alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          35,444
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    413,052
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,804,824
<ALLOWANCE>                                     28,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,367,661
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,865,606
<SHORT-TERM>                                   296,291
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             25,228
<LONG-TERM>                                     43,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           205
<OTHER-SE>                                     137,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,367,661
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 73,729
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,597
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                91,326
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              41,868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,276
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           38,050
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 100
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,786
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (871)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,129
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.10
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,246
<LOANS-PAST>                                       939
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                28,297
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,761
<RECOVERIES>                                       777
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               28,313
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            28,313
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MEDPLUS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES A OF AND FOR THE YEAR
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                      13,788,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,282,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                   115,000
<INVENTORY>                                    757,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,637,974
<PP&E>                                       2,001,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 653,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,238,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,058,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,476,985
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,238,075
<SALES>                                      7,569,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,031,643
<CGS>                                        4,607,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,210,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             346,315
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,866,384)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,121,479)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,744,905)
<DISCONTINUED>                               9,849,944
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,105,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Donald Rose, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

William B. Pribil, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. CV15-8150 PCT DGC

ORDER 

 Pursuant to stipulation for dismissal with prejudice. Doc. 58. 

IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation for dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 58) is 

granted. This action is dismissed with prejudice and each party shall bear its own 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

 Dated this 16th day of February, 2017.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"A View Through Skylab","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BICaXmLnYd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/sl4-150-5062orig\/\">A View Through Skylab<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/sl4-150-5062orig\/embed\/#?secret=BICaXmLnYd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A View Through Skylab” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BICaXmLnYd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/sl4-150-5062orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Concordia","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mVXumlDfPF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/concordia\/\">Concordia<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/concordia\/embed\/#?secret=mVXumlDfPF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Concordia” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mVXumlDfPF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/forconcordia_small.png?w=300","thumbnail_width":300,"thumbnail_height":167}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM  THE 2/28/98
AGRIBRANDS  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.  BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                            0001047598
<NAME>                           AGRIBRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                               160,400
<SECURITIES>                           1,500
<RECEIVABLES>                         92,000
<ALLOWANCES>                           9,900
<INVENTORY>                           88,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     344,200
<PP&E>                               344,000
<DEPRECIATION>                       166,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       575,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                183,200
<BONDS>                                8,600
<COMMON>                                 100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                           354,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         575,000
<SALES>                              643,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     643,100
<CGS>                                534,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        534,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      68,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     5,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       34,900
<INCOME-TAX>                          16,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   18,900
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                          18,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           1.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                           1.76
<FN>
F1 LOSS - PROVISION INCLUDED IN OTHER-EXPENSE ABOVE
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.3
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED STRATEGIC
ALLIANCE AGREEMENT
   1. AMENDMENT TO ROYALTIES
   -1-




---



##### 



2. MISCELLANEOUS
    -2-




---



##### 



provided that
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
 -3-




---



##### 



ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.By:
    
    /s/ David P. HolveckName and Title: President and CEODate: June 7, 2010PENWEST PHARMACEUTICALS CO.By:
    
    Jennifer L. GoodName and Title: President and CEODate: June 8, 2010
 -4-
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Apollo 8","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AUVgrOu1Ec\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/apollo-8\/\">Apollo 8<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/apollo-8\/embed\/#?secret=AUVgrOu1Ec\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 8” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AUVgrOu1Ec\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/apollo_8_earthrise_1968_as08-14-2383.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":469}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

James Brian Nardi, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR 01-11-1-PHX-SRB

DETENTION ORDER

A detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing on the Petition on

Supervised Release were held on June 3, 2011.

THE COURT FINDS that the Defendant has knowingly, intelligently, and

voluntarily waived his right to a detention hearing and a preliminary revocation hearing and

has consented to the issue of detention being made based upon the allegations in the Petition.

THE COURT FURTHER FINDS that the Defendant has failed to sustain his burden

of proof by clear and convincing evidence pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), FED.R.CRIM.P., that

he is not a danger to the community. United States v. Loya, 23 F.3d 1529 (9th Cir. 1994).

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall be detained pending further order of the

court.

DATED this 6th day of June, 2011.

Case 2:01-cr-00011-SRB Document 119 Filed 06/07/11 Page 1 of 1
#### Emanuel Mitchell *v.*John B. Borders et al.

Sales — Purchase of Land for Acting Commissioners.

A sale of land, by a commissioner, made to himself by a party standing in the relation of trustee or agent, will not be permitted to stand, if any profit or advantage was made by the purchase.

APPEAL FROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 24, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

The court having ascertained that a sale of Mitchell’s land was necessary to pay bis debts, so adjudged, and appointed White to execute the same, and although the land was struck off to Bordes, and be was the ostensible purchaser, yet the evidence conclusively establishes the fact that Bordes purchased the land for White, the commissioner. Whether this sale should be approved by this court is the important question in this controversy.

