alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         161,392
<SECURITIES>                                   608,293
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,063
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,273
<PP&E>                                         423,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,347,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,352
<BONDS>                                        475,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          240,908
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                     480,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,347,725
<SALES>                                         56,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,376
<CGS>                                           52,598
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,167)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (66,021)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (19,547)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (85,568)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.12)


</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Carol A. Fadale, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Equifax Information Services LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-01816-PHX-GMS

CONSOLIDATED WITH: 

No. CV-15-01826-PHX-SPL 

No. CV-15-01843-PHX-GMS 

No. CV-15-01887-PHX-GMS 

ORDER 

Douglas A. Fadale, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Equifax Information Services LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

Carol A. Fadale, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al., 

Defendants.

Douglas A. Fadale, 

Plaintiff, 

Case 2:15-cv-01826-GMS Document 37 Filed 08/09/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

v. 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al., 

Defendants.

 Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal of Case (Doc. 53) and good 

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled actions are dismissed with 

prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. Since all parties 

have been dismissed from all cases, these cases are now closed. 

 Dated this 8th day of August, 2016. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01826-GMS Document 37 Filed 08/09/16 Page 2 of 2
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
FalconStor Software, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(numbers  333-69834  and  33-83574)  filed on Form S-8, and in the  registration
statement (number 333-69830) filed on Form S-3, of FalconStor Software,  Inc. of
our report dated  January 28, 2003,  except for note 16, which is as of February
26, 2003,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of FalconStor  Software,
Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of  December  31,  2002 and  2001,  and the  related
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity and comprehensive
loss,  and cash flows for the years  ended  December  31,  2002 and 2001 and the
period from  inception  (February  10, 2000)  through  December 31, 2000,  which
report appears in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K of FalconStor
Software, Inc.

Melville, New York
March 11, 2003
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 754 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 754

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of child 
safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on 
                          commercial aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

  Mr. DeFazio (for himself, Mr. Shays, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Hinchey, Mr. 
Filner, Mrs. Morella, Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Evans, Mr. Horn, 
Ms. Woolsey, Mr. Blagojevich, Ms. Norton, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. 
Rahall, Mrs. Carson, Mrs. Maloney of New York, Mr. Mascara, Mr. Flake, 
    Mr. Gonzalez, Mrs. Clayton, Mr. Lantos, Ms. Pelosi, and Mr. Dan 
Schaefer of Colorado) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of child 
safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on 
                          commercial aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEMS ON COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 44725. Child restraint systems
    ``Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the Secretary shall issue regulations requiring the use of 
child safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary on any 
aircraft operated by an air carrier in providing interstate air 
transportation, intrastate transportation, or overseas air 
transportation. Such regulations shall establish age or weight limits 
for children who are to use such systems.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item:

``44725. Child restraint systems.''.

SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD.

    It is the sense of Congress that the United States representative 
to the International Civil Aviation Organization should seek an 
international standard to require that passengers on a civil aviation 
aircraft be restrained on takeoff and landing and when directed by the 
captain of such aircraft.
                                 <all>
```
#### John Engleman *v.*E. D. Ball.

Principal and Surety — Indemnity—Attachment.

Under the statute, a surety may bring an original suit against his principal to compel him to discharge the debt or for indemnity, and auxilliary to this he may have an attachment, notwithstanding there is an action pending against him.and his principal, seeking a common’ law judgment against them for the debt.

APPEAL PROM LINCOLN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 17, 1870.

Response to Petition eor Re-hearing by

Judge Williams :

Ball became Engleman’s security in a note for $2034.10 to Gentry wbo assigned it to Me James wbo brought suit on it in tbe Boyle Circuit Court against Ball and bis principal.

Ball desiring to secure himself and having cause of ment sued Engleman in equity in the Lincoln Circuit Court for indemnity and to compel him to discharge said debt and •obtained an attachment.

The original process was executed on Engleman in Lincoln county and the attachment levied on property there.

Engleman demurred and answered controverting the causes •of attachment and the justice of the demand, but did not deny that Ball was his security.

His demurrer is predicated upon the allegation in the petition that Me James had brought suit upon the note in Boyle county. This suit was simply for a recovery of a common law judgment -on the note and brought in that county probably because Ball may have lived there or that he or the principal was caught there and actually served with process; but however this may be, Me James sought no auxilliary remedy by attachment, but the security for his own indemnity, as he may under the provisions of our statutes, brought an original suit in Lincoln to compel his principal to discharge said debt or indemnify him and as auxilliary to this original suit he sought and obtained an attach- ■ ment. As Engleman was served with process in Lincoln county, *50that court bad jurisdiction of both his person and property and properly held it responsible to the securities claim.

*Bradleys, for appellant.*

*Durham, for appellee.*
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jeff Shell, Chief Executive Officer of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(i) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 2, 2004



/s/ Jeff ShellJeff ShellChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:15-cr-01595-DLR Document 4 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01595-DLR Document 4 Filed 11/17/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01595-DLR Document 4 Filed 11/17/15 Page 3 of 3
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2019

No. 04-19-00022-CV

IN RE CYNTHIA CADWALLADER OCHSE

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On January 11, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of a 

ruling made from the bench by the Honorable Renee Yanta. Although relator identified the 

Honorable Michael Mery as respondent, the correct respondent would have been Judge Yanta. 

However, Judge Yanta is no longer the presiding judge of the 150th Judicial District Court of 

Bexar County, Texas. When one named in her official capacity as a party to an original 

proceeding no longer holds the office, abatement is required to allow that party’s successor to 

“reconsider the original party’s decision.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(b). 

Accordingly, we ORDER the substitution of Judge Monique Diaz as respondent in this 

original proceeding, see TEX. R. APP. P. 7(a), and ABATE the case for 60 days from the date of 

this order. During the period of abatement, relator shall present to Judge Diaz each issue made 

the subject of the pending petition for writ of mandamus and obtain a ruling on each. 

Relator is further ORDERED to file in this court either an amended petition and appendix 

or the appropriate motion to dismiss this mandamus proceeding no later than 15 days following 

Judge Diaz’ ruling.

It is so ORDERED on January 18, 2019.

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-05727, styled William W. Ochse, IV and Chloe Ochse Seiler v. 

William W. Ochse, III Individually and as Trustee of the William W. Ochse, III Family 2008 Trust, pending in the 

37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County. The ruling complained of in this original proceeding was made from the 

bench by the Honorable Renee Yanta, former presiding judge of the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, 

Texas.
 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, 

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Gregory S. Madar, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webster Preferred CapitalCorporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:August 8, 2006     /s/ Gregory S. Madar Gregory S. Madar  Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer & Assistant Secretary  Principal Financial & Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CMS MECHANICAL SERVICES, LLC, a

Florida Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

PETSMART, INC., a Delaware

Corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 18-15797

18-16068

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-02040-NVW

District of Arizona, 

Phoenix

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. 33), these

appeals are voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear

their own costs and attorneys’ fees on appeal. 

A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. 

FOR THE COURT:

By: Roxane G. Ashe

Circuit Mediator

FILED

MAR 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

RGA/Mediation

Case 2:15-cv-02040-NVW Document 221 Filed 03/21/19 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE  PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Tor Olav Troim, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CalPetro  Tankers (Bahamas
III) Limited;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ Tor Olav Troim
----------------------------
Tor Olav Troim
President
(Chief Executive Officer)

Date:  June 30, 2003
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"img_3862","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wgm21DkDxi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/img_3862\/\">img_3862<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/img_3862\/embed\/#?secret=wgm21DkDxi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“img_3862” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wgm21DkDxi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/img_3862.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}