alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION OF 10-K REPORT
                                       OF
                            PACER HEALTH CORPORATION
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

1.       The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
         Officer of Pacer Health Corporation. This Certification is made
         pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This
         Certification accompanies the 10-KSB Report of Pacer Health Corporation
         for the year ended December 31, 2003.

2.       I certify that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
         that the information contained in such 10-KSB Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of Pacer Health Corporation.

This Certification is executed as of April 14, 2004.

                                  /s/  Rainier Gonzalez
                                  ------------------------
                                  Rainier Gonzalez
                                  President (Principal Executive Officer and
                                  Principal Accounting Officer) and
                                  Director
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Shanghai from Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tVEXP2zL7x\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss070e096351-2\/\">Shanghai from Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss070e096351-2\/embed\/#?secret=tVEXP2zL7x\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Shanghai from Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tVEXP2zL7x\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/iss070e096351orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
H. R. 652

One Hundred Fifth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twenty-seventh day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight

An Act

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act for the construction of a

hydroelectric project located in the State of Washington, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period specified

in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

otherwise apply to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project

numbered 9025, the Commission shall, upon the request of the

project licensee, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence,

and public interest requirements of that section and the Commission’s procedures under that section, extend the time period during

which the licensee is required to commence construction of the

project for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods.

(b) APPLICABILITY.—An extension under subsection (a) shall

take effect for a project upon the expiration of the extension, issued

by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal Power Act

(16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required for commencement of

construction of the project.

(c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the license for

the project referred to in subsection (a) has expired prior to the

date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the

license effective as of the date of its expiration and extend the

time required for commencement of construction of the project as

provided in subsection (a) for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year
H. R. 652—2

periods, the first of which shall commence on the date of such

expiration.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 18, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D22-256 Lower Tribunal No. F92-3649

________________ 

### Joseph White , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge. Joseph White, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Delores Dobson,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04311-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9282 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-mj-01842-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01842-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/17/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01842-JFM Document 3 Filed 11/17/15 Page 3 of 3
Agreement to renew Advisory Agreement



 
EXHIBIT 10.3

 

	
	 UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST
	 	 Universal Corporate Center

	
	 	 	 367 South Gulph Road

	
	 	 	 P.O. Box 61558

	
	 	 	 King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-0958

	
	 	 	 (610) 265-0688


 
December
31, 2002 
 
Mr. Alan B. Miller

President 
UHS of Delaware, Inc. 
367 South Gulph Road 
King of Prussia, PA 19406 
 
Dear Alan: 
 
The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust, at their December 2, 2002 meeting, authorized the renewal of the current
Advisory Agreement between the Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (“Agreement”) upon the same terms and conditions. 
 
This letter constitutes the Trust’s offer to renew the Agreement, until December 31, 2003, upon the same terms and conditions. Please
acknowledge UHS of Delaware’s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
 
Kirk E. Gorman 
President and Secretary 
 

	
	 cc:
	 	 Warren J. Nimetz, Esq.

	 	 	 Charles Boyle


 
Agreed to and Accepted: 
 

	
	 UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.

	
	 By:
	 	  
  


	 	 	     Alan B. Miller, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

        This schedule contains summary financial data information extracted from
the condensed consolidated balance sheet for the period ended March 31, 2000 and
the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months then
ended, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000

<CASH>                                        144,782
<SECURITIES>                                  141,152
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                    5,219
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              358,473
<PP&E>                                        549,526
<DEPRECIATION>                                 73,392
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                970,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         250,572
<BONDS>                                       817,554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         489,073
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          553
<OTHER-SE>                                   (590,886)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  970,293
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               23,064
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  77,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25,015
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (155,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (155,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (155,753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.02)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Susan M. Nelson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04393-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9945 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9945 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 49 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 49

  To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent the United States 
  Postal Service from disclosing the names or addresses of any postal 
       patrons or other persons, except under certain conditions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

