alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"In the Beginning: Project Mercury","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zHE2bIMsD6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/project-mercury\/in-the-beginning-project-mercury\/\">In the Beginning: Project Mercury<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/project-mercury\/in-the-beginning-project-mercury\/embed\/#?secret=zHE2bIMsD6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“In the Beginning: Project Mercury” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zHE2bIMsD6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/275808main_62-ma7-55__0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":719}
October 12, 1979.

423 A.2d 1305

#### Commonwealth v. Batten, Appellant.

Submitted September 15, 1978.

J. Wesley Oler, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Edgar B. Bayley, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 824 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 824

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1997

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the Federal building located at 717 Madison Place, NW., 
in the District of Columbia, as the ``Howard T. Markey National Courts 
                              Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 717 Madison Place, NW., in the 
District of Columbia and known as the National Courts Building shall be 
known and designated as the ``Howard T. Markey National Courts 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Howard T. Markey 
National Courts Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Jeff Trandahl,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 4.2

AstraZeneca[LOGO]


Graeme Musker
Secretary and Solicitor


Sir Tom McKillop


Our Ref                Direct Line              Ext             Date
GHRM/JP/L1956          020 7304 5103            5103            4 February 2003


Dear Tom

I refer to your contract of employment dated 11 January 1996 and confirm that
we have agreed the following amendment:

         In Clause 3(A) the reference to "not less than two year's previous
         notice in writing" is replaced by "not less than one year's previous
         notice in writing".

Please confirm your agreement to the above by signing the returning to me the
enclosed copy of this letter.

Yours sincerely

/s/ Graeme Musker

GRAEME MUSKER
For and an behalf of
AstraZeneca UK Limited (Successor to Zeneca Limited) and AstraZeneca Plc
(Formerly Zeneca Group Plc)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I confirm my agreement to the above.

/s/ Sir Tom McKillop
-------------------------------
Sir Tom McKillop

AstraZeneca PLC      Tel +44 (0)20 7304 5000     Registered in England No.
15 Stanhope Gate     Fax +44 (0)20 7304 5151     2723534
London W1K 1LN       www.astrazeneca.com         Registered Office
                                                 15 Stanhope Gate London W1K 1LN
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                          FRANKLIN FINANCE CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

Net income for basic income per share is computed by subtracting from the
applicable income the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
income applicable to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          Three Months Ended
                                                                     ------------------------------
                                                                                March 31,
                                                                          2001            2000
                                                                     ------------------------------
<S>                                                                  <C>                  <C>
INCOME
Net income                                                           $739,061            $685,041
Less: Preferred stock dividend requirements                           450,225             450,225
                                                                     ------------------------------
Net income applicable to common stock                                $288,836            $234,816

SHARES
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                   22,077              22,077

NET INCOME PER SHARE                                                 $  13.08            $  10.64
</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-5 to Discuss Mission, Splashdown from Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0VcFgkKAAh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-5-to-discuss-mission-splashdown-from-space\/\">NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-5 to Discuss Mission, Splashdown from Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasas-spacex-crew-5-to-discuss-mission-splashdown-from-space\/embed\/#?secret=0VcFgkKAAh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-5 to Discuss Mission, Splashdown from Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0VcFgkKAAh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/52409577829_30bec4860c_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kenneth Galpin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Scott Munro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 17, 2005  | /s/  Kenneth GalpinKenneth Galpin
President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  March 17, 2005 | /s/ Scott MunroScott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer   

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Most Home Corp. and will be retained by Most Home Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Written Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13a or 15d of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Gregory S. MadarGregory S. Madar,

Senior Vice President,


Treasurer and Assistant Secretary


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer


August 6, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Webster Preferred Capital Corporation and will be retained by
Webster Preferred Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 20
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Anthony DiSandro, Chief Executive Officer of PSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PSB Bancorp, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 15, 2006              /s/ Anthony DiSandro   Anthony DiSandro   Chief Executive Officer  
25
-1/2-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

TIFFANY LAURA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.

 Defendant.

Case No. 1:20-cv-01573

Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MOTION 

FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, Plaintiff Tiffany Laura (“Plaintiff”), by and through her 

undersigned counsel, hereby presents her Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”). 

In support of her Motion, Plaintiff has filed her Memorandum of Law, Rule 56.1 

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, and supporting exhibits, and incorporates the same as if 

fully set forth herein. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Tiffany Laura respectfully requests that this Court grant 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in its entirety. 

Respectfully submitted this 6

th day of August 2021.

By: s/Syed Hussain

Syed H. Hussain, Esq. 

Bar Number: Illinois 6331378

Price Law Group, APC

420 E Waterside Dr. #3004

Chicago, IL 60601

Telephone: (954) 225-4934

Email: syed@pricelawgroup.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Tiffany Laura

Case: 1:20-cv-01573 Document #: 75 Filed: 08/06/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:446
-2/2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 6, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 

of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notice of such filing to all attorneys of record 

in this matter.

