alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Joseph Miller, Chief Financial Officer of
Crosshair Exploration & Mining Corp. (the Company), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
      the Company for the year ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                

Date: October 14, 2008

| | /s/
      Joseph Miller
| | -----------------------
| | Joseph Miller          
| | Chief Financial Officer

---
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-30","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"X5MxZiJWHs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-30\/\">STS-30<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-30\/embed\/#?secret=X5MxZiJWHs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-30” — NASA\" data-secret=\"X5MxZiJWHs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/8905042\/8905042~large.jpg?w=600&h=1535&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1535}
Exhibit 15.5



CONSENT OF EXPERT



I, Todd W. Johnson, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the
written disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Veris Gold Corp. Jerritt Canyon Property,
Elko County, Nevada” dated July 11, 2013, and the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Yukon-Nevada
Gold Corp. Ketza River project, Yukon Territory, Canada” dated June 28, 2011, in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto (the “Form 20-F”), of Veris Gold Corp. (the “Company”),
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure in the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-171775) (the “Form S-8”) filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Form 20-F, and any
amendments thereto, and to the incorporation by reference of the Form 20-F and any amendments thereto, into the Company’s
Form S-8.



|September 11, 2014 | By: | /s/ Todd W. Johnson                    
|------------------ | --- | ---------------------------------------
|                   |     | Name: Todd W. Johnson                  
|                   |     | Title: VP Exploration, Veris Gold Corp.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I,
Kevin E. Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer of Educate, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Kevin E. ShafferName:

Kevin E. ShafferDate:

March 16, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



98
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00127-CV

EX PARTE K.Y.S.

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-CI-14239

Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 19, 2023

DISMISSED

On March 29, 2023, appellant filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal moving this court to

dismiss its appeal. Appellant’s motion to dismiss its appeal is granted, and this appeal is dismissed.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not indicate that the parties agreed 

otherwise, costs of appeal are taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         48
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,674
<ALLOWANCES>                                   50
<INVENTORY>                                    135
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,244
<PP&E>                                         2,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 13,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,234
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       68
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   13,216
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,379
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (403)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.14)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Bill Keeter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/wkeeter\/","title":"Contracts and Acquisition Integrity Law","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"s9FYrJ6Cj0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/contracts-and-acquisition-integrity-law\/\">Contracts and Acquisition Integrity Law<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/contracts-and-acquisition-integrity-law\/embed\/#?secret=s9FYrJ6Cj0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Contracts and Acquisition Integrity Law” — NASA\" data-secret=\"s9FYrJ6Cj0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/ogc-banner-small.jpg?w=535","thumbnail_width":535,"thumbnail_height":215}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1223

JOSEPH LAROSA; DOMINICK LAROSA, Plaintiffs - Appellees, versus JOAN LAROSA; VIRGIL B. LAROSA, Defendants - Appellants, and WESBANCO; BANK ONE, WEST VIRGINIA, NA; RUSSELL L. BONASSO; HARRISON COUNTY BANK, Parties in Interest. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. John S. Kaull, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-9-1) Submitted: August 23, 2004 Decided: September 3, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael D. Crim, MCNEER, HIGHLAND, MCMUNN & VARNER, L.C., Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellants. Gregory H. Schillace, SCHILLACE LAW OFFICE, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000). - 3 - PER CURIAM: Joan LaRosa and Virgil B. LaRosa appeal from the magistrate judge’s order * determining that an “Order of Court” entered in the District Court for the District of Maryland was a final judgment in that action. The magistrate judge therefore concluded that the Maryland judgment was properly registered in the Northern District of West Virginia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963 (2000), and accordingly denied Joan and Virgil’s motion to quash the registration of judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. SeeLaRosa v. LaRosa , No. CA-02-9-1 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 885 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 885

To prohibit any executive branch agency from entering into any service 
 contract if the services procured under the contract can be performed 
              at a lower cost by employees of the agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 1997

  Ms. Norton (for herself and Mrs. Morella) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and 
                               Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit any executive branch agency from entering into any service 
 contract if the services procured under the contract can be performed 
              at a lower cost by employees of the agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ENTERING CERTAIN SERVICE CONTRACTS.

