alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 742 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 742

                For the relief of Florence Barrett Cox.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

  Mr. Bryant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Florence Barrett Cox.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR FLORENCE BARRETT COX.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Florence Barrett Cox shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Florence Barrett Cox enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Florence Barrett Cox, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
Honorable Glen Aaron, Jr. Opinion No. M- 635

County Attorney Tom Green County Re: Questions relating to proSan Angelo, Texas cedure for purchasesby a county under the amount of Dear Mr. Aaron: $2,000.

Your request for an opinion on the above subject matter states that the county auditor has questioned the procedure used by the commissioners court inmaking certain purchases under the amount of $2,000. Your request states:

"It has been our procedureheretofore that in all purchasesby Commissionersunder the amount of $2,000 the Commissionerswould go ahead and make such purchase at the time needed. At the Commissioner'sCourt session immediately following said purchase,purchasewould be submitted to the Court for subsequent ratification. We desire to know at this point whether this is a proper procedureunder the Laws of the State of Texas." Article 2351,Vernon's Civil Statutes,provides in part: "Each commissionerscourt shall:

.. _.

. . . "10. Audit and settle the county and direct their all accounts against payment.

"15. Said court shall have all such other powers and jurisdiction,and shallperform all such other duties, as are now or may hereafter be prescribedby law.
. . .'I

-3041-Hon. Glen Aaron, Jr., page 2 (M-635)

Pursuant to the powers granted under Subdivision 10 of Article 2351.Vernon's Civil Statutes. it is well settled that the commissionerscourt may ratify that which it oould approve in the first instance. Angelina County v. Kent, 374 S.W.Zd 313 (Tex.Civ.App.1963, no wrkt);,Statev. Carries, 106 S.W.2d 397 (Tex.Civ.App.1937, no writ); i :ameronCounty v. FOX, 61 S.W.Zd 483 (Tex.Comm.App.1933).

Since the expenditure in question is~ not in excess of $2,000, the provisions of Article 2368a,Vernon's Civil Statutes, requiring certain contracts to be let on competitivebids, are not applicable to the purchases described in your request.

In answer to your question, therefore,you are advised that the procedure outlined **in** your request is a lawfulprocedure. SUMMARY Since the commissioners courtmay ratify that which it could approve in the first instance, purchases.by commissionersunder the amount of $2,000may be subsequently ratified at a meeting of the,

commissionerscourt.

Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen,~Co-Chairman Austin Bray J. W. Broadhurst Terry Goodman Ray McGregor MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER ExecutiveAssistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant -3042-
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  Exhibit 10.33
                                 ADDENDUM NO.2

                      attaching to and forming part of the

                        MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS' LIABILITY
                         COMBINED REINSURANCE CONTRACT
           (formerly the Primary Excess Of Loss Reinsurance Contract)

                                  made between

                           INTERMED INSURANCE COMPANY
               of 1903 E. Battlefield, Springfield, Missouri, USA
                  (hereinafter referred to as "the Reassured")

                                      and

                          REINSURERS SIGNATORY HERETO
                 (hereinafter referred to as "the Reinsurers")

With effect from 1st October, 1997, the following amendments are made to this
Contract:

1.   Item A of SECTION (1) of ARTICLE 10 - PREMIUM is amended to read as
     follows:
     A.    The Reassured shall pay to the Reinsurers for the Annual
           Period commencing 1st October, 1997, a Provisional Premium of
           US$1,000,000 in four equal instalments at 1st October, 1997, 1st
           January, 1998, 1st April, 1998 and 1st July, 1998.

2.   The participations of Reinsurers shall be as shown in the attached
     Schedules and not as heretofore.

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNALTERED

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have, by their duly authorised
representative, executed this Contract as follows:

Signed in Springfield, Missouri, this      day of      199
                                     ------      ------


For and on behalf of the Reassured:
INTERMED INSURANCE COMPANY


And for the Reinsurers by means of and in accordance with the attached
Schedules which shall be considered to form an integral part of this Contract.




<PAGE>   2


                                   SCHEDULE B

                        Attaching to and forming part of

                                 ADDENDUM NO. 2

                                     to the

                        MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS' LIABILITY
                         COMBINED REINSURANCE CONTRACT

           (formerly the Primary Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract)

                                  made between

                           INTERMED INSURANCE COMPANY
                  of 1903 E. Battlefield Springfield, Missouri
                  (hereinafter referred to as the "Reassured")

                                      and

                          REINSURERS SIGNATORY HERETO
                 (hereinafter referred to as the "Reinsurers")

Signed in London, England this      day of      199
                              ------      ------
The London Insurance and Reinsurance Market Association for and on behalf of
the following Reinsurers:


6.83%  SPHERE DRAKE (UNDERWRITING) LIMITED
       For and on behalf of:
       SPHERE DRAKE INSURANCE PLC
       Ref: 97LNCX014284
       LIRMA Ref: S0289
Case 2:16-cr-00004-SRB Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00004-SRB Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00004-SRB Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 6, 2008



/s/ James C. SmithJames C. SmithPresident(Principal Executive Officer)


Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification
is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 951 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 951

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain lands 
                     located in Hinsdale, Colorado.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 951

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require the Secretary of the Interior to exchange certain lands 
                     located in Hinsdale, Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LARSON AND FRIENDS CREEK EXCHANGE.

    In exchange for conveyance to the United States of an equal value 
of offered lands acceptable to the Secretary of the Interior which lie 
within, or in proximity to, the Handies Peak or Red Cloud Peak 
Wilderness Study Areas or the Alpine Loop Backcountry Bi-way in 
Hinsdale County, Colorado, the Secretary of the Interior shall convey 
to Lake City Ranches, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (in this 
section referred to as ``LCR''), approximately 560 acres of selected 
land located in the same county and generally depicted on a map 
entitled ``Larson and Friends Creek Exchange'', dated June 1996. The 
exchange shall be contingent upon LCR granting the Secretary a 
permanent conservation easement on the approximate 440 acre Larson 
Creek portion of the selected lands (as depicted on the map) which 
limits future use of such lands to agricultural, wildlife, 
recreational, or open space purposes. The exchange shall also be 
subject to the standard appraisal requirements and equalization payment 
limitations set forth in section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716), and to reviews and approvals 
relating to threatened species and endangered species, cultural and 
historic resources, and hazardous materials under other Federal laws. 
The costs of such appraisals and reviews shall be paid by LCR. The 
Secretary may credit such payments against the value of the selected 
land, if appropriate, pursuant to section 206(f) of the Federal Land 
Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1716(f)).

            Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
No. 14,042.

#### Smith *v.*Sills.

Filed Nov. 25, 1890.

*Set-Off.*— Of *Notes and Judgments.*— Exemption *from, Execution.*— A debtor may rightfully claim a note as exempt from execution, although the maker of the note may hold notes or judgments against him, and in a suit by the debtor on the note the maker can not defeat the exemption law by setting off against the note sued on a note executed by the debtor, or a judgment rendered against him.

From the Wabash Circuit Court.

*M. H. Kidd*and *N. G. Hunter,*for appellant.

*W. G. Sayre*and *M. Good,*for appellee.

Elliott, J.

— The appellee declared upon a promissory note, and the appellant pleaded by way of set-off that the appellee was indebted to him upon a promissory note and a judgment in a sum exceeding the amount due on the note on which the complaint is founded. The appellee replied that he was a resident householder of the State, that he had less property than the law exempts from execution, and that he claimed the note in suit as exempt from execution under the statute. The reply was held good on demurrer.

Our decisions settle the question in favor of the appellee, for they adjudge that the maker of a promissory note can not defeat the exemption law by setting off against the note when sued a note executed by the payee or a judgment rendered against him. Those decisions affirm that a debtor may rightfully claim a promissory note as exempt from execution although the maker of the note may hold notes or judgments against him. The question requires no discussion, for it is not an open one. *Puett*v. *Beard,*86 Ind. 172, and authorities cited; *Butner*v. *Bowser,*104 Ind. 255; *Burdge*v. *Bolin,*106 Ind. 175; *Junker*v. *Hustes,*113 Ind. 524; *Carpenter*v. *Cool,*115 Ind. 134.

Judgment affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, R. ScottStevenson, Chief Financial Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. certifythat:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.                                       The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.                                       The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent function):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 12, 2004

 
|   | /s/ R. SCOTT STEVENSON   |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | R. Scott  Stevenson      |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4188-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]


Washington; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for State of Washington (FEMA-4188-DR), dated August 11, 2014, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 17, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Thomas J. 
Dargan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Michael J. Hall as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-25985 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**Exhibit 99.7**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connectionwith the accompanying Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. for thequarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Andrew A. Wiederhorn, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) such Form10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) theinformation contained in such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as aseparate disclosure document.

 
| May 1, 2003 |                 | /s/  Andrew A. Wiederhorn       |   |
|-------------|----------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Date        | Andrew A. Wiederhorn |
|        |                 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----