T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by N i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T BR I AN KEI TH DENT, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. D. S I L B AU GH ; H. MUR T HY , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16125 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 7 3 6 M CE J FM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl a nd, J r . , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A ugus t8, 2012 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , B E R Z O N , an d IK U T A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B ri an K ei th D ent , a pri soner a tthe C al i forni a M edi ca l F ac i l i ty, appeal s pro s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t a n d o r d e rd e n y in g D e n t’s m o tio n to a l t e rora m e nd j udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tde f e nda nt M u rth y f ile d aru le s v io la tio n r e p o rt a g a in s t h im in r e ta lia tio n f o rD e n t’s e f

f o rts to 

# FI LED AU G 16 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 16125 2 a voi d atr a ns f

e rt o adi f

f e r e ntl e ve l of

ps y c hi a tr i c c a r e a nd f

oragr i e va nc e D e nt h e lp e d f ile a g a in s t M u rth y . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ag r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, B e e ne v . T e rhune , 380 F . 3d 1149, 1150 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , a nd r e vi e w f ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on to a lte ro ra m e n d aju d g m e n t, D ua rte v . B arda les , 52 6 F . 3d 56 3, 56 7 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) . W e a f

f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l y gr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e ntbe c aus e the un di sput ed fa ct s e st abl i sh thatthe rul es vi ol at i on re po rtfi l ed by M urthy w as r e la te d to ale g itim a te c o rr e c tio n a l g o a l a n d n o t r e ta lia to ry . See P r at t v . R ow land , 65 F . 3d 80 2, 80 6 (9th C i r. 19 95 ) ( “ T he pl ai nt i ff [i n a pri soner r et al i at i on ca se ] bear s the bu rden of pl ea di ng and p rovi ng the abse nce of l egi t i m at e c orre ct i on al g o a ls f o rth e c o n d u c t o f

w h ic h h e c o m p la in s .” ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on w he n i tde ni e d D e nt ’ s m ot i on t o a l t e rora m e nd the j udgm e ntunde rF e d. R . C i v. P . 59( e ) be c aus e D e ntof f e r e d no n e w e v id e n c e , c ite d n o m a n if e s t in ju s tic e o rc le a re rr o r , a n d id e n tif ie d n o c h a n g e in la w w a rr a n tin g s u c h r e lie f . Se e D u a r te , 526 F . 3d a t567 ( l i s t i ng gr ounds f or grant i ng such a m ot i on ).11- 16125 3 B a s e d on the f

a c t s i n the r e c or d, w e r e j e c tD e nt ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe he a r i ng o f f ic e rin h is d is c ip lin a ry p r o c e e d in g s la c k e d s u f f ic ie n t e v id e n c e to f

in d h im g u ilty of threa t eni ng st af

f. AF F I RME D.