alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Naseem Saiyed","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cwUqVRkXbQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/naseem-saiyed\/\">Naseem Saiyed<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/naseem-saiyed\/embed\/#?secret=cwUqVRkXbQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Naseem Saiyed” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cwUqVRkXbQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/naseem-saiyed.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":764}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 912

To amend section 1928 of the Social Security Act to extend eligibility for

Medicaid payment for administration of a pediatric vaccine to all children

who are not insured with respect to that vaccine.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 4, 1997

Mr. BACHUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To amend section 1928 of the Social Security Act to extend

eligibility for Medicaid payment for administration of

a pediatric vaccine to all children who are not insured

with respect to that vaccine.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENDING MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY FOR A PE4 DIATRIC VACCINE TO ALL CHILDREN UNIN5 SURED FOR THE VACCINE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1928(b)(2) of the Social

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396s(b)(2)) is amended—
2

•HR 912 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A)(iii), by striking ‘‘(I)’’

2 and all that follows through ‘‘(II)’’, and

3 (2) in subparagraph (B)(ii)(II), by striking

4 ‘‘(A)(iii)(II)’’ and inserting ‘‘(A)(iii)’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to vaccines administered on or

7 after October 1, 1997, without regard to whether or not

8 regulations to carry out such amendments have been pro9 mulgated by such date.

Æ
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 22

- 30076 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Brittany Monroe Knapp,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 80

- 1

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

The attorney appointed to represent Brittany Monroe Knapp has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Knapp has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 1, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30076 Document: 00516530249 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/01/2022No. 22

- 30076

2 brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellat e review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2

. Case: 22-30076 Document: 00516530249 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/01/2022
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Garrett Shea","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/garrett-shea-1nasa-gov\/","title":"John Daniel \u201cDanny\u201d Olivas","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vS0C4e70hS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/dr-john-daniel-danny-olivas-pe\/\">John Daniel \u201cDanny\u201d Olivas<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/people\/dr-john-daniel-danny-olivas-pe\/embed\/#?secret=vS0C4e70hS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“John Daniel \u201cDanny\u201d Olivas” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vS0C4e70hS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/nac_olivas_john.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":868}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"X-59 Construction Reaches Halfway Point","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hGjiFiZwyU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-59-construction-reaches-halfway-point-2\/\">X-59 Construction Reaches Halfway Point<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-59-construction-reaches-halfway-point-2\/embed\/#?secret=hGjiFiZwyU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-59 Construction Reaches Halfway Point” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hGjiFiZwyU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/p20-293-02.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":299}
IB

House Calendar No. 83

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 962

[Report No. 105–229]

To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland, Maryland, as the ‘‘W. Edwards

Deming Federal Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 5, 1997

Mr. WYNN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

JULY 31, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland, Maryland,

as the ‘‘W. Edwards Deming Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 Federal Office Building No. 3 located in the Suitland

5 Federal Center at 4700 Silver Hill Road in Suitland,
2

•HR 962 RH

1 Maryland, shall be redesignated and known as the ‘‘W.

2 Edwards Deming Federal Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

7 a reference to the ‘‘W. Edwards Deming Federal Build8 ing’’.

House Calendar No. 83

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 962

[Report No. 105–229]

A BILL

To redesignate a Federal building in Suitland,

Building’’.Maryland, as the ‘‘W. Edwards Deming Federal

JULY 31, 1997

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-57","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1VxqwQChCq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-57\/\">STS-57<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-57\/embed\/#?secret=1VxqwQChCq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-57” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1VxqwQChCq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/STS057-S-002\/STS057-S-002~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

HERBERT E. TOWNSEND,

Appellant

v.

BROOKS SPORTS, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2021-2143

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-

00577.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

STEVEN JOHN HAMPTON, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, 

Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by HERBERT D. HART, III. 

 DARREN EDWARD DONNELLY, Polsinelli LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 21-2143 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2022
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

June 9, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2143 Document: 47 Page: 2 Filed: 06/09/2022
9133.

#### Scruggs *v.*Morel.

Decided March 15, 1918.

Appeal; from Effingham superior court—Judge Sheppard. July 9, 1917.

*Don. E. Clark,*for plaintiff.

*Gignilliat &*Gignilliat, for defendant.

Wade, C. J..

1. The title to the property not being vested in the decedent at the time of his death, it could not be set aside as a year’s support for his widow and minor children.

2. There was no reversible error in admitting the evidence objected to; nor is there any merit in the remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*Jenkins and Luke, JJ., eoneur.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2







INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

To the Board of Directors
Navistar Financial Retail Receivables Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion that Navistar Financial Corporation (the
"Company") has complied as of and for the year ended October 31, 2004, with its
established minimum servicing standards described in the accompanying
Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance dated January 31, 2005, for the
servicing of the receivables for the Navistar Financial 2001-A Owner Trust. The
Company's management is responsible for compliance with those minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with its minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with its minimum
servicing standards.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with the
Company's minimum servicing standards. The Company was noncompliant with the
requirement that custodial bank accounts and related bank clearing accounts are
reconciled within 45 days after the cutoff date as specified in item I.1.b in
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, except for the noncompliance described in the preceding
paragraph, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended October
31, 2004 is fairly stated, in all material respects based on the criteria set
forth in Appendix I.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    Deloitte & Touche LLP
    Chicago, IL


January 31, 2005
9846.

#### Columbus Railroad Company *v.*Holcombe.

Luke, J.

1. A street-railroad company has only an equal right with the traveling public to the use of the street in which its track is laid. .In using the highway at a public crossing the law gives to the travelers on the highway the same right to cross the track that it gives to the street-car to cross the highway; and the law imposes on the street-railroad company the duty of ordinary care to avoid injury by its cars to persons attempting to cross the track at gpeh places.

2. In a suit against a street-railroad company, where the petition alleged that the injured persons was fifty-four years- of age, deaf in his left ear, and hard oí hearing in his right ear, and approached a street-railroad crossing after looking to his right and left along the railroad-track, and saw a car standing some distance away, and believing he had ample time to- cross the track before a car could reach the crossing *677where he desired to cross, proceeded on across the street to the crossing ■and on to the track, and as *he stepped upon the trade*he was' struck by a street-car and knocked down, etc., a general demurrer to the petition should have been sustained; for it is clear, from the allegations made, that by the exercise of ordinary care he could have avoided the injury. The proximate- cause of the injury was his miscalculation, that he had time to cross the track ahead of the car, and his failure to observe the car at all 'after he' made his calculation. The, court erred in overruling the demurrer.

Decided October 15, 1918.

. Action-for damages; from Muscogee, superior court—Judge Howard. May 20, 1918.

*F. U. Garrard, A. 8. Beasley,*for plaintiff in error.

*B. Terry,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Wade,.0. J., and Jenlcms, J., concur.*
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 8

- 0 0 630

- C V

Style: George Wood v. Matthew D. Wiggins, Jr.

Date motion filed * : J u ly 1 1 , 201 8

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion t o E xten d T ime f o r F il ing Notice of Appeal

Party filing motion: A ppellant George Wood ’s counsel, George F. May

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No

.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 6 , 201 8 ( regular appeal deadline) ; June 26,

2018 (interlocutory appeal deadline)

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due D ate: July 6, 2018 ; July 11, 2018

(15

- day grace period for interlocutory deadline)

Date Requested: Ju ly 5 , 201 8

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

To the extent that this is an interlocutory appeal, a ppellant Wood’ s motion t o exten d

the time f o r fil ing the notice of appeal is granted because the notice of appeal was

filed on July 5, 2018, within the 15

- day grace period for interlocutory appeals ending

on July 11, 2018, and counsel’s motion provides a reasonable explanation for the

9

- day delay

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5 (b)

, 26.1 (b)

, 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner , 959

S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Hone v. Hanafin , 104 S.W.3d 884, 886

- 87 (Tex. 2003 ).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ L a ura C. Higley



Date: July 1 9 , 2018
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
DC 20549








FORM
10-Q/A


Amendment
No. 1








x QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934





For the
quarterly period ended March
31, 2008








Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12 b - 2 of the Exchange Act)   Yes  ̈Nox








Commission
File Number 0-26573








PHYSICAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS
INC.


(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)








Delaware
            98-0203281(State
      or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
            (IRS
      Employer Identification No.)








23/F
AIA Tower


No.
183 Electric Road, North Point


Hong
Kong


(Address
of principal executive offices)








(011)
(852) 2917-0000


(Registrant's
telephone number)








Check
whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.    Yesx No
 ̈





Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act:





Large
Accelerated Filer o   Accelerated
Filer o   Non-accelerated
Filer o   Smaller
Reporting Company x





Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act):    Yes o   No
x





State the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date: March 31, 2008, 28,329,353 shares.





EXPLANATORY
NOTE





This
abbreviated Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
is being filed to revise the certifications of the Principal Executive Officer
and the Principal Financial Officer to conform to the form of certification in
Item 601(b)(31)(i) of Regulation S-K.








SIGNATURES










Pursuant
to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.








PHYSICAL
PROPERTY HOLDINGS INC.


(Registrant)







September
      12, 2008
            /s/
      Ngai Keung LukNgai
      Keung LukChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)September
      12, 2008
            /s/
      Darrie LamDarrie
      LamChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)







- 2
-