alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 701-TA-507 (Final)]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        On October 14, 2014, the Department of Commerce published notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of a negative final determination of subsidies in connection with the subject investigation concerning Korea (79 FR 61605). Accordingly, pursuant to section 207.40(a) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR § 207.40(a)), the countervailing duty investigation concerning non-oriented electrical steel from Korea (investigation No. 701-TA-507 (Final)) is terminated. The Commission's ongoing antidumping investigation involving non-oriented electrical steel from Korea (investigation No. 731-TA-1241) will continue.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 14, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Edward Petronzio (202-205-3176), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (                        *http://www.usitc.gov*). The public record for these investigations may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                         *http://edis.usitc.gov.*

Authority:This investigation is being terminated under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 201.10 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR § 201.10).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: October 23, 2014.

Lisa R. Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2014-25659 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

MUSTAFA T. MOODY, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 990 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

matter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAWNMART, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 28, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                         374,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,404,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,953,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,938,000
<PP&E>                                       6,450,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,394,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,845,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,647,000
<BONDS>                                      9,898,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,500,000
<COMMON>                                        24,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,224,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,845,000
<SALES>                                     14,532,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,417,000
<CGS>                                       11,703,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,086,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,087,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,688,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,444,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,444,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      150,000
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,594,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"NASA X-59 Unveiled During Rollout Ceremony","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fH5mS8MjS3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-x-59-unveiled-during-rollout-ceremony\/\">NASA X-59 Unveiled During Rollout Ceremony<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-x-59-unveiled-during-rollout-ceremony\/embed\/#?secret=fH5mS8MjS3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA X-59 Unveiled During Rollout Ceremony” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fH5mS8MjS3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/afrc2024-0004-001orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":385}
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-12-00408-CR

MARCO ANTONIO REBELES

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-CCR-5631-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court 

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 3, 2014.
#### Bottorf *v.*Conner.

Where a demurrer to a bill in ehancéry is overruled, a final decree is not rendered against the defendant; but he is only ordered to answer.

The vendor’s lien on real estate for the purchase-money, is not an original and absolute charge on the knd, hut only an equitable right to resort to it, in case there be not sufficient personal estate.

APPEAL from the *Clark*Circuit Court.

Scott, *J.*

Conner sold to *Bottorf*a tract of land; and the purchase-money remaining unpaid, Conner, without resorting to a Court of law for the recovery of his debt, brought his bill in equity to have the benefit of his lien on the land. The defendant demurred to the relief prayed for, because the complainant had not shown in his bill that he had no adequate remedy at law. The Court overruled the demurrer, and gave a final decree for the compMnant according to the prayer of his bill.

This was wrong. When the demurrer was overruled, the defendant ought to have been permitted to answer: and the Couri *288should have made an order to that effect. 3 Bl. Com. 446. la the case of *Evans*v. *Goodlet,*in this Court, a definitive decree was made on overruling the demurrer; but this was done with the absent and at the express request of the counsel, who informed the Court thatthey rested their case on the demurrer, and that if that were overruled they did not wish to answer (1). But this in the present case is unimportant, as the demurrer was improperly overruled. The doctrine is clear, that a vendor holds a lien on land sold, for the amount of the purchase-money; but this lien is not an original and absolute charge upon the land a but only an equitable right to resort to it, in case of failure of) personal estate. 1 Harr. Ch. 280. — Sugd. Vend. 363. — 2 Wash. 142. When a bill is brought for relief in equity, in a case in which the party has a full and complete remedy at law, the defendant may demur. 1 Harr. Ch. 282. In this case, there is nothing to show that the complainant below could not obtain his right, in the ordinary course of justice, in a Court of law.

*Thompson*and Naylor, for the appellant.

Nelson, for the appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

The decree is reversed, with costs*

(1)

 Ante, p. 246.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-20483

Summary Calendar

 

JAMES COMET BARRUS, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA-H-3892

- - - - - - - - - -

September 18, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Barrus appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. Mr.

Barrus contends that double jeopardy barred his prosecution for

conspiracy to commit bank fraud and misapplication of funds from

a federally insured financial institution and transportation of
No. 95-20483

- 2 -

stolen goods. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the same reasons given by the district court. Barrus

v. United States, No. CA-H-94-3892 (S.D. Tex. May 26, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    OF INTEGRITY MEDIA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Integrity Media, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, P. Michael Coleman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

    1    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    2    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ P. Michael Coleman
P. Michael Coleman
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Chief Executive Officer)

                                       71
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.8    
  


        The
Service contract of Matthew Barrett has been incorporated by reference to the 2001 Form 20-F filed with the SEC on March 22, 2002. 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.8
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 30, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00693- CR

BRODERICK RECHARD STOKES , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1201891

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Broderick Rechard Stokes pleaded guilty to burglary of a vehicle with two or more previous convictions. Appellant and the State agreed appellant’s punishment would not exceed ten months’ confinement in state jail

. O n April 28, 2009, the trial court sentenced appellant i n accordance with the terms of his agreement with the State. Appellant filed a notice of a ppeal on July 25, 2018

. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal for two reasons: the notice of appeal was not filed timely, and this is a plea bargain case with no appealable matters and2

appellant has not been granted permission to appeal.
First, a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements
of Rule 26 .2 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed more than nine years after sentence was imposed. Therefore, the appeal was not timely perfected, and we lack jurisdiction.
Second, in a plea bargain case—that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant—a defendant may appeal only matters raised by a written , pr etrial motion or with the trial court’s permission. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Appellant’s punishment does not exceed the agreed length of confinement. The record does not contain any appealable pretrial rulings , and the trial court did not grant appellan t permission to appeal.
Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Brown

. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"Administrator Goldin Issues Statement on Tenth Anniversary of Challenger Observance","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jTMAhyPvu0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/space-shuttle\/sts-51l\/goldin-statement-on-challenger-anniversary\/\">Administrator Goldin Issues Statement on Tenth Anniversary of Challenger Observance<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/space-shuttle\/sts-51l\/goldin-statement-on-challenger-anniversary\/embed\/#?secret=jTMAhyPvu0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Administrator Goldin Issues Statement on Tenth Anniversary of Challenger Observance” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jTMAhyPvu0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/648103main_chal-memorial_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":903}
EXHIBIT 32.

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who is the  chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Community First  Bancorporation,  hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form  10-Q of the  issuer  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

November 13, 2009

                             s/ Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                             --------------------------------------------------
                             Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"A Black Hole Gobbles Up a Star","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tnlcmR9vYi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pia25440-orig-iotd\/\">A Black Hole Gobbles Up a Star<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pia25440-orig-iotd\/embed\/#?secret=tnlcmR9vYi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Black Hole Gobbles Up a Star” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tnlcmR9vYi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/pia25440-orig-iotd.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}