alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 73
          - [Docket No. FDA-2014-C-1552]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of petition.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing that we have filed a petition, submitted by Colorcon, Inc., proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of spirulina extract as a color additive in coating formulations applied to dietary supplement and drug tablets and capsules.

# DATES:

The color additive petition was filed on September 22, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Molly A. Harry, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1075.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice that we have filed a color additive petition (CAP 4C0300), submitted by Colorcon, Inc., 275 Ruth Rd., Harleysville, PA 19438. The petition proposes to amend the color additive regulations in 21 CFR part 73*Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification*                     to provide for the safe use of spirulina extract as a color additive in coating formulations applied to dietary supplement and drug tablets and capsules.                

We have determined under 21 CFR 25.32(r) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

Dated: October 16, 2014.

Dennis M. Keefe,

Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

[FR Doc. 2014-25089 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Case 2:15-cr-01614-SMM Document 4 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01614-SMM Document 4 Filed 11/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01614-SMM Document 4 Filed 11/02/15 Page 3 of 3
#### Fischli *v.*Cowan.

*JL.*executed a bond to *B.*for 1,000 dollars. *B.*assigned it to C., stating in the assignment that the bond was payable in certain bank paper. *Held,*that the assignee could maintain debt on the bond against the obligor, but that therecovery must be limited to the value of the paper mentioned in the assignment.

Two pleas in bar of the whole action. An issue in law as to one, and in fact as to the other. *Held,*that though the former issue be first tried and found for the plaintiff, he cannot have final judgment until the latter be also found in his favour.

ERROR to the *Clark*Circuit Court.

Scott, *J.*

Fischli made his promissory note to *Rowan*for 1,000 dollars. *Rowan*assigned the note to *Henderson*payable in commonwealth paper, and at the time of this assignment there' were credits endorsed to the amount of 140 dollars. *Henderson*assigned to *Cowan,*the defendant in error, who brought suit against the maker of the note. *Fischli,*the defendant below, pleaded that he had, before the commencement of the action, paid the amount, with all interest then due, to *Cowan,*the assignee of Henderson. To this plea there was a replication, denying the payment, and an issue to the country. He also pleaded, that the amount named in the note was, by special agreement of the parties at the time of making the contract, to be discharged in the paper of tbe bank of the commonwealth of *Kentucky,*which paper he averred was worth 50 cents in the dollar, and no more. To this plea there was a demurrer, and judgment for the plaintiff in the Circuit Court for the sum of 430 dollars debt, and 10 dollars and 82 cents damages, together with costs of suit.

To this judgment it is objected here, that the action should have been covenant and not debt, inasmuch as the note was payable in paper of an uncertain value. We think tbe objection cannot be sustained; The special assignment by *Rowan,*specifying that it was payable in commonwealth paper, was the *351act of one party alone, at a subsequent day, and could not change the nature of the original contract. It amounted to no more .than if he had indorsed the note subject to a credit, or to a set-off, to the amount of the difference between cash and the paper .specified. Such indorsement would limit the amount to be recovered by the assignee, but could not alter the character of the agreement as originally made, or the action to be brought upon it. But if covenant had been the proper action in this case, what would it have availed the defendant? What injury does he sustain by the alleged error? The judgment against him is for no more than, according to his own averment, the paper was-worth, in which the note was payable.

*Farnham*and Nelson, for the plaintiff.

Dewey, for the defendant.

But there is an error in these proceedings, for which the judgment must be reversed. Final judgment was rendered on demurrer, while there remained an issue to the country undetermined (1).

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, &c. with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

*Meylin*v. Woodford, ante, p. 286.
**Exhibit 32**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operation of PSB.       /s/ Anthony DiSandro, President and Chief Executive Officer         /s/ John Carrozza,         Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer         Dated: November 14, 2006  
27
423 A.2d 1308

#### Commonwealth v. Washington, Appellant.

Argued April 12, 1979.

Plimpton L. Graul, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; David B. Douds, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and MONTGOMERY, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 568 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 568

  To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been released 
                          from incarceration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1997

 Mr. Conyers introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To secure the voting rights of former felons who have been released 
                          from incarceration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voting Rights of Former Offenders 
Act''.

SEC. 2. RIGHTS OF CITIZENS.

    The right of a citizen of the United States, who otherwise is 
qualified, to vote in any election for Federal office shall not be 
denied or abridged because he has committed a criminal offense unless 
such citizen is imprisoned in a correctional institution or facility at 
the time of such election.

SEC. 3. STATE REQUIREMENTS.

    Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit the States from 
establishing requirements for the holding of State or local elective 
office; nor from enacting any State law which affords the right to vote 
in any election for Federal office on terms less restrictive than those 
established by this Act.

SEC. 4. OFFENSE.

    Whoever intentionally denies or attempts to deny any person any 
right secured by this Act shall be fined under title 18, United States 
Code, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``correctional institution or facility'' means 
        any prison, penitentiary, jail, or other institution or 
        facility for the confinement of individuals convicted of 
        criminal offenses, except that such term does not include any 
        residential community treatment center (or similar public or 
        private facility);
            (2) the term ``election'' means (A) a general, special, 
        primary, or runoff election, (B) a convention or caucus of a 
        political party held to nominate a candidate, (C) a primary 
        election held for the selection of delegates to a national 
        nominating convention of a political party, or (D) a primary 
        election held for the expression of a preference for the 
        nomination of persons for election to the office of President; 
        and
            (3) the term ``Federal office'' means the office of 
        President or Vice President of the United States, or of Senator 
        or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, 
        the Congress of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA University Leadership Initiative\u2019s First Teams Reflect on 5 Years","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OKXHlTxKnB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/lead-uli-q-and-a\/\">NASA University Leadership Initiative\u2019s First Teams Reflect on 5 Years<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/lead-uli-q-and-a\/embed\/#?secret=OKXHlTxKnB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA University Leadership Initiative\u2019s First Teams Reflect on 5 Years” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OKXHlTxKnB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/lead-uli-q-and-a.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":410}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2712

To preserve the ability of the Federal Housing Administration to insure 

mortgages under sections 238 and 519 of the National Housing Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2004

Mr. REED (for himself, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. BOND, Ms. MIKULSKI, and Mr. 

SHELBY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL

To preserve the ability of the Federal Housing Administration to insure mortgages under sections 238 and 519 

of the National Housing Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO GENERAL AND SPECIAL RISK 

4 PROGRAM ACCOUNT. 

5 Under the heading ‘‘FEDERAL HOUSING ADMINIS6 TRATION—GENERAL AND SPECIAL RISK PROGRAM AC7 COUNT’’ in title II of Division G of the Consolidated Ap8 propriations Act, 2004 (Public Law 108–199), in the first 
2

•S 2712 IS 

1 proviso, strike ‘‘$25,000,000,000’’ and insert 

2 ‘‘$29,000,000,000’’.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 12.2

                  HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                            AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                             (in thousands except ratio)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Three Months
                                                 Year Ended December 31,              Ended      Year Ended
                                       -----------------------------------------   December 31,  September 30,
                                         2000       1999       1998       1997         1996          1996
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------   -----------   ------------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>           <C>
EARNINGS:
  Income (loss) from continuing
    operations before income taxes     $ 68,591   $ 57,989   $ 44,624   $ 31,389     $  2,164      $(29,092)
  Fixed charges                           2,481      3,054      3,292      4,863        2,965        11,793
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------     --------      --------
  Earnings as adjusted (A)             $ 71,072   $ 61,043   $ 47,916   $ 36,252     $  5,129      $(17,299)
                                       ========   ========   ========   ========     ========      ========

FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest expense                     $    819   $  1,607   $  2,046   $  3,947     $  2,867      $ 11,241
  Interest portion of rental
    expense (1)                           1,662      1,447      1,246        916           98           552
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------     --------      --------
  Total fixed charges                     2,481      3,054      3,292      4,863        2,965        11,793
  Preferred stock dividends (2)               -          -          -          -            -            20
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------     --------      --------
  Total fixed charges and preferred
    stock dividends (B)
                                       $  2,481   $  3,054   $  3,292   $  4,863     $  2,965      $ 11,813
                                       ========   ========   ========   ========     ========      ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
  fixed charges and preferred stock
  dividends (A) divided by (B)             28.6       20.0       14.6        7.5          1.7             -

Deficiency of earnings to cover
  combined fixed charges and
  preferred stock dividends
  (B) minus (A)
                                       $      -   $      -   $      -   $      -     $      -      $ 29,112
</TABLE>

(1)  Management of the Company believes approximately one-third of rent expense
     is representative of the interest component of rent expense.

(2)  Represents pretax earnings required to cover preferred stock dividends.
#### ASBURY PARK PRESS, INC. v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 233 *N.J.Super.*375).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getty
Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Elizabeth J. Huebner, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 4, 2004



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ELIZABETH J. HUEBNER                                           
|Elizabeth J. Huebner Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



Each of the undersigned, in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danka Business Systems PLC (the Company) for the quarter
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ TODD L. MAVIS      
|Todd L. Mavis          
|Chief Executive Officer



February 9, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ F. MARK WOLFINGER  
|F. Mark Wolfinger      
|Chief Financial Officer



February 9, 2005



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



58
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CR 98-0892-3-PHX-RGS

)

Juan Gastelum, ) DETENTION ORDER

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

On September 22, 2006, defendant Juan Gastelum appeared before this Court on a petition

for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the information provided to the Court,

and the arguments of counsel in determining whether the defendant should be released on

conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to revoke

his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is not

likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant to Rule 46(d),

and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §3143.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further proceedings.

DATED this 25th day of September, 2006.

Case 2:98-cr-00892-FJM Document 199 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"F\/A-18 Mission Support Aircraft","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8XlH2r9t1x\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/f-a-18-mission-support-aircraft\/\">F\/A-18 Mission Support Aircraft<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/f-a-18-mission-support-aircraft\/embed\/#?secret=8XlH2r9t1x\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“F\/A-18 Mission Support Aircraft” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8XlH2r9t1x\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/309646main_EC96-43830-11_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":461}