alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### S. A. Hagarty, &c., *v.*S. S. Scott.

Judicial Sales — Purchase by- One for Another a Trust Results.

When a party purchases land at a judicial sale with the understanding that he is to hold it for another, he holds the land in trust for the benefit of the other.

APPEAL PROM BOONE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 20, 1872.

*Drane, for appellants.*

O’Hara, *for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

It is clearly shown by the evidence that at the sale of the property by Calvert, Graves purchased under an agreement between him and S'cott that he was to buy the property and hold for .Scott, and if he should need the money he had paid out, by an arrangement made by Scott with Calvert he was to refund the money to Graves, and that he did, so that the land, or property was redeemed months before the year expired, even if Graves’ purchase could have the effect to invest him with an incohate title.

As to the sale under the execution -in favor of Brown and wife, Corbin bought in the property to secure the debt with -the intention to hold the same for Scott, having secured the debt of Brown and wife, and when Dulaney acquired the benefit of his purchase it was with the distinct understanding that Scott was to have the right to redeem, and Dulaney held in it the character of a trust, and when his money was paid the property was to go to Scott, and Hagarty, when he purchased from Dulaney, was well apprised of the whole. arrangement and was not a purchaser, without notice of the trust.

As the judgment provides for the payment of the sevei*al debts of Scott on equitable principles, we perceive no error, and the judgment is *affirmed.*

The Oi-iiep Justice did not sit in this case.
#### Magruder *v.*Marshall, Administrator.

Ir an action on a replevin bond, the defendant cannot question the constitutionality of the statute under which the bond was executed.

Scott, J.

Judgment, execution, and replevin bond; the intestate replevin surety; scire facias against his administrator; plea to the scire facias, that the bond was given for ease and favour; replication to the plea; demurrer and joinder. The defence set up is, that the law authorizing replevin bonds is unconstitutional and void; and this is the only question we are called upon to decide;

*334Howie, for the plaintiff.

Nelson, for the defendant.

Much has been said and written on this vexata quaestio, and much talent has been employed in its discussion, not only here but in some óf our sister states; and in this case it has been urged upon us with great pertinacity! However, after all that has been said, there is one consideration which, apart from all others, is sufficient to put this case to rest. The party who has availed himself of all the advantages of the replevin law, comes here now and complains that it is unconstitutional. What injury has he sustained? What constitutional right of his has been infringed? With what colour of justice can he come here to claim the advantage 'of his own unconstitutional proceedings? If any person has a right to complain, it is the party who.has sustained the injury, not he who has done the wrong and enjoyed the benefit. The defendant, by accepting the indulgence given by the statute, is estopped to say now that it is unconstitutional and void. The creditor might demand his constitutional rights, or waive them, at his election; the debtor, after accepting the .indulgence, and enjoying the benefit, of the statute, cannot now change his course. This we take to be sound law, as well as sound reason and good policy. Vide 6 Co. R. 39. — 2 Bac. 490. — Hard. 518.

*The Court*awarded execution against the defendant as administrator, &c. to be levied of the goods, &c..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,208
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,421
<PP&E>                                           5,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                     232,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,451
<SALES>                                         22,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,793
<CGS>                                           20,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (13)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,291)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,678)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)


</TABLE>
#### H. Fletcher *v.*J. S. Cain.

Bailments — Bailee’s Eight to Compensation for Storing Property.

A bailee, who has the custody of property, upon notifying the owners to remove same, and they fail to do so, is entitled to compensation for removal and storage.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON COMMON PLEAS COURT.

October 7, 1869.

Response by

Judge Williams:

There was only one witness in this case, Mathew Fletcher, a partner with the defendants in the forage ration pressing business; he stated that the presses “were bought by his partners and *were to be paid for out of the profits of the*business.” This certainly is evidence that they were bought on partnership account and to be charged to the firm, and the evidence in this cause shows that the defendants are seeking, in a chancery suit, to settle the partnership, to hold Fletcher, the witness, responsible for his part of the costs of the presses as a partner, which, however, he is resisting, and this may be the real clue why defendants would take no control of the presses when notified to take them away at the time plaintiff desired to tear down the old house in which they were stored for the purpose of erecting a new one.

But suppose this was not so, and that Mathew Fletcher was not interested as a partner, still he had custody of the presses as a bailee, and when he notified the owners to take away the presses, and they failed to do so, he had the right to have them removed and placed in some safe place, and the law will imply an undertaking by the owner to pay a reasonable compensation for the removal and storage.

So that whether as partner or bailee he had a right to have the presses cared for, and a reasonable compensation must be allowed; the only difference being that in one case he would be responsible as partner for his own share of the expenses, whilst in the other no *292part of the expenses could attach to him; but in either case the peremptory instruction was erroneous.

*Clemmons & Willis, for appellant.*

*Worthington, for appellee.*

Reversed and remanded.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Reece Freeman,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-01526-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8535 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
FOURTH AMENDMENT
TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
      (a)
    
    CHANGE OF CONTROL shall mean the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) any
person, entity or affiliated group, excluding the Company or any employee benefit plan of
the Company, acquiring more than 50% of the then outstanding shares of voting stock of the
Company, (ii) the consummation of any merger or consolidation of the Company into another
company, such that the holders of the shares of the voting stock of the Company
immediately before such merger or consolidation own less than 50% of the voting power of
the securities of the surviving company or the parent of the surviving company, (iii) the
adoption of a plan for complete liquidation of the Company or for the sale or disposition
of all or substantially all of the Companys assets, such that after the transaction, the
holders of the shares of the voting stock of the Company immediately prior to the
transaction own less than 50% of the voting securities of the acquiror or the parent of
the acquiror, or (iv) during any period of two (2) consecutive years, individuals who at
the beginning of such period constituted the Board (including for this purpose any new
director whose election or nomination for election by the Companys stockholders was
approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then still in office who were
directors at the beginning of such period) cease for any reason to constitute at least a
majority of the Board.




---



##### 








---



##### 



REIT:
MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.By:
    /s/ R. Steven HamnerName:
    R. Steven HamnerTitle:
    Executive Vice President and CFOOPERATING PARTNERSHIP:
MPT OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
By:   Medical Properties Trust, LLC 
Its:   General Partner
By:   Medical Properties Trust, Inc. 
Its:   Sole MemberBy:
    /s/ R. Steven HamnerName:
    R. Steven HamnerTitle:
    Executive Vice President and CFOEXECUTIVE:/s/ Edward K. Aldag, Jr.Edward K. Aldag, Jr.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Victoria Ugalde","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/vugalde\/","title":"Spacesuit for NASA\u2019s Artemis III Moon Surface Mission Debuts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LX8NDCXDQ1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/spacesuit-for-nasas-artemis-iii-moon-surface-mission-debuts\/\">Spacesuit for NASA\u2019s Artemis III Moon Surface Mission Debuts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/spacesuit-for-nasas-artemis-iii-moon-surface-mission-debuts\/embed\/#?secret=LX8NDCXDQ1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Spacesuit for NASA\u2019s Artemis III Moon Surface Mission Debuts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LX8NDCXDQ1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/jsc2023e015207.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
ATTACHMENTS #1-12

(Will be provided by disc to the Court and Defense Counsel)

Case 2:16-mj-06019-DKD Document 9-1 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2020

t0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2020

161058 & (33)(55)(58)(64)(65)

In re SMITH _________________________________________

STACEY R. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 161058

COA: 352572

Kent CC: 20-000224-AS

JOHN BEASON and CHRISTOPHER BECKER,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.
Exhibit 4(i)


 


UBI


 


(LOGO inserted here)


 


INCORPORATED UNDER THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY


 


 


CUSIP 913290 10 2


 


SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR


CERTAIN DEFINITIONS


 


This is to Certify that


 


is the owner of


 


FULLY PAID AND
NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE, OF


 


Unity Bancorp, Inc.


 


a corporation
incorporated under the laws of the State of New Jersey. The shares evidenced by
this certificate are transferable only on the stock transfer books of Unity
Bancorp, Inc. by the holder hereof, in person or by attorney, upon surrender of
this certificate properly endorsed.


                This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by
the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.


                WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 


Dated:


 


(signature)


Secretary


 


(SEAL inserted here)


 


(signature)


Chairman of the Board


 


Countersigned and
Registered:


REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER
COMPANY


By


Transfer Agent


and Registrar


Authorized Signature


 

















 


Unity Bancorp, Inc.


 


The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations:


 


TEN COM _ as tenants in
common


UNIF GIFT MIN ACT _ . . .
.. . . . . . . Custodian . . . . . . . . .


 


(Cust)                        (Minor)


TEN ENT  _ as tenants by the entireties


under Uniform Gifts to
Minors


 


JT TEN _ as joint
tenants with right


of survivorship and not
as


 tenants in common


 Act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..


                (State)


Additional abbreviations
may also be used though not in the above list.


 


 For value received, ________   hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHER


    IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


 


PLEASE PRINT OR
TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE.


 


Shares


represented by the
within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoin


 Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the
books  of  the  within named
corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated:


In the presence of


Signature


 


Signature


 


Note: The signature to
this assignment must correspond with the name of the stockholders(s) as written
upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without alteration or
enlargement, or any change whatever.
## United States Court of App eals F O R T H E E I G H T H

C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 29 55

__ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca, *
* App el le e, *
* App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e * W es te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i. Dwig ht Arm el , *
* [UNPUBLISHED] App el la nt

. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: Feb ru ary 24 , 20 12 Fi le d: Marc h 1 , 20 12

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re WOL LMAN, MELLOY, and SMITH, Ci rcu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM. Dwig ht Arm el ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s or de r co m m it ti ng hi m to th e cu st od y 1 of th e Att or ne y

Gene ral un de r 18 U.S.C. § 4 24 6, an d we a ffi rm

.

Sect io n 42 46 pr ov id es fo r th e in d e fin it e ho sp it al iz at io n of a pe rs on who ha s be en co m m it te d to th e cu st od y of th e Att or ne y Gen eral un de r 18 U .S.C. § 42 41 (d )

The Hon or ab le Ri ch ard E. Dor r, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri, ad op ti ng th e rep or t an d reco m m en da ti o n s of th e Hon or ab le Ja m es C. Eng la nd , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r t he W es te rn Dis tri ct of Mi ss ou ri.(co nc ern in g m en ta l in co m pe te nc e to st an d tri al ) an d who is fo u n d

- - b y cl ear an d

co nv in ci ng ev id en ce aft er a he ari ng --t o be su ffer in g fro m a m en ta l di se as e or de fect

su ch th at hi s rel eas e wou ld crea te a su bs ta nt ia l ris k of bo di ly in jury to an ot he r pe rs on
or se rio us da m ag e to th e pr op ert y of an ot he r. See 18 U.S.C

. § 4 2 4 6 ( a ) -(d ). In th is

cas e, th e di st ric t co ur t fo un d th e co m m it m en t was ap pr op ria te be cau se st at e pl acement was un av ai la bl e an d th e m en ta l he al th pr of es si on al s who ex am in ed Arm el

un an im ou sl y

be li ev ed th at hi s m en ta l ill ne ss an d hi st or y of vo la ti le an d t hr eat en in g be ha vi or wou ld crea te a ris k of da ng ero us ne ss wit hi n th e m ean in g of se ct io n 42 46 if Arm el were un co nd it io na ll y r el eas ed

. W e ho ld th at th is fin di ng is no t cl earl y
erro n e o u s

. S e e Uni te d St at es v. W il li am s, 29 9 F.3 d 67 3, 67 6- 77 (8 th Ci r. 20 02 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). W e no te th at Arm el ’s cu st od ia ns are un de r an on go in g ob li ga ti on to pr ep are an nu al rep or ts co nc ern in g hi s m en ta l co nd it io n an d th e ne ed fo r hi s co nt in ue d ho sp it al iz at io n, se e 18 U.S.C. § 42 47 (e)( 1) (B), an d to ex ert reas on ab le effo rts to pl ace h m

in a su it ab le st at e fac il it y , see 18 U.S.C. § 4 24 6( d)

.

Acco rd in gl y , th e jud gm en t i s affi rm ed , co un se l’s m ot io n to wit hd raw is gr an te d, an d Arm el ’s pro se a pp el la te m ot io ns are d en ie d.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:2
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 2 of 13 PageID #:3
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 3 of 13 PageID #:4
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 4 of 13 PageID #:5
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 5 of 13 PageID #:6
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 6 of 13 PageID #:7
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 7 of 13 PageID #:8
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 8 of 13 PageID #:9
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 9 of 13 PageID #:10
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 10 of 13 PageID #:11
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 11 of 13 PageID #:12
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 12 of 13 PageID #:13
Case: 1:20-cv-01844 Document #: 2 Filed: 03/18/20 Page 13 of 13 PageID #:14
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: F.E.V., A MINOR

PETITION OF: K.V., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 867 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.E.W.B., JR., A 

MINOR

PETITION OF: K.V., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 868 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION - CFO



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Worldwide Communications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the Report), I, Richard A. Lyew, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard A. Lyew                                                                                                                 
|Richard A. Lyew, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) November 15, 2004
Case 2:16-cr-00100-DJH Document 3 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00100-DJH Document 3 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00100-DJH Document 3 Filed 01/07/16 Page 3 of 3