alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 710

To amend the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 to direct

the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a study of the feasibility

of expanding the types of projects eligible for assistance from State

infrastructure banks.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Ms. DELAURO (for herself and Mrs. MEEK of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the National Highway System Designation Act

of 1995 to direct the Secretary of Transportation to

conduct a study of the feasibility of expanding the types

of projects eligible for assistance from State infrastructure banks.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Infrastructure

5 Bank Expansion Act’’.
2

•HR 710 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY OF EXPANDED USES OF STATE INFRASTRUC2 TURE BANKS.

3 Section 350 of the National Highway System Des4 ignation Act of 1995 (23 U.S.C. 101 note; 109 Stat. 618)

5 is amended by redesignating subsection (l) as subsection

6 (m) and by inserting after subsection (k) the following:

7 ‘‘(l) EXPANDED USES OF STATE INFRASTRUCTURE

8 BANKS.—

9 ‘‘(1) STUDY.—The Secretary, in consultation

10 with the heads of appropriate Federal departments

11 and agencies and the advisory committee established

12 pursuant to paragraph (3), shall conduct a study of

13 the feasibility of expanding the types of projects eli14 gible for assistance from State infrastructure banks

15 to include additional infrastructure development

16 projects carried out by the Secretary, as well as in17 frastructure development projects carried out by the

18 heads of other Federal departments and agencies.

19 ‘‘(2) FUNDING.—As part of the study, the Sec20 retary shall identify appropriations accounts which

21 could be used to provide funding to State infrastruc22 ture banks for projects referred to in paragraph (1).

23 ‘‘(3) ADVISORY COMMITTEE.—The Secretary

24 shall establish an advisory committee to assist the

25 Secretary in conducting the study. The members of

26 the advisory committee shall include representatives
3

•HR 710 IH

1 of private sector industries, representatives of State

2 and local governments, and other appropriate per3 sons.

4 ‘‘(4) REPORT.—Not later than 1 year after the

5 date of the enactment of this subsection, the Sec6 retary shall transmit to Congress a report containing

7 the results of the study, including recommendations

8 on appropriate administrative and legislative ac9 tions.’’.

Æ
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-K for the yearending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Partnership.

/s/David J. Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President and Director

March 30,2006

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Date

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Barrett J. O'Connor, President and Chief Executive Officer, of EFC
Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

      (1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of EFC Bancorp,
            Inc.;

      (2)   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
            untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this quarterly report;



Date: January 15, 2004                    /s/ Barrett J. O'Connor
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Barrett J. O'Connor
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (principal executive officer)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-17-00949-CV

Style: Khistina Caldwell Dejean v. Clenton Brown

Date motion filed*: February 23, 2018

Type of motion: Letter-Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Pro se appellant Khistina Caldwell Dejean

Document to be filed: Response to Jurisdictional Notice

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: February 26, 2018 

Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Dates: February 26, 2018

Date Requested: N/A (60 days for brief)

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted, in part

If documents are to be filed, documents due: April 2, 2018.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

This Court’s December 28, 2017 Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of 

Jurisdiction had warned the appellant that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want

of jurisdiction unless she timely responded within sixty days to show how this Court 

had jurisdiction. Thus, appellant’s extension request is construed as a motion for an

extension of time to file her response to the jurisdictional notice and is granted, in

part, for 30 days from this order. Accordingly, if appellant fails to file a response 

showing how this Court has jurisdiction by April 2, 2018, this appeal may be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 

(c). If appellant timely files a satisfactory response, a briefing schedule may be set.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

  Acting for the Court

Date: March 1, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                       226
<INVENTORY>                                      1,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,862
<PP&E>                                          84,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,852
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,913)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,047
<SALES>                                         45,022
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,022
<CGS>                                           39,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,678)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (874)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,804)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8


                                 AMENDMENT THREE
                                     TO THE
                        CASH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                          1994 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


         By action of the Shareholders of Cash America International, Inc. this
day, the Cash America International, Inc. 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

Section 5 of Plan is amended by revising the first sentence of paragraph (a) to
read as follows:

                  The maximum number of shares of Stock in respect of which
         Awards may be made under the Plan shall be a total of 3,800,000 shares
         of Common Stock.


                                       CASH AMERICA INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                       By:  /s/  Hugh A. Simpson
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Hugh A. Simpson, Executive Vice
                                            President,
                                            General Counsel and Secretary

May 16, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Argo-Tech Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.

Date:  September 10, 2004

                                 By: /s/ Michael S. Lipscomb
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Michael S. Lipscomb
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                 By: /s/ Frances S. St. Clair
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Frances S. St. Clair
                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                       23
#### Jno. P. Thomas *v.*Phil T. Watkins.

Trusts — Implied—Creation of by Act of Holder.

An implied trust, of funds coming into a persons hands, may be made, by his acts in using the funds on his own volition, to improve property of his wards.

