alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Hyung S. Choi, State Bar 015669

Veronika Fabian, State Bar 018770

CHOI & FABIAN, PLC

90 S. Kyrene Rd., Suite #5

Chandler, Arizona 85226

tel: (480) 517-1400

fax: (480) 517-6955

Flagstaff: (928) 779-2226

hyung@choiandfabian.com

veronika@choianfabian.com

 Attorneys for Plaintiff Christina Cohen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Christina Cohen f/k/a Christina

Gatewood,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Navient Solutions, Inc, et al., 

Defendants.

NO. 4:15-cv-00608-DCB

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 

AND

REQUEST TO VACATE

DEADLINES

Plaintiff, through counsel, hereby notifies the Court that Plaintiff and Defendant

Navient Solutions, Inc., ( “NSI”) have settled this matter regarding Plaintiff’s claims

against Defendant NSI. Plaintiff requests the Court to vacate all deadlines in this matter. 

The parties expect to complete the final settlement paperwork within the next thirty

days and file a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice. 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 4:15-cv-00608-DCB Document 58 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

DATED October 5, 2016.

CHOI & FABIAN, PLC

/s/ Hyung S. Choi 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 5, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached

documents to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of

a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Justin Balser

Ashley Calhoun

Akerman LLP

1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 500

 Denver, CO 80202

ashley.calhoun@akerman.com

Attorneys for Navient

/s/ Seunghui Choe 

Case 4:15-cv-00608-DCB Document 58 Filed 10/05/16 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0xVXme4Zog\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/low-earth-orbit-flight-test-of-an-inflatable-decelerator-loftid\/\">Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/low-earth-orbit-flight-test-of-an-inflatable-decelerator-loftid\/embed\/#?secret=0xVXme4Zog\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0xVXme4Zog\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/loftid-reentry-vehicle-recovered-on-ship-deck-after-demo-on-nov-10-2022.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":448}
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.8

                                   RENEWAL OF
                          EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

               William J. Reuter, Chairman, President and CEO, AND


                          SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.

     As of Wednesday, January 15, 2003, the employment of William J. Reuter is
hereby deemed to be renewed for three (3) years under the terms and conditions
per the Employment Agreement dated March 12, 2001 (but effective as of February
28, 2001), as amended.

     The base salary as per Section 4.1 will be $420,000 per year.

                                        SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.
Attest:



/s/ Lisa M. Cavage                      By: /s/ Edward Balderston, Jr.
------------------                          --------------------------
Secretary                               Edward Balderston, Jr.
Lisa M. Cavage                          SVP & Group Executive


[SEAL]

<PAGE>

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     The Employment Agreement effective as of February 28, 2001, and amended by
the First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated January 18, 2002, by and
between SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation organized as a
financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
(the "Company"), and WILLIAM J. REUTER, an adult individual whose principal
residence is at 6 Apple Hill Drive, Lititz, Pennsylvania 17543 (the "Employee"),
is hereby amended as follows:

     1. Subparagraph 10.5(b) is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     "(b) all other employee benefits to which the Employee would have been
entitled under paragraph 7 hereof if he had remained in the employ of the
Company for the remainder of the Period of Employment. However, to the extent
that such employee benefits are provided by insurance companies and other
vendors not affiliated with the Company, the obligation of the Company to
provide such employee benefits shall not exceed that to which the Employee would
be entitled under the contracts in force between the Company and such vendors at
the time of the event of termination under this subparagraph 10.5."

     As so amended, said Employment Agreement is hereby confirmed, with the
intent to be legally bound, this 22nd day of January, 2003.

                                         SUSQUEHANNA BANCSHARES, INC.


Attest: /s/ Lisa M. Cavage               By: /s/ Gregory A. Duncan
        ------------------                   ---------------------
Secretary                                Name: Gregory A. Duncan
                                         Title: Executive Vice President and COO

                                         EMPLOYEE

Witness:



/s/ Edward Balderston, Jr.               /s/ William J. Reuter
--------------------------               ---------------------
Name:  Edward Balderston, Jr.            William J. Reuter
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 786 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 786

 To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to restore the effectiveness 
    of certain provisions regulating Federal milk marketing orders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

   Mr. Norwood (for himself, Mr. Ballenger, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. 
    Bishop, Mr. Boyd, Mr. Bunning, Mr. Burr of North Carolina, Mr. 
  Callahan, Mr. Clyburn, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Collins, Mr. Cooksey, Mr. 
 Deal of Georgia, Mr. Everett, Mr. Foley, Mr. Graham, Mr. Hefner, Mr. 
   Kingston, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Linder, Mr. Livingston, Mr. 
   McCrery, Mr. Pickering, Mr. Spence, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Tauzin, Mr. 
Wicker, and Mr. John) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                    to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to restore the effectiveness 
    of certain provisions regulating Federal milk marketing orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TERMINATED PROVISIONS OF 
              AGRICULTURAL ADJUSTMENT ACT REGULATING FEDERAL MILK 
              MARKETING ORDERS.

