Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Notices 63121 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Contact Kerry 

Leifer, email address: leifer.kerry@

epa.gov, to discuss options for 

submitting CBI to the Agency. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets/

comments.html. 

II. Discussion 

EPA maintains a list of chemical 

substances that have been approved for 

use as inert ingredients in pesticide 

products. Inert ingredients on this list 

do not need further approval prior to 

inclusion in a pesticide formulation for 

a non-food use. These individual 

formulations are subject to data 

requirements in 40 CFR part 158, 

regardless of whether the inert 

ingredient is on the approved list. If an 

application for registration of a pesticide 

product includes inert ingredients not 

on the approved list, the inert ingredient 

will need approval and require payment 

of a fee in accordance with section 33 

of FIFRA, 7 U.S.C. 136w–8. 

EPA is considering removing from 

this list a set of 72 chemical substances 

that are no longer being used as an inert 

ingredient in a pesticide product. Some 

of the 72 chemical substances are a 

subset of a larger list of 371 inert 

ingredients that were the subject of two 

petitions submitted to EPA in 2006 (see 

docket) requesting that the Agency 

require that the identities of hazardous 

ingredients identified in the petitions be 

disclosed on pesticide products 

containing those ingredients. EPA is 

taking this action, fulfilling a 

commitment as described in an EPA 

May 22, 2014 amended response to the 

petitioners (see docket). EPA would 

remove from the approved list those 

inert ingredients listed in the petitions 

that are no longer being used in 

pesticide products. 

The list of 72 inert ingredients was 

generated by an Agency evaluation of 

pesticide product compositional 

information to determine which of those 

371 chemical substances listed as inert 

ingredients on the EPA-approved list are 

in use or not in use in currently 

registered pesticide formulations. The 

list of chemical substances that are no 

longer being used as an inert ingredient 

is available in the docket for this action, 

under docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2014–0558 at http://

www.regulations.gov. 

Once an inert ingredient is removed 

from the list, any proposed future use of 

the inert ingredient would need to be 

supported by data provided to and 

reviewed by the EPA as part of a new 

inert ingredient submission request. The 

type of data needed to evaluate a new 

inert ingredient may include, among 

others, studies to evaluate potential 

carcinogenicity, adverse reproductive 

effects, developmental toxicity, 

genotoxicity as well as environmental 

effects associated with any chemical 

substance that is persistent or 

bioaccumulative. Information regarding 

the inert ingredient approval process 

may be found at http://www2.epa.gov/

pesticide-registration/guidancedocuments-inert-ingredients. 

EPA suggests that pesticide registrants 

review their records to ensure that the 

chemical substances, listed by chemical 

name and Chemical Abstracts Service 

Registry Number, listed in the docket for 

this action are, in fact, no longer used 

as inert ingredients in their registered 

pesticide products. While EPA has 

endeavored to prepare an accurate list, 

if a pesticide registrant is aware of a 

registered product containing any of the 

72 chemical substances, that registrant 

should contact the Agency directly, 

using the contact listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

(Chemical Listing Inquiries). 

Similarly, producers of proprietary 

mixtures currently approved for use as 

inert ingredients in pesticide products 

should also review their records to 

ensure that the chemical substances 

listed in the docket for this action are, 

in fact, not currently used in their 

proprietary mixtures. 

After the close of the comment period, 

EPA will consider all comments 

received and determine appropriate 

action. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: October 7, 2014. 

James Jones, 

Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical 

Safety and Pollution Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24586 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Notice of Agreements Filed 

The Commission hereby gives notice 

of the filing of the following agreements 

under the Shipping Act of 1984. 

Interested parties may submit comments 

on the agreements to the Secretary, 

Federal Maritime Commission, 

Washington, DC 20573, within twelve 

days of the date this notice appears in 

the Federal Register. Copies of the 

agreements are available through the 

Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov) 

or by contacting the Office of 

Agreements at (202) 523–5793 or 

tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. 

Agreement No.: 012064–004. 

Title: Hapag-Lloyd/NYK MexicoDominican Republic Slot Exchange 

Agreement. 

Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG and Nippon 

Yusen Kaisha. 

Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; 

Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW; 

Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006. 

Synopsis: The amendment would 

convert the agreement from a slot 

exchange to a one-way slot charter from 

Hapag-Lloyd to NYK, change the name 

of the agreement to reflect this revision, 

make conforming changes throughout 

the agreement, and restate the 

agreement. 

Agreement No.: 201175–004. 

Title: Port of NY/NJ Sustainable 

Services Agreement. 

Parties: APM Terminals North 

America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT 

New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; 

and Port Newark Container Terminal 

LLC. 

Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; 

The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 South 

Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 

10591 

Synopsis: The amendment changes 

the name of New York Container 

Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and 

Global Terminal and Container Services, 

LLC to GCT Bayonne LP. 

Agreement No.: 201210–001. 

Title: Port of NY/NJ Port Authority/

Marine Terminal Operators Agreement. 

Parties: APM Terminals North 

America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT 

New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; 

and Port Newark Container Terminal 

LLC. 

Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; 

The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 South 

Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 

10591 

Synopsis: The amendment changes 

the name of New York Container 

Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and 

Global Terminal and Container Services, 

LLC to GCT Bayonne LP. 

Dated: October 17, 2014. 

By Order of the Federal Maritime 

Commission. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25149 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES