alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"La NASA comparte avances sobre las primeras misiones lunares Artemis con tripulaci\u00f3n","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oESuT9Qtxn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/la-nasa-comparte-avances-sobre-las-primeras-misiones-lunares-artemis-con-tripulacion\/\">La NASA comparte avances sobre las primeras misiones lunares Artemis con tripulaci\u00f3n<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/la-nasa-comparte-avances-sobre-las-primeras-misiones-lunares-artemis-con-tripulacion\/embed\/#?secret=oESuT9Qtxn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“La NASA comparte avances sobre las primeras misiones lunares Artemis con tripulaci\u00f3n” — NASA\" data-secret=\"oESuT9Qtxn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ksc-20230920-ph-kls01-0126large.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":392}
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 649 Referred in Senate (RFS)]







105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 649


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 1997

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are 
 obsolete or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related 
       section of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUIREMENTS WITH 
              GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Department of Energy Regulations.--Section 501 of the 
Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7191) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (b) and (d),
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b) and 
        by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections 
        (c), (d), and (e), respectively, and
            (3) in subsection (c) (as so redesignated), by striking 
        ``subsections (b), (c), and (d)'' and inserting ``subsection 
        (b)''.
    (b) Special Requirements Affecting Advisory Committees.--
            (1) Section 624.--Section 624 of the Department of Energy 
        Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7234) is amended by--
                    (A) striking ``(a)''; and
                    (B) striking subsection (b).
            (2) Technical and conforming amendment.--Section 17 of the 
        Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 776) is 
        repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED
IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         184,334
<SECURITIES>                                    29,711
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,944
<PP&E>                                          13,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,003
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,005
<OTHER-SE>                                     182,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   253,164
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,456
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,104
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             73,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,915
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66


</TABLE>
9126.

#### Parks *v.*Rheinberger.

Decided March 14, 1918.

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. June 7, 1917.'

*James & Bedgood, B. L. Chappell,*for plaintiff in error.

Wade, C.- J.

There being evidence to authorize the verdict, and no substantial merit in any of the assignments of error, the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., concur.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 157 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 158 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 159 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v. :

:

:

:

:

: No. 160 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court[ 157 EAL 2023, 158 EAL 2023, 159 EAL 2023, 160 EAL 2023, 161 EAL 2023, 162 EAL

2023, 163 EAL 2023, 164 EAL 2023 and 165 EAL 2023 ]

- 2 MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 161 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 162 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 163 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent :

:

:

: No. 164 EAL 2023[ 157 EAL 2023, 158 EAL 2023, 159 EAL 2023, 160 EAL 2023, 161 EAL 2023, 162 EAL

2023, 163 EAL 2023, 164 EAL 2023 and 165 EAL 2023 ]

- 3 v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARCUS TEAGUE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 165 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of January, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Case 2:16-mj-06021-DKD Document 6 Filed 01/27/16 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Powerball International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert K. Ipson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert K. Ipson
Robert K. Ipson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 8, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 10.79  


May 12,
2004 


Mr. Rakesh
Gangwal

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Worldspan, L.P.

300 Galleria Parkway, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30339 


Dear
Rakesh: 


        Reference
is made herein to the Employment Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated June 30, 2003, among Worldspan Technologies Inc. (formerly known as Travel Transaction
Processing Corporation) ("Holding"), Worldspan, L.P. (the "Company") and you (the "Executive"). Pursuant to the terms of this letter agreement, Holding, the Company and the Executive agree to amend
the provisions of the Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2004, as set forth below. 


	1.
	Appendix A
of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 






	
"Target Bonus Tiers
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	80% or less of Bonus Targets	 	—	 	0% of Target Bonus
	90% of Bonus Targets	 	—	 	50% of Target Bonus
	100% of Bonus Targets	 	—	 	100% of Target Bonus
	110% of Bonus Targets	 	—	 	150% of Target Bonus
	115% of Bonus Targets	 	—	 	200% of Target Bonus
	120% or more of Bonus Targets	 	—	 	250% of Target Bonus"






Except
as otherwise provided in this letter agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 



	Sincerely,	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Worldspan Technologies Inc.	 	Worldspan, L.P.
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	By:	 	/s/  JEFFREY C. SMITH      
 Jeffrey C. Smith

General Counsel, Secretary and Senior Vice President Human Resources	 	By:	 	/s/  JEFFREY C. SMITH      
 Jeffrey C. Smith

General Counsel, Secretary and Senior Vice President Human Resources
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	Acknowledged and Agreed:	 	 	 	 
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	/s/  RAKESH GANGWAL      
 Rakesh Gangwal
No. 87-6349.

#### Jones *v.*United States et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.3


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Real Estate Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Mark E. Zalatoris certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   March 29, 2013By:/s/ MARK E. ZALATORISName:  Mark E. ZalatorisTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Gertrude Bell, &c. *v.*J. T. Martin.

Injunction Bond — Liability On for Debt Lost.

Where the evidence shows that but for an injunction to prohibit a suit on a note, it could have been collected through the process of the court, the injunction bond will become liable for the amount of the debt.

A TREAT, BROM HARRISON CIROUIT COURT.

October 6, 1870.

*McClintochj for appellant.*

*Boyd &*Cleary, *and*West, *for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Robertson :

The pleadings and evidence preponderate in favor of the conclusion that, had not Martin‘s suit on the note been enjoined, he would have obtained a judgment against the obligor, Blaydes, at the May term, 1868, and could, by execution, have made the whole amount of the judgment, and the facts authorize the deduction that, when the timely execution on the judgment obtained on the day of the dissolution of the injunction was delivered to the sheriff of Harrison county the remnant of visible property owned by Blaydes subject to execution had been removed to Bath county, whither he had transplanted his family. So that the return of “no property” was true, and there is neither proof nor presumption that if an execution had even been afterwards sent to Bath, anything would have been made by it.

It seems to this court, therefore, that the judgment on the injunction bond for the amount of the debt, thus apparently lost, was right, and it is therefore affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40414

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLAUDIO JIMENEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CR-295-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Claudio

Jimenez-Martinez (Jimenez) has requested leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Jimenez received a copy of counsel’s motion but

filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ana Guzman","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ana-d-guzmannasa-gov\/","title":"Improving Eye Surgery with Space Technology","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nxaYUBNLnm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/improving-eye-surgery-with-space-technology\/\">Improving Eye Surgery with Space Technology<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/improving-eye-surgery-with-space-technology\/embed\/#?secret=nxaYUBNLnm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Improving Eye Surgery with Space Technology” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nxaYUBNLnm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/ahh_et_iss011e13710.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":389}
Exhibit 10.8(b)
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    CMF Eckhardt Master Fund L.P.
    
    Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & DirectorECKHARDT TRADING COMPANYBy:
    
    /s/ John D. FornengoPrint Name:  John D. FornengoJM/sr
 64
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. RO M A N W A Y N E EN CI N A S, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 30420 D. C. No . 4 : 0 7 - c r - 0 0 0 3 2 - SE H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont ana S a m E . H a ddon, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R om an W ayne E nci nas app ea l s f rom the 11 0-m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for c on spi ra cyt o d i stribu t e m etham ph et am i ne, i n vi ol a t i on of

21 U . S . C . § 846. P ur s uantt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 (196 7), E nci nas’ coun se l has f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , 

# FI LED OC T 12 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 30420 2 a l ong w i th am ot i on t o w i thdr aw a s c ouns e l of r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the ap p el l an tw i th th e o p p o rtu n i ty t o fi l e a p ro se sup p l em en t al b ri ef. N o p ro se s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f

ora ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 -8 1 (1 9 8 8 ), d i scl o ses n o arg u ab l e g ro u n d s fo r rel i ef as t o E n ci n as’ conv i ct i on . W e di sm i ss the appeal of the se nt ence i n l i gh tof the val i d app ea l w a iv e r . See U

ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 23 5 F . 3d 11 79 , 11 82 (9th C i r. 20 00 ). C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED . T h e co n v i ct i o n i s A FFI R M ED , an dth e ap p e a l o f th e s e n te n c e is D I SM I SSED .