alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Astronaut Shane Kimbrough Available for Interviews Before Space Station Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"m9LsyjWSWG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-shane-kimbrough-available-for-interviews-before-space-station-mission\/\">NASA Astronaut Shane Kimbrough Available for Interviews Before Space Station Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-astronaut-shane-kimbrough-available-for-interviews-before-space-station-mission\/embed\/#?secret=m9LsyjWSWG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut Shane Kimbrough Available for Interviews Before Space Station Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"m9LsyjWSWG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/25208654116_fe7560305e_o_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":432}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"Barry “Butch” E. Wilmore","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"64FNYS1x2F\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/barry-butch-e-wilmore\/\">Barry “Butch” E. Wilmore<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/barry-butch-e-wilmore\/embed\/#?secret=64FNYS1x2F\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Barry “Butch” E. Wilmore” — NASA\" data-secret=\"64FNYS1x2F\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/9367741944_1c2e5003a2_o_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A2491. DUNBAR et al. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.

Appellant Marcia Dunbar has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Based on

the appellate record, Dunbar isthe sole party entitled to appeal. The motion is hereby

GRANTED, and the appeal is withdrawn. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 05, 2019

08/05/2019
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 792 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 792

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent Federal prisoners 
  from engaging in activities to increase their strength or fighting 
                        ability while in prison.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Ms. Pryce of Ohio (for herself, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Herger, Ms. Molinari, 
 Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. Ney, Mr. Kingston, and Mr. Foley) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prevent Federal prisoners 
  from engaging in activities to increase their strength or fighting 
                        ability while in prison.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prison Security Enhancement Act of 
1997''.

SEC. 2. PRISON SECURITY.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 4048. Strength-training of prisoners prohibited
    ``The Bureau of Prisons shall take care that--
            ``(1) prisoners under its jurisdiction do not engage in any 
        activities designed to increase their physical strength or 
        their fighting ability; and
            ``(2) that all equipment designed for this purpose be 
        removed from Federal correctional facilities.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:

``4048. Strength-training of prisoners prohibited.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 35 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 35 Filed 05/25/16 Page 2 of 2
1 Jo hn T. Boy d, Chief Justic e (Ret.), S eventh Cour t of Appeals, sit

ting by assignment. Tex. Gov’ t Code Ann. §75.002( a)(1) (Ver non Supp. 2003). NO. 07-02-0236-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E MARCH 10, 2003

______________________________ BARRY D. YOUNG, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF LUB BOCK COUNT Y; NO. 2001-475909; H ONORABLE LARR Y B. “RU STY” LADD, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J. 1 Appellant

Ba rry D. Young was convi cted of drivi ng whil e intoxic ated, second offense. The trial jury assessed his punishment at confinement in the Lubbock County Jail for 365 days and a $1,00 0 fine. He timel y perfected an ap peal from his conv iction.2

On February

24, 2001, we received appellant’s mot ion to wi thdraw and dismiss his appeal. H is attorney

joined in that

motion. Because appellant’s moti on meets all the requirements

of Texas Rule of Appellate Proced ure 42.2(a) and because th is court has not delivered its decisi on before receiv ing appellant’ s motion, the motion m ust be, and is hereby, g ranted.
Havin g di smissed the appeal at ap pellant’s request, no motions f or rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate w ill issu e forthwith.

John T. Bo yd Senior Justice Do not publish

.
**EXHIBIT 11.1**

**COMPUTATIONOF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE**

|                                                                      | ** ** | **Quarter Ended March 31,** | ** ** |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                           | ** ** | **2006**                                   | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** |
| Diluted net loss per  share:                                         |       |                                       |       |   |   |
| Net loss to common shareholders                                      |       | $                                          | (1,180,000 | ) | $ | (1,555,000 | ) |
| Average number of shares outstanding                                 |       | 7,957,428                                  |       | 8,310,132 |   |
| Net effect of dilutive stock options based on  treasury stock method |       | —                                     |       | — |   |
| Total average shares                                                 |       | 7,957,428                                  |       | 8,310,132 |   |
| Diluted net loss  per share                                          |       | $                                          | (0.15      | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald K. Daniel, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Health Realty, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date'); and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures based on such evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 9, 2006

| | /s/ Donald K. Daniel                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Donald K. Daniel                    
| | Senior Vice President and Controller
| | (Principal Financial Officer)
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00234- CV

In re Jhakeem Cham bers

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM B ELL COUNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The petition for writ of mandamus filed by J hakee m Chambers is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8 (a).

J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and Rose Filed: Apr il 19, 2013
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Explorer 1 Fast Facts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PGxWM3EVvf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/explorer\/explorer-1-fast-facts\/\">Explorer 1 Fast Facts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/explorer\/explorer-1-fast-facts\/embed\/#?secret=PGxWM3EVvf\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Explorer 1 Fast Facts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"PGxWM3EVvf\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/PIA04601\/PIA04601~orig.jpg?w=600&h=2353&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":2353}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR           
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              34        
<SECURITIES>                                         0        
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,219        
<ALLOWANCES>                                       404        
<INVENTORY>                                     16,891        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,195        
<PP&E>                                          22,334        
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,014        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,957        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,954        
<BONDS>                                              0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0        
<PREFERRED>                                          0        
<COMMON>                                            48        
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,515        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,957        
<SALES>                                         82,154        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,154        
<CGS>                                           66,656        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,855        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,672        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    627        
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                627        
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0        
<CHANGES>                                            0        
<NET-INCOME>                                       627        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13        
                                                                  


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 917 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 917

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that the 
overtime exemption available to employees engaged in the transportation 
   and preparation of fruit and vegetables is available to employees 
     engaged in the transportation and preparation of sugar beets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 1997

  Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that the 
overtime exemption available to employees engaged in the transportation 
   and preparation of fruit and vegetables is available to employees 
     engaged in the transportation and preparation of sugar beets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OVERTIME EXEMPTION FOR SUGAR BEET EMPLOYEES.

    Section 13(b)(16)(A) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 
U.S.C. 213(b)(16)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(including sugar beets)'' after 
        ``vegetables'', and
            (2) by inserting after ``from the farm'' the following: 
        ``or where temporarily stockpiled in conjunction with the 
        harvest''.
                                 <all>
```
The Honorable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District Judge 1

for the Western District of Missouri.

___________

No. 96-2195

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Steven G. DeHart, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Appeals from the United States

No. 96-2196 District Court for the

___________ Western District of Missouri.

United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee, *

*

v. *

*

Larry D. White, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: October 24, 1996

 Filed: November 27, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Steven G. DeHart and Larry D. White challenge the sentences imposed

by the district court after a jury found them guilty of 1

conspiring to threaten and retaliate against a government 

informant, and aiding and abetting that threatening and 
-2-

retaliating, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1513(b)(2), and 2. We

affirm the sentences.

In 1994, the Drug Enforcement Administration enlisted the help of

an informant to investigate suspected methamphetamine trafficking in

central Missouri. The informant's information led to the arrest and

conviction of DeHart's brother. Shortly after his brother's arrest,

DeHart began harassing the informant. DeHart and White subsequently

followed the informant to a friend's house, shouted various epithets

and threats, and damaged the informant's car by kicking and jumping on

it. During this incident, DeHart brandished a firearm and fired two

rounds into the trunk lid of the informant's car.

 On appeal, DeHart argues the district court erred by denying him

a two-level reduction for accepting responsibility under U.S.S.G.

§ 3E1.1. We conclude the court did not clearly err in denying the

reduction, as DeHart went to trial and denied that his offense conduct

was motivated by the informant's statements regarding his brother. See

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.2) (conviction by trial "does not

automatically preclude a defendant from consideration for such a

reduction," but acceptance-of-responsibility reduction is not intended

for defendant who puts government to its burden of proof at trial by

denying essential factual elements of guilt, is convicted, and only

then admits guilt and expresses remorse); United States v. Amos, 952

F.2d 992, 995 (8th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 1010 (1992).

White argues in his appeal that the evidence indicated he was less

culpable than DeHart, and that the district court thus erred by denying

him a two-level reduction for his role as a minor participant under

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). We conclude the district court did not clearly

err in denying this reduction, because, even assuming White was less

culpable than DeHart, White was an active participant in the criminal

acts. See United States v. Abanatha, 
-3-

999 F.2d 1246, 1250 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 1549

(1994); United States v. West, 942 F.2d 528, 531 (8th Cir. 1991).

 Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.