alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Ted Drysdale, Chief Executive Officer of NexPrise, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:

      (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
      certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.

Dated: October 31, 2002                         /s/  Ted Drysdale
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Ted Drysdale
                                                Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1007

In re: HENRY EARL MILLER, a/k/a Stef, a/k/a Stefan,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(6:04-cr-00022-JMC-3; 6:17-cv-00805-JMC)

Submitted: February 22, 2018 Decided: February 27, 2018

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Earl Miller, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry Earl Miller petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court 

has unduly delayed in ruling on his successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and 

motion for bond pending resolution of his habeas motion. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue 

delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 31.1   CERTIFICATION   I, Robert G. Adams, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Health Realty, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant=s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant=s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the AEvaluation Date=); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on such evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.  5. The registrant=s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant=s auditors and the audit committee of registrant=s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant=s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant=s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant=s internal controls; and  6. The registrant=s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.   Date:  August 7, 2007 /s/ Robert G. AdamsRobert G. AdamsPresidentChief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 558 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 558

   To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first amendment 
                    rights, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 1997

Ms. Slaughter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect first amendment 
                    rights, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Women's Right To Know Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

    Title XI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
    ``Sec. 1107. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
governmental authority shall in or through any program or activity, 
administered or assisted by such authority, that provides health care 
services or information, limit the right of any person to provide, or 
the right of any person to receive, nonfraudulent information about the 
availability of reproductive health care services, including family 
planning, prenatal care, adoption, and abortion services.
    ``(b) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `governmental authority' means any authority 
        of any State or of the United States; and
            ``(2) the term `State' includes the District of Columbia, 
        Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the 
        United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Catlett *v.*M’Dowell.

In error.

Friday, June 8.

ASSUMPSIT on a promissory note dated the fourth of *January,*1836, and payable or. year after date. Pleas, 1. The general issue. 2. That the note was given for a part of the consideration of a tract of land, which the plaintiff was to convey to the defendant, free from incumbrances, on the day and year aforesaid, but which he had not so conveyed. 3. Similar to the second. 4. Similar to the second, except that it states that the land was to be conveyed in fee-simple, by a good and sufficient deed of conveyance with the usual covenant of general warranty, and that it had not been so conveyed. Replication to the second plea, admitting the consideration of the note as alleged, and stating that on the ninth of *March,*1836, the plaintiff had fully complied with his agreement, by executing and delivering to the defendant a good and sufficient warranty deed for the land. *Held,*on general demurrer, that the third and fourth pleas and the replication to the second plea, were sufficient (1).

The defendant may, under the general issue, defeat an action of assumpsit on a promissory note, by showing the want or failure of consideration, or he may reduce the damages by showing a partial failure of the consideration, *Jamison*v. *Buckner,*2 Blackf. *77.—Street*v. *Blay,*2 Barn. & Adol, 456 (2).

(1)

 There was another point decided in this cause relative to the replication to a fifth plea, but the decision as to that point having been since overruled, is *omitted.*

(2)

 Accord. *Tucker*v. *Tipton,*ante, p. 529.
Exhibit 23(a)

                    CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

<PAGE>

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT

We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  into  the  registration
statement of Giant Cement Holding, Inc. on Form S-8 (filed May 16, 1995) of
our  reports  dated  February 7, 1997, on our audits  of  the  consolidated
financial  statements  and  financial statement schedule  of  Giant  Cement
Holding,  Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995  and for each of the  three
years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which reports are included  in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.


Charlotte, North Carolina
March 24, 1997

<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notification of an Open Meeting of the National Defense 
University Board of Visitors (BOV)

AGENCY: National Defense University, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing this notice to 
announce that the following Federal Advisory Committee meeting of the 
National Defense University Board of Visitors (BOV) will take place. 
This meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, November 17, 2014 from 12:00 
p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and will continue on Tuesday, November 18, 2014, from 
9:00 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The Board of Visitors meeting will be held at Lincoln Hall, 
Building 64, Room 1105, the National Defense University, 300 5th Avenue 
SW., Fort McNair, Washington, DC 20319-5066.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The point of contact for this notice 
of open meeting is Ms. Joycelyn Stevens at (202) 685-0079, Fax (202) 
685-3920 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2b1968794878c91a8d5a28c8697cc878697"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b0e3c4d5c6d5dec3fa87f0ded4c59ed5d4c5">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is being held under the 
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. 
Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 
U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
552b and 41 CFR 102-3.140 through 102-3.165, and the availability of 
space, this meeting is open to the public. The future agenda will 
include discussion on accreditation compliance, organizational 
management, strategic planning, resource management, and other matters 
of interest to the National Defense University.
    Limited space made available for observers will be allocated on a 
first come, first served basis. Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.105(j) and 
102-3.140, and section 10(a)(3) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
of 1972, written statements to the committee may be submitted to the 
committee at any time or in response to a stated planned meeting agenda 
by FAX or email to the point of contact person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. (Subject Line: Comment/Statement 
to the NDU BOV).

