alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Tod R. Hamachek, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                         |  |                                                                                        |  | 
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: November 13, 2002 |  | /s/  Tod R. HamacheckTod R. Hamachek
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  | 





---



##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Jennifer L. Good, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                         |  |                                                                                               |  | 
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: November 13, 2002 |  | /s/  Jennifer L. GoodJennifer L. Good
Sr. Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |  |
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001


Stonebrook Capital Management, Inc.
17 State Street - 38th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10004

Attention:  Mr. Jerome Abernathy

     Re: Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Abernathy:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreements  concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futueres Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Stonebrook FX Fund plc.

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:       /S/  Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         ------------------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

STONEBROOK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT , INC.

By:        /S/   Jerome Abernathy
         -----------------------------------
Print Name:  Mr. Jerome Abernathy
             -------------------------------
              Chief Financial Officer

DRMcA/sr
EX-32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Peabodys Coffee Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the date indicted below,  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          materials  respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
          of the Company.



August 19, 2003                By: /s/ Todd Tkachuk
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Todd Tkachuk
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2








CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BUCA, Inc.








/s/    GREG A. GADELGreg A. Gadel Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Audrey Valente-Kropf,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00265-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Lopez McHugh LLP - Newport Beach, CA

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/5/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 10, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 841 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles C. Kenzie,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03481-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8422 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rawlings Sporting Goods
Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended on August 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Stephen M. O'Hara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                      /s/ Stephen M. O'Hara
                                      --------------------------
                                      Stephen M. O'Hara
                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                      Date:  November 27, 2002




<PAGE>



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rawlings Sporting Goods
Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended on August 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William F. Lacey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                     /s/ William F. Lacey
                                     ----------------------
                                     William F. Lacey
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     Date:  November 27, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Baxter Salter, Jr., 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-98-409-002-PHX-PGR

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk or danger to any other person or to the community pursuant

to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure his appearance at future proceedings.

The Court also concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a

danger and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure

the safety of the community.

Case 2:98-cr-00409-PGR Document 151 Filed 02/14/14 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 13th day of February, 2014.

Case 2:98-cr-00409-PGR Document 151 Filed 02/14/14 Page 2 of 2
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4809

For the relief of the State of Hawaii.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1998

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself and Mrs. MINK of Hawaii) introduced the

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

For the relief of the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF FROM STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR

4 REFUND OR CREDIT.

5 If refund or credit of any overpayment of tax result6 ing from the payment of taxes under section 4041, 4081,

7 or 4091 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 on fuel

8 purchased by the State of Hawaii during calendar years

9 1992 and 1993 is prevented at any time before the close

10 of the 18-month period beginning on the date of the enact11 ment of this Act by the operation of any law or rule of

12 law, refund or credit of such overpayment may, neverthe-
2

•HR 4809 IH

1 less, be made or allowed if claim therefor is filed before

2 the close of such 18-month period.

Æ
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, William B. Plummer, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM B. PLUMMER 
|William B. Plummer     
|Chief Financial Officer

July 29, 2009
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARMEN DE FREEZE.

September 25, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Astronaut Scott Kelly Preparing for Launch on One-Year Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZoPEPxY8m0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/astronaut-scott-kelly-preparing-launch-one-year-mission\/\">Astronaut Scott Kelly Preparing for Launch on One-Year Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/astronaut-scott-kelly-preparing-launch-one-year-mission\/embed\/#?secret=ZoPEPxY8m0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronaut Scott Kelly Preparing for Launch on One-Year Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ZoPEPxY8m0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/16104674433_c36fae52ea_o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":447}
| Exhibit 32.1 |
|--------------|

| 1. | to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  November 17, 2010 | /s/ Lonnie D. Schnell               Lonnie D. SchnellChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### _ Cooper *v.*The State, on the Relation of Dean.

Any unmarried woman resident in the state, may make complaint before *a*justice, under the statute, against the father of her bastard child, without regard *to*the place where the child was born.

The Court in ordering the father of such child to make certain payments for its maintenance, should not direct an execution to issue in case of non-payment.

Upon ah order for such payments, a *scire facias*or an action of debt may be sustained by the party entitled to the money.

*Tuesday, August*22.

ERROR to the *Harrison*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

A justice of the peace filed in the Circuit Court the proceedings which had taken place before him in a case of bastardy. The complaint is by the state, on the relation of *Malinda Dean,*the mother of the child, against *William Cooper,*the reputed father. The mother was resident in this state when the complaint was made; and the' child was begotten in this state, but was born in the state of *Kentucky.*The cause was tried in the Circuit Court on the plea of not guilty, and a verdict found against the defendant. Upon this verdict, the Court ordered that the defendant should pay certain sums of money, at certain periods, for the maintenance of the child. It was further ordered, that an execution should issue for the payments as they respectively became due, and the amount be paid to the mother of the child.

There are two objections to these proceedings which it is necessary to notice.

The first is, that as the child was born in the state of *Kentucky,*the Court had no jurisdiction of the cause. This objection is without foundation. The statute authorises any unmarried woman resident in the state, to make the complaint against the father of her bastard child, without regard to the place where the child was born. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 285 (1).

The other objection is to that part of the order of the Court, which directs an execution to issue on the payments as they respectively become due, &c. We think the Court has made a mistake as to this matter. The party who may be entitled to any one of the payments when it becomes due, may have a *scire facias*or an action of debt for the same, and the order, if unreversed at the time, will be conclusive evidence of the *317amount being due from the reputed father. *Harrington et al.*v. *Ferguson, May*term, 1827. But it is not proper, that execution should issue upon the order, until the defendant has had an opportunity to show that the person for whose use it issues, is not the one entitled to the money (2).

*J. W. Payne, C. Fletcher,*and *O. Butler,*for the plaintiff.

*W. Quarles,*for the state.

Dewey, J., having been concerned as counsel in the cause, was absent.

*Per*Curiam.

That part of the order directing an execution to issue, &c., is reversed, and the residue affirmed. To be certified, &c.

(1)

 Accord. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 330.

(2)

 The order stands now as a judgment; the sureties for its performance are entered of record in the nature of replevin-hail; and when an instalment becomes due, execution goes against the principal and sureties. Rev. Stat. 1838, p. 333.