alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              30
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         79
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   143
<PP&E>                                             204
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (102)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               79
<BONDS>                                            428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (214)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       334
<SALES>                                            686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   686
<CGS>                                              577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (49)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (12)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (37)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (2)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (39)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ngai Keung Luk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ngai Keung Luk
-------------------------
Ngai Keung Luk
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

May 15, 2003



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert Chui, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Chui
-------------------------
Robert Chui
Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I, Jefferson J. Gregory, Chief Executive Officer of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in this report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


Date: November 14, 2002                           /s/ Jefferson J. Gregory
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Jefferson J. Gregory
                                                 Chairman of the Board
                                                 and Chief Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp.
(the Company) on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert F. Baldock, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: October 25, 2011 | By: | /s/ Robert F. Baldock                      
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                       |     |                                            
|                       |     | Robert F. Baldock                          
|                       |     | President and Chief Executive
      Officer
|                       |     | (principal executive officer)              

---
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 786

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to restore the effectiveness of

certain provisions regulating Federal milk marketing orders.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. NORWOOD (for himself, Mr. BALLENGER, Mr. BARR of Georgia, Mr.

BISHOP, Mr. BOYD, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURR of North Carolina, Mr.

CALLAHAN, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. COOKSEY,

Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr.

HEFNER, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky, Mr. LINDER, Mr. LIVINGSTON, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr. PICKERING, Mr. SPENCE, Mr. SOLOMON,

Mr. TAUZIN, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. JOHN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to restore the

effectiveness of certain provisions regulating Federal milk

marketing orders.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 786 IH

1 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TERMI2 NATED PROVISIONS OF AGRICULTURAL AD3 JUSTMENT ACT REGULATING FEDERAL MILK

4 MARKETING ORDERS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective as of December 31,

6 1996, section 101(b) of the Agriculture and Food Act of

7 1981 (Public Law 97–98; 95 Stat. 1219; 7 U.S.C. 608c

8 note) is amended by striking ‘‘1996’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘1999’’.

10 (b) TREATMENT OF PERIOD OF LAPSED EFFECTIVE11 NESS.—The amendments made by section 101(a) of the

12 Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (Public Law 97–98;

13 95 Stat. 1219) shall continue in force as if never termi14 nated as a result of the expiration of the period of effec15 tiveness of the amendments on December 31, 1996.

Æ
Opinion issued December 21, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00909-CV

———————————

IN RE TARA STURGEON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Tara Sturgeon, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of 

mandamus asserting that the trial court had abused its discretion by: (1) “not 

returning” relator’s minor children to her custody; (2) “by entering the January 24, 

2023 Temporary Order Following Adversary Hearing”; (3) terminating relator’s 

visitation to her minor children after a July 20, 2023 hearing; and (4) failing to 
2

provide relator with effective counsel.

1

 Relator requested that the Court “issue a 

writ of mandamus directing the [trial] court to restore constitutional protections of 

the family, [and to] return the children to their parents, immediately.” 

Our review of relator’s mandamus petition reflects that relator has failed to 

establish that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A)

(relator required to provide appendix which “must contain” certified or sworn copy 

of any “document showing the matter complained of”), 52.7(a) (relator “must file” 

record with mandamus petition containing “certified or sworn copy of every 

document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any 

underlying proceeding”), 52.8(a); see also Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 

(Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of L.S., O.S., and A.S., Children, Cause No. 

2023-00153J, in the 314th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable 

Michelle Moore presiding.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH GONZALEZ,

 Plaintiff,

v.

JANET DHILLON, CHAIR; UNITED 

STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Defendants.

No. 1:20-cv-02111

Judge Matthew F. Kennelly

JOINT STATUS REPORT

Plaintiff, ELIZABETH GONZALEZ, by and through her attorneys, Riley Safer Holmes 

& Cancila LLP, and Defendant JANET DHILLON, through her counsel, and for this Joint Status 

Report the Parties state as follows:

The Parties are in the process of completing written discovery. Plaintiff has propounded 

and Defendant has responded to a first set of discovery requests. Defendant has produced 

documents responsive to Plaintiff’s requests except for ESI related to the communications/emails 

of the people involved in this case. Defendant has made an internal request for this ESI and will 

produce this information once available. Defendant has propounded an initial set of discovery. 

Plaintiff is in the process of responding to this discovery. The Parties have met and conferred 

about this discovery since Plaintiff’s personal situation related to domestic violence has delayed 

her ability to respond. After Plaintiff provides discovery responses to Defendant, Defendant will 

seek Plaintiff’s medical records.

At this time, the Parties have identified the following individuals most likely to be 

deposed in no particular order: Plaintiff Elizabeth Gonzalez, Tyrone Irvin, Patricia Jaramillo, 

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 45 Filed: 06/24/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:442
2

Julianne Bowman, Kimberly Engram, and Jose Romo. These witnesses are represented by 

counsel for the Parties.

The Parties have been working diligently to progress with fact discovery. Currently, the 

parties do not anticipate a need for an extension of any court deadlines, pending Plaintiff’s 

personal circumstances.

Dated: June 24, 2021

/s/ Brian O. Watson

Brian O. Watson

Matthew E. Lee

RILEY SAFER HOLMES & CANCILA LLP

70 W. Madison Street, Suite 2900

Chicago, Illinois 60602

(312) 471-8700

bwatson@rshc-law.com

mlee@rshc-law.com

docketdept@rshc-law.com

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Valerie R. Raedy

Valerie R. Raedy

Assistant United States Attorney

219 South Dearborn Street

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(312) 353-8694

valerie.raedy@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Janet Dhillon, United States 

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Attorneys for Elizabeth Gonzalez

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 45 Filed: 06/24/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:443
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on June 24, 2021, these papers were filed using the Court’s CM/ECF

system, which will send notice of this filing to all counsel of record. 

/s/ Brian O. Watson

4819-6997-2208, v. 1

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 45 Filed: 06/24/21 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:444
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

                Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PawnMart, Inc., a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert W.Schleizer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to my knowledge:

 

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)            The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Robert W. Schleizer

 

Robert W. Schleizer

Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2003

 

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-6788

BYRON CARLTON CUMBER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

W. Earl Britt, District Judge.

(CR-88-26, CA-96-48-7-BR)

Submitted: December 24, 1996

Decided: January 10, 1997

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Bryon Carlton Cumber, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton,

III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Byron Carlton Cumber filed this motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty

Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, attacking the revocation of his term of supervised release. Upon revocation, the district

court sentenced Cumber to twenty-four months imprisonment consecutive to a state sentence he was serving, and ordered all restitution

due. This Court affirmed the revocation on appeal. United States v.

Cumber, No. 95-5024 (4th Cir. Sept. 25, 1995) (unpublished). In this

§ 2255 proceeding, Cumber raises four challenges to the original sentence and revocation of supervised release. We find merit in none of

them.

Cumber attacks the original sentence on nonconstitutional grounds.

We decline to review these claims in a collateral attack, as they do

not raise a fundamental defect resulting in a miscarriage of justice.

United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 185 (1979). His allegation

that the sentence imposed on revocation of supervised release violates

the Double Jeopardy Clause lacks merit, as supervised release and its

revocation are all part of the punishment for the original offense.

United States v. Woodrup, 86 F.3d 359, 362 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,

___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 3294 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1996) (No. 96-6025).

We do not find that Cumber's sentence was excessive, as it was

well within the bounds set forth in 18 U.S.C.A.§ 3583(e)(3) (West

Supp. 1996), and U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3 (1995). In addition, the district

court properly clarified the ambiguous oral judgment by stating in the

judgment and commitment order that the sentence would be served

consecutive to the state sentence Cumber was serving, as required by

U.S.S.G. § 7B1.3(f).

Therefore, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                                 ONCORMED, INC.
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    CALCULATION OF SHARES USED IN COMPUTING
                               NET LOSS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                            Period from
                                                                                                             Inception
                                                                                                          (July 12, 1993)
                                                               For the Years Ended December 31,               Through
                                                   -------------------------------------------------         December 31,
                                                      1997                 1996              1995                1997
                                                  -----------          -----------        ---------        --------------
<S>                                                <C>                 <C>                <C>                 <C>
Common Stock                                       7,709,301           6,805,083          4,947,991           5,557,433
                                                   ---------           ---------          ---------           ---------

Shares used in computing net loss per share        7,709,301           6,805,083          4,947,991           5,557,433
                                                   =========           =========          =========           =========
</TABLE>










                                      S-3
IB

House Calendar No. 86

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 613

[Report No. 105–232]

To designate the Federal building located at 100 Alabama Street NW.,

in Atlanta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Sam Nunn Federal Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Mr. LEWIS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. DEAL

of Georgia, Mr. KINGSTON, and Mr. NORWOOD) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

JULY 31, 1997

Reported with amendments, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to

be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 100 Alabama

Street NW., in Atlanta, Georgia, as the ‘‘Sam Nunn

Federal Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 613 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building located at 100 Alabama Street

3 NW., in Atlanta, Georgia, shall be known and designated

4 as the ‘‘Sam Nunn Federal Center’’.

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

8 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

9 a reference to the ‘‘Sam Nunn Federal Center’’.

10 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

11 The Federal building located at 61 Forsyth Street SW.,

12 in Atlanta, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the

13 ‘‘Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center’’.

14 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

15 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

16 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

17 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a

18 reference to the ‘‘Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal Center’’.

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to designate

the Federal building located at 61 Forsyth Street SW.,

in Atlanta, Georgia, as the ‘Sam Nunn Atlanta Federal

Center’.’’.

House Calendar No. 86

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 613

[Report No. 105–232]

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 100

‘‘Sam Nunn Federal Center’’.Alabama Street NW., in Atlanta, Georgia, as the

JULY 31, 1997

Reported with amendments, referred to the House

Calendar, and ordered to be printed
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                               SARNIA CORPORATION
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                        (In thousands, except share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Years Ended June 30,
                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         1999                     1998                      1997
                                                  -----------------         -----------------         ----------------
<S>                                              <C>                       <C>                      <C>
NET INCOME APPLICABLE TO
 COMMON STOCK..................................   $            180          $             70          $             5
                                                  =================         =================         ===============

Weighted average common shares outstanding.....          4,572,545                 4,572,545                4,572,545
                                                  =================         =================         ===============


NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC...................   $           0.04          $           0.02          $           ---
                                                  =================         =================         ===============


Common shares from above.......................          4,572,545                 4,572,545                4,572,545
Assumed exercise of options (treasury stock
 method).......................................             91,973                    91,647                   30,383
                                                  ----------------          -----------------         ---------------
                                                         4,664,518                 4,664,192                4,602,928
                                                  ================          =================         ===============
NET INCOME PER SHARE -
 DILUTED.......................................   $           0.04          $           0.02          $           ---
                                                  ================          =================         ===============
</TABLE>


                                       17