Unpublished order filed 2/17/98 granted rehearing and vacated opinion of 11/18/97 in part and remanded in part.2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1223

STEPHEN A. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, and

INTER-WORLD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONS, INCORPORATED; RICHARD L. BAST, Plaintiffs,
versus
JEANNE GOLDBERG; J. FREDERICK SINCLAIR; THOMAS J. CURCIO; ANTONIA LEIGH PETTIT; JACOBOVITZ, ENGLISH & SMITH, P.C.; BARBARA OZELLA REVES; WILLIAM G. BILLINGHAM; PATRICIA GRIEST; JOHN F. DAVIS; MARY AUDREY LARKIN; LOIS AMES; ANTHONY JOSEPH PETTIT, Defendants - Appellees, and
VICTOR MICHAEL GLASBERG; COHEN, DUNN & SINCLAIR, P.C.; CARTER & KRAMER, P.C.; CHARLES WARREN KRAMER; DAVID SMITH; CLAUDE DAVID CONVISSER; NANCY GERTNER; JODY L. NEWMAN; DELMAR D. HARTLEY; MADDONA LEA SCHAMP PETTIT, removed to Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia; ANNE CONNELL; WILLIAM C. HILLMAN; ROGER A. COX, Defendants.3Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-95-531-A) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 18, 1997
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen A. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Victor Michael Glasberg, VICTOR M. GLASBERG & ASSOCIATES, Alexandria, Virginia; Frank Willard Dunham, Jr., COHEN, GETTINGS, DUNHAM & HARRISON, Arlington, Virginia; Barbara Ozella Reves, Alexandria, Virginia; John Otto Easton, JORDAN, COYNE & SAVITS, Fairfax, Virginia; Patricia Griest, Beavercreek, Ohio; Pamela Anne Bresnahan, Steven Robert Becker, VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal from district court orders entered on: (1) August 4, 1995; (2) October 10, 1995; (3) October 11, 1995; (4) October 25, 1995; (5) November 20, 1995; (6) December 6, 1995; (7) December 20, 1995; and (8) January 23, 1996. Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on February 6, 1996, which is beyond the sixty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1) asto several of the orders. Specifically, Appellant's notice of appeal is untimely as to his appeal from the district court's orders of August 4, October 10, October 11, October 25, November 20, and December 6, 1995, and we dismiss the appeal as to these orders for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal as to those orders or obtain an extension of the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) deprives this Court ofjurisdiction to consider the appeal as to those orders. We therefore dismiss the appeal as to those orders. The only orders as to which Appellant's notice of appeal is timely are the district court's order entered December 20, 1995, denying Appellant's motion for leave to file a motion pursuant toFed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), and the order entered January 23, 1996, denying Appellant's motion for leave to file supplemental pleadings. We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying either order, and therefore affirm the district court's5 orders entered December 20, 1995, and January 23, 1996. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART