alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON 

U.S. District Judge: James A. Soto Date: April 12, 2017 

USA v. Veronica Guadalupe Saldivar Case Number: CR-15-02062-001-TUC-JAS (LCK) 

U.S. Attorney: Christina Vejar 

Attorney for Defendant: Elias Damianakos, CJA 

Interpreter: N/A 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

MOTION HEARING: 

With no objection from the Government, Court grants Motion to Continue Trial and Plea Deadline 

(docket entry #55). Jury Trial presently set for 6/13/2017 is continued to 8/22/2017 at 9:00am. 

Anticipated length of trial is 3 days. Plea deadline is set for 8/4/2017. Court further sets a Pretrial 

Conference for 8/17/2017 at 1:30pm. 

Defense counsel addresses the Court regarding his second Motion for Competency Examination 

(docket entry #56) and requests that the evaluation be conducted in Spanish. 

Good cause appearing that a second competency examination is needed, Court grants Motion. Court 

sets a status hearing for 7/13/2017 at 1:30pm. Order for Exam to follow. 

Recorded by Cindy Shearman 

BY: Tiffany Dame, Deputy Clerk 

Time: 12 minutes 

Start: 10:56am 

Stop: 11:08am 

Case 4:15-cr-02062-JAS-LCK Document 58 Filed 04/12/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Astronauts Available for Final Interviews Before Space Station Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"m2m5mmPPSI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronauts-available-for-final-interviews-before-space-station-mission\/\">NASA Astronauts Available for Final Interviews Before Space Station Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronauts-available-for-final-interviews-before-space-station-mission\/embed\/#?secret=m2m5mmPPSI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronauts Available for Final Interviews Before Space Station Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"m2m5mmPPSI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/38591578060_8a81aac883_z.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50381

Summary Calendar

__________________

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF

PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES UNION

& INDUSTRY PENSION FUND,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AMERICAN DECORATING COMPANY;

DAN LORD,

 Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-94-CA-067

- - - - - - - - - -

March 21, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants appeal from the district court's order finding them in contempt of the consent

judgment. Appellants argue that a "Notice of Satisfaction of Judgment" filed by the parties bars

subsequent actions based on alleged deficient pension contributions. We have reviewed the
No. 95-50381

-2-

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades Union &

Industry Pension Fund v. American Decorating Co., No. SA-94-CA-067 (W.D. Tex. Apr. 25,

1995).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory S. Madar, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webster Preferred CapitalCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 11, 2006   /s/ Gregory S. Madar Gregory S. Madar
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section906 Certification**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR**

**PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. forthe quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Andrew A. Wiederhorn,Chief Executive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

 

This written statement isbeing furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to theReport.

 

 
| November 13, 2007 |                    | /s/  Andrew A. Wiederhorn |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|              |                    |
| Date              | Andrew A. Wiederhorn    |
|              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Company and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argo-Tech Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/
    
    Michael S. LipscombMichael S. LipscombChairman, President and CEO
 22
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 532

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the deduction

for lobbying expenses in connection with State legislation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. CRANE, Mr.

LAHOOD, Mr. BENTSEN, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. MCCOLLUM, Mr. SHAW, Mr.

ABERCROMBIE, and Mr. PICKETT) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

the deduction for lobbying expenses in connection with

State legislation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF DEDUCTION FOR LOBBYING

4 EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH STATE LEG5 ISLATION.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 162(e)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to denial

8 of deduction for certain lobbying and political activities)

9 is amended—
2

•HR 532 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘any State legislature or of’’

2 before ‘‘any local council’’ in the material preceding

3 subparagraph (A), and

4 (2) by striking ‘‘such council’’ in subparagraph

5 (B)(i) and inserting ‘‘such legislature, council,’’.

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The paragraph head7 ing of paragraph (2) of section 162(e) of such Code is

8 amended by inserting ‘‘STATE OR’’ before ‘‘LOCAL’’.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
9343.

#### Newman *v.*Redwine.

Decided May 15, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of Newnan—Judge Post. October 5, 1917. , ' .

*J. C. Newman, W. L. Stallings, W. G. Post,*for plaintiff..

*W. Y.*Atkinson> for defendant.

Bloodwoeth, J.

The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without merit; there is ample evidence to support the verdict; and the judgment is

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., coneur.*
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under (i) the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 30, 1993, as amended and restated as of August 1, 2002, January 13, 2006, July 1, 2007, and March 17, 2016, and as amended by the First Amendment thereto, dated as of January 27, 2017, (ii) the Indenture for the Notes dated as of October 9, 2002, as amended and restated as of January 13, 2006, and March 17, 2016, and (iii) the Asset Pool Supplement for the Notes dated October 9, 2002, as amended by the First Amendment, dated as of March 1, 2008 (collectively, the “Agreements”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision. |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| By:    | /s/ MICHAEL WASSMER |
|   |   |
| Name:  | Michael Wassmer |
| Title: | President |
FIRM:59738434v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

JUANITA BALDERAS, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Case No. 20 CV 1857

) 

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD ) Honorable Sara Ellis, 

COMPANY, ERICK CHASKO, ) Judge Presiding

and MARCOS SALAMANCA, )

)

Defendants. )

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the above-captioned action shall be 

dismissed with prejudice, with no award of counsel fees or costs by the Court to either 

side; 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Orders pursuant to the

foregoing may be entered of record without further notice to either party, upon the 

presentation of this Stipulation; and

WHEREFORE, the Parties hereto pray that the Court will enter an Order 

dismissing the case with prejudice, and thereby dismissing the Complaint with

prejudice.

Dated: September 6, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Susan M. Pavlow /s/ Johner T. Wilson III

For the plaintiff For the defendants

Susan M. Pavlow Johner T. Wilson III

Law Office of Susan M. Pavlow Epstein Becker Green, P.C.

53 W. Jackson Blvd., Ste. 1550 227 W. Monroe St. Ste. 3250

Chicago, Illinois 60604 Chicago, Illinois 60606

smpavlow@mac.com JWilson@ebglaw.com

Case: 1:20-cv-01857 Document #: 117 Filed: 09/07/23 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:1687
FIRM:59738434v1

/s/ Jamie Franklin

For the plaintiff

Jamie S. Franklin

Chicago-Kent College of Law

565 West Adams Street, Suite 600

Chicago, IL 60661

(312) 906-5048

(773) 696-1478 (fax)

jfranklin5@kentlaw.iit.edu

Case: 1:20-cv-01857 Document #: 117 Filed: 09/07/23 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:1688
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30913 Summary Calendar

SCOTT LINGLE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus
BURL CAIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(97-CV-1263-N)

-------------------- December 7, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Petitioner-Appellant Scott Lingle appeals the district court’s denial of relief in his 28 U. S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Lingle argues that the reasonable doubt jury instruction given at his trial was constitutionally defective under Cage v. Louisiana , 498 U.S. 39 (1990). The AEDPA precludes consideration of this claim. W illiams v. Cain , 229 F.3d 468, 473-75 (5th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the district court’s denial of relief is
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.2



MASTER SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



|                                                                                                                   |  |                                                                                                                                                           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|U.S. Bank National Association, As Indenture
Trustee CN-WN-06CT 425 Walnut Street, 6thFloor Cincinnati, Ohio
45202 |  | Education Funding Capital Trust  IV c/o U.S.
Bank National Association, as Co-Owner Trustee CN-WN-06CT 425 Walnut Street, 6thFloor Cincinnati, Ohio 45202



Pursuant to Sections
3.05(g) and 11.01 of the Indenture of Trust dated as of May 1, 2004, by and among Education Funding Capital Trust  IV, U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee and Fifth Third Bank, as Trust Eligible Lender Trustee, as amended (the
Indenture), and Section 7(1) of the Master Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2004 among Education Funding Capital Trust  IV, Education Lending Services, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association as Indenture Trustee and Fifth Third
Bank as Trust Eligible Lender Trustee (the Master Servicing Agreement) the undersigned hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities of Education Lending Services, Inc., as Master Servicer (the Master Servicer) under
the Master Servicing Agreement for the period from May 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Master Servicing Agreement throughout such period.



|               |  |                                 
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------
|March 25, 2005 |  | /s/ Perry D. Moore              
|               |  | Perry D. Moore                  
|               |  | Executive Vice President-Finance
|               |  | Education Lending Services, Inc.