alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

          - [NARA-2015-009]

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2), the National Archives and Records Administration announces the following meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on December 8, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., EDT.

# ADDRESSES:

Capitol Visitor Center, Senate Visitor Center, Room 212-10, Washington, DC 20510

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Sharon Fitzpatrick,                         *sharon.fitzpatrick@nara.gov,*                         Center for Legislative Archives, (202) 357-5350.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Agenda

(1) Chair's Opening Remarks—Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives

(2) Recognition of Co-chair—Secretary of the U.S. Senate

(3) Recognition of the Archivist of the United States

(4) Approval of the minutes of the last meeting

(5) Senate Archivist's report—Karen Paul

(6) House Archivist's report—Robin Reeder

(7) Center Update—Richard Hunt

(8) Other current issues and new business

The meeting is open to the public.

Dated: October 30, 2014.

Patrice Little Murray,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-26312 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-10-00439- CR
Jose Augustin Gutierr ez P ere z, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F MI LAM CO UNTY, 20TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. CR22,6 24, H ONO RAB LE ED MAGRE, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After J ose Aug ustin Gutierre z Perez pleade d no contest to the char g e of ag g ravated sexual assault, the trial court found him g uilty and assessed sentenc e at twenty y ear s in prison. Perez filed a notice of appe al, and the tr ial court a ppointed counsel to re prese nt him on appeal. Appellant’s court-a

ppointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief c oncluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brie f mee ts the require ments of Anders v. Calif

ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by prese nting a p ro fe s sional evaluation of the
rec ords demonstrating why there are no arguable g rounds to be advanc ed. See also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 7 5 (1 9 8 8 ); High v. State , 573 S.W .2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jack son v. State , 485 S.W .2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant rec eived a copy of counsel’sbrief and was advised of his rig ht to examine the appellate rec ords and to file a pro se brief. See

Anders , 386 U.S. at 744. No pro se br ief ha s been f iled. We have revie wed the rec ord and find no reve rsible err or. See Garner v. State , 300 S.W .3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W .3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We ag ree with counsel that the appea l is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdrawis g rante d. The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore J ustices Henson, Rose a nd Goodwin Affir med Filed: F ebrua

ry 17, 2011 Do Not Publish

2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Television Coverage Set for Space Station Crew Launch Aboard Soyuz","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pjGJOmRYR7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-coverage-set-for-space-station-crew-launch-aboard-soyuz\/\">NASA Television Coverage Set for Space Station Crew Launch Aboard Soyuz<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-coverage-set-for-space-station-crew-launch-aboard-soyuz\/embed\/#?secret=pjGJOmRYR7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Television Coverage Set for Space Station Crew Launch Aboard Soyuz” — NASA\" data-secret=\"pjGJOmRYR7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/50395365327_834fd765d2_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-2853

___________________________ Karla Ann Westjohn Plaintiff Appellant v. Seldin Co. Defendant Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________ Submitted: February 17, 2023 Filed: February 23, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Karla Westjohn appeals the district court’s 1 denial of her motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) challenging the court’s dismissal of her complaint.

1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion

in denying the motion, as Westjohn’s argument did not challenge the court’s basis for dismissal. See Noah v. Bond Cold Storage, 408 F.3d 1043, 1044-45 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam); IBEW, Local Union No. 545 v. Hope Elec. Corp., 293 F.3d 409, 415 (8th Cir. 2002). To the extent Westjohn argues that the original order dismissing the case was erroneous, we decline to address that argument, as Westjohn did not appeal the judgment. See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001); Atraqchi v. FBI, 959 F.2d 740, 741 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 681 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 681

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 313 East 
  Broadway in Glendale, California, as the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1997

    Mr. Hyde (for himself, Mr. Coble, and Mr. Rogan) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                          Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 313 East 
  Broadway in Glendale, California, as the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 313 East Broadway 
in Glendale, California, shall be known and designated as the ``Carlos 
J. Moorhead Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit N

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 87-14 Filed: 05/04/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2161
Redacted 

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 87-14 Filed: 05/04/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2162
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"Challenger Crew Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XjzLx3fIdU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/space-shuttle\/sts-51l\/challenger-crew-report\/\">Challenger Crew Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/space-shuttle\/sts-51l\/challenger-crew-report\/embed\/#?secret=XjzLx3fIdU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Challenger Crew Report” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XjzLx3fIdU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/51L-10162\/51L-10162~large.jpg?w=600&h=1519&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1519}
---



Exhibit 99.14

CONSENT OF TECHNICAL REPORT AUTHOR

Reference is made to the technical report entitled NI 43-101
Technical Report, Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp., Jerritt Canyon Property, Elko County,
Nevada, USA, dated December 31, 2011, which the undersigned has prepared (the
Technical Report). The undersigned hereby consents to the written
disclosure of extracts therefrom or summaries thereof, either directly or as
incorporated by reference, in the annual information form of Veris Gold Corp.
(the Corporation) dated March 28, 2013 and the Annual Report on Form
40-F of the Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The
undersigned further consents to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-171775) and the Registration
Statement on Form F-10 (No. 333-184496), as amended or supplemented, of the
Corporation of the extracts from, or summaries of, the Technical Report.





/s/ Mark A.
OdellMark A. Odell, P.E. March 28, 2013

---
9066.

#### Garrett *v.*Fields.

Decided May 17, 1918.

Claim; from city court of Albany—Judge Clayton Jones. .June *22,*1917. ’

*L. L. Ford,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. H. Burt, Peacock & Gardner,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. Property mortgaged may be sold under a general ■ judgment .

junior to the mortgage; and such a sale will be subject to the lien of the mortgage, unless the mortgagee shall place his mortgage fi. fa. in the hands of the officer making the sale, and request that the property be sold free and unencumbered from the lien of the mortgage, and claim the proceeds of the side, according to the date of his lien. Civil Code (1910), § 3274.

2. In this ease it is undisputed. that before and at the time of sale of the property the attorney for the mortgagee gave. all prospective and actual bidders upon the property, which was being sold under a junior general judgment, public notice that the property was being sold subject to the lien of a senior mortgage fi. fa. which he held. The purchaser at the sale acquired only the equity of ‘ redemption held by the defendant in the junior fi. fa.; and upon the trial of a claim interposed by the purchaser of the property, it was not error for the trial judge, who tried the case without a jury, to render judgment finding the property subject to the mortgage fi. fa.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, 0. J.,'and Jenkins, J., concur.*
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 12

       COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
                             DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              SEPTEMBER 30,                      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                          2001              2000             2001            2000
                                                      ---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>               <C>               <C>            <C>
Net income                                            $   2,282,195     $   2,099,341     $  842,135     $   701,210
Fixed charges:
Income before fixed charges                           $   2,282,195     $   2,099,341     $  842,135     $   701,210
Fixed charges, as above
Preferred stock dividend requirements                 $   1,350,675     $   1,350,675     $  450,225     $   450,225
Fixed charges including preferred
  stock dividends                                     $   1,350,675     $   1,350,675     $  450,225     $   450,225
Ratio of income to fixed charges and
  preferred stock dividend requirements                        1.69              1.55           1.87            1.56
</TABLE>








                                       15
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 13, 2014

No. 04-14-00380-CV

Leola STUART,

Appellant

v.

Estelita JUDSON,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 391869

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 26, 2014, appellant filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s March 20, 

2014 judgment.1 On March 26, 2014, with the notice of appeal, appellant filed in the trial court 

an affidavit of inability to pay costs for appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a), (c)(1). Pursuant to 

Rule 20.1(e), the clerk, court reporter, or any party was entitled to challenge appellant’s claim of 

indigence by filing a contest in the trial court within ten days after the date the affidavit was filed 

in the trial court, i.e., April 7, 2014. Id. R. 20.1(e). However, there is nothing in the clerk’s 

record to indicate a contest was filed. In the absence of any contest, the allegations in the 

affidavit are deemed true and appellant is permitted to proceed without payment of costs, 

including payment for the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record. Id. at R. 20(f). 

The reporter’s record was due in this court on May 19, 2014, but was not filed. On June 

2, 2014, we notified the court reporter, Liche Cavazos, that the record was overdue. We advised 

to file a notification of late record within ten days of the date of the letter, or file the record 

within thirty days of the date of the letter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a). 

On June 9, 2014, the court reporter filed a notification of late record in which she stated 

the record had not been filed because appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee 

and has failed to pay the fee for preparing the record. Based on the foregoing, this is an 

improper reason for failing to file the record. As noted above, appellant filed an affidavit of 

 

1 The district clerk did not forward the notice of appeal to this court until May 29, 2014. 
inability to pay costs and it was not challenged. Accordingly, we presume appellant is indigent; 

appellant is entitled to the record without payment of costs. 

We therefore ORDER the court reporter, Liche Cavazos, to file the reporter’s record in 

this court on or before July 14, 2014. We remind the reporter appellant is entitled to the record 

without payment for same. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all parties, all counsel, 

and the court reporter. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of June, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<CIK>                        0000922817
<NAME>                       WELCOME HOME, INC.

<S>                                      <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997                DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         845                      1,715
<SECURITIES>                                     0                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0                          0
<INVENTORY>                                 10,895                     16,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,871                     18,632
<PP&E>                                      13,132                     14,541
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,644                      5,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,668                     27,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,620                     37,604
<BONDS>                                          0                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                          0
<PREFERRED>                                  4,955                      4,510
<COMMON>                                        85                         85
<OTHER-SE>                                 (23,567)                   (16,831)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,668                     27,417
<SALES>                                     62,590                     81,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,590                     81,855
<CGS>                                       38,773                     48,734
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,712                     48,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (25)                       441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,396                      1,875
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,266)                   (18,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0                      2,185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                          0
<CHANGES>                                        0                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,266)                   (20,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.90)                     (2.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.90)                     (2.74)


</TABLE>