alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"International Space Station Crew Landing to Air Live on NASA Television","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"69OeyNf1lp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/international-space-station-crew-landing-to-air-live-on-nasa-television\/\">International Space Station Crew Landing to Air Live on NASA Television<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/international-space-station-crew-landing-to-air-live-on-nasa-television\/embed\/#?secret=69OeyNf1lp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“International Space Station Crew Landing to Air Live on NASA Television” — NASA\" data-secret=\"69OeyNf1lp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/35633804554_557e8fb0ff_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00305-CR

Billie Knoll

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-CR-3008-4

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 23, 2015.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6172

BRYAN KEITH RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MR. SMITH, Associate Warden of Prison Operations; MR. 

RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of the Entire Prison; MR. YARBER, 

Lieutenant of the SIS Department; MR. YEAGER, A Federal 

Employee at the Camp; MS. PARK-DAVISON, Unit Manager of 

Building A.; MR. WEAVER, Health Service Administrator of 

the Prison; MR. CLARK, Education Supervisor at the Prison; 

MR. BECK, Prison Education Specialist; MS. THOMPKINS, An 

Educational/Teacher at the Prison; COUNSELOR C TAYLOR, 

Counsel for Unit A-3 at the Prison; DOES 1 THROUGH 8, BOP 

Employee,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, 

District Judge. (2:14-cv-00064-JPB-MJA)

Submitted: August 26, 2016 Decided: September 13, 2016

Before KING, SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Bryan Keith Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Erin K. Reisenweber, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Bryan Keith Richardson appeals the district court’s order

adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge 

and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. 

Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 

388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Richardson v. Smith, No. 

2:14-cv-00064-JPB-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 20, 2016). In addition, 

we find that Richardson’s requests for discovery were properly 

denied because the evidence sought for discovery would not have 

created a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to defeat 

summary judgment. See Ingle ex re. Ingle v. Yelton, 439 F.3d 

191, 195 (4th Cir. 2006). We deny Richardson’s motion for

appropriate relief and dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 31
                    RULE 13A-14(A) / 15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer (and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) of Ambient Corporation (the "Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to me by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of the
Company's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November  15, 2004


                /S/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                ---------------------------------
                JOHN J. JOYCE
                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                (AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       69
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,937
<PP&E>                                          17,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,322
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              446
<BONDS>                                          8,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        750
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         835
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,480
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,487
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,196)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (3)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                       555
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,127
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,127
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45


</TABLE>
**BG** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0455 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. JACOB WILLIAM ABEL ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 60 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including March 30 , 2021 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2021

01/25/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0455
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4809 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4809

                 For the relief of the State of Hawaii.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 12, 1998

 Mr. Abercrombie (for himself and Mrs. Mink of Hawaii) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of the State of Hawaii.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF FROM STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR REFUND OR CREDIT.

    If refund or credit of any overpayment of tax resulting from the 
payment of taxes under section 4041, 4081, or 4091 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 on fuel purchased by the State of Hawaii during 
calendar years 1992 and 1993 is prevented at any time before the close 
of the 18-month period beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
Act by the operation of any law or rule of law, refund or credit of 
such overpayment may, nevertheless, be made or allowed if claim 
therefor is filed before the close of such 18-month period.
                                 <all>
```
#### C. Fitch *v.*Commonwealth for E. Bamberger & Co.

Sheriff — Failure to Return Execution — ¡Damages—Pleadings.

The cause of action set out in the petition is the failure by the sheriff and his deputy to return the execution to the office from whence it issued, for thirty days after the return day thereof, no damage beyond, the debt claimed. Held, that 30 per cent damages cannot be recovered on the allegations of the petition.

APPEAL FROM MEADE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 20, 1871.

Walker, *for appellant.*

Alexander, *for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

After the demurrer was sustained to the original petition, a supplemental petition was filed, upon another bonfl of the sheriff with different obligors, and the original petition was abondoned. The action was brought against the sheriff for a failure to return an execution for thirty days after the return day thereof without reasonable excuse therefor, and the court below rendered judgment for the amount of the debt interest and costs and thirty per cent, damages thereon.

This judgment cannot be sustained. It is true that the cause of action set out in the petition is the failure by the sheriff and his deputy to return the execution to the office from whence it issued, for thirty days after the return day thereof, but appellees do not claim any damages beyond the debt, interest and costs in the petition. And as they failed to apprise appellants by any averment in the petition that the 30 per cent, damages were claimed, they were not entitled" to recover the same.

"Wherefore the judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Television to Air Return of Three Space Station Crew Members","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cIyq7u9y2E\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-to-air-return-of-three-space-station-crew-members-2\/\">NASA Television to Air Return of Three Space Station Crew Members<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-to-air-return-of-three-space-station-crew-members-2\/embed\/#?secret=cIyq7u9y2E\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Television to Air Return of Three Space Station Crew Members” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cIyq7u9y2E\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/iss043e174193.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Baxter Salter, Jr.

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 CR-98-409-2-PHX-PGR

DETENTION ORDER

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure.

The Court concludes, therefore, by a preponderance of the evidence, that

defendant is a serious flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of

conditions that will reasonably assure his appearance at future proceedings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings. 

DATED this 11th day of August, 2010.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION

BCBSM, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants,

v.

WALGREEN CO. AND WALGREENS 

BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC.,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

Case No. 1:20-cv-01853

Honorable Virginia M. Kendall

Honorable Sheila M. Finnegan

Motion to Sever and Stay Counterclaim

Consolidated with:

Case No. 1:20-cv-04738

Case No. 1:20-cv-03332

Case No. 1:20-cv-01929

Case No. 1:20-cv-04940

Pursuant to Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s inherent power 

to stay proceedings before it and for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum in Support of 

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Sever and Stay Counterclaim, Plaintiffs respectfully move this Court to sever 

Defendants’ Counterclaim from Plaintiffs’ main claim and stay the Counterclaim until the 

resolution of both: (1) the Plaintiffs’ main claims in the above-captioned litigation; and 

(2) Walgreen Co. v. Crowell & Moring LLP, Case No. 2021 CA 000861 B, pending in the D.C. 

Superior Court.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court sever Defendants’ 

Counterclaim from Plaintiffs’ main claim, stay the former until resolution of both the Plaintiffs’ 

main claim and the related litigation in D.C. Superior Court, and grant such other further relief as 

this Court deems just and proper. 

Case: 1:20-cv-01853 Document #: 285 Filed: 06/07/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:6296
2

DATE: June 7, 2022 Respectfully Submitted,

Of Counsel:

Peter R. Jarvis

Holland & Knight LLP

601 SW Second Avenue

Suite 1800

Portland, OR 97204

(503) 243-5877

peter.jarvis@hklaw.com

admitted pro hac vice

Timothy J. Conner

Holland & Knight LLP

50 N Laura Street

Suite 3900

Jacksonville, FL 32202

(904) 798-7362

timothy.conner@hklaw.com

admitted pro hac vice

Brenton H. Cooper

Holland & Knight LLP

315 S Calhoun Street 

Suite 600

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 425-5613

brent.cooper@hklaw.com

admitted pro hac vice

By: /s/ Trisha M. Rich

Trisha M. Rich (IL Bar No. 6288544)

Holland & Knight LLP

150 N Riverside Plaza

Suite 2700

Chicago, IL 60606

(312) 263-3600

trisha.rich@hklaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case: 1:20-cv-01853 Document #: 285 Filed: 06/07/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:6297
Order filed, May 01, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00107

- CV

____________ JUNE G. BARTLE , Appellant

V.
MAIN STREET ACQUISIT ION CORP. , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

Galveston County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 0067462



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due March 11, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On March 27, 2013 , this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days. The record has not been fi led with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Lynnette Erskine , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further exte nsion will beentertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Lynnette Erskine does not timely file the record a s ordered, we will issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
### NUM BER 13-08- 0053 2-CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E XAS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ IN RE: HIDA LGO COUNTY A PPRA IS A L DISTRICT A ND HIDA LGO COUNTY A PPRA IS A L DISTRICT REVI EW BOA RD

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ On Peti tion for Wr it of M andamus and M ot ion fo r Emerg en cy Relief

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B efo re J u st ic es Yañ ez , G arza , a n d Vel a M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Relato rs, Hidalgo C oun ty App rais a l District and Hidalgo County Appraisal District Re vie w B o ard, f iled a pe tition for w rit of man dam us on Sept em ber 10 , 200 8. T he Cou rt ordered th e real par

ti es in int erest , El Pi sta lon , L. L.P. , R a m o n Garci a, O G Con str uct ion Co., L. L.P ., T he Blu e Group , Ltd ., Co., an d Sou th Texas W ildhorse Desert Investme nts, Inc., to f ile a respon se to relat ors’ petition for w rit of ma nda mu s. Such respon se was du ly filed

.2

The par ti es hav e now

fil ed a joi nt mot ion to dis mis s t he pet itio n for w ri t of ma nda mu s and mot ion for em ergency stay. The Court, ha v ing exa m in e d a n d f ully cons ide re d the j oin t moti on todi smi ss , i s o f the opi nio n tha t s aid moti on shoul d be g ra nted. Acc ordin g ly , t he moti on todi smi ssi s G RA NTED and thi s o rig ina l proceed ing i s h ereby DISMISSE D w ithou t referen ce to th e me rits.
PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 22nd day

of Janua ry , 200 9.