62098 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 200 / Thursday, October 16, 2014 / Notices 

7. Do States or stakeholders anticipate 

an increase in administrative 

expenditures or other impact if SNAP 

restructures the FNS–366B? If yes, 

please explain. 

8. How much time would be required 

for State agencies to adjust their systems 

and reporting mechanisms in order to 

provide different or additional 

information on a revised FNS–366B? 

9. How would increasing the 

frequency of reporting impact 

stakeholders? If additional costs would 

be part of this impact, please explain. 

10. How is this data currently used by 

the State and what benefit(s) does it 

provide? 

11. What data and methodology for 

calculating cost avoidance as a result of 

fraud prevention activities should FNS 

consider? 

12. What data and methodology 

should be considered to measure how 

quickly recipient trafficking suspects are 

investigated and disqualified in 

accordance with FNS rules and 

regulations? 

13. What data should FNS consider 

collecting to ensure that fraud 

prevention activities do not adversely 

impact program access? 

Dated: October 8, 2014. 

Jeffrey J. Tribiano, 

Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24572 Filed 10–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Nez Perce-Clearwater National Forest; 

Idaho; Johnson Bar Fire Salvage 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an 

environmental impact statement. 

SUMMARY: The Forest Service gives 

notice of its intent to prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement for the 

Johnson Bar Fire Salvage Project. The 

Proposed action would utilize ground 

based (tractor and skyline) and 

helicopter logging systems to harvest 

trees killed by the Johnson Bar Fire. 

Harvested areas would be replanted 

with early seral species such as 

ponderosa pine, western white pine and 

western larch. Approximately 3 miles of 

roads would be decommissioned to 

reduce sediment related impacts to the 

watershed. The EIS will analyze the 

effects of the proposed action and 

alternatives. The Nez Perce-Clearwater 

Forests invites comments and 

suggestions on the issues to be 

addressed. The agency gives notice of 

the National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) analysis and decision making 

process on the proposal so interested 

and affected members of the public may 

participate and contribute to the final 

decision. 

DATES: Comments concerning the scope 

of the analysis must be received by 

November 17, 2014. The draft 

environmental impact statement is 

expected in March 2015 and the final 

environmental impact statement is 

expected July 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to 

Mike Ward or Tam White, 

Interdisciplinary Team Leaders; 502 

Lowry Street, Kooskia, Idaho 83539. 

Comments may also be sent via email to 

comments-northern-nezperce-moosecreek@fs.fed.us 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mike Ward, Interdisciplinary Team 

Leader, (208) 926–6413 or Tam White, 

Interdisciplinary Team Leader (208) 

926–6416. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

objective of the Johnson Bar Fire 

Salvage Project would be to recover the 

economic value of the timber burned in 

the fire and move the area towards 

desired species compositions 

(ponderosa pine, western white pine 

and western larch) through reforestation 

as well as improve watershed 

conditions. 

Purpose: Provide a sustained yield of 

resource outputs at a level that will help 

support the economic structure of local 

communities and provide for regional 

and national needs (Nez Perce Forest 

Plan, II–1) 

Need: There is a need to utilize dead 

trees resulting from the fire in a timely 

manner to provide social and economic 

benefits before they lose commercial 

value and merchantability, which 

would contribute to the supply of 

timber for local, regional, and national 

needs. 

Purpose: Reduce potential sediment 

inputs into the aquatic ecosystem. 

Need: Sediment input from gravel and 

native surface roads can flow into 

streams, negatively affecting fish habitat 

and water quality. Improvement of 

watershed function and stream 

conditions can be accomplished by 

reducing road densities and repairing 

existing roads and culverts to reduce 

sediment and improve drainage. 

The Proposed Action would: Salvage 

harvest approximately 4,000 acres of 

dead trees within the approximate 

13,000 acre fire area. Harvesting 

operations would primarily utilize 

skyline and helicopter logging systems 

with a small component of ground 

based tractor skidding where 

appropriate. Openings are likely to 

exceed 40 acres. 

Approximately 23 segments of 

temporary roads would be built to 

provide line machine access from 

existing system roads. These spurs 

generally average approximately 0.16 

miles each and would be removed 

following harvest. 

Fire killed or ‘‘dead’’ trees for the 

purposes of this project are determined 

using guidelines that determine 

mortality by the amount of scorch and 

fire severity surrounding the roots and 

lower trunk. Field validation of these 

guidelines indicates they are accurate 

for the forest types and fire severity in 

the project area. All live trees will be 

generally retained however incidental 

removal may occur to facilitate harvest 

operations. 

