alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  0
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0
<PP&E>                                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               2,540
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            1,450
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1,090)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            0
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       2,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (2,450)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (2,450)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (2,450)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .00



</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ricardo Ford, Appellant.

[786 NYS2d 742]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Ward, J.), rendered May 20, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of attempted burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of one year to run consecutively with sentences for convictions in Queens County, unanimously reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the plea vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Numerous misstatements were made by the court, its clerk, and defense counsel in naming the charged crime and the crime to which defendant was then pleading guilty, all of which errors went uncorrected. Particularly in view of the vagueness of the factual allocution regarding the illegality of defendant’s presence in a store, and the incorrect recital of the charge in his formal arraignment on the plea, defendant’s guilty plea was fatally defective *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]). Were we to find that the defect did not rise to the level described in *Lopez*authorizing appellate review of a plea in the absence of a motion to withdraw the plea under CPL 220.60 (3), we would nevertheless reverse in the interest of justice. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 62932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24962]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FDA-2014-C-1616]


EMD Millipore Corp.; Filing of Color Additive Petition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing 
that we have filed a petition, submitted by EMD Millipore Corp., 
proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to expand the 
safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments in alcoholic beverages to 
include cordials, liqueurs, cocktails, and certain other alcoholic 
beverages, and non-alcoholic mixers and mixes.

DATES: The color additive petition was filed on August 21, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Anderson, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1309.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 721(d)(1) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1)), we are giving notice 
that we have filed a color additive petition (CAP 4C0299), submitted by 
EMD Millipore Corp., c/o Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C., 700 13th 
Street NW., Suite 1200, Washington, DC 20005. The petition proposes to 
amend the color additive regulations in 21 CFR 73.350, Mica-based 
pearlescent pigments, to expand the safe use of mica-based pearlescent 
pigments in alcoholic beverages to include cordials, liqueurs, 
cocktails, and certain other alcoholic beverages, and non-alcoholic 
mixers and mixes.
    We have determined under 21 CFR 25.32(k) that this action is of a 
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental 
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Dennis M. Keefe,
Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and 
Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2014-24962 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Joseph Omar Guzman, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-15-08183-001-PCT-DJH

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant was released on Pretrial Supervision on August 25, 2015. Pretrial Services

filed a Petition for Action on Conditions of Pretrial Release alleging that defendant violated

the terms of his release. Defendant was arrested and appears before the Court with counsel.

A Pretrial Release Revocation Hearing was held.

The Court finds that the Government has established by a preponderance of the

evidence and based on the allegations in the petition, that the defendant violated conditions

of his release. Arguments made on the issue of continued detention, the Court finds that

defendant is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant's release is revoked and he is

detained pending further order of the Court.

DATED this 9th day of September, 2015.

Case 3:15-cr-08183-DJH Document 19 Filed 09/10/15 Page 1 of 1
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

189 KAH 12-02327 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. NICHOLAS ROBLES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

WARDEN ORLEANS STATE PRISON, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

STEVEN D. SESSLER, GENESEO, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), entered October 25, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70. The judgment converted the petition under CPLR article 70 to one under CPLR article 78 and denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: March 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getty
Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 7, 2003



|/s/    JONATHAN D. KLEIN                                
|--------------------------------------------------------
|Jonathan D. Klein Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Frankie Ray McKinney, * From the 385th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR44036.

Vs. No. 11-15-00228-CR * November 30, 2017

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Shawn N. Prevette,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04428-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9941 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9941 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Seeks U.S. Citizens for Ground-Based Simulation of Life in Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BDxdbxUiKp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/nasa-seeks-u-s-citizens-for-ground-based-simulation-of-life-in-space\/\">NASA Seeks U.S. Citizens for Ground-Based Simulation of Life in Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/nasa-seeks-u-s-citizens-for-ground-based-simulation-of-life-in-space\/embed\/#?secret=BDxdbxUiKp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Seeks U.S. Citizens for Ground-Based Simulation of Life in Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BDxdbxUiKp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/sirius_nek_feature_main.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
Exhibit 31.2




                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Ralph J. Giordano,  Chief Financial Officer of Five Star Products, Inc.,
certify that:

     1. I have reviewed  this annual report on Form 10-K of Five Star  Products,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



Date: April 29, 2004


                                                              Ralph J. Giordano
#### IN THE MATTER OF CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS TO THE ADOPTED AND APPROVED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN OF THE MIDDLESEX COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT.

May 30, 1989.

Petitions for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Seeing Totality","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hrNMalyKQT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/seeing-totality\/\">Seeing Totality<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/seeing-totality\/embed\/#?secret=hrNMalyKQT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Seeing Totality” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hrNMalyKQT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/53641212344-be1e94e20c-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### GF THOMAS INVESTMENTS LP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CLECO CORP, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-30470.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 11, 2005.

Herschel E. Richards, Jr., Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, Shreveport, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard C. Stanley, Jennifer L. Thorthon, William Raley Alford, III, Stanley, Flanagan *&*Reuter, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before KING, Chief Judge, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

*156PER CURIAM: *

AFFIRMED. *See*5th Cir. R. 47.6.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"A New Home for Ingenuity Mars Helicopter Prototype","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OnCcR8BaCQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/ingenuity-mars-helicopter-prototype-donation-to-nasm\/\">A New Home for Ingenuity Mars Helicopter Prototype<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/ingenuity-mars-helicopter-prototype-donation-to-nasm\/embed\/#?secret=OnCcR8BaCQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A New Home for Ingenuity Mars Helicopter Prototype” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OnCcR8BaCQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/53399676593-57707b89f8-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
I, Michael Lobsinger, hereby certify:

| 1.
This annual report fully complies with the requirements    of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the *Exchange Act*; and
2.
The information contained in this report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations    of the issuer.  
***"Michael Lobsinger"*** 
Michael Lobsinger    Chief Executive Officer  
Date:
May 15, 2003
The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Reportor as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|