alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA TV to Air US Cargo Ship Departure from Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sWHvfhYLYJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-us-cargo-ship-departure-from-space-station\/\">NASA TV to Air US Cargo Ship Departure from Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-us-cargo-ship-departure-from-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=sWHvfhYLYJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA TV to Air US Cargo Ship Departure from Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"sWHvfhYLYJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/51418348980_c6ca62547d_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of OptimumBank Holdings, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Albert J. Finch, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1350, as added by §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | 2. | To my
 knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

|      |                 |                                           |                      | 
|----- | --------------- | ----------------------------------------- | -------------------- | 
|Date: | March 31,
 2009 |                                           | /s/ Albert
 J. Finch | 
|      |                 | Albert J.
 Finch, Chief Executive Officer

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Timberline Resources Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig Crowell, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: December 17, 2010

| |                                                                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   /s/ Craig Crowell
_____________________________
Craig Crowell
Chief Accounting Officer
Principal Accounting Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

VERONICA LEVONNE JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:13-cr-00451-WO-1; 1:15-cv-00072-

WO-LPA)

Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Veronica Levonne Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Thomas Inman, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Angela Hewlett Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Veronica Levonne Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
y

y

g 

him. He calls me daily to make sure I'm okay and down to making sure I've eaten and ensuring 

I've had my daily coffee. It has been an honor watching him grow up from the second he was 

born to becoming the amazing father and husband he is. I am beyond proud of everything he has accomplished in his life. He has a great heart, beautiful personality and caring soul. He 

tends to worry and make sure everyone else is okay and then ensures he's okay. There's 

nothing more beautiful than seeing him develop his relationship with his son. He is doing an 

amazing job in raising him. 

If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (224) 399-5154. 

Thank you, 

Sonia Garcia. 
g

p 

p 

p

g 

y 

the best of his ability. It's been a pleasure to see his love and care for individuals develop 

especially after having his son. They say you become a new person when you have kids. While 

Wilmer was a great person then and still is now, after having his son, his heart grew even 

bigger. Like any other husband, he makes sure his family is well taken care of. He always wants 

what's best for his wife and son. The love his son has for him is unexplainable. You can see his 

eyes light up as soon as his daddy walks in the room. Their love for each is very much 

reciprocated. While you never know what the future may hold, Wilmer will do nothing but the 

best for his family and he will do whatever he is capable of doing in making that possible. From making sure there's food on the table, ensuring bills are paid, checking up on myself or our mother or even his wife's family. Wilmer is truly a role model when it comes to someone having 

a big heart. He ensures everyone around him is happy and most importantly safe. 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (224) 772-5580. 

Thank you, 

Katherine Veliz-Garcia.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"The Science Behind Quadcopters","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8Mvd6SrF3g\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/the-science-behind-quadcopters\/\">The Science Behind Quadcopters<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/the-science-behind-quadcopters\/embed\/#?secret=8Mvd6SrF3g\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Science Behind Quadcopters” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8Mvd6SrF3g\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/quadcopters.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":459}
#### Carter *v.*Buckner.

The admissions made by a party, examined under oath on a trial before a justice, cannot be proved in the Circuit Court, on appeal, — the party being in Court, on the trial of the appeal, and not there examined.

*315ERROR to the *Vermillion*Circuit Court. *Buckner*was the plaintiff below and *.Carter*the defendant.

M’Kinney, J.

Assumpsit before a justice of the peace on a promissory note. Plea, the want of consideration. Judgment for the plaintiff. On appeal to the Circuit Court, the cause was submitted to the Court and judgment rendered in favour of the plaintiff for 32 dollars and 50 cents. .To reverse this judgment, the case is before us by writ of error.

From a hill of exceptions, it appears that Carter, the defendant below, to prove the want of consideration, introduced a witness to prove the admissions of the plaintiff, made under oath on the trial before the justice of the peace, he having been examined as a witness touching.such want of consideration; that the Circuit Court refused to hear the witness, the plaintiff being present in Court on the trial of the appeal. The refusal of the Circuit Court to hear this testimony is complained of as error.

Either party, plaintiff or defendant, may be made a witness by statute, in actions of debt or assumpsit before a justice of the peace, and in the event of appeals in such cases, the provisions of' the statute are extended to the Circuit Court. ■ It was as competent to the defendant to call upon the plaintiff to answer ubdér oath in the Circuit Court, as it was before the justice of the peace. This provision of the statute constitutes a change of the common law; and, restricted as it is, is found by experience-, to be assistant to the advancement of justice. The settled rules of evidence are, however, unchanged by the statute, and will apply in its application. Perhaps no one of the rules is more strictly enforced, than that which requires the best evidence the’nature of the case will admit of, to be produced. The rule sustains the Circuit Court in its exclusion of the testimony offered. The plaintiff was in Court, and could have been required to answer the'plea on oath. This was not done; but a witness is offered to prove his admissions made under oath before the justice. This was inadmissible.

Other admissions or confessions of the-plaintiff would have been received, or if he had been examined in the Circuit Court, it would have been competent to have proved contradictions, discrepances, or variances occurring in his examination before the justice of the peace, and that in the Circuit Court. It is true, the admissions of a party may be given in evidence *316against him. These admissions may either be *in pais*or of record; they however relate to the party, without violating any rules of evidence which apply when the party is constituted by statute a witness.

*J.*Whitcomb, for the plaintiff.

*J.*Farrington, for the defendant.

It is clear that the Circuit Court was correct in excluding the testimony.

Blackford, J., being indisposed, was absent.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Exhibit 4.1



Exhibit 4.1



	 	 	 
	
Number
	
DESIGN SOURCE, INC.
	
Shares

	 	
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF  $0.001 
	 
	 	
NEVADA 100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED,
	 
	 	
PAR VALUE
	 
	 	 	
CUSIP ___________

	 	 	
SEE REVERSE FOR 

	 	 	
CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

	
This
	 	 
	
certifies
	 	 
	
that
	 	 
	
is the owner of
	 	 
	 	 	 
	

	
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE
	 
	 	
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
	 
	 	 	 
	 	
DESIGN SOURCE, INC.
	 
	 	
transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly
	 
	 	
authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
	 
	 	
endorsed.  This certificate and the shares represented hereby
	 
	 	
are subject to the laws of the State of Nevada, and to the
	 
	 	
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation,
	 
	 	
as now or hereafter amended.  This certificate is not valid
	 
	 	
unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.  WITNESS
	 
	 	
the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature
	 
	 	
of its duly authorized officers
	 
	
	


 

 
	

	

PRESIDENT
	


[SEAL]
	
SECRETARY





 

 

 





The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations.


	
TEN COM
	
as tenants in common
	
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT
	

	
Custodian
	


	
TEN ENT
	
as tenants by the entireties
	 	
(Cust)
	 	
(Minor)

	
JT TEN
	
as joint tenants with the right of

survivorship and not as tenants

in common
	
Act
	


	
(State)







Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


For value received, ______________________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


_____________________________________________________________________________________

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE)


_____________________________________________________________________________________


_____________________________________________________________________________________


_____________________________________________________________________________________


_____________________________________________________________________________ shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


_____________________________________________________________________________, Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated _______________________


X ________________________________________________________________________________

THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.  THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions)


 

 

SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:


 

 

 

 

TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY
EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS

     As  independent  engineering  consultants,  Ryder  Scott Company, LP hereby
consents  to  the  use  of  our report entitled "PetroSearch Energy Corporation,
Estimated  Future  Reserves  and  Income  Attributable  to Certain Leasehold and
Royalty Interests, SEC Parameters, as of December 31, 2005" dated March 29, 2006
and  data  extracted  therefrom  (and all references to our Firm) included in or
made  a  part  of  this  Form  10-KSB/A  Annual  Report.

                                        /s/ Ryder Scott Company, LP.
                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP.

Houston, TX
June 6, 2006
**Exhibit
      31.3**





**INDEPENDENT
      ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT**








Lehman
        ABS Corporation, as Depositor
 745
        Seventh Avenue
 New
        York,
        New York 10019
 
 U.S.
        Bank
        Trust National Association, as Trustee
 Corporate
        Trust Department
 100
        Wall
        Street
 New
        York,
        NY 10005
  Re:  Corporate
        Backed Trust Certificates ,  Goldman
        Sachs Capital I Securities-Backed Series 2004-7 Trust
 (the****“Trust”)
  Ladies
        and Gentlemen:
  We
        have
        examined assertions of Lehman ABS Corporation (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank
        National Association, (the “Trustee” and ,
        together with the
        Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied,
        in all material respects, with the provisions of the Standard
        Terms for Trust Agreements dated as
        of January 16, 2001, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of April
        30, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”) in
        respect of the Corporate Backed Trust Certificates , Goldman
        Sachs Capital I Securities-Backed Series 2004-7 Trust (the “Trust”), during the
        period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on
        behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Annual Report”).
        Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our
        responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based on our
        examination.
 
 Our
        examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American
        Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
        on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance
        with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered
        necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides
        a
        reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In
        our
        opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects,
        with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and
        Management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in
        all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2006.
 
 
 /s/
        Aston
        Bell, CPA
 
 
 New
        York,
        New York
 March
        14,
        2007
  ASTON
        BELL, CPA