alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Thalia K. Patrinos","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/tpatrino\/","title":"Deputy Program Manager Dr. Camille Alleyne","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6iPylNUJVz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/deputy-program-manager-dr-camille-alleyne\/\">Deputy Program Manager Dr. Camille Alleyne<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/deputy-program-manager-dr-camille-alleyne\/embed\/#?secret=6iPylNUJVz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Deputy Program Manager Dr. Camille Alleyne” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6iPylNUJVz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/jsc2024e005756.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Case 2:15-mj-01786-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01786-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01786-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 3 of 3
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Carlester Sharrod Hayes, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Arizona, State of, 

Respondent.

No. CV-15-02435-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 At issue is United States Magistrate Judge James F. Metcalf’s Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”)(Doc. 26) concluding that the Court should deny and dismiss 

the pending Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

2254 (Doc. 10). Petitioner timely filed a Response to All Parties (Doc. 27), which this 

Court construes as his Objections to the R&R. Therefore the Court reviews the R&R de 

novo. Upon that review, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety, and for the reasons 

competently and clearly stated in the R&R, the Court will deny and dismiss the Second 

Amended Petition with prejudice as both grounds for relief contained therein were not 

exhausted in the state court, and are now procedurally defaulted; no statutory tolling 

applied; and Petitioner failed to show cause and prejudice for equitable tolling. Finally, 

Petitioner has failed to demonstrate any qualification for the Schlupp gateway. 

 Petitioner’s Objections fail to address the issues raised in the R&R. He spends 

more than half of his two-page Objection arguing the merits of his ground that the police 

report in his case is inconsistent with the charging document, but the Court does not reach 

Case 2:15-cv-02435-JJT Document 29 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

the merits of his Petition until he has satisfied the procedureal requirements of AEDPA. 

Petitioner does attempt to reargue his mental impairment as a reason to invoke equitable 

tolling, but he raises no argument or fact that the R&R has not already addressed and 

correctly dispensed. 

 For all of the above reasons, and as set forth in the R&R, 

 IT IS ORDERED adopting the R&R in its entirety 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying and dismissing with prejudice the Second 

Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus (Doc. 10). 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability in this matter 

as reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s assessment of the claims debatable or 

wrong. 

 Dated this 7th day of September, 2016. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-02435-JJT Document 29 Filed 09/07/16 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:15-cr-08227-SPL Document 41 Filed 11/04/16 Page 12 of 12
Case 2:15-mj-01884-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01884-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01884-JFM Document 4 Filed 12/02/15 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit Q 

Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-22 Filed 12/30/16 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-22 Filed 12/30/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01856-BSB Document 53-22 Filed 12/30/16 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Joseph E. Byrne, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Newark Group, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: December 10, 2004
**EXHIBIT 99.6**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 40-Fof NOVA Chemicals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”),I, Jeffrey M. Lipton, Chief Executive Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          suchReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained in such Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofNOVA Chemicals Corporation.

 

 
| March 1, 2006 | */s/  Jeffrey M. Lipton* |
|--------------------|--------------------------|
|               | Jeffrey M. Lipton        |
|               | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
#### Marina MRELASHVILI and Zaza Mrelashvili, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE and John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States, Respondents.

No. 02-4148.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 7, 2005.

Nicholas J. Mundy, Kuba, Mundy & Associates, New York, NY, for Petitioners.

Susan W. Berry, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division (Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice; Linda S. Wernery, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, on the brief), Washington, DC, for Respondents.

Present: WALKER, Chief Judge, CARDAMONE, and B.D. PARKER, Jr., Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is AFFIRMED and the petition is DENIED.

Petitioners Marina Mrelashvili and Zaza Mrelashvili seek review of an April 11, 2002, Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from the March 13, 2000, decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) granting their application for voluntary departure pursuant to § 240B(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(a), and accepting their withdrawal of claims for asylum and withholding of removal. In their petition, the Mrelashvilis argue that the BIA abused its discretion in dismissing their appeal and denying their motion to reopen and remand. Specifically, they claim that they did not knowingly and voluntarily withdraw their applications for asylum and withholding of removal, and thus did not knowingly and voluntarily accept voluntary departure. Familiarity with the facts and procedural history is assumed. We affirm the BIA’s order and deny the Mrelashvilis’ petition.

We review the BIA’s factual findings under a “substantial evidence” standard. *See Zhang v. INS,*386 F.3d 66, 73 (2d Cir.2004); *Secaida-Rosales v. INS,*331 F.3d 297, 306-07 (2d Cir.2003). Under this standard, such findings are “ ‘conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude the contrary.’ ” *See Zhang,*386 F.3d at 73 n. 7 (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); noting that the statute codifies the substantial evidence standard of review).

The BIA rejected petitioners’ contention that their withdrawal of claims was not *41knowing and voluntary, and their requests to reopen and remand, for reasons that were adequately substantiated by the record. The record supports the BIA’s view that these claims were withdrawn knowingly and voluntarily, with the advice of counsel, because the proffered ground for asylum was fabricated. Even if their withdrawal of claims was not knowing and voluntary, the Mrelashvilis still have set forth no ground upon which asylum or withholding of removal could be based.

We have carefully considered the Mrelashvilis’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is hereby AFFIRMED and the petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Battista, Chief Executive Officer of Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.
(the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 28, 2007



/S/    RICHARD
BATTISTARichard Battista Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Ryan Paul Hicks,

Defendant.

No. CR-15-8192-PCT-DLR

DETENTION ORDER

On February 22, 2021, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released 

on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. §

3143.

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

Dated this 22nd day of February, 2021.

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cr-08192-DLR Document 112 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-119","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"54QSdfLExQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-119\/\">STS-119<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-119\/embed\/#?secret=54QSdfLExQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-119” — NASA\" data-secret=\"54QSdfLExQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/493169main_2009-03-11_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":749}
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 72 2 . J ULI E ANN CALLAW AY v . W ILLI A M MANDERS.

Th e Ap p el l an t i n t h e ab ov e-s t y l ed cas e h as fi l ed a m o t i o n en t i t l ed M o t i o n To
W i th d raw Ap p eal

. Pu rs u an t t o Co u rt Ru l e 4 1 (g )(1 )
, s ai d m ot i o n i s h ereb y GRANTED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## July 22, 2021

07/22/2021
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Deep Space Optical Communications (DSOC)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6if3dfG0yX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/deep-space-optical-communications-dsoc\/\">Deep Space Optical Communications (DSOC)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/deep-space-optical-communications-dsoc\/embed\/#?secret=6if3dfG0yX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Deep Space Optical Communications (DSOC)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6if3dfG0yX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/main-dsoc-psyche-photo-april-2022.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"What Is a Rocket? (Grades 5-8)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HnGNhriko6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-is-a-rocket-grades-5-8\/\">What Is a Rocket? (Grades 5-8)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-is-a-rocket-grades-5-8\/embed\/#?secret=HnGNhriko6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“What Is a Rocket? (Grades 5-8)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"HnGNhriko6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/edu_falcon_9_dragon_spacecx_launch.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}