alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service.TM

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         October 31, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 27, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 97 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-5, CP2015-6.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2014-25963 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7099

DENNIS LEE PERRY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. CATOE; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES M. CONDON, South Carolina Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-313-7-13BG) Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 18, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dennis Lee Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We have accorded Perry the benefit of Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Lee Perry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Although Perry’s § 2254 petition was untimely, the district court denied relief for failure to exhaust state remedies. Because Perry’s § 2254 was filed outside the applicable one-year limitations period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for that reason. See Hernandez v. Caldwell , 225 F.3d 435, 439 (4th Cir. 2000). Under Hernandez , Perry had until April 24, 1997 to file his § 2254 petition, and he did not file until January 21, 2001. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered March 25, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00134-CR

No. 05-15-00135-CR

RAMON MILLER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-16131-Q, F10-34161-Q

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s motion to establish a new timetable for the appeal. 

Appellant asserts that although his motion for new trial was filed on September 9, 2013 and his 

notice of appeal was filed on October 2, 2013, the notice of appeal was not forwarded to this 

Court until counsel was appointed on January 30, 2015. We note that appellant filed a separate 

motion in cause no. 05-15-00134-CR, which was previously granted. The clerk’s record has 

been filed in that appeal, as well as the reporter’s record for both appeals. Accordingly, we

GRANT appellant’s motion in cause no. 05-15-00135-CR as follows.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in cause no. 05-

15-00135-CR (trial court no. F10-34161-Q) within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief for both cases within FORTY-FIVE DAYS of the 

date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Felicia 

Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1



                      [Preformed Line Products Letterhead]





                                                                  March 10, 2003



Mr. Randy Ruhlman
Ruhlman Motor Sports
2530 Brandt Forest Court
Greensboro, NC  27455


Hi Randy:

Dan, Terry and I had a great time at the Tampa-St. Pete event. We enjoyed the
hospitality that you and Cristi made available to us and our customers. Clearly,
hosting smaller groups in the paddock area is more cost effective. Besides, in
my view, it's more exciting to be right there witnessing all of the action as
the cars are being readied for the event.

As we discussed, Preformed Line Products is committed to paying a sponsorship
fee of $658,000 for the 2003 season to Ruhlman Motorsports. I know of no other
practical method to reach and partner with our customers in such an exciting,
but cost effective, manner.

Enclosed is the first payment of $300,000 to be credited towards the 2003
sponsorship fee. The payment schedule for the remainder of the 2003 fee is as
follows:

                              APRIL 2003 - $158,000
                              MAY 2003 - $100,000
                              JUNE 2003 - $100,000


<PAGE>

Randy, we look forward to employing this unique venue as an exciting way to
build stronger relationships with many of our key customers. We like these
events because you and your staff are very focused on our customers. You always
take the time to shower the customers with special attention while providing any
information requested about you, the equipment and the event. We're building
strong memories with our customers that we hope will result in additional PLP
product purchases now and in the future.

We look forward to working with you and your staff this season.

                                           Best regards,



                                           Jon Barnes

RJB:jkj

cc:      J. R. Ruhlman, R. G. Ruhlman
bcc:     E. R. Graef, W. H. Haag
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER OJI DARKINS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

DAVID SNOWDEN, in his official

capacity as Beverly Hills Chief of Police,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-56865

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-03831-JLSMAN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 26, 2016** 

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Oji Darkins appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging violations of the Privileges and Immunities Clause of

the United States Constitution. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

FILED

MAY 02 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review de novo. Chubb Custom Ins. Co. v. Space Sys./Loral, Inc., 710 F.3d 946,

956 (9th Cir. 2013) (dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)); Sommatino v. United States, 255 F.3d 704, 707 (9th Cir.

2001) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Darkins’ action because Darkins

cannot state a claim directly under the United States Constitution. See Arpin v.

Santa Clara Valley Transp. Agency, 261 F.3d 912 (9th Cir. 2001) (“This Court has

held that a litigant complaining of a violation of a constitutional right does not

have a direct cause of action under the United States Constitution but must utilize

42 U.S.C. § 1983.”). 

Moreover, to the extent that Darkins’ complaint can be liberally construed to

allege claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the district court properly dismissed

Darkins’ action because Darkins failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible

claim. See United Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Camden, 465 U.S. 208, 217

(1984) (in-state residents “have no claim under the Privileges and Immunities

Clause” to challenge their state’s laws). 

AFFIRMED.

2 13-56865
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

William Lane Craig,

Defendant.

No. 15-04397PO-001-PCT-DMF

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived and the detention hearing was submitted on the record. The Court 

finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his unsupervised 

probation as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), 

that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight 

risk or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his unsupervised probation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as flight risk and 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 10th day of July, 2018.

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, R.
Christopher Hoehn-Saric, Chief Executive Officer of Educate, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | This Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ R. Christopher Hoehn-SaricName:

R. Christopher Hoehn-SaricDate:

March 16, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



97
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Moving Forward to Enable a Low-Earth Orbit Economy","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XyxU8Is8bv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-moving-forward-to-enable-a-low-earth-orbit-economy\/\">NASA Moving Forward to Enable a Low-Earth Orbit Economy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-moving-forward-to-enable-a-low-earth-orbit-economy\/embed\/#?secret=XyxU8Is8bv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Moving Forward to Enable a Low-Earth Orbit Economy” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XyxU8Is8bv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/dragon_cygnus_iss060e022993large.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23

- 0545 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. CHARLES GALEN LANE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Robin Lee is granted an extension of time to and including February 15 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested on appeal. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2024

01/25/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0545
<PAGE>   1


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE

                        1997 SPECTRA-PHYSICS LASERS, INC.
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN

     Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 9 of the 1997
Spectra-Physics Lasers, Inc. Stock Option Plan (the "Plan"), Spectra-Physics
Lasers, Inc. hereby amends the Plan, effective September 1, 2000 as follows:



     1. SECTION 2.6 IS HEREBY AMENDED IN ITS ENTIRETY TO READ AS FOLLOWS:

          "'Committee' means the committee designated by the Board to administer
     the Plan under Section 4. No later than the date of the first meeting of
     stockholders of the Company held to elect directors after December 31,
     2000, the Committee shall have at least two members, each of whom shall be
     a non-employee director (as such term is defined in Rule 16b-3) and an
     Outside Director. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board may designate
     one or more of its members to serve as a Secondary Committee and delegate
     to the Secondary Committee authority to grant Options to eligible
     individuals who are not subject to the requirements of Rule 16b-3 or
     Section 162(m) of the Code. The Secondary Committee shall have the same
     authority with respect to selecting the individuals to whom such Options
     are granted and establishing the terms and conditions of such Options as
     the Committee has under the terms of the Plan."

                                      * * *

     To record the adoption of this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan, Spectra-Physics
Lasers, Inc. has authorized its officers to execute this Amendment this ___ day
of ____________, 2000.


                                            SPECTRA-PHYSICS LASERS, INC.



Attest :                                     By:
         ----------------------                 ---------------------------
#### A. G. Slicer *v.*Thos. A. Palmer.

Mortgages — Prior Lien — Pro Rata Distribution Among Creditors — Fraudulent Conveyances.

APPEAL EROM ELEMING CIRCUIT COURT.

September 23, 1870.

*595Andrews, *for appellant.*

*Cox,*Given, *for appellee.*

John N. Warren, an insolvent contractor for tbe partial construction of the Maysville railroad, being indebted to Thomas A. Palmer for five carts, mortgaged them to William P. Price to secure, and also to the appellant, A. C. Slicer, by separate deeds for securing distinct debts to each.

On Palmer’s petition, charging that each mortgage was made to secure an antecedent debt and for the purpose of preferring those creditors, and therefore claiming distribution, the circuit court decreed a sale and *pro rata*payment of all the creditors. The appellant, Slicer, showing that a portion of his debt was contracted simultaneously with and on the faith of the mortgage, claims a reversal on that ground.

But, as the residue of the integral consideration was a preexisting debt, his defense is unavailing.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed on Sliver’s appeal.

And as Palmer -held no lien and even a fraudulent purchase from him by Warren did not affect the mortgages as purchasers without notice, the judgment is affirmed also on his cross-appeal.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Starliner Launches to Space Station on Uncrewed Flight Test for NASA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5Q1TjOtoo3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/starliner-launches-to-space-station-on-uncrewed-flight-test-for-nasa\/\">Starliner Launches to Space Station on Uncrewed Flight Test for NASA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/starliner-launches-to-space-station-on-uncrewed-flight-test-for-nasa\/embed\/#?secret=5Q1TjOtoo3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Starliner Launches to Space Station on Uncrewed Flight Test for NASA” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5Q1TjOtoo3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/oft-2_launch_image.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":385}
#### Samuel Belknap vs. Schooner *Elizabeth,*1752

*555J Aplin for the Respondent

*556At a Court of Vice Admiralty Held at Newport in the County of Newport and. Colony of Rhode Island, on Monday the Ninth of October A. D. 1752 at Ten o Clock A. M.

Present The Honorable Samuel Wickham Esqr Deputy Judge.

The Court being opened.

Petition of Sam11 Belknap was read in Court and Sam11 Freeman’s Petition. Viz4 which was allowed. And the Court was adjourn’d untill Monday next at Ten o Clock A. M. by request of the Respondent ■— And opened Accordingly.

The Respondents Plea was Read in Court Viz4 and the exception taken by the Resp4 was overrul’d by the Judge. And the Court was adjourn’d untill three o Clock P. M. And opened Accordingly. Interlocutory Decree was read in Court Viz4

*557Abraham Belknap being solemnly sworn, Declared that he verily beleived that the matters and things contained in the Suggestions are true.

Decree was read Viz* And the Court was adjourn’d untill further notice.
Exhibit
13.1









PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERCERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro
Tankers (Bahamas III) Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Tor Olav
Trøim, the Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




·
            The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




·
            The information contained in the Report fairly
      presents,in all material respects,
      the financial condition andresults of operations of the
Company.




A signed original of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.




Date:  May
20, 2009




/s/ Tor Olav
Trøim


Tor
Olav Trøim


Principal
Executive Officer