alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Martha A. Marshall *v.*J. J. Roach.

Husband and Wife.

Separate estate of wife, not liable for debts of her husband. 2 Bush 413. Second judgment reversed.

Same — Sales—Personal Property.

Where a transfer of bank stock made before creation of debts of husband, though final payment of all purchase money not made until after such debts, the sale will not be set aside as fraudulent.

APPEAL EROM TAYLOR OIROUIT COURT.

October 13, 1870.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters:

The tract of land conveyed by Penick and wife to appellant, M. A. Marshall, as was adjudged by this court in *Marshall, &c. vs. Marshall & Penick, 2 Bush 413*was the property of Mrs. Marshall, and not liable to her husband’s debts, and which by the judgment in this case now complained of was ordered to be *414sold to pay appellee’s demands, that judgment for the reasons stated in the ease referred to is erroneous.

*James & Lindsey, for appellant.*

*Bodman, for appellee.*

As to the bank stock — Barrett -proves it was purchased and the transfers were made- in the spring of 1859, which was prior to the creation of all the debts sought to be recovered by appellee except the one for $124.65, and that as appears by the credits entered was nearly all paid, not five dollars of it was unpaid when this suit was brought — even then if there was no other objection to the judgment — appellee having become the creditor of the husband after the -transfer of the stock to the wife, has not established his right to set aside said transfer and subject said stock to the payment of his demands — and the court below erred in so -adjudging.

Wherefore the judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss appellee’s petition as to appellant, Martha A. Marshall, and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
#### Dann, Appellee, *v.*Banks, Appellant.

(No. 3977

— Decided January 9, 1947.)

*Mr. Joseph M. Harter*and *Mr. David M. Postlewaite,*for the motion.

Mr. *David T. Keating, contra.*

By the Court.

This cause is, submitted on motion by the appellee to strike the so-called notic°e of appeal, filed on December 14,1946, from the files for the reason that such document is a nullity as it was not filed within 20 days after the rendition of the judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Franklin county, such judgment being rendered on November 15, 1946.

An examination of the transcript discloses that on November 15, 1946, the judgment entry was filed, on *512November 23, 1946, a motion for a new trial was filed and on December 18,1946, tbe motion for new trial was overruled.

Having been filed before tbe overruling of the motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was prematurely filed. Section 12223-7, General Code, provides that when a motion for new trial is filed by either party within ten days after a journal entry of a final order, judgment or decree has been approved by the court in writing and filed with the clerk for journalization, the time of perfecting the appeal shall not begin to run until the entry of the order overruling or sustaining the motion for new trial. ,

The motion will be sustained, not for the reasons indicated therein, but for the reasons above stated.

*Motion sustained.*

Hornbeck, P. J., Wiseman and Miller, JJ., concur.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 578

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the treatment

of certain personal care services under the unemployment tax.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to the treatment of certain personal care services under

the unemployment tax.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONAL CARE

4 SERVICES UNDER UNEMPLOYMENT TAX.

5 (a) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PERSONAL CARE

6 SERVICES.—Subsection (c) of section 3306 of such Code

7 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (19),

8 by striking the period at the end of paragraph (20) and

9 inserting ‘‘; or’’, and by adding at the end thereof the fol10 lowing new paragraph:
2

HR 578 IH

1 ‘‘(21) services performed by an individual dur2 ing any period in providing personal attendance,

3 companionship, or household care services for any

4 individual if—

5 ‘‘(A) such services are performed in the

6 residence of such individual,

7 ‘‘(B) during such period, the individual

8 performing such services normally performs

9 such services for at least 5 individuals in their

10 residences, and

11 ‘‘(C) such services are not performed by

12 such individual while in the employ of another

13 person engaged in the trade or business of pro14 viding such services.’’

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (2) of

16 section 3306(c) of such Code is amended by inserting

17 ‘‘(not described in paragraph (21))’’ after ‘‘domestic serv18 ice’’ the first place it appears.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to remuneration paid in calendar

21 quarters ending after the date of the enactment of this

22 Act.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                         MARISA CHRISTINA, INCORPORATED
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

          EXHIBIT 11 -- STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   1994           1995           1996
                                                   ----           ----           ----
<S>                                              <C>           <C>            <C>
Outstanding common stock at January 1            5,563,126     8,434,000      8,434,250

Weighted average effect of shares issued
     during the period from January 1:
        Issuance of shares in acquisition of
           Adrienne Vittadini, Inc.                     --            --        147,679
        Acquisition of treasury shares                  --            --        (91,660)
        Stock options exercised                         --            88          3,480
        Acquisition of minority interest           193,588            --             --
        Initial public offering                  1,304,945            --             --
                                                 ---------     ---------     ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding              7,061,659     8,434,088      8,493,749

Weighted average effect of shares issued
     in public offering necessary to fund
     $6.9 million distribution of previously
     earned "S" Corporation earnings               251,570            --             --
                                                 ---------     ---------     ----------
Weighted average shares outstanding --
     supplemental                                7,313,229     8,434,088      8,493,749
                                                 =========     =========     ==========
</TABLE>


                                       44
#### Shipley Baking Company *v.*Hartford.

Opinion delivered October 27, 1930.

*505
      *W. L. Curtis,*for appellant.

*John W. Goolsby,*for appellee.

