alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA TV to Air Russian Spacewalk from International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"f0HeGOcXsV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-russian-spacewalk-from-international-space-station\/\">NASA TV to Air Russian Spacewalk from International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-russian-spacewalk-from-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=f0HeGOcXsV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA TV to Air Russian Spacewalk from International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"f0HeGOcXsV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/m14-174_eva40_suraev-samokutyaev.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Neil A.M. Crook, Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Central EuropeanDistribution Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data; and 

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 12, 2003
Opinion issued April 23, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00927-CR

———————————

BARRINGTON DAVID COOMBS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1790627

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Barrington David Coombs, appeals from the trial court’s 

December 8, 2022 judgment of conviction. Appellant has filed a motion for 

voluntary dismissal, stating that he “wishes to have his appeal dismissed” and 

requesting that the Court grant his motion.
2

Appellant and his attorney have signed the motion, and this Court has not 

issued a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Further, more than ten days have 

passed and the State has not expressed opposition to appellant’s motion. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Countiss, and Rivas-Molloy.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 875

To adjust, and provide a procedure for the future adjustment of, the salaries

of Federal judges.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 27, 1997

Mr. HYDE (for himself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To adjust, and provide a procedure for the future adjustment

of, the salaries of Federal judges.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF SALARIES OF FEDERAL

4 JUDGES.

5 (a) INITIAL ADJUSTMENT.—The annual salary rates

6 of the Chief Justice of the United States, the associate

7 justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, the

8 judges of the United States courts of appeals, the judges

9 of the United States district courts, and the judges of the

10 United States Court of International Trade, are increased
2

•HR 875 IH

1 by an amount equal to 9.6 percent of their respective exist2 ing salary rates, rounded to the nearest multiple of $100

3 (or if midway between multiples of $100, to the next high4 er multiple of $100), effective as of the first day of the

5 first applicable pay period beginning on or after the date

6 of the enactment of this Act.

7 (b) SPECIAL RULE.—For purposes of sections 153(a)

8 and 634(a) of title 28, United States Code, the increase

9 under subsection (a) shall be deemed to have been deter10 mined pursuant to section 135 of such title.

11 (c) FUTURE ADJUSTMENTS.—Section 461(a) of title

12 28, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

13 ‘‘(a) Effective as of the first day of the applicable

14 pay period beginning on or after the date on which an

15 adjustment takes effect under section 5303 of title 5 in

16 the rates of basic pay under the General Schedule (or

17 under any other provision of law in lieu thereof), each sal18 ary rate which is subject to an adjustment under this sec19 tion shall be adjusted by an amount equal to the percent20 age of the adjustment under such section 5303, rounded

21 to the nearest multiple of $100 (or if midway between

22 multiples of $100, to the next higher multiple of $100).’’.

23 (d) REPEAL.—Section 140 of Public Law 97–92 (95

24 Stat. 1200; 28 U.S.C. 461 note) is repealed.
3

•HR 875 IH

1 (2) COORDINATION RULE.—If the salary increase

2 under subsection (a) is to be made as of the same date

3 as a pay adjustment under section 461 of title 28, United

4 States Code, as amended by subsection (c), the increase

5 under subsection (a) shall be made first.

Æ
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 643

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed

at the corner of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ‘‘Carl B. Stokes United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 643 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse to be constructed at

3 the corner of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland,

4 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Carl B.

5 Stokes United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Carl B. Stokes United States

11 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 23,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

By JEFF TRANDAHL,

Deputy Clerk.
CoO NY DH BF WN Ye

NN YN NY NY NY KY HY — Be Be Be Be ee ee
oN Dn HM FY NH KF DOD eH DH BF WN KF Ss

JOHN S. LEONARDO
United States Attorney
District of Arizona

DOMINIC LANZA (Cal. State Bar No. 225989, dominic.lanza@usdoj.gov)

Assistant U.S. Attorney

40 N. Central Ave., Suite 1200
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Telephone: 602-514-7500
Attorney for Plaintiff

L
_\ FHED ___ LODGED
~_REGENED ___ COPY

JAN 2 8 2016

CLERK U 8 DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
BY. SI/DEPUTY
ot

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
Freida Battise-Moore,

Defendant.

