alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001047334
<NAME> NATIONAL HEALTH REALTY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,764,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               94,860,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     144,615,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,575,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             244,877,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,877
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,583,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               157,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,617,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,947,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA\u2019s X-59 Stands on its Own","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SK7Qkej6Yd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-x-59-stands-own\/\">NASA\u2019s X-59 Stands on its Own<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-x-59-stands-own\/embed\/#?secret=SK7Qkej6Yd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s X-59 Stands on its Own” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SK7Qkej6Yd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/p21-201-129-web.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### Elizabeth Flanagan *v.*B. F. Thurman.

Husband and Wife — Personal Property of Wife Belongs to Husband.

The personal property of the wife belongs to the husband and is free from her control so long as the relation of husband and wife continue.

Wife’s Separate Estate — Pleadings.

It being not alleged that the money which the wife professes to have invested in the property in controversy was her separate estate nor by what authority she held it free from the rights and control of her husband, she had no rights to the proceeds.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

February 9, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

It is not alleged nor shown in the record by any evidence whatever that appellant had any separate estate, and whether she received the money which she alleges was paid for the improvements put on the leasehold estate and per the lease, by gift, by *390inheritance, or per her services it belonged to her husband. He has a right to her personal property so long as the relation of husband and wife continues.

*Riley, for appellant.*

Stirman, *for appellee.*

Waiving, therefore, the consideration of the question whether appellant could make any valid contract with her husband by which she could become the owner of property which was his, she certainly could not invest money not held to her separate use, and which in law was his, in other property and hold it in her own right.independent of him, or his creditors.

As, therefore, appellant did not allege that the money which she professes to have invested in the properly in controversy was her separate estate, nor by what authority she held it, and could dispose of it independent of, and free from the right, and control of her husband, she showed no right to its proceeds.

None of the witnesses whose depositions were rejected explain by what appellant got the money with which said improvements were made, except that some of them say the tenants in said improvements paid their rent in advance. But all they say may be admitted, and still the money might be the husband’s.

Their rejection was, not prejudicial, therefore, to appellant. Wherefore, the judgment must be *affirmed.*
#### Cynthia Bland et al *v.*C. J. Bland et al.

Partnership — Land Purchased with Partnership Funds — Error to Require Heirs to Pay Co-partners for Portion of Land.

Partnership land should be partitioned instead of requiring the administrator and heirs to pay to co-partner t.heir distributive portion of the price of the land.

APPEAL FROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

October 6, 1869.

Bradley, *for appellants.*

Dunlap, *for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

It is somewhat doubtful whether the lands bought by John Bland were paid for by partnership property. But, however that may be, there is error in the decree for partition; the lands themselves ought to have been partitioned instead of requiring, as the decree does, Johns’ administrator and heirs to pay to the co-partners their distributive portion of the price of those lands.

There is also error in the personal judgment for costs.

As all subsequent orders and judgments will be set aside by this reversal we need not notice alleged errors in any of them.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for re-partition and further proceedings.

There will be no judgment for costs. The parties respectively will pay their own costs.
EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

CNL American Properties Fund, Inc.
CNL Restaurant Properties, Inc.
CNL APF LP Corp.
CNL APF GP Corp.
CNL Restaurant Net Lease GP Holding Corp
CNL Fund Advisors, Inc.
CNL APF Partners, LP
CNL Restaurant Net Lease Holdings, LP
RAI Restaurants, Inc.
CNL Restaurant Bond Holdings, Inc.
CNL Funding 2000-A, Inc.
CNL Net Lease Funding 2001, Inc.
CNL Restaurant Development Inc.
CNL Net Lease Funding 2001, LP
South Street Investments, Inc.
Maple & Main Redevelopment LLC
CNL Funding 2000-A, LP
CNL Restaurant Bond Holdings,
LP CNL/Corral South JV
CNL/Chevys Annapolis JV
CNL/Lee Vista JV
CNL/MSC Indiana JV
CNL/MSC JV No. 752
CNL/MSC JV No. 779
CNL/MSC JV No. 857
CNL/MSC JV No. 182
CNL/MSC JV No. 1005
CNL/MSC JV No. 740
Orange Den, LLC
Maple & Main Orlando, LLC
CNL Franchise Network, LP
CNL Franchise Network Corp.
CNL Financial GP Holding Corp
CNL Franchise Network GP Corp
CNL Franchise Network LP Corp
CNL Restaurant Property Services, Inc.
CNL Financial Services GP Corp.
CNL Financial Services, LP
CNL Financial LP Holding, LP
CNL Advisory Services, LLC
Restaurant Assets, LLC
CFD Holdings, LLC
CNL RP Services, LLC
CNL Restaurant Investors, LLC
CNL Restaurant Investors Properties, LLC
CNL Restaurant Investors Properties, Inc.
CNL Net Lease Investors, GP Corp
CNL Funding 2001-4, Inc.
CNL Funding 2001-A, Inc.
CNL Financial VII, Inc.
CNL Financial VIII, Inc.
CNL Financial IX, Inc.
CNL Funding 98-1, Inc.
CNL Funding 99-1, Inc.
CNL Funding 2001-A, LP
CNL Funding 2001-4, LP
CNL Financial VII, LP
CNL Net Lease Investors, LP
CNL Financial VIII, LP
CNL Financial IX, LP
EXHIBIT
32.1



Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Title
18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
John G. Robertson, Chief Executive Officer of REGI U.S., Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The
    Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of REGI U.S., Inc., for the year ended April 30, 2015 (the “Report”) fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of REGI U.S., Inc.                                                         



|Richmond,
    BC, Canada |     |                            
|------------------------ | --- | ---------------------------
|                         |     |                            
|July
    30 , 2015       | by: | /s/
    “John G. Robertson”
|                         |     | John
    G. Robertson      
|                         |     | Chief
    Executive Officer
81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

',675,&72)$5,=21$

,Q5H

'HEWRUV

&KDSWHU

&DVH1R

$GY1R

&,91R

$SSHOODQWV

Y

$SSHOOHHV

MEMO TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT RE: STATUS OF CERTIFICATE OF

READINESS

72 &OHUN8QLWHG6WDWHV'LVWULFW&RXUW'LVWULFWRI$UL]RQD

3OHDVHEHDGYLVHGWKDWD&HUWLILFDWHWKDWWKH5HFRUGRI$SSHDOLV&RPSOHWHFDQQRWEHILOHGEHFDXVHWKHIROORZLQJ

GRFXPHQWVKDYHQRWEHHQILOHGDVRIGDWH

7KH'HVLJQDWLRQRI5HFRUGLVQRWRQILOH

7KH6WDWHPHQWRI,VVXHVLVQRWRQILOH

$WUDQVFULSWKDVEHHQGHVLJQDWHGDQGWKHGHVLJQDWLQJSDUW\KDVQRWUHTXHVWHGWKHWUDQVFULSW

2WKHU

'DWHG

*(25*(35(17,&(&/(5.2)&2857

%\BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

'HSXW\&OHUN

DONITA J COLE 2:15-bk-07045-EPB

15-2105

DONITA J COLE

MR CAPITAL, LLC

WRITTEN REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT HAS BEEN FILED

(no specific designation of transcript has been requested).

March 8, 2016

T. Gilbert

✔

13

Case 2:15-cv-02105-SRB Document 19 Filed 03/08/16 Page 1 of 1
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4790

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to ban the acceptance

of cash contributions greater than $100 in campaigns for election for

Federal office.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 10, 1998

Mr. REDMOND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to

ban the acceptance of cash contributions greater than

$100 in campaigns for election for Federal office.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BANNING ACCEPTANCE OF CASH CONTRIBU4 TIONS GREATER THAN $100.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 315 of the Federal Elec6 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended

7 by adding at the end the following new subsection:

8 ‘‘(i) No candidate or political committee may accept

9 any contributions of currency of the United States or cur-
2

•HR 4790 IH

1 rency of any foreign country from any person which, in

2 the aggregate, exceed $100.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur5 ring after January 1999.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA’s IceBridge Observes Effects of Summer Melt on Greenland Ice Sheet","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fYVMz73eEY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-icebridge-observes-effects-of-summer-melt-greenland-ice-sheet\/\">NASA’s IceBridge Observes Effects of Summer Melt on Greenland Ice Sheet<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasas-icebridge-observes-effects-of-summer-melt-greenland-ice-sheet\/embed\/#?secret=fYVMz73eEY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s IceBridge Observes Effects of Summer Melt on Greenland Ice Sheet” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fYVMz73eEY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/steenstrup.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Maria Cosme-Santos, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Corizon Health, Inc., 

Defendant. 

No. CV15-02072-PHX-DGC

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement. 

Doc. 22. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release is approved in its 

entirety, and is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties’ bona fide 

dispute; 

2. This matter is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, the parties to bear their 

respective attorney’s fees and costs. 

Dated this 30th day of March, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02072-DGC Document 23 Filed 03/30/16 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-mj-01759-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01759-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/16/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01759-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/16/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"Step 3, Artemis: Moon Missions as an Astronaut Testbed for Mars","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VB4DGAOzeB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/step-3-artemis-moon-missions-as-an-astronaut-testbed-for-mars\/\">Step 3, Artemis: Moon Missions as an Astronaut Testbed for Mars<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/step-3-artemis-moon-missions-as-an-astronaut-testbed-for-mars\/embed\/#?secret=VB4DGAOzeB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Step 3, Artemis: Moon Missions as an Astronaut Testbed for Mars” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VB4DGAOzeB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/artemis_humans_space_moon_gateway_main.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
#### JOHN CALI ASSOCIATES, ETC. v. S/A ASSOCIATES, ETC.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Ramiro GALLARDO CASTRO, Petitioner, v. *306Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74639.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.**

Decided Feb. 22, 2005.

Ramiro Gallardo Castro, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Blair T. O’Connor, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Ramiro Gallardo Castro, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal, for failure to establish ten years of continuous physical presence. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review findings of fact for substantial evidence. *Vera-Villegas v. INS,*330 F.3d 1222, 1230 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Gallardo Castro did not meet his burden of proving ten years of continuous presence in the United States. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). Because Gallardo Castro’s testimony was internally incon*307sistent and was inconsistent with the testimony of his two witnesses, and he failed to provide any other corroborating evidence for the period in question, the record does not compel a different result. *See Chebchoub v. INS,*257 F.3d 1038, 1043-44 (9th Cir.2001); *cf. Vera-Villegas,*330 F.3d at 1234 (holding that inadequate documentary evidence did not necessarily bar cancellation of removal where oral and written testimony was otherwise sufficient).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**IMAGIN
MOLECULAR CORPORATION**
 **(Formerly
Known As)**
 **Cipher
Holding Corporation**
 
 
 EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Cipher Multimedia, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick Rooney,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge: (1) the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
November 21, 2005
 
 /s/ Corey
Conn
 Chief
Executive Officer, Director
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kanitha Jones,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03641-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9136 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1