alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial gauger.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to CBP regulations, that Intertek USA, Inc., has been approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes for the next three years as of July 15, 2014.
 DATES: *Effective Dates:*
                         The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial gauger became effective on July 15, 2014. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for July 2017.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Approved Gauger and Accredited Laboratories Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services Directorate, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, tel. 202-344-1060.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, that Intertek USA, Inc., 1020 South Holland Sylvania Rd., Holland, OH 43528, has been approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Intertek USA, Inc., is approved for the following gauging procedures for petroleum and certain petroleum products set forth by the American Petroleum Institute (API): API Chapters
Title2
Tank Calibration.3
Tank gauging.7
Temperature Determination.8
Sampling.12
Calculations.14
Natural Gas Fluids Measurement.17
Maritime Measurements.
 Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
                    *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*
                     Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. *http://www.cbp.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​documents/​gaulist_​3.pdf* Dated: October 8, 2014. Ira S. Reese, Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services Directorate.


[FR Doc. 2014-24826 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Elliot C. Enos, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-1566-02-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER 

 On January 2, 2018, defendant, Elliot C. Enos, appeared before this Court on a 

petition to revoke conditions of release. The Court considered the information provided 

to the Court, and the arguments of counsel, in determining whether the defendant should 

be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant has violated 

the conditions of release and that there is no condition or combination of conditions 

available to the Court. 18 U.S.C. § 3148(b). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 2nd day of January, 2018.
1/7/2016 www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi­bin/generate_civil_js44.pl

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi­bin/generate_civil_js44.pl 1/2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Civil Cover Sheet

This automated JS­44 conforms generally to the manual JS­44 approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in

September 1974. The data is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. The

information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required

by law. This form is authorized for use only in the District of Arizona.

The completed cover sheet must be printed directly to PDF and filed as an attachment

to the Complaint or Notice of Removal.

Plaintiff(s): ROBERT REYNOLDS Defendant(s):

LIBERTY MUTUAL

INSURANCE COMPANY

County of Residence: Pima County of Residence: Outside the State of Arizona

County Where Claim For Relief Arose: Pima

Plaintiff's Atty(s): Defendant's Atty(s):

ROBERT J FORMAN , Attorney

Dix & Forman

P. O. Box 43517

Tucson, Arizona 85733

520­748­0800

SCOTT A. SALMON , Attorney

Cavanagh Law Firm

1850 N. Central, Ste. 2400

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

602­322­4041

REMOVAL FROM PIMA COUNTY, CASE #C20155158

II. Basis of Jurisdiction: 4. Diversity (complete item III)

III. Citizenship of Principal

Parties(Diversity Cases Only)

Plaintiff:­1 Citizen of This State

Defendant:­ 5 Non AZ corp and Principal place of Business outside AZ

IV. Origin : 2. Removed From State Court

V. Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance

VI.Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. Sections 1332, 1441(b), 1343(4)

VII. Requested in Complaint

Class Action:No

Case 4:16-cv-00020-JGZ Document 1-1 Filed 01/08/16 Page 1 of 2
1/7/2016 www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi­bin/generate_civil_js44.pl

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi­bin/generate_civil_js44.pl 2/2

Dollar Demand:

Jury Demand:No

VIII. This case IS RELATED to Case Number NOT RELATED assigned to Judge .

Signature: SCOTT A. SALMON

Date: 1/8/16

If any of this information is incorrect, please go back to the Civil Cover Sheet Input form using the Back button in your

browser and change it. Once correct, save this form as a PDF and include it as an attachment to your case opening

documents.

Revised: 01/2014

Case 4:16-cv-00020-JGZ Document 1-1 Filed 01/08/16 Page 2 of 2
|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 32.2                                     
|Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
|As Adopted Pursuant to                           
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Neil Sy, as Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
          and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 17, 2006 |  | /s/ Neil Sy            
|                       |  | Neil Sy                
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Imagin Molecular Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                                 CERTIFICATION

                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, James R. Lattanzi, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies that (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

         This Certification is signed on August 14, 2002.


                                    /s/ James R. Lattanzi
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    James R. Lattanzi
                                    Chief Financial Officer


                                      44
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HYDE

&

SWIGART

Phoenix, Arizona

______________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL - 1 OF 2 - 2:15-CV-02046-JAT

David J. McGlothlin, Esq. (SBN: 026059)

david@westcoastlitigation.com

HYDE & SWIGART

2633 E. Indian School Road, Suite 460

Phoenix, AZ 85016

Telephone: (602) 265-3332

Facsimile: (602) 230-4482

Ryan L. McBride, Esq. (SBN: 032001)

ryan@kazlg.com

KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

2633 E. Indian School Road, Suite 460

Phoenix, AZ 85016

Telephone: (800) 400-6808

Facsimile: (800) 520-5523

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Bridget Ann Kaus

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

//

//

//

Bridget Ann Kaus,

Plaintiff,

v.

Experian Information Solutions,

Inc., 

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:15-cv-02046-JAT

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

OF DEFENDANT EXPERIAN

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,

INC. WITH PREJUDICE

Case 2:15-cv-02046-JAT Document 38 Filed 01/20/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

HYDE

&

SWIGART

Phoenix, Arizona

______________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL - 2 OF 2 - 2:15-CV-02046-JAT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff and Defendant Experian Information

Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) hereby stipulate to dismiss Experian from this action,

with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. All

parties have now been dismissed and this matter should be closed.

Dated: January 20, 2017 HYDE & SWIGART

 By: s/ David J. McGlothlin 

David J. McGlothlin

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: January 20, 2017 JONES DAY

 By: s/ Jennifer Sun 

Jennifer Sun

 Attorney for Defendant

Experian Information

Solutions

Case 2:15-cv-02046-JAT Document 38 Filed 01/20/17 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

rbudd@baronbudd.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to Plaintiff(s) 

DIANA MOSS

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. MD-15-02641-DGC

Civil Case No.: 2:17-cv-03385-DGC

NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED 

SECOND AMENDED MASTER 

SHORT FORM COMPLAINT FOR 

DAMAGES FOR INDIVIDUAL 

CLAIMS AND DEMAND FOR JURY 

TRIAL 

Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 15.1 (b), Plaintiff Diana Moss respectfully 

submits this Notice of Filing Amended Second Amended Master Short Form Complaint for 

Damages for Individual Claims and Demand for Jury Trial. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of 

the amended complaint that indicates in which respect it differs from the original complaint. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 5th day of January, 2018. 

Matthew Haynie

Laura J. Baughman

Russell W. Budd 

BARON & BUDD, PC

3102 Oak Lawn Ave., Suite 1100 

Dallas, Texas 75219 

Telephone: (214) 521-3605 

Facsimile: (214) 520-1181 

mhaynie@baronbudd.com

lbaughman@baronbudd.com

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9533 Filed 01/05/18 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BARON & BUDD, P.C. 

By: /s/ Matthew Haynie_____________ 

Matthew Haynie

3102 Oak Lawn Avenue, Suite 1100 

Dallas, TX 75219 

Phone: (214) 521-3605 

Facsimile: (214) 520-1181 

mhaynie@baronbudd.com

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 5

th day of January, 2018, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a 

Notice of Electronic Filing.

/s/ Matthew Haynie_____________ 

Matthew Haynie

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9533 Filed 01/05/18 Page 2 of 2
#### Gilly *v.*Springer, in Error.

IN an action on a note, payable at the Commercial Bank of *Louisville,*the breach laid was, that the defendant, although often requested, had not paid, &c.: *Held,*on general demurrer, that the breach was too general (1).

(1)

 Vide *Palmier*v. Hughes, *November*term, 1824, post.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**eMAGIN
      CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      K.C.
      Park, the Chief Executive Officer of eMagin Corporation (the "Company"),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended September
      30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
      (a)
      or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      eMagin Corporation and will be retained by eMagin Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:
      April 2, 2007




By:
            /s/ K.C.
              ParkK.C.
              Park*Interim
                Chief Executive Officer*
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Kendrick Lamar Hill , Appellant

No. 06

- 21

- 00028

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 202nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 20F0097

- 202 ). Memorand um Opinion delivered by Justice Steve ns, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter
, * participating

. *Justice Carter, Retired, Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. We note that the appellant, Kend rick Lamar Hill , has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 6 , 2021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
Exhibit
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of
Track Data Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Martin Kaye, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 1.           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
      Martin KayeMartin
      KayeChief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial OfficerMarch
      26, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert H. Mullen, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Newark Group, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: December 13, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Armando Perez-Flores, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-50216-PHX-JJT

ORDER OF DETENTION 

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on 

Supervised Release were held on September 15, 2016. 

The Court Finds that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily 

waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and has 

consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition. 

 The Court Further Finds that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden of 

proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., 

that he is not a serious flight risk. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the 

court. 

 Dated this 21st day of September, 2016. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-cr-50216-JJT Document 7 Filed 09/21/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Judith B. Bryan,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03418-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8490 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8490 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2