alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted October 1, 2008

Decided October 15, 2008

AMENDED October 16, 2008

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

No. 08

‐ 1291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

THOMAS KING,

Defendant

‐ Appellant

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 1:99

‐ cr

‐ 00952

‐ 1

Ruben Castillo,

Judge

.

O R D E R

The defendant

‐ appellant in this case was convicted of: (1) conspiracy to distribute in

excess of 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (Count One); (2) distribution

of 123.5 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (Count Two); and (3) using a

communication facility to facilitate a drug crime, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (Counts

Three

‐ Six). On appeal, this court affirmed the convictions but remanded the matter to the trial

court for re

‐ sentencing post

‐ Booker

. ( United States v. Booker

, 543 U.S. 220 (2005.) The defendant

‐ appellant now appeals the new sentence. 

### NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 08

‐ 1291 Page 2

This court has carefully reviewed the Amended Judgement in a Criminal Case issued

by the District Court on February 4, 2008, the record on appeal, and the briefs filed by the

parties.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this case is summarily affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian D. Urban, Chief Financial Officer of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

 

(i) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: February 25, 2005 

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 	AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 	OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

           In connection with the Quarterly report of Inland Fiber	Group, L.L.C. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities	and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas C. Ludlow, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,	pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

           1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

           2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

/s/ Thomas C. Ludlow  Thomas C. Ludlow   Chief Financial Officer 	November 14, 2004

  

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,	or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required	by Section 906, has been provided to Inland Fiber Group, L.L.C. and will be retained by Inland Fiber Group, LLC and furnished to	the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the period ended March 31, 2005 of MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the Issuer) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on this date hereof. I, Robert Valentine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 16, 2005



/s/ Robert ValentineRobert ValentineVice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Jordan Davis,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03412-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8480 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8480 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2
Honorable Tom C. King State Auditor Austin, Texas Bear Sir: opinion No. O-1480 Re: Validity

of old age assistance warrants

held by investors. We are pleased to comply with your request for OUT opinionon the following

question

submitted

by your letter of September 22nd: "If a financial

institution

or investor

shouldbuy $15O,OOO.OC old age assistance

warrants from receipients of old age assistance.

or the holders of such warrants, and heI. them in his/itsportfolio,

would such holding in any manner affect the legality

of the instrumanta prior to the runningof the warrants?" As you point out in your letter, of Texas, 195, as amended, Acts Chapter 242, 8 1, provides: as an obligation of the state statuteof limitation on state
Article 4371,Revised Civil Statutes 

### 1931, k2nd Legislature,

p. 

### 396,
*The Treasurer

shall contersign

and pay all warrants drawn by the Comutroller on the Treasury

which are authorized by **Law.** No money shall be paid out of the Treasuryexcept a the warrantsof the Comptroller, and no warrant shall be paid by the Treasurer unlesspresented

for payment

within two year5 from the close of the fiscal year in which such warrant

was issued,

but claims for the payment of such warrants

may be presented

to the Legislature for appropriations to be made from which such claimsmay be paid." Old age assistance

warrants issuedagainst the "StateDepartment of Public Welfare Pund" under authority of SenateBill No. 

### 36,Acts 

### 1939,46th Legislature,

are unquestionably

valid obligation5

of the State payableout of said fund. Such warrantsare transferable, thoughnot negotiable. Their validity cannot be in anyway affected by the fact that they may be transferred

to investors

and held by them so long as they are presented to the State Treasurer for payment "withintwo year5 from the close of the fiscal year" in which such warrantsare issued. Nor is suoh warrant holder'ssecurity

of payment impaired for failure to present such warrants

promptlyto the Treasurer for payment. Article 

### 4386, Revised Civil Statutes,

control5

the paymentof thesewarrants and providesthat:Hon. Tom C. King, Page #2 O-1480

,I

. . . in the event of a question and necessity

arisingas to the priority

of paymentof any such warrants, they shall be paid in order of their serialnumber . . .II In accordance

with this Article the Treasureris requiredto maintain in any fund out of which outstanding warrants

are payable,

sufficient money to pay such outstanding warrantsat all **times,** before he may pay otherwarrants

bearing a subsequent serialnumber. See Williamson **vs.** Franklin

County, 94 S. W. (2d) 1190.

**Yours** very truly A!LTORNEY

GENERAL

OF TEXAS 51 Walter R. Koch

BY Walter R. Koch

Assistant WPiK:N/ldw APROVFaDSEP. 25, 1939 s/W. F. Moore FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORXEY-L APPROVED OPINION COMMJTEE BP B. W. B. CHAIRMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Angela Maynard,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04653-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Gallagher Law Firm

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/15/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9411 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9411 Filed 12/21/17 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 508 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 508

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the FICA tax 
      inapplicable to overtime hours of small business employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1997

 Mr. Andrews introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the FICA tax 
      inapplicable to overtime hours of small business employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INAPPLICABILITY OF FICA TAX TO OVERTIME HOURS OF SMALL 
              BUSINESS EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 3121 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining wages) is amended by striking ``or'' at 
the end of paragraph (20), by striking the period at the end of 
paragraph (21) and inserting ``; or'', and by inserting after paragraph 
(21) the following new paragraph:
            ``(22) remuneration with respect to employment paid to an 
        individual by a small employer on an hourly basis for hours 
        worked by such individual for such small employer for any week, 
        to the extent that such hours exceed 40 such hours for such 
        week.''
    (b) Small Employer.--Subsection (a) of section 3121 of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``For purposes of paragraph (22), the term `small employer' means an 
employer that employed not more than 20 full-time employees during the 
preceding taxable year. Persons treated as a single employer for 
purposes of subsection (a) or (b) of section 52 shall be treated as a 
single employer for purposes of the preceding sentence.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to remuneration paid after December 31, 1997, with respect to 
hours worked after such date.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert E. Lanier,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03450-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8544 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8544 Filed 11/02/17 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS No. 2:15-MD-02641-DGC 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This document relates to: 

EDDIE HALL 

Civil Case No. 2:17-CV-02326-DGC 

* * * * * * * * * * * * *          *

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-02326 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff EDDIE HALL 

and Defendants C.R. BARD, INC. AND BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. through their 

undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, 

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). It is further agreed that the dismissal 

will only apply to docket number 2:17-CV-02326-DGC and will not have any effect on any other 

cases filed in regards to Plaintiff Eddie Hall with different docket numbers. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 1st day of November, 2017. 

 MURRAY LAW FIRM 

 /s/ Stephen B. Murray, Jr. 

 Stephen B. Murray, Jr. (LA Bar No. 23877) 

 650 Poydras Street, Suite 2150 

 New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 

 (504) 525-8100 

 smurrayjr@murray-lawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8528 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on this 1st day of November, 2017, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of 

notice of electronic filing. 

 /s/ Stephen B. Murray, Jr. 

 Stephen B. Murray, Jr. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8528 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:15-cr-01478-DGC Document 4 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01478-DGC Document 4 Filed 10/15/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01478-DGC Document 4 Filed 10/15/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Scientists Probe How Long-Term Spaceflight Alters Immunity","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7drhAdwDg4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/scientists-probe-how-long-term-spaceflight-alters-immunity\/\">Scientists Probe How Long-Term Spaceflight Alters Immunity<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/scientists-probe-how-long-term-spaceflight-alters-immunity\/embed\/#?secret=7drhAdwDg4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Scientists Probe How Long-Term Spaceflight Alters Immunity” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7drhAdwDg4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/serena_aunon-chancellor-saliva-sample-immunity-study-space-station.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}