alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.4


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Real Estate Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Brett A. Brown certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   March 29, 2013By:  /s/ BRETT A. BROWNName:  Brett A. BrownTitle:  Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-6 Safely En Route to International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xDFCBECTPi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-6-safely-en-route-to-international-space-station\/\">NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-6 Safely En Route to International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-6-safely-en-route-to-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=xDFCBECTPi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-6 Safely En Route to International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xDFCBECTPi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/nhq202303010010.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":236}
----

Exhibit 15.2 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTEREDACCOUNTANTS 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement No. 333-100329 on Form S-8 and Registration StatementNo. 333-142684 on Form F-3 of our report (which audit report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphs referring to arestatement of the financial statements and our consideration of internalcontrol over financial reporting and also includes a separate report titled"Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada – UnitedStates of America Reporting Difference" referring to conditions and events thatcast substantial doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern)dated March 29, 2007, except for Notes 13 and 21 which are as of June 15, 2007,on the consolidated financial statements of Zi Corporation appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 20-F/A of Zi Corporation for the year ended December 31,2006. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP                  Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Independent Registered Chartered AccountantsCalgary, Canada June 19, 2007 

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey Interrante","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/abbey-a-interrantenasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Retires Prolific Solar Observatory After 16 Years","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GYJJx8QnjB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/rhessi\/nasa-retires-prolific-solar-observatory-after-16-years\/\">NASA Retires Prolific Solar Observatory After 16 Years<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/rhessi\/nasa-retires-prolific-solar-observatory-after-16-years\/embed\/#?secret=GYJJx8QnjB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Retires Prolific Solar Observatory After 16 Years” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GYJJx8QnjB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/rhessi.2018-11-20_09_49_32.gif?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
#### James Boon *v.*Mary Givens.

Dower — Fee Simple Estate.

The acceptance of a vendee, of a husband’s conveyance, while having the effect to estop the purchasers vendees from denying the husband had title, it can not be construed into an admission that he held such an estate in the land as will entitle his surviving wife to dower, without proof by her that he was seized and possessed of the land in fee simple.

APPEAL FROM NELSON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 16, 1871.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

The petitioner in this action alleges that her deceased husband was, on the 20th of September, 1825, upon which day he made the conveyance to Stanislaus Burche, “seized and possessed of the two tracts of land out of which she claims dower. Whether or not he was seized of an estate' in fee simple in said land is not directly charged. The answer, however, distinctly and unequivocally denies that he was ever at any time “seized and possessed” of said lands at all.

There is no proof in the record tending to show that the husband of the appellee was at any time during the coverture in the actual possession of the lands. Nor that he had title of anv kind to the same.

The acceptance of Burche of the husband’s conveyance may *570have the effect of estopping those who hold under him from denying that he had title of some kind, but it can not be construed into an admission that he held such an estate in the lands as will entitle his surviving wife to dower.

Johnson, *for appellant.*

*Muir &*Wi'clcliffe, *for appellee.*

Besides, the petitioner signed the deed to Burche, and she admits in her petition that she attempted to relinquish her potential right of dower in the lands. She claims, however, that she did not acknowledge and deliver said deed in the manner and form required by the statute to make it binding upon her. As she repudiates the paper to which she admits she was a party, she can not in a court of‘equity be allowed to rely upon the same as sufficient evidence of itself to authorize her to recover in a proceeding of this kind.

We are of opinion that the record before us does not show that George Given, deceased, was, during his coverture with the appellee, seized iof such an estate in the two tracts of land mentioned in her petition as under the law entitled her to dower.

The judgment of the court below is, therefore, reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Exhibit 32.1

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In  connection  with this Annual  Report of CalPetro  Tankers   (Bahamas I)
Limited (the  "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual  period ended  December 31,
2003, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  (the "SEC") on or
about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Troim, the Principal Executive
Officer and  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed  original  of this  written  statement  has been  provided  to the
Company and will be retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

Date: June 8, 2004

/s/ Tor Olav Troim
------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

10:30 a.m. EST, Monday, November 3, 2014.

