alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 17

- 1803

_____________________________ Q UINNTERIS D B USSIE ,
Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

.
January 22, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the Appellant only admitted violating the conditions of probation as alleged in the affidavit of violation of probation. See Altman v. State

, 252 So. 3d 426, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (citin g to Margolis v. State , 148 So. 3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming revocation of probation and resulting sentence, but remanding for entry of corrected revocation order of listing only the conditions of probation to which the defendant admitted); Na rvaez v. State

, 674 So. 2d 868, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (noting that written order of revocation must comport with oral pronouncement, and2 remanding with instructions to strike from the order violations neither admitted to nor found by the court). Appellan t need not be present for this correction.

A FFIRMED , but R EMANDED for correction.

W OLF , L EWIS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9 .331

.

_____________________________

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody , Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 923 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 923

                   To prohibit the cloning of humans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 1997

  Mr. Ehlers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   To prohibit the cloning of humans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Human Cloning Prohibition Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST CLONING OF HUMANS.

    (a) In General.--It shall be unlawful for any person to use a human 
somatic cell for the process of producing a human clone.
    (b) Civil Money Penalty.--Any person who violates subsection (a) is 
liable to the United States for a civil money penalty in an amount not 
exceeding $5,000.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended  September 30, 2004 (the  "Report") by
Tag-It Pacific,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.

Dated:   November 15, 2004                    /S/ COLIN DYNE
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Colin Dyne
                                              Chief Executive Officer


Dated:   November 15, 2004                    /S/ RONDA FERGUSON
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Ronda Ferguson
                                              Chief Financial Officer
#### Buntin *v.*Lagow and Another.

Where all the items of an account are on one side, the circumstance of some of them being within five years, does not take the others of longer standing out of the statute of limitations. Aliter, where there are mutual accounts between the parties.

APPEAL from the *Knox*Circuit Court. — In this case *Lagow*■and *Rose*were the plaintiffs below, and *Buntin*the defendant.

*Tabbs,*for the appellant.

Judah, for the appellees.

Blackford, J.

Assumpsit for goods, wares, and merchandize. Pleas, non-assumpsit and the statute of limitations. The Court instructed the j ury, that if there was an open account between the parties, the delivery of articles within five years was sufficient to take the articles previously delivered out of the statute. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

What the Court meant by an open account is very uncertain. If they intended mutual accounts, it would have been correct to leave the circumstance of articles delivered within five years to the jury, as evidence of such an acknowledgment of the prior charges, as might take the case out of the statute of limitations. If they intended an account in which all the items were on one side, the instruction to the jury was wrong. *Catling*v. Skould*ing,*6 T. R. 189. From the bill of particulars filed, and the residue of the case, it appears that the latter was understood by the jury to be the meaning of the Court.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the vexdict set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 892

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 236

States Courthouse’’.‘‘Aaron Henry Federal Building and UnitedSharkey Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 892

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building located at 236 Sharkey

Street in Clarksdale, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Aaron Henry

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 892 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 236 Sharkey Street

3 in Clarksdale, Mississippi, shall be known and designated

4 as the ‘‘Aaron Henry Federal Building and United States

5 Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

10 a reference to the ‘‘Aaron Henry Federal Building and

11 United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives September 14,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
appellant challenges the district court's rejection of his counterclaim. 

### See

Consol. Generator-Neu., Inc. v. Cummins Engine 

### Co., 114 Nev. 1304, 1312, 971 P.2d 1251, 1256 (1998) (recognizing that a party may challenge interlocutory orders entered before a final judgment in an appeal from the final judgment).

Turning to the merits of appellant's challenge to the rejection of his counterclaims, having considered appellant's civil proper person appeal statement and the record on appeal, we affirm the district court's denial of his motion to submit a counterclaim, as appellant's proposed counterclaim failed to state a cognizable claim against respondent. 1 

### Cf. Halcrow, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 129 Nev. „ 302 P.3d 1148, 1152 (2013) (explaining that leave to amend a complaint should be denied if the proposed amendment would be futile because it attempts to plead an impermissible claim); 

### Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 Nev. 224, 228, 181 P.3d 670, 672 (2008) (providing that a complaint should be dismissed "if it appears beyond a doubt that [the plaintiff] could prove no set of facts, which, if true, would entitle [him or her] to relief).

