alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9450.

#### Jones *v.*Wall.

Decided July 12, 1918.

Complaint; from Columbia superior court—Judge H. C. Hammon. December 14, 1917.

*H. 8. Jones,*for plaintiff in error. *I. S. Peebles Jr.,*contra.

Jenkins, J.

1. “This court can not consider exceptions to the refusal of the trial judge to comply with written requests to charge, unless it is made to appear that they were tendered to the court before the jury retired to consider the case.” *Seaboard Air-Line Ry.*v. *Barrow,*18 *Ga. App.*261 (89 S. E. 383). It not being so made to appear in this case, the first and second grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without merit.

2. “Where a fact is established by undisputed evidence, it is not error for the judge, in his charge to the jury, to assume or intimate that the fact has been proved.” *Dexter Banking Co.*v. *McCook,*7 *Ga. App.*436 (67 S. E. 113); *Ga., Fla. & Ala. Ry. Co.*v. *Jernigan,*128 *Ga.*501 (57 S. E. 791). The third ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is without merit, since it comes properly within this rule.

3. There being sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, which has the approval of the trial, judge, this court is without authority to set the verdict aside.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.*
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 906 Certification**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ORPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”), I, R. Scott Stevenson,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Fog Cutter Capital GroupInc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FogCutter Capital Group Inc.

This writtenstatement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as anexhibit to the Report.
| August 10, 2007 |   | /s/ R. SCOTT STEVENSON          |
|-----------------|--------|---------------------------------|
| Date            |   | R. Scott Stevenson              |
|            |   | Senior Vice President and Chief |
|            |   | Financial Officer               |

 

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,065,572
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   407,536
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,133,626
<PP&E>                                         123,893
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,208,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          288,800
<BONDS>                                            951
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,555
<OTHER-SE>                                     915,201
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,208,507
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               458,073
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  255,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,667,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,667,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,667,646)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"The Hard-won Triumph of the Apollo 13 Mission – 45 Years Later","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7AutC7FCuM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/the-hard-won-triumph-of-the-apollo-13-mission-45-years-later\/\">The Hard-won Triumph of the Apollo 13 Mission – 45 Years Later<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/the-hard-won-triumph-of-the-apollo-13-mission-45-years-later\/embed\/#?secret=7AutC7FCuM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Hard-won Triumph of the Apollo 13 Mission – 45 Years Later” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7AutC7FCuM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/apollo-13-anniv-crew.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":422}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2015

d0720

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2015

149531(29)

MICHAEL A. KELLY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 149531

COA: 318629

Bay CC: 13-003417

DANIEL RAYMOND STREETER,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s February 3, 

2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Report of Physical Property Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ngai Keung Luk,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/ Ngai Keung
Luk
 Ngai
Keung Luk
 Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
 
 August
14, 2009
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-126938and No. 333-128013) and in the related Prospectuses and theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-121051)pertaining to the Gramercy Capital Corp. Equity Incentive Plan of our reportsdated February 28, 2007 with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Gramercy Capital Corp., Gramercy Capital Corp.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingof Gramercy Capital Corp., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Ernst and Young LLP

New York, New YorkFebruary 28, 2007

----
9068.

#### International Filter Co. *v.*LaGrange Ice *&*Fuel Co.

Jenkins, J.

1. Where, under a contract of sale or return, it is provided that “this filter and unused disks are to be returned for credit in good condition to the International Filter Co., at Chicago, within thirty-five, days froni this date, if directions for use are followed and the results obtained are not satisfactory,” the return must be made within the time thus expressly limited, and the question of reasonable time doe's not enter. *Newburger*v. *Hoyt,*86 *Ga.*508, 514 (12 S. E. 925).

2. A mere notice by the purchaser, given prior to the expiration' of the time limit, that the machine had proved unsatisfactory, and that unless *168better results could be had it would be returned, can not be taken as a compliance with the terms of the contract. *Dickey*v. *Winston Cigarette Machine Co.,*117 *Ca.*131 (43 S. E. 493); *Malsby*v. *Young,*104 *Ga.*205 (30 S. E. 854).

Decided April 10, 1918.

Complaint; from city court of LaGrange—Judge Harwell. July 12, 1917.

*B. II: Ilill, Moon &. Davis,*for plaintiff.

*M. U. Mooty,*for defendant.

3. It appearing that a period of forty-two days had elapsed between the date of the contract and the date when the machinery was returned,, and there being nothing in- the record as presented to us to indicate, expressly or. by implication, that the limitation imposed by the, contract had been in any way extended, upon its expiration the rights of the parties became fixed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Wade, C. J., and Duke, J., concur.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

William Christman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

William Christman,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 

an Ohio corporation.

Defendant.

Case No.: CV-15-01989-PHX-JJT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff and Defendant, Equifax 

Information Services, LLC, in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement. 

