alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______________

No. 09-2488

_____________

PINE BELT AUTOMOTIVE INC, 

a corporation of the State of New Jersey, 

 Appellant 

v.

ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY; 

GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY;

MEMBER AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP INC

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(Civ. No. 3-06-cv-05995)

District Judge: Hon. Joel A. Pisano

Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

Monday, October 25, 2010

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: November 4, 2010)

__________

OPINION

 _________

McKEE, Chief Judge.
2

Appellant Pine Belt Automotive, Inc. appeals the district court’s orders granting 

summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Granite State Insurance Company. For the 

reasons set forth below, we will affirm.

Because we write primarily for the parties, we need not repeat the facts and 

procedural history of this case. Moreover, the district court has ably summarized that 

background. See Pine Belt Auto., Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co., 2008 WL 4682582 (D.N.J. 

Oct. 21, 2008); Pine Belt Auto., Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co., 2009 WL 424384 (D.N.J. Feb. 

19, 2009); Pine Belt Auto., Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co., 2009 WL 1025564 (D.N.J. Apr. 16, 

2009). On appeal, Pine Belt argues that the district court erred in finding that: (1) the 

alteration of credit applications by Pine Belt’s employee was not covered under Granite’s 

policy; (2) Granite was not prohibited by waiver or estoppel from arguing that the 

alteration of credit applications by Pine Belt’s employee was not covered; (3) Royal’s 

declination of coverage was appropriate for additional reasons beyond the fact that Pine 

Belt’s losses did not fall within the extended discovery period; (4) Royal’s policy was 

unambiguous, reasonable and enforceable, and did not violate public policy; (5) Pine Belt 

could not recover under the Truth in Lending provisions in the Granite and Royal 

policies.

In his detailed and thoughtful opinions filed in this case, Judge Pisano carefully 

and clearly explained his reasons for granting motions for summary judgment filed by 

Granite and Royal and denying Pine Belt’s motion for reconsideration. See Pine Belt 

Auto., Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co., 2008 WL 4682582 (D.N.J. Oct. 21, 2008); Pine Belt 

Auto., Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co., 2009 WL 424384 (D.N.J. Feb. 19, 2009); Pine Belt 
3

Auto., Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co., 2009 WL 1025564 (D.N.J. Apr. 16, 2009). We will 

affirm the district court’s orders substantially for the reasons set forth in those orders 

without further elaboration.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

      COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
                             DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                               ------------------------------
                                                                          MARCH 31,
                                                                  2001                2000
                                                               ------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>                   <C>
Net income                                                     $739,061              $685,041
Fixed charges:
Income before fixed charges                                    $739,061              $685,041
Fixed charges, as above
Preferred stock dividend requirements                          $450,225              $450,225
Fixed charges including preferred
   stock dividends                                             $450,225              $450,225
Ratio of income to fixed charges and
   preferred stock dividend requirements                           1.64                  1.52
</TABLE>


                                       12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Alexis Arrieta, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01501-028-PHX-SRB

AMENDED DETENTION ORDER 

(Amended to reflect Defendant on Probation) 

 On May 21, 2018, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of probation. A detention hearing was held. The Court considered the 

information provided to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining whether 

Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

probation, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to revoke 

his probation, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely 

to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant to Rule 46(d), 

and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 21st day of May, 2018. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 81 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 89
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 81

                          [Report No. 105-235]

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan 
  Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ``Robert K. Rodibaugh United 
                    States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

  Mr. Roemer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 31, 1997

   Additional sponsors: Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Hostettler, Mr. Pease, Mr. 
  McIntosh, Ms. Carson, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Mr. 
                                 Buyer

                             July 31, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan 
  Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ``Robert K. Rodibaugh United 
                    States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan Street 
in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert 
K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert K. 
Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.
                                     

                                                  House Calendar No. 89

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 81

                          [Report No. 105-235]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan 
  Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ``Robert K. Rodibaugh United 
                    States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 1997

