alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 	AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 	SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

             In connection with the	Quarterly report of Inland Fiber Group, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed	with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Rudey, Chief Executive Officer	of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,	that: 

 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of			the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,			the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ John M. RudeyJohn M. Rudey 	Chief Executive Officer	August 15, 2005
**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,	or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required	by Section 906, has been provided to Inland Fiber Group, LLC and will be retained by Inland Fiber Group, LLC and furnished to the	Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
#### Magee *v.*Siggerson.

On appeal.

*Saturday, June*6.

IN an action of replevin; the writ must contain a description of the goods for which the action is brought; but it need not show that the affidavit; required by the statute, had been made by the plaintiff.'
#### Thomas A. CHILTON, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-7566.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March *2,*2005.

Decided March 17, 2005.

Thomas A. Chilton, Jr., Appellant pro se. John H. McLees, Jr., Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Thomas A. Chilton, Jr., seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order* denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chilton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge. *See*28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0333. ESTATEOFMILDREDDAVIS,MURIELMONTIA, EXECUTOR

v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE

FOR LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-WL3 et al.

Murial Montia filed suit against Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as

trustee for Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2005 WL3 and Select Portfolio

Servicing, Inc., et al. alleging a quiet title claim and seeking the appointment of a

special master. After the trial court dismissed the complaint, Montia filed an

application for discretionary appeal in this Court.

The Supreme Court, however, has original appellate jurisdiction over cases

involving title to land. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (1). Because

this appeal involvestitle to land, jurisdiction appearsto lie in the Supreme Court. See

Tharp v. Harpagon Co., 278 Ga. 654, 655 (1) (604 SE2d 156) (2004). Accordingly,

this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/19/2016

April 19, 2016
YENIER CARDENTEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-3825

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 19, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Mark J. Borello, Judge.

Benjamin S. Waxman of Robbins, Tunkey, Ross, Amsel, Raben & Waxman, P.A., 

Miami, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin D. Chapman, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MARSTILLER, SWANSON, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

1
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We issued our report dated January 26, 2000, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements included in the 1999 Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Royal
Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-4 (File Nos.
33-78310 and 33-80616) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-25855)



/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 24, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM C. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 340 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISLE OF
CAPRI BLACK HAWK LLC'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO SAID
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001047905
<NAME>     ISLE OF CAPRI BLACK HAWK LLC
<MULTIPLIER>     1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       APR-29-2001
<PERIOD-START>                          MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-29-2000
<CASH>                                       10825
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  341
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             12329
<PP&E>                                      104723
<DEPRECIATION>                                4473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              120337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        22066
<BONDS>                                      75000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                   23271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                120337
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             54395
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                19715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             22359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               6879
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           6879
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  6879
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
#### Ryman *v.*Clark.

In error.

*Thursday, September 7.*

A *FIERI FACIAS*was issued by a justice of the peace and dated on the 21st of *July,*1836. *Held,*that the 36 days from the date of the execution, within which the constable was bound to return it, expired on the 25th of *August,*1836; and that, therefore, a *scire facias*against the constable, dated on the 26th of *August,*1836, for not returning the execution, was not objectionable as having issued too soon. *Jacobs*v. *Graham,*1 Blackf. *392.—Arnold*v. *The United States,*9 Cranch, 104.
September 30, 2000
                                                                      $2,830,024



Grupo Industrial Cierres Ideal, S.A. de C.V.
Talon, Inc.
Antiguo Camino a San Lorenzo No. 284
Col.Los Angeles Deleg. Iztaplapa
Mexico D.F., 09830



     Re:  CONSIGNMENT INVENTORY PURCHASE AGREEMENT


     This Consignment Inventory Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") is
an addendum to the Exclusive Distribution Agreement (the "Agreement") dated
April 3, 2000 between Tag-it Pacific, Inc. ("Distributor") and Grupo Industrial
Cierres Ideal, S.A. and Talon, Inc. (collectively "GICISA").

     Effective September 30, 2000, Distributor agrees to purchase certain
inventory held on consignment by Distributor (as listed in Exhibit A to the
Purchase Agreement) totaling $2,830,024 in exchange for a non-interest bearing
unsecured promissory note due April 1, 2002 (the "Note"). Until all amounts owed
by Distributor to Sanwa Bank California, whether such amounts are for principal,
interest, fees, indemnities, expenses or otherwise, and whether such amounts are
contingent or non-contingent, are paid in full, GICISA agrees not to take,
demand, or receive, directly or indirectly, by set-off, redemption or in any
other manner, any payment, whether for interest, principal or otherwise, in
whole or in part with respect to amounts owed hereunder or under the Note.

     As a condition of this Purchase Agreement, GICISA agrees to purchase any
remaining inventory not sold by Distributor by April 1, 2002 at its original
purchase cost as outlined in Exhibit A.

     Distributor shall store the inventory at its premises and shall deliver
products from time to time as directed by customer orders. In the event sales
are made at below the original purchase cost (Exhibit A), Distributor shall be
entitled to receive a minimum of 10% margin on the net sales price of the
inventory and GICISA shall bare the remaining loss on the inventory sale.

     This Purchase Agreement shall supersede in its entirely any prior agreement
between Distributor and GICISA with respect to inventory held on consignment.


<PAGE>

     This Purchase Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California and any action commenced hereunder
shall be commenced in a federal or state court located in Los Angeles,
California.

AGREED:


TAG-IT Pacific, Inc.
By:
    --------------------------------------------

        Signature Title
        ----------------------------------------


Grupo Industrial Cierres Ideal, S.A. de C.V.

    --------------------------------------------

        Signature Title
        ----------------------------------------

Talon, Inc.
By:
    --------------------------------------------

        Signature Title
        ----------------------------------------
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00483-CR

Juan Fransisco Sanchez

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 372nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1229294D)

June 19, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Anne Gardner__________________

 Justice Anne Gardner
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Michigan Consumer Credit Lawyers

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Fred Crandell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fred Crandell,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et 

al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: CV-15-02354-PHX-GMS

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO 

DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC,

ONLY

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, Fred Crandell, by and through the undersigned 

counsel and hereby informs the court that a settlement of the present matter has been 

Case 2:15-cv-02354-DLR Document 82 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

reached with Defendant Trans Union, LLC, ONLY, and is in the process of finalizing 

settlement, which Plaintiff anticipates will be finalized within the next 60 days.

Plaintiff therefore requests that this honorable Court vacate all dates currently 

set on calendar for the present matter.

DATED: July 14, 2016 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Fred Crandell

Case 2:15-cv-02354-DLR Document 82 Filed 07/14/16 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:15-mj-01671-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01671-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01671-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 52","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mIKV1Xr0xi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-52\/\">Expedition 52<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-52\/embed\/#?secret=mIKV1Xr0xi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 52” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mIKV1Xr0xi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/exp52-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
#### Levi Dix and Wire et al, *v.*David Clapham et al.

Guardian and Ward — Judgment Against Minors.

Tire mere appointment of a guardian ad litem for infants, to take care of their interests, is not sufficient. Before a judgment could be rendered affecting the infants’ interest, it must appear that the appointment had been accepted, and a necessary answer tendered for them.

APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

October 5, 1869.

*284
      *Menzies &*Furber, *for appellants.*

Hawkins, *for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

This was a suit in equity for a sale of real estate in the Buena Vista addition to the city of Newport, comprising lot No. 319 and part of lot No. 318, under the provisions of section 543 of the Civil Code.

And the 55th section of the Code declares that “No judgment can be rendered against an infant until after a defense by a guardian.”

The appellants, Theodore, William and Georgiana Clapham, were proceeded against as infants, and although Benjamin Bull was appointed to act as their guardian *ad litem,*and also to take care of their interests as required by said section of the Code, he filed no answer for the infants as their guardian *ad*litem, nor does it appear whether he accepted the appointment, or acted in behalf of the infants in any capacity.

It is argued for the appellees that the mere appointment of a suitable person to take care of the interests of the infants, dispensed with the services of a guardian *ad litem.*But we are of a different opinion. Section 131 of the Civil Code provides that:

> “It shall be the duty of the guardian of an infant or committee of a person of unsound mind, or attorney appointed for a prisoner, to file an answer denying the material allegations of the petition, prejudicial to such defendant.”

In our opinion it should not only appear that the guardian had filed the requisite answer but that the appointment to “take care of the infants’ interest” had been accepted before the judgment of sale was rendered.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsitsent with this opinion.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00433

- CR

Bruce Edward Simmons

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 372nd District Court

o f Tarran t County (1377130D )

November 26 , 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Asad Ehtisham, 

Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., 

et al. 

Defendants. 

CV 15-02362-PHX-JAT 

ORDER GRANTING 

STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION (Doc. 59), 

 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Advance Audio, Inc. and Experian Information 

Solutions, Inc. (“Defendants”) are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its 

own attorneys’ fees and costs included herein. (Because one Defendant remains, this case is 

still open.) 

 Dated this 20th day of May, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02362-JAT Document 60 Filed 05/20/16 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC   Document 997-1   Filed 03/07/16   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32  Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National HealthCare Corporation For The Quarter Ended March 31, 2010   The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigned=s best knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for National HealthCare Corporation (AIssuer@) for the period ending March 31, 2010  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@):  (a)fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(b)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Issuer for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010.  This Certification is executed as of May 7, 2010.    /s/Robert G. AdamsRobert G. AdamsChief Executive Officer/s/ Donald K. DanielDonald K. DanielPrincipal Accounting Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:15-mj-01769-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01769-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01769-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 3 of 3
Consent of Ernst & Young Audit as auditors of France Telecom



EXHIBIT 10.2 
 
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 
 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-13662),
pertaining to the Equant N.V. 1998 Share Option Plan (with regard to the contingent value rights and American depositary contingent value rights), of our report dated March 4, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of France
Telecom S.A., included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003. 
 
ERNST & YOUNG Audit 
 
Represented by Gabriel Galet 
 
Paris, France 
March 21, 2003 
 

1
Exhibit
13.1





PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERCERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro
Tankers (Bahamas I) Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tor Olav Trøim, the
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




(2)
            The information contained in the Report fairly
      presents,in all material respects,
      the financial condition andresults of operations of the
Company.




A signed original of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.




Date:
May 20, 2009




/s/ Tor Olav
Trøim


Tor
Olav Trøim


Principal
Executive Officer