alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10485

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LORENZO LADELL HUNTER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-146-1

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lorenzo Ladell

Hunter has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hunter has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 11, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10485 Document: 00511408014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/11/2011
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Astronaut Charles Bolden Preps for Deorbit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LGDqx6UX8X\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/sts060-302-001orig\/\">Astronaut Charles Bolden Preps for Deorbit<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/sts060-302-001orig\/embed\/#?secret=LGDqx6UX8X\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronaut Charles Bolden Preps for Deorbit” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LGDqx6UX8X\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/sts060-302-001orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":388}
##### 



STATE OF TENNESSEE
 * * * * *
 SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER OF
KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
AS AMENDED
 Tennessee Code Annotated
 Name King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 Authorized Shares




---



##### 



Registered Office
 Registered Agent
 Principal Office
 Board of Directors




---



##### 



For Profit: Duration
 Director Liability
   Tennessee Code Annotated
 Indemnification
   th




---



##### 



KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    /s/ John A. A. BellamyJohn A. A. BellamyAssistant Secretary to the Board of
Directors &
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
September 16-17, 2014

    In accordance with Section 271.25 of its rules regarding 
availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below 
the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on September 16-17, 2014.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
at its meeting held on September 16-17, 2014, which includes the 
domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon 
request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal 
Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's Annual Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Federal Open Market 
Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster 
maximum employment and price stability. In particular, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds 
trading in a range from 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain such 
conditions. Beginning in October, the Desk is directed to purchase 
longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of about $10 billion per 
month and to purchase agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of 
about $5 billion per month. The Committee also directs the Desk to 
engage in dollar roll and coupon swap transactions as necessary to 
facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency mortgage-backed 
securities transactions. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its 
policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and 
its policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and 
agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. 
The System Open Market Account manager and the secretary will keep the 
Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's 
balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the 
Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, October 9, 2014.
William B. English,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 2014-24832 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### John Dugan et al *v.*Commonwealth, ex rln., R. L. Wayne.

Officers — Liability on Official Bond — Pleading—Petition.

A petition averring the issual of an execution, its. going into the hands of the sheriff, after the teste and before the return day, its collection and failure to return within thirty days after it expired, is sufficient to make the defendant prima facie liable.

Same — Succession i'n Office.

An execution was placed with a sheriff, a few days before his term expired, and placed in the hands of his deputy who was retained in office by the new sheriff: Held that upon failure by the deputy to make return in thirty days, the sheriff then in office would be liable on his official bond.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 12, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Wayne sued out execution against Thompson and Simmes and placed it in the hands of Warfield, then acting as deputy for Lock, the sheriff, a few days before the latter went out and Harrison *288came into office, Warfield also being continued as the deputy of the latter, but which, so far as this record shows, had not been levied, and which was not returned to the office whence it issued until the following July, being several months after the return day, when Warfield returned it satisfied, as deputy of his principal Harrison.

*Swope, for appellants.*

The money not being paid over to the creditor, he brought this suit on the official bond of the sheriff to recover the debt and' thirty per cent damages, for not returning the execution within thirty days of its return day, and having recovered judgment therefor, the defendants seek a reversal.

1. Because the petition is insufficient.

2. Because Warfield acted as deputy for Lock and not for Harrison, as to this execution.

The petition sufficiently avers the issual of the execution, its going to the hands of the sheriff, Harrison, after the teste and before the return day, its collection and failure to return within 30 days after it expired, and these are the essential averments to make the sheriff *prima facie*liable, if there was a reasonable excuse for not returning the execution within proper time this should be shown by way of defense, but need not be negatived by averment, non disproved by the plaintiff.

Lock could not legally have returned the execution, after he went out of office without having it levied before his term expired, nor could Warfield, his deputy, have done so. Therefore, it should legally be presumed to be in the hands of Harrison when collected, and this presumption is made the more certain by Warfield’s return thereon as deputy to the latter, and whether collected before or after the return day, the officer is now, under, our statute, responsible on his official bond.

Seeing no error, the judgment is *affirmed,*without damages, no supersedeas appearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We issued our report dated January 24, 2001, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements (except for Note R, as to which the date is
March 12, 2001) incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of Royal
Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No.
333-25855)



/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP
-----------------------
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 2001


                                       74
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63669-63670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25303]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C., App. 2, that the National 
Research Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Wednesday, December 3, 
2014, at 1100 First St. NE., 6th floor, Washington, DC. The meeting 
will convene at 9:00 a.m. and end at 3:00 p.m., and is open to the 
public. Anyone attending must show a valid photo ID to building 
security and be escorted to the meeting. Please allow 15 minutes before 
the meeting begins for this process.
    The agenda will include an overview of the research programs of the 
Office of Research and Development (ORD) (10P9), healthcare ethics 
review and

[[Page 63670]]

presentations on special research programs.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Members of the public wanting to attend, 
or needing further information may contact Pauline Cilladi-Rehrer, 
Designated Federal Officer, ORD (10P9), Department of Veterans Affairs, 
810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, at (202) 443-5607, or by 
email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3c3d2c6dfdaddd69dd0dadfdfd2d7da9ec1d6dbc1d6c1f3c5d29dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="671706120b0e090249040e0b0b06030e4a15020f15021527110649000811">[email protected]</span></a>. at least 5 days prior to the 
meeting date.

