alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ONIX SYSTEMS
INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 3, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-03-1998
<CASH>                                                 41,334
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          36,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                            2,695
<INVENTORY>                                            33,142
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      112,952
<PP&E>                                                 17,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                          6,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        190,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  38,626
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  156
<OTHER-SE>                                            150,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          190,467
<SALES>                                               115,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      115,434
<CGS>                                                  68,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          68,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        8,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          348
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        10,858
<INCOME-TAX>                                            4,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     6,534
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                            6,534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.45
        

</TABLE>
#### Posey *v.*Bullitt and Another, in Error.

HELD, that one partner can bind his co-partner by simple contract only, not by deed. (1).

*Held,*also', that if to a declaration containing two counts, one on a bond, and the other for goods sold and delivered, the- defendant plead *non est factum*to the first count, without noticing the second; the plea cannot be objected to for-not answering the whole declaration.

*Held,*also, that if a plea purport *to*be an answer to the whole declaration, and only answer a part, it is bad, and the plaintiff *100may demur: but if the plea purport to be an answer to a pan: of the declaration only, and be an answer but to a part, the plea is good *quoad hoc;*and, in such a case, the plaintiff should take issue on the plea, and pray judgment for so much as remains unanswered. 1 H. Bl. 645. — 1 Str. 302. — Tidd’s Pr. 617.

(1)

*Harrison*v. Jackson, 7 T. R. *203.*— Gerard v. *Basse,*1 Dall. *119.*— Cle*ment*v. Brush, 3 Johns. Cas. 180. The law is the same though the partnership be created *by*deed, unless a special power be reserved, authorizing the execution of such instruments. *Harrrison*v. Jackson, *supra.*— Trimble v. Coons, 2 Marsh. Ky. R. 375. The bond, however, is binding on the partner who executes it in the name of the firm, though not on his partners. *Elliot*v. *Da*vis, 2 Bos. and Pull. *338.*— Clement *v.*Brush, supra.*Skinner v.*Dayton, 19 Johns. R. *513.*— Trimble v. *Coons,*supra. — Gow on Partn. 83 — 86. Vide *Flood v. Yandes*et al., in this Court, post, p. 102. But one partner may, by deed, release a debt due to the partnership. *Bruen*v. *Marquand,*17 Johns. R. 58.— Gow on Partn. 87 — 89.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 809 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 809

                   For the relief of Frank J. Notrem.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Mr. Kennedy of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Frank J. Notrem.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT.

    The Secretary of the Treasury shall make a lump sum payment, out of 
amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, of $8,242.40 to 
Frank J. Notrem (social security account number 021-09-2186).

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AGENT AND ATTORNEY FEES.

    Not more than a total of 10 percent of the payment authorized by 
section 1 shall be paid to or received by any agent or attorney for 
services rendered in connection with obtaining such payment, any 
contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person who violates this 
section shall be fined not more than $1,000.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly M. Matter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kmatter\/","title":"NASA Glenn Helps Military Service Members Transition to Civilian Life","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MVW1oAkJjo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-glenn-helps-military-service-members-transition-to-civilian-life\/\">NASA Glenn Helps Military Service Members Transition to Civilian Life<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-glenn-helps-military-service-members-transition-to-civilian-life\/embed\/#?secret=MVW1oAkJjo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Glenn Helps Military Service Members Transition to Civilian Life” — NASA\" data-secret=\"MVW1oAkJjo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/grc-2023-c-10133.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 798

To prohibit the issuance of new public debt obligations after December 31,

2001.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. SMITH of Michigan (for himself, Mr. NEUMANN, and Mr. BARTLETT of

Maryland) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To prohibit the issuance of new public debt obligations after

December 31, 2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Balanced Budget Act

5 of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ISSUANCE OF PUBLIC DEBT OBLI7 GATIONS AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2001.

8 No obligation subject to the limitation under section

9 3101(b) of title 31, United States Code, may be issued
2

•HR 798 IH

1 to the public after December 31, 2001. The preceding sen2 tence shall not apply to any obligation (or series of obliga3 tions) issued to refund an obligation issued before January

4 1, 2002.

5 SEC. 3. SPECIAL RULE.

6 Upon the enactment of a bill or joint resolution de7 claring war or a national emergency, section 1 is sus8 pended for the 6-month period beginning upon such date

9 of enactment. Congress and the President may, by law,

10 extend such 6-month period if such declaration of war or

11 national emergency is still in effect.

Æ
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xponential,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, John R. Boudreau, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  John R.  Boudreau           |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| John R. Boudreau                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 15, 2003                          |

 

----
MOYES SELLERS &

HENDRICKS

PHOENIX, AZ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

00134705

MOYES SELLERS & HENDRICKS

Stephen Brower (No. 024908)

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 1100

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Telephone: (602) 604-2120

sbrower@law-msh.com

Attorneys for Appellee MR Capital, LLC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

In re

Donita Cole,

Debtor.

Case No. 2:15-cv-02105-SRB

Case No. 2:15-bk-07045-EPB

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

Donita Cole,

Appellant,

v.

MR Capital, LLC,

Appellee.

Appellant Donita Cole filed a Notice of Appeal and Statement of Election on 

October 15, 2015 regarding the Order Granting Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay 

dated September 28, 2015. This notice was transmitted and filed with this Court on 

October 20, 2015 [Dkt 1]. As expressly stated in the instructions provided to Appellant 

attached to the transmittal, Appellant was required to “within 14 days of the filing of the 

Notice of Appeal, file with the Clerk of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court [a] designation of the 

items to be included in the record on appeal and serve a copy on the appellee; [and] 

statement of the issues to be presented and serve a copy upon the appellee.” [Dkt 1 at p. 

2]. Nearly three months have passed since Appellant filed her notice of appeal, but

Case 2:15-cv-02105-SRB Document 10 Filed 01/02/16 Page 1 of 2
MOYES SELLERS &

HENDRICKS

PHOENIX, AZ

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

00134705

- 2 -

Appellant has not filed her statement of the issues or designation of record as required. 

There is no excuse for the lengthy delay by Appellant in perfecting her appeal by 

filing the required statement of issues and designation of the record. Appellant had been 

timely notified of her obligations as expressly provided in the instructions quoted above. 

Courts will dismiss an appeal from the bankruptcy court where Appellants have failed to 

file the threshold statements of issues. In re Burton, 316 B.R. 138, 140 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)

(dismissing appeal due to pro se debtor’s inexcusable failure to timely file the statement of 

issues and designation of the record); In re Lynch, 430 F.3d 600, 603 (2d Cir. 2005)

(affirming dismissal of bankruptcy appeal where debtor failed to file a statement of issues 

and designation of record). Accordingly, Appellee respectfully requests the Court dismiss 

the bankruptcy appeal. 

DATED: January 2, 2016

MOYES SELLERS & HENDRICKS

By /s/ Stephen Brower

Stephen Brower

Attorneys for MR Capital, LLC

CERTIFCIATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 2, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send 

notification of such filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF 

registrants. I further certify that a copy of the attached document was delivered via email 

to:

Donita Cole

d.cole@cox.net

/s/ Stephen Brower

Case 2:15-cv-02105-SRB Document 10 Filed 01/02/16 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA TV to Air U.S. Spacewalk, Briefing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cCYyx3Y5qm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-u-s-spacewalk-briefing\/\">NASA TV to Air U.S. Spacewalk, Briefing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-u-s-spacewalk-briefing\/embed\/#?secret=cCYyx3Y5qm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA TV to Air U.S. Spacewalk, Briefing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cCYyx3Y5qm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/16105358343_cb8192b330_k_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":398}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,415
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          19,232
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     72,485
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        453,443
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 568,188
<DEPOSITS>                                     362,941
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,025
<LONG-TERM>                                    108,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 568,188
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,280
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,811
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,091
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,842
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,817
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,274
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      267
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 150
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,535
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,535
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,920
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.40
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,994
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,994
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,545
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,810
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,810
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             15


</TABLE>
#### McMillar *v.*State.

Opinion delivered January 14, 1924.

Criminal law — evidence.—In a prosecution for selling intoxicating liquor, testimony as to previous raids upon defendant’s home and the finding of intoxicating liquor in her possession was a competent circumstance tending to show that she was engaged in the illegal sale of whiskey, though it was insufficient within itself to establish the sale.

Appeal from Garland Circuit Court; *Earl Witt,*Judge;

affirmed.

*Randolph & Cobb,*for appellant.

*J. 8. TJtley,*Attorney General, *John L. Garter, Wm. T. EammocJc*and *Darden Moose,*Assistants, for appellee.

Humphreys, J.

■ Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted of selling whiskey, in the Garland County Circuit Court, and, as punishment therefor, was adjudged to serve a term of one year in the State Penitentiary. She has prosecuted an appeal to this court.

The only assignment of error insisted upon for a reversal of the judgment is the admission by the trial court, over the objection and exception of appellant, of testimony of the sheriff and city detective, to the effect that they raided the home of appellant several times sub*46sequent to the alleged sale and found liquors in her possession. The testimony introduced by the State showed that appellant sold1 whiskey in the fall of 1922 and winter of 1923 at her home. The raids were made in the spring, summer, and fall of 1923. The trial court admitted the testimony relative to the discovery of intoxicating liquors in the possession of appellant as a circumstance tending to show that she was engaged in the illegal sale of whiskey. While the testimony was not sufficient, within itself, to establish the sale, it was a competent circumstance tending to prove said charge. *Ketchum*v. *State,*125 Ark. 275; *Larkin*v. *State,*131 Ark. 445; *Marsh*v. *State,*146 Ark. 77; *Casteel*v. *State,*151 Ark. 70.

No error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,670
<SECURITIES>                                        46
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                       119
<INVENTORY>                                      1,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,669
<PP&E>                                          81,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,952
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,414
<SALES>                                         25,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,901
<CGS>                                           19,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (935)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (299)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (636)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (636)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>