alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Tiernan P. Doyle","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/tdoyle1\/","title":"Following Safe Return, NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-7 to Recount Space Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l51NFYjEYb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/following-safe-return-nasas-spacex-crew-7-to-recount-space-mission\/\">Following Safe Return, NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-7 to Recount Space Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/news-release\/following-safe-return-nasas-spacex-crew-7-to-recount-space-mission\/embed\/#?secret=l51NFYjEYb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Following Safe Return, NASA\u2019s SpaceX Crew-7 to Recount Space Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"l51NFYjEYb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/crew-7-capsule.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":367}
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report to Form 10-QSB of Anscott
Industries, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, I, Jack Belluscio,
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anscott
Industries, Inc. hereby Certifies Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report to Form 10-QSB for
          the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Anscott
          Industries, Inc.

                                 ANSCOTT INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                 By: /s/ Jack Belluscio
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Jack Belluscio
                                    Principal  Executive Officer and
                                    Principal  Financial  Officer

Dated: November 22, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF HOWMET INTERNATIONAL INC. INCLUDED IN
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          21,866
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,309
<INVENTORY>                                    155,768  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,060,237
<PP&E>                                         359,864
<DEPRECIATION>                                  74,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,740,642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          249,213
<BONDS>                                        206,742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           61,360
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     287,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,740,642
<SALES>                                        328,365
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               328,365
<CGS>                                          231,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  231,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,504
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,490
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT DELOATCH.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,045,058
<SECURITIES>                                 4,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,162,805
<PP&E>                                          96,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,330,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          405,442
<BONDS>                                         10,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,542
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,910,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,330,698
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,079
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (631,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (631,098)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (631,098)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 887 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 887

   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
develop and implement a system for determining and reporting the number 
 of individuals employed by non-Federal Government entities providing 
     services under contracts awarded by executive branch agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 1997

  Ms. Norton (for herself and Mrs. Morella) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and 
                               Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to 
develop and implement a system for determining and reporting the number 
 of individuals employed by non-Federal Government entities providing 
     services under contracts awarded by executive branch agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING AND REPORTING NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS 
              EMPLOYED IN PRIVATE SECTOR IN PROVIDING SERVICES UNDER 
              SERVICE CONTRACTS AWARDED BY EXECUTIVE AGENCIES.

    (a) System.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall 
develop and begin implementing a system for determining the number of 
individuals employed by non-Federal Government entities providing 
services under service contracts awarded by agencies in the executive 
branch of the Federal Government.
    (b) Reports.--On the January 1st following implementation of the 
system required under subsection (a), and each January 1st thereafter, 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to the 
Congress a report indicating--
            (1) the number of individuals employed by non-Federal 
        Government entities providing services under service contracts 
        awarded by agencies in the executive branch of the Federal 
        Government; and
            (2) the number of individuals employed by non-Federal 
        Government entities, in jobs comparable to those occupied by 
        career Federal employees, providing services under service 
        contracts awarded by agencies in the executive branch of the 
        Federal Government.
    (c) Service Contract Defined.--For the purpose of this section, the 
term ``service contract'' has the meaning given such term in part 37 of 
title 48, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ana Guzman","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ana-d-guzmannasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Aims to Boost In Space Production Applications","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"d0BhAoZv34\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/nasa-aims-to-boost-in-space-production-applications\/\">NASA Aims to Boost In Space Production Applications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/nasa-aims-to-boost-in-space-production-applications\/embed\/#?secret=d0BhAoZv34\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Aims to Boost In Space Production Applications” — NASA\" data-secret=\"d0BhAoZv34\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss064e016385.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### E. R. Webb *v.*David Stephens.

Removal of Cause in State Court.

Motion to remand, must be made or objection is waived.

Injunction — Error in Judgment.

An Injunction will not lie to restrain collection of a judgment, in which there is an error, the proper proceeding being by appeal and supersedeas.

APPEAL PROM. MAGOPPIN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 27, 1871.

*George R. Roe, for appellant.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

This action was brought against appellant in the Elovd quarterly court, and on his motion the venue was changed to the Magoffin circuit court, the preliminary steps having been taken, such change of venue was authorized by an act of the Legislature, approved *19th of November, 1851, 1 Yol. R. 8., p. 282,*which was not repealed by the act approved *March 5, 1860, Myres’ 8upp. 78.*That is an act to amend and to reduce into one, the law in relation to changes of venue in! criminal and civil cases in the *circuit courts,*as the title of the act shows. Besides, if appellant objected to the removal of the cause to the Magoffin *circuit court,*he should have moved to have the same remanded back to the Eloyd quarterly court, and having failed to do so, any objection to the trial in the Magoffin circuit court was waived.

The judgment is for more than is claimed in the petition, and that is an error for which it would have been reversed if an appeal had been prosecuted to this court therefrom within the time prescribed by the statute. But that error in the judgment affords no grounds for an injunction.

Nor were the other grounds as stated in the original, or either of the amended petition, sufficient to authorize the setting aside the judgment and to award a new trial. The evidence alleged to have been discovered is not of that permanent character that would most probably produce a different result on another trial.

Judgment *afftrrñed.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4839 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4839

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain crystal vases and drinking 
                                glasses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 14, 1998

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain crystal vases and drinking 
                                glasses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``   9902.70.16     Vases and
                     drinking
                     glasses of
                     barium crystal,
                     the foregoing
                     valued over $5
                     each and
                     whether or not
                     cut or engraved
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     7013.29.40,
                     7013.29.60,
                     7013.99.70, or
                     7013.99.90)....  Free              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                                                                                             31/2001
                                                                                                              ''

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.31




CONSENT OF DAVID VISAGIE
 
  The undersigned hereby consents to reference to the undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F being filed by Mercator Minerals Ltd. with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with (1) the Preliminary Economic Assessment El Creston Project Opodepe, Sonora, Mexico dated December 16, 2010 (the “PEA Report”), (2) the annual information form of the Corporation dated March 30, 2012 and (3) the management’s discussion and analysis of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2011, which includes reference to my name in connection with information relating to the PEA Report and the properties described therein.
  Date: March 30, 2012
 
  /s/ David Visagie



David Visagie, P. Geo.
#### Campbell & Irvine *v.*C. *W.*Mitchell.

Attachment — Motion, to Quash Levy Grounds Stand Denied — Burden of Proof.

No pleading is necessary other than the notice stating the grounds upon which a motion to quash a levy is based. All the grounds stand denied, and it is necessary that the party making the motion should establish their existence by competent testimony.

APPEAL PROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

December 19, 1871.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Lindsay:

At the August term, 1870, an order was made quashing the levy made in virtue of the order of attachment, and also discharging the attachment itself.

The attachment was reinstated by .one of the judges of this court, and upon final hearing was sustained.

The error complained of is that the court refused to order a sale of the attached property taken under the levy quashed as aforesaid. The evidence heard by the circuit court warranted the conclusion that the property in question was exempt from levy and sale under either execution or attachment.

The only question is whether or not this fact can be inquired into upon a motion or sale. The court was called upon to sell the property. It had no right to sell property not subject to levy and sale, nor had it the right to retain possession of such property improperly and wrongfully seized by its officer.

. No pleadings were necessary, other than the notice stating the grounds upon which the motion to quash the levy was based. All these grounds stood denied, and it was necessary that the party making the motion should establish their existence by competent testimony.

The motion to quash was not a proceeding by a claimant of the property, but by the defendant in the action. It did not raise any question as to the right of plaintiffs to recover, nor as to their right to have their attachment, but only as to whether the levy was legal or illegal. If the process of the court had been abused, it *630was proper that ’this -fact should be inquired into in a summary manner, and the above corrected at once.

*Bussell & A., B.*& *F., for appellants.*

*Lisle, Harrison, for appellee.*

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 785 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 785

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 9, 1997

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To designate the J. Phil Campbell, Senior, Natural Resource 
                          Conservation Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF J. PHIL CAMPBELL, SENIOR, NATURAL RESOURCE 
              CONSERVATION CENTER.

    The Southern Piedmont Conservation Research Center located at 1420 
Experimental Station Road in Watkinsville, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior, Natural Resource 
Conservation Center''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J. Phil Campbell, Senior, 
Natural Resource Conservation Center''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 8, 1997.

            Attest:

                                                ROBIN H. CARLE,

                                                                 Clerk.
```