alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

                           CRUSADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Steve McKerihan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 6-K
or Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Crusade Global
Trust No.1 of 1999;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreements, for inclusion in these reports is included in these
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under
the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreements and based upon my knowledge
and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as
disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that
agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreements,
that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Perpetual Trustees Consolidated Limited


                                     /s/  S. McKerihan
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    S. McKerihan
                                    CFO - Crusade Management Limited
                                    Date: December 14, 2004
Exhibit
12.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED





I,
Kate Blankenship, certify that:





1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas
III) Limited;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal controls over financial reporting; and





5.
The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.





Date:
June 24, 2008





/s/ Kate
Blankenship


Kate
Blankenship


Principal
Financial Officer
#### W. R. Maupin *v.*Edgar Thompson.

Landlord and Tenant — Lease—Holding Over — Reasonable Rent.

In the absence of a special agreement as to rent to be paid by a tenant, holding over after the expiration of his lease, he will be required to pay same rent as under the lease.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT.

July 7, 1869.

Turner, Tenney, *for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

There is no sufficient legal reason shown to set aside the consent decree rendered in the case. Nor is there a preponderance of the evidence against the allowance for the rent of the land by Thompson from Maupin. It is proved that by special agreement between the parties after the agreed lease had expired, that Thompson was to hold over and pay a reasonable rent for the time he should enjoy the premises, but for this agreement the holding over would have been at no lower rates than the lease, but the amount of the rent must be established by proof and we cannot say the court erred as to the weight of the evidence. Wherefore both judgments are *affirmed*with damages on the last judgment.

It may be that Maupin paid the $200 credited *tr*Carter as of November 21, 1864, in the consent decree and if so this was left out in the same decree adjusting the credits between Maupin and Carter but as neither the petition nor amended petition for a review goes for this or any other mistake we cannot consider it but the same must be recovered in the appropriate action for money had and received or other appropriate action. Petition overruled.
9778.

#### Clark *v.*The State.

Decided October 8, 1918.

Indictment for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; from Heard superior court—Judge Searcy presiding. April 20, 1918.

*M.*77. *Mooty,*for plaintiff in error.

*G. E. Boop, solicitor-general,*contra.

Broyles, P. J.

The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds. The conviction of the defendant was authorized by the evidence and has been approved by the trial court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Bloodworth and Harwell, J.J., coneur.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry Pascucci
Jerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director

March 31, 2008
Date

---
#### F. M. Williams *v.*William L. Lomner.

Covenant — Implied Warranty — Bond for Title.

There is no implied warranty by the assignor of a bond for the conveyance of land.

Same — Specific Performance.

A holder of a bond for title, must first seek by legal process, a conveyance from the vendor, and if defeated, can have recourse on the assignor of the bond, but not on implied warranty of title.

APPEAL FROM MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT OOURT.

October 10, 1871.

*Winn &*Summers, Apperson, *for appellant.*

*B. Beid, for'appellee.*

OPINION OF THE CoüRT BY

JuDGE KiNDSAY :

Tbe answer of tbe appellant presents no valid defense. If it be true tbat be held-the bond of Newman for a conveyance of tbe Illinois land in trust for Kamsey and Morris, and tbat tbe note was given in consideration of tbeir surrender to him of tbeir claim to said bond, be at best took it as tbeir assignee.

There is no implied warranty by tbe assignor of a bond for the conveyance of land. *Moredock v. Rawlings, 3d Monroe 75.*It was tbe duty of tbe appellant to take' tbe necessary legal steps to compel Newman to convey tbe land in compliance with bis bond. And if after tbe use of due diligence, be was defeated in this attempt be would have recourse on Kamsey and Morris on tbeir contract of assignment, but not on an implied warranty of title. His answer discloses tbe fact tbat no suit has as yet been brought by him 'against Newman. No allegation of insolvency is made against bis assignors, and no reason is assigned why be has not attempted to compel Newman to convey.

In addition to this fact be fails upon the trial to prove that Newman has refused to convey.

Tbe judgment appealed from must be *affirmed.*
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA

SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO. DA 23-0554

GARY TAYLOR,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

GEORGE ANTHONY TAYLOR and ANNE MARIE TAYLOR,

Defendants and Appellees.

On Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of 

Montana in and for the County of Jefferson, Cause No. DV-2019-110, the 

Honorable Luke Berger

ORDER 

APPEARANCES:

Caitlin T. Pabst

Steven E. Goodson

PABST LAW FIRM

113 East Oak, Suite 2D

Bozeman, MT 59718

Tel: (406) 312-9091

caitlin@pabstlawmt.com

steven@pabstlawmt.com

COUNSEL FOR

DEFENDANTS/APPELLEES

COUNSEL FOR 

DEFENDANTS / APPELLEES

Kevin E. Vainio

27 West Park Street

Butte, MT 59701

Tel: (406) 782-3357

kvailaw@outlook.com

COUNSEL FOR 

PLAINTIFF / APPELLANT

03/29/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0554
 

2

UPON CONSIDERATION of Appellees’ Unopposed Motion for Two Week 

Extension to File Answer Brief, and good cause now appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees’ Answer Brief shall be due on the 

11

th day of April 2024.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

March 29 2024
No. 87-1393.

