alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2499 

To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site 

in the State of Missouri, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2004 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National 

Historic Site in the State of Missouri, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truman Farm Home 

5 Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HARRY S TRUMAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE 

7 BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 

8 The first section of Public Law 98–32 (16 U.S.C. 

9 461 note) is amended— 
2 

•S 2499 IS 

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub2 section (e); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(d) ACQUISITION OF ADDITIONAL LAND.— 

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire, 

7 by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated 

8 funds, transfer from another Federal agency, or any 

9 other means, the land described in paragraph (2) for 

10 inclusion in the Harry S Truman National Historic 

11 Site. 

12 ‘‘(2) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land re13 ferred to in paragraph (1) consists of the approxi14 mately 5 acres of land (including the structure lo15 cated south of the Truman Farm Home site), as 

16 generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Harry S 

17 Truman National Historic Site Proposed Boundary’, 

18 numbered 80,027, and dated April 17, 2003. 

19 ‘‘(3) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—On acquisi20 tion of the land under this subsection, the Secretary 

21 shall modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman 

22 National Historic Site to reflect the acquisition of 

23 the land.’’. 

Æ
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Brandon Michael Holley, 

Defendant. 

No. CR-15-1302-PHX-SPL 

DETENTION ORDER 

 

 On November 13, 2018, defendant, Brandon Michael Holley, appeared before this 

Court on a petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the 

information provided to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining whether 

the defendant should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 

3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 14th day of November, 2018.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6058

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BABATUNDE EMMANUEL POPOOLA, a/k/a Emmanuel Popoola, a/k/a Tunde 

Popoola,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15-cr-00277-PWG-5; 8:20-cv-00006-PWG)

Submitted: September 30, 2022 Decided: October 14, 2022

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Babatunde Emmanuel Popoola, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6058 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/14/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Babatunde Emmanuel Popoola seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Popoola has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

Popoola’s motion for bail or release pending appeal, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6058 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/14/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 64154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25499]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

24 CFR Part 970

[Docket No. FR-5399-C-02]
RIN 2577-AC82


Public Housing Program: Demolition or Disposition of Public 
Housing Projects, and Conversion of Public Housing to Tenant-Based 
Assistance; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD is correcting a proposed rule published in the Federal 
Register of October 16, 2014. The November 16, 2014 proposed rule 
incorrectly defined the term ``HCC'' in Sec.  970.15. This document 
corrects as unnecessary an inadvertent error in expanding the 
abbreviation ``HCC'' as it occurred in Sec.  970.15(a) of the rule. The 
term ``HCC'' is correctly defined in another section of the same rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Shaw, Regulations Division, 
Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 
451 7th Street SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-8000; telephone 
number 202-402-5087 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing- or 
speech-impaired individuals may access this number through TTY by 
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 16, 2014, HUD published a 
proposed rule entitled, ``Public Housing Program: Demolition or 
Disposition of Public Housing Projects, and Conversion of Public 
Housing to Tenant-Based Assistance'' (79 FR 62250). In Sec.  970.15(a), 
the proposed rule inadvertently defined the term ``HCC'' as Housing 
Conservation Coordinators. In Sec.  970.5, ``HCC'' is correctly defined 
as Housing Construction Cost. As a result, HUD is correcting this 
section by removing the incorrect language from the rule.
    In FR Doc. 2014-24068 appearing on page 62250 in the Federal 
Register of Thursday, October 16, 2014, the following correction is 
made. On page 62280, in the third column, correct paragraph (a)(2) of 
Sec.  970.15 to read as follows:


Sec.  970.15  [Corrected].

    (a) * * *
    (2) No reasonable program of modifications is cost-effective to 
return the project to its useful life as evidenced by at least one 
estimate of the rehabilitation cost of the project by an independent 
architect or engineer that is not a regular employee of the PHA. HUD 
generally shall not consider a program of modifications to be cost-
effective if the costs of such program exceed HCC in effect at the time 
the application is submitted to HUD; and
* * * * *

    Dated: October 22, 2014.
Aaron Santa Anna,
Assistant General Counsel for Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2014-25499 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          70,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  296,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               763,354
<PP&E>                                         338,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,152,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,261,131
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    135,328
<COMMON>                                         4,572
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,630,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,152,127
<SALES>                                        258,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,889
<CGS>                                          182,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,228,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,171,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,171,302)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,171,302)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)


</TABLE>
#### E. P. Campbell *v.*P. B. McGoodwin.

*Contracts*— Rescission—Accounting *for Rents*and Profits.

It is error to adjudge a rescission of a contract for the purchase of a livery stable without securing an accounting for rents and profits.

APPEAL FROM CALDWELL CIRCUIT COURT.

January 11, 1869.

*James, for appellant.*

*Lindsey, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

As assignee of Langley, McGoodwin ought to have prosecuted his action against Miller with more diligence and either thus fixed his insolvency or exhausted the security by enforcing the vendor’s lien on the livery stable and lot. Instead of doing this, he seems to have been co-operating with Miller to relieve him from his contract. Miller’s widow and heirs did not seek a rescission; and, had they done so, there was no apparent excuse for the rescission as adjudged. And, even if a rescission had been allowable, the circuit court erred in adjudging it without securing an acounting for rents and profits.

Wherefore, the judgment, in all its phases is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"55 Years Ago: Star Trek Debuts, Begins an Enduring Relationship with NASA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VKhqdJXviS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-star-trek-debuts-begins-an-enduring-relationship-with-nasa\/\">55 Years Ago: Star Trek Debuts, Begins an Enduring Relationship with NASA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-star-trek-debuts-begins-an-enduring-relationship-with-nasa\/embed\/#?secret=VKhqdJXviS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“55 Years Ago: Star Trek Debuts, Begins an Enduring Relationship with NASA” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VKhqdJXviS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/star_trek_first_episode_1_man_trap_scene_nbc.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
Letter Agreement



EXHIBIT 10.2(1) 
 
November 15, 2002 
 
Harry M. Cornell, Jr. 
No. 1 Leggett Road 
Carthage, MO 64836 
 
Re:    Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Policies 
            Our File No.:  2-110-13

 
Dear Harry: 
 
I am writing to confirm the agreement between you and Leggett
& Platt, Incorporated (the “Company”) regarding a cash payment from the Company in exchange for life insurance coverage currently provided by the Company. 
 
Under your employment agreement, the Company agreed to provide you with life insurance coverage at least
equal to the coverage provided before termination of employment. The Company had provided you with $293,332 of life insurance coverage under two split-dollar policies. 
 
You have agreed to give up the life insurance coverage in exchange for a cash payment of $148,110, less
required withholding taxes. 
 
If you are in
agreement with the terms of this exchange, please return a signed copy of this letter to me. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
LEGGETT & PLATT, INCORPORATED 
 
/S/    ERNEST C. JETT


Ernest C. Jett 
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 
 
AGREED TO: 
 
/S/    HARRY M. CORNELL,
JR. 

Harry M. Cornell, Jr.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Jennifer L. Good, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 30, 2003                          /s/ Jennifer L. Good
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Jennifer L. Good
                                                 Sr. Vice President, Finance and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       22
EXHIBIT 99.2


                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



William H.  Hardman,  Jr., the Vice  President,  Treasurer  and Chief  Financial
Officer of Delta Mills, Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies that to the best
of his knowledge:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28,
          2002  of  the  Company  (the   "Report")   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of  the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of complying with the
requirements  of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350)  and  may not be  relied  upon  by  anyone  for  any  other  purpose.  The
undersigned  expressly  disclaims any  undertaking to update such  certification
except as required by law.




Date         November 12, 2002                By: /s/ W. H. Hardman, Jr.
      -----------------------------------     ------------------------------
                                              W.H. Hardman, Jr.
                                              Chief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly Sands","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelly-q-sandsnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Retires a Research Workhorse","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"f3VycoEnz2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/nasa-retires-a-research-workhorse\/\">NASA Retires a Research Workhorse<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/nasa-retires-a-research-workhorse\/embed\/#?secret=f3VycoEnz2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Retires a Research Workhorse” — NASA\" data-secret=\"f3VycoEnz2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/grc-2020-c-00100.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":300}
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of REGI U.S., Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G.
Robertson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed the Report;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by the Report; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 3. | based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
      other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
      Report.                      

Date: August 14, 2006

/s/ John G. Robertson John G. Robertson, President
(Principal Executive Officer)

---