alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25296]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[DR.5B711.IA000814]


Indian Gaming

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Compact between the 
Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone (Tribe) and the State of Nevada 
(State) Governing Class III Gaming.

DATES: Effective Date: October 23, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary--Policy and 
Economic Development, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The 
Compact allows the Tribal Gaming Commission to determine the number of 
casinos, mix of games, number of gaming devices, wager, and prize 
limits. The Compact allows the Tribe to operate ``Slots Only 
Locations'' totaling 300 slot machines, provided that no more than 65 
slot machines are operated at each location. The term of the Compact is 
20 years, and the term can be amended to be coterminous with a 
financing agreement. The Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Department of the Interior, through his delegated authority, is 
publishing notice that the Tribal-State Compact between the State and 
the Tribe is now in effect.

    Dated: October 17, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-25296 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4N-P
#### Laurance W. BROOKS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-30881.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 22, 2005.

*155Michael A. Patterson, Daniel D. Holliday, III, Long Law Firm, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Louis Victor Gregoire, Jr., Kean, Muller, Hawthorne, D’Armond, McCowan & Jar-man, Baton Rouge, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Exxon Mobil Corporation appeals from the district court’s partial grant of summary judgment in favor of Lauranee Brooks, Jr. The district court entered judgment declaring that under a lease agreement between the parties Exxon Mobil is obligated to replace a building that it removed from property owned by Brooks. Exxon Mobil argues that the district court erroneously granted the declaratory judgment because Brooks failed to request such relief in his complaint and because the lease agreement permits Exxon Mobil to remove the building at issue without replacing it.

This court reviews a district court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, applying the same criteria as the district court. *Caboni v. General Motors Corp.,*278 F.3d 448, 451 (5th Cir.2002). Following a thorough review of the record and the briefs, we affirm the judgment for essentially the reasons given by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

**Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
FalconStor Software, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(numbers  333-69834,  333-103925,  333-125126 and 333-139032) filed on Form S-8,
and in the  registration  statement  (number  333-69830)  filed on Form S-3,  of
FalconStor Software,  Inc. of our reports, dated March 14, 2007, with respect to
(i)  the  consolidated   balance  sheets  of  FalconStor   Software,   Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 2006 and 2005,  and the related  consolidated
statements of operations,  stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2006, and (ii) management's  assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over  financial  reporting  as of December 31, 2006,  and the  effectiveness  of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports
appear in the  December  31,  2006  annual  report  on Form  10-K of  FalconStor
Software,  Inc.  Our  reports,  dated  March 14,  2007,  refer to the  Company's
adoption of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004),
"SHARED-BASED PAYMENT", as of January 1, 2006.

                                                      /s/ KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
March 14, 2007
```
Exhibit 4.31
SPOUSAL CONSENT
The undersigned, ___________, (Identification Card ID No. ___________), is the lawful spouse of ___________, (Identification Card ID No. ___________). I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”) by ___________ in Haidian District, Beijing, China and the disposal of the equity interests of Beijing Weimeng Chuangke Investment Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Weimeng Chuangke”) that is held by ___________ and registered in his name according to the following documents:
​
1)    Loan Agreement with Weibo Internet Technology (China) Co., Ltd.;
2)    Loan Repayment Agreement with Weibo Internet Technology (China) Co., Ltd.;
3)    Equity Transfer Agreement with Weibo Internet Technology (China) Co., Ltd.;
4)    Equity Pledge Agreement with Weibo Internet Technology (China) Co., Ltd.;
5)    Agreement on Authorization to Exercise Shareholder’s Voting Power with Weibo Internet Technology (China) Co., Ltd.;
6)    Loan Confirmation Letter from Weibo Internet Technology (China) Co., Ltd.
​
I hereby undertake not to make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of Weimeng Chuangke which are held by ___________. I hereby further confirm that  ___________ can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents absent authorization or consent from me.
​
I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).
​
I hereby agree and undertake that if I obtain any equity interests of Weimeng Chuangke which are held by ___________ for any reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations thereunder as a shareholder of Weimeng Chuangke. For this purpose, upon the Weibo Internet Technology (China) Co., Ltd.’s request, I shall sign a series of written documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).
​
(No text below)
​
​



​
	​


	​


	​



	[Signature page of Spousal Consent]

	​
	​
	​

	/s/ [name of spouse]
	​
	​

	[Name of spouse]
	​
	​

	Date:
	​
	​



​
#### Sidney Rogers *v.*P. and M. Pfieffer.

Street Improvement — Grading and Paving.

To authorize the power of assessing the property holders for street paving, grading, etc., the ordinance, and proceedings must be strictly legal.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 30, 1869.

*Barr & Goodloe, for appellant.*

W. *R. Thompson, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The ordinance authorized the *grading*and *'paving*alone. The contract went beyond the ordinance in providing also for doing the *curbing*and the apportionment warrant apportioned as against Rogers a *pro rata*part “for grading, *curbing*and paving,” as has frequently been decided by this court to authorize the extraordinary power of assessing the citizen, and giving a lien upon his property by which his property may be sold and he deprived, of it without his consent the proceedings must be strictly legal and as the contract and assessment warrant are both illegal no lien attached by reason thereof, and such was decided specifically by this court in *Milcher vs. Obst and Rupert, Mans. Opinion,*September 27, 1867.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Case 2:15-mj-01679-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01679-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/15/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01679-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/15/15 Page 3 of 3
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4810

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deductibility

of business meal expenses for individuals subject to Federal hours of service.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1998

Mr. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the deductibility of business meal expenses for individuals

subject to Federal hours of service.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASED DEDUCTIBILITY OF BUSINESS

4 MEAL EXPENSES FOR INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT

5 TO FEDERAL LIMITATIONS ON HOURS OF

6 SERVICE.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (3) of section 274(n)

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to only

9 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses allowed

10 as deduction) is amended to read as follows:
2

HR 4810 IH

1 ‘‘(3) SPECIAL RULE FOR INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT

2 TO FEDERAL HOURS OF SERVICE.—In the case of

3 any expenses for food or beverages consumed while

4 away from home (within the meaning of section

5 162(a)(2)) by an individual during, or incident to,

6 the period of duty subject to the hours of service

7 limitations of the Department of Transportation,

8 paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting ‘80

9 percent’ for ‘50 percent’.’’

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after

12 December 31, 1998.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getty
Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 3, 2004



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JONATHAN D. KLEIN                                
|Jonathan D. Klein Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 3.(i).5

                           ARTICLES OF SHARE EXCHANGE
                              (Profit Corporation)

         The  following  articles of share  exchange are submitted in accordance
with the Florida Business Corporation Act, pursuant to Sections 607.1102 through
607.1107, F.S.

FIRST:    The name and jurisdiction of the surviving corporation is:

Name                                              Jurisdiction
--------                                          ---------------
Environmental Construction Products
International, Inc., formerly known as
Ginsite Materials Inc.                            A Florida Corporation


SECOND:   The name and jurisdiction of the corporation  acquired by an  exchange
          of shares is:

Name                                              Jurisdiction
--------                                          -------------------
Envirocon Corporation                             A Nevada Corporation


THIRD:    The   plan  of  share   exchange   entitled  "Agreement  and  Plan  of
          Reorganization Ginsite  Materials,  Inc.'s   Acquisition  of Envirocon
          Corporation" is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

FOURTH:   The  reorganization shall become effective on the date the Articles of
          Share Exchange are filed.

FIFTH:    Adoption  by  surviving  corporation.   The plan of share exchange was
          adopted by the shareholders of the surviving corporation on August 13,
          1999 pursuant to Section 607.0704.

SIXTH:    Adoption by the acquired corporation.  The plan of share  exchange was
          adopted by shareholders holding greater than 80% of the authorized and
          outstanding  shares of the  acquired  corporation  on or about  August
          16,  1999 pursuant to Section 607.0704.

SEVENTH:  Signatures for each Corporation

Date: October 13, 1999

ENVIROCON CORPORATION


/s/ Frank Glinton
---------------------
Frank Glinton, President and a
Member of the Board of Directors



<PAGE>


ATTEST:

/s/ George Anagnost
-------------------------
George Anagnost, Secretary and a
Member of the Board of Directors


ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. F/K/A GINSITE
MATERIALS, INC.



/s/ Frank Glinton
-----------------------
Frank Glinton, President and a Member
of the Board of Directors

ATTEST:

/s/ George Anagnost
--------------------------
George Anagnost, Senior Vice President,
Secretary and a Member of the Board of
Directors
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFIED DIABETIC SERVICES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Certified Diabetic Services, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark A. Bock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark A. Bock       
|Mark A. Bock           
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 19, 2009
#### Harvey Keith & Co. *v.*H. Elliott, &c.

Vendor and Purchaser — Deficit—“More or Less” Annexed to a Designated Attachment Claim of Third Person — Burden of Proof.

Appellant sued out an attachment and had it levied on an undivided interest in a store, as the property of Z. Elliott, who' was in the possession of the goods and managing the business. Appellee claimed to be the owner of the goods, and made himself a party to the suit. Held, that the burden of proof was on him.

APPEAL FROM BALLARD CIRCUIT COURT.

February 24, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Appellant sued an attachment out of chancery and had it levied on an undivided interest in a store as the property of Z. Elliott, who was in the ostensible possession of the goods, and managing the business.

Appellee claimed to be the owner and presented his petition and became a party to the suit.

Upon the issue out of chancery he held the affirmative and on his failure to establish his ownership, the goods being found in Z. Elliott’s ostensible possession, should have been subjected to his indebtedness. Henry Elliott could only take them out of the sheriff’s possession by establishing his claim, hence, upon this issue the court properly held that he had the affirmative.

*628*White, Bigger & Moss, for appellants.*

*Turner, Bullock, for appellees.*

The jury having found the title of the goods in Henry Elliott, and that they were his and not his father’s, we cannot disturb the finding upon the weight of the evidence unless it greatly preponderated against the verdict, whereas in this case its weight goes to uphold the finding.

The questions propounded to the witness Utterback, and desired to be answered were as to matters which occurred in Henry Elliott’s absence and therefore not competent unless grounds had been laid in the examination of Z. Elliott when as contradictory to his statements it might have been admitted.

The facts were competent and were stated, what Z. Elliott said in Henry Elliott’s absence could not be admitted as evidence save to contradict *71.*Elliott’s statements as a witness, and no grounds were laid for this.

The court therefore did not err in refusing to let the question be answered. '

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25163]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, Office of Public Health 
Preparedness and Response, Board of Scientific Counselors (BSC, OPHPR); 
Notice of Meeting Cancellation

    Cancellation: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
September 23, 2014, Volume 79, Number 184, page 56806. The meeting 
previously scheduled to convene on October 27-28, 2014, has been 
cancelled.
    Contact Person for More Information: Christye Brown, BSC 
Coordinator, Office of Science and Public Health Practice, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop D-44, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-7957; Facsimile: (404) 
639-7977; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90dfc0d8c0c2bed2c3d3bec1e5f5e3e4f9fffee3d0f3f4f3bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eda2bda5bdbfc3afbeaec3bc98889e998482839ead8e898ec38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Claudette Grant,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2014-25163 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 473

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to prohibit nonparty

multicandidate political committee contributions in elections for Federal

office, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. GILCHREST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

prohibit nonparty multicandidate political committee contributions in elections for Federal office, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 473 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS BY

2 NONPARTY MULTICANDIDATE POLITICAL

3 COMMITTEES IN ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL

4 OFFICE.

5 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

6 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end

7 the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(i)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this

9 Act, no nonparty multicandidate political committee may

10 make any contribution to a candidate for Federal office.

11 ‘‘(2) As used in this subsection, the term ‘multican12 didate political committee’ has the meaning given that

13 term in subsection (a)(4).’’.

14 SEC. 2. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTION PROHIBI15 TION OF CONTRIBUTIONS FROM INDIVIDUAL

16 NONRESIDENTS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL

17 DISTRICT.

18 Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act

19 of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a), as amended by section 1, is fur20 ther amended by adding at the end the following new sub21 section:

22 ‘‘(j) A candidate for the office of Representative in,

23 or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress

24 may not accept contributions from an individual who is

25 not a resident of the congressional district involved.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            OF INTEGRITY MEDIA, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Integrity Media, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, P.
Michael Coleman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                 /s/ P. Michael Coleman
------------------------------------------------------------
   P. Michael Coleman
   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
   (Chief Executive Officer)




Date: March 25, 2003


                                       62