alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:16-mj-01067-JFM Document 3 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01067-JFM Document 3 Filed 02/02/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01067-JFM Document 3 Filed 02/02/16 Page 3 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Rudolph Figueroa, 

Defendant.

District of Arizona Case No.

15-09485MJ-PHX-ESW 

Southern District of California Case No. 

13-CR-01238-BEN-05 

DETENTION ORDER 

 On December 21, 2015, Defendant appeared before this Court for an initial 

appearance on a petition for revocation of supervised release filed in the Southern District 

of California. Defendant waived his right to a detention hearing and submitted the issue 

of detention to the Court. The Court considered the petition and file in determining 

whether Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending disposition 

in the Southern District of California. 

 Dated this 21st day of December, 2015. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-mj-09485-ESW Document 5 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 1
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-12-00764- CV John Rad y, Appellan t

v. BAC Hom e Loans Servicing, LP; and Mort gage Elect ronic Registr ations Sys tem , Inc., Appellees F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 419TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 1-0 0142 5, H ONO RAB LE GUS J. STRAUSS, JR., J UDGE P RESIDING O R D E R On April 19, 2013, this Court dismiss ed this appea l for want of prosec ution. On the same date, we rec eived a letter from appellant that he had made arr ang ements to pay for the cler k’s rec ord. The d i s tri ct cler k’s office has confirme d that appellant has paid for the cler k’s rec ord. Acc ording ly , we withdraw our opinion dismissing his appea l for want of prosec ution and reinstate the appeal. Appellant’s brief will be due 30 day s afte r this Court’s rec eipt of the cler k’s rec ord. See Tex. R. App. P . 38.6.

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be foreChief Justice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Filed: April 23, 2013
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6442
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SOLOMAN HAM, Respondent - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-97-2) Submitted: September 9, 1999 Decided: September 14, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Soloman Ham, Appellant Pro Se. Marcus John Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Soloman Ham appeals the district court’s order denying reliefon his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Ham , No. CA-97-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 25, 1999). We deny Ham’s motion for general relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  U.S.  TIMBERLANDS  KLAMATH  FALLS,  L.L.C.  AND  U.S.
TIMBERLANDS  FINANCE  CORP.  FOR THE SIX  MONTHS  ENDED  JUNE  30,  1999  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                1,005
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         4,690
<ALLOWANCES>                                            200
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      5,639
<PP&E>                                                1,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                          399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      340,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 7,650
<BONDS>                                             225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                          107,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        340,285
<SALES>                                              31,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     31,425
<CGS>                                                 4,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        18,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (801)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   10,965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       2,725
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   2,725
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          2,725
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2885721-JAN-201110:21 AM
Exhibit 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert K. Ipson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Powerball International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 11, 2004
/s/Robert K. Ipson
Robert K. Ipson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00433-CR

Bruce Edward Simmons

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 372nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1377130D)

November 26, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the quarterly report of Xponential, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Dwayne A. Moyers, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditions and results of operations of the Company.        Date: February 19, 2007 /s/ Dwayne A. Moyers   Dwayne A. Moyers   Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1



                   CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned,  James M. Seneff,  Jr., the Co-Chief  Executive  Officer of CNL
American Properties Fund, Inc. (the "Company"),  has executed this certification
in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

DATED this 14th day of March 2003.



                              /s/ James M. Seneff, Jr.
                              --------------------------
                              James M. Seneff, Jr.
                              Co-Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 559 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 559

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar 
carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
                  certain radiation-exposed veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1997

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchiolo-alveolar 
carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to be service-connected for 
                  certain radiation-exposed veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT BRONCHIOLO-ALVEOLAR CARCINOMA IS SERVICE-
              CONNECTED.

    Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(P) Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma.''.
                                 <all>
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00142

- CV

Michael A. Smith

v.

Cindy Pena §

§

§

§ From the 271st District Court

of Wise County (CV08

- 09

- 684)

June 25, 2015

O pinion by Justice Dauphinot



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered tha t Appellant Michael A. Smith shall pay all of the

costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF NEVADA 

* * * 

ANDIES INDUSTRIES, INC. and PCT 

INTERNATIONAL INC., 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CHENG SUN LAN, et al., 

Defendants. 

Case No. 2:14-CV-00400-APG-GWF

ORDER 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report on or before September 15, 

2015. 

DATED this 21st day of August, 2015. 

 

 ANDREW P. GORDON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:15-cv-02549-NVW Document 81 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I, Brian A. Markison, Chief Executive Officer of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

          1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

                                                 /s/ BRIAN A. MARKISON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                    Brian A. Markison
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 9, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Completes Multi-Drone Test in Downtown Reno","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PJ2KWyhLHk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-completes-multi-drone-test-downtown-reno-2\/\">NASA Completes Multi-Drone Test in Downtown Reno<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-completes-multi-drone-test-downtown-reno-2\/embed\/#?secret=PJ2KWyhLHk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Completes Multi-Drone Test in Downtown Reno” — NASA\" data-secret=\"PJ2KWyhLHk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/tcl4-acd19-0054-070.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEPTEMBER
30, 1999 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,927
<SECURITIES>                                   158,887
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,065
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,261
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,765
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,952
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,965
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    893
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                893
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       893
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Jacob Rudolph, et al.

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−02142

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin

United Airlines Holdings, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Tuesday, February 20, 2024:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Pursuant to the Court's

minute entry dated 6/22/2023 [168], counsel for defendant United Airlines reported via

email that briefing of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification [171], United's Motion for

Summary Judgment [174], and United's Motion to Exclude the testimony of Plaintiffs'

expert [182] has been completed, and that United does not plan to pursue mediation. The

Court will not stay its review of those motion papers. A telephone status hearing is set for

4/22/2024 at 9:00 a.m. Please note, the dial in information has changed. To join the

telephone conference, dial (650) 479−3207, Access Code 180 815 7648. Throughout the

hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before

speaking. Counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line. Please be sure to keep your

phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings

are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and

rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in

sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future

hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by

the Court. Mailed notice. (ecw, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to, and as required by, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that the Quarterly  Report of Geneva  Financial  Corp. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  March 31,  2004  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended,  and that  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-QSB fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 17, 2004                        /s/ Keith S. Haffner
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Keith S. Haffner
                                           Chief Executive Officer