alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         988,037
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,972,264
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (380,452)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,280,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,210,796
<PP&E>                                       1,127,292
<DEPRECIATION>                               (533,060)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,664,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,956,806
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,813
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,738,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,664,792
<SALES>                                      1,721,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,721,917
<CGS>                                          884,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,544,021
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,724,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,724,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,724,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TAG-IT PACIFIC, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE FOUR MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         262,657
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,560,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                   163,965
<INVENTORY>                                  2,734,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,827,544
<PP&E>                                       2,324,840
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,064,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,132,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,422,688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,070
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,705,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,132,744
<SALES>                                     12,916,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,916,206
<CGS>                                        8,270,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,312,969
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               180,383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                422,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                   149,122
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            273,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   273,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,512
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          13,171
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     79,937
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        436,069
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 551,816
<DEPOSITS>                                     350,538
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,210
<LONG-TERM>                                    120,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 551,816
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,733
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,193
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,926
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,341
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,686
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,240
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      156
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  69
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,054
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,054
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,962
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.37
<LOANS-NON>                                        911
<LOANS-PAST>                                       911
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,545
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,699
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,699
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             95


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Roy Wayne Dillard,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03849-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8561 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 1
#### O. F. Stirman’s Adr. *v.*Fred Hahn.

Covenant — Damages—When Action for Eviction Accrues.

A judgment, against a vendor, in an action to recover the land, is sufficient evidence of eviction, to authorize a right of action immediately for damages for breach of covenant.

APPEAL PROM JEPPBRSON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 10, 1871.

*A. Barnett, for appellant.*

*Allmett, for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

The suit to recover the land from .Stirman. had been brought before he sold to Hahn, and the latter being a *Us pendens*.purchaser was liable to be dispossessed under tbe final judgment for tbe recovery of tbe land against bis vendor. Tbe judgment alone without any further fact, was sufficient evidence of eviction. It was appellee’s duty, after judgment, to yield tbe possession, be bad no right to resist; and therefore tbe judgment itself was a virtual eviction. Woodward vs. Allen, 3 Dana 164; Radcliff vs. Sharp, Hardin 293.

Having been virtually evicted, appellee’s right of action for a breach of tbe covenant of warranty in bis deed was complete. And no error appearing in tbe proceedings in tbe court below tbe judgment must be *affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-47-2014]


Foreign-Trade Zone 25--Broward County, Florida; Authorization of 
Production Activity; Prodeco Technologies, LLC; (Electric Bicycles) 
Oakland Park, Florida

    On June 27, 2014, the Port Everglades Department of Broward County, 
grantee of FTZ 25, submitted a notification of proposed production 
activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Prodeco 
Technologies, LLC, in Oakland Park, Florida.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (79 FR 38007-38008, 7-3-2014). The FTZ 
Board has determined that no further review of the activity is 
warranted at this time. The production activity described in the 
notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's 
regulations, including Section 400.14.

    Dated: October 28, 2014.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25953 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                      SECOND AMENDMENT TO ADMINISTAFF, INC.
                         NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN

         The Administaff, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Plan ("Plan")
shall be, and hereby is, amended in the following respects:

                              I.

         Effective January 28, 2003, Paragraph 3 of the Plan is amended
in its entirety to provide as follows:

                  "3.      Shares Available Under Plan. Subject to
         adjustments as provided in Paragraph 6, the maximum number of
         shares of Common Stock with respect to Option Rights that may
         be granted under this Plan in the aggregate is Three Million
         Six Hundred Thousand (3,600,000); however, any shares of
         Common Stock which are subject to Option Rights that are
         terminated unexercised, forfeited or surrendered or which
         expire for any reason will again be available for issuance.
         Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury
         shares or a combination of the foregoing."

                              II.

         Except as modified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect.

         Executed effective as of January 28, 2003.

                                     ADMINISTAFF, INC.

                                     By:/s/ Paul J. Sarvadi
                                     --------------------------
                                     Paul J. Sarvadi
exv10w2



 




EXHIBIT 10.2



STATEMENT REGARDING AUDITORS’
CONSENT


     
The consolidated financial statements of SAP
Aktiengesellschaft Systeme, Anwendungen, Produkte in der
Datenverarbeitung (the “Company”) for each of the
years ended 2001 and 2000, included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 20-F, have been audited by Arthur Andersen
Wirschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Steuerberatungsgesellschaft
mbH (“Arthur Andersen”). On May 3, 2002, the
Company dismissed Arthur Andersen as its independent public
accountants and engaged KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft to serve
as the Company’s independent public accountants for the
fiscal year 2002. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been
unable to obtain Arthur Andersen’s consent to the
incorporation by reference into this registration statement on
Form 20-F of its audit report with respect to the
Company’s financial statements referenced above.



     
Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under
the Securities Act permits the Company to file the Annual
Report, which is incorporated by reference into the
Company’s previously filed registration statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60399, 333-65083, 333-30380, 333-41762,
333-63496, 333-63464 and 333-102564) without a written consent
from Arthur Andersen. However, because Arthur Andersen has not
consented to the inclusion of its report in this annual report
on Form 20-F, as incorporated by reference into the above
referenced registration statements, recovery by investors
relying on any such registration statement that incorporates
this annual report on Form 20-F by reference may be limited
on certain claims. In particular, and without limitation,
purchasers of securities under each such registration statement
may not be able to assert claims against Arthur Andersen under
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue
statements of a material fact contained in the financial
statements referenced above and incorporated therein or any
omission of a material fact required to be stated therein. In
addition, the ability of Arthur Andersen to satisfy any claims
(including claims arising from Arthur Andersen’s provision
of auditing and other services to the Company) may be limited as
a practical matter due to recent events regarding Arthur
Andersen.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory S. Madar, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webster Preferred CapitalCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:November 09, 2006     /s/ Gregory S. Madar   Gregory S. Madar  Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer & Assistant Secretary  Principal Financial & Accounting Officer  
19
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136027 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. BOB TURNER, INC., Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant- Justices Appellant,

v SC: 136027 COA: 279850 Oakland CC: 2007-008607-AV 52-3 DC: 06-C03129-GC WALTER FRISBEE and LINDA FRISBEE,Defendants/Counter-PlaintiffsAppellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0616 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2008

Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ana Guzman","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ana-d-guzmannasa-gov\/","title":"Astrophysics on the Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cZnHCUxw60\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/astrophysics-on-the-space-station\/\">Astrophysics on the Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/astrophysics-on-the-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=cZnHCUxw60\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astrophysics on the Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cZnHCUxw60\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/1_iss050e028862.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TRAVIS L. SHACKELFORD (Michigan Bar No. P68710)

MICHIGAN CONSUMER CREDIT LAWYERS

22142 W. Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033 

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

E-mail: travis@micreditlawyer.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Leslie Belsanti

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leslie Belsanti,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Equifax Information Services, LLC, a 

Georgia corporation; 

Trans Union, LLC, 

a Delaware limited liability company,

Capital One Bank, USA, NA,

a National Association; and

Chase Bank USA, NA,

a National Association, 

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv-08001-DGC

JOINT SETTLEMENT STATUS 

REPORT

In accordance with the Court’s September 7, 2016 Amended Case Management

Order, Plaintiff Leslie Belsanti and Defendants Equifax Information Services LLC, 

Capital One Bank USA N.A., and Chase Bank USA N.A. (collectively “the Parties”) 

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 93 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

hereby report the Parties have engaged in good faith settlement talks. Although the 

Parties have attempted to reach a resolution of this matter, current settlement 

discussions have been unsuccessful. The Parties do not believe the assistance of the 

Court through a Settlement Conference is necessary. 

DATED: October 19, 2016 MICHIGAN CONSUMER CREDIT 

LAWYERS

By: /s/ Travis L. Shackelford

Travis L. Shackelford

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Leslie Belsanti

KING & SPALDING LLP

By: /s/ J. Anthony Love

J. Anthony Love

Attorneys for Defendant,

Equifax Information Services, LLC

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

By: /s/ Andrew Soukup

Andrew Soukup

Attorneys for Defendant,

Chase Bank USA, N.A.

DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP

By: /s/ Connie Y. Tcheng

Connie Y. Tcheng

Attorneys for Defendant,

Capital One Bank, USA, N.A.

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 93 Filed 10/19/16 Page 2 of 2
#### SMB ASSOCIATES (ANCHORING POINT) v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ET AL.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.