It is so ORDERED.



### 1S4ek r . Parraguirre J.

'Although the district court denied appellant's motion to submit a counterclaim on the ground that no such motion was available to appellant, we may affirm the district court's order if it reached the correct result, albeit for a different reason. 

### See Butler ex rel. Biller v. Bayer, 123 Nev. 450, 460 n.22, 168 P.3d 1055, 1063 n.22 (2007).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2

(0) 1947A

### cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge John Michael Foster Steven J. Klearman & Associates Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 3
(0) 1947A me
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4


                              AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
                                     TO THE
                                  BESTWAY, INC.
                           INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN


         Bestway, Inc. (the "Company"), having previously adopted the Bestway,
Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), and in accord with the powers
granted to the board of directors of the Company (the "Board") pursuant to
Paragraph 12 of the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, effective as of November
26, 2002, as follows:

         1. The first sentence of Paragraph 5 of the Plan is hereby amended and
restated to read as follows:

                  "The aggregate number of shares of the Company's Common Stock
                  that may be issued upon the exercise of Options shall not
                  exceed 385,000 shares, subject to adjustment under the
                  provisions of Paragraph 8."

         2. Paragraph 17, "Loans To Assist In Exercise Of Options," is hereby
deleted in its entirety and new Paragraph 17 is hereby added and shall read as
follows:

                  "17. COMPLIANCE WITH SARBANES-OXLEY ACT. Any Participant in
                  the Plan who is covered by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
                  "Act") shall be permitted to finance the exercise of any
                  Option (or portion thereof) granted under the Plan with a loan
                  or extension of credit from the Company or any Parent or
                  Subsidiary, or through the use of a cashless exercise
                  (deducting from the number of shares issuable to the
                  Participant the number of whole shares having a Fair Market
                  Value equal to the purchase price of the shares purchased upon
                  exercise of the Option); provided, however, that a loan or
                  extension of credit or cashless exercise shall be permitted
                  only if it does not violate any term of the Act or other
                  applicable statutes or regulations."


Adopted by the Board on October 14, 2002.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 99.0


               CAPITAL ONE MASTER TRUST AGGREGATED DATA FOR 1996


<TABLE>
<S>                                                           <C>
Defaults                                                        $443,804,949.45

Total Collections                                             10,469,681,905.47

Collections of Principal Receivables                           8,981,698,136.56

Collections of Finance Charge Receivables                      1,500,720,869.08
(includes amortization of annual membership fees)

Monthly Servicing Fee paid                                       143,293,306.96

Aggregate amount paid to Certificateholders
allocable to interest                                            411,157,768.40

Aggregate amount paid to Certificateholders
allocable to principal                                         1,758,734,091.00

Class A Investor Charge-Offs                                               0.00

Class B Investor Charge-Offs                                               0.00

Reductions in Collateral Indebtedness Interest                             0.00
</TABLE>





                                      -10-
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Selects First Commercial Destination Module for International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"13ourX6BtM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-selects-first-commercial-destination-module-for-international-space-station\/\">NASA Selects First Commercial Destination Module for International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-selects-first-commercial-destination-module-for-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=13ourX6BtM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Selects First Commercial Destination Module for International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"13ourX6BtM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/issac_from_station_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":903}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 56

To authorize establishment of a Department of Veterans Affairs ambulatory

care facility in Brookhaven, New York.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. FORBES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To authorize establishment of a Department of Veterans

Affairs ambulatory care facility in Brookhaven, New York.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VETERANS’ AMBULATORY CARE FACILITY,

4 BROOKHAVEN, NEW YORK.

5 The Secretary of Veterans Affairs is authorized to es6 tablish an ambulatory care facility for the Department of

7 Veterans Affairs in Brookhaven, New York. Depending on

8 which is more cost effective, the Secretary shall establish
2

HR 56 IH

1 such a facility by lease of an existing facility or by con2 struction of a new facility.

