alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered July 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00890-CR

CURTIS DEWIGHT NELSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 068322

ORDER

When appellant’s brief, initially due on December 26, 2018, was not filed, we abated the 

appeal for a hearing to determine why the brief had not been filed. The trial court held a hearing 

and made findings, including that appellant was indigent and entitled to counsel. The trial court 

then appointed Don Jarvis (former retained counsel) to represent appellant on appeal. Because 

appellant had been found indigent, we ordered the court reporter to file the reporter’s record; it 

was filed April 8, 2019. We granted a motion for extension of time to file the brief, making the 

brief due May 16, 2019. When the brief was not filed, we notified counsel by postcard dated 

May 20, 2019 and directed him to file the brief and a motion to extend time within ten days. We 

cautioned that the failure to do so would result in the appeal being abated for a hearing. To date, 

no brief has been filed and we have had no communication from appellate counsel.
Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether 

appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeals. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, 

the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 

708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Larry Phillips, 

Presiding Judge, 59th Judicial District Court; to Don Jarvis, Jr.; and to the Grayson County 

District Attorney’s Office.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Registrant
Company Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) for June 30, 1999
and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) for the Six Months
ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          2,756,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,048,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      268,000
<INVENTORY>                                     5,696,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               24,044,000
<PP&E>                                          9,600,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    500,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 33,185,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,046,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           42,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,169,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   33,185,000
<SALES>                                        37,774,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,774,000
<CGS>                                          32,447,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  36,455,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                110,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,376,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      396,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               980,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      980,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.25


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANCISCO GONZALEZ.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFIED DIABETIC SERVICES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Certified Diabetic Services, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Lowell M. Fisher, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Lowell M. Fisher, Jr.
|Lowell M. Fisher, Jr.    
|Chief Executive Officer  
|August 19, 2009
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2814 

To impose a 1-year cooling off period before a senior Federal financial 

institutions examiner may be employed by the financial institution examined by that person. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2004 

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To impose a 1-year cooling off period before a senior Federal 

financial institutions examiner may be employed by the 

financial institution examined by that person. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bank Examiner 

5 Postemployment Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ONE-YEAR POSTEMPLOYMENT RESTRICTION. 

7 Section 207 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new sub9 section: 
2 

•S 2814 IS

1 ‘‘(m) ONE-YEAR RESTRICTIONS ON FEDERAL EXAM2 INERS OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the restric4 tions set forth in subsections (a) and (b), any person 

5 who— 

6 ‘‘(A) was an officer or employee (including 

7 any special Government employee) of an appro8 priate Federal banking agency, a Federal re9 serve bank, or the National Credit Union Ad10 ministration; 

11 ‘‘(B) served 1 or more months during the 

12 final 12 months of his or her employment with 

13 such agency or entity as a senior Federal exam14 iner of a particular financial institution, includ15 ing any holding company thereof, or in a func16 tionally equivalent position with respect to a 

17 particular financial institution or holding com18 pany thereof; and 

19 ‘‘(C) within 1 year after the termination of 

20 his or her service or employment with such 

21 agency or entity, knowingly accepts compensa22 tion as an employee, officer, director, or con23 sultant from such financial institution or hold24 ing company, subsidiary, or affiliate, 
3 

•S 2814 IS

1 shall be punished as provided in section 216 of this 

2 title. 

3 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub4 sectionl 

5 ‘‘(A) the term ‘appropriate Federal bank6 ing agency’ has the same meaning as in section 

7 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; 

8 ‘‘(B) the term ‘financial institution’ means 

9 a depository institution, as defined in section 3 

10 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, an indus11 trial bank described in section 2(c)(2)(H) of the 

12 Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, or a Fed13 eral credit union, as defined in section 101 of 

14 the Federal Credit Union Act.’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>   1





                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
        (Dollars and share amounts in thousands, except per share data)
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended           Nine Months Ended
                                                            September 30              September 30
                                                         1997         1996          1997         1996
                                                      -----------------------    -----------------------
<S>                                                   <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>       
Net income ........................................   $    5,512   $    4,461    $   13,609   $   15,666
Preferred stock dividend ..........................           --         (149)           --         (447)
Modified treasury stock method adjustment .........          359          132           682          508
                                                      ----------   ----------    ----------   ----------
                                                      $    5,871   $    4,444    $   14,291   $   15,727
                                                      ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========



Average common shares outstanding .................       38,832       37,553        39,438       36,330
Common stock equivalents ..........................       14,594       15,780        15,942       13,855
                                                      ----------   ----------    ----------   ----------
Weighted average common shares outstanding ........       53,426       53,333        55,380       50,185
                                                      ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========


Primary and fully diluted earnings per common share   $     0.11   $     0.08    $     0.26   $     0.31
                                                      ==========   ==========    ==========   ==========
</TABLE>
Case 2:15-cr-01089-DJH Document 5 Filed 08/12/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01089-DJH Document 5 Filed 08/12/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01089-DJH Document 5 Filed 08/12/15 Page 3 of 3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronald Lee MORRISON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7385.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 28, 2005.

Decided: March 16, 2005.

Ronald Lee Morrison, Appellant pro se.

Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Lee Morrison seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. In criminal *131cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered its judgment on March 12, 2003. Morrison dated his notice of appeal August 5, 2004.* Because Morrison failed to file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 We consider August 5, 2004, as the filing date pursuant to *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
Exhibit 13.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F of NOVA Chemicals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”), I, Todd Karran, Chief Financial Officer of NOVA Chemicals Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                       
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | such Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NOVA Chemicals Corporation.

February 26, 2014/s/ Todd KarranTodd KarranChief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Arrival of New NASA (Airbus H135) Helicopters at KSC","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jeDugKHN4N\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/arrival-of-new-nasa-airbus-h135-helicopters-ksc\/\">Arrival of New NASA (Airbus H135) Helicopters at KSC<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/arrival-of-new-nasa-airbus-h135-helicopters-ksc\/embed\/#?secret=jeDugKHN4N\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Arrival of New NASA (Airbus H135) Helicopters at KSC” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jeDugKHN4N\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/ksc-20200930-ph-ajw01_0108_orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dacia Massengill","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/daciamassengill-2\/","title":"NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy and Under Secretary of Commerce for Minority Business Development Donald Cravins, Jr.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EBqnQf7S92\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/melroy-mbda-signing\/\">NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy and Under Secretary of Commerce for Minority Business Development Donald Cravins, Jr.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/melroy-mbda-signing\/embed\/#?secret=EBqnQf7S92\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Deputy Administrator Pam Melroy and Under Secretary of Commerce for Minority Business Development Donald Cravins, Jr.” — NASA\" data-secret=\"EBqnQf7S92\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/melroy-mbda-signing.webp?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  EPS HAS BEEN
RESTATED FOR SFAS 128.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          68,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    228,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,942
<PP&E>                                          12,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 386,323
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,498
<BONDS>                                        318,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   386,323
<SALES>                                        149,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,729
<CGS>                                           38,021
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                       685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE REPORTED NET OF ALLOWANCES FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS ON THE BALANCE
SHEET
<F2>PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT IS REPORTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION ON THE
BALANCE SHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>