alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,709
<SECURITIES>                                    15,495
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,113
<PP&E>                                           4,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,417)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,827
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,630
<OTHER-SE>                                    (68,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,459
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,139
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       452
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (973)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (973)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1998
<CASH>                                          10,418
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,710)
<INVENTORY>                                        776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,996
<PP&E>                                          40,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,669)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,730
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         55
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,272
<SALES>                                         74,875
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,875
<CGS>                                           12,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,925
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 156
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,895
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,043
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                852
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT JUDGE'S MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – TUCSON 

U.S. District Judge: Raner C. Collins Date: October 23, 2017 

USA v. Lonnie Ray Swartz Case Number: CR-15-01723-001-TUC-RCC (DTF)

Assistant U.S. Attorney: Mary Sue Feldmeier 

Attorney for Defendant: Sean Chapman and Jaime Calle, Retained 

Deputy Clerk: Sherry Gammon

Court Reporter: Erica McQuillen

Interpreter: Sandy Frady (for victim’s family) 

Defendant: ☐ Present ☒ Present ☒ Released ☐ Custody ☐ Summons 

MOTION HEARING: 

Matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Sanctions (Brady Violation) and Motion to 

Recuse the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona (Doc. 239). 

The motion is argued by Mr. Chapman and Ms. Feldmeier. 

The Court takes the motion UNDER ADVISEMENT. 

The Motion to Exceed Page Limit Re: Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Recuse United States 

Attorney’s Office (Doc. 240) filed by the defendant is MOOT. 

Motion Hearing: 29 minutes 

Start: 2:00 p.m. 

Stop: 2:29 p.m. 

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 260 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of The UniMark Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Dated:   February 23, 2005                           /s/ Jakes Jordaan
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Jakes Jordaan
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   February 23, 2005                           /s/ David E. Ziegler
                                                     --------------------
                                                      David E. Ziegler
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEFFREY DISHON.

June 27, 1989.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
#### Larkin *v.*Wilburn, in Error.

*Saturday, November*13.

IN an action of replevin by *Larkin*against Wilburn, the defendant avowed the taking of the goods as a distress for rent, due to him from the plaintiff. To this avowry, the plaintiff pleaded *non Ienuit*and *riens in arrear.*Issues were joined upon these pleas. There was a verdict for the defendant on both the issues; the jury finding the amount of rent in arrear, but not the value- of the goods distrained. The Court *held,*that the common-law judgment for a return of the goods to the defendant, and for his costs of suit, might be rendered on this verdict; but that there could be no judgment in his favour for the arrears of rent (1).

(1)

 If the verdict, as in the case in the test, be against the plaintiff, the jury should inquire concerning the sum of the arrears, and the value of the distress; and the defendant will thereupon have judgment for the rent arrear, if the distress amount to the value of it, with costs. If the value of the distress be less than the anears of rent, the judgment is for the value of the distress, with costs. R. C, 1831, pp. 425, 426.—17 Car. 2. c. 7.—2 Selw. N. P. 379.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Imagin Molecular Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Gregory Pappas, as Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as applicable of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Dated: August 23, 2010
/s/ Gregory PappasGregory Pappas, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
#### PETER H. SODERBERG v. CRESTEK, INC., ETC.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
MEMORANDUM


From:  Stephen M. Greenberg

To:  Glenn Williams

Re:  Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dated:  December 20, 2002

         This is to confirm to you that, effective January 1, 2003, your
existing Employment Agreement ("Agreement") with Net2Phone, Inc, is hereby
amended as follows:

         1.       The term of the Agreement shall expire December 31, 2005.

         2.       Your Base Salary shall be $195,000.00 per annum, subject to
                  such increases as the Board of Directors or its Compensation
                  Committee may approve from time to time.

         3.       You shall report directly to the Chief Executive Officer of
                  the Company.

         4.       Upon termination of your Employment Agreement for any reason,
                  except for termination by the Company for Cause or termination
                  by you without Cause, all vested Options to purchase shares of
                  the Company's Common Stock held by you on the date of
                  termination shall be exercisable until the 10th anniversary
                  dates of their respective grants.

         Except as specifically otherwise provided for herein, the terms and
conditions of your existing Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and
remain in full force and effect.

   Net2Phone, Inc.                                 Accepted and Agreed

   By: /s/ Stephen M. Greenberg                    /s/  Glenn Williams
      ----------------------------                 ------------------------
      Stephen M. Greenberg, CEO                    Glenn Williams
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2861 

To prevent abuse of the special allowance subsidies under the Federal Family 

Education Loan Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

DODD, and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prevent abuse of the special allowance subsidies under 

the Federal Family Education Loan Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Abuse 

5 Prevention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EXCESSIVE ALLOWANCES. 

7 Section 438(b)(2)(B) of the Higher Education Act of 

8 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087–1(b)(2)(B)) is amended— 
2 

•S 2861 IS 

1 (1) in clause (iv), by inserting ‘‘or refunded on 

2 or after the date of enactment of the Student Loan 

3 Abuse Prevention Act,’’ after ‘‘October 1, 1993,’’; 

4 and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

6 clause: 

7 ‘‘(v) Notwithstanding clauses (i) and 

8 (ii), the quarterly rate of the special allow9 ance shall be the rate determined under 

10 subparagraph (A), (E), (F), (G), (H), or 

11 (I) of this paragraph, or paragraph (4), as 

12 the case may be, for loans— 

13 ‘‘(I) originated, transferred, or 

14 purchased on or after the date of en15 actment of the Student Loan Abuse 

16 Prevention Act; 

17 ‘‘(II) financed by an obligation 

18 that has matured, been retired, or 

19 defeased on or after the date of enact20 ment of the Student Loan Abuse Pre21 vention Act; 

22 ‘‘(III) refinanced on or after the 

23 date of enactment of the Student 

24 Loan Abuse Prevention Act, with 

25 funds obtained from a source other 
3 

•S 2861 IS 

1 than funds described in subclause (II) 

2 of this clause; or 

3 ‘‘(IV) sold or transferred to any 

4 other holder on or after the date of 

5 enactment of the Student Loan Abuse 

6 Prevention Act.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. EXPENDITURE OF SAVINGS ON INCREASED PELL 

8 GRANTS. 

9 From any amounts in the Treasury not otherwise ap10 propriated, there is appropriated for each of the fiscal 

11 years beginning after the date of enactment of this Act 

12 an additional amount for the purposes of increasing the 

13 maximum Pell grant in each Act providing annual appro14 priations for the Pell grant program under subpart 1 of 

15 part A of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

16 (20 U.S.C. 1070a) that is equal to the amount that is 

17 determined annually by the Congressional Budget Office 

18 to be the amount by which expenditures under section 438 

19 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1087–1) are reduced for such fiscal 

20 year by the enactment of section 2 of this Act. 

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jermaine Walker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwalke32\/","title":"Canberra 34-meter Antenna","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vwEDmSS0tZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-complex-07-2\/\">Canberra 34-meter Antenna<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-complex-07-2\/embed\/#?secret=vwEDmSS0tZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Canberra 34-meter Antenna” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vwEDmSS0tZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/canberra-complex-07.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10076

Summary Calendar

Hannah Logan; Henry O. Logan, 

Plaintiffs—Appellants,

versus

Jerome Hennigan, 324 Family Law Judge, 

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CV-749

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Hannah and Henry Logan appeal the district court’s dismissal of their 

complaint alleging civil rights violations and violations of the Americans with 

Disabilities Act against Judge Jerome Hennigan, the presiding judge of the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10076 Document: 00516497165 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2022
No. 22-10076

2

324th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction.

The Logans’ appellate brief does not meaningfully address the basis 

for the district court’s dismissal. While pro se briefs are liberally construed, 

see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972), even pro se litigants must brief 

arguments in order to preserve them, Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 

(5th Cir. 1993). The Logans’ failure to address the basis for the district 

court’s dismissal, “without even the slightest identification of any error in 

[the court’s] legal analysis or its application to [their] suit . . . is the same as 

if [they] had not appealed that judgment.” Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy 

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

The district court judgment is AFFIRMED. The Logans’ pending 

motions for appointment of counsel, for summary judgment, to expedite the 

appeal, and for exemption of PACER fees are DENIED. See Ulmer v. 

Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir. 1982).

Case: 22-10076 Document: 00516497165 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/05/2022
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Jon Cadenhead

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jon Cadenhead,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

an Ohio corporation, Trans Union, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company; 

Equifax Information Services, LLC, a 

Georgia corporation; Arizona Public 

Service, an Arizona corporation; Bank of 

America, National Association, a North 

Carolina corporation; Capital One Bank, 

USA, NA, a National Association; and

Ally Financial, Inc., a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: CV-15-01990-PHX-DMF

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO 

DEFENDANT ALLY FINANCIAL, 

INC., ONLY

Case 2:15-cv-01990-JJT Document 60 Filed 01/18/16 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff and Defendant, Ally Financial, 

Inc., in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement. The parties anticipate 

filing a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Ally Financial, Inc., 

ONLY, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) within 60 days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 18

th day of January 2016.

 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Jon Cadenhead

Case 2:15-cv-01990-JJT Document 60 Filed 01/18/16 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01990-JJT Document 60 Filed 01/18/16 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2805 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2805

   To extend the authorization for the Secretary of the Interior to 
  release certain conditions contained in a patent concerning certain 
  land conveyed by the United States to Eastern Washington University.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2004

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the authorization for the Secretary of the Interior to 
  release certain conditions contained in a patent concerning certain 
  land conveyed by the United States to Eastern Washington University.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAND TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION 
              EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--The authority under subsection (a) of the first 
section of Public Law 97-435 (96 Stat. 2281) is reinstated.
    (b) Extension.--Subsection (c) of the first section of Public Law 
97-435 (96 Stat. 2281) is amended by striking ``five years after the 
enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on December 31, 2009''.
                                 <all>
```
423 A.2d 1307

#### Commonwealth, Appellant, v. Reed.

Submitted June 12, 1978.

William T. Nicholas, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellant; Roger B. Reynolds, Jr., for appellee.

*634Before JACOBS, P. J., and HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT, SPAETH and HESTER, JJ.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HESTER, J., filed a memorandum dissenting statement.

JACOBS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
---

Exhibit 23.1

Smythe Ratcliffe LLP

7th Floor, Marine Building

355 Burrard Street

Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8



fax: 604.688.4675

telephone: 604.687.1231

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
  Firm

To the Board of Directors of REGI U.S., Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated July 18, 2008 on the financial statements of REGI U.S., Inc. as of April 30, 2008 that are included in the Company’s Form 10-KSB, which is included, by reference in the Company’s Form S-8.

Dated this 7th day of August, 2008.

/s/ Smythe Ratcliffe LLP

SMYTHE RATCLIFFE LLP 
  Chartered Accountants

|Smythe Ratcliffe LLP, a British Columbia limited liability
      partnership, is a member of PKF North American Network and PKF International,
      associations of legal independent firms. | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

---
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002
  1
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Royal as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ Robert A. KuehlRobert A. KuehlPrincipal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting OfficerMarch 29, 2010