alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Robert H. Mullen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Newark Group, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: September 13, 2005



/s/ Robert H. MullenRobert H. MullenChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARYL ARMSTEAD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MOTI RAGHUNATH, C.F.M. 1 and

CURTIS WELLS, Assistant F.M.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-57005

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-02246-CJCAGR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Daryl Armstead, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison

officials retaliated against him for exercising his First Amendment rights. We have

FILED

JUL 15 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-57055

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

summary judgment, Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc),

and for an abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to amend, City

of Los Angeles v. San Pedro Boat Works, 635 F.3d 440, 446 (9th Cir. 2011), and

we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Armstead

failed to create a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were

aware of his grievance prior to changing the lunch and dinner menus. See Rhodes

v. Robinson, 408 F.3d 559, 567-68 (9th Cir. 2005) (listing elements of a retaliation

claim); Pratt v. Rowland, 65 F.3d 802, 808 (9th Cir. 1995).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Armstead’s motion

for leave to amend where the motion was filed after briefing on defendants’

summary judgment motion was complete. See M/V Am. Queen v. San Diego

Marine Constr. Corp., 708 F.2d 1483, 1492 (9th Cir. 1983).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.5








                                 August 31, 1998




American Drug Company
9 West 57th Street
Suite 4170
New York, NY 10019

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      GP Strategies  Corporation ("GP Strategies")  hereby agrees,  for a period
commencing on the date hereof and ending three years thereafter, that:

(a)         GP Strategies  shall vote all of the shares of American Drug Company
            ("ADC") common stock,  par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock")
            owned by it, directly or indirectly,  in a manner such that not more
            than 50% of the  members of the Board of  Directors  of ADC shall be
            officers or directors of GP Strategies; and

(b)         on all other matters  submitted to a vote of stockholders of ADC, GP
            Strategies  shall vote its  shares of ADC  Common  Stock in the same
            manner and in the same  proportion as the remaining  stockholders of
            ADC vote.

                                Very truly yours,



                                GP STRATEGIES CORPORATION


                                 BY:                                 
                                 Jerome I. Feldman, President and
                                 Chief Executive Officer
|EXHIBIT 8.1
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
|--------------------------------







|Name of Subsidiary                  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation | Name Under Which We Do Business    
|----------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | -----------------------------------
|IHI International Holdings Ltd.     | Bermuda                       | IHI International Holdings Ltd.    
|IHI Construction Ltd.               | British Columbia              | IHI Construction Ltd.              
|Canadian Hi-Tech Manufacturing Ltd. | British Columbia              | Canadian Hi-Tech Manufacturing Ltd.
|IHI Developments Ltd.               | British Columbia              | IHI Developments Ltd.              
|IHI Sales Ltd.                      | British Columbia              | IHI Sales Ltd.                     
|IHI Planning Ltd.                   | British Columbia              | IHI Planning Ltd.                  
|IHI Manufacturing Ltd.              | British Columbia              | IHI Manufacturing Ltd.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) I, Douglas C. Haskett, II, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal period ended March 31, 2011, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Dated: May 16, 2011



/s/ Douglas C. Haskett, IIDouglas C. Haskett, IIExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Z. Blythe *v.*H. Hardy et al.

Pleading — Answer Insufficient as a Bar.

An answer, simply charging usury without facts, is insufficient as a bar, and subject to a judgment as by default.

APPEAL FROM CALLOWAY CIRCUIT COURT.

March 5, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

Though there is no formal bill of execptions, yet the agreement *694of the parties shows all the evidence on the trial. And we cannot affirm the judgment for the following reasons:

*Holt, Stubblefield, for appellant.*

*Sims, for appellees.*

1. The answer, simply charging usury without facts, is radically insufficient as a bar, and the circuit court ought to have treated it, and might have rendered a judgment as by default.

2. We construe the answer as charging usury except as to $500, *in each note.*The appellant was, of course, entitled to a judgment for- $2,000, uncontroverted. Nevertheless, after a judgment for only $500, verdict and judgment were rendered in bar of the action.

3. The trial was erroneously forced and the appellant taken, apparently, by surprise.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THIRD
QUARTER 2000 10Q FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-2000
<CASH>                                           8,488
<SECURITIES>                                     1,989
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,080
<PP&E>                                         101,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,916
<BONDS>                                          1,733
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                     100,532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,808
<SALES>                                         89,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,959
<CGS>                                           23,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,117
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,933
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Brian Weinberger,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brian Weinberger,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Trans Union, LLC, a Delaware

limited liability company; and

Payment Solutions, Inc., 

d/b/a Card Gard, a California

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01665-GMS

Hon. G. Murray Snow

STIPULATION FOR 

DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff and Defendant Trans Union, LLC, (hereinafter referred to as “Trans Union”), 

through counsel undersigned and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate that the abovecaptioned action may be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees 

and costs, in accordance with the form of dismissal order filed concurrently herewith.

DATED this 5

th day of October, 2015

Case 2:15-cv-01665-GMS Document 12 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

PHILIP R. WOOTEN, PC

 /s/ Philip R. Wooten

Philip R. Wooten

Attorney for Defendant Trans Union, LLC

KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 5, 2015 I electronically transmitted the attached document to 

the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and for transmittal of Notice of Electronic 

Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Philip R. Wooten, AZ State Bar No. 007006

PHILIP R. WOOTEN, PC

3413 E. Equestrian Tr.

Phoenix, Arizona 85044-3403

philip.wooten@azbar.org

Attorney for Defendant Trans Union, LLC

/s/ Amber Gingiloski

Case 2:15-cv-01665-GMS Document 12 Filed 10/05/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01665-GMS Document 12 Filed 10/05/15 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 23


                        Consent of Independent Accountants

         We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the Prospectus
constituting  part of the Registration  Statement on Form S-3 (No.  33-94622) of
Agri-Nutrition  Group Limited of our report dated January 15, 1999  appearing on
page F-2  of this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K/A.  We  also  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference of our report on the  Financial  Statement  Schedule
appearing on page S-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
February 8, 1999




<PAGE>


                        Consent of Independent Accountants

     We hereby  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Prospectus
constituting  part of the  Registration  Statement  on Form S-8 (Nos.  33-86880,
33-86892, 33-93340, 333-3192,  333-48069, and 333-48073) of Agri-Nutrition Group
Limited of our report  dated  January  15,  1999  appearing  on page F-2 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report on the Financial  Statement Schedule appearing on page S-1 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
January 29, 199
Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Action Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

PH I L L I P S DA Y E S

NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW FIRM

A Professional Corporation

3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1100

Phoenix, Arizona 85012

Telephone: 1-800-JOB-LAWS

docket@phillipsdayeslaw.com

TREY DAYES, No. 020805

SEAN C. DAVIS, No. 030754

seand@phillipsdayeslaw.com

Direct: (602) 288-1610 ext. 432

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZIONA

SHERI KANE,

Plaintiff, 

v.

FOOTHILLS REHABILITATION CENTER, 

LLC, an Arizona limited liability company; and 

WILLIAM ROTHNER and JANE DOE 

ROTHNER, husband and wife,

Defendants. 

Case No. 4:15-cv-00519-JGZ

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A), Plaintiff gives notice of her dismissal with prejudice of 

this action, each side to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.

Dated: January 5, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

PHILLIPS DAYES NATIONAL

EMPLOYMENT LAW FIRM PC

By /s/Trey Dayes

Trey Dayes

Sean Davis

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 4:15-cv-00519-JGZ Document 13 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Action Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 5, 2016, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the clerk’s office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transmittal of a Notice 

of Electronic Filing to each of the following registrants:

John Alan Doran

Lori Wright Keffer

Matthew Hesketh 

201 East Washington Street, Suite 800

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2327

Attorneys for Defendants 

By: /s/Nasser Abujbarah

Nasser Abujbarah

Paralegal for Sean Davis

Case 4:15-cv-00519-JGZ Document 13 Filed 01/05/16 Page 2 of 2
No. 14,465.

#### Keeler *v.*Heims.

Filed Dec. 19, 1890.

Bill op *Exceptions.*— When *not Presented in Season.*— Where the motion for a new trial was overruled on June 24th, 1887, and ninety days given from that time within which to file a bill of exceptions, a bill of exceptions presented to the judge .for his signature on September 24th, following, is not presented in season.

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

*H. J. Everett,*for appellant.

H. *Speed*and *O. B. Jameson,*for appellee.

Berkshire, J.

— The j udgment rendered in the trial court. is within the issues!

The errors assigned are not effectual in the absence of the evidence.

The court gave to the appellant ninety days from the date at which the motion for a new trial was overruled in which to file his bill of exceptions.

The motion was overruled on the 24th day of June, 1887, and the bill of exceptions was not presented to the judge for his signature until the 24th day of the following September, ninety-two days,excluding the first and including the last days. We find no error in the record.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 99.3

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSB Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Carrozza, Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.


/s/John Carrozza
------------------------------
John Carrozza
Acting Chief Financial Officer
August __, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
for the six months ending July 4, 1998, and such is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001047368
<NAME>                        GLENOIT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                         405
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  44,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                   698
<INVENTORY>                                    11,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,431
<PP&E>                                         66,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                 22,622
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,818
<BONDS>                                        124,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (38,655)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,488
<SALES>                                        87,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               87,940
<CGS>                                          59,153
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  59,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               13,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (158)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   5,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  5.699
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  5.699
        

</TABLE>