alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 27, 2019

NO. 03-18-00120-CV

The State of Texas; the City of Garland, Texas; and

the Transit Authority of Dallas MTA, Texas, Appellants

v.

Kevin Buchanan, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

ARRIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART –

OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 24, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error 

in that portion of the judgment awarding appellants no attorney’s fees. Therefore, the Court 

reverses that portion of the court’s judgment and remands the issue of attorney’s fees to the trial 

court for a new trial. The Court affirms the remainder of the trial court’s judgment. Appellee 

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 601 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 601

     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit local 
educational agencies to waive the reimbursement of the agency otherwise 
required for an alien to be accorded nonimmigrant status to study at a 
          public secondary school administered by the agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 5, 1997

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to permit local 
educational agencies to waive the reimbursement of the agency otherwise 
required for an alien to be accorded nonimmigrant status to study at a 
          public secondary school administered by the agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF REIMBURSEMENT FOR PUBLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(l)(1)(B) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(l)(1)(B)) (as added by section 625(a) of 
the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 
(Public Law 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-1820)) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(B) at a public secondary school unless--
                    ``(i) the aggregate period of such status at such a 
                school does not exceed 12 months with respect to any 
                alien; and
                    ``(ii) the alien demonstrates that--
                            ``(I) the alien has reimbursed the local 
                        educational agency that administers the school 
                        for the full, unsubsidized per capita cost of 
                        providing education at such school for the 
                        period of the alien's attendance; or
                            ``(II) such agency has waived such 
                        reimbursement.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of section 625(a) of the 
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 
(Public Law 104-208; 110 Stat. 3009-1820).
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

 vs.

Pedro Contreras-Jimenez,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CR 98-00740-PHX-RCB

 O R D E R

The Court is in receipt of Government’s Petition for Remission of Fine (Doc. 17) in the

above action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3573. The Court after reviewing the Petition, concludes

and finds that reasonable efforts to collect the fine are not likely to be effective.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the fine is remitted.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2014.

cc: United States Probation Office 

 Clerks Office Financial Section

Case 2:98-cr-00740-RCB Document 18 Filed 02/04/14 Page 1 of 1
#### P. B. Dunn’s Exors. *v.*P. B. Thompson, &c.

Actions — Offer to .Confess Judgment — Election—Dismissal.

When the defendant offers to confess judgment and the court required the plaintiff to elect to allow him to do so, and on the refusal of the plaintiff to accept of a judgment against the defendant, the action as to him was properly dismissed.

APPEAL FROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

June 26, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

As the defendant, P. B. Thompson, offered to confess judgment, it seems to us the court properly required the plaintiff to elect to allow him to do so, or have the action dismissed as to him. And on the refusal of the plaintiff to elect or to accept of a judgment against Thompson, the action as to him was properly dismissed. Thompson’s testimony, which we regard as competent, clearly establishes such a mountain of debt as to release the appellees who did not assent to it, according to principles repeatedly recognized by this court.

*636*Hardin, for appellant.*

*J. B. & P. B.*Thompson, *for appellees.*

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
for the quarter ending July 3, 1999, and such is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001051260
<NAME>                        GLENOIT ASSET CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                              30
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,032
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,032
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,942
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     5
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,415)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,480
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.48


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s X-59 Moves Closer to Runway","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IGwKaki6vJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasas-x-59-moves-closer-to-runway\/\">NASA\u2019s X-59 Moves Closer to Runway<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasas-x-59-moves-closer-to-runway\/embed\/#?secret=IGwKaki6vJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s X-59 Moves Closer to Runway” — NASA\" data-secret=\"IGwKaki6vJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/p23-092-12.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
EXHIBIT 13.2  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In
connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of NOVA
Chemicals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report),
I, Todd D. Karran, Chief Financial Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)such Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information
contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of NOVA Chemicals Corporation.   March 15, 2010
  /s/
  Todd D. KarranTodd D. KarranChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.38

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                         METROPOLITAN LIFE SUPPLEMENTAL
                      AUXILIARY SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN

         The METROPOLITAN LIFE SUPPLEMENTAL AUXILIARY SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT
 PLAN ("Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

1.       The first paragraph of the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
         "Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Texas Life Insurance Company,
         with respect to its own employees, and MetLife Group, Inc., for whom
         all obligations under this Plan for its employees are allocated between
         Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife Group, Inc. in the
         manner agreed between such parties, hereby continue in force and
         effect, as restated and amended by this instrument, effective January
         1, 2003, the Metropolitan Life Supplemental Auxiliary Savings and
         Investment Plan (the Plan), which was first established effective
         January 1, 1996."

2.       This amendment is effective January 1, 2003.

                                             METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Date

__________________                           ___________________________________
Witness

<PAGE>

                                             METLIFE GROUP, INC.
Date

__________________                           ___________________________________
Witness

__________________                           TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Date

__________________                           ___________________________________
Witness

2.

                                       2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Merillin La Rue

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Merillin La Rue,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., an 

Ohio corporation; Wells Fargo Bank, 

N.A., a California corporation; and Xceed 

Financial Credit Union, a foreign 

corporation.

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01995-SRB

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO 

DEFENDANT EXPERIAN 

INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., 

ONLY

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff and Defendant, Experian

Information Solutions, Inc., in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement. 

Case 2:15-cv-01995-SRB Document 68 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The parties anticipate filing a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant 

Experian Information Solutions, Inc., ONLY, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) within 

60 days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 8

th day of August, 2016.

 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Merrilin La Rue

Case 2:15-cv-01995-SRB Document 68 Filed 08/08/16 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE> 1


Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification for Gary R. Gannaway,
             Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my
  knowledge this Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report
  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
  results of operations of First Choice Health Network, Inc. and Subsidiary.


        By:/s/
           -----------------------------
            Gary R. Gannaway,
            President and Chief Executive Officer
            March 30, 2004





























                                            1
423 A.2d 1306

#### Commonwealth v. Joseph Dennis, Appellant. Commonwealth v. Jerome Dennis, Appellant.

*633Submitted April 12, 1979.

David O’Hanesian, for appellants; Robert L. Eberhardt, Assistant District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before CERCONE, P. J., and WIEAND and HOFFMAN, JJ.

Judgments of sentence affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 10, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30783

Summary Calendar

KEITH WARREN BLAYNE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J. FLATTERY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(1:04-CV-327)

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Keith Warren Blayne, federal prisoner # 70087-079, appeals,

pro se, the summary judgment awarded Dr. Flattery, a physician at

the prison where Blayne is incarcerated, in his action under Bivens

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). 

Blayne maintains Dr. Flattery was deliberately indifferent to

his serious medical needs by providing inadequate medical treatment
2

and delaying surgery to remove a keloid from his left earlobe.

Blayne also asserts the district court granted summary judgment

without providing him an opportunity for discovery. 

The summary judgment is reviewed de novo. E.g., Guillory v.

Domtar Indus., Inc., 95 F.3d 1320, 1326 (5th Cir. 1996). To

succeed on a Bivens claim, a prisoner must show a constitutional

violation has occurred. 403 U.S. at 395-97. To show a violation

of the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual

punishment, the violation asserted by Blayne, a prisoner must

demonstrate deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs.

Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 297 (1991). This requires a

prisoner to provide evidence that prison officials “refused to

treat him, ignored his complaints, intentionally treated him

incorrectly, or engaged in any similar conduct that would clearly

evince a wanton disregard for any serious medical needs”. Domino

v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice, 239 F.3d 752, 756 (5th Cir.

2001) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Blayne was examined on numerous occasions by prison medical

staff who monitored his condition and provided treatment for his

keloid, but he did not receive surgery because the Bureau of

Prisons’ policy classified the procedure as cosmetic. Because

Blayne has not shown Dr. Flattery refused to treat him, ignored his

complaints, or intentionally treated him incorrectly, Blayne’s

complaints do not rise to the level of deliberate indifference.
3

See id., Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 105-07 (1976); Johnson v.

Treen, 759 F.2d 1236, 1238 (5th Cir. 1985). At most, his

allegations amount to negligence or medical malpractice claims,

which is insufficient for relief. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d

320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Blayne’s complaint about the lack of

discovery is without merit. See Williamson v. United States Dep’t

of Agric., 815 F.2d 368, 382 (5th Cir. 1987).

AFFIRMED
Case 2:98-cr-00441-SMM   Document 24   Filed 05/09/06   Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-mj-01672-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01672-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01672-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 3 of 3
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2886

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

certain hazard mitigation assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 4, 2004

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income certain hazard mitigation assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR CER4 TAIN DISASTER MITIGATION PAYMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 139 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to disaster relief payments) 

7 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(g) CERTAIN DISASTER MITIGATION PAYMENTS.—

10 Gross income shall not include the value of any amount 
2

•S 2886 IS 

1 received directly or indirectly as payment or benefit by the 

2 owner of any property for hazard mitigation with respect 

3 to the property pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford Dis4 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act or the Na5 tional Flood Insurance Act.’’

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years ending on or after 

8 December 31, 2004.

Æ
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: October 20, 2014. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
(In alphabetical order)
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10506
NBRS Financial
Rising Sun
MD
10/17/2014


[FR Doc. 2014-25284 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P