alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GraniteCity Food & Brewery Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterlyperiod ended June 29, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Monica A. Underwood, InterimChief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 
| Dated: | December 21, 2004 | By     | /s/ Monica A. Underwood                                   |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   | Monica A. Underwood                                       |
|   |              |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer and  Corporate Controller |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Catherine G. Manning","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/cgmannin\/","title":"Optical Communications","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DjmNP2jfUv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/space-comms\/optical-communications-overview\/\">Optical Communications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/technology\/space-comms\/optical-communications-overview\/embed\/#?secret=DjmNP2jfUv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Optical Communications” — NASA\" data-secret=\"DjmNP2jfUv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/spectrum-optical-graphic-web.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":238}
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Autostrada  Motors,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31,  2004,  as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"),  We,  Douglas W. Fry,  President  and  director  and Travis T. Jenson,
Secretary,Treasurer, CFO and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


By/S/ Douglas W. Fry
-----------------
Douglas W. Fry
President and Director
Dated this 30th day of March, 2005


By/S/ Travis T. Jenson
-----------------
Travis T. Jenson
Secretary, Treasurer, CFO and Director
Dated this 30th day of March, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Graf","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/agraf\/","title":"Peregrine Mission One","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0xaGDJ7mLL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/peregrine-mission-one\/\">Peregrine Mission One<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/houston-we-have-a-podcast\/peregrine-mission-one\/embed\/#?secret=0xaGDJ7mLL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Peregrine Mission One” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0xaGDJ7mLL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/pm-1-featured-image-webpage.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ares Capital Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), R. Kipp deVeer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Penni F. Roll, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:





1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 12, 2019/s/ R. KIPP DEVEERR. Kipp deVeerChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)Date: February 12, 2019/s/ PENNI F. ROLLPenni F. RollChief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ares Capital Corporation and will be retained by Ares Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Anthony M. Springer","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"A9XDreYuRF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/anthony-m-springer\/\">Anthony M. Springer<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/anthony-m-springer\/embed\/#?secret=A9XDreYuRF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Anthony M. Springer” — NASA\" data-secret=\"A9XDreYuRF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/tony-springer-w.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":583}
#### Thos. D. Burford *v.*Jane B. Burford, et al.

Judicial Sale — Estoppel—Act of Claimant.

Though á sherifl at a judicial sale, by reason of failure to enter proper credit of full payment made by judgment debtor, sold more land than necessary, the debtor, not using ordinary diligence for more than a year to discover this fact, induced defendant to purchase the land so sold from the assignee of the- execution purchaser. Held, to estop plaintiff from asserting claim with or against such purchaser.

*464APPEAL PROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

May 12, 1871.

*J. a/nck P. B.*Thompson, *for appellant.*

Polk, Kyle, *for appellees.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

We are of opinion that the sheriff should have allowed appellant interest on the $2,000 payment made by him on the debt to the Ewings Institution from the date of the same up to the time when the debt fell due.

In consequence of his failure to do so he sold more land than the executions in his hands authorized him to sell, and his sale was void. But nearly a year after this sale was made, and when appellant either did know or could by the use of ordinary diligence have discovered this fact, he induced the appellee to purchase the land so sold from the assignee of the execution purchaser.

This conduct upon his part stops him from asserting with or against her. The circuit judge therefore properly dismissed his petition.

Judgment affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6898
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN FRANK B. BISHOP, JR.; JOHN MCCARTHY, State Attorney; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv - 02065

- RDB )

Submitted : November 29, 2018 Decided: December 7, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ , Circuit Judge , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Q uentin Kelly appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. Parties to a civil action are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered its final judgment on the docket on April 26, 2018. Kelly filed his notice of appeal, at the earliest, on July 11, 201 8 , after the 30

- day appeal period expired. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1). However, Kelly’s notice of appeal requested
inf ormation on his appeal, and his informal brief references an earlier

- filed notice that is not reflected on the docket sheet. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether Kelly timely filed a n otice of appeal. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We deny Kelly’s motion for release or bail pending appeal.
REMANDED
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Byron Paul Chatlin, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-15-01579-01-PHX-SRB 

 

ORDER OF DETENTION 

 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Probation were held on January 23, 2019. 

The Court Finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has 

consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. 

 The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of proof 

by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that he is 

not a serious flight risk. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 24th day of January, 2019. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge
#### Daniel McAllister’s Admr. *v.*Commonwealth.

Appeal and Error — Error in Original Judgment Cannot be Corrected on Second Appeal.

The Court of Appeals has no power, on a second appeal, to correct an error in the original judgment which either was, or might have been relied upon in the first appeal.

APPEAL PROM JEFFERSON COUNTY COURT.

January 7, 1871.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams :

The action of the county court of Jefferson county in the assessment for taxation of the property óf the estate of Daniel *179McAllister deceased has heretofore been before this court for revision.

*Harrison, for appellant.*

*Pope, Camp, for appellee.*

Said action was then reversed and the proceeding remanded to said court for the correction of two errors specifically set out in the opinion of this court.

These errors have been corrected, and the case is now before us by an appeal prosecuted to correct an error in the original judgment which either was, or might have been relied upon in the first appeal.

It is now too late for this court to reverse the action of the county court in assessing triple taxation upon the property of the appellant even if it admitted that such assessment was erroneous. The first judgment of the county court was in effect affirmed by this court except as to the errors pointed out, and it is not in our power at this time to disregard or set aside that affirmance.

