alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                       657
<INVENTORY>                                     22,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,443
<PP&E>                                          49,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,968
<BONDS>                                          7,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,513
<SALES>                                         72,311
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,311
<CGS>                                           56,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,163
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    84
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

William M. Oakley,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04363-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9963 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9963 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Tabor","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/astabor\/","title":"NASA Leader Casey Swails Learns About Wildfire Work at NASA Ames","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RSyHfwcgBt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-leader-casey-swails-learns-about-wildfire-work-at-nasa-ames\/\">NASA Leader Casey Swails Learns About Wildfire Work at NASA Ames<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-leader-casey-swails-learns-about-wildfire-work-at-nasa-ames\/embed\/#?secret=RSyHfwcgBt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Leader Casey Swails Learns About Wildfire Work at NASA Ames” — NASA\" data-secret=\"RSyHfwcgBt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/acd24-0019-032-crop.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":422}
#### MEDICAL SOCIETY OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL. v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, ET AL. AND STATE BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification granted. (See 229 *N.J.Super.*128)
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.26    
  



	 	 	Sabre Inc.

3150 Sabre Drive

Southlake, Texas 76092
	

 	
 	

Tel: (682) 605-10000





[LOGO]














October 2,
2002 














Mr. William
J. Hannigan

5116 Glenview Court

Plano, Texas 75093 



	Re:
	Amendment
to Employment Agreement Life Insurance Provisions 




Dear
Bill: 


        At
the time you began employment with Sabre Inc., the Company's flexible benefits program limited base life insurance coverage to a maximum of $70,000. The Company agreed in your
Employment Agreement to provide you with a $250,000 supplemental life insurance policy through a split dollar life insurance program. 


        Notwithstanding
the Employment Agreement, the Company never provided you with split dollar life insurance. Instead, we agreed that the Company would provide you with supplemental term
life insurance. Your current policy is a Term Life Policy carried by Security Life of Denver Insurance Company. 


        On
January 1, 2001, Sabre began offering enhanced life insurance coverage under its flexible benefits program. Under the new program, the Company provides you with life insurance
coverage equal to 200% of your annual salary. You may also purchase supplemental life insurance coverage. These policies are subject to a combined maximum coverage of $2 million, with a maximum
guaranteed issue of $1.5 million. 


        These
enhanced life insurance offerings provide significantly greater benefits than the original level of coverage contemplated by your Employment Agreement. Accordingly, there is no
need for the Company to renew your current term life insurance policy on its December 14, 2002 expiration. Moreover, Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been construed to
limit Sabre's ability to provide executive officers with split dollar life insurance policies, as contemplated by the Employment Agreement. 



        Therefore,
as we discussed, Sabre will not renew your current term life insurance policy. You have the option of converting that policy to an individual policy through the carrier.
Furthermore, we hereby amend your Employment Agreement dated December 9, 1999 to delete the provision that requires the Company to provide you with a supplemental life insurance policy having a
face value of $250,000 through a split dollar life insurance program. 



	 	Sabre Inc.
	

 	

 
	 	/s/  MICHAEL E. HAEFNER      
 By: Michael E. Haefner

Title: Senior Vice President—Human Resources








Agreed
to and accepted: 



	

 	

 
	/s/  WILLIAM J. HANNIGAN      
 William J. Hannigan	 











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.26
EXHIBIT 10.10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.

EQUITY AND PERFORMANCE INCENTIVE PLAN


 


WHEREAS,
Washington Group International, Inc. (the “Company”) has heretofore established
the Washington Group International, Inc. Equity and Performance Incentive Plan
(the “Plan”), for the benefit of its eligible employees and directors; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Board of Directors of the Company has the authority under Paragraph 19 of the
Plan to amend the Plan, with certain amendments subject to approval of the
Company’s shareholders; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan in order to increase the
performance units available for award under the Plan, subject to shareholder
approval;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, subject to shareholder approval at the Company’s 2003 annual meeting
of stockholders, the Plan shall be amended as follows:


 


1.


 


Paragraph 3(f)
of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“(f)          Notwithstanding any other provision of
this Plan to the contrary, in no event shall any Participant in any calendar
year receive an award of Performance Shares or Performance Units having an
aggregate maximum value as of their respective Dates of Grant in excess of
$2,000,000.”


 


2.


 


Except as
amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS,
WHEREOF, the Board of Directors has caused this Amendment to be executed by an
officer of the Company duly authorized on this 9th day of November, 2002.


 


	
   

  	
  WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
  By: 

  	
  /s/ Richard D. Parry

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
  Richard D.
  Parry

  	 

	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
  Senior Vice
  President and General Counsel
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Form 10-K/A) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form
10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K/A.
 Date: April 28, 2006
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonJean M. Nelson
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63078-63079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Virginia Modified Pound Net Leader Inspection Program.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0559.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 19.
    Average Hours per Response: Calls to arrange meeting with 
inspector, and calls to request replacement tags, 5 minutes each. 
Meeting with inspector, 1 hour.
    Burden Hours: 70.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a currently 
approved information collection, an inspection program for modified 
pound net leaders in the Virginia waters of the mainstem Chesapeake 
Bay. Pound net fishermen must call the National Marine Fisheries 
Service (NMFS) to arrange for a meeting. At the meeting, they must 
allow for the inspection of gear to ensure the modified leader meets 
the definition of a modified pound net leader, as described in the 
regulations (Sec.  222.102). This inspection program is necessary to 
provide fishermen with the insurance that their leaders meet the 
regulatory

[[Page 63079]]

definition of a modified pound net leader before setting their gear, 
provide managers with the knowledge that the offshore leaders in a 
portion of the Virginia Chesapeake Bay are configured in a sea turtle-
safe manner, and aid in enforcement efforts. This collection of 
information will end when Final Rule 0648-BB37 becomes effective and 
will be replaced by a training (consult the April 17, 2014 proposed 
rule (79 FR 21695) for details on the inspection program cessation).
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Mandatory.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#652a2c37243a361007080c16160c0a0b250a08074b000a154b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="df90968d9e808caabdb2b6acacb6b0b19fb0b2bdf1bab0aff1b8b0a9">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: October 17, 2014.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-25107 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB filed by Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                       |  |                             |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | GREAT PEE DEE BANCORP, INC.
|                       |  |                            
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ John S. Long       
|                       |  |                             |  | John S. Long           
|                       |  |                             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |                            
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ John M. Digby      
|                       |  |                             |  | John M. Digby          
|                       |  |                             |  | Chief Financial Officer

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAFAEL BOSSIO.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Larry B. Lombard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Enova Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  controls over financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and financial weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial data; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date:  September 15, 2005

   /s/   Larry B. Lombard
------------------------------------
Larry B. Lombard,
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew G. Sculley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:  October 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Andrew G. SculleyAndrew G. SculleyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)