alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 649

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

An Act

To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are obsolete

or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related section of the Federal

Energy Administration Act of 1974.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Energy Standardization Act of 1997’’.

SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUIREMENTS WITH GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS.

(a) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGULATIONS.—Section 501 of the

Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7191) is

amended—

(1) by striking subsections (b) and (d),

(2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b) and

by redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections

(c), (d), and (e), respectively, and

(3) in subsection (c) (as so redesignated), by striking ‘‘subsections (b), (c), and (d)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’.

(b) SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING ADVISORY COMMITTEES.—

(1) SECTION 624.—Section 624 of the Department of Energy

Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7234) is amended by—

(A) striking ‘‘(a)’’; and

(B) striking subsection (b).
H. R. 649—2

(2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 17

of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C.

776) is repealed.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-41B","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aiHlgLatz5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-41b\/\">STS-41B<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-41b\/embed\/#?secret=aiHlgLatz5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-41B” — NASA\" data-secret=\"aiHlgLatz5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S84-27026\/S84-27026~large.jpg?w=600&h=1263&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1263}
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03- 07 -00 145 -CV Je ff Bri nkle y , A ppe lla nt

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s , Appellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF B ASTROP COUNTY NO. 06- 1061 2 , HO NORAB LE B ENTON ESK EW , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UMO P I N I O N Appellant Jeff B rinkley

has filed a mot ion to dismiss his appea l, stating that he and the Dep art men t had

re so lve d th e ir

dis pute . We g ra

nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s th e a

pp e a l. Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (2).

______________________________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Puryear and He nson Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: May

3, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Katherine Johnson\u2019s Continuing Legacy at IV&V, Beyond","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7z30A9H81j\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/katherine-johnsons-continuing-legacy-at-ivv-beyond-2\/\">Katherine Johnson\u2019s Continuing Legacy at IV&V, Beyond<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/katherine-johnsons-continuing-legacy-at-ivv-beyond-2\/embed\/#?secret=7z30A9H81j\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Katherine Johnson\u2019s Continuing Legacy at IV&V, Beyond” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7z30A9H81j\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/lrc-1971-l-03033-kjohnson.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### M. E. Ingram, &c. *v.*John Fitzpatrick, &c.

Vendor and Purchaser — Deeds—Reservation of Lien.

Where the deed is made to the assigned of a title bond of the vendor, and no reservation of the purchase money is made in the deed, the ven dors lien is thereby waived, though the title bond may have specified the reservation terms.

APPEAL FROM PULASKI CIRCUIT COURT.

March 9, 1870.

*James, Owsley & Burdett, for appellants.*

*VanWinkle, for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

Hansford, who sold the house and lot and tract of land to Gilmer by executory contract, proves that he conveyed the property to the Allcorns by the directions of appellants who were the assignees of Gilmer, and had assigned his bond for a title to the Allcorns. He proves that he made the conveyance as he was directed, and fails to prove that appellants required any conditions, or any reservation to be made in the deed to secure the purchase price, the Allcorns owed them. If they had been the owners of the legal title and had made the conveyance to their vendees without an express reservation in the deed for the unpaid price, they would have certainly thereby lost their lien. And it is difficult to perceive why a conveyance made by Hansford, by their express direction without the legal reservation, should not have the same effect as if the deed had been made in the same manner by themselves.

Appellants have not brought themselves within the principle in the case of *Taylor v. Ford, 1 Bush,*44, and the cases cited.

By procuring the deed to be made to the Allcorns without a reservation of their lien therein, they as effectually waived it as if they had made the deed themselves and omitted to make the reservation.

"Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss the petition.
EXHIBIT
23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
FormsS-3 (Nos.
333-37229, 333-46243, 333-52601, 333-58799, 333-64069, 333-75253,
333-92023, 333-93761, 333-94815, 333-44928, 333-46738, 333-54160, 333-61948,
333-74180, 333-02672, 333-100759, 333-115572, 333-127658, 333-133933,
333-137466, 333-137467, 333-141879, 333-159032) and on Forms S-8 (Nos.
333-05705, 333-12551, 333-58801, 333-60731, 333-89631, 333-91985, 333-37624,
333-37626, 333-74050, 333-115573, 333-115574, 333-127659, 333-127665,
333-147933, 333-150698, 333-157779) of Home Properties, Inc. of our report
dated February 26, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements ,
financial statement schedulesand the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
10-K.
   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
  Boston,
MA
  February
26, 2010
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Arizona Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lh0E3wbqP8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/arizona-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-aboard-space-station\/\">Arizona Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/arizona-students-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-aboard-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=lh0E3wbqP8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Arizona Students to Speak with NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"lh0E3wbqP8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/m19-012.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
ATTACHMENTS #1-11 

(Will be provided by disc to the Court and Defense Counsel)

Case 2:16-mj-06019-DKD Document 8-1 Filed 02/02/16 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 751 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 751

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for research on the 
   disease known as lymphangioleiomyomatosis (commonly known as LAM).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

  Mr. Chabot (for himself, Mr. Portman, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Boehner, Mr. 
Cunningham, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Towns, Mr. Gonzalez, Mrs. Mink of Hawaii, 
  Mrs. Maloney of New York, Ms. Norton, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Brown of 
 Ohio, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Olver, Mr. Rahall, Mrs. Meek of Florida, Mr. 
 English of Pennsylvania, and Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for research on the 
   disease known as lymphangioleiomyomatosis (commonly known as LAM).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``LAM Disease Research Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF RESEARCH ON LAM DISEASE.

    Section 421 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285b-3) is 
amended by adding at the end the following subsection:
    ``(c)(1) The Program shall provide for the conduct or support of 
research on the disease lymphangioleiomyomatosis (referred to in this 
subsection as `LAM'). The Program may provide for the conduct or 
support of training, health information dissemination, and other 
programs with respect to LAM. Activities under this paragraph may 
include the establishment and operation of a registry with respect to 
the disease.
    ``(2) For the purpose of carrying out paragraph (1), there is 
authorized to be appropriated $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1998.''.
                                 <all>
```
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-12-00070-CR

BILLY JOE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 0518107

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Billy Joe Smith was on deferred adjudication community supervision for the offense of 

aggravated sexual assault of a child. The State filed a motion for adjudication and revocation, 

alleging that Smith failed to pay fees, fines, and costs assessed as part of his supervision and that 

he violated the terms and conditions of his supervision by being in the direct presence of or 

having personal contact with children. The trial court found the allegations true, adjudicated him 

guilty, and sentenced him to life in prison. 

Based on the reasoning and analysis in our opinion in cause number 06-12-00065-CR, 

issued on even date herewith, we overrule Smith’s points of error.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment and sentence. 

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: January 10, 2013

Date Decided: January 23, 2013

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISLE OF
CAPRI BLACK HAWK, L.L.C.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO
SAID FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001047905
<NAME>     ISLE OF CAPRI BLACK HAWK, L.L.C.
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-24-1999
<CASH>                                       14933
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  368
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             15999
<PP&E>                                       84160
<DEPRECIATION>                                1975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              104617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        18702
<BONDS>                                      75359
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                   10556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                104617
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             42049
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                15106
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             18833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               2769
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2769
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2769
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
Case 2:15-cr-01342-JJT Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01342-JJT Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01342-JJT Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2007 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer May 9, 2007
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
Marisa Christina, Incorporated:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-91708 and 33-91080) on Form S-8 of Marisa Christina, Incorporated of our
report dated March 6, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Marisa Christina, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the
December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Marisa Christina,
Incorporated.


/s/ KPMG LLP

New York, New York
May 17, 2001
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                                                              |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated: August 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Paul Campbell                                            |   |
|                        |   | Paul Campbell                                                     |   |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer        |   |
|                        |   |                                                              |   |
#### George W. Bates v. Robert J. Kelley, Circuit Judge of Alpena County

*Bes judicata*— Writ *of prohibition.*

A deed was adjudged to have been forged in a suit by a mother against her son, after which his administrator brought a suit at law against one of her solicitors, charging him with the mutilation of the deed, and seeking to recover damages therefor. And it is held that the circuit court had no jurisdiction to try the case, and a writ of prohibition is granted to stay all further proceedings in the suit.

Relator applied for a writ of prohibition to stay proceedings in an action at law.

Submitted June *24,*1890.

Granted July 2, 1890.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*George W. Bates,*in *pro. per. (Levi T. Griffin,*of counsel), for petitioner.

*James D. Turnbull,*for respondent.

Grant, J.

One Cynthia *W.*Crawford filed a bill of complaint in the Presque Isle circuit court, in chancery, to set aside a deed purporting to have been executed by her to her son. The sole question was whether the deed was *92forged. That suit was brought to a final determination in this Court, and decided in favor of the complainant; the Court holding that the deed was forged. 'James D. Turnbull, administrator of the estate of complainant's son, was a defendant in that suit. *Crawford v. Hoeft,*58 Mich. 1-25. Some time after the determination of that suit, Turnbull, as administrator, commenced a suit at law in the circuit court for the county of Alpena against relator, charging him with the mutilation of the deed, and seeking to recover damages therefor. The declaration sets forth the proceedings in this Court in the case above referred to, and alleges that this Court was wholly mistaken in the opinion and decree therein rendered, and was imposed upon by the acts of the relator.

If this were true, the only course open to the defendants in that suit is by application to this Court for a rehearing. They did make such application, and it was denied. They now seek to reopen the issue there adjudicated and settled, in a suit at law and in another court. The bare statement of the case is sufficient to condemn the proceeding. The respondent had no right or jurisdiction to try the case. He should have granted the motion for the perpetual stay of proceedings. *Barnum Wire & Iron Works v. Judge,*59 Mich. 272; *Maclean v. Judge,*52 Id. 257; *Hudson v. Judge,*42 Id. 248.

The writ of prohibition will therefore be granted.

Morse, Cahill, and Long, JJ., concurred. Champlin, O. J., took no part in the decision.