alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MPW
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                       734
<INVENTORY>                                      3,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,150
<PP&E>                                          50,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,390
<SALES>                                         67,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,190
<CGS>                                           45,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   119
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,071
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (741)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-53","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xSITwN75NB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-53\/\">STS-53<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-53\/embed\/#?secret=xSITwN75NB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-53” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xSITwN75NB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/92PC-2324\/92PC-2324~large.jpg?w=600&h=1920&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1920}
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **6 312** 

CLIFFORD ANTHONY JACKSON , P etitioner

- Appell ant ,

v. DAYENA CORCORAN, Warden; DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney General of Maryland , Respondents

- Appell ees .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 8:13

- cv - 00213

- PJM )

Submitted : April 25, 2013 Decided: April 30, 2013

Before AGEE and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

. Clifford Anthony Jackson , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Clifford Anthony Jackson seeks to appeal the dist rict
court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrati ng that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court de nies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have indepen dently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Jackson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the3 materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
#### Thompson and Another, *v.*The State.

In the case of a separate fine against two persons for a contempt, a joint *scire facias*against them to show cause, &c., is not sustainable.

*Saturday, December*24.

ERROR to the *Clark*Circuit Court.

M’Kinney, J.

The Circuit Court, for an alleged contempt, ordered a fine of 20 dollars to be entered against each of the plaintiffs in error. A joint *scire facias*issued on that order, requiring the defendants below to show cause why a *capias pro fine*should not issue against them. The defendants appeared, and moved to quash the *scire facias;*which motion being overruled, they then demurred; their demurrer was also overruled; and a judgment entered, awarding execution against each defendant severally.

The *scire facias*cannot be supported. There, was no privity between the defendants. The fine was against each seve*189rally, and there was, consequently, no ground for a joint *scire facias.*

*I. Naylor,*for the plaintiffs.

*W. Herod,*for the state.

Dewey, J., was absent.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.
Case 2:15-mj-01813-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01813-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01813-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/06/15 Page 3 of 3
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
FalconStor Software, Inc.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(numbers  333-69834,  33-83574,  and  333-125126)  filed on Form S-8, and in the
registration  statement  (number  333-69830)  filed on Form S-3,  of  FalconStor
Software,  Inc. of our reports  dated March 15,  2006,  with  respect to (i) the
consolidated balance sheets of FalconStor Software,  Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December  31,  2005  and  2004,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and (ii)
management's  assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial  reporting  as of  December  31,  2005,  which  reports  appear in the
December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of FalconStor Software, Inc.

