alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-128","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aCNxLpf82a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-128\/\">STS-128<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-128\/embed\/#?secret=aCNxLpf82a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-128” — NASA\" data-secret=\"aCNxLpf82a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-2009-4570\/KSC-2009-4570~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Carlos Navarro-Cuevas, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01377-PHX-DGC

DETENTION ORDER 

 On July 11, 2017, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 11th day of July, 2017. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00674

- CV

Maria Perez

- Montes

v. Live Oak Construction, Inc.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 3 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2011CCV

- 61394

- 3

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified be low for observance. May 14 , 2015
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Seeing the Solar Eclipse from 223,000 Miles Away","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"j4hfyyjSmP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/m1467242026l-cal-echo-reduce11-4fi-rotate-ee9150\/\">Seeing the Solar Eclipse from 223,000 Miles Away<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/m1467242026l-cal-echo-reduce11-4fi-rotate-ee9150\/embed\/#?secret=j4hfyyjSmP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Seeing the Solar Eclipse from 223,000 Miles Away” — NASA\" data-secret=\"j4hfyyjSmP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/m1467242026l-cal-echo-reduce11-4fi-rotate-ee9150.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Angelica Jackson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Diversified Consultants Incorporated, 

Defendant.

No. CV-16-00019-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice, 

(Doc. 19), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED dismissing this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own 

attorney’s fees and costs. 

 Dated this 18th day of April, 2016. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge

Case 2:16-cv-00019-DLR Document 20 Filed 04/18/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Shinn *v.*Barrie.

Opinion delivered October 13, 1930.

*367
      *Robert Bailey,*for appellant.

*Robinson, Blouse $ Moses*and *Franlc Bird,*for appellee.

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The decree of the chancery court was correct. No statutory right of redemption from the sale under the mortgage exists because the mortgagor had waived his right of such a redemption in the mortgage. *Smith,*v. *Simpson,*129 Ark. 275, 195 S. W. 1067.

Independent of the statute allowing the redemption by paying the amount for which the property is sold with interest and costs, there is in equity a right to redeem from the mortgage, which right may be exercised by the mortgagor or any one claiming the equity of redemption under him. The rule in equity, however, requires that, to redeem property sold under a mortgage for less than the mortgage debt, the whole mortgage must be paid or tendered into court, and it is not sufficient to tender the amount for which the property sold. *Wood*v. *Holland,*53 Ark. 69, 13 S. W. 739 ; *Smith,*v. *Simpson,*129 Ark. 275, 195 S. W. 1067.

The reason is that, the debt being a unit, no party interested in the whole premises or in any portion of them can compel the mortgagee to accept a part of the debt and to relieve the property *pro tanto*from the lien. In such cases, a mortgage in equity and in fact is only a security for the payment of a debt; and it is essential, in order to exercise what is known as the “mortgagor’s *368equity of redemption,” that the whole of the mortgage indebtedness must be tendered and paid.

Appellant only tendered the amount of the bid at the foreclosure sale which was less than the whole amount of the mortgage indebtedness. Hence the rule of the court was correct; and in this view of the matter it is not necessary to decide whether appellant waited too late to exercise the right of redemption. Therefore the decree will 'be affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Belleville","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michelle-h-bellevillenasa-gov\/","title":"STS-109","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VR9rmduyuY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-109\/\">STS-109<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-109\/embed\/#?secret=VR9rmduyuY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-109” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VR9rmduyuY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/sts109crew.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROGER JAMES HOLT.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Argo-Tech Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 27, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                           
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report.

|                         |  |         |  |                                                                  
|------------------------ |  | ------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 10, 2002 |  | By: /s/ |  | Michael S. Lipscomb
Michael S. Lipscomb
Chief Executive Officer  
|                        
|                        
|                        
|                        
|                         |  |         |  |                                                                  
|                        
|                        
|                        
|                        
|                         |  | By: /s/ |  | Frances S. St. Clair
Frances S. St. Clair
Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

19
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, KENNETH GALPIN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

|  
 
 
 
Date: June 18, 2007
 
/s/ Kenneth Galpin 
 
 
Kenneth		Galpin		President and Chief Executive Officer  
  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 10.2


            AUDITORS' REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF ASTRAZENECA PLC


We have audited the accompanying consolidated group balance sheets of
AstraZeneca Plc and subsidiaries ('AstraZeneca') as of December 31, 2002 and
2001 and the related consolidated group profit and loss accounts, consolidated
group statements of total recognised gains and losses and consolidated
statements of group cash flow for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2002. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of AstraZeneca's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the aforementioned consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AstraZeneca as of
December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
Kingdom.

As more fully described in the "Basis of Consolidation and Presentation of
Finanical Information" note to the consolidated financial statements,
AstraZeneca has adopted FRS No. 19 Deferred Tax in the year ended December 31,
2002. Consequently, AstraZeneca's consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2001 and the two year period ended December 31, 2001 referred to
above have been restated.

Generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom vary in certain
significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Application of generally accepted accounting principles in
the United States of America would have affected results of operations for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 and shareholders'
equity as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, to the extent summarised in the
"Additional Information for US Investors" section of the consolidated financial
statements on pages 113 to 122 of the consolidated financial statements. As
discussed in the "Additional Information for US Investors" section of the
consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2002, AstraZeneca
fully adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets".



/s/  KPMG AUDIT PLC

KPMG Audit Plc
Chartered Accountants
Registered Auditor
8 Salisbury Square
London
EC4Y 8BB


January 30, 2003
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Engineers Prepare Rockets, Crew Trains for First Skylab Missions","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"y1bYlsqV76\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-engineers-prepare-rockets-crew-trains-for-first-skylab-missions\/\">50 Years Ago: Engineers Prepare Rockets, Crew Trains for First Skylab Missions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-engineers-prepare-rockets-crew-trains-for-first-skylab-missions\/embed\/#?secret=y1bYlsqV76\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Engineers Prepare Rockets, Crew Trains for First Skylab Missions” — NASA\" data-secret=\"y1bYlsqV76\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/skylab_l-2_months_1_19730312_ksc-73p-111.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":475}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 697 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 697

   To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for 
               certain health maintenance organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 1997

 Mr. Bilirakis (for himself, Mrs. Thurman, and Mrs. Fowler) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To waive temporarily the Medicaid enrollment composition rule for 
               certain health maintenance organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT RULE FOR CERTAIN MANAGED 
              CARE ORGANIZATIONS.

    The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(m)(2)(A)(ii)) is waived with respect to HealthCare 
USA, Inc. and Ultramedix Health Care Systems Inc. operating in Florida 
for contract periods beginning on or after July 1, 1996, and ending on 
or before June 30, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
#### Colman *v.*Graeter, in Error.

DEBT against three persons. The writ was served on two on]y? and returned as to the other “non est inventus.” Held, that this return*, with a suggestion of it on the record, authorizes the plaintiff, in such suit, to proceed against those on whom the process is served; Stat. 1823, p. 290; but that a return of “no inhabitant” was formerly required in such cases. *Morris*v. *Knight,*ante, p. *106.*— Palmer v. *Crosby,*ante, p. 139.