alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8931]

In accordance with section 4314(c)(4) of 5 United States Code, the Department of State has appointed the following individuals to the Department of State Performance Review Board for Senior Executive Service members:

Christopher H. Flaggs, Chairperson, Comptroller, Bureau of the Comptroller and Global Financial Services, Department of State;

Kelly Clements, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, Department of State;

Hoyt B. Yee, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, Department of State; and

Mary Catherine Malin, Assistant Legal Advisor, Office of the Legal Advisor, Department of State.

Dated: October 14, 2014.

Hans Klemm, 

Acting Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-25353 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-15-P
EXHIBIT 32



Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, that this certification is an exhibit to, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MainStreet BankShares, Inc. at the dates and for
the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350(c).



|                |  |                                      
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date:    3/5/04 |  | /s/ Cecil R. McCullar                
|                |  | Cecil R. McCullar                    
|                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                | 
|Date:    3/5/04 |  | /s/ Brenda H. Smith                  
|                |  | Brenda H. Smith                      
|                |  | Executive Vice President             
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                |  | Corporate Secretary
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 2 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 3 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 4 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 5 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 6 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 7 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 8 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 9 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 10 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 11 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 12 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 13 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 14 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 15 of 16
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-5 Filed 09/01/15 Page 16 of 16
Exhibit 35.2


SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


CAPITAL ONE MULTI-ASSET EXECUTION TRUST





Capital One Multi-asset Execution Trust


c/o Capital One Funding, LLC


1600 Capital One Drive, Room 27907-A


McLean, Virginia 22102





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital One Multi-asset Execution Trust for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Capital One Services, LLC (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:





1.    A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Subservicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006, as amended by the First Amendment thereto, dated as of October 1, 2022, by and between Capital One, National Association and the Servicer (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.





2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreements in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 26 th day of March, 2024.





CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC


By:/s/ MARK DANIEL MOUADEBName:Mark Daniel MouadebTitle:President, US Card
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,127
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               59
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,900
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,597
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,656)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,660)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"St. Patrick’s Aurora Illuminates the Night Sky","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eKLZ8x0icg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/gsfc-20171208-archive-e000760orig-stpatricksaurora-iotd\/\">St. Patrick’s Aurora Illuminates the Night Sky<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/gsfc-20171208-archive-e000760orig-stpatricksaurora-iotd\/embed\/#?secret=eKLZ8x0icg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“St. Patrick’s Aurora Illuminates the Night Sky” — NASA\" data-secret=\"eKLZ8x0icg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/gsfc-20171208-archive-e000760orig-stpatricksaurora-iotd.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":899}
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 491

To prohibit the Department of State from imposing a charge or fee for

providing passport information to the general public.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. SAXTON (for himself and Mr. QUINN) introduced the following bill; which

was referred to the Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To prohibit the Department of State from imposing a charge

or fee for providing passport information to the general

public.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Passport

5 Information Act of 1997’’.

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AND REQUIREMENT CONCERNING

7 DEPARTMENT OF STATE PASSPORT INFOR8 MATION SERVICES.

9 For fiscal year 1998 and for each subsequent fiscal

10 year, the Secretary of State shall provide for a United
2

•HR 491 IH

1 States passport information telephone inquiry service for

2 the general public which shall be available without charge

3 or fee imposed by the Department of State or any other

4 entity under contract to the Department of State.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William V. CareyWilliam V. CareyChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 10, 2009
#### C. L. Morehead *v.*George R. McLean.

Vendor and Purchaser — Visible Change of Possession of Property.

A sale of personal property, though the vendor and vendee lived together, where accompanied by a visible change of jjossession, and actual use by the vendee in his individual capacity will be upheld.

APPEAL FROM MUHLENBURG CIRCUIT COURT.

April 16, 1869.

*James, for appellant.*

*Dawson, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

There is no sufficient ground for imputing actual fraud in the sale of the machine; nor do the facts require the deduction of constructive fraud. The possession accompanied the sale; and, through, as vendor and vendee lived together, the ostensible possession may not have been certainly changed, yet the notoriety of the sale and of the use of the machine by the vendee as his own exclusive property were, in principle and policy, equivalent to a visible change of the possession from the date of the sale to the levy of the execution on the machine as the property of the vendor, and the jury had a right so to decide.

All the instructions asked by the appellant were given and were as full and as favorable to him as he could expect.

The evidence, altogether properly considered, authorized the verdict for $100.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
#### Poundstone *v.*Lewark and Others.

A declaration against the defendant for not performing certain work agreeably to his contract, without showing that he was to have any thing for the work, contains no cause of action.

*Thursday, December*1.

ERROR to 'the *Rush*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

Assumpsit by *Lewark*and others against *Poundstone,*commenced before a justice of -the peace. The cause of action, described in the declaration, is in substance as follows:—

The plaintiffs on, &c., proceeded to sell out the building of a certain chimney to the lowest bidder. The defendant was the lowest bidder, and the building of the chimney was cried off to him; he thereby undertaking to build it in á specified manner, and by a certain time. Breach, that the .defendant failed to perform his contract. Damage 50 dollars.'

. Demurrer to the declaration, and judgment by the justice for the plaintiffs. The defendant appealed to the Circuit Court. The Circuit Court considering the declaration good, overruled the demurrer, and rendered a final judgment in favour of the plaintiffs, with costs of suit.

In overruling the demurrer to the declaration, the Circuit Court committed an error. The undertaking of the defendant to build the chimney, was, for any thing shown by the declaration, without any consideration whatever. It was a *nudum, pactum.*There is no averment that the defendant was to receive any thing for the performance of his promise. The following case on this subject occurred in *England*as early as the time of *Henry,*the 4th: “A carpenter, by parol without writing, undertook to build a new house, and, for the not doing it, the party brought an action against the carpenter, and it did not appear that he was to have any thing for building the house: it was adjudged that he should take nothing by his writ.” Powell on Cont. 331. This case is recognized as good law by all the modern decisions. Indeed, it is now settled, that even if the plaintiffs’ house had sustained a material injury, in consequence of the defendant’s not building the chimney, the action would not have lain. *Elsee et al.*v. *Gatward,*5 Term Rep. 143. The ground of action stated in the *174declaration before us, is nothing more than a non-feasance where there was no consideration, and the action cannot be sustained.

*J. Perry,*for the plaintiff.

*C. B. Smith,*for the defendants.

The circumstance, that this declaration was filed before a justice of the peace, makes no difference. It is defective in substance, and was therefore objectionable in a justice’s Court. *Hall*v. *Johnson, May*term, 1834.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, with leave to the plaintiffs below to amend their declaration, &c.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00103-CV

CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP.,

Appellant

v.

Fernando RAMIREZ and Minerva Ramirez,

Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003262-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees, Fernando Ramirez and Minerva Ramirez, recover 

their costs of the appeal and the full amount of the trial court’s judgment against CenterPoint 

Energy Resources Corp. from appellant and from Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as surety 

on appellant’s supersedeas bond.

SIGNED March 25, 2020.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
#### Timothy Burgess *v.*T. L. Hutchison.

Appeal and Error — Judgment Reversed.

Where on the appeal, the facts show that justice does not appear to have been done acording to the evidence, the judgment will be reversed.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

March 5, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

JuDGE PeTEES :

From the affidavit of Weir, one of the attorneys of appellant, be is illy qualified, if indeed competent, to attend to the preparation of bis, case, on account of the infirmities of old age and disease. And from these causes it seems the preparation of bis case mainly devolved on bis attorneys. It also appears that the week before the sitting of the court, Weir applied to the commissioner to know if be expected to make bis report in these cases to the approaching term and be informed him be did not, that it could not then be done, and said to him be merely would present a statement of the reasons why a report could not be made, and under this assurance, be as attorney for appellant rested. He further states, that be himself bad discovered from the books of Wing *&*Tyler that their accounts charged as expenditures of the hotel, bad been created for, and were the private expenses of appellee, the articles purchased were for bis individual benefit and bad been paid in board of the clerks of said merchants, at the hotel, and if time-were allowed him be could show that the board of the clerks aforesaid, was a proper charge against Hutchison, and were not accounted for by him.

Appellant from the facts manifested in the case, must have been to a great etxent ignorant of the business, and of the condition of the acounts between appellee and himself. The books *reported*to have been burned, and whether burned or not, inaccessible to him, greatly increased the difficulty in preparing the cases, on the part of appellant, while the knoweldge of the business, which appellee bad, gave him him much greater facilities in preparing the cases for trial than bis adversary bad.

*688*Harlan, for appellant.*

*Ray &*Hardin, *for appellee.*

Under the peculiar circumstances of this case, and the belief of appellant’s counsel that no report would be made, derived from the commissioner, and the possible hardship of the case, we think sufficient reasons were presented by appellant for a continuance, and that the court below should have re-committed the case to the master to hear additional proof, if the parties should offer any, and for a full report of the true state of the accounts between them.

It is not deemed necessary, or proper, to enter upon an examination of the details of the judgment, as the proof to be taken and further developments may essentially change the condition of the parties.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
#### William H. Patterson *v.*William L. Epperson's Admr.

Trial — Pleading—Eule not Disposed of.

The failure to have a rule disposed of before issue on the merits, and the jury sworn, held as a waiver of the rule.

Same — Answer to Cross Bill After Petition Dismissed.

Where a petition has been dismissed, the plaintiff should be allowed to answer a cross-petition, and put in such defense as he may have.

APPEAL FROM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

February 4, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The demand of the account of appellant against decedent Epperson from from his administrator, with the proper affidavits, sufficiently appears. But if it did not it is to late after answer and issue and jury sworn, to have the suit dismissed upon rule though it was sued out and response thereto before the jury were sworn.

The failure to have the rule disposed of before issue on the merits and jury, must be regarded as a waiver of the rule.

Having dismissed the plaintiff’s petition, which confessed the note and account set up in the cross action as a set-off against the plaintiff’s claim, he should then have been allowed to answer *563the cross suit and set up his account as a defense to such cross action.

*Garnett,*James, *for appellant.*

Winfrey, *for appellee.*

For these errors the judgment is reversed with directions to proceed to trial on the merits, as herein indicated.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"Who Was Katherine Johnson? (Grades K-4)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SJwSzn3Uci\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/who-was-katherine-johnson-grades-k-4\/\">Who Was Katherine Johnson? (Grades K-4)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/who-was-katherine-johnson-grades-k-4\/embed\/#?secret=SJwSzn3Uci\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Who Was Katherine Johnson? (Grades K-4)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SJwSzn3Uci\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/katherinejohnson_1.jpg?w=226","thumbnail_width":226,"thumbnail_height":333}