alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Debra Jean Milke, 

 Petitioner, 

 -vsCharles L. Ryan, et al., 

 Respondents. 

CV98–00060–PHX–RCB 

PROPOSED ORDER 

Upon motion duly made and good cause appearing, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion to Withdraw Their 

Motion to Modify the Conditional Writ of Habeas Corpus under Rule 60, 

Fed.R.Civ.P. is GRANTED. 

 Respondents’ Motion to Withdraw their Motion to Modify the Conditional 

Writ of Habeas Corpus is withdrawn. 

DATED this 11th day of September, 2013. 

Case 2:98-cv-00060-RCB Document 226 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Linda Price, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNUM Life Insurance Company of 

America, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV-15-2438-PHX-DKD

ORDER 

 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice 

(Doc. 29), and good cause appearing 

IT IS ORDERED granting the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice 

(Doc. 29) and dismissing this matter with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own 

attorney’s fees and costs. 

 Dated this 18th day of July, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02438-DKD Document 30 Filed 07/18/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,590,394
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     34,575,883
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,150,299
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 20,700,000
<COMMON>                                     6,623,100
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,827,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              42,150,300
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,567,999
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,567,999
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,567,999
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                148,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,407,336
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,407,336
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,407,336
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    22.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    22.94
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.00
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sonja Caldwell","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sonja-m-caldwellnasa-gov\/","title":"DiskSat","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WpTq65vZIa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/disksat\/\">DiskSat<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/disksat\/embed\/#?secret=WpTq65vZIa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“DiskSat” — NASA\" data-secret=\"WpTq65vZIa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/disksat-deploying-101.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00458-CV

Joseph Sagastume and Patricia 

Sagastume

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

§

§

§

§

From the 348th District Court

of Tarrant County (348-260051-12)

March 13, 2014

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS'  CONSENT

We  have  issued  our  report  dated  February  28,  1997,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial statements included in the Annual Report of Track Data
Corporation  and  Subsidiaries  on  Form  10-K for the year ended December 31,
1996.    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in
the  Registration  Statements  of Track Data Corporation on Form S-3 (File No.
333-4780,  effective  July  11,  1996)  and  on  Form  S-8 (File No. 333-4532,
effective  May  2,  1996).



GRANT  THORNTON  LLP
Melville,  New  York
February  28,  1997
#### De Camp and Another *v.*Vandagrift.

The plaintiff’s books of account in which he has charged the items for which he sues, are not admissible evidence to support his demand.

Friday, *March*24, 1837.

APPEAL from-the *Fayette*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

This was an action of assumpsit commenced before a justice of the peace by *Vandagrift*against C. and *J. De Gamp.*The justice gave a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed to the Circuit Court. Verdict and judgment, in the Circuit Court, for the plaintiff.

The plaintiff’s demand is for a great number of articles furnished the defendants, at various times, in his business as a blacksmith. -On the trial in the Circuit Court, the plaintiff proved several of the items in his account, that he kept correct and fair books, and that he usually made his charges on a slate from which they were afterwards copied into the day-book, tie then offered in evidence his books of account to support his demand. This evidence was objected to, but the objection was overruled.

The admission of these books of account in evidence is assigned for error, and we think they ought not to have been admitted. To receive as evidence for a party the entries made by him in his books, would be permitting him to make evi*273dence for himself. The common law of *England,*which we have adopted, does not countenance such proof. 12 Viner’s Abr. 90, 91.—Bull. N. P. *282.—Marriage*v. *Lawrence,*3 Barn. & Ald. 142. The-entries made by a person in his books may be evidence against him but not in his favour. The appellee cites some-cases in the Courts of *New-York*and *New-Jersey*to show thát the books of account were correctly admitted; but the decisions in those cases, we presume, are founded on the local law of those states. The common law recognised in this state excludes the evidence, and we have no statute on the subject.

*O. H. Smith,*for the appellants.

