alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A1186. RANDALL BELCHER v. THE STATE.

Randall Belcher was convicted of burglary and other crimes and sentenced as

a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7 (c). On appeal, we affirmed his convictions in

an unpublished opinion. See Belcher v. State, 326 Ga. App. XXV (Case No.

A13A2355, decided March 21, 2014). Back in the trial court, Belcher filed a “Motion

to Void and Mend Sentence,” arguing that OCGA § 17-10-7 (c) was

unconstitutionally vague and violated the due process clause in light of Johnson v.

United States, __ U. S. __ (135 SCt 2551, 192 LE2d 569) (2015). The trial court

rejected these constitutional challenges, and Belcher appealed to the Supreme Court

of Georgia. That Court transferred the case to us, ruling that Belcher had “made no

cogent argument that the language of OCGA § 17-10-7 (c) is unconstitutionally

vague” and his appeal “d[id] not present any issue that would invoke [the Supreme]

Court’s jurisdiction over constitutional questions.” We lack jurisdiction because

Belcher has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim.

A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a

void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in

fact, void. Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v.

State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void

sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and

validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not

authorize that sentence . . .” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d

446) (2013). 

March 15, 2017
Belcher argued that hissentence was not authorized because OCGA § 17-10-7

(c) is unconstitutional on its face. In its transfer order, however, the Supreme Court

ruled that Belcher had not raised a valid constitutional challenge. As Belcher did not

argue that his sentence was void on any other basis, we are bound to conclude that he

did not raise a colorable void-sentence claim. Accordingly, “the trial court’s denial

of [Belcher’s] motion is not subject to a direct appeal, and we must dismiss.” Burg

v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 120 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). This appeal is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/15/2017
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-3 Astronauts to Discuss Mission, Splashdown","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bp7mDej3K0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-3-astronauts-to-discuss-mission-splashdown\/\">NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-3 Astronauts to Discuss Mission, Splashdown<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-3-astronauts-to-discuss-mission-splashdown\/embed\/#?secret=bp7mDej3K0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-3 Astronauts to Discuss Mission, Splashdown” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bp7mDej3K0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/51797281509_b6843d98c4_k.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25519]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE & TIME: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

    Federal Register notice of previous announcement--79 FR 42009.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: The Commission also discussed: Internal 
personnel rules and internal rules and practices. Information the 
premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable 
adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.
    This meeting will be continued at the conclusion of the open 
meeting on October 23, 2014.
* * * * *

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-25519 Filed 10-22-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 32CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002          In connection with the quarterly report of Argo-Tech Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended July 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to such officer’s knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of thedates and for the periods expressed in the Report.Date: September 13, 2005       By: /s/ Michael S. Lipscomb         Michael S. Lipscomb    Chief Executive Officer       By: /s/ Frances S. St. Clair         Frances S. St. Clair    Chief Financial Officer
24
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") by Tag-It
Pacific, Inc. ("Registrant"), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       to the  best of our  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of our knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.



Dated:  August 14, 2003                         /s/ Colin Dyne
                                                -----------------------
                                                Colin Dyne
                                                Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  August 14, 2003                         /s/ Ronda Sallmen
                                                -----------------------
                                                Ronda Sallmen
                                                Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 99.0**

 

**Capital One Master Trust Aggregated Data for2005**

 

Aggregate Data for year ended December 31,2005

 
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------|
| Defaults                                                                                          |   | $      | 2,330,842,198.37  |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Total Collections                                                                                 |   | $      | 77,833,341,474.85 |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Collections of Principal Receivables                                                              |   | $      | 70,132,349,761.15 |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Collection of Finance Charge Receivables  (includes amortization of annual membership fees)       |   | $      | 7,801,448,257.24  |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Annual Servicing Fees                                                                             |   | $      | 243,765,248.64    |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Aggregate amount paid to Certificateholders  of publicly registered series allocable to principal |   | $      | 3,300,000,000.00  |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Class A Investor Charge-Offs                                                                      |   | $      | 0.00              |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Class B Investor Charge-Offs                                                                      |   | $      | 0.00              |   |
|                                                                                              |   |   |              |
| Class C Investor Charge-Offs                                                                      |   | $      | 0.00              |   |

 

1

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Training for the Trip of a Lifetime","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Cj8vvlJLMZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/training-trip-of-lifetime\/\">Training for the Trip of a Lifetime<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/training-trip-of-lifetime\/embed\/#?secret=Cj8vvlJLMZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Training for the Trip of a Lifetime” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Cj8vvlJLMZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/81h185.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":447}
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Physical Property Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Darrie Lam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Darrie Lam


Darrie Lam


Chief Financial Officer





May 12, 2011
#### Allen, Administrator, *v.*Thaxter, Executor.

Covenant on a deed averred in the declaration to have been executed for the obligor by his attorney in fact: *Held,*that a plea denying the attorney’s au» thority must be verified by affidavit.

If the clerk’s certificate, attached to the copy of a record of a Court of another state, have not the seal of the Court or officer granting the letters testamentary, the copy is not admissible as evidence.

ERROR to the *Daviess*Circuit Court. — Covenant by *Thaxter,*executor of *Bond,*against *Mien,*administrator of *Gardiner.*The declaration averred the deed to the testator, on which the suit was founded, to have been executed for *Gardner*by *Prentiss*his attorney in fact. The defendant below, inter alia* pleaded in bar, 1st, that *Prentiss*was not authorized to execute the deed; 2diy, that the plaintiff ne unques executor (1). The first of these pleas was rejected on motion, because it was not verified by affidavit. Issue was joined on the second plea, a jury dispensed with by consent, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff in the Circuit Court.

*Judah,*for the plaintiff.

Naylor. for the defendant.

(1)

 Quaere, whether this plea should not have been in abatement. The *plea*in *Weathers v. Neuman,*ante, p. 232, was in bar; but vide note to that case.

Blackford, J.

By the plea which denied the authority of *Prentiss,*proof was required of the execution of the deed. No such plea, according to the statute, can be received without affdavit. Stat. 1823, p. 292. The Court did right in rejecting it. To prove himself executor, the plaintiff offered in evidence a copy of letters testamentary from a Probate Court of *Massachusetts.*It was objected to for a defect in the clerk’s certificate, but the objection was overruled. This certificate of the clerk, without the seal of the Court, or officer granting the letters testamentary, is not sufficient either by the act of congress or the statute of our own state (2). The evidence ought not to have been admitted.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the issue are set aside, with costs de bonis testatoris. Cause remanded, &c.

(2)

 Vide *Henthorn v. Doe,*ante, p. 157, and notes 1, 2. — Stat. 1828, p; 48.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 848 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 848

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
construction of the AuSable Hydroelectric Project in New York, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 1997

  Mr. McHugh introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
construction of the AuSable Hydroelectric Project in New York, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) Project Numbered 10836.--Notwithstanding the time period 
specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that 
would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
project numbered 10836-000NY, the Commission shall, at the request of 
the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in 
accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest 
requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures under that 
section, extend the time period during which the licensee is required 
to commence the construction of the project, under the extension 
described in subsection (b), for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year 
periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--This subsection shall take effect on the date 
of the expiration of the extension of the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
that the Commission issued, prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 
under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the license for the 
project referred to in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license 
effective as of the date of its expiration and extend the time required 
for commencement of construction of the project as provided in 
subsection (a) for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods, the 
first of which shall commence on the date of such expiration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro Tankers
     (Bahamas III) Limited;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
          covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2005

/s/ Kate Blankenship
----------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Director