NO, CR-16-00130-PHX-SPL

INFORMATION

VIO: 18 U.S.C. § 1163
(Embezzlement/Theft from Indian
Tribal Organization)

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES:

Beginning in or around 2006, and continuing through in or around 2013, in the
BATTISE-MOORE embezzled. stole, and

District of Arizona, defendant FREIDA

knowingly converted to her use any of the moneys, funds, credits, goods, assets, and

other property belonging to any Indian tribal organization and intrusted to the custody

and care of any officer, employee, and agent
All in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1163.
Dated this Mev — 24 ol

of an Indian tribal organization.

JOHN S. LEONARDO
United States Attorney
Disfrict of Arizona

UN

MINICLANZA
ssistant U.S. Attorney
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-118","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"x8cvkCOBnt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-118\/\">STS-118<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-118\/embed\/#?secret=x8cvkCOBnt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-118” — NASA\" data-secret=\"x8cvkCOBnt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/185063main_image_feature_885_ys_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[COF000-LLCOF00000-L19900000.PO0000]


Notice of Meeting, Front Range Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Front Range Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 11, 2014, from 9:15 a.m. to 
4:15 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Royal Gorge Field Office, 
3028 E. Main Street, Ca[ntilde]on City, CO 81212.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Sullivan, Front Range RAC 
Coordinator, BLM Front Range District Office, 3028 E. Main St., 
Ca[ntilde]on City, CO 81212. Phone: (719) 269-8553. Email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c170f091010150a1d123c1e1011521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91fae2e4fdfdf8e7f0ffd1f3fdfcbff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to 
leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive 
a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in the BLM 
Front Range District, which includes the Royal Gorge Field Office and 
the San Luis Valley Field Office, Colorado. Planned topics of 
discussion items include: an update from field managers and the Royal 
Gorge Field Office Resource Management Plan revision. The public is 
encouraged to make oral comments to the Council at 10:30 a.m., or 
written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. 
Summary minutes for the RAC meetings will be maintained in the Royal 
Gorge Field Office and will be available for public inspection and 
reproduction during regular business hours within thirty (30) days 
following the meeting. Previous meeting minutes and agendas are 
available at: www.blm.gov/co/st/en/BLM_Resources/racs/frrac/co_rac_minutes_front.html.

Ruth Welch,
Colorado State Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-26036 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### H. Goodloe’s Exor. *v.*D. T. Davie and A. C. Collier.

Estates Tail — Devise—Mutual Exchange.

A devise of lands was made, in trust for the devisees and their, children during their lives, with power of sale by the trustee for reinvestment, etc.: Held, to authorize a mutual exchange of the separate interests between the devisees.

Same — Re-Investment,

A re-investment of a surplus for one of the devisees, through her husband as trustee, held not improper. -,

APPEAL PBOM WOODPOBD CIRCUIT COUBT.

June 10, 1869.

*364
      *Porter &*Greathouse, *for appellant.*

W. *G. Qoodloe, for appellees.*

Opinion op the Count by

Judge Williams:

Apellants petitioned the chancellor to confirm a contract of sale and exchange between Mrs. Davie and her sister, Mrs. Collier, of land devised by their deceased father, in trust for them and their children during their lives, and then to their heirs, with power in the trustees to sell and re-invest the proceeds, etc.

A portion of the land was devised for life to the testator's widow. Mrs. Collier exchanged her interest in this dower land for her sister’s interest in the other lands and gave $2,000 difference in money. The chancellor confirmed the trade and directed the trustee, Stout, to convey Mrs. Davie’s interest to Mrs. Collier, and appointed her husband, G. J. Davie, to invest the $2,000 in lands in Tennessee, under the same restrictions imposed in the will, but Stout, the testamentary trustee, refused to make the conveyance and from the peremptory order directing him to do so he has appealed.

The judgment is virtually according to the prayer of the petition, save as to the substitution of Mrs. Davie’s husband as her trustee in place of Stout, of which he does not complain.

The direction as to the conveyance of Mrs. Collier’s interest in the dower land is not as specific as could have been desired, but this is still under the direction of the court, as he must approie the deed and should see that it is conveyed under the same limitations and with the same conditions unmixed as is imposed by the will on Mrs. Davie’s interest. In a word, all the deeds both ways should be in strict accordance to the will, and then no alteration in the entail would be made. Of course this could only attach to .one-third of Mrs. Collier’s purchase of her sister, Mrs. Davie, as she pays two-thirds in money, and only one-third in land devised by her father, but as these things may yet be done, we see no reversible error in the judgment, and it is therefore affirmed.
First Amendment to Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 
EXHIBIT 10.21

 
First Amendment to 
 
Stericycle, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 
The Stericycle, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan (the “Plan”) is amended as follows pursuant to the authority of the Board of Directors of Stericycle, Inc. under Paragraph 8.2 of the Plan: 
 
1.  Minimum Holding Period. The definition of “Minimum Holding Period” in Article 2 of the Plan is amended to
read as follows: 
 
Minimum
Holding Period means, in respect of Option Shares acquired by a Participant in an Offering that began prior to July 1, 2002, the period beginning on the Last Day of the Offering and ending on the second anniversary of the First Day of the
Offering. There shall not be a Minimum Holding Period in respect of Option Shares acquired by a Participant in an Offering that begins after June 30, 2002. 
 
2.  Conforming Changes. To reflect the change in the definition of Minimum Holding Period, Paragraphs 7.2 and 7.3 of the
Plan are amended to read as follows: 
 
7.2    Certificate Requests. The following provisions shall apply to the issuance of certificates for Option Shares: 
 
(a)  In the case of Option Shares acquired by a Participant in an Offering that began prior to July 1, 2002, the
Participant may request, once each calendar year or more frequently as the Plan Administrator allows, the issuance of a stock certificate or certificates representing all or any portion of the Option Shares then credited to his or her Account for
the Minimum Holding Period. The Plan Administrator, in its discretion, may permit the Participant’s withdrawal of all or any portion of his or her Option Shares prior to the expiration of the Minimum Holding Period upon the Participant’s
demonstration of a Hardship to the Plan Administrator’s satisfaction. 
 
(b)  In the case of Option Shares acquired by a Participant in an Offering that begins after June 30, 2002, the Participant may request, at any time, the issuance of a stock certificate or
certificates representing all or any portion of the Option Shares then credited to his or her Account. 
 
(c)  All certificates issued to Participants (for example, Participants who are affiliates) shall bear any
restrictive endorsements that the Company considers necessary to comply with applicable federal and state securities laws. 
 
7.3    Termination of Employment. Upon the termination of a Participant’s 







 
employment
for any reason, the Participant shall be issued a stock certificate or certificates representing all of the Option Shares then credited to his or her Account or, in the case of Option Shares acquired by a Participant in an Offering that began prior
to July 1, 2002, all of the Option Shares then credited to the Participant’s Account for the Minimum Holding Period. A stock certificate or certificates representing any Option Shares then credited to the Participant’s Account for less
than the Minimum Holding Period shall be issued to the former Participant upon the expiration of the Minimum Holding Period. 
 
3  Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective as of February 5, 2002. 
 

2
Exhibit 10.27



 
Exhibit 10.27

 
July 29, 2002 
 
Mr. Edward J. Rivas 
Senior Vice President 
Dominion Energy

 
Re:  Supplemental Retirement Benefits 
 
Dear Ed: 
 
Because of your valuable knowledge and experience, and as an inducement for you to continue in the employ of the Company, the
Company wishes to enter into this Supplemental Retirement Benefits Agreement (the “Agreement”) with you. If you remain employed by the Company as an officer through the date of your 60th birthday, you will be provided with 30 years of credited service for the purposes of calculating your benefits under the Company’s executive supplemental
retirement plans, and its retiree medical and life insurance benefit plans. 
 
Any benefits payable under this Agreement will be in addition to any retirement or other benefits you are eligible to receive under the Company’s employee benefit plans. 
 
If you agree with the terms and conditions set forth above, please sign and
return one copy of this letter to Anne Grier. 
 
Sincerely yours.

 
/s/ Thos. E. Capps 
 
Thos. E. Capps 
Chairman of the Board and 
Chief Executive Officer 
 
 

	 Agreed:          /s/ Edward
Rivas          
	     07/30/02     



	                              Edward J. Rivas 
	 Date