Æ
Exhibit 10.63



 



Exhibit 10.63


ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This Addendum (the “Addendum”) is made effective as of the 12th day of
December, 2002 and is intended to amend a certain Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”) by and between Erie Indemnity Company and John J. Brinling, Jr.
effective as of December 16, 1997.


     WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is in the best interest of the
Company and its Shareholders to secure the continued employment of the
Executive in accordance with the terms of the Agreement; and


     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has previously considered
and agreed to extend the term of the Agreement from its original term; and


     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company at its meeting of December
10, 2002 has again agreed to extend the term of the Agreement for a period of
one (1) additional year as contained herein; and


     WHEREAS, the Executive is agreeable to the extension of the Agreement.


     NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as
follows:


     1.     Paragraph 1 of the Agreement with respect to the Term is hereby amended
by extending the Term to expire on December 15, 2004.


     2.     All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force
and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	 	ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/	 	
Jan R. Van Gorder

Jan R. Van Gorder

Secretary
	 	By:
	 	/s/
	 	F. William Hirt

F. William Hirt

Chairman of the Board
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	WITNESS:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/	 	
Martina R. Gonzales

Martina R. Gonzales

Executive Secretary
	 	 	 	/s/
	 	John J. Brinling, Jr.

John J. Brinling, Jr.

5691 Culpepper Drive

Erie, PA 16506



75
EXHIBIT
15.5




CONSENT
OF AUTHOR





To:
            Crosshair
      Exploration & Mining Corp.British
      Columbia Securities CommissionAlberta
      Securities CommissionSaskatchewan
      Financial Services Commission (Securities Division)Manitoba
      Securities CommissionOntario
      Securities CommissionNew
      Brunswick Securities CommissionNova
      Scotia Securities CommissionNewfoundland
      and Labrador, Securities DivisionRegistrar
      of Securities, Prince Edward IslandUnited
      States Securities and Exchange CommissionAND
      TO:
            Toronto
      Stock ExchangeNYSE
      Amex EquitiesRE:
            Crosshair
      Exploration & Mining Corp. (“Crosshair”) -Consent
      under National Instrument 43-101







Reference
is made to the technical report entitled “Form 43-101 Technical Report on the
Golden Promise, South Golden Promise and Victoria Lake Properties” dated
April 30, 2008, and amended September 23, 2008 (the “Technical Report “) which
the undersigned has prepared for Crosshair.
 
 I have
reviewed and approved the summaries of and extracts from the Technical Report
prepared to be filed with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information
Form) of Crosshair (fiscal year ended April 30, 2009) and confirm that such
summaries and extracts fairly and accurately represent the information in the
Technical Report.  I hereby consent to the written disclosure of my
name, and reference to and incorporation by reference of, the Technical Report
in the public filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form)
of Crosshair with the regulatory authorities referred to above.
 
 I certify
that I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 20-F (Annual Information Form)
being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any
misrepresentations in the information contained therein that are derived from
the Technical Report or that are within my knowledge as a result of the services
performed by me in connection with the Technical
Report.


Dated:  June
25, 2009.











“Larry
      R. Pilgrim”Larry
      R. Pilgrim, B.Sc. P.Geo.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Garrett Shea","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/garrett-shea-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Meet Esther Veras: Hispanic Excellence in NASA’s Small Business Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nM0w9hlxhK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/osbp\/meet-esther-veras-hispanic-excellence-in-nasas-small-business-space\/\">Meet Esther Veras: Hispanic Excellence in NASA’s Small Business Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/osbp\/meet-esther-veras-hispanic-excellence-in-nasas-small-business-space\/embed\/#?secret=nM0w9hlxhK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Meet Esther Veras: Hispanic Excellence in NASA’s Small Business Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nM0w9hlxhK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/esther-veras.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":500}
Exhibit 32.2 – Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added bysection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tarpon CoastBancorp, Inc., the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge,that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information containedin the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: July 26, 2004 /s/ Todd H. Katz   Todd H. Katz   President   
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tarpon CoastBancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Tarpon Coast Bancorp, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.