alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-61B","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"t0POV8yoTl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-61b\/\">STS-61B<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-61b\/embed\/#?secret=t0POV8yoTl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-61B” — NASA\" data-secret=\"t0POV8yoTl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/8561619\/8561619~large.jpg?w=600&h=1568&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1568}
Case 2:16-mj-01033-JFM Document 4 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01033-JFM Document 4 Filed 01/20/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-mj-01033-JFM Document 4 Filed 01/20/16 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,624,990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,395,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,481,779
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,896,529
<PP&E>                                       2,442,285
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,326,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,755,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,842,544
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,491
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,188,218
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,755,459
<SALES>                                     36,866,403
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,866,403
<CGS>                                       18,940,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,940,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,494,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,494,471)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,494,471)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.9.c

                                 First Amendment
                                       of
        FMC Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Savings and Investment Plan

     WHEREAS, FMC Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the FMC
Technologies, Inc. Non-Qualified Savings and Investment Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, since its spin-off from FMC Corporation, the Company has allowed
participants in the Plan to continue to hold or sell balances in the FMC
Corporation Stock Fund in the participants' discretion, but has prohibited new
investments in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund;

     WHEREAS, the Company now deems necessary and desirable to amend the Plan to
eliminate the FMC Corporation Stock Fund from the investment options offered
under the Plan; and

     NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority reserved to the Company by
Article IX of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of July 1, 2003,
as follows:

     Section 6.1 Deemed Investments is here by amended by adding the following
to the end thereof:

          (e) "Effective July 1, 2003 the FMC Corporation Stock Fund will be
          eliminated as a Permitted Investment in the Plan. The Company will
          direct the Trustee to sell any balances remaining in the FMC
          Corporation Stock Fund on June 30, 2003 and reinvest the proceeds
          from such sale into another Permitted Investment under the Plan to be
          designated by the Company at the time. It is currently anticipated
          that any remaining balances in the FMC Corporation Stock Fund will be
          transferred to the Fidelity Retirement Government Money Market
          Portfolio."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer has executed this amendment on
behalf of the Company, this 30/th/ day of August 2002.

                                            FMC Technologies, Inc.

                                            By:   /s/ William H. Schumann
                                               --------------------------
                                                   Senior Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40200 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO ADRIAN GUERRERO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-677-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ricardo Adrian Guerrero has filed an unopposed motion to summarily affirm the conviction and summarily vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in light of Lopez v. Gonzales , 127 S. Ct. 625 (2005), and United States v. Estrada-Mendoza , 475 F.3d 258 (5th Cir. 2007). The motion is GRANTED, the conviction is AFFIRMED, the sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED.
#### Winihister & Co. *v.*James W. Darnaby.

Attachment — Dismissal—Interlocutory Decree — Ré-instatement.

The discharge of an attachment, pendente lite;, is an interlocutory order, from which no appeal lies. It. can only be re-instated by application to and before a Judge of the Appellate Court.

APPEAL PROM PAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT.

December 9, 1870.

*Carr, for appellant.*

*Breclcinridge, for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Williams:

The discharge of the attachment *pendente lite*is only an interlocutory order, the remedy for which, if erroneous, was an application to an appellate judge for reinstatement as in case of an interlocutory dissolution of an injunction.,

. Wherefore, as this suit is still pending in the circuit court, the order discharging the attachment was not a final judgment revisable by this, court. Consequently the appeal from that order is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Nicholas Lee Cooper,

Defendant.

No. CR-16-08004-01-PCT-JJT

DETENTION ORDER

On July 28, 2020, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for revocation 

of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court 

considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released on 

conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 28th day of July, 2020.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:16-cr-08004-JJT Document 85 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131797 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan VON R. HINER, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131797 COA: 267521 Oakland CC: 2005-064151-NO JULISSA MOJICA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings or dered by the Court of Appeals.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

l0425 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2007

Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 14, 2019

a0611 

# Order

Clerk June 14, 2019

158015

JAMES FARRIS, Next Friend of

KEAGAN FARRIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 158015

COA: 337366

Antrim CC: 2016

- 009053

- NM

ELIZABETH ELLEN McKAIG, Personal

Representative of the Estate of JOHN H.

McKAIG, II,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to ap peal the May 17, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Hosts Media Briefing to Announce New Earth-Observing Role for International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HPaIFow4G8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-hosts-media-briefing-to-announce-new-earth-observing-role-for-international-space-station\/\">NASA Hosts Media Briefing to Announce New Earth-Observing Role for International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-hosts-media-briefing-to-announce-new-earth-observing-role-for-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=HPaIFow4G8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Hosts Media Briefing to Announce New Earth-Observing Role for International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"HPaIFow4G8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/m14-147.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Arrow Nicholas Lopez, 

Defendant.

No. CR-16-0114-1-PHX-SPL

DETENTION ORDER 

 In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of 

detention was addressed at a hearing on March 1, 2016. The Court was informed that the 

defendant is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time. 

 The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to 

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such 

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to 

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The 

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 

Case 2:16-cr-00114-SPL Document 32 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court 

proceeding. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of 

this detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion 

for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third 

party custodian. 

 Dated this 2nd day of March, 2016. 

Case 2:16-cr-00114-SPL Document 32 Filed 03/02/16 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joann Luiz,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03454-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8477 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 1
#### Childs *v.*Eastburn.

A *scire facias*on a mortgage, requiring the defendant to show causfe why the plaintiff should not have judgment for his debt, is insufficient. It should be to show cause why the mortgaged premises should not be taken in execu- • tion for payment of the mortgage money, &c., conformably to the statute.

ERROR to' the *Floyd*Circuit Court.

Holman, *J.*

Easlburn held a mortgage against *Childs*for the payment of a sum of money, and the same not being paid agreeably to the condition, he sued out a *scire facias.*The writ of *sci-re facias,*after setting forth the mortgage, &c., commands that if be made known to the said *Childs,*that he appear, &c. to show cause why the said *Eastburn*should not have judgment for the said debt, with lawful interest thereon. On the return of the *scire facias, Childs*made a motion to quash it, which was overruled by the Circuit Court. The mortgage was foreclosed, a judgment given for the money due, and the mortgaged premises ordered to be sold. These proceedings were predicated on the act of assembly, subjecting real and persona.! estate to execution, approved the 7th of January, 1818. The 7th section of that act provides, that • such a *scire facias*may issue to make known to the mortgagor, that he appear and show wherefore the mortgaged premises ought not to be seized and taken in execution for payment of the mortgage money, with interest, &c. (1). Agreeably to this statute, and the evident nature of the case, the object of the *scire facias*is to obtain execution of the mortgaged premises, and not a judgment for the mortgage *money.*The mortgage exists in the nature of a judgment, and when the amount due thereon, as in the present case, is apparent from the face of it, nothing is wanting by the mortgagee, but execution of the mortgaged premises for the amount due, and for this purpose only, he sues out his *scire facias.*Nor is this position affected by the right of the mortgagor to show, on the return of *119the *scire facias,*that he is exonerated from the demand, or that the premises are not subject to execution. This *scire facias*seems to have lost sight of this object, and goes only for a judgment for the debt; which is certainly erroneous. It should have pursued the act of assembly, if not literally, at least substantially; and not having done so, it should have been quashed-on motion.

*Nelson,*for the plaintiff.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the writ of *scire facias*quashed, with costs.

(1)

 Stat, 1817, p. 189. Vide *Lasselle*v. *Godfroy, May*term 1824, post.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-42","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yzFs28k0JF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-42\/\">STS-42<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-42\/embed\/#?secret=yzFs28k0JF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-42” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yzFs28k0JF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S42-S-002\/S42-S-002~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}