64364 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Notices 

1See Low Enriched Uranium From France: 

Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review, 79 FR 59475 (October 2, 2014). 

2See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 

‘‘Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review: Analysis of GNF–A Business Proprietary 

Information,’’ available on Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA 

ACCESS) (http://iaacess.trade.gov) to parties who 

have been granted access to business proprietary 

information under Administrative Protective Order. 

A public version of this memorandum is also 

available on IA ACCESS, and it is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit of the main 

Commerce Building, room 7046. In addition, a 

complete public version of this memorandum is 

accessible on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

Circular A–11, Section 22.1, all agency 

budgetary materials and data are 

considered confidential prior to the 

President submitting a budget to 

Congress. In accordance with section 

22.5 of Circular A–11, the BBG has 

determined that its meeting should be 

closed to public observation pursuant to 

5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B). In accordance 

with the Government in the Sunshine 

Act and BBG policies, the meeting will 

be recorded and a transcript of the 

proceedings, subject to the redaction of 

information protected by 5 U.S.C. 

552b(c)(9)(B), will be made available to 

the public. The publicly-releasable 

transcript will be available for 

download at www.bbg.gov within 21 

days of the date of the meeting. 

Information regarding member votes 

to close the meeting and expected 

attendees can also be found on the 

Agency’s public Web site. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Persons interested in obtaining more 

information should contact Oanh Tran 

at (202) 203–4545. 

Oanh Tran, 

Director of Board Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25841 Filed 10–27–14; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8610–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–427–818] 

Low Enriched Uranium from France: 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) determines that 

changed circumstances exist which 

affected the ability of Global Nuclear 

Fuel—Americas, LLC (GNF–A) to 

manage its inventory and comply with 

the 18-month re-export requirement 

provided for in the exclusion from the 

scope of the order. Specifically, the 

Department finds that certain past 

entries by GNF–A of low enriched 

uranium (LEU) from France satisfy the 

conditions for exclusion from the order, 

and that GNF–A will be allowed to 

make certain future entries of LEU 

under the provision for exclusion from 

the scope of the order. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 29, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4261. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 2, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review of Low 

Enriched Uranium from France.1 No 

parties commented on these preliminary 

results. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the order is 

all low-enriched uranium. Lowenriched uranium is enriched uranium 

hexafluoride (UF6) with a U235 product 

assay of less than 20 percent that has 

not been converted into another 

chemical form, such as UO2, or 

fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, 

regardless of the means by which the 

LEU is produced (including lowenriched uranium produced through the 

down-blending of highly enriched 

uranium). 

Certain merchandise is outside the 

scope of the order. Specifically, the 

order does not cover enriched uranium 

hexafluoride with a U235 assay of 20 

percent or greater, also known as highlyenriched uranium. In addition, 

fabricated low-enriched uranium is not 

covered by the scope of the order. For 

purposes of the order, fabricated 

uranium is defined as enriched uranium 

dioxide (UO2), whether or not contained 

in nuclear fuel rods or assemblies. 

Natural uranium concentrates (U3O8) 

with a U235 concentration of no greater 

than 0.711 percent and natural uranium 

concentrates converted into uranium 

hexafluoride with a U235 concentration 

of no greater than 0.711 percent are not 

covered by the scope of the order. 

Also excluded from the order is lowenriched uranium owned by a foreign 

utility end-user and imported into the 

United States by or for such end-user 

solely for purposes of conversion by a 

U.S. fabricator into uranium dioxide 

(UO2) and/or fabrication into fuel 

assemblies so long as the uranium 

dioxide and/or fuel assemblies deemed 

to incorporate such imported lowenriched uranium (i) remain in the 

possession and control of the U.S. 

fabricator, the foreign end-user, or their 

designed transporter(s) while in U.S. 

customs territory, and (ii) are reexported within eighteen (18) months of 

entry of the low-enriched uranium for 

consumption by the end-user in a 

nuclear reactor outside the United 

States. Such entries must be 

accompanied by the certifications of the 

importer and end user. 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is classified in the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

at subheading 2844.20.0020. Subject 

merchandise may also enter under 

2844.20.0030, 2844.20.0050, and 

2844.40.00. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

subject to this proceeding is dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

Because there were no comments on 

the preliminary results, the Department 

adopts the reasoning and findings of fact 

in the preliminary results as the final 

results of the review. The Department’s 

full analysis of the details of GNF–A’s 

request for CCR and the information 

provided by GNF–A in its questionnaire 

response requires a discussion of 

business proprietary information, which 

can be found in the proprietary 

Memorandum to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, ‘‘Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review: 

Analysis of GNF–A Business Proprietary 

Information.’’ 2 The Department finds 

that certain past entries by GNF–A of 

LEU from France satisfy the conditions 

for exclusion from the order, and that 

GNF–A will be allowed to make certain 

future entries of LEU under the 

provision for exclusion from the scope 

of the order. 

Instructions to CBP 

The Department will issue revised 

certifications and instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection 

regarding GNF–A’s compliance with the 

18-month re-export requirement. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 29, 2014 / Notices 64365 

1See Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From Belgium: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 36001 

(June 25, 2014) (Preliminary Results). 

2Petitioners are Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, 

North American Stainless, United Auto Workers 

Local 3303, Zanesville Armco Independent 

Organization, and the United Steel, Paper and 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied 

Industrial and Service Workers International Union 

(AFL–CIO/CLC). 

3See ASB’s letter dated July 31, 2014. 

4See the Department’s Letter to ASB dated 

August 5, 2014, Re: Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Stainless Steel Plate from 

Coils from Belgium. 

5See the Department’s Letter dated August 5, 

2014, Re: Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review of Stainless Steel Plate in Coils from 

Belgium. 

6See ASB’s letter dated August 5, 2014. 

7See id. at 3. 

8See ASB’s letters dated August 8 and 13, 2014. 

9See Petitioners’ letters dated August 7, 12, and 

14, 2014. 

10See the Department’s Letter dated August 15, 

2014, Subject: Rejection of Request to Strike 

Petitioner’s Case Brief and to Reconsider Extending 

the Due Date for Filing Rebuttal. 

11For a full description of the scope of the order, 

see the Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, titled ‘‘Stainless Steel Plate in Coils 

from Belgium: Decision Memorandum for the Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013,’’ (Final Decision 

Memorandum), dated concurrently with and hereby 

adopted by this notice. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice is the only reminder to 

parties subject to the administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results and notice in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.216. 

Dated: October 22, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25747 Filed 10–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–423–808] 

Stainless Steel Plate in Coils From 

Belgium: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 

2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 29, 2014. 

SUMMARY: On June 25, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review on stainless steel 

plate in coils (steel plate) from 

Belgium.1 This review covers one 

manufacturer/exporter of the subject 

merchandise: Aperam Stainless Belgium 

N.V. (ASB). The period of review (POR) 

is May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, we determine that 

ASB made sales at less than normal 

value. For the final weighted-average 

dumping margin, see the ‘‘Final Results 

of Review’’ section below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jolanta Lawska at 202–482–8362; AD/

CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 25, 2014, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

Preliminary Results. 

We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. On 

July 25, 2014, the Department received 

case briefs from ASB and the 

Petitioners.2 On July 31, 2014, ASB 

submitted a request for an extension of 

time to submit its rebuttal brief.3 On 

August 4, 2014, ASB submitted its 

rebuttal brief. However, on August 5, 

2014, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.302(c) 

(2012), the Department found ASB’s 

July 31, 2014, extension request 

untimely, and thus denied ASB’s 

request for an extension of time to 

submit a rebuttal brief.4 Consequently, 

on the same day, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.104(a)(2)(iii) and 19 CFR 

351.302(d), the Department rejected and 

removed ASB’s untimely filed rebuttal 

brief from the record.5 In response, on 

August 5, 2014, ASB urged the 

Department to reconsider its decision.6

In the event that the Department chose 

not to allow the submission of ASB’s 

rebuttal brief, ASB urged for Petitioners’ 

case brief to be rejected and removed 

from the record since Petitioners failed 

to properly serve ASB with its case brief 

on July 25, 2014.7 On August 8 and 13, 

2014, ASB reiterated its request to strike 

Petitioners’ case brief.8 In their letters, 

dated August 7, 12, and 14, 2014, 

Petitioners stated that they properly 

served ASB with their case brief, and 

therefore, there was no basis to reject it.9

On August 15, 2014, the Department 

rejected ASB’s multiple requests to 

strike Petitioners’ case and refused to 

reconsider its decision to reject ASB’s 

rebuttal brief.10

No party requested a hearing. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by the Order is 

certain stainless steel plate in coils. 

Stainless steel is alloy steel containing, 

by weight, 1.2 percent or less of carbon 

and 10.5 percent or more of chromium, 

with or without other elements. The 

subject plate products are flat-rolled 

products, 254 mm or over in width and 

4.75 mm or more in thickness, in coils, 

and annealed or otherwise heat treated 

and pickled or otherwise descaled.11

The merchandise subject to this order is 

currently classifiable in the harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) at subheadings: 7219.11.00.30, 

7219.11.00.60, 7219.12.00.02, 

7219.12.00.05, 7219.12.00.06, 

7219.12.00.20, 7219.12.00.21, 

7219.12.00.25, 7219.12.00.26, 

7219.12.00.50, 7219.12.00.51, 

7219.12.00.55, 7219.12.00.56, 

7219.12.00.65, 7219.12.00.66, 

7219.12.00.70, 7219.12.00.71, 

7219.12.00.80, 7219.12.00.81, 

7219.31.00.10, 7219.90.00.10, 

7219.90.00.20, 7219.90.00.25, 

7219.90.00.60, 7219.90.00.80, 

7220.11.00.00, 7220.20.10.10, 

7220.20.10.15, 7220.20.10.60, 

7220.20.10.80, 7220.20.60.05, 

7220.20.60.10, 7220.20.60.15, 

7220.20.60.60, 7220.20.60.80, 

7220.90.00.10, 7220.90.00.15, and 

7220.90.00.60. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written product description remains 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case briefs by 

the parties to this administrative review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. For reasons described 

above, we did not accept ASB’s rebuttal 

brief. Petitioners did not submit a 

rebuttal brief. 

The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file in the Central Records Unit 

(CRU), room 7046 of the main 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES