alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA, ULA Successfully Launch Weather Satellite, Re-entry Tech Demo","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BZFluZxg5r\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-ula-successfully-launch-weather-satellite-re-entry-tech-demo\/\">NASA, ULA Successfully Launch Weather Satellite, Re-entry Tech Demo<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-ula-successfully-launch-weather-satellite-re-entry-tech-demo\/embed\/#?secret=BZFluZxg5r\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA, ULA Successfully Launch Weather Satellite, Re-entry Tech Demo” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BZFluZxg5r\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/52490305672_0aab4fc589_o.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk January 22 , 2020

1 60101 ( 10 9 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 160 101

v COA: 339432

Wayne CC: 17

- 001583

- FC

LEWIS THREATT

,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the fourth motion of defendant

- appellant to extend

the time for filing an amended application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The amended

application will be accepted for filing if submitted on or before January 2 7 , 2020. No

further extensions will be granted.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, MICHAEL SCHUTZ, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|  
 
 
 
Date: December 10, 2007
 
/s/ Michael Schutz
 
 
Michael		Schutz		Chief Financial Officer
  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Powerball International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert K. Ipson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert K. Ipson
Robert K. Ipson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 11, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
9498.

#### Stephens *v.*The State.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Monroe—Judge -Stone. January 4, 1918.

T[ie accusation charged Bay Stephens with “the offense of misdemeanor, decoying, persuading, and enticing” a farm laborer, for that the defendant, on the 3d day of September, 1917, in Walton county, Georgia, “by requesting'and urging said Judge Broughton to go home with him and work out a balance which he claimed said Judge Broughton was due him, and by then and there including [inducing ?]. said Judge Broughton to get into the car in 'the possession of and being run by said Bay Stephens, did entice and persuade and decoy and did thereby attempt to entice and persuade and decoy said Judge Broughton to leave the service of J. H. Sorrells, his employer, the said Judge Broughton, then and there being the servant and farm laborer of J. H. Sorrells, employed as such under verbal contract beginning September 3d, 1917, and to continue of favor [?] and effect until said Judge Broughton should have paid in work, and labor the equivalent of $56.05 at the rate of $15.00 per month, the said Judge Broughton being then and there actually in the service of said J. H. Sorrells, and the said Bay Stephens then and there knew that said Judge Broughton was so employed; contrary to the laws of said State,” etc. The defendant demurred on the grounds that the accusation fails to charge any offense, and “fails to state any word or act of incitement or inducement on the part of the defendant whereby he influenced the will of the alleged servant so that the latter became dissatisfied with his alleged employment and was allured ¿way.”

Bloodworth, J.

1. The demurrer to the accusation was properly overruled.

2. “This court can not consider exceptions to the refusal of the trial judge to comply with written requests to charge, unless it is made to appear that they were tendered to the court before the jury retired to consider the ease. *Shirley*v. *State, 5 Ga. App,*611 (63 S. E. 583). In this case it is not disclosed that the written requests to charge were so tendered.” *Seaboard Air-Line Ry.*v. *Barrow,*18 *Ga. App.*261 (4) (89 S. E. 383) ; *Seaboard Air-Line Railway*v. *Lyon,*18 *Ga. App.*266 (6), 267 (89 S. E. 384).

3. There was some evidence to. support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*

*124
      *Rogers & Knox,*for plaintiff in error, cited,

on the demurrer: Penal Code (1910), § 125; *Watson*v. *State,*124 *Ga.*454; *Hudgins*V. *State,*126 *Ga.*639, 642; *Broughton*v. *State,*114 *Ga.*34; *Solomon*v. *State,*14 *Ga. App.*115; *Johnson*v. *State,*90 *Ga.*441; *Brown*v. *State,*116 *Ga.*562; *Carter*v. *State,*12 *Ga. App.*432 (2); United States *v. Hess,*124 U. S. 483; *McAllister*v. *State,*122 Ga. 745-6.

U. W. *Roberts, solicitor,*contra, cited:

Penal Code (1910), § 954; *Hudgins*V. *State,*supra; *Youmans*v. *State,*7 *Ga. App.*101 (4); *Holt*v. *State,*5 *Ga. App.*184 (1); *Bazemore*v. *State,*121 *Ga.*619; *Bright*v. *State,*4 *Ga. App.*333-6.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

BCBSM, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

WALGREEN CO. AND WALGREENS BOOTS 

ALLIANCE, INC.,

Defendants.

Case No. 1:20-cv-01853

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan

Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Qualification of Counsel

Consolidated with:

Case No. 1:20-cv-04738

Case No. 1:20-cv-03332

Case No. 1:20-cv-01929

Case No. 1:20-cv-04940

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR QUALIFICATION OF COUNSEL

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, Plaintiffs move for an order 

that, consistent with its ethical duties, Crowell & Moring is qualified to serve as plaintiff’s 

counsel in this case because (1) it has no conflict of interest and (2) through their delay and 

tactical maneuvers, defendants have waived, forfeited and relinquished any right to claim to the 

contrary. In compliance with the Court’s 10th Amended General Order 20-0012 In Re 

Coronavirus Covid-19 Public Emergency (Feb. 12, 2021) modifying the requirements of Local 

Rules 5.3 and 5.4, Plaintiffs will not notice this motion for in-person presentment at this time and 

will await notification from the presiding judge as to the need, if any, for a hearing by electronic 

means or in-court proceeding.
2

Dated: July 30, 2021 Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ T. Markus Funk

T. Markus Funk

Regina LaMonica

Perkins Coie LLP

131 S. Dearborn, Suite 1700

Chicago, IL 60603

Telephone: (312) 324-8500

Facsimile: (312) 324-9500

MFunk@perkinscoie.com

rlamonica@perkinscoie.com

Counsel for Crowell & Moring LLP

Thomas B. Mason (pro hac vice pending)

Thomas G. Connolly (pro hac vice pending)

Jared Marx (pro hac vice pending)

HARRIS, WILTSHIRE & GRANNIS LLP

1919 M Street NW, Eighth Floor

Washington, DC 20036

Telephone: (202) 730-1300

Facsimile: (202) 730-1301

tmason@hwglaw.com

tconnolly@hwglaw.com

jmarx@hwglaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs and Crowell & 

Moring LLP
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on July 30, 2021, I caused true and correct copies of the foregoing 

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Qualification of Counsel to be served by ECF upon counsel of record for 

all parties.

/s/ T. Markus Funk

T. Markus Funk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01).                    

*Date:*                         November 25, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Room 3F30B, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jane K. Battles, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3128, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2744,                         *battlesja@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 24, 2014.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-25764 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
9585.

#### Salter *v.*The State.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Accusation of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Dublin—Judge Elynt. February 19, 1918.

*W. A. Dampier,*for plaintiff in error.

*S. P. New, 'solicitor, contra.*

Broyles, P. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and there is no merit in any of the special grounds of'the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell J.J., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"Hinode Satellite Captures Powerful Aug. 21 Eclipse Images, Video","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vJTvUZ1faz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/hinode-satellite-captures-powerful-aug-21-eclipse-images-video\/\">Hinode Satellite Captures Powerful Aug. 21 Eclipse Images, Video<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/hinode-satellite-captures-powerful-aug-21-eclipse-images-video\/embed\/#?secret=vJTvUZ1faz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Hinode Satellite Captures Powerful Aug. 21 Eclipse Images, Video” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vJTvUZ1faz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/xrteclipse_20170821_165202-1_of_3.jpg?w=512","thumbnail_width":512,"thumbnail_height":512}
16-16208 Brian Malnes v. State of Arizona, et al "Mandate Issued (Screening/Motions Panel)"

ca9_ecfnoticing 

to:

08/22/2017 08:41 AM

Hide Details 

From: ca9_ecfnoticing@ca9.uscourts.gov

To: 

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a 

case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or 

directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this 

first viewing.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Notice of Docket Activity

The following transaction was entered on 08/22/2017 at 8:41:09 AM PDT and filed on 08/22/2017 

Case Name: Brian Malnes v. State of Arizona, et al

Case Number: 16-16208

Document(s): Document(s)

Docket Text:

MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, CTB and MHM) [10552909] (Westbrooke, Craig)

Notice will be electronically mailed to:

Kara Marie Karlson

USDC, Prescott, District/Bankruptcy Clerk

Case participants listed below will not receive this electronic notice:

Brian Edward Malnes

2157 W Alaska Ave.

Flagstaff, AZ 86001 

The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:

Document Description: Mandate Order

Original Filename: /opt/ACECF/live/forms/CraigWestbrooke_1616208_10552909_v2Order-Mandate_216.pdf

Electronic Document Stamp:

[STAMP acecfStamp_ID=1106763461 [Date=08/22/2017] [FileNumber=10552909-0] 

[9358b2e945f3902ba58fe6cf663dc1e0b6d8c14fff5322689a17dec23c59fd56784e005a5b30bd8c502afe8cae5eba75accf2521823f8be3afaee99d7aa45801]]

Recipients: 

• Kara Marie Karlson

• Brian Edward Malnes

• USDC, Prescott, District/Bankruptcy Clerk

The following information is for the use of court personnel:

DOCKET ENTRY ID: 10552909 

RELIEF(S) DOCKETED:

DOCKET PART(S) ADDED: 12481845 

16-16208 Brian Malnes v. State of Arizona, et al "Mandate Issued (Screeni... Page 1 of 1

file:///C:/Users/earagon/AppData/Local/Temp/notesF429F1/~web6515.htm 8/22/2017

Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 55-2 Filed 08/22/17 Page 1 of 1
9424.

#### City of Atlanta *v.*Copeland.

Decided May 17, 1918.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. October 31, 1917.

*J. L. May son, S. D. Hewlett,'ioi:*plaintiff in error.

*G. N. Bynum,*contra.

Luke, J.

An approval of á certiorari bond by the clerk of the municipal court of Atlanta is not such an approval as is required by the Civil Code (1910.), § 5185. In order to meet the requirements of this section, a certiorari from the appellate division of that court must show the giving of the proper certiorari bond approved by the judges from whose judgment certiorari is prayed. *Georgian Co.*v. *Button,*18 *Ga. App.*507 (89 S. E. 601). The court did not err in dismissing the first certiorari. The court having properly dismissed the first certiordri upon the ground that it was void (see *Singer Sewing Machine Co.*v. *Dacus,*ante, 297, 90 S. E. 8), the plaintiff in error could not recommence the certiorari, and it was not error to dismiss the second certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, O. J., and Jenhins, J., concur.*