alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              20
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                     30,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,617
<PP&E>                                         104,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (46,311)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,846
<BONDS>                                        173,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      9,161
<COMMON>                                        34,262
<OTHER-SE>                                     (65,521)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,398
<SALES>                                         39,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,975
<CGS>                                           24,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,280
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                       915
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John Carrozza, ActingChief Financial Officer of PSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PSB Bancorp, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)and we have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.  The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

1

----

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

Date:  November 15, 2004

 
|   | /s/John Carrozza               |
|--------|--------------------------------|
|   | John Carrozza                  |
|   | Acting Chief Financial Officer |

 

2

----
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 1 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 2 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 3 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 4 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 5 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 6 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 7 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 8 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 9 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 10 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 11 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 12 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 13 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 14 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 15 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 16 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 17 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 18 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 19 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 20 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 21 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 22 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 23 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 24 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 25 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 26 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 27 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 28 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 29 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 30 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 31 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 32 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 33 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 34 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 35 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 36 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 37 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 38 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 39 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 40 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 41 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 42 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 43 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 44 of 45
Case 2:15-cv-02638-SPL Document 1-1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 45 of 45
Exhibit 15.3



CONSENT OF EXPERT



I, Mark Odell, do hereby consent to (i) the filing of the written
disclosure regarding the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Veris Gold Corp. Jerritt Canyon Property,
Elko County, Nevada” dated July 11, 2013, and the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 Technical Report Yukon-Nevada
Gold Corp. Ketza River project, Yukon Territory, Canada” dated June 28, 2011, in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2013, and any amendments thereto (the “Form 20-F”), of Veris Gold Corp. (the “Company”),
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and (ii) the incorporation by reference of such disclosure in the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-171775) (the “Form S-8”) filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.



I also consent to the use of my name in the Form 20-F, and any
amendments thereto, and to the incorporation by reference of the Form 20-F and any amendments thereto, into the Company’s
Form S-8.



|May 7, 2014 | By: | /s/ Mark Odell      
|----------- | --- | --------------------
|            |     | Name: Mark Odell    
|            |     | Title: Owner/Manager
|            |     | Practical Mining LLC
1 

### ... T h i s pr oce edi n g ar i s es ou t of Cau s e N o. 2009- CI

- 11983, s t y l ed A dri an D e La Cruz and R oxan ne G am ez v. Aar on Rent

s I nc. , J er r y M ye r s , X, and Y , p e n d ing in th e 4 5 t h Jud i ci al D i st ri ct C o urt , B exar C o unt y , T exas, t he H o no rable Janet P

. Li t t l ejo hn presi d i ng. i i i i i i



## MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No. 04-10-00247- CV IN RE AARON’ S, INC. (F .K.A . AARON RENTS, INC.)

Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 

### PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone , Chief J ustice

Kar en Ang elini , J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: April 7, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Marc h 24, 2010, rela tor filed a petition f or writ of mandamus and a motion for e merg ency relief . The c ourt has conside red r elator’ s petition and motion for emerg ency rel i ef a nd is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief soug ht. Accor dingly , rela tor’s p et ition for writ of mandamus and motion for e merg ency relief are denied. See T EX 

### . R. A PP 

### . P. 52.8(a).

PER C URI AM
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

KEITH LINES , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3349

[February 15, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08

- 11699 CF10B

.
Keith Lines, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

T

AYLOR , C IKLIN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6324

CLIFTON BERNARD HICKEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOYCE K. CONLEY, Dr.,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-01-183-5)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clifton Bernard Hickey, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Clifton Bernard Hickey appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Hickey v. Conley, No. CA-01-183-5 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 1,

2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 6597

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JAMIE M. HARGROVE , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:11

- cr - 00249

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Jamie M. Hargrove , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6597 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Jamie M. Hargrove appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. United States v. Hargrove , No.
5:11

- cr - 00249

- BO

- 1 (E.D.N.C. May 22, 2023) ; Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that claims raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be considered, absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of ju stice)

. We deny Hargrove’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6597 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
June 1, 1999



Willowbridge Associates Inc.
101 Morgan Lane - Suite 180
Plainsboro, N.J. 07036

Attention:  Ms. Theresa Morris

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewal
                  Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P. II

Dear Ms. Morris:

We are  writing  with  respect  to  your  management  agreement  concerning  the
commodity pool to which reference is made above (the "Management Agreement"). We
would like to extend the term of the Management  Agreement through June 30, 2000
and all other provisions of the Management Agreement will remain unchanged.

Please indicate your agreement to and acceptance of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel Dantuono
at the address above or fax to 212-723-8985.  If you have any questions I can be
reach at 212-723-5416.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT INC.



By:
         Daniel A. Dantuono
         Chief Financial Officer,
         Director & Treasurer

AGREED AND ACCEPTED

WILLOWBRIDGE ASSOCIATES INC.

By:

Print Name:

DAD/sr
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25894]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m. EST, Monday, November 3, 2014.

PLACE: CFTC Headquarters Conference Center, Three Lafayette Centre, 
1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will hold this meeting to 
consider rulemaking and related matters, including the issuance of 
proposed rules and a final interpretation. The agenda for this meeting 
is available to the public and posted on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.cftc.gov. In the event that the time, date, or place of this 
meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new 
time, date, or place of the meeting, will be posted on the Commission's 
Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 
Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-25894 Filed 10-28-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 799 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 799

 To require the Secretary of Agriculture to make a minor adjustment in 
 the exterior boundary of the Hells Canyon Wilderness in the States of 
    Oregon and Idaho to exclude an established Forest Service road 
               inadvertently included in the wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 1997

 Mr. Smith of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Agriculture to make a minor adjustment in 
 the exterior boundary of the Hells Canyon Wilderness in the States of 
    Oregon and Idaho to exclude an established Forest Service road 
               inadvertently included in the wilderness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT, HELLS CANYON WILDERNESS, HELLS CANYON 
              NATIONAL RECREATION AREA.

    The Secretary of Agriculture shall revise the map and detailed 
boundary description of the Hells Canyon Wilderness designated by 
section 2 of Public Law 94-199 (16 U.S.C. 460gg-1) to exclude Forest 
Service Road 3965 from the wilderness area so that the road may 
continue to be used by motorized vehicles to its historical terminus at 
Squirrel Prairie, as was the original intent of the Congress. The road 
shall continue to be included in the Hells Canyon National Recreation 
Area also established by such Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David McEachin,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03855-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Blankenship Law Firm

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/20/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8429 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8429 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 2:16-cv-00033-DKD Document 2-1 Filed 01/07/16 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:16-cv-00033-DKD Document 2-1 Filed 01/07/16 Page 2 of 2