alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4762

To impose a temporary ban on the importation of certain steel products

from Japan, Russia, and Brazil, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Mr. ADERHOLT (for himself, Mr. NEY, Mr. REGULA, Mr. WALSH, Mr. TRAFICANT, Mr. DICKEY, Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. EVANS, Mr.

HOLDEN, Mr. Brown of Ohio, and Mr. KUCINICH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To impose a temporary ban on the importation of certain

steel products from Japan, Russia, and Brazil, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY BAN ON STEEL IMPORTS FROM

4 JAPAN, RUSSIA, AND BRAZIL.

5 No hot-rolled steel products or plate steel products

6 that are the product or manufacture of Japan, Russia, or

7 Brazil may enter the customs territory of the United

8 States, effective for the 1-year period beginning 10 days

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act.
2

•HR 4762 IH

1 SEC. 2. ASSESSMENT OF ANTIDUMPING DUTIES.

2 (a) RETROACTIVE ASSESSMENT OF DUTIES.—In any

3 case in which antidumping duties are imposed upon steel

4 products of a foreign country pursuant to subtitle B of

5 title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930, the Secretary of Com6 merce shall, in addition to assessing such duties on entries

7 made after the effective date of the antidumping order,

8 assess such duties on entries made prior to that effective

9 date for such period as the dumping occurred prior to the

10 issuance of the order, but in no case earlier than 1 year

11 before the date on which—

12 (1) the applicable petition was filed under sec13 tion 732(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or

14 (2) the Secretary initiated the investigation

15 under section 732(a) of that Act,

16 as the case may be.

17 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) applies to any

18 antidumping proceeding pending on, or initiated on or

19 after, the date of the enactment of this Act.

20 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

21 It is the sense of the Congress that the President

22 should respond to complaints filed by trading partners of

23 the United States regarding the prohibition on imports of

24 their steel products required by section 1 by addressing

25 the failure of the governments of those countries to make

26 their companies abide by the spirit and letter of inter-
3

•HR 4762 IH

1 national trade agreements with respect to dumping and

2 by stating that such a deliberate assault on United States

3 steel markets constitutes a legitimate national security

4 concern, since a viable domestic steel industry is crucial

5 to the readiness of, and timely production of materials for,

6 the Armed Forces of the United States.

Æ
#### Cutshaw *v.*Birge and Another.

It is no defence to a suit against special bail, when sued on their recognisance, that the proceedings against their principal are erroneous.

Thursday, May 31.

ERROR to the *Jackson*Circuit Court. •

*A. C. Griffith,*for the plaintiff.

Blackford, *J.*

*Scire facias*against the defendants on their recognisance as special bail. Judgment by default against *Birge. Fislar*pleaded two pleas: 1st, That there was no judge’s order for bail indorsed on the writ in the suit against the principal, nor was the action founded on a written contract; 2dly, That in the action against the principal, there was not a sufficient affidavit to hold him to bail; nor was there a judge’s order for bail; nor was the action founded on a written contract. General demurrer to these pleas, and judgment for the defendant.

This judgment in favour of *Fislar*is erroneous. The pleas are evidently bad. The special bail, when sued on their recognisance, cannot defeat the suit by showing the proceedings in the action against their principal to be erroneous. The bail are concluded by the judgment against the principal. *Lewis*v. *Brackenridge, May*term, 1821.

Dewet, J. having been concerned as counsel was absent.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment in favour of *Fislar*is reversed, and the proceedings, as respects him, subsequent to the joinder in demurrer set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Exhibit 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Enova  Systems,  Inc.'s,
Registration   Statements  on  Form  S-8  (No.  333-95701)  and  Form  S-1  (No.
333-117321) of our report on the audit of Enova Systems,  Inc.'s,  statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
2002. Our report, which is dated February 24, 2003, appears in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of Enova Systems, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                                     /s/ MOSS ADAMS LLP

Santa Rosa, California
September 15, 2005
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF R.K.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew G. Sculley,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Dated: May
      14, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Andrew
      G. SculleyAndrew
      G. SculleyChief
      Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY CHASAR.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25149]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abdfd9cacfcecac5cac7d2d8c2d8ebcdc6c885ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="daaea8bbbebfbbb4bbb6a3a9b3a99abcb7b9f4bdb5ac">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 012064-004.
    Title: Hapag-Lloyd/NYK Mexico-Dominican Republic Slot Exchange 
Agreement.
    Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG and Nippon Yusen Kaisha.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street 
NW; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
    Synopsis: The amendment would convert the agreement from a slot 
exchange to a one-way slot charter from Hapag-Lloyd to NYK, change the 
name of the agreement to reflect this revision, make conforming changes 
throughout the agreement, and restate the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 201175-004.
    Title: Port of NY/NJ Sustainable Services Agreement.
    Parties: APM Terminals North America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT 
New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; and Port Newark Container Terminal 
LLC.
    Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 
South Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591
    Synopsis: The amendment changes the name of New York Container 
Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and Global Terminal and Container 
Services, LLC to GCT Bayonne LP.

    Agreement No.: 201210-001.
    Title: Port of NY/NJ Port Authority/Marine Terminal Operators 
Agreement.
    Parties: APM Terminals North America, Inc..; GCT Bayonne LP; GCT 
New York LP; Maher Terminals LLC; and Port Newark Container Terminal 
LLC.
    Filing Party: Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 
South Broadway Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591
    Synopsis: The amendment changes the name of New York Container 
Terminal, LLC to GCT New York LP and Global Terminal and Container 
Services, LLC to GCT Bayonne LP.

    Dated: October 17, 2014.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25149 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Biomedical Flight Controllers","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ehn4ZRvogP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/biomedical-flight-controllers\/\">Biomedical Flight Controllers<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/biomedical-flight-controllers\/embed\/#?secret=ehn4ZRvogP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Biomedical Flight Controllers” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ehn4ZRvogP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/photo1-0.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63461-63462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8930]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (Osac) Renewal

    The Department of State has renewed the Charter of the Overseas 
Security Advisory Council. This federal advisory committee will 
continue to interact on overseas security matters of mutual interest 
between the U.S. Government and the American private sector. The 
Council's initiatives and security publications provide a unique 
contribution to protecting American private sector interests abroad. 
The Under Secretary for Management determined that renewal of the 
Charter is necessary and in the public interest.
    The Council consists of representatives from three (3) U.S. 
Government agencies and thirty-one (31) American private sector 
companies

[[Page 63462]]

and organizations. The Council follows the procedures prescribed by the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Pub. Law 92-463). Meetings will 
be open to the public unless a determination is made in accordance with 
Section 10(d) of the FACA and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), that a meeting or a 
portion of the meeting should be closed to the public. Notice of each 
meeting will be provided in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior 
to the meeting.
    For more information contact Marsha Thurman, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, Bureau of Diplomatic Security, U.S. Department of 
State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, phone: 571-345-2214.

    Dated: September 26, 2014.
Bill A. Miller,
Director of the Diplomatic, Security Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-25262 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
#### Green L. Key *v.*Wesley Phelps.

Sales — Failure of Consideration — Fraud.

A sale of land by one, believing he held a good title to the land, is not fraudulent, where the land was afterwards, by will disposed of, said will not being of record at the time of the sale.

Same.

The purchaser being put in possession of the land, using it for several year's, cannot claim a total failure of consideration and disregard the bond for title for a quit claim deed.

Specific Performance — Sales—Bond for Title.

Under a sale of land by bond for title, neither party being in fault as to the defective title, the vendee’s remedy is for a specific execution, and not for recovery of the consideration money.

APPEAL FROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT.

December 16, 1868.

Opinion of ti-ie Court by

Judge Williams:

When Phelps sold by quit claim the laud to Key he doubtless believed he had the title aud so did Key, as no one had then propounded the will of Mrs. McITarous’ deceased father. Key was put into possession and enjoyed the land for several years, therefore, there was not a total failure of consideration to authorize a disregard of the bond for a quit claim deed, no such fraud shown as to make it void, and had there been, it would have been barred unless this had been discovered within five years before bringing the suit. There was no error in adjudging against the plaintiff’s *547right of recovery for the consideration money, and though the judgment for a specific execution seems entirely fruitless, yet this is the most appellant is entitled to. Judgment affirmed.

*Bunch*& *See, for appellant.*

*I.*& *J. Caldwell, B. H. Field, for appellee.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,937
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                       885
<INVENTORY>                                      8,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,624
<PP&E>                                          23,523
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,586
<BONDS>                                        153,925
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            29
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,082)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,275
<SALES>                                        218,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               219,904
<CGS>                                          188,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,678
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   305
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (294)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,480)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,480)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2847 

To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH. 

4 (a) GENERAL AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA5 TIONS.—Section 104(f)(1) of the Water Resources Re6 search Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(f)(1)) is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘$9,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, $10,000,000 

8 for each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and $12,000,000 

9 for each of fiscal years 2004 and 2005’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘$12,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2005 through 
2

•S 2847 IS

1 2008 and $13,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2009 

2 and 2010’’. 

3 (b) APPROPRIATIONS FOR RESEARCH FOCUSED ON

4 WATER PROBLEMS OF INTERSTATE NATURE.—Section 

5 104(g)(1) of the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 

6 (42 U.S.C. 10303(g)(1)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘$3,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, $4,000,000 for fiscal 

8 years 2002 and 2003, and $6,000,000 for fiscal years 

9 2004 and 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘$6,000,000 for the period 

10 of fiscal years 2005 through 2008 and $7,000,000 for the 

11 period of fiscal years 2009 and 2010’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Rusty Red Waters in Madagascar","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qEa33WxWFa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss070e000959-lrg\/\">Rusty Red Waters in Madagascar<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss070e000959-lrg\/embed\/#?secret=qEa33WxWFa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Rusty Red Waters in Madagascar” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qEa33WxWFa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/iss070e000959-lrg.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Astronaut Nicole Mann Prepares for Spacewalk","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OTyKyAXy9i\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss068e040060\/\">Astronaut Nicole Mann Prepares for Spacewalk<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss068e040060\/embed\/#?secret=OTyKyAXy9i\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronaut Nicole Mann Prepares for Spacewalk” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OTyKyAXy9i\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/iss068e040060orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### CARL J. GUZZO, ET AL. v. JOHN MCDONOUGH, ET AL.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.