alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIMHD Support for Conferences and Scientific Meeting (R13).                    

*Date:*                         November 6, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hui Chen, MD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7784,                         *chenhui@mail.nih.gov.*

      ( print page 61885)    
Dated: October 7, 2014.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-24393 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nathan Cranford","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nathan-a-cranfordnasa-gov\/","title":":envihab","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6j8jC2cUoM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/envihab\/\">:envihab<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/envihab\/embed\/#?secret=6j8jC2cUoM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“:envihab” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6j8jC2cUoM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/envihab.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":300}
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 9, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00762

- CV

Fakhrealam Atiq, Appellant

v.

CoTechno Group, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, A ND FIELD
REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment render ed by the tr i a l court on October 23 , 2013. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in

the court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and renders

judgment dismissing appellee’s claims against appellant for want of personal jurisdiction. The

appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Denise H. Troy (#012915) 

dtroy@dickinsonwright.com 

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 

1850 North Central Avenue, Suite 1400 

Phoenix, Arizona 85004 

Phone: (602) 285-5000 

Fax: (602) 285-5100 

Attorneys for Defendants Johnson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Keith and Tammy Early, et al. 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

The State of Arizona, et al., 

 Defendants. 

No. 2:16-CV-00031-SPL (DMF) 

Johnsons’ Joinder in the CHC 

Defendants’ Motion to 

Strike/Preclude Plaintiffs’ Damages 

Expert Dr. Barbara Luna from 

Testify at Trial Due to Untimely 

Disclosure (Doc. # 236) 

 

 Defendants Melissa and Brian Johnson (“Johnson”), hereby join in the CHC 

Defendants’ Motion to Strike/Preclude Plaintiffs’ Damages Expert Dr. Barbara Luna from 

Testify at Trial Due to Untimely Disclosure (Doc. # 236). For the reasons stated in the CHC 

motion, Dr. Luna’s should be precluded from testifying because none of the Defendants, 

including counsel undersigned, received her expert report until August 20, 2018, long past the 

disclosure deadline, and past the rebuttal deadline. 

 Respectfully submitted on February 8, 2019. 

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC 

By: s/ Denise H. Troy 

Denise H. Troy 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Johnson

Case 2:16-cv-00031-SPL-DMF Document 237 Filed 02/08/19 Page 1 of 3
-2- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:16-cv-00031-SPL-DMF Document 237 Filed 02/08/19 Page 2 of 3
-3- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on February 8, 2019, I electronically transmitted the foregoing 

document to the Clerk’s office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing to all CM/ECF registrants. 

 s/ Denise H. Troy 

PHOENIX 58386-3 529642v1 

Case 2:16-cv-00031-SPL-DMF Document 237 Filed 02/08/19 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Anthony Greicius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/anthony-greicius-116962jpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA-Led Study Provides New Global Accounting of Earth\u2019s Rivers","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KF1kAV3lSa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/swot\/nasa-led-study-provides-new-global-accounting-of-earths-rivers\/\">NASA-Led Study Provides New Global Accounting of Earth\u2019s Rivers<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/swot\/nasa-led-study-provides-new-global-accounting-of-earths-rivers\/embed\/#?secret=KF1kAV3lSa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA-Led Study Provides New Global Accounting of Earth\u2019s Rivers” — NASA\" data-secret=\"KF1kAV3lSa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1-colorado-river.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 597

To Prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument

in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 5, 1997

Mrs. CHENOWETH (for herself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DOOLITTLE, and Mr. SMITH

of Oregon) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

A BILL

To Prohibit further extension or establishment of any national monument in Idaho without full public participation and an express Act of Congress, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 597 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FURTHER EXTENSION OR ES2 TABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN

3 IDAHO.

4 No extension or establishment of a national monu5 ment may be undertaken in Idaho after the date of enact6 ment of this Act without full public participation and an

7 express Act of Congress.

Æ
423 A.2d 1304

#### Kirtland t/a, etc., Appellants, v. Schaffer et al.

Argued March 19, 1979.

Elwood M. Malos, for appellant; M. Shay, for Schaffer, appellee. Jeffrey R. Dimmich, for Hageter, appellee. George A. Hahalis, for Donchez, appellee.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.

The order is affirmed on the able opinion of Williams, J., of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, Civil Division.
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 2 2
- 4 413

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appel lee ,

v. ALEXANDER O’NEAL JACKSON , Defendant

- Appell ant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Henry E. Hudson , Senior District Judge. ( 3 :2 1

- c r - 0 0 142

- HEH

- 1 )

Submitted : April 25 , 202 3 Decided: October 18, 2023

Before HARRIS and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Geremy C. Kamens, Federal Public Defender, Patrick L. Bryant, Alexander, Virginia, Laura J. Koenig, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jessica D. Aber, United States Attorney, Kenneth R. Simon, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee

. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cir cuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-4413 Doc: 32 Filed: 10/18/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM : Alexander Jackson appeals from his 78

- month sentence for possessing a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Jackson contends that his sentence is procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to adeq uately explain the sentence and failed to address his non

- frivolous arguments for a different sentence.
We review a criminal sentence for reasonableness “under a deferential abuse

- of

discretion standard.” Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007). “ In determining procedural reasonableness, this Court considers whether the district court properly calculated the defendant’s advisory guidelines range, gave the parties an opportunity to argue for an appropriate sentence, considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553( a) factors, and sufficiently explained the selected sentence. ” United States v. Ross , 912 F.3d 740, 744 (4th Cir. 2019) (citing Gall , 552 U.S. at 49

– 51 )

. Having reviewed the record, we conclude the district court considered the nonfrivolous arguments Jackson actually advanced in support of a different sentence

. We are also satisfied with the district court’s explanation of its
sentenc ing decision

. See Uni ted States v. Arbaugh , 951 F.3d 167, 174 (4th Cir. 2020)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-4413 Doc: 32 Filed: 10/18/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Raymond Thomas Yazzie, Jr. 

Defendant. 

No. CR-16-8008-01-PCT-DGC 

 

ORDER OF DETENTION 

 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Supervised Release were held on January 25, 2019. 

The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of proof 

by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that he is 

neither a serious flight risk nor a danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 

1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 25th day of January, 2019. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle 

United States Magistrate Judge
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25370]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD576


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) Summer 
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring Committee will hold a 
public meeting, jointly with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries 
Commission's (ASMFC's) Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass 
Technical Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 12, 2014, from 
12:30 p.m. to 5 p.m., on Thursday, November 13, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 
p.m., and on Friday, November 14, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. See 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for meeting topics.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Doubletree by Hilton BWI 
Airport, 890 Elkridge Landing Road, Linthicum, MD 21090; telephone: 
(410)-859-8060.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. State Street, 
Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council's Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring 
Committee, together with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries 
Commission's Technical Committee, will meet from Wednesday, November 12 
through Friday, November 14 (see DATES and ADDRESSES). Topics to be 
addressed include:
    1. Review of updates to a statistical model for recommending 
recreational management measures;
    2. Monitoring Committee recommendations for recreational management 
measures for the summer flounder, scup, and black sea bass fisheries 
for the 2015 fishing year;
    3. Technical Committee review of fishery independent indices for 
black sea bass.
    A detailed agenda and background documents will be made available 
on the Council's Web site (www.mafmc.org) prior to the meeting.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to M. Jan Saunders at the Mid-Atlantic Council 
Office, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 21, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-25370 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### W. J. Walker, &c., H. C. Smith, &c.

Bills and Notes — 'Waiver of Defense. .

The -acceptance of an article for which a note is given, without objection, and long possession of same, is a waiver of a defense against the note for the consideration, except for illegality.

Same.

Where a new note is taken, in consideration of the surrender of another debt, the assignee is estopped from impeaching the legality of the original consideration.

Bills and Notes — -Illegal Consideration — Adulteration in Violation of Statute;

A note, given for the purchase of an article, adulterated in violation of a penal statute, is voidable -and without consideration, in the hands of the obligee or his assignee without the privity of the obligor, and for a new consideration on which the assignee accepted it.

*324APPEAL PROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT.

February 12, 1870.

*Bennett, for appellants.*

Burnam> *Lilly, for appellees.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Kobertson :'

The acceptance of the whisky without objection and long possession and use of it without an offer to return it or rescind the contract, waived any defense against the note for the consideration except that of illegality and all cause of action on account of a breach of warranty by a deficit in quantity or quality.

But if, as alleged, the vendor of the whisky and obligee of the note had drugged it in violation of the penal statute against all such chemical adulteration; the consideration was illegal and the noté therefore voidable in the hands of the obligee and also in the hands of an assignee without the privity of the obligor and for a new consideration on which the assignee took it.

In this case the testimony tends to prove that the appellants gave up a debt on Johnson in consideration of' a new note and the assignment of it to them. If this be so the appellees are estopped, as against the appellants, from impeaching the legality of the original consideration.

Consequently, the court erred in the instruction to find for the appellees if the whisky was drugged and known to be so adulterated by the obligee when he sold it. The instruction ought to have been qualified by the hypothetical estoppel.

Wherefore, the judgment for the appellees is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Webster Preferred Capital
Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies, that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) | the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 8, 2010



/s/ Theresa M. MessinaTheresa M. MessinaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


Pursuant to
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or
incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

William Sturgiss, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Pinnacle West Capital Corporation, et al., 

Defendants. 

NO. CV-15-02567-PHX-SRB

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues 

have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. 

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that pursuant to the Court’s Minute Entry 

filed February 21, 2017, judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff. 

 Brian D. Karth

 District Court Executive/Clerk of Court

February 21, 2017 

s/ A. Duran

 By Deputy Clerk

 

Case 2:15-cv-02567-SRB Document 75 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 1