APPEAL PROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

June 12, 1871.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

Neither party complains of the judgment in so far as it determines the amount to which the appellant is entitled as a *422credit on account of money advanced by him for his wards in the purchase of the improvements made upon their land by Hathaway and others. The amount to which said appellant may be entitled on account of boarding, clothing and tuition of his said wards, and on various other claims being yet undetermined by the lower court, cannot be considered upon this appeal, and the only question before this court for revision is the judgment of thé circuit court charging appellant with $4,000.00, the amount of the notes surrendered to him by the husband of his deceased sister, Mrs. Craig, in compliance with her wishes, as expressed before her death. By his answer appellant in response to the. direct charge that the notes were surrendered to him to he held in trust for the use and benefit of his wards denies the specific charge as made, and says that the defendants (meaning appellees) had no interest in said notes further than he might choose to use the same, directly or indirectly, for their benefit. He admits that he did swear in his deposition that the houses purchased from Hathaway and others for the appellees were paid for with their means, and his pleadings clearly show that at that time, they had no available means whatever, unless the notes received from Mrs. Craig were held for their benefit. And in his letter of April 8, 1865, to appellee Phil T. Watkins he states that he purchased the houses from Hathaway and others with the 33% acres of land given to him by Mrs. Craig during her life time for *that*purpose, or in other words for any purpose in aiding him in taking care of said appellee and his sisters.

The facts thus admitted, whilst they may not have created an enforceable trust in favor of the appellees, yet imposed upon the appellant a moral obligation to expend the amount of said notes for their benefit, and as he discharged this obligation by the purchase >of the improvements situate upon their lands, and by so doing invested them with the legal title to the proceeds of said notes, he has made an election in their favor, and by adding to their equity, which was at least equal to his own, the legal title, to the property acquired by the fund, which in morals if not in law, be held in trust for them, he cannot now be allowed to avoid this election, voluntarily made upon a sufficient consideration, and claim against them. We are of opinion that the judg*423meat of the circuit e«urt upon this branch of the case is right and proper and the same is therefore affirmed.

*Thompson, Weir, for appellant.*

*Sweeney & S., for appellee.*
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Randall Chance Bonito III, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-08248-PCT-SMB

ORDER OF DETENTION 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Supervised Release were held on July 19, 2019. 

The Court Finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has 

consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. 

 The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of proof 

by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that he is 

neither a serious flight risk nor a danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 

1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 19th day of July, 2019. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle

United States Magistrate Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 496 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 496

  To amend title 5, United States Code, to include medical foods as a 
  specific item for which coverage may be provided under the Federal 
                   Employees Health Benefits Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 1997

    Ms. Woolsey (for herself and Ms. Pryce of Ohio) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                          Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 5, United States Code, to include medical foods as a 
  specific item for which coverage may be provided under the Federal 
                   Employees Health Benefits Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDICAL FOODS.

    Section 8904(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(E) by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``, including with respect to medical foods (as 
        defined by section 5(b)(3) of the Orphan Drug Act).''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(F) by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``, including medical foods (as defined by 
        section 5(b)(3) of the Orphan Drug Act).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2003 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdams Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


August 8, 2003
Opinion filed November 4, 2010



## In The



# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________



### No. 11

- 10

- 00 283

- C R

__________

ANTHONY PAU L DELACRUZ , Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 32 nd District Court

Fisher County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 3383

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Anthony Paul De l aCruz 1 was convicted of the offense of aggravated sexual assault of an

elderly person. On August 4, 2010, the trial court sentenced him in open court to confinement

for fifty years pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. We dismiss the appeal.

A motion for new trial was not filed. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be fi le d

within thirty days of the date the sentence was imposed in open court in order to timely perfect

an appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2. Appellant filed his pro se notice of appeal on September 16,

1 The s pelling of appellant’s name is taken from signature on notice of appeal and right of appeal.2

2010, forty

- three days after the date the sentence was impose d in open court. A motion to extend

time was not filed pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3. Absent a timely notice of appeal or the

granting of a timely motion for extension of time, this court does not have jurisdiction to

entertain an appeal. Slaton v. S tate , 981 S.W.2d 208, 209

- 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v.

State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108, 109

-

10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State , 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).

Moreover, we not e that the trial court stated in its certification of defendant’s right to

appeal that this was a plea bargain agreement case and appellant had no right to appeal and that

appellant had waived his right to appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CUR IAM

November 4 , 2010

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Strange, J.
Case 2:16-cr-00096-SMM Document 4 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00096-SMM Document 4 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00096-SMM Document 4 Filed 12/14/15 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01834-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01834-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/17/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01834-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/17/15 Page 3 of 3
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ROCKLAND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A CHANGE IN ITS FUEL CHANGE TO BE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1987. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE v. NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 231 *N.J.Super.*478)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: F.E.V., A MINOR

PETITION OF: K.V., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 867 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: A.E.W.B., JR., A

MINOR

PETITION OF: K.V., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 868 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 22nd day of January, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-51B","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6qd47bTPRT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-51b\/\">STS-51B<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-51b\/embed\/#?secret=6qd47bTPRT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-51B” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6qd47bTPRT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/word-image-1194.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":466}