alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001046883
<NAME>                        Asian Star Development, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         240,877
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,274,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,217,179
<PP&E>                                         2,898,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (269,243)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,481,414
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,260,663
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15,711
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,205,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,481,414
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               962,332
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  929,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               866,071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (780,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (780,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,310,435)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,091,018)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.151)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.151)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 206 (Friday, October 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 98


Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 96 to 99, 
revised as of July 1, 2013, on page 765, in Sec.  98.226, paragraph (c) 
is reinstated to read as follows:


Sec.  98.226  Data reporting requirements.

* * * * *
    (c) Annual nitric acid production from each nitric acid train 
(tons, 100 percent acid basis).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-25390 Filed 10-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### Coons *v.*Thompson.

The deposition of a prosecuting attorney of one of the Circuits was taken, under the statute, to be read in evidence on the trial of a cause in another Circuit, if the witness should not be able to attend. Held, that the circumstance that the official duties of the witness, at the time of the trial, required his attendance at a different place from that of the trial, was *prima fade*sufficient to authorise the admission *of*the deposition.

Monday, *May*25.

ERROR to the *Johnson*Circuit Court!

Blackford, J.

Trover by *Coons*against *Thompson.*Plea, not guilty. The cause was submitted to the Court without a jury. On the trial, the defendant offered in evidence the deposition of *W. J. Brown,*the prosecuting attorney of a different Circuit from that in which this case was tried. The time fixed by law for the sitting of the Circuit Court, in one of the counties of the Circuit in which Mr. *Brown*was prosecuting attorney, was the same with the time when the trial in t'he cause under consideration took place. The plaintiff objected to the admission of the deposition. The Circuit Court overruled the objection, and the deposition was read. Judgment for the defendant.

The only error assigned is, that the deposition was improperly admitted.- The ground relied on against the admission of the deposition is, that Mr. *Brown’s*office did not show his inability to attend in person to give evidence.

The statute on the subject is, that when it appears that a witness is unable by age, sickness, *or otherwise,*to attend the Court, the deposition of the witness may be taken *to he*read in evidence on the trial, if the witness himself should not be able to attend. Rev. Code, 1831, p. 407. It appears to us, that the facts sufficiently show that the witness was unable to attend at the trial of this cause. At the time of the trial, Mr. *Brown’s*office required his personal attendance at a different place from that of the trial. That circumstance was sufficient, *prima facie,*to authorise the admission of the deposition.

On the trial of Col. *Burr,*the defendant moved for a *subpoena duces tecum*to the President of the *United States.*The Court granted the motion; but intimated that if the President’s duties demanded his attention at the time of the trial, he would be excused for not attending to the *subpoena.*1 Burr’s Trial, 124.

In the case before us, Mr. *Brown’s*duties required his presence at a different Court, when his deposition was offered; and it *9must be presumed, from what appears in the record, that the witness was unable to attend at the time of this trial. case is therefore within the statute, and authorises the admission of the deposition.

*P. Sweetser,*for the plaintiff.

*C. Fletcher*and *W. W. Wick,*for the defendant.

_ The Court in *North-Carolina*says, that it is the common practice to receive the depositions of all such public officers, whose duties oblige them to attend at a particular place. *Mushrow*v. *Graham, 1*Hayw. 361. 3 Amer. Dig. 225.

We consider that the Circuit Court, in admitting Mr. *Brown’s*deposition, decided correctly.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
EMPLOYEE NAME  EMPLOYEE ADDRESS
 EMPLOYEE NAME
 is not
   1. Option Exercise Price
  2. Term of Option
  3. Exercisability of Option




---



##### 



2 Performance-Based Vesting Condition
  Maximum Number of[Performance] Achieved as a %
    
    Shares as to Whichof Target
    
    Option is Exercisable99% or less100% to 110%111% and above
  Employment Condition.
 Cumulative Percentageof Shares Vested underSection 3(b) as to WhichPeriod Beginning
    
    Option is Exercisable
  4. Exercise of Option




---



##### 



3  5. Satisfaction of Option Price
 Payment of Cash.
 Payment of Common Stock.
 Broker-Assisted Cashless Exercise.
 Net Share Exercise.
 6. Termination of Employment
 General.




---



##### 



4  Termination of Employment for Cause.
 Voluntary Termination of Employment.
 Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason; Sale of Subsidiary or Division. provided, however
 Death or Disability.
 [Alternative 1: For Lipson, Silverberg & Pemble]




---



##### 



5 provided, however
 [Alternative 2: for all others]
 provided, however
 Retirement.




---



##### 



6  Acceleration and Adjustments of Exercise Period.
 Committee Determinations.
 7. Change of Control
  8. Tax Withholding




---



##### 



7    9. Administration of the Plan
  10. Non-transferability of Option
  11. Amendment and Adjustments to your Option
  12. Effect on Other Benefits
  13. Regulatory Compliance




---



##### 



8  14. Data Privacy
  15. Consent to Jurisdiction
     Very truly yours,Lawrence PembleExecutive Vice President of Operations




---



##### 



Definition of Good Reason
 provided however provided that
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra May","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-b-maynasa-gov\/","title":"What Is a Black Hole? (Grades 5-8)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kq59p9x545\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-is-a-black-hole-grades-5-8\/\">What Is a Black Hole? (Grades 5-8)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/learning-resources\/for-kids-and-students\/what-is-a-black-hole-grades-5-8\/embed\/#?secret=kq59p9x545\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“What Is a Black Hole? (Grades 5-8)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"kq59p9x545\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/sgr_lg_3.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
Amendment #1 to 401(K) Plan



Exhibit 10.10(b) 
 
FIRST AMENDMENT 
TO 
ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. 
401(K) PLAN 
 
The ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC. 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 
 

	1.	 	Section 2.20(a) of the Plan is amended and restated as follows: 

 
(a)    In the case of any Employee whose Employment Commencement Date is
both prior to July 1, 2007 and within five (5) years of his or her “Severance Date” from the “Company” (as each term is defined in the Allergan Savings Plan), he or she shall be credited with Credited Service under the Plan equal
to the period (if any) of “Credited Service” (as defined in the Allergan Savings Plan) credited to such Employee under the Allergan Savings Plan; except, however, for purposes of determining an Employee’s “Profit Sharing
Percentage” under Section 5.3(c), he or she shall be credited with Credited Service equal to the number of his or her “Benefit Years” (in whole years and fractions of a year) as determined under the terms of the Allergan, Inc. Pension
Plan as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Date. 
 

