alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No.05-2721 GLADEN VELEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v . JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC, Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA
The opinion of this court issued on November 3, 2006, is amended as follows: On page 6, insert the following language at the end of Footnote 6: For example, if, as a matter of stand a r d procedure, a company never advertises specific positions that are available f o r promotion or employment, it might be inappropriate to require the identification of specific positions in a job application. However, as we have indicated, Janssen did advertise the availability of specific positions if no current employees were selected. Velez's August 2001 letters were not sent in response to any such advertisement.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Lonnie Ray Swartz, 

 Defendant. 

 CR 15-1723-TUC-RCC (DTF) 

 ORDER 

 

 UNDER SEAL 

 The Court has taken Under Advisement the Motion for Disclosure (Doc. 263) filed 

by the Defendant and the Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Defendant’s Army 

Service and Personnel Records (Doc. 272). 

IT IS ORDERED GRANTING the Motion for Disclosure (Doc. 263), filed by 

the defendant, so the defendant knows specifically what measurements and items Mr. 

Tavernetti used in composing his exhibit. The defense will not further disclose these 

materials to anyone not connected to the defense team and will not use the disclosure in 

any fashion other than for use in this trial. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING the Motion to Preclude Evidence of 

the Defendant’s Army Service and Personnel Records (Doc. 272) filed by the defendant. 

The Court finds the records are more than ten years old and that the argument that the 

defendant fully disclosed can be made in good faith. Therefore, the Court will not permit 

the defendant to be cross examined on the issue of his military record. In regard to the 

personnel issue, Mr. Kleindienst has agreed to point out the fifteen or so documents he 
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

intends to use. If there is an issue with their use, counsel shall inform the Court. 

 Dated this 1st day of February, 2018.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Systems Engineering Supervisor Amy Lendian","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CcQefrsrHK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amylendian-ksc-20230530-ph-kls01-0018\/\">Systems Engineering Supervisor Amy Lendian<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amylendian-ksc-20230530-ph-kls01-0018\/embed\/#?secret=CcQefrsrHK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Systems Engineering Supervisor Amy Lendian” — NASA\" data-secret=\"CcQefrsrHK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/amylendian_ksc-20230530-ph-kls01_0018.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

 

 On February 9, 2017, Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle filed a “Report and 

Recommendation”. The findings recommended that the District Court find the Defendant 

was in violation of his terms of supervised release as contained in Allegations A, B, and 

C. Having reviewed this matter de novo, and no objections having been filed pursuant to 

28 USC § 636(b)(1), the Court accepts the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 

Accordingly, the Court finds the Defendant has violated his terms of supervised release 

as contained in Allegations A, B, and C. 

 Dated this 28th day of February, 2017. 

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

United States of America, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Samuel Ward, 

Defendant. 

 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CR-15-50162-01-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

Case 2:15-cr-50162-SPL Document 34 Filed 02/28/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-41D","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"T2DkoaDEjP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-41d\/\">STS-41D<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-41d\/embed\/#?secret=T2DkoaDEjP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-41D” — NASA\" data-secret=\"T2DkoaDEjP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/sts-41d-crew-photo-s84-30259.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-114","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BMUTELfX8m\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-114\/\">STS-114<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-114\/embed\/#?secret=BMUTELfX8m\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-114” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BMUTELfX8m\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-04pd1239\/KSC-04pd1239~large.jpg?w=600&h=1532&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1532}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Manuel Cuen, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 

United States of America, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV-15-00512-TUC-RCC

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is a stipulation of dismissal. Doc. 72. Good cause 

appearing; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation is granted and this case is 

dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. The 

Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

Dated this 22nd day of May, 2018.

Case 4:15-cv-00512-RCC Document 73 Filed 05/23/18 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT NAS HVILLE JAM ES D UBO SE v. STA TE OF TEN NES SEE, KEV IN M YER S, WAR DEN

Direc t Appeal from the Circ uit Court for Wayne County

No. 13370 JimT. Hamilton, Judge

No. M2004- 01021-CCA -R3-HC - F iled Novem ber 9, 2004

ORDER Th e Ap pe llant, Jame s D ub os e , h a s file d a pet iti on to re he ar in this c a se . Th e op ini on of thi s Court, affirming the judg ment of the t ri al co u rt, was f iled October

15, 2004. Upon re view of the petition to rehea

r, we conclude that it should be denied. It is therefor e orde red that the petition to rehea r is respe ctfully

denied.

P ER CURIAM T h o m as T
. W o o d al l , J u d ge Da v i d H. W el l es , J u d ge J erryL
. S m i t h , J u d ge
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of DrugMax, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jugal K. Taneja, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge: 

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Exhibit 10.2


 


ALLONGE TO CONVERTIBLE GRID PROMISSORY NOTE


 


Allonge (this “Allonge”)
to that certain Convertible Grid Promissory Note (the “Note”) attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and made a part hereof in
the principal amount of $125,000 dated April 21, 2020, from Brain Scientific Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), in
favor of Andrew Brown, as Holder (the “Holder”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Note.


 


The Company and the Holder
agree that the Note shall be revised as follows:


 


1. The
definition of “Maturity Date” set forth in Section 1.1 of the Note shall be amended and replaced to read as follows:


 


“Maturity
Date” shall mean April 21, 2022.”


 


This Allonge is intended to
be attached to and made a permanent part of the Note.


 


Dated as of the 20th day of April,
2021.


 


	Company:	BRAIN SCIENTIFIC INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Boris Goldstein
	 	Name:	Boris Goldstein
	 	Title:	Chairman
	Holder:	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Andrew Brown
	 	Name:	Andrew Brown
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Surveyor 1 Creating Shadows","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dR2nDVGqmI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/surveyor-1-creating-shadows\/\">Surveyor 1 Creating Shadows<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/surveyor-1-creating-shadows\/embed\/#?secret=dR2nDVGqmI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Surveyor 1 Creating Shadows” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dR2nDVGqmI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pia02976_0-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":597}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7424

DEVAUGHN JHERELLE HALL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate

Judge. (3:09-cv-00647-MHL)

Submitted: May 13, 2011 Decided: May 20, 2011

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Highland, WASHINGTON & LEE IMMIGRATION & CITIZENSHIP 

PROGRAM, Lexington, Virginia, for Appellant. Eugene Paul 

Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Devaughn Jherelle Hall seeks to appeal the magistrate 

judge’s*

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Hall has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85.

 * The parties consented to the exercise of the district 

court’s jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c) (2006).
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:98-cr-00892-FJM   Document 210   Filed 05/23/07   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:98-cr-00892-FJM   Document 210   Filed 05/23/07   Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23



Consent Independent Auditors'



The Board of Directors
MedPlus, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration 
statements of MedPlus, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (No. 33-
94426) and Form S-3 (No. 333-20547) of our report dated April 30, 
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of MedPlus, Inc. 
and subsidiaries as of January 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related 
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and 
comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years ended January 
31, 1999 and 1998, the one month period ended January 31, 1997 and 
for the year ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the 
January 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-KSB of MedPlus, Inc. and 
subsidiaries.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Cincinnati, Ohio
April 30, 1999
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. S TATE OFW ASHINGTON ; S WINOMISH I NDIAN T RIBAL C OMMUNITY ; L UMMI No. 08-35794 N ATION ; U PPERS KAGIT I NDIAN T RIBE ; C ONFEDERATED T RIBES AND D.C. Nos. B ANDS OF THE Y AKAMA I NDIAN 2:01-sp-00002-RSM



#  N ATION ; T ULALIP T RIBES ; P ORT 2:70-cv-09213-RSM G AMBLE S’K LALLAM I NDIAN T RIBE ; J AMESTOWN S’K LALLAM I NDIAN ORDER T RIBE , Defendants-Appellees,

v. S AMISH I NDIAN T RIBE ,

Movant-Appellant. 

# 

Filed August 19, 2009

ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

11785PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                      FIRST AMENDMENT TO ADMINISTAFF, INC.
                         NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN

         The Administaff, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Plan ("Plan")
shall be, and hereby is, amended in the following respects:

                              I.

         Effective August 7, 2001, Paragraph 3 of the Plan is amended
in its entirety to provide as follows:

                  "3.      Shares Available Under Plan. Subject to
         adjustments as provided in Paragraph 6, the maximum number of
         shares of Common Stock with respect to Option Rights that may
         be granted under this Plan is equal to the number of shares
         authorized by the Board for such grants; however, any shares
         of Common Stock which are subject to Option Rights that are
         terminated unexercised, forfeited or surrendered or which
         expire for any reason will again be available for issuance.
         Such shares may be shares of original issuance or treasury
         shares or a combination of the foregoing."

                              II.

         Except as modified herein, the Plan shall remain in full force
and effect.

         Executed effective as of August 7, 2001.

                                     ADMINISTAFF, INC.

                                     By:/s/ Paul J. Sarvadi
                                     --------------------------
                                     Paul J. Sarvadi