alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4792 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4792

      To improve the adoption system of the District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 1998

  Mr. Bliley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To improve the adoption system of the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Adoption 
Improvement Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. REPORT AND DATABASE.

    (a) Report.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Child Protective Services Division of the Department 
of Human Services of the District of Columbia (hereafter in this Act 
referred to as the ``Division'') shall report to Congress the number of 
children under the jurisdiction of the Division who are legally free 
for adoption.
    (b) Database.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Division shall establish a database listing 
and tracking each child under the jurisdiction of the Division, with 
the goal of adoption or becoming legally free for adoption.

SEC. 3. TRANSFER OF RECRUITMENT, HOME STUDY, AND PLACEMENT FUNCTIONS TO 
              PRIVATE SERVICE PROVIDERS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than September 30, 1999, the Division 
shall enter into contracts with private service providers in the 
Washington Metropolitan Area to perform the recruitment, home study, 
and placement functions of the Division.
    (b) Competitive Bidding.--Any contract entered into pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall be subject to a competitive bidding process and 
outcome-based outsourcing.
                                 <all>
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

In Re: BARD IVC FILTERS MDL No. 2:15-MD-02641-PHX-DGC

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

_____________________________________

This Document Relates to:

JAMES HEADLEY AND PAMELA HEADLEY Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-02877-DGC

Plaintiff

v.

C.R. BARD, INC., and

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.

Defendants

______________________________________

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-02877 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs James and 

Pamela Headley and Defendants C.R. BARD. INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, 

INC. through their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, 

without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 15th day of January, 2018.

THE MOODY LAW FIRM

By: /s/ Willard J. Moody, Jr.

Willard J. Moody, Jr.

500 Crawford Street, Suite 200

Portsmouth, VA 23704

(757) 393-6020

will@moodyrrlaw.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9647 Filed 01/15/18 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on January 15, 2018, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of notice of 

electronic filing.

/s/ Willard J. Moody, Jr.

Willard J. Moody, Jr.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9647 Filed 01/15/18 Page 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N C / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T A N T O N I O C O C A , A K A A nthony A l v aras, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. DWI GH T NE VE N, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 16428 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 5 - CV - 0 0 8 1 6 - J CM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

N e va da J a m e s C . M a ha n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 16, 2010 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , P R E G E R S O N , an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N ev ad a s tate p riso n erA n to n io C o ca ap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e have j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED MA R 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN C/ Res ea r ch 08- 16428 2 p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. C o c ac o n te n d s th a t th e s ta te c o u rt v io la te dth e le g a l p r in c ip le s a rtic u la te din App re nd iv. N

ew Je rs ey , 53 0 U . S . 46 6 (20 00 ), because i tconsi dere d fac t s other th an th e f

ac t o f h is p rio r c o n v icti o n s w h en itse n ten ce dh im p u rs u an t t o N ev ad a’s habi tual cr i m i nal st atut e, N ev. R ev. S t at . § 2 07 . 01 0. C oca’ s argum ent s are sq u arel y fo recl o sedb y T i lc oc k v . B udge , 53 8 F . 3d 11 38 , 11 43 -45 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). C o c af u rth e rc o n te n d s th a t h is tr ia l c o u n s e l w a s in e f f e c tiv e f o rf a ilin g to obj e c tt o the s t a t e c ourt ’ s a l l e ge d Ap p r e n d i e rr or . B e c aus e C oc a ’ s unde r l y i ng Ap p r e n d i ar gu m entfa i l s, C oca c anno tm ee thi s burden u nd erStri cklan d v. W as hi ngton , 46 6 U . S . 66 8 (19 84 ). C oca’ s l ett er , re ce i ved i n thi s c ou rton F ebruary26 , 20 10 , i s dee m ed fi l ed a n dis d e n ie da s m o o t. AF F I RME D.
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4811

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Federal Credit Union

Act to prohibit fees for using teller windows at depository institutions,

and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 1998

Ms. DELAURO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Federal Credit Union Act to prohibit fees for using teller

windows at depository institutions, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Depository Institution

5 Customer Protection Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FEES FOR USING TELLER WINDOWS PROHIBITED.

7 (a) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT.—Section

8 18 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1828)
2

•HR 4811 IH

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub2 section:

3 ‘‘(t) PROHIBITION ON FEES FOR USING TELLER

4 WINDOWS.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No fee may be imposed, di6 rectly or indirectly, on a customer of an insured de7 pository institution for using the services, in person,

8 of any individual employed by the depository institu9 tion at a domestic branch of the institution.

10 ‘‘(2) REGULATIONS.—Each Federal banking

11 agency shall prescribe such regulations as the agen12 cy determines to be appropriate to ensure compli13 ance by insured depository institutions with the re14 quirements of this subsection.’’.

15 (b) FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACT.—Section 205 of

16 the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1785) is amend17 ed by adding at the end the following new subsection:

18 ‘‘(h) PROHIBITION ON FEES FOR USING TELLER

19 WINDOWS.—

20 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No fee may be imposed, di21 rectly or indirectly, on a member of an insured cred22 it union for using the services, in person, of any in23 dividual employed by the credit union at an office of

24 the credit union where deposits are accepted or

25 checks are paid or money lent.
3

•HR 4811 IH

1 ‘‘(2) REGULATIONS.—The Board shall prescribe

2 such regulations as the Board determines to be ap3 propriate to ensure compliance by insured credit

4 unions with the requirements of this subsection.’’.

