alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MARINE BANCSHARES, INC. DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         113,392
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             9,110,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,079,351
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            245,853
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,821,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,079,351
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               298,888
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               298,888
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,129
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          288,759
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                434,486
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (145,477)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (145,477)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (145,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual Report of American Homestar
Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2003, as
amended,  (the  "Report"),  I,  Finis  F. Teeter, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d));  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.



Dated: December 30, 2003            /s/ Finis F. Teeter
                                    ----------------------
                                    Finis F. Teeter,
                                    Chief Executive Officer


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual Report of American Homestar
Corporation  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ended June 27, 2003, as
amended,  (the  "Report"),  I, Craig A. Reynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or
          78o(d));  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.



Dated: December 30, 2003            /s/ Craig A. Reynolds
                                    ------------------------
                                    Craig A. Reynolds,
                                    Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
Josue

Case 2:15-mj-01906-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01906-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/08/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01906-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/08/15 Page 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 10.42
 SECOND AMENDMENT
TO
SECURED SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTE
DATED AS OF APRIL 29, 2004
         Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Signature Page Follows.




---



##### 



BORROWERS:VIRBAC CORPORATIONa Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonName:
    
    Jean M. NelsonTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerPM RESOURCES, INC.a Missouri corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonName:
    
    Jean M. NelsonTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerST. JON LABORATORIES, INC.a California corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonName:
    
    Jean M. NelsonTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerFRANCODEX LABORATORIES, INC.a Kansas corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonName:
    
    Jean M. NelsonTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer




---



##### 



DELMARVA LABORATORIES, INC.a Virginia corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonName:
    
    Jean M. NelsonTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerVIRBAC AH, INC.a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonName:
    
    Jean M. NelsonTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerHOLDER:VIRBAC S.A.a company organized under the laws of theRepublic of FranceBy:
    
    /s/ Eric MareeName:
    
    Eric MareeTitle:
    
    President of the Management Board
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Most Home Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Scott Munro, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. s. 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date:  June 23, 2003 | /s/  Scott Munro
Scott Munro
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

FERNANDO MELENDEZ, AS 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

DAMARIS REYES, DECEASED,

Respondent

v.

THE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF 

LEBANON, PENNSYLVANIA; LEBANON 

EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS; THE GOOD 

SAMARITAN HOSPITAL,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 528 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of December, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50490 c/w No. 15

- 50493 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE PABLO BARTOLO

- GUERRA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 20

- 1 USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 52

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment s in criminal case s , Jose Pablo Bartolo

- Guerra raises a n argument that is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 228, 235 (1998), which held that convictions used to enhance a sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) need not be set forth in the indictment. The motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the alternative motion for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50490 Document: 00513384642 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016No. 15

- 50490 c/w No. 15

- 50493

2 an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment s of the district
court are AFFIRMED. Case: 15-50490 Document: 00513384642 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Scott Robert Hennager,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03878-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Murray Law Firm

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8566 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8566 Filed 11/02/17 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 681 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                               H. R. 681

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the United States Post Office building located at 313 East 
  Broadway in Glendale, California, as the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
                           Office Building''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 681

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located at 313 East 
  Broadway in Glendale, California, as the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States Post Office building located at 313 East Broadway 
in Glendale, California, shall be known and designated as the ``Carlos 
J. Moorhead Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carlos J. Moorhead Post 
Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 21, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Astronaut Candidate Survival Training","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yfEYAsyDqJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/astronaut-candidate-survival-training-2\/\">Astronaut Candidate Survival Training<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/astronaut-candidate-survival-training-2\/embed\/#?secret=yfEYAsyDqJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronaut Candidate Survival Training” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yfEYAsyDqJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jsc2013e078097.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 719

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to allow

children who meet certain criteria to attend a school that receives funds

under part A of title I of such Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 12, 1997

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

of 1965 to allow children who meet certain criteria to

attend a school that receives funds under part A of

title I of such Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS.

4 Section 1115(b) of the Elementary and Secondary

5 Education Act of 1965 is amended by adding at the end

6 the following:

7 ‘‘(3) A child who attends a school that does not

8 receive funds under this part may be eligible to
2

•HR 719 IH

1 transfer to a school that receives funds under this

2 part if the child meets the criteria described in para3 graph (1).’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  224,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (27,111)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,039
<PP&E>                                         100,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,289)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,987,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,314
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,987,367
<SALES>                                        206,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               206,498
<CGS>                                          142,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,628
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,392
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
418 A.2d 445

#### Benjamin IZENSON, Appellee, v. Irwin IZENSON and Specialty Luggage Co., Inc., Appellants.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued June 18, 1979.

Filed Jan. 11, 1980.

*357Judith L. Maute, Pittsburgh, for appellants.

William J. Murray, Pittsburgh, for appellee.

Before HESTER, HOFFMAN, and CATANIA, JJ.*

*

 President Judge FRANCIS J. CATANIA of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants contend that the lower court erred in issuing a preliminary injunction and a permanent injunction. We cannot reach the merits, however, because appellants failed to appeal the lower court’s order granting a permanent injunction. For the reasons which follow, we must dismiss this appeal.

*358On January 29, 1979, appellee filed a complaint in equity against appellants, seeking a preliminary injunction. On April 17,1979, following hearings, the lower court granted a preliminary injunction enjoining appellants from wrongfully interfering with appellee’s rights as an officer, director, and shareholder of the appellant corporation; ordering appellant Irwin Izenson to transfer 75 shares of the corporation’s stock to appellee; vacating a special meeting of the corporation’s directors and stockholders; ordering that appellants provide appellee access to the corporation’s place of business; and requiring appellee to post bond in the amount of $10,000.00. On April 20,1979, appellants filed this appeal. On April 27, 1979, pursuant to the parties’ prior stipulation, the lower court granted a permanent injunction, incorporating all the terms of the preliminary injunction with the exception of the bond requirement. Appellants have not appealed the order granting the permanent injunction.

Where a preliminary injunction is in force, the issuance of a permanent injunction terminates the preliminary injunction. *See*43A C.J.S. Injunctions § 243 b, at 537 (1978). Thus, we cannot reach appellant’s contention that the preliminary injunction was improperly issued because that injunction is no longer in effect.1 In addition, the issue of whether the lower court erred in granting the permanent injunction is not before us because appellants have not appealed that order. *See*Pa.R.A.P. 903; *Duggan v. Environmental Hearing Board,*13 Pa.Cmwlth. 339, 342, 321 A.2d 392, 393 (1974). Accordingly, we must dismiss this appeal. Appeal dismissed.

1

. In their brief, appellants question the propriety of the lower court’s issuance of a permanent injunction after notice of appeal from the order granting a preliminary injunction had been filed. Rule 1701(a) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure provides: “Except as otherwise prescribed by these rules, after an appeal is taken . ., the lower court may no longer proceed further in the matter.” Pa.R.A.P. 311(e) provides: “Rule 1701(a) shall not be applicable to a matter in which an interlocutory order is appealed under [Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(4) (appeal from injunctions)].” Accordingly, the lower court did not err in proceeding after the notice of appeal was filed.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2839 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

555 West 180th Street in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Sergeant 

Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2004 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 555 West 180th Street in New York, New 

York, as the ‘‘Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT RIAYAN A. TEJEDA POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 555 West 180th Street in New 

6 York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•S 2839 IS 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Sergeant Riayan A. 

3 Tejeda Post Office. 

Æ