alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA Artemis Science, First Intuitive Machines Flight Head to Moon","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qBdy44nXPW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-artemis-science-first-intuitive-machines-flight-head-to-moon\/\">NASA Artemis Science, First Intuitive Machines Flight Head to Moon<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-artemis-science-first-intuitive-machines-flight-head-to-moon\/embed\/#?secret=qBdy44nXPW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Artemis Science, First Intuitive Machines Flight Head to Moon” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qBdy44nXPW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/ksc-20240215-ph-kls01-0023large.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"Elaine Ho","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tzFCohuumJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/elaine-ho\/\">Elaine Ho<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/elaine-ho\/embed\/#?secret=tzFCohuumJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Elaine Ho” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tzFCohuumJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/20200123-_dsc7790.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 816

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for certain amenities and personal

comforts in the Federal prison system.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 25, 1997

Mr. CASTLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for certain amenities

and personal comforts in the Federal prison system.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal No Frills Pris5 ons Act of 1997’’.
2

•HR 816 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR

2 CERTAIN AMENITIES AND PERSONAL COM3 FORTS IN THE FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM.

4 No Federal funds may be used to provide any of the

5 following amenities or personal comforts in the Federal

6 prison system:

7 (1) In-cell television viewing, except for pris8 oners who are segregated from the general prison

9 population for their own safety.

10 (2) Viewing of any motion picture rated R, X,

11 or NC–17, without regard to the medium through

12 which the motion picture is presented.

13 (3) Instruction (whether live or through broad14 casts), or training equipment, for boxing, wrestling,

15 judo, karate, or any other martial art, or any

16 bodybuilding or weightlifting equipment of any sort.

17 (4) Possession of any in-cell coffee pot, hot

18 plate, or heating element.

19 (5) Use or possession of any electric or elec20 tronic musical instrument.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISLE OF
CAPRI BLACK HAWK LLC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO SAID
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-25-1998
<CASH>                                             613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      347
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,358
<PP&E>                                          26,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,590
<BONDS>                                         75,000<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,564
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,031)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes Bonds payable of $75 million.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:15-cr-01517-DGC Document 3 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01517-DGC Document 3 Filed 10/15/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01517-DGC Document 3 Filed 10/15/15 Page 3 of 3
#### Samuel Dinklespeil *v.*John C. Sanders, Exor.

Pleading — Answer and Cross-Petition — Sufficiency of.

It is not alleged, in the answer and cross-petition of appellant, that the choses in action claimed to have been delivered to Sanders, were against solvent persons, nor that anything could have been collected by the- exercise of diligence. Held, Such being the case, no judgement could have been rendered on the eros^petition, and the proof fails to. cure the defect in the pleading.

APPEAL PROM TAYLOR CIRCUIT COURT.

January 27, 1872.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

It is uot alleged iu the answer and cross-petition of appellant, • that the choses in action, claimed to have been delivered by the assignee Parrott to Sanders, were against” solvent persons, nor that anything could have been collected on them by the exercise of the most extraordinary diligence. Nor is it alleged that any amount whatever was collected by Sanders. No discovery is asked for, and no claim for damages • against Sanders on account of anything done, or anything he failed to do touching such choses in action, is set up. Such being the case, no judgment could have been rendered on this cross-petition. The proof in the case does not tend to cure the defects of this pleading. The court did not err in failing to refer the matter fo the master. Appellant did not ask for such reference, and did not object to the submission of the cause when it was heard.

*683
      *Oaildwell &*Sachs, *for appellant.*

*J. B. Bobinson, for appellee.*

Under the pleadings and proof, the circuit judge could not avoid dismissing the cross-petition.

Judgment affirmed.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. and OAKLEY, 

INC., 

 Plaintiffs,

v.

RBZXR.COM, et al., 

 Defendants.

Case No. 20-cv-02297

Judge Marvin E. Aspen

Magistrate Judge Sidney I. Schenkier

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL UNDER RULE 41(a)(1)

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Luxottica 

Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) hereby dismiss this action with prejudice as to the 

following Defendant:

Defendant Name Line No.

ablibi2017 230

Dated this 29th day of May 2020. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Allyson M. Martin

Amy C. Ziegler

Justin R. Gaudio

Allyson M. Martin

Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd.

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2500

Chicago, Illinois 60606

312.360.0080 / 312.360.9315 (facsimile)

aziegler@gbc.law

jgaudio@gbc.law

amartin@gbc.law

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly M. Matter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kmatter\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Jeremiah O\u2019Callahan Values Native American Roots and Community Outreach","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SqoBgNogHl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/nasas-jeremiah-ocallahan-values-native-american-roots-and-community-outreach\/\">NASA\u2019s Jeremiah O\u2019Callahan Values Native American Roots and Community Outreach<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people-of-nasa\/nasas-jeremiah-ocallahan-values-native-american-roots-and-community-outreach\/embed\/#?secret=SqoBgNogHl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Jeremiah O\u2019Callahan Values Native American Roots and Community Outreach” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SqoBgNogHl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/jeremiah_and_astronaut_john_herrington.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":800}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Richard Di Donato, Individually and On 

Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Insys Therapeutics, Inc.; et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-16-00302-PHX-NVW 

ORDER 

 

 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement with 

Defendant Baker. (Doc. 341.) The Motion omits information necessary or helpful to 

whether to grant preliminary or final approval, including: 

1. The quantum of class damages is not stated or even estimated, even if disputed 

between the parties. 

2. The quantum of recovery to the class as a whole and as a proportion of claimed 

damages per shareholder is not stated, only the recovery per share if all class 

members apply. 

3. The source of funding of the $2,000,000 settlement amount is not stated. Is it 

from Defendant Baker’s personal resources? Is it partly or entirely from 

insurance resources? If from insurance resources, what are the nature and 

amounts of such policies and coverages? What are the limits in coverage 

amounts of each insurance source? How much of the total available insurance 

Case 2:16-cv-00302-NVW Document 342 Filed 05/26/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

coverage would be expended to fund the Settlement? What insurance coverage 

would remain for the benefit of the non-settling defendants? 

These data are surely within the knowledge or estimate of the parties and should 

have been stated in the Motion and in the proposed class disclosure. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the settling parties file by June 9, 2020, a 

Supplement to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement with Defendant 

Baker (Doc. 341) giving the foregoing information. 

Dated: May 26, 2020. 

Case 2:16-cv-00302-NVW Document 342 Filed 05/26/20 Page 2 of 2
#### WALTER CARR, DEFENDANT IN CERTIORARI, v. FEDERAL SHIP BUILDING AND DRYDOCK CO., PROSECUTOR IN CERTIORARI.

Submitted January 22, 1946

Decided February 4, 1946.

Before Justices Case, Bodine and Peksicie.

.. Eor the prosecutor, *Stryker, Tams & Horner*and *William L. Dill, Jr.*

For the defendant, *Jacob 8. Spiro*and *Joseph Moritz.*

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. In the Bureau there was an award. This was affirmed by the Court of Common Pleas. *Certiorari*was allowed. There is no question in the case as to the petitioner’s injury. The sole question is whether it was due to an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.

The petitioner testified that while climbing up a stepladder he felt cramps in his left leg, lost his balance and fell to the ground a distance of four or five feet; that he hit his head and injured his left ann.

Edward Ahrens, a sub-foreman under whom the petitioner worked, testified that when he first saw him on the day of the occurrence he was lying up against the bulkhead against the deck house, one leg under the back of the deck house and the rest of him was out from the deck house about seven feet from the base of the ladder. The men picked him up. The petitioner was assistant to a mechanic — he carried materials to the mechanic. There were no marks or scars on petitioner’s body when Ahrens found him. .

Joseph Dainoski, a registered nurse who answered the ambulance call, took the petitioner to St. Francis Hospital in *565Jersey City. Petitioner complained of a tingling sensation in the fingers of his right hand and difficulty in moving his left leg and arm; he was drooling from the left side of his mouth. The nurse found no marks, bruises, scratches or bumps on his head or body. The record in the hospital diagnosed the case as one of cerebral hemorrhage.

If the petitioner had fallen four or five feet and struck his head, there would have been bruises and scratches on his head and body. Further, if he had fallen off the ladder it is difficult to understand how he could have been found seven feet away from it. A cerebral hemorrhage may occur without a blow of any kind. Unless all the probabilities are rejected and the petitioner’s bare statement that he fell, which is not corroborated in any way, is accepted as conclusive, there is no way to sustain the judgment below. The probabilities, in the absence of any direct proof, must weigh in favor of the accident. This we do not think they do. *Azarowicz v. Metropolitan Beef Co.,*118 *N. J. L.*89; see, also, *Gilbert*v. *Gilbert Machine Works, Inc., 122 Id.*533.

The judgment is reversed, but without costs.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Roberta Lipson, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Chindex International, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.June 23, 2006   /s/ Roberta Lipson   Roberta Lipson  Chief Executive Officer and President  (Principal Executive Officer)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

MSHIFT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

DIGITAL INSIGHT CORPORATION 

(doing business as Intuit Financial Services), 

Defendant-Appellee. 

and 

COMMUNITY TRUST BANK, MOBILE MONEY 

VENTURES, LLC, MERITRUST CREDIT UNION, 

PROFESSIONAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, 

SANFORD INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS, FORT 

WORTH COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, USE 

CREDIT UNION, GATE CITY BANK, BUSEY BANK, 

DENSION STATE BANK, FIDELITY BANK, FIRST 

INTERNET BANK OF INDIANA, and VISION BANK,

Defendants-Appellees.

and 

SK C&C CO., LTD., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2011-1057 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-0710, Judge 

William H. Alsup. 
______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

JAMES C. OTTESON, Agility IP Law, of East Palo Alto, 

California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on 

the brief was XIANG LONG. Of counsel on the brief was 

MELINDA M. MORTON, Bergeson, LLP, of San Jose, 

California. Of counsel was MONICA MUCCHETTI ENO, 

Agility IP Law, of East Palo Alto, California. 

HEATHER N. MEWES, Fenwick & West LLP, of San 

Francisco, California, argued for all defendants-appellees. 

With her on the brief was HECTOR J. RIBERA for Digital 

Insight Corporation. On the brief were ANDREW P.

VALENTINE and BRENT K. YAMASHITA, of DLA Piper LLP, 

of East Palo Alto, California, for defendants-appellees 

Community Trust Bank, et al.; and HAE-CHAN PARK and 

WAYNE M. HELGE, of H.C. Park & Associates, PLC, of 

Vienna, Virginia, for defendants-appellees SK C&C Co. 

Ltd, and Mobile Money Ventures, LLC; and BRAIN S.

SEAL, of Highbury Chapman, LLC, of Washington, DC, for 

defendant-appellee SK C&C Co. Ltd. Of counsel was ERIK 

R. FUEHRER, of DLA Piper LLP, of East Palo Alto, 

California. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, MAYER, and O’MALLEY, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk