alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JACK MOISEYEV v. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Xponential, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Dwayne A. Moyers, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditions and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 16, 2005 | /s/ Dwayne  A. Moyers    |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|
|                     | Dwayne A.  Moyers        |
|                     | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 744 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 744

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase the maximum Pell 
                                 Grant.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Mr. McGovern introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to increase the maximum Pell 
                                 Grant.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Affordable Higher Education-Through-
Pell Grants Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM PELL GRANTS.

    Section 401(b)(2)(A) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(b)(2)(A)) is amended by striking clauses (i) through (v) and 
inserting the following:
            ``(i) $4,500 for academic year 1997-1998, and
            ``(ii) $5,000 for academic year 1998-1999 and each of the 4 
        succeeding academic years,''.

SEC. 3. FUNDING OF PELL GRANTS.

    Section 401 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) 
is further amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(j) Funds for Expenses.--There shall be available to the 
Secretary, from funds not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be 
necessary to provide funds to be obligated for the costs of the grants 
under this section in the maximum amounts authorized by this 
section.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Carlos Rene Vega-Gaxiola, 

Defendant.

No. CR-16-00179-PHX-DGC

DETENTION ORDER 

 On July 26, 2016, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 26th day of July, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:16-cr-00179-DGC Document 31 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 1
**
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**OF CITIBANK, N.A.**

**FORTHE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2022**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Citibank, N.A., as Servicer under theThird Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 10, 2016 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), as supplemented by the Amended and Restated Series 2000 Supplement thereto dated as of August 9,2011, as further amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of November 10, 2016 (the “Series 2000 Supplement” and, together with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the “Agreement”), each between Citibank, as Sellerand Servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee; and as Managing Beneficiary of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust (the “Issuing Entity”) under the Second Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of November 10,2016 (the “Indenture”), between the Issuing Entity and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, does hereby certify that: 

1. Citibank is the Servicer under the Agreement and the Managing Beneficiary of the Issuing Entity. 

2. A review of the servicing activities of Citibank during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance under the Agreement and the Indenture was conducted under my supervision. 

3. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, Citibank has fulfilled all of its servicing obligations under the Agreement and the Indenture in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of March, 2023. 

 

/s/ Tami R. Berens
Tami R. BerensVice President**
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIAN XIN ZHOU, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-72693 

Agency No. A099-635-704 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2023**

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Jian Xin Zhou, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-72693 

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards created by the 

REAL ID Act. Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1083, 1089-90 (9th Cir. 2011). We 

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Zhou failed to 

provide sufficient corroborative evidence, along with his credible testimony and 

the rest of the evidence in the record, to meet his burden of proof to establish 

eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1158(b)(1)(B)(ii) (“Where the trier of fact determines that the applicant should 

provide evidence that corroborates otherwise credible testimony, such evidence 

must be provided unless the applicant does not have the evidence and cannot 

reasonably obtain the evidence.”); Ren, 648 F.3d at 1094 (corroborative evidence 

consisting of “two short and vague letters,” along with the rest of the evidence in 

the record, did not compel the conclusion that the petitioner had met his burden of 

proof). Thus, Zhou’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection 

because Zhou failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or 

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to China. See Aden 

v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). We reject Zhou’s contention that 

the agency ignored evidence or otherwise erred in its legal analysis. See 
3 16-72693 

Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency adequately 

considered evidence and sufficiently announced its decision).

We do not consider the country conditions reports Zhou references in his 

opening brief that are not a part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS, 79 

F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc). 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITON FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE BOARD OF EDUCATION v. OLD BRIDGE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification granted. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*182)
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22D0308. EDWARD T. RIDLEY v. ESTATE OF WILLIAM BILL

DICKERSON, et al.

Edward T. Ridley filed a civil action against the estate of William “Bill”

Dickerson and Dickerson’s heirs. On January 11, 2022, the trial court dismissed the

case for lack of prosecution. On March 17, 2022, Ridley filed an application for a

discretionary appeal, seeking review of the dismissal order. We, however, lack

jurisdiction. 

An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days following

entry of the order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). “The

requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this court cannot accept an

application for appeal not made in compliance therewith.” Moulder v. Reilly, 226 Ga.

App. 608, 608 (487 SE2d 142) (1997) (punctuation omitted); see also Gable v. State,

290 Ga. 81, 82 (2) (a) (720 SE2d 170) (2011) (noting that this Court “has held that

the failure to meet the statutory deadline for filing a discretionary application is a

jurisdictional defect”). Here, Ridley filed his application 65 days after entry of the

order he seeks to appeal. The application is thus untimely, and it is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

April 18, 2022
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/18/2022
#### Evans *v.*Goodlet.

Whore the vendor of real estate takes no security for the purchase-money but the vendee’s bond, he retains a lien on the land while held by the vendee, whether the conveyance has been executed or not.

THIS was a suit in equity, commenced in this Court on account of the interest of the circuit judge, in whose circuit the land mentioned in the bill is situate. — The bill states, that the complainant had sold the defendant a certain tract of land; had. taken *no*security for payment but the defendant’s bond; and had given possession without executing a conveyance. Also, that the complainant bad recovered a judgment at law on the bond,, and had sued out a fieri facias thereon, which was returned “no property found.” Prayer, that the premises might be sold to *satisfy the*judgment. The bill was demurred to, and the demurrer overruled. The defendant declined putting in an answer.

*247*Hart,*for the complainant.

*Tabbs,*for the defendant..

*Per Curiam.*

A sale of the property is decreed, according to the prayer of the bill (1).

(1)

 The taking of the bond did not discharge the lien. It is only when the security taken is intended as a substitution for the lien, nob as a mere mode of payment, that the lien is discharged. Vide *Lagow et al.*v. *Badollet et al.*and note, *May*term, 1826, post.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dacia Massengill","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/daciamassengill-2\/","title":"Former NASA Associate Administrator Bob Cabana at the Moon to Mars Townhall","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MWLwuAdhfO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52908439303-db3b14f293-k\/\">Former NASA Associate Administrator Bob Cabana at the Moon to Mars Townhall<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52908439303-db3b14f293-k\/embed\/#?secret=MWLwuAdhfO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Former NASA Associate Administrator Bob Cabana at the Moon to Mars Townhall” — NASA\" data-secret=\"MWLwuAdhfO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/52908439303-db3b14f293-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Space Shuttle Missions","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sUzgmCpHGT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/space-shuttle-missions\/\">Space Shuttle Missions<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/space-shuttle-missions\/embed\/#?secret=sUzgmCpHGT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Shuttle Missions” — NASA\" data-secret=\"sUzgmCpHGT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/201102230003HQ\/201102230003HQ~large.jpg?w=600&h=1277&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1277}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America

v.

Blayne Douglas Wayne De Long

No. CR-16-00124-001-TUC-JGZ (MSA)

JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT

REVOCATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

Hugo Castorena Reyna (CJA)

Attorney for Defendant

USM#: 51955-408

On 5/12/2017 the defendant, present with counsel, appeared for sentencing for violating, Title 18, U.S.C. 

§§113(a)(6) and 1152, Assault Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury, Class C Felony offense, as charged in 

Count 2 of the Indictment.

The defendant was sentenced to a term of THIRTY-TWO (32) MONTHS imprisonment and upon 

release, THREE (3) YEARS of supervised release to follow.

On 6/5/2020 the defendant appeared with counsel and the term of supervised released imposed on 

5/12/2017 was revoked and the defendant was sentenced to a term of 8 months imprisonment followed 

by a 28-month term of supervised release.

On 10/27/2020 the United States Probation Office filed a petition to revoke the term of supervised 

release.

On 1/22/2021 the defendant appeared with counsel and admitted allegation C as reflected in the petition 

to revoke filed in this matter. The matter now comes on for disposition.

IT IS ORDERED that the term of supervised release imposed on 6/5/2020 is hereby REVOKED and 

the defendant is committed to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of ELEVEN (11) 

MONTHS, with no term of supervised release to follow. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining allegation(s) are dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is given credit for time served.

//

//

//

//

Case 4:16-cr-00124-JGZ-MSA Document 127 Filed 02/24/21 Page 1 of 2
CR-16-00124-001-TUC-JGZ (MSA) Page 2 of 2

USA vs. Blayne Douglas Wayne De Long 

The defendant previously waived the right to appeal.

The Court orders commitment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons.

Date of Imposition of Sentence: Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Dated this 24th day of February, 2021.

CR-16-00124-001-TUC-JGZ (MSA) - De Long

Case 4:16-cr-00124-JGZ-MSA Document 127 Filed 02/24/21 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 1 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 2 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 3 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 4 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 5 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 6 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 7 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 8 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 9 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 10 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 11 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 12 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 13 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 14 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 15 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 16 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 17 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 18 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 19 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 20 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 21 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 22 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 23 of 24
Case 4:15-cv-00546-JR Document 1 Filed 11/23/15 Page 24 of 24
Case 3:16-cv-08008-GMS Document 50 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-99","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GPyuSdFD20\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-99\/\">STS-99<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-99\/embed\/#?secret=GPyuSdFD20\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-99” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GPyuSdFD20\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/0400060\/0400060~large.jpg?w=600&h=1523&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1523}
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Marisa Christina, Incorporated:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-91078 and 33-91080) on Form S-8 of Marisa Christina, Incorporated of
our report dated February 26, 2004 relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Marisa Christina, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and
2002 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report
appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Marisa Christina,
Incorporated.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 17, 2004

                                       34