alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wilbert W. KELLY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Joanne BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 04-1707.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

March 22, 2005.

Francis M. Jackson and Jackson & MacNichol on brief for appellant.

Paula Silsby, United States Attorney, Robert J. Triba, Regional Chief Counsel, Social Security Administration, and Eskunder Boyd, Special Assistant to the U.S. Attorney on brief for appellee.

*413Before SELYA, LYNCH and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After carefully considering the briefs and record on appeal, we *affirm,*for substantially the reasons stated in the magistrate’s report and adopted by the district court. Among other problems, the appellant made no showing of documented, severe mental impairment. Substantial evidence supported the determination that his mental capacity was not significantly limited. *Rodriguez v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs.,*647 F.2d 218 (1st Cir.1981). He also made no showing that the record cast doubt on his ability to perform light work. An ALJ may render “commonsense judgments about functional capacity.” *Gordils v. Sec’y of Health & Human Serv.,*921 F.2d 327, 329 (1st Cir.1990).

Finally, the appellant failed to preserve the issue of the ALJ’s duty to develop the record. Passing allusion to the issue does not suffice. *Keating v. Sec’y of Health & Human Serv.,*848 F.2d 271 (1st Cir.1988).

*Affirmed.*1st Cir. R. 27(c).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-115","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"56rbNNU4Zs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-115\/\">STS-115<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-115\/embed\/#?secret=56rbNNU4Zs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-115” — NASA\" data-secret=\"56rbNNU4Zs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-06pd0637\/KSC-06pd0637~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Tahira S. Allen","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/tsallen2\/","title":"Ocean Worlds Planetary Scientist Dr. Lynnae Quick","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ykj4zJ3gG9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/lynnae-quick-portrait\/\">Ocean Worlds Planetary Scientist Dr. Lynnae Quick<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/lynnae-quick-portrait\/embed\/#?secret=Ykj4zJ3gG9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ocean Worlds Planetary Scientist Dr. Lynnae Quick” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ykj4zJ3gG9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/nhq202402070010.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
FORM 10-KSB/A
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C.  20549
                                        
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934

                   For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1996
                                        
                           Commission File No. 0-24624
                          ----------------------------
                         U.S.-CHINA INDUSTRIAL EXCHANGE
                 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)
                                        
           NEW YORK                                         13-3097642
 (State or other jurisdiction of                        (I.R.S. Employer
  incorporation or organization)                         Identification No.)

                              7201 Wisconsin Avenue
                            Bethesda, Maryland, 20814
                                 (301) 215-7777

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE

        Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

                         Common Stock, $.01 par value
                         Class A Warrants
                         Class B Warrants

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange  Act during the past 12 months  (or for such
shorter  period  that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes    [ x ]       No [    ]

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to
the best of  registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ x ].

The issuer's revenue for its most recent fiscal year was $22,901,000.

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed
by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, the average bid and asked
prices of such stock,  as of March 26, 1997 was approximately $16,704,000.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's class of common equity,
as of March 26, 1997, was 4,772,500 shares of Common Stock and 2,000,000 shares
of Class B Common Stock.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:  Part III:  Proxy Statement


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This amendment is to supply required EDGAR Financial Data Schedule EX-27 left
off original submission.
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE

 

CAPITAL ONE BANK

 

----

 

CAPITAL ONE MASTER TRUST

 

----

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative ofCapital One Bank, as Servicer (the “Bank”), pursuant to the Amended andRestated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 30, 1993, asamended and restated as of August 1, 2002 (as amended and supplemented, the “Agreement”),among the Bank, as Servicer, Capital One Funding, LLC, as Transferor, and TheBank of New York, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

1.             TheBank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificatehave their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

2.             Theundersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuant to theAgreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

3.             Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year endedDecember 31, 2003, and of its performance under the Agreement was conductedunder my supervision.

4.             Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in allmaterial respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year andno default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuingexcept as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

5.             Thefollowing is a description of each default in the performance of the Servicer’sobligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been madeby the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2003, which sets forth indetail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by theServicer, if any, to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status ofeach such default:

None.

 

1

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificatethis 29th day of March, 2004.