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). The decree of the chancery court was erroneous. This ease is ruled by the decision in *Phillips*v. *City of Siloam Springs, ante*p. 137. In that case the court held that under Crawford & Moses’ Digest, § 5125, *et seq.,*the power is conferred on the State Board of Health to require inspection of bakeries and to regulate the sale of their products, and that it was not within the power of a city to enact an ordinance exacting an inspection fee for products of a bakery located in another city which had complied with all the rules and regulations'of the State Board of Health and city board of health of the city in which the bakery was located, and manufactured and shipped its products under the supervision of such State and city boards of health. The court said in effect that the statute giving the power of regulation in the sale of foods and drinks was paramount, and that it is elementary law that a municipal ordinance, in so far as it conflicts with the statute, is invalid. The reason is that the statute of the State operates within the limits of the municipal corporation the same as it does elsewhere, and that local laws- and regulations are at all times subject to the paramount *506authority of the Legislature. Hence, ordinances of cities and towns inconsistent with statutes on the same subject must be held of no effect unless they are authorized by an express legislative grant. As applying this principle according to the facts of the particular case, we cite the following: *Carpenter*v. *Little Rock,*101 Ark. 238, 142 S. W. 162 ; *State*v. *Haynes,*175 Ark. 645, 300 S. W. 380 ; *Duncan*v. *Jonesboro,*175 Ark. 650, 1 S. W. (2d) 58 ; and *Bragg*v. *Adams,*180 Ark. 582, 21 S. W. (2d) 950. Therefore, the decree will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded, with directions to the chancery court to grant the prayer of the complaint of the plaintiffs.
EX-10.1




 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE

 BRIGHTCOVE INC. 

2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 

WHEREAS, Brightcove Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Brightcove Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”),
which was previously adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) and approved by the stockholders of the Company; 

WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the tax withholding provisions of the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, Section 17 of the Plan provides that the Board may amend the Plan at any time, subject to certain conditions set forth
therein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE: 

1.    Section 14(b) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“(b)    Payment in Stock. Subject to approval by the Administrator, a grantee may elect to have the
Company’s required tax withholding obligation satisfied, in whole or in part, by authorizing the Company to withhold from shares of Stock to be issued pursuant to any Award a number of shares with an aggregate Fair Market Value (as of the date
the withholding is effected) that would satisfy the withholding amount due; provided, however, that the amount withheld does not exceed the maximum statutory tax rate or such lesser amount as is necessary to avoid liability accounting treatment. For
purposes of share withholding, the Fair Market Value of withheld shares shall be determined in the same manner as the value of Stock includible in income of the grantees. The required tax withholding obligation may also be satisfied, in whole or in
part, by an arrangement whereby a certain number of shares of Stock issued pursuant to any Award are immediately sold and proceeds from such sale are remitted to the Company in an amount that would satisfy the withholding amount due.” 

2.    Effective Date of Amendment. This Amendment to the Plan shall become effective upon the date that it is
approved by the Board. 
 3.    Other Provisions. Except as set forth above, all other provisions of the Plan
shall remain unchanged. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan has been adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Company this 24th day of April 2021.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 06, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0020. RAPHAEL DONALDO SICHERON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2014CR900
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, KENNETH GALPIN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Most Home Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

|Date: December 21, 2005 | /s/  Kenneth Galpin
Kenneth Galpin
President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Anthony Greicius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/anthony-greicius-116962jpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Uses Two Worlds to Test Future Mars Helicopter Designs","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Q95m7ZOc92\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/mars-2020-perseverance\/ingenuity-helicopter\/nasa-uses-two-worlds-to-test-future-mars-helicopter-designs\/\">NASA Uses Two Worlds to Test Future Mars Helicopter Designs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/mars-2020-perseverance\/ingenuity-helicopter\/nasa-uses-two-worlds-to-test-future-mars-helicopter-designs\/embed\/#?secret=Q95m7ZOc92\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Uses Two Worlds to Test Future Mars Helicopter Designs” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Q95m7ZOc92\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/2worldscrop.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":296}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Brad Pitt to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station about Artemis Program","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iguey20Z4A\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/brad-pitt-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-on-space-station-about-artemis-program\/\">Brad Pitt to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station about Artemis Program<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/brad-pitt-to-speak-with-nasa-astronaut-on-space-station-about-artemis-program\/embed\/#?secret=iguey20Z4A\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Brad Pitt to Speak with NASA Astronaut on Space Station about Artemis Program” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iguey20Z4A\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/iss060e043273.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<CIK>                                  923027
<NAME>                                 BENEDEK BROADCASTING CORP

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                   8,090,583
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                           24,226,731
<ALLOWANCES>                               483,520
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        39,908,907
<PP&E>                                 123,870,640
<DEPRECIATION>                          39,849,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         491,297,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   36,211,154
<BONDS>                                247,171,289
<COMMON>                                 1,046,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                             144,907,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           491,297,569
<SALES>                                108,913,163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       110,891,836
<CGS>                                   14,505,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           14,505,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        81,120,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           396,560
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      23,589,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (8,720,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (1,848,831)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (6,871,685)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (6,871,685)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JUNE 30,
1998 QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,776
<SECURITIES>                                   198,775
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,090
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          191,213
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,985
<OTHER-SE>                                       (732)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,866
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,799
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    357
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                357
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>