alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"James Anderson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/james-n-andersonnasa-gov\/","title":"Contraband Corned Beef and the Early Days of Space Biology: the Gemini III Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZkINUdfCZ5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/contraband-corned-beef-and-the-early-days-of-space-biology-the-gemini-iii-mission\/\">Contraband Corned Beef and the Early Days of Space Biology: the Gemini III Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/contraband-corned-beef-and-the-early-days-of-space-biology-the-gemini-iii-mission\/embed\/#?secret=ZkINUdfCZ5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Contraband Corned Beef and the Early Days of Space Biology: the Gemini III Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ZkINUdfCZ5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/john_young_s65-23488orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
Case 2:15-mj-01879-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01879-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01879-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0578 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID LLOYD ORR,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2021

12/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0578
Case 2:15-cr-01314-GMS Document 4 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01314-GMS Document 4 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01314-GMS Document 4 Filed 09/28/15 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Clifford Jones,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03846-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8424 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Jean M. Nelson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Virbac Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 10, 2005 By:  /s/  Jean M. Nelson    Jean M. Nelson    Executive Vice President
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                (Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Tommy L. McAden, as Chief Financial Officer of Technical Olympic USA, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

1.       the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
         quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), filed with
         the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934, as amended; and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  November 12, 2002                        /s/ TOMMY L. MCADEN
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Tommy L. McAden
                                                Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Threeton,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03932-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Niemeyer, Esq, Mark R

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8482 Filed 11/01/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8482 Filed 11/01/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999, THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOOTNOTES THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          79,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  875,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    949,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,590,200
<PP&E>                                         669,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 332,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,977,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,906,500
<BONDS>                                         24,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (362,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,977,400
<SALES>                                      2,270,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,270,800
<CGS>                                        1,477,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,477,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,320,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,320,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,320,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER L. DAVIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 567 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER L. DAVIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 568 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Clifford Jones,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03846-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8423 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8423 Filed 10/27/17 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 99.0**

 

Capital One Master TrustAggregated Data for 2003

 
| Defaults                                                                                    |   | 2,022,486,778.55  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Total Collections                                                                           |   | 61,186,632,547.10 |   |
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Collections of Principal Receivables                                                        |   | 55,062,769,160.46 |   |
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Collection of Finance Charge Receivables  (includes amortization of annual membership fees) |   | 6,166,029,363.26  |   |
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Annual Servicing Fee Paid                                                                   |   | 430,517,871.91    |   |
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Aggregate amount paid to Certificateholders  allocable to principal*                        |   | 4,959,710,144.93  |   |
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Class A Investor Charge-Offs                                                                |   | 0.00              |   |
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Class B Investor Charge-Offs                                                                |   | 0.00              |   |
|                                                                                        |   |              |   |
| Class C Investor Charge-Offs                                                                |   | 0.00              |   |

 

----

* Aggregate amount paid toCertificateholders allocable to principal includes a principal distribution of$250,000,000 made on 01/15/03, which relates to the December 2002 monthlyperiod.

 

Page 9of 45

----
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 12

       COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK
                              DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                   NINE MONTHS ENDED         THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                               ---------------------------------------------------
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,             SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                   2000           1999       2000           1999
                                               ---------------------------------------------------

<S>                                             <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Net income                                      $2,099,341   $1,790,676   $  701,210   $  610,314
Fixed charges:
Income before fixed charges                     $2,099,341   $1,790,676   $  701,210   $  610,314
Fixed charges, as above
Preferred stock dividend requirements           $1,350,675   $1,350,675   $  450,225   $  450,225
Fixed charges including preferred
  stock dividends                               $1,350,675   $1,350,675   $  450,225   $  450,225
Ratio of income to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividend requirements                 1.55         1.33         1.56         1.36
</TABLE>








                                       14
[3075546-1]

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Lisa Ells – Cal. Bar No. 243657*

Krista Stone-Manista – Cal. Bar No. 269083*

Andrew G. Spore – Cal. Bar No. 308756*

ROSEN BIEN

GALVAN & GRUNFELD LLP

50 Fremont Street, 19th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105-2235

Telephone: (415) 433-6830

Facsimile: (415) 433-7104

lells@rbgg.com

kstone-manista@rbgg.com

aspore@rbgg.com

Sabarish Neelakanta – Fla. Bar No. 26623*

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER

Post Office Box 1151

Lake Worth, Florida 33460-1151

Telephone: (561) 360-2523

Facsimile: (866) 735-7136

sneelakanta@humanrightsdefensecenter.org

David J. Bodney – Ariz. Bar No. 006065

Michael A. DiGiacomo – Ariz. Bar No. 032251

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

1 East Washington Street, Suite 2300

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2555

Telephone: (602) 798-5400

Facsimile: (602) 798-5595

bodneyd@ballardspahr.com

digiacomom@ballardspahr.com

* Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the 

Human Rights Defense Center,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHARLES L. RYAN, in his official capacity 

as Director of the Arizona Department of 

Corrections and in his individual capacity; 

GAIL RITTENHOUSE, in her official 

capacity as Division Director, Support 

Services of the Arizona Department of 

Corrections and in her individual capacity; 

JEFF HOOD, in his official capacity as 

Case No. CV-15-2245-PHX-ROS

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF 

DISCOVERY RESPONSE

Judge: Hon. Roslyn O. Silver

Trial Date: None Set

Case 2:15-cv-02245-ROS Document 165 Filed 08/21/17 Page 1 of 2
2

[3075546-1]

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Deputy Director of the Arizona Department of 

Corrections and in his individual capacity; 

ALF OLSON, in his individual capacity; 

JAMES RIGGS, in his official capacity as an 

employee of the Office of Publication Review 

of the Arizona Department of Corrections and 

in his individual capacity; and DOES 1 to 20, 

inclusive,

Defendants.

Plaintiff, Prison Legal News, through undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice that 

on August 21, 2017, it served on Defendants the following response to their First Set of 

Requests for Production of Documents:

 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Response to Defendants’ First Set of 

Requests for Production of Documents

DATED: August 21, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER

By:

Sabarish Neelakanta

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-cv-02245-ROS Document 165 Filed 08/21/17 Page 2 of 2