alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charlotte Robinson *v.*C. A. McLaughlin, &c.

Estoppel — Judicial Sale — Purchase on Faith of Allegation in Petition.

Appellant alleged in her petition that her husband gave her the property in litigation, and the appellee purchased on the faith of that allegation. Held, to estop her to allege or prove the contrary.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

April 26, 1869.

*Pryor & Chambers, for appellant.*

*Carlisle & O’Hara, for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

It seems to this court that the appellant is concluded by the decree under which the appellee McLaughlin purchased her house and lot.

Her petition in that case alleged that her husband gave her the property, and McLaughlin’s purchase on the faith of that allegation, estops her to allege or prove the contrary. Then, according to the *17th section, article*4, *chapter 28, Revised Statutes,*she might alienate her interest, with consent of the donor, which was given to tbat decree.

Wherefore, the judgment dismissing her petition for reclamation is *affirmed.*
##### 



CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Section 302
Of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Virbac Corporation; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
 Date: April 28, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jean M. NelsonJean M. Nelson
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### N. R. Jones &c. *v.*Pearce & Son.

Pleadings — Amended Answer as Counter-claim Piled.

Where the allegations in an amended counter-claim, show facts material to the issue, on motion, it should he permitted to he filed, it having the effect of requiring the plaintiff to verify his defense to the the counter-claim. •

APPEAL FROM BATH CIRCUIT COURT.

April 24, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

This suit was brought in February 1862 when business in the courts, if not suspended, was greatly interrupted by the Civil war then flagrant and raging, and at the next term an answer and counter-claim were filed which do not appear to have been verified by any one.

Nevertheless in June 1864 a reply to the counter-claim seems to have been filed, which was not signed or verified. Prom that time the case seems to have languished without even an order of continuance until the 20th of March 18 6 Y, when the defendants presented and moved to be permitted to file an amended answer and counter-calim, verified by the affidavit of N. E. Jones, one of the defendants, stating that he believed the statements thereof were true, and that the facts were in the personal knowledge of the plaintiffs, and the attorney of the plaintiffs could not truthfully verify, by his oath and affidavit, and answer thereto.

The alegations of the amended counter-claim, appear to have been material and the motion had the effect of requiring the plaintiffs to verify their defense to the counter-claim according to sect. 611 of the Civil Code, as amended in 1865.

And this, under all the circumstances of the case, the court should, we think, have, permitted, before trying the case, and for the error in refusing to do so judgment should have been set aside.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the- cause remanded *90for a new trial and for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Simpson, *Nesbitt &*Gudgell, *for appellant.*

*Wadsworth,*Lacy, *for appellee.*
575 A.2d 1370

#### IN THE MATTER OF PETER J. ANTICO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

July 3, 1990.

ORDER

PETER J. ANTICO of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, having tendered his consent to *60disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PETER J. ANTICO, is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent's name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"Artemis I SLS with Full Moon","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KGxYBg687o\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ksc-20220614-ph-csh01_0044\/\">Artemis I SLS with Full Moon<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ksc-20220614-ph-csh01_0044\/embed\/#?secret=KGxYBg687o\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Artemis I SLS with Full Moon” — NASA\" data-secret=\"KGxYBg687o\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-20220614-PH-CSH01_0044\/KSC-20220614-PH-CSH01_0044~large.jpg?w=600&h=1919&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1919}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANDRE COOPER.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Armando Daniel, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Andrew Saul, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-15-0452-TUC-BGM 

ORDER 

 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Under 

the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. 27). Defendant does not object to the fees 

requested. See Def.’s Response to Pl.’s Mot. for Attorney Fees (Doc. 33). Having 

reviewed the same, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded attorney’s fees of 

$7,714.84 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 

EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset 

under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). See Astrue v. 

Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 595–98, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528–29, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010). As 

such, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving this Order, the Commissioner 

determines upon its effectuation that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset 

under the Treasury Offset Program, fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney, 

Blair Ariel Feldman. If, however, there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Treasury Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check 

made out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiff’s attorney, Blair Ariel Feldman. 

