alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Paul Mark Mosakowski, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-15-02010-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 

United States Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine’s Report and Recommendation 

(“R&R”). Docs. 1, 16. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the Petition and 

dismiss with prejudice. Doc. 16 at 13. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they 

had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections 

could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 13 (citing 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, 6(a), 6(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th 

Cir. 2003)). 

 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is wellCase 2:15-cv-02010-GMS Document 17 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

taken. The Court will accept the R&R and deny the Petition and dismiss with prejudice. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in 

whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended 

disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with 

instructions.”). 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. Magistrate Judge Fine’s R&R (Doc. 16) is accepted. 

 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and this action is 

dismissed with prejudice. 

 3. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the 

event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability 

because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 

 Dated this 3rd day of February, 2017. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:15-cv-02010-GMS Document 17 Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 2
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-1227V Filed: March 16, 2016 UNPUBLISH ED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * LEA LYDON, * * Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; Shoulder * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”) Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Franklin John Caldwell, Jr., M aglio, Christopher & Toale, Wash ington, DC, for petitioner. Douglas Ross, U.S. Department of Just ice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey , Chief Special Master:

On October 21, 2015, petit ioner filed a petition fo r compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensat ion Program, 42 U.S .C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she su ffered a left shoulder injury as a result of her October 10, 2014 influenza vaccination. Peti tion at 1-3. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On March 14, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “concluded that petitioner suffered a non-Table injury of SIRVA [shoulder injury related to vaccine administration] and that the preponderance of the medical evidence indicates that the in jury was causally related to the flu vaccination.” Id. at 5. Respondent agr ees that no other causes have been identified for petitioner’s injury, and that pet itioner met the stat utory requirements by suffering from

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reaso ned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other inform ation, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, t he undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). v.2 her injury for more than six months. Id. Respondent further indicates that “based on the record as it now stands, compensation is appropriate, as petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for com pensation under the Act.” Id. at 6.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Tara Redbird Uqualla, 

Defendant.

No. 15-4303PO-001-PCT-DMF

ORDER 

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was knowingly and voluntarily waived; the detention hearing was submitted on 

the record by defendant through defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to 

believe the defendant violated the terms of her probation as alleged in the revocation 

petition. 

 IT IS ORDERED that the defendant is detained as flight risk and danger, pending 

further probation revocation proceedings. The Court finds that, defendant has failed to 

show by clear and convincing evidence that she is not a flight risk or a danger pursuant to 

Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

 Dated this 19th day of November, 2015. 

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-po-04303-DMF Document 12 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STUPID PC INC. AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         310,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    211,762
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               694,270
<PP&E>                                         221,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,847
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,231,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,282,319
<BONDS>                                      1,107,971
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,033,843
<OTHER-SE>                                  (4,104,821)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (70,978)
<SALES>                                      1,870,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,870,724
<CGS>                                        1,526,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,746,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               865,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             865,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,741,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,741,270)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,741,270)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.25)


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM HARTSHORN.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF T.J.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"X-59 Gets Its Tail","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wBjkdPS9zW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-59-gets-tail\/\">X-59 Gets Its Tail<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-59-gets-tail\/embed\/#?secret=wBjkdPS9zW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-59 Gets Its Tail” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wBjkdPS9zW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/p23-042-06-web.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          24,126
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,580)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,124
<PP&E>                                          86,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                (34,633)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 481,561
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,870
<BONDS>                                         48,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           299
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   481,561 
<SALES>                                         37,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,931
<CGS>                                         (11,607)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (11,607)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (29,542)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (205)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (551)  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,080)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Glow with the Flow","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kIA3vfquk1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/glow-with-flow\/\">Glow with the Flow<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/glow-with-flow\/embed\/#?secret=kIA3vfquk1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Glow with the Flow” — NASA\" data-secret=\"kIA3vfquk1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/hwb_oil_visualization_larc_2013-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<MULTIPLIER>                            1000
<CURRENCY>                              U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                       19,046
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                53,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (5,799)
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            103,238
<PP&E>                                      711,967
<DEPRECIATION>                               22,087
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              830,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        72,596
<BONDS>                                     657,519
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        100
<OTHER-SE>                                  165,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                830,740
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             13,479
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 8,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 56
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,565)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.16)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25084]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, October 
23, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the 
items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Adjudicatory matter;
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25084 Filed 10-17-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus EDITH ANIBAL GARCIA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94- 256-L, CA-98-2448-L) Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 28, 2002 Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edith Anibal Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Edith Anibal Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Garcia’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Garcia , Nos. CR-94-256-L, CA-98-2448-L (D. Md. May 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"x-57_mod_ii","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lzjxXic9Ak\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-57_mod_ii-2\/\">x-57_mod_ii<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-57_mod_ii-2\/embed\/#?secret=lzjxXic9Ak\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“x-57_mod_ii” — NASA\" data-secret=\"lzjxXic9Ak\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/x-57_mod_ii.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}