alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.35.1

                                  July 30, 2007


Talon International, Inc.
(f/k/a Tag-It Pacific, Inc.)
21900 Burbank Blvd., Suite 270
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Attention:  Mr. Lonnie D. Schnell, CFO

         Re:      AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LOAN AGREEMENT

Dear Sirs:

         Reference is made to the Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement dated
June 27, 2007 (the "LOAN  AGREEMENT") by and between Bluefin  Capital,  LLC (the
"LENDER")  and Talon  International,  Inc.  (f/k/a  Tag-It  Pacific,  Inc.) (the
"BORROWER").  All  capitalized  terms used herein  without  definition  have the
respective meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement.

         This will confirm the  agreement of the Lender and the Borrower to make
the following correction to the Loan Agreement as follows:

         1.       CORRECTED COVENANT.  Section 6.17 the Loan Agreement is hereby
amended, effective as of June 29, 2007, so as to read in full as follows:

                  SECTION  6.17.  COVERAGE  TEST.  Permit,  as of the end of any
         quarter of any Fiscal  Year,  principal  and  interest  payments by the
         Borrower  and its  Subsidiaries  for the  four (4)  consecutive  fiscal
         quarters then ended (excluding principal of the Convertible  Debentures
         and principal  payments  made from a matched  source where such matched
         source  makes the  payment)  to exceed  EBITDA for such four (4) fiscal
         quarter period; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the Lender shall not accelerate
         the Obligations by reason of any non-compliance  with this Section 6.17
         unless and until  non-compliance  herewith  occurs as of the end of two
         (2) consecutive fiscal quarters.


<PAGE>


         2.       ONGOING  FORCE  AND  EFFECT.  Except  as  expressly  set forth
herein,  all of the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement  remain unchanged
and in full force and effect.  From and after June 29, 2007,  all  references to
the Loan Agreement in any other Loan Documents  shall mean and refer to the Loan
Agreement as amended by this Amendment No. 1.

         3.       GOVERNING  LAW.  This  amendment  shall  be  governed  by  and
construed in accordance  with the laws of the State of New York,  without giving
effect to conflicts of laws principles.

         Kindly  confirm your  agreement to the  foregoing by  countersigning  a
counterpart copy of this Amendment No. 1 in the space provided below.


                                    Very truly yours,

                                    BLUEFIN CAPITAL, LLC

                                    By:  /S/ LARRY E. LENIG, JR.
                                         ----------------------------------
                                         Larry E. Lenig, Jr., Vice Chairman


Acknowledged, Confirmed and Agreed To:

TALON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(f/k/a Tag-It Pacific, Inc.)

By:  /S/ LONNIE D. SCHNELL
     ------------------------------------------
     Lonnie D. Schnell, Chief Financial Officer


                                       2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"A Full Moon Illuminates Artemis I","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"s1MIZAb66m\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/ksc-20220614-ph-jbs01-0332orig\/\">A Full Moon Illuminates Artemis I<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/ksc-20220614-ph-jbs01-0332orig\/embed\/#?secret=s1MIZAb66m\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Full Moon Illuminates Artemis I” — NASA\" data-secret=\"s1MIZAb66m\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/ksc-20220614-ph-jbs01_0332orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 11/30/99
AGRIBRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF  EARNINGS  AND  IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0001047598
<NAME>                           AGRIBRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                               161,400
<SECURITIES>                           1,800
<RECEIVABLES>                         90,100
<ALLOWANCES>                          12,000
<INVENTORY>                           98,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     345,000
<PP&E>                               348,600
<DEPRECIATION>                       180,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       568,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                147,500
<BONDS>                               11,000
<COMMON>                                 100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                           382,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         568,000
<SALES>                              890,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     890,200
<CGS>                                741,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        741,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      95,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       51,400
<INCOME-TAX>                          17,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   34,300
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          34,300
<EPS-BASIC>                             3.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                           3.27
<FN>
F1 LOSS - PROVISION INCLUDED IN OTHER-EXPENSE ABOVE
</FN>


</TABLE>
560 A.2d 309

#### Monica BROWN and Roy Brown v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al. Appeal of CITY OF PHILADELPHIA.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued March 7, 1989.

Decided June 23, 1989.

*550Alan C. Ostrow, Asst. City Sol., Norman S. Weaver, Chief Deputy in Charge of Claims, and Barbara R. Axelrod, Div. Deputy in Charge of Appeals, Seymour Kurland, City Sol., Philadelphia, for appellant.

Allen L. Feingold, James P. Hadden, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge, McGINLEY (P.), J., and NARICK, Senior Judge.

CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge.

The City of Philadelphia and its Department of Public Health Community Health Services (collectively referred to as “the City defendants”) seek to appeal a Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court order denying their motion for judgment on the pleadings. Monica and Roy Brown, who commenced this personal injury action against the City defendants, move to quash the appeal.

The Browns sued the City defendants alleging that, following Monica’s treatment at a City public health center where she underwent x-rays, she discovered that she was pregnant and that the x-rays could harm the fetus. The *551complaint avers that this caused her to suffer psychological stress and to undergo an abortion because of the potential harm to the fetus. The City defendants asserted, by way of new matter, governmental immunity as affirmative defenses, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 8541—8564.

The City defendants then moved for judgment on the pleadings, contending that the Browns’ action was not within a statutory immunity exception. The trial court denied this motion.

We conclude that this case is controlled by *Bollinger v. Obrecht,*122 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 562, 552 A.2d 359 (1989). There we held that an interlocutory order rejecting a claim of immunity under Pennsylvania law is not a final order or a collateral order since it is not separate from and collateral to the main cause of action. Likewise, the trial court’s order in this action is an unappealable interlocutory order. Therefore, we grant the Browns’ motion to quash the appeal.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the application to quash appeal filed by Monica Brown and Roy Brown, said application is granted and the appeal is hereby quashed.
Exhibit 4.19
​

Exclusive Services Agreement
This Exclusive Services Agreement (this “Agreement”) is concluded in Beijing on January 11, 2021 by and between:
Party A: Abitcool (China) Broadband Inc.
Registered address: Room 10, 3/F, Administrative Service Building, No.6 Zhongxing Road, Hongmei Town, Dongguan
Party B: WiFire Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
Registered address: Room 802, Information Building, No. 13, Linyin North Street, Pinggu District, Beijing
Upon equal and voluntary negotiation, both Parties reach a consensus on the provision of Internet technical services and management consulting services under the Exclusive Technical Consulting and Service Agreement entered into by and between Party A and Party B on January 11, 2021, and hereby agree as follows:
	1.
	During the term of this Agreement, Party A shall provide Party B with, and Party B agrees to receive from Party A, the management consulting and Internet technical services.


	2.
	During the term of this Agreement, without the prior consent of Party A, Party B shall not seek any entity or individual other than Party A to provide management consulting and Internet technologies or such other similar services.


	3.
	Service fees shall be calculated and paid as per RMB1,000/hour, which may be adjusted by Party A at any time at its sole discretion and decision. Service fees shall be paid on a monthly basis. Every month, Party B shall pay the Service Fees within 5 days after examining and verifying the invoice issued and provided by Party A.


	4.
	All intellectual property rights generated in Party A providing services hereunder shall belong to Party A; provided, however, that if compulsory legal provisions have provided otherwise, such compulsory legal provisions shall apply with respect to the determination of the ownership of the intellectual property rights.


	5.
	The Parties shall each ensure that they have all rights, qualifications and capacity necessary for negotiation, execution and performance of this Agreement.


	6.
	The Parties shall each keep confidential the confidential information obtained from the other signing party in the process of negotiation, execution and performance of this Agreement.


	7.
	This Agreement shall terminate when a new agreement has been entered into between the Parties in connection with service matters set out hereunder.


	8.
	This Agreement shall be executed in two counterparts, with each party holding one copy.


[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
​

​



​

[Signature Page to Exclusive Services Agreement]
​
​
Party A: /s/ Abitcool (China) Broadband Inc.
​
​
Party B: /s/ WiFire Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

​
Order entered January 18 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 00534

- CV

STEWART TITLE GUARAN TY COMPANY, Appellant

V.

JOHN & LUCY MIMS, HE LEN COTTON RAGLAND, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Co urt

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10

- 14112



### O RDER

Appellant’s October 3, 2012 motion for leave to file response to sur

- reply brief is

GRANTED and the response tendered on October 3, 2012 is ORDERED filed as of the date of

this order.

/s/ MICH AEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________

No. 07-13-00339-CR 

________________________

JAMES JAY LARGE, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

 

On Appeal from the 181st District Court 

Randall County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 16,028-B; Honorable John B. Board, Presiding 

 

October 16, 2013 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant, James Jay Large, was convicted in 2007 of four counts of aggravated 

sexual assault of a child and sentenced to thirty years confinement for Count I, fifteen 

years confinement for Count II and twenty-five years confinement for Counts III and IV. 

The documents filed by Appellant reflect that his conviction was the result of a plea 

bargain. On October 15, 2013, Appellant, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal in 
2

the trial court requesting permission to appeal based on newly discovered evidence. 

For the reasons expressed herein, we dismiss this purported appeal for want of 

jurisdiction.

A timely and proper notice of appeal invokes this Court=s jurisdiction. State v. 

Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). When, as here, no motion for new 

trial was filed, the notice of appeal was required to be filed within thirty days after the 

day Appellant’s sentence was imposed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The deadline could 

have been extended if, within fifteen days of the deadline, Appellant had filed the notice 

with the trial court clerk and had also filed a motion for extension of time in compliance 

with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in this Court. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.3. This Court has no authority to invoke Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure to enlarge the time in which to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 2; Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998).

The District Clerk’s Certificate filed in this Court with the notice of appeal reflects 

that Appellant’s sentence was imposed in open court on July 25, 2007. No motion for 

new trial having been filed, the thirtieth day to file the notice of appeal was August 24, 

2007. Applying the fifteen day extension provided by Rule 26.3 extended the deadline 

to Monday, September 10, 2007.

1

 The notice of appeal, however, was not filed until 

more than six years later on October 15, 2013, after all deadlines for doing so had 

expired. 

 

1

The fifteenth day fell on Saturday, September 8th, but was extended to September 10, 2007, pursuant to 

Rule 4.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
3

Although Appellant could be entitled to relief by filing a post-conviction writ of 

habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an 

out-of-time appeal pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 

2012), his untimely filing of his notice of appeal herein prevents this Court from 

acquiring jurisdiction to entertain his appeal at this time.

Consequently, this purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
- - - - - - - -
NO. 22-0377 KAMALAKANNAN SIVANANDAM v. THEMESOFT, INC. § § § § § § Dallas County, 5th District.
September 2, 2022 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.  I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioner, KAMALAKANNAN SIVANANDAM, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 7th day of October, 2022.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, William T. Bromage, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webster Preferred CapitalCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:November 09, 2006     /s/ William T. Bromage   William T. Bromage  President  Principal Executive Officer  
18
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 851 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 851 Filed 02/19/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDPLUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 ADN IS QUALIFIED IN TIS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       2,700,607
<SECURITIES>                                   300,510
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,239,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (100,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    827,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               943,089
<PP&E>                                       1,922,108
<DEPRECIATION>                               (459,290)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,847,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,741,599
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,076
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,847,144
<SALES>                                     10,940,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,940,456
<CGS>                                        5,477,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,477,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,470,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,472,192)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,044,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               95,908,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     167,272,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (18,920,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             245,739,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 123,393,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               245,739,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,575,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,010,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               737,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,930,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,825,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61


</TABLE>