alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 783

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit candidates

for election for Federal office from accepting unsecured loans from depository institutions regulated under Federal law, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit candidates for election for Federal office from

accepting unsecured loans from depository institutions

regulated under Federal law, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING CANDIDATES FROM ACCEPTING

4 UNSECURED LOANS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 315 of the Federal Elec6 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended

7 by adding at the end the following new subsection:
2

•HR 783 IH

1 ‘‘(i)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

2 Act, a candidate for election for Federal office may not

3 accept—

4 ‘‘(A) any contribution consisting of an unse5 cured loan from a depository institution; or

6 ‘‘(B) any contribution from an individual serv7 ing as an officer or director of a depository institu8 tion with respect to which the candidate has an out9 standing unsecured loan as of the date of the enact10 ment of this subsection.

11 ‘‘(2) Any candidate for election for Federal office

12 with an outstanding unsecured loan from a depository in13 stitution as of the date of the enactment of this subsection

14 shall repay the loan not later than 90 days after the date

15 of the enactment of this subsection.

16 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘depository institu17 tion’ has the meaning given such term in section

18 19(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act.’’.

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

20 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur21 ring after January 1997.

Æ
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3031

LORENZO POBLETE,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

in SF0831080325-I-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of Lorenzo Poblete's motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The mandate will be recalled, the court's November 25,

2008 dismissal order will be vacated, and the petition will be reinstated, if Poblete files

his informal brief within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 9 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk	FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

cc:	Lorenzo Poblete

Roger A. Hipp, Esq.	

FEB 0 9 2009

s8

	

JAN HütibAL?

CLERK

Date
9464.

#### Massart *v.*The State.

Decided April 2, 1918.

Accusation of unlawful possession of liquor; from city court of Savannah—Judge Rourke. November *17,*1917.

*Robert L. Golding,*for plaintiff in error.

*Walter 0. Eartridge, solicitor-general,*contra.

Harwell, J.

The charge against the defendant was that he “did unlawfully have, control, and possess spirituous liquors.” The witness for the State testified that he found numerous quantities and varieties of spirituous liquors in defendant’s house. The defendant introduced no evidence, and in his statement admitted that he had spirituous liquors in his possession and control, and said, “I, am no *frequent*violator of this law.” The verdict of guilty was authorized, and the trial judge properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Bloodioorth, J., concur.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Television Coverage Set for Next Space Station Crew Launch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Hsd9WNuZ1L\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-coverage-set-for-next-space-station-crew-launch-3\/\">NASA Television Coverage Set for Next Space Station Crew Launch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-coverage-set-for-next-space-station-crew-launch-3\/embed\/#?secret=Hsd9WNuZ1L\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Television Coverage Set for Next Space Station Crew Launch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Hsd9WNuZ1L\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/23159697140_588e3d2240_o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"G. Michael Green","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"58Zy1tD9cY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/g-michael-green\/\">G. Michael Green<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/g-michael-green\/embed\/#?secret=58Zy1tD9cY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“G. Michael Green” — NASA\" data-secret=\"58Zy1tD9cY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/mike-green.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":847}
Exhibit 13.2

                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas III) Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date:  June 26, 2007

/s/ Kate Blankenship
--------------------
    Kate Blankenship
    Principal Financial Officer
#### Averil *v.*Dickerson.

An appeal bond mast be proved to have been executed in the clerk’s office of the Court below.

APPEAL, from the *Switzerland*Circuit Court. — The appellee moved the Court to dismiss this case, because it was not shown, that the appeal bond had been executed.in the clerk’s office of the Circuit Court.

Holman, J.

The statute requires the- bond to be *given*in the *4clerk’s office of the Court from which the appeal is prayed. We are of opinion, that according to a fair construction of the act, the appeal bond must not only be *filed*in the clerk’s office, but-must be actually *executed*there, in the presence of the clerk, or of one of his deputies. In thus deciding, we are supported by a decision of the Court of Appeals in *Kentucky,*in the construction of a similar statute. *Hardin*v. Owings, 1 Bibb, 214.

*Kidder,*for the appellant.

*Lane,*for the appellee.

In this case, the appellant, upon whom the burthen of proof lies, has produced no evidence of the execution of the bond in the clerk’s office of the Circuit Court, in conformity to the provisions of the act of assembly, and the case must therefore be dismissed (1).

*Per Curiam.*

This suit is dismissed, with costs.

(1)

 Ind. Stat. 1816, p. 7. — Acc. Ind. Stat. 1823, p. 131.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 904

To amend the definition of ‘‘State’’ in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act

to include American Samoa within the meaning of such term.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 3, 1997

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the definition of ‘‘State’’ in the Federal Home

Loan Bank Act to include American Samoa within the

meaning of such term.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO DEFINITION OF ‘‘STATE’’.

4 Section 2(3) of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act

5 (12 U.S.C. 1422(3)) is amended by inserting ‘‘American

6 Samoa,’’ after ‘‘Puerto Rico,’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cecile D. Blake,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03415-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8420 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8420 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 90

To require random drug testing within the executive branch of the

Government.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To require random drug testing within the executive branch

of the Government.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Executive Branch

5 Drug Testing Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RANDOM DRUG TESTING.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—All officers and employees within

8 the executive branch of the Government shall be subject

9 to random drug testing in accordance with regulations

10 prescribed by the President.
2

HR 90 IH

1 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term

2 ‘‘drug’’ means a controlled substance, as defined by sec3 tion 102(6) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.

4 802(6)).

5 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

6 Any regulations necessary to carry out this Act shall

7 be issued in time so that they may be implemented begin8 ning not later than the 90th day after the date of the en9 actment of this Act.

Æ
February 28 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MALCOLM LANIER GUIDR Y , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00338

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

EAN HOLDINGS, LLC d/b/a ENTERPRISE 

RENT-A-CAR

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00081-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable Francisco X. Dominguez, Judge of the 205th District Court of Hudspeth County, 

Texas, and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. 

We therefore conditionally grant the petition for writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to 

vacate its order denying the motion for leave to designate a responsible third party. The writ will 

issue only if the trial court fails to act in accordance with this opinion. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ. 

Palafox., J., concurring
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

 Emilio Chatto Haddo, 

Defendant.

No. CR16-08012-001-PCT-PGR

RELEASE AND TRANSPORTATION 

ORDER 

The defendant Emilio Chatto Haddo having qualified for pretrial release and 

placement at Crossroads. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshal transport defendant to 

the Sandra Day O=Connor Courthouse on Thursday, February 25, 2016 for release to the 

custody of Crossroads. A bag and baggage hearing before the Court will not be required. 

The defendant shall reside pretrial at said facility as previously ordered by the Court. 

 Dated this 11th day of February, 2016. 

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cr-08012-PGR Document 23 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Bobbie J. Rucker,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03777-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8942 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8925]


In the Matter of the Designation of Sangeen Zadran as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of 
September 23, 2001, as amended (``the Order''), I hereby determine that 
the individual known as Sangeen Zadran, also known as other aliases and 
transliterations, no longer meets the criteria for designation under 
the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke the designation of the 
aforementioned individual as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist 
pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 10, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-25171 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
9001.

#### Tison *v.*Sword.

Decided May 14, 1918.

Affidavit of illegality of execution; from city court of Nashville. Judge Christian. June 11, 1918.

Hendricks, *Mills &*Éendricks, for plaintiff in error.

*Joseph A.*Alexander, contra.

Bloodwobth, J.

It appears from the qualifying note of the judge to hjs approval of the motion for a new trial that by agreement of counsel for both parties only one issue would be submitted to the jury, and that was, “whether the defendant A. ¡P. Tison was served with a.copy of petition and process,” and that the authority of the constable (whose return was traversed) to serve the paper was eliminated and not an issue in the case. , This note amounts to a. disapproval of grounds 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of the amendment to the motion.- Therefore this court will not consider them. *Southern Railway Co.*v. *Bales,*137 *Ga.*567 (73 S. E. 846); *Griggs*v. *State,*17 *Ga. App.*301 (2) (86 S. E. 726).

The 2d ground of the amendment to' the motion for a new trial is merely an amplification of the general ground that the verdict is without evidence to support it. There is some evidence to support the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.*
Case 2:15-mj-01959-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/30/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01959-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/30/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01959-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/30/15 Page 3 of 3
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 10477 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RONALD H. RIVA, III

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:04

- CR

- 47

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ronald H. Riva, III,

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Riva h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 4, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-10477 Document: 00512825813 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2014No. 14

- 10477

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

G RANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 14-10477 Document: 00512825813 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2014