alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (i)    | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-128013) of Gramercy Capital Corp. and in the      related Prospectus,                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                  |
|   | (ii)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-143037) of Gramercy Capital Corp. and in the      related Prospectus,                   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                  |
|   | (iii)  | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121051) pertaining to the Gramercy Capital      Corp. Equity Incentive Plan,  and  |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                  |
|   | (iv)   | Registration      Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-149838) pertaining to the Gramercy Capital      Corp. 2008 Employee Stock PurchasePlan; |

|   |   | of our reports dated      March 15, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and      schedules of Gramercy Capital Corp., and the effectiveness of internal      control over financial reporting of Gramercy Capital Corp., included in      this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,      2009. |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| New      York, New York  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| March 16,      2010 |   |

----
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30397

Summary Calendar

__________________

FRED R. VINET,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. LAURIANO, Officer; K WOLKART;

UNIDENTIFIED PARTIES; HARRY LEE,

Sheriff; JEFFERSON PARISH, STATE 

OF LOUISIANA,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-CA-0546

- - - - - - - - - -

November 16, 1995

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

his motion to vacate its dismissal. He argues that he timely

filed his postjudgment motion. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. 
No. 95-30397

-2-

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. 

Vinet v. Lauriano, No. 92-CA-0546 (E.D. La. Apr. 20, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,576,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               96,515,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     164,577,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,391,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,743,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 125,842,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,743,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,135,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,907,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               221,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,897,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,977,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1
                    RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of Ambient Corporation (the
"Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 13, 2005


/s/ JOHN J. JOYCE
---------------------------------
JOHN J. JOYCE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
#### McGehee *v.*State.

Opinion delivered December 22, 1930.

Per Curiam.

This is a petition duly verified by Harney McGehee for reinstatement to practice law upon his promise of future good conduct. The facts upon which his suspension are based are stated in the proceedings for disbarment in our opinion delivered on November 3, 1930, *ante*p. 603. We all agree that he should not be reinstated in the general practice from which he was suspended for the period of one year; but, inasmuch as he was elected to the office of prosecuting attorney at the general election held on the first Tuesday in November, 1930, a majority of the court is of the opinion that the suspension should not apply to his official duties as prosecuting attorney, and that he be reinstated, so far as his suspension might apply to the discharge of the duties of that office.

Smith, Humphreys and MoIIaney, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Worldwide Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shawkat Raslan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Shawkat Raslan

Shawkat Raslan

Chairman of the Board, President and

Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

August 14, 2003
ISSUED ON 11:13 am, Jan 05, 2016 s/ Brian D. Karth, Clerk

Case 2:16-cv-00003-DJH Document 6-2 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:16-cv-00003-DJH Document 6-2 Filed 01/05/16 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2801

CAROLYN L. DAVIDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GROVE PARK INN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-96-136-1)

Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 24, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carolyn L. Davidson, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Wiley Westall, Jr.,

WESTALL, GRAY & CONNOLLY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Davidson v. Grove Park Inn,

No. CA-96-136-1 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Dr. Ron Colantonio","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dwuqgpaBy1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/dr-ron-colantonio\/\">Dr. Ron Colantonio<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/dr-ron-colantonio\/embed\/#?secret=dwuqgpaBy1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Dr. Ron Colantonio” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dwuqgpaBy1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/ron-colantonio-2020-300.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Spreadtrum Communications, Inc. (the Registrant)



|                                                                         |  |                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Name of Entity                                                           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                                                         | 
|Direct or Indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries:                            |  |                              
|                                                                         | 
|Spreadtrum Communications USA Inc.                                       |  | Delaware, U.S.A.             
|                                                                         | 
|SPRD LLC                                                                 |  | Delaware, U.S.A              
|                                                                         | 
|Spreadtrum Hong Kong Limited                                             |  | Hong Kong                    
|                                                                         | 
|Spreadtrum International Limited                                         |  | Hong Kong                    
|                                                                         | 
|Quorum Technology (H.K.) Limited                                         |  | Hong Kong                    
|                                                                         | 
|Han & Qin International (BVI) Limited                                    |  | British Virgin Islands       
|                                                                         | 
|Spreadtrum Communications (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.                           |  | P.R.C.                       
|                                                                         | 
|Spreadtrum Communications Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.                |  | P.R.C.                       
|                                                                         | 
|Shanghai Han & Qin Investment Co., Ltd.                                  |  | P.R.C.                       
|                                                                         | 
|Affiliated Entity Consolidated in the Registrants Financial Statements: |  |                              
|                                                                         | 
|Beijing Spreadtrum Hi-Tech Communications Technology Co., Ltd.           |  | P.R.C.
Exhibit 99.2









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of Protective Life Insurance Company and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee of Protective
Life Secured Trust 2004-22, (collectively the "Management")
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Protective Life Secured Trust 2004-22 (the "Trust"):

We have examined Management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)," that the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to the noteholders has occurred as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee during the year ended December 31, 2004.  Management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria defined in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)."



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, AlabamaMarch 30, 2005











Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust
Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)





Management of the Trust asserts that it has collected payments on the funding agreements and distributed payments to the noteholders as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31, 2004.  This assertion is based on the following criteria:

1. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in Protective Life's Secured Trusts P & I Payments: 1/1/04 through 12/31/04 (P & I Payments report).
2. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2004, are included in the Indenture Trustee's History of Transactions List.
3. The amounts due on the Notes are reported as a component of the charges from Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, on the Indenture Trustee's Payment Obligation Report System (PORS Report).
4. Charges from Cede & Co. are included in the Indenture Trustee's screen prints titled The Depository Trust Company Activity History Details, which represent the charge confirmations to Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company.
#### Tailored Woman, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Paul Emile Bibily, Defendant.

Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District,

December 14, 1925.

Ambassadors and consuls • — • process —■ motion to vacate service made upon defendant — fact that defendant is chancellor attached to French Consulate-General does not exempt him from service.

A process served upon the defendant, holding the post of chancellor to the French Consulate-General, at a place other than at the consulate premises or dwelling, should not be vacated by reason of defendant’s position, since, under the circumstances of the service, he was not exempt.

*360Motion to vacate service of process made upon defendant.

*Maurice M. Cohn [William J. Hammel*of counsel], for the plaintiff.

*Falk & Orleans [Ilo Orleans*of counsel], for the defendant.

*Daly, Hoyt & Mason [Charles K. Carpenter*of counsel], for the Consul-General of France at New York, as *amicus curice.*

Lauer, J.

In the present case no judgment has yet been entered but the motion is made by the defendant to vacate process upon him because of his position as Chancellor attached to the French Consulate-General of New York.

In this case the process was not served upon him at the Consulate premises or dwelling. Hence that phase of the matter presented in the motion in -the case of *Lonsdale Shop, Inc.,*v. *Bibily,*126 Misc.-, does not here arise.

As I have held, the mere fact that the defendant holds the position of *“*Chancellor *”*does not exempt the defendant from the service of process where that process is made at a proper place. I conclude, therefore, that the present service is proper.

The motion to vacate service is, therefore, denied, with ten dollars costs to the plaintiff to abide the event.
### **EXHIBIT 11.1**

**COMPUTATIONOF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE**
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **Quarter Ended September 30,** | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended September 30,** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **2006**                                       | ** ** | **2005**                                                | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** |
| Diluted net loss per  share:                                         |       |                                           |       |                                                    |       |   |   |   |   |
| Net loss to  common shareholders                                     |       | $                                              | (823,000   | )                                                       | $          | (2,481,000 | ) | $ | (3,614,000 | ) | $ | (3,943,000 | ) |
|                                                                 |       |                                           |       |                                                    |       |   |   |   |   |
| Average number  of shares outstanding                                |       | 7,957,428                                      |       | 7,957,428                                               |       | 7,957,428 |   | 8,089,692 |   |
| Net effect of  dilutive stock options based on treasury stock method |       | —                                         |       | —                                                  |       | — |   | — |   |
| Total average  shares                                                |       | 7,957,428                                      |       | 7,957,428                                               |       | 7,957,428 |   | 8,089,692 |   |
|                                                                 |       |                                           |       |                                                    |       |   |   |   |   |
| Diluted net loss per  share                                          |       | $                                              | (0.10      | )                                                       | $          | (0.31 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | $ | (0.49 | ) |

 

----