alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Kentucky Students to Speak with NASA Astronauts on Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AharbveJY8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/kentucky-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronauts-on-space-station\/\">Kentucky Students to Speak with NASA Astronauts on Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/kentucky-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronauts-on-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=AharbveJY8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Kentucky Students to Speak with NASA Astronauts on Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AharbveJY8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/downlink_media_advisory_picture_-_sept_91.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

 

EDWARD F PARKS, )

) Case No. 2:16-cv-00090-GMN-NJK

Plaintiff(s), )

) ORDER

vs. ) 

) 

CHRISTY D JOHNSON, et al., ) 

)

Defendant(s). )

__________________________________________) 

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and has submitted documents in an effort to initiate this

case on January 14, 2016. Docket No. 1. Plaintiff has not, however, submitted the required filing fee or

requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. In order to proceed with

his case, Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or submit the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing an

inability to prepay fees and costs or give security for them.

In addition, Plaintiff’s hand-written complaint is not sufficiently legible to enable the Court or any

opposing party to fully understand it. See Local Rule 10-1 (“All handwriting shall be legible”). Plaintiff’s

complaint is therefore dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff is permitted to refile the complaint, but it

must either be type-written or it must be hand-written legibly. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall either make the necessary arrangements to pay the filing fee, accompanied by

a copy of this order, or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. 

Case 4:16-cv-00083-RCC-PSOT Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a blank application form. 

3. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff is permitted to refile the

complaint, but it must either be type-written or it must be hand-written legibly. 

4. Plaintiff must comply with this order no later than February 16, 2016. Failure to comply

will result a recommendation to the District Judge that this case be dismissed for failure to

comply with this order. 

Dated: January 15, 2016

________________________________________

NANCY J. KOPPE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

Case 4:16-cv-00083-RCC-PSOT Document 2 Filed 01/15/16 Page 2 of 2
#### BOEHLE v. ELECTRO METALLURGICAL CO.

Civil Action No. 3412.

District Court, D. Oregon.

June 9, 1947.

Harry George, Jr., and William A. Bab-cock, Jr., both of Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Gunther Krause, of Portland, Or. (of Krause *&*Evans of Portland, Or.) for defendant.

McCOLLOClI, District Judge.

The Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S. C.A. §§ 251-263, is a case of “chickens come home to roost.”

In 1932 Congress passed the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 101 et seq., which withdrew jurisdiction from Federal Courts to issue injunctions in labor disputes.

Now, Congress has withdrawn jurisdiction from Federal Courts to consider labor claims of the Portal-to-Portal type.

Both the Norris-LaGuardia Act and the Portal-to-Portal Act were put in terms of restricting jurisdiction “to avoid constitutional questions.” Both are procedural devices to avoid face-to-face conflict with substantive issues. Both are bad in principle; for, if on rising tides of public opinion the jurisdiction of Federal Courts can be tinkered with to suit the passions of the hour, the independence of the courts will be gravely impaired. The average judge will not venture outside old and well-charted waters, if he knows that Congress may revoke jurisdiction in the case, if dissatisfied with the way it is decided.

In short, jurisdiction of the courts should not be a legislative football.

Despite this view, I do not see how a Federal District Judge could hold this most recent tampering with jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, while at the same time upholding the constitutionality of the Norris-LaGuardia Act, as is required by countless decisions over the last fifteen years, including decisions of the Supreme Court.

So, this case and others of the Portal-to-Portal type that have been assigned to me will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-86,523-01 & - 02

EX P ARTE EDWIN MAURIC E HIL L, App licant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US

CAUSE NOS. 1342475-A & 1342476-A IN THE 338T H DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for wr i t s o f h ab ea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and possession of a firea rm by a felon and sentenc ed t o five y ear s’ imprisonment in each c ount, to be serve d concur rently

. Applicant contends , am ong other things, that his counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use counse l failed to timely file notices of

appea l. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte2

Axe l , 757 S.W .2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we he ld in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960) , the trial cour t is the appropri at e fo ru m for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffe ctive assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hear ing, it sha ll de termine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as t o wh ether Applicant timely informed counsel that he wanted an appea l, and if so, what actions counsel took to fac ilitate that appea l. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems re levant and a

ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this orde r. A supplemental transcript c ontaining all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of t he date of t his order

. Any extensions of ti me shall be obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Mar ch 29, 2017 Do not publish
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**





**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**





**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      Joseph G. Oliverio, as Chief Executive Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
      applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
                August 13, 2007
            
            /s/
                Joseph G. OliverioJoseph
                G. OliverioChief
                Executive Officer, Director







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Imagin Molecular
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24

                                 FIRST AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
              DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

      This Amendment is made to the AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, effective September 1, 2001 (the
"Plan"). All terms defined in the Plan shall have the same meanings when used
herein. This Amendment shall be effective September 1, 2002. All provisions of
the Plan not amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

      THE SECOND SENTENCE OF SECTION 4.5.4 ("DEFERRAL OF RESTRICTED SHARES") IS
AMENDED TO READ IN ITS ENTIRETY, AS FOLLOWS:

            A Director may choose to defer receipt of all or only a portion of
            the AWS Stock to be received upon the vesting of such Restricted
            Shares.

      The Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on the date indicated
below.

                                            AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.


Dated:                                      By
      ---------------------------             ----------------------------------
                                              Its
                                                 -------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 589 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 589

         To amend the Fair Housing Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 1997

Mr. Bilbray (for himself, Ms. Harman, Mr. Horn, Mr. White, Mr. Calvert, 
 Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Packard, Mr. Baker, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Hunter, Mr. 
Lewis of California, Mr. King, and Mr. Dreier) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To amend the Fair Housing Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Housing Reform and Freedom of 
Speech Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING ACT.

    (a) In General.--The first sentence of section 807(b)(1) of the 
Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3607(b)(1)) is amended by inserting before 
the period the following: ``, including any restriction relating to the 
maximum number of unrelated persons permitted to occupy a dwelling, or 
governing the proximity of dwellings to each other, in connection with 
the occupancy of a dwelling by a convicted felon, sex offender, or 
recovering drug addict, if the purpose of the restriction is to 
restrict land use to single family dwellings''.
    (b) Protection of Certain Activities.--Title I of the Fair Housing 
Act (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new section:

``SEC. 821. PROTECTION OF CERTAIN ACTIVITIES.

    ``Nothing in this Act shall be construed to apply to any otherwise 
lawful activity engaged in by one or more persons, including the filing 
or maintaining of a legal action, that is engaged in solely for the 
purpose of--
            ``(1) achieving or preventing action by a governmental 
        entity or official; or
            ``(2) receiving an interpretation of any provision of this 
        Act in a court of competent jurisdiction.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:16-cv-00302-NVW Document 15 Filed 03/14/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cv-00302-NVW Document 15 Filed 03/14/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cv-00302-NVW Document 15 Filed 03/14/16 Page 3 of 3
9201.

#### BOWEN *v.*SMITH-HALL GROCERY COMPANY.

There being no evidence that any member of the defendant company or any of its agents or servants placed in the street the paper that frightened the plaintiff’s horses, he failed to prove his case as laid; and it was not error to grant a nonsuit.

Decided March 14, 1918.

Action for damages; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Wright presiding. ' August 2, 1917.

*Rosser & Shaw, G. G. Glenn, W. M. Ilenry,*for plaintiff.

*Maddox, McCamy & Shumate,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

This case has been to the Supreme Court twice. 141 *Ga.*721 (82 S. E. 23, L. R. A. 1915D, 617); 146 *Ga.*157 (91 S. E. 32). Bowen brought suit for damages against Smith-Hall Grocery Company, a'• partnership doing business in the city of Dalton. The petition as amended contained, among other allegations, the -following; The defendants’ storehouse and place of ' business fronts on Hamilton street, the principal business street of the city,'upon which at all times' of the day there is a large amount of'travel by pedestrians and vehicles. At the time of the injury complained of there was in force in the city the following ordinance; “The proprietor of each business house must keep a covered garbage-can outside of his place of business, in which must *55be placed all refuse, garbage, and trasb from said place of business, to be called for by the proper city officers.” On the day of the injury the defendants, through their employes, placed upon and near the street and sidewalk in front of their place of business a large amount of trash and loose sheets of paper, without putting it in a receptacle or confining it in any way. The sheets of paper were light and were naturally liable to be blown about the street by even a slight breeze, and'naturally tended to excite and frighten even quiet and steady horses. The plaintiff, who was a capable driver, was driving two reasonably well broken, steady, and roadworthy horses along the street. The wind blew some of the paper on the horses and against their legs, which frightened them and caused them to run away, overturning the vehicle, breaking the tongue out of itj and causing the plaintiff to be violently thrown to the ground, to his serious personal injury. It was also alleged that they were negligent in placing the trash and paper where it was deposited. The Supreme Court held that the ordinance was a sanitary ordinance, and that its violation would not be negligence per se. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the court granted a nonsuit.

The evidence did not prove the plaintiff’s ease, as laid, there being no proof that Smith-Hall Grocery Company, by its partners, servants, or agents placed the paper in the street which frightened, the plaintiff’s horses. The court therefore did not err in. granting a nonsuit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Wade, *G.*J., *and Jenhins,*J*, *concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    (THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P. BALANCE SHEET ON July 31, 1999
AND THE STATEMENT OF EARNINGS ENDING July 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                        0000922358
<NAME>                                       FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         34,134
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  59,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,296
<INVENTORY>                                    24,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,939
<PP&E>                                         650,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                 245,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 656,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,506
<BONDS>                                        583,840
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    (70,866)
<COMMON>                                       1,215
<OTHER-SE>                                     (70,866)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   656,745
<SALES>                                        578,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               624,149
<CGS>                                          273,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  542,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             46,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                14,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,783
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (12,786)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,997
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .06



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements accompanying the filing of Form 10QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,599,157
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,061,475
<PP&E>                                             128,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,621,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,515,476
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            12,839
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,718,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,621,588
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,859,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 184,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (20,019,796)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (20,019,796)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (9,778,167)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (29,797,963)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (3.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (3.43)



</TABLE>