    Dated: October 21, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-25371 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2317 

To limit the royalty on soda ash. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2004 

Mr. THOMAS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To limit the royalty on soda ash. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SODA ASH ROYALTIES. 

4 Section 24 of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 

5 262) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘SEC. 24. That upon’’ and in7 serting the following: 

8 ‘‘SEC. 24. LEASES. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Upon’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(b) SODA ASH ROYALTIES.—Notwithstanding sub12 section (a), during the 5-year period beginning on the date 
2 

•S 2317 IS 

1 of enactment of this subsection, the royalty rate applicable 

2 to any soda ash lease entered into under subsection (a) 

3 before, on, or after the date of enactment of this sub4 section shall be 2 percent.’’. 

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Cygnus Flies to the International Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ezXA7TSUx5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/cygnus-flies-to-the-international-space-station\/\">Cygnus Flies to the International Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/cygnus-flies-to-the-international-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=ezXA7TSUx5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Cygnus Flies to the International Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ezXA7TSUx5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ksc-20240130-ph-spx02-0003orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25172]



[[Page 63393]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Issuance of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting 
Standards 46

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of 
Procedure, as amended in October, 2010, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued 
Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standard 46, Deferral of the 
Transition to Basic Information for Long-Term Projections.
    The Standard is available at http://www.fasab.gov/accounting-standards/authoritative-source-of-gaap/accounting-standards/fasab-handbook/
    For assistance in accessing the document contact FASAB at (202) 
512-7350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, 
441 G St. NW., Mail Stop 6H19, Washington, DC 20548 or call 202-512-
7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

    Dated: October 20, 2014.
Charles Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-25172 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          25,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               106,125
<PP&E>                                          36,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,431
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,431
<SALES>                                         31,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,081
<CGS>                                           21,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,160
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,153)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,880)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,880)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
1 WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

9 United States of America, No. CR-15-01881-TUC-JAS-LAB 

10 Plaintiff, ORDER 

11 V. 

12 Francis Xavier Santillan, 

13 Defendant. 

14 1---------------------" 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a 

proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant 

violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further 

finds, pursuant to Rule 32. l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and 

convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

DATED this 26th day of November, 2019 

-
Case 2:15-cr-01289-SMM Document 4 Filed 09/24/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01289-SMM Document 4 Filed 09/24/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01289-SMM Document 4 Filed 09/24/15 Page 3 of 3
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 504

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 relating to the minimum

wage and overtime exemption for employees subject to certain leave policies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 4, 1997

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Education and the Workforce

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 relating

to the minimum wage and overtime exemption for

employees subject to certain leave policies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workplace Leave

5 Fairness Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EMPLOYEES SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LEAVE POLI7 CIES.

8 Section 13(a)(1) (29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1)) is amended

9 by adding before the semicolon at the end the following:
2

•HR 504 IH

1 ‘‘and an employee shall not be disqualified for an ex2 emption under this paragraph on the basis that such

3 employee is subject to reductions—

4 ‘‘(A) in accrued leave of any type, or

5 ‘‘(B) in pay,

6 because of an absence of the employee and because

7 such employee’s accrued leave was exhausted or such

8 employee chose to be absent without charging the

9 employee’s accrued leave, regardless of the length of

10 the leave or absence for which such reductions are

11 to be made’’.

12 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

13 The amendment made by section 2 shall apply to an

14 employee (described in the amendment) before, on, and

15 after the date of enactment of this Act unless—

16 (1) an action was brought in a court involving

17 the application of section 13(a)(1) of the Fair Labor

18 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(a)(1)) to the

19 employee; and

20 (2) a final judgment has been entered in the ac21 tion on or before the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