alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal executive officer of Xerium Technologies, Inc. (the Company), does
hereby certify that, to his knowledge:

1) the Companys Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Stephen R. LightStephen R. Light Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: March 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT A. GRATE, JR., a/k/a Lloyd,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-95-13)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert A. Grate, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Watkins, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert A. Grate, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis, which was

properly construed as a motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grate, No. CR-95-13

(E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 968 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 968

  To amend title XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to permit a 
     waiver of the prohibition of offering nurse aide training and 
     competency evaluation programs in certain nursing facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 1997

 Mr. Ehrlich (for himself, Mr. Burr of North Carolina, and Mr. Minge) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
  Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Commerce, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to permit a 
     waiver of the prohibition of offering nurse aide training and 
     competency evaluation programs in certain nursing facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING WAIVER OF PROHIBITION OF OFFERING NURSE AIDE 
              TRAINING AND COMPETENCY EVALUATION PROGRAMS IN CERTAIN 
              FACILITIES.

    Section 1819(f)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i-
3(f)(2)) and section 1919(f)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r(f)(2)) are 
each amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(iii), by inserting ``subject to 
        subparagraph (C),'' after ``(iii)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Waiver authorized.--Clause (iii) of 
                subparagraph (B) shall not apply to a program offered 
                in (but not by) a nursing facility in a State if the 
                State--
                            ``(i) determines that there is no other 
                        such program offered within a reasonable 
                        distance of the facility,
                            ``(ii) assures, through an oversight 
                        effort, that an adequate environment exists for 
                        operating the program in the facility, and
                            ``(iii) provides notice of such 
                        determination and assurances to the State long-
                        term care ombudsman.''.
                                 <all>
```
### Exhibit 3.2

##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 12, 2010



/s/ James C. SmithJames C. SmithPresident(Principal Executive Officer)


Pursuant to Securities
and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated
by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Color Kinetics Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
G. Mueller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                        /s/ George G. Mueller
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        George G. Mueller
                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 16, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Color Kinetics Incorporated and
will be retained by Color Kinetics Incorporated and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      19,355,234
<SECURITIES>                                14,443,563
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,913,349
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,913,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,224,471
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,688,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,913,349
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (4,729,644)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,813,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (17,543,124)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (17,543,124)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,543,124)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (4,950.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (4,950.97)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Luke Delaney","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BrDNljhKiz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nasa-astronaut-luke-delaney\/\">NASA Astronaut Luke Delaney<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/nasa-astronaut-luke-delaney\/embed\/#?secret=BrDNljhKiz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Luke Delaney” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BrDNljhKiz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/astronaut_candidate_luke_delaney.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
#### Menzies & Finnell *v.*W. W. Williams, &c.

Municipalities — Street—Improvements.

Where an. owner of property, has stood by, and saw a city council act on a declaration of a greater number of owners, for street improvement, by doing the work and improving the property, he can not be permitted to refuse payment therefor.

APPEAL PROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

May 17, 1871.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters:

It is distinctly alleged in the petition that the city council passed the ordinance for improving Garrard street, between North and Seventh streets, in said city, etc., setting forth, specifying the manner in which said' improvements were to be made, in accordance with its charter, requiring the work to be let to the lowest bidder, after being properly advertised, and that appellee being the lowest bidder the contract for the work was awarded to him, etc., etc. And it is alleged that the persons owning the larger portion of the ground fronting the improvement, petitioned the council to make the order for the improvement, and from an exhibit filed September 16th, 1810, it appears that appellant signed the petition, which fact is charged and not denied, but appellants do deny that the owners of a majority of feet fronting said improvement signed the petition. And then they allege that the price paid for the improvement is excessive. These are all the issues presented by the pleadings.

As to whether the owners of the greater number of feet fronting said improvement petitioned in writing for the improvement, we deem immaterial, because it is alleged in the petition and shown that the appellants asserted to the council that the owners of a' majority of feet had petitioned, and they can not after the city council acted on that declaration and they stood, by and saw the work done and their property improved, be permitted to deny what they have asserted to be true, thereby induced others to expend money and labor.

*553*Menzies & Furber, for appellant.*

Fishs, *for appellee.*

If the price paid for the work done was so excessive as to amount to a fraud, the owners of lots would not be bound to pay it. But that is affirmative matter, of which there is no evidence, and this court does not judicially know that the price paid was so high as to amount to a fraud.

The judgment must, therefore, be *affirmed.*
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13

                       DESCRIPTION OF ANNUAL RETAINER FOR
                    SERVICES AS MEMBER OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                          OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
                          OR OF A BANKING SUBSIDIARY OF
                            PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
                        OR AS A MEMBER OF ADVISORY BOARD
                     FOR A DIVISION OF A BANKING SUBSIDIARY


         The board of directors of Park National Corporation ("Park") and each
of its banking subsidiaries as well as the advisory board for certain divisions
of those banking subsidiaries with two divisions have determined that each of
the non-employee directors or non-employee advisory board members, as
appropriate, is to receive the annual retainer for service as a board member in
the form of Park common shares. Each director of Park who is not an employee of
Park or one of its subsidiaries receives an annual retainer for service as a
member of the Park board of directors in the form of 100 Park common shares.
Each non-employee director of one of Park's banking subsidiaries receives an
annual retainer for service as a member of that subsidiary's board of directors
in the form of 50 Park common shares. Each non-employee member of an advisory
board for a division of a banking subsidiary receives an annual retainer for
service as a member of that advisory board in the form of 50 Park common shares.
These common shares are issued in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"NASA Creates In-Space Servicing, Assembly, Manufacturing Consortium","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Mw8b1Xri6F\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-creates-in-space-servicing-assembly-manufacturing-consortium\/\">NASA Creates In-Space Servicing, Assembly, Manufacturing Consortium<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-creates-in-space-servicing-assembly-manufacturing-consortium\/embed\/#?secret=Mw8b1Xri6F\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Creates In-Space Servicing, Assembly, Manufacturing Consortium” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Mw8b1Xri6F\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/isam.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 643 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 643

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1997

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at the 
 corner of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ``Carl 
                 B. Stokes United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse to be constructed at the corner of 
Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Carl B. Stokes United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carl B. Stokes 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

        Clerk.

                              By Jeff Trandahl,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
V

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 583

For the relief of David R. W. Light.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of David R. W. Light.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO REMAIN TEMPORARILY IN

4 THE UNITED STATES FOR DAVID R. W. LIGHT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General—

6 (1) shall refrain from removing or deporting

7 David R. W. Light from the United States and per8 mit him to remain temporarily in the United States

9 notwithstanding section 241(a) of the Immigration

10 and Nationality Act (before redesignation as section
2

•HR 583 IH

1 237(a) of such Act by section 305(a)(2) of the Ille2 gal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibil3 ity Act of 1996); and

4 (2) shall authorize David R. W. Light to engage

5 in employment in the United States and provide him

6 with an ‘‘employment authorized’’ endorsement or

7 other appropriate work permit.

8 (b) GROUNDS FOR DEPORTATION.—The stay of re9 moval and deportation under subsection (a) shall apply

10 only to grounds for removal or deportation that are based

11 on the expiration of the most recent nonimmigrant visa

12 issued to David R. W. Light under section 101(a)(15)(J)

13 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

14 (c) DURATION OF STAY OF DEPORTATION AND

15 WORK AUTHORIZATION.—The stay of removal and depor16 tation and work authorization under subsection (a) shall

17 be effective during the 3-year period beginning on the date

18 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