alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

                                    

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 79

    To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the Six Rivers 
National Forest in the State of California for the benefit of the Hoopa 
                             Valley Tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

  Mr. Riggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for the conveyance of certain land in the Six Rivers 
National Forest in the State of California for the benefit of the Hoopa 
                             Valley Tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hoopa Valley Reservation South 
Boundary Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF LANDS WITHIN SIX RIVERS NATIONAL FOREST FOR HOOPA 
              VALLEY TRIBE.

    (a) In General.--All right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to the lands described in subsection (b) shall hereafter 
be held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Hoopa 
Valley Tribe and shall be part of the Hoopa Valley Reservation.
    (b) Lands Described.--The lands referred to in subsection (a) are 
those portions of Townships 7 North and 8 North, Ranges 5 East and 6 
East, Humboldt Meridian, California, within a boundary beginning at a 
point on the current south boundary of the Hoopa Valley Indian 
Reservation, marked and identified as ``Post H.V.R. No. 8'' on the Plat 
of the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation prepared from a field survey 
conducted by C.T. Bissel, Augustus T. Smith, and C.A. Robinson, Deputy 
Surveyors, approved by the Surveyor General, H. Pratt, March 18, 1892, 
and extending from said point on a bearing of north 72 degrees 30 
minutes east, until intersecting with a line beginning at a point 
marked as ``Post H.V.R. No. 3'' on such survey and extending on a 
bearing of south 15 degrees 59 minutes east, comprising 2,641 acres 
more or less.
    (c) Boundary Adjustment.--The boundary of the Six Rivers National 
Forest shall be adjusted to exclude the lands to be held in trust for 
the benefit of the Hoopa Valley Tribe pursuant to this section.
    (d) Survey.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting through the 
Bureau of Land Management, shall survey and monument that portion of 
the boundary of the Hoopa Valley Reservation established by the 
addition of the lands described in subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1   CERTIFICATION   I, Robert G. Adams, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Health Realty, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant=s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant=s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the AEvaluation Date=); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on such evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.  5. The registrant=s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant=s auditors and the audit committee of registrant=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant=s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant=s internal controls; and  6. The registrant=s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.   Date:   May 3, 2007 /s/ Robert G. AdamsRobert G. AdamsPresidentChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                       378
<INVENTORY>                                     15,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,591
<PP&E>                                          50,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  82,352
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,454
<BONDS>                                          6,207
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    82,352
<SALES>                                         66,223
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,223
<CGS>                                           58,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   189
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,461)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,465)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,996)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)


</TABLE>
#### WILLIAM A. KRAIBUEHLER, Jr., ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, CITY OF NEWARK AND JOHN A. BRADY, DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, RESPONDENTS.

Argued May 1, 1945

Decided September 24, 1945.

*248Before Justices Dokges, Heiier and Colie.

For the petitioners, *Bisenberg £ Spicer.*

For the Civil Service Commission, *Walter D. Van Riper,*Attorney-General (by *John F. Bruther,*Deputy Attorney-General).

For the City of Newark, *Philip J. Schotland (Thomas M. Kane,*of counsel).

Per Curiam.

Petitioner Kraibuehler and fourteen others were employees of the Department of Public Affairs of the City of Newark. On November 15th, 1943, they were advised by the Director ' of the Department of Public Affairs that it was imperative to retrench in the administrative costs of the department and that he was therefore placing each of the petitioners on a leave of absence from their position for reasons of economy. Petitioners, feeling aggrieved by this action, filed a petition with the Civil Service Commission; hearings were had'and on August 1st, 1944, the petition was dismissed. Thereafter, on December 23d, 1944, application was made to a single justice for a writ of *certiorari*which was denied.

Petitioners allege that the lay-offs were illegal because they were not made on a city-wide basis and they rely upon the provisions of *R. S.*11:22-9 dealing with separation from service for reasons of economy. The city and the Civil Service Commission in their respective briefs rely upon the provisions of *R. S.*11:22-10 which has to do with the abolition of positions. We are of the opinion that there is a fairly debatable question of law.

The city asserts that the petitioners are guilty of laches in that they waited from August 1st, 1944, when an adverse decision was handed down by the Civil Service Commission, until December 23d, 1944, before making their application for a writ of *certiorari,*which was denied. In view of the *249importance to petitioners of the adverse decision before the Civil Service Commission and due to the fact that the questions raised appear to he of novel impression, and that neither the brief of the Civil Service Commission nor of the cityr and its Director of Public Affairs points out in what respect they are harmed by the delay of five months, we do not think that under the circumstances laches should bar petitioners. The writ will be allowed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Integrated Electrical Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 (the Report), I,
James M. Lindstrom, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o (d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |     |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  | --- |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2012 |  |  | By: |  |  | /s/ JAMES M. LINDSTROM               
|                      |  |  |     |  |  |                                      
|                      |  |  |     |  |  | James M. Lindstrom                   
|                      |  |  |     |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Mary Young et al Mary A. Watson.

Husband and Wife — Agreed Separation — Consideration.

A stipulated payment, in consideration of an agreed separation between husband and wife, is binding on the wife, and precludes her from setting up a claim against her deceased husband’s estate.

Same — Demurrer.

The allegations in a petition, setting out an agreement of separation between husband and wife, showing a stipulated sum paid in consideration, is not demurrable.

APPEAL FROM BRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

September 25, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

Appellee an testator were married as early as 1845, in February 1847 they entered into articles of separation, she acting through the agency of two selected friends as her trustees. In which they agree from that time during 'the remainder of their lives to remain separated, and then mutually and respectively surrendered all rights growing out of their marriage. And in consideration of two hundred dollars- paid down by said testator to appellee’s trustees, they covenanted for her, she joining therein, that she would forever release all claim to dower, and all claim to a support which she then had or might thereafter have on him, or his estate.

The causes which produced this domestic calamity are unexplained in this record, nor is it important that they should be, they were sufficient however, in the opinion of the parties to lead to an endless separation, for although the testator lived more than twenty years afterwards, no reconciliation ever took place. This peaceful seperation may have been effected to avoid a litigation between these parties, which would have resulted in even greater calamities. But be that as it may, a separation did take place in the manner, and with the formalities herein described, in which appellee was provided for as well, perhaps, as the. pecuniary condition of testator would then allow, and as well or better, it may be, than the court would have done in a litigation *211between them. And in consideration thereof she relinquished all claim to dower, and to her distributable share of his estate, and the parties acted upon this agreement for more than twenty years and up to the death of one of them. These facts in the answer present a good defense to the action and the demurrer to the answers was improparly sustained.

*John B.*Clark, *for appellant.*

*Loud vs.*Loud, 4 *Bush, 453,*and authorities there cited. Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer to the answers and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Exhibit 32











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Unilava Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Baldwin Yung, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 15th day of April, 2010.








/s/ Baldwin YungBaldwin YungChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"Meet the Two Women Leading Space Station Science","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"09Qw6hP8h0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/women-at-nasa\/meet-the-two-women-leading-space-station-science\/\">Meet the Two Women Leading Space Station Science<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/women-at-nasa\/meet-the-two-women-leading-space-station-science\/embed\/#?secret=09Qw6hP8h0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Meet the Two Women Leading Space Station Science” — NASA\" data-secret=\"09Qw6hP8h0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/jenniferbuchli-meghaneverett.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":343}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Drone Maze","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fuklidOrBA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/drone-maze\/\">Drone Maze<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/drone-maze\/embed\/#?secret=fuklidOrBA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Drone Maze” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fuklidOrBA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/104674-acd19-0054-070.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6.3.2

Eastern Division

Libertarian Party of Illinois, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02112

Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr.

J.B. Pritzker, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, May 15, 2020:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer: Motion hearing held

by telephone. For the reasons stated on the record, State Board of Elections Defendants'

emergency motion for reconsideration in part of order granting preliminary injunction [31]

is granted in part and denied in part. The court will shorten the deadline for submission of

candidate nomination and petition filings to 7/20/2020. The minimum petition signature

threshold will remain at 10% as previously ordered. Notice mailed by judge's staff (ntf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-02112 Document #: 36 Filed: 05/15/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:499
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael Schutz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

|  
 
 
 
Date: March 17, 2008
 
/s/ Michael Schutz
 
 
Michael		Schutz		Chief Financial Officer
 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Most Home Corp. and will be retained by Most Home Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|