alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10066.

#### Harris *v.*The State.

Broyles, P. J.

1. Each ground of the motion for a new trial must be complete within itself. The first ground of'the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of the court’s refusal to rule out the following testimony of a named witness: “We went to Sam Harris’s house together, we were at his home. I found in his kitchen 12 or 15 cases of canned syrup, about 12 gallons to the case, and 15 sacks, of two bushels to the sack, of meal.” This testimony was objected to on the ground that it was illegal because the witness had no search-warrant to search the defendant Harris’s premises. It is not shown, though, in this ground of the motion, that the witness did not have such a warrant. Accordingly this ground raises no question for adjudication by this court. However, if such fact had been shown, the evidence, under the rulings in *Duren*v. *Thomasville,*125 *Ga.*1 (53 S. E. 814), *Smith*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App.*693 (88 S. E. 42), and *Calhoun*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App.*705 (88 S. E. 586), was admissible.

2. When considered in the light of the charge of the court as,,a whole and the facts of the ease, the excerpt from the charge, complained of in the *7962d ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, while somewhat confusing and not entirely accurate, does not require a new trial.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Indictment for manufacture of intoxicating liquor; from Bibb , superior courts Judge Mathews. July 29, 1918.

*John B. Cooper, E. W. Butter,*for plaintiff in error.

*John P. Boss, solicitor-general,*contra.

3. The remaining special ground of the motion for a new trial is virtually abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, and therefore will not be considered.

4. The conviction was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Good Vibrations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nqkKPK2No0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/good-vibrations\/\">Good Vibrations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/good-vibrations\/embed\/#?secret=nqkKPK2No0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Good Vibrations” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nqkKPK2No0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/edu_srch_good_vibrations.png?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":328}
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Petrosearch Energy Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
D. Dole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      March 25, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Richard D. DoleRichard
      D. DoleChief
      Executive Officer
#### TWIN OAKS ASSOCIATES AND HEALTH RESOURCES OF MORRISTOWN, INC. v. TOWN OF MORRISTOWN.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF RESTAURANT COMPANY AS OF MARCH 31, 2000
AND FROM THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,254
<INVENTORY>                                      5,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,776
<PP&E>                                         269,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 206,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,893
<BONDS>                                        168,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,952)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   206,737
<SALES>                                         75,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,905
<CGS>                                           21,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   109<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    301
<INCOME-TAX>                                        93
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       209
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The provision for doubtful accounts and notes is presented within operating
expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and is included
in total costs above.
</FN>


</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Donald J. Stutler, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Sonya R. Book, 

Defendant. 

No. 4: 16-CV-00023-TUC-JAS 

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United 

States Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman that recommends dismiss the case due to lack 

of subject matter jurisdiction. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not 

filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections 

has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 

 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge 

Bowman’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1); Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley 

v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

(1) Magistrate Judge Bowman=s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) is accepted and 

adopted. 

(2) The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is ordered to close the file 

in this case. 

 Dated this 23rd day of May, 2016. 

Honorable James A. Soto 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:16-cv-00023-JAS-LAB Document 11 Filed 05/23/16 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 46","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NTa1jkZPZ8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-46\/\">Expedition 46<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-46\/embed\/#?secret=NTa1jkZPZ8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 46” — NASA\" data-secret=\"NTa1jkZPZ8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/exp46-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Williams ScotsmanInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Singer, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |            | /s/    |                                                  | Robert C. Singer |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
|   |            |   | Robert C. Singer                                      |
|   |            |   | Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |            |   |
| Date:  | March 17,  2006 |   |                                                  |
|        |                 |        |                                                       |                  |        |  |  |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                   4,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,517                  11,105
<PP&E>                                          46,429                  11,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,968                   3,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,205                  24,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          447,146                 417,808
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         2,013                   2,002
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,205                  67,205
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  146,268                  84,881
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (325)                   (899)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,672                   3,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (156,615)                (87,415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (156,615)                (87,415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                237,961                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,346                (87,415)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.004                 (0.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.004                 (0.004)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-60445

Jonathan Edwards, 

Petitioner—Appellant,

versus

Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, 

Respondent—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:20-CV-47

Before Clement, Elrod and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jonathan Edwards, Mississippi prisoner # 44510, moves for a 

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s decision to 

grant him voluntary dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 case, in which he 

sought to challenge his 2017 conviction and sentence for burglary of a 

dwelling in case number K15-219H. He also moves for leave to proceed in 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 14, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-60445 Document: 00515822383 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2021
No. 20-60445

2

forma pauperis (IFP). In seeking a COA, Edwards argues only the merits of 

his § 2254 claims, without raising any error regarding the voluntary dismissal 

of the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).

“[W]e must consider the basis of our own jurisdiction, sua sponte if 

necessary.” Perez v. Stephens, 784 F.3d 276, 280 (5th Cir. 2015). The district 

court’s decision to grant Edwards voluntary dismissal without prejudice and 

without any conditions is not a final appealable decision. See Williams v. 

Seidenbach, 958 F.3d 341, 343, 349 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc); Mortg. Guar. 

Ins. Corp. v. Richard Carlyon Co., 904 F.2d 298, 300 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.

The appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction, and Edwards’s 

motions for a COA and leave to proceed IFP are DENIED as moot.

Case: 20-60445 Document: 00515822383 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. I), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Advisory Board of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC), to be held from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. (EDT) on Thursday, December 4, 2014 via conference call. The agenda for this meeting will be as follows: Opening Remarks; Consideration of Minutes of Past Meeting; Quarterly Report; Old and New Business; Closing Discussion; Adjournment.

Attendance at the meeting is open to the interested public but limited to the space available. With the approval of the Administrator, members of the public may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing further information should contact, not later than Friday, November 28, 2014, Anita K. Blackman, Senior Advisor to the Administrator, Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; 202-366-0091.

Any member of the public may present a written statement to the Advisory Board at any time.

Issued at Washington, DC, on October 28, 2014.

Carrie Lavigne,

Chief Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2014-25993 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-61-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,138
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,292
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     61,719
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           8,543
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             8,204
<LOANS>                                        572,572
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 667,196
<DEPOSITS>                                     428,478
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,304
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,052
<LONG-TERM>                                    173,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 667,196
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,719
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,248
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,967
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,012
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,590
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,377
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,021
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,914
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,914
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.65
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,014
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,499
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,781
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,951
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       39
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,412
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,412
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,171


</TABLE>