alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00003-CV

In the Interest of W.M.H., a child §

§

§

§

From the 393rd District Court

of Denton County (97-10804-16)

November 6, 2014

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was some error in the trial court’s December 2, 2013 order. We modify that

order to provide that attorney Phillip E. Romero may enforce the judgment for 

attorney’s fees “by any means available for the enforcement of a judgment for 

debt.” We affirm the remainder of that order.

We dismiss the appeal of the September 18, 2013 order.

It is further ordered that appellant Father shall pay all of the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00167

- CV

DAPENG HOLDINGS, LLC AND YI CHENG ZHENG v. JEFFORY DEAN BLACKARD, BLACKARD GENERAL PARTNER V, LLC

AND BLACKARD GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT II, LLC

On Appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021DCV

- 3875

- E

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal will be taxed against t he party incurring the sa m e

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. November 10, 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# AGENCY:

United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint is announcing a price of $13.95 for the American $1 Coin and Currency Set.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marc Landry, Acting Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701.

Dated: November 3, 2014.

Beverly Ortega Babers,

Chief Administrative Officer, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2014-26372 Filed 11-5-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-37-P
<FN>





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of XFormity Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Christopher Ball, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Jack Rabin, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/  Christopher
Ball


Christopher
Ball


Chief
Executive Officer


February
10, 2009





/s/  Jack
Rabin


Jack
Rabin


Chief
Financial Officer


February
10, 2009
Rev. 0//2016

86'LVWULFW&RXUWIRUWKH1RUWKHUQ'LVWULFW2I,OOLQRLV

$SSHDUDQFH)RUPIRU3UR6H/LWLJDQWV

,QIRUPDWLRQHQWHUHGRQWKLVIRUPLVUHTXLUHGIRUDQ\SHUVRQILOLQJDFDVHLQWKLVFRXUWDVDSURVH

SDUW\WKDWLVZLWKRXWDQDWWRUQH\3OHDVH35,17OHJLEO\

&DVH7LWOH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB &DVH1XPEHU BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

$QDSSHDUDQFHLVKHUHE\ILOHGE\WKHXQGHUVLJQHGDVDSURVHOLWLJDQW

1DPH BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

6WUHHW$GGUHVV BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

&LW\6WDWH=LSBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

3KRQH1XPEHU BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

6LJQDWXUH ([HFXWHGRQ GDWH

5(48(67725(&(,9(127,&(7+528*+(0$,/

,I\RXFKHFNWKHER[EHORZDQGSURYLGHDQHPDLODGGUHVVLQWKHVSDFHSURYLGHG\RXZLOOUHFHLYHQRWLFH

YLDHPDLO%\FKHFNLQJWKHER[DQGSURYLGLQJDQHPDLODGGUHVVXQGHU)HGHUDO5XOHRI&LYLO3URFHGXUH

E(\RXDUHZDLYLQJ\RXUULJKWWRUHFHLYHDSDSHUFRS\RIGRFXPHQWVILOHGHOHFWURQLFDOO\LQWKLVFDVH

<RXVKRXOGQRWSURYLGHDQHPDLODGGUHVVLI\RXGRQRWFKHFNLWIUHTXHQWO\

,UHTXHVWWREHVHQWQRWLFHVIURPWKHFRXUWYLDHPDLO,XQGHUVWDQGWKDWE\PDNLQJWKLVUHTXHVW,

DPZDLYLQJWKHULJKWWRUHFHLYHDSDSHUFRS\RIDQ\HOHFWURQLFDOO\ILOHGGRFXPHQWLQWKLVFDVH,

XQGHUVWDQGWKDWLIP\HPDLODGGUHVVFKDQJHV,PXVWSURPSWO\QRWLI\WKH&RXUWLQZULWLQJ

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

(0DLO$GGUHVV3OHDVH35,17OHJLEO\

[If you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.]

[If you need additional space for ANY section, please attach an additional sheet and reference that section.]

  

 

  

/RXDL6DOHK7DDQ

-RUGDQ

V/RXDL6DOHK7DDQ )HEUXDU\

RQOLQHVHOO\RX#JPDLOFRPOHJDOEDUQHV#JPDLOFRP

¥

$PPDQ



%HQHILW&RVPHWLFV//&Y7KH

3DUWQHUVKLSVDQG8QLQFRUSRUDWHG

$VVRFLDWLRQV,GHQWLILHGRQ6FKHGXOH$ FY

),/('

&/(57+20$

. 866*%58721

',675,&7&2857

&/

Case: 1:20-cv-02552 Document #: 73 Filed: 04/22/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1505
#### TURNEY et al., Appellants, v. SPARKS et al.

Division One,

November 12, 1900.

Appeal: title to real estate: appellate jurisdiction. In order to give the Supreme Court jurisdiction of a cause on the ground that title to real estate is involved, the judgment to be-rendered must directly affect the title. The fact that a collateral inquiry into the title is necessarily involved in the trial is not sufficient to confer jurisdiction.

Appeal from Shelby Circuit *Court.*— Hon *Andrew Bllison}*Judge.

Transferred to st. louis court of appeals.

*W. O. L. Jeivett & Son*for appellants.

*G. W. Humphrey*for respondents.

VALLIANT, J.

This is a suit to recover of one of tbe defendants $500 alleged to be held by him in trust to be paid ' over to one of tbe plaintiffs when tbe court shall determine that tbe title she conveyed by deed to another one of tbe defendants is valid.

There was a judgment for tbe defendants and tbe plaintiffs appealed. Tbe appeal was brought to this court upon tbe idea that title to real estate was involved.

In several recent cases it has been- held that in order to *366give this court jurisdiction of a cause on the ground that title to real estate is involved, the judgment to be rendered must directly affect the title, and it is not sufficient that a collateral inquiry into the title is necessarily involved in the trial. [Price v. Blankenship, 144 Mo. 203; Rothrock v. Lumber Co., 146 Mo. 57; Edwards v. Railroad, 148 Mo. 513; Gay v. Savings Ass’n, 149 Mo. 606; Bonner v. Lisenby, 157 Mo. 165.] The test of jurisdiction as laid down in those decisions may be illustrated thus: A claims to be the owner of two separate pieces of land by the same title; B is in adverse possession of one piece and has cut down and removed trees from the other; A brings two suits against B, one for possession of the one piece, the other for $500 damages for an alleged trespass upon the other piece; B’s defense in each case is what he alleges to be the invalidity of A’s title; the trials involve the same inquiry into the title in each case, and there is a judgment in each for the plaintiff. An appeal in the ejectment suit would be properly taken to this court while that in the trespass case would go to the court of appeals. The difference between the two is that in the ejectment suit the judgment itself affects the title to the land and can be satisfied only by a surrender of its possession, whereas in the other, it is only a judgment for $500, and can be satisfied by the payment of that amount.

Thus, in the case at bar, if the facts stated in the plaintiff’s petition entitle them to a judgment, the trial of the issues as to those facts may involve an inquiry and conclusion as to the character of the title created by the will under which plaintiffs claim, but their judgment would simply be that they recover of the defendant $500 and costs.

The only point we decide is that on the record* before us there is no case within the jurisdiction of this court. The cause is transferred to the St. Louis Court of Appeals.

All concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jason Costa","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jason-p-costanasa-gov\/","title":"LSP Media Resources","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mRYU2eIdD6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/lsp-media-resources\/\">LSP Media Resources<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/lsp-media-resources\/embed\/#?secret=mRYU2eIdD6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“LSP Media Resources” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mRYU2eIdD6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"‘First Woman’ Graphic Novel and Camp Experience","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ITdXL2rgp6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/first-woman-graphic-novel\/\">‘First Woman’ Graphic Novel and Camp Experience<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/first-woman-graphic-novel\/embed\/#?secret=ITdXL2rgp6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“‘First Woman’ Graphic Novel and Camp Experience” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ITdXL2rgp6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/artemis-first-woman-covers.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":388}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-93","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YEVfeWWmex\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-93\/\">STS-93<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-93\/embed\/#?secret=YEVfeWWmex\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-93” — NASA\" data-secret=\"YEVfeWWmex\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/sts093-322-017\/sts093-322-017~large.jpg?w=600&h=1266&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1266}
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of MKA Capital, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

(1) the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                                MKA Capital, Inc

Date:  April 26, 2006
                                                         By: /S/ Ronald Gorthuis
                                                      --------------------------
                                                                 Ronald Gorthuis
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Scott Munro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Date:  March 15, 2006 | /s/ Scott Munro
Scott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Most Home Corp. and will be retained by Most Home Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Apelt, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-98-0882-PHX-ROS

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

Pursuant to LRCiv 83.3(b)(2), counsel for Petitioner, Dana Carpenter, moves to

substitute Emily Skinner, Esq., for Patrick McGillicuddy, Esq., as co-counsel for Petitioner

in this matter. (Dkt. 224.) 

Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Petitioner’s motion for substitution of counsel,

but denying ex parte status to the motion as counsel for Petitioner did not properly comply

with the requirements of LRCiv 83.3(b)(1). (Dkt. 224.) Patrick McGillicuddy, Esq., is

withdrawn as co-counsel for Petitioner in this matter. Mr. McGillicuddy shall submit any

outstanding interim voucher for payment within thirty (30) days of this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. McGillicuddy file an affidavit within ten (10)

days certifying that he has complied with LRCiv 83.2(e), incorporating the State Rules of

Professional Conduct, in particular, E.R. 1.16.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED appointing Emily Skinner, Esq., Arizona Capital

Representation Project, 131 East Broadway Blvd., Tucson, Arizona, 85701, as co-counsel

for Petitioner. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Petitioner’s request that Ms. Skinner be

appointed nunc pro tunc to January 13, 2010. Ms. Skinner shall be appointed as of the date

of this Order, at the rate of $140 per hour. See General Order No. 10-01 (D. Ariz. Jan. 8,

2010).

DATED this 12th day of May, 2010.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

JACK FEINTUCH, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CHRISTOPHER M. CRANE, et al., 

Defendants, 

 Case No. 1:20-cv-02255 

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall 

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ACTION 

Plaintiff Jack Feintuch (“Feintuch”) respectfully moves to voluntarily dismiss the pending 

action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.1(c) without prejudice. Defendants have moved to dismiss 

the action asserting that pre-suit demand must be made upon the Exelon Corporation’s Board of 

Directors. (ECF Nos. 44-47, 48). Feintuch intends to make such demand, which may obviate 

defendants’ arguments seeking dismissal of the derivative complaint. 

Pursuant to Rule 23.1(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a derivative action may 

only be voluntarily dismissed with approval of the presiding court. Dismissal of this action will 

allow Feintuch to make a litigation demand upon Exelon that will either be accepted or rejected 

by the Exelon board of directors. This action was filed on April 10, 2020 and its dismissal will not 

result in the lapsing of any statute of limitations that would prevent the re-filing of the action after 

demand has been made. Exelon shareholders were not provided any notice of the initial filing of 

the Feintuch complaint and no notice need be provided of its voluntary dismissal. 

Defendants have been advised of Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss and do not 

oppose its entry reserving all rights they may have including seeking fees or a security. 
2 

For these reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court grant the voluntary 

dismissal of this action without prejudice. 

 Dated: July 27, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 

 Plaintiff 

 

 By: s/Marvin A. Miller

Marvin A. Miller 

MILLER LAW LLC 

115 S. LaSalle St., Suite 2910 

Chicago, Illinois 60603 

Tel: 312-332-3400 

E-mail: mmiller@millerlawllc.com 

GLANCY PRONGAY & MURRAY LLP 

Matthew M. Houston 

Benjamin I. Sachs-Michaels 

712 Fifth Avenue 

New York, New York 10019 

Telephone: (212) 935-7400 

E-mail: mhouston@glancylaw.com 

 -and- 

 

Robert V. Prongay 

Pavithra Rajesh 

1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100 

Los Angeles, California 90067 

Telephone: (310) 201-9150 

E-mail: rprongay@glancylaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jack Feintuch 

 
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on July 27, 2020, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ACTION to be 

filed electronically. Notice of the filing will be sent to all counsel of record by operation of the 

Court’s electronic filing system.

 /s/ Marvin A. Miller 

 Marvin A. Miller
9161.

#### St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. *v.*Jackson.

Decided April 11, 1918.

Action for damages; from Calhoun superior court—Judge Harrell. June 6, 1917.

*Erie B. Askew, 'A. L. Miller,*for plaintiff. >

*L. M. Rambo, H. M. Calhoun, B. W. Fortson,*for defendant.

Bloodworth, J.

The only 'assignment of error is that the judge erred in awarding a nonsuit. A. consideration of the evidence being necessary to a determination of the issue, involved, and no proper brief thereof being made, the judgment must be affirmed. *Tidwell*v. *Alabama Great Southern R. Co.,*20 *Ga. App.*826 (93 S. E. 511), and cases cited; *Ryan*v. *Kingsbery,*88 *Ga.*361 (2), 368 (14 S. E. 596); *Moss*v. *Birch,*102 *Ga.*556 (28 S. E. 601); *Henson*v. *Derrick,*104 *Ga.*856 (31 S. E. 199); *Wall v. Mercer,*119 *Ga.*346 (1), 349 (46 S. E. 420), and cases cited.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*