alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Catherine Buckner *v.*Commonwealth.

Criminal Law — Evidence—(Confession—Competency — Admissibility — Instructions.

It is not error to refuse to instruct the jury that confessions made alone to one witness constitutes the weakest evidence admissible in law. The proof of confessions so made is evidence which should be carefully scannedj but the confessions themselves, if freely made, and satisfactorily proved, are entitled to the greatest weight.

Arrest of Judgment.

A judgment of conviction in a criminal ease can be arrested only because the indictment does not charge facts constituting a public offense within the jurisdiction of the court.

APPEAL PROM GREEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 6, 1872.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

It appears from the record that the grand jury returned into court the indictment charging appellant with the commission of the offense for which she was subsequently tried and convicted. The presumption is that it was presented by the foreman. It is not the province of this court to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence upon which the verdict of the jury was founded.

The circuit court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury that confessions made alone to one witness constituted the weakest evidence admissible in law. The proof of confessions so made is evidence which should be carefully scanned; but the confessions themselves, if freely made, and satisfactorily proved, are entitled to the greatest weight.

Nor did the court err in refusing the second instruction asked for by appellant.

In .the first place, the admissibility of the evidence conducing to prove the confessions of the accused was one to be determined by the court. Whilst the jury may consider the circumstances attending the making of confessions, in arriving at a conclusion, as to the weight to which they may be entitled, they can not refuse to con-*647aider tbem altogether when, held admissible by the court. In this case the proof of the confessions was not objected to, and in law it could not have been properly excluded from the jury.

*Lewis, for appellant.*

*Attorney General, for appellee.*

The instructions given for the Commonwealth were not objected to,'when given, and therefore can not be considered by this court.

The motion in arrest of judgment was necessarily overruled.

A judgment of conviction in a criminal case can be arrested only because the indictment does not charge facts constituting a public offense within the jurisdiction of the court.

In this case appellant was charged with feloniously stealing, taking and carrying away two legal tender notes of specified amounts and values, the property of another, and that the acts were committed in the county of Creen. Conceding all this to be true, there can be no doubt that a public offense within the jurisdiction of the Green circuit court was charged,' although the grand jury were not able to give the number and series of the stolen notes.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 (the  "Report") by Talon
International,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  each of the undersigned  hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.


Dated:  August 14, 2007                      /S/ STEPHEN P. FORTE
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Stephen P. Forte
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 14, 2007                      /S/ LONNIE D. SCHNELL
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Lonnie D. Schnell
                                             Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA TV to Air Return of Space Station Crew Members to Earth April 10","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XHUvuBit7L\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-return-of-space-station-crew-members-to-earth-april-10\/\">NASA TV to Air Return of Space Station Crew Members to Earth April 10<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-return-of-space-station-crew-members-to-earth-april-10\/embed\/#?secret=XHUvuBit7L\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA TV to Air Return of Space Station Crew Members to Earth April 10” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XHUvuBit7L\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/04\/32845263954_f6e6a12f01_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Bill Keeter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/wkeeter\/","title":"OTPS Releases its 2023 Annual Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qNBLjmPPSO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/otps\/otps-releases-its-2023-annual-report\/\">OTPS Releases its 2023 Annual Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/organizations\/otps\/otps-releases-its-2023-annual-report\/embed\/#?secret=qNBLjmPPSO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“OTPS Releases its 2023 Annual Report” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qNBLjmPPSO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/otps-annual-report-a-year-in-review-2023-cover.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":776}
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Wiederhorn,Chief Executive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

(a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 11, 2007
|   | /s/ ANDREW A. WIEDERHORN |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Andrew A.  Wiederhorn    |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |

 

1

----
9470.

#### Morrison *v.*The State.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Indictment for seduction; from Fulton' superior court—Judge 1-Iill.

*R. R. Shropshire,*for plaintiff in error.

*John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, E. A. Stephens,*contra.

Bloodwortii, J.

The motion for a new trial in this ease contained only the general grounds. There was ample evidence to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
Exhibit 31.1





CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Harold C. Bevis, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the “registrant”); and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





Date: March 28, 2013





/s/ Harold C. Bevis


Harold C. Bevis


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
9077.

#### GASKINS *v.*GRAY.

The verdict is supported by some evidence, and this court can not set it aside on the ground that a preponderance of the evidence is against it.

Decided March 15, 1918.

Complaint; irom city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. June 16, 1917.

J. *D. Lovett,*for plaintiff in error. *W. D. Buie,*contra.

Wade, C. J.

Predicating his suit upon the law of contribution (Civil Code of 1910, § 3561) and determination of suretyship after judgment (§ 3557), the plaintiff gave the requisite statutory notice, and proceeded to have a determination of the issue raised by his petition and the defendant’s answer, as to whether or not his legal status towards the defendant was one of cosurety or principal; and the jury having decided this issue in favor of the-plaintiff, it does not rest within the power of this court arbitrarily to set aside a verdict supported by some evidence, even if it appeared, as contended by the plaintiff in error, that the “preponderance” of the testimony was against the verdict. It was for the jury alone to determine in whose favor the evidence preponderated, and it is enough if their verdict be supported by *some*evidence.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; P50 Botanical Centers.                    

*Date:*                         December 17-18, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Martina Schmidt, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3456.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 30, 2014.

Michelle Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-26203 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Station Cosmonauts Complete Spacewalk to Deploy Cameras","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"O9TjYgMVmY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/station-cosmonauts-complete-spacewalk-to-deploy-cameras\/\">Station Cosmonauts Complete Spacewalk to Deploy Cameras<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/station-cosmonauts-complete-spacewalk-to-deploy-cameras\/embed\/#?secret=O9TjYgMVmY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Station Cosmonauts Complete Spacewalk to Deploy Cameras” — NASA\" data-secret=\"O9TjYgMVmY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pic-122613a.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":398}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Nominations Process Opens for National Space Council Users\u2019 Advisory Group","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mQNtxWNhPT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nominations-process-opens-for-national-space-council-users-advisory-group\/\">Nominations Process Opens for National Space Council Users\u2019 Advisory Group<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nominations-process-opens-for-national-space-council-users-advisory-group\/embed\/#?secret=mQNtxWNhPT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Nominations Process Opens for National Space Council Users\u2019 Advisory Group” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mQNtxWNhPT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/nasa-logo-web-rgb.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":300}
#### James A. Hall *v.*T. K. Hazelrigg's Admr. et al.

Trial — iContinuance—Statue of Limitation.

Appellant having obtained at least one continuance because of the absence of his counsel, when the cross-petition against him could have been taken for confessed, and then at the next term also applying for another continuance. Held, that the court had a right to put him under terms; and did not abuse a sound discretion in then rejecting that ’part of his answer setting up the statute of limitation.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

June 18, 1869.

*W. H.*Holt, *for appellant.*

Tenney, *for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Appellant having obtained at least one continuance because of the absence of his counsel, when Tenny was pressing for a trial and when he could have taken his cross-petition as confessed, and then at the next terra also applying for another continuance, the court had a right to put him under terms, and did not abuse a sound discretion in then rejecting that part of his answer setting up the statute of limitations, if indeed it were apparent he could avail himself thereof, which by no means appears certain, for as he had claims against Tenny, the general rule is to apply barred items where mutual accounts exist as payments on the adversary’s account.

Neither can we say the judgment for fifteen dollars was too large, the evidence allowed-the court quite a range in fixing the value of the rent of Tenny’s house, and though the court did not take the mean sum as fixed by all the witnesses of its value, yet we cannot reverse for that reason.

Judgment *affirmed.*