alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"NASA Interns at Johnson\u2019s Rock Yard","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xwaPpmkiwN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52945857760-666c5484fe-o\/\">NASA Interns at Johnson\u2019s Rock Yard<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52945857760-666c5484fe-o\/embed\/#?secret=xwaPpmkiwN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Interns at Johnson\u2019s Rock Yard” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xwaPpmkiwN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/52945857760-666c5484fe-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          24,292
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               208,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    551,167
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,070,614<F1>
<ALLOWANCE>                                     24,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,980,034
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,659,030
<SHORT-TERM>                                   108,735
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             28,979
<LONG-TERM>                                     80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,330<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,980,034
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 72,317
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               48,378
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               120,695
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              60,178
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              83,466
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           37,229
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   25,728
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             112,770
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (123,451)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (123,451)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (81,707)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.64)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.70
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,500
<LOANS-PAST>                                       230
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                11,435
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   16,574
<RECOVERIES>                                        47
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               24,687
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            24,687
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,485
<FN>
<F1>TAG IS A GROSS LOANS NUMBER.
<F2>TAG INCLUDES RETAINED EARNINGS, PAID IN CAPITAL, AND TREASURY STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350),  the  undersigned,  ReiJane Huai,  Chief Executive  Officer of FalconStor
Software, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify, to
his knowledge, that:

      The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of the
Company (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information  contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

                                                         /s/ Reijane Huai
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Reijane Huai
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         March 14, 2007
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-75","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fx6dLqsOZi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-75\/\">STS-75<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-75\/embed\/#?secret=fx6dLqsOZi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-75” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fx6dLqsOZi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30211

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of Farm Service Agency, formerly

known as Farmers Home Administration,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ALVANIA DEXTER SCOTT; FRED WASHINGTON; OSBORN SCOTT, JR.;

SANTANNA ANNETTE SMITH JOHNSON; GLENDA SCOTT WILSON

WASHINGTON, also known as Glenda Wilson; MACK HENRY JOHNSON,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC 1:10-CV-997

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This appeal arises from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to

Plaintiff United States of America, representing the Farm Service Agency, for

in rem rights to Defendants’ property due to a defaulted mortgage. The district

court found no dispute concerning the government’s status as holder of a valid

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

September 13, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30211 Document: 00511600665 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2011
No. 11-30211

mortgage or the amount of payment in default. On appeal, defendants argue

that the disputed ownership of improvements to the property and the

subsequent transfer of portions of the land render summary judgment improper.

We review the district court’s order granting summary judgment de novo. 

Morris v. Equifax Info. Servs, LLC, 457 F.3d 460, 464 (5th Cir. 2006). Summary

judgment is appropriate if there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact

and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

(a). 

Defendants fail to raise any genuine dispute of material fact. First, the

alleged ownership of improvements on the mortgaged property is irrelevant to

the government’s in rem suit because any such owners would retain their

property rights until ninety days after a written demand for removal. See La.

Civ. Code 493 (2003). Second, Louisiana law allows a foreclosing mortgage

creditor to ignore any post-recording transfers or encumbrances of the

mortgaged property. See Dibert v. Marrero, 117 F.3d 160, 175 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Therefore, the district court properly granted the government’s motion for

summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-30211 Document: 00511600665 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/13/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2847 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 2847

        To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2004

 Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Jeffords) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH.

    (a) General Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 104(f)(1) of 
the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(f)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``$9,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, $10,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and $12,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2004 and 2005'' and inserting ``$12,000,000 for the period of 
fiscal years 2005 through 2008 and $13,000,000 for the period of fiscal 
years 2009 and 2010''.
    (b) Appropriations for Research Focused on Water Problems of 
Interstate Nature.--Section 104(g)(1) of the Water Resources Research 
Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(g)(1)) is amended by striking ``$3,000,000 
for fiscal year 2001, $4,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and 
$6,000,000 for fiscal years 2004 and 2005'' and inserting ``$6,000,000 
for the period of fiscal years 2005 through 2008 and $7,000,000 for the 
period of fiscal years 2009 and 2010''.
                                 <all>
```
#### MARK KASSICK v. MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP., ET AL.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification granted.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,





As Adopted Pursuant to





Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Corey N. Conn, as Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








Dated:August 13, 2009
/s/ Corey N. ConnCorey N. ConnChief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Imagin Molecular Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 559

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add

tain radiation-exposed veterans.eases presumed to be service-connected for cerbronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma to the list of dis-
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 559

AN ACT

To amend title 38, United States Code, to add bronchioloalveolar carcinoma to the list of diseases presumed to

be service-connected for certain radiation-exposed veterans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 559 EH

1 SECTION 1. PRESUMPTION THAT BRONCHIOLO-ALVEOLAR

2 CARCINOMA IS SERVICE-CONNECTED.

3 Section 1112(c)(2) of title 38, United States Code,

4 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 paragraph:

6 ‘‘(P) Bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma.’’.

Passed the House of Representatives October 14,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
S. 2742

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To extend certain authority of the Supreme Court Police, modify the venue of

prosecutions relating to the Supreme Court building and grounds, and authorize

the acceptance of gifts to the United States Supreme Court.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT POLICE TO PROTECT COURT OFFICIALS OFF THE SUPREME COURT GROUNDS.

Section 6121(b)(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended

by striking ‘‘2004’’ and inserting ‘‘2008’’.

SEC. 2. VENUE FOR PROSECUTIONS RELATING TO THE UNITED

STATES SUPREME COURT BUILDING AND GROUNDS.

Section 6137 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by

striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:

‘‘(b) VENUE AND PROCEDURE.—Prosecution for a violation

described in subsection (a) shall be in the United States District

Court for the District of Columbia or in the Superior Court of

the District of Columbia, on information by the United States

Attorney or an Assistant United States Attorney.’’.

SEC. 3. GIFTS TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

The Chief Justice or his designee is authorized to accept, hold,

administer, and utilize gifts and bequests of personal property

pertaining to the history of the United States Supreme Court or
S. 2742—2

its justices, but gifts or bequests of money shall be covered into

the Treasury.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2415

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4141 Postmark Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, as the ‘‘Robert J. Opinsky 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 13, 2004

Mr. STEVENS (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4141 Postmark Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, as 

the ‘‘Robert J. Opinsky Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROBERT J. OPINSKY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4141 Postmark Drive, in An6 chorage, Alaska, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Robert J. Opinsky Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2

S 2415 IS 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert J. Opinsky 

3 Post Office Building’’.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 10.8(a) AMENDMENT TO
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN WHEREAS, SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.(the Company) has heretofore adopted the SEABULK
INTERNATIONAL, INC. EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN(the Plan); and WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plans restricted stock unit adjustment provisions; WHEREAS, the Company also desires to amend the Plans termination provisions; and WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized
this amendment on April 18, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of April 18, 2005:  I.
    Section 4.8 of the Plan shall be deleted and replaced with the following:  4.8
    In the event of stock dividends, spin offs of assets or other
extraordinary dividends, stock splits, combinations of shares,
recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, liquidations,
issuances of rights or warrants and similar transactions or events, the number
or type of shares or other property in which RSUs are deemed to be invested
shall be adjusted appropriately by the Deferred Compensation Committee, as
determined in its sole discretion. The Deferred Compensation Committee may, in
its sole discretion, make such other adjustments to the operation of this
Article 4 as it determines to be appropriate to reflect an adjustment made
pursuant to the preceding sentence.  II.
    The following shall be added to the end of Section 4.9 of the Plan:  Notwithstanding the foregoing or any provision of a Restricted Stock
Deferral Agreement to the contrary, in the event of an adjustment pursuant
to Section 4.8, distributions from a Participants RSU Account shall be made
in such forms or forms as the Deferred Compensation Committee determines in
its sole discretion to be necessary to appropriately reflect such
adjustment.  III.
    The following shall be added to the end of Section 13.2 of the Plan:  Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of the consummation of a merger
of the Company with Seacor Holdings Inc. or a subsidiary thereof on or
before December 31, 2005, the Plan shall not be terminated pursuant to this
Section 13.2 before the expiration of a period of ten (10) years following
the effective date of such merger.  IV.
    As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                             EXHIBIT 10(b)(xxii)

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                         ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
                           ANNUAL INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN

      WHEREAS, ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION (the "Company") has heretofore
adopted the ANNUAL INCENTIVE BONUS PLAN which was amended on January 1, 1995
(the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to further amend the Plan in the manner
and to the extent herein provided.

:

      NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended, effective as of January 1,
1999, as follows:

1. The amount of "$1.5 million" in the fourth sentence of Section 4 shall be
replaced with the amount of "$3 million".

2. Except as amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. .


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
executed this ____ day of January, 1999.

                              ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
ATTEST:

_________________________     By:____________________________________
                                    Charles G. Manley
                                    Senior Vice President, Administration
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Brittany Everts, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Sushi Brokers LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-02066-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 Upon review of the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Sushi Brokers, 

LLC, with Prejudice (Doc. 110), and good cause appearing, 

 IT IS ORDERED granting the Stipulation (Doc. 110). The above-entitled matter is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice, the parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court has continuing jurisdiction over the 

matter with regard to resolution of Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees and costs request. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to close this matter. 

 Dated this 29th day of November, 2017. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-02066-JJT Document 111 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Chindex International, Inc.
Bethesda, Maryland

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-114996 and 333-123975) and Form S-8 (Nos.
333-128754 and 333-43946) of Chindex International, Inc. of our
reports dated
June 12, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and the effectiveness of Chindex International, Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting, which appear in the Annual Report
to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.

We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated June 12, 2007 relating to the financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Bethesda, Maryland
June 14, 2007