alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6348

KIM TYRONE JESSUP, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. THEODORE DAVID HILL, Detective; JOHN PAUL TIMBERLAKE,Detective; STEVEN WAYNE TOLLIE, Corporal; CITY OF WINSTONSALEM, NORTH CAROLINA, Forsyth County; RENEE SUZANNE MELLY, Detective; TIMOTHY VAUGHN SOUTHERN, Sergeant; JAMES THOMAS MCKNIGHT, Deputy; JAMIE DENTON, Deputy; DANNY CARTER, Deputy; WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT; FORSYTH COUNTY, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-01114-WO-WWD)

Submitted: July 10, 2009 Decided: August 14, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kim Tyrone Jessup, Appellant Pro Se. James R. Morgan, Jr., Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Kim Tyrone Jessup appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2006). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Jessup that failure to file timely and specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Although Jessup filed timely objections, he failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation that his claim was barred by collateral estoppel. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Jessup has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections to a dispositive basis for the ruling after receiving proper notice. * Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the

district court.

* In any event, we have reviewed the record and agree that Jessup’s § 1983 complaint is barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel.

23 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 19","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GFxBvaTskf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-19\/\">Expedition 19<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-19\/embed\/#?secret=GFxBvaTskf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 19” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GFxBvaTskf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/exp19-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Apelt, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-98-00882-PHX-ROS

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Respondents’ motion for an extension of time to respond

to Petitioner’s motion to amend and to answer the proposed Third Amended Petition. (Doc.

256.) Petitioner does not oppose the request. Respondents have been provided sufficient

time to prepare their response, however, the Court will grant the instant motion, but cautions

that no further extensions will be allowed absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Respondents’ unopposed motion for an

extension of time. (Doc. 256.) Respondents shall file their response no later than January

7, 2011.

DATED this 30th day of November, 2010.

Case 2:98-cv-00882-ROS Document 259 Filed 11/30/10 Page 1 of 1
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report, of ZiCorporation (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, DaleKearns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

> 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. 

Date: March 31, 2006. 

| */s/ Dale Kearns*       |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
| Dale Kearns             |
| Chief Financial Officer |

----
#### Joseph Williams *v.*Mary J. Jones, &c.

Cancellation of Instruments — Inadequate Consideration — Weak Mental Condition.

Evidence showed a .sale of 26 acres of land, worth $20.00 per acre, subject only to the widow’s dower, and sale of a life estate of considerable value, in consideration of a horse, diseased, and which shortly died. Held, that in view of the grossly inadequate consideration, the grantor’s advanced age, distressed and weak mental condition, and being overreached' by the grantee, the transaction cannot be upheld by a Court of Equity.

APPEAL FROM EDMONDSON CIRCUIT OOUR.T.

April 17 1871.

Opinion oe the 'Oouet by

Judge Hardin :

It appears from tbe evidence that the tract of about twenty-six acres of land to which the appellant had the legal title as heir of his son, Berry Williams, subject only to the widow’s dower, was worth at least $20 an acre, and that the life estate embraced by his deed to Mrs. Jones, was also of considerable value; all of which the deed purports to convey, in consideration of a diseased mare which died shortly afterwards of but little value at the time the deed was made, and belonging equally to the plaintiff and Mrs. Jones as distributees of the estate of Berry Williams deceased. In view of this grossly inadequate consideration for the conveyance, and the advanced age, distress and weak, if not deranged mental condition of appellant and the expectation he seems to have had at the time, of being further compensated by having a home with his danghter-in-law, which was disappointed; and Mrs. Jones’ own admissions disclosing a knowledge of his incapacity, and a deliberate purpose to overreach him, we are constrained to conclude that the transaction was one which ought not to be upheld by a court of equity, and thát the circuit court erred in refusing'the relief sought by the plaintiff and dismissing his petition.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded *335with instructions to render a judgment for the plaintiff in conformity with this opinion.

*B.*Lawless, *for appellant.*
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Barrett J. O’Connor, certify that:

 

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofEFC Bancorp, Inc.;

 

Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a)                                  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)                                 Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)                                  Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

----

 

The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

(a)                                  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)                                 Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | November 12, 2004                                 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/ Barrett J. O’Connor                      |   |
|   | Barrett J. O’Connor

Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Sending \u201cWater\u201d to Europa","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wpELaKPpnE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pia26063orig\/\">Sending \u201cWater\u201d to Europa<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pia26063orig\/embed\/#?secret=wpELaKPpnE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Sending \u201cWater\u201d to Europa” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wpELaKPpnE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/pia26063orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Beth Ridgeway","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/angela-b-ridgewaynasa-gov\/","title":"Does the Five-Second Rule Apply Aboard the Space Station?","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qa4AxYgd3I\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/does-the-five-second-rule-apply-aboard-the-space-station\/\">Does the Five-Second Rule Apply Aboard the Space Station?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/does-the-five-second-rule-apply-aboard-the-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=qa4AxYgd3I\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Does the Five-Second Rule Apply Aboard the Space Station?” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qa4AxYgd3I\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/751216main_1_226.jpg?w=226","thumbnail_width":226,"thumbnail_height":170}
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**ETSPAYPHONES, INC.PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, GUY A. LONGOBARDO, am the Chief Executive Officerof ETS Payphones, Inc. (the “Company”).

 

This certification is being furnished pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005(the “Report”).

 

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(a)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods covered by the Report.

 
| Date:  March 31, 2006 |                              |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                  |                              |
|                  | /s/  GUY  A. LONGOBARDO |   |
|                  | Guy  A. Longobardo                |
|                  | *Chief Executive Officer*         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to ETS Payphones, Inc. and will beretained by ETS Payphones, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,





2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date: November 8, 2010





By:
/s/ John J. JoyceJohn J. JoyceChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.1

Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the Company), I, Joe A. Shearin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                         |  |       |  |              |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----- |  | ------------ |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Joe A. Shearin      |  | Date: |  | May 12, 2010 |  | 
|    |  | Joe A. Shearin          |  |       |  |              |  | 
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer |  |       |  |              |  |
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64841-64842]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25966]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service <SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: October 31, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 27, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 96 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at

[[Page 64842]]

www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-4, CP2015-5.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-25966 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P