alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Financial Telecom Limited (USA), Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

(1) the 10-KSB/A Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the 10-KSB/A Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                            Financial Telecom Limited (US), Inc.


Date: January 13, 2006                                        By: /s/ David Chen
                                                --------------------------------
                                                                      David Chen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 13, 2006                                      By: /s/ Stephen Tang
                                                --------------------------------
                                                                    Stephen Tang
                                                          President and Chairman
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

SUGARTOWN WORLDWIDE LLC, 

TOMMY BAHAMA GROUP, INC., and

SOUTHERN TIDE, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

v.

MEMORYHOME STORE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02187

Judge Sara L. Ellis

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, a judgment was entered in the above action on July 22, 2020 [52], in favor

of Plaintiffs Sugartown Worldwide LLC, Tommy Bahama Group, Inc., and Southern Tide, LLC 

(collectively “Plaintiffs”) and against the Defendants Identified in Schedule A in the amount of 

two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) of trademark statutory damages and one hundred 

thousand dollar ($100,000) of copyright statutory damages per Defaulting Defendant, and Lilly 

Pulitzer acknowledges payment of an agreed upon damages amount, costs, and interest and 

desires to release this judgment and hereby fully and completely satisfy the same as to the 

following Defendants:

Defendant Name Line No.

outstanding zz 83

wuxiaotao 87

THEREFORE, full and complete satisfaction of said judgment as to the above-referenced 

Defendants is hereby acknowledged, and the Clerk of the Court is hereby authorized and directed 

to make an entry of the full and complete satisfaction on the docket of said judgment.

Case: 1:20-cv-02187 Document #: 55 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:2466
2

Dated this 7th day of August 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

RiKaleigh C. Johnson

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 

312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

rjohnson@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiffs Sugartown Worldwide LLC, 

Tommy Bahama Group, Inc., and Southern Tide, 

LLC

Case: 1:20-cv-02187 Document #: 55 Filed: 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:2467
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.25    
  


 
  SECOND AMENDMENT
  TO THE
  AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
  


        Second
Amendment, dated as of January 1, 2003 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement entered into by and between Willis North America Inc. ("Willis US") and
Joseph J. Plumeri ("Executive") effective as of March 26, 2001 (the "Employment Agreement") 


        WHEREAS,
the parties wish to formally amend the Employment Agreement and reflect their mutual agreement and understanding of the modification. 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein and for other valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereby agree as follows: 


	1.
	Section 1(b)(ii)
of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by the substituting for the words "Fiscal Year 2002" the words "Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003" therein.



	2.
	All
other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, not specifically amended or modified by this Second Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect and unaltered by this
Second Amendment. 






	WILLIS NORTH AMERICA, INC.	 	EXECUTIVE
	

By:	

/s/  WILLIAM P. BOWDEN, JR.      
 William P. Bowden, Jr.	
 	

/s/  JOSEPH J. PLUMERI      
 Joseph J. Plumeri
	Title	General Counsel	 	 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.25


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
LOGO

Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

As independent consultants, Netherland,
Sewell & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of W&T Offshore, Inc. to be filed on or about March 9, 2007, of information from our reserve report with respect to the
reserves of W&T Offshore, Inc. dated January 22, 2007, and entitled Estimate of Reserves and Future Revenue to the W&T Offshore, Inc. Interest in Certain Oil and Gas Properties Located in State and Federal Waters Gulf of Mexico as
of December 31, 2006, and to the use of our reports on reserves and the incorporation of the reports on reserves for the years ended 2005 and 2004. We further consent to the incorporation by reference of information contained in our
reports as of December 31, 2006, in the W&T Offshore, Inc. Registration Statement Nos. 333-126251 and 333-126252 on Form S-8.



NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:

LOGOFrederic D. Sewell, P.E. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dallas, Texas

March 9, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"David F. Voracek","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MOew6Jq3Xg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/chief-technologist-david-f-voracek\/\">David F. Voracek<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/chief-technologist-david-f-voracek\/embed\/#?secret=MOew6Jq3Xg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“David F. Voracek” — NASA\" data-secret=\"MOew6Jq3Xg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/ed12-0298-14.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Naomi Hartono","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/naomi-hartonojpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Planetary Radar Images Slowly Spinning Asteroid","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"di5kFiVpUJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/asteroids\/nasas-planetary-radar-images-slowly-spinning-asteroid\/\">NASA\u2019s Planetary Radar Images Slowly Spinning Asteroid<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/solar-system\/asteroids\/nasas-planetary-radar-images-slowly-spinning-asteroid\/embed\/#?secret=di5kFiVpUJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Planetary Radar Images Slowly Spinning Asteroid” — NASA\" data-secret=\"di5kFiVpUJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/1-asteroid-2008-os7-radar-crop.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
#### L. H. Martin *v.*Trustees of Ky. Baptist Education Society.

Appeal and Error — Variance Between Prayer and- Verdict Not a Substantial Error.

An apparent variance between the prayer of the petition and the verdict of the jury, is a mere error or defect in the proceedings which does not effect the substantial rights of the defendant.

