alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,026,765
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,193,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (86,859)
<INVENTORY>                                    493,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,839,225
<PP&E>                                         617,171
<DEPRECIATION>                               (277,728)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,795,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,504,856
<BONDS>                                        117,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           82,495
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,910,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,795,735
<SALES>                                      3,546,675
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,546,675
<CGS>                                        1,575,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,022,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (19,896)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,043,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,043,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,043,197)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<S>                             <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         4723000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 13253000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (604000)
<INVENTORY>                                    5771000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              23290000
<PP&E>                                         5281000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1367000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                28553000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         16086000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         68000
<OTHER-SE>                                    12128000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  28553000
<SALES>                                       21563000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              21610000
<CGS>                                         14373000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 25223000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (118000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1964000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (75000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (2039000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (2039000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.58)
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Viking Aircraft Soars Over Cleveland Skyline","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qL4PiK9dbq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-viking-aircraft-soars-over-cleveland-skyline\/\">NASA Viking Aircraft Soars Over Cleveland Skyline<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-viking-aircraft-soars-over-cleveland-skyline\/embed\/#?secret=qL4PiK9dbq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Viking Aircraft Soars Over Cleveland Skyline” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qL4PiK9dbq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/462543main_viking_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MPW
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                       767
<INVENTORY>                                      3,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,722
<PP&E>                                          51,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,761
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              101
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,943
<SALES>                                         46,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,064
<CGS>                                           30,738
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,750
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,269)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,019
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,019
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2839 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2839

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 555 West 180th Street in New York, New York, as the ``Sergeant 
                    Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2004

  Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 555 West 180th Street in New York, New York, as the ``Sergeant 
                    Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT RIAYAN A. TEJEDA POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 555 West 180th Street in New York, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Sergeant 
Riayan A. Tejeda Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FREDERICK STREATER.

September 26, 1989.

Gross-petition for certification denied. (See 233 *N.J.Super.*537).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      43,570,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,814,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 90,481,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           187,663,000
<PP&E>                                     117,739,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,660,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             362,233,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      147,670,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,110,000
<COMMON>                                       921,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  85,871,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               362,233,000
<SALES>                                    532,634,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           574,036,000
<CGS>                                      446,378,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              622,244,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               566,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,366,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (67,140,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (20,141,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (47,591,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (47,591,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.59)


</TABLE>
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4845

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from increasing the

national audience reach limitations established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 15, 1998

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Commerce

A BILL

To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from

increasing the national audience reach limitations established under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

4 COMMISSION AUTHORITY.

5 Section 202(c) of the Telecommunications Act of

6 1996 is amended by adding at the end the following new

7 paragraph:

8 ‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON COMMISSION AUTHOR9 ITY.—The Commission shall not increase in the na-
2

•HR 4845 IH

1 tional audience reach limitation for television sta2 tions above the level specified paragraph (1)(B) ex3 cept as expressly authorized by amendment to this

4 subsection.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Tod R. Hamachek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: May 15,  2003           /s/  Tod R. Hamacheck
                               ---------------------
                               Tod R. Hamachek
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
#### G. W. Graves *v.*W. L. Brown.

Appeal and Error — Appeal to Circuit Court — New Defense.

On an appeal to the Circuit Court the action should be tried anew and the defendant should be allowed to put in any sufficient defense as if the suit had been brought orginally in that court.

Written Contract — Contradictory Parol Agreement.

A written contract unimpeached, cannot be controlled or modified by a simultaneous and contradictory parol agreement.

APPEAL FROM MARION CIRCUIT COURT.

June 24, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

We are of the opinion that upon the appeal to the circuit court, as the action should there have been tried anew, the defendant should have been allowed to put in any sufficient defense, as if the suit had been brought originally in that court. (Civil Code, section 849.)

But if the answer tendered by the defendant presented no defense to the action, the court might have refused to allow it to be filed, or afterwards exclude it on motion of the plaintiff.

The correctness of the judgment in this case, therefore, depends on the question whether the answer presented a sufficient defense to the action. It seems to ns that it did not.

The parol agreement set up is inconsistent with the written contract, and the answer does not allege fraud or mistake in the execution of the note, or- any sufficient reason why it should not be taken as expressing the contract. It is well settled that a written contract' unimpeached, cannot be controlled or modified by a simultaneous and contradictory parol agreement. *(Hubble vs. Murphy, 1 Duvall, 278.)*

This court has repeatedly decided that a hirer of a slave was not entitled to an abatement of the stipulated price in a case like *418this, for loss of the service of the slave by his enlistment in the army.

*Rountree &*Fox, *for appellant.*

Lindseys, *for appellee.*

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
Exhibit 99.10(c)
  

  
   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  

  
   The Board of Directors
Protective Life Insurance Company:
  

  
   We consent to the use of our report dated April 28, 2021, with respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts, which comprise Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account as of December 31, 2020, and for each of the years or periods in the two-year period then ended, incorporated by reference in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of this registration statement on Form N-4 and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the Statement of Additional Information.
  

  
     
  

  
   /s/ KPMG LLP
  

  
   Birmingham, Alabama
April 28, 2021
  

   
  

   
  

   
  


  



  1

  





   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  

  
   The Board of Directors
Protective Life Insurance Company:
  

  
   We consent to the use of our report dated March 30, 2021, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and for the years then ended, and financial statement schedules III to V, incorporated by reference in the Statement of Additional Information, which is part of this registration statement on Form N-4 and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the Statement of Additional Information.  Our report dated March 30, 2021 refers to a change in accounting principle due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses.
  

  
     
  

  
   /s/ KPMG LLP
  

  
   Birmingham, Alabama 
April 28, 2021
  

  
    
  

  
  2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Salifou Pessouore,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00147-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/17/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9844 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9844 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 2