alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40594

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

MATTHEW SCOTT WILLARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 578

Filed: July 12, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bannock County. Hon. Stephen S. Dunn, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of four years, for driving under the influence or alcohol 

and/or drugs, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Matthew Scott Willard pled guilty to driving under the influence or alcohol and/or drugs, 

a repeated offense. Idaho Code §§ 18-8004, 18-8005(9). The district court sentenced Willard to 

a unified term of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years. Willard

appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Willard’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,045
<PP&E>                                          51,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,370
<BONDS>                                        165,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,954
<SALES>                                         42,999
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,999
<CGS>                                           29,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,423
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                198
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    837
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Host Axiom Mission 1 Flight Readiness Media Teleconference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Odr0Oe0z6s\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-host-axiom-mission-1-flight-readiness-media-teleconference\/\">NASA to Host Axiom Mission 1 Flight Readiness Media Teleconference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-host-axiom-mission-1-flight-readiness-media-teleconference\/embed\/#?secret=Odr0Oe0z6s\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Host Axiom Mission 1 Flight Readiness Media Teleconference” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Odr0Oe0z6s\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/51814546773_87375876c8_k.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, SCOTT MUNRO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: June 14, 2005 | /s/ Scott MunroScott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 91-1 Filed 03/05/20 Page 9 of 9
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1924

KOKOUVI AMOUZOU , Petitioner ,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : December 21, 2017 Decided: March 13, 2018

Before WILKINSON, FLOYD, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kokouvi Amouzou , Petitioner Pro Se. Chad A. Readler, Kristen Giuffreda Chapman , Jennifer Parker Levings, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kokouvi Amouzou , a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Tort ure (CAT). We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Amouzou’s merits hearing before the immigration court and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that the Board did not abuse its discretion in finding that Amouzou’s conviction was a particularly serious crime. See Gao v. Holder , 595 F.3d 549, 556

- 57 (4th Cir. 2010) (noting standard of revi ew). We also conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Amouzou failed to establish eligibility for deferral of removal under the CAT.
See INS v. Elias

– Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992) (stating standard of review)

. Additionally, beca use Amouzou failed to substantially comply with the requirements under In re Lozada , 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (B.I.A. 1988) , we will not review his claim that counsel
was ineffective. See Barry v. Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 745

- 47 (4th Cir. 2006)

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

. We also deny Amouzou’s motion to reconsider the order denying his motion for stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 10.15****Summary of Director Compensation for Fiscal 2006**     Effective March 23, 2005, our non-employee directors, other than the Chairman of the AuditCommittee, receive an annual retainer of $36,000, plus an additional $1,500 for each meetingattended. The Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $36,000, plus anadditional $2,500 for each meeting attended. In March 2005, we granted each of our non-employeedirectors options to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock. These options fully vestedupon grant. In addition, it is the intention of the Compensation Committee to award each of ournon-employee directors on an annual basis 20,000 options, such options to vest on the firstanniversary of the date of grant. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee granted 20,000 optionsto each of the non-employee directors in January 2006, whichoptions will vest in January 2007. We do not pay employee members of our Boardof Directors separately for their service on our Board of Directors.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of President  of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I,
Michael J. Arougheti, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ares Capital Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 27, 2013

/s/ MICHAEL J. AROUGHETI Michael J. Arougheti President(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Consent of RSM Salustro Reydel



EXHIBIT 10.1 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 
 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-13662),
pertaining to the Equant N.V. 1998 Share Option Plan (with regard to the contingent value rights and American depositary contingent value rights), of our report dated March 4, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of France
Telecom S.A., included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003. 
 
RSM SALUSTRO REYDEL 
 
Represented by Guy Stievenart and Jean-Michel Charpentier 
 
Paris, France 
March 21, 2003 
 

1
Order entered November <7, 2012 

In The 

Court of 3ppeabs 

jfiftb rii5stritt of Zexati at Maftati 

No. 05-12-00530-CR 

SUGAR RAY FRANKLIN, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F11-55114-T 

ORDER 

The Court DENIES appellant's November 26, 2012 pro se motion to extend time to file 

a pro se brief. Appellant is represented by counsel who filed a brief on the merits and is not 

entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel 

Op.] 1981). 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosures controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an Annual Report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/  Carlos E. AgüeroCarlos E. AgüeroChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2004 (the
"Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce,
Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





AUGUST __, 2004                          /s/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      JOHN J. JOYCE
                                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                      (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO AMBIENT CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY AMBIENT CORPORATION AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ana Guzman","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ana-d-guzmannasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Wants to Open Space to More People, Supports Private Missions","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WAi8LDIHHE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/nasa-wants-to-open-space-to-more-people-supports-private-missions\/\">NASA Wants to Open Space to More People, Supports Private Missions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/nasa-wants-to-open-space-to-more-people-supports-private-missions\/embed\/#?secret=WAi8LDIHHE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Wants to Open Space to More People, Supports Private Missions” — NASA\" data-secret=\"WAi8LDIHHE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/iss066e080907_large.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.4

Eastern Division

BCBSM, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−01853

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Walgreen Co., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Monday, April 4, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Attorneys Regina

LaMonica and Jared Marx's Motions to Withdraw [245] and [246] are granted. Mailed

notice(lk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-01853 Document #: 249 Filed: 04/04/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:6016