alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6338

THOMAS BLEVINS, a/k/a Tommy Ray Blevins,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANNY KING, Jail Administrator; FERNIE HYMAN, Food Service Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03064-D)

Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023

Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Blevins, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley O. Wood, WOMBLE BOND DICKINSON 

(US) LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Steven Andrew Bader, Marshall Wall, 

CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6338 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Blevins appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to 

dismiss Blevins’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse 

of discretion. See Mey v. Phillips, 71 F.4th 203, 217 (4th Cir. 2023) (“A district court has 

wide latitude in controlling discovery, and its rulings will not be overturned absent a 

showing of clear abuse of discretion.” (cleaned up)). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. Blevins v. King, No. 5:22-ct-03064-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2023). We deny 

Blevins’ request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6338 Doc: 20 Filed: 08/29/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
{"id":2667,"count":153,"description":"","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/","name":"Organizations","slug":"organizations","taxonomy":"category","parent":0,"meta":{"redirect":"","media-tag":0},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories\/2667"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/category"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hdsnav?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/gallery?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reference?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/mission?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/feature?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/press-release?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/stem-content?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/people?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/event?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/image-article?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/nasa-blog?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/migration?categories=2667"},{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?categories=2667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shaun Heinrichs, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2010

| | /s/
      Shaun Heinrichs    
| | -----------------------------
| | Shaun Heinrichs              
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (principal financial officer)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 114 Agreed to House (ATH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 114

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 1997

Mr. Linder submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Banking and Financial Services: Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
Foley, and Mr. Jones.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:16-cr-00097-SPL Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00097-SPL Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00097-SPL Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"ATD-1 Technology Transfer","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JEPeX5ixtq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/atd1-tech-transfer005\/\">ATD-1 Technology Transfer<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/atd1-tech-transfer005\/embed\/#?secret=JEPeX5ixtq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ATD-1 Technology Transfer” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JEPeX5ixtq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/atd1-tech-transfer005.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":401}
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Gramercy Capital Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/Aas filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert R. Foley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ ROBERT R. FOLEY |                    |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:               | Robert R. Foley         |   |
| Title:              | Chief Financial Officer |   |
| March 1, 2007  |                    |
|                     |                         |        |  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposal and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposal, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel.                    

*Date:*                         November 21, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 24, 2014.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-25765 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

GLEN ELLYN PHARMACY, INC., )

on behalf of plaintiff and the )

class members defined herein, )

) Case No. 20-cv-2177

Plaintiff, )

) Honorable Marvin E. Aspen

AKRON GENERICS, LLC )

and JOHN DOES 1-10 )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiff, Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc., by and through its attorneys Edelman, Combs, 

Latturner & Goodwin, LLC, hereby informs this Court that the parties have reached a settlement 

which will resolve the case on an individual basis. Plaintiff expects to complete the settlement 

within the next 60 (sixty) days and file a Stipulation to Dismiss with prejudice. 

In consideration thereof, the Parties respectfully request that this Court strike all pending 

dates and deadlines in this matter including, but not limited to, the Status Hearing currently 

scheduled for December 17, 2020 at 10:30 a.m..

Respectfully submitted

/s/ Dulijaza Clark

Dulijaza (Julie) Clark

Daniel A. Edelman

Dulijaza (Julie) Clark

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER 

& GOODWIN, LLC

20 S. Clark St, Suite 1500

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 739-4200

(312) 419-0379 (FAX)

E-mail for Service:

courtecl@edcombs.com

Case: 1:20-cv-02177 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/08/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:186
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Dulijaza Clark, hereby certify that on December 8, 2020, a true and accurate copy of 

the foregoing document was filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system, which shall cause delivery 

via email to all counsel of record. 

/s/ Dulijaza Clark

Dulijaza (Julie) Clark

Daniel A. Edelman

Cathleen M. Combs

Dulijaza (Julie) Clark

EDELMAN, COMBS, LATTURNER 

& GOODWIN, LLC

20 S. Clark St, Suite 1500

Chicago, Illinois 60603

(312) 739-4200

(312) 419-0379 (FAX)

E-mail for Service:

courtecl@edcombs.com

Case: 1:20-cv-02177 Document #: 28 Filed: 12/08/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:187
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-157793) of W&T Offshore, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-159005) pertaining to the W&T Offshore, Inc.Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan and Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-126252) pertaining to the W&T Offshore, Inc. 2004 Directors Compensation Plan, respectively, of our reports dated March 4, 2011, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of W&T Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of W&T Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2010. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Houston, Texas 

March 4, 2011
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0 858

_____________________________
L AZARO G ARCIA

- R UIZ
Appellant,

v.

R OYAL P OOL /A IG C LAIMS , I NC

. , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Mark A. Massey , Judge

.
Date of Accident: January 29, 2015.

August 24, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Richard A. Sicking and Mark A. Touby of Touby, Chait & Sicking, P.L., Coral Gables
, for Appellant.

Warren Brown of Brown & Pena, P.A., Hollywood
, for Appellee.
9911.

#### Cox *v.*Giddens.

Decided October 16, 1918.

Levy and claim; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. June 13, 1918.

*R. A. Hendricks,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. D. Lovett, W. D. Buie,*contra.

Wade, C. J.

There is no merit in the various special grounds of the motion for a new trial, and there was evidence to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
9051.

#### Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway Company *v.*Malsby Company.

Decided July 10, 1918.

On rehearing, September 17, 1918.

Jenkins, J.

