alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            OF INTEGRITY MEDIA, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Integrity Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald
S. Ellington, Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                   /s/ Donald S. Ellington
------------------------------------------------------------
   Donald S. Ellington
   Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration
   (Chief Financial Officer)




Date: March 25, 2003


                                       61
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                           3,629
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                       260
<INVENTORY>                                     34,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,055
<PP&E>                                          85,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 291,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,458
<BONDS>                                        277,324
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (83,611)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   291,033
<SALES>                                         81,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,200
<CGS>                                           43,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (181)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,722
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,722
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN-DEPTH GEOPHYSICAL, INC., IN-DEPTH 

COMPRESSIVE SEISMIC, INC.,

Appellants

v.

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY,

Cross-Appellant

______________________ 

2021-1013, 2021-1063

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2019-

00850.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

WILLIAM POWELL JENSEN, Crain Caton & James, Houston, TX, argued for appellants. Also represented by JAMES 

ELMORE HUDSON, III. 

 WILLIAM R. PETERSON, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, 

Houston, TX, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented 

by ARCHIS VASANT OZARKAR; DION MICHAEL BREGMAN,

THOMAS Y. NOLAN, ALEXANDER STEIN, Palo Alto, CA. 

 ______________________ 

Case: 21-1013 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 10/08/2021
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

October 8, 2021

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-1013 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 10/08/2021
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Astronaut Nicole Mann Prepares for Spacewalk","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"o5hWm57wNX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/astronaut-nicole-mann-prepares-for-spacewalk\/\">Astronaut Nicole Mann Prepares for Spacewalk<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/astronaut-nicole-mann-prepares-for-spacewalk\/embed\/#?secret=o5hWm57wNX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronaut Nicole Mann Prepares for Spacewalk” — NASA\" data-secret=\"o5hWm57wNX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/iss068e040060orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lance Cain,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00446-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 19, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 854 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Michael S. Lipscomb, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argo-Tech Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: June 9, 2005 By:
    
    /s/
    
    Michael S. LipscombMichael S. LipscombChairman, President and CEO
 21
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT I, Michael S. Lipscomb, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argo-Tech
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 28, 2004 By: /s/
    
    Michael S. LipscombMichael S. LipscombChairman, President and CEO
 20
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeffrey A Krassow, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

State of Arizona, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-16-00054-TUC-JGZ

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United 

States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Rateau that recommends denying Petitioner’s Petition 

for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 21.) 

 A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the 

Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the 

Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 

 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Rateau’s 

recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley 

v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 

 Before Petitioner can appeal this Court's judgment, a certificate of appealability 

must issue. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c) and Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)(1). Federal Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 22(b) requires the district court that rendered a judgment denying 

the petition made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 to "either issue a certificate of 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

appealability or state why a certificate should not issue." Additionally, 28 U.S.C. 

§2253(c)(2) provides that a certificate may issue "only if the applicant has made a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." In the certificate, the court 

must indicate which specific issues satisfy this showing. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(3). A 

substantial showing is made when the resolution of an issue of appeal is debatable among 

reasonable jurists, if courts could resolve the issues differently, or if the issue deserves 

further proceedings. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). Upon review 

of the record in light of the standards for granting a certificate of appealability, the Court 

concludes that a certificate shall not issue as the resolution of the petition is not debatable 

among reasonable jurists and does not deserve further proceedings. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 

1. Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is accepted and 

adopted; 

2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED; 

3. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment 

accordingly. 

 Dated this 25th day of April, 2017. 

Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps

United States District Judge
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jeffery Rubio","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jeffery-j-rubionasa-gov\/","title":"Engineer Tests MSolo Instrument for VIPER","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QzEsXyXplN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/clps\/engineer-tests-msolo-instrument-for-viper\/\">Engineer Tests MSolo Instrument for VIPER<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/clps\/engineer-tests-msolo-instrument-for-viper\/embed\/#?secret=QzEsXyXplN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Engineer Tests MSolo Instrument for VIPER” — NASA\" data-secret=\"QzEsXyXplN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/ksc-20220214-ph-kls01_0039.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135667 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135667 

 COA: 277635 

Ottawa CC: 04-027885-FH 

ROBERT JOSEPH FEWLESS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001



Willowbridge Associates Inc.
101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180
Plainsboro, N.J. 08536

Attention:  Ms. Bonnie Huff / Ms. Janet Boyer

     Re: Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Ms. Huff and Ms. Boyer:

     We are writing with respect to your  management  agreements  concerning the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

o        Smith Barney Principal Plus Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
o        Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II
o        Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures Fund L.P.

     Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC


By:       /s/    Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         -----------------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.

By:        /s/ Ms. Bonnie Huff
         ------------------------------------

Print Name:    Ms. Bonnie Huff
             --------------------------------
                Chief Financial Officer

DRMcA/sr
EXHIBIT 10.47
 
 Home Properties, L.P.
 Amendment No. One Hundred Three to
 Second Amended and Restated
 Agreement of Limited Partnership
 
 
 
 The
Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Home Properties,
L.P. (the “Partnership Agreement”) is hereby amended effective November 12, 2009
to substitute the “Schedule A” attached hereto for the “Schedule A” currently
attached to the Partnership Agreement.  “Schedule A” is hereby amended
to reflect various changes.
 
 GENERAL
PARTNER
 Home
Properties, Inc.
 
  /s/ Ann M. McCormick
 Ann M.
McCormick
 Secretary
 
 
 LIMITED
PARTNERS LISTED ON ATTACHED SCHEDULE A
 By: Home
Properties, Inc.
 as
attorney-in-fact
 
 
 /s/ Ann M. McCormick
 Ann M.
McCormick
 Secretary