alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

Donita J. Cole, 

Debtor. 

No. CV-15-02105-PHX-SRB

ORDER 

Donita J. Cole, 

Appellant, 

v. 

MR Captial, LLC, 

Appellee. 

 The Court has reviewed Appellant’s Motions for Leave of Court to Amend Initial 

Brief (Docs. 28 & 29) and Appellee’s Notice of No Objection to either motion. 

 IT IS ORDERED granting Appellant’s Motions for Leave of Court to Amend 

Initial Brief (Docs. 28 & 29). 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant shall file her Amended Brief within 3 

days of the date of this Order. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:15-cv-02105-SRB Document 33 Filed 06/09/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s responsive brief shall be filed 14 

days after Appellant’s brief is filed. 

 Dated this 9th day of June, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02105-SRB Document 33 Filed 06/09/16 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:15-cr-01250-SMM Document 3 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01250-SMM Document 3 Filed 08/26/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01250-SMM Document 3 Filed 08/26/15 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Real Estate Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brett A. Brown certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:   February 26, 2009 By:  /s/ Brett A .Brown Name:  Brett A. Brown Title:  Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

ASAD EHTISHAM, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION 

SOLUTIONS, INC.; EQUIFAX 

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; 

TRANS UNION, LLC; ADVANCE 

AUDIO, INC.; CCM 

ENTERPRISES, LLC; and 

PORSCHE CARS NORTH 

AMERICA; 

 Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

CASE NO. CV 15-02362-PHX-JAT

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF 

DEFENDANT CCM ENTERPRISES, 

LLC 

)

)

Having considered the Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant CCM 

Enterprises, LLC, filed by Plaintiff and Defendant CCM Enterprises, LLC, the 

Court rules as follows: 

IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation (Doc. 52) is approved. Defendant 

CCM Enterprises, LLC (ONLY) is hereby dismissed from the above-entitled 

action with prejudice. Each party to the stipulation shall bear its own costs and 

expenses. Because this is not the only remaining Defendant, this case remains 

pending. 

Dated this 24th day of March, 2016. 

Case 2:15-cv-02362-JAT Document 54 Filed 03/25/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Track Data Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Barry Hertz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Martin Kaye, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/Barry HertzChief Executive OfficerMarch 19, 2004/s/Martin KayeChief Financial OfficerMarch 19, 2004
#### Jane Ozham et al *v.*William Stephens et al.

Wills — -Undue Influence — Exclusion of Children.

A will, voluntarily made, unconstrained by influence or dictation by any one, will be upheld, though all the testators property be given therein to a second wife and son, to the exclusion entirely of a former divorced wife and children.

APPEAR FROM ESTILL CIRCUIT COURT.

February 11, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

Matthias Ozham died at the age of about 57 years, having recently before, and during his last illness, executed a will which is the subject of this controversy, it haying been admitted to probate in the county court, and subsequently set aside by the judgment of the circuit court, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The testator was twice married, having been divorced from his first wife, who as well as the last one, survived him, and by the provisions of the will the last wife and her infant son, who are *536now appellants, were preferred to the children of the first marriage, who contested the will in the court below.

*Riddle & Fluty, for appellants.*

Incompetency of the testator, and undue influence of his wife over him, were the alleged grounds for setting the will aside, and are now relied on as reasons for an affirmance.

The judgment cannot be sustained on either ground. The proof does not admit of a reasonable doubt that the testator had sufficient capacity to make a valid testamentary disposition of his estate, such as the paper in contest purports to make, and although from some cause, not fully explained, but perhaps connected with his separation from his first wife, he had become, to some extent, estranged from his children by his marriage with her, it does not appear that his second wife had any agency, or exerted an influence over him to induce the execution of the will, nor does it appear that she possessed such an influence over him as to 'have had it in her power to unduly control his action, or subordinate his will. Nor is the conclusion authorized by the evidence that the will was the result of insane aversion to the appellees.

Whatever may have been the testator’s reasons for discriminating between the objects of his bounty, he seems to have done so of his own voluntary will, unconstrained by the influence or dictation of any one. Therefore we must adjudge the paper in contest, to be the true last will and testament of Matthias Ozham, deceased.

Wherefore the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to affirm the judgment of the county court of Estill county, admitting the will to record.
#### Zeph Meek *v.*James W. Preston.

Oil Leases — Surrender—Non-payment of Penalty Provided.

Where an oil lease, providing for a payment of $50.00 per year for not commencing work, thereunder, this penalty is lost by a subsequent surrender and acceptance of the lease.

Same — Rents.

Such a payment, provided for, cannot be held as an amount due for rent, but merely a penalty for non-performance.

APPEAL FROM JOHNSON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 23, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Appellee sued appellant for the penalty of fifty dollars each year for three years on a lease of oil privileges for not commencing the work within one year from its date, December 3, 1864, but by agreement the lease was surrendered in March 1866, and accepted by the appellee ‘be remarking at the time that the defendant ought to have paid him something, but according to *206the -agreement be would have to take the lease.” This surrender was made by the defendants agent and the only witness who testified in the case. The defendant seems never to have taken possession or in any manner entered upon the development of the oil and mineral resources of the land. The fifty dollars to be paid annually for the delay in not commencing the work was not for rents but by way of penalty and the evidence indicates that it was settled by the agreement to surrender the lease, but the judge to whom the case was referred erroneously gave judgment for sixty-two dollars and fifty cents. Wherefore it is reversed with directions for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Dawson, *for appellant.*
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 61 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 61

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to assure that the operations of 
       the Forest Service are free of racial, sexual, and ethnic 
                            discrimination.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 7, 1997

  Mr. Herger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to assure that the operations of 
       the Forest Service are free of racial, sexual, and ethnic 
                            discrimination.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Forest Service Employment 
Opportunity Act of 1997''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF DISCRIMINATION IN FOREST SERVICE.

    (a) Required Steps.--The Secretary of Agriculture is directed to 
take such steps as are necessary to assure that the operations of the 
Forest Service are free of racial, gender-based, and ethnic 
discrimination. Such steps shall include--
            (1) assuring that employment is not offered to persons 
        based on their race, sex, or national origin;
            (2) assuring Forest Service compliance with the 
        requirements of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 
        U.S.C. 2000e et seq.); and
            (3) such other steps as are necessary to prevent any 
        preferences in employment, contracting, or otherwise, from 
        being extended by the Forest Service on the basis of race, sex, 
        or national origin.
    (b) Report.--Not later than one year after the date of the 
enactment of this section, the Secretary of Agriculture shall submit to 
Congress a report describing the steps taken to implement this section 
and their effectiveness.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-106","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FPbpZpxXh7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-106\/\">STS-106<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/mission\/sts-106\/embed\/#?secret=FPbpZpxXh7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-106” — NASA\" data-secret=\"FPbpZpxXh7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/0501028\/0501028~large.jpg?w=600&h=1523&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1523}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2499 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2499

To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 2004

  Mr. Talent introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the boundary of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site in 
             the State of Missouri, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Truman Farm Home Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. HARRY S TRUMAN NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    The first section of Public Law 98-32 (16 U.S.C. 461 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Acquisition of Additional Land.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may acquire, by donation, 
        purchase with donated or appropriated funds, transfer from 
        another Federal agency, or any other means, the land described 
        in paragraph (2) for inclusion in the Harry S Truman National 
        Historic Site.
            ``(2) Description of land.--The land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) consists of the approximately 5 acres of land 
        (including the structure located south of the Truman Farm Home 
        site), as generally depicted on the map entitled `Harry S 
        Truman National Historic Site Proposed Boundary', numbered 
        80,027, and dated April 17, 2003.
            ``(3) Boundary modification.--On acquisition of the land 
        under this subsection, the Secretary shall modify the boundary 
        of the Harry S Truman National Historic Site to reflect the 
        acquisition of the land.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Milo McCormick Stanley, 

Petitioner, 

vs.

Charles L. Ryan, et al., 

Respondents. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

No. CV-98-0430-PHX-GMS

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s unopposed motion for a short four-day

extension of time to file supplemental briefing. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Petitioner’s unopposed motion for an

extension of time. (Doc. 109.) By no later than June 17, 2011, Petitioner shall file his

supplemental brief regarding the effect of Cullen v. Pinholster, 131 S. Ct. 1388 (2011) on this

case. Respondents shall have fifteen (15) days to respond and Petitioner shall have ten (10)

days to reply.

DATED this 9th day of June, 2011.

Case 2:98-cv-00430-GMS Document 110 Filed 06/09/11 Page 1 of 1
#### New Liberty Literary Institute *v.*D. S. Curd.

Corporations — Signer of Subscription to Capital Stock — Estoppel.

The signer of a subscription to the capital stock of a corporation, is estopped to deny its existence.

Same

This rule will apply, though before due date of subscription, the corporate name was changed by legislative enactment

Same.

As long as the objects and purposes of the corporation were the same as when the subscription was signed, the subscriber remained bound.

APPEAL FROM OWEN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 29, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

From the facts stated as the foundation.of the action it appears that appellate Curd by a subscription signed by himself, agreed to pay to appellant, by the name in which the suit is brought, the sum claimed by it. This fact he does not deny, nor does he deny that the condition has been performed upon which he prom*212ised to pay the money. lie is therefore estopped to deny the existence of the corporation with which he contracted to pay the money, *Depew vs. Bank Limestone, 1 J. J. Mar. 380, Bank Galleepolis vs. Trimble, 6 B. Mon. 601, Jones vs. Bank Tennessee 8 B. M. 122.*

*Major, for appellant.*

*Lillard, for appellees.*

Besides, if that were not so, it would have been proper under section 161 Civil Code to have permitted appellant to amend the warrant as proposed by changing the name of plaintiff to that of *“Concord College”*the corporate name fixed by the amendatory *act approved February 27, 1868, 2 Vol. Acts 1867 page 69.*

As long as the objects and purposes of the corporation were the same as when appellee agreed to pay the subscription he remained bound notwithstanding the change of the name of the corporation.

The title of the Act is *“An Act to incorporate the New Liberty Institute.”*

The 1st. section of the Act, declares that the corporation shall be known and designated by the name and style of the *New Liberty Baptist Education Society.”*The law, as an examination of it will show, relates only, and exclusively to the subject of education. It is an institution of learning, and although there is some confusion in the preamble, and the first section of the Act, as to the name by which it shall be called and known, and which confusion perhaps was the reason the amendatory act *supra*was passed; still no other subject is referred to in the act and the sole purpose in the education of white males and females, and is not therefore within the constitutional inhibition of *section 87, article 3*Con. *of Kentucky.*

No other objections need be noticed; but for the reasons herein stated the judgment is *reversed*and the cause remanded for a new trial to be awarded and for further proceedings consistent herewith.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ralph Duvall,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03721-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9363 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
Amendment dated December 31, 2002 to Zions Banc Restated Pension Plan


  EXHIBIT 10.14
 AMENDMENT
TO THE
ZIONS BANCORPORATION
PENSION PLAN
 This Amendment to
the restated and amended Zions Bancorporation Pension Plan (the “Plan”) is made and approved this 31 day of December, 2002, by the Zions Bancorporation Benefits Committee (“Benefits Committee”), for and on behalf of Zions
Bancorporation, hereinafter referred to as the “Employer.”
 W I T N E S S E T H:
 WHEREAS, the Employer has heretofore entered into the Plan, which Plan has been most recently restated and amended in its entirety effective January 1, 2001, and
 WHEREAS, the Employer has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or in part, and
 WHEREAS, the
Employer, by action of its Board of Directors, has authorized the Zions Bancorporation Benefits Committee to make certain amendments to the Plan for the purpose of ceasing generally all benefit accruals under the Plan;
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises the Benefits Committee, for and on behalf of the Employer adopts the following amendments to the Plan:
 1.         Section 2.1 is amended by adding a new sub-section (h)
to read as follows:
 (h)      From and after December 31, 2002, no
Employee (whether or not an Eligible Employee) who is not already a Participant in the Plan as of December 31, 2002, shall become a Participant in the Plan or be eligible to commence participation in the Plan.
 2.         Section 3.2 is amended by adding a new sub-section (f) to read
as follows:
 (f)       Unless otherwise provided by further
amendment, from and after 
  






  December 31, 2002, no Cash Balance Account of any Participant shall accrue any further contribution or earnings credit under this Section
3.2.
 2.         This Amendment shall be effective
for all Plan Years commencing after December 31, 2002.
 3.         In all other respects the Plan is ratified and approved.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Benefits Committee has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be duly executed as of the date and year first above written.
  

	  
 	  
 	 ZIONS BANCORPORATION BENEFITS COMMITTEE
 
	 
 
 
 	  
 	 By: 
 	 
 /s/ DIANA ANDERSEN