alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Activity One: Propeller Design Challenge","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AeORH2bw66\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/activity-one-propeller-design-challenge\/\">Activity One: Propeller Design Challenge<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/activity-one-propeller-design-challenge\/embed\/#?secret=AeORH2bw66\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Activity One: Propeller Design Challenge” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AeORH2bw66\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/prandtl-propeller.jpg?w=390","thumbnail_width":390,"thumbnail_height":382}
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 38 Filed 06/13/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 38 Filed 06/13/16 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 38 Filed 06/13/16 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 38 Filed 06/13/16 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 38 Filed 06/13/16 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 38 Filed 06/13/16 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 38 Filed 06/13/16 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          11,702
<SECURITIES>                                     3,589
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       452
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,748
<PP&E>                                           8,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,581
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,776
<OTHER-SE>                                    (25,089)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,449
<SALES>                                          5,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,883
<CGS>                                              304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,935
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    22
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 209
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,992)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)


</TABLE>
9618.

#### HAINES *v.*THE STATE.

A conviction of the offense of gaming was authorized by the evidence in this case.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Accusation of gaming; from city court of Wrightsville—Judge Blount. February 23, 1918.

*Fairclofh & Claxton,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. C. Brinson, solicitor,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence in this case is almost exactly like that in *Frost*v. *State,*120 *Ga.*311 (47 S. E. 901), in which the Supreme Court said: “The defendant was indicted for the offense of playing and betting' at cards. The evidence disclosed that in a certain house one of the persons named in the indictment was lying on the. floor, supported on his elbows, with his head from under the bed, shuffling a deck of cards. The others were arranged around in a circle, in the center of which was thirty or forty cents in nickels. The defendant'was included among those who were in the circle, and was on his knees. This was the tableau which met the gaze of the police officer and another person who was with him, when, without warning, they entered the house. The jury .could infer from this evidence the defendant’s guilt, and their finding, approved by the trial judge, will not be disturbed.”

*275The instant case is stronger than that of *Freeman*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*494 (94 S. E. 588), cited by counsel for the plaintiff.in error. In that case Freeman was indicted for participating in this same game. In the instant case the evidence’shows: that the chief of police of the City of Wrightsville went to the home of Nath Neal, and there saw several negroes sitting in a ring around a lamp which was on the floor; that the accused was “sitting in the ring with the bunch,” and Nath Neal was shuffling cards; that he left, and returned ten or fifteen minutes later, and, with the nightwatchman and the deputy sheriff, entered the house, and tiren “the defendant Gene Haines was in-the party down on the floor around the lamp, and Nath Neal still had the cards in his hands shuffling them, and there was some money down on the floor - in the ring, and cards lyihg on the floor. Gene Haines was in the crowd around the lamp and cards.” In the *Freeman*case, supra, the evidence of the chief-of police was that when he was first' at the house “the ■defendant was lying down on his stomach and elbows, with his face towards or fronting the ring where they were all sitting,” and when he returned with the other officers, and went, into the room, the defendant-David Ereenian was standing up imthe floor.. Another witness for the State, who was present in the room, where the •card game was in progress, testified: “I did not see the'defendant David Freeman playing cards.” Thus is the one case differentiated from the other.. While the evidence in the present case is weak and unsatisfactory, the jury are the final arbiters of the facts; no error of law is complained of, and it can not be held that the evidence was not sufficient to authorize the jury to infer that the defendant was guilty.

*J udgmeni affirmed,.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, Jconcur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"2024 Summer Legal Honors Internship Program","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PAnE7cxQuO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/2024-summer-legal-honors-internship-program-at-nasa-headquarters-and-nasa-centers\/\">2024 Summer Legal Honors Internship Program<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/2024-summer-legal-honors-internship-program-at-nasa-headquarters-and-nasa-centers\/embed\/#?secret=PAnE7cxQuO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“2024 Summer Legal Honors Internship Program” — NASA\" data-secret=\"PAnE7cxQuO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jason Costa","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jason-p-costanasa-gov\/","title":"LSP Primary Launches Archive","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9rjSvDx9PQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/lsp-primary-launches-archive\/\">LSP Primary Launches Archive<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/lsp-primary-launches-archive\/embed\/#?secret=9rjSvDx9PQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“LSP Primary Launches Archive” — NASA\" data-secret=\"9rjSvDx9PQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[783 NYS2d 254]

#### In the Matter of Teresa Brown, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Monique Brown, an Infant, Petitioner, v Sea Park West Houses, Respondent.

Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County,

August 25, 2004

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jacoby & Meyers, LLP (Sylvia*A. *Fermanian*of counsel), for petitioner.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eileen N. Nadelson, J.

*225Petitioner has applied to the court to approve the settlement of a negligence claim of an infant against the management of a housing complex where the infant was injured. In her petition, the mother of the infant has included the affirmation of the infant’s physician who is licensed to practice medicine in the State of Alabama, where the infant and her family presently reside. The court initially informed petitioner that she would have to provide the court with an affidavit from the doctor, and petitioner has applied for an adjournment of the hearing.

Petitions to settle infant compromise agreements are governed pursuant to the provisions of section 1208 of the CPLR. This section requires that all such petitions be accompanied by an affidavit or affirmation of the infant’s attending physician. Any application which lacks such documentation should be denied without prejudice to renew with appropriate medical substantiation. *(Lentine v Jacobs,*137 Misc 403 [NY City Ct, NY County 1930].) The purpose of this requirement is to assure the court that the infant has fully recovered and that the settlement is appropriate for the injury sustained. *(Maguire v New York R.T. Corp.,*141 Misc 807 [Brooklyn Mun Ct 1931].)

To meet the burden imposed by CPLR 1208 and the judicial decisions rendered thereunder, petitioners uniformly provide the court with affirmations of the infants’ attending physicians. Such affirmations are permitted under CPLR 1206, which states:

> “The statement of an attorney admitted to practice in the courts of the state, or of a physician, osteopath or dentist, authorized by law to practice in the state, who is not a party to an action, when subscribed and affirmed by him to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be served or filed in the action in lieu of and with the same force and effect of an affidavit.” (Emphasis added.)

However, as baldly stated by the statute, the physician must be licensed in the State of New York in order for his or her affirmation, rather than an affidavit, to be accepted as having evidentiary weight. Such affirmations by out-of-state physicians have been held, in malpractice actions, not to constitute competent evidence. *(Catanese v Furman,*9 AD3d 863 [4th Dept 2004]; *Palo v Latt,*270 AD2d 323 [2d Dept 2000].) Although there is no case directly on point, this court feels the same standard is mandated by statute in infant compromise situations as well.

*226Therefore, based on the foregoing, the court grants petitioner’s application to adjourn the hearing so that she may obtain the mandated affidavit from the Alabama doctor.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Astronaut to Discuss American Space Record in News Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ptmslGxbi2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-to-discuss-american-space-record-in-news-conference\/\">NASA Astronaut to Discuss American Space Record in News Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-to-discuss-american-space-record-in-news-conference\/embed\/#?secret=ptmslGxbi2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut to Discuss American Space Record in News Conference” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ptmslGxbi2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/iss065e335291_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mary Cook,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03876-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8521 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 1
#### Mary McCormac *v.*W. J. McCormac.

Divorce — Duty of Wife.

A wife is not entitled arbitrarily to insist on a husband selecting as a borne, one that is distasteful to him, and a refusal of a husband to so select, and live with the wife, is not grounds for a divorce.

APPEAL PROM JEPPERSON CIRCUIT COURT., CHANCERY OI' TSJO.V.

February 14, 1872.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

While appellant’s conduct during the short period that they lived together was in every respect correct, and that of appellee, on the 13th of November, 1868, was unkind, violent, and wholly without cause, or even slight provocation on her part, still, as he very soon thereafter, perhaps the very next day, sent an apology for his misbehavior and offered to provide a comfortable, respectable home for her, if she would share it with him, and as he was bound to provide the home, it was proper for her to have gone, and made au effort by a continuation of that blameless conduct which had marked her short married life, to win his highest regard, and smooth the path, upon which they had just entered, as they doubtless hoped in the start to travel through life together. The violence of his conduct on the evening of the 13th of November, 1868, within two weeks after their marriage, was such as to excite justly her apprehension of future domestic troubles. But as it was the husband’s duty to provide her future home, appellant could not consistently insist on his selecting one that was dissatis*554factory to him. And as he offered to provide one that should be comfortable and not disagreeable to her, she sould have gone with him, and endeavored to make it bright to him and happy to her. We do not see that appellant has brought herself within any of the provisions of the statute entitling her to a divorce.

Hams, *for appellant.*

Elliott, *for appellee.*

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Chui, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Chui
-------------------------
Robert Chui
Chief Financial Officer

May 20, 2005
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-11-00869- CV

Elias J. De La Garz a d/b /a Eli as De La G arza Insurance, Appellant
v. Texas Depart m ent of In surance and Com m ission er of Insu rance M ike Ge eslin, App ellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 98TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 0-0 0064 3, H ONO RAB LE RHO NDA HURLEY , JUDGE P RESIDING
O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

Appellant has filed an unopp o s ed m o t i on to stay proce eding s for 90 day s and a motion to withdraw as counsel of rec ord. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5, 10. Appellant’s lead counsel died unexpectedly , his law firm is in the proce ss of winding down, and the law firm is unable to continue to repr esent appellant in this case . We g rant the motions and stay the p ro ce ed i n gs for 90 day s or further order of this Court.

It is ordere d August 14, 2013. Be fore Justices Puryear , Rose, and Goodwin