alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Executive Office of the President

###### Office of National Drug Control Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of National Drug Control Policy.

# ACTION:

Notice of removal of HIDTA county designation.

# SUMMARY:

The Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) removed 5 counties as High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas (HIDTA) counties pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 1706, effective September 29, 2014. The 5 counties removed from HIDTA county designation within the Appalachia HIDTA are (1) Cumberland and Clinton Counties in Kentucky; (2) Clay and White Counties in Tennessee; and (3) Mason County in West Virginia. The Executive Board of the Appalachia HIDTA requested removal of these counties from designation after assessing the threat and determining that these counties no longer met the statutory criteria necessary for designation as HIDTA counties. ONDCP evaluated and accepted the request.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions regarding this notice should be directed to Michael K. Gottlieb, National HIDTA Program Director, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-4868.

Dated: October 27, 2014.

Daniel Rader,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2014-25994 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 

1, 2019

Order 

Clerk

March 1, 2019

156579(69)

GENESEE COUNTY DRAIN COMMISSIONER

JEFFREY WRIGHT,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON, DENNIS

BOW, KARYN MILLER, BONNIE MATHIS,

PAULA ZELENKO, MARILYN HOFFMAN,

LARRY GREEN, JAKE LAFURGEY, RAY

FOUST, DAVID GUIGEAR, ROBERT M.

PALMER, RICK CARUSO, WILLIAM W.

KOVL, MAXINE ORR, VILLAGE OF

GOODRICH, VILLAGE OF GAINES, VILLAGE

OF LENNON, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF

MUNDY, TOWNSHIP OF ARGENTINE,

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FLINT, CHARTER

TOWNSHIP OF MT. MORRIS, TOWNSHIP OF

GAINES, and CITY OF FLUSHING,

Plaintiffs,

SC: 156579

v COA: 331023

Genesee CC: 11-097012-CK

GENESEE COUNTY,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

GENESEE COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to file a response to 

the brief amicus curiae filed by the City of Flint is GRANTED. The response submitted 

on February 27, 2019, is accepted for filing.
#### Wilson *v.*The State.

The statute of 1825, authorizing special sessions, of the Circuit Court, does Hot warrant the finding of an indictment at the special term, against any other' person than the one for whose trial the Court was convened.

ERROR to the *Gibson*Circuit Courts

*Hall,*for the plaintiff.

*Fletcher,*for the state.

Blackford, J.

There was a special Court called in *Gibson*county for the trial of one *David Ewing,*who was in prison on a charge of larceny. At that special Court the present indictment against *Wilson*was found; which was continued until the next regular term of the Circuit Court, when, upon the general issue, a verdict and judgment were rendered against the defendant.

This proceeding is erroneous. We are of opinion that the act of the legislature, authorizing special sessions of the *Court*for the trial of particular cases therein stated, does not warrant the grand jury in finding any indictments at such special term, except against the person or persons for whose trial the Court was thus particularly convened. Stat. *Jan.*1825, p. 21 (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed.

(1)

**This statute is repealed. Stat. 1826, p. 23;
#### G. H. B. Thompson *v.*Samuel L. Cooper et al.

Guardian and W ard — Purchase of Land xor Ward — Title in Triist.

A guardian is not bound • to advance his own means to protect the land of his infant wards, but as he did1 purchase it for their benefit, he held the legal title in trust for them.

Same — Limitation.

The appellees did not lose their right to maintain this 'action by reason of their failure to- sue immediately after arriving at age.

Same — Notice of Holding.

It is1 the duty of a Guardian to notify his ward of the manner in which he holds his land, and) if he fails, within a reasonable time to offer to refund the money advanced by his guardian, he will lose his right.

Same — Jurisdiction.

This is in effect, an action to enforce the performance of a personal duty, and nou to secure the possession of land, and is therefore not local.

APPEAL PROM BRACKEN CIRCUIT OOURT.

April 21, 1871.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lindsay :

Although appellant was not bound legally to advance his own means in the protection of the lands of, his infant wards, yet it appears from the evidence'in this case, that he did purchase the fifty acres of land for their benefit, and that by stating that such was his intention at the time he bid for the same, he thereby prevented other parties from bidding. The court did not err in adjudging that he held the title in trust for the appellees, nor do we think that appellees have lost their right to maintain *337tbis action, by reason of tbeir failure to sue immediately after arriving at age. In all cases tbe law requires the utmost good faith upon the part of the guardian in transactions with his wards relative to their estate. It was his duty to have notified the appellees of the manner in which he held their land, and if he had done this, and they had not, within a reasonable time, offered to refund to him the money advanced for their benefit, the case would have been different. But he seems to have ¿laimed the land as his own and denied their title and to have occupied and enjoyed the samé until the rents and profits will go very far towards discharging his claim against them, and now seeks to avoid responsibility on account of this violation of his duty as a fiduciary. The question of jurisdiction is not raised in the pleadings, but if it had been, we ■ do not regard it as available. This is in effect an action to enforce the performance of a personal duty, and not to recover the possession of land and is therefore not local in its character.

*Willis &*Taylor, *for appellant.*

*Doniphan, for appellees.*

Judgment affirmed.
Case 2:16-cr-00005-GMS Document 3 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00005-GMS Document 3 Filed 11/19/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00005-GMS Document 3 Filed 11/19/15 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01783-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01783-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01783-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/27/15 Page 3 of 3
#### Bates v. Wernwag.

In error.

*Friday, March*24, 1837.

A PLAINTIFF obtained a judgment before a justice on a note dated the 12th of *January,*1833, bearing interest at a higher rate than 6 *per cent, per annum.*The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court. *Held,*that upon the plaintiff’s recovery in the Circuit Court, he was entitled to interest up to the time of such recovery at the rate mentioned in the note (1).

(1)

 In 1833, and soon after the date of the note mentioned in the text, the law relative to interest was changed. *See*note to *Harvey*v. *Crawford,*Vol. 2 of these Rep. 43. *See,*also, Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 336.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Unpacking the Future of Supersonic Air Travel","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mxCGRrG7FM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/unpacking-future-of-supersonic-air-travel\/\">Unpacking the Future of Supersonic Air Travel<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/unpacking-future-of-supersonic-air-travel\/embed\/#?secret=mxCGRrG7FM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Unpacking the Future of Supersonic Air Travel” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mxCGRrG7FM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/p20-234-59.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Adam E. Lang (022545)

Jennifer A. Stevens (024655)

SNELL & WILMER

One Arizona Center

400 E. Van Buren St., Ste. 1900

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202

Telephone: (602) 382-6000

Facsimile: (602) 382-6070

Email: alang@swlaw.com jstevens@swlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Wells Fargo Bank NA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Merillin La Rue,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., an 

Ohio corporation; Wells Fargo Bank, 

National Assoc., a California corporation, 

and XCeed Financial Credit Union, a 

foreign corporation,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01995-SRB

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Please Take Notice, Plaintiff Merillin La Rue and Defendant Wells Fargo Bank,

N.A. have reached an agreement to resolve this matter. The parties anticipate filing a

dismissal with prejudice, as to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. only, within 60 days

from the date of this Notice.

DATED this 23rd day of June, 2016.

SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.

By s/Jennifer A. Stevens

Adam E. Lang

Jennifer A. Stevens

Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case 2:15-cv-01995-SRB Document 63 Filed 06/23/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 23, 2016, I electronically transmitted 

the foregoing document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and for 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the participating CM/ECF Registrants. 

s/ Jennifer A. Stevens

24347386

Case 2:15-cv-01995-SRB Document 63 Filed 06/23/16 Page 2 of 2
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 895

To amend section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968

to improve the housing counseling program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 27, 1997

Mr. TRAFICANT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend section 106 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 to improve the housing counseling

program of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Housing Counseling

5 Enhancement Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

7 (a) EMERGENCY HOMEOWNERSHIP COUNSELING.—

8 Section 106(c)(9) of the Housing and Urban Development
2

•HR 895 IH

1 Act of 1968 (12 U.S.C. 1701x(c)(9)) is amended by strik2 ing ‘‘September 30, 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30,

3 1999’’.

4 (b) PREPURCHASE AND FORECLOSURE PREVENTION

5 COUNSELING DEMONSTRATION.—Section 106(d)(13) of

6 the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 (12

7 U.S.C. 1701x(d)(12)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year

8 1994’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal year 1999’’.

9 SEC. 3. NOTIFICATION OF DELINQUENCY ON VETERANS

10 HOME LOANS.

11 Subparagraph (C) of section 106(c)(5) of the Hous12 ing and Urban Development Act of 1968 is amended to

13 read as follows:

14 ‘‘(C) NOTIFICATION.—Notification under

15 subparagraph (A) shall not be required with re16 spect to any loan for which the eligible home17 owner pays the amount overdue before the expi18 ration of the 45-day period under subparagraph

19 (B)(ii).’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.36.1

                           [LETTERHEAD OF CONOCO INC.]



July 22, 2002



Archie W. Dunham
600 N. Dairy Ashford
Houston, Texas  77070

RE:  Employment Agreement of November 18, 2001

Dear Mr. Dunham:

         Please refer to the Employment Agreement, dated as of November 18,
2001, between you, Conoco Inc. and ConocoPhillips. The capitalized terms in the
Agreement will have the same meaning here, unless otherwise specified.

         Under your Employment Agreement, ConocoPhillips (called "New Parent" in
the Agreement) has agreed to provide you the compensation and benefits described
in Section 2(b) of the Agreement, beginning on the Agreement Effective Date. By
signing this letter, you acknowledge and agree that ConocoPhillips will satisfy
this obligation by causing its wholly owned subsidiary administering the payroll
for former employees of Conoco Inc., to provide you the compensation and
benefits described in Section 2(b) of the Agreement.

                                                Sincerely,



                                                /s/ R. A. Harrington
                                                --------------------------------
                                                R. A. Harrington






/s/ Archie W. Dunham
----------------------------------
Archie W. Dunham
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Technology Missions Launch on SpaceX Falcon Heavy","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7LcmMcyeok\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-technology-missions-launch-on-spacex-falcon-heavy\/\">NASA Technology Missions Launch on SpaceX Falcon Heavy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-technology-missions-launch-on-spacex-falcon-heavy\/embed\/#?secret=7LcmMcyeok\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Technology Missions Launch on SpaceX Falcon Heavy” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7LcmMcyeok\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/48124976652_41523f3a2f_o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":413}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 876 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 876

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
  for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals to 100 
                         percent of such costs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 1997

    Mrs. Kelly (for herself, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Bentsen, Mr. Burton of 
Indiana, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Fattah, Mr. Filner, Mr. Goodling, 
  Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Linder, Mr. McHugh, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
Metcalf, Mr. Minge, Ms. Molinari, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Pitts, 
  Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Riggs, Ms. Rivers, Mr. Scarborough, Mr. Bob 
   Schaffer of Colorado, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Smith of 
  Michigan, Mr. Thornberry, and Ms. Woolsey) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
  for the health insurance costs of self-employed individuals to 100 
                         percent of such costs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Self-Employed Health Fairness Act of 
1997''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS OF SELF-
              EMPLOYED INDIVIDUALS TO 100 PERCENT OF SUCH COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 162(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health insurance 
costs of self-employed individuals) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Allowance of deduction.--In the case of an individual 
        who is an employee within the meaning of section 401(c)(1), 
        there shall be allowed as a deduction under this section an 
        amount equal to 100 percent of the amount paid during the 
        taxable year for insurance which constitutes medical care for 
        the taxpayer, his spouse, and dependents.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31


                          CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Steve McKerihan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,  and all reports on Form 6-K
or Form 8-K  containing  distribution  or servicing  reports filed in respect of
periods  included in the year covered by this annual  report,  of Crusade Global
Trust No. 2 of 2003;

2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports,  taken as a whole,
does not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements   made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and  servicing,  or
similar,  agreements,  for  inclusion  in these  reports  is  included  in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and  servicing,  or similar,  agreements and based upon my knowledge
and the annual  compliance  review required under that agreement,  and except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant  deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards based upon the report provided
by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers or similar
procedure,  as set forth in the pooling and servicing,  or similar,  agreements,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Perpetual Trustees Consolidated Limited


                                               /s/ S. McKerihan
                                               --------------------------------
                                               S. McKerihan
                                               CFO - Crusade Management Limited
                                               Date: December 14, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.F

                DESCRIPTION OF THE MASCO CORPORATION PROGRAM FOR
                  ESTATE, FINANCIAL PLANNING AND TAX ASSISTANCE

         In order to assure that the Company's senior executives are fully aware
of the tax, legal and financial implications of the Company's benefit programs,
the Company has established a program to provide senior executives with
assistance in their estate, financial and tax planning matters. Under this
program, the Company will pay up to $10,000 for such professional services each
year, with a special "carry-forward" of the second year's $10,000 allowance
during the first year to cover additional costs associated with development of
an initial estate and financial plan. The Company will inform each participant
during the course of this process as to the amount of professional fees
allocated to services performed on such participant's behalf under the program.
The value of any such services received will be taxable as ordinary income to
the participant.