alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

James Clifton, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Michelangelo Leasing Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-01841-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 The Court has reviewed the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice. 

(Doc. 53.) For good cause shown, 

 IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear 

its own costs and attorney’s fees. 

 Dated this 17th day of February, 2017. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01841-DLR Document 54 Filed 02/21/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 16","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BzCeL0Eqxw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-16\/\">Expedition 16<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/expedition-16\/embed\/#?secret=BzCeL0Eqxw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 16” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BzCeL0Eqxw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/exp16-portrait.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
Case 2:15-cr-01176-SMM Document 3 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01176-SMM Document 3 Filed 08/25/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01176-SMM Document 3 Filed 08/25/15 Page 3 of 3
##### 



1.
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
March 19, 2007
    
    
    
    /s/ ANTONIO B. MON

Antonio B. MonChief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Rochelle N. Poulton 

The Arizona Credit Law Group, P.L.L.C.

700 E. Baseline Rd. Ste. C-3

Tempe, AZ 85283

State Bar No. 029172

Fax: (480) 907-7126

rochelle@azclg.com

Tel: (480) 907-6088

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael G. Liddicoat and Sally L. 

Liddicoat, husband and wife,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

New Penn Financial, LLC dba Shellpoint 

Mortgage Servicing, LLC; Equifax

Information Services, L.L.C., a Georgia 

limited liability company; Experian 

Information Solutions, Inc., an Ohio 

corporation. 

 

 Defendants.

No: 2:15 -cv-02262-SRB

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS 

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 

LLC

Plaintiffs, through undersigned counsel, and Defendant Equifax Information 

Services, LLC having reached a settlement in the above referenced matter, hereby stipulate 

and jointly move to dismiss Plaintiffs claims against Equifax Information Services, LLC

with prejudice. Each party to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. 

Case 2:15-cv-02262-SRB Document 77 Filed 08/22/16 Page 1 of 3
Stipulated Motion to Dismiss - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 22nd day of August, 2016.

/s/ Rochelle N. Poulton 

Rochelle N. Poulton 

The Arizona Credit Law Group, PLLC 

700 E. Baseline Rd. Suite C-3

Tempe, AZ 85283

Attorney for Plaintiffs

/s/ Jacob C. Jones 

Jacob C. Jones 

Snell & Wilmer LLP 

One Arizona Center 

400 E Van Buren Ste 1900 

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 

Attorney for Defendant Equifax Information 

Solutions, Inc. 

Case 2:15-cv-02262-SRB Document 77 Filed 08/22/16 Page 2 of 3
Stipulated Motion to Dismiss - 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 22nd, 2016 the attached Stipulated Motion to Dismiss was 

served this day on the below listed Defendants using with Court’s electronic CM/ECF 

system and via US Mail. 

/s/ Rochelle N Poulton

Rochelle N Poulton 

The Arizona Credit Law Group, PLLC

700 E Baseline Rd Suite C-3

Tempe, AZ 85283 

(480) 907-6088

Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Jacob C. Jones 

Snell & Wilmer LLP 

One Arizona Center 

400 E Van Buren Ste 1900 

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 

Local Counsel for Equifax Information 

Services, LLC 

Alexandra Fries 

Jones Day 

555 S Flower St. 50th Floor 

Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300 

Email: Afries@JonesDay.com

Counsel for Experian Information Solutions 

Thuy Tran 

Yu Mohandesi LLP 

633 W 5th St Ste 2800 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Counsel for New Penn Financial 

Todd D. Erb 

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

201 E Washington St Ste 1200 

Phoenix, AZ 85004-2595 

Email: terb@lrrc.com

Local Counsel for Shellpoint Mortgage 

Servicing 

N. Charles Campbell, II 

KING & SPALDING LLP 

1180 Peachtree St. 

Atlanta, GA 30303

Attorney for Defendant Equifax 

Information Solutions, Inc.

Case 2:15-cv-02262-SRB Document 77 Filed 08/22/16 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 584 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 584

                  For the relief of John Wesley Davis.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 4, 1997

   Mr. Wynn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of John Wesley Davis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    The time limitations set forth in section 3702(b) of title 31, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to a claim by John 
Wesley Davis, of Forestville, Maryland, for the amounts due to him by 
the--
            (1) Department of the Navy in the amount of $42,123.84; and
            (2) Department of the Treasury in the amount of $12,508.20.
The amounts due are represented by checks that were received but not 
negotiated by John Wesley Davis.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE.

