alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"NASA to Participate in Next Private Astronaut Mission News Conference","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JZuRYdvp7a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-participate-in-next-private-astronaut-mission-news-conference\/\">NASA to Participate in Next Private Astronaut Mission News Conference<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-participate-in-next-private-astronaut-mission-news-conference\/embed\/#?secret=JZuRYdvp7a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Participate in Next Private Astronaut Mission News Conference” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JZuRYdvp7a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/axiom-3-crew.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 700 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 700

To remove the restriction on the distribution of certain revenues from 
the Mineral Springs parcel to certain members of the Agua Caliente Band 
                          of Cahuilla Indians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

 Mr. Bono (for himself and Mr. Kildee) introduced the following bill; 
            which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To remove the restriction on the distribution of certain revenues from 
the Mineral Springs parcel to certain members of the Agua Caliente Band 
                          of Cahuilla Indians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON DISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN REVENUES.

    (a) In General.--The fourth undesignated paragraph in section 3(b) 
of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the equalization of 
allotments on the Agua Caliente (Palm Springs) Reservation in 
California, and for other purposes'' approved September 21, 1959 (25 
U.S.C. 951 et seq.), is amended by striking ``east: Provided,'' and all 
that follows through ``deceased member.'' and inserting ``east.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to net rents, profits, and other revenues that 
accrue on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Agreement to Make Payment.--The Congress finds that the tribe 
agrees to make payment in accordance with Tribal Ordinance Number 22 
dated August 6, 1996, and shall do so not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brown *v.*Osborne.

The Court, to affirm 'a judgment, may, *ex officio,*award a *certiorari*to com *píete*the record.

APPEAL from the *Gibson*Circuit Court.

Raymond, for the appellant.

Scott, J.

In this case the record does not show the names of the judges who rendered the judgment complained of; nor does it appear *from the*transcript before us that there were any judges, except what may be conjectured from the statement that a judgment has been rendered. This is evidently a neglect of the clerk, but it is a defect for which the Court will not now reverse the proceedings.

*Per Curiam.*

A *certiorari*is awarded to the *Gibson*Circuit Court, directing them to send up a full and complete transcript *of the record*in this case (1).

(1)

 It is a general rule, that, at any time pending a writ of error, whether before or after errors assigned, or after in *nullo est erratum,*pleaded, the Court, *ex officio,*may award a *certiorari to inform their conscience,*to affirm a judgment, but not to reverse it, or make error. *Franklyn*v. Reeves, Cas, *temp.*Hardw. 118, 119. — 2 Will. Saund. 101, s, t.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of SK Realty Ventures, Inc., (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended December 31, 2006
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Richard Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:








|(1) | The
              Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1,
              fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
              Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Registrant
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Dated:
                April 11, 2007
            /s/
                Richard Miller________________________Richard
                MillerChief
                Executive Officer and Chief
              Financial
                Officer







A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
      retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





This
      certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not
      deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
      Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or
      after
      the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in such filing.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 213 (Tuesday, November 4, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 65350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 74

[FCC 14-150]


Commission Suspends Expiration Dates and Construction Deadlines 
for New Digital Low Power Television and TV Translator Stations

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; suspension of expiration dates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission announced that, effective immediately, it is 
suspending the expiration dates and construction deadlines for all 
outstanding construction permits for new digital low power television 
(LPTV) and TV translator stations. The Commission will decide on a new 
construction deadline for these permittees in the rulemaking proceeding 
in MB Docket No. 03-185. Until a decision is reached in the rulemaking 
decision and the Commission can determine the effect of the future 
incentive auction and repacking, permittees of new digital LPTV and TV 
translator stations may delay completing construction of their digital 
facilities.

DATES: The suspension became effective on October 10, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media 
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d083b8b1a5befe9db1b8b5a290b6b3b3feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="abf8c3cadec585e6cac3ced9ebcdc8c885ccc4dd">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 
418-2324.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective immediately, the expiration dates 
and construction deadlines for all outstanding unexpired construction 
permits for new digital low power television (LPTV) and TV translator 
stations set forth in 47 CFR 74.788 are hereby suspended pending final 
action in the rulemaking proceeding in MB Docket No. 03-185 initiated 
today by the Commission. In a Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
released October 10, 2014 in MB Docket No. 03-185 (FCC 14-151) the 
Commission recognized that the incentive auction and repacking process 
will impact existing analog LPTV and TV translator stations 
transitioning to digital and, because of this, it tentatively concluded 
to postpone the September 1, 2015 digital transition date. For similar 
reasons, the Commission also tentatively concluded to extend the 
construction deadlines of permits for new digital LPTV and TV 
translator stations and proposed that these permits be subject to 
whatever new transition date is adopted. This proposed action would 
also have the effect of treating these permittees similarly to the 
permittees of transitioning LPTV and TV translator stations.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26064 Filed 11-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 18, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00207

- CV

Eduardo AQUINO

, Appellant

v.

Piedad AQUINO

, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19584

The Honorable Mo nique Diaz , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellee’s brief was originally due October 1, 2021. After the court granted two extensions, the brief was due December 1, 2021. Appellee then filed an unopposed motion for a sixty

- day extension because the p arties were engaged in settlement discussions and scheduled for a mediation on December 24, 2021. We granted the extension and ordered appellee to file a status report of settlement negotiations on December 30, 2021, followed by her brief or a motion

that disposed of the appeal by January 31, 2022. We also advised the parties that further

extensions would be disfavored.

On January 31, 2022, appellee did not file a brief or a motion that disposed of the appeal. Instead, appellee filed an unopposed motion for a sixty

- day extension of time to file her brief. She explains that the parties have agreed on the material terms of the settlement agreement, but a January 18, 2022 inspection report has necessitated additional work by the parties in finalizing the settlement agreement.

We grant the requested extension, and order appellee to file her brief or a motion that disposes of the appeal in accordance wit h Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 by April 1,

2022 . We further order appellee to file a status report advising the court of the status of settlement negotiations by March 1, 2022 . Absent extraordinary circumstances, appellee is

advised that no furth er extensions of time will be granted.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h and and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of February, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 2 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 3 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 4 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 5 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 6 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 7 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 8 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 9 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 10 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 11 of 12
Case 4:16-cr-00153-DCB-LAB Document 3 Filed 01/20/16 Page 12 of 12
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff/Respondent, 

vs. 

Leonardo Rabanales-Casia, 

Defendant/Movant.

No. CV15-1678 PHX DGC (ESW)

 CR11-1622 PHX DGC 

ORDER 

 Defendant/Movant Leonardo Rabanales-Casia has filed a motion to vacate 

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 1. United States Magistrate Judge Eileen S. 

Willett has issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the motion 

be denied. Doc. 16. No objection has been filed, which relieves the Court of its 

obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3);

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 

1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the R&R and deny the motion. 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. The R&R (Doc.16) is accepted. 

 2. The motion to vacate sentence (Doc. 1) is denied. 

 3. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on 

appeal are denied

 4. The Clerk is directed to terminate this action. 

 Dated this 1st day of May, 2017.
|    |                                                                                                           |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Heron Lake BioEnergy, LLC; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | April 23, 2014 |   |   |   |
|   |   |   | /s/ Steve Christensen |   |
|   |   |   | Steve Christensen |   |
|   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |   | (principal executive officer) |   |
#### James Stafford *v.*The Commonwealth.

Gáme — Wild Animals — Premium on Scalps — Certificate.

The law provides that the person killing an animal for which a reward is to be paid must state the time, and the county in which the killing was done and both are required to be certified.

APPEAL FROM JOHNSON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 7, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

*498
      *W. M. Strong, for appellant.*

*Attorney*General, *for appellee.*

By section 5 of the Act approved the 17th of February, 1866, entitled “An Act granting a premium on red and grey foxes, wolves and wild cats’ scalps in this State,” it is provided that the justice of the peace, or the county clerk shall issue to the person by name who shall kill a red fox in this State, a certificate stating the facts, and that he shall take the oath required in *section 2, chapter*vjr, *R. S.*And it is therein required that the person killing the animal for which the reward is to be paid shall not only state the time, but the *county*in which the killing was done, and both are required to be certified. By an examination of the certificates in this case it will be found that they are fatally defective, as the county is not stated in which any of the red foxes were killed.

And for that defect the judgment must be *affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America

 v.

Jose Luis Loyola-Ruis

Citizen of Mexico

JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

(For Offenses Committed on or After November 1, 1987)

No. 15-01814-001M 

Nora Nunez (AFPD)

Attorney for Defendant

YOB: 1974 ICE#: A205 245 863

THE DEFENDANT ENTERED A PLEA OF guilty on 12/29/2015 to Count TWO of the Complaint.

ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT HAS ADJUDICATED THAT THE DEFENDANT IS GUILTY OF THE

FOLLOWING OFFENSE(S): violating Title 8 USC 1325 (a)(1) ILLEGAL ENTRY, a Petty offense,

as charged in Count TWO of the Complaint.

IT IS THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT THAT the defendant is hereby committed to the custody

of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of SIXTY (60) DAYS on Count TWO, with credit for time served.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining counts are dismissed on motion of the United States.

CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES

The defendant shall pay to the Clerk the following total criminal monetary penalties:

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT: REMITTED FINE: NONE RESTITUTION: NONE

THE COURT FINDS that you have been sentenced in accordance with the terms of the plea

agreement and that you have waived your right to appeal and to collaterally attack this matter. The

waiver has been knowingly and voluntarily made with factual basis and with an understanding of the

consequences of the waiver.

The Court orders commitment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons.

The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

Date of Imposition of Sentence: Tuesday, December 29, 2015

 Date 12/29/2015

JOHN A. BUTTRICK, United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-mj-01814-JFM Document 10 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 2
15-01814-001M Page 2 of 2

USA vs. Jose Luis Loyola-Ruis

RETURN

I have executed this Judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on to at , the institution

designated by the Bureau of Prisons, with a certified copy of this judgment in a Criminal case.

By:

United States Marshal Deputy Marshal

15-01814-001M - 

Case 3:15-mj-01814-JFM Document 10 Filed 12/30/15 Page 2 of 2
______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for GOOD CAUSE shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Experian Information Solutions, 

Inc. is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorney’s fees 

and costs. The case is to be dismissed in its entirety. 

 Dated this 6th day of September, 2016. 

Daniel Robert Osborn, 

 PLAINTIFF, 

V. 

Experian Information Solutions, 

Inc., North American Recovery, 

and Wells Fargo Bank, National 

Association, 

 DEFENDANTS.

CASE NO: 2:15-CV-02632-SRB 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, 

INC. AND ENTIRE CASE 

Case 2:15-cv-02632-SRB Document 43 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 4, 2014

No. 04-14-00615-CV

IN RE ADAN VOLPE PROPERTIES, LTD., 

Maricela Volpe, General Partner and Juan A. Gonzalez 

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On September 2, 2014, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency 

motion for temporary stay. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the 

mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The 

respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court no later than September 25, 2014. Any such response must conform 

to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relator’s request for temporary stay is GRANTED. The trial court’s order signed July 1, 

2014, and any interim deadlines established in the court-ordered arbitration proceeding are 

TEMPORARILY STAYED pending final resolution of the petition filed in this court.

It is so ORDERED on September 4th, 2014. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2003-CVF-000414-D2, styled Donato Volpe Jr. v. Adan Volpe Properties, 

Ltd. and Maricela Volpe, General Partner, pending in the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the 

Honorable Elma T. Salinas Ender presiding.
#### Jas. K. Claybrook *v.*James Jones.

Process — Proof of Loss — Entry by Clerk.

. In tbe' absence of proof that a summons was lost, the entry by the clerk on his docket, as to the service, is not evidence.

APPEAL PROM WASHINGTON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 1, 1872.

*Broune & Lewis, for appellant.*

*J. 8. Bay, for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Pryor:

It does not appear from anything in the record that the summons said to have been executed upon the appellant in Washington county was ever lost. In the absence of such proof the entry by the clerk on his docket as to the service is not evidence. The court had no right to render a judgment upon the summons on the defendant out of the county where this suit was instituted. Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to set aside the judgment and for further proceedings consistent herewith.