alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-0053-369113    -3-054-CV

THE CADLE COMPANY ANDVeErRnNoOnN WhHiIpPpPlLeE CoOrRrReEcCtTiIoOnNaAlL SeErRvViIcCeEsS CoOrRpPoOrRaAtTiIoOnN a	appAPPELLANTS

AND KNYVETT REYES	APAnNdD KnNyYvVeEtTtT ReEyYeEsS	APPELLANTS

DANIEL C. CADLEVernon Whipple

S

	V.

DAVID B. LOBINGIER AND THER2 EeEnNtTeErRpPrRiIsSeEsS, IiInNcC. aAnNdD TtTeEdD RrReEeEvVeEsS RiIcCkKeEyY AlLeExXaAnNdDeErR, InNdDiIvViIdDuUaAlLlLyY aAnNdD aAsS InNdDeEpPeEnNdDeEnNtT AdDmMiInNiIsStTrRaAtToOrR oOfF tThHeE EsStTaAtTeE oOfF BrRyYaAnN DaAlLeE AlLeExXaAnNdDeErR, aAnNdD JuUdDyY ScChHuUmMpPeErRtT

	APPELLEESsS

AND AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF BRYAN DALE ALEXANDER, AND JUDY SCHUMPERT

OF THE ESTATE OF BRYAN DALE ALEXANDER, AND JUDY SCHUMPERT

AND JUDY SCHUMPERT

STATE OF TEXAS

	----------

	FROM THE 48TH 158TH236TH236TH DISTRICT        158TH DISTRICT COURT OF  TARRANT           DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the THE the parties’ P“aapAppellant’sAgreed Joint Motion tTo Dismiss for Mootness Appeal.”  Appeal Due To Settlement.”  It is the court'’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(212), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL DMDD:	mMCCOY,  LIVINGSTON, and DAUPHINOTOT, JJ.J

MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 2430, 2005December 31, 2003  November 21, 20053, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MPW
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             325
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                       959
<INVENTORY>                                      9,279
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,551
<PP&E>                                          80,364
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,785
<BONDS>                                         77,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           109
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   156,451
<SALES>                                         46,396
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,396
<CGS>                                           31,295
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,380
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,028
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

October 10, 2014.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 22, 2014.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (entry from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. DQ Fire and Explosion 
Consultants, Docket Nos. WEVA 2011-952-R, et al. (Issues include 
whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in ruling that the violation 
of the order in question was the result of high negligence.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2014-24695 Filed 10-14-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Curtis B.  McWilliams,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  of CNL
Restaurant Properties,  Inc. (the "Company"), has executed this certification in
connection  with the filing with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

DATED this 12th day of March 2004.




                                           /s/ Curtis B. McWilliams
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Curtis B. McWilliams
                                           Chief Executive Officer


                                           A  signed  original  of this  written
                                           statement required by Section 906 has
                                           been provided to the Company and will
                                           be   retained   by  the  Company  and
                                           furnished  to  the   Securities   and
                                           Exchange Commission or its staff upon
                                           request.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 499

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service under construction at 7411 Barlite Boulevard in San Antonio, Texas, as the ‘‘Frank

M. Tejeda Post Office Building’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. BONILLA (for himself and Mr. ORTIZ) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

under construction at 7411 Barlite Boulevard in San

Antonio, Texas, as the ‘‘Frank M. Tejeda Post Office

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service under

5 construction at 7411 Barlite Boulevard in San Antonio,

6 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank M.

7 Tejeda Post Office Building’’.
2

HR 499 IH

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Frank M. Tejeda Post Office Building’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2895 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2895

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
       by pink lights in honor of breast cancer awareness month.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ILLUMINATION OF GATEWAY ARCH IN HONOR OF BREAST CANCER 
              AWARENESS MONTH.

    In honor of breast cancer awareness month, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be 
illuminated by pink lights for a certain period of time in October, to 
be designated by the Secretary of the Interior.

            Passed the Senate October 5, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2895

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
       by pink lights in honor of breast cancer awareness month.
```
Case 2:98-cr-00700-PGR Document 300 Filed 07/20/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:98-cr-00700-PGR Document 300 Filed 07/20/06 Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11** 
**- 2215** 

CLIFTON ANDERSON ; RICHARD STOERKEL ,
Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v.
CITY OF CAMDEN, South Carolina; MIKE STONE, Lieutenant; KERSHAW COUNTY; PEGGY SPIVEY; BOBBIE BULLIN GTON ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:10

- cv
- 02547

- JFA )

Submitted : March 13, 2012 Decided: March 23, 2012

Bef ore AGEE, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Clifton Anderson; Richard Stoerkel, Appellants Pro Se. David Leon Morrison, MORRISON LAW FIRM, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina; James M. Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON & LI NDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Clifton Anderson and Richard Stoerkel filed suit
against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) . The

district co urt awarded D efendants summary judgment, a nd Anderson
and Stoerkel now appeal.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Anderson v. City of Camden , No. 3:10

- cv
02547

- JFA (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-4 No.333-110138, Form S-8 No. 333-108732, Form S-8 No. 333-61806, Form S-4 No. 333-34716 and Form S-3No. 333-30390) of Seabulk International, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report datedFebruary 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Seabulk International,Inc. included in this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004.    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Certified Public Accountants   Fort Lauderdale, Florida  April 19, 2005
Case 2:15-cv-02082-DLR Document 29 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-02082-DLR Document 29 Filed 06/07/16 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. WARD

No. 158A92-9

Case below: Pitt County Superior Court

Application by defendant for writ of habeas corpus denied 11 October 2001.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Assembly Milestone Reached as XVS Pallet Installed onto X-59","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zdEoUd2iIh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/assembly-milestone-reached-as-xvs-pallet-installed-onto-x-59-2\/\">Assembly Milestone Reached as XVS Pallet Installed onto X-59<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/assembly-milestone-reached-as-xvs-pallet-installed-onto-x-59-2\/embed\/#?secret=zdEoUd2iIh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Assembly Milestone Reached as XVS Pallet Installed onto X-59” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zdEoUd2iIh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/p20-169-01_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62947-62948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24969]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy


Notice of Request for Information (RFI) Re: Photovoltaic Module 
Recycling

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) today gives notice of a request 
for information regarding the possible technical areas of research in 
the area of photovoltaic module recycling. DOE intends to understand 
the current state of recycling technology and the areas of research 
that could lead to impactful recycling technologies to support the 
developing photovoltaic industry. The intent of this RFI is to generate 
discussion related to planning for the end of life of photovoltaic 
modules and to create a list of high impact research topics in 
photovoltaics recycling. Details regarding the RFI and instructions for 
submitting responses to the RFI can be found at the following

[[Page 62948]]

URL address: https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/.

DATES:  Responses to this RFI must be received by November 14, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The RFI and instructions for submitting responses to the RFI 
can be found at the following URL address: https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions may be directed to_pv-
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="770512140e141b1e19105a05111e3712125913181259101801">[email protected]</a>.

    Issued in Washington, on October 14, 2014.
Marie Mapes,
Program Manager, Solar Energy Technologies Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-24969 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00022

- CV

IN RE CYNTHIA CADWAL LADER OCHSE

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

On January 11, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of a

ruling made from the bench by t he Honora b le Renee Yanta

. Although relator identified the

Honorable Michael Mery as respondent, the correct respondent would have been Judge Yanta.

However, Judge Yanta is no longer the presiding judge of the 150th Judicial District Court of

B exar County , Texas. When one named in h er official capacity as a party to an original

proceeding no longer holds the office, abatement is required to allow that party’s successor to

“reconsider the original party’s decision.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 7.2(b).

Accordin gly, we ORDER the substitution of Judge Monique Diaz as respondent in this

original proceeding, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 7(a), and ABATE the case for 60 days from the date of

this order. During the period of abatement, relator shall present to Judge Diaz each issue made

the subject of the pending petition for writ of mandamus and obtain a ruling on each.

Relator i s further ORDERED to file in this court either an amended petition and appendix

or the appropriate motion to dismiss this mandamus proceeding no la ter than 15 days following

Judge Diaz’ ruling.

It is so ORDERED on January 18, 2019

.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 201 8

- CI

- 05727 , styled William W. Ochse, IV and Chloe Ochse Seiler v.

William W. Ochse, III Individually and as Trustee of the William W. Ochse, III Family 2008 Trust , pending in the

37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County. The ruling complained of in this original proceeding was made from the

bench by the Honorable Renee Yanta, former presiding judge of the 150th J udicial District Court, Bexar County,

Texas.PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E. Hottle,

Clerk of Court
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA T-38s Soar Over Artemis I","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZWZFYZXpgO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-t-38s-soar-over-artemis-i\/\">NASA T-38s Soar Over Artemis I<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa-t-38s-soar-over-artemis-i\/embed\/#?secret=ZWZFYZXpgO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA T-38s Soar Over Artemis I” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ZWZFYZXpgO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jsc2022e066539_alt.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions IV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the
period ending May 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Terry Fields, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Terry Fields



 Terry Fields ,

 President

August 9, 2004
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                    RESOURCE BANCSHARES MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE,
                      BASIC and DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

                   ($ in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                For the Quarter Ended
                                                       March 31, 1998
      ---------------------------------------------------------------


      Net income                                              $ 9,581

      Net income per common share - basic (1)                 $  0.42

      Net income per common share - diluted (2)               $  0.41

1) The number of common shares outstanding used to compute net income per share
- basic was 23,060,458.

2) Diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, was
calculated based on weighted average shares outstanding of 23,505,793, which
assumes the exercise of options covering 1,748,604 shares and computes
incremental shares using the treasury stock method.