# PLACE:

CFTC Headquarters Conference Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will hold this meeting to consider rulemaking and related matters, including the issuance of proposed rules and a final interpretation. The agenda for this meeting is available to the public and posted on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.cftc.gov.*                         In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, or place of the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's Web site.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2014-25894 Filed 10-28-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 802 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 802

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
                              gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

Mr. Thornberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
                              gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    (a) Estate Tax.--Chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to estate taxes) is hereby repealed.
    (b) Gift Tax.--Chapter 12 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to gift taxes) is hereby repealed.
    (c) Effective Date.--
            (1) Estate tax.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to the estates of decedents dying after September 30, 
        1997.
            (2) Gift tax.--The repeal made by subsection (b) shall 
        apply with respect to transfers made after September 30, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of
Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to
his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)  the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
     2003 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Gregory S. Madar
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Gregory S. Madar,
                                    Senior Vice President,
                                    Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
                                    (Principal Financial Officer)
                                    November 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Webster Preferred Capital Corporation and will be retained by
Webster Preferred Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"What Is a Rocket? (Grades K-4)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wWmk1uHPBO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-is-a-rocket-grades-k-4\/\">What Is a Rocket? (Grades K-4)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-is-a-rocket-grades-k-4\/embed\/#?secret=wWmk1uHPBO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“What Is a Rocket? (Grades K-4)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wWmk1uHPBO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/367208main_road2apollo-22b_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":796}
##### 



Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Argo-Tech Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 26, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                           
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.

Date: June 9, 2003

| |         |                                                                  
| | ------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: /s/ | Michael S. Lipscomb
Michael S. Lipscomb
Chief Executive Officer  
|
| | By: /s/ | Frances S. St. Clair
Frances S. St. Clair
Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

20
#### SLONIM, LTD., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BANKERS MORTGAGE & REALTY COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted May 1, 1945

Decided May 15, 1945.

Before Justices Case, Bobine and Persicie.

For the appellant, *Charles N. Thorn, Jr.*

For the respondent, *Ralph J. Slonim.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bobine. J.

The plaintiff, an assignee of C. Witfield Williams, a real estate broker, recovered a judgment for com*46missions under a contract for the sale of prerhises situate at 591 Woodland Avenue, Mountainside, Tew Jersey.

The pertinent provisions of the contract are as follows:

> “The liability of the purchasers to complete this contract is contingent upon their ability to obtain a mortgage loan for $4,000 on the premises within two weeks from the date of the execution of this agreement. * * * And the Seller hereby agrees to pay to C. H. Williams a commission of 5% on the purchase price aforesaid, said commission to be paid in consideration of services rendered in consummating this sale; said commission to become due and payable when title to the property passes to purchasers. The contract was dated August 30th, 1944.

On October 10th, 1944, the purchaser named in the contract wrote the seller, in part, as follows: “My reason for cancelling this contract is due to the fact that I am unable to secure a mortgage on this property because we find, that part of the driveway is now on another property, and also that the length specified on the property is indefinite.” The recitation of fact in this letter was not disputed.

In the agreed state of the case, it appears that: “Plaintiff’s assignor was the broker recognized in the sales contract by the defendant; that he had been present in the office of defendant’s attorney at the time the contract was executed and was familiar with and consented to the contents of the contract.”

It also appeared that the purchaser could not obtain a mortgage loan because the title was defective. The title did not pass to the purchaser because she could not obtain the mortgage loan within the time fixed in the contract. The broker knew of this provision in the contract and was not entitled to a commission except upon the consummation of the sale within the four corners of the contract'. *Lippincolt*v. *Content,*123 *N. J. L.*217. The broker had not procured a purchaser on the terms agreed upon in the contract, the conditions of which were known to him. The assignee stands in no better position.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.