alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 19.

#### John Doe, on the several demises of Zachariah Lamar and A. J. Lamar, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*Richard Roe, casual ejector, and Moses Grier, tenant in possession, defendants in error. Ejectment. From Early.

The security on appeal in the Court below, not having been made a party, writ of error dismissed.

De Grapfenreid & Schley, for plaintiffs.

Jones & Carithers, and Dudley, for defendants.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2002



Capital Fund Management
109-11 Rue V. Hugo
92532 Levallois
France

Attention:  Jean-Pierre Aguilar, CFO

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Aguilar:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made below (the "Management Agreement"). We
are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2003 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.
Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:     /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
       ------------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

  AGREED AND ACCEPTED
  CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT

By:     /s/ Jean-Pierre Aguilar
        ------------------------------

Print Name: Jean-Pierre Aguilar
             ------------------------------
            Chief Financial Officer
DRMcA/sr
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 568

To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been released from

incarceration.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. CONYERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been

released from incarceration.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voting Rights of

5 Former Offenders Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.

7 The right of a citizen of the United States, who other8 wise is qualified, to vote in any election for Federal office

9 shall not be denied or abridged because he has committed

10 a criminal offense unless such citizen is imprisoned in a
2

•HR 568 IH

1 correctional institution or facility at the time of such elec2 tion.

3 SEC. 3. STATE REQUIREMENTS.

4 Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the

5 States from establishing requirements for the holding of

6 State or local elective office; nor from enacting any State

7 law which affords the right to vote in any election for Fed8 eral office on terms less restrictive than those established

9 by this Act.

10 SEC. 4. OFFENSE.

11 Whoever intentionally denies or attempts to deny any

12 person any right secured by this Act shall be fined under

13 title 18, United States Code, or imprisoned not more than

14 one year, or both.

15 SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

16 For purposes of this Act—

17 (1) the term ‘‘correctional institution or facil18 ity’’ means any prison, penitentiary, jail, or other in19 stitution or facility for the confinement of individ20 uals convicted of criminal offenses, except that such

21 term does not include any residential community

22 treatment center (or similar public or private facil23 ity);

24 (2) the term ‘‘election’’ means (A) a general,

25 special, primary, or runoff election, (B) a convention
3

•HR 568 IH

1 or caucus of a political party held to nominate a

2 candidate, (C) a primary election held for the selec3 tion of delegates to a national nominating conven4 tion of a political party, or (D) a primary election

5 held for the expression of a preference for the nomi6 nation of persons for election to the office of Presi7 dent; and

8 (3) the term ‘‘Federal office’’ means the office

9 of President or Vice President of the United States,

10 or of Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or

11 Resident Commissioner to, the Congress of the

12 United States.

Æ
Order entered September 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00374-CR

RODERICK BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-56213-U

ORDER

On August 11, 2015, this Court ordered Cheryl Dixon, then official court reporter of the 

291st Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record of the February 13, 2015 adjudication 

proceeding within thirty days. On September 9, 2015, Ms. Dixon filed a letter stating she did not 

record that hearing, but that upon research she was able to determine Gina Udall was the court 

reporter who recorded the hearing. In her September 9, 2015 letter, Ms. Dixon stated she 

notified Ms. Udall that the record is due. 

Accordingly, we ORDER court reporter Gina Udall to file the reporter’s record of the 

February 13, 2015 hearing within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Gina Udall, court reporter, and to 

counsel for all parties.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
In the Senate of the United States,

July 9, 1997.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 680) entitled ‘‘An Act to amend the Federal

Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 to authorize the transfer of surplus personal property to States for donation to nonprofit providers of necessaries to impoverished

families and individuals, and to authorize the transfer of surplus real property to States, political subdivisions and instrumentalities of States, and nonprofit organizations for providing housing or housing assistance for low-income individuals

or families.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 4, after line 8 insert:

2 ‘‘(D)(i) The Administrator shall ensure that nonprofit

3 organizations that are sold or leased property under sub4 paragraph (B) shall develop and use guidelines to take into

5 consideration any disability of an individual for the pur6 poses of fulfilling any self-help requirement under subpara7 graph (C)(i).
2

HR 680 EAS

1 ‘‘(ii) For purposes of this subparagraph, the term ‘dis2 ability’ has the meaning given such term under section 3(2)

3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.

4 12102(2)).

5 Ω2æPage 4, line 9, strike out ø(D)¿ and insert: (E)

Attest:

Secretary.
105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 680

AMENDMENTS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

DC: 6153932-1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Michigan Consumer Credit Lawyers

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Leslie Belsanti

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leslie Belsanti,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Equifax Information Services, LLC, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv-08001-DGC

Hon. David G. Campbell

STIPULATION TO AMEND 

CASE MANAGEMENT 

ORDER RE: DEADLINE 

FOR GOOD FAITH 

SETTLEMENT TALKS 

(First Request)

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 70 Filed 08/25/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff and Defendants Capital One Bank USA, NA (“Capital One”), Chase 

Bank USA, NA (“Chase”), Equifax Information Services LLC (“Equifax”), Experian 

Information Solutions Incorporated (“Experian”), and

Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”)—the remaining parties that have not settled—

stipulate and jointly move to amend Paragraph 9 of the Case Management Order (Doc. 

No. 26) to extend the deadline for good faith settlement talks from August 26, 2016 to 

November 23, 2016. Good cause exists for this extension because Defendants have 

not yet deposed Plaintiff—they are scheduled to do so on September 23, 2016— and 

may conduct expert discovery. The parties believe that settlement discussions 

may be more productive if they occur after Plaintiff’s deposition and after any expert 

discovery occurs.

The parties also request that the Court allow the parties and their counsel to 

meet either telephonically or in person for good faith settlement talks. Given the 

number of parties, and the fact that several parties and their counsel are located out of 

state, engaging in settlement talks telephonically may prove to be more productive.

A proposed form of order is attached.

DATED: August 25, 2016.

KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 70 Filed 08/25/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

DESSAULES LAW GROUP

 /s/ Jonathan A. Dessaules 

Jonathan A. Dessaules

Local Counsel for Experian

SNELL & WILMER, LLP

__/s/ Jacob C. Jones 

Jacob C. Jones

Attorneys for Defendant,

Equifax Information Services, LLC

COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP

_/s/ Andrew Soukup

Andrew Soukup (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Defendant,

Chase Bank USA, N.A.

ENGELMAN BERGER, P.C.

_/s/ Wade E. Burgeson _

Wade E. Burgeson

Attorneys for Defendant,

Capital One Bank, USA, N.A.

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 70 Filed 08/25/16 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are available for domestic and foreign licensing by the Department of the Navy.

The following patents are available for licensing: Patent No. 8,852,950: HELICOPTER WEAPON MOUNTING SYSTEM//Patent No. 8,855,961: BINARY DEFINITION FILES.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, telephone 812-854-4100.

Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: October 22, 2014.

N.A. Hagerty-Ford,

Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-25736 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 490 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 490

  To relieve the Puerto Rico Housing Bank and Finance Agency and its 
   assignees of liability for certain loans subject to the Truth-in-
                              Lending Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1997

 Mr. Romero-Barcelo  introduced the following bill; which was referred 
           to the Committee on Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To relieve the Puerto Rico Housing Bank and Finance Agency and its 
   assignees of liability for certain loans subject to the Truth-in-
                              Lending Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS AND RULES OF CONSIDERATION.

    (a) Unless otherwise provided, the terms used in this act have the 
same meaning and are subject to the same rules of construction as those 
set forth in the Truth-in-Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1601-1667) and its 
implementing regulation.
    (b) The term ``Housing Bank'' refers to the Puerto Rico Housing 
Bank and Finance Agency, created pursuant to Act No. 146 of June 30, 
1961, P.R. LAWS ANN. tit. 7, sec 901 et seq. (1961).

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.

    (a) For any credit transaction subject to the Truth-in-Lending Act 
(15 U.S.C. 1601-1667) in which the Housing Bank was a creditor, and 
which was consummated before the date of enactment of this act, neither 
the Housing Bank nor any of its assignees shall have any civil 
criminal, or administrative liability under the Truth-in-Lending Act 
for any failure of the Housing Bank to comply with the provisions of 
that act or any regulations promulgated pursuant to it.
    (b) No consumer who consummated a credit transaction subject to the 
Truth-in-Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1601-1667) in which the Housing Bank 
was a creditor, and which was consummated before the date of enactment 
of this act, shall have any rescission right under section 125 of the 
Truth-in-Lending (15 U.S.C. 1635) against an assignee for the failure 
by the Housing Bank to deliver any disclosures required thereunder.
                                 <all>
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00205-CV

Marissa Peterson

v.

HEB Grocery Co., L.P.

On Appeal from the

131st District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-CI-19610

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellee.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 21, 2024
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-111","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AgWVzuc8CV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-111\/\">STS-111<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-111\/embed\/#?secret=AgWVzuc8CV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-111” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AgWVzuc8CV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/STS111-s-002\/STS111-s-002~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. I, Jefferson J. Gregory, Chief Executive Officer of King
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.       The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Date: May 10, 2004                               /s/ Jefferson J. Gregory
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Jefferson J. Gregory
                                                 Chairman of the Board
                                                 and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,221
<INVENTORY>                                      5,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               147,818
<PP&E>                                         146,713
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,322
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   385,322
<SALES>                                         20,528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               391,155
<CGS>                                           16,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,776
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,324
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,134
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,583
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00722-CR

JORUAM C. OLIVARES

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-11-10772-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 26, 2014
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Debra Jean Milke, 

Petitioner, 

v.

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-98-00060-PHX-RCB

ORDER GRANTING

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 Pursuant to the mandate of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Milke v.

Ryan, 711 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2013), 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is

GRANTED. Respondents shall release Petitioner Debra Jean Milke from custody unless the

State of Arizona: (1) notifies this Court within 30 days of the filing date of this Order that

it intends to retry Petitioner, and (2) actually commences Petitioner’s retrial within 90 days

of the filing date of this Order. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and

terminate this matter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall expeditiously return the

state court records received on August 3, 1999, and March 7, 2002 (Docs. 46 & 88) to the

Clerk of the Arizona Supreme Court. 

DATED this 8th day of July, 2013.

copies to all counsel of record

Case 2:98-cv-00060-RCB Document 213 Filed 07/08/13 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60282 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSEPH MATERNE, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(2:94-CR-2 (02)) April 19, 1996 Before JOHNSON, JOLLY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Materne appeals his guilty plea convictions on double jeopardy grounds based on a prior civil forfeiture of drug proceeds found in his possession upon his arrest. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Materne is trying to take advantage of the attachment of jeopardy in a proceeding where, following proper notice, no one timely entered an appearance or contested the forfeiture. Such an attempt by Materne to “retroactively. . .bootstrap himself into the civil forfeiture proceeding and. . .its jeopard effects” will not be tolerated by this Court. See United States v. Arreola-Ramos , 60 F.3d 188, 190 (5th Cir. 1995). Materne’s claims of violations of due process and his right to counsel in connection with the civil forfeiture proceeding are not properly before this Court on this direct appeal of his2

convictions. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the convictions in full.
AFFIRMED.