alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

      This Amendment is made to the AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan, as most recently amended and restated effective January 1,
2002 (the "Plan"). All terms defined in the Plan shall have the same meanings
when used herein. This Amendment shall be effective January 1, 2003. All
provisions of the Plan not amended by this Amendment shall remain in full force
and effect.

1. SECTION 2.45 IS AMENDED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

      "Mandatory Deferral" means the amount of a Senior Executive's Total
      Compensation that must be deferred in accordance with Section 4.7 to
      reduce the Senior Executive's estimated annual Total Compensation to an
      amount that does not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000) for a taxable
      year (calculated in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code).

2. SECTION 3.2.1 IS AMENDED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

      ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS FOR MANDATORY DEFERRALS. If the Company estimates
      that a Senior Executive's Total Compensation shall exceed one million
      dollars ($1,000,000) for a taxable year (calculated in accordance with
      Section 162(m) of the Code), the Committee in its discretion may direct
      the Company to defer such excess pursuant to the Mandatory Deferral
      provisions of the Plan.

3. THE FIRST SENTENCE OF SECTION 4.5.1 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

      Each Covered Employee may elect, within 30 days after the grant of a
      Performance Share Award, or at such other time as determined by the
      Committee but in no event later than December 31 of the Plan Year
      preceding the Plan Year in which a Performance Share would otherwise be
      payable, to defer not less than ten percent (10%) or more than one-hundred
      percent (100%) of a Performance Share Award.

<PAGE>

4. THE LAST TWO SENTENCES OF SECTION 4.7.1 ARE DELETED.

      The Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on the date indicated
below.

                                             AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.


Dated:                                       By
      -------------------------                ---------------------------------
                                               Its
                                                  ------------------------------


                                     - 2 -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joseph Moore, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03838-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8487 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 10


                               MATERIAL CONTRACTS


The following  material  contracts of Navistar  Financial 2001-A Owner Trust are
incorporated herein by reference:

10.1     Purchase  Agreement  dated  as of  April  27,  2001,  between  Navistar
         Financial   Corporation  and  Navistar   Financial  Retail  Receivables
         Corporation,  as Purchaser,  with respect to Navistar  Financial 2001-A
         Owner Trust,  as Issuer.  Filed as Exhibit  99.1 to Navistar  Financial
         Retail  Receivables  Corporation's Form 8-K dated May 3, 2001. Filed on
         Registration No. 333-62445.

10.2     Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  dated as of April 27,  2001,  among
         Navistar  Financial  Corporation,  as Servicer,  and Navistar Financial
         Retail  Receivables  Corporation,  as Seller,  and  Navistar  Financial
         2001-A  Owner  Trust,  as  Issuer.  Filed as  Exhibit  4.1 to  Navistar
         Financial Retail Receivables  Corporation's Form 8-K dated May 3, 2001.
         Filed on Registration No. 333-62445.

10.3     Trust Agreement dated as of April 27, 2001,  between Navistar Financial
         Retail  Receivables  Corporation,  as Seller,  and Chase Manhattan Bank
         Delaware,  as Owner Trustee,  with respect to Navistar Financial 2001-A
         Owner  Trust.  Filed  as  Exhibit  4.3  to  Navistar  Financial  Retail
         Receivables  Corporation's  Form  8-K  dated  May  3,  2001.  Filed  on
         Registration No. 333-62445.

10.4     Indenture dated as of April 27, 2001, between Navistar Financial 2001-A
         Owner  Trust  and The Bank of New  York,  as  Indenture  Trustee,  with
         respect to Navistar  Financial 2001-A Owner Trust. Filed as Exhibit 4.2
         to Navistar Financial Retail  Receivables  Corporation's Form 8-K dated
         May 3, 2001. Filed on Registration No. 333-62445.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"NASA Selects Axiom Space for Third Private Astronaut Station Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Rqanx1MXIr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-selects-axiom-space-for-third-private-astronaut-station-mission\/\">NASA Selects Axiom Space for Third Private Astronaut Station Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-selects-axiom-space-for-third-private-astronaut-station-mission\/embed\/#?secret=Rqanx1MXIr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Selects Axiom Space for Third Private Astronaut Station Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Rqanx1MXIr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/axiom_space.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 8935]

      ( print page 65474)    
Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in these matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 2008 decision to maintain the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.

Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the aforementioned organization as a Foreign Terrorist Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. § 1189), shall be maintained.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

John F. Kerry,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-26200 Filed 11-3-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Advanced Air Mobility Bookmark","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"s6T9O2rcSt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/aam-bookmark\/\">Advanced Air Mobility Bookmark<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/aam-bookmark\/embed\/#?secret=s6T9O2rcSt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Advanced Air Mobility Bookmark” — NASA\" data-secret=\"s6T9O2rcSt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/12\/aam.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
9090.

#### Buchanan *v.*Satterwhite.

Wade, C. J.

1. Section 5185 of the Civil Code of 1910 requires2 among other things, that “before any writ of certiorari shall issue, the party-applying for the same, his agent or attorney, . . shall . . produce a certificate from the officer whose decision or judgment is the subject-matter of complaint, that *all*[italics ours] costs which may have accrued on the trial below have been paid.” Where such a certificate shows that all the costs which accrued on the trial below were paid “except tlnee dollars allowed by the court to the garnishee for cost of answering the garnishment,” it is obvious that the mandatory provision of the code that *all*costs shall be paid before the writ will issue was not complied with; and the judge of the superior court did not err *24in dismissing the certiorari for this reason. See *Savannah, Griffin & North Alabama Railroad*v. *Shell,*72 *Ga.*201; *Western & Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Carder,*120 *Ga.*460 (47 S. E. 930).

Decided March 13, 1918.

Certiorari; from Muscogee superior court—Judge Howard. June 20, 1917.

*B. Terry, 8. T. Pinkston,*for plaintiff in error.

*Paul Blanchard,*contra.

2. Section 5294 of the Civil Code of 1910 provides that “if the garnishee shall have to incur any expense in making his or her answer to the garnishment, or in turning over said personal property, the amount so incurred shall be taxed in the bill of costs, under the approval of the court, and be paid by the party east in the suit, as other costs are now paid.” The amount incurred in answering the garnishment in the present suit was therefore a proper item of costs.

*(a)*The contention of the plaintiff in error that the cost of answering the garnishment was not proved in the lower court, and therefore could not be taxed as a part of the costs, cannot be considered, since this complaint was made in the bill of exceptions for the first time, whereas the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant the judgment allowing the garnishee the cost of answering should have been raised in the petition for certiorari. See *Jefferson*v. *City of Perry,*18 *Ga. App.*690 (90 S. E. 366).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
9273.

#### Nunez *v.*Emanuel County.

Decided April 12, 1918.

Action for damages; from city court of Swainsboro—Judge Kirkland. September 24, 1917.

*Williams & Bradley,*for plaintiff.

*T. N. Brown,*for defendant.

Wade, C. J.

1. In a suit against a county for damage alleged to have, been caused by a defective bridge, the plaintiff can not recover unless the proper county authorities had knowledge of the defective condition, or unless the defect had existed for such a length of time that:-knowl- » edge thereof on the parr of the county authorities would be presumed *(Stamps*v. *Newton County,*8 *Ga. App.*230 (3b)) (68 S. E. 947); and it is a jury question as to what length of time a defect in a bridge must exist before a county is charged with knowledge of negligence. *City of Rome*v. *Brooks,*7 *Ga. App.*244 (66 S. E. 627); *Enright*v. *Atlanta,*78 *Ga.*289.

2. The evidence as a whole being sufficient to warrant the jury in finding that the county authorities did not have notice of the defect in the bridge, and that the defective condition had not existed for such a . length of time as to charge the authorities with such knowledge as would make them liable under the law, the trial court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based on the general grounds only.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and I/uke, J.J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 12.1











                                       86


<PAGE>


                                                                      Exhibit 12

                    SCOTSMAN HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                                     ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       1993          1994         1995         1996        1997
                                                       ----          ----         ----         ----        ----
                                                                         (Dollars in thousands)
<S><C>
Earnings:
     Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
       before income taxes and
       extraordinary item                            $(6,377)      $  (702)      $ 4,530      $11,980     $ 7,776
     Fixed charges from below                         22,322        21,869        26,174       29,894      46,900
                                                     -------       -------       -------      -------     -------
       Total earnings                                $15,945       $21,167       $30,704      $41,874     $54,676
                                                     -------       -------       -------      -------     -------

Fixed Charges:
     Interest                                        $21,530       $21,106       $25,306      $28,936     $45,744
     Interest component of rent expense:
       Total rent expense                            $ 2,375       $ 2,288       $ 2,605      $ 2,875     $ 3,468
       Portion considered interest expense                33%           33%           33%          33%         33%
                                                     -------       -------       -------      -------     -------
                  Interest component                 $   792       $   763       $   868      $   958     $ 1,156
                                                     -------       -------       -------      -------     -------

     Total fixed charges                             $22,322       $21,869       $26,174      $29,894     $46,900
                                                     -------       -------       -------      -------     -------

Earnings to Fixed Charges                                0.7x          1.0x          1.2x         1.4x        1.2x
                                                     =======       =======       =======      =======     =======

Excess Fixed Charges                                 $ 6,377       $   702           ---          ---         ---
                                                     =======       =======       =======      =======     =======
</TABLE>

                                       87
9212.

#### Kenner *v.*Connally, sheriff, for use, etc.

Decided March 15, 1918.

Complaint; from Murray superior court—Judge Tarver. September 8, 1917.

*Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, F. K. McCutchen,*for plaintiff in error. *W. F. Mann, C. N. King,*contra.

Wade, C. J.

1. Under the provisions of sections 6054 and. 6071 of the Civil Code of 1910, the verdict directed in this case was demanded by the evidence adduced at the trial.

2. There is no merit in the various special grounds of the motion for a new trial, assigning error upon the rejection of certain'proffered testimony.

3. The judgment refusing the motion for a new trial is affirmed, with 10 per cent, damages against the plaintiff in error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on form 10-K of Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II (the
registrant);
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  March 31, 2010
    /s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroCeres Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Marc Holliday, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                | /s/ Marc Holliday       |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:               | Marc Holliday           |
| Title:              | Chief Executive Officer |
|                |                    |
| March 17, 2005 |

 

----
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kenneth Galpin, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company and Scott Munro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  December 19, 2003 | /s/  Kenneth GalpinKenneth Galpin
President (Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  December 17, 2003 | /s/  Scott MunroScott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer    

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Most Home Corp. and will be retained by Most Home Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]