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall apply after the end of the 6-month period

7 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MACIT KAHRAMAN.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Water Touches Everything","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gKr4mZbAGz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/2024-earthday-desktop-white-4k\/\">Water Touches Everything<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/2024-earthday-desktop-white-4k\/embed\/#?secret=gKr4mZbAGz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Water Touches Everything” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gKr4mZbAGz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2024-earthday-desktop-white-4k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":375}
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4777

To expand authority for programs to encourage Federal employees to commute by means other than single-occupancy motor vehicles to include

an option to pay cash for agency-provided parking spaces, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Ms. NORTON (for herself and Mr. NADLER) introduced the following bill;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

A BILL

To expand authority for programs to encourage Federal employees to commute by means other than single-occupancy motor vehicles to include an option to pay cash

for agency-provided parking spaces, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CASH PAYMENT TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FOR

4 PARKING SPACES.

5 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the

6 ‘‘Federal Employee Flexibility Act of 1998’’.
2

•HR 4777 IH

1 (b) IN GENERAL.—Section 7905(b)(2) of title 5,

2 United States Code, is amended—

3 (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ‘‘and’’

4 after the semicolon;

5 (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking the period

6 and inserting a semicolon and ‘‘and’’; and

7 (3) by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(D) taxable cash payment to an employee

9 in lieu of an agency-provided parking space.’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Beth Ridgeway","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/angela-b-ridgewaynasa-gov\/","title":"Space Launch System Infographics","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0xeaEZGlK2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/space-launch-system-infographics\/\">Space Launch System Infographics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/space-launch-system-infographics\/embed\/#?secret=0xeaEZGlK2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Launch System Infographics” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0xeaEZGlK2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/sls-4533-icps-infographic6.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
Document

SECOND AMENDMENT TO
KBR BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN
AS RESTATED EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2010




WHEREAS, KBR, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the KBR Benefit Restoration Plan, as most recently restated effective December 31, 2010 and as subsequently amended (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to allow a discretionary employer contribution to be allocated to the Accounts of certain Participants;


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of February 25, 2021, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.The following shall be added to the end of Paragraph (A) of Article IV of the Plan:


“Further, for each Allocation Year, the Committee may allocate to the credit of a Participant’s Account such amount, if any, as the Committee determines in its sole discretion for such Participant for such year.  A discretionary allocation described in the preceding sentence (1) shall be in addition to any allocation to which a Participant may be entitled pursuant to the first two sentences of this Paragraph (A), (2) may be made on behalf of one or some Participants but not others, and (3) may vary in amount among individual Participants.”


2.Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan is ratified and confirmed in all respects and shall remain in full force and effect.


EXECUTED this  25th  day of  February  2021, effective for all purposes as provided above.
KBR, INC.





By:     


Name: Stuart J. B. Bradie    
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Frank Tolerico,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04303-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9296 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 1
#### RALPH B. FAMIGLIETTI v. GRACE GENTILE, ET UX.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachel H. Kraft","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rkraft\/","title":"Artemis II Crew, Recovery Teams Train for Final Phase of Moon Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bIX3CqYmZv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/artemis-ii-crew-recovery-teams-train-for-final-phase-of-moon-mission\/\">Artemis II Crew, Recovery Teams Train for Final Phase of Moon Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/artemis-ii-crew-recovery-teams-train-for-final-phase-of-moon-mission\/embed\/#?secret=bIX3CqYmZv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Artemis II Crew, Recovery Teams Train for Final Phase of Moon Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bIX3CqYmZv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-20240225-PH_KAA01-0142\/KSC-20240225-PH_KAA01-0142~large.jpg?w=600&h=1322&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1322}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Sean C. Chapman

Sean@seanchapmanlaw.com

Law Office of Sean C. Chapman, P.C.

100 North Stone Avenue, Suite 701

Tucson, Arizona 85701

Telephone: (520) 622-0747

Fax: (520) 628-7861

Arizona State Bar No. 012088

Jim E. Calle

jimcalle@mac.com

Law Office of Jim E. Calle, P.C.

2185 West Magee Road, Suite 125

Tucson, Arizona 85719

Telephone: (520) 293-6121

Fax: (520) 308-4781

Arizona State Bar No. 014985

Attorneys for Defendant Swartz

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

Lonnie Ray Swartz,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 CR15-1723 TUC RCC(DTF)

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL DISCLOSURE

The Defendant, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby moves this Court for 

its order compelling the Government to comply with this Court’s Order (Doc. 296) 

granting Defendant’s Motion for Disclosure (Doc. 263). In its motion, Defendant 

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 301 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

requested the .Max files and accompanying folders for work produced by Government 

Expert James Tavernetti. This Court granted Defendant’s request, directed that 

Defendant not disclosure the .Max files and accompanying folders to anyone outside of 

the defense team and directed that the disclosed files be used only for trial purposes. 

The Government has now indicated it does not intend to comply with the Court’s order. 

In light of the trial’s proximity and Defendant’s need for time to analyze the requested 

files, Defendant is requesting an immediate hearing.

Respectfully submitted this 12nd day of February, 2018

LAW OFFICE OF JIM E. CALLE, P.C.

BY: /S/ Jim Calle

Jim Calle

Attorney for Defendant

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 301 Filed 02/12/18 Page 2 of 3
3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that on February 12, 2018, caused to be electronically 

filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system 

which sent notification to the following:

Wallace H. Kleindienst

Mary Sue Feldmeier

Wallace.Kleindienst@usdoj.gov

Mary.Sue.Feldmeier@usdoj.gov

US Attorneys Office – Tucson, AZ

405 W. Congress, Suite 4800

Tucson, AZ 85701-4050

Serena Lara

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 301 Filed 02/12/18 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01357-SMM Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01357-SMM Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01357-SMM Document 3 Filed 10/06/15 Page 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Regina VENGOECHEA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7552.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 10, 2005.

Decided: March 14, 2005.

*122Regina Vengoechea, Appellant pro se.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Regina Vengoechea seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing her Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and dismissing it without prejudice. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Vengoechea has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*