alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                       8,285,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    147,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,716,610
<PP&E>                                      15,862,164
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,906,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,864,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,174,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,526
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,932,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,864,375
<SALES>                                     16,550,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,550,468
<CGS>                                        4,526,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,526,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,816,214
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,429,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,429,472)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,429,472)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISLE OF
CAPRI BLACK HAWK LLC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED TO SAID FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-25-1999
<CASH>                                          15,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      331
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,606
<PP&E>                                          81,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,413
<BONDS>                                         75,566
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,907
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,229
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,004
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,141
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Includes bonds payable of $75 million plus other long-term depreciation.
</FN>


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"A Splash of Pink","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UCfXiL8x7r\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/a-splash-of-pink\/\">A Splash of Pink<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/a-splash-of-pink\/embed\/#?secret=UCfXiL8x7r\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Splash of Pink” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UCfXiL8x7r\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/05pd2169orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
#### John Beavan, &c., *v.*N. T. Berry, Trustee, &c.

Husband and Wife — Tenants of Entirety.

Sight of survivor to take, and convey.

APPEAL PROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

January 17, 1871.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

As to two-thirds of the land conveyed by Ilagan, and Berry and wife to Jarboe and wife, took as tenants of the entirety, that conveyance was made in *1827,*before the adoption of the *Revised, Statutes.*

By the stern rule of law established by a current of authorities, coming down to 1868, the last reported case on the question being *Simmons, etc., vs. McKay, etc., 5 Bush 25,*the surviving grantee *569under deeds of this character is entitled to the estate. The case of *Babbit, etc., vs. Scroggin, etc., 1 Duvall,*is very similar to this in its facts, and in that case the husband having survived was adjudged entitled to the estate.

*Noble, for appellants.*

*Harrison, for appellees.*

As it appears that W. Jarboe survived his wife, he thereby became entitled to two-thirds of the land under the deed of Hagan and Berry and wife, which, by his conveyance, passed to his trustee.

Wherefore, the judgment is *reversed,*and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that the Quarterly  Report of Geneva  Financial  Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  September  30, 2003 fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 14, 2003                            /s/ Noel Ratner
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Noel Ratner
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Order filed, May 01, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00107-CV

____________

JUNE G. BARTLE, Appellant

V.

MAIN STREET ACQUISITION CORP., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-0067462

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 11, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On March 27, 2013, this court ordered the court reporter to file the 

record within 30 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the 

reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Lynnette Erskine, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be 
entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are 

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Lynnette Erskine does not timely file the record as ordered, 

we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the 

reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

Mary T. Hone, Esq. - SBN 010891

THE LAW OFFICES OF MARY T. HONE, PLLC

10505 North 69th Street, Suite 1400

Scottsdale, Arizona 85253

Phone: (480) 336-2557

Fax: (480) 478-0146

E-Mail: Mary@honelegal.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

CARLOS C. HERNANDEZ, a married man 

dealing with his sole and separate property,

 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

BANK OF AMERICA, a North Carolina 

corporation; EQUIFAX INFORMATION 

SERVICES, LLC, a Georgia limited liability 

company; TRANSUNION, a Pennsylvania 

corporation; EXPERIAN, a Texas corporation;

 Defendants. 

 

Cause No. CV-16-23-PHX-JJT

STIPULATION TO DISMISS 

DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA

Plaintiff, Carlos Hernandez, and Defendant Bank of America, by and through their 

respective counsel, undersigned, hereby stipulate , pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Fed.R.Civ.P., 

that the above-captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice with respect to Defendant Bank of 

America only, Plaintiff and Defendant Bank of America having reached a settlement.

Case 2:16-cv-00023-JJT Document 40 Filed 08/23/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

DATED this __23rd__ day of August, 2016.

THE LAW OFFICES OF MARY T. HONE, PLLC

_Mary T. Hone_________________

Mary T. Hone – AZ Bar # 010891

Attorney for Plaintiff Carlos C. Hernandez

BRYAN CAVE, LLP

_Daniel P. Crane_________________

Daniel P. Crane

Attorney for Defendant Bank of America

Original of the foregoing

was filed electronically this _23rd_ 

day of August, 2016, and copies mailed to:

United States District Court

District of Arizona – Phoenix Division

Judicial In-Box of the Honorable John J. Tucci

Sandra Day O’Conner U.S. Courthouse – Suite 130

401 West Washington Street, SPC 1

Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2118

Mr. Philip R. Wooten, Esq.

PHILIP R. WOOTEN PC

3413 E. Equestrian Trail

Phoenix, AZ 85044-3403

Local Counsel for Trans Union LLC

Ms. Kelly A. Hensley • Strasburger & Price, LLP

2600 Dallas Parkway Suite 600 • Frisco, TX 75034

469.287.3925 • www.strasburger.com

Attorney for TransUnion LLC

Mr. Lewis P. Perling

King & Spalding LLP

1180 Peachtree Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3521

Tel.: (404) 572-3079

Fax: (404) 572-5138

LPerling@KSLaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC

Case 2:16-cv-00023-JJT Document 40 Filed 08/23/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Ms. Christine Neuharth

Reed Smith LLP

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 700

Los Angeles, California 90067

Counsel for Defendant Bank of America

By: ___Janet Hone_______________

Case 2:16-cv-00023-JJT Document 40 Filed 08/23/16 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10689 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TODD BAINES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-00156-ALL-Y

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender, court-appointed counsel for Todd Baines, has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Baines has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Hosts Live Science Chat: One Year After Eclipse 2017","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ovfyt5U6vv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-hosts-live-science-chat-one-year-after-eclipse-2017\/\">NASA Hosts Live Science Chat: One Year After Eclipse 2017<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-hosts-live-science-chat-one-year-after-eclipse-2017\/embed\/#?secret=Ovfyt5U6vv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Hosts Live Science Chat: One Year After Eclipse 2017” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ovfyt5U6vv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/36672924626_9ea90eb838_o_0_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":295}
4849-1842-5069.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

WILLIAM AMOR, 

 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JOHN REID & ASSOCIATES, INC., 

MICHAEL MASOKAS, THE ESTATE OF 

ARTHUR T. NEWEY, AND UNKNOWN 

EMPLOYEES OF JOHN REID & 

ASSOCIATES, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

 

No. 20 CV 1444 

 

Hon. Judge Lee 

 

Mag. Judge Cummings 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

To: See attached Service List 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 7, 2021, we caused to be served by electronic mail to 

all parties: 

- DEFENDANTS’ RULE 26(a) INITIAL DISCLOSURES 

This Certificate of Service, without attachment, has been filed with the Clerk of the Court 

using the CM/ECF filing system, through which notification of such service is sent to all parties. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

 By: /s/F. Michael Pasqualino___________ 

One of the attorneys for the Defendants 

Jonathan W. Goken, ARDC No. 6278837 

F. Michael Pasqualino, ARDC No. 6311292 

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

550 West Adams Street, Suite 300 

Chicago, Illinois 60661 

(312) 345-1718/Fax: (312) 345-1778 

Jonathan.Goken@lewisbrisbois.com 

F.Pasqualino@lewisbrisbois.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-01444 Document #: 53 Filed: 06/07/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:343
2 

William Amor v. John Reid & Associates, Inc., Michael Masokas, The Estate of Arthur T. Newey, 

and Unknown Employees of John Reid & Associates 

SERVICE LIST 

Jonathan I. Loevy 

Gayle M. Horn 

Mariah Esperanza Garcia 

Loevy & Loevy 

311 N. Aberdeen, 3rd FL 

Chicago, IL 60607 

(312) 243-5900 

jon@loevy.com 

gayle@loevy.com 

mariah@loevy.com

James Thomas Nyeste 

James T. Nyeste 

Attorney at Law 

820 Davis Street, 504 E 

Evanston, IL 60201 

(847) 242-0601 

jnyeste@coveragelaw.com 

Case: 1:20-cv-01444 Document #: 53 Filed: 06/07/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:344
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors
Navistar Financial Retail Receivables Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that Navistar Financial Corporation (the
"Company") has complied as of and for the year ended October 31, 2004, with its
established minimum servicing standards described in the accompanying
Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance dated January 31, 2005, for the
servicing of the receivables for the Navistar Financial 2002-A Owner Trust. The
Company's management is responsible for compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with its minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with its minimum
servicing standards.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with the
Company's minimum servicing standards. The Company was noncompliant with the
requirement that custodial bank accounts and related bank clearing accounts are
reconciled within 45 days after the cutoff date as specified in item I.1.b in
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, except for the noncompliance described in the preceding
paragraph, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended October
31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects based on the criteria set
forth in Appendix I.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    Deloitte & Touche LLP
    Chicago, IL


January 31, 2005
#### William Sayres *v.*Whitehead, Eggleston & Co.

Action — Caption—Name of Real Party in Interest

The 30th section of Civil Code provides that every action must he prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest. This requisition of the Code is not a mere form, but is of substance. The recitation in the caption of the petition, that the action was for the use of Simonton & Co. did not make them a party to the action.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 10, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

This action, as the caption shows, is brought in the name of J. L .Eggleston, N. R. Whitehead and E. W. Sherom, late partners as Whitehead & Eggleston, for benefit of Joe Simonton & Co., against appellant. Simonton & Co. are not made plaintiffs^ either in the caption or body of the petition, but the caption shows that they are the persons beneficially interested as plaintiffs, and the bill of particulars filed with the petition, and made part of it, shows that the debt was contracted with Simonton & Co.

The 30th section of Civil Code provides every action *must*be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except as provided for in section 33rd. And this case is not embraced within the exception.

This requisition of the Code is not a mere form, but is of substance. The recitation in the caption of the petition that the action *388.was for the use of Simonton & Co., did not make them a party to the action, and was insufficient. *Lytle vs. Lytle, 2 Met., 127.*

*Carlisle, for appellant.*

*Drane, for appellees.*

Nor was it a clerical misprision, but a failure to make the real parties in interest plaintiffs, and there is no analogy between this case, and *Oldham vs. Brannen, 2 Met., 302.*

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Toney E. Holland,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00120-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9858 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1