alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Return
      to Main Document




**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
        connection with the quarterly report of Mexoro Minerals Ltd.. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Tracy
        A.
        Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
  1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the Company's financial position and results of
        operations.






By:
                /S/
                Tracy A. MooreTracy
                Moore, Chief Financial Officer




October
      16,
      2006
April 7, 1988

No. 87-1615.

#### Texaco Inc. *v.*Pennzoil Co.

Ct. App. Tex., 1st Dist. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.
#### H. Merrifield *v.*Wm. Lucas.

Pleading — Petition—Mortgage Exhibits — Enle to File — New Trials.

When a petition discloses the existence of a mortgage and proposes to file it, it is in the power of the defendant to compelí the plaintiff to do so, but if he fails to exercise this right, or to interpose any other objection to the judgment in the circuit court, the irregularity is not a cause for reversal.

APPEAL EROM RUSSELL CIRCUIT COURT.

September 18, 1867.

Opinion oe tiie Court by

Judge LIardin :

The mortgage, from tlie appellant to the appellee, as copied into the transcript by the clerk from the Oonnl.y Court records, cannot be regarded by this court as part of the record.

Hisiegarding the mortgage, and the facts it tends to disclose, as to the personal property mortgaged, the only question which we deem important in the case is, whether the failure of the plaintiff to file 1he mortgage, as an exhibit proffered by him, is an available cause of .reversal in this court. .

The mortgage is referred to as an exhibit, but is not made part of tlie petition, which seems to prevent a valid cause of action upon its face. As the petition discloses the existence of the mortgage, and proposes to file it, it was in the power of the defendant to compel the plaintiff to do so by a rule, but failing to exercise this right, or to interpose any other objection to tlie judgment in tlie Circuit Court, the irregularity is not a cause for a reversal in this court.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On October 20, 2014, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Childress Royalty 
                        ( print page 63641)
                        Company, Case No. 14-CV-633-CVE-FHM.* Childress owned property where mining operations took place at the Tar Creek Site. The proposed settlement resolves the United States' claims against Childress under Section 107 of CERCLA for recovery of response costs incurred and to be incurred at the Site. Under the proposed Consent Decree, Childress will pay $810,918.00 to resolve the government's claims. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States of America*
                     v. 
                    *Childress Royalty Company, Case No. 14-CV-633-CVE-FHM.*
                     All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments:
Send them to:By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: 
                    *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $22.50 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Thomas P. Carroll, Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2014-25283 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-CW-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the period ended December 31, 2004 of MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the Issuer) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on this date hereof. I, Monte R. Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 14, 2005



/s/ Monte R. BlackMonte R. BlackChairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), the undersigned, ReiJane Huai,
Chief Executive Officer of FalconStor Software, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:
  The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 of the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  
 
  /s/  ReiJane
  HuaiReiJane
      HuaiChief
      Executive OfficerMarch
      12, 2008
<PAGE>
                                 Exhibit 10(a)

                       Consent of the independent auditors




TO THE SUPERVISORY BOARD AND BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS
ELECTRONICS N.V.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (No. 33-65972, No. 33-80027, No. 333-91287, No. 333-70215, No. 333-91289,
No. 333-39204, No. 333-75542 and No. 333-87852) and in the registration
statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-4582 and 333-90686) of Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V. of our report dated February 7, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, included in the
December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 20-F of Koninklijke Philips Electronics
N.V..

Eindhoven, The Netherlands

                                                       /s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.
March 14, 2003                                             KPMG ACCOUNTANTS N.V.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID CHRAPPA.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE FOTOBALL USA, INC. FORM 10-KSB FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,797,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,963,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                   250,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,105,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,531,267
<PP&E>                                       3,089,438
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,825,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,824,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,964,417
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,665
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,553,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,824,878
<SALES>                                     28,690,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,690,211
<CGS>                                       16,922,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,939,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             120,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,759,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                   113,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,646,066
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,646,066
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83




</TABLE>
PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 16

- 3422

_____________

ROGER VANDERKLOK

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA);

CHARLES KIESER, TSA; CITY OF PHILADELPHIA;

R AYMOND PINKNEY, Philadelphia Police;

DETECTIVE M. WOJCIECHOWSKI, Philadelphia Police;

KENNETH FLAVILLE, Philadelphia Police;

JEH JOHNSON, Department of Homeland Security;

JOHN S. PISTOLE, TSA

Charles Kieser, TSA,

Appellants

_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 2

- 15

- c v

- 370 )

District Judge: Hon. Gerald J. Pappert

_______________

ARGUED

March 23, 2017

Before: SMITH, C

hief Judge

, JORDAN, and ROTH, Circuit Judges

.

(Filed : August 2 2 , 2017 )

_______________

ORDER TO AMEND OPINION

_______________2

JORDAN, Circuit Judge

.

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the above captioned opinion be amended as follows:

Page 39, the th ird line, “Kaiser” shall be changed to “Kieser”.

By the Court:

s/ Kent A. Jordan

Circuit Judge

DATED: August 25, 2017
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6226

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DEREK DESHAUD FAULCON, a/k/a Pegleg,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (2:13-cr-00055-MSD-DEM-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Deshaud Faulcon, Appellant Pro Se. V. Kathleen Dougherty, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Derek Deshaud Faulcon appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his motion to dismiss the indictment. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Faulcon, No. 2:13-cr-00055-MSD-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-55","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BNTUWsp2au\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-55\/\">STS-55<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-55\/embed\/#?secret=BNTUWsp2au\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-55” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BNTUWsp2au\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2838 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2838

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, as the ``Anthony I. 
               Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 23, 2004

  Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mr. Schumer) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, as the ``Anthony I. 
               Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTHONY I. LOMBARDI MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10 West Prospect Street in Nanuet, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Anthony I. Lombardi Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Anthony I. 
Lombardi Memorial Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 1 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 1
exv10w20



 



Exhibit 10.20



AMENDMENT TO SALE AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT




              This Amendment to Sale and Assignment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made
as of this 24th day of September, 2002, by and between Scott Goss, an individual,
residing at 11414 Brook Run Drive, Germantown, MD 20876 (hereinafter referred to as “Owner”),
and Veridian Corporation, its subsidiaries and affiliates, with a principal
place of business at 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, Virginia (collectively
the “Purchaser”). Unless otherwise defined, capitalized terms used in this
Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Sale and Assignment
Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and between Owner and Purchaser dated as of
August 12, 2002.


              WHEREAS, the Owner are Purchaser are parties to the Agreement; and



              WHEREAS, the Owner and Purchaser desire to amend the Agreement as set
forth herein;


              NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:



     1.     Section 2 of the Agreement is amended by adding the following sentences
to the end thereof:


     “Purchaser and Owner acknowledge and agree that Two Hundred Thousand
Dollars ($200,000) of each payment to be made by Purchaser to Owner on the
first, second and third anniversaries of the Closing pursuant to Section 3.2
shall be allocated as consideration for the covenants and agreements set forth
in this Section 2, and the remainder shall be allocated as consideration for
the Business, including the Software. The parties further agree that such
allocation is fair and reasonable given the scope and duration of the
limitations set forth in this Section 2, and that, for purposes of any tax
return, they will report all payments made or received hereunder consistent
with such allocation.”


     2.     Except as amended above, the Agreement remains in full force and
effect.


     3.     This Amendment may be signed in counterparts by telecopy.








 



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment
as of the date above written.



	SCOTT GOSS	VERIDIAN CORPORATION




	/s/ Scott
Goss                                   	By /s/ James P.
Allen                                   

Name: James P.
Allen                                   

Title: Sr. VP & CFO
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2615 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2615

  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to eliminate the consumptive demand 
 exception relating to the importation of goods made with forced labor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 7, 2004

  Mr. Harkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to eliminate the consumptive demand 
 exception relating to the importation of goods made with forced labor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOODS MADE WITH FORCED OR INDENTURED LABOR.

    (a) In General.--The second sentence of section 307 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) is amended by striking ``; but in no 
case'' and all that follows to the end period.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2867

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of the 

military death gratuity from $12,000 to $50,000. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

Mr. HAGEL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the 

amount of the military death gratuity from $12,000 to 

$50,000.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEATH GRATUITY PAYABLE WITH 

4 RESPECT TO MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

5 FORCES. 

6 (a) AMOUNT OF DEATH GRATUITY.—Section 

7 1478(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘$12,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$50,000’’. 
2

•S 2867 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to deaths occurring 

3 on or after September 11, 2001. 

4 (c) OFFSET.—The Secretary of Defense shall derive 

5 funds for amounts payable during fiscal year 2005 by rea6 son of the amendment made by subsection (a) from 

7 amounts available for that fiscal year for travel for per8 sonnel assigned to, or employed in, the Office of the Sec9 retary of Defense. Amounts for such purpose shall be 

10 transferred to the appropriate accounts of the Department 

11 of Defense available for such payments, and amounts so 

12 transferred shall not be counted for purposes of any limi13 tation on the amount of transfers of Department of De14 fense funds during that fiscal year.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Chris BiedermannChris BiedermannChief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2005