alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Veronica Guadalupe Saldivar,

Defendant.

No. CR-15-02062-001-TUC-JAS (LCK)

ORDER 

Upon Motion to Modify Conditions of Release (Doc. 62) filed by Defendant and 

there being no objections by the Government or Pretrial Services;

IT IS ORDERED the Motion is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Defendant is granted permission to travel to 

Nogales, Sonora, Mexico on May 9, 2017, and return the same day. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendant is to contact Pretrial Services upon her

return to the District of Arizona. 

Dated this 1st day of May, 2017.

Honorable Lynnette C. Kimmins

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:15-cr-02062-JAS-LCK Document 63 Filed 05/01/17 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2009 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdamsChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive OfficerMay 4, 2009
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra L. Johnson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-l-johnsonnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-84","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"a4t78jicu0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-84\/\">STS-84<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-84\/embed\/#?secret=a4t78jicu0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-84” — NASA\" data-secret=\"a4t78jicu0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/sts084-s-002.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
#### A. W. Macklin *v.*Zeb Ward.

Appeal — Evidence—Original Papers Destroyed.

On an appeal, and the original papers, books, etc., used at the trial below, are shown to have been destroyed by fire, the Appellate Court cannot take judicial cognizance of same, no copies appearing to have been made.

Same — Bill of Exceptions.

The bill of exceptions will be treated as if such evidence had been entirely omitted.

APEEAL FROM WOODFORD CIRCUIT COURT.

April 22, 1869.

*109
      *Lindsey, for appellant.*

*Ward, Craddock, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

By granting a rehearing this case stood in this court precisely in the condition that it stood in before any opinion had been delivered, and just as if no opinion had ever been delivered in the case by this court.

It appears in the record now before us that the original books and papers of the prison, kept while the hemp was being delivered by Macklin, and manufactured by Ward, were used as evidence on the trial of the case in the court below to show how the accounts stood between the parties.

It furthermore appears in the record now before the court that said original books and papers had been used on the trial aforesaid,'and that' an order was made by the consent of the parties to the following effect: That the penitentiary books and papers used in this trial be used in the'Court of Appeals without being copied.

These original books and papers 'as stated in an affidavit by T. N. Linsey, who says he has been counsel for Macklin from the commencement of the suit to the present time, are material to a proper understanding of the case, and are lost, that they were brought up to this court as a part of the record in this case, were in the office of the clerk of this court, and he believes were burned when the clerk’s office of the court was burned.

As these hooks and papers do not seem to be copied, and are not now on file, and consequently a part of the material evidence which was used on the trial of the court below cannot be produced here, this court cannot review that judgment on an incomplete record, and a very material part of the evidence not supplied.

This insuperable difficulty in the way of reviewing that judgment must be obvious, and consequently must result in an *affirmance*of the judgment of the court below. Judgment *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Information Technology Lead Dana Bolles","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XhcoRDpCS0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/information-technology-lead-dana-bolles\/\">Information Technology Lead Dana Bolles<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/information-technology-lead-dana-bolles\/embed\/#?secret=XhcoRDpCS0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Information Technology Lead Dana Bolles” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XhcoRDpCS0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/nhq202303020039.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit
13.1








PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350





In
connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (IOM) Limited. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Tor Olav Troim, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
April 29, 2010







/s/ Tor Olav Troim


Tor Olav
Troim


Principal
Executive Officer
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 642

To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain types of mail

matter from being sent by a Member of the House of Representatives

as part of a mass mailing.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 6, 1997

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on Government

Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent certain

types of mail matter from being sent by a Member of

the House of Representatives as part of a mass mailing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3210(a) of title 39, Unit5 ed States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing:
2

•HR 642 IH

1 ‘‘(8) A Member of the House of Representatives may

2 not send, as part of a mass mailing, any matter described

3 in subparagraph (B), (C), or (F) of paragraph (3).’’.

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

5 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to mail sent during

6 any session of Congress beginning after the date of the

7 enactment of this Act.

Æ
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                       
|------------ |  | ----------------------
|May 11, 2007 |  |                       
|             | 
|             |  | /s/ William T. Bromage
|             |  | William T. Bromage    
|             |  | President             

Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is
being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
II (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition and results of
operations of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  March 31, 2009

/s/
Jerry PascucciJerry PascucciCitigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director
II

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 595

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 27, 1998

Received

AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia,

as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle Federal Building and

United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 595 RDS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The Federal building and United States courthouse

3 located at 475 Mulberry Street in Macon, Georgia, shall

4 be known and designated as the ‘‘William Augustus Bootle

5 Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

9 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec10 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William

11 Augustus Bootle Federal Building and United States

12 Courthouse’’.

Passed the House of Representatives November 13,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
#### F. C. Evans *v.*George Rock et al.

Trial — Answer Taken as True.

A plaintiff is only entitled to a trial of a cause at the same term an answer is filed, by consenting that statements of the answer were true.

Same.

If such consent had been given, the defendant would have been entitled, on the averments of his answer, to a judgment dismissing the action.

APPEAL FROM MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

April 17, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The judgment foreclosing the mortgage of Rock was rendered, against an objection of Evans, on the 21th of January, 1868.

At the same term Evans had been admitted as a party, and filed an answer alleging facts constituting a bar, if true, .to the plaintiff’s right to Nave a judgment forcing the mortgage, and which was made a cross petition, and was answered, and controverted by the plaintiff, and other parties.

According to section 395 Civil Code the .plaintiff was only entitled to a trial at that term, by consenting that the statements of the answer were true. If such consent had been given the appellant would have been entitled, on the averments of the answer to a judgment dismissing the action; no such consent having been *249given *the*trial was unauthorized and the judgment can not be sustained *(Gruel & wife vs. Smally. 1 Duvall 358).*

*J. B. Husbands, for appellant.*

*Harlan & Newman, for appelle.*

Wherefore the judgment is reversed for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
#### G. L. Bourbon *v.*Martha Porter & Others.

Vendor and Purchaser — Notice of Deraignment of Title.

The purchaser of property, with notice of the deraignment of title, assumes the risk subsequent thereto.

Same — Payment of Purchase Money.

Nor can he escape the payment of purchase money notes therefor, especially when he refuses a rescission of the contract, and seeks to stand on a warranty of title.

APPEAL PROM HOPKINS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 31, 1870.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Williams:

The evidence in this case does not warrant the conclusion that. Mrs. Porter “artfully concealed” from Bourland the true character of her title to the house and lot for which the notes sued on were executed, and when interrogated upon that subject, she promptly informed him that she derived title through her husband’s will. And her acquiescence in the opinion expressed by her attorney as to the title vested in her by said will, was neither fraudulent nor artful.

Bourland having accepted a deed containing covenants of warranty, could make no available defense to the payment of the purchase price, unless he could show that his vendor was either a non-resident or insolvent. The latter fact was charged to exist, but there was not one word of evidence to sustain the allegation.

The judgment of the circuit court giving Bourland the right to rescind the contract of sale in case he chose to do so, was more favorable to him than he had the right to expect, and having declined to. avail himself • of that privilege he has no legal or *374equitable ground of complaint at being compelled to pay the notes executed for the purchase money of the house and lot. <Tudgment affirmed.

*Waddell &*Pratt, *for appellant.*

*Drane, for appellee.*
#### Matter of the Estate of Thomas Joseph Donovan, Deceased.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

April, 1920.)

Negligence — who entitled to distributive share of proceeds of judgment for negligence resulting in death — meaning of words “next of kin’’—Code Civ. Pro. §§ 1870, 1903(1) — Decedent Estate Law, § 98.

Under section 1870 of the Code of Civil Procedure and section 98 of the Decedent Estate Law, a grandchild is one of the “ next of kin ” of her grandfather within the meaning of section 1903(1) of said Code, and is entitled to her distributive share of the proceeds of a judgment recovered in an action for negligence resulting in the death of the grandfather.

Proceeding upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of an administrator.

Valentine & Chichester, for petitioner,

Adolph Bangser, for guardian.

Peter P. McElligott, special guardian.

Foley, S.

The question involved in this accounting is as to the distribution of the proceeds of a judgment obtained for negligence resulting in death. The decedent left him surviving a widow, six children and one grandchild, a daughter of a deceased daughter. The administratrix contends that section 1903 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as construed by *Matter of Meng,*227 N. Y. 264, excludes the grandchild from sharing in the distribution. Subdivision 1, section 1903, however, only applies where no children survive the deceased. Where children survive the first sentence of that section applies, and the damages recovered are “ for the benefit of decedent’s husband or wife and next of kin.” The grandchild, under section 1870 of *534the Code of Civil Procedure, and subdivision 1, section 98 of the Decedent Estate Law, is one of the next of kin and is entitled to her proper distributive share. *Matter of Meng,*supra, is not applicable here.

Decreed accordingly.
Exhibit 10.6(b)
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Fairfield Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II.
    
    Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & DirectorGRAHAM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.By:
    
    /s/ Peter SedlackPrint Name:  Peter SedlackJM/sr
 63
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: August 14, 2009



| |     |                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                     
| |     |                                                                                                     
| | By: | /s/ JOHN J. JOYCE                                                                                   
| |     | John J. Joyce                                                                                       
| |     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.