/s/ Roxanne Harris

Case: 1:20-cv-01573 Document #: 75 Filed: 08/06/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:447
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.2c

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE

                           RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN FOR

                     SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

      Selective Insurance Company of America (the "Company") hereby adopts the
following amendment to the Retirement Income Plan for Selective Insurance
Company of America (the "Plan") effective for distributions with annuity
starting dates on or after January 1, 2003;

      1.    Section 2.3(b)(1) of Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by
adding the following to the end thereof:

            "Notwithstanding any other Plan provisions to the contrary, the
            Applicable Mortality Table used for purposes of adjusting any
            benefit or limitation under Section 415(b)(2)(B), (C), or (D) of the
            Code as set forth in Sections 15.4 and 15.5 of the Plan and the
            Applicable Mortality Table used for purposes of satisfying the
            requirements of Section 417(e) of the Code as set forth in Section
            15.3 of the Plan is the table prescribed in Revenue Ruling 2001-62."

      2. Section 2.3(c) of Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by changing
the reference from "the mortality basis outlined in (a) above" to "the mortality
basis outlined in (b) above," effective January 1, 1997.
1 TheHonorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 00-3023NE

_____________ McArthur Johnson, * * Appellant, * On Appeal from the United * States District Court v. * for the District of * Nebraska. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a * Corporation, * [Not To Be Published] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 25, 2001 Filed: August 2, 2001

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. McArthur Johnson appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Union Pacific Railroad, his former employer, in his Americans with Disabilities Act case. Upon a thoroughreview of the record--and of Johnson’s appellate brief, which does not present us with any specific legal challenge to the jury verdict or to the trial--we conclude that the District Court’s 1 judgment should be affirmed.-2-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Johnson’s motion for appointment of counsel. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### SETH RHODES CO., Inc., v. SOUTHWEST TEXTILES, Inc., et al.

No. 4710.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

June 4, 1947.

Cowgill & Popham and Sam Mandell, all of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Joseph Koralchik, of Kansas City, Mo., for defendants.

REEVES, District Judge.

The only ground for the dismissal of this action is that the amount in controversy is not within the jurisdiction of this court. The basis of this claim is that in the prayer of the complaint, among other things, the complainant asks for “judgment against the defendants in the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) and for its costs.”

The action seeks the cancellation of a purchase contract entered into between the parties on October 9, 1946, the consideration whereof was $21,000. It is alleged that there was a mutual mistake of fact appertaining to the price of certain material involved in said purchase contract and because of such mistake of fact the plaintiff asks that the contract be canceled and set aside and that it be permitted to recover the amount paid on account of such purchase contract in the sum of $2,000.

1. It is obvious that the claim for a money decree is only a part of the remedy sought by the plaintiff. In the first instance it seeks to have a contract under which it obligated itself to pay $21,000 canceled and set aside, and that it recover from the defendants the sum of $2,000 advanced on said contract. It is the rule that on a question of this kind the status of the case is that jurisdiction must be determined at the very threshold by consideration of the plaintiff’s complaint. Trainor v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., *7*Cir., 131 F.2d 895. And, before dismissal, it must appear “to a legal certainty that the claim is really for less than the jurisdictional amount * * St. Paul Indemnity Co. v. Cab Co., 303 U. S. 283, loc. cit. 289, 58 S.Ct. 586, 590, 82 L.Ed. 845.

*7892. Upon the foregoing authorities and others this court had jurisdiction for the reason that the value to the plaintiff is the annulment of a contract involving -ft. promise to pay $21,000.

If, upon the issues tendered by the plaintiff, the contract should be canceled then it would follow that he would be entitled, as a part of the relief prayed, to have returned to him the $2,000 paid on his contract. The motion to dismiss on the grounds stated should be overruled and it will be so ordered.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Report of Physical Spa & Fitness Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Chui, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Chui
-------------------------
Robert Chui
Chief Financial Officer

November 19, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE BENJAMIN JOSEPH 

GUTIERREZ,

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00314-CV

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Benjamin Joseph Gutierrez, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Laura Strathmann, Judge of the 388th District Court of El Paso County, 

Texas. He asks that we order Respondent to grant his motion to dismiss a pending modification 

action in cause number 2010CM094 filed by the Real Party in Interest, Araceli Jiminez. Relator 

has also filed a motion to stay proceedings in the trial court, including a pretrial hearing and the 

trial setting. We deny both the motion to stay and the petition for writ of mandamus.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. First, the 

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance 

Company of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate 

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id. at 136. Based on the record before us, we 

conclude that Relator has not established he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we 
- 2 -

deny both the motion to stay and the petition for writ of mandamus.

October 14, 2015

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

McClure, C.J., Not Participating