alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ignacio Romero Romero,

Petitioner,

v. 

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

Respondents.

No. CV-15-02018-PHX-JJT

ORDER

At issue is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 17) entered by United 

States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade in this matter recommending that the Court deny 

the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as untimely. 

Petitioner filed no objection to the R&R and the time to do so has now passed. As the 

R&R warned, Petitioner’s failure to object results in the Court accepting the R&R 

without further review, and issuing an order of judgment pursuant to those 

recommendations. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Even were the Court to conduct further review, the R&R correctly concluded that 

the statute of limitations for this 2254 petition expired July 11, 2004. Petitioner did not 

file this petition until more than eleven years latet, and no equitable tolling or other 

exception to that limitations period applies. The Court therefore must deny and dismiss 

the Petition.

IT IS ORDERED denying and dismissing as untimely the Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Case 2:15-cv-02018-JJT Document 20 Filed 10/31/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a certificate of appealability in this matter 

because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable 

jurists would not find the ruling debatable. The Clerk of Court shall close this matter.

Dated this 31st day of October, 2016.

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-02018-JJT Document 20 Filed 10/31/16 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 14-0807

IN THE INTEREST OF T.L.D., A

CHILD

§

§

§

§

§

§

Dallas County,

5th District.

February 13, 2015

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, IN THE INTEREST OF T.L.D., A CHILD, pay all

costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 31st day of March, 2015.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 3  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with
the accompanying annual report on Form 40-F of NOVA Chemicals Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report), 1, Larry A. MacDonald,
Chief Financial Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)such
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the
information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of NOVA Chemicals
Corporation.  April 7, 2003
  /s/ Larry A. MacDonaldLarry A. MacDonaldChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Joseph E. Byrne, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Newark Group, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: September 12, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.6

                  CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

      I, Ron Zilkowski, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Chindex International, Inc.; and

      2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report.

Date:  July 29, 2005


                                          /S/ RONALD ZILKOWSKI
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Ronald Zilkowski
                                          Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7540

DEVIN JAMAAL KERSHAW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden of Lee C.I.,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief 

District Judge. (5:11-cv-00306-MBS)

Submitted: January 22, 2013 Decided: January 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Devin Jamaal Kershaw, Appellant Pro Se. Brendan McDonald, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, 

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Devin Jamaal Kershaw seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Kershaw has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and Kershaw’s motion for appointment of counsel, 

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 13.2  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of NOVA Chemicals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Todd Karran, Chief Financial Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NOVA Chemicals Corporation.   March 9,   2011
/s/ Todd KarranTodd   KarranChief   Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,219
<PP&E>                                          65,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,707
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,841,900
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,020
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               510,184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (510,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (510,184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (510,184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### LOUIS P. BARBATO, JR., ET AL. v. BOROUGH OF NETCONG.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### CATHERINE SLACK v. RICHARD B. GRUBER, D.D.S.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification granted.
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Bennett L. Kyte,certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided on Form10-D with respect to the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as exhibits to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, Ihave reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas. 

Date: March 27, 2019

 

/s/ Bennett L. Kyte
Name: Bennett L. KyteTitle: Vice President, Citibank, N.A.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)**
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ONE 1986 SUBARU, N.J. REG. AXB-13X, SERIAL NO. JF1AX45B3GB302047.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification granted. (See 230 *N.J.Super.*451).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001067701
<NAME>    UNITED RENTALS INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          31,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  511,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                    56,170
<INVENTORY>                                    160,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,598,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                 539,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,525,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      2,214,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          300,000
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                           720
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,352,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,525,950
<SALES>                                      1,564,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,564,589
<CGS>                                          312,473
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  989,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,706
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                166,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             98,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,319
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Mullen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated:December 13, 2007 

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001046282
<NAME> HOLLYWOOD THEATERS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,451
<PP&E>                                         120,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,073)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,439
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           61,017
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,509
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,064)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,252
<SALES>                                         23,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,692
<CGS>                                            9,721
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### L. C. Rankin *v.*Amos Turney.

Usury — Action to Recover — Limitation.

The right to recover back usurious interest paid is limited by the Act of March 17, 1862, to one year from the time of payment.

APPEAL FROM BOURBON CIRCUIT COURT.

January 16, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The right of action to recover back usurious interest paid is limited by the Act of March 17, 1862, to one year from the time of payment *(Myers Supplement 292).*In this case, more than one *163year had elapsed from the payment of the usury sought to be reclaimed before the action was brought, but it is contended in argument for the appellant that inasmuch as the act is made to take effect from its passage and might, therefore, if constitutional, operate from the time of its passage to bar the recovery of usury paid one year before, it is void absolutely. But whether or not in the case supposed the statute would be adjudged to be in contravention of the constitution, as impairing the obligation of a contract, it is not liable to that objection in this case, which appears to have been commenced in March, 1865, and more than one year subsequent to both the payment of the usury and the enactment of the statute.

Ward, *for appellant.*

*Alexander &*Turney, *for appellee.*

This being the only ground on which the appellant seeks a reversal, the judgment is *affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Harvey D. Ashman,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03764-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9074 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1