alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nathan Cranford","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nathan-a-cranfordnasa-gov\/","title":"Spaceflight Standard Measures: Characterizing How Humans Adapt in Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Q7Lk2Q7pZP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/spaceflight-standard-measures-characterizing-how-humans-adapt-in-space\/\">Spaceflight Standard Measures: Characterizing How Humans Adapt in Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/spaceflight-standard-measures-characterizing-how-humans-adapt-in-space\/embed\/#?secret=Q7Lk2Q7pZP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Spaceflight Standard Measures: Characterizing How Humans Adapt in Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Q7Lk2Q7pZP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/standardmeasures_10-01.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":320}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jay Porton,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R.

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04103-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8959 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-mj-01700-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01700-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01700-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/23/15 Page 3 of 3
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 22, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00427

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.M.O ., A Child,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01766

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The appellee’s brief is due on October 15, 2014. Because this is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s termination of appellant’s parental r ights, no further extensions of time will be

considered.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav e hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 643 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 487
105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 643

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 24, 1997

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                             July 22, 1998

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at the 
 corner of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ``Carl 
                 B. Stokes United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse to be constructed at the corner of 
Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Carl B. Stokes United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carl B. Stokes 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 23, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.

                              By Jeff Trandahl,

                                                          Deputy Clerk.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 487

105th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 643

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at the 
 corner of Superior and Huron Roads, in Cleveland, Ohio, as the ``Carl 
                 B. Stokes United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 22, 1998

                       Reported without amendment
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Olivia F. Littleton","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/olittlet\/","title":"GUSTO Balloon Mission Maintains Course Circling Antarctic Skies","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Kbagonps84\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/gusto-balloon-mission-maintains-course-circling-antarctic-skies\/\">GUSTO Balloon Mission Maintains Course Circling Antarctic Skies<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/gusto-balloon-mission-maintains-course-circling-antarctic-skies\/embed\/#?secret=Kbagonps84\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“GUSTO Balloon Mission Maintains Course Circling Antarctic Skies” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Kbagonps84\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/gusto-mt.-erebus.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00419

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023

- 005541

- 1

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion



### R OBERT 

### D YSART 

### , Appellant

V



### .
R

AYMOND 

### B RITTON 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant ’ s brief was due on Mar ch 7, 2024. On April 8, 2024, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38 .6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution

unless , within ten days, appellant filed with the court a n appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an

extension was ne eded. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1 ), 42.3(b). We have

received no response. Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T ex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered : May 9, 2024
**IMAGIN MOLECULAR CORPORATION                              (Formerly Known As)                              Cipher Holding Corporation**

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cipher Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for                              the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,                              I, Patrick Rooney, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify,                              pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) the quarterly report                              fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the                              information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                              and results of operations of the Company.

                              Date: August 22, 2005

/s/ Corey Conn                              Chief Executive Officer, Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided                              to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission                              or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Training a Shape Memory Alloy Wire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2tvYatx4Cl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/ga_tech_michael-sm\/\">Training a Shape Memory Alloy Wire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/ga_tech_michael-sm\/embed\/#?secret=2tvYatx4Cl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Training a Shape Memory Alloy Wire” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2tvYatx4Cl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/ga_tech_michael-sm.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00301-CR

Michael L. Jordan

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1274694R)

June 26, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bob McCoy___________________

 Justice Bob McCoy
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kathleen O'Connor,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04538-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Lopez McHugh LLP - Newport Beach, CA

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/11/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9708 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9708 Filed 01/18/18 Page 2 of 2
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 22

- 10149 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Kyrin Peters,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 77

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Graves,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** * Kyrin Peters appeals the 41

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for unlawful receipt of a firearm while under indictment. Peters argues that the district court erred in applying a two

- level reckless endangerment enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2 because

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 17, 2023

Ly le W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10149 Document: 00516612587 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/17/2023No. 22

- 10149

2 his reckless conduct was not the result of attempting to flee from the consequences of the offense of conviction. The Government’s unopposed motion to correct its brief is **GRANTED**

. Peters preserved his challenge to the reckless en dangerment enhancement in the district court; accordingly, we review the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear

error. United States v. Deck e rt , 993 F.3d 399, 401 (5th Cir. 2021). There is no clear error when the district court’s findings are plausible in light of the entire record. See U nited States v. Torres

- Magana , 938 F.3d 213, 216 (5th Cir. 2019)

. Citing United States v. Southerland , 405 F.3d 263, 268 (5th Cir. 2005), Peters argues that the § 3C1.2 enhancement was not applicable because the evidence reveals that he fled from law enforcement officials because he knew he had warrants and also possessed marijuana, not because of the offense of conviction. He further assert s that there was an unknown temporal nexus between the flight and the receipt of the firearm and that he likely would have thought he would have been charged with unlawful carrying of a weapon, not receipt.

The district co urt is permitted to choose between “two permissible views of the evidence

. ” Torres

- Magana , 938 F.3d at 216 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The evidence reveals that it is just as likely that Peters fled to avoid detection of the firearm he had in the car as to avoid being arrested for warrants or possession of a small amount of marijuana , particularly in light of the fact that he admitted to receiving the firearm on or about the same day of the chase and that he knew he was under indictme nt. The district court’s conclusion that the § 3C1.2 enhancement was applicable given the facts of this case was not clear error. See id

. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 22-10149 Document: 00516612587 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/17/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET,   CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF  LOSS  AND  DEFICIT,
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, AND THE NOTES THERETO, WHICH MAY BE FOUND
ON PAGES 2 THROUGH 10 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
1999,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         168,324
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               205,581
<PP&E>                                         65,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,477
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          39,689
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       835,091
<OTHER-SE>                                     (601,255)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,183
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,390
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               357,564
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (310,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (310,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (310,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>