alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Milo McCormick Stanley, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-98-0430-PHX-GMS

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Respondents’ motion for reconsideration and their motion

to strike. (Doc. 139.) Respondents request that the Court reconsider its order allowing

Petitioner to file certain depositions, deposition exhibits, an interview transcript, and a video

deposition after judgment had been entered in this case. (Id.) Respondents also move to

strike from the record the written and video deposition of Dr. Paul Bindleglass, which was

filed prior to judgment. (Id.) 

This Court’s Local Rules, LRCiv 7.2(g)(2) provides that the Court will not grant a

motion for reconsideration without providing the opposing party an opportunity for response,

which will be ordered. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:98-cv-00430-GMS Document 141 Filed 09/21/11 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED requiring that Petitioner provide a response to

Respondents’ motion for reconsideration and their motion to strike within fourteen (14) days

of this Order.

DATED this 21st day of September, 2011.

Case 2:98-cv-00430-GMS Document 141 Filed 09/21/11 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"The Moon Passes in Front of the Sun","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Cf55tmZIfp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/gmt288_01_16_jasmin-moghbeli_sn1063_annular-eclipse-second-pass-2\/\">The Moon Passes in Front of the Sun<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/gmt288_01_16_jasmin-moghbeli_sn1063_annular-eclipse-second-pass-2\/embed\/#?secret=Cf55tmZIfp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Moon Passes in Front of the Sun” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Cf55tmZIfp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/53263321254-599bd112c5-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 32.2
 
 YUHE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of YUHE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hu Gang, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, CERTIFY, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
 
 /s/ Hu GangHu GangChief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-18-00630-CV

Style: George Wood v. Matthew D. Wiggins, Jr.

Date motion filed*: July 11, 2018

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion to Extend Time for Filing Notice of Appeal

Party filing motion: Appellant George Wood’s counsel, George F. May

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 6, 2018 (regular appeal deadline); June 26, 

2018 (interlocutory appeal deadline)

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: July 6, 2018; July 11, 2018

(15-day grace period for interlocutory deadline)

Date Requested: July 5, 2018

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

To the extent that this is an interlocutory appeal, appellant Wood’s motion to extend

the time for filing the notice of appeal is granted because the notice of appeal was 

filed on July 5, 2018, within the 15-day grace period for interlocutory appeals ending 

on July 11, 2018, and counsel’s motion provides a reasonable explanation for the

9-day delay. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.1(b), 26.3; Verburgt v. Dorner, 959

S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886-87 (Tex. 2003).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  

Date: July 19, 2018
Presidential Documents

63803 

Federal Register 

Vol. 79, No. 206 

Friday, October 24, 2014 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of October 17, 2014 

Providing an Order of Succession Within the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service 

Memorandum for the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation 

Service 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform 

Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq. (the ‘‘Act’’), it is hereby ordered that: 

Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of section 2 of 

this memorandum, and to the limitations set forth in the Act, the following 

officials of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, in the order 

listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of 

the Director of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (Director), 

during any period in which the Director has died, resigned, or otherwise 

become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Director: 

(a) Deputy Director, Mediation Services and Field Programs; 

(b) Deputy Director, National and International Programs; 

(c) Director of Field Operations; and 

(d) Most senior Director of Mediation Services (seniority being defined 

as the individual with the longest tenure in the position of Director of 

Mediation Services). 

Sec. 2. Exceptions. (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed 

in section 1 of this memorandum in an acting capacity, by virtue of so 

serving, shall act as Director pursuant to this memorandum. 

(b) No individual listed in section 1 of this memorandum shall act as 

Director unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the 

Act. 

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President 

retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Director. 

Sec. 3. General Provisions. (a) This memorandum is not intended to, and 

does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable 

at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, 

agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PRESDOCS
63804 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 206 / Friday, October 24, 2014 / Presidential Documents 

(b) You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in 

the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 17, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25564 

Filed 10–23–14; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 6732–01 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PRESDOCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Margaret Sadosky,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03452-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8519 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2882 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2882

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 4, 2004

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To make the program for national criminal history background checks for 
                      volunteer groups permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VOLUNTEER GROUP ACCESS TO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (Public Law 108-21) is 
amended by striking ``an 18-month'' and inserting ``a''.

            Passed the Senate October 1, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Pertains to:

Case No.: 2:15-cv-02308-DGC

Case No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

ORDER

Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel is granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Julia Reed Zaic and the firm of HEAVISIDE REED

ZAIC are hereby withdrawn as counsel of record in this action and David P. Matthews and the

firm of MATTHEWS & ASSOCIATES, and Richard M. Freese and Calle M. Mendenhall of the

firm of FREESE & GOSS, PLLC, are hereby substituted as the above captioned Plaintiff’s

counsel of record.

DATED this day of January, 2018.

David G. Campbell,

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9619-1 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
McMoRan Oil & Gas Co. financial statements at December 31, 1997 and
for the 12 months then ended, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.The earnings per share (EPS)
data shown below was prepared in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No. 128,"Earnings Per Share," and basic and diluted
EPS have been entered in the place of primary and fully diluted, respectively.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000921941
<NAME> MCMORAN OIL & GAS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          29,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,214
<PP&E>                                          68,585
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           427
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,088
<SALES>                                         13,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,552
<CGS>                                           11,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,538)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,538)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,538)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1

                CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS AMENDED

I, Tor Olav Troim, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas
I) Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal controls over financial reporting; and

5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: June 26, 2007

/s/ Tor Olav Troim
------------------
    Tor Olav Troim
    Principal Executive Officer
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before MONAHAN , STEPHENS , and DEERWESTER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Emmanuel BELL First Lieutenant (O

- 2 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202100137

_________________________

Decided: 14 March 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : Stephen Keane
Sentence adjudged 21 January 2021 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton , California , consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : confinement for 36 months , 1 and a dismissal.
For Appellant: Major Mary C

. Finnen
, USMC

1 The convening a uthority suspended 2 months of confinement adjudged for the Specification of Charge II pursuant to Defense Counsel’s request and the Military Judge’s concurring recommendation

.United States v. Bell , NMCCA No. 202100137 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________

PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings a nd sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant ’s substantial rights occurred. 2
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40098

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD R. BUDD,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:96-CR-22)

 

August 26, 1998

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA,

Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T:

The petition for rehearing is GRANTED. We find no error of

fact or of law and affirm the conviction. We remand to the

district court for correction of judgment and sentence on the

concession of the government that Counts 3 and 4 should be merged,

as multiple counts of fraud supported by a single mailing. 

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Document

Exhibit 10(a)






SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED 
SOUTHERN COMPANY 
CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFITS PROTECTION PLAN


Southern Company Services, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby adopts this Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Southern Company Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan (effective December 31, 2008, and amended effective as of March 1, 2018) (the “Plan”), effective as of February 26, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). This Amendment will be effective as described herein. 


WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Company to amend the Plan, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, to clarify the definition of a “Southern Termination” under the Plan; and 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors may amend the Plan for this purpose pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan. 


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, but only with respect to cash or equity-based awards approved on or after the Amendment Effective Date, the Board of Directors hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
I.


Section 2.33 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 


“2.33 “Southern Termination” shall mean the following:


(a) The Consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation of Southern Company under circumstances where either (i) Southern Company is not the Surviving Company or (ii) Southern Company’s Voting Securities are no longer publicly traded as long as either would also constitute a Southern Change in Control;


(b) The Consummation of a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of Southern Company’s assets; or


(c) The Consummation of an acquisition by any Person of Beneficial Ownership of all of Southern Company’s Voting Securities such that Southern Company’s Voting Securities are no longer publicly traded as long as it would also constitute a Southern Change in Control.”


II.


Except as amended by this Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Plan. 


[SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE]












    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, through its duly authorized officer, has adopted this Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Southern Company Change in Control Benefits Protection Plan (effective as of December 31, 2008, and amended effective as of March 1, 2018) this 26th day of February, 2021.
									
		SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC.

			
		By:
	/s/James M. Garvie
			
		Name:	James M. Garvie
			
		Its:	SVP Total Rewards