alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Allen Peterson et al *v.*S. C. Holcomb.

New Trial — Newly Discovered Evidence.

Matters set forth as grounds for a new trial, which upon proof disclosed, all seem to relate to the issue of fact contested on the first trial, are not of that description of newly discovered evidence which would authorize the court to vacate the judgment.

APPEAL FROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

January 26, 1870.

Bradleys, *for appellants.*

*Owsley & Burdett, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The allegation of fraud in procuring the judgment at law, was denied by the 'defendant and not proved. The other matters set forth as grounds for a new trial, as to which additional proof was disclosed, all seem to relate to the issues of fact which were contested on the first trial, and are not of that description of newly discovered evidence which might have authorized the court to vacate the judgment and grant a new trial. It seems to us the court did not abuse its discretion in either refusing to allow the amended petition to be filed, or to continue the cause, and no error is perceived in the judgment.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2827 

To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to create an explicit privilege 

to preserve medical privacy. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2004 

Mrs. CLINTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to create an explicit 

privilege to preserve medical privacy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patients’ Privacy Pro5 tection Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HEALTH CARE PROVIDER-PATIENT PRIVILEGE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Article V of the Federal Rules of 

8 Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following: 
2 

•S 2827 IS 

1 ‘‘Rule 502. Health Care Provider and Patient 

2 ‘‘(a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), a patient 

3 has a privilege with respect to any evidence consisting of 

4 a confidential communication or record made in the course 

5 of medical treatment. 

6 ‘‘(b)(1) A court may order the disclosure of a commu7 nication or record otherwise privileged under this rule, to 

8 the extent the court determines, after the individual who 

9 is the subject of the information in the communication or 

10 record has been provided with notice and an opportunity 

11 to raise objections, that the public interest in disclosure 

12 significantly outweighs the patient’s privacy interests. 

13 ‘‘(2) If the court orders disclosure under this subdivi14 sion, the court shall, to the greatest practicable extent, 

15 ensure that the personally identifiable information in the 

16 communication or record is redacted, and that the pa17 tient’s communications and records remain under seal. 

18 ‘‘(c) The exception in subdivision (b) does not apply 

19 to any other privilege, provided by these rules or other 

20 law, with respect to a communication or record subject 

21 to the privilege created by this rule. 

22 ‘‘(d) As used in this rule, the term ‘medical treat23 ment’ means medical treatment of the patient by a duly 

24 licensed health care provider.’’. 

25 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

26 at the beginning of the Federal Rules of Evidence is 
3 

•S 2827 IS 

1 amended by inserting after the item relating to rule 501 

2 the following: 

‘‘Rule 502. Health care provider and patient.’’. 

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"Dragon Lights Up the Night","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4KSVqfPhll\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/afs-8-101-445\/\">Dragon Lights Up the Night<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/afs-8-101-445\/embed\/#?secret=4KSVqfPhll\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Dragon Lights Up the Night” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4KSVqfPhll\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/ksc-20231109-ph-kls01-0024-orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dacia Massengill","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/daciamassengill-2\/","title":"NASA Administrator Bill Nelson at Solar Eclipse Media Briefing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gLF8XFNkou\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/53613032699-31ee249c29-k\/\">NASA Administrator Bill Nelson at Solar Eclipse Media Briefing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/53613032699-31ee249c29-k\/embed\/#?secret=gLF8XFNkou\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Administrator Bill Nelson at Solar Eclipse Media Briefing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gLF8XFNkou\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/53613032699-31ee249c29-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":460}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF IOS CAPITAL, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,478,377<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     128,515,000<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                              58,439,000<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,589,431,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                  1,865,798,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0<F3>
<OTHER-SE>                                 392,430,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,589,431,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           298,970,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            67,226,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         114,961,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            143,237,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                54,910,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         88,327,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                88,327,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F4>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDE NET INVESTMENTS IN LEASES OF $2,401,572,000 AND OTHER ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE.
<F2>INCLUDES LEASED EQUIPMENT OF COST - $110,735,790; ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION -
$51,055,000.
<F3>COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE, 1,000 SHARES OUTSTANDING. SINCE TOTAL IS LESS
THAN $1,000, ZERO IS REPORTED.
<F4>NOT REQUIRED AS THE REGISTRANT IS A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 5/31/98
AGRIBRANDS  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.  BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0001047598
<NAME>                           AGRIBRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                AUG-31-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                     MAY-31-1998  
<CASH>                           92,200           
<SECURITIES>                     2,100            
<RECEIVABLES>                    152,600          
<ALLOWANCES>                     11,200           
<INVENTORY>                      123,800          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 372,600          
<PP&E>                           340,900          
<DEPRECIATION>                   166,700          
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   595,500          
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            211,000          
<BONDS>                          20,600           
<COMMON>                         100              
<PREFERRED>                      0                
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0                
<OTHER-SE>                       333,300          
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     595,500          
<SALES>                          1,058,900        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,058,900        
<CGS>                            909,700          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    909,700          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 117,700          
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0                
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               9,500            
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  22,000           
<INCOME-TAX>                     12,600           
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              9,400            
<DISCONTINUED>                   0                
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0                
<CHANGES>                        0                
<NET-INCOME>                     9,400            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.88             
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.88           
<FN>
F1 LOSS - PROVISION INCLUDED IN OTHER-EXPENSE ABOVE
</FN>
                                                

</TABLE>
DAVID KING DIXON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 5439

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed January 15, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Virginia Norton , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo B ondi, Attorney Gen eral, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO

, WETHERELL

, and SWANSON

, J J

. , CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6679

STEVEN E. TARPLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT J. KUPEC; ROBERT D. RITCHEY; MS.

PULLER; BRUCE BOZMAN; T. MILLINER, Captain; G.

BARNES; DR. REEVES; A. TULL, Lieutenant;

LIEUTENANT HOLLAND; T. J. LEWIS, Officer;

GEORGE KALOROUMAKIS; MR. NASTRI; JOHN DOE,

Hearing Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (CA-02-3461-WMN)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 4, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven E. Tarpley, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven E. Tarpley seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion to recuse the district court judge from hearing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Tarpley seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order issued November ~0, 2012

In The 

## ( m=rt _ q p als ifth istrict l xas at allas

No. 05-12-01143-CV LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Appellant

V. QUICK TRIP CORPORATION AND CHESTER CADIEUX, Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas-County, Texas ’ " " Trial Court Cause No. DC:09-13818=E



### ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 5, 2012 motion for a copy of the appellate record and an extension of time to file his brief. Because appellant ~s presently incarcerated and is allowed to proceed without prepayment of costs, GRANT the request for a copy of the record. We further GRANT the extension mohon. We note that the court reporter has informed us that appellant did not request preparation of the reporter’s record, and a reporter’s record will not be filed. Accordingly, we DIRECT theClerk of the Court to mail to appellant a copy of the clerk’s record and ORDER appellant to file his brief 

### within forty (40) days of the date of this order.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2713

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the amount of minimum 

allotments under the Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2004

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to revise the amount 

of minimum allotments under the Projects for Assistance 

in Transition from Homelessness program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MINIMUM ALLOTMENTS UNDER THE PROJECTS 

4 FOR ASSISTANCE IN TRANSITION FROM 

5 HOMELESSNESS PROGRAM. 

6 Section 524 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 290cc–24) is amended to read as follows: 
2

•S 2713 IS 

1 ‘‘SEC. 524. DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT OF ALLOTMENT. 

2 ‘‘(a) DETERMINATION UNDER FORMULA.—Subject 

3 to subsection (b), the allotment required in section 521 

4 for a State and Territory for a fiscal year is the product 

5 of—

6 ‘‘(1) an amount equal to the amount appro7 priated under section 535 for the fiscal year; and 

8 ‘‘(2) a percentage equal to the quotient of—

9 ‘‘(A) an amount equal to the population 

10 living in urbanized areas of the State involved, 

11 as indicated by the most recent data collected 

12 by the Bureau of the Census; and 

13 ‘‘(B) an amount equal to the population 

14 living in urbanized areas of the United States, 

15 as indicated by the sum of the respective 

16 amounts determined for the States under sub17 paragraph (A). 

18 ‘‘(b) MINIMUM ALLOTMENT.—

19 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

20 the allotment for a State under section 521 for a fis21 cal year shall, at a minimum, be the greater of—

22 ‘‘(A) the amount the State or Territory re23 ceived under section 521 in fiscal year 2004; 

24 and 

25 ‘‘(B) $600,000 for each of the several 

26 States, the District of Columbia, and the Com-
3

•S 2713 IS 

1 monwealth of Puerto Rico, and $100,000 for 

2 each of Guam, the Virgin Islands, American 

3 Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern 

4 Mariana Islands. 

5 ‘‘(2) CONDITION.—If the funds appropriated in 

6 any fiscal year under section 535 are insufficient to 

7 ensure that States and Territories receive a min8 imum allotment in accordance with paragraph (1), 

9 then—

10 ‘‘(A) no State or Territory shall receive 

11 less than the amount they received in fiscal 

12 year 2004; and 

13 ‘‘(B) any funds remaining after amounts 

14 are provided under subparagraph (A) shall be 

15 used to meet the requirement of paragraph 

16 (1)(B), to the maximum extent possible.’’.

Æ
----

| 1.   | Telava Wireless, a Wyoming corporation |
|----------------|----------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Telava Networks, Inc, a Nevada corporation, which uses the trade names Local Area Yellow Pages, Nationwide Roadside Assistance and Smart Cash Mobile |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Telava Mobile, a Delaware corporation |
|----------------|---------------------------------------|

| 4.   | Telava Acquisitions Inc, a Delaware corporation |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | IBFA Acquisition, LLC, a Michigan limited liability corporation |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6.   | Local Info Pages, Inc., a Korean corporation |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alethia Jones,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00165-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Moody Law Firm, Inc.

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/18/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9778 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9778 Filed 01/25/18 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:15-mj-01871-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/01/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01871-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/01/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01871-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/01/15 Page 3 of 3
423 A.2d 1308

#### Commonwealth v. Walker, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted April 12, 1979.

John Regis Valaw, for appellant; Robert L. Eberhardt, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, HESTER and LIPEZ, JJ.

Order affirmed.
#### BJI ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUNPARK ELECTRONICS CORP., Defendant-Cross Appellant. Bji Energy Solutions, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C.F. (Jim) Chao, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-1560, 04-1606, 05-1078.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 18, 2005.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).