	2.	 	This First Amendment shall be effective as of the Effective Date of the Plan. 

 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Advanced Medical Optics, Inc. hereby executes this First Amendment to the Advanced
Medical Optics, Inc. 401(k) Plan on this 26th day of December, 2002. 
 
 

	 ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS, INC.
  
  

	 BY:
	 	 /s/    AIMEE S. WEISNER

	 	 	

	 	 	 Aimee Weisner
 Corporate Vice President and General Counsel
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 16, 2010

1209 

# Order

December 16, 2010

141761

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141761 COA: 289071 Gladwin CC: 08-003915-FH PAUL ALAN FARQUHARSON, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 22, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the
case of People v Dowdy (Docket No. 140603) is pending on appeal before this Court and
that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER th at the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the
decision in that case.
108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2882 

AN ACT 

To make the program for national criminal history 

background checks for volunteer groups permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

S 2882 ES 

1 SECTION 1. VOLUNTEER GROUP ACCESS TO CRIMINAL 

2 BACKGROUND CHECKS PROGRAM. 

3 Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (Public 

4 Law 108–21) is amended by striking ‘‘an 18-month’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘a’’. 

Passed the Senate October 1, 2004. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2882 

AN ACT 

background checks for volunteer groups permanent. 

To make the program for national criminal history 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9


                       SUMMARY OF 2002 BONUS PROGRAM FOR
                          EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTS OF
                       UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION

     The objectives of the 2002 Bonus Program for Executive Vice Presidents (the
"2002 Bonus Plan") of United States Cellular Corporation ("USM") are: (i) to
provide incentives for the Executive Vice Presidents of USM to extend their best
efforts to achieve superior results in relation to key performance targets,
(ii) to reward USM's Executive Vice Presidents in relation to their success in
meeting and exceeding these performance targets, and (iii) to help USM attract
and retain talented leadership in positions of critical importance to the
success of USM.

     The 2002 Bonus Plan was designed to generate a targeted 2002 bonus pool
equal to the total of 40% of the aggregate of the base salaries of the Company's
senior executive officers other than the President. Under the 2002 Bonus Plan,
the size of the target bonus pool is increased or decreased depending on USM's
2002 achievements with respect to the performance categories. No bonus pool is
paid under such plan if minimum performance levels are not achieved in these
categories. The maximum bonus pool that could be generated, which would require
exceptional performance in all areas, would equal the total of 80% of the
aggregate base salaries of the Company's senior executive officers other than
the president. At target performance, the bonus pool would be equal to 40% of
the aggregate salaries of the Company's senior executive officers other than the
President. The performance categories include (i) gross post-pay customer
additions; (ii) consolidated cash flow; (iii) consolidated revenue; (iv) return
on capital; and (v) customer defections.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert H. Mullen, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Newark Group, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: September 12, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Mario
Ayub, the Acting Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting
Officer of Mexoro Mineral Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended August 31,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  October
10, 2008





/S /Mario
Ayub


_________________________________


Mario
Ayub


Acting
Principal Executive Officer


Acting
Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             2003         2002         2001
                                                          ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                                       <C>          <C>          <C>
Weighted average number of issued shares each period       5,611,000    5,599,000    5,638,000
Common stock equivalents, computed using treasury stock
method                                                       347,000      412,000      600,000
                                                          ----------   ----------   ----------
                                                           5,958,000    6,011,000    6,238,000
                                                          ==========   ==========   ==========
Shares used in
Basic EPS                                                  5,611,000    5,599,000    5,638,000
Diluted EPS                                                5,958,000    6,011,000    6,238,000
</TABLE>

                                       65
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
APRIL 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,228
<SECURITIES>                                    15,072
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,628)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,938
<PP&E>                                          13,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,927)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           251
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,090
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,780
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,705)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,053)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,652)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)


</TABLE>
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

# COURT OFAPPEALS SE CONDDI S T RICTOFT E XAS

FORT W ORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 42 2- CR J E S US T OR R E S AP P E L L ANT V . THE STATE OF TE XA S STATE

----- ----- FR O M THE 3 62 DI STRI CT CO URT O F DENTO N CO UN TY ND

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h aveco ns i der ed app el l ant ’ s “M ot i on To W i t hdr aw A ppe al . ” The m ot i on c om pl i e s w i t h r ul e 42. 2( a ) of t he r ul e s of a pp e l l a t e pr oc e du r e . Te x. R. A pp. P. 42 . 2( a) . N o deci sion oft hi s courthavi ng been del i ver ed bef or e w e re c e i v e d th i s m o ti o n , w e g ra n t th e m o ti o n a n d d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S eeTe x. R. A p p . P . 4 2 .2 (a ), 4 3 .2 (f). P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: W A LKER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d M C C O Y, J. DO NO T P UBLI SH Tex. R. A pp. P. 47. 2( b)DEL I VERE D: J a nu a r y 8, 2009