alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 968 Referred in Senate (RFS)]







105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 968


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 9, 1997

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
  To amend title XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to permit a 
     waiver of the prohibition of offering nurse aide training and 
     competency evaluation programs in certain nursing facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING WAIVER OF PROHIBITION OF OFFERING NURSE AIDE 
              TRAINING AND COMPETENCY EVALUATION PROGRAMS IN CERTAIN 
              FACILITIES.

    Section 1819(f)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i-
3(f)(2)) and section 1919(f)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r(f)(2)) are 
each amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(iii), by inserting ``subject to 
        subparagraph (C),'' after ``(iii)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Waiver authorized.--Clause (iii)(I) of 
                subparagraph (B) shall not apply to a program offered 
                in (but not by) a nursing facility (or skilled nursing 
                facility for purposes of title XVIII) in a State if the 
                State--
                            ``(i) determines that there is no other 
                        such program offered within a reasonable 
                        distance of the facility,
                            ``(ii) assures, through an oversight 
                        effort, that an adequate environment exists for 
                        operating the program in the facility, and
                            ``(iii) provides notice of such 
                        determination and assurances to the State long-
                        term care ombudsman.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.`
Exhibit
32.1







PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of California Petroleum Transport Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Nancy I. DePasquale, Director and President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
March 28,
2008







/s/Nancy I. DePasquale


Nancy
I. DePasquale


President
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"Bruce A. Lipe","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UOAsEg4ta0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/bruce-a-lipe\/\">Bruce A. Lipe<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/bruce-a-lipe\/embed\/#?secret=UOAsEg4ta0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Bruce A. Lipe” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UOAsEg4ta0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/bruce-lipe-afrc2023-0002-28.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"About Apollo 7, the First Crewed Apollo Space Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nfjGh0QncO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/about-apollo-7-the-first-crewed-apollo-space-mission\/\">About Apollo 7, the First Crewed Apollo Space Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/about-apollo-7-the-first-crewed-apollo-space-mission\/embed\/#?secret=nfjGh0QncO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“About Apollo 7, the First Crewed Apollo Space Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nfjGh0QncO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/s68-26668.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":476}
Order entered August 6, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00329-CR

No. 05-14-00330-CR

DANIEL URBINA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F07-23478-U, F08-00824-U

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeals, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeals.
 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeals 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 845

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a minimum mandatory

penalty for conveying false bomb threats through instrumentalities of

interstate and foreign commerce.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 26, 1997

Mrs. KENNELLY of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a minimum mandatory penalty for conveying false bomb threats

through instrumentalities of interstate and foreign commerce.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘False Bomb Threat

5 Penalty Act of 1997’’.
2

HR 845 IH

1 SEC. 2. FALSE BOMB THREATS.

2 Section 844(e) of title 18, United States Code, is

3 amended by striking ‘‘for not more than’’ and all that fol4 lows through ‘‘, or both.’’ and inserting ‘‘for not less than

5 one year nor more than 10 years and fined under this

6 title.’’.

Æ
#### George W. White et al *v.*D. H. Hickey et al.

Judicial Sales — Right to Partite Lands After Sale and Before Confirmation.

A sale, ordered at the instance of the litigants upon an agreed judgment,' may be set aside at their request, and the lands partited, according to their agreement.

Same.

Where before a sale by a commissioner is confirmed, the litigants, for ■whose benefit the sale was made, notify the commissioner they. did not want the judgment executed, a subsequent confirmation of the sale by the court, will be dismissed.

APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

October 2, 1871.

OPINION OE THE CoÚRT BY

JuDGE LlNDSAY:

Tbis court can perceive no good and valid reason for enforcing tbe sales made by tbe master commissioner in opposition to tbe wishes of tbe appellants. Although tbe judgment under which said sales were made, was entered at their instance it was for their sole benefit, and could only be enforced by their consent. They bad tbe legal right to make partition of tbe property after tbe judgment, and their deeds vested each grantee with a perfect title to tbe estate conveyed.

Before tbe sale by tbe commissioner was completed by execution of bonds by tbe purchasers be was- notified that tbe partition bad been made, and that tbe parties did not wish tbe *58judgment executed. This information be doubtless imparted to said purchasers, but whether he did or not 'they were nothing more than preferred bidders. It was still within the power of the chancellor to reject their bids. The appellants were somewhat derelict in not preventing the sales, but as neither of them were present when the sales were made either in person or by attorney they are not directly responsible for the action of the purchasers. The confirmation of the sales under the circumstances will work a great hardship upon appellants, a hardship they ought not to suffer, when it can be averted without divesting appellees of any vested rights or even of depriving them of speculations to be made upon the property bid for. They claim and the, proof offered by them conduces to show that they bid not only the fair value for the property but even more than this. If such be the case they will lose nothing by having their bids rejected.

*Stevenson, for appellant,*

Robinson, *for appellee.*

court confirming the commissioner’s report is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to sustain the exceptions to such report, and cancel the purchase bonds. A reasonable allowance should be made to the master for making' the sale.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7328

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

JERRELL ANTONIO THOMAS, a/k/a Baby Huey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3)

Submitted: January 7, 2014 Decided: January 14, 2014

Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerrell Antonio Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael 

Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion to compel the filing of a motion for 

sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, 

No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 2013). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 120 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 17, 1997.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and that they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure: Mr. Holden and Mr. Lampson.
    Committee on Science: Mrs. Tauscher.
    Committee on International Relations: Mr. Davis of Florida.
    Committee on National Security: Mr. Rodriguez.
    Committee on Resources: Mr. Doggett.
    Committee on Government Reform and Oversight: Mr. Ford.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 998

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 8, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

For the relief of Lloyd B. Gamble.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 998 RFS

1 SECTION 1. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS.

2 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

3 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap4 propriated, to Lloyd B. Gamble of Fairfax, Virginia, the

5 sum of $253,488.

6 (b) BASIS.—The payment required by subsection (a)

7 shall be to compensate Lloyd B. Gamble for the injuries

8 sustained by him as a result of the administration to him,

9 without his knowledge, of lysergic acid diethylamide by

10 United States Army personnel in 1957.

11 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIMS.

12 The payment made pursuant to section 1 shall be in

13 full satisfaction of all claims Lloyd B. Gamble may have

14 against the United States for any injury described in such

15 section.

16 SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFITS.

17 Upon payment of the sum referred to in section 1,

18 Lloyd B. Gamble shall not be eligible for any compensa19 tion or benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs

20 or the Department of Defense for any injury described in

21 such section.

22 SEC. 4. LIMITATION OF AGENTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES.

23 It shall be unlawful for an amount of more than 10

24 percent of the amount paid pursuant to section 1 to be

25 paid to or received by any agent or attorney for any service

26 rendered to Lloyd B. Gamble in connection with the bene-
3

HR 998 RFS

1 fits provided by this Act. Any person who violates this sec2 tion shall be guilty of an infraction and shall be subject

3 to a fine in the amount provided in title 18, United States

4 Code.

Passed the House of Representatives October 7,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Exhibit 99.2








Independent Accountant’s Report








Structured Products Corp., as Depositor


390 Greenwich Street


New York, New York 10013





U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee


Corporate Trust Department


100 Wall Street


New York, NY 10005





Re:           CorTS Trust II for Goldman Sachs Capital I (the “Trust”)




Ladies and Gentlemen:





We have examined management’s assertions that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of December 15, 2000, as supplemented by the CorTS Trust II for Goldman Sachs Capital I Series Supplement, dated as of April 15, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertions based on our examination.





Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.





In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2011.








/s/ Aston Bell CPA





New York, New York


March 16, 2012
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.4.1

                                    EXHIBIT A

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO

                           SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.

                    2001 ASSOCIATES EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN

         Effective as of December 9, 2002, the Safeguard Scientifics, Inc. 2001
Associates Equity Compensation Plan is amended as set forth herein.

         1. Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the initial
sentence and inserting the following in lieu thereof:

                   Subject to the adjustment specified below, the aggregate
                   number of shares of common stock of the Company ("Company
                   Stock") that may be issued or transferred under the Plan is
                   5,400,000 shares.

         Amended by the Board of Directors on May 22, 2002 and confirmed by the
Compensation Committee on December 9, 2002.



                                      /s/ N. Jeffrey Klauder
                                      -------------------------------------
                                      N. Jeffrey Klauder
                                      Managing Director and General Counsel

Date: December 9, 2002
EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED (MANAGER)
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


     The undersigned  officer of Crusade Management Limited, a company organized
under the laws of New South Wales, Australia ("CML"), hereby certifies on behalf
of CML and on his own behalf for  purposes of the Crusade  Global Trust No. 1 of
2002 Class A Mortgage Backed Floating Rate Notes (the "Notes"), as follows:

     1.    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Officer of CML,

     2.    I  am  duly   authorized  to  execute  and  deliver  this   Officer's
           Certificate on behalf of CML; and

     3.    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer Trustee has complied with all
           conditions and covenants  under the  Transaction  Documents,  for the
           Crusade  Global  Trust No. 1 of 2002  issue of Notes  for the  period
           between  October 1, 2003 and the end of the Manager's  fiscal year on
           September 30, 2004.

     Capitalized  terms used and not  defined  herein  shall  have the  meanings
assigned  to such terms in the Note Trust Deed  related to the  above-referenced
issue of Notes.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of December 14, 2004.



                                         /s/  G.M. Bartlett
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         By:      G.M. Bartlett
                                         Title:   Director
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 46 Filed 06/30/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 46 Filed 06/30/16 Page 2 of 2
9267.

#### Fitzgerald *v.*Brown, sheriff, *et al.*

Decided March 14, 1918.

Money rule; from Fayette superior court—Judge Searcy, September 17, 1917.

*W. B. Hollingsworth,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. W. Culpepper,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. Tlie alleged statement of facts not being set out in the bill of exceptions, or attached thereto as an exhibit and properly identified by the trial judge, or contained in a brief of evidence approved by him and made a part of the record, what purports to be an agreed statement of facts, sent up as a part of the record, but not approved by the trial judge and ordered filed as such, can not be considered by this court. See *Robinson*v. *Woodward,*134 *Ga.*777 (68 S. E. 553); *Blackman*v. *Garrett,*135 *Ga.*226 (69 S. E. 110); *Roberts*v. *Cairo,*133 *Ga.*642 (66 S. E. 938); *Silvey*v. *Brown,*137 *Ga.*104 (72 S. E. 907).

2. Section 3 of the act of 1911 (Ga. L. 1911, p. 149) is by its terms applicable exclusively to motions for a new trial, and is not applicable to this casé, wherein there was no motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*