alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TOM'S FOODS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 9,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-09-2000
<CASH>                                           2,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,680)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,297
<PP&E>                                         100,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,889
<BONDS>                                         68,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,458
<PREFERRED>                                     28,590
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,355
<SALES>                                        141,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               141,396
<CGS>                                           85,542
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (5,551)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        97
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,398)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### May Starr, Plaintiff, *v.*William P. MacNamara, Defendant.

(Supreme Court, New York Trial Term,

March, 1920.)

Verdict — when set aside — infants — guardian ad litem must be appointed before verdict — Code Civ. Pro. §§ 471, 721.

After a verdict adverse to an infant defendant, a motion for an order *nunc pro tunc*appointing a guardian *ad litem*for him will be denied and the verdict and any judgment entered thereon must be set aside; the defect not being one cured under section 721 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

However, an application for the appointment of a guardian may be regularly made under section 471 of said Code.

Motion to set aside a verdict.

Edwards, Murphy & Minton, for plaintiff.

Joseph L. Prager, for defendant.

Pendleton, J.

This is a motion to set aside a verdict in favor of plaintiff. It appeared at the trial that the defendant is an infant. No motion was then made for the appointment of a guardian *ad litem.*After *243verdict defendant moved to set aside the verdict on the ground defendant is an infant and no guardian had been appointed. Plaintiff now moves for the appointment of a guardian before entry of judgment. In *Anderson*v. *Anderson,*164 App. Div. 812, it was held that after a special verdict adverse to the infant before judgment a guardian *ad litem*could not be appointed for the purpose of entering judgment, but the verdict must be set aside and the case stricken from the calendar. In *Seiden*v. *Reimer,*decided by the Appellate Division at January last term, a judgment against an infant was reversed because a guardian *ad litem*had not been appointed. In the opinion it is stated that the guardian might have been appointed at the end of the case before verdict. *Anderson*v. *Anderson, supra,*was cited with approval, and it is quite clear that case was approved. The rule seems to be that a guardian may be appointed at any time before verdict *(Rima*v. *Rossie Iron Works,*120 N. Y. 433), but after a verdict adverse to the infant a guardian *nunc pro tunc*cannot be appointed, and the verdict and any judgment entered thereon must be set aside. The verdict being adverse to the infant, the defect is not one of those cured under section 721 of the Code. No motion to appoint a guardian was made here at the end of the case, and the verdict, being against the infant, must be set aside. Motion to appoint a guardian denied and verdict set aside. An application for the appointment of a guardian may be made in the regular way under section 471 of the Code.

Ordered accordingly.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.6.3

Eastern Division

BCBSM, Inc., et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−01853

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Asuris Northwest Health, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, November 1, 2022:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Third Party Defendant

Omedarx, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer to Third Party

Complaint [345] is granted. Answer shall be filed by 11/18/2022. Status hearing is reset

for 12/6/2022 at 9:15 AM. Prior to the hearing, you are directed to cut and paste this hyper

link into a browser: https://us−courts.webex.com/join/virginia_kendalli lnd.uscourts.gov If

you do not have access to a device with video capability, please use the dial in option:

(650)−479−3207, the access code is: 180 698 4009. If you do have access to a device with

video capability, you are directed to appear telephonically. Mailed notice(lk, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-01853 Document #: 346 Filed: 11/01/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:7194
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Shirley Bishop,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Frank Reyes, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-16-00009-PHX-ESW

ORDER 

Plaintiff has consented to the exercise of Magistrate Judge jurisdiction (Doc. 7). 

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 10). The Court, 

however, must screen the Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) before it is allowed to be 

served. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). As the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has explained, 

“section 1915(e) not only permits but requires a district court to dismiss an in forma 

pauperis complaint that fails to state a claim.” Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d 1122, 1127 (9th 

Cir. 2000). 

In the Court’s Order (Doc. 9) filed on May 19, 2016, the Court identified the 

deficiencies of Plaintiff’s original Complaint (Doc. 1). The Court set forth the 

requirements of Rule 8, Fed. R. Civ. P., as well as the law involving the filing of a claim 

for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Amended 

Complaint (Doc. 10). The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which 

relief may be granted. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). Plaintiff 

has failed to cure the deficiencies noted in the original Complaint. The Court will 

Case 2:16-cv-00009-ESW Document 11 Filed 07/01/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) without prejudice. 

CONCLUSION 

For the reasons set forth above, 

IT IS ORDERED dismissing without prejudice Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint 

(Doc. 10). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this 

action. 

Dated this 30th day of June, 2016. 

- 2 - 

Case 2:16-cv-00009-ESW Document 11 Filed 07/01/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM  THE 2/29/00
AGRIBRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF  EARNINGS  AND  IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0001047598
<NAME>                           AGRIBRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                           174,100
<SECURITIES>                     1,800
<RECEIVABLES>                    85,600
<ALLOWANCES>                     12,100
<INVENTORY>                      90,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 345,600
<PP&E>                           352,800
<DEPRECIATION>                   179,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   574,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            142,900
<BONDS>                          11,300
<COMMON>                         100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                       390,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     574,000
<SALES>                          589,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 589,000
<CGS>                            488,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    488,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 61,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               1,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  37,500
<INCOME-TAX>                     12,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              24,900
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     24,900
<EPS-BASIC>                    2.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                    2.34
<FN>
F1 LOSS - PROVISION INCLUDED IN OTHER-EXPENSE ABOVE
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### M’Garrah *v.*Prather.

*HELD,*that if a hill of interpleader do not contain an offer to bring the money into Court, the omission is a ground, of: demurrer (1).

(1)

 1 Madd. Ch. 174, note z.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Xponential, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Dwayne A. Moyers, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 27, 2004 | /s/ Dwayne A. Moyers    |   |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                             | Dwayne A. Moyers        |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Case 2:15-mj-01948-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01948-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01948-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/24/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA, Boeing Complete Starliner Uncrewed Flight Test to Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1GF2sr32gY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-boeing-complete-starliner-uncrewed-flight-test-to-space-station\/\">NASA, Boeing Complete Starliner Uncrewed Flight Test to Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-boeing-complete-starliner-uncrewed-flight-test-to-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=1GF2sr32gY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA, Boeing Complete Starliner Uncrewed Flight Test to Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1GF2sr32gY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/nhq202205250013.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 99.1

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report
of PSB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), and is given solely for the purpose
of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.  To the best of their knowledge, the undersigned, in their
respective capacities as set forth below, hereby certify that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operation of the Company.

         /s/Anthony DiSandro, Chief Executive Officer
            --------------------------
         Date: May 14, 2003

        /s/John Carrozza, Acting Chief Financial Officer
          ----------------------------
         Date: May 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided
to PSB Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sharon A. Foster,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03411-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8568 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8568 Filed 11/02/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-83","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rO6V8tSHGc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-83\/\">STS-83<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-83\/embed\/#?secret=rO6V8tSHGc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-83” — NASA\" data-secret=\"rO6V8tSHGc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/9701384\/9701384~large.jpg?w=600&h=1537&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1537}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 71

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt from the minimum wage and overtime requirements individuals who volunteer their

time in order to enhance their occupational opportunities.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. KNOLLENBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to exempt

from the minimum wage and overtime requirements individuals who volunteer their time in order to enhance

their occupational opportunities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Job Skill Development

5 Act of 1997’’.
2

•HR 71 IH

1 SEC. 2. VOLUNTEERS.

2 Section 3(e)(4) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of

3 1938 (29 U.S.C. 203(e)(4)) is amended by adding at the

4 end the following:

5 ‘‘(C) The term ‘employee’ does not include any indi6 vidual who volunteers to perform services for an employer

7 if—

8 ‘‘(i) the individual’s volunteering to perform

9 services was initiated by the individual;

10 ‘‘(ii) the individual volunteers to perform serv11 ices for not more than 1040 hours and for not more

12 than 40 hours in any week;

13 ‘‘(iii) the individual receives no compensation

14 for, or is paid only expenses, reasonable benefits, or

15 a nominal fee to perform, the services for which the

16 individual volunteered;

17 ‘‘(iv) the services for which the individual volun18 teered are not services for which the individual has

19 been employed by such employer;

20 ‘‘(v) such services develop skills and experience

21 for which the individual may thereafter be employed;

22 ‘‘(vi) the individual has voluntarily agreed to

23 perform such services with no promise of employ24 ment by the employer;
3

•HR 71 IH

1 ‘‘(vii) no regular employee has been laid off or

2 terminated by such employer from the position to be

3 filled by such individual; and

4 ‘‘(viii) no regular employee experiences a reduc5 tion in hours, wages, or employment benefits as a

6 result of the services performed by such individual.’’.

Æ