```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63080-63081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of 
Sunset Review, Notice of Rescission of Sunset Review, and Advance 
Notification of New Sunset Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Goldberger, AD/CVD Operations, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; Telephone: (202) 482-4136.

Background

    Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and 
conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or 
antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended 
under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as 
the case may be) and of material injury.
    In December 2013, the Department initiated a sunset review of the 
antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the 
People's Republic of China five years from the imposition of the order 
in January 2009.\1\ On July 11, 2014, The Department published the 2014 
Sunset Review.\2\ Notwithstanding the holding of the United States 
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) that ``the statutory 
scheme impose{d{time}  a mandatory duty on Commerce to issue 
antidumping duty orders covering the subject entries'' as of January 
2009,\3\ the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) held, on September 
23, 2014, that the 2014 Sunset Review was unlawful and premature, 
agreeing with the plaintiff that the five-year period should have been 
counted from November 2009. Thus, the CIT ordered the Department to 
rescind the 2014 Sunset Review and to re-initiate the sunset review of 
the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from 
the People's Republic of China on November 4, 2014.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Review, 78 FR 72061 
(December 2, 2013) (Initiation Notice).
    \2\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of 
the Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 40062 (July 11, 2014) (2014 Sunset 
Review).
    \3\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374, 1382-1383 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
    \4\ See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United 
States, Court No. 13-00391, slip op. 2014-111, 2014 Ct. Intl. Trade 
LEXIS 112 (Ct. Int'l Trade Sep. 23, 2014) (Diamond Sawblades 
Manufacturers' Coalition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the decision of the CAFC in Timken Co. v. United 
States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades, the Department is notifying the public that the final 
judgment in this case is not in harmony with the Department's 2014 
Sunset Review. The Department is therefore rescinding the 2014 Sunset 
Review.

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 341, as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades, the CAFC has held that, pursuant to section 516A(c)(1) of 
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the Department must publish a 
notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department 
determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a 
``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's September 23, 2014, judgment 
constitutes a final decision of that court that is not in harmony with 
the Department's 2014 Sunset Review. This

[[Page 63081]]

notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
Timken. The effective date of this Timken notice is October 3, 2014.

Rescission of the 2014 Sunset Review

    Pursuant to the CIT order in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' 
Coalition, we are hereby rescinding the 2014 Sunset Review, effective 
September 23, 2014.

Upcoming Sunset Review for November 2014 Pursuant to the CIT Order

    Pursuant to the CIT order in Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' 
Coalition, the first sunset review of the antidumping duty order on 
diamond sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China 
is now scheduled for initiation on November 4, 2014 and will appear in 
a notice of Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review (Notice of 
Initiation).
    The Department's procedures for the conduct of a sunset review are 
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation provides further 
information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in 
the sunset review.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and 
make available a service list for this sunset review. To facilitate the 
timely preparation of the service list, it is requested that those 
seeking recognition as interested parties to this sunset review contact 
the Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the 
Notice of Initiation.
    If the Department receives a Notice of Intent to Participate from a 
member of the domestic industry within 15 days of the date of 
initiation, the sunset review will continue. Thereafter, any interested 
party wishing to participate in the sunset review must provide 
substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no later 
than 30 days after the date of initiation.
    We are publishing this notice pursuant to the CIT order in Diamond 
Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition for the rescission of the 2014 
Sunset Review and as a service to the international trading community 
for the advance notification of the re-initiation of the sunset review. 
The advanced notification of a sunset review is not required by 
statute.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-25206 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```