*C. B. Smith,*for the appellee.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs, Cause remanded, &c.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Philbrick HH Cook, 

Defendant.

No. CR-98-00869-PHX-GMS

DETENTION ORDER 

 On January 2, 2019, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released 

on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 

3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 2nd day of January, 2019. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ashley Balzer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/abalzer\/","title":"Goddard Team Builds, Tests Calibrator for NASA\u2019s Roman in Record Time","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l0i0UYRiH3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/roman-space-telescope\/goddard-team-builds-tests-calibrator-for-nasas-roman-in-record-time\/\">Goddard Team Builds, Tests Calibrator for NASA\u2019s Roman in Record Time<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/roman-space-telescope\/goddard-team-builds-tests-calibrator-for-nasas-roman-in-record-time\/embed\/#?secret=l0i0UYRiH3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Goddard Team Builds, Tests Calibrator for NASA\u2019s Roman in Record Time” — NASA\" data-secret=\"l0i0UYRiH3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/23-01884_roman_gsfc_srcs_installed_lowres.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
EXHIBIT 99.2



                   CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned,  Curtis B. McWilliams,  the Co-Chief  Executive  Officer of CNL
American Properties Fund, Inc. (the "Company"),  has executed this certification
in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

DATED this 14th day of March 2003.




                                     /s/ Curtis B. McWilliams
                                     ------------------------------
                                     Curtis B. McWilliams
                                     Co-Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2856 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2856

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 16, 2004

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To limit the transfer of certain Commodity Credit Corporation funds 
    between conservation programs for technical assistance for the 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1241 of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 
U.S.C. 3841) is amended by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(b) Technical Assistance.--Effective for fiscal year 2005 and 
each subsequent fiscal year, Commodity Credit Corporation funds made 
available for each of the programs specified in paragraphs (1) through 
(7) of subsection (a)--
            ``(1) shall be available for the provision of technical 
        assistance for the programs for which funds are made available; 
        and
            ``(2) shall not be available for the provision of technical 
        assistance for conservation programs specified in subsection 
        (a) other than the program for which the funds were made 
        available.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) takes 
effect on October 1, 2004.

            Passed the Senate October 11, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 	AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 	SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

              In connection with	the Quarterly report of Inland Fiber Group, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as	filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C. Ludlow, Chief Financial	Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act	of 2002, that: 

 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of			the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,			the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

/s/ Thomas C. LudlowThomas C. Ludlow 	Chief Financial Officer 	August 15, 2005

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,	or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required	by Section 906, has been provided to Inland Fiber Group, LLC and will be retained by Inland Fiber Group, LLC and furnished to the	Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**
Case 2:15-mj-01730-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01730-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01730-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 201 (Friday, October 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24892]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-14-035]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  October 22, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-1012 (Second Review) (Certain Frozen 
Fish Fillets from Vietnam). The Commission is currently scheduled to 
complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on 
October 30, 2014.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 15, 2014.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-24892 Filed 10-15-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katherine Schauer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ksschaue\/","title":"Working in Tandem: NASA\u2019s Networks Empower Artemis I","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"E94MvtQzy8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/working-in-tandem-nasas-networks-empower-artemis-i\/\">Working in Tandem: NASA\u2019s Networks Empower Artemis I<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/artemis\/working-in-tandem-nasas-networks-empower-artemis-i\/embed\/#?secret=E94MvtQzy8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Working in Tandem: NASA\u2019s Networks Empower Artemis I” — NASA\" data-secret=\"E94MvtQzy8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/faiazs3waaigo20.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":184}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7173

JACOB LEON MITCHELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA PENINSULA REGIONAL JAIL, Officer in Charge; SERGEANT BOYD, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-98-256-AM) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacob Leon Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jacob Leon Mitchell, a Virginia inmate, appeals the districtcourt’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v. Virginia Peninsula Regional Jail , No. CA-98-256-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED