alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2742 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2742

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2004

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend certain authority of the Supreme Court Police, modify the 
   venue of prosecutions relating to the Supreme Court building and 
  grounds, and authorize the acceptance of gifts to the United States 
                             Supreme Court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 
              POLICE TO PROTECT COURT OFFICIALS OFF THE SUPREME COURT 
              GROUNDS.

    Section 6121(b)(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2008''.

SEC. 2. VENUE FOR PROSECUTIONS RELATING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME 
              COURT BUILDING AND GROUNDS.

    Section 6137 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Venue and Procedure.--Prosecution for a violation described 
in subsection (a) shall be in the United States District Court for the 
District of Columbia or in the Superior Court of the District of 
Columbia, on information by the United States Attorney or an Assistant 
United States Attorney.''.

SEC. 3. GIFTS TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.

    The Chief Justice or his designee is authorized to accept, hold, 
administer, and utilize gifts and bequests of personal property 
pertaining to the history of the United States Supreme Court or its 
justices, but gifts or bequests of money shall be covered into the 
Treasury.

            Passed the Senate September 28, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Apollo 15: Mission Details","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0zwOSnSm8A\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-15-mission-details\/\">Apollo 15: Mission Details<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/apollo\/apollo-15-mission-details\/embed\/#?secret=0zwOSnSm8A\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 15: Mission Details” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0zwOSnSm8A\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/s71-30463.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":580}
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4822

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require the improved

disclosure of tax effects of portfolio transactions on mutual fund performance, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 13, 1998

Mr. GILLMOR (for himself, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. MANTON, Mr. DEAL of Georgia,

Mr. BURR of North Carolina, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. WHITFIELD, Mr.

LARGENT, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. TAUZIN, and Mr. SHIMKUS)

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on

Commerce

A BILL

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require the improved disclosure of tax effects of portfolio

transactions on mutual fund performance, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mutual Fund Tax

5 Awareness Act of 1998’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:
2

•HR 4822 IH

1 (1) Performance figures that investment compa2 nies generally disclose to their shareholders are net

3 of fees and expenses, but not taxes, and thereby fail

4 to take into consideration the impact taxes have on

5 an investor’s return.

6 (2) The incompleteness of this disclosure with

7 respect to taxes, because it treats investment compa8 nies with similar pre-tax, but with dissimilar after9 tax, returns, presents investors with a false or mis10 leading picture of fund performance.

11 (3) Improved disclosure of tax-efficiency would

12 allow shareholders to compare after-tax returns to

13 raw performance, and would permit the investors to

14 determine whether the fund manager tries to mini15 mize tax consequences for shareholders.

16 (4) If a fund’s performance is based mostly on

17 short-term gains, investors can lose up to one-half of

18 the return to taxes.

19 (5) The average portfolio turnover rate for an

20 actively managed (non-index) fund has increased

21 from 30 percent 20 years ago to almost 90 percent

22 today, and average capital gains distributions of

23 growth funds, per share, have more than doubled in

24 the last 10 years.
3

•HR 4822 IH

1 (6) While the investment company prospectus

2 details the average annual portfolio turnover rate,

3 the prospectus does not adequately inform share4 holders about the impact the portfolio turnover rate

5 has on total returns.

6 SEC. 3. IMPROVEMENTS IN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

7 Within 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act,

8 the Securities and Exchange Commission shall revise reg9 ulations under the Investment Company Act of 1940 to

10 require, consistent with the protection of investors and the

11 public interest, improved methods of disclosing in invest12 ment company prospectuses and annual reports the after13 tax effects of portfolio turnover on investment company

14 returns to investors.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.0

               Capital One Master Trust Aggregated Data for 1997



      Defaults                                          $     821,834,503.46
      Total Collections                                    12,898,842,891.64
      Collections of Principal Receivables                 10,767,286,976.54
      Collections of Finance Charge Receivables             2,148,116,115.86
      (includes amortization of annual membership
      fees)
      Monthly Servicing Fee Paid                              160,985,190.49
      Aggregate amount paid to Certificateholders             500,105,971.99
      allocable to interest
      Aggregate amount paid to Certificateholders             606,187,489.75
      allocable to principal
      Class A Investor Charge-Offs                                         0
      Class B Investor Charge-Offs                                         0
      Class C Investor Charge-Offs                                         0
      Reductions in Collateral Indebtedness Interest    $                  0

                                      -9-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HOWMET
INTERNATIONAL  INC.  UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER  30, 1998,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                               21,306
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       136,802
<ALLOWANCES>                          5,405
<INVENTORY>                         158,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,050,397
<PP&E>                              425,382
<DEPRECIATION>                      109,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,758,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,010,953
<BONDS>                             123,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                64,153
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              1,000
<OTHER-SE>                          353,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,758,228
<SALES>                             995,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    995,715
<CGS>                               695,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       695,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     57,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   10,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     145,173
<INCOME-TAX>                         55,166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  90,007
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         90,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .86
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"X-59 Team Installs Quiet Supersonic Technologies","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cVEDNMzf1c\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-59-team-installs-quiet-supersonic-technologies-2\/\">X-59 Team Installs Quiet Supersonic Technologies<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-59-team-installs-quiet-supersonic-technologies-2\/embed\/#?secret=cVEDNMzf1c\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-59 Team Installs Quiet Supersonic Technologies” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cVEDNMzf1c\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/p21-019-01-3600x2400-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
No. 87-1503.

#### Shipps *v.*Stoughton Police Department et al.

Appeal from C. A. 1st Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a *1018petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
**CERTIFICATION**
 
 I,
Michael D. Donnell, certify that:
  1.  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Zi Corporation;
  2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      annual report;
  3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects
      the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
      report;
  4.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:
  a.
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;
  b.
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;
      and
  c.
    disclosed
      in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fiscal year that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.
    The
      registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
  a.
    all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b.
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls.
  
 Date: March 31, 2005
    
    */s/ Michael D. Donnell*Michael D. DonnellChief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2046

THERESA B. BRADLEY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CVS CORPORATION; CVS OF BETHESDA, LLC; CVS PHARMACY, d/b/a CVS Pharmacy Store #1831; MIDAS, INCORPORATED; MIDAS AUTO REPAIR AND SERVICE HARFORD CAR CARE; STEPHEN TENNANT; SHANE ROSS; SAM DOPPLER; YURIY BRONFMAN; ELENA DONSKAIA; STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY; LARISSA MILLER; SCOTT PATRICK BURNS,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:07-cv-02732-PJM)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theresa B. Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Patrick Burns, Toyja E. Kelley, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Frank Furst Daily, III, LAW OFFICES OF FRANK F. DAILY, PA, Hunt Valley, Maryland; Herbert Romulus O’Conor, III, O’CONOR GRANT & SAMUELS, Towson, Maryland; Betty Sue Diener, MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN & COURTNEY, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Theresa Bradley appeals the district court’s order

granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss Bradley’s civil

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny as moot Bradley’s motion to vacate

this court’s dismissal for failure to prosecute and affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Bradley v. CVS Corp.
,
No. 8:07-cv-02732-PJM (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Chris BiedermannChris BiedermannVice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 11, 2009
#### W. P. Smith *v.*D. H. McWilliams et al.

Debtor *and*Creditor — Duty of Creditor to Show Ownership of Property^ attached.

It is the duty of an attaching creditor to show that the property attached was that of his debtor.

Same — Lien.

One who advances money with which to buy personal property for use of a brother in business, reserving a lien on same at the time of the purchase, will be entitled to hold the property to the exclusion of a creditor of hréí brother.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

*247April 17, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

It was inctimbent on the appellant to show, with judicial certainty, that the mules attached by him were the property of his debtor, D. TI. McWilliams. The facts conduce rather to the conclusion that they belonged to his brother T. McWilliams. Confusion of dates and some other discrepancies may authorize suspicion of collusion between them for securing the property beneficially to D. H. McWilliams against the appellant as his creditor. But in this forum, mere suspicion is no proof. The answers are so far supported by the testimony as not to allow this court to reverse the long and carefully considered judgment of the chancellor. The evidence shows that the debtor was insolvent and without credit, that to enable him to try the culture of cotton in Mississippi as a resource for sustaining his family and paying his debts, his brother Samuel and his brother-in-law Newton borrowed from Hyatt $2500 for procuring the necessary outfit for that experiment; that this they did on the written assurance, the day before the loan, that the title to the mules bought with a portion of the borrowed money should be retained by Samuel as security, and though that written memorial was dated a few days before the final purchase of the. mules yet that purchase was then contemplated, and, for the purpose of the security, may have been properly considered as potentially consummated, and therefore was so treated in the written contract on the faith of which Newton and S. McWilliams became bound for the money borrowed for the outfit necessarily including the mules.

On this theory it is not material in whose name the mules were bought, nor whether they were paid for out of the borrowed money or Samuel’s own money, though it is probable that they were actually bought by Samuel and paid for out of the borrowed fund.

We could not presume that Newton and S. McWilliams would have become responsible for the borrowed money without any lien on the property in which it was to be invested. But Newton proves that they assumed the responsibility solely on faith of such security. And the appellant, who might have been benefited, can*248not be damged by sucb an arrangement, if honestly made, as the facts conduce to prove that it was.

*Bullitt, for appellant.*

*Cochran, for appellees.*

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*