Case 2:15-cv-01989-JJT Document 14 Filed 12/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The parties anticipate filing a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, pursuant to Fed. 

R. Civ. P. 41(a) within 60 days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 29

th day of December, 2015.

 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff,

William Christman

Case 2:15-cv-01989-JJT Document 14 Filed 12/29/15 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Desert Research and Technology Studies (Desert RATS)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ibel33UaAI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/desert-research-and-technology-studies-desert-rats\/\">Desert Research and Technology Studies (Desert RATS)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/desert-research-and-technology-studies-desert-rats\/embed\/#?secret=Ibel33UaAI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Desert Research and Technology Studies (Desert RATS)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ibel33UaAI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/hhp-habitability-ler-rover-drats-ler-testing-eva.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":479}
9074.

#### Cieucevich *v.*The State.

Decided May 1, 1918.

Petition for certiorari; from Chatham superior court—Judge MeMri-m. June 11, 1917. . ,r

Broyles, P. J.

1. The writ of certiorari lies from a judgment of the city court of Savannah overruling a motion for a new trial in a misdemeanor case tried therein.

2. The chief judge of the municipal court of Savannah, who is ex-officio judge of the city court of Savannah, under the act of the General Assembly amending the constitution of the State and creating the municipal court of Savannah, approved August 13, 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 124), and the further act of 1915 (Acts 1915, p. 122), is authorized to draw a panel of jurors and swear them in for the trial of a criminal case in which he as ex-officio judge of the city court is to preside; and such ' duty does not devolve solely upon the regular judge of the city court.

3. In answer to certified questions by this court the Supreme Court made the rulings just stated. 147 *Ga.*816 (95 S. E. 670). Under the second of these rulings the trial judge did not err-in overruling the defendant’s challenge to the panel of jurors put upon him.

4. The assignments of error other than those dealt with above are expressly .abandoned in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error.

5. The judge, of the superior court did not err in refusing to sartctiop the certiorari.

*■Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworih and Harwell, ‘JJ., concur.*

*241
      *Osborne, Lawrence & Abrahams,*for plaintiff in. error.

*Walter 0. Hartridge, solicitor-general,*contra.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:17−cr−00040

Honorable John J. Tharp Jr.

Martez Easter, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, May 2, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr. as to Mardi Lane: On the

request of defendant's counsel, the due date for post−trial motions is further extended to

8/11/23. Responses due 9/22/23. Replies due 10/20/23. In−person sentencing hearing is

reset to 12/8/23 at 10:00 a.m. Mr. Lane is required to appear.Mailed notice (air, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:17-cr-00040 Document #: 637 Filed: 05/02/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:6828
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.8.c

                                 First Amendment
                                       of
               FMC Technologies, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan

     WHEREAS, FMC Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the FMC
Technologies, Inc. Savings and Investment Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, since its spin-off from FMC Corporation, the Company has allowed
participants in the Plan to continue to hold or sell balances in the FMC
Corporation Stock Fund in the participants' discretion, but has prohibited new
investments in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund;

     WHEREAS, the Company now deems necessary and desirable to amend the Plan to
eliminate the FMC Corporation Stock Fund from the investment options offered
under the Plan; and

     NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority reserved to the Company by
Section 10.3 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of July 1,
2003, as follows:

     Section 10.3.3. Investment of Accounts is here by amended by adding the
     following to the end thereof:

          "Effective July 1, 2003 the FMC Stock Fund will be eliminated as an
          Investment Fund in the Plan. The Company will direct the Trustee to
          sell any balances remaining in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund on June
          30, 2003 and reinvest the proceeds from such sale into another
          Investment Fund under the Plan to be designated by the Company at the
          time. It is currently anticipated that any remaining balances in the
          FMC Corporation Stock Fund will be transferred to the Fidelity
          Retirement Government Money Market Portfolio."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer has executed the foregoing
amendment on behalf of the Company, this 13/th/ day of August 2002.

                                            FMC Technologies, Inc.

                                            By: /s/ William H. Schumann
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                    Senior Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit4.5**

WILLIAMS SCOTSMANINTERNATIONAL, INC.

8211 Town Center Drive

Baltimore, Maryland 21236

Securities andExchange CommissionStation Place100 F Street, N.E.Washington, D.C. 20549

March 12, 2007

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Instrumentsdefining the rights of holders of certain issues of long-term debt of WilliamsScotsman International, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries have not beenfiled as exhibits to this Form 10-K because the authorized principal amount ofany one of such issues does not exceed 10% of the total assets of WilliamsScotsman International, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.Williams Scotsman International, Inc. agrees to furnish a copy of each of suchinstruments to the Commission upon request.
|        |   | Very truly yours,                         |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                      |
|   |   | /s/John Ross                              |
|   |   | Name: John Ross                           |
|   |   | Title: Vice President and General Counsel |

 

----