 

 

 
|   | CAPITAL ONE BANK, |
|--------|-------------------|
|   | as Servicer       |
|   |              |
|   |              |
|   | By:               | /s/ Stephen Linehan |   |
|   |              | Name: Stephen Linehan |
|   |              | Title: Senior Vice President and Treasurer |

 

2

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph E. Byrne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: March 9,2007 

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1439

PETER O. AGBRO; DEIDRA R. AGBRO , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. AMERICAN PARTNERS BANK; CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; U. S. BANK, N.A., trustee for securitized trust; BANC OF AMERICA FUNDING 2006

- 6 TRUST; BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (MERS); DOES 1 THROUGH 100 INCLUSIVE , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from the United States District C ourt for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. George Jarrod Hazel , District Judge. ( 8:19

- cv - 01606

- GJH )

Submitted : August 24 , 2021 Decided: August 26, 2021

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Peter O. Agbro, Deidra R. Agbro, Appellants Pro Se. V anessa Destime , Edward Hutchinson Robbins, Jr. , MILES & STOCKBRIDGE PC , Melissa O. Martinez, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP , Baltimore, Maryland; Matthew Daniel Cohen , BWW LAW GROUP, LLC , Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Peter O. Agbro and Deidra R. Agbro appeal the district court’s order dismissing
their civil action for failure to state a claim . On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the Agbros ’ informal brief does not challenge several dispositive bas e s for the district court’s disposition, they have forfeited appell ate review of those findings

. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”)

. * Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have reviewed the issues raised in the Agbros’ informal brief and discern no reversible error based on those claims.
Co em ND HW FF WHY |

NN YN NY NY NY KY NY HS Be Be ee eH ew eB eB
oD DA A BF wWwNH FH SO wM RI AW KR WHY Ke S

XK Hep LODGED

____ RECEIVED ____ COPY
JAN 2 5 2010

CLERK U 8 DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

wo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, CR-98-00466-PHX-SMM

)
Plaintiff,
vs.
)
)

Armando Edward Garcia, ORDER

Defendant.

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on
Supervised Release were held on January 20, 2010.

THE COURT FINDS that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and
voluntarily waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and
has consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition.

THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden
of proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM_LP., that
he is neither a flight risk nor a danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529
(9th Cir. 1994).



CO NIN DWH BF WN

NN NY NY YN N NN Se Be Be Be Be Be eB me ee
oN AA Bw NHN KF SO we NI DAH FF WN SEH SS

court.

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the

+2
DATED this J6~day of January, 2010.

Shon 0 Lillinorn

Lawrence @ Anderson
United States Magistrate Judge
#### Cammack *v.*Rupert and Another.

To an action on a bond, a plea stating merely that the parties had agreed, by a writing obligatory, that the bond should be discharged on certain conditions, is insufficient.

*Monday, November*28.

ERROR to the *Vigo*Circuit Court,

Dewey, *J.*

*Rupert et al.*declared in an action of debt against *Cammack*on a single bond for the payment of a sum of money.

*Cammack*pleaded in bar, that by á certain writing obligatory made between himself of the first part, a certain *Robert Kyle*of the second part, and *Rupert et al.*and other creditors of *Cammack,*of the third part, it was agreed by *Rupert et al.*and the other creditors of *Cammack,*that, in consideration of the assignment by *Cammack*of all his right and interest in and to a certain policy of insurance executed to *Cammack*by the *154Protection Insurance Company’ *of Hartford, Connecticut,—on*which policy a .suit was then pending in the *Jefferson*Circuit Court, *Kentucky,—they*would receive of said *Kyle*50 cents in the dollar on the respective sums due them, provided an • amount sufficient for that purpose should be recovered in the suit upon the policy; that it was.also agreed between the three parties aforesaid, -that if the suit should produce more than would pay to the.creditors 50 cents in the dollar on their debts, that-the overplus should go to said *Cammack;*and that it was further agreed, that if nothing should be recovered on the policy, so soon as that event should be known, *Cammack*should have it in his power to discharge himself from the *debts*enumerated in said writing obligatory, “ by giving to the creditors therein named satisfactory security *for the*payment .of 50 cents on each-dollar due them.” And the plea concludes witli an averment that the debt on which th'e suit was founded, was one of those contained in the aforesaid writing obligatory.

