alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
for the quarter ending April 1, 2000, and such is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001047368
<NAME> GLENOIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                             749
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,326)
<INVENTORY>                                     57,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,299
<PP&E>                                          96,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                (30,196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,212
<BONDS>                                        244,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (62,163)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,131
<SALES>                                         77,870
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,870
<CGS>                                           58,527
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,949)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (954)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,995)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.99)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25381]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting


DATE AND TIME:  Thursday, October 30, 2014, 9:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (Board) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The Board will vote on a consent 
agenda consisting of the minutes of its August 13, 2014 meeting and a 
resolution to propose Board meeting dates in 2015. The Board will 
consider establishing a new Board special committee on the future of 
the Voice of America. The Board will convene a panel discussion titled, 
``What's the Secret to Media Brand Loyalty? Storytelling in the Digital 
Age.''
    This meeting will also be available for public observation via 
streamed webcast, both live and on-demand, on the agency's public Web 
site at www.bbg.gov. Information regarding this meeting, including any 
updates or adjustments to its starting time, can also be found on the 
agency's public Web site.
    The public may also attend this meeting in person at the address 
listed above as seating capacity permits. Members of the public seeking 
to attend the meeting in person must register at https://bbgboardmeetingoctober2014.eventbrite.com by 12:00 p.m. (EDT) on 
October 29. For more information, please contact BBG Public Affairs at 
(202) 203-4400 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62121700030404220000054c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec9c998e8d8a8aac8e8e8bc28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Oanh Tran at (202) 203-4545.

Oanh Tran,
Director of Board Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-25381 Filed 10-22-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-17-00382-CR 

TYRA FAITH COX, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 

Tarrant County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 1449042D, Honorable Elizabeth Beach, Presiding 

 

November 17, 2017 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Pending before the Court is the motion of appellant Tyra Faith Cox to dismiss her 

appeal. Appellant and her attorney have signed the motion. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). 

No decision of the Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and 

our mandate will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
----

|   | Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP **Chartered Accountants** 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation of our report, dated  February 20, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of  Cambior Inc. as at December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the years in the  three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report is included in this  Annual Report on Form 40-F. 

/s/ Raymond Chabot LLP Grant Thornton

Chartered Accountants 

Montréal, Canada   March 29, 2006 
Suite 1900 National Bank Tower 600 De La Gauchetière Street West Montréal, Québec H3B 4L8 Telephone: (514) 878-2691 Fax: (514) 878-2127 www.rcgt.com   **Member of Grant Thornton International**  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

SCHLEIER LAW OFFICES, P.C. 

3101 N. Central Avenue 

Suite 1090 

Phoenix, Arizona 85012 

Telephone: (602) 277-0157 

Facsimile: (602) 230-9250 

TOD F. SCHLEIER, ESQ. #004612 

Tod@SchleierLaw.com 

BRADLEY H. SCHLEIER, ESQ. #011696 

Brad@SchleierLaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Alternate 36, Inc., Ramirez and Murphy 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

SPARROWONE, LLC, an Arizona 

limited liability company, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

ALTERNATE 36, INC., a Delaware 

corporation; Kenneth Ramirez, a natural 

person; Lauren Murphy, a natural 

person; and Jeffery Nickoloff, a natural 

person, 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-15-02609-PHX-SPL 

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION 

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that, pursuant to RCP 26 and 30, the deposition 

of the person named below will be taken upon oral examination at the time and place 

stated below, before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths: 

 PERSON TO EXAMINED: Rob Johnson 

 DATE AND TIME OF DEPOSITION: October 4, 2016 @ 9:30 am 

Case 2:15-cv-02609-SPL Document 85 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 3
-2-

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 PLACE OF DEPOSITION: Schleier Law Offices, P.C. 

 3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1090 

 Phoenix, Arizona 85012

 

DATED this 9th day of September, 2016. 

 SCHLEIER LAW OFFICES, P.C. 

 /s/ Bradley H. Schleier 

 Bradley H. Schleier 

 Attorneys for Defendants Alternate 36, Inc., 

 Ramirez, and Murphy 

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 

I hereby certify that on this 9th day of September, 2016, I electronically filed the 

foregoing NOTICE OF DEPOSITION with the U.S. District Court Clerk using the 

CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: 

Joyce N. Van Cott 

Ryan J. Talamante 

VAN COTT & TALAMANTE, PLLC 

CopperPoint Tower 

3030 North Third Street, Suite 790 

Phoenix, Arizona 85012 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Sparrowone, LLC 

Marc Edward Rosenthal 

Casey Ryan Cummings 

KENNER & CUMMINGS, PLLC 

104 Southeast 8th Avenue 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 

Attorneys Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Sparrowone, LLC 

John M. McKindles 

McKINDLES LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C. 

