alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-11983, styled Adrian De La Cruz and Roxanne Gamez

v. Aaron Rents Inc., Jerry Myers, X, and Y, pending in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn presiding.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00247-CV

IN RE AARON’S, INC. (F.K.A. AARON RENTS, INC.)

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 7, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 24, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency

relief. The court has considered relator’s petition and motion for emergency relief and is of the

opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM
#### Thomas O. Letcher *v.*S. R. Tolle, Admr., &c.

Judicial Saltes — Consideration—Sale Bonds — Cost of Defending and Prosecuting Suit by Purchaser.

The costs and expenses of .defending and prosecuting suits after the appellant purchased the land had no connection with the consideration of the sale bonds.

APPEAL EEOM BARBEN CIB0U1T COUBT.

April 12, 1871.

Opinion oe the Oouet bt

Judge Haedin :

The costs and expenses of defending and prosecuting suits, after the appellant purchased .the land, had no connection with the consideration of the sale bonds, and as the appellee was not *338a grantor or warrantor in tbe deed of Thomas H. Letcher’s heirs, by commission to the appellant, Thomas O. Letcher, it is. not, perceived how these claims could constitute any ground for enjoining the balance of the purchase money. Nor can we decide from the record before us, that the petition discloses any available ground for crediting or abating the unpaid sale bond for the alleged failure of consideration, in consequence of the adverse claim and possession of Scott and others. The suit of Myer’s Admr. vs. Letcher’s heirs, referred to as part of the petition, to show what were the terms and particular character of the sale, and from which claim the court could determine whether or not a sufficient defense is presented for a partial failure of considera; tion, is not copied in the record. If it was it might show the sale to have been one in gross only of so much land as belonged to Letcher’s heirs, and not intended to embrace the lands of others in their adverse possession,, and that the circuit court properly dissolved the injunction and- dismissed the actionwhich we must presume it did, is the absence of a transcript of the suit, which constituted so important a part of the petition.

James, *for appellant.*

*Leslie for appellee.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 13, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Country Bancorporation, Crawfordsville, Iowa; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Lone Tree Service Company, Lone Tree, 
Iowa, and thereby indirectly acquire Farmers and Merchants Savings 
Bank, Iowa City, Iowa.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 14, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-24712 Filed 10-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             931
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,221
<PP&E>                                           2,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,935
<SALES>                                         14,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,841
<INCOME-TAX>                                       425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (93)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,323
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Erin Mahoney","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/erin-c-mahoneynasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Provides Updated International Space Station Transition Plan","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2YQJSm16F3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/nasa-provides-updated-international-space-station-transition-plan\/\">NASA Provides Updated International Space Station Transition Plan<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/nasa-provides-updated-international-space-station-transition-plan\/embed\/#?secret=2YQJSm16F3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Provides Updated International Space Station Transition Plan” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2YQJSm16F3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 696

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to require humane living conditions for

calves raised for the production of veal.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Agriculture

A BILL

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to require humane living

conditions for calves raised for the production of veal.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HUMANE LIVING CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR

4 VEAL CALVES.

5 The Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) is

6 amended—

7 (1) by redesignating section 29 (7 U.S.C. 2159)

8 as section 30; and

9 (2) by inserting after section 28 (7 U.S.C.

10 2158) the following new section:
2

•HR 696 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 29. PROTECTION OF VEAL CALVES.

2 ‘‘(a) HUMANE LIVING CONDITIONS REQUIRED.—Be3 ginning one year after the date of the enactment of this

4 section, no person shall raise a calf for the production of

5 veal unless the person complies with the following require6 ments:

7 ‘‘(1) The calf must be free to turn around with8 out difficulty, lie with its legs outstretched, and

9 groom itself, without any impediment such as too

10 small an enclosure or chaining or tethering.

11 ‘‘(2) The calf must be fed a daily diet contain12 ing sufficient iron and, if the calf is more than 14

13 days old, sufficient digestible fiber to prevent anemia

14 and to sustain full health.

15 ‘‘(b) PENALTIES.—The remedies and procedures pro16 vided in subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 19 shall

17 apply with respect to a violation of subsection (a).

18 ‘‘(c) INVESTIGATIONS AND INSPECTIONS.—For pur19 poses of enforcement of this section, the Secretary may

20 make such investigations or inspections as the Secretary

21 considers necessary of any facility where calves are kept

22 for the production of veal. Section 16 shall apply with re23 spect to investigations and inspections conducted under

24 this section.’’.

Æ
!"#$ %&'()$

*+,,)+-!.)(/0!#1(/".&+1)!2+1""3)+/03)$

*""3)+/+'4"/,3),)!+"5$

6!)'$  7")"11)$ !"/87""89!,$ 

:);<%&'()$ #,.3+%&'()$

= %3

= %3

= %3

= %3

47!"'>!+!+")&-"!3+5

?'!#*11)$

*)/3&-"!+2#1-3&+#!+".!-@

*)/3&-"!+2#3-#-3&+#!+".!-@

*)/3&''()30".-3&)"A")!#()@

;0".!-)-.")!#BC!##/3&-"".")!#""3)+/@

;0".!!-)!'!+#-B-.-D/3&)""&E F"!+13&+#

*,,3!+"13&+#

;0,,3!+"1-3&+#G)/3&

61)#<0+1)

H*I+#*""3)+/

JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ

;+3)1)"3,,)(03)".!K3&)"+""3)+/'&"!".)(''()!+2331"+1!+230".!K3&)"A

2+)#()3)(2)+"1#L"3,,)MNOPQRSTRU,)3L!1103)(/#3-#)&#V>EWX".)3&2.V>EWYE

;1-#)&+1),+#"/30,)Z&)/"."".03)23!+2!")&+1-3))-"E[+1)XV\E]EK^_W`YaB".!

""'+"&+1),)Z&)/.".'03)-+100-"C3)+""'+"'1&+1)3".E

?b-&"13+

*""3)+/!2+"&)$78

4[#-")3+!-!2+"&)!0".,,)+-03)'!0!#1#-")3+!-##/E5

FL!1V8W8XcWd

efggfhijiklmnokpqrsftu

jvvkwfhxsvsxhgny z{|}~z

ghfqxf

hgsklq

ksmuksm

zzjsltssq

~pfwhky}}

|| z||}}

hgsgksmnwki

|}|z





hgsklq

Case: 1:20-cv-01444 Document #: 52 Filed: 06/04/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:342
## NUMBER 13 - 2 1 - 00224 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE CITY OF ARANSAS PASS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.


## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices L ongoria , Hinojosa, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina 1 By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, the City of Aransas Pass, Texas (the City) , sought to compel the trial court to quash deposition notices directed to Mayor Ramiro Gomez , Council M embers Carrie Scruggs, Jan Moore , and Vickie Abrego, and former Council Member Billy Ellis

. However, the City has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding on grounds that the parties have reached an

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so , ” but “ [w]hen granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case ” ); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2 agreement concerning the matters in dispute

. The City contends that the petition for writ of mandamus has been rendered moot and it r e quests that we dismiss th is original proceeding. The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding, is of the opinion that it should be granted. See Heckman v. Williamson County , 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012) (“A case becomes moot if, since the tim e of filing, there has ceased to exist a justiciable controversy between the parties

— that is, if the issues presented are no longer ‘live,’ or if the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome.”); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc ., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (stating that a case becomes moot “if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings”); see also In re Smith County , 521 S.W.3d 447, 455 (Tex. App.

— Tyler 2017, orig. proceedi ng). Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b) ( “ Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided. ” ). We grant the unopposed motion to dismiss and we dismiss this original proceeding as moot

.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice Delivered and filed on the 11th d ay of August , 202 1

.
#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN R. CONNOR, ETC. v. R.G. SACHS, M.D., ET AL.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial extracted from the financial statements
of RB Asset,  Inc. for the 6 months ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                              52,060
<SECURITIES>                                         1,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                       39,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16,832
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    55,185
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     173,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                              11,944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                             938
<COMMON>                                              7,100
<OTHER-SE>                                           87,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        173,092
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     11,831
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         8,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      2,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (126)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            363
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (489)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.09)



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Kenneth Galpin, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Scott Munro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  March 23, 2004 | /s/  Kenneth GalpinKenneth Galpin
President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  March 23, 2004 | /s/ Scott MunroScott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer   

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Most Home Corp. and will be retained by Most Home Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
#### Cook *v.*Surplus Trading Company.

Opinion delivered October 13, 1930.

*Sam T. Poe*and *Tom Poe,*for appellant.

*Rose, Hemingway, Cantrell & Loughborough,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

As pointed out in our original opinion, under § 9889 of the Digest all property assessed in this State shall be assessed by the duly authorized authorities *421according to its value on the first day of May. The record shows that appellee failed to assess its personal property, and that the clerk put the same on the tax roll as omitted property, and the assessor duly assessed the same under the provisions of 9906 and 9910 of the Digest. In making the assessment, however, the county assessor assessed the property in a lump sum of the value of $100,000. A part of this property was situated at that date on the Camp Pike Military Reservation, and was not subject to assessment by the State authorities. *Surplus Trading Co.*v. *Cook,*281 U. S. 647, 50 S. Ct. 455, 74 L. ed. 625.

On the date of May 1, 1922, there was stored in the Terminal Warehouse in the city of Little Rock blankets of the estimated value of $20,000. These blankets should have been assessed by the county assessor. We are asked now to direct the chancery court to segregate these blankets from the others and make the assessment. It is not within the province of the courts to assess property. Under our Constitution and laws, the duty of assessing all property devolves upon the assessor, and no one else can perform that duty. *Lyman*v. *Howe,*64 Ark. 436, 42 S. W. 830 ; and *Walton*v. *Arkansas County,*153 Ark. 285, 239 S. W. 1054. Courts can only review the assessments made by the assessing officers and have no power under our Constitution and laws to make the assessments.

Therefore the decree of the chancery court will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded with directions to the chancery court to direct that the county assessor shall make an assessment of the blankets and other personal property of appellee which was situated in the Terminal Warehouse in the city of .Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas, on the first Monday of May, 1922. In all other respects, the decree of the chancery court will be affirmed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dacia Massengill","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/daciamassengill-2\/","title":"NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, Bulgarian Minister of Finance Assen Vassilev, and Bulgarian Ambassador to the United States Georgi Panayotov","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yoIhTdaxpl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/53515707583-39a2f96e55-k\/\">NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, Bulgarian Minister of Finance Assen Vassilev, and Bulgarian Ambassador to the United States Georgi Panayotov<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/53515707583-39a2f96e55-k\/embed\/#?secret=yoIhTdaxpl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Administrator Bill Nelson, Bulgarian Minister of Finance Assen Vassilev, and Bulgarian Ambassador to the United States Georgi Panayotov” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yoIhTdaxpl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/53515707583-39a2f96e55-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":370}