*153Note.—Judge *M'Kinney*was absent, in consequence of indisposition, during the first week of the present term.

*154J. *D. Taylor,*for the plaintiff. .

*E. M. Huntington,*for the defendants.-

To this plea there, was- a general demurrer. The Circuit Court sustained the demurrer; and rendered a.judgment in favour of *Rupert et al.*for their debt and damages.

- This judgment is correct. The plea does not profess to allege accord and satisfaction, or a release. It contains no averment of the result of the suit in the *Jefferson*Circuit Court— whether it be pending or whether it be decided. We know not whether any thing was recovered by *Kyle*in that súit; or whether if he failed to recover any thing, *Cammack*has given or attempted -to .give security to *Rupert et al.*for the payment of 50 cents on the dollar of their debt. Without determining whether the averments of these facts would make the plea good, there can be no. doubt that without them it is bad.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with 5 *per cent.*damages and costs.
BRANDON DUNNELL , Petitioner,

v.
STATE OF FLORIDA , Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2011

Opinion filed July 28, 2014.
Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Brandon Dunnell, pro se , Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM. Petitioner is granted a bel ated appeal of the June 13, 2013, judgment and sentence in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16

- 2013

- CF

- 000120

- AXXX

MA. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided
to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment a s the notice of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal. PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 7.1  NOVA Chemicals Corporation Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (U. S. GAAP)  July 6 -
  
  Jan. 1 -Dec. 31,
  
  July 5,
  
  Year ended Dec. 31,(U.S. dollars in millions)
  
  2009
  
  2009
  
  2008
  
  2007
  
  2006
  
  2005Successor
  
  PredecessorEarnings:Net income
  
  $
  (2
  )
  $
  (240
  )
  $
  (24
  )
  $
  363
  
  $
  (703
  )
  $
  (141
  )Adjustments for minority interest in losses of
  less than 100% owned affiliates and our equity in undistributed income
  (losses) of less than 50% owned equity investees
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Income tax provision expense (recovery)
  
  7
  
  (63
  )
  (54
  )
  50
  
  (147
  )
  (9
  )Fixed charges
  
  94
  
  104
  
  182
  
  201
  
  192
  
  147Capitalized interest, net of amortization of capitalized
  interest
  
  (1
  )
  
  
  
  
  (1
  )
  (3
  )
  (14
  )Total Earnings
  
  $
  98
  
  $
  (199
  )
  $
  104
  
  $
  613
  
  $
  (661
  )
  $
  (17
  )Fixed Charges:Interest expense
  
  94
  
  104
  
  182
  
  201
  
  192
  
  147Pre-tax earnings required to cover preferred stock
  dividends
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Total Fixed Charges
  
  $
  94
  
  $
  104
  
  $
  182
  
  $
  201
  
  $
  192
  
  $
  147Earnings to Fixed Charges Excess
  (Deficiency)
  
  $
  4
  
  $
  (303
  )
  $
  (78
  )
  $
  412
  
  $
  (853
  )
  $
  (164
  )Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
  Charges(1) (2)
  
  1.0
  
  N/A
  
  N/A
  
  3.0
  
  N/A
  
  N/A  
 (1)
  
  For
  the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
  earnings represent net income adjusted for the minority interest in losses
  of less than 100% owned affiliates, equity in undistributed income or losses
  of less than 50% owned affiliates, income taxes and fixed charges, less
  capitalized interest, net of amortization of capitalized interest. Fixed
  charges include interest expense (including amortization of bond discounts
  and debt issue costs, capitalized interest and a representative portion of
  rental expense) and pre-tax earnings required to cover preferred stock
  dividends.(2)
  
  For
  2008, 2006, 2005 and the period January 1, 2009 to July 5, 2009,
  earnings were insufficient to cover fixed charges by approximately $78
  million, $853 million, $164 million and $303 million, respectively, and this
  ratio is not meaningful.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 7, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The 2011 Colis Delta Trust, Oakbrook, Illinois, and George P. 
Colis; John N. Colis; Valerie Colis-Livaditus; and Leslie Colis-Ward, 
as trustees, to retain voting shares of Oxford Financial Corporation, 
and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Oxford Bank and Trust, 
both in Oak Brook, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 20, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-25264 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P