1. Since no limitation of time for the bringing of actions by carriers for the collection of freight charges in interstate shipments is prescribed by act of Congress, the statute of limitations of the particular State must govern and control in such cases *(South Georgia Railway Co.*v. *South Georgia Grocery Co.,*17 *Ga. App.*349, 86 S. E. 939); and since liability of the shipper or the consignee for such charges arises by virtue of an expressed or implied promise to pay, and not merely by operation of law, the law of this State governing the limitation of ' actions under statutory rights (Civil Code of 1910, § 4360) is not applicable.

2. While a bill of lading issued by a common carrier is.a “contract in writing” within the meaning of section 4361 of the Civil Code (1910), and as such is binding not only upon the carrier and the shipper, but upon the consignee as well, when the latter' ratifies its provisions by talcing possession of the goods shipped thereunder *(Seaboard Air-Line Railway*v. *Luke,*19 *Ga. App.*100, 90 S. E. 1041), .still, where an action by a carrier against a consignee for freight, storage, and demurrage is shown to have been commenced more than four years after the refusal of the shipment by the consignee, the suit is barred under the provisions of section 4362 of the Civil Code. See *Central of Georgia Ry. Co.*v. *Eatonton Lumber Co.,*14 *Ga. App.*302 (2) (80 S. E. 725).

3. Upon the consignee’s refusal of a shipment it becomes the duty of the carrier to notify the shipper as to the refusal, and to hold the goods subject to the shipper’s order. *American Sugar Co.*v. *McGhee,*96 *Ga.*27 (21 S. E. 383). The mere fact that the consignee, on rejecting the shipment, may have given verbal directions for their return to the consignor'would not alter the rule, or amount to a ratification by the consignee of the terms of the bill of lading under which the rejected goods were moved.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Adhered to on rehearing. Wade, C. J., and Luhe, J., concur.*

*596Certiorari; from-Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. June 6, 1917.

*McDaniel & Blade, Charles Ciarle,*for plaintiff.

*A. M. Brand,*for defendant.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

__________________________

No. 12-13336

__________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00353-CEH-GJK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN C. PATTERSON,

 Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

__________________________

(June 18, 2013)

Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, JORDAN and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John C. Patterson challenges on appeal the district court’s denial of his 

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Specifically, he

argues that although he qualified as a career offender, he was not sentenced as a 

career offender, and thus he is eligible for a sentencing reduction under 

Case: 12-13336 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Amendment 750 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We find his

argument unpersuasive because the application of Amendment 750 would not 

lower his sentencing range. 

Patterson also contends that Freeman v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2685 

(2011), abrogated our decision in United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 

2008). As Patterson concedes, however, this argument is foreclosed by our 

decision in United States v. Lawson, 686 F.3d 1317 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 133 S. 

Ct. 568 (2012). 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 12-13336 Date Filed: 06/18/2013 Page: 2 of 2
9687.

#### BASIL *v.*THE STATE.

Broyles, P. J.

1. To convict an innkeeper, who has personal charge of an inn or hotel, of keeping a lewd house, it is sufficient if the evidence shows actual knowledge of the illegal practices, or that the defendant was in possession of such facts as to charge him with “constructive” or “implied” knowledge. Such knowledge may be shown by direct proof, or by proof of facts and circumstances from which the jury could reasonably infer that the defendant did have knowledge that acts of adultery or fornication were committed in the house. “He can not shut his eyes to what is going on around him, for the purpose of avoiding knowledge, and then defend upon the ground of his lack of knowledge.” *Fitzgerald*v. *State,*10 *Ga. App.*70 (2), 72 (72 S. E. 541).

*{a)*In such a case the fact that women of notoriously lewd reputation room at the hotel, and the further fact that the hotel has a reputation in the community of being a place where adultery or fornication is commonly committed, would be sufficient to authorize a finding that it was a lewd house, and that the proprietor knew, or should have known, that he was maintaining a lewd house. ' I

*(b)*The *Fitzgerald*case, supra, was a unanimous decision by three Judges, has never been overruled, and is binding upon this court until overruled. Upon a review thereof, as requested by the plaintiff in error, its rulings are reaffirmed.' The holding in *Jones*v. *State,*14 *Ga. App.*811 (82 S. E. 470), by two Judges, is in conflict with the older adjudication in the *Fitzgerald*case, and will hot be iollowed.

2. Under the rulings stated above, the refusal of the trial judge to give the various requested "instructions in charge to the jury was not error.

3. No reversible error appears in any of the excerpts from the charge excepted to; nor in any of the rulings of the court upon the admissibility of evidence. The conviction of the ’ accused was amply authorized by *766the evidence, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior .court—Judge Bell. March 29, 1918. .

*George Gordon,*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, Lowry Arnold, solicitor, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworlh, J., concurs. Harwell, J., concurs specially.*

Harwell, J.

If there is any conflict in *Fitzgerald*v. *State*and *Jones*v. *State*(cited supra), the correct rule, in my opinion, was stated by Judge Wade in the *!jones*case. I am inclined to think that Judge Powell, by the use of the phrase “knowledge, . . implied,” etc., in the 2d headnote to the *Fitzgerald*decision, referred to knowledge which might be *inferred*by the jury from circumstances. In my judgment, in order to authorize a conviction, knowledge of the illegal practices by the defendant must appear; but this knowledge may be shown by direct proof, or inferentially by circumstances. I recognize that if there is a conflict in the two decisions above referred to, the one rendered in the *Fitzgerald*case is authority until overruled.