alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of New River Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) for the period ending January 2, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Krish S. Krishnan, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                     
|/s/ Krish S. Krishnan                                                                                                                                
|Krish S. Krishnan Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) April 1, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Apelt, ) No. CV-98-882-PHX-ROS

)

Petitioner, ) DEATH PENALTY CASE

)

v. )

)

) ORDER

Charles L. Ryan, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

)

)

Good cause appearing,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for 7-Day Extension of Time to File

Response to Supplemental Brief (Doc. 331) is GRANTED. The response shall be filed no

later than November 21, 2012. Petitioner shall file a reply no later than December 21, 2012.

DATED this 13th day of November, 2012.

Case 2:98-cv-00882-ROS Document 332 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



eCOST.com, Inc.



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of eCOST.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Adam W. Shaffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



March
31, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/    ADAM W.
SHAFFER 
|Adam W. Shaffer        
|Chief Executive Officer
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40594

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

MATTHEW SCOTT WILLARD

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 578

Filed: July 12, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho,

Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years , for driving under the influence or alcohol and/or drugs

, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Matthew Scott Willard pled guilty to driving under the influence or alcohol and/or drugs

, a repeated offense. Idaho Code §§ 18

- 8004, 18

- 8005(9) . The district court sentenced Willard to

a unified term of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of four year s

. Willard

appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court ’ s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Willard ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Petrosearch Operating Company, L.L.C.
TK Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Guidance Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Pursuit Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Buena Vista Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Rocky Mountain Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Big Sky Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Great Buffalo Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Beacon Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Anadarko Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Rancon Petrsearch, L.L.C.
Wilcox Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Magnolia Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Black Ramn Petrosearch, L.L.C.
Barnett Petrosearch LLC
Garwood Petrosearch, Inc.
Exploration Holdings Co, LLC
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 39","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"00H7mmML9F\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-39\/\">Expedition 39<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-39\/embed\/#?secret=00H7mmML9F\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 39” — NASA\" data-secret=\"00H7mmML9F\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss039-s-002.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
Exhibit
12.1




CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED




I,
Tor Olav Trøim, certify that:




1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas
III) Limited;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company’s internal controls over financial reporting; and





5.
The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.







Date:  June
24, 2008




/s/ Tor Olav
Trøim


Tor
Olav Trøim


Principal
Executive Officer
9436.

#### McDonald *v.*Hardee.

Decided March 15, 1918.

Trover; from. Liberty superior court—Judge Sheppard. November 17, 1917.

*J. R. Thomas,*for plaintiff in error. *W. 0. Hodges,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. “Where cotton is delivered by the owner to another to be ginned for a specific price, this is a bailment for hire. Therefore, where . the cotton, is lost by the bailee, the onus is upon him to show due care and diligence in protecting and keeping it.” *Concord Variety Works*v. *Beckham,*112 *Ga.*242 (37 S. E. 392).

2. This case is here upo,n exception - to the overruling of a motion for a new trial, based' on the general grounds only. The evidence authorized, the verdict, which has the approval of the trial .judge, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and JenJdns, J., eoneur.*
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 26, 2010

y1018 

# Order

October 26, 2010

141528

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141528 COA: 298336 Genesee CC: 06-019088-FC ANDRE BERNARD DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 9, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30436

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC MCDONALD, also known as E,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 02-CR-302-6-B

