alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00065-CV

IN RE: TED EUGENE SLANKER, JR.

Original Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
2

ORDER

On June 18, Ted Eugene Slanker, Jr., Relator, filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

asking this Court to grant him relief from an order signed June 11, 2013, by the County Court at 

Law of Lamar County directing him to pay $3,000.00 per month in spousal support, and 

$10,000.00 to opposing counsel for attorney’s fees, expenses, and mediation fees in the 

underlying divorce and property proceeding. Along with that petition, Slanker also filed a 

motion for temporary relief requesting that this Court stay enforcement of the order pending 

decision on the mandamus.

After reviewing the petition and the motion for temporary relief, this Court is of the 

opinion that the temporary relief requested should be granted and the June 11 order stayed 

pending the ruling of this Court on the petition.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the directive to pay the $3,000.00 per month and 

$10,000.00 is stayed, pending this Court’s determination of the petition for writ of mandamus or 

further order of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: June 19, 2013
The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 1

the Southern District of Iowa. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1751

___________

In re: Edward Ronwin, *

 * Appeal from the United States

Appellant, * District Court for the 

 * Southern District of Iowa

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: July 31, 1998 

 Filed: August 11, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Edward Ronwin appeals from the district court&s order (1) denying him an

1

evidentiary hearing to review independently the Iowa Supreme Court&s prior decision

to revoke his license to practice law in the State of Iowa, and (2) revoking his license

to practice law in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

On November 12, 1997, this court sitting en banc adhered to our prior August 13, 1997

order revoking Ronwin&s membership in the bar of the United States Court of Appeals

for the Eighth Circuit. In our en banc order, we deferred to the decision of the Iowa

Supreme Court revoking Ronwin&s law license, and declined to hold a separate

evidentiary hearing. After reviewing Ronwin&s brief, in which he again challenges the
-2-

Iowa Supreme Court&s decision, we affirm the judgment of the district court without an

extended discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### E. W. Barton et al *v.*Eliz. C. Ingels et al.

Parent and Child — Retention of Infant’s Estate for Necessaries, Board and. Clothing — Creditors.

The mother has a right to retain so much of her infant child’s estate for her full'and reasonable indemnity for his board, clothing and tuition during his minority as! against his creditors.

APPEAL FROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 1, 1869.

Davis, *for appellants.*

*Prall, for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

As against bis creditors, the mother of Charles Ingels had a right to retain so much of his estate as might be necessary for her full and reasonable indemnity for his board, clothing and tuition during his minority, and her care and actual expenditures since.

Her charge for board, etc., includes some time when she did not board him, and is apparently high when he lived with her.

His interest in the slave and houses and lots, and her profits thereon, and his watch and horse and buggy apparently reimbursed her at his death, leaving a surplus to the extent of his checks in her favor; and, deducting her *post mortem*expenditures from that residue, a balance equal at least to the debts due by him to his appellant creditors would remain in her hands to their use.

Wherefore, the judgment dismissing their petitions is reversed, and the cause remanded for a proper decree in their favor.
#### LUIS A. SANCHEZ, ET AL. v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

May 8, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Senior Program Analyst Ronnie Adams","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FmGczU0rj6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/senior-program-analyst-ronnie-adams\/\">Senior Program Analyst Ronnie Adams<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/senior-program-analyst-ronnie-adams\/embed\/#?secret=FmGczU0rj6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Senior Program Analyst Ronnie Adams” — NASA\" data-secret=\"FmGczU0rj6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/ksc-20221128-ph-kls01_0045.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Patrick D. Lynch, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Midland Funding LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-02038-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 The Court having reviewed the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 11), 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED dismissing this action in its entirety, with prejudice, 

each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 IT IS FINALLY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this 

action. 

 Dated this 28th day of December, 2015. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-02038-DJH Document 12 Filed 12/28/15 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Samuel Ward, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-50162-PHX-SPL

DETENTION ORDER 

 On May 10, 2016, defendant, Samuel Ward, appeared before this Court on a 

petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the information 

provided to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining whether the 

defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed 

on supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition 

to revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 11th day of May, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cr-50162-SPL Document 6 Filed 05/11/16 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ivy N. Albright","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/inalbrig\/","title":"Orion Splashdown","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Izi0zIChjg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ksc-20221211-ph-kls01-0009\/\">Orion Splashdown<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ksc-20221211-ph-kls01-0009\/embed\/#?secret=Izi0zIChjg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Orion Splashdown” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Izi0zIChjg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-20221211-PH-KLS01-0009\/KSC-20221211-PH-KLS01-0009~large.jpg?w=600&h=1920&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1920}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jason Costa","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jason-p-costanasa-gov\/","title":"Kennedy Space Center’s NASA Causeway Bridge Construction","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"P1WEQPqMqT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/kennedy-space-centers-nasa-causeway-bridge-construction\/\">Kennedy Space Center’s NASA Causeway Bridge Construction<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/kennedy-space-centers-nasa-causeway-bridge-construction\/embed\/#?secret=P1WEQPqMqT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Kennedy Space Center’s NASA Causeway Bridge Construction” — NASA\" data-secret=\"P1WEQPqMqT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-20231127-PH_JBP01-0068\/KSC-20231127-PH_JBP01-0068~large.jpg?w=600&h=1440&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1440}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"A Story for Axel: Big Ideas for Better Air Mobility with Drones of all Sizes","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"V38Q754qGd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/a-story-for-axel-big-ideas-for-better-air-mobility-with-drones-of-all-sizes\/\">A Story for Axel: Big Ideas for Better Air Mobility with Drones of all Sizes<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/a-story-for-axel-big-ideas-for-better-air-mobility-with-drones-of-all-sizes\/embed\/#?secret=V38Q754qGd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Story for Axel: Big Ideas for Better Air Mobility with Drones of all Sizes” — NASA\" data-secret=\"V38Q754qGd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/envision-future-v4-blue-0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 24(c)

                                CASE CORPORATION

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  CASE CORPORATION ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K



     The undersigned, in his capacity as a Director of Case Corporation, does
hereby appoint Theodore R. French, Richard S. Brennan and Kevin J. Hallagan, and
each of them, severally, his true and lawful attorneys, or attorney, to execute
in his name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director of said Corporation,
an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, and
any and all amendments to said Annual Report and to the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and all instruments necessary
or incidental in connection therewith, and to file the same with the Securities
and Exchange Commission.  Each of such attorneys shall have the power to act
hereunder with or without the other of such attorneys and shall have full power
and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned,
in any and all capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be
done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the
undersigned might or could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and
approving the acts of said attorneys and each of them.

     IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument on this
1st day of March, 1999.



                                                   /s/ JEFFERY T. GRADE
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 Jeffery T. Grade
#### J. L. Bottom et al *v.*Elgy Chandler.

Land — Gift of — Future Recognition — Dower.

The father bought a tract of land and directed the vendor to convey it to his daughter. A few hours before the father’s death he called on the grantor to remember his promise to the daughter. No deed or writing having been made between the parties. Held, that a direction to convey to the daughter and future recognition of the gift by her father, must be regarded as a gift of either the money or land to her. The title never being in the father, either equitable or legal, the widow is not entitled to dower.

APPEAL FROM ADAIR CIRCUIT COURT.

October 9, 1868.

Garnett, Caldwell, *for appellant.*

*J. R. Robinson, for appellee.*

Opinion of tiie Court by

Judge Williams:

In tbe winter of 1844-45 McWherter in exchange sold John Monday deceased a tract of 62 acres of land for $302 paid and $12 to be paid.

Monday directed him to convey it to his daughter Nancy, then some eight years old, who is now the wife of J. T. Bottom.

But a few hours before liis decease Monday called on McAVherter as he testifies *“to remember my promise to his child;”*no deed or other writing seems to have been executed by McWherter, but he says he will convey when the remaining $12 is paid.

Although Monday and his family seem to have resided on the land as well as Bottom and his family, yet the widow never claimed dower in it, and as the direction to convey to Nancy and future recognition of the gift by her father must be regarded as a gift of either the money or land to her, the title never being in the father, either equitable or legal, the widow is not entitled dower.

It was therefore erroneous to adjudge dower to her and subject it to payment of her debts created since her husband’s death. Judgment reversed, with directions to dismiss appellee’s petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          61,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,259
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,022
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,437
<PP&E>                                         131,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,821
<SALES>                                        214,087
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               214,087
<CGS>                                          170,190
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  201,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,653)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,729
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form SB-2 No. 333-31947, Form S-8 No. 333-53159, Form S-8 No. 333-63799, Form
S-3 No. 333-77923, Form S-3 No. 333-35662 and Form S-3 No. 333-40630) of
ViewCast.com, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated March 18,
2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of ViewCast.com,
Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K as amended) for
the year ended December 31, 2001.



                                                Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
April 30, 2002
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remy International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajesh K. Shah, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Rajesh K. Shah          
|Rajesh K. Shah              
|Executive Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer     



May 16, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Remy International, Inc. and will be retained by Remy International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.