alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 207 (Monday, October 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date: October 27, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 21, 2014, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Parcel Select 
Contract 8 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-1, CP2015-3.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2014-25537 Filed 10-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nathan Cranford","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nathan-a-cranfordnasa-gov\/","title":"Experiments to Unlock How Human Bodies React to Long Space Journeys","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OorwTQIyza\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/experiments-to-unlock-how-human-bodies-react-to-long-space-journeys\/\">Experiments to Unlock How Human Bodies React to Long Space Journeys<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/experiments-to-unlock-how-human-bodies-react-to-long-space-journeys\/embed\/#?secret=OorwTQIyza\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Experiments to Unlock How Human Bodies React to Long Space Journeys” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OorwTQIyza\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/cipher.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2724 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 2724

To amend section 33(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657c(a)) to 
clarify that the National Veterans Business Development Corporation is 
                           a private entity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2004

   Ms. Snowe (for herself, Mr. Kerry, and Mr. Talent) introduced the 
following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, 
                               and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 33(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657c(a)) to 
clarify that the National Veterans Business Development Corporation is 
                           a private entity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL VETERANS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

    Section 33(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657c(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Corporation is a private entity and is not an 
agency, instrumentality, authority, entity, or establishment of the 
United States Government.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Brown and Another *v.*Wernwag.

On appeal.

*Monday, May*25.

DEBT on a promissory note. Plea, that the defendant had executed a mortgage on real estate to secure the debt; that the plaintiffs had obtained a decree of foreclosure and sale of the mortgaged premises; that a writ of error to the decree had been sued out by the defendant, and the cause was then pending in the Supreme Court. *Held,*on demurrer, that the plea was bad. *Stevens*v. *Dufour,*1 Blackf. 387.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       12,398,62
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         798,471
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            18,775,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 18,556,597
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      74,872,259
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        75,474,256
<LOANS>                                    214,281,803
<ALLOWANCE>                                  8,398,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             349,037,191
<DEPOSITS>                                 245,711,245
<SHORT-TERM>                                   638,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         12,847,941
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,644,503
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,036,857
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,158,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             349,037,191
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             17,515,762
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,919,848
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            23,435,610
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,332,955
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,475,996
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       15,959,614
<LOAN-LOSSES>                              (1,674,909)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              13,643
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,940,095
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,440,302
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,783,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.09
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,286,976
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,255,645
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,142,100
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,142,100
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  761,790
<RECOVERIES>                                 1,750,603
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            8,398,058
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of FindWhat.com (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip
R. Thune, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


                                  /s/ Phillip R. Thune
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  Phillip R. Thune, Chief Financial Officer and
                                  Chief Operating Officer of FindWhat.com
                                  April 30, 2003
**Exhibit 31.3**
**CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**
I, Ronald Zilkowski, certify that:  
     1. I    have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Chindex International,    Inc.;  
     2. Based    on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement    of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements    made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,    not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;  
     3. Based    on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information    included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the    financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant    as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;  
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  
a) designed such disclosure controls and    procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by    others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this    annual report is being prepared;  
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the    registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this    annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls    and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on    such evaluation; and  
c) Disclosed in this report any change    in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred    during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected,    or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting;  
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.  
February 27, 2004  
/s/ Ronald Zilkowski
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Monaghan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-b-monaghannasa-gov\/","title":"Second Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) Ground Terminal","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"oo0xwbT4Md\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/photo_stgt_antennas\/\">Second Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) Ground Terminal<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/photo_stgt_antennas\/embed\/#?secret=oo0xwbT4Md\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Second Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS) Ground Terminal” — NASA\" data-secret=\"oo0xwbT4Md\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Photo_STGT_Antennas.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Douglas L. Tree, 

Defendant.

No. CR-01-00009-PHX-SMM

DETENTION ORDER 

 On August 25, 2014, defendant Douglas L. Tree appeared before this Court on a 

petition for revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the 

Court. The Court considered the petition and file in determining whether the defendant 

should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed 

on supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition 

to revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. §3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 25th day of August, 2014. 

Case 2:01-cr-00009-SMM Document 40 Filed 08/25/14 Page 1 of 1
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

February 25, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LINDSEY KENT SPRINGER,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-5109

(D.C. Nos. 4:13-CV-00145-SPF-TLW and

4:09-CR-00043-SPF-1)

(N.D. Okla.)

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

Before HARTZ, McKAY, and MATHESON, Circuit Judges.

Appellant seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s dismissal

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas petition.

In 2010, Appellant was convicted on several tax evasion charges and sentenced to

180 months’ imprisonment. We affirmed his convictions and sentence on direct appeal. 

United States v. Springer, 444 F. App’x 256 (10th Cir. 2011). Appellant then filed the

instant § 2255 petition, in which he raised seventy-six grounds for relief. The district

court dismissed the majority of these grounds as procedurally barred, then concluded that

*

 This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case,

res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Appellate Case: 14-5109 Document: 01019390228 Date Filed: 02/25/2015 Page: 1 
each of the remaining grounds failed on the merits.

We have thoroughly reviewed the appellate record and Appellant’s filings on

appeal, as well as the applicable legal standards. Having done so, we conclude that

reasonable jurists would not debate the correctness of the district court’s comprehensive

orders disposing of this case. We accordingly DENY Appellant’s request for a certificate

of appealability and DISMISS the appeal. We DENY Appellant’s motion to proceed in

forma pauperis on appeal. All other pending motions are likewise DENIED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge

-2-

Appellate Case: 14-5109 Document: 01019390228 Date Filed: 02/25/2015 Page: 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"X-57 High Voltage Test with Both Motors in Hangar","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6N3rmxgvSc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-57-high-voltage-test-with-both-motors-in-hangar\/\">X-57 High Voltage Test with Both Motors in Hangar<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/x-57-high-voltage-test-with-both-motors-in-hangar\/embed\/#?secret=6N3rmxgvSc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-57 High Voltage Test with Both Motors in Hangar” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6N3rmxgvSc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/afrc2021-0071-072_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF

JOSHUA DANIEL TOVAR, DECEASED. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00028

- CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court Number 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021

- CPR01440)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

trial court’s judgment . We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below . We further order that

Appellee recover from Appellant and her sureties, if any, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 43.5, on the judgment

and all costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance

.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 6TH DAY O F MARCH, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CR 98-0221-PHX-EHC

)

Keith Edwin Lowery, ) DETENTION ORDER

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________)

January 23, 2008, defendant, Keith Edwin Lowery, appeared before this Court on a

petition for revocation of supervised release. The Court considered the information provided

to the Court, and the arguments of counsel in determining whether the defendant should be

released on conditions set by the Court.

The Court finds that the defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C.

§3143.

Case 2:98-cr-00221-EHC Document 36 Filed 01/24/08 Page 1 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings. 

DATED this 23rd day of January, 2008.

Case 2:98-cr-00221-EHC Document 36 Filed 01/24/08 Page 2 of 2