alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 513

AN ACT

To exempt certain contracts entered into by the

view by the Council of the District of Columbia.government of the District of Columbia from re-
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 513

AN ACT

To exempt certain contracts entered into by the government

of the District of Columbia from review by the Council

of the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 513 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

3 Council Contract Review Reform Act of 1997’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS FROM COUN5 CIL REVIEW.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 451 of the District of Co7 lumbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganiza8 tion Act (sec. 1–1130, D.C. Code) is amended by adding

9 at the end the following new subsection:

10 ‘‘(d) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CONTRACTS.—The

11 requirements of this section shall not apply with respect

12 to any of the following contracts:

13 ‘‘(1) Any contract entered into by the Washing14 ton Convention Center Authority for preconstruction

15 activities, project management, design, or construc16 tion.

17 ‘‘(2) Any contract entered into by the District

18 of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority established

19 pursuant to the Water and Sewer Authority Estab20 lishment and Department of Public Works Reorga21 nization Act of 1996, other than contracts for the

22 sale or lease of the Blue Plains Wastewater Treat23 ment Plant.

24 ‘‘(3) At the option of the Council, any contract

25 for a highway improvement project carried out under

26 title 23, United States Code.’’.
3

•HR 513 EH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered

3 into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives March 6,

1997.

Attest:

Clerk.
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 12

- 00070

- CR

BILLY JOE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0518107

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Billy Joe Smith was on deferred adjudication community supervision for the offense of

aggrava ted sexual assault of a child. The State filed a motion for adjudication and revocation,

alleging that Smith failed to pay fees, fines, and costs assessed as part of his supervision and that

he violated the terms and conditions of his supervision by being in the direct presence of or

having personal contact with children. The trial court found the allegations true

, adjudicated him

guilty, and sentenced him to life in prison.

Based on the reasoning and anal ysis in our opinion in cause number 06

- 1 2

- 00 0 6 5

- CR,

issued on even date herewith , we overrule Smith ’s points of error

.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment and sentence.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: January 10, 2013

Date Decided: January 23 , 2013

Do Not Publish
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,937-01

EX PARTE MARKAILON ADRELL DAILEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W13-45287-L(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT No. 5

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to fifty-five years’ imprisonment. Through

habeas counsel, Applicant filed inthe county of conviction an application for a writ of habeas corpus and

anamended application for a writ of habeas corpus. The district clerk forwarded the habeas applications

to this Court. See TEX. CODECRIM. PROC. art. 11.07; TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5).

The trialcourt had entered anOrderDesignatingIssues. There are no findingsinthe habeasrecord

forwarded to this Court resolving the disputed factual issues. The applications are remanded to the trial

court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.
2

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from the date

of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s findings and

conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things, affidavits, motions,

objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcriptsfromhearings and depositions. See

TEX.R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Anyextensions oftime must be requested bythe trialcourt and obtained from

this Court. 

Filed: August 24, 2022

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,420
<SECURITIES>                                   149,551
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                       268
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,941
<PP&E>                                          93,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,758
<BONDS>                                        156,549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   258,596
<SALES>                                         11,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,772
<CGS>                                           10,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,293)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,293)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.69)
        

</TABLE>
No. 14,293.

#### Burkhart *v.*Ogle.

Filed Jan. 9, 1891.

From the Tipton Circuit Court.

*G. H. Gifford,*for appellant.

W. *Neal*and *R. P. Neal,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

— This opinion, in which we all concur, was prepared for the court by the late Judge Mitchelx,, and expresses'the views and j udgment of the court.

Action by Burkhart against Ogle to recover damages for the breach of a warranty in the sale of a horse. On appellant’s behalf it is contended, or more properly we should say suggested, that although a warranty may* not cover open and visible defects, such as the absence of a member or an obvious deformity, it does cover defects of which the purchaser may have been informed, and of which he may have known, but which are not open to inspection or obvious to the senses. The question propounded is an interesting one, but as nothing more is done than to propound it to the court, without argument or authority, and for the more cogent reason' that the record presents no question of any kind for decision, we do not feel at liberty to express any opinion upon the question suggested.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
#### Mills *v.*Conner.

ERROR to the *Dearborn*Circuit Court. — The plaintiff moved for a writ of *supersede as*in this case, on the ground, that the judgment had been rendered on an award made after the time limit-, ed by the rule.

*Kidder,*for the plaintiff

*Per Curiam.*

Take your motion, upon condition that a bond be executed according to law (1).

(1)

 A similar motion was made and granted in the case of *Percival*v. Post; Absent *Holman, i.*who had been of counsel for the defendant.
#### L.M. Lee *v.*J. M. Harper & Co.

Arbitration and Award — Petition on — Cause of Action.

A petition on an amount found by arbitrators, is sufficient, if it set out the covenant between the parties to show the demand, and the award to show the amount due.

Same — Demurrer.

A demurrer to such petition should not be sustained as it shows a cause of action.

APPEAL FROM HICKMAN CIRCUIT COURT.

February 21, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Appellees having obtained from appellant permission to run his mill race through the latter’s land executed to him a covenant to compensate him “for any damages that said race may cause to said land,” and in case the parties, concerned cannot agree as *527to the value of the land damaged by said race and mill, each were to select an arbitrator, and in case of disagreement they to select a third umpire, and these were to ascertain the damages, and the partis were to abide their award.

Bullock, *for appellant.*

Lindsay, *for appellee.*

The parties did select each a man who awarded to Lee two hundred dollars and wrote their award on the back of said covenant. Harper & Co. not paying, Lee brought this action, setting up the covenant and award with protest of both and an averment that each had selected an arbitrator who had made their written award on the back of the covenant and that the defendants had due notice thereof.

To this petition and amendment the court sustained a demurrer.

There is now but one form of action, that by petition, and when a cause of action is set out, to sustain a demurrer is erroneous.

This writing covenanted that the defendants would *compensate*the plaintiff for the damage to his land by running their mill race through it,- and provided a means of ascertaining the amount alternately, that is, by the agreement of the parties or by arbitration, the ascertainment of these damages, however, either way did not perform the covenant to compensate, that could only be done by payment; the award only made certain the amount of damages. It was, therefore, proper to set out the covenant and the award, the one to show the demand, the other to show the amount.

The averment of due notice of the award is sufficient.

The petition and amendment sets out a good cause of action and their dismissal upon demurrer was erroneous and the judgment is • reversed for further proceedings.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL DANIEL CUCUTA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

 State.

 

§

§

§

 

§

§

§ 

 

§

'

'

No. 08-15-00027-CR

Appeal from the

213th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1371061R)

 O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief 

until August 18, 2015. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE 

APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Blake R. Burns, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 18, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### Woodburn and another *v.*Fleming and another.

The certificate of the clerk is not the only evidence, by which the due execution of the appeal bond may be proved.

APPEAL from the *Jefferson*Circuit Court. — A motion was made by the appellees for the dismission of this suit. The certified copy of the appeal bond did not show, that the original had been executed in the clerk’s office; and in supportofthe motion, it was contended, that no other evidence was admissible to prove that fact.

Scott, J.

Whether the bond was executed in the clerk’s office or not, is a plain question of fact susceptible of proof. Although the bond does not show the place where it was executed, yet if the appellants can prove by other'evidence that they are within the law, the Court will permit them to do so; if they .cannot, the motion must be sustained (1).

*Note.*— The appellants afterwards produced the certificate of the clerk of the C. C., stating that the bond had been duly executed in his office; whereupon,

*The Court*overruled the motion to dismiss the suit.-

*5Lane, for the appellants.

*Meek,*for the appellees.

(1)

 Vide *Averil*v. Dickerson, in this Court, ante, p. 3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,592,624
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         100,030
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,550,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 36,951,162
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      61,894,538
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        62,159,860
<LOANS>                                    304,475,629
<ALLOWANCE>                                 11,919,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             427,621,784
<DEPOSITS>                                 290,389,685
<SHORT-TERM>                                   365,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         12,271,111
<LONG-TERM>                                 30,526,720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       15,022,432
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,046,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             427,621,784
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             33,513,439
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            7,126,866
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            40,640,305
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          11,167,451
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,163,201
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       27,477,104
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                4,769,785
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             12,271,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,408,202
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,783,940
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.84
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,419,378
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               631,075
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,324,829
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             8,186,237
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                1,635,919
<RECOVERIES>                                   599,442
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           11,919,545
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:15-cr-01400-JJT Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01400-JJT Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01400-JJT Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 3 of 3
#### Jones *v.*Rodman and Another.

On appeal.

Wednesday, *May,*30.

TWO days after the rendition of a judgment by a justice in favour of the plaintiff, the defendant obtained a new trial. On the day fixed for the new trial, the parties appeared, and the plaintiff obtained a continuance on account of the absence of witnesses whom he had subpoenaed, making no objection to the previous proceedings. On the day to which the cause was continued, the parties appeared and the cause was tried, the previous proceedings not being objected to. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appealed. *Held,*that the plaintiff’s affidavit that the justice’s first judgment was rendered in the plaintiff’s absence, and that the new trial *493was applied for and granted without his knowledge, was not a sufficient ground, under the circumstances, for dismissing appeal.
Case 2:15-cr-01483-SRB Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01483-SRB Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01483-SRB Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461*et seq.*) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a savings association and nonbanking companies owned by the savings and loan holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 20, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *Seminole Bancorp, Inc.,*                     Hollywood, Florida; to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Mackinac Savings Bank, F.S.B., Boynton Beach, Florida.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 21, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-25332 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Expedition 43 Crew Departs Space Station, Lands Safely in Kazakhstan","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"agW19RnblH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/expedition-43-crew-departs-space-station-lands-safely-in-kazakhstan\/\">Expedition 43 Crew Departs Space Station, Lands Safely in Kazakhstan<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/expedition-43-crew-departs-space-station-lands-safely-in-kazakhstan\/embed\/#?secret=agW19RnblH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 43 Crew Departs Space Station, Lands Safely in Kazakhstan” — NASA\" data-secret=\"agW19RnblH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/15-120.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":139}