alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kate Blankenship, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro  Tankers (Bahamas
III) Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in thisreport,  fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e))  for the  registrant  and have:
     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)   disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
          control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during the period
          covered by the  annual  report  that has  materially  affected,  or is
          reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
     a)   all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation  of internal  control  over  financial  reporting  which are
          reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date: June XX, 2006


/s/ Kate Blankenship
----------------------------
Kate Blankenship
Director
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"55 Years Ago: Tragedy on the Launch Pad","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HZ806pH9Fo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-tragedy-on-the-launch-pad\/\">55 Years Ago: Tragedy on the Launch Pad<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-tragedy-on-the-launch-pad\/embed\/#?secret=HZ806pH9Fo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“55 Years Ago: Tragedy on the Launch Pad” — NASA\" data-secret=\"HZ806pH9Fo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/apollo_1_fire_1_as1-0292-s67-19770-crew_posing_at_pad_34-1.17.67.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":499}
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Five Star
Products, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such
officer's knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 30, 2007





John C. Belknap                                      Neal Collins
Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer
NUMBER 13-08-00532-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE: HIDALGO COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND

HIDALGO COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT REVIEW BOARD

__________________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and 

Motion for Emergency Relief

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relators, Hidalgo County Appraisal District and Hidalgo County Appraisal District

Review Board, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on September 10, 2008. The Court

ordered the real parties in interest, El Pistalon, L.L.P., Ramon Garcia, O G Construction

Co., L.L.P., The Blue Group, Ltd., Co., and South Texas Wildhorse Desert Investments,

Inc., to file a response to relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Such response was duly

filed.
2

The parties have now filed a joint motion to dismiss the petition for writ of

mandamus and motion for emergency stay. The Court, having examined and fully

considered the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that said motion should be granted.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this original proceeding is hereby

DISMISSED without reference to the merits.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 22nd day of January, 2009.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 722

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain small businesses from the required use of the electronic fund transfer system

for depository taxes, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington (for himself, Mr. TALENT, Mr. NETHERCUTT,

Mr. MANZULLO, Mrs. KELLY, Mr. COMBEST, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr.

HOEKSTRA, Mrs. SMITH of Washington, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. CHABOT,

Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. MCINTOSH, Mr. BARR

of Georgia, Mr. SCARBOROUGH, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. CONDIT, Mr.

SNOWBARGER, Mrs. EMERSON, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. WATKINS,

Mr. COOKSEY, and Ms. HARMAN) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt

certain small businesses from the required use of the

electronic fund transfer system for depository taxes, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 722 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FOR SMALL BUSINESSES FROM RE2 QUIRED USE OF ELECTRONIC FUND TRANS3 FER SYSTEM.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (h) of section 6302 of

5 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to use of elec6 tronic fund transfer system for collection of certain taxes)

7 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as

8 paragraphs (4) and (5), respectively, and by inserting

9 after paragraph (2) the following new paragraph:

10 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION FOR SMALL DEPOSITORS.—

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A taxpayer who is a

12 small depositor for any calendar year shall not

13 be required to make deposits by electronic fund

14 transfer for taxes attributable to payments

15 made during the following calendar year.

16 ‘‘(B) SMALL DEPOSITOR.—A taxpayer is a

17 small depositor for any calendar year if the

18 amount of employment taxes attributable to

19 payments made by such taxpayer during such

20 year is $50,000 or less.’’

21 (b) REQUIRED PERCENTAGES OF DEPOSITS FROZEN

22 AT 1996 LEVEL.—

23 (1) Subparagraph (B) of section 6302(h)(2) of

24 such Code is amended—
3

•HR 722 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘the applicable required

2 percentage’’ in clause (i) and inserting ‘‘20.1

3 percent’’, and

4 (B) by striking ‘‘the applicable required

5 percentage’’ in clause (ii) and inserting ‘‘30

6 percent’’.

7 (2) Paragraph (2) of section 6302(h) of such

8 Code is amended by striking subparagraph (C).

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to amounts otherwise required to

11 be deposited after June 30, 1997.

Æ
#### James Callahan, &c. *v.*O. O. Brannin, &c.

Courts — Judgment—Presumption of Correctness.

The action of a lower Court is presumed to be correct, until the contrary is made to appear, and everything necessary to sustain the judgment will be presumed which is not inconsistent with the facts stated in the record. .

APPEAL PROM JEPPERSON CIRCUIT COURT. CHANCERY BRANCH.

May 13, 1871.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

The judgment in this ease recites that it was heard on the pleadings, exhibits, and proof by oral testimony, and the production, and exhibition of the original records and journals of the boards of the General Council of the City of Louisville. But no Bill of Exceptions was filed containing the .evidence, and we are therefore unable to determine that the judgment of the court was not sustained by the evidence.

It. is a well-settled legal principle that the action of the inferior court will be presumed to be correct until the contrary is made to appear, and everything necessary to sustain the judgment will be presumed which is not inconsistent with the facts stated in the record. Vanable vs. McDonald, 4 Dana, 336; Harvey vs. Payne, 2 Met. 451.

The evidence before the inferior court may have authorized ■ the judgment, and yielding to the legal presumption in favor *329of the correctness of tbe court below we must affirm the judgment.

*Mix, for appellant.*

*Thompson, Booth & Kline for appellee.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         27,611
<SECURITIES>                                   171,822
<RECEIVABLES>                                  755,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,382)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,488
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 959,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,404
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          40,000
<PREFERRED>                                    1,000
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     917,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   959,739
<SALES>                                        30,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               30,189
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                28,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   28,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  278,880
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  278,860
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Cancels Planned Media Availabilities with Astronauts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4z8OqViD3a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-cancels-planned-media-availabilities-with-astronauts\/\">NASA Cancels Planned Media Availabilities with Astronauts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-cancels-planned-media-availabilities-with-astronauts\/embed\/#?secret=4z8OqViD3a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Cancels Planned Media Availabilities with Astronauts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4z8OqViD3a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/08\/harvey-iss-tuesday_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NICOLAS FIBELA,

Appellant,

v.

KAREN M. WOOD,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00019-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number 6

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCV1242)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the trial court’s judgment 

should be affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. The judgment of the trial court 

granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee’s statutory fraud claim is affirmed. The portion 

of the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee on Appellant’s 

breach of contract claim is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with the opinion of this Court.

We further order that Appellant, and his sureties, if any, and Appellee each pay one-half 

(1/2) the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5. This decision 

shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS ORDERED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Russell J. Webster,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00197-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss, PLLC - Jackson, MS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/8/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 10, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 844 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    This schedule contains summary financial extracted from the
                    financial statements of RB Asset, Inc. for the 9 months
                    ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
                    reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                         26,558
<SECURITIES>                                   1,283
<RECEIVABLES>                                  78,311
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,553
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,841
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         11,409
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        952
<COMMON>                                         7,100
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,797
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,485
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,327
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                       432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                638
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       638
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        


</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Audree Renee Osborn, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Equifax Information Services, LLC, et atl, 

Defendants. 

No. CV15-2630 PHX DGC

ORDER 

 The parties have requested an extension of time to provide the Court with a 

stipulation of dismissal. Doc. 29. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

 1. The Court will grant a 30 day extension to the deadline to submit a 

stipulation of dismissal in this case. 

 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this matter on

May 18, 2016 without further leave of Court. The parties are advised that the Court will 

not grant further extension of this deadline absent truly extraordinary circumstances. 

 Dated this 14th day of April, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02630-DGC Document 30 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 1