alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### S. W. Bailey *v.*T. W. Jackson.

Accounts — Instructions as to the Account of a Physician Distinguished.

In an action on a medical account, the jury after retiring, returned into court and requested of the judge “what kind of proof was required.” They were told that less proof was sufficient to establish a medical account, than any other species, but they should be “satisfied” the account was just. Held, to be too vague and indefinite, and calculated to mislead the jury.

APPEAL FROM BOYLE CIRCUIT COURT.

June 23, 1870

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

This is, according to the record, a strange case. The pleadings and evidence do not clearly disclose the grounds of the verdict. One of the contested claims was a medical account, without special proof of any one item in the account. After their retirement the jury perplexed as to the proof necessary to sustain that account, came into court and, inquiring of the judge what kind of proof should be required, were told in substance that less proof was sufficient to establish a medical than any other species of account, but that they should be “satisfied” that the account was just.

And with that information they probably found the whole account just.

That, instruction was too vague and left an indefinite margin which may have misled the jury and probably did.

*719
      *Dunlap, for appellant.*

*Durham, & Jacobs, Bell, for appellee.*

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
---

Exhibit 99.6

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as the Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Veris Gold Corp., certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge and belief, the annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2012, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Veris Gold Corp. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for
any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update
the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: March 28, 2013

/s/ Shaun
HeinrichsShaun Heinrichs Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer

---
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: August 9, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Terry L. FreemanTerry L. FreemanSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sharon A. Foster,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03411-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8569 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Anthony Greicius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/anthony-greicius-116962jpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"Engineers Solve Data Glitch on NASA\u2019s Voyager 1","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"c22XrKydt8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/voyager-program\/voyager-2\/engineers-solve-data-glitch-on-nasas-voyager-1\/\">Engineers Solve Data Glitch on NASA\u2019s Voyager 1<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/voyager-program\/voyager-2\/engineers-solve-data-glitch-on-nasas-voyager-1\/embed\/#?secret=c22XrKydt8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Engineers Solve Data Glitch on NASA\u2019s Voyager 1” — NASA\" data-secret=\"c22XrKydt8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/1-voyager-illustration-1041.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":361}
9774.

#### King *v.*The State.

Bloodworth, J.

1. On the trial of King on the charge of selling intoxicating liquor, the judge asked a witness: “Who was King accused of selling to up there, do you know?” This was not error for the .reason alleged, that it impressed the jury that the court believed that the defendant was guilty. “The court may properly propound questions to a witness on the stand, with a view to elicit the truth of the ease; and if in such examination the court does not express or intimate an opinion as to the credibility of the witness, or as to what has or has-not been proved, the mere fact that competent testimony of the witness so elicited may be detrimental to the interest of a party will not be cause for granting him a new trial. The questions which the court *642asked the witness, as set out in the motion for a new trial in the present case, were not calculated to impress the jury with the idea that the judge believed the party who gained the case in the court below should prevail.” *Johnson*v. *Leffler Co.,*122 *Ga.*670 (7) (50 S. E. 488).

*Decided*October 14, 1918.

Indictment for sale of liquor; from Whitfield superior court-judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.

*W. B. Mann, G. G. Glenn, W. 0. Martin,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. M. Lang,*solicitor-generalcontra. ■

2. When considered in connection with the entire charge, there is no error, in any of the excerpts therefrom complained of.in the motion for new trial.

3. The evidence demanded the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hill International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Fanelli III, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By: /s/ John Fanelli III

John Fanelli III

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 11, 2011
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jermaine Walker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwalke32\/","title":"Deep Space Station 35","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yFwzlSGXq2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/olympus-digital-camera-42\/\">Deep Space Station 35<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/olympus-digital-camera-42\/embed\/#?secret=yFwzlSGXq2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Deep Space Station 35” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yFwzlSGXq2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/canberra-dss-35-04.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":627}
No. 87-1215.

#### E & T Realty et al. *v.*Strickland et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Donald J. Berchtold, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc. certify that:

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter CapitalGroup Inc;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)   Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)   Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: August 12, 2005

 
|   | /s/  DONALD J. BERCHTOLD |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Donald J. Berchtold      |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                     130,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,103,445
<PP&E>                                     355,191
<DEPRECIATION>                             (89,801)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,368,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      902,235
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     3,104
<OTHER-SE>                                 352,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,368,835
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         1,990,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,990,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,990,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,990,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.68)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Application for the Fixing of an Order on Taxable Transfers of Property of Arthur Farrand, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Columbia County,

February 23, 1926.

Husband and wife — tenants by entirety — conveyance by husband to wife of one-half interest in real property — deed stated intent that parties should hold as tenants by entirety — deed construed as creating tenants by entirety — taxation —■ transfer tax — on death of husband entire property subject to transfer tax under Tax Law, § 220, subd. 7 (as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 430).

A clause in a deed by which decedent conveyed to his wife a one-half interest in real property, reciting “ it is the intent of the party of the first part by this instrument to create in himself and his said wife, a tenancy by the entirety and not tenancy in common,” should be construed as creating a tenancy by the entirety and the property upon decedent’s death became vested in his wife, she having survived him, and became subject to transfer tax under subdivision 7 of section 220 of the Tax Law (as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 430).

Application for order fixing transfer tax on transfer of real property.

*Chace Brothers,*for the moving party.

*Amasa P. Disher [Seth T. Cole*of counsel], for the State Tax Commission.

Whitbeck, S.

On July 8, 1919, Arthur Farrand conveyed to his wife, Bertha W. Farrand, a one-half interest in certain real property situated in the county of Columbia and State of New York. Preceding the *habendum*clause in said deed is the paragraph : *“*It is the intent of the party of the first part by this *591instrument to create in himself and his said wife, a tenancy by the entirety and not tenancy in common.”

The question presented is as to the effect of such conveyance. While it was held in 1912 at Special Term that such a deed was ineffectual to create a tenancy by the entirety and only created a tenancy in common *(Dressler*v. *Mulhern,*77 Misc. 476), yet since the decision in the *Klatzl*case in 1915 *(Matter of Klatzl,*216 N. Y. 83) the more recent trend of judicial opinion appears to be toward holding such a deed to have created a tenancy by the entirety. *(Matter of Horler,*[1917] 180 App. Div. 608; *Matter of Vogelsang,*[1924] 122 Misc. 599.) It is to be regretted that the question involved cannot be more positively determined in the Court of Appeals.

But I am constrained to hold and do decide that the deed before me created a tenancy by the entirety in said Arthur Farrand and Bertha Farrand and that upon his* death on February 13, 1924, leaving him surviving his said wife, that she became the owner of said premises in fee.

Under the statute in effect both at the time of the making of the deed and at the time of decedent’s death (Tax Law, § 220, subd. 7, added by Laws of 1915, chap. 664, as amd. by Laws of 1919, chap. 626, and Laws of 1922, chap. 430) * the transfer was taxable as though the whole property belonged absolutely to the deceased.

An order may be entered accordingly.

*

 Since amd. by Laws of 1924, chap. 177; now Tax Law, § 220, subd. 5, as amd. by Laws of 1925, chap. 143. — [Rep.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Host Briefings, Interviews for Next Crew Mission with SpaceX","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oG6O6xQKo8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-host-briefings-interviews-for-next-crew-mission-with-spacex\/\">NASA to Host Briefings, Interviews for Next Crew Mission with SpaceX<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-host-briefings-interviews-for-next-crew-mission-with-spacex\/embed\/#?secret=oG6O6xQKo8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Host Briefings, Interviews for Next Crew Mission with SpaceX” — NASA\" data-secret=\"oG6O6xQKo8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/crew-3.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 12, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 12, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0295. TROY STILPHEN v. CATHERINE STILPHEN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

19100575