alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8223

ROBERT A. MCGHIE, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. NANCY ROUSE, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:05-cv-03102-BEL)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: September 10, 2009

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert A. McGhie, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert A. McGhie seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McGhie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2380

To authorize the President to issue posthumously to the late William ‘‘Billy’’ 

Mitchell a commission as major general, United States Army. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2004

Mr. SUNUNU (for himself, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. GREGG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To authorize the President to issue posthumously to the 

late William ‘‘Billy’’ Mitchell a commission as major 

general, United States Army.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POSTHUMOUS COMMISSION OF WILLIAM 

4 MITCHELL IN THE GRADE OF MAJOR GEN5 ERAL IN THE ARMY. 

6 (a) AUTHORITY.—The President may issue post7 humously a commission as major general, United States 

8 Army, in the name of the late William ‘‘Billy’’ Mitchell, 
2

•S 2380 IS 

1 formerly a colonel, United States Army, who resigned his 

2 commission on February 1, 1926. 

3 (b) DATE OF COMMISSION.—A commission issued 

4 under subsection (a) shall issue as of the date of the death 

5 of William Mitchell on February 19, 1936. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF BENEFITS. 

7 No person is entitled to receive any bonus, gratuity, 

8 pay, allowance, or other financial benefit by reason of the 

9 enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 62793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25090]



[[Page 62791]]

Vol. 79

Monday,

No. 202

October 20, 2014

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2015-01 of October 9, 2014--Provision of 
U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Brazil



Notice of October 16, 2014--Continuation of the National Emergency With 
Respect to Significant Narcotics Traffickers Centered in Colombia


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 79 , No. 202 / Monday, October 20, 2014 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 62793]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2015-01 of October 9, 
                2014

                
Provision of U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to 
                the Government of Brazil

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of Defense

                By the authority vested in me as President by section 
                1012 of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
                Fiscal Year 1995, as amended (22 U.S.C. 2291-4), I 
                hereby certify, with respect to Brazil, that: (1) 
                interdiction of aircraft reasonably suspected to be 
                primarily engaged in illicit drug trafficking in 
                Brazil's airspace is necessary because of the 
                extraordinary threat posed by illicit drug trafficking 
                to the national security of that country; and (2) 
                Brazil has appropriate procedures in place to protect 
                against innocent loss of life in the air and on the 
                ground in connection with such interdiction, which 
                shall at a minimum include effective means to identify 
                and warn an aircraft before the use of force is 
                directed against the aircraft.

                The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to 
                publish this determination in the Federal Register and 
                to notify the Congress of this determination.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, October 9, 2014

[FR Doc. 2014-25090
Filed 10-17-14; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3295-F5
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JULIO SALINAS.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2



Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ NEIL A.M. CROOKNeil A.M. CrookChief Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2004
#### Harry Richard HAMMAR, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Mr. ERMAN, Doctor; Ms. Banks, Nurse; Ms. Read, Nurse, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-7817.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 14, 2005.

Decided: Feb. 17, 2005.

*569Harry Richard Hammar, III, Appellant pro se.

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Harry Richard Hammar, III, seeks to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). The district court dismissed Hammar’s complaint by an order entered on July 14, 2004. On September 9, 2004, the district court received a motion, which Hammar originally filed in the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and which was forwarded to the district court.

In this motion, Hammar asserted that he failed to timely note an appeal because he did not know in which court to file his notice. The district court construed this motion as one to reopen the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6), and denied it. Because Hammar’s motion was received within thirty days after the expiration of the appeal period and sought an extension of time to note an appeal, this motion constituted a motion for an extension of the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), rather than a motion to reopen the appeal period. Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting that court to determine whether Hammar has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal. The record, as supplemented, then will be returned to this court for further consideration.

*REMANDED*
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 805

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2407

(602) 281-3400

FPDOCS 33480756.1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cleopatria Martinez,

Plaintiff,

v.

Maricopa County Community College 

District; et al.,

Defendants.

No. CV 15-01759-PHX-NVW

NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTATION 

REGARDING NOTICE OF 

MOTION AND MOTION FOR 

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

(DOC. 95)

In response to the Court’s November 21, 2017 Order at Doc. 101 denying 

Defendants’ Motion to File Defendants’ Task-Based Itemized Statement of Fees and 

Expenses and Fee Agreement Under Seal (Doc. 96), Defendants hereby submit unsealed 

copies of Defendants’ Task-Based Itemized Statement of Attorneys’ Fees and NonTaxable Costs and Defendants’ Fee Agreement referenced in Defendant’s Notice of 

Motion and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Doc. 95) (Exhibit A, Exhibits 1 and 

2). 

The attached exhibits were previously lodged with the Court but not filed 

pursuant to Defendants’ Motion to File Defendants’ Task-Based Itemized Statement of 

Fees and Expenses and Fee Agreement Under Seal (Doc. 96), which was denied. The 

exhibits were also previously served on Plaintiff’s counsel via email and U.S. Mail 

Pavneet Singh Uppal, SBN 016805

Shayna H. Balch, SBN 024852

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 805

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2407

Telephone: (602) 281-3400

Fax: (602) 281-3401

puppal@fisherphillips.com

sbalch@fisherphillips.com

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 103 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 3
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 805

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2407

(602) 281-3400

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

contemporaneously with the filing of Defendants’ Motion to File Defendants’ TaskBased Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses and Fee Agreement Under Seal (Doc. 

96).

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 22nd day of November 2017.

