alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of the Colgate-Palmolive Supplemental Savings Plan


 
EXHIBIT 10-N

 
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY

DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS & INVESTMENT PLAN 
 
 
IRS regulations restrict compensation that may be taken into account by tax-qualified retirement plans such as the Colgate-Palmolive Company Employees Savings and Investment Plan (S&I Plan). 
 
The Colgate benefit plans use “Recognized Earnings”
as a proxy for compensation. For employees whose annual Recognized Earnings exceed the compensation limit set by the IRS for the year (“Eligible Employees”), their own S&I Plan contributions are based on Recognized Earnings up to the
IRS limit, instead of their full Recognized Earnings. Accordingly, the Company matching contributions made on their behalf to the S&I Plan are also limited, as they are a function of employee contributions. 
 
Through the Colgate-Palmolive Supplemental S&I Plan, the
Company makes available to Eligible Employees a hypothetical amount equal to the Company matching contributions that cannot be made in the tax-qualified S&I plan due to the above limits. Prior to the beginning of each year, Eligible Employees
can elect to either receive this Supplemental Company Match in cash at the end of the year, or defer it into the Supplemental S&I Plan. Any amount deferred remains deferred until the employee leaves the Company. A separate election form is
completed with respect to each year. 
 
If an
Eligible Employee elects to receive the Supplemental Company Match for a given year in cash, the amount will be taxable and included in their W-2 earnings for the year for purposes of both income taxes and Medicare taxes. Payment of the Supplemental
Company Match is made on December 15 (for US-based employees, in mid-December for Eligible Employees working outside the US) of such year. 
 
If an Eligible Employee elects to defer the Supplemental Company Match for a given year, the deferral is credited to the Eligible
Employee’s account in the Supplemental S&I Plan and accrues interest at the same rate as is used in the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan for long-term deferrals. The deferral is credited as of December 31 of such year, and earnings
accrue beginning on the following January 1. However, the Eligible Employee electing deferral is still required to pay the applicable Medicare tax on the deferred amount at the time of crediting. The Medicare tax is deducted from the Eligible
Employee’s pay in December, and the deferral is reported on the Form W-2 for the year as Medicare wages. The Supplemental S&I Plan is unfunded, and all deferrals must remain in the Plan while the Eligible Employee remains a Colgate
employee. 
 
If an Eligible Employee fails to make
an election with respect to a given year, the Supplemental Company Match for that year will be paid in cash in December of such year as if a cash election had been made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999, AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE NOTES
THERETO, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          27,214
<SECURITIES>                                    84,903
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,285
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,285
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,587
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,006)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,006)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($1.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($1.90)
        

</TABLE>
| 1.     |                                                                                                     | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     |                                                                                                     | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Registrant. |
|   |                                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                               |   |   |
|   | Date:      July 29, 2010                                                                            |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | /s/      Lawrence Pemble                                                                                 |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | Lawrence      Pemble                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | Executive      Vice President, Finance andChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   |

----
9794.

#### Littlefield *v.*The State.

Decided November 1, 1918.

Harwell, J.

The evidence amply authorized .the defendant’s conviction of having and possessing intoxicating liquors, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.*

*784Indictment for possession of intoxicating liquor; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.

*W~ E. Mann, Olénn & House,*for .plaintiff in error.

*Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general,*contra.
#### Elizabeth Warfield & Co. *v.*D. S. Goodloe, &c.

Guaranty — Contract to Hold Party Harmless — Procedure.

APPEAL EROM EAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT.

September 30, 1871.

*Breckinridge & Thornton, for appellants.*

*Huston & Mulligan, for appellees.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Pryor :

If the writing, upon which this suit is instituted, can be regarded as an obligation upon which the appellees are personally liable, it must be construed as a guaranty upon their part that they will leave the appellants harmless in the event they shall suffer loss from pursuing with proper diligence, their vendor Johnson. The appellees had no interest whatever in the sale and delivery of the whisky by Johnson to the appellants, and the only consideration upon which the validity of the obligation is based, was the refusal on the part of appellants to pay to Johnson the money on the whisky until this writing was executed. Johnson’s liability to the appellants originated the moment this whisky was seized and confiscated by the government officials, and all that the appellees agreed to do was to leave the appellants harmless in the event they lost the whisky and failed to recover the money back from their vendor, Johnson. The petition fails to allege the exercise of any diligence in pursuing their remedy against Johnson, or his insolvency, and the proof is as silent upon this subject as the petition. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1233

KAKO K. RANKINE,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY J. RANKINE,

Defendant - Appellant,

versus

HICKORY PUBLIC SCHOOLS “SYSTEM”; DANIEL

MASSEY; TIMOTHY SIMMS; D. STUART THOMPSON;

CATHY ISENHOUR; MARILYN MAX; JEFFREY T.

MACKIE; DOES 1-10,

Third Party Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (CA-01-79-5-V)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 23, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony J. Rankine, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Ray Green, Jr.,

Hickory, North Carolina; Jeffrey T. Mackie, SIGMON, CLARK & MACKIE,

Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony J. Rankine appeals the district court’s order:

granting Kako Rankine and the Third Party Defendants’ motions to

dismiss; granting the motions for sanctions but deferring a ruling

on the amount of sanctions; dismissing Anthony Rankine’s complaint

and amended complaint; deferring a ruling on the motion for costs

and attorney’s fees; denying as moot Kako Rankine’s and the Third

Party Defendants’ remaining motions; remanding the matter to the

state court; and imposing an injunction on Anthony Rankine. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Rankine v. Rankine, No. CA-01-79-5-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 12,

2002). We deny Rankine’s motion to stay. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA, Boeing to Provide Update on Boeing\u2019s Orbital Flight Test-2","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Xz4P10Qzpn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-boeing-to-provide-update-on-boeings-orbital-flight-test-2\/\">NASA, Boeing to Provide Update on Boeing\u2019s Orbital Flight Test-2<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-boeing-to-provide-update-on-boeings-orbital-flight-test-2\/embed\/#?secret=Xz4P10Qzpn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA, Boeing to Provide Update on Boeing\u2019s Orbital Flight Test-2” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Xz4P10Qzpn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/nhq202107290019_large.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Graf","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/agraf\/","title":"Laser Communications","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GYggYfvhUK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/laser-communications\/\">Laser Communications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/laser-communications\/embed\/#?secret=GYggYfvhUK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Laser Communications” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GYggYfvhUK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/lcrd.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":616}
Exhibit G

 

Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 87-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:2133
Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 87-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:2134
Case: 1:20-cv-02111 Document #: 87-7 Filed: 05/04/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:2135
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Jesus Enrique Rosas-Pasillas, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-16-50004-01-PHX-NVW

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure his appearance at future proceedings.

\\\

\\\

\\\

\\\

Case 2:16-cr-50004-NVW Document 7 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 15th day of January, 2016.

Case 2:16-cr-50004-NVW Document 7 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhbit 99.1

        CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive
Officer (and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 14, 2002                     /s/ John J. Joyce
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      John J. Joyce
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      (and Principal Financial Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Cawley","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/james-j-cawleynasa-gov\/","title":"Brian Berry","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5P6TAZzbnt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/brian-berry\/\">Brian Berry<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/brian-berry\/embed\/#?secret=5P6TAZzbnt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Brian Berry” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5P6TAZzbnt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/brian-berry.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001048275
<NAME>                        PMCC FINANCIAL CORP.

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         3,514,284
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 56,023,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                   16,293,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                         2,219,255
<DEPRECIATION>                                   393,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                77,626,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         63,552,595
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          37,500
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  77,626,032
<SALES>                                       14,116,244
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              15,153,153
<CGS>                                          9,151,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 14,252,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,018,959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  900,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                     369,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              531,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     531,973
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.14


</TABLE>