alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 632

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 6, 1997

Mr. CHRISTENSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on

Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of

Congress, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Balance the Budget

5 First Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a)

8 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C.

9 31(2)) is repealed.
2

•HR 632 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 601(a)(1)

2 of such Act is amended—

3 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’;

4 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B),

5 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively;

6 and

7 (3) by striking ‘‘, as adjusted by paragraph (2)

8 of this subsection’’.

9 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

10 It is the sense of the Congress that pay for Members

11 of Congress should not be increased until such time as

12 the Federal budget has been balanced, as certified by the

13 Congressional Budget Office.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jill Obiala,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00163-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Jackson Allen & Williams, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/19/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9808 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9808 Filed 01/25/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Nicola Fox","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ktmSINu8L8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nicola-fox\/\">Nicola Fox<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nicola-fox\/embed\/#?secret=ktmSINu8L8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Nicola Fox” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ktmSINu8L8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/fox_nicola_00100553.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":776}
Supreme Court of the United States

Office ofthe Clerk

Washington, DC 20543-0001

July 16, 2015

Scott S. Harris

Clerk ofthe Court

(202) 479-3011

Clerk

Court ofAppeals of Texas, Twelfth District

1517 W. Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12th Coun oi !\py0»lz DisTict

Re: Nicky Charune Agnew

v. Texas

No. 15-71

(Your No. 12-13-00181-CR)

CATHY S. LUSiUCL

Dear Clerk:

The petition for a writ of certiorari in the above entitled case was filed on July

14, 2015 and placed on the docket July 16, 2015 as No. 15-71.

Sincerely,

Scott S. Harris, Clerk

by

Jacob C. Travers

§e Analyst
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Joel Montalbano","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aIXfcz9BSJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/joel-montalbano\/\">Joel Montalbano<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/joel-montalbano\/embed\/#?secret=aIXfcz9BSJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Joel Montalbano” — NASA\" data-secret=\"aIXfcz9BSJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
9719.

#### Crone *v.*The State.

Decided October 9, 1918.

Bdoodwoeth, *J.*

1. The charge to the jury that “malice shall be implied where no considerable provocation appears, and where all the circumstances of the killing show an abandoned and malignant heart” (Penal Code, § 62), was not' subject to exception on the ground that the judge erred in so charging “without going further and charging and instructing the jury that if considerable provocation appeared and all the circumstances' did not show that the killing was of an abandoned and malignant heart, no malice would be implied.” The accused was not convicted of murder, but was convicted of manslaughter; and for this reason the instruction on the subject of malice could not have been prejudicial to him. *Simpson*v. *State,*12 *Ga. App.*292 (77 S. E. 105); *Gray*v. *State,*12 *Ga. App.*634 (77 S. E. 916); *Land*v. *State,*11 *Ga. App.*761 (2) (76 S. E. 78). Moreover, “a correct and pertinent charge is not rendered erroneous by failure to give other instructions, appropriate to the case, in connection therewith.” *Grimsley*v. *Singletary,*133 *Ga.*56 (3), 57 (65 S. E. 92, 134 Am. St. R. 196). *Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Watkins,*14 *Ga. App.*388 (4), 394 (80 S. E. 916) and eases cited.

2. Tlie court charged the jury: “It is the duty of a jury, in the investigation of a criminal ease, to consider along with the evidence the defendant’s statement; and after considering the entire case, all of the circumstances surrounding it and part of it under the law as given in charge by the court, then you determine what it is.” This is alleged to be error because the court did not explain what was meant by the expression' “then you determine what it is.” While this portion of the charge was subject to' criticism, yet, when considered in connection with the entire charge, we do not think it was calculated to mislead the jury to the prejudice of the defendant.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere.

*Judgment, affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*

*637Indictment for murder—conviction of manslaughter; from Habersham superior court—Judge J. B. Jones. March 15, 1918.

*B. E. A. Hamby, T. L. Bynum, J. G. Edwards & Sons,*for plaintiff in error.

*Robert McMillan, solicitor-general,*contra.
#### ROSINA LEOGRANDE, RESPONDENT, v. SOCIETA M. S. FRATELLANZA ITALIANA, APPELLANT.

Argued October 18, 1945

Decided January 3, 1946.

Por the respondent, *James J. Rose.*

Por the appellant, *Louis Santorf.*

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Bodine in the Supreme Court.

*For affirmance*— -The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Donges, Heher, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Raeeertt, Dill, Preund, McGeehan, JJ. 12.

*For reversal*— Hone.
Exhibit 32.1







Section 906 Certification




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR


PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), I, Andrew A. Wiederhorn, Chief Executive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.




This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.






March 30, 2010


/s/ Andrew A. WiederhornDate


Andrew A. WiederhornChief Executive Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District Of Illinois

Attorney Appearance Form

Case Title: Case Number: 

An appearance is hereby filed by the undersigned as attorney for: 

Attorney name (type or print): 

Firm: 

Street address: 

City/State/Zip: 

Bar ID Number: Telephone Number: 

 Yes No 

 Yes No 

 Yes No 

 Yes No 

(See item 3 in instructions) 

Email Address: 

Are you acting as lead counsel in this case? 

Are you acting as local counsel in this case? 

Are you a member of the court’s trial bar? 

If this case reaches trial, will you act as the trial attorney? 

If this is a criminal case, check your status. Retained Counsel 

Appointed Counsel 

If appointed counsel" are you 

a Federal Defender 

 CJA Panel Attorney 

______________________________________________________________________ 

In order to appear before this $ourt an attorney must either be a member in good standing of this $ourt’s 

general bar or be granted leave to appear pro hac vice as provided for by local rules 83.12 through 83.14. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Under 28 &.%.$#§1746, this 

statement under perjury has the same force and effect as a sworn statement made under oath. 

Executed on 

Attorney signature: S/ 

(Use electronic signature if the appearance form is filed electronically.) 

Revised 8/1/2015 

In re FICO Antitrust Litig. 1:20-CV-2114

Plaintiff Sky Federal Credit Union

Carmen A. Medici

Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP

600 West Broadway, Suite 3300

San Diego, CA 92101

CA 248417 619-233-4565

cmedici@scott-scott.com

May 10, 2023

Carmen A. Medici

Case: 1:20-cv-02114 Document #: 168 Filed: 05/10/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:3402
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 796

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical corrections to

a map relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SANFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to make technical

corrections to a map relating to the Coastal Barrier

Resources System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO MAPS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior

5 shall, before the end of the 30-day period beginning on

6 the date of the enactment of this Act, make such correc7 tions to the map described in subsection (b) as are nec8 essary to ensure that depictions of areas on that map are

9 consistent with the depictions of areas appearing on the
2

•HR 796 IH

1 map entitled ‘‘Amendments to the Coastal Barrier Re2 sources System’’, dated September 3, 1996, and on file

3 with the Secretary.

4 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this

5 subsection is the map that—

6 (1) is included in a set of maps entitled ‘‘Coast7 al Barrier Resources System’’, dated October 24,

8 1990; and

9 (2) relates to unit SC–03 of the Coastal Barrier

10 Resources System.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-550-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Report on Investigation of Lost and Unaccounted for 
Gas Volumes [TRA/LAUF] of Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/15/14.
    Accession Number: 20141015-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-551-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Report on Investigation of Lost and Unaccounted for 
Gas Volumes [RAM/LAUF] of Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/15/14.
    Accession Number: 20141015-5168.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-50-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: AlaTenn OFO and 
Change of Address Filing to be effective 11/15/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/15/14.
    Accession Number: 20141015-5075.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-51-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate 
Release--KeySpan to BUG eff 11-1-2014 to be effective 11/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20141016-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated October 16, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25706 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VAN 

COTT 

& TALAMANTE, PLLC

3030 North Third Street, Suite 790

Phoenix, Arizona 85012 ♦ (602) 257-9160

Joyce N. Van Cott ̶ SBN 009878

Ryan J. Talamante ̶ SBN 015323

VAN COTT & TALAMANTE, PLLC

3030 North Third Street, Suite 790

Phoenix, Arizona 85012

Telephone: (602) 257-9160

Facsimile: (602) 257-9180

E-mail: vct.law@vancotttalamante.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff SPARROWONE, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

SPARROWONE, LLC, an Arizona

limited liability company,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALTERNATE 36, INC., a Delaware

corporation; Kenneth Ramirez, a

natural person; Lauren Murphy, a

natural person; and Jeffery Nickoloff,

a natural person,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 15-CV-02609-SPL

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO

DEFENDANTS ALTERNATE 36,

INC., KENNETH RAMIREZ AND

LAUREN MURPHY

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on October 13, 2016, Plaintiff 

Sparrowone, LLC, by and through its attorneys, served via email and regular mail, 

Plaintiff’s First Request for Production of Documents to Defendants Alternate 36, 

Inc., Kenneth Ramirez and Lauren Murphy. upon Defendant.

Case 2:15-cv-02609-SPL Document 94 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 3
2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GLOVER & VAN 

COTT, P.A.

2025 North Third Street, Suite 260

-9160

GLOVER 

& VAN 

COTT, 

P.A.

2025 North Third 

Street, Suite 260

Phoenix, Arizona 

-

9160

VAN 

COTT 

& TALAMANTE, PLLC

3030 North Third Street, Suite 790

Phoenix, Arizona 85012 ♦ (602) 257-9160

DATED this 13th day of October, 2016.

VAN COTT & TALAMANTE, PLLC

By: /s/ Ryan J. Talamante 

Joyce N. Van Cott

Ryan J. Talamante 

3030 North Third Street, Suite 790

Phoenix, Arizona 85012

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sparrowone, LLC

Case 2:15-cv-02609-SPL Document 94 Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 3
3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

GLOVER & VAN 

COTT, P.A.

2025 North Third Street, Suite 260

-9160

GLOVER 

& VAN 

COTT, 

P.A.

2025 North Third 

Street, Suite 260

Phoenix, Arizona 

-

9160

VAN 

COTT 

& TALAMANTE, PLLC

3030 North Third Street, Suite 790

Phoenix, Arizona 85012 ♦ (602) 257-9160

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 13, 2016, I electronically filed the attached 

document with the U.S. District Court Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for 

filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all known CM/ECF registrants. 

THIS 13th day of October, 2016. 

By: /s/ Ryan J. Talamante 

Case 2:15-cv-02609-SPL Document 94 Filed 10/13/16 Page 3 of 3