alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

           In connection with theQuarterly report of U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, L.L.C. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Thomas C. Ludlow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

           1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

           2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

/s/ Thomas C. Ludlow Thomas C. Ludlow Chief Financial Officer November 19, 2003 

  

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to U.S. TimberlandsKlamath Falls, L.L.C. and will be retained by U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, L.L.C. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
#### T. C. Blackwell *v.*R. L. Byrne.

Set-off and Counter-claim — Action On — Claim for Damages — Contracts of Builders.

Though a plaintiff may, under Civil Code, sections 38 and 126, sue defendants jointly or severally, a claim for damages presented by- a counterclaim, for defective work, is not a right of action in either of them separately, but jointly.

Same — Parties—Demurrer.

The counter-claim aa pleaded by one defendant alone, was not maintainable, it not being a complete cause of action in favor of the party pleading it, and the demurrer should have been sustained.

APPEAL PROM UNION CIRCUIT COURT.

October 28, 1870.

Opinion op the Oourt by

Judge Hardin:

This action was brought by the appellant against B. L. Byrne for the recovery of $112.37 as a balance of a joint demand against him and T. ,S. Chapman upon a contract for' building a house, which as alleged had been ascertained by a parol arbitration and award. The defendant by his answer pleaded a counter-claim, on which he sought a recovery over against the plaintiff, without making Chapman a party, for damages sustained by them, in consequence of a defective performance of the contract to build the house, in certain particulars, which he alleged, were by the plaintiff, fraudulently concealed from' the defendant and the arbitrators, and therefore not considered by the latter. •

*411
      *Bush, for appellant.*

*James, for appellee.*

The answer and counter-claim were adjudged sufficient ou demurrer, and a trial of the case resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant for $200, from which the court having-refused to grant a new trial, this appeal is prosecuted. Although, under section *88*of the Civil Code of Practice, the plaintiff might at his option have sued either Byrne or Chapman separately, or both of them jointly, upon his joint demand against them, as the claim for damages presented by the counter-claim, was not a right of action in either of them separately, but jointly in them both, the counter-claim as pleaded by the appellee alone, without bringing Chapman before the court, was not maintainable, because it was not a complete cause of action in favor of the party pleading it; (Civil Code, See. 126) ; and for that reason the demurrer of the plaintiff should have been sustained.

The court also erred in permitting the defendant to examine Chapman as a witness in his behalf. If Chapman had in fact been released from responsibility to the plaintiff, as implied by his statement upon his *voir dire,*he was still certainly interested in the claim for damages asserted by the counter-claim against the plaintiff.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial and proceedings conformible to this opinion.
#### Garwood and Another v. Cox.

On appeal.

*Tuesday, December*1.

A SUPERINTENDENT of school-land, by a written contract without seal, leased to *A.,*in 1824, a part of the land for 10 years. *Held,*that as the contract was not under seal and was for a longer term than the statute authorised, it did not enable a purchaser of the land in 1830 from the school-commissioner, to sue *A.*for a breach of the contract. *Vide*Stat. 1818, p. 301.—1829, p. 120.

The above-named contract did not show in what county the land was situate,—its situation being only stated to be in township 15, range eight; and the declaration contained no averment to supply this defect. *Held,*that the declaration were it otherwise good, would be objectionable for want of such an averment.

' It was necessary for the declaration in the suit above-named, to state that the lease, (supposing it to be conformable to the statute,) remained uncancelled; and that the trustees of the township had authorised the commissioner to sell the land, and that he had sold it accordingly to the plaintiff. It was also necessary for the declaration to show, that the situation of the land, as to place, was such as to authorise the sale. *Vide*Stat. *supra.—Trustees, &c.*v. *Miller,*5 *Ohio*Rep. 184.
9633.

#### Darby *v.*The State.

Decided September 17, 1918.

Broyles, P. J.

1. The motion by the accused for a continuance of the case on the ground of the' absence of a witness did not come up, in several particulars, to the statutory requirements (Pena'l Code, § 987), and the judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling it.

2. The court did not err in admitting the alleged dying declaration of the deceased, which, according to the- testimony, was made -a few hours before his death and when he believed that he was about to die. Under all the facts surrounding it, disclosed by the record, the jury were authorized to find that the deceased was actually in the article of death at the time of the declaration; and the court clearly instructed the jury that they could not consider the alleged declaration unless they found that the deceased was, at the time he made it, in the very article of death. *Darby*v. *State,*9 *Ga. App.*700 (3), 703 (72 S. E. 182).

3. The excerpt from the charge upon the subject of voluntary- manslaughter, complained of in the 4th special ground of the motion for a new trial, is not erroneous when considered with its context and in the light of the’.entire charge.

4. The court did not err in overruling those special grounds of the motion for a new trial based upon the disqualification of certain members of the- jury which returned the verdict against the defendant.’ The showing by the movant was met by a counter-showing by the State, and it does not appear that the court abused its discretion in this matter.

5. The court did not err in refusing to give any of the instructions requested. So much of them as was legal and pertinent to the facts of the case was sufficiently covered by the charge given.

6. There is no substantial merit in any of the other special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

7. The defendant in this case has been three times convicted of the offense of voluntary manslaughter. Twice, on account of errors in the trial of the case, this court has granted him a new trial. 9 *Ga. App.,*supra;16 *Ga. App.*171 (84 S. E. 724). Upon the last trial no material error appears to have been committed; the charge of the court was fair, full, and as favorable to the defendant as he was entitled to under the law; and the verdict is amply supported by the evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.*

*607Conviction of manslaughter; from Toombs superior court-.Judge Hardeman. October 4, 1917.

*E. J. Giles, G.*1F. *Lanlcford, G.*IF.. *Sparks, J. K. Hines,*for' ■ plaintiff in error.

*Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general,*contra.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, KENNETH GALPIN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: December 15, 2004 | /s/  Kenneth GalpinKenneth Galpin
President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the reference to our firm in Item 6“Selected Financial Data”, and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121244) pertaining to the Educate, Inc. 2003 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and the Educate, Inc. 2004 Omnibus StockIncentive Plan of (i) our reports dated March 13, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Educate, Inc., Educate, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Educate, Inc., and (ii) our report dated March 13, 2006 with respect to the combined financial statements and schedule of the Laureate pre-K-12 Business(Predecessor to Educate, Inc.), each included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

 

Baltimore, Maryland 

March 13, 2006 

 

94
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jamie Adkins","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jamieladkins-2-2-2-2-2-2-2-2\/","title":"CME Week: Mapping the Journey of a Giant Coronal Mass Ejection","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Dfe0TxPs54\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/cme-week-mapping-the-journey-of-a-giant-coronal-mass-ejection\/\">CME Week: Mapping the Journey of a Giant Coronal Mass Ejection<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/cme-week-mapping-the-journey-of-a-giant-coronal-mass-ejection\/embed\/#?secret=Dfe0TxPs54\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“CME Week: Mapping the Journey of a Giant Coronal Mass Ejection” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Dfe0TxPs54\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/cmeweek-226_3.jpg?w=226","thumbnail_width":226,"thumbnail_height":75}
#### JOHN G. VAN DALEN, ETC. v. WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP, ETC.

September 6, 1989.

Petitions for certification granted. (See 232 *N.J.Super.*205).
IV

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 130

Providing for a lump sum allowance for the Corrections Calendar Office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 24, 1997

Mr. GUTKNECHT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Providing for a lump sum allowance for the Corrections

Calendar Office.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. LUMP SUM ALLOWANCE FOR CORRECTIONS

3 CALENDAR OFFICE.

4 There shall be a lump sum allowance of $300,000 per

5 fiscal year for the salaries and expenses of the Corrections

6 Calendar Office, established by House Resolution 7, One

7 Hundred Fifth Congress, agreed to January 7, 1997.

8 Such amount shall be allocated between the majority party

9 and the minority party as determined by the Speaker, in

10 consultation with the minority leader.
2

HRES 130 ATH

1 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The allowance under section 1—

3 (1) shall be available beginning with the month

4 of May 1997;

5 (2) through the end of September 1997, shall

6 be paid from the applicable accounts of the House

7 of Representatives on a pro rata basis; and

8 (3) beginning with fiscal year 1998, shall be

9 paid as provided in appropriations Acts.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Garrett Shea","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/garrett-shea-1nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA OSBP Celebrates Small Business Saturday 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bAwzgDfv9n\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/osbp\/nasa-osbp-celebrates-small-business-saturday\/\">NASA OSBP Celebrates Small Business Saturday 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/osbp\/nasa-osbp-celebrates-small-business-saturday\/embed\/#?secret=bAwzgDfv9n\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA OSBP Celebrates Small Business Saturday 2023” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bAwzgDfv9n\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/small-business-saturday-social-media-graphic.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":315}
#### Teegarden, a Minor, Appellant, *v.*Teegarden et al., Appellees.

(No. 138

— Decided March 26, 1947.)

*Mr. Royon G. 'Hess*and *Mr. R. E. Boiler, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Mr. E. J. Garmhausen*and *Mr. Richard P. Faulkner,*for appellees.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of. appellees to strike the bill of exceptions on the ground that it was not filed within the time prescribed by law.

There is no memorandum in support of the motion, but it may be assumed that the motion is directed to the facts of record in the trial court. The motion for new trial was overruled December 30, 1946. The bill of exceptions was filed in the trial court on February 15, 1947, which was 47 days after the overruling of the motion for new trial.

The filing of the bill of exceptions in the trial court within 40 days after the overruling of the motion for a new trial, as required by Section 11564, General Code, is mandatory. *Pace*v. *Volk,*85 Ohio St., 413, 98 N. E., *80111; *McEvoy*v. *Ripley,*24 Ohio Law Abs., 678; *Bridgewater*v. *Boyles,*29 Ohio Law Abs., 362; *Lutz*v. *Lutz,*74 Ohio App., 517, 60 N. E. (2d), 67.

A bill of exceptions which is not filed in the trial court within 40 days after the overruling of the motion for a hew trial will'be stricken by the appellate court on motion. *Kennedy*v. *Mancini,*22 Ohio Law Abs., 607; *Eubank*v. *Industrial Commission,*59 Ohio App., 189, 17 N. E. (2d), 416; *Seifer*v. *Industrial Commission,*29 Ohio Law Abs., 52.

The motion to strike will be sustained.

*Motion-sustained.*

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
#### R. C. Tevis *v.*John J. Ireland.

Judicial Sales — Advance Bid.

The chancellor does not abuse a sound discretion in re-opening a sale, where a bona fide advance bid of twenty per cent, properly secured, is made.

Same.

Bidders at judicial sales do not become the purchaser until confirmed by the chancellor, but stand as merely a preferred bidder.

APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT.

July 5, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The advance bid offered was secured by good security and was therefore reliable, and being for over twenty per cent, advance on the original, the chancellor did not abuse a sound discretion *152in rejection the first bid and opening the offering. The highest bidder at a decretal sale does not become the purchaser until his offer is confirmed by the chancellor, but until then he stands as a mere prof erred bidder. Still- the power to open the biddings is not an absolute arbitrary one, but to be exercised for reasonable cause and to forward justice. The policy of sustaining judicial sales, unless for good cause these be set aside, is equally for the benefit of both parties for a reasonable assurance that the purchase will be confirmed is calculated to invite such competitors as may desire to buy.

*Lindseys, Harlan, for appellant.*

*Craddock, for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Bill Keeter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/wkeeter\/","title":"Contact Us","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Q1UH1qVoWa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/contact-us\/\">Contact Us<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/contact-us\/embed\/#?secret=Q1UH1qVoWa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Contact Us” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Q1UH1qVoWa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/osi_banner1.jpg?w=597","thumbnail_width":597,"thumbnail_height":214}
YONI CALHOUN
,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16-2417

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 10, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael Flowers
, Judge.

Philip J. Massa, West Palm Beach
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY
, WINSOR
, and M.K. THOMAS
, JJ., CONCUR.