alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6018

ALPHONSO BELL, SR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MR. SESSION, Deputy Sheriff; SGT. ELIAS, Deputy Sheriff; MRS. PAGGOT, Nurse, RN; MR. JACKSON, Deputy Sheriff , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 01309

- LMB

- MSN )

Submitted : February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Alphonso Bell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alphonso Bell, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order s dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying as moot his subsequent motion to appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 2 8 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). Because the district court dismissed Bell’s complaint without prej udice to refiling his improperly joined claims in separate complaints, we conclude that the orders Bell seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral
orders. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 623

- 24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066

- 67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* Because Bell has since complied with the district court’s direction to file separate complaints, we need not remand with instructions to allow Bell to amend the instant complaint. See Goode , 807 F.3d at 630.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Michael R.
Zapata, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Schmitt Industries, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: September 28, 2020 |  | /s/ Michael R. Zapata                 
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                         |  | Michael R. Zapata                     
|                         |  | President and  Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  | (principal executive officer)
Order entered July 17, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01467
- CV CERGON, INC. D/B/A P RIMO'S BAR & GRILL A ND EDWARD CERVANTES, Appellant s V. CHEUNG
- LOON, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial Distri ct Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 08
- 9267
- G 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellants’ counsel’s July 7, 2014 motion to withdraw

. We DIRECT the Clerk to remove Sloan Matney LLP, John D. Sloan, Jr., and Douglas W. Lukasik as counsel of record for appel lants. Because a corporation may only appear in this Court through an attorney, we ORDER appellant Cergon, Inc. d/b/a Primo’s Bar & Grill to notify the Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, of the name, State Bar number, address, and telepho ne number of new counsel. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of Cergon’s appeal. On our own motion, we GRANT appellants an extension of time to file their briefs, which are currently due July 23, 2014, and ORDER the briefs be filed no later than Se ptember 19, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Matthew Timothy Nozie,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 Case No. CR15-01327-001-PHX-DLR

TEMPORARY DETENTION ORDER

FOR INTAKE ASSESSMENT

Defendant appeared in court with counsel. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3141 et seq. a

detention hearing was held. Upon recommendation of Pretrial Services, the defendant is

ordered detained pending an intake assessment for placement at a residential treatment

facility in Arizona or other facility as designated by Pretrial Services. Should defendant

qualify for such placement, defendant shall be released upon conditions set by this Court,

including pretrial residency at said facility, as conditions do exist which would reasonably

assure the safety of others and the appearance of the defendant. Should defendant not so

qualify, the release conditions set by this Court shall be vacated and defendant shall be

detained pending trial as there are no conditions or combination of conditions which would

reasonably assure the safety of others or the appearance of the defendant.

//

//

//

Case 2:15-cr-01327-DLR Document 12 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

The Pretrial Services Officer is ordered to timely notify this Court of the defendant's

intake assessment results, and if found acceptable, the date and time the facility will provide

transportation from the Sandra Day O’Connor Courthouse for defendant.

DATED this 28th day of October, 2015.

Case 2:15-cr-01327-DLR Document 12 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2415 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2415

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4141 Postmark Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, as the ``Robert J. Opinsky 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2004

 Mr. Stevens (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4141 Postmark Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, as the ``Robert J. Opinsky 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT J. OPINSKY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4141 Postmark Drive, in Anchorage, Alaska, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Robert J. Opinsky Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. 
Opinsky Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Artemis II Crew Meet with President, VP at White House","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OOexDnMrGU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-artemis-ii-crew-meet-with-president-vp-at-white-house-2\/\">NASA\u2019s Artemis II Crew Meet with President, VP at White House<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-artemis-ii-crew-meet-with-president-vp-at-white-house-2\/embed\/#?secret=OOexDnMrGU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Artemis II Crew Meet with President, VP at White House” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OOexDnMrGU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/nhq202312140006orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":537}
#### Hiram S. Williams *v.*Martha Lams.

Duress — Signing of Note — Testimony Conflicting.

Where the testimony shows that a plaintiff was not in actual clanger of violence or made an assignment of a note through intimidatio” or fear, he cannot recover property so given in settlement of a suit.

APTEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

June 1, 1870.

*696
      *Turner, for appellant.*

*Burnam, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The appellant was held for trial for bastardy in the Estill county court, on the complaint of the appellee, Martha J. Lams, and for the ostensible purpose of avoiding the prosecution and satisfying the complaint against him, he assigned to her the amount of a note for $600, which he held on Presby Oldham, except $50 thereof which he assigned to Col. S. M. Barnes, • to satisfy his fee as an attorney employed to prosecute the charge against him.

He afterwards brought this suit to cancel his assignments and recover back the note or the amount of it, on the alleged grounds that it was wrongfully extorted from him by means of threats of violence and intimidation used for the purpose by the father, brother and other friends of said Martha J. Lams, and for no good or valuable consideration, he being, as he alleged, innocent of the offense charged against him.

Although there is evidence, particularly of the declarations of the appellee, which conduces to the conclusion that the appellant was not guilty of the charge of bastardy which she- professed against him, and although on the occasion of the assignment of the note, the father and brother of the appellee were present, and manifested some unfriendly feeling towards the- appellant, who, according to some of the witnesses, was alarmed and apprehensive of danger from thém, the evidence on that subject is not such' as to satisfy us either that he was in danger of violence or made the assignment through intimidation or fear; on the contrary it is most probable and reasonable that he made the assignment to compromise the prosecution and avoid further responsibility to the appellee, and it seems to us, therefore, that his petition was properly dismissed.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*

As the cross-appeal seeks a reversal against Oldham, who is not an appellant, the same is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# AGENCY:

National Transportation Safety Board.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Availability of FY 2012 Service Contract Inventory Analysis, FY 2013 Service Contract Inventory, and FY 2013 Service Contract Inventory Planned Analysis.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the National Transportation Safety Board is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2012 Service Contract Inventory Analysis, the FY 2013 Service Contract Inventory, and the FY 2013 Service Contract Inventory Planned Analysis. The FY 2012 inventory analysis provides information on specific service contract actions that were analyzed as part of the FY 2012 inventory. The FY 2013 inventory provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2013. The inventory information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                         *http://www.whitehouse.gov/​sites/​default/​files/​omb/​procurement/​memo/​service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf.*                         The FY 2013 inventory planned analysis provides information on which functional areas will be reviewed by the agency. The National Transportation Safety Board has posted its FY 2013 inventory, FY 2013 planned analysis, and FY 2012 inventory analysis at the following link:                         *http://www.ntsb.gov/​about/​open.html*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions regarding the service contract inventory should be directed to Christopher Blumberg, Deputy Director, Office of Administration, NTSB at 202-314-6102 or                         *christopher.blumbeg@ntsb.gov.*

Dated: October 21, 2014.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2014-25407 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 15","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JA4dnUu5wU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-15\/\">Expedition 15<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-15\/embed\/#?secret=JA4dnUu5wU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 15” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JA4dnUu5wU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/exp15-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"Watch the Latest Episodes of HERA Groundlinks","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"S5ynmb7P1Q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/watch-the-latest-episodes-of-hera-groundlinks\/\">Watch the Latest Episodes of HERA Groundlinks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/watch-the-latest-episodes-of-hera-groundlinks\/embed\/#?secret=S5ynmb7P1Q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Watch the Latest Episodes of HERA Groundlinks” — NASA\" data-secret=\"S5ynmb7P1Q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/hera.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                              AMENDED AND RESTATED
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

        NexPrise, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
does hereby certify as follows:

        1. The undersigned hereby certifies that this amendment to the Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation has been duly
adopted in accordance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware:

        RESOLVED: That the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
shall be amended, effective as of 8:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Monday,
April 22, 2002 (the "Effective Date"), to effect a one-for-fifteen (1-for-15)
reverse stock split;

        RESOLVED FURTHER: That to effect such reverse stock split, paragraph (A)
of Article FOURTH of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation shall be amended to read as follows:

        "(A) The Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be
designated, respectively, "Common Stock" and "Preferred Stock." The total number
of shares which the Corporation is authorized to issue is one hundred
seventy-seven million five hundred thousand (177,500,000), each with a par value
of $0.0002 per share. One hundred seventy-five million (175,000,000) shall be
Common Stock and two million five hundred thousand (2,500,000) shall be
Preferred Stock. Upon the Effective Date of this Certificate of Amendment of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, each fifteen issued and
outstanding shares of the Corporation's Common Stock shall be converted into one
share of Common Stock."

        2. The foregoing amendment has been approved by the stockholders of the
Corporation at a duly held meeting of the stockholders.

        3. Said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, NexPrise, Inc. has caused this certificate to be
signed by its President and Chief Executive Officer this 18th day of April,
2002.


                                             /s/ Ted Drysdale
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Ted Drysdale
                                             Title: President and Chief
                                                    Executive Officer