alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"Sunita L. Williams","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jXRDhsL1IH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/sunita-l-williams\/\">Sunita L. Williams<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/sunita-l-williams\/embed\/#?secret=jXRDhsL1IH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Sunita L. Williams” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jXRDhsL1IH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/jsc2012e096604.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
No. 13,618.

#### Tate et al. *v.*Foshee et al.

Beat. *Estate.*— Pawl *Contract of Exchange.*— Performance.—Statute *of Frauds.*—Estoppel.—Where parties enter into a parol agreement to exchange part of their respective lots for the purpose of rectifying and straightening the boundary lines, and the agreement is fully carried into effect and possession surrendered, the transfer is valid, and the parties are es-topped from asserting title to the ground which they have respectively exchanged.

From the Posey Circuit Court.

*W. P. Edson*and *F.*P. *Leonard,*for appellants.

*A. P. Hovey, G. V. Menzies*and *E. M. Spencer,*for appellees.

Elliott, C. J. —

In 1872 William Foshee and Charles Leonard were the owners of lots in the city of Mount "Vernon, and in that year they entered into an agreement to exchange part of their respective lots for the purpose of rectifying and straightening the boundary lines of their lots. During that year this agreement was carried into effect. ' A new dividing line was agreed upon, a division fence erected, and Foshee, in *323pursuance of his agreement, graded and gravelled a street in front of Leonard’s property. Foshee was placed in possession of the parcel of land now claimed by the appellants, and Leonard was put in possession of the parcel which it was agreed he should receive in exchange.

Filed Feb. 14, 1889.

The law is decisively and plainly with the appellees. The agreement for the exchange, although in parol, is not within the statute of frauds, because it was not only partly performed, but was completely executed. Leonard acquired a complete and perfect title. There was, in effect, a valid parol partition, fully executed, and also an effectual establishment of a boundary line, so that the transfer was as effective as if it had been made by deed. *Bruce*v. *Osgood,*113 Ind. 360; *Wright*v. *Jones,*105 Ind. 17; *Hauk v. McComas,*98 Ind. 460; *Gay*v. *Parpart,*106 U. S. 679 ; *Kinsey*v. *Satterthwaite,*88 Ind. 342; *Main v. Killinger,*90 Ind. 165.

In addition, there is present the element of estoppel, which effectually precludes Leonard or his heirs from asserting title. *Pitcher*v. *Dove,*99 Ind. 175.

The proper offer of proof was not made, and, therefore, no question is presented on the ruling denying the appellants the right to propound the interrogatory which they proposed to ask Mattie L. Tate.

Judgment affirmed.
#### J. C. Burch *v.*Terry Perkins.

Judicial Sales — Commissioner—Judgment of Court.

Where a judgment excepts from a sale, of lands, “except the share of B., one of the heirs above,” etc., the commissioner has no power to sell all the land, but must first set apart the portion coming to the heir.

APPEAL PROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 13, 1870.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

The judgment in the case of Perkins’ heirs on petition, directs that the land of the ancestor of the petitioners should be sold *“except the share of Lydia Burch, one of the heirs above "*her share is to be allotted off of the above tract of land by agreement of the other heirs, the residue will be exposed at public sale to the highest bidder on the premises.”

No other judgment for a sale of the land was rendered in the case, consequently, the commissioner had no authority or power to sell the share of Mrs. Burch in the land of her father; but it was his duty under the judgment to set apart to her, her portion of the land and sell the residue. And if he did attempt to sell her part, could not invest the purchaser with the title, nor could she be divested without her conveyance thereof by privy examina*499tion as directed by the Statute; and this was not done.

Turner, *for appellant.*

*Burnam, for appellee.*

Whether ior not the conveyance of her husband of her part of the land to an innocent purchaser for a valuable consideration without notice might not have invested him with the title we need not now decide as the question is not before us. Appellee was a party to the suit of Perkins’ heirs for a sale of the land and slaves, and had actual notice of the precise condition of the title; and urged that as a reason why his vendor Burch should sell it to him at not more than one half its value.

Besides Burch paid nothing for the land, it was paid for by deducting from the price the share of Mrs. Burch in her father’s estate, and the residue of the price was paid out of the price for which she sold eight acres and a fraction of the same land.

As the commissioner’s deed to J. Burch, and his .sale and conveyance to appellee created an impediment, and obscured appellant’s title by a cloud, she had a right to maintain her suit to remove the impediment, and to dissipate the cloud from her reversionary interest in one half of the land which she derived as one of the heirs of her mother. And this was eminently proper before the land passed into the hands of an innocent purchaser. And this she was entitled to under her prayer for general relief.

Appellee is entitled to the land during the life of J ames Burch who is tenant by the curtesy, and to one half thereof in fee, under his purchase from James O. Burch, one of the heirs of Mrs. Lydia Burch, and as to him the petition was properly dismissed. But as to Susan Ann Burch the judgment dismissing the petition was erroneous; and the same is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a judgment for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
9423.

#### BLUMENTHAL *v.*CAIN.

Where no authority for a private sale of property of a testator’s estate was conferred by the will, a contract privately made in behalf of the executors, by one of them, for a sale of land of the estate, providing that title should be perfected, was contrary to public policy; and an action for breach of the contract was not maintainable. v

Decided July 30, 1918.

Rehearing denied September 17, 1918.

Action for breach pf contract; ■ from Chatham superior court— Judge Meldrfm. November 22, 1917.

As to individual liability of an executor making an unauthorized contract ¡in behalf of the estate, counsel for the plaintiff cited: *Walton*v. *Reid,*148 *Ga.*176 (96 S. E. 214); *King*v. *Johnson,*96 *Ga.*498; 18 Cye. 248; 11 E. C. L. 166; Civil Code (1910), § 3613; *Anderson*v. *Foster,*105 *Ga.*563; *Parlcer*v. *Barlow,*93 *Ga.*700 (2); *Allen*v. *Hurst,*120 *Ga.*763.

*Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams,*for plaintiff.

*Adams & Adams,*for defendant.

Luke, J.

Blumenthal sued Cain, not as executor but as an individual, for $4,125 damages, alleging: that Cain, as executor of the Downs estate, and in behalf of the other executors, contracted with him in writing to sell to him certain land of the estate for $10,000 when the executors should perfect title to the property; that, under the will the defendant did not have authority to sell said property at private sale, but'the plaintiff did not know, this at the time the contract was made; that the plaintiff was at all times ready, able, and willing to pay to Cain the purchase-price stipulated, but Cain, instead of complying with the contract, in behalf of himself and the executors, offered the property for sale at public outcry, and it was then and there bid off by another person for $14,125, the market price of the property, and Cain thereby became indebted to the plaintiff in the sum sued for. The defendant demurred on the ground that no cause of action was set forth; The trial court sustained the demurrer on the ground “that the *597■contract is contrary to public policy and void, because sales by, executors, unless otherwise provided by the will, must be by public .outcry.”

Section 4035 of the Civil Code of 1910 declares .that “A private sale of land, under an obligation to perfect by legal formality, is contrary to public policy, and renders such sales always open to review at the option of parties at interest.”. “While such contracts are executory, being contrary to public policy, they can not be enforced either at law or in equity.” *Campbell Coal Co.*v. *Baker,*142 *Ga.*434 (83 S. E. 105). See also *Logan*v. *Gigley,*9 *Ga.*114; *Bond*v. *Watson,*22 *Ga.*637; *Downing*v. *Peabody,*56 *Ga.*40; Park’s Annot. Code, § 4253. It follows, therefore, that the court did not err in sustainiiig the demurrer and - dismissing the; petition.

*judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., concurs. Jenkins, J., not presiding.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 692 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 692

To amend the independent counsel provisions of title 28, United States 
 Code, to authorize the appointment of an independent counsel when the 
 Attorney General determines that Department of Justice employees have 
                      engaged in certain conduct.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1997

Mr. Traficant introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the independent counsel provisions of title 28, United States 
 Code, to authorize the appointment of an independent counsel when the 
 Attorney General determines that Department of Justice employees have 
                      engaged in certain conduct.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT COUNSEL.

    Section 592(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (A), by striking the period 
at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; or'', and by adding 
after subparagraph (B) the following:
            ``(C) the Attorney General, upon completion of a 
        preliminary examination under this chapter, determines that 
        there are reasonable grounds to believe that--
                    ``(i) employees of the Department of Justice have 
                engaged in misconduct, criminal activity, corruption, 
                or fraud, and
                    ``(ii) further investigation is warranted.''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"Space Launch System RS-25 Core Stage Engine","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UPBzEPFeUQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/space-launch-system-rs-25-core-stage-engine\/\">Space Launch System RS-25 Core Stage Engine<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/reference\/space-launch-system-rs-25-core-stage-engine\/embed\/#?secret=UPBzEPFeUQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Launch System RS-25 Core Stage Engine” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UPBzEPFeUQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/rs-25_engine_call-outs.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":401}
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26190]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at the conclusion of the open 
meeting.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109 
(formerly 2 U.S.C. 437g). Matters concerning participation in civil 
actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and 
internal rules and practices. Information the premature disclosure of 
which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the 
implementation of a proposed Commission action.
* * * * *

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-26190 Filed 10-30-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Package Delivery Drone Simulation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xAZEaFRrcj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/package-delivery-drone-simulation\/\">Package Delivery Drone Simulation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/package-delivery-drone-simulation\/embed\/#?secret=xAZEaFRrcj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Package Delivery Drone Simulation” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xAZEaFRrcj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/package-delivery-drone-simulation-graphic.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":443}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 848 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 848

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 1997

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
construction of the AuSable Hydroelectric Project in New York, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) Project Numbered 10836.--Notwithstanding the time period 
specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that 
would otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
project numbered 10836-000NY, the Commission shall, at the request of 
the licensee for the project, and after reasonable notice, in 
accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public interest 
requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures under that 
section, extend the time period during which the licensee is required 
to commence the construction of the project, under the extension 
described in subsection (b), for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year 
periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--This subsection shall take effect on the date 
of the expiration of the extension of the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
that the Commission issued, prior to the date of enactment of this Act, 
under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the license for the 
project referred to in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license 
effective as of the date of its expiration and extend the time required 
for commencement of construction of the project as provided in 
subsection (a) for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods, the 
first of which shall commence on the date of such expiration.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Ray Strong,

                                                Assistant to the Clerk.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Build an Anemometer","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3WMVqlUpTE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/build-an-anemometer\/\">Build an Anemometer<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/stem-content\/build-an-anemometer\/embed\/#?secret=3WMVqlUpTE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Build an Anemometer” — NASA\" data-secret=\"3WMVqlUpTE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/edu_srch_build_an_anemometer.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":259}