Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices 64213 

management decisions in the park for 

the next five to ten years. 

Biscayne National Park’s FMP is the 

result of a cooperative effort between 

the Park and the Florida Fish and 

Wildlife Conservation Commission 

(FWC). This partnership is a necessary 

part of fishery management because the 

Park’s enabling legislation states that 

fishing within the Park must be in 

accordance with the laws of the State of 

Florida. 

The FMP FEIS presented a range of 

five alternatives. The development of 

the alternatives and the identification of 

the preferred alternative were based on 

a combination of public input (derived 

from three public comment periods and 

three series of public meetings, and the 

input of the FMP Working Group), interagency meetings, and environmental 

and socioeconomic analyses. The NPS, 

in coordination with the FWC, has 

decided to implement Alternative 4, 

Rebuild and Conserve Park Fisheries 

Resources for its Fishery Management 

Plan. The NPS and FWC determined 

that Alternative 4 best balances resource 

protection and visitor use. Factors 

considered during the decision-making 

process included: (A) Assessment of the 

direction and degree of environmental 

impacts to the Park’s fisheries resources, 

given their current status, (B) the ability 

of an alternative to equitably balance 

conservation, enjoyment and extractive 

uses of the Park’s fisheries resources, (C) 

impacts on recreational and commercial 

fishing, (D) feasibility of successfully 

implementing regulations to achieve 

alternative goals, and (E) socioeconomic 

impacts. Factors A and B were weighted 

more heavily than the remaining factors. 

Under Alternative 4, a considerable 

change from current management 

strategies would be required to achieve 

a substantial improvement in Park 

fisheries resources status and a 

reduction in fishing-related habitat 

impacts. Specific regulatory changes 

proposed under this alternative include: 

• Developing park-specific fishing 

regulations (in conjunction with the 

FWC) to increase the abundance and 

average size of targeted fish and 

invertebrate species within the Park by 

at least 20% over current conditions and 

over conditions in similar habitat 

outside the park. 

• Elimination of the two-day lobster 

sport season. 

• Prohibition of the use of an air 

supply or gear with a trigger mechanism 

while spearfishing. 

• Phasing out of commercial fishing 

via the requirement that all commercial 

fishers must purchase a limited-entry, 

Special Use Permit from the park 

Superintendent. The permit would be 

permanently non-transferable, would 

require annual renewal, and would be 

‘‘use or lose’’ such that a permit could 

not be renewed if (1) it was not renewed 

the previous year, or (2) no catch was 

reported in the previous year. 

• Establishment (by FWC) of coral 

reef protection areas (CRPAs) to 

delineate coral reef habitat on which 

lobster and crab traps could not be 

deployed. Traps within the CRPAs 

could be moved outside CRPA 

boundaries by authorized FWC or Park 

staff, or other authorized personnel. 

Additionally, the trap number from 

traps observed within CRPAs would be 

recorded, and traps with three or more 

recorded violations could be confiscated 

from Park waters. 

• Proposal of a no-trawl zone within 

the Bay, in which commercial shrimp 

trawling would be prohibited. This zone 

would serve to protect juvenile fish and 

invertebrates commonly caught as 

bycatch in trawls, as well as protect 

essential fish habitat. 

New regulations will be implemented 

through the federal rulemaking process 

(for federal rules) and through the 

FWC’s rulemaking process (for parkspecific state rules). The public will 

have the opportunity to comment on all 

proposed regulatory changes. Regulatory 

changes that would be implemented are 

expected to improve fisheries and 

habitat resources. The FEIS and 

National Marine Fishery Service 

Biological Opinion can be obtained in 

its entirety by (1) downloading the 

report from the Planning, Environment, 

and Public Comment (PEPC) Web site at 

http://parkplanning.nps.gov/bisc, (2) 

Visiting Biscayne National Park at 9700 

SW 328th St, Homestead, FL 33033 to 

request a copy, or (3) Calling Biscayne 

National Park at 305–230–1144 to 

request a copy. 

Dated: October 1, 2014. 

Stan Austin, 

Regional Director, Southeast Region. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25583 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–SERO–CANA–16428; PPSESEROC3, 

PMP00UP05.YP0000] 

Record of Decision for the General 

Management Plan, Canaveral National 

Seashore 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 

Section 42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the 

National Park Service (NPS) announces 

the availability of the Record of 

Decision (ROD) for the General 

Management Plan (GMP) for Canaveral 

National Seashore (Seashore). On 

August 12, 2014 the Regional Director, 

Southeast Region, approved the ROD for 

the project. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Superintendent Myrna Palfrey, 

Canaveral National Seashore, 212 S. 

Washington Avenue, Titusville, FL 

32796; telephone (321) 267–1110. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FEIS/ 

GMP evaluated four alternatives for 

managing use and development of the 

Seashore: 

• Alternative A was the No-Action 

Alternative and is the continuation of 

current management. 

• The NPS preferred alternative was 

Alternative B. Under this alternative, 

emphasis would be placed on retaining 

the Seashore’s relatively undeveloped 

character and providing uncrowded 

experiences by dispersing visitors via a 

shuttle service or canoe, kayak, hiking 

and walking trails, and bicycle trails. 

Elements of this alternative would 

support the resilience of the Seashore to 

climate change concerns, such as sea 

level rise, coastal erosion, and higher 

storm surges, all of which may affect 

cultural and natural resources as well as 

visitor experience at the Seashore. 