Judgment *affirmed.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

ANTHONY MAYS, Individually and on behalf )

of a class of similarly situated persons; and )

JUDIA JACKSON, as next friend of KENNETH )

FOSTER, Individually and on behalf of a class )

of similarly situated persons, ) Case No. 20 C 2134

)

Plaintiffs-Petitioners, ) Hon. Robert W. Gettleman, J.

)

v. ) Hon. M. David Weisman, M.J.

)

THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook )

County, )

)

Defendant-Respondent. )

PLAINTIFFS’ STATUS REPORT

Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, by and 

through their undersigned attorneys, hereby submit the following status report:

1. On March 19, the Court held a fairness hearing on the proposed settlement

agreement in this matter. ECF No. 322. 

2. As ordered by the Court, Plaintiffs drafted and filed a letter to be sent to the 

detainees who provided input about the proposed settlement. ECF No. 323-3. The Court approved 

the letter and directed Plaintiffs’ counsel to mail it out no later than March 25, 2024. 

3. Plaintiffs confirm that they mailed the letters as ordered before 2 p.m. on March 25, 

2024. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alexa A. Van Brunt 

Alexa A. Van Brunt
Alexa A. Van Brunt

MacArthur Justice Center 

Northwestern Pritzker School of Law

375 E. Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611 

Tel: 312-503-0884

Locke E. Bowman

Stephen H. Weil 

LOEVY & LOEVY

311 N. Aberdeen Street, #3

Chicago, IL 60607

Tel: 312-243-5900 

Fax:312-243-5902

PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL
---

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Douglas R. Brett, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Crosshair
Exploration & Mining Corp., as amended by Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 1);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companys internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Douglas R.
Brett
By:   Douglas R.
Brett          Chief
Financial Officer

Date: June 25, 2008

---
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

5 AUSTIN 

ikmorublo H. ri. &aClain 

county Attorlmy, kllllmmmn county 

Grorgetown. Teraa 

Phfr will eoknor 

January IU, 1944, pertinon 

set out: 

Lfooaaad 3teto Land 

rumoy (18 ohm& and 

do ao abovo doa?rlbed with only 

of the Licensed sttito L~tnd Surveyor:’ 

rk contads that all af rheee survey8 

zed boiaro thy aan bo feoordsa. I 

would crpproolato your nnawer to tho above quoatloo 

in order that I may advim tbo County Clerk.” 

Artiolo beSO, Vrrnoo'a m~l;lod Civil .Jtrtuem, 1625, 

provides, ln part, us follo*a: 

“naoh oounty nurveyor sLai.1 record ?n a well 

bound book ull the ourveye In hia aounty vclth t>e 

plats thereof that he May SW&I) wheLhisr privtlts or 

official." 

I 
stlalo Se07 of wid stututum furthe provides thtit 

*ocLoh county surveyor 6lxill recolvs and era:!ia all ricla notea 

OS mrveym made in oulC county U~JOU whloh pstonta mre to be obtained r.nd ehmA1 certify to the nmia aoooniirrg to lw, rnd record auoh SlsAU notes in a book to be kept by Dim for tbt purpan ~4 ha mhall perform much other dutiae aa nary be regulrsd 

of him by luw.. Tbu oommim~ionsrm~ #ourt a?~11 rurnleh him roll 

amceumary book& of raor,rd." It aselns th:t the 2~ oontemplatse~ 

in 4ountieo thving a county mumoyor that a4oh county surveyor 

do &is oua roooralng and koep his own racaraq, but, Ii the 

County Clerk aosumem this ro@onatbillty for the county surveyor, 

a nd rooor ds a nd mo p s l uoh rsoordm in the Cocnty CLerk*e 3rri,00, 

he should not raquiro an; oortlfleatlon of muah record8 alfsera~t 

from thikt requiroa by 1611, A l ta tO O? fACtS 01 08a Fly Qla t86 t0 

thl@ warn pamod OD by thir 6o~wtaarf1t ln &II opln$oa dalivered In 

1941, mambored 044SZ, Ln tiioh a rimilar view xam taken am next 

above oxprosmod. 

t'3hfle iqtiolem Be78 And bi377 were rmetrded by tha haislaturs, aftor tbs mdd prior opbl~n wn8 rendered, there ~'88 no 

oh~n~o m4lsrde iathan that uould ronaer aaid opinion. obeQlete, or 

f.n any way arreot ttr l pplkotlon In thla mutter. A UOpf Or 

esld opinion la attached beret0 for further am~lltfc*tf~. 

In vlaw of t!& atKJv0 quoted stututem, und tlm eda 

r0wr oyialaop, thim dopstsent baldm that th8 County Clerk 0r 

your County 18 pormltted to raoord 8urvsp four and under tho dlroctioa 0s your County 2hrveyor. suoh r0420o8a 6urvep bclog ocrtlrLc6 

to by tba Caocty Burvoyor or any other duly Llooa806 State L~nb 

&rvoyor, rlthout bolng notarismd, am a oortliloeto by a notary 

would @aither rdd to nor 6etrRet rror the le@lity or tho proooedlngm. 

.,, 

Youra vary truly 

A-miHIZsy WH~GAl, ."F ??A ;i3 

?Y 

nobst L. Lattlmore, .:r. 

:umiiltrnt 

hiJ.:W 

anal.