alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"Raja Chari","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"olKErSBwvn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/raja-chari\/\">Raja Chari<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/raja-chari\/embed\/#?secret=olKErSBwvn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Raja Chari” — NASA\" data-secret=\"olKErSBwvn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/jsc2017e114853_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 215 (Thursday, November 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 1, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, 
Applications and Enforcement), 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. Pacific Premier Bancorp, Inc., Irvine, California; to acquire 
voting shares of Independence Bank, Newport Beach, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 3, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-26366 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citizens Bancorp (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, William V. Humphreys, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ William V. Humphreys
-------------------------------
William V. Humphreys
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 7, 2004

                                       18
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

*CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite City Food &Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James G. Gilbertson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 
| 1.     |   | the Report fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     |   | the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:   May 15,  2009 | By:    | /s/ James G.  Gilbertson |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                                       |   | James G.  Gilbertson     |
|                                       |   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 7

- 00 949

- CV

Style: Khistina Caldwell Dejean v. Clenton Brown

Date motion filed * : February 2 3 , 201 8

Type of motion: Letter

- Motion f o r E xten sion of T ime to F ile A ppellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Pro se a ppellant Khistina Caldwell Dejean

Document to be filed: Response to Jurisdictional Notice

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 26, 2018

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due D ate s : February 26, 2018

Date Requested: N/A (60 days for brief )

Ordered that motion i s:

 Granted , in part

If document s are to be filed, document s due: April 2 , 201 8

.  Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

This Court’s December 28, 2017 Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of

Jurisdiction had warned the appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want

of jurisdiction unless she timely responded within sixty days to show how this Court

had jurisdiction. Thus, appellant’s extension request is construed as a motion for an

extension of time to file her response to the jurisdictional notice and is gran ted , in

part, for 30 days from this order . Accordingly, if appellant fails to file a response

showing how this Court has jurisdiction by April 2, 2018 , this appeal may be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a),

(c). If appellant timely files a satisfactory response, a briefing schedule may be set.

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

 Acting for the Court

Date: M a rch 1 , 2018
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 4, 2010 | /s/Richard A. Smith                       |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------|
|           | Richard A. Smith                          |
|           | Chief Executive Officer of FelCor Lodging |
|           | Trust Incorporated, as general partner of |
|           | FelCor Lodging Limited Partnership        |
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 26, 2014

NO. 03-13-00448-CV

Greg Fullmer and Melanie A. Rocha, Appellants

v.

360 Mortgage Group, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANTS’ MOTIONS -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 24, 2013. Appellants have

filed motions to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motions, the Court agrees that the 

motions should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motions and dismisses the appeal. 

Each party shall pay the costs of appeal incurred by that party, both in this Court and the court 

below.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danielle Sempsrott","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/danielle-c-sempsrottnasa-gov\/","title":"Cliff Lanham","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UITwcbZc7C\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-lanham\/\">Cliff Lanham<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-lanham\/embed\/#?secret=UITwcbZc7C\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Cliff Lanham” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UITwcbZc7C\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/cliff_lanham_portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":902}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1244

REGINA QUARTEY, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, 

Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals. 

Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 9, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Taiwo A. Agbaje, AGBAJE LAW FIRM, PC, Gwynn Oak, Maryland, for 

Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Susan K. 

Houser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Linda Y. Cheng, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Regina Quartey, a native and citizen of Ghana, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s 

denial of her motion to reopen. We have reviewed the 

administrative record and the parties’ briefs and conclude that 

we lack jurisdiction to review Quartey’s challenges to the 

immigration judge’s determination that Quartey was ineligible 

for adjustment of status due to her fraudulent marriage, see

8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2006), and that the denial of Quartey’s 

motion to reopen was not an abuse of discretion, see 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.23(b)(3). We therefore deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Hill International,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Irvin E. Richter, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: /s/ Irvin E. Richter

Irvin E. Richter

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 30, 2009
9611.

#### Mayor & Aldermen of Savannah *v.*Williamson *et al.*

Decided October 15, 1918.

Action for damages; from Chatham superior court—Judge Meldrim. February 8, 1918.

*B. J. Travis, D. 8. Atkinson,*for plaintiff in error.

- *Baiford Falligant, Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams,*contra.

Wade, C. J.

1. Where, as in this ease, damages are sought on account of injury to certain subdivisions of a 40-acre tract of land, alleged to have been caused by a change in the grade of abutting streets, and the petition fails to allege the market value of the *entire tract*prior to and after the grading, there can be no recovery; and, so far as the instant case is concerned,, this doctrine (right or wrong) has crystallized into unalterable'law. See former decision, 19 *Ga. App.*784 (92 S. E. 291). It was there said: “If a plaintiff could select certain lots out of an entire tract belonging to him and sue for .the difference in market value of these lots before and after the grading of a street abutting them had been altered, notwithstanding .the value of the entire property, including these lots, had been greatly enhanced thereby, this - would be not only in direct opposition to the ruling in *Nelson*v. Atlanta, 128 *Ga.*252 (57 S. E. 245), but also in opposition to the general principle that an increase in value resulting from improvement may be set off against damage caused by the grading of streets. *Moore*v. *Atlanta,*70 *Ga.*611, 617; *Hurt*V. *Atlanta,*100 *Ga.*274 (28 S. E. 65).”

(a) The fatal omission to allege in the petition the market value of the *entire tract*-before and after the grading of the a'butting. streets was not supplied by an amendment setting forth that the market value of plaintiffs’ lands “contiguous to the described lots, including said lots,” before the elevation was $40,000, and after the elevation only $20,000. There should have been a clear and unequivocal allegation in accordance with law. The depreciation alleged should not have been confined to the particular lots named, nor to the lots or land immediately contiguous to the described lots.

2. There being no allegation in the petition, as finally amended, setting out the market value of the *entire tract of land, not merely that contiguous to the described lots, but also that contiguous to the abutting streets,*before and after the grading, the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer attacking the petition for this reason.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenhins and Lulce, JJ., concur.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Billy Downey,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03428-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8410 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2703 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2703

   To provide for the correction of a certain John H. Chafee Coastal 
                     Barrier Resources System map.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2004

Mrs. Hutchison introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the correction of a certain John H. Chafee Coastal 
                     Barrier Resources System map.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make any corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) that are necessary to ensure 
that the map is consistent with the map entitled ``Corrections to 
Coastal Barrier Resources System Map Unit T-10'', dated June _____, 
2004, and on file with the Secretary and the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate.
    (b) Map Described.--The map described in this subsection is the map 
that is subtitled ``Four Mile Hill Unit TX-16P, North Padre Island Unit 
T10/T10P'', which is included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal 
Barrier Resources System'' and dated October 24, 1990.
    (c) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the map 
described in subsection (b) on file and available for public inspection 
in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
IV

House Calendar No. 48

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 164

[Report No. 105–127]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 437) to reauthorize the National

Sea Grant College Program Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 10, 1997

Mr. GOSS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 437) to reauthorize the National Sea Grant College Program Act,

and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 1(b) of

3 rule XXIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 437) to reauthorize the National

6 Sea Grant College Program Act, and for other purposes.

7 The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. Gen-
2

HRES 164 RH

1 eral debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not ex2 ceed one hour, with forty minutes equally divided and con3 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of

4 the Committee on Resources and twenty minutes equally

5 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi6 nority member of the Committee on Science. After general

7 debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under

8 the five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendment rec9 ommended by the Committee on Science now printed in

10 the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill

11 for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule

12 the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in

13 the Congressional Record and numbered 1 pursuant to

14 clause 6 of rule XXIII. Each section of that amendment

15 shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consider16 ation of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise

17 and report the bill to the House with such amendments

18 as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a

19 separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted

20 in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amend21 ment in the nature of a substitute made in order as origi22 nal text. The previous question shall be considered as or23 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage

24 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit

25 with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 48

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 164

[Report No. 105–127]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 437)

Program Act, and for other purposes.to reauthorize the National Sea Grant College

JUNE 10, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed