alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-15298

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-01777-SLB-TMP

ARTHUR BRENNAN MALLOY, 

 Petitioner-Appellant,

 versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS, 

 Respondents-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(July 9, 2015)

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 14-15298 Date Filed: 07/09/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

Arthur Malloy, an Alabama prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district 

court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition related to his other 

than honorable discharge from the military in 1965. Malloy asserts the district

court erred in dismissing his § 2241 petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 

because he did not meet the “in custody” definition of § 2241. 

We review de novo a district court’s dismissal of a habeas petition for lack 

of jurisdiction. Taylor v. United States, 396 F.3d 1322, 1327 (11th Cir. 2005). To 

bring a federal habeas action, a petitioner must be “in custody in violation of the 

Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). The 

Supreme Court has interpreted § 2241 as requiring that a habeas petitioner be “in 

custody” under the conviction or sentence that he seeks to attack at the time when 

his petition is filed. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 238 (1968). The Supreme

Court has also recognized habeas actions brought pursuant to § 2241 may be 

appropriate where “members of the armed services . . . have been unlawfully 

detained, restrained, or confined” by the military. Schlanger v. Seamans, 401 U.S. 

487, 489 (1971). Although a petitioner can challenge his other than honorable 

discharge from the military in district court and seek declaratory judgment, § 2241 

is not the proper vehicle for bringing such a claim. See Harmon v. Brucker, 355 

U.S. 579, 580-83 (1958) (finding the district court had jurisdiction to review 

petitioners’ actions seeking declaratory judgments that the Secretary of Army’s 

Case: 14-15298 Date Filed: 07/09/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

issuance of other than honorable discharge certificates were void and in excess of 

his powers). 

The district court did not err in dismissing Malloy’s claim for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction. Malloy is not challenging his conviction or sentence related to 

his confinement in Alabama state prison, and he is not detained, restrained, or 

confined by the military. Thus, he does not meet the “in custody” definition of 

§ 2241. Accordingly, we affirm. 

AFFIRMED. 

Case: 14-15298 Date Filed: 07/09/2015 Page: 3 of 3
#### W. A. Crigler *v.*Charles O. Lockard et al.

Banks and Banking — Checks only Prima Facie Evidence of Payment.

A bank cheek reciting “in full of all demands to date”, is held to be but prima facie evidence of payment, and may be, explained or corrected by proof aliunde.

APPEAL FROM BOONE CIRCUIT COURT.

March 1, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

The action was brought by appellees for the balance of the price of store goods, which they allege they had sold and delivered to appellant at various times from 1863 to 1866 inclusive.

Appellant in his answer traversed the charge of indebtedness, alleged payment in full of all demands prior to the commencement of the action, and exhibted a-check drawn by himself on Grinstead & Bradley (bankers in Lexington), dated subsequent .to the date of any item charged in the account of appellees, payable to them, and expressing on its face, that it is in full of all demands to date.

Appellees collected the money on that check as is shown by the evidence before they instituted their suit, but the jury returned a verdict against appellant for $217.36 on which a judgment was rendered, and his motion for a new trial having been overruled, he has appealed to this court.

The only cause of action set out in the petition is for store goods sold and delivered to appellant, and although on the account filed' there is an item charged of $21 “for cash lost on Biggs note,” another of $50 cash paid Judge Perrin and $1.22 exchange on deft., there is no allegation of any such payments, or an indebtedness for either of said items; and deducting them from the balance claimed by appellees, after allowing the credits which are given on the account, the verdict is for more than would be due them.

Appellant, in the amended answer, traversed any indebtedness on account of said items, or either of them, although such indebtedness was not charged, and on the trial there was no evidence *670offered tending even to show that he owed the same or any part thereof. But they were not excluded from the consideration of the jury, and were considered, and taken into the estimate in making up the verdict, as must be apparent from the amount found, and by excluding them appellee’s account shows the indebtedness to be less than the verdict.

*Stevenson &*Myers, *for appellant.*

Drane, *for appellee.*

As there was neither allegation, nor proof to sustain the verdict for the amount thereof, it should have been set aside, and a new trial awarded. No other error is perceived, the check, although purporting to be in full demands to date, is only *prima facie*evidence of payment and may be explained or corrected by proof *almnde.*But for the error indicated, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8552 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lauren E. Low","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lelow\/","title":"NASA Invites Media to First Astronaut Launch Aboard Boeing\u2019s Starliner","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"taWSi9nesw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-invites-media-to-first-astronaut-launch-aboard-boeings-starliner\/\">NASA Invites Media to First Astronaut Launch Aboard Boeing\u2019s Starliner<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-invites-media-to-first-astronaut-launch-aboard-boeings-starliner\/embed\/#?secret=taWSi9nesw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Invites Media to First Astronaut Launch Aboard Boeing\u2019s Starliner” — NASA\" data-secret=\"taWSi9nesw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/starliner.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the filing of the financial statements of Chindex
International, Inc. (Registrant) for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2002 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Registrant. /s/ Lawrence Pemble
Lawrence Pemble
Executive Vice President Finance
and Business Development
(Principal Financial Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chindex International, Inc. and will be retained by Chindex
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Annette Aryeh, Respondent, v Nathaniel Aryeh, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 622]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated June 25, 2004, which denied his motion to disqualify the plaintiffs attorney from representing the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The disqualification of an attorney is a matter which rests within the sound discretion of the court *(see Campolongo v Campolongo,*2 AD3d 476 [2003]; *Nationwide Assoc. v Targee St. Internal Med. Group,*303 AD2d 728 [2003]; *Horn v Municipal Info. Servs.,*282 AD2d 712 [2001]; *Olmoz v Town of Fishkill,*258 AD2d 447 [1999]). A party’s entitlement to be represented in ongoing litigation by counsel of his or her own choosing is a valued right which should not be abridged absent a clear showing that disqualification is warranted *(see Campolongo v Campolongo, supra; Horn v Municipal Info. Servs., supra; Olmoz v Town of Fishkill, supra).*The party seeking to disqualify a law firm or an attorney bears the burden on the motion *(see Solow v Grace & Co.,*83 NY2d 303, 308 [1994]).

Under the particular facts of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to disqualify the plaintiffs attorney from representing the plaintiff since the defendant failed to meet his burden of showing that disqualification was warranted based upon a *635conflict of interest *(see Olmoz v Town of Fishkill, supra;*Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-108 [22 NYCRR 1200.27]). Luciano, J.P., Rivera, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur. *[See*5 Misc 3d 1005(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 51198(U).]
Case 4:16-cv-00001-DCB Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-00001-DCB Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-00001-DCB Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-00001-DCB Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-00001-DCB Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:16-cv-00001-DCB Document 1 Filed 01/04/16 Page 6 of 6
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 714

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs nursing care center at

the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Aspinwall, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘H. John Heinz III Department of Veterans Affairs

Nursing Care Center’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. DOYLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs nursing

care center at the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Aspinwall, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘H. John

Heinz III Department of Veterans Affairs Nursing Care

Center’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 714 IH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF H. JOHN HEINZ III DEPART2 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS NURSING CARE

3 CENTER, ASPINWALL, PENNSYLVANIA.

4 The Department of Veterans Affairs nursing care

5 center at the Department of Veterans Affairs medical cen6 ter in Aspinwall, Pennsylvania, is hereby designated as the

7 ‘‘H. John Heinz III Department of Veterans Affairs Nurs8 ing Care Center’’. Any reference to such nursing care cen9 ter in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other

10 paper of the United States shall be considered to be a ref11 erence to the ‘‘H. John Heinz III Department of Veterans

12 Affairs Nursing Care Center’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Demonstration Proves Nuclear Fission System Can Provide Space Exploration Power","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wN2S7Av2NG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/demonstration-proves-nuclear-fission-system-can-provide-space-exploration-power\/\">Demonstration Proves Nuclear Fission System Can Provide Space Exploration Power<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/demonstration-proves-nuclear-fission-system-can-provide-space-exploration-power\/embed\/#?secret=wN2S7Av2NG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Demonstration Proves Nuclear Fission System Can Provide Space Exploration Power” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wN2S7Av2NG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/105_4792-dip.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":444}
Case 2:15-cv-01881-DGC Document 8 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-01881-DGC Document 8 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 909 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 909 Filed 02/29/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,432
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,897
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,123
<INVENTORY>                                     17,656
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,056
<PP&E>                                         155,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,350
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,616
<SALES>                                        110,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,198
<CGS>                                           77,818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,275
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,421
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:15-mj-01727-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01727-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01727-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE BENDAU LAW FIRM PLLC

Clifford P. Bendau, II (AZ Bar #030204)

P.O. Box 97066

Phoenix, Arizona 85060

Telephone: (480) 382-5176

Fax: (480) 304-3805

Email: cliffordbendau@bendaulaw.com 

chris@bendaulaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs Josephine Tijerino

and Tamicka Toliver

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Josephine Tijerino,

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

Stetson Desert Project, LLC, et al. 

 Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-cv-2564-PHX-SMM

(Consolidated with Case No. 2:15-cv- 2563-PHX-SMM and Case No. 2:16-cv- 00408-PHX-SMM)

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND 

REQUEST TO VACATE STATUS 

CONFERENCE WITH RESPECT TO 

PLAINITFF TAMICKA TOLIVER’S 

CASE ONLY

Tamicka Toliver, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

Stetson Desert Project, LLC, et al. 

 Defendants.

Jane Roe Dancer, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs.

Stetson Desert Project, LLC, et al. 

 Defendants.

Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 87 Filed 02/04/20 Page 1 of 3
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Defendants and Plaintiff Tamicka Toliver, by and through undersigned counsel, 

hereby jointly submit this Notice of Settlement to notify the Court that Defendants and 

Plaintiff Tamicka Toliver only have reached an agreement to settle this matter. The 

parties will submit a motion for FLSA settlement approval within 28 days. Plaintiff 

Tamicka Toliver also requests that the February 10, 2020 status conference be vacated 

with respect to her case only. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 4th day of February, 2020.

THE BENDAU LAW FIRM, PLLC

/s/ Clifford P. Bendau, II

Clifford P. Bendau, II

Attorney for Plaintiff Tamicka Toliver

Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 87 Filed 02/04/20 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Certificate of Service

I certify that on this 4th day of February, 2020, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all parties of record. 

/s/ Clifford P. Bendau, II

Case 2:15-cv-02563-SMM Document 87 Filed 02/04/20 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA Releases Its First International Space Station Tour in Spanish","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0SnYMLVS02\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-releases-first-international-space-station-tour-in-spanish\/\">NASA Releases Its First International Space Station Tour in Spanish<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-releases-first-international-space-station-tour-in-spanish\/embed\/#?secret=0SnYMLVS02\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Releases Its First International Space Station Tour in Spanish” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0SnYMLVS02\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/iss069e036163orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1 WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

9 United States of America, 

10 Plaintiff, 

11 V. 

12 Thorton Bishop Honga, 

13 Defendant. 

14 

No. CR-15-08272-001-PCT-SPL 

ORDER 

15 The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

16 hearing was waived, and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a 

17 proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant 

18 violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further 

19 finds, pursuant to Rule 32.l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and 

20 convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger. 

21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

22 proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release. 

23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

24 danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

25 Dated this 7th day of October, 2019. 

26 

27 

28