Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 64117 

Safety and effectiveness have not been 

established in veal calves. A withdrawal 

period has not been established for this 

product in preruminating calves. Do not 

use in calves to be processed for veal. 

(ii) [Reserved] 

PART 524—OPHTHALMIC AND 

TOPICAL DOSAGE FORM NEW 

ANIMAL DRUGS 

■ 11. The authority citation for 21 CFR 

part 524 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. 

§ 524.1580a [Amended] 

■ 12. In paragraph (b)(1) of § 524.1580a, 

remove ‘‘Nos. 050749, 054628, 054925, 

058005, and 061623’’ and add in its 

place ‘‘Nos. 054628, 054925, 058005, 

059051, and 061623’’. 

§ 524.1580b [Amended] 

■ 13. In paragraph (b) of § 524.1580b, 

remove ‘‘No. 054628’’ and in its place 

add ‘‘Nos. 054628 and 059051’’. 

PART 556—TOLERANCES FOR 

RESIDUES OF NEW ANIMAL DRUGS 

IN FOOD 

■ 14. The authority citation for 21 CFR 

part 556 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 342, 360b, 371. 

■ 15. In § 556.344, revise paragraphs (a), 

(b)(1)(i), and (b)(2)(ii); and add 

paragraph (c) to read as follows: 

§ 556.344 Ivermectin. 

(a) Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI). The 

ADI for total residues of ivermectin is 5 

micrograms per kilogram of body weight 

per day. 

(b) * * * 

(1) * * * 

(i) Cattle. 1.6 parts per million. 

(2) * * * 

(ii) Cattle. 650 parts per billion. 

(c) Related conditions of use. See 

§§ 520.1192, 520.1195, 520.1197, 

522.1192, 522.1193, 524.1193, and 

558.300 of this chapter. 

Dated: October 23, 2014. 

Bernadette Dunham, 

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25588 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4164–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2014–0747] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Allegheny River; Mile 

45.7; Kittanning, PA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary safety zone on 

the Allegheny River at mile 45.7. This 

safety zone is needed to protect vessels 

transiting the area and event spectators 

from the hazards associated with a 

barge-based fireworks display. Entry 

into this zone is prohibited unless 

specifically authorized by the Captain of 

the Port (COTP) Pittsburgh or a 

designated representative. 

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 

p.m. until 10:00 p.m. on November 21, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in 

this preamble are part of docket USCG– 

2014–0747. To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to http://

www.regulations.gov, type the docket 

number in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety 

Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard, at 

telephone 412–644–5808, email 

Jennifer.L.Haggins@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Cheryl F. 

Collins, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

A. Regulatory History and Information 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary final rule without prior 

notice and opportunity to comment 

pursuant to authority under section 4(a) 

of the Administrative Procedure Act 

(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not using the 

NPRM process. Upon receiving notice of 

this display and after full review of the 

event information and location, the 

Coast Guard determined that a safety 

zone is necessary. Delaying this rule by 

completing the full NPRM process 

would unnecessarily delay the safety 

zone and be contrary to public interest 

because the safety zone is needed to 

protect transiting vessels, spectators, 

and the personnel involved in the 

display from the hazards associated 

with fireworks displays taking place 

over the waterway. Completing the full 

NPRM process could also unnecessarily 

delay the locally advertised and 

planned event and possibly interfere 

with contractual obligations. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 

Guard finds that good cause exists for 

making this temporary rule effective less 

than 30 days after publication in the 

Federal Register for the same reasons 

discussed in the preceding paragraph, 

waiting for a 30 day notice period to run 

would be impracticable and contrary to 

the public interest. 

B. Basis and Purpose 

On November 21, 2014, as a part of 

Light Up Night, Downtown Kittanning 

Inc. will sponsor a barge-based 

fireworks display. The display will take 

place in the vicinity of mile 45.7 on the 

Allegheny River. This event presents 

safety hazards for spectators and vessels 

navigating in the area, and therefore a 

safety zone is needed to protect persons 

and property from the hazards 

associated with a fireworks display over 

the waterway. 

The legal basis and authorities for this 

rule are found in 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 

U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 

U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 

6.04–6, and 160.5; Public Law 107–295, 

116 Stat. 2064; and Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 

0170.1, which collectively authorize the 

Coast Guard to establish and define 

regulatory safety zones. 

C. Discussion of the Final Rule 

The Coast Guard is establishing a 

safety zone for all waters of the 

Allegheny River, mile 45.7, extending 

the entire width of the river. Entry into 

this zone is prohibited to all vessels and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
64118 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

persons except persons and vessels 

specifically authorized by the COTP 

Pittsburgh. This rule is effective on 

November 21, 2014 and will be enforced 

from 8:30 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. 

D. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 

or under section 1 of Executive Order 

13563. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under those 

Orders. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the 

regulatory policies and procedures of 

the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS). This rule is limited in scope and 

will be in effect for a limited time 

period. Notifications to the marine 

community will be made through local 

notice to mariners and broadcast notice 

to mariners. Deviation from the rule 

may be requested and will be 

considered on a case-by-case basis by 

the COTP or a designated 

representative. The impacts on routine 

navigation are expected to be minimal. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires federal agencies to consider the 

potential impact of regulations on small 

entities during rulemaking. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule will affect the following 

entities, some of which may be small 

entities: The owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the 

Allegheny River, mile 45.7 from 8:30 

p.m. until 10:00 p.m. on November 21, 

2014. This safety zone will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

because this rule is limited in scope and 

will be in effect for a limited time 

period. Additionally, notifications to the 

marine community will be made 

through BNMs, LNMs, and contacting 

local industry that could be operating in 

the area during the event so that they 

may plan around the scheduled event. 

Deviation from the rule may be 

requested and will be considered on a 

case-by-case basis by the COTP 

Pittsburgh or a designated 

representative. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT, above. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

determined that this rule does not have 

implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT, section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not cause a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 28, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 64119 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule establishes a 

safety zone for waters of the Allegheny 

River, from mile 45.7. This rule is 

categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph 34(g) of figure 

2–1 of the Commandant Instruction an 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination and a 

Categorical Exclusion Determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR Part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C., 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. A new temporary § 165.T08–0747 is 

added to read as follows: 

§ 165.T08–0747 Safety Zone; Allegheny 

River, Mile 45.7, Kittanning, PA. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All waters of the Allegheny 

River, mile 45.7, extending the entire 

width of the waterway. 

(b) Effective date. This rule is 

effective, and will be enforced through 

actual notice, from 8:30 p.m. until 10:00 

p.m. on November 21, 2014. 

(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with 

the general regulations in § 165.23, entry 

into this zone is prohibited unless 

authorized by the COTP Pittsburgh or a 

designated representative. 

(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry 

into or passage through the zone must 

request permission from the COTP 

Pittsburgh or a designated 

representative. The COTP Pittsburgh 

representative may be contacted at 412– 

644–5808. 

(3) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

COTP Pittsburgh or their designated 

representative. Designated COTP 

representatives include United States 

Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, 

and petty officers. 

(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP 

Pittsburgh or a designated 

representative will inform the public 

through broadcast notices to mariners of 

the enforcement period for the safety 

zone as well as any changes in the 

planned schedule. 

Dated: September 30, 2014. 

L.N. Weaver, 

Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of 

the Port Pittsburgh. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25615 Filed 10–27–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2014–0385; FRL–9917–92– 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; 

Ohio PM2.5 NSR 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving, under the 

Clean Air Act (CAA), revisions to Ohio’s 

state implementation plan (SIP) as 

requested by the Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency (OEPA) to EPA on 

June 19, 2014. The revisions to Ohio’s 

SIP implement certain EPA regulations 

for particulate matter smaller than 2.5 

micrometers (PM2.5) by establishing 

definitions related to PM2.5, defining 

PM2.5 increment levels, and setting 

PM2.5 class 1 variances. The revisions 

also incorporate changes made to 

definitions and regulations that 

recognize nitrogen oxides (NOX) as an 

ozone precursor, revising and adding 

definitions, adding Federal land 

manager notification requirements, and 

incorporating minor organizational or 

typographical changes. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective December 29, 2014, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by 

November 28, 2014. If adverse 

comments are received, EPA will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2014–0385, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-Mail: damico.genevieve@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 385–5501. 

4. Mail: Genevieve Damico, Chief, Air 

Permits Section, Air Programs Branch 

(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Genevieve Damico, 

Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

Such deliveries are only accepted 

during the Regional Office normal hours 

of operation, and special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. The Regional Office official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2014– 

0385. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES