alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:15-mj-01970-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/31/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01970-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/31/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01970-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/31/15 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64628-64629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

[[Page 64629]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, 
Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#64252725140116090d1017240a17024a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fbbab8ba8b9e8996928f88bb95889dd59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 18, 2014 the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. After considering all comments received, the 
permit modification was issued on October 24, 2014 to: Dan McGrath and 
Dwayne Stevens, Permit No. 2014-007.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-25771 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Gibbons *v.*Surber.

In a joint action against two, on a joint or on a joint and several contract, the plaintiff cannot take judgment against one alone, unless the process be returned *non est inventus*as to the other.

*Monday, November*28.

ERROR to the *Hendricks*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

This was an action of debt by the assignee of a joint and several bond for the payment of á sum of money, in which he declared jointly against all the obligors *j Smith*and *Gibbons.*The record contains- no notice of *Smith*whatever, after the filing of the declaration. *Gibbons*appeared and put in a special plea in bar', upon which issue was joined; which being found for the plaintiff below, a separate judgment was rendered against *Gibbons*for the debt demanded and damages.

The error assigned is the rendition of this judgment against one obligor, without any disposition of the suit having been made as to his co-obligor, sued jointly with him.

The law is well settled in *England,*that in a joint action against several on contract, a valid judgment cannot be rendered against a part of the defendants, on -whom process may have been served, without having first proceeded to outlawry against the residue of them. 1 Strange, 473.—2 id. 1269.—15 East, 1.—1 Maule & Selw. 242. The same doctrine has been recognised and established by our own and other *American*decisions, substituting in the place of the *English*process of outlawry, statutory provisions designed to effect the same object. 1 Blackf. 106.—Ib. 139.—7 Crunch, 194.

It is true that in this case, the contract on which the suit in the Court *below*was founded is *joint*and *several.*Rut the defendant in error cannot avoid the force of the authorities above quoted, in consideration of that circumstance.. The only difference between a contract merely *joint,*and one joint and several, as respects the right of the holder of the one or the other in pursuing his remedy, is, that on the first he is obliged to sue all the living promisers, whereas on the latter he has a right to elect between one and all of them. Having made his election, the contract becomes, so far as the rules of law applicable to his remedy are concerned, purely several or purely joint; and he is no longer at liberty to consider it other *156than what he has made it by his own determination. The contract has then entirely lost its mixed character; and a suit upon it must be governed by the same principles which would have controlled it, had it been originally what choice ultimately made it. 1 Chitt. Pl. 32.—1 Saunder’s Rep. 291, *n.*4.—1 Blackf. 140. In this case, therefore, as the action below was joint, the contract which was the foundation of it must be viewed as also joint.

C. *C. Nave*and *W. Quarles,*for the plaintiff.

*J. B. Ray,*for the defendant.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the issue set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Assembly Milestone Reached as XVS Pallet Installed onto X-59","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GhGkNQT0Oq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/assembly-milestone-reached-as-xvs-pallet-installed-onto-x-59-3\/\">Assembly Milestone Reached as XVS Pallet Installed onto X-59<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/assembly-milestone-reached-as-xvs-pallet-installed-onto-x-59-3\/embed\/#?secret=GhGkNQT0Oq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Assembly Milestone Reached as XVS Pallet Installed onto X-59” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GhGkNQT0Oq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/p20-169-13.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ashley Balzer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/abalzer\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Roman Space Telescope Selects 24 Flight-Quality Heat-Vision \u2018Eyes\u2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aiC12RIUVl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/roman-space-telescope\/nasas-roman-space-telescope-selects-24-flight-quality-heat-vision-eyes\/\">NASA\u2019s Roman Space Telescope Selects 24 Flight-Quality Heat-Vision \u2018Eyes\u2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/roman-space-telescope\/nasas-roman-space-telescope-selects-24-flight-quality-heat-vision-eyes\/embed\/#?secret=aiC12RIUVl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Roman Space Telescope Selects 24 Flight-Quality Heat-Vision \u2018Eyes\u2019” — NASA\" data-secret=\"aiC12RIUVl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/dete-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
No. 11.

#### Samuel Johnson, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Charles F. Bemis, defendant in error.

Upon error from Early Superior Court.

Diminution of the record suggested on behalf of the defendant in error, and the case consequently continued.

The following is the proceeding bad under the suggestion as taken from the minutes of the Supreme Court:

“ Samuel Johnson, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Charles F. Bemis, defendant in error. From Early Superior Court.

“ It appearing to the Court that the transcript of the record in the above stated case is not complete, and that objections have been made under oath by the counsel of defendant;

“ It is ordered that a eertioi'ari do issue, directed to the clerk of the Superior Court of Early County, requiring him to certify and send up a complete transcript of the entire record in the above case, to the next January Term of this Court, to he held at Talbotton, on the fourth Monday in January next; and that this cause stand continued until that time.”'

Sturgis, for plaintiff in error,

Jones & C'aritiiers, for defendant in error.
Exhibit 31.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
  
 1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Track
      Data Corporation;
 
 2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by this report;
 
 3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
      financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 
 4.
    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
      the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed in
      this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
      of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
      equivalent functions):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Date: March 28, 2005
    
    /s/ Martin KayeMartin Kaye, CFO(principal financial officer)
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MAURICE BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-2214

September 21, 2022

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Polk County; Donald G. Jacobsen, Judge.

Maurice Brown, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Olympic Torch Highlights Station Spacewalk","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ryflldpJw7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/olympic-torch-highlights-station-spacewalk\/\">Olympic Torch Highlights Station Spacewalk<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/olympic-torch-highlights-station-spacewalk\/embed\/#?secret=ryflldpJw7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Olympic Torch Highlights Station Spacewalk” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ryflldpJw7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pic-110813a.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":237}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"What Was Project Mercury? (Grades K-4)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SYWQO3pMjy\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-was-project-mercury-grades-k-4\/\">What Was Project Mercury? (Grades K-4)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-was-project-mercury-grades-k-4\/embed\/#?secret=SYWQO3pMjy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“What Was Project Mercury? (Grades K-4)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SYWQO3pMjy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/6100114.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":457}
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gregory S. Madar, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webster Preferred CapitalCorporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 9, 2005
/s/ Gregory S. Madar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Renee A. Decker,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03487-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8537 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fred Crandell, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-02354-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 65) and good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED dismissing Defendant Capital One Bank USA N.A. from this 

action with prejudice, with each party to bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 Dated this 17th day of May, 2016. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-02354-DLR Document 66 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 1