#### Lisak *v.*Mercantile National Bank of Indiana et al.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Robert Colvin et al *v.*James H. Reynold's Assignee et al.

.Executors — Administrators—Distributee—Overpayment—Motion.

Where an administrator overpays a distributee, pendente lite, a rule for restitution is the proper remedy.

APPEAL EROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

March 8, 1870.

*Oaldwell, Bissell & A., for appellant.*

*Garnett, for appellees.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Robertson :

If the payments to the appellants of tbeir entire demands considerably exceeded their *pro rata*portions of tbe distributable fund as finally reduced, they- are equitably liable to restitution of tbe excess. And as those inadvertent payments by tbe administrator were made *pendente lite,*a rule for restitution was an appropriate remedy.

"Wherefore, as there is no apparent error, tbe judgment is affirmed.
#### John R. Upshaw *v.*W. D. Carbelt, et al.

Garnishment — Answer of Garnishee — Oral Examination Not Required— Depositions.

A garnishee has the right to appear in person and he examined orally or answer in writing, and if he adopts the latter mode he cannot be compelled to appear in person, after a transfer of the case to equity, to undergo an examination before the court, unless he is in contempt of court for failing to make a sufficient answer. His testimony should have been obtained by deposition.

APPEAL PROM PULTON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 5, 1871.

*Goalder*James, *for appellant.*

*Randle &*Tyler, *for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin :

If the appellant, was, as is insisted, only before tbe court as an ordinary garnishee, be bad a right, under section 245 of tbe Civil Code, to appear in person and be examined orally, or answer in writing, and if be adopted tbe latter mode, be should not have been compelled to appear in person, after tbe transfer of tbe case to equity, to undergo an examination before tbe court, unless be was in contempt of court for failing to make a sufficient answer. But as tbe appellant was in this case formally made a defendant in tbe action, and properly so as tbe court decided on the demurrer, and tbe case was on tbe plaintiff’s motion, transferred to equity, so far as appellant was concerned, the case should have remained for preparation and trial as any other suit in equity according to tbe provision of tbe code, and if tbe testimony of tbe appellant was desired it should have been obtained by bis deposition or upon interrogatories before tbe final bearing, and it was both irregular and premature to force him into court to give oral testimony, and try tbe case on tbe result of that examination before tbe action stood for trial according to tbe rules of equity practiced and within the time allowed to parties for preparation.

Wherefore tbe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rolland G. Divin, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tom's Foods Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 11, 2004

/s/ Rolland G. Divin
-----------------------------------------------
Rolland G. Divin
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

                                       17
EXHIBIT 99.29




CONSENT OF GILLES ARSENEAU
 
  The undersigned hereby consents to reference to the undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F being filed by Mercator Minerals Ltd. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with (1) the Preliminary Economic Assessment El Creston Project Opodepe, Sonora, Mexico dated December 16, 2010 (the “PEA Report”) and (2) the annual information form of the Corporation dated March 30, 2012, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the PEA Report and the properties described therein.
  Date: March 30, 2012
   /s/ Gilles Arseneau

Gilles Arseneau, P. Geo.
[exhibit424002.gif]





October 22, 2007

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

Attached to this filing, in PDF format, are the following documents:

1.

Exhibit 4.24.

Yours very truly,

CROSSHAIR EXPLORATION & MINING CORP.

[signed]
Julie Bolden
VP Corporate Affairs

/jlb
Encl.



|                                                 |                                                   |                                                
|------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|                                                 |                                                   |                                                
|Targeting Uranium and Gold                       | Trading Symbol: CXX                               | Website: www.crosshairexploration.com          
|Head Office: Suite 1240, 1140 West Pender Street | Telephone: 604-681-8030                           | Investor email: dan@crosshairexploration.com   
|Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 4G1      | Toll Free: 1-866-683-8030
Facsimile: 604-681-8039 | General email: michele@crosshairexploration.com
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, SCOTT MUNRO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: December 9, 2004 | /s/ Scott MunroScott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0605 BOARD OF REGENTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION OF THE STATE OF MONTANA,

Petitioner and Appellee,
v. THE STATE OF MONTANA, BY AND THROUGH AUSTIN KNUDSEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellant. 

# FILED FEB 1 8 2022 Bowen Greenw000 Clerk of Supreme Court State of lw,,Itana ORDER

ThisCourtreviewsbriefstoensure compliancewith Rules 11 and 12 oftheMontana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the amicus curiae brief of Montana Shooting Sports Association electronically filed on February 17, 2022, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below-referenced Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 11(6)(b)(iii) requires the cover page to include the name, the venue ofthe tribunal, and thejudge in which the case originated or from which appeal is taken. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced briefis rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days ofthe date ofthis Order the Amicus shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court this brief containing the revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule and that Amicus shall serve copies ofthe revised briefon all parties ofrecord; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than those specified in this Order may be made to the briefas originally filed; and 02/18/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0605The Clerk is directed toprovide a true copy ofthis OrdertoAmicus and to all parties

ofrecord. DATED this 18th day ofFebruary, 2022. 

# ?.-i /e Aiiit, Justice

2
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 10, 2009
    By:

/s/ Raymond K. GubaRaymond K. GubaExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer