alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"What Was Project Mercury? (Grades 5-8)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iaF4m4GYQD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-was-project-mercury-grades-5-8\/\">What Was Project Mercury? (Grades 5-8)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-was-project-mercury-grades-5-8\/embed\/#?secret=iaF4m4GYQD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“What Was Project Mercury? (Grades 5-8)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iaF4m4GYQD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/gpn-2000-000686_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
576 A.2d 892

#### IN THE MATTER OF SALVATORE J. BATE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

July 28, 1990.

ORDER

This matter having been submitted to the Court on the report of the Disciplinary Review Board recommending that SALVATORE J. BATE and RONALD C. GOLDFARB, formerly partners together in ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS, each be publicly reprimanded for flagrant recordkeeping violations, in violation of *RPC*1.15(a) and (d).

And it further appearing that the foregoing misconduct, taken in consideration with respondents’ admissions of noncompliance with recordkeeping requirements and their implementation of a system to bring their recordkeeping into full compliance, calls for the imposition of a public reprimand; and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and SALVATORE J. BATE is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board, together with this order and the full *377record of the matter, be added as a permanent part of the file of said SALVATORE C. Bate as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey; and it is further

ORDERED that SALVATORE J. BATE reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for his share of the appropriate administrative costs.
,17+(81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

)257+(',675,&72)$5,=21$

BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

,15(%$5',9&),/7(56352'8&76  &DVH1RPG'*&

/,$%,/,7</,7,*$7,21 0'/1R BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

7KLV'RFXPHQW5HODWHGWR3ODLQWLIIV

/$.(<$%$6.20

&LYLO&DVH7FY'*&

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CIVIL ACTION 

NO. 2:17-CV-02427 WITHOUT PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, LAKEYA 

BASKOM and Defendants C.R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., 

through their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, 

without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(a)(ii). It is further 

agreed that the dismissal will only apply to docket number 2:17-cv-02427-DGC and will not 

have any effect on any other cases filed in regards to Plaintiff Lakeya Baskom with different 

docket numbers.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of December, 2017.

GOETZ LAW FIRM, INC.

/s/ Dean A. Goetz, Esq. 

Dean A. Goetz, Esq. 

603 N. Coast Hwy, 101, Ste. H

Solana Beach, CA 92075

(858) 481-8844

dgoetz12@gmail.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9226 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 2


&(57,),&$7(2)6(59,&(

,KHUHE\FHUWLI\WKDWRQDecember 6 DFRS\ RIWKHIRUHJRLQJZDVVHUYHG

HOHFWURQLFDOO\DQGQRWLFHRIWKHVHUYLFHRIWKLVGRFXPHQWZLOOEHVHQWWRDOOSDUWLHVE\RSHUDWLRQRI

WKH&RXUW¶VHOHFWURQLFILOLQJV\VWHPWR&0(&)SDUWLFLSDQWVUHJLVWHUHGWRUHFHLYHVHUYLFHLQWKLV

PDWWHU3DUWLHVPD\DFFHVVWKLVILOLQJWKURXJKWKH&RXUW¶VV\VWHP

V'HDQ$*RHW] 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9226 Filed 12/06/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Hamilton and Another *v.*Knight.

If an affidavit against two joint debtors be insufficient as to one of them, it will not authorize an attachment against the property of both.

ERROR to the *Franklin*Circuit Court. — An attachment issued in this case against the property of *James Hamilton*and *Miihael Jones,*upon an affidavit, which merely stated, as to the former, that he was a sojourner of the county in which the writ was sued out, and that the ordinary process of law could not bé served on him. The Court below, to which the attachment was returned, at their *May*term, 1814, under the territorial government, rendered judgment by default against both the defendants, and the property of both, which had been attached, was ordered to be sold.

Blackford, J.

This affidavit is defective as to one of the defendants below, in not showing that he was privately removing, or about to remove from the county. Ind. Terr. Stat. 1811, p. 46. And as the attachment is against the property of both, and the judgment against them both, the proceedings are erroneous (1).

*26Lane, for the plaintiffs.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, with costs*

(1)

 If a joint judgment against two, be erroneous as to one, it must be *té.*versed as to both. *Battle*v. *Coleman,*6 Wheat. 475.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Debra Jean Milke, )

)

Petitioner, ) CV-98-0060-PHX-RCB

)

vs. ) DEATH PENALTY CASE )

) O R D E R

)

Dora B. Schriro, et al., )

)

Respondents. ) )

It is ORDERED setting a status conference in this matter

for Wednesday, October 7, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom

606, Sandra Day O’Connor Courthouse, 401 W. Washington

Street, Phoenix, Arizona. 

DATED this 1st day of October, 2009.

Copies to counsel of record
EXHIBIT 32

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who is the  chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Community First  Bancorporation,  hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-QSB of the issuer  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.


November 10, 2005



                                  s/ Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                                  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                  Officer
CIPHER HOLDING CORP


                                  EXHIBIT 99(a)

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cipher Multimedia,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof,  I,  Patrick  Rooney,
President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1) the quarterly
report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information  contained in the quarterly report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Date:   November 12, 2004

/s/ Patrick Rooney
President,
Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman of the Board and Director




A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into previously filed Registration Statementson Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-95701, 333-125284, 333-143006), which pertain to the 1996 Stock OptionPlan and 2006 Equity Compensation Plan, of Enova Systems, Inc., ofour report dated March 18, 2008relating to the financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and for theyears then ended, which are included in this Form 10-K.        /s/ PMB Helin Donovan, LLP     PMB Helin Donovan, LLPIrvine, California  March 25, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Thorton Bishop Honga, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-15-08272-PCT-SPL

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure his appearance at future proceedings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 2nd day of January, 2019
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jermaine Walker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwalke32\/","title":"Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex, 1964","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KE1kS8kEFc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/woomera-1964-01\/\">Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex, 1964<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/woomera-1964-01\/embed\/#?secret=KE1kS8kEFc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Canberra Deep Space Communications Complex, 1964” — NASA\" data-secret=\"KE1kS8kEFc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/woomera-1964-01.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":718}
EXHIBIT 32(a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America), Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Wayland R. Hicks, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/S/    WAYLAND R. HICKS                 
|                                        
|Wayland R. Hicks Chief Executive Officer



May 10, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-52","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"onTb1Tfuf8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-52\/\">STS-52<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-52\/embed\/#?secret=onTb1Tfuf8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-52” — NASA\" data-secret=\"onTb1Tfuf8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/9263748\/9263748~large.jpg?w=600&h=1452&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1452}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"Who Was Neil Armstrong? (Grades 5-8)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tNBInO9Bik\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/who-was-neil-armstrong-grades-5-8\/\">Who Was Neil Armstrong? (Grades 5-8)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/who-was-neil-armstrong-grades-5-8\/embed\/#?secret=tNBInO9Bik\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Who Was Neil Armstrong? (Grades 5-8)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tNBInO9Bik\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/neilarmstrong_3.jpg?w=279","thumbnail_width":279,"thumbnail_height":251}
#### Creed Janny *v.*John Dills, Jr.

Husband and Wife — Sale of Land — Failure of Wife to Sign Deed — Acknowledgement Without Signature Passes Nothing.

The simple acknowledgment of a deed without signing passes nothing.

APPEAL FROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT.

July 7, 1869.

Stewart, *for appellant.*

*Apperson, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The deed, not having been signed by the wife, did not relinquish her dower or any other interest in the land.

And the simple acknowledgement of the deed without signing passed nothing. It does not purport to be a relinquishment of dower.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE LOPEZ.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Eliza Jones’ Heirs *v.*E. F. Jones.

Wills — Incapacity to Make — Unadue Influence.

A father, enfeebled in body, and mind, so as not to be able to care for himself, giving a deed to his -whole estate to a son whom theretofore he had always been astranged from, no considerations except his support for life, that after making the deed he tried to sell some of the land, saying he had only conveyed it during life to his son, held to constitute incapacity, and undue influence.

APPEAL FROM CHRISTIAN CIRCUIT COURT.

March 3, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

The facts established by the large multitude of witnesses, in many respects conflicting, conduce strongly to the following conclusions.

1. That until about the time that Eliza Jones went to bis own homestead and commenced cohabitancy with bis son, the appellee, be bad been estranged from that son and strongly prejudiced against him.

2. That very soon thereafter, the appellee manifested much anxiety to obtain from bis father a conveyance of bis whole estate, or the greater portion of it, intimated a resolve to get it, and complained of the interference of the other children to frustrate bis purpose.

3. That within a year, bis father acknowledged a conveyance to him for four tracts of land in Christian county, and personalty, which may perhaps include his whole estate", and without any other valuable consideration than a promise to take care of him during the short remnant of his rapidly waning life.

4. That the father was then so much enfeebled in body and mind as not to be able to take care of himself or manage his property or business.

5. That the promised care and support apparently constituted a very inadequate consideration for the absolute conveyance of so much property.

*684*Ritter, McPherson & Champlin, for appellants.*

*Campbell & Phelps, for appellee.*

6. That shortly after the acknowledgment of the conveyance, the father said that he had only conveyed the estate during his own life, and proposed to sell some of the land, thus indicating that he did not understand the legal effect of the conveyance as acknowledged.

*7.*That the old man’s mental condition was such as to incapacitate him to make a prudent, or binding contract of such a character and magnitude.

These deductions uncounterbalanced by opposing facts, necessarily lead to the judicial conclusion that the appellant heirs of Eliza Jones are entitled to a cancellation of the conveyance as sought by their petition.

And consequently the judgment dismissing the petition is reversed, and the cause remanded for a decree setting aside the conveyance, of April 9, 1866, subject to a reasonable allowance to the appellee for his care and support, if on inquiry by a commissioner he be found entitled to any compensation.