alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      490
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,737
<PP&E>                                          17,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,712
<SALES>                                          8,673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,673
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    679
<INCOME-TAX>                                       136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     17
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       526
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SERGIO ACEVEDO-RAMOS, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72571 

Agency No. A208-304-851 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 18, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Acevedo-Ramos, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 25 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-72571 

agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 

2014). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that AcevedoRamos failed to establish that the harm he suffered or fears in Mexico was or 

would be on account of a protected ground. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 

1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (“An [applicant’s] desire to be free from harassment by 

criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus 

to a protected ground.”). Thus, Acevedo-Ramos’s asylum and withholding of 

removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of Acevedo-Ramos’s 

CAT claim because he failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured 

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico. 

See Garcia-Milian, 755 F.3d at 1033-35 (concluding that petitioner did not 

establish the necessary state action for CAT relief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Martian Barchan Dunes","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FCNimQwu35\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pia23669orig\/\">Martian Barchan Dunes<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pia23669orig\/embed\/#?secret=FCNimQwu35\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Martian Barchan Dunes” — NASA\" data-secret=\"FCNimQwu35\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/pia23669orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":375}
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 765

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 23, 1997

Received

SEPTEMBER 3, 1997

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

AN ACT

To ensure maintenance of a herd of wild horses in Cape

Lookout National Seashore.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 765 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shackleford Banks

3 Wild Horses Protection Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. MAINTENANCE OF WILD HORSES IN CAPE LOOKOUT

5 NATIONAL SEASHORE.

6 Section 5 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for

7 the establishment of the Cape Lookout National Seashore

8 in the State of North Carolina, and for other purposes’’,

9 approved March 10, 1966 (16 U.S.C. 459g–4), is amended

10 by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ after ‘‘SEC. 5.’’, and by adding at the

11 end the following new subsection:

12 ‘‘(b)(1) The Secretary, in accordance with this sub13 section, shall allow a herd of free roaming horses in the

14 seashore.

15 ‘‘(2) Within 180 days after enactment of this sub16 section, the Secretary shall enter into an agreement with

17 the Foundation for Shackleford Horses (a nonprofit cor18 poration established under the laws of the State of North

19 Carolina) to provide for management of free roaming

20 horses in the seashore. The agreement shall—

21 ‘‘(A) provide for cost-effective management of

22 the horses; and

23 ‘‘(B) allow the Foundation to adopt any of

24 those horses that the Secretary removes from the

25 seashore.
3

HR 765 RFS

1 ‘‘(3)(A) The Secretary shall accommodate the historic

2 population level of the free roaming horse herd in the sea3 shore, which shall be considered to be not less than 100

4 horses and not more than 110 horses.

5 ‘‘(B) The Secretary may not remove, or assist in or

6 permit the removal of, any free roaming horses from Fed7 eral lands within the boundaries of the seashore unless—

8 ‘‘(i) the number of free roaming horses in the

9 seashore exceeds 110;

10 ‘‘(ii) there is an emergency or a need to protect

11 public health and safety, as defined in the agreement

12 under paragraph (2); or

13 ‘‘(iii) there is concern for the persistence and

14 viability of the horse population that is cited in the

15 most recent findings of annual monitoring of the

16 horses under paragraph (4).

17 ‘‘(4) The Secretary shall annually monitor, assess,

18 and make available to the public findings regarding the

19 population structure and health of the free roaming horses

20 in the national seashore.

21 ‘‘(5) Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as

22 creating liability for the United States for any damages
4

HR 765 RFS

1 caused by the free roaming horses to property located in2 side or outside the boundaries of the seashore.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
Paul Menefee
Barclays Capital Inc.
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166

Re: Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust, 2004-NC1,
Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2004-NC1

To whom it may concern:

The undersigned officer of National City Corporation, which is the parent
corporation of National City Bank, successor by merger to Servicer,
provides this Annual Statement as to Compliance as required by the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") for the above-referenced security
and certifies that (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during
the eleven-month period ending November 30, 2004 and of performance under
the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement for the eleven-month period ending
November 30, 2004, subject to the items disclosed in the report for
the eleven-month period ending November 30, 2004 prepared by Ernst & Young
LLP after conducting a review conducted in compliance with the Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers .

Sincerely,

NATIONAL CITY CORPORATION


By: /s/   John D. Gellhausen
     John D. Gellhausen
     Executive Vice President

Dated:  March 31, 2005
Case 2:16-mj-01065-JFM Document 4 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01065-JFM Document 4 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01065-JFM Document 4 Filed 02/02/16 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lauren E. Low","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lelow\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Loral O\u2019Hara to Discuss Space Station Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5gOFZDs5FI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-loral-ohara-to-discuss-space-station-mission\/\">NASA Astronaut Loral O\u2019Hara to Discuss Space Station Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-loral-ohara-to-discuss-space-station-mission\/embed\/#?secret=5gOFZDs5FI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Loral O\u2019Hara to Discuss Space Station Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5gOFZDs5FI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/loralohara-119aae.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":395}
#### Matter of the Application of Bown Brothers, Inc., for a Voluntary Dissolution.

(Supreme Court, Monroe Special Term,

March, 1920.)

Corporations — when application for dissolution granted — General Corporation Law, § 172.

Where an increase of the capital stock of a corporation is necessary in order to avoid the borrowing of money upon the personal indorsement of the two equal owners of all the stock, one of whom is desirous of selling the unissued stock, but the other refuses to join, an application under section 172 of the General Corporation Law for the dissolution of the corporation will be granted.

Application for a voluntary dissolution of a corporation.

*295Warren, Shuster & Case, for motion.

Morrison H. McMath, opposed.

Rodenbeck, J.

The application for dissolution should be granted. The application is properly made since the stock is equally divided into not more than two independent ownerships or interests. Gen. Corp. Law, § 172. These ownerships are deadlocked, one desiring to sell the stock unissued and the other refusing to join. The record owners are not the actual owners of the stock, but this fact would not prevent the actual owner of one-half of the stock from blocking any attempt to sell the stock against his wishes. The facts show the necessity for an increase of the capital stock to avoid the borrowing of money upon the personal indorsement of the owners of the stock. The stockholders are, therefore, at variance upon a vital program of business management. It is for the interest of Mrs. Bown, the owner of one-half of the stock, that the corporation should be dissolved now rather than be continued, if there is to be a substantial disagreement with the owner of the other half of the stock, with the possibility of a refusal to indorse corporate paper and actively manage the business. It is unreasonable to require the business to be continued in its present form without the acquiescence of the owner of either half of the stock. Section 172 of the General Corporation Law presents a ground for the application independent of section 170. *Matter of McLoughlin,*176 App. Div. 653.

The application to dissolve the corporation is entertained and a suitable order may be prepared as provided by statute.

Ordered accordingly.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 870

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into contracts to assist

the Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency, California, to implement

a Basin Management Plan for the elimination of ground water overdraft

and seawater intrusion, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 27, 1997

Mr. FARR of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into

contracts to assist the Pajaro Valley Water Management

Agency, California, to implement a Basin Management

Plan for the elimination of ground water overdraft and

seawater intrusion, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 The Congress finds and declares the following:

5 (1) A serious ground water overdraft problem

6 exists in the Pajaro Valley of Santa Cruz and Mon7 terey Counties, California.
2

•HR 870 IH

1 (2) The ground water overdraft problem in the

2 Pajaro Valley has resulted in seawater intrusion and

3 water quality degradation.

4 (3) Agricultural production is the leading indus5 try in the Pajaro Valley, with gross receipts of more

6 than $460,000,000 in 1994.

7 (4) The Pajaro Valley Water Management

8 Agency (in this Act referred to as the ‘‘Agency’’)

9 was established by the State of California and the

10 citizens of the Pajaro Valley to eliminate the ground

11 water overdraft and preserve agricultural production.

12 (5) The Agency was directed by California stat13 ute to develop a comprehensive plan to stabilize

14 ground water supplies in an economically and envi15 ronmentally acceptable manner.

16 (6) The Agency has drafted and approved a

17 comprehensive plan, entitled the ‘‘Basin Manage18 ment Plan’’ and dated November 1993, which will,

19 when implemented, stabilize the water resources of

20 the basin and address the problems of overdraft and

21 seawater intrusion by emphasizing water conserva22 tion and by developing supplemental sources of

23 water.
3

•HR 870 IH

1 (7) The Secretary of the Interior needs author2 ization in order to enter into contracts or agree3 ments to assist the Agency in implementing the

4 Basin Management Plan.

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION.

6 Notwithstanding any provision of law limiting the au7 thority of the Secretary to enter into long-term contracts

8 or agreements, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized

9 to enter into such contracts or agreements as the Sec10 retary shall deem necessary to assist the Pajaro Valley

11 Water Management Agency to implement the provisions

12 of the Basin Management Plan, dated November 1993,

13 to prevent long-term ground water overdraft, land subsid14 ence, and water quality degradation in Santa Cruz and

15 Monterey Counties, California.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          30,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  225,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (8,232)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               423,640
<PP&E>                                         123,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                (61,451)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,105,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          268,777
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,105,775
<SALES>                                        232,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,883
<CGS>                                          147,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,865)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,457
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,551
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,551
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I,  Jenelle  Ray,  the Chief  Financial  Officer  of  Liquidix,  Inc.  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: August 19, 2002



                                                      /s/Jenelle Ray
                                                   Name: Jenelle Ray
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer