Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”), the Department of Commerce (“the Department”) is automatically initiating the five-year review (“Sunset Review”) of the antidumping and countervailing duty (“AD/CVD”) orders listed below. The International Trade Commission (“the Commission”) is publishing concurrently with this notice its notice of 
                        *Institution of Five-Year Review*
                         which covers the same orders.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         (November 1, 2014).
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Department official identified in the 
                        *Initiation of Review*
                         section below at AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. For information from the Commission contact Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205-3193.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in its 
                    *Procedures for Conducting Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders,*63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). Guidance on methodological or analytical issues relevant to the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews is set forth in 
                    *Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification,*77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). Initiation of Review In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating Sunset Reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders: DOC case No.
ITC case No.
Country
Product
Department contactA-351-837
731-TA-1024
Brazil
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (2nd Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.A-570-900
731-TA-1092
PRC 1 2
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof (1st Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.A-570-887
731-TA-1046
PRC
Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol (2nd Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.A-533-848
731-TA-1155
India
Commodity Matchbooks (1st Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.C-533-849
701-TA-459
India
Commodity Matchbooks (1st Review)
Jacqueline Arrowsmith (202) 482-5255.A-533-828
731-TA-1025
India
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (2nd Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.C-533-829
701-TA-432
India
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (2nd Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.A-588-068
AA1921-188
Japan
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (4th Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.A-201-831
731-TA-1027
Mexico
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (2nd Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.A-580-852
731-TA-1026
Republic of Korea
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (2nd Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.A-549-820
731-TA-1028
Thailand
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand (2nd Review)
David Goldberger (202) 482-4136.1
                         Pursuant to court order in 
                        *Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United States,*
                         2014 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 112 (Ct. Int'l Trade Sep. 23, 2014), we are initiating the sunset review for diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China (PRC) effective November 4, 2014.2
                         For 
                        *Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Sunset Review, Notice of Rescission of Sunset Review, and Advance Notification of New Sunset Review,*79 FR 63080 (October 22, 2014), the case number is A-570-900. We inadvertently omitted the case number in this notice.
 Filing Information As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset proceedings, including copies of the pertinent statute and Department's regulations, the Department's schedule for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past revocations and continuations, and current service lists, available to the public on the Department's Web site at the following address: “
                    *http://enforcement.trade.gov/​sunset/​.*
                    ” All submissions in these Sunset Reviews must be filed in accordance with the Department's regulations regarding format, translation, and service of documents. These rules, including electronic filing requirements via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (“IA ACCESS”), can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.[3] Revised Factual Information Requirements This notice serves as a reminder that any party submitting factual information in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.[4]
                    
                     Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/government officials as well as their representatives in all AD/CVD investigations or proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013.[5]
                    
                     The formats for the revised certifications are provided at the end of the 
                    *Final Rule.*
                     The Department intends to reject factual submissions if the submitting party does 
                    ( print page 65187)
                    not comply with the revised certification requirements. On April 10, 2013, the Department published 
                    *Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule,*78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013), which modified two regulations related to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: The definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). The final rule identifies five categories of factual information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)-(iv). The final rule requires any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 so that, rather than providing general time limits, there are specific time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after May 10, 2013. Review the final rule, available at 
                    *http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​2013/​1304frn/​2013-08227.txt,*
                     prior to submitting factual information in this segment. To the extent that other regulations govern the submission of factual information in a segment (such as 19 CFR 351.218), these time limits will continue to be applied. Revised Extension of Time Limits Regulation On September 20, 2013, the Department modified its regulation at 19 CFR 351.302(c) concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: 
                    *Extension of Time Limits,*78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). The modification clarifies that parties may request an extension of time limits before a time limit established under part 351 of the Department's regulations expires, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Under certain circumstances, the Department may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, the Department will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This modification also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which the Department will grant untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after October 21, 2013. Review the final rule, available at 
                    *http://www.gpo.gov/​fdsys/​pkg/​FR-2013-09-20/​html/​2013-22853.htm,*
                     prior to submitting factual information in these segments. Letters of Appearance and Administrative Protective Orders Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the Department will maintain and make available a public service list for these proceedings. Parties wishing to participate in any of these five-year reviews must file letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). To facilitate the timely preparation of the public service list, it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding submit an entry of appearance within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews can be very short, we urge interested parties who want access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (“APO”) to file an APO application immediately following publication in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of this notice of initiation. The Department's regulations on submission of proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304-306. Information Required From Interested Parties Domestic interested parties, as defined in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b), wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must respond not later than 15 days after the date of publication in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of this notice of initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the Department's regulations, if we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, the Department will automatically revoke the order without further review.[6] If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate from a domestic interested party, the Department's regulations provide that 
                    *all parties*
                     wishing to participate in a Sunset Review must file complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of publication in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of this notice of initiation. The required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties. Also, note that the Department's information requirements are distinct from the Commission's information requirements. Consult the Department's regulations for information regarding the Department's conduct of Sunset Reviews. Consult the Department's regulations at 19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at the Department. This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). Dated: October 23, 2014. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.


# Footnotes

3.
    
                         
                        *See also Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures,*76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         section 782(b) of the Act. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See Certification of Factual Information To Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings,*78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (“
                        *Final Rule*
                        ”) (amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)). Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2014-26087 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P