alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 2:15-cv-01981-BSB Document 3 Filed 10/05/15 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 2:15-cv-01981-BSB Document 3 Filed 10/05/15 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein Registration Statement No. 333-157760-02 on Form S-3 of our reportdated September 28, 2009, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedule of Ferrellgas, L.P., and the effectiveness of Ferrellgas,L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Amendment No. 1to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Ferrellgas L. P. for the year endedJuly 31, 2009.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Kansas City, Missouri

November 6, 2009

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies
that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of BUCA, Inc.

Dated: August 4, 2006



/s/ Wallace B. DoolinWallace B. DoolinChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kaye R. OLearyKaye R. OLearyChief Financial Officer
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 886 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 886 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Corey N. Conn, as Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Dated: May 19, 2010
/s/ Corey N. ConnCorey N. ConnChief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Imagin Molecular Corporation and will be retained by Imagin Molecular Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael J. Kneeland, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ MICHAEL J. KNEELANDMichael J. KneelandChief Executive Officer


July 29, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in thefollowing listed Registration Statements on Form S-8 of RF Monolithics, Inc. of our report dated November 17, 2006 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of RFMonolithics, Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2006: 333-83492, 333-000366, 333-01420, 333-23669, 333-59643, 333-83667, 333-83689, 333-34912, 333-58530, 333-84612, 333-104021, 333-113885 and 333-137439. 

/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

November 17, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1350
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
A. Morache, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: June 9, 2005                         /s/ MICHAEL A. MORACHE
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael A. Morache
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Cannon & Byers *v.*Margarett Morris.

Fraudulent Conveyance — Transfer of Property.

A transfer of property, by a debtor to a stranger, for an ostensible consideration, not supported by competent evidence of fairness, and free from fraud, will not be upheld.

APPEAL FROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 11, 1869.

*Harlan, Weir, for appellants.*

*Sweeney & Stewart, for appellees.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

As decided by this court in *Whitaker vs. Barrett, 3 Bush, 413,*the recitals of a deed, when assailed by creditors as fraudulent, are not evidence as to persons not parties to it.

The other evidence in the case implies rather than repels the imputation of fraud.

The fact that a stranger appeared and bought a stock of goods, in gross, without invoice, and transferred them to the wife of a debtor who .had failed in business, pretending to have paid $2,800 in cash, and this upon the sole consideration of love and affection, and then disappeared and not afterwards heard of or known at the place of business, is wholly insufficient to establish relationship, though it was said *he was her uncle,*or to repel the supposition that the goods were bought by the friends of the husband.

Certainly the fact of relationship, the situation of the donor and the probable ability and desire of an uncle to bestow such an uncommon gift upon a niece whom he had never before or since visited, or so far as this record shows even corresponded with, should be made out by some other evidence than the mere hearing he was the donor uncle by a single witness, else some reason assigned for this absence of evidence, generally so easily obtained as to real transactions.

The judgment is therefore reversed, with directions to dismiss appellee’s petition absolutely, and to dissolve the injunction granted thereon.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America),
Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael J. Kneeland, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL J. KNEELAND
|Michael J. Kneeland    
|Chief Executive Officer

July 29, 2009
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America), Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Michael J. Kneeland, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL J.
KNEELAND
|Michael J. Kneeland       
|Chief Executive Officer   

October 28, 2009
stg-ex428_186.htm



 Exhibit 4.28

 

 

Spousal Consents

 

I, LIU Yiru, (Citizen of the People's Republic of China; ID Card No.:                                              ), is the lawful spouse of LI Ming (Citizen of the People's Republic of China; ID Card No.:                                                   , the “My Spouse”). I hereby confirm and agree that the equity held by My Spouse presently and in the future (hereinafter referred to as “Equity and Interest”) is the personal property of My Spouse, do not form the common property of me and My Spouse and can be disposed solely by My Spouse:

 

1) The equity of Beijing Odysseus Education Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Beijing Odysseus”);

 

I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably waive any foregoing Equity and Interest, or any rights or Equity and Interest of the corresponding assets thereof which may be granted to me by any applicable laws, promise not to propose any claim regarding the foregoing Equity and Interest and the corresponding assets thereof, including proposing that the any of the foregoing Equity and Interest and its corresponding assets constitute the common property of me and My Spouse, and based upon such proposition, further claiming to participate in the routine operation management of the Shareholding Platform or Beijing Odysseus or affecting in any manner any decision made by My Spouse.

 

I further confirm, promise and warrant that under any circumstance, My Spouse shall have the right to independently dispose any of the foregoing Equity and Interest he holds, and that I will not take any action that may affect or prevent the performance by My Spouse of the obligations under any transaction or transaction documents in connection with the foregoing Equity and Interest (including but not limited to, the series of controlling agreements signed by Beijing Odysseus and its shareholders and Wuhan Studyvip Online Education Co. Limited).

 

The conclusion, validity, interpretation, performance, modification, termination and dispute settlement shall be governed by the laws of China. All parties to this Letter agree that any dispute arising out of the interpretation and performance of this Spousal Consents shall be firstly settled through amicable negotiations, or in case it cannot be settled within Thirty (30) days after one party issues a written notice to the other parties to the effect of requesting settlement through negotiations, either party may submit the dispute to China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission for arbitration subject to its then-currently effective arbitration rules. The arbitration shall be conducted at Beijing. The language of the arbitration shall be in English. The arbitration award shall be final and binding upon the parties.

 

 

This Spousal Consents is signed on the fifth day of August, 2020.

 

 

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]

 



[This page is the signature page to the Spousal Consents]

 

Signature:/s/ LIU Yiru

Name: LIU Yiru

 

 

 

LI Ming hereby agrees and accepts this Spousal Consents:

 

Signature: /s/ LI Ming 

Name: LI Ming
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31204

ASTORIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. EDWIN W. EDWARDS, ET AL., Defendants, EDWARD J. DEBARTOLO, JR.; ROBERT GUIDRY; BOYD KENNER, INC.; LOUISIANA GAMING ENTERPRISES, INC; BOYD LOUISIANA LLC; CROWN GROUP, INC.; BOOMTOWN, INC.; BOYD GAMING, INC. Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans 98-CV-3359-K

-------------------- January 7, 2003 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellants appeal from the determination of the district court that it would not exercise jurisdiction over state law claims after dismissing all of the federal claims. When a matter is still in the pleadings stages of litigation, the general rule2

is to dismiss pendant state claims if all the federal claims are dismissed. See McClelland v. Gronwaldt , 155 F.3d 507, 519 (5th Cir. 1998)(citing Wong v. Stripling , 881 F.2d 200, 204 (5th Cir. 1989)); cf. Batiste v. Island Records Inc. , 179 F.3d 217, 227-28 (5th Cir. 1999) (holding that the district court did abuse its discretion by dismissing pendant state law claims when the case had moved beyond the pleadings, substantial discovery had taken place, and trial was one month away). Here, it is undisputed that no discovery has taken place in this matter and the litigation is still in the pleadings stage. Given these circumstances, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, the determination of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM PRINGLE.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) of Eastern Virginia Bankshares, Inc. (the
Company), I, Ronald L. Blevins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Form 10-Q.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                         |  |  |  |                     
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Ronald L. Blevins   |  |  |  | Date: August 7, 2006
|    |  | Ronald L. Blevins       |  |  |  |                     
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  |                     



26
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Hudson City Bancorp, Inc.:     Hudson City Savings Bank United States of America   **Name**  **Jurisdiction of Incorporation**  The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Hudson City Savings Bank:     HudCiti Service Corporation New Jersey   **Name**  **State of Incorporation**       HC Value Broker Services, Inc New Jersey   **Name**  **State of Incorporation**  The following is a list of the subsidiaries of HudCiti Service Corporation:     Hudson City Preferred Funding Corp. Delaware   **Name**  **State of Incorporation**   Sound REIT, Inc. New York   **Name**  **State of Incorporation**
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4861 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4861

   To nullify the effect of certain provisions of various Executive 
                                orders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 1998

 Mr. Barr of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
              to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To nullify the effect of certain provisions of various Executive 
                                orders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terrorist Elimination Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) past Presidents have issued Executive orders which 
        severely limit the use of the military when dealing with 
        potential threats against the United States of America;
            (2) these Executive orders limit the swift, sure, and 
        precise action needed by the United States to protect our 
        national security;
            (3) present strategy allows the military forces to bomb 
        large targets hoping to eliminate a terrorist leader, but 
        prevents our country from designing a limited action which 
        would specifically accomplish that purpose;
            (4) on several occasions the military has been ordered to 
        use a military strike hoping, in most cases unsuccessfully, to 
        remove a terrorist leader who has committed crimes against the 
        United States;
            (5) as the threat from terrorism grows, America must 
        continue to investigate effective ways to combat the menace 
        posed by those who would murder American citizens simply to 
        make a political point; and
            (6) actions by the United States Government to remove such 
        persons is a remedy which should be used sparingly and 
        considered only after all other reasonable options have failed 
        or are not available; however, this is an option our country 
        must maintain for cases in which international threats cannot 
        be eliminated by other means.

SEC. 3. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF VARIOUS 
              EXECUTIVE ORDERS.

    The following provisions of Executive orders shall have no further 
force or effect:
            (1) Section 5(g) of Executive Order 11905.
            (2) Section 2-305 of Executive Order 12036.
            (3) Section 2.11 of Executive Order 12333.
                                 <all>
```