alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001047166
<NAME> United Rentals (North America), Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          31,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  609,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                    59,745
<INVENTORY>                                    142,078
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,772,668
<DEPRECIATION>                                 610,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,204,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,801,333
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,830,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,204,413
<SALES>                                      2,167,941
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,167,941
<CGS>                                          443,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,349,455
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (796)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                29,915
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                259,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                   107,722
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            151,731
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   151,731
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"HyspIRI Earth Ecosystem Research Campaign","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VkN74JEFsB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/hyspiri-earth-ecosystem-research-campaign\/\">HyspIRI Earth Ecosystem Research Campaign<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/hyspiri-earth-ecosystem-research-campaign\/embed\/#?secret=VkN74JEFsB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“HyspIRI Earth Ecosystem Research Campaign” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VkN74JEFsB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/14-642_mcl_cir.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
#### Andrew Owens et al. *v.*John Bartley.

Non-Resident — Summons—Constructive Service — Bond—Judgment.

It is erroneous to render judgment against a non-resident, defendant, constructively summoned, until the plaintiff has executed the bond required by section 441, Civil Code.

Same — Appeal—Appearance.

An absent defendant enters his appearance to the suit by an appeal from a judgment rendered against him.

APPEAL EROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT.

April 17, 1871.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters:

Under *sub-section 2, section of Givil Gode,*it was erroneous to render judgment for appellee against the absent defendant, Owens, until he had executed a bond with sufficient surety conditioned that he would restore to appellant the property taken by the judgment in the action, provided he appeared within the time prescribed by law, and a restoration of the same should be adjudged. This requisition of the Code seems not to have been complied with, and for that reason the judgment was erroneous. The petition we regard as sufficient. The averments are not as *266direct, and positive as they might be, but if they be true the debt was due and unpaid. But as the absent defendant prosecuting this appeal, has entered his appearance, that will dispense with the bond.

*Radliffe, for appellant.*

But for the error indicated the judgment 'must be reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
American Homestar Corporation:



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (No. 333-2037) on Form S-8 of American Homestar Corporation of our
report dated June 24, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
American Homestar Corporation and subsidiaries as of May 31, 1997 and 1998, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 1998, and the
related schedule, which report appears in the May 31, 1998 annual report on Form
10-K of American Homestar Corporation.




                                                 /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP





Houston, Texas
August 28, 1998
#### Ambrose Morrison *v.*The Commonwealth.

Criminal Law.

Where the facts and evidence shows, an accused was guilty of an unwarranted attack upon the deceased, who was acting in a role of defense, a verdict will not he disturbed.

Instructions.

A hypothetical instruction, assuming self-defense without any exculpatory evidence is not sufficient grounds for a new trial.

APPEAL FROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 23, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The facts proved on the trial of the indictment in this case conduce strongly to the following conclusions: 1st, that the appellant, with express notice, sought, without any apparent provocation, to commit violence on the person of Jackson, and not improbably, to take his life on the day of the homicide and at different times before he shot him. 2nd, that he pursued, with his loaded rifle, Jackson’s friend Duncan for no other reason than the fact that Duncan said that he was Jackson’s friend, declaring his neutrality at the same time. 3rd, that Jackson then, with an empty shot-gun picked up near the door, left the grocery to cross the street and go to his mother’s house holding the gun in such a way as to show that he intended to use it’s but and for defense if necessary. 4th, that the appellant, being eluded by Duncan, turned back and interrupted Jackson on his way to his mother’s and near the door walking backwards between him and the house, and confronting him as he continued to walk on to the house with the musket clubbed evidently for defense and not attack, he fired on and killled Jackson.

From these facts it is obvious that the appellant was pursuing Jackson, who was trying to avoid him then and before, and that the appellant himself, by his own misconduct, occasioned all the *135difficulty and shot Jackson without any plausible pretense of excuse.

*A. H. Ward,*Trimble, *for appellant.*

*Atto.*Gen'l, *for appellee.*

Then the 5th instruction, now complained of, as ground for a new trial hypothetically assuming self-defense without any exculpatory evidence, was more favorable to the accused than it ought to have been, and there being no pretense of self-defense, the jury could not have been mislead to the appellant’s prejudice. And the appellant has no cause to be dissatisfied with the verdict.

Wherefore there being no error in refusing a new trial, the judgment of conviction is *affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 651 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 651

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for the construction 
of a hydroelectric project located in the State of Washington, and for 
                            other purposes.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 651

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for the construction 
of a hydroelectric project located in the State of Washington, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 8864, the Commission shall, upon the request of the project 
licensee, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures 
under that section, extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence construction of the project for not more than 3 
consecutive 2-year periods.
    (b) Applicability.--An extension under subsection (a) shall take 
effect for a project upon the expiration of the extension, issued by 
the Commission under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
806), of the period required for commencement of construction of the 
project.
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the license for the 
project referred to in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license 
effective as of the date of its expiration and extend the time required 
for commencement of construction of the project as provided in 
subsection (a) for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods, the 
first of which shall commence on the date of such expiration.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
DAVID KING DIXON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5439

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 15, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Virginia Norton, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Case 2:15-mj-01945-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01945-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01945-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/23/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"SLS Infographic","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HwO7vQ2TgI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/sls-infographic-3\/\">SLS Infographic<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/sls-infographic-3\/embed\/#?secret=HwO7vQ2TgI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“SLS Infographic” — NASA\" data-secret=\"HwO7vQ2TgI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/sls-4215-sls-artemis-i-infographic.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":776}
In the Senate of the United States,

October 30, 1997.

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 672) entitled ‘‘An Act to make technical amendments to certain provisions of title 17, United States Code.’’,

do pass with the following

AMENDMENTS:

1 Ω1æPage 15, after line 8, insert:

2 SEC. 11. DISTRIBUTION OF PHONORECORDS.

3 Section 303 of title 17, United States Code, is amend4 ed—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘Copyright’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)

6 Copyright’’; and

7 (2) by inserting at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(b) The distribution before January 1, 1978, of a pho9 norecord shall not for any purpose constitute a publication

10 of the musical work embodied therein.’’.

11 Ω2æPage 15, line 9, strike out ø11¿ and insert: 12
2

HR 672 EAS

1 Ω3æPage 20, line 7, strike out ø12¿ and insert: 13

2 Ω4æPage 20, line 16, strike out ø11(b)(1)¿ and insert:

3 12(b)(1)

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 672

AMENDMENTS
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                   SUMMARY OF OTHER COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS

       The Company provides Company-paid financial counseling for key
executives, including through the end of the year in which the executive
retires. Such services include executive compensation planning, investment
planning, income tax planning and return preparation, and cash flow and debt
management. The Company provides a tax gross-up payment equal to 47 percent of
the cost of the services provided.

       Certain key executive officers have the use of company automobiles. The
Company provides club memberships for certain management employees.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Michael G. Liddicoat and Sally L. 

Liddicoat, husband and wife, 

 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint 

Mortgage Servicing, LLC 

 

 Defendants. 

No: 2:15-cv-02262-SRB 

ORDER 

The Court having received and considered the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, the 

Court being fully advised and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion be Granted and New Penn Financial, 

LLC dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, LLC be dismissed with prejudice and each party 

to bear its own costs and attorney fees. 

 Dated this 19th day of September, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02262-SRB Document 84 Filed 09/19/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,917
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,586)
<INVENTORY>                                     42,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,044
<PP&E>                                         106,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,382)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 809,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,072
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   809,196
<SALES>                                        240,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,914
<CGS>                                           75,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (83)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,062
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,667
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (705)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,962
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64


</TABLE>
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4829

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transcenter, and for other purposes. the United States for the construction of a visitor sevelt National Historic Site to the Archivist of the boundaries of the Home of Franklin D. Roo- fer administrative jurisdiction over land within
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4829

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative jurisdiction over land within the boundaries of

the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic

Site to the Archivist of the United States for the construction of a visitor center, and for other purposes.
2

•HR 4829 EH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VISITOR CENTER FOR HOME OF FRANKLIN D.

4 ROOSEVELT NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE.

5 (a) TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDIC6 TION.—The Secretary of the Interior may transfer to the

7 Archivist of the United States administrative jurisdiction

8 over land located in the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt

9 National Historic Site, for use by the Archivist for the

10 construction of a visitor center facility to jointly serve the

11 Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site and

12 the Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library, located in

13 Hyde Park, New York.

14 (b) CONDITIONS OF TRANSFER.—

15 (1) PROTECTION OF THE SITE.—The transfer

16 authorized in subsection (a) shall be subject to an

17 agreement between the Secretary and the Archivist

18 that shall include such provisions for the protection

19 of the Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National His20 toric Site and the joint use of the facility to be con21 structed as the Secretary and the Archivist may con22 sider necessary.

23 (2) CONSIDERATION.—A transfer made pursu24 ant to subsection (a) shall be made without consider25 ation or reimbursement.
3

•HR 4829 EH

1 (3) TERMINATION.—If use by the Archivist of

2 the land referred to in subsection (a) is terminated

3 by the Archivist at any time, administrative jurisdic4 tion over the land shall automatically revert to the

5 Department of the Interior.

6 (c) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in

7 subsection (a) shall consist of not more than 1 acre of

8 land as may be mutually agreed to by the Secretary and

9 the Archivist and more particularly described in the agree10 ment required under subsection (b)(1).

Passed the House of Representatives October 15,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Willie Moon, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03995-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8832 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS**

 

Geerlings & Wade, Inc. 

Canton, Massachusetts 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-85557, No. 333-36741, No. 333-45311 and No.333-65907) of Geerlings & Wade, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2003, except Note 4, which is as of February 24, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 26, 2003