alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Provide Coverage of Preview Briefing, US Spacewalks","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xDzIDR5XFs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-provide-coverage-of-preview-briefing-us-spacewalks\/\">NASA to Provide Coverage of Preview Briefing, US Spacewalks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-provide-coverage-of-preview-briefing-us-spacewalks\/embed\/#?secret=xDzIDR5XFs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Provide Coverage of Preview Briefing, US Spacewalks” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xDzIDR5XFs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/preview_briefing_spacewalk_advisory.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
9614.

#### Crump *v.*The State.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Macon—Judge Guerry. February 20, 1918.

*Nottingham & Holliman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Will Gunn, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

1. When considered in connection with the qualifying notes of the trial judge, there is no substantial merit in any of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

*■Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworfh and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

CEDRIC WARREN , Petitioner ,
v. Cas e No. 5D 23 -567 LT Case No. 2001

- 36396 -CFAES

STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed May 19, 2023 Petition for Writ of Habeas Cor pus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction. Cedric Warren , Lake City, pro se. No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

. Due to Petitioner’s apparent abuse of the legal process by his abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous pro se filings attacking his judgment and sentence in Volusia County Circuit Court Case No. 2001

- 36396

- CFAES , this Court issued an order directing Petitioner to show cause why he should not2

be prohibited from future pro se filings. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47, 48 (Fla. 1999). Having received no response , we conclude that Petitioner is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings. Therefore, in order to conserve judicial resources, the Clerk of this Court is direc ted not to accept any further pro se filings concerning the above referenced case. Any future filings regarding the referenced case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk unless filed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar. See Isley v. State , 652 So. 2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary proceedings. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (202 3 ); Si mpkins v. State , 909 So. 2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). FUTURE PRO SE FILINGS PROHIBITED.
EISNAUGLE, HARRIS and KILBANE , JJ., concur.
exv4w2



 





CERTIFICATE



The undersigned, constituting the Caterpillar Money Market Account Committee,
hereby declare and confirm the following:



1. The Caterpillar Money Market Account Plan (the “Plan”) shall be
expanded to include Investors beyond Eligible Employees, Eligible
Retirees and Immediate Family Members of such Eligible Employees or
Eligible Retirees (as those terms are defined in the plan). Any
Investor may invest in the Notes issued pursuant to the Plan, provided
such Investor is a citizen of the United States or, except as provided
in applicable Treasury Regulations, a partnership, a corporation
incorporated or established in or under the laws of the United States
or a Trust or estate that is treated as a United States person under
Section 7701 of the Internal Revenue Code.



2. The interest rate on the Notes issued pursuant to the Plan shall be
set by the appropriate Funding Manager in the Treasury Department of
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation. All actions taken to date
by James Leonard, Funding Manager, with respect to the determination of
the appropriate interest rate on the Notes issued pursuant to the Plan,
are hereby ratified.



The undersigned have executed this Certificate as of February 1, 1998.




/s/ James S. Beard







James S. Beard

President

Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation



/s/ J.R. English







J.R. English

Executive Vice President

Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation



/s/ Edward J. Scott







Edward J. Scott

Treasurer

Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/  Eric W. FinlaysonEric W. FinlaysonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the Annual Report of The Beacon
Financial Futures Fund, L.P. (the Partnership), on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Stratton, Chief
Executive Officer of Beacon Management Corporation (USA) as General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



THE BEACON FINANCIAL FUTURES FUND, L.P.By: Beacon Management Corporation (USA), General Partner of the PartnershipBy:

/s/ Mark S. StrattonMark S. Stratton Chief Executive Officer March 31, 2006


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to liability under that Section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the
extent that this Exhibit 32 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"QSF-18 (Quiet Supersonic Flight 2018)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6cPONecvNb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/qsf-18-quiet-supersonic-flight-2018-3\/\">QSF-18 (Quiet Supersonic Flight 2018)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/qsf-18-quiet-supersonic-flight-2018-3\/embed\/#?secret=6cPONecvNb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“QSF-18 (Quiet Supersonic Flight 2018)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6cPONecvNb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/afrc2018-0287-070-edit-sm.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":364}
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R

. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________

No. 02-30071

(Summary Calendar)

_________________

FLORETTA SNOW-SORAPURU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G REYHOUND LINES INC., and (Its Insurer); UNIDENTIFIED

PARTY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

No. 00-CV-3553-F

October 28, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaint iff Floretta Snow-Sorapuru appeals the district court’s dismissal of her personal injury

suit agains t defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc. under Rule 52(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil-2-

Procedure. Snow-Sorapuru contends that the district court, applying Louisiana law in this diversity

action, erred in finding that her failure to look where she was sitting was the sole cause of her alleged

injury fro m a bro ken armrest on one of the defendant’s buses. Where a district court has entered

judgment after hearing all the evidence on a crucial issue of fact pursuant to Rule 52(c), its findings

of fact are reviewed only for clear error while its co nclusions of law are reviewed d e novo

. S ee

Samson v. Apollo Res., Inc.

, 242 F.3d 629, 632-33 (5th Cir. 2001). The only evidence presented on

the issue of causation wa s t he t est imo ny of the plaintiff, who stated that she sat down without

looking. Because the district court’s findings were not clearly erroneous, we affirm. S ee Ryland v.

Liberty Lloyd’s Ins. Co.

, 630 So.2d 1289, 1302 (La. 1994) (“Negligence is only actionable where it

is both a cause in fact and a legal cause of the injury.”); Johnson v. Lull Enters., Inc.

, 663 So.2d 403,

409 (La. Ct. App. 1995) (“Even in a case where some negligence exists, without causation no liabilit y

is created and the negligence is not actionable.”).

AFFIRMED.
9554.

#### KENNEDY & COMPANY *v.*SAVANNAH BUGGY COMPANY.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Rehearing denied November 11, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of Thomasville—Judge W. H. Hammond.

*Merrill & Grantham,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Titus, Delete & Iloplcins,*contra.

Harwell, J.

In this case no final judgment is excepted to, the only error assigned in the bill of exceptions being upon the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the plea and answer of the defendant and the striking of this plea and answer. Moreover, it does not appear from the bill of exceptions or the record that any final judgment was ever rendered. The bill of exceptions therefore can not be maintained, and the writ of error must be dismissed. *Woodall*v. *Harris,*22 *Ga. App.*69 (95 S. E. 377), and cases therein cited.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*

ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.

Harwell, J.

The able counsel for plaintiff in error, in their motion for rehearing, called the attention of this court to the cases of *O’Neal*v. *Miller,*9 *Ga. App.*180; *Whiddon*v. *Thomasville,*10 *Ga. App.*194; *Walker*v. *Crummey,*18 *Ga. App.*414; *Toomey*v. *Reid,*133 *Ga.*855. The cases of *Walker*v. *Crummey,*supra, and *Toomey*v. *Raid,*supra,' are not at all in point, and need not be discussed. In *O’Neal*v. *Miller*and in *Whiddon*v. *Thomasville,*supra, a general demurrer to the petition was sustained, the plaintiff excepted to the sustaining of this general demurrer, and it was held that the judgment sustaining the general demurrer to the petition was a final judgment, and that the assignment of error *763was sufficient. In. the instant case the demurrer to the plea was sustained, and the plea stricken. The court can not in this case hold as a matter of law that a final judgment has been rendered because.the plea has been stricken, or because the suit is on a promissory note. Neither can we look to the briefs to get that information. The hill of exceptions should show that a final judgment has been rendered and excepted to. In thé *O’Neal*and *Whiddon*cases, supra, the rulings were predicated upon the fact that when a general demurrer to a petition is sustained, it necessarily follows that a final judgment has been rendered. The suit is out of court. But it does not follow that because a plea has been stricken a final judgment has been rendered. Under the repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court the dismissal of the writ of error, in our judgment, is demanded, and it could avail nothing to grant a rehearing. It is therefore denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

DALE WATERS, Derivatively on Behalf of 

Nominal Defendant THE KRAFT HEINZ 

COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ALEXANDRE BEHRING, et al., 

Defendants, 

and 

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY, 

Nominal Defendant. 