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Eric McDonald has filed a motion to withdraw and

an accompanying brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). McDonald has received a copy of counsel’s

motion and brief and has filed a response. Our independent

review of the brief, McDonald’s response, and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
Exhibit21.1

| Subsidiary Name                                               |   | Country        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
| Full      Art International Limited                           |   | Hong      Kong |
| Zhuhai      King Glass Engineering Co., Limited                    |   | PRC            |
| Zhuhai      King General Glass Engineering Technology Co., Limited |   | PRC            |
| King      General Engineering (HK) Limited                         |   | Hong      Kong |
| KGE      Building System Limited                                   |   | Hong      Kong |
| KGE      Australia Pty Limited                                     |   | Australia      |
| Zhuhai      City, Xiangzhou District Career Training School        |   | PRC            |
| Techwell      Engineering Limited                                  |   | Hong      Kong |
| Techwell      International Limited                                |   | Macau          |
| Techwell      Building System (Shenzhen) Co. Limited               |   | PRC            |
| CAE      Building Systems, Inc.                                    |   | USA            |
| China      Architectural Engineering (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.          |   | PRC            |
| Techwell      International (SEA) Pte Ltd.                         |   | Singapore      |
| CAE      Building Systems (Singapore) Pte Ltd.                     |   | Singapore      |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

NIKE, INC., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

333STRONGER, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 20-cv-02613 

Judge Charles P. Kocoras 

Magistrate Judge Sunil R. Harjani 

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on July 8, 2020 [45], in favor of 

Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Nike”) and against the Defendants Identified in Schedule A in 

the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) per Defaulting Defendant for willful use 

of counterfeit Nike Trademarks in connection with the offer for sale and/or sale of products 

through at least the Defendant Internet Stores, and Nike acknowledges payment of an agreed upon 

damages amount, costs, and interest and desires to release this judgment and hereby fully and 

completely satisfy the same as to the following Defendants: 

Defendant Name Line No. 

FlyAnyAAA 36

wanglixia123 142

Wangqiandexiaopu 143

Warm Wnd 146

xxw store 152

Zuqiuduijiu 174

Joie Store 185

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendants are hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment. 

Case: 1:20-cv-02613 Document #: 48 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:3612
2 

Dated this 14th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

Amy C. Ziegler 

Justin R. Gaudio 

RiKaleigh C. Johnson 

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd. 

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500 

Chicago, Illinois 60606 

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile) 

aziegler@gbc.law 

jgaudio@gbc.law 

rjohnson@gbc.law 

Counsel for Plaintiff Nike, Inc.

Case: 1:20-cv-02613 Document #: 48 Filed: 08/14/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:3613
NO. 07-05-0009-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL B FEBRUARY 8, 2005

______________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF M.N., K.S., AND B.R.S., JR., CHILDR EN

_________________________________ FROM THE 69TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAR TLEY COUNTY; NO. 4128- H; HONORA BLE RON ENNS, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORAND UM OPINION On Ja nuary 26, 2005, appellant filed a Motion to D ismiss Appeal signed by bot h appella nt and ap pellant’ s attorney . Accordingly, without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal i s granted and the appeal i s hereby dismisse d. Rule 42.1(a). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’srequest, no motion for rehearing will be entertain ed, and o ur mandate will i ssue forth with. Phil Johnson Chief Justice
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danny Baird","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dsbaird\/","title":"DSN Season Trailer | NASA’s The Invisible Network Podcast","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BSVE0ixz9D\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/invisible-network\/deep-space-network-season-trailer-nasas-the-invisible-network-podcast\/\">DSN Season Trailer | NASA’s The Invisible Network Podcast<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/invisible-network\/deep-space-network-season-trailer-nasas-the-invisible-network-podcast\/embed\/#?secret=BSVE0ixz9D\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“DSN Season Trailer | NASA’s The Invisible Network Podcast” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BSVE0ixz9D\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/in_socialmedia.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
Case: 1:20-cv-02350 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/29/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:82
Case: 1:20-cv-02350 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/29/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:83
Case: 1:20-cv-02350 Document #: 19 Filed: 04/29/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:84
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Drone Safety Poster Activity","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rGUxH8FTse\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/drone-safety-poster-activity\/\">Drone Safety Poster Activity<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/drone-safety-poster-activity\/embed\/#?secret=rGUxH8FTse\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Drone Safety Poster Activity” — NASA\" data-secret=\"rGUxH8FTse\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/drone-safety.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}