alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Richard Di Donato, Individually and On 

Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Insys Therapeutics, Inc.; et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-16-00302-PHX-NVW

ORDER 

 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Exceed Page Limit (Doc. 82). Good 

cause appearing, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Defendants’ Motion to Exceed Page Limit 

(Doc. 82) in the total amount of 30 pages. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to file Defendants’ 

lodged Motion (Doc. 83). 

 Dated this 17th day of January, 2017. 

Neil V. Wake

Senior United States District Judge 

Case 2:16-cv-00302-NVW Document 84 Filed 01/18/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 10(h)(a)

              SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

     In accordance with Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the
Registrant has omitted filing Change in Control Employment Agreements by and
between P. H. Glatfelter Company and the following employees as exhibits to this
Form 10-K because they are identical to the Change in Control Employment
Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and Robert P. Newcomer, dated
as of December 31, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10(j) to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001:

    John R. Anke, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    Robert L. Inners II, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    Carroll L. Missimer, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    Markus R. Mueller, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    Dante C. Parrini, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    Mark W. Pitts, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    Werner Ruckenbrod, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    C. Matthew Smith, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    William T. Yanavitch, dated as of December 31, 2000.
    Peter M. Yaffe, dated as of December 31, 2001.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.23


                                 April 16, 2001


PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL

Lisa A. Kempa
2035 Filbert #205
San Francisco, CA 94123

Lisa:

     I am pleased to confirm our offer of employment as Vice President of
Finance at Converse Inc. ("the Company"). In this position you will report to
the CEO, Jack Boys. Your start date will be May 1, 2001.

COMPENSATION:

     If you decide to join us, you will receive an annual salary of $145,000.00
which will be paid commensurate with the normal payroll cycle of the company.
The following benefits will be provided by Converse, Inc.

                                BENEFITS PACKAGE
                                ----------------

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS:

     You will be eligible for medical and dental benefits based upon the
Company's Employee Benefit Program.

PAID TIME OFF:

     You will be eligible for twenty days of Paid Time Off (PTO) on an annual
basis to be used for vacation, illness or personal business. Additionally,
floating holidays will be determined on a Company-wide basis annually.

MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN:

     You will be participating in the Executive Management Incentive Plan, which
provides for bonus compensation based upon both the Company's and your
individual performance. This Plan is subject to Board of Directors approval.

STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN:

     You will participate in the Executive Management Stock Incentive Plan. This
Plan is subject to Board of Directors approval.

<PAGE>
Lisa A. Kempa
April 16, 2001
Page 2


SEPARATION:

     If the employee is terminated for any reason other than material misconduct
or criminal action the Company will pay six months of salary based on employees
existing level of annual compensation.

RELOCATION:

     Reasonable relocation costs to be mutually agreed upon and up to six months
of temporary living expenses will be provided by the Company.

     To indicate your acceptance of the Company's offer, please sign and date
this letter in the space provided below and return it to me within one week from
the date of this letter. This letter, along with any agreements relating to
confidential information between you and Converse Inc., set forth the terms of
your employment with Converse, Inc. and supersedes any prior representations or
agreements, whether written or oral. This letter may not be modified or amended
except by a written agreement, signed by Converse Inc. and by you.

     Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this employment offer
or any points covered in this letter. We look forward to receiving your positive
response and look forward to working with you as you join the Converse team.

     I hereby agree and/or accept employment with Converse, Inc. and the terms
set forth above. I understand and agree to keep the contents of this letter
confidential.


Signature and Date:


/s/ Marsden Cason
-----------------------------
Marsden Cason, President
Footwear Acquisitions, Inc.


Signature and Date:


/s/ Lisa Kempa
-----------------------------
Lisa A. Kempa
EXHIBIT 99.2      THE SERVICER OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE


MEMBERS EQUITY PTY LIMITED (MORTGAGE MANAGER) OFFICER'S
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Members Equity Pty Limited,
as Mortgage Manager (the "Mortgage Manager"), pursuant to the agreement entitled
"Mortgage  Origination and Management  Agreement"  dated 4 July 1994 (as novated
and  amended)  between  Perpetual  Trustees  Australia  Limited,   ME  Portfolio
Management  Limited and Members  Equity Pty  Limited,  (the  "Agreement"),  does
hereby certify that:

1.   Capitalized  terms used but not defined in this Officer's  Certificate have
     their  respective  meanings set forth in the Agreement,  unless the context
     requires   otherwise  or  unless   otherwise   defined  in  the   Officer's
     Certificate.

2.   As of the date of this Officer's Certificate, Members Equity Pty Limited is
     the Mortgage Manager of SMHL Global Fund No. 5 (the "Trust").

3.   This Officer's Certificate is delivered pursuant to the Agreement.

4.   A review of the activities of the Mortgage Manager during the calendar year
     ended June 30, 2004 and of its performance  under the pooling and servicing
     agreement or similar agreements was made under my supervision.

