alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        13374000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10870000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (115000)
<INVENTORY>                                    2188000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24872000
<PP&E>                                         2289000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (506000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                28964000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8922000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         68000
<OTHER-SE>                                    18848000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  28964000
<SALES>                                       22060000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              22901000
<CGS>                                         15078000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 22974000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (119000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 717000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (141000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             576000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    576000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15



</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES v. SIMS.

No. 14028.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

March 22, 1946.

Otto Schmid, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Kansas City, Mo., for the United States.

No appearance for defendant.

REEVES, District Judge.

Now on this day comes the defendant in the above entitled cause, and also comes . Sam M. Wear, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, who prosecutes and defends for and on behalf of the United States, and this cause is by the Court taken up by consent of the parties hereto on the motion of defendant to vacate a sentence and judgment of the Court entered in the above entitled cause on the 31st day of January, 1938, on the second count of the indictment filed in said cause, and it appears to the Court that the following sentence and judgment was rendered in said cause, to-wit:

“On this 31st day of January, 1938, came the United States Attorney, and the defendant Orville Earnest Sims, with alias appearing in proper person, and

“The defendant having been convicted on his plea of guilty of the offenses charged in the indictment in the above entitled cause to wit taking money from a member bank of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation by force and violence and putting the persons in charge thereof in fear with loaded guns, as charged in count 1, and taking money from said bank by putting the lives of persons in charge thereof in jeopardy with loaded guns, as charged in count 2 of the indictment, and the defendant being now asked whether he has anything to say before judgment is pronounced against him, and no sufficient cause being shown or appearing to the Court, it is by the court

“Ordered and adjudged that the defendant be hereby committed to the custody of the Attorney General for imprisonment in an institution of the pentitentiary type to be designated by the Attorney General or his authorized representative for the period of twenty (20) years on count 1, and for a period of twenty-five (25) years on count *6322,said sentences of imprisonment to run concurrently, without costs.”

And it further appears to the Court that the crime charged against the defendant in said cause in both counts of the indictment constitutes only a single sentenceable offense and that after entering the sentence of twenty years on count one of the indictment in said cause the Court exhausted its power and authority to impose a sentence on the second count of said indictment and that the sentence so imposed on said second count of the indictment is null and void.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged by the Court that the defendant’s motion be and the same is hereby sustained, and that the sentence rendered by the Court on the second count of the indictment in said cause be and the same is hereby revoked, set aside and held for naught.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 64295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25791]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 64295]]


                Notice of October 24, 2014

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Sudan

                On November 3, 1997, by Executive Order (E.O.) 13067, 
                the President declared a national emergency with 
                respect to Sudan and, pursuant to the International 
                Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), 
                took related steps to deal with the unusual and 
                extraordinary threat to the national security and 
                foreign policy of the United States posed by the 
                actions and policies of the Government of Sudan. On 
                April 26, 2006, in E.O. 13400, the President determined 
                that the conflict in Sudan's Darfur region posed an 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security and foreign policy of the United States, 
                expanded the scope of the national emergency to deal 
                with that threat, and ordered the blocking of property 
                of certain persons connected to the conflict. On 
                October 13, 2006, the President issued E.O. 13412 to 
                take additional steps with respect to the national 
                emergency and to implement the Darfur Peace and 
                Accountability Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-344).

                The actions and policies of the Government of Sudan 
                continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to 
                the national security and foreign policy of the United 
                States. For this reason, the national emergency 
                declared in E.O. 13067 of November 3, 1997, expanded on 
                April 26, 2006, and with respect to which additional 
                steps were taken on October 13, 2006, must continue in 
                effect beyond November 3, 2014. Therefore, consistent 
                with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the 
                national emergency with respect to Sudan declared in 
                E.O. 13067.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    October 24, 2014.

[FR Doc. 2014-25791
Filed 10-27-14; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295-F5
8943.

#### Cook *v.*Daniel.

Decided March 14, 1918.

Action for damages; from Marion superior court—Judge Howard. April 25, 1917.

*George P. Munro, T. B. Rainey,*for plaintiff.

*John C. Butt,*for defendant.

Wade, 'O. J.

Under the liberal rule obtaining in this State, the court erred in declining to allow the proffered amendment which set up that the value of the mule damaged by the defendant’s automobile was partially and not wholly destroyed. With this amendment allowed, recovery for the value of its feed and the attention expended on the mule during the period of its convalescence from the injury was allowable in connection with a recovery for the *partial*depreciation of its market value, and the court therefore erred in dismissing the petition as corrected by the proposed amendment. *City of Columbus*v. *Anglin,*120 *Ga. 785,*793 (48 S. E. 318).

*Judgment reversed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)

I,
R. Kipp deVeer, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ares Capital Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 26, 2015

/s/ R. KIPP DEVEER R. Kipp deVeer Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)


---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On September 24, 2014 the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on October 27, 2014 to: Dr. Mike Polito, Permit No. 2015-008.                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2014-25875 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel, Targeting Co-dependent Molecular Pathways in Oral Cancer (U01) Applications Review Panel.                    

*Date:*                         December 9, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         DoubleTree by Hilton, Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver Spring, MD 20910.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Victor Henriquez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, DEA/SRB/NIDCR, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 668, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-451-2405,                         *henriquv@nidcr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 29, 2014.

David Clary, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-26208 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### MODERN INDUSTRIAL BANK, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM L. TAUB ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Argued October 2, 1945

Decided October 15, 1945.

Before Brogan, Chief Justice, and Justices Parker aud Oliphant.

For the appellants, *Irvin M. Lichtenstein.*

For the respondent, *Emerson L. Richards (Samuel*Backer, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The suit is by a hanking corporation of New York State, against maker and endorsers of a promissory note made by the appellant Taub to the order of “Riker & Co. Inc.” and bearing the endorsements of Taub and of appellant Isador Ostroff, besides others. Riker & Co., the payees, seem to have discounted it with Modern Industrial Bank, the present respondent, plaintiff below. It was not paid at maturity, and the bank brought this suit against Taub and Ostroff “severally and jointly” in the Atlantic Common Pleas. The defendants answered jointly, with a general denial and specified eighteen distinct defenses, to which they added a “reservation” of right to move to strike out the complaint as not stating any cause of action. On plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer and for summarjr judgment, Judge Uaneman in the Atlantic Pleas struck out twelve of the *286eighteen separate defenses, allowing the other six to stand, hut some two months later, after a reargument, struck out the remaining six, taking the ground that although he had held previously that the note was subject to the usual defenses as regards the maker, the contract of an endorser was different; and that in view of the rule, enacted into statute by the Negotiable Instruments Act, *R. 8.*7:2-66, that an endorser warrants the validity of the instrument endorsed, the six defenses in question should also be stricken, as to both defendants. The general rule seems well settled. 8 *G. J.*375, 396. As regards the appellant Ostroff, the case seems clear. The situation of Taub differs to the extent that he was the maker of the note, though he .signed also the first indorsement. We are unable to subscribe to the view that the maker of a note to the order of another cuts off whatever defenses he may have as maker by repeating his own signature on the back of his own note. No adequate authority is cited for that proposition and we find none on our examination. It may be well to observe that as between Taub, the maker of the note, and the payees, Riker & Co., the case is apparently open to the defense by Taub that the note was invalid because of our statute relating to real estate brokers, *R. 8.*45:15-1, *ei seq.,*in that Riker & Co., a New York corporation, was not a licensed real estate broker of this state, and therefore not entitled to recover commissions as such. *Kenney*v. *Paterson Milk and Cream Co.,*110 *N. J. L.*141.

As regards appellant Ostroff, the judgment is affirmed; but as to appellant Taub there will be a reversal and remand for trial.
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 3 - 3394 LT Case No s . 2012 - CF - 2541

2012 - CF - 2540 2012 - CF - 2538 2012 - CF - 2539 2012 - CF - 2569 2012 - CF - 2568 2012 - CF - 2567 2012 - CF - 2584 2013 - CF - 000006

____________________________ _ R ICHARD L EACH , Appellant, v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ 3.850 A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge. Richard Leach, Lowell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. April 9, 2024 P ER C URIAM .2 A FFIRMED . M AKAR , K ILBANE , and P RATT , JJ., concur .

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 519

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the

special rule for charitable contributions to private foundations of stock

for which market quotations are readily available.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. CAMP (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently

extend the special rule for charitable contributions to

private foundations of stock for which market quotations

are readily available.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 519 IH

1 SECTION 1. SPECIAL RULE MADE PERMANENT FOR CER2 TAIN CONTRIBUTIONS OF STOCK FOR WHICH

3 MARKET QUOTATIONS ARE READILY AVAIL4 ABLE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (D) of section

6 170(e)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is hereby

7 repealed.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub9 section (a) shall apply to contributions made after

10 May 31, 1997.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 782 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 782

To provide for the use of private delivery services in filing documents 
                         with Federal agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the use of private delivery services in filing documents 
                         with Federal agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF DESIGNATED PRIVATE DELIVERY SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Any Federal law which provides that an item is 
deemed to be received by a Federal agency as of the date of the 
postmark on the item by the United States Postal Service shall be 
deemed to further provide that such an item is deemed to be received by 
the Federal agency as of the date recorded or marked on the item by a 
designated private delivery service.
    (b) Definition.--In this Act, the term ``designated private 
delivery service'' has the meaning provided by section 7502(f)(2) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Scott Munro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. s. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date:  December 12, 2002 | /s/ Scott Munro
Scott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------