It is an equitable rule well established that a sale made to himself by a party standing in relation of trustee, or agent, will not be permitted to stand, if the party shall have gained any profit *207or advantage by the purchase. In this case, the evidence does not leave the question free from doubt, whether the price paid for the land was full and adequate, and perhaps according to the authorities that of itself should be sufficient to set aside the sale, as the burden is on the purchaser, to show that the price was fair and full and he made no profit by the purchase.

*Turner, for appellants.*

*Burnam, Breckinridge, for appellee.*

But there is some evidence tending to show that White, before the sale assured the wife of appellant, in his absence, that he intended to buy the land if it did not bring $30 per acre, for the benefit of appellant and permit him to retain it, by refunding to him, what he paid. Under these circumstances as the effort was made to set aside the sale before it had been confirmed by the court, and as it was not in fact a sale until it was approved and confirmed, it would have been proper to have opened the biddings and thereby ascertained whether the land would have sold for more than it brought at the sale made by White.

It is objected, that more than $1.50 was allowed the commissioner who executed the deed to the purchaser and the allowance was taxed as costs against appellant. This allowance violates the provision of *section 5, chapter 65, 2 R. S. p. 140,*and perhaps in a case of a further departure, and a greater allowance might, of itself be a cause of reversal. It is safest to make such allowance only as is provided for, by the *state,*but whether or not this court would reverse for that error *alone,*need not now and in this case be decided. But for the error indicated the judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded with directions to set aside the sale, upon equitable principles and to order a resale. Appellees to have a lien on the land for the purchase price paid by Bordes or White with interest from the day .of sale subject to deductions of soil, timber etc., and for an adjustment of improvements upon equitable principles.
No 14,871.

#### Hawkins et al. *v.*McDougal.

*Appeal.*— Assignment *of Errors.*— In the absence of an assignment of errors it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal.

From the Daviess Circuit Court.

*A. J. Padgett, A. Paget*and *H. Burns,*for appellants.

*J. H. O’Neall*and *W. Hefferman,*for appellee.

*545Filed Nov. 11, 1890.

Elliott, J.

— There is no assignment of errors, and hence this court has no jurisdiction of this cause. The assignment of errors constitutes the complaint of the appellant in .all eases appealed from the trial courts, and in the absence of an assignment it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal. *Estate of Thomas*v. *Service,*90 Ind. 128; *Bacon*v. *Withrow,*110 Ind. 94; *Smythe*v. *Boswell,*117 Ind. 365, and cales cited p. 366; *Lawrence*v. *Wood,*122 Ind. 452.

Appeal dismissed, at costs of the appellants.
Exhibit 21.1

                   AMERICAN HOMESTAR CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES
                   ------------------------------------------


                   ACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES:
                   --------------------
                   American Homestar Financial Services, Inc.
                   American Homestar Mortgage, LLP   (50% - owned)
                   American Homestar of Burleson, LP
                   American Homestar of Lancaster, LP
                   Homestar 21, LLC   (50% - owned)
                   HSTR General Holdings, Inc.
                   HSTR Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
                   HSTR Retail Holdings, Inc.
                   Humble Springs Ltd. (49.5% - owned)
                   Nationwide Housing Properties, LP
                   Nationwide Housing Systems, LP
                   Oak Creek Homes, LP
                   Oak Creek Housing Properties, LP
                   Roadmasters Transport Company, Inc.   (51% - owned)
                   Western Insurance Agency, Inc.

                   INACTIVE SUBSIDIARIES:
                   ----------------------
                   Amcorp Management Service Company
                   American Homestar of Alabama, Inc.
                   American Homestar of North Carolina, Inc.
                   American Homestar West, Inc.
                   Associated Retailers Group, LP
                   Associated Retailers Holdings, Inc.
                   Brilliant Carriers, Inc.
                   First Value Homes, Inc.
                   Gold Medal Homes, Inc.
                   Gold Medal NC, Inc.
                   Homexpress, Inc.
                   Lifestar Reinsurance Limited
                   Nationwide NC Homes, Inc.
                   Nationwide of Alabama, Inc.
                   Nationwide West, LP
                   Pacific II Northwest Homes, Inc.
                   Pacific Northwest Homes, Inc.
                   Paradise Mortgage, Inc.
                   R-Anell Custom Homes, Inc.


All entities are 100% owned except where indicated to the contrary.


<PAGE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 9, 2018

No. 04

- 16

- 00671

- CR

Luis Alfredo SERVIN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR5175

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’ s Motion to Substitute A ppellate Counsel, and for Extension of Time to

File Brief is GRANTED. The appellant ’ s brief is due on August 27, 2018.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court