T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R AMON MUR I L L O, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C H A R L E S L E E D U D L E Y , M .D .; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16874 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 5 8 4 - J SW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J e f f r e yS . W hi t e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R am on M uri l l o, a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g th a t d e f e n d a n ts vi ol a t e d hi s E i ghth a nd F ourt e e nth A m e ndm e ntr i ght s byc i r c um c i s i ng hi m w i thout 

# FI LED JAN 02 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 16874 2 hi s c ons e nt . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo, T oguc hiv . Chung , 3 9 1 F. 3 d1 0 5 1 , 1 0 5 6 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t o n M u rill o ’s de l i be r a t e i ndi f

f e r e nc e c l a i m be c aus e M ur i l l o f a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne di s put e of m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rd e f

e n d a n ts k n e w o rh a dr e a s o n to k n o w th a t M u r illo d id n o t c o n s e n t to th e c ir c u m c is io n . See Farm e rv . B r e nnan , 511 U . S . 825, 837 ( 1994) ( s ta n d a r df

o re v a lu a tin g ac la im o f d e lib e r a te in d if

f e r e n c e ) ; see a l

so T oguc hi , 391 F . 3 dat1 0 6 0 (m ed i cal m al p ract i ce o r n eg l i g en ce i s i n su ffi ci en tt o est ab l i sh del i bera t e i nd i ff

er ence un der the E i gh th A m endm ent ). T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t o n M u rill o ’s exce ss i ve force cl ai m because M uri l l o fai l ed t o rai se a genui ne di sput e of m at er i al f a c t a s to w h e th e rth e c ir c u m c is io n w a s p e r f o rm e dm a lic io u s lya n ds a d is tic a llyto c au s e h a rm . See H

uds on v . McMi l l i an , 503 U . S . 1, 6- 7 ( 1992) ( s t a nda r d f or eval uat i ng a c l ai m of exces si ve force ). T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d M ur i l l o’ s F ourt e e nth A m e ndm e nt cl ai m thathe w as ci rc um ci se d w i tho uthi s c on se ntas barr ed by the do ctri ne of re s ju d ic a tab a s e do n th e ju d g m e n t in h is p r e v io u s s ta te c o u rt a c tio n . See B rodh ei m v. Cry , 5 8 4 F .3 d1 2 6 2 , 1 2 6 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( p r o v id in g th e s ta n d a r df o rc la im prec l usi on un der C al i forni a l aw ); Ko u g a s ia n v . T M S L , I n c ., 359 F . 3d 1136, 114311- 16874 3 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( a f

eder al courtre l i es on “ the preclusi on l aw of the st at e c ou rtthat r e nde r e d the e a r l i e rj udgm e ntorj udgm e nt s t o de t e rm i ne w he the rs ubs e que nt fe dera l l i t i gat i on i s pre cl ud ed”) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g M u r illo ’s m o tio n to ap p o in t c o u n s e l b e c au s e M u r illo f a ile dto s h o w e x c e p tio n a l c ir c u m s ta n c e s . See P alm erv. V

aldez , 560 F . 3d 965, 970 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( s e tt i ng f orth s t a nda r d of r e vi e w a nd r e qui r e m e ntof “ e xc e pt i ona l c i r c um s t a nc e s ” f orappoi ntm e ntof coun se l ). M ur i l l o’ s c ont e nt i ons c onc e rni ng the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s s uas pont e gr a ntof sum m ary j ud gm entand h i s pre se rvat i on of fe dera l j uri sdi ct i on ar e unp er suas i ve. W e gr a ntM ur i l l o’ s m ot i on t o f i l e as ubs t i tut e r e pl ybr i e f , a nd w e i ns truc tthe C le rkto f

ile th e r e p lyb r ie f

s u b m itte do n O c to b e r5 , 2 0 1 2 . AF F I RME D.