• Under Alternative C the Seashore 

would be managed as a place where 

visitors would explore and experience a 

wide range of opportunities that would 

be designed to provide an in-depth 

understanding of the natural and 

cultural history of eastern coastal 

Florida. When visitors enter the 

Seashore, they would be presented with 

choices for alternative modes of access 

to land- and water-based natural and 

cultural features, appropriate 

recreational opportunities, and 

educational pursuits. Enhanced 

development related to recreational 

opportunities and educational pursuits 

would be pursued. 

• Under Alternative D the Seashore 

would be managed to focus on 

enhancing the existing lands, resources, 

and facilities. Limited facility 

development would provide more 

efficient NPS administration and 

operations and enhanced visitor 

amenities. Coordination with partners 

would be increased to provide 

additional educational opportunities 

and programs for visitors and enhanced 

monitoring of Mosquito Lagoon 

resources. 

The ROD selected Alternative B, which 

the NPS intends to implement as soon 


asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
64214 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Notices 

as possible and which will guide the 

management of the Seashore over the 

next 20+ years. 

The responsible official for this FEIS/ 

GMP is the Regional Director, NPS 

Southeast Region, 100 Alabama Street 

SW., 1924 Building, Atlanta, Georgia 

30303. 

Dated: October 1, 2014. 

Stan Austin, 

Regional Director, Southeast Region. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25584 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–JD–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 337–TA–055, 087, 105, 

112, 287, 295] 

Certain Novelty Glasses; Certain CoinOperated Audio Visual Games and 

Components Thereof; Certain CoinOperated Audio Visual Games and 

Components Thereof (Viz., Rally-X and 

Pac-Man); Certain Cube Puzzles; 

Certain Strip Lights; Certain Novelty 

Teleidoscopes; Request for Written 

Submissions on Whether Certain 

Commission Exclusion Orders Should 

Be Rescinded, in Whole or in Part, 

Based on Changed Conditions of Fact 

or Law or the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission is requesting submissions 

on whether the exclusion orders issued 

at the conclusion of the following six 

Commission investigations should be 

rescinded, in whole or in part, based on 

changed conditions of fact or law, or the 

public interest, pursuant to 19 CFR 

210.76: Certain Novelty Glasses, Inv. 

No. 337–TA–055, Exclusion Order (July 

11, 1979); Certain Coin-Operated Audio 

Visual Games and Components Thereof, 

Inv. No. 337–TA–087, Exclusion Order 

(June 25, 1981); Certain Coin-Operated 

Audio Visual Games and Components 

Thereof (Viz., Rally-X and PAC MAN), 

Inv. No. 337–TA–105, Exclusion Order 

(January 15, 1982); Certain Cube 

Puzzles, Inv. No. 337–TA–112, 

Exclusion Order (December 30, 1982); 

Certain Strip Lights, Inv. No. 337–TA– 

287, Exclusion Order (September 28, 

1989); and Certain Novelty 

Teleidoscopes, Inv. No. 337–TA–295, 

Exclusion Order (April 11, 1990). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

has notified the Commission that the six 

above-identified exclusion orders may 

be candidates for rescission based on 

changed conditions of fact or law. Each 

of the above-identified exclusion orders 

issued over twenty (20) years ago and 

each resulted from a Commission 

investigation alleging a violation of 

section 337 based on at least trademark 

or trade dress infringement. CBP’s 

preliminary investigation has indicated 

that the trademarks or trade dress at 

issue in the exclusion orders are no 

longer used in commerce or 

complainant has stopped making 

required compliance filings. See EDIS 

Document Nos. 542137–42. The 

Commission therefore is requesting 

submissions from the public, including 

the current owners of the trademarks or 

trade dress at issue, on whether these 

exclusion orders should be rescinded 

based on changed conditions of fact or 

law, or the public interest, pursuant to 

19 CFR 210.76. 

The public interest factors that will be 

considered by the Commission in 

determining whether to rescind the 

exclusion orders include the following: 

(1) The public health and welfare, (2) 

competitive conditions in the U.S. 

economy, (3) U.S. production of articles 

that are like or directly competitive with 

those that are subject to investigation, 

and (4) U.S. consumers. 

Written Submissions: The parties to 

the investigations, the current rights’ 

holders or successors-in-interest to the 

trademarks or trade dress at issue, 

interested government agencies, and any 

other interested parties are encouraged 

to file written submissions on whether 

the Commission should rescind the 

exclusion orders at issue based on 

changed conditions of fact or law or the 

public interest. The written submissions 

must be filed no later than close of 

business on December 22, 2014. Reply 

submissions must be filed no later than 

the close of business on January 20, 

2015. No further submissions on these 

issues will be permitted unless 

otherwise ordered by the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to 

Commission rule 210.4(f), 19 CFR 

210.4(f). Submissions should refer to the 

investigation number (e.g., ‘‘Inv. No. 

337–TA–055’’) in a prominent place on 

the cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document (or portion thereof) to the 

Commission in confidence must request 

confidential treatment unless the 

information has already been granted 

such treatment during the proceedings. 

All such requests should be directed to 

the Secretary of the Commission and 

must include a full statement of the 

reasons why the Commission should 

grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 210.6. 

Documents for which confidential 

treatment by the Commission is sought 

will be treated accordingly. All 

nonconfidential written submissions 

will be available for public inspection at 

the Office of the Secretary. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 22, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25546 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 337–TA–867/861 

(Advisory Opinion Proceeding)] 

Certain Cases for Portable Electronic 

Devices; Institution of an Advisory 

Opinion Proceeding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 


asabaliauskas on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES