Filed 1/6/16 In re Jose M. CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

In re J ose M

. , a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court L aw. B 265302

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JOSE M

.,
Defendant and Appellant. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TJ21943 )

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County

. Catherine J. Pratt

, J uvenile Court Referee

. Affirmed.

James M. Crawford , under appointment by the Cou rt of Appeal, for Defendant

and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * * * * * * * * *2

J ose M

. , now 18

, appeals from order s denying his motion to suppress, and finding
him to be a person described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 , following a finding he committed misdemeanor possession of marijuana on school grounds ( Health &
Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (e) ). We appointed appel late counsel to repre sent him.
Appointed counsel filed a brief in which no issues were raised. ( People v. Wende (1979)
25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) .) The brief included a declaration from coun s el that he reviewed

the record and advised J ose M

. of his right, under Wende , to submit a supplemental brief.

T his court sent Jose M

. notice advising him that he had 30 days to personally submit any

contentions or issues tha t he wished to raise on appeal. No supplemental brief was filed.
Jose M. moved to suppress his oral statements, and th e observations of police
officers and campus security, based on the warrant less search and seizure made by police.
The motion to suppress was considered contemporaneously with the evidence adduced

for the adjudication of the petition.
Salvador Villa, an officer with the Compton School Police Department, testified

that on December 17, 2014, he was working as the resource officer for the C esar Chavez
Continuation High School

. A school security guard asked Officer Villa to detain Jose M.
The security guar d reported that a teacher ha d seen Jose M. conduct a hand

- to

- hand drug

transaction with another student. Officer Villa told Jose M. to stop, and Jose M.
complied. Officer Villa asked if Jose M. had any drugs on him, and Jose M. pulled some
marijuana out of his pocket and showed it to Officer Villa.
Thomas McCleary , a senior criminalist with the Los Angeles Sheriff ’ s Department, testified that the substance recovered from Jose M. was marijuana.
The juvenile court denied the motion to suppress, and fo und the allegations to be

true . The court ordered probation under Welfare and Institutions Code section 725.
We have examined the entire record, co nsisting of one volume of clerk’ s transcript

and two volumes of reporter’ s transcript, and are satisfied that appointed counsel fully
complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable appellate issues exist. ( People v.
Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106; Wende, supra , 25 Cal.3d 436.) We therefore affirm orders

below

.3 DISPOSITION

T he orders are affirmed.

GRIMES

, J. WE CONCUR:

BIGELOW , P. J.

RUBIN , J.