alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Michigan Consumer Credit Lawyers

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Leslie Belsanti

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leslie Belsanti,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Equifax Information Services, LLC, 

et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 3:16-cv-08001-DGC

Hon. David G. Campbell

STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE AS TO 

DEFENDANT TRANS 

UNION, LLC, ONLY

Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union, LLC (hereinafter referred to as “Trans 

Union”), through counsel undersigned and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby 

stipulate that the above-captioned action may be dismissed with prejudice against 

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 61 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendant Trans Union, only, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and 

costs, in accordance with the form of dismissal order filed concurrently herewith.

DATED this 29

th day of July, 2016

KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff

PHILIP R. WOOTEN P.C.

__/s/ Philip R. Wooten ___

Philip R. Wooten

Attorneys for Defendant,

Trans Union LLC

DESSAULES LAW GROUP

 /s/ Jonathan A. Dessaules

Jonathan A. Dessaules

Local Counsel for Experian

SNELL & WILMER, LLP

__/s/ Jacob C. Jones _

Jacob C. Jones

Attorneys for Defendant,

Equifax Information Services, LLC

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 61 Filed 07/29/16 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP

_/s/ Andrew Soukup _

Andrew Soukup (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Attorneys for Defendant,

Chase Bank USA, N.A.

ENGELMAN BERGER, P.C.

_/s/ Wade E. Burgeson __

Wade E. Burgeson

Attorneys for Defendant,

Capital One Bank, USA, N.A.

Case 3:16-cv-08001-DGC Document 61 Filed 07/29/16 Page 3 of 3
#### Fugate *v.*Ferguson.

A debtor, in pursuance of a corrupt agreement to get time, gave his creditor an obligation payable at a future period, for a sum including the debt and usurious interest at 8 per cent, per annum from the time the debt accrued until the obligation was to be paid. Held, that the contract being usurious, the original debt without interest was all that could be recovered.

*Held,*also, that a plea setting forth the usury, and also a payment of part of the principal, was not bad for duplicity.

ERROR to the *Wayne*Circuit Court. — Debt by Ferguson, assjgnee 0f *Munden,*the obligee, against Fugate, the obligor, on a writing obligatory for 255 dollars and 20 cents, dated *the 9th*of June, 1820, and payable the last of *Avgust*following. Two pleas: the first in bar, except as to 142 dollars and 80 cents; the second in bar, except as to 178 dollars. They stated, that the defendant had been indebted to the obligee since the last of Avgust, 1818, in the sum of 220 dollars; that in pursuance of a corrupt and usurious agreement, the defendant, on, &c. in. consideration of forbearance, gave the obligation, &c. including that debt and usurious interest at 8 per cent, per annum from the time the debt accrued until the last of *August,*1820, when the bond was made payable. The pleas further stated a payment of 42 dollars. The plaintiff, praying judgment for the part confessed, demurred specially to the pleas for duplicity, and for not answering what they professed to answer. Demurrers sustained, and judgment for the plaintiff below.

Scott, J.

The first plea claims a greater deduction from the amount really due, than is authorized by the statute. The second claims a credit on the obligation, only for the usurious interest charged, and the payment actually made. This plea is good in substance and sufficiently formal, the demurrer to it ought therefore to have been overruled (1).

*367*Rariden,*for the plaintiff.

Smith, for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed, and the proceed-ings subsequent to the plea are set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 The rate of interest here is 6 per cent, per arm. If more be taken it is usury. Stat. 1823, p. 227. If a contract be usurious, the principal debt may be'recovered, but no interest. *Crawford,*v. Harvey, *Nov.*term, 1825, post.— *Harvey*v. Crawford, *May*term, 1827, post. The *English*statute of 12 Anne provides, that all bonds, contracts, and assurances whatsoever, whereupon and whereby shall be reserved or taken above the rate of 5 per cent, shall.be utterly void. 3 Stark. Ev. 1522. The *English*law of usury is fully explained in a note to Jones v. Davison, 1 Holt, 256.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**ANTONIO R. ORTIZ,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 343 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of October, 2015, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Studying Arctic Ice","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EYJIAVwthq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/7348420132-79aab0d0d9-o\/\">Studying Arctic Ice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/7348420132-79aab0d0d9-o\/embed\/#?secret=EYJIAVwthq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Studying Arctic Ice” — NASA\" data-secret=\"EYJIAVwthq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/7348420132-79aab0d0d9-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 	AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 	SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly report	of Inland Fiber Group, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities	and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Rudey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,	certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

           1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

           2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company. 

/s/ John M. RudeyJohn M. Rudey 	Chief Executive Officer	May 13, 2005
**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,	or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required	by Section 906, has been provided to Inland Fiber Group, LLC and will be retained by Inland Fiber Group, LLC and furnished to the	Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 583 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 583

                  For the relief of David R. W. Light.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1997

 Mr. McNulty introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of David R. W. Light.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION TO REMAIN TEMPORARILY IN THE UNITED STATES FOR 
              DAVID R. W. LIGHT.

    (a) In General.--The Attorney General--
            (1) shall refrain from removing or deporting David R. W. 
        Light from the United States and permit him to remain 
        temporarily in the United States notwithstanding section 241(a) 
        of the Immigration and Nationality Act (before redesignation as 
        section 237(a) of such Act by section 305(a)(2) of the Illegal 
        Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996); 
        and
            (2) shall authorize David R. W. Light to engage in 
        employment in the United States and provide him with an 
        ``employment authorized'' endorsement or other appropriate work 
        permit.
    (b) Grounds for Deportation.--The stay of removal and deportation 
under subsection (a) shall apply only to grounds for removal or 
deportation that are based on the expiration of the most recent 
nonimmigrant visa issued to David R. W. Light under section 
101(a)(15)(J) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
    (c) Duration of Stay of Deportation and Work Authorization.--The 
stay of removal and deportation and work authorization under subsection 
(a) shall be effective during the 3-year period beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10(a)



FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (First Amendment) between UNITED RENTALS, INC. (the Company) andMICHAEL J. KNEELAND (Employee) is hereby entered into as
of the later date of signing by either of the parties below.

RECITALS:

WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2006;

WHEREAS, on March 7, 2007, the Company appointed Employee to the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer;

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to update the references to Employees title contained therein;

AND WHEREAS, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged;

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are acknowledged, the parties mutually agree that:

All references in the Employment Agreement to the title of Executive Vice
President, Operations shall be deleted and replaced by the title of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer.

The terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this First Amendment shall modify Employees current position as
interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company or his current base salary.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First
Amendment to be effective as of the date identified below.



|                     |  |                  |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | ---------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|UNITED RENTALS, INC. |  |                  |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |                  |  | 
|By:                  |  | /s/ Roger Schwed |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. Kneeland
|Name:                |  | Roger Schwed     |  |  |  |  |  | MICHAEL J. KNEELAND    
|Title:               |  | General Counsel  |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|                     |  |                  |  | 
|Date:                |  | August 1, 2007   |  |  |  |  |  | Date: August 1, 2007
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 31.1
                     RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A) CERTIFICATION

I, John J. Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of Ambient Corporation (the
"Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Company is made known to us by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Company's auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors
(or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                        Date: AUGUST 12, 2005


                                        /s/ JOHN J. JOYCE
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        JOHN J. JOYCE
                                        CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles Corbett,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04499-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9981 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9981 Filed 02/06/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA’s B-52 mother ship carries the X-43A and its booster rocket on a captive carry flight Jan. 26, 2004","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5ZgnURtUvw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ec04-0029-17\/\">NASA’s B-52 mother ship carries the X-43A and its booster rocket on a captive carry flight Jan. 26, 2004<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ec04-0029-17\/embed\/#?secret=5ZgnURtUvw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s B-52 mother ship carries the X-43A and its booster rocket on a captive carry flight Jan. 26, 2004” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5ZgnURtUvw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/EC04-0029-17\/EC04-0029-17~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}