alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAPR06-0422INTHEMATTEROFTHEPETITIONOFJAMIEK.TRACTAUG032021BowenGreenwoocClerkofSupremeCow-,ORDEcyrrViontanaJamieK.TracthaspetitionedtheCourttowaivethethree-yeartestrequirementfortheMultistateProfessionalResponsibilityExamination(MPRE)forpurposesofTract'sapplicationforadrnissionbyrnotiontotheStateBarofMontana.Byrule,applicantsforadmissionbyrnotionmustprovideevidenceoftherequisitescoreonanMPREtaken"withinthreeyearsprecedingthedateoftheapplicationforadrnission."RuleIV.A.3,RulesofAdmission.TractpassedtheMPREin2013whenseekingadmissiontothepracticeoflawinCalifornia,in2014whenseekingadrnissioninNevada,andin2015whenseekingadmissioninColorado.Tractwasadmittedtoallthebarsofallthreestates.ThepetitionstatesthatTracthaspracticedsince2013"withoutanyethicalordisciplinaryactioninanyjurisdictionwherelicensedoradmittedtopracticelaw."Goodcauseappearing,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthepetitionofJamieK.Tracttowaivethethree-yeartestrequirementfortheMPREforpurposesofTract'scurrentapplicationforadmissionbyrnotiontotheStateBarofMontanaisGRANTED.TheClerkshallmailacopyofthisordertoPetitionerandtotheAdministratoroftheBoardofBarExaminersattheStateBarofMontana.DATEDthisZ‘----42-dayofAugust,2021.ChiefJustice08/03/2021Case Number: PR 06-04226c).4_,rt_.ml•.4.....2‘-s2,,z,Justices2
No. 15,008.

#### Hawkins et al. *v.*Heinzman et al.

Filed Nov. 11, 1890;

petition for a rehearing overruled Jan. 16, 1891.

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

*A. J. Padgett, A. Paget*and *H. Burns,*for appellants.

*J. H. O’Neall*and *W. Hefferman,*for appellees.

Elliott, J.

— Affirmed upon the authority of *Hawkins*v. *Heinzman, ante,*p. 551.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Exelis Inc., Information Systems Division ) ) Under Contract No. Fl9628-02-C-0010 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCE FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58869

Steven M. Masiello, Esq. Tyson J. Bareis, Esq.

McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Denver, CO E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney
ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 4 March 2014

MARK N. STEMPLER Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certifY that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 58869, Appeal ofExelis Inc., Information Systems Divison, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Television Coverage Set for Space Station Crew Landing, Launch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VJ2NAIoqUO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-coverage-set-for-space-station-crew-landing-launch\/\">NASA Television Coverage Set for Space Station Crew Landing, Launch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/nasa-television-coverage-set-for-space-station-crew-landing-launch\/embed\/#?secret=VJ2NAIoqUO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Television Coverage Set for Space Station Crew Landing, Launch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VJ2NAIoqUO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/38679079912_8b046fff16_k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
Case 2:16-cr-00012-GMS Document 3 Filed 11/16/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00012-GMS Document 3 Filed 11/16/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:16-cr-00012-GMS Document 3 Filed 11/16/15 Page 3 of 3
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Richard Joseph Martin, * From the 70th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. A-42,411.

Vs. No. 11-17-00040-CR * February 28, 2019

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Real Estate Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Brett A. Brown certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:     February 28, 2012 | By:    | /s/   BRETT A. BROWN      |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                                       | Name:  | Brett   A. Brown          |
|                                       | Title: | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
---

Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, as the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge and
belief, the annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2011, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Yukon-Nevada Gold Corp. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for
any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update
the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: March 29, 2012

|/s/ Robert F.
      Baldock           | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Robert F. Baldock                     | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 

---
Opinion issued December 21, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00 909
- CV

——————————— IN RE TARA STURGEON , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator , Tara Sturgeon, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of
mandamus asserting that the trial court ha d abused its discretion by: (1) “not returning” relator’s minor children to her custody ; (2) “by entering the January 24, 2023 Temporary Order Following Adversary Hearing” ; ( 3 ) terminating relator’s visitation to her minor children after a July 20, 2023 hearing ; and ( 4 ) failing to2

provide relator with effective counsel

. 1 Relator request ed that the Court “issue a writ of mandamus directing the [trial] court to restore constitutional protections of the family, [and to] return the children to their parents, immediately.” Our review of relator’s mandamus petition reflects that relator has failed t o establish that she is entitled to mandamus relief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (relator required to provide appendix which “must contain” certified or sworn copy of any “document showing the matter complained of ” ) , 52.7(a ) (relator “must file” record with mandamus petition containing “certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding” ), 52.8(a); see also Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 19 92). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Countiss, and Farris.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of L.S., O.S., and A.S., Children , Cause No. 2023

- 00153J, in the 314th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michelle Moore presiding.
#### Uriah Shinkle *v.*City of Covington.