Reforestation would plant long lived 

early seral tree species such as 

ponderosa pine, western white pine and 

western larch. This strategy would 

allow us to continue towards the goal of 

restoring more resilient tree species 

across the landscape. Seventeen to 

thirty-three tons per acre of standing 

and down large woody debris would be 

left across the treatment area to provide 

soil microclimate and habitat, long term 

nutrients, soil stability, and snag 

habitat. For safety reasons, retention 

would generally occur in clumps rather 

than individual snags distributed across 

the units. Retention would generally 

favor the largest snags. Approximately 3 

miles of unneeded roads may be 

decommissioned by placing them in a 

hydrologically stable condition. This 

may involve a range of road 

decommissioning methods from culvert 

removal to full recontouring. 

As they are developed, additional 

information and maps will be posted to 

‘‘NEPA Projects’’ page on the Forests 

Web site: http://data.ecosystemmanagement.org/nepaweb/project_

list.php?forest=110117. 

Responsible Official and Lead Agency 

The USDA Forest Service is the lead 

agency for this proposal. The Nez PerceClearwater Forest Supervisor is the 

responsible official. 

The Decision To Be Made is whether 

to adopt the proposed action, in whole 

or in part, or another alternative; and 

what mitigation measures and 

management requirements will be 

implemented. 

The Scoping Process for the EIS is 

being initiated with this notice. The 

scoping process will identify issues to 

be analyzed in detail and will lead to 

the development of alternatives to the 

proposal. The Forest Service is seeking 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 200 / Thursday, October 16, 2014 / Notices 62099 

1See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From 

Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, Final Determination of No 

Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012– 

2013, 79 FR 51306 (August 28, 2014) (Final 

Results). 

2See id.,79 FR at 51307 n.11. 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 

2005). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 11401 

(February 28, 2014) (Initiation Notice). The 

Department inadvertently excluded certain 

companies for which reviews had been requested 

from the list of companies for which it initiated an 

administrative review in the Initiation Notice. The 

Department listed those companies in a subsequent 

initiation notice (see Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262 (April 

1, 2014)). 

3See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 103 

(January 2, 2014). 

4See Initiation Notice. 

information and comments from other 

Federal, State, and local agencies; Tribal 

Governments; and organizations and 

individuals who may be interested in or 

affected by the proposed action. 

Comments received in response to this 

notice, including the names and 

addresses of those who comment, will 

be a part of the project record and 

available for public review. 

Early Notice of Importance of Public 

Participation in Subsequent 

Environmental Review: A draft 

environmental impact statement will be 

prepared for comment. The second 

major opportunity for public input will 

be when the draft EIS is published. The 

comment period for the draft EIS will be 

45 days from the date the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

publishes the notice of availability in 

the Federal Register. The Draft EIS is 

anticipated to be available for public 

review in April 2015. 

Dated: October 7, 2014. 

Rick Brazell, 

Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24569 Filed 10–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–822] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From Thailand: Notice of Correction to 

the Final Results of the 2012–2013 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dennis McClure, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5973. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

28, 2014, the Department of Commerce 

(the Department) published in the 

Federal Register the final results of the 

2012–2013 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Thailand.1 The period of review is 

February 1, 2012, through January 31, 

2013. Footnote 11 in the published 

Federal Register notice 2 contained an 

inadvertent error related to the order in 

which certain antidumping duty 

margins were stated; the correct 

antidumping duty margins in this 

footnote 11 were reversed. The footnote 

should read: 

This cash deposit rate is based on the 

combined sales of Thai Union and 

Pakfood after the companies were 

collapsed (i.e., sales made during the 

period April 23, 2012, through January 

31, 2013). The rates calculated for Thai 

Union and Pakfood for the period 

February 1, 2012, through April 22, 

2012, are 2.09 percent and zero percent, 

respectively. The calculations for the 

period February 1, 2012, through April 

22, 2012, will be used for assessment 

purposes only, as noted in the 

‘‘Collapsing of Thai Union and 

Pakfood’’ section of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

As a result, we now correct the final 

results of the 2012–2013 administrative 

review as noted above. 

This correction to the final results of 

administrative review is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended. 

Dated: October 8, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24644 Filed 10–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On January 4, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (Department) 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC).1 On February 

28, 2014, the Department published in 

the Federal Register a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

that order.2 The review covers 127 

companies. Based on timely 

withdrawals of all review requests for 

certain companies, we are now 

rescinding the administrative review 

with respect to 101 companies. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 16, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Pedersen or Patrick O’Connor, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 

482–2769 or (202) 482–0989, 

respectively. 

Background 

On January 2, 2014, the Department 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC.3 In 

January 2014, the Department received 

multiple timely requests to conduct an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the PRC. On 

February 28, 2014, in accordance with 

section 751(a) of Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of the initiation of an 

administrative review of that order.4

The administrative review was initiated 

with respect to 127 companies, and 

covers the period from January 1, 2013, 

through December 31, 2013. While a 

number of companies remain under 

review, the requesting parties have 

timely withdrawn all review requests 

for certain companies, as discussed 

below. 

Rescission of Review, in Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party that requested the review 

withdraws its request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. All 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES