alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,186,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,839,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                   624,621
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,038,431
<PP&E>                                      11,479,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             109,215,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       51,295,809
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,285
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,119,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               109,215,447
<SALES>                                     43,436,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,436,818
<CGS>                                       26,655,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,655,855
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            16,091,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,308,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (566,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (253,404)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (313,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                101,686
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (415,182)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.04)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1619

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* District of Nebraska. 

Thomas Dewayne Ross, also known as *

Thomas Dwayne Ross, also known as * [UNPUBLISHED]

Dewayne Ross, also known as Wayne, *

*

Appellant. * 

___________

Submitted: December 12, 2011

Filed: February 15, 2012

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Ross appeals the 120-month sentence the district court1

 imposed after

granting the government’s motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 35(b). He argues that the extent of the district court’s reduction

did not adequately reflect his assistance to the government. This court lacks

jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) to consider such a challenge to the district

1

The Honorable Richard Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of 

Nebraska. 
court’s ruling on a Rule 35(b) motion. United States v. Haskins, 479 F.3d 955, 957

(8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam); United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir.

1998) (per curiam). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION

Name

JurisdictionARCC CIC Flex Corporation

DelawareARCC CCS, Inc.

DelawareARCC CLPB Corporation.

DelawareARCC GF LLC

DelawareARCC HBF LLC

DelawareARCC Imperial Corporation

DelawareARCC Imperial LLC

DelawareARCC IGS Corporation

DelawareARCC LVCG Investors LLC

DelawareARCC LVCG Holdings LLC

DelawareARCC OTG Corporation

DelawareARCC PSSI Corporation

DelawareARCC TTL Corporation

DelawareARCC VTH Corporation

DelawareARCC Universal Corporation

DelawareARCC CLO 2006 LLC

DelawareARCC Commercial Loan Trust 2006

DelawareARES Capital FL Holdings LLC

DelawareARCC PCG1 III AIV Blocker Inc

DelawareARCC WMA Corporation

DelawareARCC BB Corporation

DelawareAC Notes Holdings LLC

DelawareARCC Covestia Corporation

DelawareARCC JTC LLC

DelawareARES Capital JB Funding LLC

DelawareARES Capital CP Funding LLC

DelawareARES Capital CP Funding II LLC

DelawareARES Capital CP Funding Holdings LLC

DelawareARES Capital CP Funding Holdings II LLC

DelawareIvy Hill Asset Management GP, LLC

Delaware10th Street Equity, LLC

DelawareA.C. Corporation

DelawareAC Postle, LLC

DelawareACC Universal Corporation

DelawareAIC Universal Corporation

DelawareALD TBB/WIN Equity, LLC

DelawareAMP Admin LLC

DelawareAircraft Maintenance Holdings, LLC

DelawareAlbras Equity, LLC

DelawareAllbridge Equity, LLC

DelawareAllied Capital Germany Fund LLC

DelawareAllied Capital Holdings LLC

DelawareAllied Capital Property LLC

DelawareAllied Crescent Equity, LLC

DelawareAmerex Equity Corporation

DelawareAmerex Equity LLC

DelawareAviation Properties Corporation

DelawareBinks Equity Corporation

Delaware


---



Name

JurisdictionCalder Capital Partners LLC

DelawareCalder Equity, LLC

DelawareCalder Investment Partners LLC

DelawareCleveland East Equity, LLC

DelawareCrescent Equity Corporation

DelawareDynamic Equity, LLC

DelawareForesite Equity, LLC

DelawareHavco Equity Corporation

DelawareHCI Equity, LLC

IllinoisIAT Equity, LLC

DelawareMultiad Equity Corporation

DelawareNPH, Inc.

MarylandOld Orchard Equity Corporation

DelawarePostle Equity Corporation

DelawareRWI, LLC

DelawareS2 Equity Corporation

DelawareSMF II Equity, LLC

DelawareSlate Equity LLC

DelawareSoteria Mezzanine Corporation

DelawareStag Equity, LLC

DelawareStartec Equity, LLC

DelawareSubfractional Motors, Inc.

DelawareTransamerican Equity Corporation

DelawareVan Ness Hotel, Inc.

Delaware


In
addition, we may be deemed to control certain portfolio companies identified as "Affiliated" companies that we "Control" in footnote (7) to the Consolidated Schedule of
Investments as of December 31, 2011 included in the Financial Statements portion of Ares Capital Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 595 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 595

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, as the ``William Augustus 
        Bootle Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 1997

Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, as the ``William Augustus 
        Bootle Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 475 
Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 
``William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Report of Physical Property Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Darrie Lam, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.






/s/ Darrie
Lam


Darrie
Lam


Chief
Financial Officer





August
14, 2008
##### 



Director Compensation Policy
for Non-Employee Directors of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 As Approved by the Board of Directors on February 13, 2004
and amended on July 22, 2005, February 22, 2006, August 2, 2006,
May 16, 2007, February 21, 2008 and April 30, 2008
 Retainer *
    
    $38,000 annuallyBoard Meeting Fees*
    
    $2,000 per meetingCommittee Meeting Fees*
    
    $1,200 per meetingLead Independent Director Retainer *
    
    $25,000 annuallyAudit Chair Retainer *
    
    $12,000 annuallyOther Chair Retainer *
    
    $7,500 annuallyContinuing Education Expenses
    
    Reasonable and customary expenses
(up to 3 days per year)Personal use of corporate aircraft
    
    10 hours of flight time
per calendar year **Annual Grant of Restricted Stock Units
    
    $135,000 market value, restricted stock units ***
  *
    
    Fees are to be paid at the end of each quarter for service during that quarter. Fees for
service during part of a quarter will be pro rated.
 **
    
    (1) 10 hours are available to each director each calendar year. Unused hours do not
accumulate from one year to the next.




---



##### 



***
    
    Automatically awarded once annually through the King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Incentive Plan.
     Notes to Schedule of Compensation for Non-Management Directors:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
333-09735 of Silver Diner, Inc. on Form S-3 and in Registration Statements No. 
333-18509, No. 333-21841, No. 333-27325, No. 333-59533 and No. 333-59535 of 
Silver Diner, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated March 8, 1999, appearing in 
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silver Diner, Inc. for the year ended January
3, 1999.

                                              /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
                                              March 31, 1999
                                              Washington, D.C.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Keith and Tammy Early, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

The State of Arizona, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-16-00031-PHX-SPL (DMF)

ORDER 

 The parties, through counsel, filed a Joint Stipulated [Seventh] Motion to Extend 

Deadlines (Doc. 205). The Court finds good cause to reset some of the deadlines in the 

matter, but this is the final time. The Court will not entertain another motion and/or 

stipulation to extend deadlines. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order 

(Doc. 183) filed on April 18, 2018 are hereby modified as follows: 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for disclosure of expert rebuttal 

opinion reports is extended to August 24, 2018. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for completion of all lay witness 

and party depositions is extended to October 26, 2018. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline of completion of all expert 

witness depositions is extended to December 21, 2018. 

Case 2:16-cv-00031-SPL-DMF Document 206 Filed 08/14/18 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for completion of all fact 

discovery is extended to October 26, 2018. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the Parties to file dispositive 

motions or motions to disqualify expert witnesses is extended to February 8, 2019. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that these deadlines are final deadlines and no 

further extensions of time will be granted. 

Dated this 14th day of August, 2018. 

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:16-cv-00031-SPL-DMF Document 206 Filed 08/14/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 66","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yTfT6tiEDM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-66\/\">Expedition 66<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-66\/embed\/#?secret=yTfT6tiEDM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 66” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yTfT6tiEDM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss066-s-002.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 596 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 596

To prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument 
                  without an express Act of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 1997

Mrs. Chenoweth (for herself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Doolittle, and Mr. Smith of 
   Oregon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument 
                  without an express Act of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF 
              NATIONAL MONUMENTS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
extension or establishment of a national monument may be undertaken in 
the United States without an express Act of Congress enacted after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Definition of United States.--For the purposes of subsection 
(a), the term ``United States'' means the several States, the District 
of Columbia, and the territories and possessions of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 5 AUSTIN

ikmorublo H. ri.

&aClain county Attorlmy, kllllmmmn county Grorgetown. Teraa

Phfr will eoknor January IU, 1944, pertinon set out:

Lfooaaad 3teto Land rumoy (18 ohm& and

do ao abovo doa?rlbed with only of the Licensed sttito 

### L~tndSurveyor:’ rk contads that all af rheee survey8 **zed boiaro**  thy **aan** bo feoordsa. I would crpproolato your nnawer to tho above quoatloo in order that I may advim tbo County Clerk.”

