alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ABC CORPORATION,

 Plaintiff,

v.

THE PARTNERSHIPS AND 

UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 

IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, 

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02640

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Plaintiff ABC Corporation (“Plaintiff”) files this Motion requesting leave to file the 

following documents under seal: (1) Exhibits 1 and 2 to the Complaint; (2) the Amended 

Complaint which will identify and include additional allegations regarding Plaintiff and list the 

fully interactive, e-commerce stores operating under the seller aliases identified in Schedule A 

(collectively, the “Seller Aliases”), and accompanying exhibits; (3) Schedule A attached to the 

Complaint and Amended Complaint, which includes a list of the Seller Aliases and the ecommerce store urls under the Online Marketplaces; (4) Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of a 

Temporary Restraining Order, including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, 

and Expedited Discovery, and accompanying supporting memorandum, declarations, and 

exhibits, including screenshot printouts showing the e-commerce stores operating under the 

Seller Aliases; (5) Plaintiff’s Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 4(f)(3), and accompanying supporting memorandum, declaration, and exhibits; (6) Plaintiff’s 

Notification of Affiliates; and (7) Plaintiff’s Notice of Claims Involving Patents. 
2

In this action, Plaintiff is requesting temporary ex parte relief based on an action for

design patent infringement. Sealing this portion of the file is necessary to prevent the 

Defendants from learning of these proceedings prior to the execution of the temporary 

restraining order. If Defendants were to learn of these proceedings prematurely, the likely result 

would be the destruction of relevant documentary evidence and the hiding or transferring of 

assets to foreign jurisdictions, which would frustrate the purpose of the underlying law and 

would interfere with this Court’s power to grant relief. Once the temporary restraining order has 

been served on the relevant parties and the requested actions are taken, Plaintiff will move to 

unseal these documents.

Dated this 30th day of April 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Justin R. Gaudio

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson M. Martin

Jake M. Christensen

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080

312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

amartin@gbc.law

jchristensen@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS 

EASTERN DIVISION 

RHONDA THOMPSON, on behalf of herself ) 

and all others similarly situated, ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) Case No. 20-cv-02216 

 v. ) 

 ) 

VALENTINE & KEBARTAS, LLC, LVNV FUNDING, ) Hon. Thomas M. Durkin 

LLC, and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, LP, ) 

 ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED to by Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorneys 

and the Defendants and Defendants’ attorneys, that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-titled action against the Defendants shall be and hereby is 

dismissed with prejudice, with each side to bear its own fees and costs, pursuant to the settlement 

agreement between the parties. 

Dated: November 11, 2021 

Case: 1:20-cv-02216 Document #: 55 Filed: 11/11/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:268
 

 Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for Defendants 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Mario Kris Kasalo

Mario Kris Kasalo 

The Law Office of M. Kris Kasalo, Ltd.

4950 Madison St. 

PO Box 1425 

Skokie, IL 60077 

Tel 312-726-6160 

Fax 312-698-5054 

mario.kasalo@kasalolaw.com 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Nabil Foster 

Nabil Foster 

Barron & Newburger, PC 

53 W. Jackson Blvd. Suite 1205 

Chicago, IL 60604 

(312) 767-5750 |Direct 

(866) 476-9103, x-234 |Office 

nfoster@bn-lawyers.com 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I, Mario Kris Kasalo, an attorney, hereby certify that on November 11, 2021 I electronically 

filed the foregoing document using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing 

to all attorneys of record. 

Respectfully submitted,

By: s/ Mario Kris Kasalo 

Case: 1:20-cv-02216 Document #: 55 Filed: 11/11/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:269
#### Amelia E. Barnard *v.*Edw. B. Barnard.

Husband and Wife — Divorce.

Where evidence does not show for six months last past, the husband habitually behaved toward the wife in a cruel and inhuman manner, as to indicate a settled aversion to her, etc., no statutory grounds for divorce.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY BRANCH.

May 10, 1871.

*581Elliott, *for appellant.*

*Garullj for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

This record develops the fact that upon several occasions appellee has treated his wife with inexcusable harshness, and that for some months before their separation he manifested for her very little affection. It is very clear that she has not received from him that degree of attention nor that sympathy she had a right to expect, in view of the protracted suffering she experienced from the unfortunate malady which resulted in the loss of one of her eyes.

Still, the testimony in the case does not justify the conclusion that appellee had for six months habitually behaved towards her in such a cruel and inhuman manner as to indicate a settled aversion to her, and to destroy permanently her peace and happiness, nor that his conduct and threats had been such as to indicate an outrageous and ungovernable temper in him, such as to probably endanger the appellee’s life, or to subject her to personal violence at his hands, had she continued to live with him. Hence, no statutory grounds for a decree of divorce seems to exist.

While it seems that during all the unfortunate domestic disagreements unfolded by the evidence before us, the conduct of the appellant has been blameless, except in failing to return to her husband’s house upon her arrival at Louisville from Cincinnati, the courts under the law have no power to interfere in her behalf. The chancellor did not err in dismissing her petition, and bis judgment must be affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Sylvester Conrad Clay,

Defendant.

No. CR—16-08020-001-PCT-GMS

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was held on the record including a proffer 

by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the

terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, 

pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing 

evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings.

Dated this 27th day of August, 2019.
EXHIBIT 13.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of NOVA Chemicals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Randy Woelfel, Chief Executive Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NOVA Chemicals Corporation.   March 9,   2011
/s/ Randy WoelfelRandy   WoelfelChief   Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 906Certification**

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter CapitalGroup Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, AndrewA. Wiederhorn, Chief Executive Officer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc., herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.

Thiswritten statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionas an exhibit to the Report.
| May 11, 2006 |                    | /s/ ANDREW A.  WIEDERHORN |
|-------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------|
| Date              | Andrew A. Wiederhorn    |
|              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby § 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Robert Wood III, 

Defendant. 

No. CR 15-50201-01-PHX-DGC

ORDER 

 Defendant’s motion to terminate his supervised release is denied for reasons stated 

in Doc. 3. 

 Dated this 6th day of June, 2017. 

Case 2:15-cr-50201-DGC Document 5 Filed 06/06/17 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.10.BM


 


DEBT CONVERSION
AGREEMENT


 


THIS DEBT
CONVERSION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of
the 20th day of May, 2004, by and between ANTHONY M. FRANK, TTEE, ANTHONY M. FRANK DEFINED
BENEFIT PENSION PLAN, UNDER AGREEMENT DATED 12/01/98, FBO:  SHIRLEY M. PEGG, (hereinafter
referred to as “Buyer”) and ELECTROPURE, INC., a California corporation
(hereinafter referred to as “Electropure” or the “Company”).


 


R E C I T A L S


 


WHEREAS, Buyer loaned the Company Four Hundred Thousand Dollars
($400,000) under the terms of that certain 8% Convertible Term Note dated
September 16, 2001 (the “Term Note”), as amended on May 20, 2004.


 


WHEREAS, as of March 31, 2004, a total of $8,000.00 in interest accrued
under the above Term Note is due and payable to Buyer by the Company.


 


WHEREAS, Buyer wishes to convert all of the interest accrued on the
Term Note through March 31, 2004 into shares of Electropure, Inc. Common Stock
and the Company wishes to issue such shares to extinguish the debt owed Buyer.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual obligations
herein contained, it is agreed as follows:


 


1.                                      CONVERSION


 


(a)                                  On
the effective date set forth above, Buyer hereby converts all of the $8,000.00
in interest accrued on the Term Note into Shares of Electropure, Inc. Common
Stock, $0.01 par value, at an effective conversion rate of $0.30 per share, for
a total of 26,667 Shares (the “Shares”).


 


(b)                                 The
Shares shall have the rights, preferences, privileges, restrictions and other
terms set forth in the By-laws of the Company.


 


(c)                                  Upon
conversion hereby and pursuant to the Debt Conversion Agreement previously
entered into between the parties, Buyer acknowledges that all interest accrued
and due through March 31, 2004 pursuant to the terms of the 8% Convertible Term
Note entered into between the parties on September 16, 2002, and as amended on
May 20, 2004, has been satisfied in full and that any default by Electropure
for failure to pay interest due on the Term Note through March 31, 2004 has
been cured.


 


2.                                      REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF BUYER     Buyer represents and
warrants to the Company:


 


(a)                                  The
Shares are being acquired by Buyer for investment for an indefinite period, for
Buyer’s own account, not as a nominee or agent, and not with a view to the sale
or distribution of
No. 87-6208.

#### Robinson *v.*City of Decatur, Alabama, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Let’s Fly Away \u2014 Airplane Dodecahedron","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yEWyTJaFxZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/lets-fly-away-airplane-dodecahedron\/\">Let’s Fly Away \u2014 Airplane Dodecahedron<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/lets-fly-away-airplane-dodecahedron\/embed\/#?secret=yEWyTJaFxZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Let’s Fly Away \u2014 Airplane Dodecahedron” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yEWyTJaFxZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/edu_lets_fly_away.png?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":311}
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: Anthony Manuel Hanby v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00242

- CR

Trial court case number: 1583865

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

Appellant ’ s August 31, 2021 motion for rehearing is DENIED. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ R ichard H ight ower

_________ ________ Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and H ightower.

Date: _ October 7, 2021

______________
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.5

                       TERMINATION OF INVESTMENT AGREEMENT

         This Termination of Investment Agreement (this "Agreement") is given in
respect of that certain Investment Agreement dated as of April 14, 1999 and made
by and among Danielson Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, SZ
Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, and Martin J.
Whitman, an individual (the "Investment Agreement").

         Each of the undersigned hereby agrees that, effective from and after
the date hereof, the Investment Agreement is terminated and shall be void and
of no further force and effect.

         This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which
shall be deemed an original, and all such counterparts shall constitute one
instrument. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Termination of
Investment Agreement as of the 8th day of November, 2002.

SZ INVESTMENTS, L.L.C.                           DANIELSON HOLDING CORPORATION

By:    /s/ Donald J. Liebentritt                 By:     /s/ Paul F. Solomon
       ----------------------------------            ------------------------
Name:  Donald J. Liebentritt                     Name:   Paul F. Solomon
       ----------------------------------              ----------------------
Title: Vice President                            Title:  General Counsel
       ----------------------------------              ----------------------

/s/ Martin J. Whitman
-----------------------------------------
MARTIN J. WHITMAN
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 874 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 874

 To provide that Oregon may not tax compensation paid to a resident of 
      Washington for services as a Federal employee at a Federal 
         hydroelectric facility located on the Columbia River.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 1997

Mr. Hastings of Washington (for himself, Mrs. Smith of Washington, Mr. 
    Nethercutt, Ms. Dunn, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Metcalf, Mr. Smith of 
  Washington, Mr. Dicks, Mr. White, and Mr. Traficant) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide that Oregon may not tax compensation paid to a resident of 
      Washington for services as a Federal employee at a Federal 
         hydroelectric facility located on the Columbia River.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF STATE AUTHORITY TO TAX COMPENSATION PAID TO 
              CERTAIN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 111 of title 4, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) General Rule.--'' before ``The 
        United States'' the first place it appears, and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Treatment of Certain Federal Employees Employed at Federal 
Hydroelectric Facilities Located on the Columbia River.--Pay or 
compensation paid by the United States for personal services as an 
employee of the United States at a hydroelectric facility--
            ``(1) which is owned by the United States,
            ``(2) which is located on the Columbia River, and
            ``(3) portions of which are within the States of Oregon and 
        Washington,
shall be subject to taxation by the State of Oregon or any political 
subdivision thereof only if such employee is a resident of such State 
or political subdivision.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to pay and compensation paid after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



eCOST.com, Inc.



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the annual report of eCOST.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification has not been, and shall not be
deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



May 2,
2005



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/    ELIZABETH S.C.S.
MURRAY
|Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray       
|EVP & Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

NO. 13-0796

WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL

TEXAS, INC.

v.

ANITA VALERO AND EVA

SHIELLS, GUARDIANS OF THE

PERSON AND ESTATE OF

ABDENAGO VALERO §

§

§

§

§

§ Yoakum County,

7th District.

March 21, 2014

Petitioner 's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied

.

(Justice Phil Johnson not sitting)

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL TEXAS, INC., pay all

costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 2nd day of May, 2014

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Kathy Sandoval, Deputy Clerk
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350**
 **ADOPTED
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF
        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Report of Physical Property Holdings Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Ngai
        Keung Luk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 
 **/s/
        Ngai Keung Luk**
 Ngai
        Keung Luk
 Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
 
 November
        14, 2007