alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                                 309
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       25,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                           253
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                             540,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                     100,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     514,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            533,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                82
<OTHER-SE>                                        (128,931)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       514,175
<SALES>                                            236,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   236,190
<CGS>                                              128,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      128,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    54,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      7,776
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     11,472
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (6,942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.95)



</TABLE>
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 608

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Marion National Fish

Hatchery and the Claude Harris National Aquacultural Research Center

to the State of Alabama.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Mr. HILLIARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Resources

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey the Marion

National Fish Hatchery and the Claude Harris National

Aquacultural Research Center to the State of Alabama.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marion National Fish

5 Hatchery Conveyance Act’’.
2

•HR 608 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF MARION NATIONAL FISH HATCH2 ERY AND CLAUDE HARRIS NATIONAL

3 AQUACULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER TO THE

4 STATE OF ALABAMA.

5 (a) CONVEYANCE REQUIREMENT.—Within 180 days

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of the Interior shall convey to the State of Alabama with8 out reimbursement all right, title, and interest of the Unit9 ed States in and to the property described in subsection

10 (b) for use by the Game and Fish Division of the Alabama

11 Department of Conservation and Natural Resources as

12 part of the State of Alabama fish culture program.

13 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred

14 to in subsection (a) consists of—

15 (1) that portion of the Marion National Fish

16 Hatchery leased to the Alabama Game and Fish Di17 vision, located on State Highway 175 seven miles

18 northeast of Marion, Alabama, as described in

19 Amendment No. 2 to the Cooperative Agreement

20 dated June 6, 1974, between the United States Fish

21 and Wildlife Service and the State of Alabama, De22 partment of Conservation and Natural Resources,

23 Game and Fish Division, comprised of approximately

24 300 acres (more or less), and the Claude Harris Na25 tional Aquacultural Research Center, located on

26 State Highway 175 seven miles northeast of Marion,
3

•HR 608 IH

1 Alabama, as described in a United States Fish and

2 Wildlife Service document entitled ‘‘EXHIBIT A’’

3 and dated March 19, 1996, comprised of approxi4 mately 298 acres (more or less);

5 (2) all improvements and related personal prop6 erty under the control of the Secretary that is lo7 cated on that property, including buildings, struc8 tures, equipment, and all easements and leases relat9 ing to that property; and

10 (3) all water rights relating to that property.

11 (c) REVERSIONARY INTEREST.—If any of the prop12 erty conveyed to the State of Alabama under this section

13 is used for any purpose other than the use authorized

14 under subsection (a), all right, title, and interest in and

15 to all property conveyed under this section shall revert to

16 the United States. The State of Alabama shall ensure that

17 all property reverting to the United States under this sub18 section is in substantially the same or better condition as

19 at the time of transfer to the State.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Thad M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Donald Johnson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03404-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8437 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8437 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NICHD.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the Eunice 
Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, including consideration of personnel qualifications and 
performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NICHD.
    Date: December 5, 2014.
    Closed: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31A, Conference 
Room 2A48, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Constantine A. Stratakis, MD, D(Med)Sci, 
Scientific Director, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Building 31A, Room 2A46, 31 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-5984, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#413235332035202a22012c20282d6f2f28296f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a393e382b3e2b21290a272b232664242322642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://dir.nichd.nih.gov/dirweb/bsc.html, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

 (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: October 24, 2014.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-25766 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Richard M. Galitz,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04419-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/4/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9743 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9743 Filed 01/19/18 Page 2 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Evelyn Nayelly Garcia, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01521-PHX-DLR

DETENTION ORDER 

 On July 27, 2016, Evelyn Nayelly Garcia (the “Defendant”) appeared before this 

Court on a Petition to Revoke Conditions of Release and submitted the issue to the Court. 

The Court considered the information provided to the Court in determining whether the 

Defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(1): 

☐ There is probable cause to believe that the Defendant has committed a 

Federal, State, or local crime while on release. 

☒ There is clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant has 

violated the conditions of release. 

 The Court makes the following findings under 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2): 

☐ Rebuttable Presumption where Probable Cause to Believe Felony 

Committed on Pretrial Release. The Defendant has failed to rebut the 

presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will 

assure that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any 

other person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2) 

Case 2:15-cr-01521-JZB Document 30 Filed 07/28/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

(providing that rebuttable presumption of dangerousness applies if 

there is probable cause to believe that while on release a defendant 

has committed a Federal, State, or local felony). 

☒ Flight Risk. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not flee. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); U.S. 

v. Gotti, 794 F.2d 773, 778 (2nd Cir. 1986) (holding that “findings 

made under section 3148(b) may be established by a preponderance of 

the evidence”). 

☐ Dangerousness. After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 

3142(g), the Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that there 

is no condition or combination of conditions of release that will assure 

that the Defendant will not pose a danger to the safety of any other 

person or the community. See 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b)(2)(A); Gotti, 794 

F.2d at 778. 

☒ Compliance with Conditions. The Court finds by a preponderance of 

the evidence that the Defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition 

or combination of conditions of release. See 18 U.S.C. § 

3148(b)(2)(B); Gotti, 794 F.2d at 778. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 28th day of July, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-cr-01521-JZB Document 30 Filed 07/28/16 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND 
                                  REQUIREMENTS



                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                              March 31,
                                                         1999         1998
                                                   ---------------------------
Net income                                           614,611         745,618
Fixed charges:                                       
Income before fixed charges                          614,611         745,618
Fixed charges, as above
Preferred stock dividend requirements                450,225         450,772
Fixed charges including preferred
  stock dividends                                    450,225         450,772
Ratio of income to fixed charges and
  preferred stock dividend requirements                 1.37            1.65
Case 2:15-cv-02549-NVW Document 95 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-mj-01853-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01853-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01853-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/24/15 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, P. Michael Coleman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Integrity Media, Inc., certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Integrity Media,
Inc.; and

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report.

Date:  April 28, 2004

                            /s/ P. Michael Coleman
              ---------------------------------------------------
                              P. Michael Coleman
                Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Marisa Christina, Incorporated:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-91078 and 33-91080) on Form S-8 of Marisa Christina, Incorporated of our
report dated February 21, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Marisa Christina, Incorporated and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001
and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income
(loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears
in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Marisa Christina,
Incorporated.


\s\ KPMG LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 12, 2003
Exhibit
32.2





PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Annual Report of California Petroleum Transport Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, R Douglas Donaldson, Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.








Date:
March 28,
2008






/s/ R.
Douglas Donaldson


R.
Douglas Donaldson


Treasurer
#### Pumphrey *v.*Coleman.

in actions on instruments not under seal, profert isnever made: but, after the defendant’s appearance in such oases, the Court, if required, will make an order that the writing be produced for the defendant’s inspection; that a copy be furnished him; and that in the mean time all proceedings be stayed.

ERROR to the *Fayette*Circuit Court,

*Caswell,*for the plaintiff

*Test,*for the defendant.

Blackford, J.

Assumpsit on a promissory note. Special demurrer to the declaration because profert is not made of the note. Judgment in the Circuit Court for the plaintiff below, defendant in error. It is contended that, as the statute requires an •affidavit of the plea, before the plaintiff is obliged to prove the execution of the note (1), the defendant should have an opportunity to see the note, and should have a copy if he wishes it, before he is called upon to plead. The Court has no doubt of the correctness of this position; and if the plaintiff were not bound to produce an Instrument of writing on which suit is brought, except in cases where he makés profert, the objection to the declaration in the cause before us should be. sustained. Upon examining the books of practice it will he found, that profert is never made of writings not under seal; hut that after the appearance of the defendant, the Court will make an order on the plaintiff, in all cases when required, that the note or other writing declared on he produced for the inspection of the defendant; 'that a copy be delivered to him; and that all proceedings in the action he in the mean time stayed. 1 Tidd, 532. Our statute, .referred to by the plaintiff in error, requires no change of practice ; but only affords an additional reason for adhering to a well-known mode of proceeding, long since established.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 *per cent*damages and costs.

(1)

*Bates*v. *Hunt,*ante, p. 67, and note 3.