alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9564.

#### CHANCE *v.*THE STATE.

There being some evidence to authorize the verdict of assault with intent to rape, and the verdict being approved by the trial judge, this court will not interfere.'

Decided May 1, 1918.

Conviction of assault with intent to rape; from Colquitt superior court—Judge Thomas. January 35, 1918.

*Ragan & Maire, Edgar Dykes, James Humphreys,*for plaintiff in error. '

*Fondren Mitchell, solicitor-general, T. H. Parker,*contra.

Harwell, J.

Charlie Chance was indicted for rape upon his fourteen-year-old daughter, Lela Chance, and was convicted' of assault with' intent to rape. Her testimony was sufficient to authorize the verdict. Other witnesses testified that she came to them and made complaint of her father^ treatment, and a physician testified on behalf of the State as to her condition. The exceptions relate, only to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and BloodwortTi, J., concur.*
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: 

REGINALD C. GILBERT

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00122-CR

Appeal from the

142nd Judicial District Court

of Midland County, Texas

TC # CR57535

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Reginald C. Gilbert, acting pro se, appealed the trial court’s “Order Denying Petition for 

Writ of Habeas Corpus Seeking Bail Reduction,” signed on June 6, 2022.1 On July 22, 2022, this 

Court received notice updating the contact and representation information for Gilbert. On 

August 31, 2022, Gilbert, through new counsel, filed his “Appellant’s Motion to Voluntarily 

Dismiss Appeal” in this Court. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2 (governing voluntary dismissals in criminal 

cases). Gilbert and counsel both signed the written motion. See id. The motion is granted.

CONCLUSION

The appeal is dismissed. 

1 This case was transferred from our sister court, the Eastland Court of Appeals, pursuant to the Texas Supreme 

Court’s docket equalization efforts. See TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. We follow the precedent of the Eastland 

Court of Appeals to the extent they might conflict with our own. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3. 
2

September 13, 2022

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Alfonso Antillon

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alfonso Antillon,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

an Ohio corporation, Trans Union, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company; 

Equifax Information Services, LLC, a 

Georgia corporation; Bank of America, 

National Association, a North Carolina 

company.

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00035-BSB

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO 

DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC, 

ONLY

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff and Defendant, Trans Union, LLC, 

in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement. The parties anticipate filing a 

Case 2:16-cv-00035-DLR Document 45 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Trans Union, LLC, ONLY, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) within 60 days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 7

th day of April, 2016.

 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Alfonso Antillon

Case 2:16-cv-00035-DLR Document 45 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board's ad hoc Working Group on Administrative 
Burdens (AB), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR Part 614), the 
National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and 
the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice 
of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National 
Science Board business, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, November 5, 10:00-11:00 a.m., EST.

SUBJECT MATTER: Chairman's updates on implementation of previous Board 
recommendations; and discussion of the scope of work for the ad hoc 
Working Group on Administrative Burdens.

STATUS: Open.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference. A public listening 
line will be available. Members of the public must contact the Board 
Office (call 703-292-7000 or send an email message to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94faf5e0fdfbfaf5f8e7f7fdf1faf7f1f6e6f0d4fae7f2baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8be5eaffe2e4e5eae7f8e8e2eee5e8eee9f9efcbe5f8eda5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>) at least 24 hours prior to the 
teleconference for the public listening number. Please refer to the 
National Science Board Web site www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional 
information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status 
of meeting) which may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. 
Point of contact for this meeting is Jacqueline Meszaros at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0daddd5c3cad1c2dff0dec3d69ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3999e96808992819cb39d8095dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-25891 Filed 10-28-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Worldwide Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report), I, John Hamerski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Hamerski                                                                                                                
|                                                                                                                                 
|John Hamerski Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) November 14, 2003
9229.

#### Bankers Health & Life Insurance Co. *v.*Murray.

Decided July 11, 1918.

Certiorari; from Biehmond superior court—Judge H. C. Hammond. September 15, 1917.

*Isaac S. Peebles Jr., Lawton Nalley,*for plaintiff in error.

*A. B. Williamson, J. S. Bussey Jr.,*contra.

Jenkins, J.

1. Under the act of August 17, 1906 (Acts 1906, p. 107; Civil Code of 1910, § 2471), the application on which an insurance policy is based is not to be considered as part of the policy or contract between the parties, unless a copy thereof is attached to or accompanies the policy. Therefore, statements- made in the application are not to be treated as warranties or • covenants, on account of the failure or falsity of which the policy may be avoided, unless a copy of the application is attached to the policy ór accompanies it, though representations contained in the application, if fraudulently made, may give to the insurance company the right to avoid the policy. *Johnson*v. *American Nat. Life Ins. Co.,*134 *Ga.*800 (68 S. E. 731); *Southern Life Ins. Co.*v. *Logan,*9 Ga. *App.*503 (71 S. E. 742).

2. While there were facts and circumstances from which the jury could have found that the policy was procured by fraud, there were other facts and circumstances in evidence tending the other way; and there was some evidence which authorized the jury to find that the decedent was in good health at the time the insurance was issued, as required by the terms of the policy.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
Exhibit 31.2  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Gordon L. Wiltse, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lions Petroleum Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 18, 2007/s/ Gordon L. Wiltse
Gordon L. Wiltse
Chief Financial Officer
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 932

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for the

appointment in each United States circuit court of appeals, of at least

one resident of each State in such circuit, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 1997

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself and Mrs. MINK of Hawaii) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to

provide for the appointment in each United States circuit

court of appeals, of at least one resident of each State

in such circuit, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STATE RESIDENCY OF JUDGES OF UNITED

4 STATES COURTS OF APPEALS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 44(c) of title 28, United

6 States Code, is amended—

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(c)’’; and
2

•HR 932 IH

1 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following

2 new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(2) In each circuit (other than the District of Co4 lumbia or Federal judicial circuit) there shall be at least

5 one circuit judge in regular active service appointed from

6 the residents of each State in that circuit.’’.

7 (b) APPOINTMENTS.—

8 (1) FUTURE APPOINTMENTS.—The President

9 shall make appointments under subsection (a) of

10 section 44 of title 28, United States Code, to fill va11 cancies occurring and judgeships created on or after

12 the date of the enactment of this Act in a manner

13 to meet the requirements of subsection (c)(2) of

14 such section (as added by subsection (a) of this sec15 tion) at the earliest practical date.

16 (2) SITTING JUDGES NOT AFFECTED.—The

17 amendment made by subsection (a) shall not affect

18 the tenure of any judge of a United States court of

19 appeals who is in office on the date of the enactment

20 of this Act.

Æ
9211.

#### Duane Chair Company *v.*Lewallen.

Decided May 15, 1918.

Action for damages; from Whitfield superior court—Judge'Tarver. September 18, 1917.

*Maddox, McCamy & Shumate,*for plaintiff in error.

*James J. Copeland,, Glenn & House,*contra.

Luke, J.

1. Lewallen sued .tlie Duane Chair Company for damages, alleging that the Automatic Sprinkler Company had a contract with the Duane Chair Company to install a sprinkler system in the chair company’s plant, and employed him to perform the mechanical labor of installing the system, agreeing to pay him $2 a day for his time and labor; and that, with knowledge of this, the president of the chair company, acting with authority for the chair company,' after Lewallen had worked a part of a day,- tortiously forbade his working or coming on the premises, and run him off and had the sprinkler company discharge him, to his loss and damage, for which he sued. *Keld,*that the petition set forth a cause of action. See *Southern Railway Co.*v. *Chambers,*126 *Ga.*404 (55 S. E. 37, 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 926); Civil Code (1910), § 4405.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict for the actual loss sustained by Lewallen by reason of the tortious conduct of the defendant, and the verdict has-the approval of the trial judge., Eor none of the reasons assigned did the court, err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.3  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Tarpon Coast
Bancorp, Inc., the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: October 25, 2004
    
    /s/ George E. Cline
George E. Cline
Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tarpon Coast
Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Tarpon Coast Bancorp, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 22
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

As independent registered public accountants, we hereby consent to theincorporation of our report dated March 29, 2005 relating to the consolidated financialstatements of Vistula Communications Services, Inc. and its wholly-ownedsubsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in this Form 10-KSB,into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (FileNo. 333-130805).

 

 
| /s/Vitale,  Caturano & Company, Ltd. |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     |
| VITALE,  CATURANO & COMPANY, LTD.    |

 

 

March29, 2006

Boston,Massachusetts

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Parker Solar Probe","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fNrQOykbDX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/parker-solar-probe\/\">Parker Solar Probe<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/parker-solar-probe\/embed\/#?secret=fNrQOykbDX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Parker Solar Probe” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fNrQOykbDX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/parker_solar_probe_in_front_of_sun.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Apollo 10: Mission Details","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TsWLVw5JyJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-10-mission-details\/\">Apollo 10: Mission Details<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-10-mission-details\/embed\/#?secret=TsWLVw5JyJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 10: Mission Details” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TsWLVw5JyJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/apollo-10-moon.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":401}
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40550

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EUGENIO ANTONIO GARCIA-AMARO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-60-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eugenio Antonio 

Garcia-Amaro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Amaro has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40550 Document: 00512598434 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-40550

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40550 Document: 00512598434 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014