5.   Based on such review,  to my knowledge,  the Mortgage Manager has fulfilled
     its  obligations  under the  pooling  and  servicing  agreement  or similar
     agreements relating to the Trust (including the Agreement)  throughout such
     calendar year and, except as set forth in paragraph 6 below.

6.   The following is a description  of any exceptions to paragraph 5 above:- No
     significant deficiencies were detected.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of the Mortgage
Manager,  has  duly  executed  this  Officer's  Certificate  this  24th  day  of
September, 2004.

MEMBERS EQUITY PTY LIMITED,
as Mortgage Manager


/S/ N. VAMVAKAS
-------------------------------------

Name: N.VAMVAKAS
Title: Director
#### Lewis Runyon et al *v.*Flem Ratliff and Wife (of color.)

Trial — Transfer of Causes.

A suit for recovery of land by different claimants, one of whom claimed under a will then in litigation in the equity court should, on motion, be transferred to said court.

Same.

Should the will be set aside, such decree would be an end to the litigation, and an adjudication of both suits.

APPEAL FROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT.

January 18, *1870.*

*Apperson, for appellants.*

*Bowles, Harkins, Burns, for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Appellees claim the land in contest under the will of -Barnabas Johnson and appellants claim it as heirs to said Johnson. His will had been probated by the county court from which an appeal had been taken to the circuit court and a bill in equity is now pending to contest its validity.

In this state of affairs it was eminently proper to transfer this common law proceedings, for a recovery of the land, to the equity side of the docket and consolidate it with the suit there pending to set aside said will so probated by the county court, and a refusal to do so on appellant’s motion was erroneous.

Should the chancellor set aside said will such decree would be an end to this suit, hence, the importance of its transfer.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed, with directions to transfer the cause to the equity docket and consolidate it with the case there pending between these parties.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 514 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 514

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 1997

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To permit the waiver of District of Columbia residency requirements for 
    certain employees of the Office of the Inspector General of the 
                         District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Inspector 
General Improvement Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES OF 
              INSPECTOR GENERAL.

    Section 906 of the District of Columbia Government Comprehensive 
Merit Personnel Act of 1978 (sec. 1-610.6, D.C. Code) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``or subsection (d)'' 
        after ``subsection (c)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) At the request of the Inspector General (as described in 
section 208(a) of the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 
1985), the Director of Personnel may waive the application of 
subsections (a) and (b) to employees of the Office of the Inspector 
General.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 18, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-56058) and Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-7288, No. 333-7290, No. 33-64326, No. 33-95224, No. 33-71956,
No. 333-42070, No. 333-42072, No. 333-84980 and No. 333-84982) of Royal
Caribbean Cruises Ltd. of our report dated February 28, 2003, relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Miami, Florida
March 24, 2003
Case 2:98-cv-00871-ROS Document 11 Filed 04/29/99 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:98-cv-00871-ROS Document 11 Filed 04/29/99 Page 2 of 2
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 754

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of child safety

restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on commercial aircraft.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr.

FILNER, Mrs. MORELLA, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. NADLER, Mr. EVANS,

Mr. HORN, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Ms. NORTON, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. RAHALL, Mrs. CARSON, Mrs. MALONEY of New

York, Mr. MASCARA, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr.

LANTOS, Ms. PELOSI, and Mr. DAN SCHAEFER of Colorado) introduced

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation

and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use

of child safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on commercial aircraft.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 754 IH

1 SECTION 1. CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS ON COMMERCIAL

2 AIRCRAFT.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 447 of title 49, United

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow5 ing new section:

6 ‘‘§ 44725. Child restraint systems

7 ‘‘Not later than 90 days after the date of the enact8 ment of this section, the Secretary shall issue regulations

9 requiring the use of child safety restraint systems ap10 proved by the Secretary on any aircraft operated by an

11 air carrier in providing interstate air transportation, intra12 state transportation, or overseas air transportation. Such

13 regulations shall establish age or weight limits for children

14 who are to use such systems.’’.

15 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

16 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding

17 at the end the following new item:

‘‘44725. Child restraint systems.’’.

18 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD.

19 It is the sense of Congress that the United States

20 representative to the International Civil Aviation Organi21 zation should seek an international standard to require

22 that passengers on a civil aviation aircraft be restrained

23 on takeoff and landing and when directed by the captain

24 of such aircraft.

Æ
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 12 - 00408 - CR
MARCO ANTONIO REBELES

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No

. 3 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 10
- CCR
- 5631 - C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its op inion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 3, 2014

.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abbey A. Donaldson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aadonald\/","title":"NASA Administrator to Travel to India, UAE; Discuss Space Cooperation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4U5PR2qJPW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-administrator-to-travel-to-india-uae-discuss-space-cooperation\/\">NASA Administrator to Travel to India, UAE; Discuss Space Cooperation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-administrator-to-travel-to-india-uae-discuss-space-cooperation\/embed\/#?secret=4U5PR2qJPW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Administrator to Travel to India, UAE; Discuss Space Cooperation” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4U5PR2qJPW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/nhq202306210059medium.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":499}
II

Calendar No. 123

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 748

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 9, 1997

Received

JULY 22, 1997

Read the first time

JULY 23, 1997

Read the second time and place on the calendar

AN ACT

To amend the prohibition of title 18, United States Code,

against financial transactions with terrorists.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 748 PCS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibition on Finan3 cial Transactions With Countries Supporting Terrorism

4 Act of 1997’’.

5 SEC. 2. FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH TERRORISTS.

6 Section 2332d of title 18, United States Code, (relat7 ing to financial transactions) is amended—

8 (1) in subsection (a)—

9 (A) by striking ‘‘Except as provided in reg10 ulations issued by the Secretary of the Treas11 ury, in consultation with the Secretary of State,

12 whoever’’ and inserting ‘‘Whoever’’; and

13 (B) by inserting ‘‘of 1979’’ after ‘‘Export

14 Administration Act’’; and

15 (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting after

16 ‘‘1956(c)(4)’’ the following: ‘‘, except that such term

17 does not include any transaction ordinarily incident

18 to—

19 ‘‘(A) routine diplomatic relations among

20 countries;

21 ‘‘(B) an official act by a representative of,

22 or an act which is authorized by and conducted

23 on behalf of, the United States Government;

24 ‘‘(C) the broadcasting or reporting of news

25 by organizations regularly engaged in such ac26 tivity; or
3

HR 748 PCS

1 ‘‘(D) the provision or purchase of assist2 ance intended to relieve human suffering, in3 cluding medical services, supplies, and equip4 ment;

5 ‘‘(E) the receipt of emergency medical

6 services;

7 ‘‘(F) any postal, telegraphic, or other per8 sonal communication which does not involve a

9 transfer of anything of value;

10 ‘‘(G) the protection of intellectual property

11 rights of any United States person;

12 ‘‘(H) the performance of any contract or

13 agreement that was entered into before June

14 12, 1997, but not those renewed after such

15 date;

16 ‘‘(I) the provision of hospitality or trans17 portation services; or

18 ‘‘(J) the payment of a claim to any United

19 States person’’.

20 SEC. 3. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF ENACTMENT.

21 Beginning not later than one year after the date of

22 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, in

23 consultation with the Secretary of State, shall issue an an24 nual report to Congress on—
4

HR 748 PCS

1 (1) the impact of this prohibition on United

2 States businesses; and

3 (2) any means by which a negative impact

4 might be ameliorated.

Passed the House of Representatives July 8, 1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 123

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 748

AN ACT

Code, against financial transactions with terrorists.

To amend the prohibition of title 18, United States

JULY 23, 1997

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

C.A., The Mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3968

[April 12, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Kenneth L. Gillespie, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017-1277DP.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Morgan Lyle Weinstein and Thomasina Moore, Hollywood and Sanford, 

for Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Case 2:16-mj-01031-JFM Document 4 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01031-JFM Document 4 Filed 01/20/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01031-JFM Document 4 Filed 01/20/16 Page 3 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Alfonso Antillon, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-16-00035-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice, 

(Doc. 49), and good cause shown, 

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC, only, is 

dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own attorney’s fees and costs 

included herein. 

 Dated this 6th day of May, 2016. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge 

Case 2:16-cv-00035-DLR Document 50 Filed 05/06/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Shannon and Wife *v.*Spencer, on Appeal.

HELD, that the appeal bond must he in a sum sufficient to. *121cover the judgment below, and the damages and cost's in this Court; or the appeal will be dismissed (1).

(1)

 Stat. 1817, p. 7; — 1823, p. 131. In the case of a writ of error, operating as a supersedeas, the security must be sufficient to secure the whole amount of the judgment. *Catlett v. Brodie,*9 Wheat. 553. So, by the 12th rule of the Supreme Court, the penalty of the bond in writs of error, if a supersedeas be allowed, must be the same as is necessary, agreeably to the decision in the text, in the case of an appeal. Vide also to the same effect, *Moore*v. Gorin, 2 Litt. 186.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

HERBERT E. TOWNSEND, Appellant

v.

BROOKS SPORTS, INC., Appellee

______________________

2021

- 2143

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018

- 00577.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S TEVEN J OHN H AMPTON

, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by H ERBERT D. H ART

, III

.

D ARREN E DWARD D ONNELLY

, Polsinelli LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is Case: 21-2143 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2022O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R EYNA

, H UGHES

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDE R OF THE C OURT

June 9, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 21-2143 Document: 47 Page: 2 Filed: 06/09/2022