alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID Peer Review Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         November 21, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fisher Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brenda Lange-Gustafson, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Scientific Review Program,  Room 3122, 5601 Fisher Lane, Rockville, MD 20892                         *bgustafson@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 22, 2014.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-25511 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ana Guzman","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ana-d-guzmannasa-gov\/","title":"Space Station Research and Technology Contacts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qEBWYiBHRN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/iss-research\/station-research-contacts\/\">Space Station Research and Technology Contacts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/station\/iss-research\/station-research-contacts\/embed\/#?secret=qEBWYiBHRN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Station Research and Technology Contacts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qEBWYiBHRN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss044e005486.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
### Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 2 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00963

- CR

GARRICK IAN HASTINGS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 208th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1403750

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted a ppellant of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The jury
sentenced appellant t o confinement for sixty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of $ 10,000 . Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and with out merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v.2

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by advancing frivolous contentions which arguably might support the appeal. See Currie v. State , 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State , 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v.
State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See S tafford v. State
, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). T he record was provided to appellant and

on November 4 , 2014, appellant filed a pro se response to counsel’s brief.
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and appellant’s resp onse, and agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of ea ch claim raised in an
Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby. Do Not Publish

— T ex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Case 2:15-mj-01766-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01766-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01766-JFM Document 4 Filed 10/23/15 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  FEB-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-26-2000
<CASH>                                    1054
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                            19652
<ALLOWANCES>                              (278)
<INVENTORY>                             157028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        181120
<PP&E>                                   38085
<DEPRECIATION>                           17733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          208863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   175788
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   112
<OTHER-SE>                               32745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            208863
<SALES>                                 270631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        270631
<CGS>                                   187391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           187391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         82055
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        7185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (6000)
<INCOME-TAX>                              1587
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (7587)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             (7587)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.71)


</TABLE>
#### C. J. Coker *v.*The Commonwealth for the use of Jacob Powell.

Bond of Sheriff — Breach—Leaving State After Property Comes in His Hands.

Property coming into a sheriff’s hands on attachment, must he preserved, and an illegal conversion of same, and leaving of the state, is a breach of his bond.

Same — Pleading—Petition.

A petition that charges such a breach, is substantially good.

Same — Cause of Action — When Will Accrue.

A cause of action thereon, would not however accruei until the attaching creditor had obtained his judgment in the attachment suit.

Same — Statute of Limitations.

Such judgment being rendered within seven years from the institution of an action, the statute of limitations would not discharge the sureties.

APPEAL FROM FULTON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 19, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

*516
      *Randle &*Tyler, *for appellant.*

The legal effect of the sheriff’s bond is to guarantee his faithful performance of every official duty. When he attached the horse the law requires him to keep it subject to the order and disposition of the court; and consequently his illegal conversion of it to his own use and leaving the state without accounting for it was a breach of his bond. The petition sufficiently charges that breach, and is, therefore, substantially good.

The cause of action did not, however, accrue, as complete and maintainable, until after the attaching creditor had obtained his judgment in the attachment case. And therefore as that judgment was rendered within seven years preceding the institution of this action against the sureties in the bond, the statute of limitations does not discharge them from this liability.

Wherefore, "perceiving no error in the judgment against these appellants, the judgment is *affirmed.*
#### Sherwood *v.*Hammond.

In *February,*1837, *FI.*sued S. in the *White*Circuit Court in assumpsit. Plea, non assumpsit. On the trial, *S.*offered to prove that in *March,-1837,*he sued *FI*before a justice on two promissory notes; that *IF.*proved in that suit, as a set-off, the demand now sued for; that the verdict and judgment being against *IF.,*he appealed to the *White*Circuit Court; and that the appeal was still pending. *Field,*that the evidence was inadmissible.

The pendency of a subsequent suit cannot be pleaded, either in bar or abatement, to a prior suit for the same cause.

*Thursday, May*31.

APPEAL from the *White*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

Assumpsit by *Hammond*against *Sherwood.*Suit commenced in the *White*Circuit Court in *February,*1837. Plea, the general issue. Judgment for the plaintiff.

On the trial, the plaintiff proved the items of his demand against the defendant as contained in a bill of particulars. The defendant then offered to prove that in *March,*1837, he sued the plaintiff before a justice of the peace on two promissory notes, and that on the trial of that action, the plaintiff in this suit—the defendant in that—gave in evidence to the jury, as a set-off, the same matters contained in the bill of particulars; that the jury found against him, and that the justice rendered judgment accordingly; that *Hammond*appealed to the *White*Circuit Court, where the cause was then pending and undetermined. This evidence was objected to, and rejected by the Court. The defendant excepted. The rejection of this testimony raises the only point in the cause.

We think the decision of the Circuit Court was correct. By the appeal from the justice’s judgment, both actions were pending in the Circuit Court at the same time. This the elder, and the appeal the younger. Neither was decided. *Hammond,*by attempting to set off his account against the demand of *Sherwood*before the justice, became a *quasi*plaintiff; and we must view the question in the same light, as if he had commenced two actions in the Circuit Court for the same cause. The pendency of that which was first commenced might have been pleaded in abatement of the other; but not e *converso. Renner*v. *Marshall,*1 Wheat. 215. This, however, is not an attempt to abate either of the actions, but to give in evidence, under the general issue, the pendency of and *505proceedings in the younger, in bar of the elder action. This is clearly inadmissible. The *pendency*of even a prior suit cannot be set up in defence of another for the same cause: it can only be adduced in evidence under a plea in abatement; 1 Chitt. Pl. 7 *Am.*from 6 *Lond.*ed. 488; nor can it operate in mitigation of damages.

*I.*Naylor, for the appellant.

*A. S. White*and *R. A.*Lockwood, for the appellee.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed-with 5 *per cent.*damages and costs. To be certified, &c.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America), Inc. (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael J. Kneeland, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/S/    MICHAEL J.
KNEELAND
|Michael J. Kneeland       
|Chief Executive Officer   

October 18, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4847 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4847

    To authorize the Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial Foundation to 
  establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to 
honor veterans who became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 16, 1998

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Murtha) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial Foundation to 
  establish a memorial in the District of Columbia or its environs to 
honor veterans who became disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of 
                           the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMORIAL TO HONOR DISABLED VETERANS OF THE UNITED STATES 
              ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Memorial Authorized.--The Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial 
Foundation is authorized to establish a memorial on Federal land in the 
District of Columbia or its environs to honor veterans who became 
disabled while serving in the Armed Forces of the United States.
    (b) Compliance With Standards for Commemorative Works.--The 
establishment of the memorial shall be in accordance with the 
Commemorative Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
    (c) Payment of Expenses.--The Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial 
Foundation shall be solely responsible for acceptance of contributions 
for, and payment of the expenses of, the establishment of the memorial. 
No Federal funds may be used to pay any expense of the establishment of 
the memorial.
    (d) Deposit of Excess Funds.--If, upon payment of all expenses of 
the establishment of the memorial (including the maintenance and 
preservation amount required under section 8(b) of the Commemorative 
Works Act (40 U.S.C. 1008(b))), or upon expiration of the authority for 
the memorial under section 10(b) of such Act (40 U.S.C. 1010(b)), there 
remains a balance of funds received for the establishment of the 
memorial, the Disabled Veterans' LIFE Memorial Foundation shall 
transmit the amount of the balance to the Secretary of the Treasury for 
deposit in the account provided for in section 8(b)(1) of such Act (40 
U.S.C. 1008(b)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:15-mj-01823-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01823-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01823-JFM Document 4 Filed 11/10/15 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 696 Introduced in House (IH)]

105th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 696

To amend the Animal Welfare Act to require humane living conditions for 
               calves raised for the production of veal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 12, 1997

 Mr. Ackerman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Animal Welfare Act to require humane living conditions for 
               calves raised for the production of veal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HUMANE LIVING CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR VEAL CALVES.

    The Animal Welfare Act (7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating section 29 (7 U.S.C. 2159) as section 
        30; and
            (2) by inserting after section 28 (7 U.S.C. 2158) the 
        following new section:

``SEC. 29. PROTECTION OF VEAL CALVES.

    ``(a) Humane Living Conditions Required.--Beginning one year after 
the date of the enactment of this section, no person shall raise a calf 
for the production of veal unless the person complies with the 
following requirements:
            ``(1) The calf must be free to turn around without 
        difficulty, lie with its legs outstretched, and groom itself, 
        without any impediment such as too small an enclosure or 
        chaining or tethering.
            ``(2) The calf must be fed a daily diet containing 
        sufficient iron and, if the calf is more than 14 days old, 
        sufficient digestible fiber to prevent anemia and to sustain 
        full health.
    ``(b) Penalties.--The remedies and procedures provided in 
subsections (b), (c), and (d) of section 19 shall apply with respect to 
a violation of subsection (a).
    ``(c) Investigations and Inspections.--For purposes of enforcement 
of this section, the Secretary may make such investigations or 
inspections as the Secretary considers necessary of any facility where 
calves are kept for the production of veal. Section 16 shall apply with 
respect to investigations and inspections conducted under this 
section.''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Gemini Pioneered the Technology Driving Today’s Exploration","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QSI8FIXAAk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/gemini\/gemini-pioneered-the-technology-driving-todays-exploration\/\">Gemini Pioneered the Technology Driving Today’s Exploration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/missions\/gemini\/gemini-pioneered-the-technology-driving-todays-exploration\/embed\/#?secret=QSI8FIXAAk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Gemini Pioneered the Technology Driving Today’s Exploration” — NASA\" data-secret=\"QSI8FIXAAk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/gemini_3.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":485}