  Mr. Condit introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 39, United States Code, to prevent the United States 
  Postal Service from disclosing the names or addresses of any postal 
       patrons or other persons, except under certain conditions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Privacy Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS FOR DISCLOSURE OF NAMES OR ADDRESSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 412 of title 39, United States Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 412. Conditions for disclosure of names or addresses
    ``(a) No officer or employee of the Postal Service may make 
available to the public, by any means or for any purpose, any names or 
addresses (past or present) of postal patrons or other persons, except 
as provided under subsection (b) or as otherwise specifically provided 
by law.
    ``(b) The Postal Service shall prescribe such regulations as may be 
necessary to carry out this section. Under the regulations, no 
disclosure described in subsection (a) shall be allowable except if, or 
to the extent that--
            ``(1) the disclosure consists of information which--
                    ``(A) relates to a change of address; and
                    ``(B) was obtained from a person in accordance with 
                subsection (c);
            ``(2) permission to disclose has not been denied under 
        subsection (c)(2); and
            ``(3) the disclosure would contribute to the efficiency of 
        postal operations.
    ``(c) Any form used by the Postal Service to obtain information 
from a person relating to a change of address shall include--
            ``(1) notice of the Postal Service's information practices 
        under this section, including how, and to whom, any information 
        furnished on such form may be disclosed; and
            ``(2) a means for such person to deny permission for the 
        Postal Service to disclose any information furnished on such 
        form.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 4 of 
title 39, United States Code, is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 412 and inserting the following:

``412. Conditions for disclosure of names or addresses.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-4413

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALEXANDER O’NEAL JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:21-cr-00142-HEH-1)

Submitted: April 25, 2023 Decided: October 18, 2023

Before HARRIS and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Geremy C. Kamens, Federal Public Defender, Patrick L. Bryant, Alexander, 

Virginia, Laura J. Koenig, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE 

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Jessica D. Aber, 

United States Attorney, Kenneth R. Simon, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4413 Doc: 32 Filed: 10/18/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Jackson appeals from his 78-month sentence for possessing a firearm as 

a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Jackson contends that his sentence is 

procedurally unreasonable because the district court failed to adequately explain the 

sentence and failed to address his non-frivolous arguments for a different sentence. 

We review a criminal sentence for reasonableness “under a deferential abuse-ofdiscretion standard.” Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007). “In determining 

procedural reasonableness, this Court considers whether the district court properly 

calculated the defendant’s advisory guidelines range, gave the parties an opportunity to 

argue for an appropriate sentence, considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and 

sufficiently explained the selected sentence.” United States v. Ross, 912 F.3d 740, 744 (4th 

Cir. 2019) (citing Gall, 552 U.S. at 49–51). Having reviewed the record, we conclude the 

district court considered the nonfrivolous arguments Jackson actually advanced in support 

of a different sentence. We are also satisfied with the district court’s explanation of its 

sentencing decision. See United States v. Arbaugh, 951 F.3d 167, 174 (4th Cir. 2020).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4413 Doc: 32 Filed: 10/18/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.10(a)

   
EVERSHEDS SUTHERLAND (US) LLP
  

    
  

  
   THOMAS E. BISSET
  

  
   DIRECT LINE: 202.383.0118
  

  
   E-mail: ThomasBisset@eversheds-sutherland.com
  

  
    
  

  
   April 28, 2021

  
    
  

  
   VIA EDGAR
  

  
    
  

  
   Board of Directors
  

  
   Protective Insurance Company
  

  
   2801 Highway 280 South
  

  
   Birmingham, AL 35223
  

  
    
  

  
   Re:         Protective Investors Series Variable Annuity

  
   Post-Effective Amendment No. 12
  

  
    
  

  
   Directors:
  

  
    
  

  
   We hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption “Legal Matters” in the Statement of Additional Information filed as part of the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-190294) by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity Separate Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933.
  

  
    
  

  	
    	
    	
    
	
     
       
     

    	
     
      Very truly yours,
     

    
	
     
       
     

    	
     
       
     

    	
     
       
     

    
	
     
       
     

    	
     
      Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
     

    
	
     
       
     

    	
     
       
     

    	
     
       
     

    
	
     
       
     

    	
     
       
     

    	
     
       
     

    
	
     
       
     

    	
     
      By:
     

    	
     
      /s/ Thomas E. Bisset
     

    
	
     
       
     

    	
     
       
     

    	
     
      Thomas E. Bisset
     

    


   
  


 
  1