alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Brian C. Odom","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/briancodom\/","title":"Frederick D. Gregory","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4FqbmanaIE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/frederick-d-gregory\/\">Frederick D. Gregory<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/frederick-d-gregory\/embed\/#?secret=4FqbmanaIE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Frederick D. Gregory” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4FqbmanaIE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/bhm_gregory_portrait_as_deputy_administrator.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Detergent, Skin Bioprinter Launch on NASA\u2019s SpaceX Resupply Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tHQgbHQ9mK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/detergent-skin-bioprinter-launch-on-nasas-spacex-resupply-mission\/\">Detergent, Skin Bioprinter Launch on NASA\u2019s SpaceX Resupply Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/detergent-skin-bioprinter-launch-on-nasas-spacex-resupply-mission\/embed\/#?secret=tHQgbHQ9mK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Detergent, Skin Bioprinter Launch on NASA\u2019s SpaceX Resupply Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tHQgbHQ9mK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/crs-24_large_cropped.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":347}
9600.

#### Whitfield *v.*The State.

Decided April 12, 1918.

'Indictment for burglary; from Laurens superior court—Judge Kent February 4, 1918.

*W. A. Dampler,*for plaintiff in error.

*'K. L. Stephens, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

The bill of exceptions containing no assignment of error whatever, the writ of error is

*Dismissed.*

*Bloodworlh and Harwell, JJ., coneur.*
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Abel Hernando Rivera-Chavarria, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-50237-TUC-SPL

DETENTION ORDER 

 On February 5, 2016, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release for appointment of counsel. The issue of detention 

previously was submitted to the Court in Tucson on January 11, 2016. The Defendant 

was detained pending disposition. However, no order of detention was issued. The 

Court has considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 8th day of February, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cr-50237-SPL Document 7 Filed 02/08/16 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danny Baird","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dsbaird\/","title":"Artemis I: Demonstrating the Capabilities of NASA\u2019s United Networks","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ya7fjQl7cH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/artemis-i-demonstrating-the-capabilities-of-nasas-united-networks\/\">Artemis I: Demonstrating the Capabilities of NASA\u2019s United Networks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/artemis-i-demonstrating-the-capabilities-of-nasas-united-networks\/embed\/#?secret=ya7fjQl7cH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Artemis I: Demonstrating the Capabilities of NASA\u2019s United Networks” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ya7fjQl7cH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/artemis_i_comm_nav_milestones.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 548 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 548

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 27, 1998

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 500 Pearl Street 
     in New York City, New York, as the ``Ted Weiss United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New York City, 
New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Ted Weiss United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ted Weiss 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 13, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that the Quarterly  Report of Geneva  Financial  Corp. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  March 31,  2004  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 17, 2004                                   /s/ Noel Ratner
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Noel Ratner
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-05304, 333-06886 and 333-77391 pertaining to the Gemstar InternationalGroup Limited 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, 333-31074 pertaining to NuvoMedia, Inc. 1997 Stock Plan, 333-31170 pertaining to SoftBook, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan, 333-42720 pertaining to TV Guide, Inc. 401(k) Plan and 333-96407 pertaining to TV Guide, Inc.Equity Investment Plan) of our report dated February 23, 2004, except for items c., d. and e. of Note 19, as to which the date is March 2, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. includedin the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 2, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 824 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 824

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To redesignate the Federal building located at 717 Madison Place, NW., 
in the District of Columbia, as the ``Howard T. Markey National Courts 
                              Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 824

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the Federal building located at 717 Madison Place, NW., 
in the District of Columbia, as the ``Howard T. Markey National Courts 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 717 Madison Place, NW., in the 
District of Columbia and known as the National Courts Building shall be 
known and designated as the ``Howard T. Markey National Courts 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Howard T. Markey 
National Courts Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
9004.

#### Harbin *v.*Flannigan.

Decided March 13, 1918.

Action for damages; from Cherokee superior court—Judge J. B. Jones presiding. June 9, 1917.

That part of the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error to which the decision refers is as follows: “Counsel insists the various excerpts excepted to in the amended motion were prejudicial to plaintiff in error; and also insists the evidence of Miss Nina Axley should not have gone to the jury, as she did not qualify as an expert;”

*Herbert Clay, W. D. Mills,*for plaintiff in error.

*Howell Broolce, Fred. Morris,*contra.

Bloodwobth, J.

1. Tlie reference in the brief of counsel for the' plaintiff in error to the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial does not amount to an argument, and these grounds will be treated as abandoned. *Mills*v. *State,*19 *Ga. App.*623 (1), 624 (91 S. E. 918), and cases cited; *Laffitte*v. *State,*105 *Ga.*595 (1), 596 (31 S. E. 540); *Moss*v. *Bohanon,*111 *Ga.*871 (36 S. E. 954).

2. There Is evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and this court will not interfere.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
9060.

#### Savannah Guano Company *v.*Abell.

Decided April 9, 1918.

Mortgage foreclosure; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. June 11, 1917.

*W. D. Buie, J. B. Murrow,*for plaintiff.

*Hendriclcs, Mills & Hendriclcs,*for defendant.

Jenkins, J.

1. Since the exhibits attached to tile motion for a new trial in this case are specifically referred to therein as annexed, they thus became a part of the record; and the motion to dismiss the writ of error, on the ground that the exhibits attached to the motion for a new trial are “nowhere identified or allowed by the trial court as a part of the motion for new trial or as part of the record in the case,” is therefore overruled. *Patterson*v. *Collier,*77 *Ga.*292 (3 S. E. 119); *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.*v. *O’Kelley,*16 *Ca. App.*594 (85 S. E. 938).

2. Diligence is required of parties in the preparation of causes, and courts are not inclined to disturb verdicts occasioned by negligence; nor will the court relieve a party from the consequences of mere ignorance, inadvertence, or neglect, by granting a new trial. *Denmond*v. *Hillyer,*129 *Ga.*698 (59 S. E. 806); *Dacy*v. *State,*17 *Ga.*439; *Marshall*v. *Means,*12 *Ga.*61 (56 Am. D. 444); *Rolfe*v. *Rolfe,*10 *Ga.*143.

3. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and. no reason appears why the verdict should be set aside.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luhe, J., concpr.*.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      

</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                        0001048501
<NAME>                                       International Capital Funding, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S.DOLLARS
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1
<CASH>                                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            2
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                                      (8)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     0
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 0
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    2
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (6)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NELSON HERNANDEZ RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 95 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 826

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific penalties for

taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr. BAKER, Mr.

RIGGS, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. GOODE, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. HOBSON, and

Mr. FOX of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific

penalties for taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Retention Act

5 of 1997’’.
2

•HR 826 IH

1 SEC. 2. TAKING A FIREARM FROM A LAW ENFORCEMENT

2 OFFICER.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 18, United

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing:

6 ‘‘§ 117. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement

7 officer

8 ‘‘(a) Whoever knowingly takes a firearm—

9 ‘‘(1) from the person of a law enforcement offi10 cer, while such officer is engaged in the performance

11 of official duties; and

12 ‘‘(2) against that officer’s will;

13 or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in sub14 section (b).

15 ‘‘(b) The punishment for an offense under this sec16 tion is—

17 ‘‘(1) in the case of an offense other than an at18 tempt, or an offense that is an attempt during which

19 the firearm is discharged (other than intentionally

20 by the officer), a fine under this title and imprison21 ment for not less than 10 nor more than 15 years;

22 and

23 ‘‘(2) in the case of any other offense that is an

24 attempt, a fine under this title and imprisonment for

25 not less than 5 nor more than 10 years.
3

•HR 826 IH

1 ‘‘(c) A term of imprisonment imposed under this sec2 tion shall not run concurrently with any other term of im3 prisonment imposed with respect to the same criminal

4 episode.

5 ‘‘(d) As used in this section—

6 ‘‘(1) the term ‘firearm’ has the meaning given

7 that term in section 921 of this title; and

8 ‘‘(2) the term ‘law enforcement officer’ means

9 a person designated in section 1114 of this title.’’.

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

11 at the beginning of chapter 7 of title 18, United States

12 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

13 item:

‘‘117. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement officer.’’.

Æ