alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
  þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2003
  o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from                 to
 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-24312
 VIRBAC CORPORATION
  DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    43-1648680
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)3200 MEACHAM BOULEVARD
FORT WORTH, TEXAS
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    76137
(Zip Code)
 (817) 831-5030
 
  Title of each Class:
    
    Name of each exchange on which registered:COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE
    
    NONE
 
 o þ
 o þ
 þ o
 o
 o þ
 o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXPLANATORY NOTEPART IVITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESEXHIBITSSIGNATURESConsent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCertification of the President and CEO Pursuant to Section 302Certification of the CFO Pursuant to Section 302    Table of Contents  
 EXPLANATORY NOTE
  
 PART IV
 
 ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 
 EXHIBITS
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Document23.1
    
    Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.31.1
    
    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  VIRBAC CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Erik R. MartinezErik R. Martinez
President and Chief Executive
OfficerDate:
    
    November 10, 2005




---



##### Table of Contents



Index to Exhibits
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Document23.1
    
    Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.31.1
    
    Certification of the President and Chief
Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
#### Ben F. Crawford *v.*Sarah James.

Landlord and Tenant — Termination of Lease — Removal from Premises — Possession Reverts.

Upon the termination of a lease and the removal from the premises by the tenant the possession reverts to the landlord.

Same — Contracts to Lease — Actual Entry — Action for Forcible Entry.

A mere contract for a lease -without an entry does not vest the possession in the lessee, consequently he cannot maintain an action for forcible entry. The right of action is in the landlord.'

APPEAL FROM CARTER CIRCUIT COURT.

January 13, 1868.

*Dulin, for appellant.*

*J. R. Botts, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

Upon the termination of the lease to Rice, and his removal from the premises, the possession would revert to Crawford, the landlord under whom he entered and who owned the land, and would continue in him, until Armstrong, with whom he had made a contract to lease the premises, actually entered, a mere contract for the lease without an entry could not vest the possession in him, consequently he could not maintain an action for a forcible entry j but if Rice removed and the traversor moved in before Armstrong entered, the right of action for her wrongful entry was in Crawford, and not in the lessee, Armstrong.

These facts should have been submitted to the jury, consequently the peremptory instruction to find for the traversor was erroneous. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           12,981
<SECURITIES>                                     20,053
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 33,117
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   33,117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9,752
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             48
<OTHER-SE>                                       23,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     33,117
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,400
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     671
<INCOME-TAX>                                        295
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 376
<DISCONTINUED>                                   14,354
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      3.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      3.01
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**YUHE
      INTERNATIONAL, INC.**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of YUHE INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gao
      Zhentao, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, CERTIFY, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that :





(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      14th day of November, 2008.





/s/
                Gao ZhentaoGao
                ZhentaoChief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-95","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gyN2svBQS5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-95\/\">STS-95<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-95\/embed\/#?secret=gyN2svBQS5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-95” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gyN2svBQS5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### E. T. White *v.*G. W. Gabbert.

Bills and Notes — Off-set—Partnership Accounts.

Evidence examined and held sufficient to sustain a judgment for an assignee of a note given by one member of a partnership to another, though there were outstanding partnership accounts unsettled between the partners, prior in date to the note executed and assigned.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 17, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

Gabbert, assignee of Yewell, sued White, surviving partner of the firm of Blair & White, on a note for five hundred and eighty dollars. White answered, claiming that as surviving partner of the firms of Blair & White and Blair, Queen & Co., he held accounts older than the note against the assignor Yewell, and he plead the same as set-offs against the note. He made his answer a cross petition against Yewell. G-abbert replied to the answer, denying all knowledge or. information as to the accounts, and Yewell answered the cross petition, claiming that he had paid them, before the execution of the note, by giving Blair & White credit on another note he held against them.

The only evidence in the case was proof of admissions made hy Yewell to the effect that the accounts were just, but he at the same time claimed that they were paid in the manner charged in his answer.

There is no explanation given as to why Blair & White executed the note, whilst they held accounts against Yewell for a sum nearly as great, and which had been due for more than a year at the date of its execution. This circumstance raises a strong presumption that the accounts had been settled.

Considering all the circumstances in the case, we are of opinion that the judgment of the circuit court in favor of Gabbert, and *315dismissing tbe cross petition against Yewell, is correct, and tbe same is affirmed.

*Weir, Harlan N. & B., for appellant.*

*Bush, for appellee.*
#### Wesley Sparks *v.*Frank Shropshire.

Judgment — Claimants Bond — Forth-coming Bond — Bar.

A judgment on a claimant’s-bond is not a bar to a motion on a forthcoming bond.

APPEAL FROM HARRISON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 11, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The judgment on the claimant’s- bond was not a final bar to the *391motion on the forthcoming bond — because, first, that judgment itself was not conclusive and has been reversed, and, second, the parties to the two motions are not the same.

Trimble, Ward, *for appellant.*

*Robinson, for appellee.*

Wherefore, the judgment in this case is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Case 2:15-mj-01956-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01956-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01956-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/28/15 Page 3 of 3
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 4.7    
  


Amendment to

1995 Employees' Stock Purchase Plan  


        Pursuant to the duly authorized and executed resolutions of the Board of Directors of HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), dated
February 25, 2003, Section 12 of the Company's 1995 Employees' Stock Purchase Plan is amended as follows: 



	12.
	STOCK.






        (a)  The
maximum number of shares of the Company's Common Stock which shall be made available for sale under the Plan shall be 2,000,000 shares, subject to adjustment upon
changes in capitalization of the Company as provided in Section 19. If on a given Exercise Date the number of shares with respect to which Options are to be exercised exceeds the number of
shares then available under the Plan, the Company shall make a pro rata allocation of the shares remaining available for purchase in as uniform a manner as shall be practicable and as it shall
determine to be equitable. 


        (b)  The
Participant will have no interest or voting right in shares covered by his Option until such Option has been exercised and the applicable shares of Common Stock are
issued to him or her. 


        (c)  Shares
to be delivered to a Participant under the Plan will be registered in the name of the Participant or in the name of the Participant and his or her spouse. 





Dated:
March 21, 2003 



	 	 	HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  RANDALL J. FRAPART      

	 	 	Its:	Chief Financial Officer











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 4.7
#### Walter Goodlow *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 2-873A186.

Filed December 19, 1974.]

*511
      *Harriette Bailey Conn, (Mrs.),*Public Defender of Indiana, *Carr L. Darden, Sr.,*Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendalc,*Attorney General, *Robert F. Collcer,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

White, J.

Appellant appeals from a post-conviction relief judgment (PC. 1) which reduced his ten to twenty-five year robbery sentence to five to twenty-five years, contending that judicial modification of an unconstitutional statutory penalty to render the statute constitutional is judicial legislation prohibited by Article III, section 1, Constitution of Indiana (separation of powers), and ultimately contending that the imposition of any sentence under the unconstitutional statute is error. Exactly the same argument was rejected in *Landaw*v. *State*(1972), 258 Ind. 67, 279 N.E.2d 230; *Jacobs*v. *State*(1972), 153 Ind. App. 102, 286 N.E.2d 224; and *Davis*v. *State*(1973), 156 Ind. App. 534, 297 N.E. 2d 450.

The judgment is affirmed.

Sullivan, P.J., and Buchanan, J., concur.

Note. — Reported at 319 N.E.2d 866.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25691]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNVS00000 L19200000.PH0000 LRSNCI530800 241A; MO#4500067839]


Notice of Termination of the Recreation Area Management Plan, a 
Comprehensive Transportation and Travel Management Plan for the Las 
Vegas Field Office, NV and Associated Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Las Vegas Field Office, 
Las Vegas, Nevada, intends to terminate the process for preparing a 
Recreation Area Management Plan (RAMP), Comprehensive Transportation 
and Travel Management (CTTM) Plan, and associated Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the Las Vegas Field Office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Linehan, telephone 702-515-5236, 
or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56353a3f38333e373816343a3b78313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="06656a6f68636e676846646a6b28616970">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device 
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Services 
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal 
business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to 
leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive 
a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice of Intent To Prepare a RAMP, a CTTM 
Plan for the Las Vegas Field Office, Nevada and Associated EIS was 
published in the Federal Register (76 FR 5199) on Friday, January 28, 
2011. The RAMP/CTTM Plan was intended to provide more specific 
management direction for those activities in the planning area based on 
the current Las Vegas and Pahrump Resource Management Plan (RMP). 
However, because the RMP is currently under revision and any changes to 
the plan may significantly change the RAMP/CTTM Plan under development, 
it was decided to delay the RAMP/CTTM PLAN until the Record of Decision 
for the RMP revision was complete. Due to a delay in the anticipated 
completion of the RMP revision, funding for RAMP/CTTM Plan will expire. 
As such, the BLM has decided that the RAMP/CTTM EIS process should be 
terminated.
    Prior to the decision to terminate the process, public scoping 
meetings were held on March 1, 2, 3, 9, and 10, 2011, in Searchlight, 
Mesquite, Las Vegas, Goodsprings, and Overton respectively. Work also 
ensued on a draft EIS, but the draft EIS was neither completed nor 
released.

    Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7; 43 CFR 1610.2 and 8342.1-2.

Mark Slaughter,
Acting Manager, Las Vegas Field Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-25691 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-HC-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of Geerlings & Wade, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby
certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1) the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
        2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K
        for the year ended December 31, 2002 fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

                                    /s/ David R. Pearce
                                    ----------------------------
                                    David R. Pearce
                                    Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 26, 2003
IB

Union Calendar No. 137

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 700

[Report No. 105–241]

To remove the restriction on the distribution of certain revenues from the

Mineral Springs parcel to certain members of the Agua Caliente Band

of Cahuilla Indians.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. BONO (for himself and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Resources

SEPTEMBER 3, 1997

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To remove the restriction on the distribution of certain revenues from the Mineral Springs parcel to certain members

of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 700 RH

1 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON DISTRIBUTION

2 OF CERTAIN REVENUES.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The fourth undesignated para4 graph in section 3(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to pro5 vide for the equalization of allotments on the Agua

6 Caliente (Palm Springs) Reservation in California, and for

7 other purposes’’ approved September 21, 1959 (25 U.S.C.

8 951 et seq.), is amended by striking ‘‘east: Provided,’’ and

9 all that follows through ‘‘deceased member.’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘east.’’.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to net rents, prof13 its, and other revenues that accrue on or after the date

14 of enactment of this Act.

15 (c) AGREEMENT TO MAKE PAYMENT.—The Congress

16 finds that the tribe agrees to make payment in accordance

17 with Tribal Ordinance Number 22 dated August 6, 1996,

18 and shall do so not later than 180 days after the date

19 of the enactment of this Act.

20 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION ON DISTRIBUTION

21 OF CERTAIN REVENUES.

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—The fourth undesignated paragraph

23 in section 3(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for

24 the equalization of allotments on the Agua Caliente (Palm

25 Springs) Reservation in California, and for other purposes’’

26 approved September 21, 1959 (25 U.S.C. 951 et seq.), is
3

•HR 700 RH

1 amended by striking ‘‘east: Provided,’’ and all that follows

2 through ‘‘deceased member.’’ and inserting ‘‘east.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE AND AGREEMENT TO MAKE PAY4 MENT.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply

5 with respect to net rents, profits, and other revenues that

6 accrue on or after the date of distribution of the payment,

7 as provided in Tribal Ordinance 22 dated August 6, 1996,

8 to those referenced in Exhibit B of Tribal Ordinance 22.
Union Calendar No. 137

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 700

[Report No. 105–241]

A BILL

To remove the restriction on the distribution of cerCahuilla Indians. certain members of the Agua Caliente Band of tain revenues from the Mineral Springs parcel to

SEPTEMBER 3, 1997

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commitordered to be printed tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and