alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"osam-1-53-001_feb_2021","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iQnLmA9bXy\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/osam-1-53-001_feb_2021\/\">osam-1-53-001_feb_2021<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/osam-1-53-001_feb_2021\/embed\/#?secret=iQnLmA9bXy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“osam-1-53-001_feb_2021” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iQnLmA9bXy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/osam-1-53-001_feb_2021.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 23
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
 We have issued our report dated March 1, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial statements of Track Data Corporation which is included in the Annual Report of Track Data Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Track Data Corporation on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-4780, effective July 11, 1996, File No. 333-83167, effective August 16, 1999, File No. 333-91645, effective February 9, 2000, File No. 333-34696, effective June 8, 2000 and File No. 333-54296, effective February 9, 2001) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-4532, effective May 2, 1996, File No. 333-52131, effective May 8, 1998, File No. 333-82171, effective July 2, 1999, File No. 333-85000, effective March 27, 2002 and File No. 333-104059, effective March 27, 2003).
 
 /S/GRANT THORNTON LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 1, 2004
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10209

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Gustavo Ruiz Mendoza, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-363-2

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Gustavo Ruiz Mendoza has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Ruiz Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 9, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10209 Document: 00515932114 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
No. 20-10209

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-10209 Document: 00515932114 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**eMAGIN
      CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      K.C.
      Park, the Chief Executive Officer of eMagin Corporation (the "Company"),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,
      2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or 15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      eMagin Corporation and will be retained by eMagin Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: May
              15th, 2007
            By:
            /s/ K.C.
              ParkK.C.
              Park*Chief
                Executive Officer*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"New NASA Earth Science Missions Expand View of Our Home Planet","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9pAkbpAH4H\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/new-nasa-earth-science-missions-expand-view-of-our-home-planet\/\">New NASA Earth Science Missions Expand View of Our Home Planet<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/new-nasa-earth-science-missions-expand-view-of-our-home-planet\/embed\/#?secret=9pAkbpAH4H\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New NASA Earth Science Missions Expand View of Our Home Planet” — NASA\" data-secret=\"9pAkbpAH4H\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/m15-025.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the cou rt has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30792 Summary Calendar

__________________

ERIC TREADAWAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JACK STEPHENS,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CV-3973-R)

______________________________________________

March 14 1996 Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Eric Treadaway, a Louis iana state prisoner, appeals the

dismissal of his civil rights complaint for failure to prosecute.

Finding that the district court erred in dismissing the suit with

prejudice, we reverse and remand.

A district court's dismissal of a complaint with prejudice may

be affirmed only if (1) there is a clear record of delay or

contumacious conduct by the plaintiff, and (2) either the district1 Additionally, Treadaway filed objections to the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation, arguing that he could not comply
with the court's order of February 8 until after discovery had been completed. He asserted that he had so informed the court by letter. The letter, however, is not in the record. court has exp ressly determined that lesser sanctions would not

prompt diligent prosecution or the record shows that the district

court employed lesser sanctions that proved to be futile. B erry v.

CIGNA/RSI-CIGNA

, 975 F.2d 1188, 1191 (5th Cir. 1992). A clear

record of delay is found where there have been "significant periods

of total inactivity." Morris v. Ocean Systems , 730 F.2d 248, 252

(5th Cir. 1984).

The district court made no express findings on the efficacy of

lesser sanctions for Treadaway's failure to comply with the

magistrate judge's orders. Further, there is not a clear record of

delay in this case. Treadaway did fail to comply with the order to

file the pretrial documents and the order to show cause why the

suit should not be dismissed for failure to prosecu te.

Nevertheless, in general, "where a plaintif f has failed only to

comply with a few court orders or rules, we have held that the

district court abused its discretion in dismissing the suit with

prejudice." Berry , 975 F.2d at 1191 n.6.

Moreover, Treadaway did later respond, asserting that he had

been placed in isolation for disciplinary reasons and that he was

not allowed any incoming or outgoing mail during that time. 1

Treadaway' s conduct does not appear sufficiently egregious to

warrant dismissal of his complaint with preju dice, rendering the

district court's dismissal under the circumstances of this case an

abuse of discretio n. We REVERSE and REMAND for further3

proceedings.
Exhibit
10.4(b)
  
  Re:    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    Citigroup Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    CMF Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
    
    CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer
MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & DirectorWILLOWBRIDGE
ASSOCIATES INC.By:
    
    /s/ Steven R. CraneSteven R. CranePrint
Name: Senior Vice President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Richard L. Hutchinson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03482-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8542 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8542 Filed 11/02/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA SpaceX Crew-2 to Discuss Station Mission, Upcoming Splashdown","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sFswk8sqp3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-spacex-crew-2-to-discuss-station-mission-upcoming-splashdown\/\">NASA SpaceX Crew-2 to Discuss Station Mission, Upcoming Splashdown<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-spacex-crew-2-to-discuss-station-mission-upcoming-splashdown\/embed\/#?secret=sFswk8sqp3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA SpaceX Crew-2 to Discuss Station Mission, Upcoming Splashdown” — NASA\" data-secret=\"sFswk8sqp3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/51332610874_46b98f19e2_k.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

William Amor

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−01444

Honorable John Z. Lee

John Reid & Associates, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, July 7, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John Z. Lee:Plaintiff's response to

Defendant's motion to dismiss [16] is due by 7/31/20; reply due by 8/14/20. Mailed

notice(ca, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-01444 Document #: 19 Filed: 07/07/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:105
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.3

Eastern Division

Elizabeth Gonzalez

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02111

Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly

Janet Dhillon

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Wednesday, June 10, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Plaintiff's motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted [4] [5]. Plaintiff's motion for attorney

representation is denied without prejudice [6], as it is too early to determine if plaintiff can

reasonably prosecute the case on her own. The Marshal is appointed to serve the

defendant with summons and the complaint. Plaintiff is directed to cooperate with the

Marshal as requested in effectuating service of process and, specifically, is directed to

complete and return any forms sent by the Clerk to assist the Marshal in serving process

on the defendant. The case is set for a status hearing on 8/10/2020 at 9:15 a.m. The status

hearing will be conducted by telephone using the following call−in number:

888−684−8852, access code 746−1053. Plaintiff must call in for the status hearing. If she

fails to do so, the case may be dismissed for want of prosecution. Mailed notice. (mma, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 12 Filed: 06/10/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:147
Exhibit 15.6



CONSENT OF EXPERT



I, Michele White, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Veris Gold Corp. Jerritt Canyon Property,
Elko County, Nevada” dated July 11, 2013 in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013, and any
amendments thereto (the “Form 20-F”), of Veris Gold Corp. (the “Company”), filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure in the Company’s Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-171775) (the “Form S-8”) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Form 20-F, and any
amendments thereto, and to the incorporation by reference of the Form 20-F and any amendments thereto, into the Company’s
Form S-8.



|May 7, 2014 | By: | /s/ Michele White              
|----------- | --- | -------------------------------
|            |     | Name: Michele White            
|            |     | Title: President, All One River
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          66,112
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,112
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 673,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,060,362
<OTHER-SE>                                   (603,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   673,112
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   190
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (63,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,657)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>