alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7220
TYRONE WEST, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA04-223-RDB) Submitted: February 22, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrone West, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tyrone West seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that West has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Chicago, Illinois 60604 January 11, 2006
Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Chief Judge Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ] ] Appeal from the United Plaintiff-Appellant, ] States District Court for Cross-Appellee, ] the Northern District of ] Illinois, Eastern Division. Nos. 03-2068 & 04-1377 v. ] ] No. 98 CR 946 IVAN EBERHART, ] ] James B. Zagel, Defendant-Appellee. ] Judge. Cross-Appellant. ]

O R D E R The opinion issued in the above-entitled case on January 10, 2006, is hereby amended as follows:
In the caption, the argued date of October 1, 2004 should be changed to read:

SUBMITTED DECEMBER 27, 2005
II

Calendar No. 252

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 651

[Report No. 105–133]

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 12, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

NOVEMBER 4, 1997

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for

the construction of a hydroelectric project located in the

State of Washington, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy

7 Regulatory Commission project numbered 8864, the Com-
2

HR 651 RS

1 mission shall, upon the request of the project licensee, in

2 accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public

3 interest requirements of that section and the Commis4 sion’s procedures under that section, extend the time pe5 riod during which the licensee is required to commence

6 construction of the project for not more than 3 consecutive

7 2-year periods.

8 (b) APPLICABILITY.—An extension under subsection

9 (a) shall take effect for a project upon the expiration of

10 the extension, issued by the Commission under section 13

11 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period

12 required for commencement of construction of the project.

13 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the

14 license for the project referred to in subsection (a) has

15 expired prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the

16 Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of the

17 date of its expiration and extend the time required for

18 commencement of construction of the project as provided

19 in subsection (a) for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year

20 periods, the first of which shall commence on the date of

21 such expiration.

Passed the House of Representatives March 11,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.

Calendar No. 252

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 651

[Report No. 105–133]

AN ACT

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

purposes.located in the State of Washington, and for otherAct for the construction of a hydroelectric project

NOVEMBER 4, 1997

Reported without amendment
#### H. W. Everston *v.*W. L. Buckham.

Principal and Surety — Money Borrowed Used to Discharge Obligation of Surety —Statute of Limitation,

Appellant and Winston were partners and upon the dissolution of the partnership Winston assumed the debts of the firm. Afterward Winston borrowed money from the appellee, with appellant as his surety, a part of which he used to discharge one of the partnership debts. The appellee sued appellant on the note executed to him as Winston’s surety, to which action the appellant pleaded and relied on statute of limitation as a bar. Held, that the payment of the partnership debt by Winston out of a part of the money borrowed from appellee did not change the true condition of appellant on the note.

APPEAL FROM UNION CIRCUIT COURT.

October 3, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

The note sued on matured the 15th of October 1854, and this atcion was not brought to enforce its colection until March 12, 1862. Appellant pleads that he was only surety of Winston the principel obligor in the note, and relies upon the statute of limitations as a bar to the action against him.

The evidence conduces to prove that Winston borrowed the money of appellee, and that appellant was in fact his surety and this fact was known to appellee. From this conclusion the testimony of Finnie and others, leaves no escape. Nor can the fact that a part of the money borrowed of appellee was applied to the satisfaction of a debt upon which appellant was bound, change the responsibility of the parties. By the terms of the dissolution of the partnership theretofore existing between appellant, and Winston, the latter was bound to pay that debt, and as between them it was the individual debt of Winston, and the payment of it by him, out of the money borrowed of appellee, could not change the true condition of appellant on the- note, any more than the payment of the money to any other creditor of Winston could do.

Nor does the act approved May 24, 1861 entitled *“An Act to*
      *634
      *suspend*the circuit, and other courts in this commonwealth and *for oilier purposes ”*have the effect to "suspend the running of the act of limitations for the benefit of sureties, as was held by this court. *Rhodes v. Letcher's executors*Mss. opinion, 1863.

*D. H.*Hughes, *for appellant.*

Huston, *for appellee.*

Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to award a new trial, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

GARY D. NITZKIN (MI State Bar No P41155)

Admitted Pro hac vice

MICHIGAN CONSUMER CREDIT LAWYERS

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Nancy Fedri

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

NANCY FEDRI, 

Plaintiff,

v.

TRANS UNION LLC,

A Delaware limited liability company,

and CHASE BANK USA, N.A.,

a National Association,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:15-cv -01952-GMS

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO 

DEFENDANT CHASE BANK USA, 

N.A., ONLY

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff and Defendant, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., 

in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement. The parties anticipate filing a 

Case 2:15-cv-01952-GMS Document 55 Filed 07/06/16 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., ONLY, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) within 60 days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 6th day of July, 2016.

 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Nancy Fedri

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 6, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the 

Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and for transmittal of Notice of Electronic Filing on the 

following CM/ECF registrants:

Trinette G Kent

Kent Law Offices

10645 N Tatum Blvd., Ste. 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028

480-247-9644

Fax: 480-717-4781

Email: tkent@kentlawpc.com

1. Attorneys for Plaintiff

2. Robert W. Shely

3. Shayna Fernandez Watts

Bryan Cave LLP

Two North Central Avenue, Suite 2200

Phoenix, AZ 85004-4406

Telephone: (602) 364-7000

Facsimile: (602) 364-7070

rwshely@bryancave.com

shayna.watts@bryancave.com

Attorneys for Defendant Chase Bank USA, 

N.A.

By: /s/ Janice M. Moser

Case 2:15-cv-01952-GMS Document 55 Filed 07/06/16 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                         MARISA CHRISTINA, INCORPORATED

           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Marisa Christina, Incorporated. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to
his knowledge, on the date hereof:

      (a)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
            December 31, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
            Exchange Commission (the Annual Report) fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael H. Lerner                   /s/ S.E. Melvin Hecht
----------------------------------      ---------------------------------------
Michael H. Lerner                       S.E. Melvin Hecht
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,      Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer,
     and President                             and Treasurer
Marisa Christina, Incorporated          Marisa Christina, Incorporated
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Karl B. Hille","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/khille\/","title":"MMS: Five Years, Four Spacecraft, Thousands of Inspired Students","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5Q79LrYFYQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/mms-five-years-four-spacecraft-thousands-of-inspired-students\/\">MMS: Five Years, Four Spacecraft, Thousands of Inspired Students<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/mms-five-years-four-spacecraft-thousands-of-inspired-students\/embed\/#?secret=5Q79LrYFYQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“MMS: Five Years, Four Spacecraft, Thousands of Inspired Students” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5Q79LrYFYQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/mmsmodeltroyjohn.jpeg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":226}
-1- 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Scott E. Davis 

State Bar No. 016160 

SCOTT E. DAVIS, P.C. 

8360 E. Raintree Drive, Suite 140 

Scottsdale, AZ 85260 

Telephone: (602) 482-4300 

Facsimile: (602) 569-9720 

email: davis@scottdavispc.com

Attorney for Plaintiff Catherine Boettcher 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Catherine Boettcher, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. 2:15-cv-01930-DGC

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE 

 

 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff dismisses the above captioned 

case without prejudice. Plaintiff filed her complaint on September 25, 2015. Defendant 

Metropolitan Life Insurance Company has not filed an Answer or a responsive pleading to 

Plaintiff’s complaint. 

 DATED this 18th day of May, 2016. 

 

 SCOTT E. DAVIS, P.C. 

 /s/ Scott E. Davis, Esq. 

 Scott E. Davis, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-cv-01930-DGC Document 16 Filed 05/18/16 Page 1 of 1
423 A.2d 1310

#### Shea et ux., Appellants, v. Eller et al.

Argued June 5,1979.

Mitchell Kievan, for appellants; John J. Hart, for appellee.

Before PRICE, HOFFMAN and DOWLING, JJ.*

*

 Judge John G. Dowling of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.

Order affirmed.
Case 2:15-mj-01781-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01781-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/27/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01781-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/27/15 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the
Company), I, Ronald L. Blevins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                         |  |  |  |                  
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------
|By: |  | /s/ Ronald L. Blevins   |  |  |  | Date: May 6, 2009
|    |  | Ronald L. Blevins       |  |  |  |                  
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |                  



32
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 649 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.649

                       One Hundred Fifth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-seven

                                 An Act

 
To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are 
  obsolete or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related 
        section of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Energy Standardization 
Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUIREMENTS WITH 
              GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Department of Energy Regulations.--Section 501 of the 
Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7191) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsections (b) and (d),
        (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b) and by 
    redesignating subsections (e), (f), and (g) as subsections (c), 
    (d), and (e), respectively, and
        (3) in subsection (c) (as so redesignated), by striking 
    ``subsections (b), (c), and (d)'' and inserting ``subsection (b)''.
    (b) Special Requirements Affecting Advisory Committees.--
        (1) Section 624.--Section 624 of the Department of Energy 
    Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7234) is amended by--
            (A) striking ``(a)''; and
            (B) striking subsection (b).
        (2) Technical and conforming amendment.--Section 17 of the 
    Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 776) is 
    repealed.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

# AGENCY:

Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) published a Notice of Funding Availability in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 10, 2014, that contained an error. Specifically, it incorrectly stated the phone number for the VA point of contact, John Kuhn. The correct phone number is (877) 737-0111.                    

Dated: October 17, 2014.

William F. Russo,

Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2014-25096 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001067701
<NAME> UNITED RENTALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          34,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  456,092
<ALLOWANCES>                                    53,042
<INVENTORY>                                    145,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,629,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                 563,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,764,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,489,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          300,000
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                           721
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,413,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,764,482
<SALES>                                        578,962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               578,962
<CGS>                                          125,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  372,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (204)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,282
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,411
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>