Damages — Wharfage Regulations — Instructions.

It is error to submit to the. jury, by instructions, in an action for damages, whether a boat of the plaintiff was moored to defendants wharf “under the wharfage regulations established by the defendant,” without informing the jury what those regulations were.

APPEAL EROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 8, 1870.

Fisks, *for appellant.*

*Baker &*Athey, *for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin :

We perceive no valid objection to either of the two instructions which were ashed for plaintiff, and refused by the court, and the error thus committed was not remedied by the action ¡of the court in giving other instructions.

The first instruction given by the court was erroneous in submitting to the jury the question whether the boat of the plaintiff was moored to the defendant’s wharf, “under the wharfage regulations established by the defendant,” without informing the jury what those regulations were. It was also liable to objection as involved, by reference to particular cause of peril to boats moored at the defendant’s wharf. x

We are also of the opinion that the court might properly have granted a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial consistent with this opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          55,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               144,747
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 403,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,750
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,704
<OTHER-SE>                                     687,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   403,719
<SALES>                                        239,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               239,457
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               710,104
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (471,104)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (471,104)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (471,104)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Science Command Post Supports Scott Kelly\u2019s Year In Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cTwPM8yHBo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/nasas-science-command-post-supports-scott-kellys-year-in-space\/\">NASA\u2019s Science Command Post Supports Scott Kelly\u2019s Year In Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/nasas-science-command-post-supports-scott-kellys-year-in-space\/embed\/#?secret=cTwPM8yHBo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Science Command Post Supports Scott Kelly\u2019s Year In Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cTwPM8yHBo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/poic_panorama1-100_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":239}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 68","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uAzYZZAyJH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-68\/\">Expedition 68<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-68\/embed\/#?secret=uAzYZZAyJH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 68” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uAzYZZAyJH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/exp68-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1

Eastern Division

Juanita Balderas

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:20−cv−01857

Honorable Sara L. Ellis

Illinois Central Railroad Company, et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Thursday, July 6, 2023:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sara L. Ellis:Telephone conference held on

7/6/2023. Plaintiff appears for status hearing and reported to the Court that parties are

working on releases. Telephone Conference set for 7/20/2023 at 1:30 PM and if the parties

file a stipulation of dismissal prior to the next status date, no appearance is required.

Attorneys/Parties should appear for the hearing by calling the Toll−Free Number: (866)

434−5269, Access Code: 8087837. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will

be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Please note that the

conference call−in will be used by all cases that are on the court's calendar for the said

date, therefore counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line and must have the

telephone muted until your case is called. Members of the public and media will be able to

call in to listen to this hearing (use toll free number). Persons granted remote access to

proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and

rebroadcasting court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions,

including removal of court−issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings,

denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court.

Mailed notice(rj, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:20-cv-01857 Document #: 113 Filed: 07/06/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:1683
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the quarterly report of Xponential, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Dwayne A. Moyers, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial conditions and results of operations of the Company.        Date: May 17, 2006 /s/ Dwayne A. Moyers   Dwayne A. Moyers   Chief Executive Officer
No. 15,179.

#### The State *v.*Klein.

Constitutional *Law.*— Selling *Uwmspeeted Meats.*— Act *Prohibiting.*— Un*constitutionality of.*— The act of March 2d, 1889 (Acts 1889, p. 150), entititled “An act for the protection of the public health by promoting the growth and sale of healthy cattle and sheep, making it a misdemeanor to sell the same without inspection before slaughtering within this State, and to authorize cities to appoint inspectors,” is in violation of the Constitution of the United States, and void.

From the Marion Criminal Court.

*J. E. McDonald, J. M. Butler, A. H. Snow*and *J. L. Mitchell,*Prosecuting Attorney, for the State.

— *Johnson*and *J. S. Slick,*for appellee.

Berkshire, C. J.

— This prosecution rests upon the following entitled statute:

> “An act for the protection of the public health by promoting the growth and sale of healthy cattle and sheep, making it a misdemeanor to sell the same without inspection before slaughtering within this State, and to authorize cities to appoint inspectors.” Acts of 1889, p. 150 (Elliott’s Supp., section 359).

*69Filed Nov. 15, 1890.

The court below quashed the affidavit and information, upon the ground that the statute was in violation of the Constitution of the United States. And the constitutionality of the statute is the only question which is presented by this appeal.

In the case of *Minnesota*v. *Barber,*136 U. S. 313, the Supreme Court of the United States declared a statute of that State very similar to the one in question to be inoperative and void, for the reason that it was repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.

The two statutes are so nearly alike that the reasoning and conclusion of the court apply as well to our statute as to the.Minnesota statute; hence we are required to follow the decision and judgment of the court in the case referred to, without reference to any opinion we might express were the case one of first impression.

Judgment affirmed.