alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) by Talon International, Inc. (“Registrant”), the undersigned hereby certifies that: 

|   | 1. | to the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:   May 15, 2009 | **TALON INTERNATIONAL, INC.**/s/ Lonnie D. Schnell                                                                     By: Lonnie D. Schnell                Its: Chief Executive Office & Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 50 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
                                 H. R. 50

To provide for the operation of a combined post exchange and commissary 
  store at Castle Air Force Base, California, a military installation 
 selected for closure under the base closure laws, in order to ensure 
that adequate services remain available to the numerous members of the 
 Armed Forces, retired members, and their dependents who reside in the 
                     vicinity of the installation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

  Mr. Condit introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the operation of a combined post exchange and commissary 
  store at Castle Air Force Base, California, a military installation 
 selected for closure under the base closure laws, in order to ensure 
that adequate services remain available to the numerous members of the 
 Armed Forces, retired members, and their dependents who reside in the 
                     vicinity of the installation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPERATION OF COMBINED POST EXCHANGE AND COMMISSARY STORE, 
              CASTLE AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) BX Mart Required.--Subsection (c) of section 2490a of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out the subsection heading and inserting in 
        lieu thereof the following: ``Operation Required at Certain 
        Installations.--(1)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(2) The military installations selected as the sites for the 
operation of a combined exchange and commissary store under this 
section shall also include Castle Air Force Base, California. The 
Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the combined exchange and 
commissary store is fully operational at Castle Air Force Base not 
later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 
paragraph.''.
    (b) Conforming Change in Number of Authorized BX Marts.--Subsection 
(b) of such section is amended by striking out ``ten'' and inserting in 
lieu thereof ``11''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brandi Sitar,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03848-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8415 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
#### Sweetser and Others *v.*The State.

A charge of an assault and battery with intent to kill, is only a charge of an assault and battery; the words “with intent to kill” heing surplusage.

Monday, *June 4.*

APPEAL from the *Bartholomew*Circuit Court.

Dewey, *J.*

*Scire facias*on a recognisance, conditioned that *John Gians*should appear at the Circuit Court therein named, to answer “ the state on a charge of assault and battery with intent to kill, committed by said *Gians*on the body of one *John F. Jones.”*There was a demurrer to the *scire facias*which was overruled: judgment for the state.

The only objection urged against the *scire facias*is, that the condition of the recognisance does not describe an offence known to our laws; and, therefore, that the recognisance is void.

The inference would be correct were the premises true. The words “with intent to kill,” certainly do not aggravate the charge, which they were meant to qualify, into a penitentiary offence. To have done that, the intent must have been to “ murder.” But although these words do not add to, they *529do not destroy, the meaning of those which do actually charge a crime—an assault and battery. Legal principles require that they should be rejected as surplusage, rather than suffered to render senseless and void an instrument which is valid without them. This construction is also in the spirit of the statute, which enacts that recognisances shall not be void for want of form. R. C. 1831, p. 197. (R. S. 1838, p. 221.)

*P. Sweetser,*for the appellants.

*W. Quarles,*for the state.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with 3 *per cent,.*damages and costs. To be certified, &c.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Danny Marvin Salmon,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-02866-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8428 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.3

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the financial statements of Chindex International, Inc. ("Registrant") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

1.    	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the 	Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, 	the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

 

_/S/ Ronald Zilkowski

Ronald Zilkowski

Principal Accounting Officer

"A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Chindex International, Inc. and will be retained by Chindex International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request."
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Ramsey Romero, Jr., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Matturro's Service & Repair LLC, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-15-02403-PHX-ESW

ORDER 

 The Court having considered the parties’ Joint Motion for Court Approval of 

Settlement Agreement and Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 32), and good 

cause appearing, 

 IT IS ORDERED granting the Joint Motion for Court Approval of Settlement 

Agreement and Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. 32). 

 The Court finds that the settlement reached among the parties is enforceable and 

fair. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED approving the Settlement Agreement and Mutual 

Release between Plaintiff Ramsey Romero, Jr. and Defendants Matturo’s Service & 

Repair, LLC, Anthony J. Matturro, and Deana Matturro. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice the above-entitled action, 

with each party to pay their own attorney’s fees, costs and expenses, except as otherwise 

specified in the Settlement Agreement. 

 Dated this 23rd day of August, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-cv-02403-ESW Document 33 Filed 08/23/16 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ana Guzman","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ana-d-guzmannasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Commercial Partners Deliver Cargo, Crew for Station Science","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fDnZaPWvDX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/iss-research\/nasas-commercial-partners-deliver-cargo-crew-for-station-science\/\">NASA\u2019s Commercial Partners Deliver Cargo, Crew for Station Science<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/iss-research\/nasas-commercial-partners-deliver-cargo-crew-for-station-science\/embed\/#?secret=fDnZaPWvDX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Commercial Partners Deliver Cargo, Crew for Station Science” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fDnZaPWvDX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/starliner-crew.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.34

[LOGO]                                                                  WACHOVIA

February 5, 2003

Radian Group Inc.
1601 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA
19103-2337
Attn: Terry Latimer

Dear Terry:

As we discussed, Wachovia Bank, National Association (referred to herein as
"Wachovia" and formerly known as First Union National Bank) is pleased to
confirm its agreement to extend the maturity date of the Radian Group Inc.'s
("Radian") existing $50,000,000 364-Day Revolving Credit Facility from February
7, 2003 to May 30, 2003. Therefore, the parties hereby agree that the definition
of "Maturity Date" in the Credit Agreement between Radian and First Union
National Bank (now known as Wachovia), dated as of February 8, 2002 (the "Credit
Agreement") shall be deleted and replaced, effective as of the date hereof, with
the following definition: "Maturity Date" shall mean May 30, 2003. All other
terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.

As consideration for Wachovia's commitment, Radian hereby agrees to pay the
following non-refundable fee to Wachovia:

     (1)  a 6.5 bps upfront fee ($10,021), which fee shall be due and payable in
          full on February 7, 2003. The upfront fee was calculated on an
          actual/360-day basis commencing on the execution date through the
          maturity date.

Radian agrees that, once paid, the fee or any part thereof payable hereunder
will not be refundable under any circumstances. All fees payable hereunder will
be paid in immediately available funds.

     If Radian is in agreement with the foregoing, please indicate your
acceptance of the terms hereof by signing this letter agreement and returning it
to Wachovia.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Kim Shaffer
-----------------------------------
WACHOVIA BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: Kim Shaffer
Title: Director


                                           Agreed to and accepted as of the date
                                           first above written:

                                           RADIAN GROUP INC .


                                           By:    /s/ Terry Latimer
                                                  ------------------------------
                                           Title: Treasurer
Order entered January 24, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00942 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 00943 - CR No. 05 - 19 - 00944 - CR MARCOS GALLEGOSMARTI NEZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE O F TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s. F 18 - 57057 - Q , F18 - 57058 - Q, F18 - 57059 - Q 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s January 21, 2020 second motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on or before February 2 1 , 20 20 . We caution appellant that further requests for extension of time are disfavored.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-85","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yJqTyk0ju6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-85\/\">STS-85<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-85\/embed\/#?secret=yJqTyk0ju6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-85” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yJqTyk0ju6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/0500972\/0500972~large.jpg?w=600&h=1539&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1539}
#### John H. MAHORNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lisa BUCKLES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-7051.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2005.

John H. Mahorney, Helena, OK, pro se.

S. Steven Barnes, Poteau, OK, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before EBEL, MURPHY, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

*946MICHAEL R. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this court has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This case is before the court on John Mahorney’s *pro se*request to proceed on appeal *in forma pauperis.*Mahorney seeks to proceed *in forma pauperis*so that he can appeal the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The district court dismissed Mahorney’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), concluding that the suit was frivolous because it lacked a basis in either law or fact. *See Schlicher v. Thomas,*111 F.3d 777, 779 (10th Cir.1997) (holding that an action is frivolous under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) if “the claim [is] based on an indisputably meritless legal theory or if it is founded on clearly baseless factual contentions”). This court reviews the district court’s dismissal based on frivolousness for abuse of discretion. *Conkle v. Potter,*352 F.3d 1333, 1335 n. 4 (10th Cir.2003). Like the district court, we construe *pro se*pleadings liberally. *See Haines v. Kerner,*404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972).

Applying the standards set out in § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), and after careful review of the record on appeal and Mahorney’s filings, it is absolutely clear that the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Mahorney’s complaint was so vague and conclusory that it clearly failed to state an injury of constitutional magnitude. Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Dismissal of Mahorney’s appeal as frivolous counts as a strike against him, as does the district court’s dismissal of his complaint. *See Jennings v. Natrona County Det. Ctr. Med. Facility,*175 F.3d 775, 780 (10th Cir.1999). Thus, Mahorney has accumulated at least two strikes for purposes of the filing restrictions set out in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Mahorney is reminded of his obligation to continue making partial payments of the appellate filing fee until paid in full.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. SERLUCO D/B/A CONSOLIDATED PROPERTIES,

Petitioner

v.

BOROUGH OF CAMP HILL,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 209 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

Michelle H. Swann - 019819 

SCHNEIDER & ONOFRY, P.C. 

3101 N. Central Avenue, Suite 600 

Phoenix, AZ 85012-2658 

 Telephone: (602) 200-1287 

Fax: (602) 230-8985 

E-mail: minute-entries@soarizonalaw.com mswann@soarizonalaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Best Western International, Inc., an 

Arizona non-profit corporation, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

SDV Hospitality and Resorts Corporation, 

an Illinois corporation; and Deepak Kant 

Vyas, a Missouri resident, 

 Defendants. 

No. 

SUMMONS 

TO: SDV Hospitality and Resorts Corporation, an Illinois corporation 

 

A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons 

on you (not counting the day you received it) – or 60 days if you are the United States or a 

United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 12(a)(2) or (3) - you must serve on the Plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint 

or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion 

must be served on the Plaintiff’s attorney, whose name and address is: 

Case 2:15-cv-02159-JJT Document 5 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1401523.doc -2-

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 Michelle Swann 

 SCHNEIDER & ONOFRY, P.C. 

 3101 N. Central Avenue, Suite 600 

 Phoenix, AZ 85012 

 (602) 200-1287 

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the 

relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the 

Court. 

DATE: ___________________________. 

 BRIAN D. KARTH 

 CLERK OF COURT 

 By________________________________ 

 Deputy Clerk’s Signature 

ISSUED ON 8:35 am, Oct 28, 2015 s/ Brian D. Karth, Clerk

Case 2:15-cv-02159-JJT Document 5 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:15-mj-01845-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01845-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/18/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01845-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/18/15 Page 3 of 3