                                                     /s/  KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
March 15, 2006
```
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK J. CAMPANILE.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-05304, 333-06886 and 333-77391 pertaining to the Gemstar
International Group Limited 1994 Stock Incentive Plan, 333-31074 pertaining to
NuvoMedia, Inc. 1997 Stock Plan, 333-31170 pertaining to SoftBook, Inc. 1996
Stock Plan, 333-42720 pertaining to TV Guide, Inc. 401(k) Plan and 333-96407
pertaining to TV Guide, Inc. Equity Investment Plan) of our report dated March
25, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Gemstar-TV
Guide International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A amendment
No. 3) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 31, 2003
1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOHN S. LEONARDO

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

LISA E. JENNIS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Two Renaissance Square

40 N. Central Ave., Suite 1200

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Telephone: 602-514-7500

Email: lisa.jennis@usdoj.gov

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Craig Dewalt,

Defendant.

Case No. 15-mj-08513-JZB

NOTICE OF CONFESSIONS, 

ADMISSIONS AND STATEMENTS 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.1

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 16.1 of the Rules of Practice of the United 

States District Court for the District of Arizona, that the government intends to introduce 

and use at trial certain confessions, admissions and statements made by the defendant 

relevant to the matters made issue in this case. See, United States v. Hall, 742 F.2d 1153, 

1156 (9th Cir. 1984); United States v. Long, 455 F.2d 962, 963 (9th Cir. 1972). 

With respect any such statement the United States has made available to defense 

counsel, copies of law enforcement reports and audio which include any confessions, 

admissions and statements made by the defendant relevant to this certain matter which 

the United States intends to use at trial.

Respectfully submitted this 19th day of January, 2016.

 

JOHN S. LEONARDO

 United States Attorney

 District of Arizona

 /s Lisa E. Jennis 

LISA E. JENNIS 

 Assistant U.S. Attorney

Case 2:15-mj-08513-JZB Document 15 Filed 01/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this date, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the 

Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of 

Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrant: 

Jeffrey A. Williams

Case 2:15-mj-08513-JZB Document 15 Filed 01/19/16 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 542 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 542

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that military 
   reservists who are retained in active status after qualifying for 
 reserve retired pay shall be given credit toward computation of such 
         retired pay for service performed after so qualifying.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1997

 Mr. McNulty introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on National Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide that military 
   reservists who are retained in active status after qualifying for 
 reserve retired pay shall be given credit toward computation of such 
         retired pay for service performed after so qualifying.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPUTATION OF YEARS OF SERVICE IN COMPUTING RESERVE RETIRED 
              PAY.

    (a) Credit for Days After Qualifying for Retired Pay.--Section 
12733(1) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
before the period the following: ``, including the person's days served 
in active status after qualifying for retired pay under this chapter, 
which shall be credited when the person leaves active status''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to any person who qualifies after January 1, 1988, for retired 
pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, or under 
chapter 67 of such title as in effect before December 1, 1994.
                                 <all>
```
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 2:15-cv-02111-BSB Document 9 Filed 10/21/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:15-cv-02111-BSB Document 9 Filed 10/21/15 Page 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). tk/R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L E R O Y W I L L I S , J r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. W . B I L L K O L L E N D E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s. N o. 08- 56879 D. C . No . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 8 4 4 - J AH J MA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J ohn A . H ous t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e bruary16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L er oy W i l l i s, Jr . , a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct co u rt’s ju d g m en t d ism issin g h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 ac ti o n alleg in g th at sh er iff’s 

# FI LED MA R 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALStk / Res ea r ch 08- 56879 2 d e p u t i e s u s e de x c e s s i v e f o r c e a g a i n s th i m. W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is tr ic t c o u rt’s d is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 A . R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F. 3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyc o n c lu d e dth a t W illis ’s a c tio n w a s tim e - b arr e d . See C al . C i v. P roc. § 3 35 . 1 (prov i di ng a tw o-ye arst atut e of l i m i t at i on s f or pers on al in ju ryc la im s ) ; J

ones v . B lanas , 393 F . 3d 918, 927 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( “ F ora c t i ons unde r42 U . S . C . § 1983, c ourt s appl ythe f orum s t a t e ’ s s t a tut e of

l i m i t a t i ons f

or pe r s ona l i nj urya c t i ons . ” ) . C ontr aryt o W i l l i s ’ s c ont e nt i ons , the s t a tut e of l i m i t a t i ons be gan t o run w he n the w r ongf ul a c tr e s ul t s i n da m a ge s , notw he n the f u ll e x te n t o f

th o s e d a m a g e s ar e u n d e r s to o d . Se e W a lla c e v . Ka to , 549 U . S . 384, 39 1 (20 07 ). AF F I RME D.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                             508
<SECURITIES>                                       146
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1412
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1781
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4033
<PP&E>                                            1794
<DEPRECIATION>                                     312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5986
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4099
<OTHER-SE>                                         788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5986
<SALES>                                           7080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7080
<CGS>                                             2547
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    62
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1447
<INCOME-TAX>                                       230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1217
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
#### Stone *v.*Huxford.—On appeal.

ANY devisee or other person interested in the estate of a testator may have the will proved. R. S. 1843, p. 492, s. 34.

If an estate be devised on condition that the devisee will maintain the testator’s widow during her life, and the devisee refuse to accept and perform the condition, the devise is void and the heirs may enter.' *Jackson*v. *Bull,*10 Johns. 151.— *Jackson*v. *Martin,*18 *id.*34.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             443
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                      7,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,773
<PP&E>                                          33,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,988
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,588
<SALES>                                          9,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,721
<CGS>                                            6,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,754
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  92
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (10)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,877)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,877)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)


</TABLE>