alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Brings the International Space Station Experience to Emerald City","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5kdem8gwqV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-brings-the-international-space-station-experience-to-emerald-city\/\">NASA Brings the International Space Station Experience to Emerald City<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-brings-the-international-space-station-experience-to-emerald-city\/embed\/#?secret=5kdem8gwqV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Brings the International Space Station Experience to Emerald City” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5kdem8gwqV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/iss050e030665.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.7    
  


        The
Service contract of Sir Peter Middleton has been incorporated by reference to the 2000 Form 20-F filed with the SEC on April 16, 2001. 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.7
Case 2:16-cv-00287-JJT--BSB Document 1 Filed 02/01/16 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:16-cv-00287-JJT--BSB Document 1 Filed 02/01/16 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:16-cv-00287-JJT--BSB Document 1 Filed 02/01/16 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:16-cv-00287-JJT--BSB Document 1 Filed 02/01/16 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:16-cv-00287-JJT--BSB Document 1 Filed 02/01/16 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:16-cv-00287-JJT--BSB Document 1 Filed 02/01/16 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: May 10, 2010
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Terry L. Freeman

Terry L. FreemanSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST CHOICE
HEALTH NETWORK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AUDITED DECEMBER 31, 1999 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     13,082,130
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,705,796
<ALLOWANCES>                                  317,788
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           24,656,434
<PP&E>                                      3,677,870
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,011,730
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             30,667,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      16,394,980
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       41,185
<OTHER-SE>                                 12,107,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               30,667,873
<SALES>                                    92,097,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           92,505,175
<CGS>                                      69,688,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              90,633,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             1,872,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                  279,143
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,592,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,660,238
<EPS-BASIC>                                   28.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   28.33


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 9, 2015

NO. 03-13-00762-CV

Fakhrealam Atiq, Appellant

v.

CoTechno Group, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

REVERSED AND RENDERED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered by the trial court on October 23, 2013. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in 

the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders 

judgment dismissing appellee’s claims against appellant for want of personal jurisdiction. The 

appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64621-64622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAC06900 L17110000.AL0000 15XL1109AF]


Notice of Public Meeting of the Carrizo Plain National Monument 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Carrizo Plain National 
Monument Advisory

[[Page 64622]]

Committee (MAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Saturday, December 13, 2014, at the 
Carrisa Plains Elementary School, located approximately 2 miles 
northwest of Soda Lake Road on Highway 58. The meeting will begin at 10 
a.m. and finish at 1:30 p.m. The meeting will focus on scoping the 
Travel Management Plan and provide updated information on the continued 
implementation of the resource management plan. There will be a public 
comment period from 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Lunch will be available for 
under $10.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Johna Hurl, Monument Manager, 
Bakersfield Field Office, 3801 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, CA 93308, 
(661) 391-6093, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#23494b56514f63414f4e0d444c55"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d6765787f614d6f6160236a627b">[email protected]</span></a> or John Kelley, Carrizo Program Support 
Technician, Bakersfield Field Office, 3801 Pegasus Drive, Bakersfield, 
CA 93308, (661) 391-6088, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#68021c030d04040d11280a0405460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97fde3fcf2fbfbf2eed7f5fbfab9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ten-member MAC advises the Secretary of 
the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of public land issues 
associated with public land management in the Carrizo Plain National 
Monument in Central California. At this meeting, Monument staff will 
present the proposed Travel Management Plan for the Monument and 
updated information on the continued implementation of the Resource 
Management Plan. This meeting is open to the public. Depending on the 
number of persons wishing to comment and the time available, the time 
allotted for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who 
plan to attend and need special assistance such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations should contact the 
BLM as indicated above.

    Dated: October 7, 2014.
Gabriel Garcia,
Field Manager, Bakersfield Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-25843 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Dunn & Anderson *v.*Jas. M. Anderson.

Infants — Parent and Child — Necessaries Furnished Child — Payment for — Notice of Non-payment for Other Articles Furnished.

APPEAL FROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

September 16, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

Prom tlie evidence in this case it appears that -when the goods were sold and delivered to Mrs. Anderson, she was living with her father, constituting one of his family, tinder 21 years of age, and although he had been found a lunatic, still for the support and maintenance of his family, including his daughter, Mrs. Anderson, his estate in the hands of his committee, would have been responsible, but it appears that appellants had been notified by the committee that for goods sold to the appellee, Mrs: Anderson, the estate of her father would not be responsible, and the credit for the goods sold to her, after that, was given to her alone, of which it seems she was notified. And if at the time they were purchased she labored under no disability, she would be liable for their value, but she alleges in her answer that at the time of the sale she labored under the disability of infancy, though was willing to pay for such articles as were bought for her own use, or such as were necessary for her. And her infancy at the time was proved by her sister. And there is no evidence that she has pilaced herself under any legal obligation to' pay said account since that disability was removed. The judgment recovered against her by appellants is for as much as would cover the articles necessary for her in her condition in life ^ for this reason therefore, the judgment is as favorable to appellants as they are entitled to.

