alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.149

                            FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE

THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE dated September 30, 1996, (this "Amendment")
First Amendment to Lease dated October 11, 1999, Second Amendment dated
September 21, 2000 and Third Amendment dated September 19, 2001, is made and
entered into as of the 3rd day of September 2002, by and between JAY ARTEAGA
("Lessor") and OPTIMUMCARE CORPORATION ("Lessee") with reference to the
following items:

         A.       Lessor and Lessee desire to modify and amend the terms of the
                  Lease as set forth in this Amendment, while expressly
                  maintaining in full force and effect all other terms and
                  conditions of the Lease not so modified:

                           1.       This Amendment will extend the Lease for an
                                    additional one year, November 1, 2002
                                    through October 31, 2003 pursuant to Para.
                                    1.5 of our Lease Agreement.

                           2.       The currently monthly base rental will be
                                    adjusted on the anniversary of the
                                    commencement, November 1, 2002, based upon
                                    the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as provided
                                    in Para. 4.3 of the Lease.

                           3.       Pursuant to Para. 1.9 and Para. 5, the
                                    security deposit will remain at $1,100.00.

                           4.       Lessor agrees to shampoo carpet and touch up
                                    paint as needed.

         B.       Except as expressly modified by this amendment, all terms and
                  provisions of the Lease and previous amendments shall remain
                  unmodified and in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have entered into this Amendment as of
         the date written above.

         "LESSOR" JAY ARTEAGA                  "LESSEE" OPTIMUMCARE CORPORATION


         By: /s/ Jay Arteaga              By: /s/ Edward A. Johnson
            ----------------   ------         ---------------------   ------
            Jay Arteaga         Date      Edward A. Johnson, CEO       Date
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-49","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YZ8ZmPeOkv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-49\/\">STS-49<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-49\/embed\/#?secret=YZ8ZmPeOkv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-49” — NASA\" data-secret=\"YZ8ZmPeOkv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/s49-s-269\/s49-s-269~large.jpg?w=600&h=1424&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1424}
#### Shelby, Administratrix, *v.*Marshall, Administrator.

SHELBY agreed with *Craig,*in 1818, for the purchase of certain real estate for 4,000 dollars; paid 1,500 dollars in hand; and gave his obligations for the residue: taking a bond conditioned for the execution of a legal title. At the *4pril*term, 1820, *Craig*obtained judgment on one of these obligations for 1,000 dollars; and, at the same term, he became surety for *Tate*in the replevy on record of a judgment for 150 dollars at the suit of *Huffnagle.*In *November,*1820, *Craig*and his wife executed a conveyance to *Shelby*conformably to the title bond, with covenants of right tq convey and of general warranty* In 1821, the use for seven ye'qrs of the estate thus conveyed, was sold as the property of *Craig*on an execution against him and *Tate,*issued on the replevin record; and afterwards, in an ejectment against *Shelby,*the purchaser at sheriff’s sale recovered possession of the premises.

*Shelby*filed a bill in chancery against *Craig*setting forth these *385facts, suggesting the defendant’s insolvency, and praying that the judgment against the complainant might be perpetually enjoined. The parties having died, the suit was revived in the names of their representatives.

The Court, upon bill, answer, and exhibits, after having ascertained by a writ of inquiry' the damages which the complainant had sustained on account of the incumbrance, decreed a perpetual injunction against the judgment, to the amount of the as; sessment and costs (1).

(1)

 Vide *Smith*v. *M'Campbell,*ante, p. 100.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report, of Zi Corporation (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dale Kearns, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  ****Date: March 31,
2005
    By:
    /s/ *Dale
      Kearns*Dale KearnsChief
      Financial Officer
#### James A. Cook *v.*Bradford F. Cantrill.

Trial — Conflicting Evidence — Preponderance—Second Verdict.

Although, conflicting evidence may, when carefully scrutinized, preponderate against it, a second verdict will not he set aside on that account.

APPEAL EROiM CALDWELL CIROUIT COUET.

January 11, 1871.

OPINION OE THE 0OUET BY

JuDGKE B.OBERTSON :

Even though the intrinsic probabilities, deducible from the conflicting evidence, may, when carefully scrutinized, preponderate against the verdict, yet there is some strong testimon.} to sustain it.

*180Marble, *for appellant.*

Hewlett, *for appellee.*

In such a case, whatevei we might have done as jurors, we cannot consistently or safely set aside tbe second verdict for the appellee by a jury acquainted with tbe parties and tbe witnesses.

Wherefore tbe judgment is *affirmed.*
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 676

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit the penalty for

late enrollment under the Medicare program to 10 percent and twice

the period of no enrollment.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1997

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr.

FILNER, Mr. DELLUMS, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr. EVANS, Mr. WATT of

North Carolina, Mr. BORSKI, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr. OLVER,

and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to

the Committee on Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways

and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker,

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to limit

the penalty for late enrollment under the Medicare program to 10 percent and twice the period of no enrollment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 676 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITING MEDICARE LATE ENROLLMENT PEN2 ALTY TO 10 PERCENT AND TWICE THE PE3 RIOD OF NO ENROLLMENT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

5 1839(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395r(b))

6 is amended by striking ‘‘10 percent of the monthly pre7 mium so determined for each full 12 months’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘10 percent of the monthly premium so determined

9 for premiums paid during a period equal to twice the num10 ber of months in each of the full periods of 12 months’’.

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section

12 1818(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–2(c)) is amended—

13 (A) by striking paragraph (6); and

14 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through

15 (9) as paragraphs (6) through (8), respectively.

16 (2) Section 1818(g)(2)(B) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

17 1395i–2(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘by substitut18 ing’’ and all that follows and inserting the following: ‘‘by

19 substituting ‘section 1818 (without any increase resulting

20 from the application of section 1839(b) to such section)’

21 for ‘section 1839 (without any increase under subsection

22 (b) thereof)’.’’.

23 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—(1) The amendments made

24 by this section shall apply to premiums paid for months

25 beginning after the end of the 90-day period beginning

26 on the date of the enactment of this Act.
3

•HR 676 IH

1 (2) In applying these amendments, months (before,

2 during, or after the month in which this Act is enacted)

3 in which an individual was or is required to pay an in4 creased premium shall be taken into account in determin5 ing the month in which the premium will no longer be sub6 ject to an increase.

Æ
1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation 

No. 2:15-MD-02641-DGC

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc.’s and Bard Peripheral Vascular, 

Inc.’s (collectively, “Bard”) Motion and Incorporated Memorandum to Seal Documents 

Lodged Under Seal by Plaintiffs in Support of Plaintiffs’ Omnibus Separate Statement of 

Facts in Support of Their Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in the 

Bellwether Cases and for other good cause shown, Bard’s Motion to Seal for the documents 

filed redacted in Dkt. ___, and the redactions to Plaintiffs’ Responses are hereby sealed. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8444-1 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
V

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4784

For the relief of Marin Turcinovic, and his fiancee, Corina Dechalup.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Mr. YATES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Marin Turcinovic, and his fiancee, Corina

Dechalup.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Marin Turcinovic and his fiancee, Corina

7 Dechalup, shall be held and considered to have been law8 fully admitted to the United States for permanent resi9 dence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon

10 payment of the required visa fees.
2

HR 4784 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Marin

3 Turcinovic and his finance, Corina Dechalup, as provided

4 in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper

5 officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the

6 current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas

7 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

8 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

9 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

Æ
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 850

To amend certain provisions of law concerning communications between

Government agencies and the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 26, 1997

Mr. RANGEL (for himself and Mr. GILMAN) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend certain provisions of law concerning communications between Government agencies and the Immigration

and Naturalization Service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS BE4 TWEEN GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THE

5 IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERV6 ICE.

7 (a) PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND WORK OPPOR8 TUNITY RECONCILIATION ACT OF 1996.—Section 434 of

9 the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Rec10 onciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1644) is repealed.
2

•HR 850 IH

1 (b) ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION REFORM AND IMMIGRANT

2 RESPONSIBILITY ACT OF 1996.—Section 642 of the Ille3 gal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility

4 Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–208) is amended—

5 (1) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and in6 serting the following new subsection:

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro8 vision of law, a Federal, State, or local government entity

9 or official may not prohibit any government entity or offi10 cial from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration

11 and Naturalization Service any information regarding the

12 immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual

13 who has been convicted of a crime under Federal, State,

14 or local law.’’; and

15 (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub16 section (b).

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Brian Dunbar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/brian-dunbarnasa-gov\/","title":"Image of the Day","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AF6qTxW1Ak\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-of-the-day\/\">Image of the Day<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-of-the-day\/embed\/#?secret=AF6qTxW1Ak\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Image of the Day” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AF6qTxW1Ak\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT EUGENE FALASCO, Petitioner

v. WILBERT F. O'DELL, III AND SUZANNE R. O'DELL, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 126 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 23rd day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"New Look at NASA, Boeing Sustainable Experimental Airliner\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rRP3T7PwkV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/new-look-at-nasa-boeing-sustainable-experimental-airliner\/\">New Look at NASA, Boeing Sustainable Experimental Airliner\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/new-look-at-nasa-boeing-sustainable-experimental-airliner\/embed\/#?secret=rRP3T7PwkV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Look at NASA, Boeing Sustainable Experimental Airliner\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"rRP3T7PwkV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/x-66-yr0jv9-boe-x66-image10-01a-post.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":327}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes: Meeting 
Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will convene a 
teleconference meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of 
Isotopes (ACMUI) on December 10, 2014, to discuss the Committee's 
comments on NRC's Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Title 10 
of the Code of Federal Regulations for Part 20. Meeting information, 
including a copy of the agenda and handouts, will be available at 
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acmui/meetings/2014.html. 
The agenda and handouts may also be obtained by contacting Ms. Sophie 
Holiday using the information below.

DATE:  The teleconference meeting will be held on Wednesday, December 
10, 2014, 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).
    Public Participation: Any member of the public who wishes to 
participate in the teleconference should contact Ms. Holiday using the 
contact information below.
    Contact Information: Sophie Holiday, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbb8a4bba3a2aee5a3a4a7a2afaab28ba5b9a8e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c0f130c1415195214131015181d053c120e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>, 
telephone: (301) 415-7865.

Conduct of the Meeting

    Dr. Bruce Thomadsen, ACMUI Chairman, will preside over the meeting. 
Dr. Thomadsen will conduct the meeting in a manner that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. The following procedures apply to 
public participation in the meeting:
    1. Persons who wish to provide a written statement should submit an 
electronic copy to Ms. Holiday at the contact information listed above. 
All submittals must be received by December 05, 2014, three business 
days prior to the meeting, and must pertain to the topic on the agenda 
for the meeting.
    2. Questions and comments from members of the public will be 
permitted during the meetings, at the discretion of the Chairman.
    3. The draft transcript and meeting summary will be available on 
ACMUI's Web site http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acmui/meetings/2014.html on or about January 23, 2015.
    This meeting will be held in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act 
of 1954, as amended (primarily Section 161a); the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App); and the Commission's regulations in Title 
10, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 7.

    Dated: October 24, 2014
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-25854 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Leslie Belsanti, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., an 

Ohio corporation, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No. CV16-8001-PCT DGC 

 

ORDER 

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Experian Information 

Solutions, Inc. with Prejudice. Doc. 81. 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation (Doc. 81) is granted. Defendant Experian 

only is dismissed from this action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees 

and costs. 

Dated this 12th day of September, 2016. 

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 82 Filed 09/12/16 Page 1 of 1