alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Moon and Sun Over Wyoming","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9kgXJhcRBZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/2017-total-solar-eclipse-44\/\">Moon and Sun Over Wyoming<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/2017-total-solar-eclipse-44\/embed\/#?secret=9kgXJhcRBZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Moon and Sun Over Wyoming” — NASA\" data-secret=\"9kgXJhcRBZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/nhq201708210205orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
#### Lidia GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70536.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.**

Decided Feb. 22, 2005.

Lidia Gonzalez, Desert Hot Springs, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Robbin K. Blaya, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*301MEMORANDUM ***

Lidia Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal of an immigration judge’s order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

Gonzalez contends that because of ineffective assistance of counsel she neglected to file an application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review this contention because Gonzalez failed to raise this issue before the BIA and administrative exhaustion is required for alleged errors that the administrative tribunal could remedy. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir.2004) (recognizing that exhaustion is mandatory and jurisdictional).

Pursuant to *Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741, 750 (9th Cir.2004), petitioner’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the stay of removal was continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, nunc pro tunc, as of the filing of the motion for stay of removal and this stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.4

Exhibit 32.4 Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the
Company), I, Ronald L. Blevins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                         |  |  |  |       |  |                |  | 
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Ronald L. Blevins   |  |  |  | Date: |  | August 8, 2007 |  | 
|    |  | Ronald L. Blevins       |  |  |  |       |  |                |  | 
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |       |  |                |  |
Case 2:15-mj-01760-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01760-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/20/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01760-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/20/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Seeing the Solar Eclipse from 223,000 Miles Away","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yzQ7lR5gOH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/seeing-the-solar-eclipse-from-223000-miles-away\/\">Seeing the Solar Eclipse from 223,000 Miles Away<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/seeing-the-solar-eclipse-from-223000-miles-away\/embed\/#?secret=yzQ7lR5gOH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Seeing the Solar Eclipse from 223,000 Miles Away” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yzQ7lR5gOH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/m1467242026l-cal-echo-reduce11-4fi-rotate-ee9150.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
#### STATE v. HOLT

No. 336PA01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 112

Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas allowed 4 October 2001. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 October 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         879,190
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         647,507
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,006,120
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 24,577,243
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     25,667,296
<ALLOWANCE>                                    133,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,225,390
<DEPOSITS>                                  52,653,166
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,205,796
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,272,898
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,082,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              67,225,390
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                849,934
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,344,330
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               336,416
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,530,680
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,882,275
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,097
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          484,308
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   83,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,633,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,207,081)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  (1,207,081)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,207,081)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.05)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.41
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                49,500
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              133,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>




         EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002


               In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Royal
          Bancshares a Pennsylvania ("Royal") on Form 10-K for the period ending
          December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph P. Campbell,
          Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
          as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          that:

               1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
                    Act of 1934; and

               2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of Royal as of the dates and for the periods
                    expressed in the Report.






                                                 /s/ Joseph P. Campbell
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 Joseph P. Campbell
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 June 8, 2006.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD R. BUDD, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:96-CR-22)

August 26, 1998

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T:

The petition for rehearing is GR ANTED. We find no error of

fact or of law and affirm the conviction. We remand to the

district court for correction of judgment and sentence on the

concession of the government that Counts 3 and 4 should be merged,

as multiple counts of fraud supported by a single mailing.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
#### Toni Wright, Respondent, v Evanston Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[788 NYS2d 416]

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Evanston Insurance Company is obligated to indemnify the defendant Freeport Hudson Anglers, Inc., in an underlying personal injury and wrongful death action entitled *Toni Wright, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert A. Wright v Freeport Hudson Anglers, Inc.,*pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under index No. 014164/02, the defendant Evanston Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated September 12, 2003, which denied its motion pursuant to CELR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The documentary evidence submitted in support of the motion of the defendant Evanston Insurance Company (hereinafter Evanston) to dismiss the complaint failed to resolve all factual issues and conclusively dispose of the plaintiffs claims as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of its motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CELR 3211 (a) (1) *(see Arnav Indus., Inc. Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner,*96 NY2d 300, 303 [2001]; *Leon v Martinez,*84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; *Klein v Gutman,*12 AD3d 348 [2004]).

The documentary evidence submitted by Evanston failed to establish by “clear and unmistakable language” capable of “no *506other reasonable interpretation” that an exclusion applies to negate coverage for the underlying incident *(Continental Cas. Co. v Rapid-Am. Corp.,*80 NY2d 640, 652 [1993]; *see Belt Painting Corp. v TIG Ins. Co.,*100 NY2d 377, 383 [2003]). The ambiguous and conflicting provisions of the policy presented to the Supreme Court for review must be construed against the insurer (see *Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. v Schaefer,*70 NY2d 888, 890 [1987]; *Matter of KSI Rockville v Eichengrun,*305 AD2d 681, 682 [2003]). Moreover, in light of the additional premium paid by the insured, the interpretation advanced by Evanston would render the coverage illusory, a result which the public policy of this state cannot abide (see *Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*34 NY2d 356, 362 [1974]; *Matter of Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Davis,*195 AD2d 561, 562 [1993]).

Evanston’s remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.3


 


ALLONGE TO CONVERTIBLE GRID PROMISSORY NOTE


 


Allonge (this “Allonge”)
to that certain Convertible Grid Promissory Note (the “Note”) attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and made a part hereof in
the principal amount of $125,000 dated April 21, 2020, from Brain Scientific Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), in
favor of Thomas J. Caleca, as Holder (the “Holder”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.


 


The Company and the Holder
agree that the Note shall be revised as follows:


 


1. The
definition of “Maturity Date” set forth in Section 1.1 of the Note shall be amended and replaced to read as follows:


 


“Maturity
Date” shall mean April 21, 2022.”


 


This Allonge is intended to
be attached to and made a permanent part of the Note.


 


Dated as of the 20th day of April,
2021.


 


	Company:	BRAIN SCIENTIFIC INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Boris Goldstein
	 	Name: 	Boris Goldstein
	 	Title:	Chairman
	Holder:	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Thomas J. Caleca
	 	Name:	Thomas J. Caleca
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON; SWINOMISH

INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY; LUMMI

NATION; UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN No. 08-35794

TRIBE; CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND D.C. Nos. BANDS OF THE YAKAMA INDIAN  2:01-sp-00002-RSM NATION; TULALIP TRIBES; PORT 2:70-cv-09213-RSM GAMBLE S’KLALLAM INDIAN TRIBE;

JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM INDIAN ORDER

TRIBE,

Defendants-Appellees,

v.

SAMISH INDIAN TRIBE,

Movant-Appellant. 

Filed August 19, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it

is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit

Rule 35-3.

11785
PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS

BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted

© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kathryn Hambleton","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kathrynhambleton\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Artemis IV: Building First Lunar Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZBvIl4qHUb\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasas-artemis-iv-building-first-lunar-space-station\/\">NASA\u2019s Artemis IV: Building First Lunar Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasas-artemis-iv-building-first-lunar-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=ZBvIl4qHUb\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Artemis IV: Building First Lunar Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ZBvIl4qHUb\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/gateway-full-configuration-hero-image-121123.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSBBancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the datesindicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tohis knowledge:

 

1.                             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Anthony DiSandro,                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer              |
|   |                                               |
|   | /s/ John Carrozza,                                 |
|   | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                               |
|   | Dated: May 16, 2005                           |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 13.1  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In
connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of NOVA
Chemicals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report),
I, Randy Woelfel, Chief Executive Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)such Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information
contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of NOVA Chemicals Corporation.   March 15, 2010
  /s/
  Randy WoelfelRandy WoelfelChief Executive Officer
#### CWA LOCAL 1044 AND LOCAL 102 v. THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE, ET AL.

April 5, 1989.

Certification to Law Division, Superior Court, is granted.