    Dated: October 21, 2014.
Jelessa Burney,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-25303 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Cite as Midgett v. Richland Cty. Sheriff, 2020-Ohio-3465.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DAJUAN MIDGETT : JUDGES: 

 : Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. 

 Petitioner : Hon. John W. Wise, J. 

 : Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., J. 

-vs- : 

 : 

RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF : Case No. 2020 CA 0045 

 : 

 Respondent : O P I N I O N 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus 

JUDGMENT: Dismissed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT: June 22, 2020 

APPEARANCES: 

For Petitioner For Respondent 

DAJUAN MIDGETT - #57301 JOSEPH C. SNYDER 

13 East 2nd Street 38 South Park Street 

Mansfield, OH 44902 2nd Floor 

 Mansfield, OH 44902 
Richland County, Case No. 2020 CA 0045 2 

Wise, Earle, J.

{¶ 1} On May 26, 2020, Petitioner, DaJuan Midgett, refiled a Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus against Respondent, Richland County Sheriff. The Richland County 

Prosecutor filed a Motion to Dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). On May 14, 2020, we 

previously dismissed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Mr. Midgett. See 

DaJuan Midgett v. Richland County Sheriff, 5th Dist. No. 20CA41, 2020-Ohio-2966. Due 

to the following deficiencies, we grant the prosecutor’s Motion to Dismiss. 

{¶ 2} First, the petition is not verified as required by R.C. 2725.04. The failure to 

verify the petition requires dismissal. State v. Vore, 91 Ohio St.3d 323, 327, 744 N.E.2d 

763 (2001); State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270, 272, 695 

N.E.2d 254 (1998). Second, Mr. Midgett did not comply with R.C. 2725.04(D), which 

requires a copy of the commitment or cause of detention be attached to the petition for 

writ of habeas corpus. Without the commitment papers, the writ of habeas corpus is fatally 

defective. Brown v. Rogers, 72 Ohio St.3d 339, 341, 650 N.E.2d 422 (1995). 

{¶ 3} For the foregoing reasons, we grant the Motion to Dismiss under Civ.R. 

12(B)(6). The clerk of courts is hereby directed to serve upon all parties not in default 

notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

{¶ 4} MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. 
Richland County, Case No. 2020 CA 0045 3 

{¶ 5} PETITION DISMISSED. 

{¶ 6} COSTS TO PETITIONER. 

{¶ 7} IT IS SO ORDERED. 

By Earle E. Wise, Jr., J. 

Hoffman, P.J. and 

Wise, John, J. concur. 

EEW/amc
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

District of Arizona

John Doe 1, an individual, John Doe 2, an individual,

and John Doe 3, an individual,

GoDaddy.com, LLC, a Delaware corporation;

Amazon Web Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation;

John Roe 1, John Roe 2, John Roe 3, and Roes

4-20,

GoDaddy.com, LLC

c/o Keena Willis

Go Daddy Operating Company LLC

14455 N. Hayden Rd. #219

Scottsdale, AZ 85260

Karl S. Kronenberger

Jeffrey M. Rosenfeld

Virginia Anne Sanderson

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP

150 Post St., Suite 520

San Francisco, CA 94108
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Antonio Benedict Juan, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01107-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER 

 On June 15, 2018, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 15th day of June, 2018. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
Presidential Documents

63287 

Federal Register 

Vol. 79, No. 205 

Thursday, October 23, 2014 

Title 3— 

The President 

Executive Order 13680 of October 16, 2014 

Ordering the Selected Reserve and Certain Individual Ready 

Reserve Members of the Armed Forces to Active Duty 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including sections 121 and 12304 

of title 10, United States Code, I hereby determine that it is necessary 

to augment the active Armed Forces of the United States for the effective 

conduct of Operation United Assistance, which is providing support to 

civilian-led humanitarian assistance and consequence management support 

related to the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa. In furtherance 

of this operation, under the stated authority, I hereby authorize the Secretary 

of Defense, and the Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the 

Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, under 

their respective jurisdictions, to order to active duty any units, and any 

individual members not assigned to a unit organized to serve as a unit 

of the Selected Reserve, or any member in the Individual Ready Reserve 

mobilization category and designated as essential under regulations prescribed by the Secretary concerned, and to terminate the service of those 

units and members ordered to active duty. 

This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 16, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25292 

Filed 10–22–14; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with E0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Apollo 11 Audio Highlights","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IS6xmy0RHY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/apollo-11-audio-highlights\/\">Apollo 11 Audio Highlights<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/apollo-11-audio-highlights\/embed\/#?secret=IS6xmy0RHY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 11 Audio Highlights” — NASA\" data-secret=\"IS6xmy0RHY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/03\/9352713724_c2edddf21e_z.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":486}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Whitney Whitmore, individually and on 

behalf of all of the similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Remedy Temporary Services, Inc. and 

McKesson Specialty Arizona, 

Defendant. 

No. 2:15-cv-2161-SRB 

ORDER 

Defendants Remedy Temporary Services, Inc. and McKesson Specialty Arizona 

(“Defendants”), having filed a Motion to File Under Seal requesting that this Court 

permit it to file their status report under seal pursuant to the Court’s June 13, 2017 

directive, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing the Clerk to file Defendants’ status report 

under seal. 

 Dated this 5th day of July, 2017. 

Case 2:15-cv-02161-SRB Document 98 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 1