alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67208-67209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26550]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Submission for OMB Review; Comments Request

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a Notice in the Federal 
Register notifying the public that the agency has prepared an 
information collection for OMB review and approval and has requested 
public review and comment on the submission. OPIC received no comments 
in response to the sixty (60) day notice published in Federal Register 
volume 79, number 168, page 51626 on August 29, 2014. The purpose of 
this notice is to allow an additional thirty (30) days for public 
comments to be submitted. Comments are being solicited on the need for 
the information; the accuracy of the Agency's burden estimate; the 
quality, practical utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and ways to

[[Page 67209]]

minimize reporting the burden, including automated collected techniques 
and uses of other forms of technology.

DATES: Comments must be received within thirty (30) calendar days of 
publication of this Notice. OPIC plans to implement this form in Dec 
2013/Jan 2014.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form may be obtained from the Agency 
Submitting Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Essie 
Bryant, Records Manager, Overseas Private Investment Corporation, 1100 
New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20527; (202) 336-8563.

Summary Form Under Review

    Type of Request: New form.
    Title: Aligned Capital Investor Screener.
    Form Number: OPIC-253.
    Frequency of Use: Once per investor.
    Type of Respondents: Foundations, non-profit entities, investment 
fund managers, investment companies, U.S. Government Agencies.
    Description of Affected Public: U.S. and foreign citizens investing 
in projects overseas.
    Reporting Hours: 75 hours (1 hour per response).
    Number of Responses: 75 per year.
    Federal Cost: $3,819.
    Authority for Information Collection: Sections 231, 234(a), 239(d), 
and 240A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): The personal financial statement is 
supporting documentation to the OPIC application for financing (OPIC-
115). The information provided is used by OPIC to determine if 
individuals who are providing equity investment in or credit support to 
a project have sufficient financial wherewithal to meet their expected 
obligations under the proposed terms of the OPIC financing.

    Dated: November 3, 2014.
Nichole Cadiente,
Administrative Counsel, Administrative Affairs, Department of Legal 
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-26550 Filed 11-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 162 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 43
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 162

                          [Report No. 105-120]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
recovery from natural disasters, and for overseas peacekeeping efforts, 
  including those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     1997, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 1997

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
recovery from natural disasters, and for overseas peacekeeping efforts, 
  including those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     1997, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
1469) making emergency supplemental appropriations for recovery from 
natural disasters, and for overseas peacekeeping efforts, including 
those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1997, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 43

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 162

                          [Report No. 105-120]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
   bill (H.R. 1469) making emergency supplemental appropriations for 
recovery from natural disasters, and for overseas peacekeeping efforts, 
  including those in Bosnia, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     1997, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 5, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Andrew A. Wiederhorn,Chief Executive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

(a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2007
|        |   | /s/ ANDREW A. WIEDERHORN |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Andrew A. Wiederhorn     |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randal Hardy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 8, 2009

| | By:   /s/ Randal Hardy
_____________________________
Randal Hardy
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
Principal Executive and Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Andrea Dunn","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/andreacdunn-2-2-2-2-2-2\/","title":"Jennifer Scott Williams","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EKtEhjs1aw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/jennifer-scott-williams\/\">Jennifer Scott Williams<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/jennifer-scott-williams\/embed\/#?secret=EKtEhjs1aw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Jennifer Scott Williams” — NASA\" data-secret=\"EKtEhjs1aw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/jsc2023e000992.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
#### Benjamin Puleo, an Infant, etc., Appellant, *v.*Stanislaw Holding Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 28, 1926.

Trial —• instructions — comment of trial court as to accuracy of photographs prejudicial to plaintiff’s case — new trial granted.

Instructions of the trial court concerning the accuracy of distances as presented by photographs which, in effect, amounted to an- instruction to the jury to find for the defendant, warrants a reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, where the general tenor of the charge is indicative of antagonism to plaintiff’s cause of action.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Second District, rendered in favor of the defendant for the sum of sixty-three dollars, representing costs.

*Kevie Frankel,*for the appellant.

*Pettigrew, Glenney & Bovard [L. C. Stryker*of counsel], for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

The comment of the court with reference to the accuracy of distances as represented by the photographs was tantamount to an instruction to the jury to find for the defendant. It is a matter of almost common knowledge that photographs may be taken from different angles so as to exaggerate certain distances, or, on the other hand, to make space more compact, but notwithstanding this the judge instructed the jury that photographs cannot exaggerate. Again, the trial .judge in his charge, after having stated to the jury that “ photographs cannot lie,” stated that if the photograph is to be believed the accident could not have happened without the contributory negligence of plaintiff. A fair trial must always be insisted upon. The general tenor of the charge is one of antagonism to plaintiff’s cause.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Guy, Wagner and Lydon, JJ.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with Annual Report of Kid Castle
      Educational Corporation, a Florida Corporation (the “Registrant”), on Form 10-Q
      for the fiscal period ending March 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission , the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.





DATE:
              May 24, 2007
            BY:
            */s/
              MIN TAN YANG*MIN
              TAN YANGCHIEF
              EXECUTIVE OFFICER




DATE:
              May 24, 2007
            BY:
            /s/
              *SUANG-YI
              PAI*SUANG-YI
              PAICHIEF
              FINANCIAL OFFICER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED SOVEREIGN
SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC.'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,740
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,902
<PP&E>                                          55,257
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,693)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,116
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,084
<SALES>                                         55,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,445
<CGS>                                           37,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,436
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,238
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

stateRoosd of Rcbluation Austin, Texas Gentlemen: Attentlonr Mr. Gaynor Kendall Opinion Rumbar 0-4QjO Ret Does the Sto aatlonhave **authorize th** 

ur request for an opinion

auucunt of the State interestrefknding terast than the bonds

uldver to the first question ifiLn

minimum 1imltatLoIl

ar 3X they are aoaepted in lieu of and to refund Snterest coupons detached from bonds held by the Permanent S&o01 Fund?"stata, Board of Btlu~~cnion* page #2

In reply to your rir6t qwstion, ~Artiarle iq89, Rerided **Civil** Matutes, as amended**by** Chapter 33l, **Adis or**  **the** Re&ul& Session or theForty-fourthL6 slature, authcrices 68hOOlastriet6 to nfund bondsvhl8h fita 168Md', y have ?egally

into "newbonds, bear- the asme or a less rate of interests" it further provldes "thatsriatundinterestooupoas may be refunded in likemanner * l 

### l , and that the State !Pnasurer shall,upon order of the StateBoard of Rdueaticn, exchange bonds not matured held by hlx ~forthe Permanent s&o01 Fund for the new xM'unding bond6 Issuedby the sutqlnoorporatlon under the prov3.slo~ of this 6ubdlvl6lon, in 8ase the rate of interest on the new bonds is not less than the rate 0r interest on the bonds 

## ror vhi6h they am exchanged. "
In oonneetlonwith the question submlited,wwther m&tured interest@mpons may be refundedror the aeaount$f theAv65.lable

&ho:@ Fund into interestrefondlng bonds Welng a lesser rate%han the bonds frown which they are detached, itwl.ll

be notit that the statuteauthorlses the dlstriets to refund'lnotured

lnteresteoupcn6 intobonds %esHng the skum or A 

## les6 ’rate 0r lntenst', and that the liaitation~upon tb& paver 0r the State Board to mcept mwmg bond6 inlieu 0r 0bup florur held ror the accounts 0r the school fuuds is that no mefondingbollds.shallbe accepted in exchange for "bond6not matureda if the nfundlmg bonds bear Intonat at a lesser rata 

### thani.heunderlySngbond8.

ItwfYbeseen~omtheaboostbottb6Zmgi41aeur6 dram adl6tlnoti0nbctw66n "maMe0upn6"and %nmatumd 8cupc~*~ and authori6~8 schooldfStrlet6 to *fund -6 rrhish

'Referringto yam secondquestion,Artlole 2671, as amended by the Forty-slHbLegislature, read6 a6 follows%

"The Comptrollerof StdeBoard sballe&~ful.ly I exrimine

the bonds, obltgations,or pledges 60 offWed and tnvestlgate the ~facts,tandlng to show the validity
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 95-1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 18 of 18
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

KEVIN WOODROW BLACKERBY , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA

- CR 23

- 0265 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR1988

- 007047 The Honorable Lisa Ann Vandenberg , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Faith C. Klepper Counsel for Respondent
De La Torre Law Office, PLC , Phoenix By Daniela De La Torre Counsel for Petitioner FILED: 05-16-2024STATE v. BLACKERBY Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma , Judge Jennifer B. Campbell , and Michael J. Brown delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Kevin Woodrow Blackerby seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Proce dure 32.1. This is Blackerby ’s seventh petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or legal error, this court will not d isturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. S ee S tate v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577 ¶ 19 (2012). Petitioner has the burden to show that the superior court erred in denying the petition for post

conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ari z. 537, 538 ¶ 1 (App. 2011)

. ¶3 This court has reviewed the record in this matter, the order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief and the petition for review. This court finds t he petitioner has not established error

. ¶4 This court grants review but den ies relief.