alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"Skylab 2","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LQEkXCb3Xh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/skylab-2\/\">Skylab 2<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/skylab-2\/embed\/#?secret=LQEkXCb3Xh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Skylab 2” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LQEkXCb3Xh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S73-25902\/S73-25902~large.jpg?w=600&h=1920&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1920}
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 31

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew J. Cederoth, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
    8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
    included in the year covered by this annual report of Navistar Financial
    2003-B Owner Trust;

2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
    whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
    report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
    to be provided to the trustee by the Servicer under the pooling and
    servicing agreement, for inclusion in these reports, is included in these
    reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
    in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
    with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as
    disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations
    under that agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
    Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
    report provided by an independent public accountant,  after conducting a
    review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
    Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the Pooling and
    Servicing Agreement, that is included in these reports.

6.  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Owner
    Trustee.


By: /s/ ANDREW J. CEDEROTH
Andrew J. Cederoth
Vice President and Treasurer
Navistar Financial Corporation
January 31, 2005
#### James M. Fogle's Exrs. *v.*Willie P. Fogle, et al.

Wills — Discretion of Executors.

A will gives executors a power, “All the bequests, devises, legacies, etc., are not to be paid until X X arrive at the respective ages of 30 years.” Held, that the executors could hot withhold all the payment, at their discretion, until the 30 year age had been reached by the devisees.

APPAEL EROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

*493Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters:

This suit is brought to have the will of the late James M. Fogle construed, or rather to have the eighth clause thereof construed, as in the preceding clauses hq directs to whom, and in what portions his estate shall pass.

In the eighth clause he says: *“All the*bequests, *devisas*and legacies that are made in this will are *not*to be paid, or delivered to my four children, Willie P., Mattie B., Bettie P. and James L. Fogle (should the contingency happen by which he should get anything), before they each arrive at the respective ages of thirty years each. And the parts that go to Mattie B. and Bettie P. are to be owned and controlled by them each to their sole and separate use, without being under the control of any husband they, or either of them, may have. If James M. Fogle should receive any part of my estate, upon his death without child or children, the part so received is to go, and pass to his half brothers and sisters, or the survivor, or his or their children, the child, or children to receive the father or mother’s part; in no event is his estate to go to his mother, or any of her kindred on her mother or father’s side.”

The devisees insist that the executors have the power, under the clause cited, to appropriate at least the income or annual profits on their respective portions to their support, and education, while the executors contend that they have no such power under the will, and can make no distribution or advancement to the devisees until, or as they attain the age of thirty years respectively. Neither the grammatical, nor literal construction of the clause under consideration sustains the position of the executors. They are not prohibited from paying over a part of the legacies — the language is that they shall not pay *all;*if the testator had said that his executors should not pay any part of their legacies to his children, until they arrived at the ages of 30 years respectively, the prohibition would have been complete, and the devisees might not have been able to enjoy their portions until they did arrive at the ages designated, but that is not the language. They are not restrained from paying a part before the period fixed. The restriction is that they are not to pay *all.*They certainly may pay a part and not transcend their power, even according the strictest construction of the *494will. Nor. is there anything in the'ninth clause of the will in conflict with this interpretation.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Nick Hague Set for New Space Station Mission After Abort","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mqHXJTxfRc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-nick-hague-set-for-new-space-station-mission-after-abort\/\">NASA Astronaut Nick Hague Set for New Space Station Mission After Abort<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-nick-hague-set-for-new-space-station-mission-after-abort\/embed\/#?secret=mqHXJTxfRc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Nick Hague Set for New Space Station Mission After Abort” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mqHXJTxfRc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/12\/18-106.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":371}
Exhibit 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen R. Light, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: April 8, 2008



|                                                                                     |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                                                                                     | 
|/s/ Stephen R. Light                                                                 |  | 
|Stephen R. Light President and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.1





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Supplemental Information


To the Stockholders and Board of Directors Ares Capital Corporation:


We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of Ares Capital Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2021, and our report dated February 9, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.





We have also previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the consolidated balance sheets of the Company, including the consolidated schedules of investments, as of December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (none of which is presented herein), and we expressed unqualified opinions on those consolidated financial statements.





