64414 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Notices 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

85,525, Amgen Inc., Longmont, 

Colorado. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

85,517, M&D Industries, Inc., 

Clarendon, Pennsylvania. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

85,429, San Bernardino Sun (SBSUN)/

Inland Valley Daily Bulletin (IVDB), 

Ontario, California. 

85,435, American IT Solutions, 

Danbury, Connecticut. 

85,462, Microsoft Corporation, Santa 

Monica, California. 

85,500, J.R. Simplot Company, Moses 

Lake, Washington. 

85,500A, J.R. Simplot Company, 

Othello, Washington. 

85,530, Shure Incorporated, El Paso, 

Texas. 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of October 6, 2014 through October 10, 2014. 

These determinations are available on the 

Department’s Web site www.tradeact/taa/taa_

search_form.cfm under the searchable listing 

of determinations or by calling the Office of 

Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 

365–6822. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of 

October 2014. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25680 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of September 29, 2014 through 

October 3, 2014. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. there has been a shift in production 

by such workers’ firm or subdivision to 

a foreign country of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles which 

are produced by such firm or 

subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. the country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. there has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) either— 

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and 

the component parts it supplied for the 

firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) a loss or business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Notices 64415 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

85,469, Litho-Krome Company, LLC, 

Midland, Georgia. August 6, 2013. 

85,518, Scherer & Trier USA, Saline, 

Michigan, September 5, 2013. 

85,521, CIVCO, Kalona, Iowa. 

September 9, 2013. 

85,522, Marlow Industries, Inc., Dallas, 

Texas. September 8, 2013. 

85,524, Sunspring America, Inc., 

Henderson, Kentucky. August 19, 

2013. 

85,533, Modine Manufacturing 

Company, Ringwood, Illinois, 

September 11, 2013. 

85,535, UTI Integrated Logistics, LLC, EL 

Paso, Texas, September 4, 2013. 

85,418, Three Dimensional Graphics, 

Danvers, Massachusetts. July 7, 

2013. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

85,488, Sig Sauer, Inc., Newington, New 

Hampshire. 

85,496, Remington Arms, Inc., Ilion, 

New York. 

85,513, Heartland Footwear, Inc., 

Pocahontas, Arkansas. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

85,373, General Electric International, 

Inc., Plainville, Connecticut. 

85,466, GrafTech International 

Holdings, Inc., Emporium, 

Pennsylvania. 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of September 29, 2014 through October 3, 

2014. These determinations are available on 

the Department’s Web site www.tradeact/taa/ 

taa_search_form.cfm under the searchable 

listing of determinations or by calling the 

Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll 

free at 888–365–6822. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of 

October 2014. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25654 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–85,013] 

TRW Integrated Chassis Systems, 

LLC; North American Braking Division; 

A Subsidiary of TRW Automotive 

Including On-Site Leased Workers 

From Adecco and DM Burr; Saginaw, 

Michigan; Negative Determinations 

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance And 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

herein presents the results of an 

investigation regarding certification of 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance. 

Workers of a firm may be eligible for 

worker adjustment assistance if they 

satisfy the criteria of subsection (a) and 

(b) of Section 222 of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 

2272(a) and (b). For the Department of 

Labor to issue a certification for workers 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, 19 

U.S.C. 2272(a), the following three 

criteria must be met: 

(1) The first criterion (set forth in Section 

222(a)(1) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 2272(a)(1)) 

requires that a significant number or 

proportion of the workers in such workers’ 

firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the 

firm, have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become totally 

or partially separated 

(2) The second criterion (set forth in 

Section 222(a)(2) of the Act, 19 U.S.C. 

2272(a)(2)) may be satisfied in one of two 

ways: 

(A) Increased Imports Path: 

(i) Sales or production, or both, at the 

workers’ firm must have decreased 

absolutely, AND 

(ii) imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles produced by such 

firm or subdivision have increased; and 

(iii) the increase described in clause (ii) 

contributed importantly to such workers’ 

separation or threat of separation and to the 

decline in the sales or production of such 

firm or subdivision. 

(B) Shift in Production Path: 

(i) There has been a shift in production by 

such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign 

country of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are produced 

by such firm or subdivision; and 

(ii)(I) the country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the articles is 

a party to a free trade agreement with the 

United States; 

(II) the country to which the workers’ firm 

has shifted production of the articles is a 

beneficiary country under the Andean Trade 

Preference Act, African Growth and 

Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin 

Economic Recovery Act; or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES