alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of REGI U.S., Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G. Robertson, President of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed the Report;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain
        any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
        necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
        which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
        covered by the Report; and
|
| | 3. | based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
        other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in
        all material respects the financial condition, results of operations,
        and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
        in the Report.                      



/s/ John G. Robertson 
  John G. Robertson, President
  (Principal Executive Officer)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   981
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,524
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,900
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,451
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,719)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Aeronautical Artwork, Computer Simulation, or Both?","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8t1CyBLKmI\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/aeronautical-artwork-computer-simulation-or-both-2\/\">Aeronautical Artwork, Computer Simulation, or Both?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/aeronautical-artwork-computer-simulation-or-both-2\/embed\/#?secret=8t1CyBLKmI\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Aeronautical Artwork, Computer Simulation, or Both?” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8t1CyBLKmI\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/aeronautical-artwork-computation.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":316}
#### Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. *v.*Nathaniel L. Monin.

Eminent Domain — Appropriation of Land to Public Use — Interest from Date of Entry.

The money being due at the time the appellant entered and appropriated appellees land, he is entitled to interest from that date.

APPEAL FROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

November 19, 1869.

*Cofer, for appellant.*

Wilson, *for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

Even if appellant’s estimate of the value of the land of appellee to be taken as correct, the money was due at the time appellant entered and appropriated the land and it admits in the answer that appellee is entitled to interest on the price from the date of its entry, which would now nearly double the amount.

In addition to the value of the land actually taken and the interest on that value, the Englishes, witnesses for appellant, state that the disadvantages to appellee over and above the advantages to him resulting from the road, are the amount it would take to fence the land on both sides of the road, which according to the surveyors statement, will require- a line of fence on each side 153 poles long, and although there is no direct proof of the cost of building said fences, still we cannot say in view of the evidence of the Englishes in connection with the evidence of the other witnesses as to the amount of damages sustained by appellee in consequence of the running of the road through bis land, that the court below erred in the amount adjudged to appellee.

Wherefore the judgment is *affirmed.*
859.032
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

         We hereby certify that the accompanying Report of Harris Preferred
Capital Corporation, on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation.





/s/ PAUL R. SKUBIC                              /s/ PAMELA C. PIAROWSKI
---------------------                           ------------------------------
Paul R. Skubic                                  Pamela C. Piarowski
Chairman of the Board                           Chief Financial Officer
and President



May 14, 2003
#### Peter Seminon *v.*J. J. Woodson.

Accord and Satisfaction — Debt Must be Actually Settled.

A proposition, and promise by letter to transfer property in satisfaction of a debt, and an acceptance thereof, cannot have the effect of an accord and satisfaction, until'there was an actual transfer of something of value, and the creditor placed in condition to get possession of the property.

APPEAL FROM WEBSTER COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.

March 4, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

To this action which was brought to subject real estate held by an equitable title to the payment of a debt reduced to judgment, appellee pleaded in sitisfaction of the debt that his brother Leland Woodson, since the institution of the action had satisfied and discharged the" debt by a sale and transfer of his interest in certain property in Hickman, Ky., and that appellant had by his letter accepted said interest in satisfaction of said debt, and had directed said L. Woodson in said letter to make a transfer and send the same to him.

The letter of appellant referred to was filed, and is an agreement to take the interest of said Woodson in Hickman, with a request that he would inform him what part he had in the estate of his father, what kind .of property it was, and for him to prepare a transfer thereof and send it to him. The case was heard and plaintiff’s petition dismissed on the ground that the letter was an acceptance of the proposition and operated as a satisfaction of the debt.

The offer of the interest in the property in Hickman and the promise to transfer it could not be a satisfaction of the debt, until the transfer was made, appellee must show that his brother had some property at Hickman, Ky., and such as transfer thereof as made as would invest appellant with the title thereto. The proposition, and promise of L. Woodson in his letter to appellant, to transfer the property, could not have the effect of an accord and *664satisfaction., until there was an actual transfer of something of value, and appellant placed in a condition to get possession of the property transferred.

Given, *for appellant.*

The judgment must, therefore, be *reversed*and the cause remanded, with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.
ACCEPTED

13-14-00560-CV

THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS

8/27/2015 8:50:20 AM

CECILE FOY GSANGER

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 13th COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI/EDINBURG, TEXAS 8/27/2015 8:50:20 AM CECILE FOY GSANGER Clerk
EXHIBIT 8.1  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES  Jurisdiction of
  OrganizationNOVA
  Chemicals (Canada) Ltd./NOVA Chimie (Canada) Ltée.
  
  CanadaNOVA
  Chemicals Inc.
  
  Delaware, USANOVA
  Chemicals (International) S.A.
  
  SwitzerlandNovacor
  Chemicals Investments B.V.
  
  The NetherlandsNOVA
  Petrochemicals Ltd.
  
  Alberta, CanadaNOVA
  Chemicals Cooperatief U.A.
  
  The NetherlandsNC
  Holdings USA Inc.
  
  Delaware, USA  The names of
particular subsidiaries have been omitted, because the unnamed subsidiaries,
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a
significant subsidiary as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Enova Systems,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Carl
D. Perry, Chief Executive Officer, and Larry B. Lombard,  Acting Chief Financial
Officer,  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.


/s/  Edwin O. Riddell
------------------------------------
Edwin O. Riddell
Chief Executive Officer
September 15, 2005


/s/   Larry B. Lombard
------------------------------------
Larry B. Lombard
Chief Financial Officer
September 15, 2005


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL KOVACSIK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1181

[May 13, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Edward H. Merrigan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-

12501CF10E.

Jeremy Kroll of Dutko and Kroll, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robert Gregg, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Eric GANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of TEXAS; Unknown State Officials, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-10757.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2005.

Eric Gant, Grand Prairie, TX, pro se.

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Eric Gant appeals the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit challenging as unconstitutional state court rulings against him. As the district court determined, Gant’s claims are barred by the *Rooker-Feldman*** doctrine. *See Davis v. Bayless,*70 F.3d 367, 375 (5th Cir.1995); *Liedtke v. State Bar of Texas,*18 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir.1994). Gant’s conclusional assertion that the *Rooker-Feldman*doctrine does not apply to his case because any ruling in his favor would not affect any state court rulings is patently without merit; the face *623of his complaint sought reversal of the state court rulings and the entry of judgment in his favor in the challenged state court case.

Because the appeal raises no nonfrivolous issues, it is DISMISSED. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cíe. R. 42.2. We caution Gant that the filing or prosecution of frivolous appeals will subject him to sanctions. Gant should review all pending appeals to ensure that they are not frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

**

*Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.,*263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); *District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983).
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 64 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 64

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an inflation 
  adjustment for the amount of the maximum benefit under the special 
   estate tax valuation rules for certain farm, etc., real property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

 Mr. Herger (for himself and Ms. Dunn) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an inflation 
  adjustment for the amount of the maximum benefit under the special 
   estate tax valuation rules for certain farm, etc., real property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF MAXIMUM BENEFIT UNDER SPECIAL ESTATE 
              TAX VALUATION RULES FOR CERTAIN FARM, ETC., REAL 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 2032A(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitation on aggregate reduction in 
fair market value) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Limitation on aggregate reduction in fair market 
        value.--
                    ``(A) In general.--The aggregate decrease in the 
                value of qualified real property taken into account for 
                purposes of this chapter which results from the 
                application of paragraph (1) with respect to any 
                decedent shall not exceed $750,000.
                    ``(B) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of estates 
                of decedents dying in a calendar year after 1996, the 
                $750,000 amount set forth in subparagraph (A) shall be 
                increased by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) $750,000, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for such 
                        calendar year by substituting `calendar year 
                        1995' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph 
                        (B) thereof.
                Any increase determined under the preceding sentence 
                shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of $1,000.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to estates of decedents dying after December 31, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2895

AN ACT

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to

be illuminated by pink lights in honor of breast cancer

awareness month.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2895 ES

1 SECTION 1. ILLUMINATION OF GATEWAY ARCH IN HONOR

2 OF BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH.

3 In honor of breast cancer awareness month, the Sec4 retary of the Interior shall authorize the Gateway Arch

5 in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated by pink lights

6 for a certain period of time in October, to be designated

7 by the Secretary of the Interior.

Passed the Senate October 5, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.

108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2895

AN ACT

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Misof breast cancer awareness month. souri, to be illuminated by pink lights in honor
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly M. Matter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kmatter\/","title":"True Blue: High-Power Propulsion for Gateway","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vTYcISwMpx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/true-blue-high-power-propulsion-for-gateway\/\">True Blue: High-Power Propulsion for Gateway<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/true-blue-high-power-propulsion-for-gateway\/embed\/#?secret=vTYcISwMpx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“True Blue: High-Power Propulsion for Gateway” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vTYcISwMpx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/grc-2023-c-05543.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}