alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Meylin *v.*Woodford.

To an action of assumpsit, the defendant pleaded two pleas in bar. The plaintiff having joined issue on one and demurred to the other, the issue in law was first tried and found in his favour. *Held,*that tihe plaintiff was entitled to the costs of that issue; but that he could not have final judgment, until he had also recovered on the issue in fact.

ERROR to the *Harrison*Circuit Court. — In this case Wood* *j.Qrg*wag piajntjff below, and *Meylin*the defendant.

*287*Moore*and Payne, for the plaintiff.

Kidder, for the defendant.

Blackford, J.

Assumpsit. Pleas, non-assumpsit and payment. Issue on the first plea, and a demurrer to the second. Upon a trial of the issue in law, final judgment was rendered for the plaintiff without any regard to the issue in fact.

Thisjudgmentmust.be reversed. The special plea being bad, the plaintiff had a right to have his demurrer sustained, and was entitled to the costs of the issue in law; yet his success on that issue did not of itself entitle him to a recovery on the merits. There was another issue to be tried, and the rendition of this final judgment, before that issue was disposed of, is erroneous (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the joinder in demurrer are set aside, with costs* Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 Had the judgment on the demurrer been for the defendant below — the plea demurred to being an answer to the whole action — the plaintiff could Slot have had judgment on the issue in fact, though it had been found in his favour. In such a case, the only judgment that can be entered is, *nil supiat per breve. 2*Arch, Pr. 11.
#### Wilson and Others *v.*Lilly, Auditor.

Suit by the auditor of public accounts, against a collector of taxes and his sureties, by notice and motion: *Held,*that the notice, in such case, should contain a description of the defendants’ bond.

ERROR to the *Fayette*Circuit Court.

*Lane*and *]\'P Kinney,*for the plaintiffs.

*Smith,*for the defendant.

Holman, J.

Judgment on motion in favour of *Lilly,*auditor of public accounts, against *Wilson,*sheriff and collector of *Fayette*county, and *Crisler, Vincent,*and *Conner,*his sureties. The notice is defective. It does not set forth nor even refer to the bond by which alone the sureties could become liable. The case therefore comes directly within the principle established in the cases of *Dawson*v. *Shaver et al.*and *Lemon et al.*v. *Hay, Nov.*term, 1822; which were both reversed, because the notices did not set forth nor describe the bonds, by which alone the sureties could be charged (1). The act o.f assembly under which this motion was made, is not, in this particular, materially variant from the acts by which those cases were regulated. The decision must therefore be the same.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs.

(1)

 Ante, pp. 204, 227. *Wilson*himself was liable independently of the bond. The common law remedy in assumpsit, for money had and received, would have lain against him alone. *The Board of Commissioners of Gibson County*v. Harrington, ante, p. 260.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the filing of the financial statements of Chindex
International, Inc. (Registrant) for the fiscal year
ended December
31, 2002 (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Registrant. /s/ Roberta Lipson
Roberta Lipson
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Chindex International, Inc. and will be retained by Chindex
International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

4730952.1 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Christine King, on behalf of herself and all 

others similarly situated, 

Plaintiff,

v. 

Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, 

Inc. dba FBCS, Inc.; and Midland Credit 

Management, Inc.; and Midland Funding, 

LLC, 

Defendants.

NO. 4:15-cv-00582-JAS

Order Re: Stipulation to Extend 

Date for Defendant Financial 

Business and Consumer Solutions, 

Inc. dba FBCS, Inc. to Respond to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint 

(First Request) 

Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulations (Docs. 8 and 9) to Extend Date for 

Defendant Financial Business and Consumer Solutions’ Response to Plaintiff’s 

Complaint; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED extending the deadline for Defendant Financial 

Business and Consumer Solutions to file its answer and and/or responsive pleading to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint to March 2, 2016. 

 Dated this 4th day of February, 2016. 

Honorable James A. Soto 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:15-cv-00582-JAS Document 11 Filed 02/04/16 Page 1 of 1
August 24, 1999



R. G. Neiderhoffer Capital
 Management Inc.
145 West 57th Street - 10th Floor
New York, New York 10019

Attention:  Mr. Roy Neiderhoffer

Re:      Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
         Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P.

Dear Roy:

         Please liquidate all of your positions for the above mentioned funds in
an orderly fashion by the close of business Friday, August 27, 1999.

         If you have any questions, please call me at 212-723-5418.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT




Daniel A. Dantuono
Chief Financial Officer & Director



DAD/sr
DISMISS and Opinion Filed January 24, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01022-CV 

CAE SIMUFLITE, INC. AND AMERICAN FLYERS, INC., Appellants 

V. 

VICTOR MAURICIO AGUILAR TALAVERA, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF 

THE ESTATE OF JUAN JOSE AGUILAR TALAVERA, 

DECEASED, MICHELLE DENISSE AGUILAR GONZALEZ, HEITRIAN 

NAXYELI AGUILAR GONZALEZ, ZIANYA NATALIA MARISA 

AGUILAR GONZALEZ, PABLO GONZALEZ GONZALEZ, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LUIS 

OVIDIO GONZALEZ FLORES, DECEASED, LORENA GUADALUPE 

FLORES BARRON, AND INGRID YANEL ALONSO MORALES, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.M.G.A., A MINOR, 

Appellees 

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-05624 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Goldstein 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

Seeking to appeal the trial court’s interlocutory order denying their respective 

motions to dismiss appellees’ claims against them under Texas Rule of Civil 

Procedure 91a, appellants have filed a petition for permissive appeal. We deny the 
 –2– 

petition and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.CIV. PRAC. & REM.

CODE ANN. § 51.014(f); TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3, 42.3(a). 

211022F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CAE SIMUFLITE, INC. AND 

AMERICAN FLYERS, INC., 

Appellants 

No. 05-21-01022-CV V. 

VICTOR MAURICIO AGUILAR 

TALAVERA, AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF JUAN JOSE 

AGUILAR TALAVERA, 

DECEASED, MICHELLE DENISSE 

AGUILAR GONZALEZ, 

HEITRIAN NAXYELI AGUILAR 

GONZALEZ, ZIANYA NATALIA 

MARISA AGUILAR GONZALEZ, 

PABLO GONZALEZ GONZALEZ, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF LUIS OVIDIO 

GONZALEZ FLORES, 

DECEASED, LORENA 

GUADALUPE FLORES BARRON, 

AND INGRID YANEL ALONSO 

MORALES, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

 On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-05624. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and 

Goldstein participating. 
 –4– 

AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.M.G.A., A 

MINOR, Appellees 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

It is ORDERED that appellees VICTOR MAURICIO AGUILAR 

TALAVERA, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JUAN JOSE 

AGUILAR TALAVERA, DECEASED, MICHELLE DENISSE AGUILAR 

GONZALEZ, HEITRIAN NAXYELI AGUILAR GONZALEZ, ZIANYA 

NATALIA MARISA AGUILAR GONZALEZ, PABLO GONZALEZ 

GONZALEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE 

OF LUIS OVIDIO GONZALEZ FLORES, DECEASED, LORENA GUADALUPE 

FLORES BARRON, AND INGRID YANEL ALONSO MORALES, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.M.G.A., A MINOR recover their 

costs of this appeal from appellants CAE SIMUFLITE, INC. AND AMERICAN 

FLYERS, INC. 

Judgment entered January 24, 2022
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, KENNETH GALPIN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|  
 
 
 
Date: December 20, 2006
 
/s/ Kenneth Galpin
 
 
Kenneth Galpin		President and Chief Executive Officer  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Project Gemini: Apollo’s Training Ground","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ebl1qufHKq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/project-gemini-apollos-training-ground\/\">Project Gemini: Apollo’s Training Ground<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/project-gemini-apollos-training-ground\/embed\/#?secret=ebl1qufHKq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Project Gemini: Apollo’s Training Ground” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ebl1qufHKq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/279524main_gemini_test_lg.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


HBC Broadcasting Texas, L.P.
HBC Florida, LLC
HBC GP Texas, Inc.
HBC Houston License Corporation
HBC Illinois, Inc.
HBC Investments, Inc.
HBC License Corporation
HBC Los Angeles, Inc.
HBC Management Company, Inc.
HBC Network, Inc.
HBC New York, Inc.
HBC Phoenix, Inc.
HBC San Diego, Inc.
HBC Tower Company, Inc.
HBCi, LLC
HBC-Las Vegas, Inc.
KCYT-FM License Corp.
KECS-FM License Corp.
KESS-AM License Corp.
KESS-TV License Corp.
KHCK-FM License Corp.
KICI-AM License Corp.
KICI-FM License Corp.
KLSQ-AM License Corp.
KLVE-FM License Corp.
KMRT-AM License Corp.
KTNQ-AM License Corp.
La Oferta, Inc.
License Corp. No 1
License Corp. No. 2
Mi Casa Publications, Inc.
Momentum Research, Inc.
Spanish Coast to Coast, Ltd.
T C Television, Inc.
Tichenor License Corporation
TMS Assets California, Inc.
TMS License California, Inc.
WADO Radio, Inc.
WADO-AM License Corp.
WLXX-AM License Corp.
WPAT-AM License Corp.
WQBA-AM License Corp.
WQBA-FM License Corp.
Case 2:15-mj-01719-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01719-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01719-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/02/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Moon Microscope, Solar Arrays Launch on NASA\u2019s SpaceX Cargo Ship","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"APLjtEQOKJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/moon-microscope-solar-arrays-launch-on-nasas-spacex-cargo-ship\/\">Moon Microscope, Solar Arrays Launch on NASA\u2019s SpaceX Cargo Ship<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/moon-microscope-solar-arrays-launch-on-nasas-spacex-cargo-ship\/embed\/#?secret=APLjtEQOKJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Moon Microscope, Solar Arrays Launch on NASA\u2019s SpaceX Cargo Ship” — NASA\" data-secret=\"APLjtEQOKJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/ksc-20221126-ph-kls01_0038_orig.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
#### Malaby *v.*Hinkston.

In error.

Saturday, *December 5.*

THE Circuit Court overruled the appellee’s motion to dismiss an appeal. The motion was founded on the affidavit of a third person of his belief that the appeal-bond was not executed within the time required by the statute. The record and bond showed on their face that the bond was executed and filed in time. *Held,*that the motion was correctly overruled.

The plaintiff, in the case of an appeal from the judgment of a justice in his favour, was a non-resident when the cause was called in the Circuit Court. *Held,*that he might be required to give security for costs, though he was a resident when he commenced the suit, when the judgment was rendered, and when the appeal was taken.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Garrett Jason Deetz,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR -98-384-01-PHX-SMM

DETENTION ORDER

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The Court considered the Petition and file in determining whether defendant

should be released on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

will not flee pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142(b) or (c). Further, that there is no condition or

combination of conditions that will reasonably assure the appearance of defendant as

required.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings. 18 U.S.C. §3142(e); Rules 32.1(a)(1) and 46(c), Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure.

DATED this 19th day of October, 2006.

Case 2:98-cr-00384-SMM Document 210 Filed 10/19/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 5, 2009



/s/ James C. SmithJames C. SmithPresident(Principal Executive Officer)


Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification
is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.