alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Eric Meadows, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Second Chance Group Homes LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-02454-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 At issue is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement 

(Doc. 24), which agreement was filed under seal (Doc. 25 Sealed). Upon review of the 

agreement, good cause appearing and Plaintiff having no opposition, 

 IT IS ORDERED granting Defendant’s Motion (Doc. 24) and approving the 

settlement agreement (Doc. 25 Sealed), which agreement shall remain under seal, as 

reasonable. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED dismissing this matter. The Clerk is instructed to 

close this matter. 

 Dated this 14th day of July, 2016. 

Honorable John J. Tuchi

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-02454-JJT Document 26 Filed 07/14/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ellen Sheets Hunter,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03393-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/23/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8449 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8449 Filed 10/30/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25590]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than November 12, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Laura Lee Lehmberg Austin, Mason, Texas; to acquire voting 
shares of Commercial Company, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of The Commercial Bank, both in Mason, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 23, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-25590 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q/A FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             255
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,143
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,810
<PP&E>                                       1,794,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                  81,901
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,751,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,494
<BONDS>                                        629,354
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    238,205
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                     757,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,751,809
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,463
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,383
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,999
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,999
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,999
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96


</TABLE>
IIA

105TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 513

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 6, 1997

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To exempt certain contracts entered into by the government

of the District of Columbia from review by the Council

of the District of Columbia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 513 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia

3 Council Contract Review Reform Act of 1997’’.

4 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS FROM COUN5 CIL REVIEW.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 451 of the District of Co7 lumbia Self-Government and Governmental Reorganiza8 tion Act (sec. 1–1130, D.C. Code) is amended by adding

9 at the end the following new subsection:

10 ‘‘(d) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CONTRACTS.—The

11 requirements of this section shall not apply with respect

12 to any of the following contracts:

13 ‘‘(1) Any contract entered into by the Washing14 ton Convention Center Authority for preconstruction

15 activities, project management, design, or construc16 tion.

17 ‘‘(2) Any contract entered into by the District

18 of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority established

19 pursuant to the Water and Sewer Authority Estab20 lishment and Department of Public Works Reorga21 nization Act of 1996, other than contracts for the

22 sale or lease of the Blue Plains Wastewater Treat23 ment Plant.

24 ‘‘(3) At the option of the Council, any contract

25 for a highway improvement project carried out under

26 title 23, United States Code.’’.
3

HR 513 RFS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered

3 into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Passed the House of Representatives March 6,

1997.

Attest: ROBIN H. CARLE,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 10.49

                                      RETIREMENT AND TRANSITION AGREEMENT





                                                                                                 Exhibit 10.49




February 10, 2003


Robert W. Fiondella
29 Summerberry Circle
Bristol, CT  06010

                              Re:  Retirement and Transition Agreement

Dear Bob:

This letter sets forth our agreement to amend your Retirement and Transition Agreement (the "Agreement") dated
September 27, 2002 to change your retirement date to March 31, 2003. In addition, we intend to continue to
provide an office, secretarial support, and access to a company provided driver and car through June 30, 2003
on the same terms and conditions as the Agreement currently contemplates. You will also be paid a consulting
fee, on the first day of each month, equal to your current monthly salary for the period commencing April 1,
2003 and ending June 30, 2003. In consideration for these amendments, we expect you to make yourself available
to provide advice and counsel on management transition matters until June 30, 2003. The terms of the Agreement
remain unaltered in all other respects.

If this letter accurately describes your understanding of our proposal, please sign both copies of this letter
on the line below and return one copy to me.

Very truly yours,



Tracy L. Rich



Acknowledged:



------------------------------------------------------              ---------------------------------------
                 Robert W. Fiondella                                                Dated
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Danielle Sempsrott","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/danielle-c-sempsrottnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA’s SpX-28 Liftoff","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Q4H5zrzrCj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ksc-20230605-ph-kno02_0008\/\">NASA’s SpX-28 Liftoff<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ksc-20230605-ph-kno02_0008\/embed\/#?secret=Q4H5zrzrCj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s SpX-28 Liftoff” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Q4H5zrzrCj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/KSC-20230605-PH-KNO02_0008\/KSC-20230605-PH-KNO02_0008~large.jpg?w=600&h=1920&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1920}
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE ADDITIONAL SITING CONSIDERATION ADOPTED BY THE NEW JERSEY HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES SITING COMMISSION.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Dana BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-5400.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2005.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 2005.

Joe H. Byrd, Jr., Byrd & Byrd, Jackson, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Joe A. Dycus, Asst. U.S. Attorney, William Siler, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Memphis, TN, for DefendantAppellee.

Before RYAN and COOK, Circuit Judges; and BELL, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Robert Holmes Bell, United States Chief District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Dana Brooks appeals the district court’s order affirming the ALJ’s denial of social security disability benefits. After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decisión for the reasons well stated in Chief District Judge James Todd’s opinion.
Case 2:15-mj-01785-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01785-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01785-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/28/15 Page 3 of 3
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON 

U.S. District Judge: Raner C. Collins Date: November 21, 2018 

USA v. Lonnie Ray Swartz Case Number: CR-15-01723-001-TUC-RCC (DTF)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Wallace Kleindienst/Mary Sue Feldmeier 

Attorney for Defendant: Sean Chapman/Jaime Calle, Retained 

Deputy Clerk: Sherry Gammon 

Court Reporter: Erica McQuillen 

Spanish Interpreter for victim’s family: Sandy Frady 

Defendant: ☒ Present ☐ Not Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons ☐ Writ 

JURY TRIAL – Day 17: 

The jury arrives at 9:30 a.m. to resume deliberation. 

9:49 a.m. – In absence of the jury, Defense counsel objects to the Court instructing the jury to continue 

to deliberate. The oral motion for a mistrial is renewed. The Government requests the Court instruct the 

jury with the Allen charge. The motion for mistrial is denied. 

The jury enters at 9:57 a.m. 

The Court instructs the jury with the Allen charge. 

The jury is excused at 9:59 a.m. to continue deliberation. 

Recess taken 11:18 a.m. – 11:28 p.m. 

A verdict is received at 11:55 a.m. 

The jury enters at 12:20 p.m. 

The jury is unable to reach a verdict as to the charge of Voluntary Manslaughter. The Defendant is 

found Not Guilty as to the charge of Involuntary Manslaughter. 

The jury is not polled. 

The jury is excused at 12:30 p.m. 

A Status Conference is set for 12/11/2018 at 10:00 a.m. before Judge Raner C. Collins. 

 Jury Trial: 20 Minutes 

 9:49 p.m.– 9:59 p.m. 12:20 p.m. – 12:30 p.m. 

 

 Jury deliberation time: 2 Hours 38 Minutes 

 9:30 a.m. – 9:57 a.m. 9:59 a.m. – 11:18 a.m. 

 11:28 a.m. – 12:20 p.m. 

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 630 Filed 11/21/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.

                Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The  undersigned,  who is the  chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial officer of Community First  Bancorporation,  hereby certifies that, to
the best of his  knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form  10-Q of the  issuer  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  and that  information  contained  in the  report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the issuer.

August 12, 2008

                                   s/ Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Frederick D. Shepherd, Jr.
                                   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                                   Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40414 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CLAUDIO JIMENEZ-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-295-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Claudio Jimenez-Martinez (Jimenez) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jimenez received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
**Exhibit32**

** **

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODICFINANCIAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the10-Q Report of PSB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Issuer”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Anthony DiSandro, President andChief Executive Officer of the Issuer, and I, John Carrozza, VicePresident-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, each herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ‘1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Periodic Report containing the financialstatements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that information contained in thePeriodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Issuer.

 

 
| /s/Anthony DiSandro                    |                                        | /s/John Carrozza |   |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|------------------|--------|
| Anthony DiSandro                       | John Carrozza                               |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer | Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 10(i)
​
SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF TRUSTEES’ COMPENSATION
​
The compensation paid to each Individual Trustee and the Corporate Trustee is set forth in the Amendment to the Agreement of Trust dated as of October 25, 1982 (the “Amendment”).  The Amendment is filed as Exhibit 3(a) to the Form 10-K.
​
Pursuant to the Amendment, each Individual Trustee receives at least $20,000 in annual compensation for services as Trustee.  Each year, annual Trustee compensation is adjusted up or down (but not below $20,000) in accordance with changes from the November 1981 level of 295.5 (the “1981 Escalation Level”) in the All Commodities Producer Price Index (with 1967 = 100 as a base).  The All Commodities Producer Price Index is published by the U.S. Department of Labor.  The adjustment is made at the end of each fiscal year and is calculated on the basis of the proportion between (a) the level of such index for the November preceding the end of such fiscal year, and (b) the 1981 Escalation Level.  Each of the Individual Trustees received $40,148 in cash compensation for services to the Trust during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2021.
​
Also pursuant to the Amendment, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Corporate Trustee, receives annual compensation in an amount equal to the greater of (i) $20,000, or such other amount determined in accordance with the adjustments described in the preceding paragraph, or (ii) one quarter of one percent (1/4 of 1%) of the Trust Moneys, exclusive of proceeds of sale of any part of the Trust Estate (as such terms are defined in the Agreement of Trust), received by the Trustees and distributed to Trust Unitholders.  The Corporate Trustee earned $54,776 pursuant to this provision for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2021.
​
Additionally, each year the Corporate Trustee receives $62,500 (or more, if unanimously approved by the Individual Trustees) to cover clerical and administrative services to Mesabi Trust other than services customarily performed by a registrar or transfer agent.  In fiscal 2021, the Trust paid the Corporate Trustee $62,500 to cover clerical and administrative services to Mesabi Trust and $6,578 for services as registrar and transfer agent.  The Corporate Trustee earned $123,854 in total compensation for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2021.