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"A Parting Shot of Neptune From Voyager 2","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YoBR2rxWR4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/parting-shot-of-neptune-from-voyager-2\/\">A Parting Shot of Neptune From Voyager 2<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/parting-shot-of-neptune-from-voyager-2\/embed\/#?secret=YoBR2rxWR4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Parting Shot of Neptune From Voyager 2” — NASA\" data-secret=\"YoBR2rxWR4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/150636main_image_feature_596_ys_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
NUMBER 13-12-00179-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

IN RE SHAMOUN & NORMAN, LLP,

GREGORY SHAMOUN, AND BRIAN NORMAN

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relators, Shamoun & Norman, LLP, Gregory Shamoun, and Brian Norman, have

filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which they contend that respondent, the Honorable 

Mario Ramirez, presiding judge of the 332nd Judicial District Court of Hidalgo County, 

Texas, abused his discretion, leaving relators without an adequate appellate remedy, by

denying an Agreed Motion to Transfer Venue filed by relators and real party in interest, 

Robert Yarto.

 

1

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying [mandamus] relief, the court may hand down an 

opinion but is not required to do so.”).
2

Having reviewed and fully considered relators’ petition, this Court is of the opinion 

that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and that the petition 

should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

4th day of June, 2012.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF HOWMET INTERNATIONAL INC. INCLUDED IN
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>              
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  139,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,235
<INVENTORY>                                    161,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,044,382
<PP&E>                                         378,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,738,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          995,477
<BONDS>                                        154,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           62,741
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     313,627
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,738,854
<SALES>                                        664,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               664,061
<CGS>                                          466,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  466,815
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<FN>
<F1>Long-term debt, excluding the Pechiney Notes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

----

| 1. | on [DATE OF GRANT] (the “Grant Date”); |
|----|----------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | [NAME OF OPTIONEE], of [ADDRESS OF OPTIONEE] (the “Optionee”); |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | was granted the option (the “Option”) to purchase [NUMBER] Common Shares (the “Option Shares”) of the Company; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | for the price (the “Option Price”) of $[EXERCISE PRICE]  per share; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | terminating on the [DATE] (the “Expiry Date”); |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6. | Option Shares may be exercised from time to time prior to the Expiry Date as follows: |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (a) | [INSERT VESTING PROVISIONS] or if no vesting provisions: [at any time after the Grant Date of the Option, the Optionee may purchase up to 100% of the total number of Option Shares;] |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 7. | notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 6, the Option shall not be exercisable until such time as the Plan has been approved by the Company’s shareholders; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| THE COMMON SEAL OF CROSSHAIR EXPLORATION & MINING CORP. was affixed in the presence of: Authorized Signatory  Authorized Signatory  | )))))))))) |     C/S |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|

----

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A Copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012182-001                

*Title:*                     Hyundai Glovis/Eukor Car Carriers Inc. Space Charter Agreement                

*Parties:*                     Hyundai Glovis Co. Ltd. and Eukor Car Carriers Inc.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20006-4007.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment adds China to the geographic scope of the agreement.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: October 27, 2014.

Rachel E. Dickon, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-25847 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lauren E. Low","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lelow\/","title":"NASA Welcomes Switzerland as Newest Artemis Accords Signatory","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NaM5Q3xmtD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-welcomes-switzerland-as-newest-artemis-accords-signatory\/\">NASA Welcomes Switzerland as Newest Artemis Accords Signatory<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-welcomes-switzerland-as-newest-artemis-accords-signatory\/embed\/#?secret=NaM5Q3xmtD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Welcomes Switzerland as Newest Artemis Accords Signatory” — NASA\" data-secret=\"NaM5Q3xmtD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/screenshot-83.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":406}
Exhibit 13.1

                    PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas III) Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Troim, the Principal Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date:  June 26, 2007

/s/ Tor Olav Troim
------------------
    Tor Olav Troim
    Principal Executive Officer