    (a) Prohibition.--An agency in the executive branch of the Federal 
Government may not enter into a service contract, unless--
            (1) the agency has determined--
                    (A) the total cost to the Federal Government of 
                procuring services under the contract; and
                    (B) the total cost to the Federal Government of 
                having those services performed by employees of the 
                agency; and
            (2) the costs determined under paragraph (1)(A) are less 
        than the costs determined under paragraph (1)(B).
    (b) Cost Comparison.--The comparison of costs required by 
subsection (a)(2) shall be made pursuant to the criteria set forth in 
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76, as in effect on the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application.--Subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 
contracts awarded after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (d) Service Contract Defined.--For the purposes of this section, 
the term ``service contract'' has the meaning given such term in part 
37 of title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
#### T. C. S. Thomas *v.*S. S. Sizemore.

Injunction — Dissolution—Dismissal of Petition.

When, on the dissolution of an injunction hy the lower court, the petition is dismissed, a Judge of the Appellate Court has no. power to re-instate the injunction.

Principal and! Surety — Limitation—Assignment of Judgment.

The assignment of a judgment on.a note will not operate to arrest the running of the statute of limitations in favor of a surety, though the assignee may not have known that the creditor w<as not the principal in the note, hut only a surety.

APPEAL PROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 26, 1870.

■ Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters :

When the injunction was dissolved, the petition was dismissed, which made it a final judgment, and a judge of this court has no authority to reinstate an injunction when the case was finally disposed of. ...

It is clearly established by the evidence that appellant was only *368the surety in tbe note upon which the original action was brought, and more than seven years having elapsed without suing out an execution on the judgment, was exonerated from the payment of the debt under the statute, *2 B. 8., 400.*

*Vance, fot' appellant.*

*Sizemore, for appellee.*

Nor can the fact that the judgment had been assigned to appellee who may not have known that appellant was not a principal in the note, prevent his exoneration, as was ruled by this court in *Day vs. Billingsley, 3 Bush, 157.*

Wherefore the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to render judgment perpetuating appellant’s injunction, and-for further proceedings consistent herewith.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jason Costa","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jason-p-costanasa-gov\/","title":"Tim Dunn","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hWwC7PvEIh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-dunn\/\">Tim Dunn<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/kennedy-biographies-dunn\/embed\/#?secret=hWwC7PvEIh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Tim Dunn” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hWwC7PvEIh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/dunn.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

Order 

September 23, 2015

150678-80 & (130)

SS Next Friend of Minor LM, DS Next Friend of

Minor SD, MJ Next Friend of Minor MS, DC Next

Friend of Minor LB, TF Next Friend of Minors

DF, ID, and FC, and LH Next Friend of Minor CM,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 150678-9

COA: 317071; 317072

Wayne CC: 12-009231-CZ

STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE BOARD OF

EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF 

EDUCATION, and STATE SUPERINTENDENT

OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT,

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT

EMERGENCY MANAGER, HIGHLAND PARK

PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY SYSTEM, and

LEONA GROUP, L.L.C.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

SS Next Friend of Minor LM, DS Next Friend of

Minor SD, MJ Next Friend of Minor MS, DC Next

Friend of Minor LB, TF Next Friend of Minors

DF, ID, and FC, and LH Next Friend of Minor CM,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 150680

COA: 317073

Wayne CC: 12-009231-CZ
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 23, 2015

p0916

2

Clerk

STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE BOARD OF

EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION, STATE SUPERINTENDENT

OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, HIGHLAND PARK

PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY SYSTEM, and

LEONA GROUP, L.L.C.,

Defendants,

and

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT and

HIGHLAND PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT

EMERGENCY MANAGER,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a supplemental brief is 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2014 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.