alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement No. 333-157760-02 on Form S-3 of our reportdated September 28, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedule of Ferrellgas L.P. and the effectiveness of Ferrellgas, L.P.’sinternal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof Ferrellgas L.P. for the year ended July 31, 2009.

 

** **

Kansas City, Missouri

September 28, 2009

 

----
EXHIBIT 13.1


From page 25 of the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders of
Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc.:


STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

     Rawlings' Common Stock is quoted on the NASDAQ National
Market System under the symbol RAWL.  As of August 31, 1997,
there were 630 shareholders of record.

Common Stock                   High        Low     Close

1997
4th Qtr.                      $10 3/4      $7 7/8  $10 9/16
3rd Qtr.                       10 1/2       7 3/4    8 3/4
2nd Qtr.                       14 1/8       7 5/8    9
1st Qtr.                       10 3/8       7 5/8    7 7/8

1996                          
4th Qtr.                      $10 1/2      $8 3/8  $9 9/16
3rd Qtr.                       11           8       9 1/4
2nd Qtr.                       9 1/8        6       8 1/4
1st Qtr.                       9 3/4        7 1/4   7 5/8


The Company has paid no dividends.
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4796

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to prohibit

the use of funds for any facility a primary purpose of which is the

distribution or use of tobacco products.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 10, 1998

Mr. ENSIGN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Banking and Financial Services

A BILL

To amend the Housing and Community Development Act

of 1974 to prohibit the use of funds for any facility

a primary purpose of which is the distribution or use

of tobacco products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS TO FACILITATE SALE OR USE

4 OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS PROHIBITED.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 105 of the Housing and

6 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5305)

7 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section:
2

•HR 4796 IH

1 ‘‘(h) INELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES.—Notwithstanding sub2 section (a), activities under this title may not include the

3 acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or

4 other improvement of any facility a primary or significant

5 purpose of which is the distribution, including sale, of any

6 tobacco product.’’.

7 (b) FUNDS AFFECTED.—The amendment made by

8 subsection (a) shall not apply to funds which were obli9 gated by the Secretary of Housing and Human Develop10 ment before the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63963-63964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25399]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDIO TRUST


Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: The Presidio Trust.

[[Page 63964]]


ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Sec.  103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 
16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's 
bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio 
Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, 
November 20, 2014, at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, Presidio 
of San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by 
Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former 
U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.
    The purposes of this meeting are to take action on the minutes of a 
previous Board meeting, to provide the Chairperson's report, to provide 
the Executive Director's report, to provide a report on the New 
Presidio Parklands Project, and to receive public comment in accordance 
with the Trust's Public Outreach Policy.
    Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such 
as needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Laurie Fox at 
415.561.5300 prior to November 10, 2014.
    Time: The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Thursday, November 20, 
2014.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher 
Loop, Presidio of San Francisco.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Cook, General Counsel, the 
Presidio Trust, 103 Montgomery Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, 
California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

    Dated: October 20, 2014.
Karen A. Cook,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-25399 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
Exhibit 4.36
Power of Attorney
This Enterprise, Shanghai Rongyan Yunqi Technology Co., Ltd., owns 100% of the equity (hereinafter referred to as the “Target Company’s Equity”) of Shanghai Zhiyan Yunwei Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Target Company”). A series of agreements including the Exclusive Technical Consulting and Service Agreement, the Exclusive Option Agreement and the Equity Pledge Agreement (collectively referred to as the “Controlling Agreements”) have been entered into by and among this Enterprise, Shanghai Edge Connect Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “WFOE”) and the Target Company.
In order to ensure the performance of the Controlling Agreements, with respect to the Target Company’s Equity, this Enterprise hereby irrevocably authorizes the WFOE to exercise the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney:
WFOE is authorized to exercise relevant rights including but not limited to the following with respect to the matters related to the Target Company’s Equity with full authority for and on behalf of this Enterprise as the only and exclusive agent of this Enterprise: 1) Exercise all the shareholder’s rights and voting rights enjoyed by this Enterprise in accordance with the laws and the articles of association of the Target Company, and make shareholders` resolutions, including but not limited to selling or transferring or pledging or disposing of all or part of the equity of the Target Company; and 2) Designate and appoint the legal representative (Chairman of the board), directors, supervisors, general manager and other senior managers of the Target Company as the authorized representative of this Enterprise.
All the acts of WFOE in relation to the voting rights of the Target Company shall be deemed to be the acts of this Enterprise, and all the documents signed by WFOE shall be deemed to be signed by this Enterprise, and the above are acknowledged by this Enterprise.
WFOE has the right to delegate the above matters to other persons or entities without prior notice to this Enterprise or the consent of this Enterprise.
This Power of Attorney is irrevocable and shall remain in force as long as this Enterprise is a shareholder of the Target Company, commencing from the effective date of the Controlling Agreements. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Power of Attorney may be terminated in any of the following circumstances: 1) WFOE may unilaterally terminate this Power of Attorney at any time upon written notice thirty (30) days in advance to this Enterprise; 2) WFOE purchases all the equity of the Target Company pursuant to the Exclusive Option Agreement.
​



During the term of this Power of Attorney, this Enterprise hereby waives all the rights granted to WFOE through this Power of Attorney and will not exercise such rights on its own.
Shanghai Rongyan Yunqi Technology Co., Ltd.
(Seal)
Authorized Representative (Signature): /s/ Yang Haifeng
December 10, 2020
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cornelia Demers-Sborov,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Hartford Life and Accident Insurance 

Company,

Defendant.

No. CV-15-00467-TUC-FRZ

ORDER 

The parties have settled, and pursuant to the joint stipulation (Doc. 22):

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice, each 

party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court close this case.

Dated this 20th day of June, 2016.

Case 4:15-cv-00467-FRZ Document 23 Filed 06/21/16 Page 1 of 1
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

District of Arizona

Electrical Prefab Systems, LLC; Bruce Phillips

Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC; Eaton Corporation

Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC

c/o CT Corporation System

3800 North Central Avenue, Suite 460

Phoenix, Arizona 85012

Brian J. Schulman

Greenberg Traurig, LLP

2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 700

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

schulmanb@gtlaw.com

602-445-8000

Case 2:15-cv-01968-JJT Document 2 Filed 10/01/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

u I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

u I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

u I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

u I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

u Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 2:15-cv-01968-JJT Document 2 Filed 10/01/15 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"45 Years Ago: Space Shuttle Enterprise Arrives at NASA\u2019s Kennedy Space Center","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"MNqb9BeBOV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-space-shuttle-enterprise-arrives-at-nasas-kennedy-space-center\/\">45 Years Ago: Space Shuttle Enterprise Arrives at NASA\u2019s Kennedy Space Center<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-space-shuttle-enterprise-arrives-at-nasas-kennedy-space-center\/embed\/#?secret=MNqb9BeBOV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“45 Years Ago: Space Shuttle Enterprise Arrives at NASA\u2019s Kennedy Space Center” — NASA\" data-secret=\"MNqb9BeBOV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/enterprise-at-ksc-22-arriving-paris-air-show-jun-1983.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":402}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                    9,617
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                             16,049
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               5,517
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          38,326
<PP&E>                                    242,319
<DEPRECIATION>                            28,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            273,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     47,030
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  11
<OTHER-SE>                                101,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              273,473
<SALES>                                   109,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          109,356
<CGS>                                     63,777
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             88,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (437)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        11,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           9,576
<INCOME-TAX>                              3,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       6,033
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           8,108
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              (2,075)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.23)



</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIAN XIN ZHOU,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 16

- 72693

Agency No. A099

- 635

- 704

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2023 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS , Circuit Judges.

Ji a n Xin Zhou , a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

i mmigration j udge ’ s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 16

- 72693

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S .C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence the agency ’ s factual findings, applying the standards created by the

REAL ID Act. Ren v. Holder , 648 F.3d 1079, 1083, 1089

- 90 (9th Cir. 2011). We

deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Zhou failed to

provide sufficient corroborative evidence, along with his credible testimony and

the rest of the evidence in the record, to meet his burden of proof to establish

eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1158(b)(1)(B)(ii) ( “ Where the trier of fact determines that the applicant should

provide evidence that corroborates otherwise credible testimony, such evidence

must be provided unless the applicant does not have the evidence and c annot

reasonably obtain the evidence. ” ) ; Ren , 648 F.3d at 1094 (corroborative evidence

consist ing of “two short and vague letters,” along with the rest of the evidence in

the record, did not compel the conclusion that the petitioner had met his burden of

p roof). Thus, Zho u ’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT protection

because Zhou failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to China. See Aden

v. Holder , 589 F.3 d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). We reject Zho u ’s contention that

the agency ignored evidence or otherwise erred in its legal analysis. See3 16

- 72693

Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (agency adequately

considered evidence and sufficiently announ ced its decision).

We do not consider the country conditions reports Zhou references in his

opening brief that are not a part of the administrative record. See Fisher v. INS , 79

F.3d 955, 963 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The temporary stay of removal rema ins in place until issuance of the

mandate.

PETITON FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW   Document 1-10   Filed 09/02/15   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW   Document 1-10   Filed 09/02/15   Page 2 of 2
°RONAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0712

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SUSAN LEE HINRICH HAYNAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

MAR 1 g MN

Bowen 

GaBertwood

Clerk of Suprezne Court

State or 

Montana

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant's motion for extension of time,

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including April 22, 2020, within which to prepare, file,

and serve Appellant's opening brief on appeal.

DATED this / `c day of March, 2020.

Chief Justice

03/18/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0712
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Linda Ritts,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-02853-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9614 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 1
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4769

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to prepare a report on the current

Federal program costs, and Federal revenues, attributable to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and on other matters relating to the taxation

of residents of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred

to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to prepare a report

on the current Federal program costs, and Federal revenues, attributable to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

and on other matters relating to the taxation of residents

of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FISCAL EQUITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR

4 PUERTO RICO.

5 The Secretary of the Treasury shall prepare and sub6 mit to Congress a report which includes detailed informa7 tion with respect to—
2

•HR 4769 IH

1 (1) the cost of all current Federal programs,

2 services, benefits, entitlements, and activities in the

3 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, separately indicating

4 the cost of each major category of Federal spending;

5 (2) all revenues received into the Federal

6 Treasury collected in or attributable to the Common7 wealth of Puerto Rico;

8 (3) the reliability and efficiency of current fi9 nancial management and budget execution processes

10 involving transactions between Federal and Com11 monwealth of Puerto Rico fiscal systems;

12 (4) measures which would be necessary or rec13 ommended in the event Congress determines to in14 troduce and phase-in over a period of years Federal

15 taxation for residents of the Commonwealth of Puer16 to Rico on the same basis as in the States of the

17 Union, as well as the application of all additional

18 forms of Federal corporate taxation on the same

19 basis as in the States of the Union;

20 (5) the operation of the current system of tax21 ation in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico under

22 local law, including historical and current levels of

23 revenue and allocation of such revenues under local

24 law, as well as adjustments in local tax law and pol25 icy which would be necessary or appropriate in order
3

•HR 4769 IH

1 to facilitate introduction of Federal taxation in the

2 event Congress determines that integration of the

3 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico into the Federal fis4 cal system is in the national interest; and

5 (6) possible alternative forms of Federal tax6 ation which would result in the collection by the In7 ternal Revenue Service from individuals and cor8 porations in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of

9 revenues which after a reasonable transition period

10 will equal or exceed the annual costs of the Federal

11 Government in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,

12 including recommendations regarding the feasibility

13 of a gradual phase-in of Federal taxes proportional

14 to levels of income and Federal spending in the

15 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico relative to the nation

16 as a whole.

Æ