alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1


                  CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Roberta Lipson, certify that:


     1.  I  have   reviewed   this  annual   report  on  Form  10-K  of  Chindex
International, Inc.;

     2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement of material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and presented in this annual report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent year that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

           5. The registrant's  other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent function):

                  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal  controls  over  financial  reporting  which are

<PAGE>

reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  b)  any  fraud,   whether  or  not  material,   that  involves
management or other  employees who have a significant  role in the  registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.


June 28, 2004


/S/ROBERTA LIPSON
-----------------------
Roberta Lipson
Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

EDUARDO GARCIA and JULIE GARCIA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-02402

Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.’S MOTION TO COMPEL INDEPENDENT MEDICAL 

EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFFS

Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., by and through its undersigned counsel, respectfully 

request that this Court enter an order compelling the independent medical examinations of 

Plaintiffs Eduardo Garcia and Julia Garcia (“Plaintiffs”). The grounds for this motion are more 

fully set forth in Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Order to Conduct an

Independent Medical Examination of Plaintiffs. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant request that the Court enter an order compelling Plaintiffs to 

undergo independent medical examinations.

Dated: April 11, 2022 Respectfully submitted,

_/s/ Shawn R. Obi_________

Shawn R. Obi (pro hac vice)

Winston & Strawn LLP

333 South Grand Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90071

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 77 Filed: 04/11/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:717
Phone: 213-615-1700 

Fax: 213-615-1750 

Email: SObi@winston.com

Christopher Parker 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

35 West Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601 

Phone: 312-558-8085 

Fax: 312-558-5700 

Email: cparker@winston.com 

Angela A. Smedley (pro hac vice) 

Winston & Strawn LLP 

200 Park Avenue 

New York, NY 10166 

Phone: 212-294-5348 

Fax: 212-294-4700 

Email: asmedley@winston.com

Attorneys for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 77 Filed: 04/11/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:718
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 11th day of April 2022, the foregoing was 

filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of Illinois, and was served by operation of that Court’s electronic filing system, upon the 

following:

Rusty A. Payton

Payton Legal Group

20 North Clark Street, Suite 3300

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(773) 682-5210

info@payton.legal

Salvador J. Lopez

Robson & Lopez, LLC

180 W. Washington Street, Suite 700

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 525-2166

lopez@robsonlopez.com

Nicholas H. Wooten

Nick Wooten, LLC

5125 Burnt Pine Drive

Conway, Arkansas 72034

(833) 937-6389

nick@nickwooten.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 /s/ Shawn R. Obi

Case: 1:20-cv-02402 Document #: 77 Filed: 04/11/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:719
#### STANISLAWA KONAZEWSKA, APPELLANT, v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Argued October 16, 1945

Decided January 3, 1946.

For the appellant, *Sallie Donarovich Dixon (Elsie L.*White, of counsel).

For the respondent, *Collins £ Corbin.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— -The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Colie, Olipj-iant, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, Freund, McGeeiian, JJ. 13.

*For reversal*— None.
Exhibit 31.1








CERTIFICATION





I, Stanley Louie, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Structured Products Corp., on behalf of CorTSTrust II For Goldman Sachs Capital I;





2.           Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;





4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and





5.           The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trustee and the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank Trust National Association.







By:
/s/ Stanley Louie
 Name:
Stanley LouieTitle:
Vice President, Finance Officer(senior officer in charge of securitization function of the Depositor)Date:
March 20, 2012
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7753

ERIC VANCLEAVE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; 

MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (0:20-cv-00099-RMG)

Submitted: March 31, 2022 Decided: April 20, 2022

Before AGEE, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elizabeth Anne Franklin-Best, ELIZABETH FRANKLIN-BEST, P.C., Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellant. William Joseph Maye, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7753 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/20/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric Vancleave seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Vancleave’s 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 

759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that 

the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vancleave has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 20-7753 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/20/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Hernan D. Posada","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ThbNxjj3cG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/hernan-d-posada\/\">Hernan D. Posada<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/hernan-d-posada\/embed\/#?secret=ThbNxjj3cG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Hernan D. Posada” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ThbNxjj3cG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/ed09-0242-75_p-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":800}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 914 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                        April 16, 1997.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
914) entitled ``An Act to make certain technical corrections in the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 relating to graduation data 
disclosures.'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Page 2, after line 16 insert:

SEC. 2. DATE EXTENSION.

    Section 1501(a)(4) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 6491(a)(4)) is amended by striking ``January 1, 1998'' 
and inserting ``January 1, 1999''.

SEC. 3. TIMELY FILING OF NOTICE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Education shall deem Kansas and New Mexico to have timely submitted 
under section 8009(c)(1) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7709(c)(1)) the States' written notices of intent to 
consider payments described in section 8009(b)(1) of the Act (20 U.S.C. 
7709(b)(1)) in providing State aid to local educational agencies for 
school year 1997-1998, except that the Secretary may require the States 
to submit such additional information as the Secretary may require, 
which information shall be considered part of the notices.

SEC. 4. HOLD HARMLESS PAYMENTS.

    Section 8002(h)(1) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(h)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) for fiscal year 1997 and each succeeding 
                fiscal year through fiscal year 2000 shall not be less 
                than 85 percent of the amount such agency received for 
                fiscal year 1996 under subsection (b).''.

SEC. 5. DATA.

    (a) In General.--Section 8003(f)(4) of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7703(f)(4)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by inserting ``expenditure,'' after 
                ``revenue,''; and
                    (B) by striking the semicolon and inserting a 
                period;
            (2) by striking ``the Secretary'' and all that follows 
        through ``shall use'' and inserting ``the Secretary shall 
        use''; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (B).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to fiscal years after fiscal year 1997.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 914

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2302

JACOB E. QUEERN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-cv-00363-M)

Submitted: April 26, 2022 Decided: April 28, 2022

Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacob E. Queern, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Coull Wilson, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jacob E. Queern seeks to appeal numerous district court orders filed in his pending 

suit against the United States. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

orders Queern seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or 

collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny 

Queern’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 924

To amend title 18, United States Code, to give further assurance to the

right of victims of crime to attend and observe the trials of those

accused of the crime.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 1997

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. LUCAS of Oklahoma)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to give further

assurance to the right of victims of crime to attend

and observe the trials of those accused of the crime.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Victim Allocution Clar5 ification Act of 1997’’.
2

•HR 924 IH

1 SEC. 2. RIGHTS OF VICTIMS TO ATTEND AND OBSERVE

2 TRIAL.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 223 of title 18, United

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing:

6 ‘‘§ 3510. Rights of victims to attend and observe trial

7 ‘‘A United States district court shall not order any

8 victim of an offense excluded from the trial of a defendant

9 accused of that offense because such victim may or will—

10 ‘‘(1) exercise the right to make a statement or

11 present any information in relation to the sentence

12 at the imposition of sentence; or

13 ‘‘(2) testify as to the effect of the offense on

14 the victim and the victim’s family.’’.

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

16 at the beginning of chapter 223 of title 18, United States

17 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

18 item:

‘‘3510. Rights of victims to attend and observe trial.’’.

19 (c) EFFECT ON PENDING CASES.—The amendments

20 made by this section shall apply in cases pending on the

21 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Case 2:15-mj-01794-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01794-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01794-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/02/15 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned chief executive officer of Tom's
Foods Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

(1) the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the twelve weeks ended March
27, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods presented in the Report.

Dated: May 11, 2004

                                    /s/ Rolland G. Divin
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Rolland G. Divin
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       19
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 679

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude beverage alcohol compounds emitted

from aging warehouses from the definition of volatile organic compounds.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1997

Mr. HAMILTON (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr.

GORDON, Mrs. NORTHUP, and Mr. MCINTOSH) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude beverage alcohol

compounds emitted from aging warehouses from the definition of volatile organic compounds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COM4 POUNDS.

5 Section 302(s) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

6 7602(s)) is amended by adding the following at the end

7 thereof: ‘‘Such term shall not include beverage alcohol

8 compounds (ethanol) emitted from aging warehouses.’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Karl B. Hille","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/khille\/","title":"NASA Tech Lets Scientists See Snow-Water Through the Trees","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2boBGaoWDZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/goddard-tech\/seeing-snow-water-through-the-trees\/\">NASA Tech Lets Scientists See Snow-Water Through the Trees<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/goddard-tech\/seeing-snow-water-through-the-trees\/embed\/#?secret=2boBGaoWDZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Tech Lets Scientists See Snow-Water Through the Trees” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2boBGaoWDZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/snowex1-pair.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}