alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant to**
 
 **Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the
        “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), Corey N. Conn, as Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d),
        as
        applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  November 14,
                  2006
              
              /s/
                  Corey N. ConnCorey
                  N. ConnChief
                  Financial Officer
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Imagin Molecular
        Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
        staff
        upon request.
Case 2:15-mj-01745-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01745-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01745-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/14/15 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25756]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 24, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. People's United Financial, Inc., Bridgeport, Connecticut; to 
become a bank holding company upon the conversion of People's United 
Bank, Bridgeport, Connecticut, to a national bank.
    In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to 
engage through Shem Creek Capital Fund I, LLC, Wellesley, 
Massachusetts, and Northeast Retirement Services, Inc., Woburn, 
Massachusetts, in employee benefit administrative services, trust 
company functions, investment advisory activities and extending credit 
and servicing loans, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(1), 225.28(b)(5), 
225.28(b)(6)(i), 225.28(b)(7)(i), and 225.28(b)(9)(ii).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 24, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-25756 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6312

CLIFFORD ANTHONY JACKSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DAYENA CORCORAN, Warden; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney 

General of Maryland,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:13-cv-00213-PJM)

Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 30, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifford Anthony Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clifford Anthony Jackson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny Jackson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Francisco Ramirez-Camacho, 

Defendant. 

NO. CR-15-01506-001-PHX-JJT

ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING 

DISPOSITION (PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. § 3143) 

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3143, a detention hearing was 

submitted on 2/1/2017. Defendant was present and was represented by counsel. The 

defendant has not rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that he is not likely to flee if 

released. 

FINDINGS OF FACT 

I find by a preponderance of the evidence that: 

☒ The defendant is not a citizen of the United States or lawfully admitted for 

permanent residence. 

☒ The defendant, at the time of the charged offense, was in the United States 

illegally. 

☒ The defendant has a prior criminal history. 

☒ The defendant has been ordered detained on the underlying 8 USC 1326(a)&(b)(1) 

charged in Case No: 17-1029MJ. 

The Court incorporates by reference the material findings of the Pretrial Services Agency 

which were reviewed by the Court at the time of the hearing in this matter, except as 

noted in the record. 

Case 2:15-cr-01506-JJT Document 30 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 

1. There is a serious risk that the defendant will flee. 

2. No condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance 

of the defendant as required. 

DIRECTIONS REGARDING DETENTION 

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his/her designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court 

proceeding. 

APPEALS AND THIRD PARTY RELEASE 

 IT IS ORDERED that should an appeal of this detention order be filed with the 

District Court, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion for 

review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing set before 

the District Court. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

before the District Court to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and 

investigate the potential third party custodian. 

DATE: 2/1/2017 

Honorable James F. Metcalf

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-cr-01506-JJT Document 30 Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Releases Restored Apollo 11 Moonwalk Video","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MxLzfB4kXS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-11\/nasa-releases-restored-apollo-11-moonwalk-video\/\">NASA Releases Restored Apollo 11 Moonwalk Video<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-11\/nasa-releases-restored-apollo-11-moonwalk-video\/embed\/#?secret=MxLzfB4kXS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Releases Restored Apollo 11 Moonwalk Video” — NASA\" data-secret=\"MxLzfB4kXS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/apollo-11_image_comparison.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":319}
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2005 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Joseph E. Byrne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



Dated: March 15, 2005



/s/ Joseph E. ByrneJoseph E. ByrneChief Financial Officer




This certification has been
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Karen L. Rugg","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/krugg\/","title":"Eyes on Ice","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EYNlHSAMG2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/eyes-on-ice\/\">Eyes on Ice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/eyes-on-ice\/embed\/#?secret=EYNlHSAMG2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Eyes on Ice” — NASA\" data-secret=\"EYNlHSAMG2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/eyes-on-ice.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,681
<SECURITIES>                                   141,989
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,782
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,697
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,235
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,167)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,549
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    99
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    209
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                209
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       209
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 540

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain materials used in the manufacture

of skis and snowboards.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. MCDERMOTT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain materials used

in the manufacture of skis and snowboards.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN MATE4 RIALS.

5 (a) SPRING STEEL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

8 new heading:
2

•HR 540 IH

‘‘ 9902.72.17 L-shaped edges

of spring steel

for use in the

manufacture of

skis and

snowboards

(provided for in

subheading

7217.10.90) .... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/99 ’’.

1 (b) POLYETHYLENE BASE MATERIALS.—Subchapter

2 II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of

3 the United States is amended by inserting in numerical

4 sequence the following new heading:

‘‘ 9902.39.20 Polyethylene

base materials

that are sanded on 1 side

and surfacetreated for use

in the manufacture of skis

and

snowboards

(provided for

in subheading

3920.10.00) .. Free No change No change On or before

12/31/99 ’’.

5 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY.

6 The amendments made by section 1 apply to goods

7 entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption,

8 on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment

9 of this Act.

Æ
Case 2:15-mj-01714-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01714-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/29/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01714-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/29/15 Page 3 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Cheryl Ann McGill, 

Defendant.

No. 15-7690MJ

DETENTION ORDER 

 On January 8, 2016, defendant, Cheryl Ann McGill, appeared before this Court on 

a petition to revoke conditions of release. The Court considered the information provided 

to the Court, and the arguments of counsel, in determining whether the defendant should 

be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant has violated 

the conditions of release and by a preponderance of the evidence that she has violated 

law, and further finds that there is no condition or combination of conditions available to 

the Court. 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 11th day of January, 2016. 

Case 2:15-mj-07690-BSB Document 23 Filed 01/11/16 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

            ASSUMPTION OF OFFICERS' AND EMPLOYEES' STOCK OPTION PLAN


          THIS ASSUMPTION OF STOCK OPTION PLAN (the "Assumption") is made as of
the 1st day of July, 2001.

                                WITNESSETH THAT:

          WHEREAS, Old Florida Bank (the "Bank") and Old Florida Bankshares,
Inc. ("Bankshares") entered into an Agreement and Plan of Share Exchange (the
"Agreement") pursuant to which the Bank has been reorganized as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Bankshares through a share exchange transaction (the "Share
Exchange"); and

          WHEREAS, the Bank has in effect an Officers' and Employees' Stock
Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, Bankshares and the Bank desire to set forth in this
Assumption the assumption by Bankshares of the Plan and the options issued
thereunder ("Options").

          NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

          1. Adoption of Recitals. The parties confirm that the foregoing
recitals are true and accurate as of the date hereof and are reflective of the
intent of the parties.

          2. Assumption of Plan and Options. Effective July 1,2001, Bankshares
shall assume the Plan and the Options, and the obligations of the Bank in
connection with the Plan and said Options, as if an original party thereto.

          3. Additional Instruments. Bankshares and the Bank agree to provide
from time to time any additional documents, agreements, instruments or writings
that may be deemed necessary or appropriate by either party to evidence the
assumption by Bankshares of the Plan and the Options.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bankshares and the Bank have caused this Assumption
to be duly executed all as of the date first above written.

OLD FLORIDA BANKSHARES, INC.                   OLD FLORIDA BANK


By: /s/ Larry W. Johnson                       By: /s/ Larry W. Johnson
   ----------------------------                   ----------------------------
   Larry W. Johnson                               Larry W. Johnson
   President and Chief Executive                  President and Chief Executive
   Officer                                        Officer