alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katherine Schauer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ksschaue\/","title":"Space Communications: 7 Things You Need to Know","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yPM1YjeSPN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/tech-demonstration\/space-communications-7-things-you-need-to-know\/\">Space Communications: 7 Things You Need to Know<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/tech-demonstration\/space-communications-7-things-you-need-to-know\/embed\/#?secret=yPM1YjeSPN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Communications: 7 Things You Need to Know” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yPM1YjeSPN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/untitled-1-07.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE FOUR MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          44,109
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,176,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                   159,156
<INVENTORY>                                  2,331,131
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,804,517
<PP&E>                                       1,741,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                 767,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,171,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,057,063
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,470
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,193,482)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,171,064
<SALES>                                      6,006,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,006,457
<CGS>                                        4,007,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,573,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               300,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             300,851
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                132,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57,288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             74,825
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    74,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
J. 

J. 

2 

11 

compliance with the procedural requirements set forth in NRS chapter 34. 

See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). Even 

assuming that appellant's use of the wrong vehicle could be overlooked, 

appellant's claim for additional presentence credit lacked merit because 

the time spent incarcerated after the sentencing hearing but before entry 

of the judgment of conviction is already credited as flat time against the 

sentence as the prison begins to calculate a sentence from the sentencing 

date. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

L°71 

Hardesty 

Pe..4.0k 

Parraguirre 

J. 

cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge 

Andres Hernandez Mendoza 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 

- -• .7 -I,7-7• 7;
Opinion filed November 4, 2010

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-10-00283-CR

__________

ANTHONY PAUL DELACRUZ, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 32nd District Court

Fisher County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 3383

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Anthony Paul DelaCruz1 was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of an 

elderly person. On August 4, 2010, the trial court sentenced him in open court to confinement 

for fifty years pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. We dismiss the appeal.

A motion for new trial was not filed. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed

within thirty days of the date the sentence was imposed in open court in order to timely perfect 

an appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2. Appellant filed his pro se notice of appeal on September 16, 

 

 

1

The spelling of appellant’s name is taken from signature on notice of appeal and right of appeal.
2

2010, forty-three days after the date the sentence was imposed in open court. A motion to extend 

time was not filed pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Absent a timely notice of appeal or the 

granting of a timely motion for extension of time, this court does not have jurisdiction to 

entertain an appeal. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. 

State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109-

10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).

Moreover, we note that the trial court stated in its certification of defendant’s right to 

appeal that this was a plea bargain agreement case and appellant had no right to appeal and that 

appellant had waived his right to appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

November 4, 2010

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Diane Preiss,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00182-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9789 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Francisco Emanuel Arias, 

Defendant.

No. 15-7767MJ

MATERIAL WITNESS ORDER 

 Defendant, Francisco Emanuel Arias, having been charged in the District of 

Arizona with a violation of Title 8, United States Code, Section 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the 

Magistrate Judge having determined from the affidavit of Agent Goodin filed in this case, 

the following persons can provide testimony that is material to the offense(s) alleged in 

the Complaint: Virgilio Morales-Garcia, aka Francisco Garcia-Nunez 

 The Magistrate Judge finds that it may become impracticable to secure the 

presence of the witness by subpoena in further proceedings because they are not in the 

United States legally and have no legal residence or employment in this Country. 

IT IS ORDERED that the witness shall be detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3144 

in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or 

serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The witness shall be afforded 

a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. 

 Dated this 15th day of December, 2015. 

Case 2:15-mj-07767-BSB Document 8 Filed 12/16/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.6

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 40-F of NOVA Chemicals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007
(the "Report"), I, Jeffrey M. Lipton, Chief Executive Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|March 10, 2008 | /s/JEFFREY M. LIPTON                     
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------
|               | Jeffrey M. Lipton Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
423 A.2d 1304

#### Rowen et al. v. Coane, M. D., Appellant.

Reargument Denied March 14, 1980.

Argued June 7, 1979.

Jerry Zaslow, M.D., J.D., for appellant; Robert Dickman, for appellee.

Before PRICE, GATES and DOWLING, JJ.*

*

 President Judge G. Thomas Gates of the Court of Common Pleas of Lebanon County, Pennsylvania, and Judge John C. Dowling of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, are sitting by designation.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  
  Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), the undersigned, James Weber,
Chief Financial Officer of FalconStor Software, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:
  The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 of the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
  
  /s/James WeberJames
      WeberChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      12, 2010
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 35","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"G6bR0JRrwd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-35\/\">Expedition 35<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-35\/embed\/#?secret=G6bR0JRrwd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 35” — NASA\" data-secret=\"G6bR0JRrwd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/exp35-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
EXHIBIT 32

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who is the  chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Community First  Bancorporation,  hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

May 13, 2005

                                     s/ Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                        Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                                     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                     Officer
Case 2:15-mj-01923-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01923-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01923-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/15/15 Page 3 of 3
No. 87-6186.

#### Santistevan *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.26

                    Rayonier Key Executive Insurance Program

     The Rayonier Key Executive Insurance Program (formerly known as the
Rayonier Split-Dollar Life Insurance-Deferred Compensation Retention Benefit
Program) is designed to promote retention of eligible senior executives by
providing enhanced benefits for a 15-year period from date of retirement. This
Program includes an early retirement benefit option available at the later of
age 60 or five years following the Program implementation date (January 1,
2000). An executive who voluntarily leaves the Company's employ prior to
eligible retirement does not receive the enhanced benefits.

     The Company has purchased a life insurance policy for each of the four
eligible executives to facilitate funding of Program benefits, with premiums
paid by the Company to be recaptured upon the executive's death. Prior to
February 2003, if death occurred prior to retirement, the portion of the death
benefit remaining after refund of premiums to the Company was paid to the
executive's estate. With the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, all such
"split-dollar" life insurance arrangements came into question as potentially
violating the Act's prohibition of company loans to executive officers.
Accordingly, in February 2003 Messrs. Nutter, Pollack and O'Grady voluntarily
signed over the pre-retirement death benefits to the Company. As a result,
neither they nor their estates are beneficiaries under the policies, and the
"split-dollar" feature has been removed. In order to address the resulting
potential for the Company's tax-free receipt of death benefits in excess of
premiums paid upon a covered executive's death prior to retirement, the
Compensation and Management Development Committee, at its February 2003 meeting,
approved payment of any such excess death benefits to the covered executive's
beneficiary or estate.

     Change in Control protection is provided for Program benefits both prior to
and after retirement by virtue of the individual life insurance policies being
held in a trust established by the Company. Under the Trust Agreement, upon a
Change in Control, the Company would transfer any amounts due the eligible
executives under the Program to the trust, with subsequent payment to the
executive, or his/her beneficiary, made directly by the trust.

     The annual benefits under the Key Executive Life Insurance Program for each
eligible executive, in the event of early retirement and at age 65 retirement,
respectively, are as follows: Mr. Nutter, $60,000 and $70,000; Mr. Pollack,
$40,000 and $50,000; and Mr. O'Grady, $40,000 and $50,000.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cynthia L. Dunn,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03879-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Johnson Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8425 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8425 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages F-4 and F-5 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      $3,198,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,359,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                   191,299
<INVENTORY>                                     27,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,487,243
<PP&E>                                      29,504,099
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,682,538
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,267,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,242,609
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       213,350
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,930,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,267,101
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,767,532
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,613,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                153,936
<INCOME-TAX>                                    54,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,936
<DISCONTINUED>                              (2,326,228)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,226,292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>