alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Worldwide Communications, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shawkat Raslan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/    SHAWKAT RASLANShawkat Raslan Chief Executive
Officer





November 5, 2002
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 979

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of

private activity bonds which may be issued in each State, and to index

such amount for inflation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 1997

Mrs. KENNELLY of Connecticut (for herself, Mr. HOUGHTON, Mr. ENGLISH

of Pennsylvania, and Mr. LAZIO of New York) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the amount of private activity bonds which may be issued

in each State, and to index such amount for inflation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN STATE CEILING ON PRIVATE AC4 TIVITY BONDS.

5 (a) REPEAL OF POST-1987 REDUCTION.—Subsection

6 (d) of section 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

7 (relating to State ceiling) is amended by striking para8 graph (2).
2

•HR 979 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATE CEILING FOR IN2 CREASES IN COST-OF-LIVING.—Subsection (d) of section

3 146 of such Code is amended by inserting after paragraph

4 (1) the following new paragraph:

5 ‘‘(2) COST-OF-LIVING ADJUSTMENT.—

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a cal7 endar year after 1998, each of the dollar

8 amounts contained in paragraph (1) shall be in9 creased by an amount equal to—

10 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by

11 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de12 termined under section 1(f)(3) for such

13 calendar year by substituting ‘calendar

14 year 1997’ for ‘calendar year 1992’ in sub15 paragraph (B) thereof.

16 ‘‘(B) ROUNDING.—If any increase under

17 subparagraph (A) is not a multiple of the appli18 cable dollar amount, such increase shall be

19 rounded to the nearest applicable dollar

20 amount. For purposes of the preceding sen21 tence, the applicable dollar amount is—

22 ‘‘(i) $1 in the case of an adjustment

23 of the $75 amount in paragraph (1)(A),

24 and
3

•HR 979 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) $5 in the case of an adjustment

2 of the $250 amount in paragraph (1)(B).’’

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

4 this section shall apply to calendar years after 1997.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 8.,
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          35,882
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     68,009
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,831
<PP&E>                                          77,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                (27,423)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           183
<OTHER-SE>                                     137,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,524
<SALES>                                        364,742
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               364,742
<CGS>                                          232,441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,650)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,904
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,496
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57
                                             

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the accompanying Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for thequarter ended September 30, 2003, I, R. Scott Stevenson, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) such Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

 

This writtenstatement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to such Form 10-Q.

 

 
| November 13,  2003 |   | /s/   R. Scott Stevenson                      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date                    |   | R. Scott Stevenson                                 |
|                    |   | Senior Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-14-037]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: November 6, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-506 and 508 and 731-TA-1238-1243 (Final) 
(Non-Oriented Electrical Steel from China, Germany, Japan, Korea, 
Sweden, and Taiwan). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete 
and file its determinations and views of the Commission on November 18, 
2014.
5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 28, 2014.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-26133 Filed 10-30-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE BALANCE SHEET OF KNOLOGY HOLDINGS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE
RELATED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999. THIS INFORMATION IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,831,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                   348,832
<INVENTORY>                                 25,830,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,444,129
<PP&E>                                     244,430,796
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,607,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             321,352,731
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,810,575
<BONDS>                                    329,172,724
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        499
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                 (31,118,031)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               321,352,731
<SALES>                                     32,516,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,516,573
<CGS>                                       15,569,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               68,248,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            22,209,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,644,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (57,941,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                11,861,510
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (46,079,819)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (46,079,819)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (6.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (6.16)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Karla Manciel,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03934-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Niemeyer, Grebel & Kruse LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8496 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8496 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Tobias Logan *v.*William Logan et al.

Bailment — Loan of Horse — Condition of Bailment — Negligence.

Appellant loaned the appellee his horse on the condition that they were not to take him beyond G-reenupburg, which agreement they violated and the horse was killed. Held, that appellees were responsible for the value of the horse, although the death was not the result of carelessness or negligence upon their part.

APPEAL BROM ROWAN CIRCUIT OOURT.

January 5, 1871.

Opinion ob the Oourt by

Judge Williams:

Without intending to indicate an opinion as to the preponder*178anee of the evidence upon either of the propositions to be noticed, we think *from*the evidence that the jury might have rationally inferred that the appellees were the joint bailees of the appellant’s horse, and therefore jointly responsible to him for the consequences of any violation of the conditions of their bailment, Further, that the condition upon which the horse was loaned was that he was to be taken no further than Greenupburg; also that he was taken beyond that point with the assent and at the instance of the appellees. If their propositions be true, they are responsible for the value of the horse, although the death was not the result of carelessness or negligence upon their part.

Hargis, *for appellant.*

■Phister, *for appellees.*

We think the court erred in its peremptory instruction to the jury to find for the appellees. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed,' and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, William V. Humphreys, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ William V. Humphreys
-------------------------------------
William V. Humphreys
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Sparking Participation and Real-world Experiences in STEM (SPARX)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"s3tuHiYWTA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-sparking-participation-and-real-world-experiences-in-stem-sparx\/\">NASA Sparking Participation and Real-world Experiences in STEM (SPARX)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/nasa-sparking-participation-and-real-world-experiences-in-stem-sparx\/embed\/#?secret=s3tuHiYWTA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Sparking Participation and Real-world Experiences in STEM (SPARX)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"s3tuHiYWTA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/MSFC-1800108\/MSFC-1800108~large.jpg?w=600&h=1444&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1444}
H. Res. 14

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 7, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Member be and is

hereby elected to the following standing committees:

COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES:

Bernard Sanders of Vermont.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT: Bernard Sanders of Vermont.

Attest:

Clerk.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFONSO SIRINGORINGO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73508

Agency No. A095-629-764

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Alfonso Siringoringo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from

the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

OCT 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73508

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

questions of law and review for substantial evidence factual findings. Wakkary v.

Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and grant in part the

petition for review, and we remand.

In his opening brief, Siringoringo fails to challenge the IJ’s dispositive

determination that his asylum claim was time-barred, and he also does not raise

any substantive challenge to the denial of his CAT claim. See Martinez-Serrano v.

INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues that are not addressed in the

argument portion of a brief are deemed waived). Accordingly, we deny the

petition as to these claims. 

Siringoringo’s contention that the agency erred in failing to consider his

country condition evidence is belied by the record.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Siringoringo’s contentions based on being a

member of the “Medanese tribe” because he did not exhaust them before the

agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).

Siringoringo does not argue he suffered past persecution as a Christian in

Indonesia, but he contends that he has shown a likelihood of future persecution as a

member of a disfavored group and because of a pattern and practice of persecution. 

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Siringoringo failed to establish a
3 08-73508

pattern or practice of persecution of Christians in Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558

F.3d at 1060-62. However, the IJ found the disfavored group analysis did not

apply to Siringoringo’s claims, and did not consider it when she denied relief. 

Because the IJ did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Tampubolon v.

Holder, 610 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 2010), we remand for the agency to assess

Siringoringo’s withholding of removal claim under the disfavored group analysis

in the first instance. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1060-67; see also INS v. Ventura,

537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
          ------------------------------------------------------------
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Perry Barker, the President of Liquidix, Inc. (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: November 19, 2002


                                                       /s/ Perry Barker
                                                       ------------------
                                                       Name: Perry Barker
                                                       Title: President

                                       11