    (a) In General.--Effective as of December 31, 1996, section 101(b) 
of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (Public Law 97-98; 95 Stat. 
1219; 7 U.S.C. 608c note) is amended by striking ``1996'' and inserting 
``1999''.
    (b) Treatment of Period of Lapsed Effectiveness.--The amendments 
made by section 101(a) of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (Public 
Law 97-98; 95 Stat. 1219) shall continue in force as if never 
terminated as a result of the expiration of the period of effectiveness 
of the amendments on December 31, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
#### Parker *v.*Bodcaw Bank.

Opinion delivered December 24, 1923.

1. Appeal and error — final decrees. — A decree foreclosing a mortgage and a later decree confirming the foreclosure sale were both final and appealable.

2. Appeal and error — time for appealing. — Where a decree foreclosing a mortgage was rendered on September 22, 1922, and a decree confirming the sale on December 21, 1922, an appeal perfected on March 29, 1923, was too late to bring up for review the decree of September 22, 1922.'

3. Appeal and error — matters for review. — Where, in an appeal from a decree confirming a foreclosure sale, the abstract showed that there were exceptions to the confirmation of the sale, but the grounds were not shown nor any argument made to support them, the decree must foe affirmed.

Appeal from Columbia Chancery Court; *J. 7. Stevens,*Chancellor;

affirmed.

*Joe Joiner,*for appellant.

*Wade Kitchens,*for appellee.

McCulloch, C. J.

Appellee instituted' this action in the chancery court of Columbia County to recover the amount of certain promissory notes executed by appellants, and to foreclose a mortgage on land given as security for said notes. Appellants answered, and filed a cross-complaint setting forth claim for damages in an amount sufficient to extinguish appellee’s debt if the counter-claim be sustained. Final decree was rendered by the court on September 22, 1922, in favor of appellee against appellants for the recovery of said debt, and for the foreclosure of the mortgage, and dismissing the cross-complaint of appellants for want of equity. There was a sale of the land by the court’s commissioner, and on December 21, 1922, the sale came on for confirmation, and the court overruled the exceptions of appellants and confirmed the sale.

The appeal was not perfected by the filing of the transcript in this court until March 29, 1923, which was too late to bring up for review the original decree of Sentember 22, 1922. On motion of appellee we have *427heretofore dismissed the appeal as to the first decree, leaving only the appeal from the hist decree, which confirmed the sale.

The original decree foreclosing the mortgage was final and appealable, and the later decree confirming the sale was also final, from which an appeal could be prosecuted. *Cooper*v. *Ryan,*73 Ark. 37.

Appellants have failed to abstract the record with respect to the proceedings before the court when the sale came up for confirmation, therefore we have nothing before us to decide as to that feature of the record. The abstract shows that there were exceptions to the confirmation, but the grounds of the exceptions are not shown, nor is there an argument made in support of them.

The decree confirming the sale is therefore affirmed.
#### David Staples *v.*Peter Leonard.

Evidence — Oral Testimony to Prove Contents of Account Book.

Oral testimony is incompetent to prove the contents of an account book, without first accounting for the non-production of the book itself.

Appeal and Error — Affidavit of Juror as Grounds for New Trial.

The affidavit of a juror as to the grounds of a verdict is inadmissible in a motion for a new trial.

Accounts — Payment—Burden of Proof — Instructions.

Where the appellant pleads payment, the affirmative is upon him, and an instruction predicated thereon is proper.

APPEAL FROM SHELBY CIRCUIT COURT.

September 22, 1869.

*J. L. Caldwell, for appellant.*

*Harwood & Carpenter, for appellee*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The memorandum on which this action is brought acknowledges that, on a former settlement, the appellant owed the appellee a balance of $300 and agrees to pay him $100 unless his check had paid that sum instead of only $200, as claimed by the appellee. And it also acknowledges indebtedness for services for the year 1858, unless that account had been included in a subsequent settlement or otherwise satisfied. On those issues the appellant, therefore, held the affirmative of payment as claimed by him, and, on that subject, the instruction to the jury was right,' and, there being no proof, the verdict as reduced by the remitter of an excess was proper.

The affidavit of a juror was inadmissible as the grounds of the verdict, and oral testimony was incompetent to prove the contents of the account book without accounting for the non-production of the book itself.

'Wherefore, perceiving no substantial error, the judgment is *affirmed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 680 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                                                          July 9, 1997.
      Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
680) entitled ``An Act to amend the Federal Property and Administrative 
Services Act of 1949 to authorize the transfer of surplus personal 
property to States for donation to nonprofit providers of necessaries 
to impoverished families and individuals, and to authorize the transfer 
of surplus real property to States, political subdivisions and 
instrumentalities of States, and nonprofit organizations for providing 
housing or housing assistance for low-income individuals or 
families.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)Page 4, after line 8 insert:
    ``(D)(i) The Administrator shall ensure that nonprofit 
organizations that are sold or leased property under subparagraph (B) 
shall develop and use guidelines to take into consideration any 
disability of an individual for the purposes of fulfilling any self-
help requirement under subparagraph (C)(i).
    ``(ii) For purposes of this subparagraph, the term `disability' has 
the meaning given such term under section 3(2) of the Americans with 
Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12102(2)).

(2)Page 4, line 9, strike out [(D)] and insert: (E)

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 680

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
`[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 681 Referred in Senate (RFS)]







105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 681


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 1997

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 313 East 
  Broadway in Glendale, California, as the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 313 East Broadway 
in Glendale, California, shall be known and designated as the ``Carlos 
J. Moorhead Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 21, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.`
Case 2:15-mj-01894-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/07/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01894-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/07/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01894-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/07/15 Page 3 of 3
IB

Union Calendar No. 24

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 785

[Report No. 105–36]

To designate the J. Phil Campbell, Senior, Natural Resource Conservation

Center.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. NORWOOD (for himself, Mr. LINDER, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. KINGSTON,

Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. BARR of Georgia, and

Mr. DEAL of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Agriculture

MARCH 20, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To designate the J. Phil Campbell, Senior, Natural Resource

Conservation Center.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 785 RH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF J. PHIL CAMPBELL, SENIOR,

2 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION CEN3 TER.

4 The Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Cen5 ter located at 1420 Experimental Station Road in

6 Watkinsville, Georgia, shall be known and designated as

7 the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior, Natural Resource Con8 servation Center’’.

9 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

10 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

11 paper, or other record of the United States to the building

12 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

13 to the ‘‘J. Phil Campbell, Senior, Natural Resource Con14 servation Center’’.

Union Calendar No. 24

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 785

[Report No. 105–36]

A BILL

To designate the J. Phil Campbell, Senior, Natural

Resource Conservation Center

MARCH 20, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25994]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

Office of National Drug Control Policy


Removal of 5 Counties as High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy.

ACTION: Notice of removal of HIDTA county designation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy 
(ONDCP) removed 5 counties as High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas 
(HIDTA) counties pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 1706, effective September 29, 
2014. The 5 counties removed from HIDTA county designation within the 
Appalachia HIDTA are (1) Cumberland and Clinton Counties in Kentucky; 
(2) Clay and White Counties in Tennessee; and (3) Mason County in West 
Virginia. The Executive Board of the Appalachia HIDTA requested removal 
of these counties from designation after assessing the threat and 
determining that these counties no longer met the statutory criteria 
necessary for designation as HIDTA counties. ONDCP evaluated and 
accepted the request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding this notice should 
be directed to Michael K. Gottlieb, National HIDTA Program Director, 
Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the 
President, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-4868.

    Dated: October 27, 2014.
Daniel Rader,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-25994 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of NIEHS R13 Conference 
Grant Applications.
    Date: November 24, 2014.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 
Keystone Building, Conference Room 3118, 530 Davis Drive, Research 
Triangle Park, NC 27709, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Janice B. Allen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research 
and Training, Nat. Institute of Environmental Health Science, P.O. 
Box 12233, MD EC-30/Room 3170 B, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 
919/541-7556.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower Development 
in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological Response to 
Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied Toxicological Research 
and Testing, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 24, 2014.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-25873 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We issued our report dated January 25, 2002, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
of Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8
(File No. 333-25855), effective April 25, 1997, as amended on August 18, 1997.




/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP
-----------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2002