alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jermaine Walker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwalke32\/","title":"Deep Space Station 35","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bPNGqWKYrG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/olympus-digital-camera-41\/\">Deep Space Station 35<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/olympus-digital-camera-41\/embed\/#?secret=bPNGqWKYrG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Deep Space Station 35” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bPNGqWKYrG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/canberra-dss-35-01.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":858}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Reginald Ray Norling,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04431-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9916 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9916 Filed 02/02/18 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,058
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         914,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,066,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        915,823
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            95
<OTHER-SE>                                    (38,683)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,066,467
<SALES>                                        405,805
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               405,805
<CGS>                                          202,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,965
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.64


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information for Marisa Christina,
Inc.'s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1996 and the Consolidated
Statement of Earnings for the year then ended and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,044,094
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,120,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (73,344)
<INVENTORY>                                 10,097,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,333,530
<PP&E>                                       4,817,052
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,144,229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,199,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,707,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,868
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,128,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,199,933
<SALES>                                    115,536,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           115,536,726
<CGS>                                     (75,584,880)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (29,777,439)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (309,774)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (918,189)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,920,367
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,543,826)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,376,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,376,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.87
        

</TABLE>
#### L. D. Daniel *v.*Julia Cassell, &c.

Adverse Possession.

Record of bolding, as manifested by court proceedings. Prior right.

APPEAL EROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

May 16, 1871.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters :

The only defense made to the suit by appellant was an adversary *545holding of over fifteen years, which he utterly failed to make out by the proof.

*TLallam, for appellant.*

*Menzies &*F., *for appellee.*

The recovery of the land by Mrs. Cassell of G-. Daniel, &c., the persons then in possession, is manifested by the record and proceedings of that action filed in this case, and read as evidence without objection in the court below. And it is very clear from the evidence that after the recovery in that action, appellees, and their ancestor were in the possession by their tenants before appellant entered, and that his subsequent entry was without right, and tortuous.

We perceive no error prejudicial to appellant, and the judgment must be *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"NASA Sets Coverage for White House National Space Council Meeting","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vMEykPmMRk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-sets-coverage-for-white-house-national-space-council-meeting\/\">NASA Sets Coverage for White House National Space Council Meeting<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-sets-coverage-for-white-house-national-space-council-meeting\/embed\/#?secret=vMEykPmMRk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Sets Coverage for White House National Space Council Meeting” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vMEykPmMRk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/national-space-council-2021.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":254}
9356.

#### Central of Georgia Railway Company *v.*McRee.

Decided August 1, 1918.

Action for damages; from Early superior court—Judge Worrill. October 2, 1917.

The petition as amended alleges, that the defendant 'has damaged the plaintiff in the sum of $50, by reason-of the following facts: “That on or about the ninth day of June, .1915, the defendant, by negligence of its servants, in and by the running and operating of its cars, engines, and other machinery, carelessly threw or otherwise set out fire from an engine on defendant’s railroad in said county and set fire to the grass and fence on plaintiff’s lands; which fire destroyed a considerable portion of plaintiff’s fence and damaged him in the above-named amount.” “Wherefore plaintiff prays judgment against defendant in the sum of $50, and. that *595process do issue,” etc. The grounds of the demurrer are: that no cause of action is stated; that “it is not alleged how much fence was destroyed, and the value of the fence alleged to have been destroyed is not alleged;” that “it is not alleged what the acts of negligence complained of consisted of;” and thát “the date on which the plaintiff claims that he was damaged is not alleged” (no date was given in the original petition).

*594Bloodworth, J.

1. A petition' to recover damages from a railroad company, which alleges that the defendant “destroyed a considerable, portion of plaintiff’s fence,” is too indefinite to withstand a special demurrer which makes the objection that “it is not alleged how much fence was destroyed.”

2. The other grounds of the demurrer ar.e without merit. See, in this connection, Ell*is*v. *Pullman,*95 *Ga.*445 (3), 446 (22 S. E. 568); *Augusta & Savannah Railroad Co.*v. *McElmurry,*24 *Ga.*75, 78; *Sims*v. *Western*& *Atlantic Railroad Co.,*111 *Ga.*820 (35 S. E. 696); *Southern Pine Co.*v. *Smith,*113 *Ga.*629 (38 S. E. 960); *Atkinson,*v. *Dismuke,*11 *Ga. App.*521 (75 S. E. 835).

3. The erroneous ruling on the demurrer, as set out above, rendered the further proceedings nugatory.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and EgrweJl, J., concur.*

*595*A. H. Gray, L. M. Bambo,*for plaintiff in error.

*Park & Stone,*contra.
Exhibit 21.1

                   AMERICAN HOMESTAR CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES
                   ------------------------------------------
                               As of July 2, 2004


                   ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES:
                   -------------------
                   114 Starwood Development LTD. (49.5% - owned)
                   American Homestar Financial Services, Inc.
                   American Homestar Mortgage, LLP   (50% - owned)
                   American Homestar of Burleson, LP
                   American Homestar of Lancaster, LP
                   HSTR General Holdings, Inc.
                   HSTR Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
                   HSTR Retail Holdings, Inc.
                   Humble Springs LTD. (49.5% - owned)
                   Nationwide Housing Properties, LP
                   Nationwide Housing Systems, LP
                   Oak Creek Homes, LP
                   Oak Creek Housing Properties, LP
                   Western Insurance Agency, Inc.

                   INACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES:
                   ---------------------
                   Amcorp Management Service Company
                   American Homestar of Alabama, Inc.
                   American Homestar of North Carolina, Inc.
                   American Homestar West, Inc.
                   Associated Retailers Group, LP
                   Associated Retailers Holdings, Inc.
                   Brilliant Carriers, Inc.
                   First Value Homes, Inc.
                   Gold Medal Homes, Inc.
                   Gold Medal NC, Inc.
                   Homexpress, Inc.
                   Lifestar Reinsurance Limited
                   Nationwide NC Homes, Inc.
                   Nationwide of Alabama, Inc.
                   Nationwide West, LP
                   Pacific II Northwest Homes, Inc.
                   Pacific Northwest Homes, Inc.
                   Paradise Mortgage, Inc.
                   R-Anell Custom Homes, Inc.

All entities are 100% owned except where indicated to the contrary.


<PAGE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA TV Coverage Set for US Cargo Ship Departure from International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XbgeeuiVxl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-coverage-set-for-us-cargo-ship-departure-from-international-space-station\/\">NASA TV Coverage Set for US Cargo Ship Departure from International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-coverage-set-for-us-cargo-ship-departure-from-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=XbgeeuiVxl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA TV Coverage Set for US Cargo Ship Departure from International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XbgeeuiVxl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/m16-098.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
0

HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Server: nginx
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:52:56 GMT
Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Connection: keep-alive
X-Robots-Tag: noindex
Link: <https://www.nasa.gov/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Access-Control-Expose-Headers: X-WP-Total, X-WP-TotalPages, Link
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Authorization, X-WP-Nonce, Content-Disposition, Content-MD5, Content-Type
Allow: GET
X-rq: mdw1 96 184 443
Age: 0
X-Cache: hit
Vary: Accept-Encoding, Origin
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000

49
{"code":"oembed_invalid_url","message":"Not Found","data":{"status":404}}
0
#### John Hall *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 2-174A51.

Filed May 19, 1975.]

*Richard L. Swartz, Reading and Swartz,*of Wabash, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendalc,*Attorney General, *Glenn Richard Potter,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

White, J.

Appellant Hall was convicted after jury trial of having burglarized a grocery store. His argument in this appeal is that inasmuch as the undisputed evidence shows that he never entered the store he cannot be convicted of a crime that requires breaking and entering.

The undisputed evidence also shows that three persons participated in the burglary, that it was Hall’s idea, that Hall attempted to enter the store but was too large to fit through the opening, that he stood outside the opening and told the smaller companion who did go inside how to open the safe, that he took possession of the money as it was passed out through the opening, that he drove the three participants and the stolen money from the store, and that he divided the stolen money equally between the three participants.

Under the accessory statute, IC 1971, 35-1-29-1, Ind. Ann. Stat. §9-102 (Burns 1956 Repl.), a person who aids or abets the breaking and entering can be convicted as a principal whether or not be himself enters. *Smithhart*v. *State*(1971), 256 Ind. 533, 270 N.E.2d 740; *Maynard*v. *State*(1973), 157 Ind. App. 573, 301 N.E.2d 200; *Tinsley*v. *State*(1974), 260 *235Ind. 577, 298 N.E.2d 429. The trial court correctly instructed the jury on that statute.

The judgment is affirmed.

Sullivan, P.J., and Buchanan, J., concur.

NOTE.—Reported at 328 N.E.2d 226.