alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                       201
<INVENTORY>                                        690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,857
<PP&E>                                          18,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           118
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,033
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,552
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,164
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     6
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    914
<INCOME-TAX>                                       416
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                498
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       498
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.10(b)

   
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  
 
  

   
  

  
   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (No. 333-233415) (the “Registration Statement”) of our report dated March 25, 2019, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Protective Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2018. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement. 
  

   
  

   
  

  
   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
  

   
  

  
   Birmingham, Alabama
  

  
   April 28, 2021
  

   
  

 



  1
```

[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4827 Introduced in House (IH)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 4827

To amend the Fair Housing Act to provide an exemption for restrictions 
on the occupancy of group homes by persons convicted of certain crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 13, 1998

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Housing Act to provide an exemption for restrictions 
on the occupancy of group homes by persons convicted of certain crimes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Neighborhood Act of 1998''.

SEC. 2. OCCUPANCY OF GROUP HOMES BY CERTAIN CRIMINALS.

    Section 807 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3607) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Nothing in this title limits the applicability of any 
reasonable local, State, or Federal restriction on the occupancy of 
group homes by persons convicted of crimes for which a term or 
imprisonment was imposed.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

     The registrant is IOS Capital, Inc., a Delaware corporation, whose parent
is IKON Office Solutions, Inc. The following sets forth information with respect
to IOS Capital, Inc.'s subsidiaries as of December 28, 2000.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  STATE OR OTHER
                                                                  JURISDICTION OF
                                    % VOTING SECURITIES           INCORPORATION OR
SUBSIDIARY                            OWNED (BY WHOM)               ORGANIZATION
--------------                      -----------------             ----------------
<S>                                 <C>                           <C>
IKON Funding, Inc...............    100% IOS Capital                   Delaware
IKON Funding, LLC...............    100% IOS Capital                   Delaware
IKON Funding-1, LLC.............    100% IOS Capital                   Delaware
IKON Funding-2, LLC.............    100% IOS Capital                   Delaware
IKON Receivables-1, LLC.........    100% IOS Capital                   Delaware
IKON Receivables, LLC...........    100% IKON Receivables-1, LLC       Delaware
IKON Receivables Funding, Inc...    100% IOS Capital                   Delaware
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kisha Coward,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04109-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Flint Law Firm LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/9/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8994 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"NAVAIR F\/A-18E\u00c2\u00a0Undergoes Loads Testing at NASA Armstrong","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uIMySFUqL4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-afrc2022-0063-096\/\">NAVAIR F\/A-18E\u00c2\u00a0Undergoes Loads Testing at NASA Armstrong<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-afrc2022-0063-096\/embed\/#?secret=uIMySFUqL4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NAVAIR F\/A-18E\u00c2\u00a0Undergoes Loads Testing at NASA Armstrong” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uIMySFUqL4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/AFRC2022-0063-096\/AFRC2022-0063-096~large.jpg?w=600&h=1279&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1279}
Case 2:15-mj-01789-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/29/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01789-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/29/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01789-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/29/15 Page 3 of 3
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-55185 of
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. on Form S-4 to Form S-1, in Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-71111 of Ferrellgas
Partners, L.P. and Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. on Form S-3,
and in Registration Statement No. 333-87633 of Ferrellgas
Partners, L.P. on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 14,
2000, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ferrellgas
Partners, L.P. and Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. for the year
ended July 31, 2000.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
--------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
October 23, 2000
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.23    
  


 
 

AMENDED AND RESTATED UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE    
  



	$150,000.00	 	March 31, 2001





        WHEREAS, on July 13, 2000, Ronald D. Zimmerman ("Borrower") executed an unsecured promissory note ("Note") for $150,000 in
favor of QuickLogic Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("QuickLogic") and the note was subsequently amended on January 18, 2001; 


        WHEREAS, the principal and interest under the Note were due and payable on March 31, 2001 under the amendment; and 



        WHEREAS, Borrower and QuickLogic now desire to amend and restate the Note to provide that the principal and interest under the Note shall
be due and payable upon demand by QuickLogic; 


        NOW THEREFORE, Borrower and QuickLogic agree as follows: 


        For
value received, Borrower promises to pay to QuickLogic the principal sum of $150,000.00 with interest thereof accrued from July 13, 2000 at the annual simple interest rate of
5.0%, on the unpaid balance of the principal sum. Said principal and all accrued interest shall be due and payable upon demand by QuickLogic. 



        In
the event that Borrower breaches this agreement by failing to pay principal and interest when due, QuickLogic may withhold salary or cause the exercise and sale of Borrower's options
to purchase QuickLogic shares. Proceeds from such sale, up to the balance due, will be paid directly to QuickLogic. 


        The
holder of this Note shall have full recourse against the undersigned personally for failure to pay the Note as and when due. 


        The
principal is payable in lawful money of the United States of America. The privilege is reserved to prepay any portion of the Note at any time without any pre-payment
penalty. 


        Should
suit be commenced to collect this Note or any portion thereof, such sum as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees. The maker waives presentment for
payment, protest, notice of protest and notice of non-payment of this Note. This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of California as they apply to contracts entered into and
wholly to be performed within such state. 



	 	 	Borrower:
	

 	
 	

/s/  RONALD D. ZIMMERMAN      
 Ronald D. Zimmerman
	

 	
 	
QuickLogic Corporation:
	

 	
 	

Signature:	
 	

/s/  ARTHUR O. WHIPPLE      

	

 	
 	

Title:	
 	

CFO

	

 	
 	

Name:	
 	

Arthur O. Whipple













QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.23


AMENDED AND RESTATED UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                           
|----------------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002       

In connection with the Annual Report of REGI U.S.,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2007 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  I, John G. Robertson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed the Report;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | 2. | based on my knowledge, the Report does
        not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
        material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
        under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
        the period covered by the Report; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | 3. | based on my knowledge, the financial
        statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly
        present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations,
        and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
        in the Report.                      

|Date: July 27, 2007           | 
|----------------------------- | 
|                              | 
|/s/
      John G. Robertson   | 
|John G. Robertson, President  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) | 

---
#### Simerjit SINGH, Petitioner, v. *310Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73989.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.**

Decided Feb. 22, 2005.

George T. Heridis, Esq., Rai & Associates, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, and Alison Marie Igoe, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Simerjit Singh, native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Alvarez-Santos v. Ashcroft,*332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition.

The BIA determined that, even assuming Singh established past persecution, the government rebutted the presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution. Substantial evidence supports that finding. The BIA gave a sufficiently individualized analysis of the State Department’s country profile reports as to the current treatment of Sikhs in India. *See Gonzalez-Hernan**311*dez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.2003) (concluding that substantial evidence supported determination that government rebutted presumption of well-founded fear).

Because petitioner failed to demonstrate that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Farah v. Ashcroft,*348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003). In addition, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of relief under the CAT. *See id.*at 1157.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

MONAHAN, STEPHENS, and DEERWESTER

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Emmanuel BELL

First Lieutenant (O-2), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 202100137

_________________________

Decided: 14 March 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Stephen Keane

Sentence adjudged 21 January 2021 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of 

a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement for 36 months,1 and a dismissal.

For Appellant: 

Major Mary C. Finnen, USMC

 

1 The convening authority suspended 2 months of confinement adjudged for the 

Specification of Charge II pursuant to Defense Counsel’s request and the Military 

Judge’s concurring recommendation. 
United States v. Bell, NMCCA No. 202100137

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.2

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

 

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
EXHIBIT 23.1




The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
American Homestar Corporation:


We  consent to the use of our report dated August 14, 2000, except as to Notes 1
and  8 which are as of October 11, 2000, relating to the consolidated statements
of  operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended
June  30,  2000  for  American Homestar Corporation, which report appears in the
June  30,  2002  Annual  Report  on  Form 10-K of American Homestar Corporation.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Houston, Texas
September 12, 2002


<PAGE>