    Section 1 shall apply only if John Wesley Davis or his authorized 
representative submits a claim pursuant to such subsection before the 
expiration of the 6-month period beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nathan Cranford","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nathan-a-cranfordnasa-gov\/","title":"Lying in Bed for the Sake of Science: NASA Co-Sponsors Bed Rest Study in Germany","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uSKjmZ8x4U\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/lying-in-bed-for-the-sake-of-science-nasa-co-sponsors-bed-rest-study-in-germany\/\">Lying in Bed for the Sake of Science: NASA Co-Sponsors Bed Rest Study in Germany<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/lying-in-bed-for-the-sake-of-science-nasa-co-sponsors-bed-rest-study-in-germany\/embed\/#?secret=uSKjmZ8x4U\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Lying in Bed for the Sake of Science: NASA Co-Sponsors Bed Rest Study in Germany” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uSKjmZ8x4U\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/sirius-1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":300}
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4790 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4790

     To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to ban the 
  acceptance of cash contributions greater than $100 in campaigns for 
                      election for Federal office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 1998

 Mr. Redmond introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to ban the 
  acceptance of cash contributions greater than $100 in campaigns for 
                      election for Federal office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BANNING ACCEPTANCE OF CASH CONTRIBUTIONS GREATER THAN $100.

    (a) In General.--Section 315 of the Federal Election Campaign Act 
of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441a) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subsection:
    ``(i) No candidate or political committee may accept any 
contributions of currency of the United States or currency of any 
foreign country from any person which, in the aggregate, exceed 
$100.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections occurring after January 1999.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"A Sample of Asteroid Ryugu","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CivPxFziSg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/sample-of-asteroid-ryugu\/\">A Sample of Asteroid Ryugu<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/sample-of-asteroid-ryugu\/embed\/#?secret=CivPxFziSg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Sample of Asteroid Ryugu” — NASA\" data-secret=\"CivPxFziSg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jsc2021e022434.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":416}
Case 2:15-mj-01711-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01711-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01711-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/28/15 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.3
 CHINDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
(as amended and restated as of November 22, 2010)
 SECTION 1 Purpose
  SECTION 2 Types of Awards
   SECTION 3 Definitions




---



##### 



SECTION 4 Administration




---



##### 



provided,
however




---



##### 



SECTION 5 Stock Subject to Plan




---



##### 



SECTION 6 Eligibility
  SECTION 7 Stock Options




---



##### 








---



##### 



SECTION 8 Stock Appreciation Rights (SARs)
 provided, however,
 SECTION 9 Restricted Stock




---



##### 



SECTION 10 Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)




---



##### 



SECTION 11 Other Stock-Based Awards
  SECTION 12 Cash Awards
   SECTION 13 Performance Awards
   (1)
    
    Net earnings or net income (before or after
taxes);
 (2)
    
    Earnings per share;
 (3)
    
    Net sales or revenue growth;
 (4)
    
    Gross revenues (and/or gross revenue
growth) and/or mix of revenues among the Companys business activities;
 (5)
    
    Net operating profit (or reduction in
operating loss);
 (6)
    
    Return measures (including, but not limited
to, return on assets, capital, invested capital, equity, sales, or
revenue);
 (7)
    
    Cash flow (including, but not limited to,
operating cash flow, free cash flow, cash flow return on equity, and
cash flow return on investment);
 (8)
    
    Earnings before or after taxes, interest,
depreciation, amortization, and/or other non-cash items;
 (9)
    
    Gross or operating margins;
 (10)
    
    Productivity ratios (and/or such ratios as
compared to various stock market indices);
 (11)
    
    Stock price (including, but not limited to,
growth measures and total shareholder return);




---



##### 



(12)
    
    Stock price and market capitalization
ratios (including, but not limited to, price-to-earnings ratio and
enterprise multiple)
 (13)
    
    Expense targets (including, but not limited
to, expenses-to-sales ratios);
 (14)
    
    Margins;
 (15)
    
    Operating efficiency;
 (16)
    
    Market share;
 (17)
    
    Customer satisfaction;
 (18)
    
    Employee satisfaction or retention;
 (19)
    
    Development and implementation of employee
or executive development programs (including, but not limited to,
succession programs);
 (20)
    
    Working capital targets;
 (21)
    
    Economic value added;
 (22)
    
    Market value added;
 (23)
    
    Debt to equity ratio; and
 (24)
    
    Strategic business goals relating to
acquisitions, divestitures and joint ventures.
       SECTION 14 Tax Withholding




---



##### 



SECTION 15 Beneficiary of Award Holder
   SECTION 16 Amendments and Termination
       SECTION 17 Change of Control




---



##### 



SECTION 18 Section 409A




---



##### 



SECTION 19 General Provisions




---



#####
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Confer,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04678-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/20/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9511 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9511 Filed 12/29/17 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:15-mj-01847-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/19/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01847-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/19/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01847-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/19/15 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          59,162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,278)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,570
<PP&E>                                          18,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,950)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,204
<BONDS>                                            148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           440
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,623
<SALES>                                         84,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,118
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,980)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,980)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>