\"rXRaP8NiZs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/m15-168-exp45.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-51","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NGPkWmwHek\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-51\/\">STS-51<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-51\/embed\/#?secret=NGPkWmwHek\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-51” — NASA\" data-secret=\"NGPkWmwHek\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/STS051-S-002\/STS051-S-002~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
Exhibit 13.2




Certification by the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the annual report of Spreadtrum Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shannon Gao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 6, 2011





/s/ Shannon GaoShannon GaoChief Financial OfficerSpreadtrum Communications, Inc.