alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.5

                         PROMISSORY NOTE

                                                         Salt Lake City, Utah
$5,000.00                                             Date: December 31, 2002


      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, DRACO HOLDING CORPORATION
(hereinafter "Maker") promises to pay to the order of LANE S. CLISSOLD, at 135
West 900 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 (hereinafter "Payee"), the
principal sum of Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($5,000.00) in lawful money
of the United States of America, together with interest thereon at the rate of
ten percent (10.0%) per annum until paid in full.

      Payment of principal together with all accrued interest shall be due
upon demand by the holder hereof.

      The Maker of this Promissory Note shall have the privilege, without
penalty or premium, of paying in advance the entire principal or any portion
thereof.

      In the event that any portion of principal or interest is not paid when
due, it shall thereafter bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12.0%)
per annum, both before and after judgment, until paid in full.  In the event
of default on any payment herein provided for, then without notice,
presentment or demand, the principal sum hereof together with any accrued
interest thereon shall, at the option of the holder of this Promissory Note,
become due and payable immediately.  Failure to delay in exercising its option
shall not constitute a waiver of any such breach or default nor waiver of the
holder's right to exercise said option upon any subsequent breach or default.

      The undersigned hereby expressly waives all statutes of limitation
affecting the enforceability of this Promissory Note, and agree to pay all
reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurred in collection of payments due, or
in the enforcement of any right or remedy hereunder.  The Makers, assumers,
endorsers, sureties, and guarantors of this Promissory Note consent to all
renewals, indulgences, extensions, and all releases of security granted or
permitted by the owner or holder without notice.

      Payment of this promissory note is unsecured.

                                       MAKER:

                                       DRACO HOLDING CORPORATION



                                       By /s/ Steven D. Moulton
                                         -------------------------------
                                       Steven D. Moulton, Secretary
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
#### Songer, Administrator, *v.*Walker and Another, in Error.

IN an action of debt against an administrator, on a bond: of the Intestate, the defendant made default, and judgment was rendered against him for the debt and costs *de bonis propriis.*The Court held the judgment to be erroneous (1).

(1)

 The plaintiffs in the Court below might have had this judgment amended there, on motion, even after a transcript of the record had been transmitted to this Court, They could then have alleged a diminution, had a transcript of the amended record brought up by a writ of certiorari, and have thus prevented a reversal of- the judgment. *Short*v. *Coffin,*5 Burr. 2730. And the mistake, being in the form of the judgment, might have been amended at a term subsequent to that in which tho judgment was rendered. Per *Heath,*J. in *Burroughs*v. *Stevens, 5*Taunt. 554. Vide also *Usher v. Dansey,*4 Maule Selw. *94.*— Richardson v. *Mellish,*3 Bing. *334.*— Lambert v. Blackman, ante., p. 69, and note *2.*— Fite v. Doe, ante, p. 127, 132.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"25 Years Ago: The First Pieces of the International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"N6UVmfnqj7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/s88e5157orig\/\">25 Years Ago: The First Pieces of the International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/s88e5157orig\/embed\/#?secret=N6UVmfnqj7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“25 Years Ago: The First Pieces of the International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"N6UVmfnqj7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/s88e5157orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
exv10w9



 



Exhibit 10.9



Amendment to the General Dynamics

Supplemental Savings and Stock Investment Plan




	1.	 	The General Dynamics Supplemental Savings and Stock Investment Plan (the
“Plan”) is hereby amended by the addition of a new Section 4.8 to read as
follows:




		
	 	4.8 Change of Control. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the
contrary, immediately prior to the occurrence of a Change of Control (as
defined in the Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated 1997 Incentive
Compensation Plan, as amended), all allocations made to Member accounts,
whether or not vested, shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable.



2.     Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:



		
	 	5.1 Amendment. The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Corporation
reserves the right to modify or amend this Plan in whole or in part,
effective as of any specified date; provided, however, that the Chairman
shall have no authority to modify or amend the Plan to:




		
	 	(a) reduce any benefit accrued hereunder based on service and
compensation to the date of the amendment unless such action is necessary
to prevent this Plan from being subject to any provision of Title I,
Subtitle B, Parts 2, 3 or 4 of ERISA;




		
	 	(b) permit the accrual, holding or payment of actual shares of General
Dynamics Common Stock under the Plan; or




		
	 	(c) adversely affect any accrued benefits hereunder (and any benefits
that will accrue upon a Change of Control) and any rights attaching
thereto after or in anticipation of the occurrence of a Change of Control
(as defined in the Corporation’s Second Amended and Restated 1997
Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended).




	3.	 	The preceding amendments shall be effective as of the date first written
below.
	 
	4.	 	Except as amended herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.





	*	 	Bold text indicates new text.





	 	 	 
	Dated this 3rd day of October, 2002.	 	 
	 
	 	 	
/s/ Nicholas D. Chabraja



Nicholas D. Chabraja

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

General Dynamics Corporation
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katherine Schauer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ksschaue\/","title":"Volunteers Worldwide Successfully Tracked NASA\u2019s Artemis I Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jI5WhWhfMG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/artemis-1\/volunteers-worldwide-successfully-tracked-nasas-artemis-i-mission\/\">Volunteers Worldwide Successfully Tracked NASA\u2019s Artemis I Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/artemis-1\/volunteers-worldwide-successfully-tracked-nasas-artemis-i-mission\/embed\/#?secret=jI5WhWhfMG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Volunteers Worldwide Successfully Tracked NASA\u2019s Artemis I Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jI5WhWhfMG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/nhq202208280008.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":725}
No. 14,063.

#### Poulson et al. *v.*Simmons.

Law of Case. — The law, as declared on a former appeal, continues to be the law of the case to the end.

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

*J. A. New,*for appellants.

*W. R. Hough*and *L. H. Reynolds,*for appellee.

Berkshire, J.

— The only error assigned, to which counsel for the appellants calls our attention, is the one calling in question the correctness of the conclusions of law, as announced by the trial court. Counsel for the appellee make the point that there is not a proper assignment of errors, but in view of the conclusion to which we have arrived we have not seen proper to consider the question of practice.

This case has been here before, and the law, as declared on the former appeal, must continue to be the law of the case to the end.

The opinion of the court, given upon the former appeal, will be found reported in *Thomas*v. *Simmons,*103 Ind., beginning with page 538. The opinion was delivered by Niblack, J.

*228Filed Dec. 9, 1890.

The issues were in no way changed after the cause was remanded to the trial court for another trial, and hence we can not do better than to adopt the statement made in the former opinion, as it is clear and comprehensive. This court, in its former decision, affirmed the ruling of the trial court in overruling the demurrers to the second, fifth, and sixth paragraphs of the complaint, but held that there was technical error as against the appellants in the court’s conclusions of law, as stated in its special finding, at the same time holding that the appellee was entitled to relief of a higher and different character than the judgment afforded him.

In the last trial the court seems to have carefully followed the law, as declared by this court, and in view of the facts as found, we can not imagine how its conclusions of law could have been other than as stated.

The facts bring the case clearly within the case made by the second paragraph of the complaint.

Upon the facts found the appellant Poulson was the owner of the judgment and decree, which he obtained against the Forgeys ; and, as was held upon the former appeal, the judgment became wholly merged when he purchased the certificate of sale held by Hough to the mortgaged premises, and afterwards obtained a sheriff’s deed therefor.

Whatever equities there may have been as between Poulson and Taylor W. Thomas, they could in no way prejudice or affect the rights of other parties.

There is no error in the record.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25349]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-925]

Certain Communications or Computing Devices and Components 
Thereof; Notice of Correction Concerning a Commission Determination Not 
To Review an Initial Determination Granting Intervenor Status to 
Google, Inc.

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Correction of notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Correction is made to the investigation number and caption for 
notice 79 FR 62465 which was published on Friday, October 17, 2014. The 
investigation number should be corrected from 337-TA-884 to 337-TA-925, 
and the caption should be corrected from Certain Consumer Electronics 
with Display and Processing Capabilities to Communications or Computing 
Devices and Components Thereof.

    Issued: October 21, 2014.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-25349 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bedi A. Singh, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gemstar-TV
Guide International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 14, 2008



| |  |                                                     
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Bedi A. Singh                                   
| |  | Bedi A. Singh                                       
| |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Lagow and Others *v.*Patterson, in Error.

*LAGOW,*as attorney in fact for a company consisting of him", self and several others, confessed ajudgmentinthe names of the partners, in favour of *Patterson^*The power of attorney under which *Lagow*acted, authorized him in the names of the partners to negotiate, compromise, adjust, determine, settle, and arrange all differences and disputes between them and the Bank of *Vincennes,*and all persons whatever; to execute and sign their names to any release, covenant, or conveyance of all or any part of their joint estate, whether real or personal; and to give and re* ceive discharges, receipts, &c.

*Held,*that the confession of judgment by *Lagow*was without sufficient authority. *Scott,*J. dissentiente.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISLE OF
CAPRI BLACK HAWK LLC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO SAID
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001047905
<NAME>     ISLE OF CAPRI BLACK HAWK LLC
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       APR-29-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUL-30-2000
<CASH>                                        9636
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  314
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             10820
<PP&E>                                      104094
<DEPRECIATION>                                3673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              118371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        23717
<BONDS>                                      75000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                   19654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                118371
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             25678
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 9304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             10775
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3262
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           3262
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  3262
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Philbrick HH Cook,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR-98-0869-PHX-GMS

DETENTION ORDER

On September 11, 2013, defendant Philbrick HH Cook appeared before this Court on a

petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the information provided

to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining whether the defendant should be

released on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to revoke

his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is not

likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant to Rule 46(d),

and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 3143.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further proceedings.

DATED this 11th day of September, 2013.

Case 2:98-cr-00869-GMS Document 18 Filed 09/12/13 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21





Subsidiaries



The following table sets forth the information on our subsidiaries that is
required to be reported under Item 601 of the SECs Regulation S-K.



|                   |  |                                        |  |                                       
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Name               |  | State of Incorporation or Organization |  | Name Under Which Business is Conducted
|                   |  |                                       
|ESI Service Corp.  |  | Delaware                               |  | ESI Service Corp.                     
|                   |  |                                       
|ESI Maryland Corp. |  | Maryland                               |  | ITT Technical Institute
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25379]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice: Cancellation of Meeting Notice

October 20, 2014.
    The following Commission meeting has been cancelled. No earlier 
announcement of the cancellation was possible.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 22, 2014.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (entry from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. DQ Fire and Explosion 
Consultants, Docket Nos. WEVA 2011-952-R, et al. (Issues include 
whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in ruling that the violation 
of the order in question was the result of high negligence.).
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/
(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2014-25379 Filed 10-21-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P