Artiolo beSO, Vrrnoo'a m~l;lod Civil .Jtrtuem, 1625, provides, ln part, us follo*a:

“naoh oounty nurveyor sLai.1 record ?n a well bound **book** ull the ourveye In hia aounty vclth t>e plats thereof that he May SW&I) wheLhisrprivtlts

or official." Istlalo Se07 of wid stututum furthe provides thtit

*ocLoh **county** surveyor **6lxill** recolvs and **era:!ia all**  ricla notea **OS mrveym**  **made in**  **oulC county**  U~JOU whloh pstonta mre to be obtained r.nd

ehmA1 certify to the nmia aoooniirrg to lw, rnd record auoh SlsAU notes in a book to be kept by Dim for tbt purpan ~4 ha mhall perform much other dutiae aa nary be regulrsd of him by luw.. Tbu oommim~ionsrm~ #ourt a?~11 rurnleh him roll amceumary book& of raor,rd." It aselns th:t the 2~ oontemplatse~ in 4ountieo thving a county mumoyor that a4oh county surveyor do &is oua roooralng and koep his own racaraq, but, Ii the County Clerk aosumem this ro@onatbillty for the county surveyor, and rooords

andmo ps l

uoh rsoordm in the Cocnty CLerk*e 3rri,00, he should not raquiro an; oortlfleatlonof muah record8 alfsera~t from thikt requiroa **by 1611,**  A ltatOO? fACtS 0108aly FQlat86

t0 thl@ warnpamod OD by thir 6o~wtaarf1t ln &IIopln$oa dalivered In 1941, mambored 044SZ, Ln tiioh a rimilar view xam taken am next **above**oxprosmod.

t'3hfle

iqtiolem Be78 And bi377 were rmetrded by tha haislaturs, aftor tbs mdd prior opbl~n wn8 rendered, there ~'88no oh~n~o m4lsrde

ia than that uould 

### ronaer aaid opinion. obeQlete, or f.n any way arreot 

### ttr l pplkotlon In thla **mutter.** A UOpf Or **esld** opinion la attached beret0 for further 

### am~lltfc*tf~.

In vlaw of t!& atKJv0 quoted stututem, und tlm eda
r0wr oyialaop, thim dopstsent baldm that th8 County **Clerk** 

### 0r your 

### County 18 pormltted to raoord 8urvsp four and under tho dlroctioa 0s your County 

### 2hrveyor.suoh r0420o8a 6urvep bclog ocrtlrLc6 **to by**  tba **Caocty Burvoyor**  or **any** other duly Llooa806 State L~nb **&rvoyor, rlthout**  **bolng** notarismd, **am**a oortliloeto **by a**  notary would @aither rdd to nor 6etrRet rror the le@lity 

## or tho proooedlngm.

.,, Youra vary truly A-miHIZsy

WH~GAl, ."F??A;i3

?Y nobst L. Lattlmore, .:r. :umiiltrnt
hiJ.:W

anal.
Exhibit 99.2

**** 

**** 

**Independent Accountant’s Report**

**** 

**** 

Structured Products Corp., as Depositor

390 Greenwich Street, 1st Floor

New York, New York 10013

 

U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee

Corporate Trust Department

100 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

 

Re:       CorTS Trust II for Goldman Sachs Capital I (the “Trust”)       

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have examined management’s assertions that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of December 15, 2000, as supplemented by the CorTS Trust II for Goldman Sachs Capital I Series Supplement, dated as of April 15, 2004 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Depositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Annual Report”).  Management is responsible for compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertions based on our examination.

 

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and management’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

/s/ Aston Bell CPA

 

New York, New York

March 22, 2011

 

 

----
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 514

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 19, 1997

Received

AN ACT

To permit the waiver of District of Columbia residency requirements for certain employees of the Office of the

Inspector General of the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 514 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

3 Inspector General Improvement Act of 1997’’.

4 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT FOR CER5 TAIN EMPLOYEES OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.

6 Section 906 of the District of Columbia Government

7 Comprehensive Merit Personnel Act of 1978 (sec. 1–

8 610.6, D.C. Code) is amended—

9 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘or sub10 section (d)’’ after ‘‘subsection (c)’’; and

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section:

13 ‘‘(d) At the request of the Inspector General (as de14 scribed in section 208(a) of the District of Columbia Pro15 curement Practices Act of 1985), the Director of Person16 nel may waive the application of subsections (a) and (b)

17 to employees of the Office of the Inspector General.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives March 18,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.