alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
Silver Diner, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos.
33-9668449 and 33-97535703 on Form S-8 and No. 333-09735 on Form S-3 of Silver
Diner, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated April 2, 1996, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of Silver Diner, Inc. and Subsidiaries (formerly
Silver Diner Development, Inc., Silver Diner Limited Partnership and Silver
Diner Potomac Mills, Inc.) as of December 31, 1995, and the related consolidated
satements of operations, stockholders' equity and partners' deficit and cash
flows for the two-year period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in
the December 29, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Silver Diner, Inc. and
Subsidiaries.


/s/ REZNICK FEDDER & SILVERMAN
_________________________________
Bethesda, Maryland
March 31, 1997
#### W. H. Ballard et al *v.*Squire Turner et al.

Attorney and Client — Compensation and Lien of Attorney.

An attorney has a statutory lien on the fund in litigation and an order for paying his allowance out of that fund is not erroneous.

APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

December 21, 1869.

Opinion oF the Court by

Judge Robertson:

As the parties appeared and introduced testimony as to the value of the services of the appellee attorneys and the record does not, by bill of exceptions, or otherwise, show what the evidence was, this court cannot adjudge that the allowance by the circuit court was exorbitant or that the attorneys had engaged for less.

Holding, as they did, a statutory lien on the fund in litigation, the order for paying their allowance out of that fund does not appear to be erroneous.

Nor does the record afford a sufficient means for determining that $J5, as allowed to the commissioner, was excessive.'

*649Goodloe, *for appellants.*

Turner, *for appellees.*

"Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Apollo 7 Launched as Race to Moon Reached Final Stretch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DKx0ODiUp8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-7\/apollo-7-launched-as-race-to-moon-reached-final-stretch\/\">Apollo 7 Launched as Race to Moon Reached Final Stretch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-7\/apollo-7-launched-as-race-to-moon-reached-final-stretch\/embed\/#?secret=DKx0ODiUp8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 7 Launched as Race to Moon Reached Final Stretch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"DKx0ODiUp8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/1a-ap7-ksc-68pc-182.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":483}
### **Exhibit 32.1**

###  

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of EFC Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report),Barrett J. O’Connor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eric J.Wedeen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of theirknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | By:                      | /s/ Barrett J. O’Connor |   |
|--------|--------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|   | Barrett J. O’Connor |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  |
|   | November 4, 2005    |
|   |                     |
|   | By:                      | /s/ Eric J. Wedeen           |   |
|   | Eric J. Wedeen           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |
|   | November 4, 2005    |
|        |                          |                              |        |  |

 

----
#### Morrison *v.*King.

In error.

*Thursday, December*4.

*SCIRE FACIAS*by a justice of the peace, to show cause why an execution should not issue on a judgment, rendered by his predecessor in office against the defendant. Plea, payment. Judgment for the plaintiff, and an appeal to the Circuit Court.

*Held,*that, on the trial in the Circuit Court, the defendant might prove *by parol*that he had paid the judgment to the justice before whom it was rendered,—it being proved that, at the time of the payment, the justice was in office and had the docket in his possession, but that he had made no entry in it of the payment.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Former Astronaut John L. \u201cJack\u201d Swigert","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kyukPVUYBr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/former-astronaut-john-l-jack-swigert\/\">Former Astronaut John L. \u201cJack\u201d Swigert<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/former-astronaut-john-l-jack-swigert\/embed\/#?secret=kyukPVUYBr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Former Astronaut John L. \u201cJack\u201d Swigert” — NASA\" data-secret=\"kyukPVUYBr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME INCLUDED IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         237,046
<SECURITIES>                                    49,145
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,342
<PP&E>                                          18,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 467,171
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,425
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,105
<OTHER-SE>                                     383,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   467,171
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,439
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                124,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,296
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,317
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Lynn Scott, 

Defendant.

No. 15-PO-6574 

DETENTION ORDER 

 In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of 

detention was addressed at a hearing on December 14, 2015. The Court was informed 

that the defendant is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time. 

 The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to 

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such 

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to 

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The 

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated 

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, 

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The 

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense 

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the 

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to 

Case 3:15-po-06574-DKD Document 4 Filed 12/15/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court 

proceeding. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of 

this detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion 

for review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it 

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing 

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third 

party custodian. 

 Dated this 15th day of December, 2015. 

Case 3:15-po-06574-DKD Document 4 Filed 12/15/15 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Doris J. Bassett,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03407-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8440 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

 

 
| **Capital One Master Trust Aggregated Data for  2007**                                             | ** ** | ** ** | ** **        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|-------------------|
|                                                                                               |       |       |              |
| Aggregate Data for year ended December 31, 2007                                               |       |       |              |
|                                                                                               |       |       |              |
| Defaults                                                                                           |       | $          | 2,434,577,496.46  |   |
| Total Collections                                                                                  |       | $          | 98,932,292,229.75 |   |
| Collections of Principal Receivables                                                               |       | $          | 89,092,545,155.38 |   |
| Collection of Finance Charge Receivables (includes  amortization of annual membership fees)        |       | $          | 9,878,040,504.00  |   |
|                                                                                               |       |       |              |
| Annual Servicing Fee Paid by each publicaly  registered series                                     |       | $          | 97,598,581.63     |   |
| Aggregate amount paid to Certificateholders of publicaly  registered series allocable to principal |       | $          | 2,370,000,000.00  |   |
| Class A Investor Charge—Offs                                                             |       | $          | 0.00              |   |
| Class B Investor Charge—Offs                                                             |       | $          | 0.00              |   |
| Class C Investor Charge—Offs                                                             |       | $          | 0.00              |   |

 

 

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Larry L. Marling,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03476-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8506 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8506 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2
Dismiss and Opinion Filed April 14, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00808
- CV DOMINIC STRICKLAND , Appellant

V. WESTWOOD TOWNHOMES , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 20
- 02964
- D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Schenck Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant faile d to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered this appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and appellant’s brief to be filed by February 13, 2021. By postcard dated March 8, 2021, we notified appellant the time for filing hi s brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his brief by that time might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellan t has not filed– 2

–

a brief, filed a n extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

200808 F

. P 05 /David J. Schenck/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
DOMINIC STRICKLAND, Appellant
No. 05

- 20

- 00808

- CV V. WESTWOOD TOWNHOMES, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 20

- 02964

- D. Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. Justices Reichek and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.
Judgment entered this 14th day of April , 2021

.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John J. Joyce, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: November 16, 2009



| |     |                                                                                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                     
| |     |                                                                                                     
| |     |                                                                                                     
| | By: | /s/ JOHN J. JOYCE                                                                                   
| |     | John J. Joyce                                                                                       
| |     | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.