alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65936-65937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26416]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of the members of the 
Performance Review Board (PRB) for the Federal Mine Safety and Health 
Review Commission. The PRB reviews the performance appraisals of career 
and non-career senior executives. The PRB makes recommendations 
regarding proposed performance appraisals, ratings, bonuses, pay 
adjustments, and other appropriate personnel actions.

[[Page 65937]]


DATES: Effective on November 6, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Boyd, Executive Director, Federal 
Mine Safety and Health Review Commission, (202) 434-9910.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Notice announces the appointment of the 
following primary and alternate members to the Federal Mine Safety and 
Health Review Commission PRB:

Primary Members

Cynthia Z. Springer, Deputy Commissioner, Accounting and Shared 
Services, Bureau of the Fiscal Service
Matthew J. Miller, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Governmentwide 
Accounting, Bureau of the Fiscal Service
D. Michael Linder, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Fiscal Accounting, 
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
Douglas Anderson, Assistant Commissioner, Office of Shared Services, 
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
Donald Keith Rake, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of Shared 
Services, Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Alternate Members

    None.

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 4313(c)(4)

Lisa M. Boyd,
Executive Director, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-26416 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Air Briefing, Spacewalks to Upgrade Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6cLWsJ3BwQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-air-briefing-spacewalks-to-upgrade-space-station\/\">NASA to Air Briefing, Spacewalks to Upgrade Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-air-briefing-spacewalks-to-upgrade-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=6cLWsJ3BwQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Air Briefing, Spacewalks to Upgrade Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6cLWsJ3BwQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/51732390695_6d2609b78a_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

USA

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Yen Cham Yung

Defendant(s).

Case No. 20 CR 231

Chief Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

ORDER

Government's unopposed motion for an extension of time to return indictment pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), to and including September 17, 2020 [17] is granted. Enter Order.

Date: 7/13/2020

Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

United States Chief District Judge
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40341 Summary Calendar

__________________ FRANKIE DON HUIE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CV-49
- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Texas prisoner Frankie Don Huie, # 335113, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Huie argues that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to object to testimony concerning an extraneous offense or request a limiting instruction, attack the credibility of a prosecutionNo. 95-40341 -2- witness, and conduct an adequate pre-trial investigation and that counsel's cumulative trial errors caused Huie's trial to be fundamentally unfair. Having reviewed the record, we conclude that Huie has failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel. Lockhart v. Fretwell , 506 U.S. 364, 372 (1993). For the first time on appeal, Huie argues that counsel failed to interview his neighbors, call several witnesses, hire a firearms expert, argue to the jury that Huie's son mistakenly left the murder weapon loaded, or file an appeal after contracting to do so. Huie further implies that the State withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963). He has not shown that these issues meet the standard for plain error. See Highlands Ins. v. National Union Fire Ins. , 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 903 (1995). Huie’s motion for appointed counsel is DENIED, and the dismissal of his § 2254 petition is AFFIRMED.
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 122

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding tactile

currency for the blind and visually impaired.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 17, 1997

Mr. BAKER (for himself, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. LAZIO of New

York, Mr. KING, Ms. RIVERS, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. FRANK

of Massachusetts, Mr. FROST, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SMITH

of New Jersey, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. STARK, and Mr.

RILEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives

regarding tactile currency for the blind and visually impaired.

Whereas currency is used by virtually everyone in everyday life, including blind and visually impaired persons;

Whereas the Federal reserve notes of the United States

are inaccessible to individuals with visual disabilities;

Whereas the Americans with Disabilities Act enhances

the economic independence and equal opportunity for

full participation in society for individuals with disabilities;
2

•HRES 122 IH

Whereas most blind and visually impaired persons are

therefore required to rely upon others to determine

denominations of such currency;

Whereas this constitutes a serious impediment to independence in everyday living;

Whereas electronic means of bill identification will always

be more fallible than purely tactile means;

Whereas tactile currency already exists in 23 countries

worldwide; and

Whereas the currency of the United States is presently

undergoing significant changes for security purposes:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) endorses the efforts recently begun by the

3 Bureau of Engraving and Printing to upgrade the

4 currency for security reasons; and

5 (2) strongly encourages the Secretary of the

6 Treasury and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing

7 to incorporate cost-effective, tactile features into the

8 design changes, thereby including the blind and vis9 ually impaired community in independent currency

10 usage.

Æ
#### M’Neal *v.*Woods, in Error.

SLANDER. The declaration stated, that on, &c. at *Brook-ville,*&c. a dwelling-house, the property of *Enoch*M’Carly, was consumed by fire; and that the defendant, in a discourse concerning the said fire, spoke these words: — “I (the defendant meaning) believe that *Charles M’JVeál*(the plaintiff meaning) had the bouse (meaning the said dwelling-house) set on fire intentionally; and the circumstances attending the case are sufficient to prove it:” — thereby alluding to .the said fire; and meaning that the plaintiff had oc.casioned-it, and bad thus been guilty of arson. Plea, not guilty.

Thé. evidence was, — that, on, &c. at *Brookville,*&c, several houses were destroyed by fire; that two of them belonged to the said *M’Carty;*that *M’Carty*was not in possession of either of the bouses, one of them being in the plaintiff’s possession as a tenant for the year, and the other in the possession, of another *486tenant for the year; and that the words charged were spoken of the plaintiff and the said fire.

■ The Circuit Court, on the defendant’s motion, instructed the jury as follows:—

1. That arson is an offence against the possession, and if they believed from the evidence that the plaintiff was in the possession of the house as tenant for the year, he could not be guilty of arson in burning it, while it was in the plaintiff’s possession as such tenant; and that if the defendant charged the plaintiff with having set that house on fire, it could not amount to a charge of arson (1). '

2. That if the words charged in the declaration were spoken concerning another house, the property of *M’Carty*in fee, which was by the aforesaid fire consumed, and which was in the possession of a tenant for the year at the time of the burning, and so understood by the hearers, it would not support the charge in the declaration as to the burning the house of JkP *Carty;*but that it should have been stated as the house of the tenant.

Verdict and judgment for the defendant.

*The Court*held, that the first instruction could not be objected to, but that the second was erroneous. The judgment was accordingly reversed with costs, the cause remanded-, &c.

*D. J.*Caswell, for the plaintiff.

O. *H.*Smith, for the defendant.

(1)

 “Declaration stated, that defendant intending to cause it to be believed that plaintiff *had been guilty of -wilfully setting his house and premises on fire,*said of the plaintiff, that he had set fire to his ov?n premises, meaning that he had *been guilty of -wilfully setting fire to the premises,*which, while in his occupation, had been destroyed by fire: After verdict for the plaintiff, the judgment was arrested, on the ground that wilfully setting his own premises on fire was not, except under special circumstances, a crime punishable by law; and the Court would presume only such circumstances as it was essentially necessary for the plaintiff to have proved in support of his declaration.” *Sweetapple*v. *Jesse,*5 Barn. & Adolp. 27.
IV

House Calendar No. 105

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 261

[Report No. 105–311]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 2158) making appropriations for the Departments of Veterans

Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and for sundry independent agencies, commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year

ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 7, 1997

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 2158) making appropriations

for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing

and Urban Development, and for sundry independent

agencies, commissions, corporations, and offices for the

fiscal year ending September 30, 1998, and for other

purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2158) making appropriations for
2

HRES 261 RH

1 the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and

2 Urban Development, and for sundry independent agencies,

3 commissions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year

4 ending September 30, 1998, and for other purposes. All

5 points of order against the conference report and against

6 its consideration are waived. The conference report shall

7 be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 105

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 261

[Report No. 105–311]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference reposes. ending September 30, 1998, and for other pur- sions, corporations, and offices for the fiscal year and for sundry independent agencies, commis- Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, appropriations for the Departments of Veterans port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2158) making

OCTOBER 7, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I,Dale B. Herbst, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WII Components, Inc.;

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.            The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.            Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.            Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.            Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.            The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.            All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b.            Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: March 28, 2008 |                                              |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                      | /s/ Dale B. Herbst                                |   |
|                      | Dale B. Herbst                                    |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,476
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          14,614
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,843
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,796
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             8,883
<LOANS>                                        134,700
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,114
<DEPOSITS>                                     168,051
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,580
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             14,274
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,513
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 211,114
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,535
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,357
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   401
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,293
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,493
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,810
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,483
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      104
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  20
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,959
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,959
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,901
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                          1
<LOANS-PAST>                                        54
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,201
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       11
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,294
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,294
<FN>
<F1>Information not calculated for interim reports.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
ILND 450 (Rev. 04/29/2016) Judgment in a Civil Action

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Podiatry In Motion, Inc.

Plaintiff(s). 

v. 

Interviewing Service of America, LLC et al

Defendant(s).

Case No. 20 C 3159 

Judge Ronald A. Guzman 

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Judgment is hereby entered (check appropriate box): 

☐ in favor of plaintiff(s)

and against defendant(s)

in the amount of $ , 

which ☐ includes pre–judgment interest. 

☐ does not include pre–judgment interest.

Post-judgment interest accrues on that amount at the rate provided by law from the date of this judgment. 

Plaintiff(s) shall recover costs from defendant(s).

⌧ in favor of defendant(s) 

and against plaintiff(s) 

Defendant(s) shall recover costs from plaintiff(s).

☐ other:

This action was (check one): 

☐ tried by a jury with Judge presiding, and the jury has rendered a verdict. 

☐ tried by Judge without a jury and the above decision was reached. 

⌧ decided by Judge Guzman on cross-motions for summary judgment. 

Date: October 05, 2020 Thomas G. Bruton, Clerk of Court 

/s/Kerwin Posley, Deputy Clerk 

Case: 1:20-cv-03159 Document #: 30 Filed: 10/05/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:146
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-3 Astronauts Headed to International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pfbQIOM4Sq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-3-astronauts-headed-to-international-space-station\/\">NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-3 Astronauts Headed to International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-3-astronauts-headed-to-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=pfbQIOM4Sq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-3 Astronauts Headed to International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"pfbQIOM4Sq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/nhq202111100014.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":466}