alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Jose Luis Barajas-Zamorano,

Defendant.

No. CR-16-00057-PHX-DLR

DETENTION ORDER

On June 21, 2022, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for revocation 

of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court 

considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released on 

conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 21st day of June, 2022.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:16-cr-00057-DLR Document 36 Filed 06/21/22 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Christina Cohen, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Sallie Mae Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-15-00608-TUC-DCB

ORDER 

 Pursuant to Plaintiff and Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC 

(“Equifax”) stipulation (Doc. 48), 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims or causes of action against Equifax in the 

above-captioned matter are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear their own costs and 

attorneys’ fees incurred herein. 

 Dated this 22nd day of August, 2016. 

Honorable David C. Bury United States District Judge

Case 4:15-cv-00608-DCB Document 49 Filed 08/23/16 Page 1 of 1
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 543

To provide for award of the Navy Combat Action Ribbon based upon participation in ground or surface combat as a member of the Navy or Marine

Corps during the period between July 4, 1943, and March 1, 1961.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. MCNULTY (for himself, Mr. STUMP, Mr. BONO, Mr. UNDERWOOD, Mr.

FRANKS of New Jersey, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. MANTON, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mrs. CLAYTON,

Mr. SAXTON, Mr. FROST, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr.

HINCHEY, Mr. SMITH OF NEW JERSEY, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. LEACH, Mr.

FRELINGHUYSEN, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. KILDEE, and Mr. BENTSEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on National Security

A BILL

To provide for award of the Navy Combat Action Ribbon

based upon participation in ground or surface combat

as a member of the Navy or Marine Corps during the

period between July 4, 1943, and March 1, 1961.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Secretary of the Navy shall provide for award

4 of the Navy Combat Action Ribbon (established by Sec5 retary of the Navy Notice 1650, dated February 17, 1969)
2

•HR 543 IH

1 with respect to participation in ground or surface combat

2 during any period after July 4, 1943, and before March

3 1, 1961 (the date of the otherwise applicable limitation

4 on retroactivity).

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Varney,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03937-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8524 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8524 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 803

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to the treatment

of livestock sold on account of weather-related conditions.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 13, 1997

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Michigan, Mr. HILL, Mr. LATHAM,

Mr. BARRETT of Nebraska, Mrs. EMERSON, and Mr. POMEROY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways

and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 relating to

the treatment of livestock sold on account of weatherrelated conditions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF LIVESTOCK SOLD ON ACCOUNT

4 OF WEATHER-RELATED CONDITIONS.

5 (a) DEFERRAL OF INCOME INCLUSION.—Subsection

6 (e) of section 451 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

7 (relating to special rules for proceeds from livestock sold

8 on account of drought) is amended—
2

•HR 803 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘drought conditions, and that

2 these drought conditions’’ in paragraph (1) and in3 serting ‘‘drought, flood, or other weather-related

4 conditions, and that such conditions’’; and

5 (2) by inserting ‘‘, FLOOD, OR OTHER WEATH6 ER-RELATED CONDITIONS’’ after ‘‘DROUGHT’’ in the

7 subsection heading.

8 (b) INVOLUNTARY CONVERSIONS.—Subsection (e) of

9 section 1033 of such Code (relating to livestock sold on

10 account of drought) is amended—

11 (1) by inserting ‘‘, flood, or other weather-relat12 ed conditions and such conditions resulted in the

13 area being designated as eligible for assistance by

14 the Federal Government’’ before the period at the

15 end thereof; and

16 (2) by inserting ‘‘, FLOOD, OR OTHER WEATH17 ER-RELATED CONDITIONS’’ after ‘‘DROUGHT’’ in the

18 subsection heading.

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to sales and exchanges after De21 cember 31, 1996.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald K. Daniel, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Health Realty, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we
have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date'); and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures based on such evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there
were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 1, 2006

| | /s/ Donald K. Daniel                
| | ------------------------------------
| | Donald K. Daniel                    
| | Senior Vice President and Controller
| | (Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Tracey Allen Antone, Sr.,

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01230-PHX-DGC

DETENTION ORDER

On March 25, 2020, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released 

on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 25th day of March, 2020.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
#### Davis *v.*Scott, in Error.

TRESPASS for an assault and battery and false imprisoninQnt. Pie,a* former recovery and execution against a joint *170trespasser. *Held*, on*general demurrer, that the plea was a bar ‡0 ^ action.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 512 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 156
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 512

                          [Report No. 105-276]

     To prohibit the expenditure of funds from the Land and Water 
  Conservation Fund for the creation of new National Wildlife Refuges 
      without specific authorization from Congress pursuant to a 
  recommendation from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to 
                           create the refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1997

    Mr. Young of Alaska (for himself and Mr. Pombo) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

                           September 29, 1997

                   Additional sponsor: Mr. Radanovich

                           September 29, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit the expenditure of funds from the Land and Water 
  Conservation Fund for the creation of new National Wildlife Refuges 
      without specific authorization from Congress pursuant to a 
  recommendation from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to 
                           create the refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Wildlife Refuge Authorization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NEW REFUGES.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds may be 
expended from the Land and Water Conservation Fund established by 
Public Law 88-578, for the creation of a new refuge within the National 
Wildlife Refuge System without specific authorization from Congress 
pursuant to recommendation from the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service, to create that new refuge.
                                     

                                                 Union Calendar No. 156

105th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 512

                          [Report No. 105-276]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

     To prohibit the expenditure of funds from the Land and Water 
  Conservation Fund for the creation of new National Wildlife Refuges 
      without specific authorization from Congress pursuant to a 
  recommendation from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to 
                           create the refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 29, 1997

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 211 (Friday, October 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service.<SUP>TM</SUP>

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: October 31, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 27, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 98 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-6, CP2015-7.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-25961 Filed 10-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 24, 2017

Order 

Clerk

May 24, 2017

152448(143)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 152448

v COA: 317892

St. Clair CC: 10-002936-FC

TIA MARIE-MITCHELL SKINNER,

Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Fair Punishment Project to file a 

late amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief will be accepted for filing if 

submitted on or before June 16, 2017.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                             231,297
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      6,150,900
<ALLOWANCES>                       170,606
<INVENTORY>                        13,773,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   20,904,308
<PP&E>                             16,284,880
<DEPRECIATION>                     3,519,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     43,633,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              8,644,076
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           209,757
<OTHER-SE>                         25,431,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       43,633,018
<SALES>                            43,717,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   43,717,824
<CGS>                              25,774,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      43,684,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 576,950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (543,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (543,776)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       (543,776)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (0.03)



</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Offers Up to $200 Million to Help Push New Technologies to Market","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ow50CeI2lW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-offers-up-to-200-million-to-help-push-new-technologies-to-market\/\">NASA Offers Up to $200 Million to Help Push New Technologies to Market<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-offers-up-to-200-million-to-help-push-new-technologies-to-market\/embed\/#?secret=Ow50CeI2lW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Offers Up to $200 Million to Help Push New Technologies to Market” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ow50CeI2lW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/artemis_illustration.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}