alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Dual Gemini Flights Achieved Crucial Spaceflight Milestones","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2CfSRglsYy\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/gemini\/dual-gemini-flights-achieved-crucial-spaceflight-milestones\/\">Dual Gemini Flights Achieved Crucial Spaceflight Milestones<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/gemini\/dual-gemini-flights-achieved-crucial-spaceflight-milestones\/embed\/#?secret=2CfSRglsYy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Dual Gemini Flights Achieved Crucial Spaceflight Milestones” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2CfSRglsYy\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/11\/1-s65-59932a.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":913}
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00299-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.W. AND L.W., CHILDREN

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-000066-CV-272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Elizabeth appeals from an order that terminated the parent-child relationship 

between her and her children, J.W. and L.W. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §§ 161.001, 161.003. 

Elizabeth's appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California asserting 

that the appeal presents no issues of arguable merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 

87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). The procedures set forth in Anders are applicable 

to appeals of orders terminating parental rights. In re E.L.Y., 69 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. 

App.—Waco 2002, order). Counsel advised Elizabeth that counsel had filed the brief 

pursuant to Anders and that Elizabeth had the right to review the record and file a pro se

response on her own behalf. Counsel also informed Elizabeth that she could request 
In the Interest of J.W. and L.W., Children Page 2

access to the record by contacting the Court. Elizabeth did not request the record or file 

a response with this Court.

Counsel included a detailed recitation of the facts in the Anders brief and asserted 

that counsel reviewed the record for any potentially meritorious issues and determined 

there is no non-frivolous issue to raise in this appeal. Counsel's brief discusses the 

sufficiency of the evidence relating to Section 161.001(b)(1)(D) and (E)1 and Section 

161.003 as well as the best interest of the children. Counsel's brief evidences a 

professional evaluation of the record, and we conclude that counsel performed the duties 

required of appointed counsel. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; see also In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403, 406-408 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).

Upon the filing of the Anders brief, as the reviewing appellate court, it is our duty 

to independently examine the record to decide whether counsel is correct in determining 

that an appeal is frivolous. See In the Interest of G.P., 503 S.W.3d 531, 536 (Tex. App.—

Waco 2016, pet. denied). Arguments are frivolous when they "cannot conceivably 

persuade the court." McCoy v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 436, 108 S. Ct. 1895, 100 L. 

Ed. 2d 440 (1988).

Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the Anders brief, we agree with 

counsel that the appeal is frivolous. See In re D.D., 279 S.W.3d 849, 850 (Tex. App.—Dallas 

1 An Anders brief must include a review of Section 161.001(b)(1)(D) or (E) if the termination was granted on either 

or both of those subsections pursuant to In re N.G., 577 S.W.3d 230, 235-36 (Tex. 2019).
In the Interest of J.W. and L.W., Children Page 3

2009, pet. denied). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order of termination.

CONCLUSION

Having found no meritorious issues presented in this appeal, we affirm the 

judgment of the trial court. 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith 

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed November 30, 2022

CV06
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       9,047,700
<SECURITIES>                                73,903,987
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           119,297,824
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,297,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,267,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,297,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,495,097
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,089,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,594,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,594,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,594,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (374.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (374.52)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalFinancial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Fred Crandell, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-02354-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 The Court has been advised that Plaintiff has settled with Defendant Equifax 

Information Services, LLC Only (Doc. 21). 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC will, 

without further Order of this Court, be dismissed with prejudice within 60 days of the 

date of this Order unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate

Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC on February 19, 2016 without further 

leave of Court. 

 Dated this 22nd day of December, 2015. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-02354-DLR Document 23 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Real Estate Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mark E. Zalatoris certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:   February 25, 2010 By:  /s/ MARK E. ZALATORIS Name:  Mark E. Zalatoris Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates by reference.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001047334
<NAME> NATIONAL HEALTH REALTY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,770,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               94,497,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     144,615,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,137,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             242,946,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 129,453,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               242,946,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,197,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               280,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,208,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,989,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




YUHE
INTERNATIONAL, INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of YUHE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hu Gang, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, CERTIFY, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
14, 2010





/s/
      Hu GangHu
      GangChief
      Financial Officer
JULIAN BELIZAIRE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2666

Opinion filed September 4, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.

Julian Belizaire, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.2.4

AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                                       NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT NO. 3, dated as of May 5, 2002, among THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), CITIBANK (NEW
YORK STATE), a New York banking corporation ("NYS"), CITIGROUP INC., a Delaware corporation and the ultimate parent of NYS
("Citigroup" and, together with NYS, the "Parents").

WHEREAS, the Company, NYS and Citicorp, a Delaware corporation, have heretofore entered into a Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of
December 22, 1992, the term of which was extended pursuant to a letter agreement dated November 1, 1999, the term of which was
further extended pursuant to Amendment No. 1 dated June 22, 2000 and Amendment No. 2 dated June 22, 2001 and Citigroup was substituted as a party in lieu of Citicorp (the Non-Competition Agreement, as so extended
and amended, being referred to herein as the "Agreement").

WHEREAS, the parties to the Agreement wish to extend the term of the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Company, NYS and Citigroup hereby consent and agree as follows:

SECTION 1.  Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 3, all defined terms used in this Amendment No. 3 shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

SECTION 2.  The term of the Agreement (originally scheduled to expire on December 22, 1999, and previously extended to June 22, 2002)
shall be extended for an additional twelve (12) months to June 22, 2003.

SECTION 3.  This Amendment No. 3 may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

SECTION 4. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 3, all references in the Agreement to this "Agreement" shall refer to the
Agreement as amended hereby.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, NYS and Citigroup have each caused this Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement to be duly executed by
their respective officers as of the day and year first above written.

THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION

By/s/ Bill Beckmann       Name:  Bill Beckmann
          Title:  Chairman

CITIBANK (NEW YORK STATE)

By/s/ Doug Webb       Name:  Doug Webb
          Title:  Secretary

CITIGROUP INC.

By/s/ Ajay Banga       Name:  Ajay Banga
          Title:  Division Executive
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         426
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  23,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                   258
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         452,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                 67,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 429,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        294,827
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       35
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   429,546
<SALES>                                        195,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,146
<CGS>                                          109,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               44,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,086
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.08
        


</TABLE>
IB

Union Calendar No. 10

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 652

[Report No. 105–13]

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for the construction

of a hydroelectric project located in the State of Washington, and for

other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 6, 1997

Mr. WHITE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Commerce

MARCH 11, 1997

Additional sponsor: Ms. DUNN

MARCH 11, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for

the construction of a hydroelectric project located in the

State of Washington, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 652 RH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

3 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

4 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy

5 Regulatory Commission project numbered 9025, the Com6 mission shall, upon the request of the project licensee, in

7 accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public

8 interest requirements of that section and the Commis9 sion’s procedures under that section, extend the time pe10 riod during which the licensee is required to commence

11 construction of the project for not more than 3 consecutive

12 2-year periods.

13 (b) APPLICABILITY.—An extension under subsection

14 (a) shall take effect for a project upon the expiration of

15 the extension, issued by the Commission under section 13

16 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period

17 required for commencement of construction of the project.

18 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the

19 license for the project referred to in subsection (a) has

20 expired prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the

21 Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of the

22 date of its expiration and extend the time required for

23 commencement of construction of the project as provided

24 in subsection (a) for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year

25 periods, the first of which shall commence on the date of

26 such expiration.

Union Calendar No. 10

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 652

[Report No. 105–13]

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

purposes.located in the State of Washington, and for otherAct for the construction of a hydroelectric project

MARCH 11, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed