alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                                   MEMORANDUM

FROM: Stephen Greenberg

TO: Bruce D. Shoulson

RE: Employment Agreement

Dated: December 10, 2002

         This is to confirm that, with the approval the Board of Directors, this
Memorandum shall serve to amend your Employment Agreement dated January 8, 2001
as follows:

         1.       Effective January 1, 2003, your annual base salary shall be
                  increased to $260,000.00.

         2.       In the event of the termination of your employment for any
                  reason, other than cause or your resignation without cause,
                  you and your eligible dependents shall continue to receive all
                  Welfare Benefits provided for in your Employment Agreement
                  until at least August 12, 2005.

         3.       In the event of the termination of your employment for any
                  reason, other than cause or your resignation without cause,
                  the period during which your options shall be exercisable
                  shall be extended until the fourth anniversary date of
                  termination.

         4.       You shall report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of
                  the Company.

         For purposes of this Agreement, your failure to agree to or the
Company's failure to offer the extension of the term of your employment shall
not be deemed to be a termination for "cause" or a "resignation without cause".

         Except as specifically provided for herein, the terms of your
Employment Agreement of January 8, 2001 are hereby ratified and confirmed and
remain in full force and effect.

                                          Net2Phone, Inc.

                                          By: /s/ Stephen M. Greenberg
                                             ------------------------------
                                          Stephen M. Greenberg, CEO

         Agreed:
         /s/ Bruce D. Shoulson
         --------------------------
         Bruce D. Shoulson
EXHIBIT 32.1











Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to


Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, John G. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of REGI U.S., Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of REGI U.S., Inc., for the year ended April 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of REGI U.S., Inc.




Richmond, BC, Canada


by: /s/ John G. Robertson


August 15, 2011


John G. Robertson


Chief Executive Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to REGI U.S., Inc. and will be retained by REGI U.S., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Providing an Order of Succession Within the Social Security Administration

# Memorandum for the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

                    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345*et seq.*                     (the “Act”), it is hereby ordered that:                

**Section 1**                    .                     *Order of Succession.*                     Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this memorandum, and to the limitations set forth in the Act, the following officials of the Social Security Administration, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), during any period in which both the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Social Security have died, resigned, or become otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Commissioner:                

(a) Deputy Commissioner for Operations;

(b) Deputy Commissioner for Budget, Finance, Quality, and Management;

(c) Deputy Commissioner for Systems;

(d) Regional Commissioner, Atlanta; and

(e) Regional Commissioner, Dallas.

**Sec. 2**                    .                     *Exceptions.*                     (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this memorandum in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Commissioner pursuant to this memorandum.                

(b) No individual listed in section 1 of this memorandum shall act as Commissioner unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Act.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Commissioner.

**Sec. 3**                    .                     *Revocation.*                     The Presidential Memorandum of October 17, 2008 (Designation of Officers of the Social Security Administration to Act as the Commissioner of Social Security), is hereby revoked.                

**Sec. 4**                    .                     *General Provisions.*                     (a) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.                

                    (b) You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2014-25568

Billing code 4191-02
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          29,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,529
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,947
<PP&E>                                          75,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,605
<SALES>                                         83,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,833
<CGS>                                           51,508
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,537
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Belleville","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michelle-h-bellevillenasa-gov\/","title":"STS-103","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Nu4a9N6qDz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-103\/\">STS-103<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-103\/embed\/#?secret=Nu4a9N6qDz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-103” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Nu4a9N6qDz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/27946755301-40efb2a35a-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
Case 2:15-cr-01386-NVW Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01386-NVW Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01386-NVW Document 4 Filed 09/11/15 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01824-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01824-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01824-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 3 of 3
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1824** 

DORIS N. ANDERSON , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION , Defendant

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Di strict of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 3:06

- cv - 00399

- MR

- DCK )

Submitted : March 16, 2011 Decided: April 13, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Doris N. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Stricklin Cox, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON, LLP, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina; John James Doyle, Jr., Candice S. Wooten, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpub lished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Doris N. Anderson appeals the district court ’ s order affirming the clerk’s taxation of costs and awarding costs to the Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible er ror. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons s tated by the district court. See Anderson v. Duke Energy Corp. , No. 3:06

- cv - 00399

- MR

- DCK (W.D.N.C. June 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately present ed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4845 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4845

 To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from increasing the 
       national audience reach limitations established under the 
                    Telecommunications Act of 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 15, 1998

  Ms. Waters introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                         Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Federal Communications Commission from increasing the 
       national audience reach limitations established under the 
                    Telecommunications Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AUTHORITY.

    Section 202(c) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Limitation on commission authority.--The Commission 
        shall not increase in the national audience reach limitation 
        for television stations above the level specified paragraph 
        (1)(B) except as expressly authorized by amendment to this 
        subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jermaine Walker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwalke32\/","title":"Deep Space Station 35","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FkrnrZlv5u\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-dss-35-05\/\">Deep Space Station 35<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-dss-35-05\/embed\/#?secret=FkrnrZlv5u\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Deep Space Station 35” — NASA\" data-secret=\"FkrnrZlv5u\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/canberra-dss-35-05.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

RICHARD A. SPRAGUE, ESQUIRE AND LYNNE M. ABRAHAM, ESQUIRE

,

Appellant s

v.

R. SETH WILLIAMS,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 18 EAP 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15 th day of June , 2017, the Application for Leave to File a Brief

in Reply is granted

. Notice of Appeal is transferred to the Superior Court. Se e

Commonwealth v. Spano , 701 A.2d 566 (Pa. 1997); Pa.R.A.P. 751(a).
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Corey N. Conn, as Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 Dated: May 19, 2009
/s/ Corey N. ConnCorey N. ConnChief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Imagin Molecular Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Michael Anthony Reyes,

Defendant,

No. CR15-50191-001-PCT-NVW

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived and the detention hearing was submitted on the record. The Court 

finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release 

as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that 

defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk 

or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 15th day of May, 2017.
#### John F. Cantrill *v.*Joshua Talbott.

Frauds, Statute of — Sale of Land by Judgment of Court.

The sale of land by judgment of court is not -within the provisions of the statute of Fraud and Perjuries and therefore need not be in writing.

Same — Trust—Purchase for Another.

The agreement between Cantrill and Talbott and Mrs. Shropshire that they would purchase for her benefit is also binding on both and any attempt to convey the title to another would be a violation of the trust.

APPEAL FROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT.

June 11, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

As was decided by this court in *Watson’s admr. vs. Violett, 2*Duvall, *333,*tbe sale of land by judgment of court is not within the provisions of the statute of fraud and perjuries, and therefore, need not be evidenced by writing, consequently it has always been held competent to prove that the preferred bidder purchased for some one else, and such trust has always been upheld.

The purchase by Cantrill on the joint account of himself and Talbott of Shropshire’s land at decretal sale can, therefore, not only be proved but upheld by either, and the payment of Talbott of tlie Pollc notes for about $1500 to Cantrill on his part of this purchase, was valid and binding, and precluded him from recovering it back.

The agreement between Cantrill and Talbott and Mrs. Shropshire that they would purchase for her benefit is also binding on both, and therefore there was no necessity. that Cantrill should tender to Talbott a paper evidence of his interest Cantrill himself held not even a certificate of purchase, and until the court shall convey the title to him he has nothing to convey to Talbott, and as he asserts the title by agreement of himself and Talbott, and Mrs. Shropshire, was to be made to her, had he attempted to con*414vey or give a written assurance to Talbott that he. was to have any portion of the land, it would have been in violation of the agreement with her and a violation of the trust of both Oantrill and Talbott to her.

*Huston & Mulligan, for appellant.*

*Prewitt, Darnaby, for appellee.*

Cantrill therefore, had presented a legal defense to this action, hence his sickness and absence and the absence of his counsel and witnesses when the trial was had, presented a good cause for setting aside the judgment and granting him a new trial, and the refusal to do so, on his motion, was erroneous.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Andres D. Almeida","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aalmeid1\/","title":"X-57 High Lift Propeller Test","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SahBZ1GaDc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-57-high-lift-propeller-test-2\/\">X-57 High Lift Propeller Test<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-57-high-lift-propeller-test-2\/embed\/#?secret=SahBZ1GaDc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-57 High Lift Propeller Test” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SahBZ1GaDc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/lrc-2020-b701_p-01048.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}