As to the alleged error of the court in refusing to permit Anderson, the retiring piartner, to testify, he was a plaintiff, and ■as such had incurred costs, and even if he was otherwise competent after transferring his interest to Dunn, he could not have been examined until a bond with surety, or a bond satisfactory *505.to the court had been tendered, securing not only to appellees the costs which might accrue, but those which had already accrued, or proper orders had been made securing all the costs- — neither of which had been done in this case. See. 32, C. O.

*Anderson, for appellants.*

*Dunlap, for appellees.*

But under the rulings of this court in Dougherty vs. Smith, Wilson & Co., *4*Met., 279, he was not competent.

No sufficient grounds were made out for a new trial, by reason of the affidavits, appellants got judgment for the additional sums they could have proved by *Mrs. Anderson and Mrs. Reid,*and as to the other witnesses, no sufficient reason is shown why their evidence was not produced on the' trial. Appellants lmew the witness who had gone to Missouri — was absent when they went into the trial, and knew what she would prove.

Judgment affirmed.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

David J. McGlothlin, Esq. (SBN: 026059) 

david@southwestlitigation.com 

Hyde & Swigart 

2633 E. Indian School Road, Suite 460 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

(602) 265-3332 

(602) 230-4482 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Teresa McGlothlin 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Please take Notice that pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Plaintiff hereby 

dismisses this matter without prejudice. 

 Hyde & Swigart 

Date: March 21, 2016 By: /s/ David J. McGlothlin 

 David J. McGlothlin 

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

______________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

 - 1 of 1 -

Teresa McGlothlin 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

Reasonable Solutions, LLC d/b/a 

RS Processing; Harriet Jackson,

 Defendants.

Case No: 2:15-cv-02469

Unilateral Dismissal Without 

Prejudice

Case 2:15-cv-02469-SRB Document 9 Filed 03/21/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAWNMART, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 29, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                         733,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,267,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,453,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,667,000
<PP&E>                                       6,380,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,891,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,667,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,161,000
<BONDS>                                     17,015,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                        72,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,892,000
<SALES>                                      4,756,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,712,000
<CGS>                                        3,724,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,506,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,090,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             509,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,117,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,117,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,117,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
WWW Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K 2003



Exhibit 10.17




          The following persons have a percentage benefit multiplier under the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "Plan") of 2.4% or 2.0%, as indicated below, in lieu of the 1.6% of final average monthly remuneration benefit multiplier described in the Plan:


	
 
	
2.4%
	
2.0%
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Steven M. Duffy
	
Owen S. Baxter
	
 

	
 
	
V. Dean Estes
	
William J.B. Brown
	
 

	
 
	
Stephen L. Gulis, Jr.
	
Arthur G. Croci
	
 

	
 
	
Blake W. Krueger
	
Richard C. DeBlasio
	
 

	
 
	
Timothy J. O'Donovan
	
Gary Fountain
	
 

	
 
	
Robert J. Sedrowski
	
Ted Gedra
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Blaine C. Jungers
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Jacques Lavertue
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Thomas P. Mundt
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Nicholas P. Ottenwess
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
A. T. Payne
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
James Weston
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Spencer E. Zimmerman
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Mullen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated:December 14, 2006 

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
10.6(b)
  
  Re: Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Citigroup Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    CMF Graham Capital Master Fund L.P.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & DirectorGRAHAM CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT, L.P.By:
    
    /s/ Paul SedlackPrint Name: Paul SedlackJM/sr
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 81 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 689
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 H. R. 81

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1998

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                            October 2, 1998

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan 
  Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ``Robert K. Rodibaugh United 
                    States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 401 South Michigan Street 
in South Bend, Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ``Robert 
K. Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert K. 
Rodibaugh United States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 1998.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 689

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                H. R. 81

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 401 Soth Michigan 
  Street in South Bend, Indiana, as the ``Robert K. Rodibaugh United 
                    States Bankruptcy Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 2, 1998

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
for the nine months ending October 3, 1998, and such is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0001051260
<NAME>     GLENOIT ASSET CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                         84
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               84
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 35,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,010
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     31,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   35,721
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,874
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,727)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,591
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  6.235
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  6.235
        

</TABLE>