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

By s/ Shayna H. Balch

Pavneet Singh Uppal

Shayna H. Balch

3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 805

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2407

Attorneys for Defendants

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 103 Filed 11/22/17 Page 2 of 3
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

3200 N. Central Avenue, Suite 805

Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2407

(602) 281-3400

3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 22, 2017, I electronically transmitted the 

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrant(s):

Edmundo P. Robaina

Thomas T. Griffin

ROBAINA & KRESIN PLLC

5343 North 16th Street, Suite 200

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Attorneys for Plaintiff

 s/ Michelle C. Colwell

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 103 Filed 11/22/17 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 4.10


 


UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION FROM THE HEBREW ORIGINAL


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S 2010 OPTION
PLAN


EFFECTIVE FROM OCTOBER 13, 2020


 


Section 13.1 of the Company’s 2010 Option Plan (the “Plan”)
shall be replaced as follows:


“13.1 The Plan shall terminate 20 years after its approval
by the directors.”


The other sections of the Plan remain unchanged.
I

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 477

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, relating to metropolitan

planning.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 21, 1997

Mr. HEFLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

A BILL

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, relating

to metropolitan planning.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING

4 ORGANIZATIONS UNDER HIGHWAY PRO5 GRAM.

6 (a) PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION REPRESENTED.—

7 Section 134(b) of title 23, United States Code, is amended

8 in each of paragraphs (1), (4), and (5) by striking ‘‘75

9 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’.
2

HR 477 IH

1 (b) VETO POWER.—Section 134(b) of such title is

2 amended in each of paragraphs (1), (5)(A), and (5)(B)

3 by striking the parenthetical phrase.

4 (c) AUTONOMY.—Section 134(e) of such title is

5 amended by striking ‘‘and the State’’ and all that follows

6 through the period at the end and inserting the following:

7 ‘‘to ensure that the plans and programs required by this

8 section are complied with. It is the responsibility of the

9 State to provide oversight in the area with multiple metro10 politan planning organizations.’’.

11 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGA12 NIZATIONS UNDER TRANSIT PROGRAM.

13 (a) PERCENTAGE OF POPULATION REPRESENTED.—

14 Section 5303(c) of title 49, United States Code, is amend15 ed in each of paragraphs (1)(A), (4)(B)(i), and (5)(A) by

16 striking ‘‘75 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘50 percent’’.

17 (b) VETO POWER.—Section 5303(c) of such title is

18 amended in each of paragraphs (1)(A), (5)(A), and (5)(B)

19 by striking the parenthetical phrase.

20 (c) AUTONOMY.—Section 5303(e)(3) of such title is

21 amended by striking ‘‘and the State’’ and all that follows

22 through the period at the end and inserting the following:

23 ‘‘to ensure that the plans and programs required by this

24 section are complied with. It is the responsibility of the
3

HR 477 IH

1 State to provide oversight in the area with multiple metro2 politan planning organizations.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2895 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2895

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
        by pink lights in honor of breast cancer awareness month.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ILLUMINATION OF GATEWAY ARCH IN HONOR OF BREAST CANCER 
AWARENESS MONTH.
    In honor of breast cancer awareness month, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be 
illuminated by pink lights for a certain period of time in October, to 
be designated by the Secretary of the Interior.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64203-64204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.

[[Page 64204]]

    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Human Genetic Cell Repository 
Review.
    Date: November 25, 2014.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3An.18K, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3An.18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c2b2aba9a0b082acaba5afb1ecacabaaeca5adb4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c1c05070e1e2c02050b011f42020504420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 22, 2014.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-25508 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,839
<SECURITIES>                                    32,012
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (126)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,446
<PP&E>                                           7,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,830)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,817
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,314
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,074
<SALES>                                          5,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,607
<CGS>                                            2,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,472)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (32)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,504)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.40)
        

</TABLE>
AMENDED

DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

**Amended to add statue for lesser included charges**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON

U.S. District Judge: Raner C. Collins Date: May 11, 2018

USA v. Lonnie Ray Swartz Case Number: CR-15-01723-001-TUC-RCC (DTF)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Mary Sue Feldmeier

Attorney for Defendant: Sean Chapman and Jaime Calle, Retained

Deputy Clerk: Sherry Gammon

Court Reporter: Tracy Jamieson

Interpreter: Sandy Frady assists victim’s family

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Presence Waived ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ

STATUS CONFERENCE:

Matter comes before the Court on a Status Conference re: trial status. The Government will proceed to 

trial on the charges of Voluntary Manslaughter and Involuntary Manslaughter and requests a new trial 

date be set as early as practical. 

IT IS ORDERED this matter is set for trial on Tuesday, 10/23/2018 at 9:30 a.m. before Chief Judge 

Raner C. Collins. The plea deadline is 10/5/2018. Estimated length of trial is 4 weeks. Excludable 

delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7) is found to commence on 5/12/2018 and end on 10/23/2018. A 

Motion Hearing to address any outstanding motions is set for 7/30/2018 at 10:00 a.m. before Chief 

Judge Raner C. Collins. 

Thereafter, the Clerk is instructed to add the charges of Voluntary Manslaughter and Involuntary 

Manslaughter to the case, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. §1112, which is a lesser included charge in Title 

18 U.S.C. §1111.

Status Conference: 5 minutes

Start: 10:00 AM

Stop: 10:05 AM

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 498 Filed 05/11/18 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7423

ROBERT NEIL JOANNIDES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUSSELL GINN; LARRY DAIL; ROBERT TYSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-58-5-BR)

Submitted: February 26, 2002 Decided: March 12, 2002

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Neil Joannides, Appellant Pro Se. Buren Riley Shields, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Neil Joannides appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Further, Joannides’ claims regarding his untimely

submission of affidavits, and allegations of bias on the part of

the magistrate judge are meritless. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Joannides v. Ginn, No. CA-00-

58-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED