alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          93,224
<SECURITIES>                                   116,112
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                       478
<INVENTORY>                                         36
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,520
<PP&E>                                         169,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 381,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,363
<BONDS>                                        157,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           46,663
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            23
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   381,814
<SALES>                                         34,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,922
<CGS>                                           31,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,744)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,744)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.50)


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

REBECCA A. SCHWARTZ, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3406 ) JAMES A. SCHWARTZ, as ) Administrator Ad Litem for the Estate ) of Steven P. Schwartz, deceased, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Opinion filed February 1, 2019. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Patricia A. Muscarella, Judge. Nancy S. Paikoff and Andrew M. Brown of Macfarlane Ferguson & McMullen, Clearwater, for Petitioner. Stephen A. Barnes of Barnes Trial Group, Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Denied.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Carrie Gilder","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/carrie-w-gildernasa-gov\/","title":"Science in Space: Week of July 10, 2023 – Plant Science","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EfdMNnNL8v\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/iss-research\/science-in-space-week-of-july-10-2023-plant-science\/\">Science in Space: Week of July 10, 2023 – Plant Science<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/iss-research\/science-in-space-week-of-july-10-2023-plant-science\/embed\/#?secret=EfdMNnNL8v\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Science in Space: Week of July 10, 2023 – Plant Science” — NASA\" data-secret=\"EfdMNnNL8v\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/iss068e041971-ph03.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"NASA’s C-130 Delivers GUSTO Payload to Antarctica","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hme0Qe5sjt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-c-130-delivers-gusto-payload-to-antarctica-3\/\">NASA’s C-130 Delivers GUSTO Payload to Antarctica<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-c-130-delivers-gusto-payload-to-antarctica-3\/embed\/#?secret=hme0Qe5sjt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s C-130 Delivers GUSTO Payload to Antarctica” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hme0Qe5sjt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/53296469002-a92ea42cb9-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":339}
#### *V.*S. Boisseau *v.*Town of Franklin.

Taxation — Appeals from — Jurisdiction.

Under a sale for taxes, of personal property, no appeal lies under Civi1 Code section 16, where the amount involved is less than the statutory amount.

AKPEAL KROM SIMPSON CIRCUIT COURT.

May 9, 1871.

*568
      *Wilkinson, for appellant.*

*Bush, for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

The relief sought in this action was to restrain the sale of the plaintiff’s horse which had been levied on by the marshal of the town of Franklin to satisfy certain taxes alleged to be due from him to said town, and to enjoin the town from proceeding in any other manner to distrain for or enforce the collection of the same.

It appears from the record that the amount of said taxes was the sum of eighteen dollars and thirty-seven cents ($18.31), and that this was the whole amount in controversy.

Under the construction frequently given by this court to the sixteenth section of the Civil Code as amended, no appeal can be prosecuted to the court of appeals where the amount in controversy is less than fifty dollars, except in cases in which the title to real estate is involved, or in some way called in question. ■

Therefore, having no jurisdiction of the matter, both the appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed.
#### Turner & McCreary *v.*Malinda Searcy.

Husband and Wife — Married Women Alienation of Separate Estate.

Under see. 17, art. 4, ch. 47, Rev. Stat., a married woman cannot alienate her separate estate acquired by devise or conveyance, etc. Held, that as she cannot transfer such estate under those restrictions, she could not change its status by contracting debts.

APPEAL PROM MADISON OIRCUIT COURT.

October 3, 1871.

*Turner &*McCreary, *for appellant.*

*Burnam, for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Oourt by

Judge Lindsay:

The second amended petition of appellees alleges that the estate of Mrs. Searcy sought to be subjected to the payment of their note is her separate estate. The answer admits that such is the fact. Section *11,*article 4, chapter *41,*Eevised Statutes, provides, that a married woman shall not alienate her separate estate acquired either by devise or conveyance with or without the consent of any husband she may have, unless it be a gift and then only with the consent of the donor, or his personal representative. Mrs. Searcy seems to' have acquired the estate in question by conveyance. As a married woman can not sell such estate, neither can she change it by contracting debts.. Daniel v. Robinson, 18 B. Monroe, 306.

Judgment affirmed.
Case 2:15-cr-01513-JJT Document 4 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01513-JJT Document 4 Filed 10/16/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01513-JJT Document 4 Filed 10/16/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"A View of SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavour Approaching the Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5uBoUkcma3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/view-of-spacex-crew-dragon-endeavour-approaching-station\/\">A View of SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavour Approaching the Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/view-of-spacex-crew-dragon-endeavour-approaching-station\/embed\/#?secret=5uBoUkcma3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A View of SpaceX Crew Dragon Endeavour Approaching the Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5uBoUkcma3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss065e002261.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### Wm. L. Poynter *v.*M. Delph.

Vendor and Purchaser — Courts—Correction of Error in Deeds.

After title to land sold, has been corrected by court proceedings, it is not error to require the vendor to convey the land, acknowledge the deed, and deposit same for record, instead of first producing it to the court for inspection.

APPEAL EEOM MARION CIRCUIT COUET.

December 17, 1870.

*■James, for appellant.*

*Smith, for appellee.*

OPINION OE THE 0OURT BY

JtTDGE PETERS :

The only objection to the title to the land as pointed out by this court was removed after the return of the cause to the court below, and as Delph’s title is now unquestionable, and his conveyance will invest the appellant with a perfect title, we can not say that it is an error for which this court should reverse the judgment by requiring Delph to convey the land, and acknowledge the deed, and deposit it with the clerk of the county court for record, instead of first producing it to the court below for inspection, especially as the case is retained on the docket, and the circuit court has the power to remedy any defect in the deed required to be made.

As to the allowance of 30 days for appellee to pay the money and prevent a sale, he is not prejudiced by that indulgence, and can not complain of it.

Judgment *affirmed.*
<PAGE>


                                                     SCHEDULE A TO EXHIBIT 10.2

         The following individuals entered into Split-Dollar Agreements with the
subsidiaries of Park National Corporation ("Park") identified below which are
identical to the Split-Dollar Agreement, dated May 17, 1993, between William T.
McConnell, Chairman of the Board and a Director of Park and of The Park National
Bank ("Park National Bank") and Park National Bank filed as Exhibit 10(f) to
Park's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993
(File No. 0-18772):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              Subsidiary of Park
Name and Positions Held With Park                Date of Split-               which is Party to
and/or Principal Subsidiaries of Park            Dollar Agreement             Split-Dollar Agreement
-------------------------------------            ----------------             ----------------------
<S>                                              <C>                          <C>
David C. Bowers - Retired Secretary of           June 2, 1993                 Park National Bank
Park; Retired Executive Vice President
and a Director of Park National Bank

C. Daniel DeLawder - President, Chief            May 26, 1993                 Park National Bank
Executive Officer and a Director of Park
and of Park National Bank; Director of
The Richland Trust Company; Director of
Second National Bank

John W. Kozak - Chief Financial Officer          June 2, 1993                 Park National Bank
of Park; Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Park National Bank; a
Director of Century National Bank

William A. Phillips - a Director of Park;        May 22, 1998                 Century National Bank
Chairman of Board and a Director of
Century National Bank

David L. Trautman - Secretary of Park;           September 23, 1993           Park National Bank
Executive Vice President and a Director
of Park National Bank; Chairman of the
Board and a Director of The First-Knox
National Bank of Mount Vernon; a
Director of United Bank, N.A.
</TABLE>
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 761

To amend title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity

Reconciliation Act of 1996 to extend the 1-year transition from disqualification for a current welfare recipient while the recipient’s naturalization

application is pending.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee

on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title IV of the Personal Responsibility and Work

Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 to extend the

1-year transition from disqualification for a current welfare recipient while the recipient’s naturalization application is pending.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 761 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF 1-YEAR TRANSITION FROM WEL2 FARE DISQUALIFICATION FOR CURRENT

3 WELFARE RECIPIENTS DURING NATURALIZA4 TION PROCESS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 402(a)(2)(D) of the Per6 sonal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation

7 Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1612(a)(2)(D)) is amended—

8 (1) in clauses (i)(III) and (ii)(III), by striking

9 ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to clause (iii), the’’;

10 and

11 (2) by adding at the end the following:

12 ‘‘(iii) EXTENSION OF GRANDFATHER

13 PROVISIONS DURING NATURALIZATION

14 PROCESS.—

15 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—The protec16 tion from disqualification provided

17 under clauses (i)(III) and (ii)(III)

18 shall continue to apply to an individ19 ual, for months beginning on and

20 after the date of a redetermination or

21 recertification with respect to the indi22 vidual, if the individual establishes

23 that the individual has submitted an

24 application for naturalization to the

25 Attorney General, and the application

26 is regarded as filed and pending under
3

•HR 761 IH

1 regulations promulgated by the Attor2 ney General.

3 ‘‘(II) DISCONTINUATION.—Sub4 clause (I) shall cease to apply to an

5 individual for months beginning on

6 and after the date on which there has

7 been a final, unappealable administra8 tive or judicial determination to deny

9 the individual’s application for natu10 ralization.’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact13 ment of section 402(a)(2)(D) of the Personal Responsibil14 ity and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 13, 2022

No. 04-22-00361-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.I.M., A.J.M., Children

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-04-29187-CV

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 13, 2022, appellant timely filed an unopposed motion requesting an 

extension of time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is 

due no later than November 18, 2022

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of October, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
Case 2:15-cr-01401-JJT Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01401-JJT Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01401-JJT Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20483 Summary Calendar

JAMES COMET BARRUS, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-3892

- - - - - - - - - - September 18, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * James Barrus appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. Mr. Barrus contends that double jeopardy barred his prosecution for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and misapplication of funds from a federally insured financial institution and transportation ofNo. 95-20483 - 2 - stolen goods. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the same reasons given by the district court. Barrus v. United States , No. CA-H-94-3892 (S.D. Tex. May 26, 1995).
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25831]



[[Page 64587]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1436-007; ER14-152-002; ER13-1793-004; ER12-
1260-006; ER10-3099-009; ER10-2329-004.
    Applicants: Eagle Point Power Generation LLC, Elgin Energy Center, 
LLC, Hazle Spindle, LLC, RC Cape May Holdings, LLC, Stephentown 
Spindle, LLC, Vineland Energy LLC.
    Description: Supplement to June 23, 2014 Triennial Market-Based 
Rate Update Filing for the Northeast Region and Notice of Non-Material 
Change in Status of the Rockland Seller.
    Filed Date: 10/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20141014-5173.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-175-000.
    Applicants: San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2015 
SDGE RS Update to Transmission Owner Tariff to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 10/23/14.
    Accession Number: 20141023-5141.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-176-000.
    Applicants: Wheeling Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 
Reactive Supply and Voltage Control from Generation Sources Concurrence 
to be effective 12/31/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/23/14.
    Accession Number: 20141023-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/13/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 23, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25831 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P