alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Betty DeJournette,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03460-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8407 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8407 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"California Students to Hear from NASA Astronauts Aboard Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zTA2iVzFxI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/california-students-to-hear-from-nasa-astronauts-aboard-space-station-2\/\">California Students to Hear from NASA Astronauts Aboard Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/california-students-to-hear-from-nasa-astronauts-aboard-space-station-2\/embed\/#?secret=zTA2iVzFxI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“California Students to Hear from NASA Astronauts Aboard Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zTA2iVzFxI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/iss066e078591.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Andres Palmero, 

Defendant.

No. CR15-08263-001-PCT-DMF

ORDER 

 The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing and detention hearing were submitted on the record. The Court finds probable 

cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in 

the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has 

failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger. 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the defendant is detained as flight risk and danger 

pending further revocation proceedings. 

 Dated this 19th day of July, 2016. 

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge

 

Case 3:15-cr-08263-DMF Document 26 Filed 07/20/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Abbie Rowe,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04075-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9250 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 1
#### Denby *v.*Hart.

In error.

Tuesday, *May*26.

A JUDGMENT of the Circuit Court for the plaintiff, on an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, must be reversed, if the transcript of the record do not disclose the cause of action. But any statement, however short or informal it may be, will answer the purpose, provided enough be shown to bar another action for the same demand,
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 783 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 783

    To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit 
  candidates for election for Federal office from accepting unsecured 
loans from depository institutions regulated under Federal law, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Mrs. Mink of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit 
  candidates for election for Federal office from accepting unsecured 
loans from depository institutions regulated under Federal law, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING CANDIDATES FROM ACCEPTING UNSECURED LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act 
of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, a 
candidate for election for Federal office may not accept--
            ``(A) any contribution consisting of an unsecured loan from 
        a depository institution; or
            ``(B) any contribution from an individual serving as an 
        officer or director of a depository institution with respect to 
        which the candidate has an outstanding unsecured loan as of the 
        date of the enactment of this subsection.
    ``(2) Any candidate for election for Federal office with an 
outstanding unsecured loan from a depository institution as of the date 
of the enactment of this subsection shall repay the loan not later than 
90 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection.
    ``(3) In this subsection, the term `depository institution' has the 
meaning given such term in section 19(b)(1)(A) of the Federal Reserve 
Act.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections occurring after January 1997.
                                 <all>
```
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
  þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from            to
 Commission File No. 0-24425
 King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Tennessee
    
    54-1684963(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
    
    Identification No.)501 Fifth Street, Bristol, TN
    
    37620(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (423) 989-8000  (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 þ o
 þ o
 o o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  PART II  OTHER INFORMATIONItem 5. Other InformationItem 6. ExhibitsSIGNATURESEX-10.3  RETIREMENT AND CONSULTING AGREEMENT    Table of Contents  EXPLANATORY NOTE
  
 PART II  OTHER INFORMATION
 
 Item 5. Other Information




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 6. Exhibits
  10.1*
    
    
    
    Offer letter to Joseph Squicciarino dated May 25, 2005.10.2*
    
    
    
    Offer letter to Eric J. Bruce dated May 19, 2005.10.3
    
    
    
    Retirement and Consulting Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2005,
and Waiver, Release and Non-Solicitation, Noncompete and
Nondisclosure Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2005, by and
between King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and James R. Lattanzi.10.4*
    
    
    
    2005 Executive Management Incentive Award.10.5*
    
    
    
    King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to the definitive proxy statement, filed April 28,
2005, related to the 2005 annual meeting of shareholders).10.6*
    
    
    
    Compensation Policy for Non-Employee Directors.10.7*
    
    
    
    Salary Amendments For Certain Executive Officers.10.8*
    
    
    
    King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.31.1*
    
    
    
    Certification of Brian A. Markison, President and Chief
Executive Officer of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2*
    
    
    
    Certification of Joseph Squicciarino, Chief Financial Officer
of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1*
    
    
    
    Certification of Brian A. Markison, President and Chief
Executive Officer of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2*
    
    
    
    Certification of Joseph Squicciarino, Chief Financial Officer
of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
 *
    
    Previously filed




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    /s/ Brian A. MarkisonBrian A. MarkisonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:15-mj-01954-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01954-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01954-JFM Document 3 Filed 12/28/15 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 12, 2003 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By: /s/ Joseph Lloyd McAdamsJoseph Lloyd McAdamsChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer November 12, 2003




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 6

To extend the authorization of programs under the Higher Education Act

of 1965, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 7, 1997

Mr. MCKEON (for himself, Mr. GOODLING, Mr. CLAY, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To extend the authorization of programs under the Higher

Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Higher Education

5 Amendments of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.

7 (a) EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.—The authorization

8 of appropriations for, and the duration of, each program

9 conducted under the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20
2

HR 6 IH

1 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) shall be extended for each of the fis2 cal years ending before October 1, 2004.

3 (b) CONTINUATION OF AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—

4 The amount authorized to be appropriated for a program

5 for each fiscal year during the period of extension under

6 subsection (a) shall be the amount authorized to be appro7 priated for such program for the terminal fiscal year of

8 the program.

9 (c) PERFORMANCE OF REQUIRED FUNCTIONS.—If

10 the Secretary of Education is required, in the terminal fis11 cal year of a program extended under subsection (a), to

12 carry out certain acts or make certain determinations that

13 are necessary for the continuation of such program, such

14 acts or determinations shall be required to be carried out

15 or made during the period of the extension under sub16 section (a).

17 (d) TERMINAL FISCAL YEAR.—For purposes of this

18 section, the term ‘‘terminal fiscal year’’, when used with

19 respect to a program conducted under the Higher Edu20 cation Act of 1965, means the last fiscal year for which

21 funds are authorized to be appropriated, or during which

22 such program is authorized to be conducted, by such Act

23 as in effect on January 1, 1997.

Æ
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Lemus Harry Doka,

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01408-001-PCT-GMS

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived and the detention hearing was held on the record including a proffer 

by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the 

terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, 

pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing 

evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 14th day of August, 2018.

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Erin Mahoney","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/erin-c-mahoneynasa-gov\/","title":"Artemis II Crew at GSFC","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9i4fdUgQqF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-nhq202305190043\/\">Artemis II Crew at GSFC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-nhq202305190043\/embed\/#?secret=9i4fdUgQqF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Artemis II Crew at GSFC” — NASA\" data-secret=\"9i4fdUgQqF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/NHQ202305190043\/NHQ202305190043~large.jpg?w=600&h=1066&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1066}
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, R.
Christopher Hoehn-Saric, Chief Executive Officer of Educate, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | This Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ R. Christopher Hoehn-SaricName: R. Christopher Hoehn-Saric Date: April 30,
2007


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Paul Haggerty, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Gemstar-TV Guide
International, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (i) the annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
     (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date:  March 31, 2003

                    /s/ Paul Haggerty
                  --------------------------
                  Paul Haggerty
                  Acting Chief Financial Officer
                  (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.