alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Apollo 9: Mission Details","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GSHAXBEkPJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-9-mission-details\/\">Apollo 9: Mission Details<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-9-mission-details\/embed\/#?secret=GSHAXBEkPJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 9: Mission Details” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GSHAXBEkPJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S69-25478\/S69-25478~large.jpg?w=600&h=1529&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1529}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           6,801                   4,648
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,301                   8,052
<PP&E>                                          17,461                  11,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,890                   2,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,237                  21,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          660,520                 328,150
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         2,008                   2,002
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,237                  21,954
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,028                  55,448
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (5)                     (8)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,565                   1,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (127,588)                (57,396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (127,588)                (57,396)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (127,588)                (57,396)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.006)                 (0.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.006)                 (0.003)


</TABLE>
#### J. E. Taylor’s Admr. *v.*L. Berry et al.

Waiver of Right to Redeem Land — Estoppel—Laches.

A defendant, who, by cross petition is permitted to have a judgment entered by agreement, cannot be subsequently heard to controvert the right of others, coming into possession of the property, by reason of his failure to perform said judgment.

APPEAL FROM CRITTENDEN CIRCUIT COURT.

December 3, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

In the action of Persons vs. Bobbitt, after a judgment had been rendered for the amount of purchase money owing by said Bobbitt and Persons, and a sale of the land to pay the same, and B. EL Persons had purchased, Taylor by his answer, made a cross petition in that case averred that he was willing to pay off the demand of Persons on the land, and asked leave of the court to do so, and professed in his answer to offer to do so. The Berrys answer that cross petition, in which they say if Taylor will pay the purchase money due to Persons they are willing that the deed to the land may be made to him, and a credit therefor shall be entered on the notes N. G. Berry, as assignee, held on him for the purchase money, which he, Taylor, owed. On the filing of these pleadings a judgment was entered by the consent of all the parties, which provides if Taylor or any one for him shall on or before the first day of August next thereafter, (that judgment was entered 27th February, 1863) pay to the commissioner who made the sale, or to the plaintiff, B. BE. Persons, the purchase money for which said land was sold with interest from the day of sale — in that event the commissioner was to convey the land to him instead of to Persons, the purchaser, and the Berrys were to credit his notes for the purchase money which he owed, and they held, by the amount thus paid.

If he failed to perform that judgment made with his consent and by his agreemnt he has no right to controvert longer the claim *242of Berry, his assignee, against Oliver. He thereby waived any equity which he might otherwise have had, against Berry for the purchase money. If the land was lost to him it was so lost by his own neglect and laches, and he is estopepd to interpose any obstacle in the way of his assignee to make his money off of Oliver.

Bush, Greer, *for appellant.*

*D. H.*Hughes, *S.*Hodge, *for appellees.*
#### J. A. Boyd *v.*J. D. Stion et al.

Executions — Excuse for Failure to Return.

Where the plaintiff takes an execution out of the hands of the sheriff he cannot complain <m account of its not being returned.

ARPEAD FROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 2, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin :

The evidence authorizes the conclusion that the sheriff’s failure to return the execution was caused by their being taken out of his hands by the plaintiff for the purpose of settling the accounts of Wooldridge and giving him credit therefor. This was a reason*281able ground for excuse for the failure to return the executions.

*Feland & Evans, for appellant.*

*Bitter, for appellees.*

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.5

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q  OF  PAWNMART, INC.    FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 4, 2001

The
undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of PawnMart, Inc. (the "Registrant"). This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the Three Month period ended August 4, 2001.

We
certify that such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

This
Certification is executed as of August 8, 2002.

/s/
John R. Boudreau
John R. Boudreau
Chief Executive Officer

/s/
Robert W. Schleizer
Robert W. Schleizer
Chief Financial Officer

This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 AUGUST 26, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13905

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 09-20270-CR-JEM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO ANTONIO CARVAJAL VARONA,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(August 26, 2010)

Before BLACK, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Kathleen Williams, appointed counsel for Pedro Antonio Carvajal Varona in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of

the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carvajal Varona’s

convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 12, 2010



/s/ Theresa M. MessinaTheresa M. MessinaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


Pursuant to Securities
and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated
by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                          FRANKLIN FINANCE CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

Net income for basic income per share is computed by subtracting from the
applicable income the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
income applicable to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                  Six Months Ended                Three Months Ended
                                                            ------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     June 30,                           June 30,
                                                                1999           1998              1999              1998
                                                            ------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                        <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
INCOME
Net income                                                 $1,180,362       $1,407,336       $  565,751       $  661,719
Less: preferred stock dividend requirements                   900,450          900,997          450,225          450,225
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income applicable to common stock                         279,912          506,339          115,526          211,494

SHARES
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding           22,077           22,077           22,077           22,077

NET INCOME PER SHARE                                       $    12.68       $    22.94       $     5.23       $     9.58
</TABLE>



                                       12
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Local Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
undersigned's best knowledge and belief:

         (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of November 2003.

                                                    LOCAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                                    ("Company")

                                                    /s/ Edward A. Townsend
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Edward A. Townsend
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                                    /s/ Richard L. Park
                                                    -------------------------
                                                    Richard L. Park
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Local Financial Corporation and will be retained by Local
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                        ST.GEORGE BANK LIMITED (SERVICER)
                       OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

     The  undersigned,  a  duly  authorized  representative  of  St.George  Bank
Limited,  as  Servicer  ("St.George  Bank" or the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the
agreement  between  Perpetual  Trustees  Consolidated  Limited,  St.George  Bank
Limited  and  Crusade  Management  Limited,  dated as of  March  25,  2003  (the
"Agreement"), does hereby certify that:

     1.   Capitalized  terms used but not defined in this Officer's  Certificate
          have their respective meanings set forth in the Agreement,  unless the
          context  requires   otherwise  or  unless  otherwise  defined  in  the
          Officer's Certificate.

     2.   As of the date  hereof,  St.George  Bank is the  Servicer  of  Crusade
          Global Trust No. 1 of 1999.

     3.   This Officer's Certificate is delivered pursuant to the Agreement.

     4.   A review of the  activities  of the  Servicer  during  the year  ended
          September  30,  2004 and of its  performance  under  the  pooling  and
          servicing   agreement  or  similar   agreements   was  made  under  my
          supervision.

     5.   Based on such review, to my knowledge,  the Servicer has fulfilled its
          obligations  under the  pooling  and  servicing  agreement  or similar
          agreements  relating  to the Trust  (including  the Master  Trust Deed
          dated March 14, 1998, The Crusade Euro Trust Servicing Agreement dated
          March 19, 1998 and the Supplementary  Terms Notice dated September 22,
          1999)  throughout  such  calendar  year  and,  except  as set forth in
          paragraph 6 below.

     6.   The  following  is a  description  of any  exceptions  to  paragraph 5
          above:- No significant deficiencies were detected.


     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned,  a duly  authorized  officer of the
Servicer, has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 14th day of December
2004.


                                               ST.GEORGE BANK LIMITED
                                               as Servicer


                                                      /s/ G.M. Bartlett
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name:    G.M. Bartlett
                                               Title:   Group Executive
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Christopher Baker","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iSSiOxtNw6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/christopher-baker\/\">Christopher Baker<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/christopher-baker\/embed\/#?secret=iSSiOxtNw6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Christopher Baker” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iSSiOxtNw6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/chris-baker.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":739}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Robert Willeford, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-16-00313-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 The Court having received the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Only, with Prejudice (Doc. 39) 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the Stipulation (Doc. 39) and dismissing 

Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., with prejudice, each party to bear its 

own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this 

action in its entirety. 

Dated this 9th day of September, 2016. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:16-cv-00313-DJH Document 40 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 1