alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hemmingway *v.*State.

Opinion delivered November 19, 1923.

1. Criminal law — judicial notice. — Courts take judicial notice of the statutory division of a county into judicial districts and of the location of towns in the county with reference to such districts.

2. Criminal law — venue—evidence.—Where it was alleged and proved that defendant sold liquor behind a store in a certain town, which the court knows judicially was situated in the district and county of the venue, the venue was sufficiently established.

3. Intoxicating liquors — sale—evidence.—In. a prosecution for selling intoxicating liquors, evidence *held*to warrant a finding that the sales were made prior to the finding of the indictment.

Appeal from Mississippi Circuit . Court, Chickasawba District; *G. W. Keck,*Judge;

affirmed.

*G. W. Barham,*for appellant.

*J. S. Utley,*Attorney General, *John L. Garter, Wm. T. Hammock*and *Darden Moose,*Assistants, for appellee.

Smith, J.

Appellant was indicted for selling intoxicating liquor, and was found guilty as charged.

For the reversal of the judgment of the court sentencing him to the penitentiary, two errors are assigned; (1), that the venue was not proved; and (2), that the testimony did not show a sale-prior to the date of the indictment.

The testimony on the part of the State was to the effect that the sale was made behind Shaffer’s hardware' store, in the town of Manila. Now, the court knows judicially that by-act '81 of the Acts of 1901, page 136, Mississippi County was divided into two judicial districts, which were there called the Osceola District and the Chickasawba District; and we also know that Manila is in the Chickasawba District thereof; indeed, this fact appears from the act itself, as § 4 thereof provides that the citizens of the Chickasawba District should determine, at an election which the -act directed to be held for that purpose, whether the courts of that dis*140trict should be held at the town of 'Manila or Blythe-ville. The indictment alleges the venue in the Chickasawba District of Mississippi County, and, as we have said, we judicially know that Manila is situated in that district. *Bonner*v. *Jackson,*158 Ark. 526; *Guerin*v. *State,*150 Ark. 295; *Wells*v. *State,*151 Ark. 221.

The indictment was returned by the grand jury and filed in open court on April 6,1922, and the trial was had at the April term, 1923. One of the State’s witnesses did testify that the sale was made in the fall of 1922, but, upon being pressed to be definite, answered that the sale was made in 1921. Another witness, who was asked about the time of'alleged sales, answered that he bought liquor from appellant on Christmas eve. He was further asked: “Q. This last Christmas eve or the one before that? A. The one before that. Q. In the town of Manila? A. Yes sir.. Q. You don’t know whether that was in the Chickasawba District of Mississippi County or not, do you? A. No sir.”

"We think this testimony warranted the finding that the sales were made prior to, and not since, the date of the indictment.

No error appears, and the judgment is affirmed.
CIPHER
HOLDING CORPORATION
 
 
 EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cipher Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick Rooney,
President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the quarterly
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the quarterly report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
October 19, 2005
 
 /s/
      Patrick RooneyPresident,Chief
      Executive Officer,Chairman
      of the Board and Director
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25676]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday, 
October 29, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no 
earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Adjudicatory matter;
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 23, 2014.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25676 Filed 10-24-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-71594 (333-71594-01)) and S-8 (No. 333-73047;
333-68871; 333-58753; 333-57893; 333-56823; 333-08025; 333-87315; 333-82489;
333-45680; 333-56798; 333-90136) of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. of our report
dated February 13, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 3, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Steven Louie,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03409-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8571 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KING PHARMACEUTICALS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          73,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,214)
<INVENTORY>                                     60,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,167
<PP&E>                                         114,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,724)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 902,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,124
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     476,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   902,219
<SALES>                                        171,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,585
<CGS>                                           52,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (179)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,706
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,706
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,706
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,685
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,315
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 63 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                                H. R. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the Central Valley 
               project, California, as ``Trinity Lake''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 63

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the Central Valley 
               project, California, as ``Trinity Lake''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRINITY LAKE.

    (a) Designation.--The reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the 
Central Valley project, California, and designated as ``Clair Engle 
Lake'' by Public Law 88-662 (78 Stat. 1093) is hereby redesignated as 
``Trinity Lake''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, regulation, document, 
record, map, or other paper of the United States to the reservoir 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
``Trinity Lake''.
    (c) Repeal of Earlier Designation.--Public Law 88-662 (78 Stat. 
1093) is repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### M’Carty *v.*Rhea, in Error.

HELD, that an assignee of a promissory note cannot sue a remote assignor, where the note assigned is not governed by the law of merchants. *Mandeville*v. *Riddle,*1 Cranch, 290.— *Drake*v. *Johnson,*Hardin, 218 (1).

*Held,*also, that where there is a demurrer to the whole declaration containing several counts, one of which is good, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment. 1 Chitt. Plead. 643 (2).

(1)

*Jones*v. *Wood,*3 Marsh. Ky. Rep. 162. The assignee of a promissory *hote*in *Fa.,*may recover the amount from a remote assignor, in equity, though *56not it Jaw. The remote assignor has the same defence in equity against the remrte assignee, as against his immediate assignee; and he has a right to insist that the other assignors be made parties. *Riddle*v. *Mandeville,*5 Cranch, 322.

(2)

*Mumford v. Fitzhugh,*18 Johns. Rep. 457. So where there is but one count, and part is good and part bad, and the matters divisible; or several breaches in covenant, some well assigned, othersnot; if the defendant demur generally to the whole, the plaintiff will have judgment. *Duppa*v. *Mayo,*1 Will. Saund. 286, and note 9 *—Pinkney*v. The inhabitants of Rutland, 2 Will. Saund. 379, and note *14.*— Powdick *v. Lyon,*11 East, 565. — 1 Chitt. Plead. *643.*— Amory v. *Brodrick,*5 Barnew. and Ald. *712.*— Martin, v. *Williams,*13 Johns. Rep. 264.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Billy R. Hughes Sr., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03505-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8614 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Emanuel Joseph Ayala, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-15-01200-02-PHX-SRB 

ORDER OF DETENTION 

 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Supervised Release were held on April 20, 2018.. 

The Court Finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has 

consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. 

 The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of 

proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., 

that he is not a serious flight risk. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 20th day of April, 2018. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Mercury-Atlas 6: Friendship 7","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oRL9ZgLXLC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/mercury-atlas-6-friendship-7\/\">Mercury-Atlas 6: Friendship 7<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/mercury-atlas-6-friendship-7\/embed\/#?secret=oRL9ZgLXLC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mercury-Atlas 6: Friendship 7” — NASA\" data-secret=\"oRL9ZgLXLC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/friendship_7_9_liftoff_s62-00337-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,979
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,261
<PP&E>                                           2,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,397
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,122
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,174
<SALES>                                         18,743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,743
<CGS>                                           15,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (7)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,309
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (6,189)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (51,800)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (56,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.87)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LARRY BELLAMY.

June 14, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Samuel V. Lopez, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Dora Schriro, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-98-0072-PHX-SMM

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment and a

corresponding Motion to Exceed Page Limitations for the motion to alter or amend. The

motion for additional pages is reasonable and will be granted. Before ruling on Petitioner’s

motion to alter or amend, the Court has determined that a response on issue I (“Respondents

expressly conceded Petitioner’s constitutional violation resulting from his sentencing

counsel’s ineffectiveness was exhausted”) would be helpful.

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Exceed Page Limitations (Dkt. 203) is

GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner’s

Motion to Alter or Amend, limited to Issue I, within ten (10) days of this Order’s file date.

DATED this 1st day of August, 2008.

Case 2:98-cv-00072-SMM Document 204 Filed 08/01/08 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Spacewalkers Install Camera Platform, Inspect Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"g8TO3afqRi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/spacewalkers-install-camera-platform-inspect-station\/\">Spacewalkers Install Camera Platform, Inspect Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/spacewalkers-install-camera-platform-inspect-station\/embed\/#?secret=g8TO3afqRi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Spacewalkers Install Camera Platform, Inspect Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"g8TO3afqRi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/pic-082113a.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":300}