alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-92","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hzC8R85L2l\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-92\/\">STS-92<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-92\/embed\/#?secret=hzC8R85L2l\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-92” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hzC8R85L2l\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/0500977\/0500977~large.jpg?w=600&h=1497&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1497}
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/
    
    Michael S. LipscombMichael S. LipscombChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/
    
    John S. GloverJohn S. GloverChief Financial Officer
 24
Case 2:15-mj-01705-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01705-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01705-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/24/15 Page 3 of 3
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  (18
U.S.C.ss.1350)

         Pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350), the undersigned,  ReiJane Huai, Chief Executive Officer of FalconStor
Software, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

         The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December 31,
2003 of the Company (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Sections  13(a)  and  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  and the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ ReiJane Huai
                                        ------------------------------
                                        ReiJane Huai
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        March 12, 2004
```
#### Thomas Elder, &c. *v.*Daniel Procise.

Vendor and Purchaser — Rescission—Improvements.

A purchaser from one holding lands in fee subject to be defeated upon his dying without issue, buys in good 'faith and is entitled to recover improvements just the amount the land was enhanced in value at the date of suit of the heirs, he being liable for rent, beginning at the same time.

APPEAL EROM JEEEEÉSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY BRANCH.

February 29, 1872.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters:

There can be no question that Hiram Tucker took, under the will of his father, the fee in the land sued for, subject to be defeated by his dying without issue, and upon the happening of that event the title to the 132 acres of land vested in his surviving brothers and sisters.

But appellee, the vendee of Hiram Tucker, paid the full value of the land, and doubtless put the improvements on it in good faith, believing at the time that the land was his, he had the deed of his vender with a covenant of general warranty. And having made the improvements in good faith, appellee was entitled to be paid for them, just the amount the land was enhanced in value at the time the suit was brought, he being liable for rent beginning at the same time.

Appellants are to be charged with the value of the estate each received as heirs of Hiram Tucker, that value to be estimated at the time of his death, which is $4,400 in all, but in estimating the *535value of that inheritance, the value of the dower right of the widow of decedent should be deducted. Certainly their inheritance from their brother of the 51 acres and odd poles of land was the worth of each one’s portion subject to the dower interest of the widow of their brother therein, and they should not be charged more than the land they inherited was actually worth at the time, and its cash value, to be ascertained by means of annuity tables, taking into consideration the age and health of the widow, and that should be deducted.

*James Harrison, for appellants.*

Barnett, *for appellee.*

Appellants are not entitled to any allowance for the stable that was burned pn the 132 acres of land, as it was not burned by any fault of appellee.

It does not appear from the report of the master that the improvements put on the land were changed to appellant at their original cost, or whether he estimated them at the time he made his report' — but neither aspect presents the case according to the rights .of the parties. Appellee is only entitled to be allowed for the improvements made by him just .the amount they enhanced or added to the value of the land at the time the suit was brought.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with directions that further proceedings be had not inconsistent herewith. And it may be proper to add that the judgment for the sale of appellants’ interests in the land is also reversed,, and the sale is set aside.
### NUMBER 13

- 10

- 00 527

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

STATE FARM COUNTY GENERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY

, APPELLANT,

v.

LESLIE TORRES A/K/A LESLIE ANN LUCIO TORRES

A/K/A LESLIE ANN SERRATO A/K/A LESLIE LUCIO

- SERRATO



### , APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________ _______________

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

of Matagorda County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza

, Vela , and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court on a defective notice of appeal and appellant's

failure to co rrect the defect. On November 3, 2010, and February 8 , 20 11 , the Court

advised appellant that the notice of appeal was not in compliance with Texas Rule of2

Appellate Procedure 25.1(d) (2) and informed appellant that the appeal would be

dismissed if the defect was not cured after the expiration of ten days from the date of

receipt of the Court's notice. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d) (2) , 37.1, 42.3(b),(c).

A ppellant has failed to correct the defect or otherwise respond to the Court's notices.

On its own motion, with ten days notice to the parties, an appellate court may

dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution or failure to comply with a notice from the

clerk requiring a re sponse or other action within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and failure to

comply with a notice from the Court. See id.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

31st day of March , 20 11

.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64721-64722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25725]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2014-0366; FRL-9918-55-Region-6]


Arkansas: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

ACTION: Proposed rule

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Arkansas has applied to EPA for Final 
authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant 
Final authorization to the State of Arkansas. In the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the 
changes by an immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior 
to the direct final rule because we believe this action is not 
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
direct final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the direct final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw

[[Page 64722]]

the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We will then respond 
to public comments in a later final rule based on this proposal. You 
may not have another opportunity for comment. If you want to comment on 
this action, you must do so at this time.

DATES: Send your written comments by December 1, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Arkansas during normal business 
hours at the following locations: Arkansas Department of Environmental 
Quality, 8101 Interstate 30, Little Rock, Arkansas 72219-8913, (501) 
682-0876, and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733, phone number (214) 665-8533 ; or Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule 
which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
direct final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of 
this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 22, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2014-25725 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

PAYPHONE WIND DOWNCORPORATION**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, GUY A. LONGOBARDO, am the Chief Executive Officerof Payphone Wind Down Corporation (the “Company”).

 

This certification is being furnished pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006(the “Report”).

 

I hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(a)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  October 9, 2007 |                                         |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                         |
|                   | /s/ Guy A. Longobardo                        |   |
|                   | Guy  A. Longobardo *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Payphone Wind Down Corporation andwill be retained by Payphone Wind Down Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"NASA Coverage Set for Uncrewed Soyuz Undocking, Departure","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8uXY3oKPUG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-coverage-set-for-uncrewed-soyuz-undocking-departure\/\">NASA Coverage Set for Uncrewed Soyuz Undocking, Departure<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-coverage-set-for-uncrewed-soyuz-undocking-departure\/embed\/#?secret=8uXY3oKPUG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Coverage Set for Uncrewed Soyuz Undocking, Departure” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8uXY3oKPUG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/soyuz_m22.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 12, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

                    1.                     *Laura Lee Lehmberg Austin,*                     Mason, Texas; to acquire voting shares of Commercial Company, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Commercial Bank, both in Mason, Texas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 23, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-25590 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Clinton JENNINGS also known as, Gato also known as, Blacc Gato, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-10821.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 22, 2005.

Michael Gill, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Larry Chris lies, Rockport, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.*

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate sentence and remand for resentencing is granted.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA to Provide Live Coverage of Space Station Crew Landing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YdCeDVcu4z\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-provide-live-coverage-of-space-station-crew-landing\/\">NASA to Provide Live Coverage of Space Station Crew Landing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-to-provide-live-coverage-of-space-station-crew-landing\/embed\/#?secret=YdCeDVcu4z\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Provide Live Coverage of Space Station Crew Landing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"YdCeDVcu4z\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/50563964032_57134c1431_k.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

                In connection withthe Quarterly Report of PawnMart, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John R. Boudreau,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to §906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to my knowledge:

 

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/  John R. Boudreau

 

John R. Boudreau

President and Chief Executive Officer

February 14, 2003

 

 

----