alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of River Rock Entertainment Authority (the “Authority”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Searle, Chief Executive Officer of the Authority, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   |  (1) | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act    of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      |                                                                                                                                                         |
|   |  (2) | The information contained in the    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition    and results of operations of the Authority. |

By: /s/ Douglas Searle      Douglas SearleChief Executive OfficerMarch 25, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the River Rock Entertainment Authority and will be retained by the River Rock Entertainment Authority and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.2

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                            GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

         WHEREAS, GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. (the "Company") has heretofore
adopted the GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN, as amended and
restated effective as of January 1, 2002 (the "Plan"), for the benefit of
certain of the Company's employees and the employees of other adopting
Employers; and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects; and

         WHEREAS, the power to amend the Plan is vested in the Compensation
Committee of the Company's Board of Directors pursuant to Section 11.4 of the
Plan;

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows:

         1. Effective as of January 1, 2002, Section 8.5 of the Plan shall be
deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:

                  "8.5 CLAIMS REVIEW. Claims for Plan benefits and reviews of
         Plan benefit claims which have been denied or modified will be
         processed in accordance with the written Plan claims procedures
         established by the Committee, which procedures are hereby incorporated
         by reference as a part of the Plan."

         2. Effective as of January 1, 2002, Section 8.6 of the Plan shall be
deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:

                  "8.6     Intentionally left blank."

         3. As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused these presents to be
executed this 21st day of May, 2003.


                                           GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC.



                                           BY:   /s/ B. B. Hollingsworth, Jr.
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:  B. B. Hollingsworth, Jr.
                                              Title: Chairman, President &
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.2

                              [MaxxZone letterhead]

                                  May 19, 2004

David M. Otto
The Otto Law Group,  PLLC
900 Fourth Avenue, Suit 3140
Seattle, WA 98164

Dear Mr. Otto:

         This letter agreement memorializes our agreement as to amending that
certain Consulting Services Agreement dated February 12, 2004, by and between
maxxZone.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and The Otto Law Group, PLLC (the
"Agreement"), as amended on April 22, 2004. All capitalized terms used herein
shall be ascribed those definitions provided for in the Agreement.

         Section 6 of the Agreement is hereby amended so that the Company shall
issue an additional five million (5,000,000) shares of common stock of the
Company to Consultant for the performance of the Consulting Services to the
Company.

         If you agree with the foregoing, please sign below and return a copy of
this letter to me by facsimile today and the original by overnight delivery.

                                            Sincerely,



                                            Roland Becker

Agreed and Accepted:

The Otto Law Group,  PLLC


By:  _________________________________
     Name:  __________________________
     Title: __________________________

Date: ________________________________
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 202 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 76
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 202

                          [Report No. 105-218]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2015) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections 
   (b)(1) and (c) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 1998.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 1997

   Mr. Solomon, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2015) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections 
   (b)(1) and (c) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 1998.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2015) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections (b)(1) and 
(c) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for 
fiscal year 1998. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read. The conference report shall be debatable for ninety 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Budget.
                                     





                                                  House Calendar No. 76

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 202

                          [Report No. 105-218]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 2015) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to subsections 
   (b)(1) and (c) of section 105 of the concurrent resolution on the 
                      budget for fiscal year 1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 30, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA astronaut candidate Kayla Barron participates in spacewalk training","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qDt6Ip8vC1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-astronaut-candidate-kayla-barron-participates-spacewalk-training-4\/\">NASA astronaut candidate Kayla Barron participates in spacewalk training<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-astronaut-candidate-kayla-barron-participates-spacewalk-training-4\/embed\/#?secret=qDt6Ip8vC1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA astronaut candidate Kayla Barron participates in spacewalk training” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qDt6Ip8vC1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jsc2018e095908.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6497

GARY LONTELL DAVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LESLIE G. MATTHEWS, Attorney at Law,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-97-265-2)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Lontell Davis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for

appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Davis v. Matthews, No. CA-97-265-2 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-66V

UNPUBLISHED

HEATHER GELDBACH,

Personal Representative of the

ESTATE OF WENDY G. 

STRICKLAND,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 14, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Nancy Routh Meyers, Ward Black Law, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner.

Debra A. Filteau Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On January 15, 2019, Heather Geldbach (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for 

compensation on behalf of decedent Wendy G. Strickland under the National Vaccine 

Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the “Vaccine Act”). 

Petitioner alleges that Ms. Strickland suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”) as a 

result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on October 13, 2017. Petition at 1.

Petitioner further alleges that Ms. Strickland’s death was directly and proximately 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

caused by the flu vaccination. Id. at 5. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 13, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes that “petitioner has shown that 

Ms. Strickland’s symptoms and clinical course have satisfied the criteria set forth in the 

Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation for a 

flu/GBS Table injury.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “Ms. Strickland’s 

condition persisted for at least six months and was also a substantial factor in causing 

her death, and there is no preponderant evidence of an alternative cause that explains 

her condition.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
9730.

#### Stewart *v.*Fincher.

Decided July 30, 1918.

Broyles, P. J.

Under the facts of the case the court didr not err in dismissing the petition for certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*

*554Petition, for certiorari; from Butts superior court—Judge Searcy. February term, 1918.

*C. L. Redman,*for plaintiff in error. *II. M. Fletcher,*contra.
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________ No. 22

- 30709 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus Casondra Reagan, Defendant

— Appellant

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 21

- 1

______________________________ Before Jones , Haynes , and Duncan , Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Casondra Reagan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Reagan has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the re levant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir

. R

. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 29, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30709 Document: 00516804067 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2023No. 22

- 30709

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further resp onsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2

. Case: 22-30709 Document: 00516804067 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/29/2023
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135309 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135309 

 COA: 279093 

Wayne CC: 00-011010-02 

LARRY WESLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 23, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
#### Peter Smith *v.*Jerry Johnson, etc.

Municipal Corporations — Improvement of Sidewalks — Action to Recover for Necessary Allegation — Notice—Demurrer.

The petition, is defective in failing to allege that Johnson had notice of the passage of the ordinance by. the council, to repair the streets, nor are facts alleged showing the failure of the city council to take such action as to make the appellee liable for the work.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 26, 1872.

*Mooar, for appellant.*

*R. D. Handy, Baker, for appellee.*

Opinion by

Judge Peters.

Although the demurrer of Johnson and wife, and that of the city of 'Covington, were both sustained to the petition and leave was granted appellant to amend it, he failed to do so, and took the risk of a trial in this court.

The petition is palpably defective in failing to allege that Johnson and wife had notice of the passage of the ordinance by the council to repair the sidewalks fronting their property, either actually or constructively. It is not averred that said ordinance was printed in the newspaper of a city, or otherwise, and circulated as required' by Sec. 6, Art. 2 of the charter of the city, which might have been regarded as constructive notice to Johnson and wife, and thereby made them responsible. Nor are facts alleged showing the failure of the city council to take such action by it as to make Johnson and wife liable for the work, and thereby throw the responsibility on the city.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, William V. Humphreys, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ William V. Humphreys
-------------------------------------
William V. Humphreys
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2005
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7753

ERIC VANCLEAVE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hi ll

. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. ( 0:20

- cv - 00099

- RMG )

Submitted : March 31, 2022 Decided: April 20, 2022

Before AGEE , HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Elizabeth Anne Franklin

- Best , ELIZABETH FRANKLIN

- BEST, P.C. , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. William Joseph Maye, Assistant Attorney General , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee s
.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 20-7753 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Eric Vancleave seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Vancleave ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable un less a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v

. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vancleave has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 20-7753 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 1

Case: 1:20-cv-01589 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 03/04/20 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:21
SUPERHYPE TAPES, LTD. 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”

EXHIBIT 1 TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

1 

Case: 1:20-cv-01589 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 03/04/20 Page 2 of 5 PageID #:22
SUPERHYPE TAPES, LTD. 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”

EXHIBIT 1 TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

2 

Case: 1:20-cv-01589 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 03/04/20 Page 3 of 5 PageID #:23
SUPERHYPE TAPES, LTD. 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”

EXHIBIT 1 TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

3 

Case: 1:20-cv-01589 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 03/04/20 Page 4 of 5 PageID #:24
SUPERHYPE TAPES, LTD. 

v. 

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED 

ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”

EXHIBIT 1 TRADEMARK REGISTRATION

4 

Case: 1:20-cv-01589 Document #: 1-1 Filed: 03/04/20 Page 5 of 5 PageID #:25