 Case No. 1:20-cv-02072 

Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. 

STEPHEN SILVERMAN and CHARLOTTE 

HAYS, Derivatively on Behalf of THE KRAFT 

HEINZ COMPANY, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ALEXANDRE BEHRING, et al., 

Defendants. 

 – and – 

THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY, a Delaware 

corporation, 

Nominal Defendant. 

 Case No. 1:20-cv-02257 

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Case: 1:20-cv-02072 Document #: 29 Filed: 05/26/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:707
2 

IAN GREEN, Derivatively on Behalf of THE 

KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ALEXANDER BEHRING, et al., 

Defendants, 

-andTHE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY, a Delaware 

Corporation, 

Nominal Defendant. 

Case No. 1:20-cv-02258 

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

IN RE KRAFT HEINZ SHAREHOLDER 

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION 

Case No. 1:20-cv-02259 

Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr.

NOTICE OF AGREED MOTION FOR REASSIGNMENT OF RELATED CASES 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT on June 5, 2020, at 9:15 a.m., or as soon thereafter as 

counsel may be heard, counsel for Defendants Alexandre Behring, John T. Cahill, Gregory E. 

Abel, Tracy Britt Cool, Feroz Dewan, Jeanne P. Jackson, Jorge Paulo Lemann, John C. Pope, 

Marcel Herrmann Telles, Alexandre Van Damme, George Zoghbi, Bernardo Hees, Paulo Basilio, 

David H. Knopf, Christopher R. Skinger, and Vince Garlati shall appear by telephone before the 

Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr., or any judge sitting in his stead, and there and then present their 

Agreed Motion for Reassignment of Related Cases. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02072 Document #: 29 Filed: 05/26/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #:708
3 

Dated: May 26, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON 

& GARRISON LLP 

Daniel J. Kramer (admitted pro hac vice) 

Andrew J. Ehrlich (admitted pro hac vice) 

William A. Clareman (admitted pro hac vice) 

1285 Avenue of the Americas 

New York, NY 10019-6064 

Phone: (212) 373-3000 

Fax: (212) 757-3990 

dkramer@paulweiss.com

aehrlich@paulweiss.com 

wclareman@paulweiss.com 

Counsel for Defendants 

JENNER & BLOCK LLP 

BY: /s/ Dean N. Panos 

Dean N. Panos (Il. ARDC # 6203600) 

Howard S. Suskin (Il. ARDC # 6185999) 

Gabriel K. Gillett (Il. ARDC # 6328233) 

353 N. Clark Street 

Chicago, IL 60654-3456 

Phone: (312) 222-9350 

Fax: (312) 527-0484 

dpanos@jenner.com 

hsuskin@jenner.com 

ggillett@jenner.com 

Counsel for Defendants

Case: 1:20-cv-02072 Document #: 29 Filed: 05/26/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #:709
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Agreed Motion 

for Reassignment of Related Cases was filed on May 26, 2020 with the Clerk of the Court using 

the CM/ECF system, which will effect electronic service on all parties and attorneys registered to 

receive notifications via the CM/ECF system. 

 By: /s/ Dean N. Panos 

Dean N. Panos 

Case: 1:20-cv-02072 Document #: 29 Filed: 05/26/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #:710
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. (together, the Company), does hereby certify that to the
undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  | /s/ Leigh Ginter                      
|                     |  | Leigh Ginter  Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  | (Chief Accounting Officer)            

A signed original of this written statement, required by Section 906, has been provided to Norcraft Holdings,
L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and will be retained by Norcraft Holdings, L.P. and Norcraft Companies, L.P. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

*CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350*

* *

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraniteCity Food & Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ended June 29, 2003, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven J. Wagenheim,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 
| Dated: | December 21,  2004 | By     | /s/ Steven J.  Wagenheim               |   |
|--------|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |               |   | Steven J.  Wagenheim                   |
|   |               |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----