alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,821
<SECURITIES>                                    11,017
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                       134
<INVENTORY>                                        786
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,700
<PP&E>                                          50,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,034
<BONDS>                                         90,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,145
<SALES>                                         15,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,767
<CGS>                                           10,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,704
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    88
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    155
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 72
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    933
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (861)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Amanda McKay, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Maria Mylene Abad, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-02367-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 UPON stipulation of the parties (Doc. 6), and good cause appearing, 

 IT IS ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is hereby dismissed without 

prejudice. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack 

of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 5) is denied as moot. 

 Dated this 3rd day of December, 2015. 

 

 Honorable John J. Tuchi 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-02367-JJT Document 10 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2007 (the Report), I, Joseph Lloyd McAdams, Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    JOSEPH LLOYD
MCADAMSJoseph Lloyd McAdamsChairman of the Board, President andChief Executive OfficerAugust 7, 2007
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 677

To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to provide that

no funds are authorized to be appropriated to carry out that Act.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 11, 1997

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN (for himself, Mr. BASS, and Mr. FRANKS of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to

provide that no funds are authorized to be appropriated

to carry out that Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 27 of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of

4 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831z) is amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘SEC. 27. No appropriations are authorized to carry

6 out the provisions of this Act after September 30, 1997.’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-69","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dXx3ugEWaO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-69\/\">STS-69<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-69\/embed\/#?secret=dXx3ugEWaO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-69” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dXx3ugEWaO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/9508405\/9508405~large.jpg?w=600&h=1525&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1525}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7057

NATHANIEL JOHNSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD MOATS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-97-1683-AW)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Moats, No. CA-97-1683-AW (D. Md. July 3,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        40,930,956
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       7,057
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              47,385,771
<CASH>                                         102,175
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             463,081
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         183,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,725,652
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             31,030,412
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          7,717,308
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,998
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,969,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,725,652
<PREMIUMS>                                   4,497,837
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          2,623,033
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (14,049)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   4,478,424
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,790,215
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         2,199,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,361,594)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (408,820)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (952,774)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   ($.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   ($.48)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                              25,787,944
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          5,646,863
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                          (1,168,439)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             413,191
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                             8,773,277
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                             21,079,900
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                      1,663,000


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"El an\u00e1lisis de la NASA confirma que 2023 fue el a\u00f1o m\u00e1s c\u00e1lido registrado","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ehb2pjV6zO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/el-analisis-de-la-nasa-confirma-que-2023-fue-el-ano-mas-calido-registrado\/\">El an\u00e1lisis de la NASA confirma que 2023 fue el a\u00f1o m\u00e1s c\u00e1lido registrado<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/el-analisis-de-la-nasa-confirma-que-2023-fue-el-ano-mas-calido-registrado\/embed\/#?secret=Ehb2pjV6zO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“El an\u00e1lisis de la NASA confirma que 2023 fue el a\u00f1o m\u00e1s c\u00e1lido registrado” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ehb2pjV6zO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/2023averagetemp-4k-for-2024-release.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Bruce Baile,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03865-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8416 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8416 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Catherine G. Manning","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/cgmannin\/","title":"Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"PnOFirlaRs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/lunar-laser-communications-demonstration-llcd\/\">Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/lunar-laser-communications-demonstration-llcd\/embed\/#?secret=PnOFirlaRs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"PnOFirlaRs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/llcd-0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 No. 333-128478 pertaining to the Williams ScotsmanInternational, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Award Plan and the Employee Stock PurchasePlan of Williams Scotsman International, Inc. and Form S-8 No. 333-128457pertaining to the Scotsman Holdings, Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan,Scotsman Holdings, Inc. 1997 Amended and Restated Employee Stock Option Plan, andthe Scotsman Holdings, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Option Plan) of our reportdated February 17, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsand schedule of Williams Scotsman International, Inc. included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 
|   |   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|

 

Baltimore, Maryland

March 16, 2006

 

1

----
#### Baby *v.*Dubois, in Error.

HELD, that a plea of alien enemy should be rejected on motion, if the nation in which the plaintiff is alleged to be resident be at peace with ours; treaties with foreign nations being a part of the law of the land, of which the Courts are bound to take notice.
Exhibit 13.2

                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with this Annual Report of CalPetro Tankers (Bahamas I) Limited
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kate Blankenship, the Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date:  June 26, 2007


/s/ Kate Blankenship
--------------------
    Kate Blankenship
    Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.3

                            ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO
                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                     NEWPARK SHIPBUILDING AND REPAIR, INC.
                                        
     Pursuant to the terms and provisions of Article 4.04 of the Texas Business
Corporation Act, Newpark Shipbuilding and Repair, Inc., a Texas corporation,
adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation.


                                       I.

     The name of the corporation is Newpark Shipbuilding and Repair, Inc.


                                      II.

     The Articles of Incorporation are amended as follows:

     Article I of the Articles of Incorporation shall be amended in its entirety
by substituting the following therefor:

                                "CORPORATE NAME
                                        
    The name of the corporation is Newpark Shipbuilding-Brady Island, Inc."


                                      III.

     Each amendment made by the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation has been effected in conformity with the provisions of the Texas
Business Corporation Act.  The Articles of Amendment to the Articles of
Incorporation, including each amendment set forth above, were adopted by the
shareholders of the corporation on July 31, 1998.


                                      -1-
<PAGE>   2
                                      IV.

     The number of shares of the corporation outstanding at the time of the
adoption of, and entitled to vote on, these amendments was One Hundred Thousand
(100,000).


                                       V.

     The number of shares that voted for these amendments was One Hundred
Thousand (100,000), and no shares were voted against the amendment.


                                      VI.

     The Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation do not provide
for an exchange, reclassification or cancellation of issued shares.

                                      VII.

     The Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation do not effect a
change in the amount of stated capital.

     Dated:  July 31, 1998.


                                             NEWPARK SHIPBUILDING
                                             AND REPAIR, INC.


                                             BY:    FRANK W. EAKIN
                                                ------------------
                                                Frank W. Eakin
                                                President

                                      -2-