65186 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 212 / Monday, November 3, 2014 / Notices 

3See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

4See section 782(b) of the Act. 

5See Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 

17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’) (amending 19 CFR 

351.303(g)). 

XIII. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2014–26076 Filed 10–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating the five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

(‘‘AD/CVD’’) orders listed below. The 

International Trade Commission (‘‘the 

Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: (November 1, 

2014). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) 

and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). 

Guidance on methodological or 

analytical issues relevant to the 

Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews is set forth in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 

Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 

2012). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating Sunset 

Reviews of the following antidumping 

and countervailing duty orders: 

DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product Department contact 

A–351–837 ....... 731–TA–1024 Brazil ..................... Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

(2nd Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–570–900 ....... 731–TA–1092 PRC 1 2 .................. Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof 

(1st Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–570–887 ....... 731–TA–1046 PRC ...................... Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol (2nd Review) .. David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–533–848 ....... 731–TA–1155 India ...................... Commodity Matchbooks (1st Review) ...... David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

C–533–849 ....... 701–TA–459 India ...................... Commodity Matchbooks (1st Review) ...... Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482–5255. 

A–533–828 ....... 731–TA–1025 India ...................... Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

(2nd Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

C–533–829 ....... 701–TA–432 India ...................... Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

(2nd Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–588–068 ....... AA1921–188 Japan .................... Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

(4th Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–201–831 ....... 731–TA–1027 Mexico ................... Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

(2nd Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–580–852 ....... 731–TA–1026 Republic of Korea Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

(2nd Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

A–549–820 ....... 731–TA–1028 Thailand ................ Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

(2nd Review).

David Goldberger (202) 482–4136. 

1Pursuant to court order in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United States, 2014 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 112 (Ct. Int’l Trade Sep. 

23, 2014), we are initiating the sunset review for diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) effective November 4, 2014. 2For Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Sunset Review, Notice of Rescission of Sunset Review, and Advance Notification of New Sunset Review, 79 FR 63080 (October 22, 

2014), the case number is A–570–900. We inadvertently omitted the case number in this notice. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statute and Department’s 

regulations, the Department’s schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Web site at 

the following address: ‘‘http://

enforcement.trade.gov/sunset/.’’ All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, and service of 

documents. These rules, including 

electronic filing requirements via 

Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(‘‘IA ACCESS’’), can be found at 19 CFR 

351.303.3

Revised Factual Information 

Requirements 

This notice serves as a reminder that 

any party submitting factual information 

in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify 

to the accuracy and completeness of that 

information.4 Parties are hereby 

reminded that revised certification 

requirements are in effect for company/ 

government officials as well as their 

representatives in all AD/CVD 

investigations or proceedings initiated 

on or after August 16, 2013.5 The 

formats for the revised certifications are 

provided at the end of the Final Rule. 

The Department intends to reject factual 

submissions if the submitting party does 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 212 / Monday, November 3, 2014 / Notices 65187 

6See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

not comply with the revised 

certification requirements. 

On April 10, 2013, the Department 

published Definition of Factual 

Information and Time Limits for 

Submission of Factual Information: 

Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 

2013), which modified two regulations 

related to antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings: The 

definition of factual information (19 

CFR 351.102(b)(21), and the time limits 

for the submission of factual 

information (19 CFR 351.301). The final 

rule identifies five categories of factual 

information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), 

which are summarized as follows: (i) 

Evidence submitted in response to 

questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted 

in support of allegations; (iii) publicly 

available information to value factors 

under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure 

the adequacy of remuneration under 19 

CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed 

on the record by the Department; and (v) 

evidence other than factual information 

described in (i)–(iv). The final rule 

requires any party, when submitting 

factual information, to specify under 

which subsection of 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(21) the information is being 

submitted and, if the information is 

submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 

factual information already on the 

record, to provide an explanation 

identifying the information already on 

the record that the factual information 

seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The 

final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 

so that, rather than providing general 

time limits, there are specific time limits 

based on the type of factual information 

being submitted. These modifications 

are effective for all segments initiated on 

or after May 10, 2013. Review the final 

rule, available at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/

1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to 

submitting factual information in this 

segment. To the extent that other 

regulations govern the submission of 

factual information in a segment (such 

as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits 

will continue to be applied. 

Revised Extension of Time Limits 

Regulation 

On September 20, 2013, the 

Department modified its regulation at 19 

CFR 351.302(c) concerning the 

extension of time limits for submissions 

in antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings: Extension of Time Limits, 

78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). The 

modification clarifies that parties may 

request an extension of time limits 

before a time limit established under 

part 351 of the Department’s regulations 

expires, or as otherwise specified by the 

Secretary. In general, an extension 

request will be considered untimely if it 

is filed after the time limit established 

under part 351 expires. For submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously, an extension request 

will be considered untimely if it is filed 

after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Under 

certain circumstances, the Department 

may elect to specify a different time 

limit by which extension requests will 

be considered untimely for submissions 

which are due from multiple parties 

simultaneously. In such a case, the 

Department will inform parties in the 

letter or memorandum setting forth the 

deadline (including a specified time) by 

which extension requests must be filed 

to be considered timely. This 

modification also requires that an 

extension request must be made in a 

separate, stand-alone submission, and 

clarifies the circumstances under which 

the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time 

limits. These modifications are effective 

for all segments initiated on or after 

October 21, 2013. Review the final rule, 

available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/

pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013- 

22853.htm, prior to submitting factual 

information in these segments. 

Letters of Appearance and 

Administrative Protective Orders 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a public service list for these 

proceedings. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these five-year 

reviews must file letters of appearance 

as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To 

facilitate the timely preparation of the 

public service list, it is requested that 

those seeking recognition as interested 

parties to a proceeding submit an entry 

of appearance within 10 days of the 

publication of the Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties who want access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) to file an APO 

application immediately following 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation. The 

Department’s regulations on submission 

of proprietary information and 

eligibility to receive access to business 

proprietary information under APO can 

be found at 19 CFR 351.304–306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties, as 

defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), 

and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b), wishing to participate in a 

Sunset Review must respond not later 

than 15 days after the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this notice of initiation by filing a notice 

of intent to participate. The required 

contents of the notice of intent to 

participate are set forth at 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the 

Department’s regulations, if we do not 

receive a notice of intent to participate 

from at least one domestic interested 

party by the 15-day deadline, the 

Department will automatically revoke 

the order without further review.6

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in a Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Consult the Department’s 

regulations for information regarding 

the Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews. Consult the Department’s 

regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for 

definitions of terms and for other 

general information concerning 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings at the Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: October 23, 2014. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2014–26087 Filed 10–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–875] 

Certain Steel Nails From the Republic 

of Korea: Preliminary Negative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty 

Determination With Final Antidumping 

Duty Determination 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) preliminarily 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES