alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15


             [Letterhead of Marden, Harrison & Kreuter, CPAs, P.C.]


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
Momentum Holdings Corporation
36 West 25th Street
New York, New York 10010

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
Momentum Holdings Corporation as of September 30, 2001 and the related condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2001 and 2000, shareholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows
for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2001 and 2000. These condensed
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the
condensed consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

As discussed in Note 7, certain conditions indicate that the Company may be
unable to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do
not include any adjustments to the financial statements that might be necessary
should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of
Momentum Holdings Corporation as of December 31, 2000, presented herein, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the year then ended not presented herein; and in our report dated
March 23, 2001, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial
statements.


Marden, Harrison & Kreuter
Certified Public Accountants, P.C.


/s/ Marden, Harrison & Kreuter


White Plains, New York
October 29, 2001
##### 



KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED UNIT CERTIFICATE
  1.     Name and Address of Participant:2.     Date of Grant:3.     Type of Grant:
    
    Restricted Units4.     Number of Shares:5.     Restricted Period:
    
    The restrictions upon the Restricted Units
shall lapse upon the first to occur of the
following events, and otherwise according to
the terms of the Incentive Plan: (1) one year
following the date of grant; (2) the
Participant, standing for reelection, is not
reelected; (3) the Participant completes his
or her term of office after declining to stand
for reelection; (4) the Participant completes
his or her term of office after not being
nominated to stand for reelection; (5) the
Participant completes his or her term of
office, having been ineligible to stand for
reelection under term limit provisions then in
effect.6.     Date of Payment:
    
    ___, except as otherwise set forth
in the Restricted Unit Grant Agreement.
  KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:Name:Title: PARTICIPANT




---



##### 



RESTRICTED UNIT GRANT AGREEMENT
PURSUANT TO THE KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
INCENTIVE PLAN
  1. AWARD OF RESTRICTED UNITS.
  2. GOVERNING PLAN.
  3. RESTRICTIONS ON THE RESTRICTED UNITS.
 No Transfer (
 Restricted Period
 Forfeiture
 2




---



##### 



Death and Permanent Disability
 Change of Control.
 4. FORM AND TIMING OF PAYMENT.
  5. VOTING AND DIVIDEND RIGHTS.
  6. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS.
 Tax Matters
 3




---



##### 



Independent Advice; No Representations
 Value of Restricted Units
 Adjustment in Capitalization
 Spousal/Domestic Partner Consent
 7. GENERAL.
 Successors and Assigns
 4




---



##### 



Notices
 5




---



##### 



To the Company:
    
    King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.501 Fifth StreetBristol, TN 37620Attention: ___
   Entire Agreement
 Governing Law; Severability
 Remedies
 Interpretation
 6




---



##### 



Waivers; Amendments
 7




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
to Restricted Unit Grant Agreement
pursuant to the
King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Incentive Plan
 CONSENT OF SPOUSE / DOMESTIC PARTNER
    I AM AWARE THAT THE LEGAL, FINANCIAL AND RELATED MATTERS CONTAINED IN THE AGREEMENT ARE
COMPLEX AND THAT I AM FREE TO SEEK INDEPENDENT PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE OR COUNSEL WITH RESPECT TO
THIS CONSENT. I HAVE EITHER SOUGHT SUCH GUIDANCE OR COUNSEL OR DETERMINED AFTER REVIEWING THE
AGREEMENT CAREFULLY THAT I WILL WAIVE SUCH RIGHT.
 
 Signature: Name: 8
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

2 p.m., Monday, October 27, 2014.

# PLACE:

NeighborWorks America—Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS:

Open (with the exception of Executive Sessions).

# CONTACT PERSON:

                        Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-4101;                         *jbryson@nw.org.*

# AGENDA:

I. Call To Order

II. Executive Session with the Chief Audit Executive

III. Executive Session: Chief Audit Executive Performance Review

IV. Executive Session: CEO Transition Update

V. Executive Session: Pending Litigation

VI. Internal Audit Reports with Management's Response

VII. Internal Audit Status Reports

VIII. OHTS Watch List Review

IX. Update on A-133 Findings

X. Annual Audit Update & Other External Audit Reports

XI. Management Updates

XII. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,  

EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014-25243 Filed 10-20-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
#### Tredway *v.*Gapin, in Error.

IT was said by the Court, in this case, that from the- time a. statute is published in print, by authority, at any place within, the state, it takes effect in every part of it, unless the act itself otherwise direct (1).

(1)

 The constitution, as to this, is as follows: — “No act of the general assembly shall be in force, until it shall have .been published in print, unless in cases of emergency.” Art. 11, sec. 8. The statute now requires the clerks of the Circuit Courts to make a record of the time when the acts and joint re-, solutions are received in their respective offices, and makes such record in a county the evidence of the time of the publication of the laws therein. Stat. Jan. 1825, p. 55.

At common law, a statute was in force from the first day , of the session of parliament in which it was made. *Hatless*v. Holmes, 4 T. R. 660. But now: by the 33 Cr. 3, a statute takes effect from the time it receives the royal assent, if the act itself provide no other. 6 Bac.,370. An act of congress is in force from its date, if it fix no.other time. *Matthews*v. *Zane,*7 Wheat. 164, 211. Vide 1 Kent, 426 — 429.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Sally Ride \u2013 First American Woman in Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Kshc5jcLN2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/sally-ride-first-american-woman-in-space\/\">Sally Ride \u2013 First American Woman in Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/sally-ride-first-american-woman-in-space\/embed\/#?secret=Kshc5jcLN2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Sally Ride \u2013 First American Woman in Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Kshc5jcLN2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/shuttle_sally_ride.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":223}
#### Brown *v.*Girard Fire & Marine Insurance Company.

Opinion delivered November 10, 1930.

*John L. Bledsoe,*for appellant.

*Verne McMillen,*for appellee.

McHaney, J.

Appellant sued appellee on a policy of fire insurance for a loss sustained by him.. Appellee defended on the ground that the policy had been canceled. Wells and Bates were the general agents for appellee at Pocahontas. Mr. Bates, testified that on instructions from appellee he had canceled the policy and had notified appellant thereof, both by letter and in person about three'weeks prior to the fire which destroyed appellant’s building. The case was submitted to a jury on instructions from the court, which are not complained of, which resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee.

During the course of the argument to the jury, counsel for appellee used this language: “If you find against the defendant it will be the same as finding against J. D. Wells and F. E. Bates, it 'will be the same as finding against your neighbors.” On objection being made by counsel for appellant the court said: ‘£ Gentlemen of the jury, what the attorneys may say is not evidence in the case. You get your evidence from the lips of the witnesses and the law from the instructions given you by the court. You should not consider any statement made by attorneys for either party which are not borne out by the record. In arriving at your verdict *672you will base your verdict on the testimony given by the witnesses and the law as given by the court and upon .that alone.”

This is the only assignment of error for a reversal of the case. We do not think this was improper argument, nor do we think it was prejudicial to the appellant. What counsel evidently meant by the statement was that a verdict for appellant would necessarily imply that the testimony of Mr. Bates was untrue. We think this was a legitimate argument based upon the testimony as the appellant denied that he had received the written notice of the cancellation or the check in payment of the unearned premium which Mr. Bates testified had been sent him. Appellant also denied that Mr. Bates had verbally notified him of the cancellation in Pocahontas a short time after writing the letter notifying- him of the cancellation, and the remarks of counsel were made with the view and hope that the jury would believe Mr. Bates instead of appellant. Moreover, conceding the argument to be improper, we are of the opinion that the remarks of the court in response to the objection cured any harmful effect it may have had. *Ark. Short Leaf Lbr. Co.*v. *Wilkerson,*154 Ark. 455.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 35.1


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE MULTI-ASSET EXECUTION TRUST





Capital One Multi-asset Execution Trust


c/o Capital One Funding, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-A


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Multi-asset Execution Trust, as the issuing entity in respect of the notes, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One Bank (USA), National Association (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under (i) the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 30, 1993, as amended and restated as of August 1, 2002, January 13, 2006, July 1, 2007, and March 17, 2016, and as amended by the First Amendment thereto, dated as of January 27, 2017, (ii) the Indenture for the Notes dated as of October 9, 2002, as amended and restated as of January 13, 2006, and March 17, 2016, and (iii) the Asset Pool Supplement for the Notes dated October 9, 2002, as amended by the First Amendment, dated as of March 1, 2008 (collectively, the “Agreements”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 25 th day of March, 2022.





CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


By:/s/ MICHAEL WASSMERName:Michael WassmerTitle:President
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4752

To prohibit the construction of any monument, memorial, or other structure

at the site of the Iwo Jima Memorial in Arlington, Virginia, until such

time as an environmental impact statement is prepared for the construction.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 8, 1998

Mr. SOLOMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To prohibit the construction of any monument, memorial,

or other structure at the site of the Iwo Jima Memorial

in Arlington, Virginia, until such time as an environmental impact statement is prepared for the construction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT RE4 QUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION AT

5 IWO JIMA MEMORIAL.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—After the enactment of this Act

7 no person (including any governmental entity) may con-
2

•HR 4752 IH

1 struct any monument, memorial, or other structure of any

2 kind (whether above grade or below grade) on the parcel

3 of Federal land located south of Rosslyn, Virginia, and

4 north of the Arlington National Cemetery that is bounded

5 on the west by Meade Street, on the north by Arlington

6 Boulevard (U.S. Route 50), on the east by Jefferson Davis

7 Highway (Virginia Route 110), and on the south by Mar8 shall Drive, until the person has prepared and made avail9 able a statement regarding the construction in accordance

10 with section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Pol11 icy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).

12 (b) CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED PRIOR TO ENACT13 MENT.—Any person (including any governmental entity)

14 who commenced construction of any monument, memorial,

15 or other structure prior to the enactment of this Act on

16 the parcel described in subsection (a) shall immediately

17 cease such construction upon the enactment of this Act.

18 (c) EXISTING MEMORIALS AND STRUCTURES.—

19 Nothing in subsection (a) or (b) shall apply to the United

20 States Marine Corps (Iwo Jima) Memorial or to the Neth21 erlands Carillon.

22 (d) UTILITIES.—Nothing in subsection (a) or (b)

23 shall apply to the construction, reconstruction, or repair

24 by any person of any below-grade utility facilities, includ-
3

•HR 4752 IH

1 ing sewer, electrical, water supply, and communications

2 facilities.

3 (e) ENFORCEMENT.—Any person may bring a civil

4 action in the appropriate United States district court

5 against any person (including the United States) to en6 force the provisions of subsection (a) and (b), and such

7 court shall have jurisdiction in any such action, without

8 regard to the citizenship of the parties or the amount in

9 controversy, to issue such orders as may be necessary to

10 restrain any violation of the prohibition set forth in sub11 section (a) and to enforce the requirements of subsection

12 (b).

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.9



                THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.
                          1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

         The LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

         The provisions of Section 3.1 are hereby deleted in their entirety and
the following provisions are inserted in their place:

                  3.1      Number of Shares. Subject to the following provisions
         of this Section 3, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that
         may be issued pursuant to all Awards under the Plan is 9,625,000 shares
         of Common Stock; provided, however, that no more than 300,000 of such
         shares of Common Stock may be issued pursuant to Restricted Stock
         Awards, Performance Awards, Phantom Stock Awards and Dividend
         Equivalent Awards in the aggregate. The shares of Common Stock to be
         delivered under the Plan will be made available from authorized but
         unissued shares of Common Stock or issued shares that have been
         reacquired by the Corporation. To the extent that any Award payable in
         Common Stock is forfeited, cancelled, returned to the Corporation for
         failure to satisfy vesting requirements or upon the occurrence of other
         forfeiture events, or otherwise terminates without payment being made
         thereunder, shares of Common Stock covered thereby will no longer be
         charged against the foregoing maximum share limitations and may again
         be made subject to Awards under the Plan pursuant to such limitations.

         Except as otherwise set forth herein, all other terms and provisions of
the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has duly executed and delivered this
Third Amendment to the LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan
as of the _____ day of __________, 2002.


                                    LIFEPOINT HOSPITALS, INC.



                                    By:
                                       -------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-45-2014]

On June 20, 2014, the Greater Mississippi Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 158, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Southern Motion, Inc., within Subzone 158G, in Pontotoc and Baldwyn, Mississippi.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 37281-37282, 7-1-2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14, and the following restrictions and conditions:                

1. The annual volume of foreign micro-denier suede upholstery fabric finished with a caustic soda solution that may be admitted to the subzone under nonprivileged foreign status (19 CFR 146.42) is limited to 6.0 million square yards.

2. Southern Motion, Inc., must admit all foreign upholstery fabrics other than micro-denier suede upholstery fabrics finished with a caustic soda solution to the subzone under domestic (duty-paid) status (19 CFR 146.43).

3. Southern Motion, Inc., shall submit supplemental annual report data and information for the purpose of monitoring by the FTZ Staff.

4. The authority for Southern Motion, Inc., shall remain in effect for a period of five years from the date of approval by the FTZ Board.

Dated: October 20, 2014.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-25642 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 10.19


 


 


AMENDED SUMMARY AND RESCISSION OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN
THE COMPANY 

AND ROBERT C. HAGERTY


 


 


In fiscal 2001, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors of Polycom, Inc. (the “Company”) approved a loan of
$2,000,000 to Robert C. Hagerty, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and a retention bonus agreement with Mr. Hagerty.  This compensation arrangement was
subsequently ratified by a unanimous vote of the Company’s Board of Directors,
except for Mr. Hagerty, who abstained from voting.  This arrangement was rescinded by the Board
in August 2002, without ever having gone into effect.