alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
13.1








PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350











In
connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas III) Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Troim, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.





Date:
April 29, 2010







/s/ Tor Olav Troim


Tor Olav
Troim


Principal
Executive Officer
* District Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by

designation. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

______________________________

No. 95-30524

______________________________

MARY ANNA RIVET, MINNA

REE WINER, EDMOND G.

MIRANNE, and EDMOND G.

MIRANNE, JR.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

REGIONS BANK OF LOUISIANA, 

F.S.B., WALTER L. BROWN, JR., 

PERRY S. BROWN, and FOUNTAINBLEAU 

STORAGE ASSOCIATES,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

____________________________________________

April 20, 1998

Before JONES and WIENER, Circuit Judges, and FURGESON,* District

Judge. 

B Y T H E C O U R T:

IT IS ORDERED that the subject case be and it is hereby

remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Louisiana for further proceedings consistent with the

opinion of the United States Supreme Court, filed February 24,
 

2 Mary Anna Rivet, et al., Petitioners v. Regions Bank of

Louisiana, et al., No. 96-1971, slip op. 522 U.S. (February 24,

1998). 

2

1998.2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of plaintiffsappellants-petitioners Mary Anna Rivet, et al., to set briefing

schedule and hearing for fixing of award of costs and attorneys’

fees be and it is hereby denied, without prejudice to filing such

a motion in the United States District Court to which this case is

remanded, that court being the more appropriate forum in which to

commence such proceedings.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Euclid Spots a Spiral Galaxy","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gWZHi51rEu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/shape-8200-8200-3\/\">Euclid Spots a Spiral Galaxy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/shape-8200-8200-3\/embed\/#?secret=gWZHi51rEu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Euclid Spots a Spiral Galaxy” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gWZHi51rEu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/euclid-s-view-of-spiral-galaxy-ic-342.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William T. Bromage, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webster Preferred CapitalCorporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: May 9, 2005
/s/ William T. Bromage
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT SOGLUIZZO.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00147

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF M.S. AND S.S.,

C HILDREN §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 231st District Court

of Tarrant County ( 231

- 6 60 900

- 19 )

October 15, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of the tri al court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
Case 2:15-mj-01817-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01817-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01817-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/06/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Andres D. Almeida","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aalmeid1\/","title":"How 11 Deaf Men Helped Shape NASA’s Human Spaceflight Program","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YLnnSSuH9M\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/project-mercury\/how-11-deaf-men-helped-shape-nasas-human-spaceflight-program\/\">How 11 Deaf Men Helped Shape NASA’s Human Spaceflight Program<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/project-mercury\/how-11-deaf-men-helped-shape-nasas-human-spaceflight-program\/embed\/#?secret=YLnnSSuH9M\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“How 11 Deaf Men Helped Shape NASA’s Human Spaceflight Program” — NASA\" data-secret=\"YLnnSSuH9M\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/nasazakutney.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":755}
#### Philip Weber v. Peter Ryers, Commissioner of Highways, and William Stagray, Clerk, of Hampton Township.

[See *ante,*177.]

*Highways.*

This case is ruled by *Weber v. Ryers, ante,*177.

*Certiorari*to review proceedings in altering a highway.

■Submitted June 26, 1890.

Writ quashed August 1, 1890.

The facts are stated in *Weber v. Ryers, ante,*177.

*Lindner, Porter & Haffey,*for petitioner.

*T. A. JS. é J. C. WeadocTc,*for resnondents.

Cahill, J.

This case involves the same questions that were considered in *Weber v. Ryers, ante,*177. The two oases were heard together, and this case will be governed by that.

The other Justices concurred.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Gilberto Estrada-Garcia, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-1459-PHX-DJH

DETENTION ORDER 

 In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of 

detention was addressed at a hearing on July 21, 2016. The Court was informed that the 

defendant is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time. 

 The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to 

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such 

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to 

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The 

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 

Case 2:15-cr-01459-DJH Document 30 Filed 07/22/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court 

proceeding. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of 

this detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion 

for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third 

party custodian. 

 Dated this 22nd day of July, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cr-01459-DJH Document 30 Filed 07/22/16 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2007 (the Report), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    THAD M. BROWNThad M. BrownChief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2007
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 19, 2019

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Circuit Judge

No. 18-2054

VICTORIA WEILAND and DEANNA CHRONES,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

SHAWN LOOMIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for 

the Northern District of 

Illinois, Eastern Division.

No. 17 C 6111

Amy J. St. Eve, Judge.

Order

The opinion of this court issued on September 18, 2019, is amended as 

follows:

Page 4, “Mullenix v. Luna, 136 S. Ct. 305, 308 (2005);” should be “Mullenix v. 

Luna, 136 S. Ct. 305, 308 (2015);”.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.46  


 
 

NOTE    




	 	 	December 18, 2002
	$5,000,000.00	 	Minneapolis, Minnesota





        The undersigned, for value received, promises to pay to the order of LaSalle Bank National Association (the
"Bank") at the principal office of LaSalle Bank National Association (the "Agent") in Chicago, Illinois
the aggregate unpaid amount of all Loans made to the undersigned by the Bank pursuant to the Credit Agreement referred to below (as shown on the schedule attached hereto (and any continuation thereof)
or in the records of the Bank), such principal amount to be payable on the dates set forth in the Credit Agreement. 



        The
undersigned further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such Loan is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the
time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement. Payments of both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States of America. 


        This
Note evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the terms and provisions of, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2002 (as
amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"; terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit
Agreement), among the undersigned, certain financial institutions (including the Bank) and the Agent, to which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and provisions
under which this Note may or must be paid prior to its due date or its due date accelerated. 


        This
Note is being executed and delivered in replacement of, but not in payment of: (a) that certain "Note" evidencing indebtedness to the Bank dated to be effective
September 15, 2000, made by the undersigned payable to the order of the Bank in the original principal amount of $20,000,000.00; and (b) that certain "Note" evidencing indebtedness to
the Harris Trust and Savings Bank ("Harris") dated to be effective September 15, 2000, made by the undersigned payable to the order of Harris in the original principal amount of $10,000,000.00;  provided, however, that interest on such replaced notes accrued through the date hereof shall be payable
in accordance with the terms thereof. 


        This
Note is made under and governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State. 



	 	 	Fargo Electronics, Inc.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  PAUL W.B. STEPHENSON      

	 	 	Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer













QuickLinks


NOTE
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Barrett J. O'Connor, President and Chief Executive Officer, of EFC
Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

      (1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of EFC Bancorp,
            Inc.;

      (2)   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
            untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this quarterly report;



Date: January 15, 2004               /s/ Barrett J. O'Connor
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Barrett J. O'Connor
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
                                     (principal executive officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT    TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I, Brian A. Markison, Chief    Executive Officer of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify,    pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    that:     1. The report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2. The information contained in this report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. /s/  BRIAN    A. MARKISON    Brian A. Markison*President and Chief Executive Officer*     Date: August 7, 2007
Attorney or Party without Attorney: For Court Use Only 

Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman 

& Balint, P.C 

2325 East Camelback Road, Suite 300 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

Telephone No: 602-274-1100 FAX No: 602-274-1199 

Attorney for: Plaintiff 

I Ref No. or File No.: 

Insert name of Court, and Judicial District and Branch Court: 

United States District Court - District of Arizona 

Plaintiff: Richard DiDonato, Individually, et al. 

Defendant: Insys Therapeutics, Inc., et al. 

Affidavit Of Service I Hearing Date: I Time: IDept/Div: Case Number: 

PROOF SUMMONS 16CV00302NVW 

1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this action. 

2. I served copies of the Summons in a Civil Action; Amended Class Action Complaint 

3. a. Party served: Alec Burlakoff 

b. Person served: Alec Burlakoff, Personally, Caucasian, Male, 50 Years Old, Brown Hair, 5 Feet 8 

Inches, 170 Pounds 

4. Address where the party was served: 

5. I served the party: 

6308 Creola Road 

Charlotte, NC 28226 

a. by personal service. 1 personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive 

process for the party (1) on: Wed., Jul. 06,2016 (2) at: 6:15PM 

7. Person Who Served Papers: 

a. Rick Francis 

b. Class Action Research & Litigation 

POBox 740 

Penryn, CA 95663 

c. (916) 663-2562, FAX (916) 663-4955 

Fee for Service: 

I Declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of 

NORTH CAROLINA that the foregoing is tru nd correct. 

(Signa 

8. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COUNTY OF~~ 

Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this jL_ day of~l )\ A 1 ,·2tlli.o 

proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person w efor me. 

Case 2:16-cv-00302-NVW Document 56 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 1