Evidence — Action, Notice of — Corporation.

A stipulation in relation to the certificate of the chairman of an executive committee of the trustees, held as relating to the requisite evidence to authorize a recovery, and not as a means of giving notice to the obligor therein, preliminary to a .right of action.

APPEAL EROM WOODEORD CIRCUIT COURT.

June 21, 1870.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin :

It is argued for the appellant on several grounds that the judgment is erroneous and should be reversed; but -neither ground is *284deemed available.

*Wallace, for appellant.*

*Marshall & McLeod, for appellee.*

1. It is contended that tbe verdict of tbe jury is not sustained .by the evidence. Whether the witnesses as to handwriting disclosed such knowledge on that subject as to entitle their testimony to consideration, or not, we think the facts proved by Bohannon were evidence from which the jury might have found the note to be the act and deed of the defendant.

2. As to the stipulation in relation to the certificate of the chairman of the executive committee of the trustees as evidence, we construe it as relating to the rquisite evidence to authorize a recovery, and not as a means of giving notice to the obligor, preliminary to a right of action.

3. Though there is an apparent variance between the prayer of the petition and the verdict of the jury, as the contract set out in the petition shows in connection with the other facts alleged and proved, that the plaintiff was entitled to the interest on the several installments of the debt which the jury found and the court adjudged in the aggregate, we regard the irregularity as a mere error or defect in the proceedings which did not affect the substantial rights .of the defendant, and did not constitute a ground for setting aside the judgment. (Civil Code of Practice, section 161.)

Wherefore, the .judgment is affirmed.
H. Res. 137

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 30, 1997.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the

House of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE OVERSIGHT: Mr. Mica.

Attest:

Clerk.
# United States Court **of Appeals** 

**f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 20408 Summary Calendar

**Donald Ray Eubanks,**

Plaintiff

— Appellant

**,**

versus

**Bishop; Brian Collier; John Werner; Senior Warden Boscoe; Knoor; Fallasee Ojo; Owen Murray; Lianette**  **Linthicum; Steven Williams; Olungbenda; Cynthia Ho; Bower; Murphy; Eduardo Oriheula; Cameron Ghaffary;**  **Feng; Lee; Goodgame; Ballow,**

Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21

- CV

- 1879

Before **King, Higginson,**  and **Willett,** Circuit Judges

**.**
**Per Curiam :**  *

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
July 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk Case: 21-20408 Document: 00516410527 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/2022No. 21

- 20408

2 Donald Ray Eubanks, Texas prisoner # 1593107, appeals the denial of
his motion for the appointment of counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

action. We lack jurisdiction because the order denying his motion to appoint
counsel is not an appealable in terlocutory order. See Williams v. Catoe , 946
F.3d 278, 279

- 81 (5th Cir. 2020) (en banc).

The appeal is **DISMISSED** for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 21-20408 Document: 00516410527 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/28/2022
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Darith Yim","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darith-s-yimnasa-gov\/","title":"Astronauta de la NASA Marcos Berr\u00edos","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"soqZxmp0Rl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/astronauta-de-la-nasa-marcos-berrios\/\">Astronauta de la NASA Marcos Berr\u00edos<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/astronauta-de-la-nasa-marcos-berrios\/embed\/#?secret=soqZxmp0Rl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronauta de la NASA Marcos Berr\u00edos” — NASA\" data-secret=\"soqZxmp0Rl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/astronaut_candidate_marcos_berrios.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cheryl Warner","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/cmwarner\/","title":"NASA Welcomes Nigeria, Rwanda as Newest Artemis Accords Signatories","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JDhfbuzKuF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/nasa-welcomes-nigeria-rwanda-as-newest-artemis-accords-signatories\/\">NASA Welcomes Nigeria, Rwanda as Newest Artemis Accords Signatories<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/nasa-welcomes-nigeria-rwanda-as-newest-artemis-accords-signatories\/embed\/#?secret=JDhfbuzKuF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Welcomes Nigeria, Rwanda as Newest Artemis Accords Signatories” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JDhfbuzKuF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/nasa_meatball_for_carousel_120820.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":448}
Exhibit 13  CERTIFICATION

I, Tor Olav Troim,  Director and  President and Kate  Blankenship,  Director and
Secretary  of CalPetro  Tankers  (Bahamas I) Limited (the  "Company"),  certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, that:

1. The Annual  Report on Form 20-F of the  Company for the annual  period  ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m);  and 2. The
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                      /s/ Tor Olav Troim
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Tor Olav Troim
                                                      Director and President


                                                      /s/ Kate Blankenship
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Kate Blankenship
                                                      Director and Secretary

                                Date: June 30, 2005

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


02089.0006#582961
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 30, 2020

t0622 

# Order

Clerk June 30, 2020

161058 & (33) (55)(58)(64)(65)

In re SMITH

_________________________________________

STACEY R. SMITH

, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 161058

COA: 352572

Kent CC: 20

- 000224

- AS

JOHN BEASON and CHRISTOPHER BECKER,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions p resented

should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.