alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA TV to Air Live Coverage of International Space Station Crew Landing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vQ2mg7ygrx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-live-coverage-of-international-space-station-crew-landing\/\">NASA TV to Air Live Coverage of International Space Station Crew Landing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-tv-to-air-live-coverage-of-international-space-station-crew-landing\/embed\/#?secret=vQ2mg7ygrx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA TV to Air Live Coverage of International Space Station Crew Landing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vQ2mg7ygrx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/28438093857_a18448f947_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":330}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 826 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 826

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific penalties 
      for taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 1997

 Mr. Ney (for himself, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Barr of Georgia, Mr. Baker, Mr. 
Riggs, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Goode, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Hobson, and Mr. Fox 
 of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide specific penalties 
      for taking a firearm from a Federal law enforcement officer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gun Retention Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. TAKING A FIREARM FROM A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 117. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement officer
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly takes a firearm--
            ``(1) from the person of a law enforcement officer, while 
        such officer is engaged in the performance of official duties; 
        and
            ``(2) against that officer's will;
or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
    ``(b) The punishment for an offense under this section is--
            ``(1) in the case of an offense other than an attempt, or 
        an offense that is an attempt during which the firearm is 
        discharged (other than intentionally by the officer), a fine 
        under this title and imprisonment for not less than 10 nor more 
        than 15 years; and
            ``(2) in the case of any other offense that is an attempt, 
        a fine under this title and imprisonment for not less than 5 
        nor more than 10 years.
    ``(c) A term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall not 
run concurrently with any other term of imprisonment imposed with 
respect to the same criminal episode.
    ``(d) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `firearm' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 921 of this title; and
            ``(2) the term `law enforcement officer' means a person 
        designated in section 1114 of this title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 7 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``117. Taking a firearm from a law enforcement officer.''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-33","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TNhm2EPKu0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-33\/\">STS-33<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-33\/embed\/#?secret=TNhm2EPKu0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-33” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TNhm2EPKu0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S89-45737\/S89-45737~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6



                    DESCRIPTION OF PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

         Park National Corporation ("Park") adopted the Park National
Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan or "SERP" in December 1996.
The SERP currently benefits 29 officers of Park and its subsidiaries, including
William T. McConnell, C. Daniel DeLawder, David C. Bowers and John W. Kozak.
Harry O. Egger does not participate in the SERP but is provided with
supplemental retirement benefits under the terms of his employment agreement
with The Security National Bank and Trust Co. David L. Trautman does not
participate in the SERP. The SERP is a non-qualified benefit plan designed to
restore benefits lost due to limitations under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, on the amount of compensation covered by and the benefits
payable under a defined benefit plan such as the Park National Corporation
Defined Benefit Pension Plan. Park has purchased life insurance contracts to
fund the SERP. The SERP is designed to provide a monthly retirement benefit of
approximately $5,000, $10,500, $5,000 and $500 for Messrs. McConnell, DeLawder,
Bowers and Kozak, respectively. These additional benefits are not guaranteed and
are dependent upon the earnings from the related life insurance contracts
compared to the average yield on three-month Treasury bills. The SERP also
provides a life insurance benefit for officers of Park and its subsidiaries
participating in the SERP who die before age 86.
No. 87-1307.

#### Porto *v.*Armco, Inc., et al.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I WO 

2 

3 

4 

~5 

6 

7 

8 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

9 United States of America, 

IO Plaintiff, 

11 v. 

12 Monika Lynn Gilchrist, 

13 Defendant. 

14,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

No. CR15-08249-001-PCT-DMF 

ORDER 

_ 15 The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

16 hearing was waived and the detention hearing was submitted on the record, including a 

17 proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant 

18 violated the terms of her supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further 

19 finds, pursuant to Rule 32.l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and 

20 convincing evidence that she is not a flight risk. 

21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the defendant shall be bound over for further 

22 proceedings on the petition: to revoke her supervised release. 

· 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the defendant is de!ained as a flight risk pending 

24 further revocation proceedings. 

25 Dated this 21st day of July,'2016. 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:15-cr-08249-DMF Document 25 Filed 07/22/16 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2262

WILLIE JAMES PRICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

VALERIE YOUNG,

Plaintiff,

versus

RONALD C. MCCORMACK, Attorney; EDWARD F.

HALLORAN, Attorney; RUSSELL D. KNIGHT; GEORGE

MILLESON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (CA-01-1212-A)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Willie James Price, Appellant Pro Se. John Andrew Basham, HEILIG,

MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk, Virginia; Charles Malcolm Lollar,

TANNER, MULKEY, GORDON & LOLLAR, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; Edward F.

Halloran, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Russell D. Knight, Stafford,

Virginia; George Milleson, Stafford, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Willie James Price appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state

a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Price v. McCormack, No.

CA-01-1212-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2001). We deny Appellees’ request

for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### W. H. Beazley *v.*A. J. Mershon.

Judicial Sales — Stare Decisis — Former Appeals — Demurrer Properly Sustained.

APPEAL PROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

December 15, 1870.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

Deeming it unnecessary to enter upon a history of this protracted litigation it may be sufficient to state that after several appeals had been prosecuted from the original judgment, and subsequent final orders, and the sale of the real estate which is the subject of this controversy, had several times been recognized by this court as valid,

First, on the appeal prosecuted from the original judgment, this court, in the opinion then delivered, expressly stated that the reversal of the judgments in the consolidated cases would not avoid the sales.

Second, in an opinion delivered in the case in April, 1866, it is said that the court below, in refusing to permit appellant to file an answer tendered by him, which opened the whole case as to the sale, and opened it for litigation *in personam,*instead of in *rem,*and should the appellant finally succeed in quashing the at tachment, or *defeating the claims of any*of the other creditors to any extent, *the sales standing,*his remedy *pro tanto*may be on the bonds of the defeated appellees. *1 Bush 466.*

Again, last January, the question presented by this appeal was before this court on a motion to file a pleading in the nature of a bill of review, substantially the same as the one now under consideration, and in the opinion of the court then -delivered, it is said, by *section 579, Civil Code,*the court in which a judgment, or final order, has been rendered, or made, shall have power, after the expiration of the term, to vacate or modify such, judgment or order *for eight*specific causes, which fully embrace every cause for a bill of review. *6 Bush.*

This ruling is in conformity with *Anderson vs. Anderson 18 B.**549*Mon. 97; McLean vs. Gixan, Ib. 774; Hocker, &c., vs. Gentry, 3 Met. 463, McManama vs. Garnett, Ib. 517.*

*Owsley & BurdeTl, Bradley,, for appellant.*

*Dunlap, for appellee.*

It is manifest from an examination of the pleading in .this case that none of the causes for which a judgment can be vacated or modified, as prescribed in *section 579*of Civil Code, are embraced in it, consequently the demurrer was properly sustained to it by the court below.

If appellant had resorted to the remedy suggested in the opinion in *1 Busk, supra,*a redress of the grievances complained of, to some extent at least might before this have been obtained. Be that, however, as it may the courts have no power over the former judgments complained of, nor to give relief in the mode herein sought.

Wherefore, the judgment of the court below sustaining appellee’s demurrer, dismissing the petition and awarding to appellee a writ of possession is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.4(b)
  
  Re:
    
    Management Agreement Renewals
   
    
    Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Diversified Multi-Advisor Futures Fund L.P. II
    
    Orion Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P.
    
    Institutional Futures Portfolio LP
    
    CMF Willowbridge Argo Master Fund L.P.
    
    Orion Futures Fund (Cayman) Ltd.
    By:
    
    /s/ Jennifer Magro

Jennifer MagroChief Financial Officer & DirectorWILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.By:
    
    /s/ Stephen CranePrint Name:  Stephen CraneJM/sr
 62
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.15.4    
  


Amendment No. 4 (the "Amendment") To

Employment Agreement between

Univision Communications Inc. and

Douglas Kranwinkle ("Employee") that

was assigned to Univision Management Co. ("Company") effective

January 1, 2003 (the "Employment Agreement")  


Employee
and Company agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 


        1.    Term.    The Term of the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31,
2005, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Employment Agreement. 


        2.    Salary.    The annual Base Salary rate will be: Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000)
for the annual period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005. 



        3.    Effective Date of Amendment.    Upon execution by Employee and Company, this Amendment
will become effective as of January 1, 2003. 


        4.    Notices.    Any notice to Company shall also be sent to Company's General Counsel at
1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 3050, Los Angeles, California 90067, Fax (310) 556-1526; and to Company's Deputy General Counsel at Univision, 5999 Center Drive, Los Angeles,
California 90045, Fax (310) 348-3679. 



        5.    Other.    Except as provided in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions in the
Employment Agreement will remain in full force and effect, and the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby, is ratified and confirmed. 



	

 	
 	
UNIVISION MANAGEMENT CO.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ROBERT V. CAHILL      
 Robert V. Cahill

Chairman, President and CEO





	/s/  DOUGLAS KRANWINKLE      
 Douglas Kranwinkle	 	 	 	 





As
further inducement for Employee to enter into this Amendment, Univision Communications Inc. hereby guarantees all of Company's financial obligations under the Employment Agreement as
amended. Company acknowledges that Employee is relying on this guarantee in entering into this Agreement. 



	

 	
 	
UNIVISION COMMUNICATIONS INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  ROBERT V. CAHILL      
 Robert V. Cahill

Vice Chairman and Corporate Secretary











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.15.4
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 683 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 683

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified 
  estate and gift tax credit to an amount equivalent to a $1,200,000 
                               exemption.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 11, 1997

 Mr. Livingston (for himself, Mr. Baker, Mrs. Chenoweth, Mr. Cooksey, 
 Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Frost, Ms. Granger, Mr. 
  Hayworth, Mr. Holden, Mrs. Kelly, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Latham, Mr. 
   Lewis of California, Mr. McHugh, Mr. McIntosh, Ms. Molinari, Mrs. 
Myrick, Mr. Ney, Mr. Nethercutt, Mr. Norwood, Mr. Packard, Mr. Parker, 
Mr. Petri, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Skeen, Mr. 
  Snowbarger, and Mr. Walsh) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the unified 
  estate and gift tax credit to an amount equivalent to a $1,200,000 
                               exemption.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN UNIFIED ESTATE AND GIFT TAX CREDIT.

    (a) General Rule.--Sections 2010(a), 2102(c)(3)(A), and 2505(a)(1) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 are each amended by striking 
``$192,800'' and inserting ``$427,800''.
    (b) Filing Requirement.--Paragraph (1) of section 6018(a) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``$600,000'' and inserting ``$1,200,000''.
    (c) Technical Amendment.--Paragraph (2) of section 2001(c) of such 
Code is amended by striking ``$21,040,000'' and inserting ``the amount 
at which the average tax rate under this section is 55 percent''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to the estates of decedents dying, and gifts made, after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Travis T. Jenson, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO of Autostrada Motors, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Registrant; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report; 

 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual Report (the “Evaluation Date”), and presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures; and 

 

c) disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

 

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function); 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

 

| *Date:*** | *03/29/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Travis T. Jenson***                            |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Travis T. Jenson, Secretary, Treasurer and CFO*** |