The senior securities information included in Part II, Item 5 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2021, under the caption “Senior Securities” (the Senior Securities Table), has been subjected to audit procedures performed in conjunction with the audit of the Company’s respective consolidated financial statements. The Senior Securities Table is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our audit procedures included determining whether the Senior Securities Table reconciles to the Company’s respective consolidated financial statements or the underlying accounting and other records, as applicable, and performing procedures to test the completeness and accuracy of the information presented in the Senior Securities Table. In forming our opinion on the Senior Securities Table, we evaluated whether the Senior Securities Table, including its form and content, is presented in conformity with the instructions to Form N-2. In our opinion, the Senior Securities Table is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the Company’s respective consolidated financial statements as a whole.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Los Angeles, California


February 9, 2022
EXHIBIT 13



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of IWI Holding Limited ( the Company") on Form 20-F for the  year  ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Mark Thompson, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mark Thompson

By: Mark Thompson

Chief Executive and Financial Officer

August 15, 2008
**EXHIBIT 3.4**

 

**GEMSTAR - TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

 

A Delaware Corporation 

Amended and RestatedBy-laws ****

 

**Amendments**

 

**Section 2.1 Number and Term of Office.**

 

(a) The governing body of this Corporation shall be a Board of Directors. TheBoard of Directors shall be comprised of not less than three (3) members. The Board of Directors, by action taken by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total number of members of the Board of Directors then authorized at aregular meeting or a special meeting called for that purpose, may increase or decrease the number of directors. Directors need not be stockholders of the Corporation. No class or series of preferred stock shall be entitled to elect any additionaldirectors, although the terms of any class or series of preferred stock may provide that the shares of such class or series are entitled to vote in elections of directors. 

 

**Section 2.8 Quorum and Organization of Meetings.**

 

A majority of the total number of members of the Board of Directors thenauthorized shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, but, if at any meeting of the Board of Directors (whether or not adjourned from a previous meeting) there shall be less than a quorum present, a majority of those present mayadjourn the meeting to another time and place, and the meeting may be held as adjourned without further notice or waiver. Except as otherwise required by law or provided by the Certificate or these 

By-laws, directors present at any meeting at which a quorum is present for the transaction of business may by majorityvote decide any question brought before such meeting. Meetings shall be presided over by the Chief Executive Officer, or in his or her absence, by his or her designee. The Board of Directors shall keep written minutes of its meetings. The Secretaryof the Corporation shall act as secretary of the meeting, but in his or her absence the chairman of the meeting may appoint any person to act as secretary of the meeting. 

 

**Section 5.5 Amendments.**

 

In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by the laws of the State of Delaware, the Board of Directors,by action taken by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total number of members of the Board of Directors then authorized, is hereby expressly authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or repeal any provision of the By-laws of thisCorporation. 

 

Subject to the rights of the holders of any classor series of preferred stock, these By-laws may be adopted, amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than 66 2/3% of the total voting power of the Voting Securities of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon; provided, however, that this paragraph shall not apply to, and no vote of the stockholders ofthe Corporation shall be required to authorize, the adoption, amendment or repeal of any provision of the By-laws by the Board of Directors in accordance with the preceding paragraph. 

 

2
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-422-CR

JESUS TORRES APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 362 DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY ND

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Withdraw Appeal.” The

motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we

received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: January 8, 2009
21.1	List of Subsidiaries 

 

Chindex Shanghai International Trading Co., Ltd., incorporated in The People's Republic of    China

Beijing United Family Hospital, incorporated in The People's Republic of China

Chindex Hong Kong Limited, incorporated in Hong Kong

Chindex Holdings International Trade (Tianjin), Ltd., incorporated in the People's Republic of China

China Hospital Ventures, incorporated in the Republic of Mauritius

Chindex Asia Holdings, incorporated in the Republic of Mauritius

Chindex Export Limited, incorporated in The British Virgin Islands

Chindex Healthcare Holdings, incorporated in the Republic of Mauritius

Chindex, Inc., incorporated in the State of New York
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Louvenia Smith,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03442-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8512 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8512 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2