alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 542

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that military reservists

who are retained in active status after qualifying for reserve retired

pay shall be given credit toward computation of such retired pay for

service performed after so qualifying.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. MCNULTY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on National Security

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that

military reservists who are retained in active status after

qualifying for reserve retired pay shall be given credit

toward computation of such retired pay for service performed after so qualifying.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF YEARS OF SERVICE IN COM4 PUTING RESERVE RETIRED PAY.

5 (a) CREDIT FOR DAYS AFTER QUALIFYING FOR RE6 TIRED PAY.—Section 12733(1) of title 10, United States
2

•HR 542 IH

1 Code, is amended by inserting before the period the follow2 ing: ‘‘, including the person’s days served in active status

3 after qualifying for retired pay under this chapter, which

4 shall be credited when the person leaves active status’’.

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to any person who qualifies after

7 January 1, 1988, for retired pay under chapter 1223 of

8 title 10, United States Code, or under chapter 67 of such

9 title as in effect before December 1, 1994.

Æ
#### Lucy Harcourt et al, *v.*H. G. Baxter.

Husband and Wife — Feme Covert — Judgment by Defendant.

It is erroneous to adjudge by default against a feme covert on an executory contract to purchase land without averring in the petition that she had separate estate or that the purchase was necessary for herself and family.

APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 15, 1869.

*604
      *Turner, for appellants.*

*Burman, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

As this was an executory sale of a house and one acre of ground by appellee to appellant, Lucy, at the 'price of $2300, of which $1000 was paid at the time, and the residue to be paid March 1, 1868, when the deed was to be made as evidenced by a memorandum signed by Baxter, Mrs. Harcourt and her husband, dated January 11, 1868, and much of the deferred payment being paid. Still, according to the long recognized rules as settled by this court in *Johnson and wife v. Jones, 12 B. Mon., 326,*it was erroneous to adjudge by default against the feme convert on such a contract without averring in the petition that she had a separate estate, or that the purchase was necessary for herself and family regarding her pecuniary situation and her condition as to family, etc., so as to bring the case within the common law rules, or the provision of our statute, neither of which is so averred.

But as the husband signed the contract it is enforceable as against him.

Whether it shall finally appear that the payments were the separate estate of Mrs. Harcourt and therefore the contract binding on her, or whether it was such general estate as legally to vest ,in her husband and therefore irreclaimable by her, will depend on the pleadings and evidence, and to the end that a full and fair adjustment of the legal and equitable rights of these parties may be had, the plaintiff should be allowed to amend his petition and the defendants to make issue thereon, and then the cause finally adjudicated upon such issues and the evidence.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed for further proceedings consistent herewith.
1 ·wo 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

, 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

9 United Sta,tes of America, No. CR-15-08245-001-PCT-JJT 

10 Plaintiff, ORDER 

11 v. 

12 Alvin Wesley Begody, 

13 Defendant. 

1411-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived and the detention hearing was held on the record including a proffer 

by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the 

terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, 

pursuant to Rule 32.l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing 

evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a ( 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 13th day ofMarch, 2018.'
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on form 10-K of Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
II (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition and results of
operations  of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  March 31, 2009

/s/
Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC

Chief Financial Officer and Director
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"On Cupid! On, Donner and BARREL!","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yK7e3Qn0YF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/on-cupid-on-donner-and-barrel\/\">On Cupid! On, Donner and BARREL!<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/on-cupid-on-donner-and-barrel\/embed\/#?secret=yK7e3Qn0YF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“On Cupid! On, Donner and BARREL!” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yK7e3Qn0YF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/gsfc-20171208-archive-e000249orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 20, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 20, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0205. THE CITY OF SAVANNAH v. KAREN ADAMS et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STCV1700660
Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-09735 of Silver Diner, Inc. on Form S-3 and in Registration Statements No.
33-96684449 and No. 33-97535703 of Silver Diner, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report
dated March 14, 1997, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Silver
Diner, Inc. for the year ended December 29, 1996.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
_____________________________
March 14, 1997
Washington DC
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kenneth Galpin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

|  
 
 
 
Date: June 18, 2007
 
/s/ Kenneth Galpin
 
 
Kenneth		Galpin		President and Chief Executive Officer  
 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Most Home Corp. and will be retained by Most Home Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"California Students to Hear from NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"g05o6w8gA3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/california-students-to-hear-from-nasa-astronaut-aboard-space-station\/\">California Students to Hear from NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/california-students-to-hear-from-nasa-astronaut-aboard-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=g05o6w8gA3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“California Students to Hear from NASA Astronaut Aboard Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"g05o6w8gA3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/iss066e137090_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### FRANK TALBOT v. FIRST AND SECURITY NATIONAL BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS.1

January 23, 1920.

No. 21,502.

Case followed.

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $223.97. The case was tried before Steele, J., who, when plaintiff rested on the pleadings, denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action and at the close of the testimony its motion for a directed verdict and granted plaintiff’s motion for a *482directed verdict for $227.43, From an. order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

Reversed.

*Lancaster & Simpson*and *James E. Dorsey,*for appellant.

*Douglas, Kennedy & Kennedy,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 176 N. W. 187.

Per Curiam.

This case and the case of B. S. Talbot against the same defendant were tried together, supra, page 12, 176 N. W. 184. The issues and facts are alike, save as to the amount of the checks. The decision in that case is applicable here. The order appealed from is accordingly reversed.
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 63

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 12, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

AN ACT

To designate the reservoir created by Trinity Dam in the

Central Valley project, California, as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 63 RFS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRINITY LAKE.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The reservoir created by Trinity

3 Dam in the Central Valley project, California, and des4 ignated as ‘‘Clair Engle Lake’’ by Public Law 88–662 (78

5 Stat. 1093) is hereby redesignated as ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula7 tion, document, record, map, or other paper of the United

8 States to the reservoir referred to in subsection (a) shall

9 be considered to be a reference to ‘‘Trinity Lake’’.

10 (c) REPEAL OF EARLIER DESIGNATION.—Public

11 Law 88–662 (78 Stat. 1093) is repealed.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Robert Wood, III,

Defendant.

No. CR-15-50201-01-PHX-DGC

ORDER OF DETENTION

A detention hearing in this matter was held on August 20, 2019.

The Court Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of proof by clear 

and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that he is not a 

danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994).

Defendant traveled outside of Arizona on two occasions. On December 12, 2018,

Defendant traveled to Texas. When asked on December 13 about his travel, he lied to his 

probation officer. On February 6, 2019, Defendant traveled to Oregon when he only had 

permission to travel to Washington. When asked about this travel, Defendant told his 

probation officer that he resided at a home in Shoreline, Washington. The Court previously 

found Petitioner violated his supervised release for similar conduct. Also, Petitioner has 

been charged with felony, fraud offenses in the Arizona state courts for conduct in June 

and July of 20171, which was prior to his current term of supervised release. Defendant 

has demonstrated a disregard for court orders and will not be honest with his probation 

 

1 Defendant commenced his first term of supervised release in the District of 

Arizona on July 17, 2015.
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

officer when discussing his conduct. Defendant’s pending state charges demonstrate that 

he poses a greater risk to commit offenses while on supervised release. Defendant has not 

established by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a danger to the community.

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court.

Dated this 21

st day of August, 2019.

Honorable John Z. Boyle

United States Magistrate Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 648 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 648

 To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from treating as allowable costs 
under a defense contract any restructuring costs of the Boeing Company 
   arising from its acquisition of the McDonnell Douglas Corporation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 1997

 Mr. Sanders (for himself and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on National 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from treating as allowable costs 
under a defense contract any restructuring costs of the Boeing Company 
   arising from its acquisition of the McDonnell Douglas Corporation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Boeing-McDonnell Douglas Corporate 
Welfare Elimination Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TREATING RESTRUCTURING COSTS OF BOEING COMPANY 
              RESULTING FROM ACQUISITION OF MCDONNELL DOUGLAS COMPANY 
              AS ALLOWABLE COSTS UNDER A DEFENSE CONTRACT.

    The Secretary of Defense may not treat as an allowable cost under a 
defense contract (in accordance with section 2324 of title 10, United 
States Code, and the regulations prescribed under that section) any 
restructuring costs of the Boeing Company arising from the acquisition 
by that company of the McDonnell Douglas Corporation announced on 
December 15, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4188-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]


Washington; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Washington (FEMA-4188-DR), dated August 11, 2014, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 12, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Washington is hereby amended to include the following 
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of August 11, 2014.

    Kittitas County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.


W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-25075 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P