 Dated this 20th day of August, 2019.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Bailey G. Light","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/blight\/","title":"Going Beyond the Challenge for New and Continued Success","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nJ8S2VwqS7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/going-beyond-the-challenge-for-new-and-continued-success\/\">Going Beyond the Challenge for New and Continued Success<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/going-beyond-the-challenge-for-new-and-continued-success\/embed\/#?secret=nJ8S2VwqS7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Going Beyond the Challenge for New and Continued Success” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nJ8S2VwqS7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/1_icon_olympus_multi-purpose_isru-based_lunarconstructionsystem_concept-render_nov2022_for_icon_release.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Recursos STEM","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cW0TE84G42\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/es\/recursos-stem\/\">Recursos STEM<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/es\/recursos-stem\/embed\/#?secret=cW0TE84G42\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Recursos STEM” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cW0TE84G42\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/aero-stem.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":313}
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a14(a)/15d14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Kevin
M. Modany, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ITT Educational Services, Inc.;
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 20, 2014



/s/ Kevin M. ModanyChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION
  Dated: February 23, 2011
    /s/ Bruce W. DuncanBruce W. DuncanChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Dated: February 23, 2011
    /s/ Scott A. MusilScott A. MusilChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The information contained in this written statement shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
Case 2:15-mj-01734-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01734-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/07/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01734-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/07/15 Page 3 of 3
423 A.2d 1308

#### Commonwealth v. Warren, Appellant.

Submitted March 23, 1979.

Thomas G. Klingensmith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant; Ronald L. Buckwalter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before VAN der VOORT, HESTER and WIEAND, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE LIMITE.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. SERLUCO D/B/A 

CONSOLIDATED PROPERTIES,

Petitioner

v.

BOROUGH OF CAMP HILL,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 209 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Apollo 12: The Pinpoint Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vxf1JKGm0U\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-12-the-pinpoint-mission\/\">Apollo 12: The Pinpoint Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-12-the-pinpoint-mission\/embed\/#?secret=vxf1JKGm0U\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 12: The Pinpoint Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vxf1JKGm0U\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/s69-52336.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":612}
#### Andrew Scott *v.*John Pinson et al.

Parent a lid Child — Deeds—Proof of Payment of Consideration.

In the absence of direct proof of payment of the consideration expressed in a deed from a father to his son, he will be held liable therefor.

APPEAL FROM PIKE CIRCUIT COURT.

February 10, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

There is no evidence of the existence of undue influence,' nor fraud in the procurement of the deed from William Pinson to *574appellee, nor is there any evidence of imbecility, or impairment of the intellect of the grantor, certainly no snch failure of mental capacity as to incapacitate him from alienating his estate.

Dawson, *for appellant.*

*Burns & Auxier, for appellee.*

The consideration expressed in the deed is $300, and there is no evidence that the same was paid; appellee claims to have settled it with his father and to have taken a receipt therefor, but he neither files the receipt, nor accounts for his failure to do so.

In several coversations appellee expressed a belief that he could not be compelled to pay said sum on the ground that no note was given for it, but did not claim that it had been paid, or that his receipt embraced it— At the execution of the deed the grantor expressed the belief that the price fixed on the land would be paid in a few weeks, and the receipt as the evidence of Diskins, the draftsman, strongly preponderates to show was' only intended to show that whatever claims there might thereafter be set up against appellee for rents and personal estate of his father used by appellee were settled. And the non-production of the receipt strongly fortifies the conclusion that it did not, and was not designed to embrace the price for the land — and there is no pretense that the price was ever paid.

And the conclusion must be that appellee should be made to account for the $300 which is the consideration he agreed to pay.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to render judgment against appellee for three hundred dollars, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the 19th of March, 1866, till paid and costs— Which sum will be distributed amongst the heirs of William Pinson to the exclusion of appellee, after the payment of decedent’s debts and for furher proceedings consistent herewith.
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

District of Arizona

Chad McAllister and Jordan McAllister, individually

and as husband and wife; Mind Smoothie, LLC, an

Arizona limited liability company; Chad's Videos,

LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; et al.

Plainti, fJ(s)

v.

Alan Halls and Tamara Halls, individually and as

husband and wife; Course Saver, LLC, an Arizona

limited liability company; and Course Saver, LLC, a

Utah limited liability company etc., et al.

Defendants)

Civil Action No.

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant's name and address) Alan Halls, Statutory Agent for Course Saver, LLC, a Utah Limited Liabiltity Company,

1142 E. 2000 North, Lehi, UT 84043

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) —you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff attorney,

whose name and address are: Bradley D. Weech

Jackson White, P.C.

40 N. Center, St., Suite 200

Mesa, AZ 85201

480-464-1111

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

Date:

CLERK OF COURT

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 2:15-cv-02204-ESW Document 2-1 Filed 11/02/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.2




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Enova Systems,  Inc.'s,
Registration  Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-95701) and Form S-1 (333-85308 and
333-96829)  of our  report on the  audit of the  financial  statements  of Enova
Systems,  Inc.,  as of December  31,  2002,  and for each of the two years ended
December 31, 2002. Our report,  which is dated February 24, 2003, appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Enova  Systems,  Inc., for the year ended December
31, 2003.

                               /s/ MOSS ADAMS LLP


Santa Rosa, California
May 12, 2004