alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William V. CareyWilliam V. Carey Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer November 9, 2005




33
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 0021

VERSUS

VICTOR GALAN MARCH 14, 2022

In Re: Victor Galan, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 

563, 468. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMG

GH

WRC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

IfI

E UIEY CLERK OF COUR

FOR THE COURT
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEVEN FERRILLI.

September 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Ron Hadani,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James A. Tracy, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, that:

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                           | /s/ Ron Hadani          |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
| Dated: November  14, 2006 | Ron Hadani              |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |

 
|                           | /s/ James A Tracy       |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
| Dated: November  14, 2006 | James A Tracy           |
|                      | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Emanuel Joseph Ayala, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-15-1200-02-PHX-SRB 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On November 14, 2018, defendant, Emanuel Joseph Ayala, appeared before this 

Court on a petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the 

information provided to the Court, and any arguments of counsel in determining whether 

the defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed 

on supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition 

to revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 15th day of November, 2018.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONALD WITHERSPOON.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### R. H. Sebree *v.*W. D. Sebree’s Admr.

Executors and Administrators — Account Against Decedent — Sufficiency of Affidavit.

The affidavit of appellee that the account, sued on, against decedent was just and fair and included no usury, nor was there any just set-offs, and the affidavit of a disinterested witness that it was just, substantially conformed to the requirement of the statuee.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

February 5, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The affidavit of appellee that the account, sued on, against decedent was just and unpaid and included no usury nor was there any just off-set and the affidavit of a disinterested witness that it was just, were made December 13, 1866, therefore evidence that in the spring of 1868, the defendant said that plaintiff had presented his account authorized the inference that it was presented with the proper affidavits, especially as the affidavit of the defendant to obtain the rule was so peculiarly guarded for it says “that no demand was made of him upon the account accompanied by the presentation of the account with the affidavit and proof required by law.”

As there seems to have been some doubts as to the conformity of the first affidavits to the statute, the plaintiff subsequently, July 15, 1868, made an affidavit, one which was probably super induced by the objections of the defendant to the first ones, as indicated by the proof of what he had said.

The first affidavits substantially conformed to the requirements of the statutes and the proof on the rule was sufficient to establish a demand and the bill of exceptions leaves no doubt but that all the evidence heard on the trial of the rule is certified therein.

Wherefore the judgment dismissing the petition on the rule is reversed with directions for further proceedings as indicated herein.

*623*Sweeney & S., for appellant.*

*Ray & Hardin, for appellee.*

The interlineations in the original account probably made at the time of the last affidavit are not at all important or significant, being only the more particularly to identify the original items.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2687 

To provide coverage under the Railway Labor Act to employees of certain 

air and surface transportation entities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2004 

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide coverage under the Railway Labor Act to 

employees of certain air and surface transportation entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Express Carrier Em5 ployee Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT. 

7 Section 201 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 

8 181) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘All’’ and inserting ‘‘(a) IN

10 GENERAL.—All’’; 
2 

•S 2687 IS 

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘and every express carrier’’ 

2 after ‘‘common carrier by air’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(b) EXPRESS CARRIERS.—The employees of an ex5 press carrier shall be covered by this Act only if they are 

6 licensed airmen, licensed aircraft maintenance technicians, 

7 or licensed aircraft dispatchers, and only if they perform 

8 duties for the express carrier pursuant to the privileges 

9 of the appropriate license. All other employees of an ex10 press carrier shall be covered by the provisions of the Na11 tional Labor Relations Act. 

12 ‘‘(c) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘express 

13 carrier’ means any company (or companies affiliated 

14 through common control or ownership) that has an inte15 grated network of air and surface transportation for the 

16 purpose of the express shipment of packages.’’. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (7,534)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,818
<PP&E>                                          17,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,020)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,937
<BONDS>                                          5,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     52,000
<COMMON>                                           172
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,155)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,156
<SALES>                                         53,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,497)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,497)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,497)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRST
CHOICE HEALTH NETWORK, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AUDITED DECEMBER 31, 1998
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      5,759,751
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,737,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                  361,000
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           14,680,593
<PP&E>                                      2,908,240
<DEPRECIATION>                              1,488,358
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             20,712,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,756,510
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       41,219
<OTHER-SE>                                 10,482,289
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               20,712,398
<SALES>                                    56,878,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           57,226,757
<CGS>                                      42,275,382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              56,612,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               614,641
<INCOME-TAX>                                  429,348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           185,293
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  703,551
<EPS-BASIC>                                   12.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   12.00




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

<PAGE>
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT





The Board of Directors
Lakeview Financial Corp.:

We consent to incorporation  by reference in the Registration  Statement on Form
S-8 of Lakeview Financial Corp.  relating to the 1993 Stock Option Plan (Plan A,
Plan B and Plan C) of our  report  dated  September  5,  1996,  relating  to the
consolidated  balance sheets of Lakeview  Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of
July 31,  1996  and 1995 and the  related  consolidated  statements  of  income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended July 31, 1996, which report is included in the July 31,
1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lakeview Financial Corp.

Our report  refers to a change in the method of  accounting  for income taxes in
1994 and a change in the accounting  for certain  investments in debt and equity
securities in 1995.

                                    /s/KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                    KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



Short Hills, New Jersey
October 23, 1996
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.5(f)    
  



	 February 25, 2003
	

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

850 SW Broadway, Suite 1200

Portland, Oregon 97205

Attn: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	

Re:	
 	

Standby Purchase and Note Support Agreement, dated as of August 16, 1999 among Louisiana-Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation ("L-P"), Bank of America, N.A., a national banking association
("BofA"), and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, a Canadian chartered bank ("CIBC") (as amended or modified from time to time, the "Agreement").





Ladies
and Gentlemen: 


        L-P
has advised BofA and CIBC that it is entering into a Fifth Amendment of even date herewith (the "Amendment") by and among
L-P, BofA as Agent and as Lender and the other Lenders party to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of November 15, 2001 (as amended or modified from time to time, the
"Credit Agreement"). The Amendment amends certain provisions of the Credit Agreement as more fully set forth therein. A copy of the Amendment is
attached hereto as Exhibit A. 


        Because
the Agreement incorporates by reference certain of the provisions of the Credit Agreement without giving effect to any amendment thereof unless consented to by BofA and CIBC (the
"Standby Lenders"), L-P has asked the Standby Lenders to consent to the execution by L-P of the Amendment. By their respective
signatures below, BofA and CIBC hereby consent to the execution and delivery of the Amendment by the parties thereto. BofA and CIBC further agree that, to the extent covenants and representations and
warranties in the Credit Agreement are incorporated by reference into the Agreement, such covenants, representations and warranties as incorporated shall be deemed amended as set forth in the
Amendment. 


[Signature
Page Follows] 





 


	 Very truly yours,	 
	
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.	

 
	

By:	

 	

 	

 
	 	
	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	
	 
	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	
	 
	
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE	

 
	

By:	

 	

 	

 
	 	
	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	
	 
	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	
	 
	
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:	

 
	

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION	

 
	

By:	

 	

 	

 
	 	
	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	
	 
	 	Title:	 	 
	 	 	
	 




2









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.5(f)
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.34    
  


 
 

ADDENDUM TO EXECUTIVE TERMINATION BENEFITS AGREEMENTS    
  


	1.
	Continuation Period pursuant to Subparagraph 1(d) of the Executive Termination Benefits Agreement shall mean "the period of time
beginning on the Termination Date and ending thirty-six (36) months thereafter."



	2.
	The
following language shall be added as Subparagraph 2(a)(iv) of the Executive Termination Benefits Agreement: 



by
the Executive within the thirty (30) day period immediately following the first anniversary of a Change in Control. 



	3.
	The
following language shall be added as Subparagraph 4(a) of the Executive Termination Benefits Agreement: 



The
Company will pay to the Executive the sum of (i) three (3) times the greater of (A) the Executive's effective annual base salary at the Termination Date or (B) the
Executive's effective annual base salary immediately prior to the Change in Control, plus (ii) three (3) times the greater of (X) the highest annual bonus awarded to the Executive
under the Company's Variable Compensation Plan or any other bonus plan (whether paid currently or on a deferred basis) with respect to any twelve (12) consecutive month period during the last
three (3) fiscal years ending prior to the Termination Date or (Y) the highest target bonus rate applicable to the Executive for any period during such prior three (3) year
period, multiplied by the applicable annual base salary determined under clause (i) of this Section 4(a); the resulting amount to be paid in a lump sum on the first day of the month
following the Termination Date. 






	4.
	The
following language shall be added following the last sentence of Subparagraph 4(f)(iii) of the Executive Termination Benefits Agreement: 



Notwithstanding
anything in Section 4(f)(ii) or (iii) (or elsewhere) to the contrary, all equity awards shall vest upon voluntary termination of the Executive during the thirty
(30) day period immediately following the first anniversary of the Change in Control. 



	 	 	Dated: August 8, 2001
	

 	
 	

SABRE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  JAMES F. BRASHEAR      
 James F. Brashear

Corporate Secretary
	

 	
 	

SABRE INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  JAMES F. BRASHEAR      
 James F. Brashear

Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
	

 	
 	

David A. Schwarte
	

 	
 	

Signed: /s/  DAVID A. SCHWARTE      











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.34


ADDENDUM TO EXECUTIVE TERMINATION BENEFITS AGREEMENTS
EXHIBIT 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Martin E. Welch III, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ MARTIN E. WELCH IIIMartin E. Welch IIIChief Financial Officer


October 31, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order filed, March 11, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00060

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF A .M.C. AND T.R.C., CH ILDREN , Appellant

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 48772



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due February 16, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the
record. The record has not been filed with the cou rt. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Rebecca Hammons , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: ELAMEX, S.A. DE C.V. ; ELAMEX

USA, CORP. ; and MOUNT FRANKLIN

FOODS, L.L.C.

Relators. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00246

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Ruben Morales

, Judge of the County Court at Law No.7 District Court of El Paso,

Texas and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandam us should be denied. We therefore

deny the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21 S T DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024.

L ISA J. SOTO

, Justice

Before Palafox , J., Soto, J., and Barajas, C.J. (Senior Judge)

Barajas

, C.J. (Senior Judge) (sitting by assignment)
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Brenwin Garice Kayquoptewa, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-8194-PCT-SPL (DKD)

DETENTION ORDER 

 On January 19, 2016, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition to revoke 

conditions of release and submit the issue to the Court. The Court considered the 

information provided to the Court in determining whether the Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that Defendant has violated the 

conditions of release and that there is no condition or combination of conditions available 

to the Court that will reasonably assure the appearance of Defendant as required. 18 

U.S.C. § 3148(b). 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 19th day of January, 2016. 

Honorable John Z. Boyle

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cr-08194-SPL Document 31 Filed 01/20/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Tony Silvester et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v Time-Warner, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 870]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered on or about June 20, 2003, which granted defendants’ CPLR 3211 (a) motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff recording artists sue to recover damages allegedly occasioned by defendant recording companies’ release of certain of their recordings for transmission over the Internet in digital format. The documentary evidence, however, demonstrates conclusively that plaintiffs contracted away any rights they had to the subject recordings, without reservation, and, indeed, expressly conveyed, in each of the governing contracts entered into with defendants, the right to exploit the subject recordings by any method, including methods unknown at the time of contracting (see *Greenfield v Philles Records, Inc.,*98 NY2d 562 [2002]). These arm’s length contracts are entirely dispositive of plaintiffs’ various claims. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Ellerin and Sweeny, JJ. *[See 1*Misc 3d 250.]
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OLLIE ROSCOE EATON.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.