1108 E. Greenway Street Suite1 

Mesa, AZ 85203 

Attorney for Defendant Jeffery Nickoloff 

Case 2:15-cv-02609-SPL Document 85 Filed 09/09/16 Page 2 of 3
-3-

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

A copy was emailed to: 

Alliance Reporting 

2700 N. Central, #350 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

/s/ Cindy J. Anderson 

Case 2:15-cv-02609-SPL Document 85 Filed 09/09/16 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01728-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01728-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01728-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 3 of 3
Supplemental Letter dated February 27, 2003



 
Exhibit 10.22

 
February 27, 2003 
 
Mr. Thos. E. Capps 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Dominion
Resources, Inc. 
 
Dear Tom: 
 
Under an Employment Agreement with the Company dated September 30, 2002, you
will receive a lifetime benefit under the Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan (ESRP). This letter clarifies the treatment of survivor benefits paid in connection with your lifetime ESRP in the event of your death. The Organization, Compensation
and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors approved this benefit at their meeting of April 16, 2002. 
 
If you should die prior to your retirement from the Company, your beneficiary under the ESRP will receive a lump-sum cash payment equal to the vested lifetime benefit under the ESRP as if you retired
on the date of your death. 
 
If you should die following your
retirement from the Company and you elected to receive your ESRP benefit in the form of a lifetime annuity, your beneficiary will receive a payment equal to the lifetime ESRP lump sum benefit (calculated at your retirement date) minus the total
annuity payments paid from your retirement date to date of death. 
 
Sincerely yours, 
 
/s/ K.A. Randall 
 
Kenneth A. Randall, Chairman 
Organization, Compensation & Nominating Committee 
Board of Directors
#### Lang *v.*Scott.

Where a hew right is introduced by statute, the party complaining of its violation is confined to the statutory remedy, if one be prescribed. Aliter, where the right existed at common law, and an affirmative statute intervenes inflicting a new penalty. . ■

ERROR to tbe *Marion*Circuit Court.'

Blackford, J.

Action on the case against *Lang*for erectIng an unauthorized ferry, within two miles of the plaintiff’s ferry, to his damage 2,000 dollars. Demurrer to the' declaration and judgment for the plaintiff.

If a statute is introductory of new rights which did not before exist in the country, and prescribes a penalty for their violation, the persons claiming under the act must depend, for the security of the rights thus claimed, upon the provisions therein specified (1). When there is a pre-existing right at common law, and an affirmative statute intervenes inflicting a new penalty, the law is otherwise. The exclusive privileges of ferries were not known here until they were authorized by statute; and the statute by which- they are authorized prescribes a specific penalty for their violation (2). Upon the provisions of the act, therefore, the owners of ferries must rely for the security of their *406rights, so far as the Courts of common law are concerned. This case cannot be distinguished in principle from *Almy*v. Harris, 5 Johns. R. 175.

*Szueetser,*for the plaintiff.

*Wick,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs.

(1)

 Vide *Sturgeon*v. *The State,*ante, p. 39.

(2)

 Stat. 1823, p. 208.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-50","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Evb1HWhApr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-50\/\">STS-50<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-50\/embed\/#?secret=Evb1HWhApr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-50” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Evb1HWhApr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/9256753\/9256753~large.jpg?w=600&h=1566&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1566}
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20963 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v. JAVIER VALLEJO, also known as Chalo, also known as José Rias, also known as Gonzalo

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-455-1

-------------------- June 12, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tom Moran, appointed to represent Javier Vallejo, has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Vallejo has filed a motion for appointment of new counsel on appeal. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,No. 00-20963 -2- and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Vallejo’s motion for new counsel is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Thad M. Brown, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|Dated: November 12, 2003 |  | /s/ THAD M. BROWN                                                   
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | Thad M. Brown Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting
officer)
CIPHER
HOLDING CORPORATION
 
 
 EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Cipher Holding Corporation. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick Rooney,
President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the quarterly
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the quarterly report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: May
23, 2005
 
 /s/
      Patrick RooneyPresident,Chief
      Executive Officer,Chairman
      of the Board and Director
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                            $669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (218)
<INVENTORY>                                    102,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,293
<PP&E>                                          27,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,401
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,452
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,452
<SALES>                                        231,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231,143
<CGS>                                          157,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  157,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,239
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,292
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,448
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Anayely A. Martinez, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-15-50198-PHX-JJT

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry her burden of establishing that she

does not pose a serious flight risk or danger to any other person or to the community pursuant

to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure her appearance at future proceedings.

The Court also concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a

danger and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure

the safety of the community.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 15th day of November, 2017