UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549   FORM 10-K    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 Commission file number of issuing entity: 333-52984-03, 333-145220-01, 333-171055-01, 333-208054, 333-224484 Central Index Key Number of issuing entity: 0001108348   CITIBANK CREDIT CARD ISSUANCE TRUST* (Issuing Entity in respect of the Notes) (Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)    DELAWARE

NOT APPLICABLE(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization of issuing entity)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No. of issuing entity) Commission file number of issuing entity:
333-80743-02, 333-145220-02; 333-171055-02, 333-208054-01, 333-224484-02 Central Index Key Number of issuing entity: 0000921864   CITIBANK CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST I (Issuing Entity in respect of the Collateral Certificate) (Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)    NEW YORK

NOT APPLICABLE(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization of issuing entity)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No. of issuing entity) Commission file number of depositor and sponsor: 333-145220-03, 333-171055-03, 333-208054-02, 333-224484-01 Central Index Key Number of sponsor and
depositor: 0001522616   CITIBANK, N.A. (Exact
name of depositor and sponsor as specified in its charter)    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

13-5266470(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)  388 Greenwich St
New York, New York

10013(Address of principal executive offices
of depositor and sponsor)

(Zip Code) Telephone number, including area code: (212) 559-1000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE   Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    Yes  ☐    No  ☒. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    Yes  ☒    No  ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐ [Rule 405 of Regulation S-T is not applicable.] Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of
this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form
10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☒ [Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not applicable.] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, and emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large accelerated filer

☐

Accelerated filer

☐Non-accelerated filer

☒

Smaller reporting company

☐Emerging growth company

☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes  ☐    No  ☒. State the aggregate market value of the voting and
non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such
common equity, as of the last business day of the registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter: NOT APPLICABLE  *
In accordance with relevant regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the depositor files annual
and other reports concerning the Notes with the Commission on behalf of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust and Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I under the Central Index Key (CIK) number (0001108348) for Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust.




---

PART I The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10K:  Item 1:

Business.Item 1A:

Risk Factors.Item 2:

Properties.Item 3:

Legal Proceedings. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. Not Applicable. Item 4. Mine Safety
Disclosures. Not Applicable. Substitute information provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10K: Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB: Significant Obligors of Pool Assets (Financial Information). The primary asset of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust, a Delaware statutory trust formed on September 12, 2000 (the issuance
trust)  and its primary source of funds for the payment of principal of and interest on the notes  is a collateral certificate issued by Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I (the master trust) to the issuance trust. The
collateral certificate represents an undivided interest in the assets of the master trust. The master trusts assets consist primarily of credit card receivables arising in a portfolio of revolving credit card accounts. The master trust,
therefore, may be considered a significant obligor in relation to the issuance trust. Pursuant to Instruction 2.b. to Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the information required by Instruction J to Form 10-K in
respect of the master trust has been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K in lieu of the information otherwise contemplated by Item 1112(b). The pool assets held by the master trust do not include any significant obligors. Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB: Credit enhancement and other support, except for certain derivatives instruments (financial information). Based on the standards set forth in Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, no information is required in response to this Item. Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB: Certain derivatives instruments (financial information). Based on the standards set forth in Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, no information is required in response to this Item.  2




---

Item 1117 of Regulation AB: Legal proceedings. Interchange Fee Litigation Beginning in
2005, several putative class actions were filed against Citigroup Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A. (collectively Citigroup), together with Visa, MasterCard and other banks and their affiliates, in various federal
district courts and consolidated with other related individual cases in a multi-district litigation proceeding in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. This proceeding is captioned IN RE PAYMENT CARD INTERCHANGE FEE
AND MERCHANT DISCOUNT ANTITRUST LITIGATION. The plaintiffs, merchants that accept Visa and MasterCard branded payment cards as well as
membership associations that claim to represent certain groups of merchants, allege, among other things, that defendants have engaged in conspiracies to set the price of interchange and merchant discount fees on credit and debit card transactions
and to restrain trade unreasonably through various Visa and MasterCard rules governing merchant conduct, all in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and certain California statutes. Plaintiffs further alleged violations of Section 2
of the Sherman Act. Supplemental complaints also were filed against defendants in the putative class actions alleging that Visas and MasterCards respective initial public offerings were anticompetitive and violated Section 7 of the
Clayton Act, and that MasterCards initial public offering constituted a fraudulent conveyance. In 2014, the district court entered
a final judgment approving the terms of a class settlement providing for, among other things, a total payment to the class of $6.05 billion; a rebate to merchants participating in the damages class settlement of 10 bps on interchange collected
for a period of eight months by the Visa and MasterCard networks; and changes to certain network rules. Various objectors appealed from the final class settlement approval order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In 2016, the Court of Appeals reversed the district courts approval of the class settlement and remanded for further proceedings. The
district court thereafter appointed separate interim counsel for a putative class seeking damages and a putative class seeking injunctive relief. Amended or new complaints on behalf of the putative classes and various individual merchants were
subsequently filed, including a further amended complaint on behalf of a putative damages class and a new complaint on behalf of a putative injunctive class, both of which named Citigroup. In addition, numerous merchants have filed amended or new
complaints against Visa, MasterCard, and in some instances one or more issuing banks. Three of these suits7-ELEVEN, INC., ET AL. v. VISA INC., ET AL.; ROUNDYS SUPERMARKETS, INC. v. VISA INC. ET
AL.; and LUBYS FUDDRUCKERS RESTAURANTS, LLC, v. VISA INC., ET ALbrought on behalf of numerous individual merchants, name Citigroup as a defendant. On January 24, 2019, the court granted the damages class plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement with the
defendants, including Citigroup. The settlement involves the damages class only and does not settle the claims of the injunctive relief class or any actions brought on a non-class basis by individual
merchants. Additional information concerning these consolidated actions is publicly available in court filings under the docket number MDL 05-1720 (E.D.N.Y.) (Brodie, J.).  3




---

Indenture Trustee and Master Trust Trustee Litigation Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (DBTCA), the indenture trustee and the master trust trustee, have been sued by investors in civil
litigation concerning their role as trustees of certain residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS) trusts. On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed a
derivative action against DBTCA and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (DBNTC) in New York State Supreme Court purportedly on behalf of and for the benefit of 544 private-label RMBS trusts asserting claims for alleged violations of the U.S. Trust
Indenture Act of 1939 (TIA), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence based on DBNTC and DBTCAs alleged failure to perform their duties as trustees for the trusts. Plaintiffs subsequently dismissed their state court
complaint and filed a derivative and class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of and for the benefit of 564 private-label RMBS trusts, which substantially overlapped with the trusts at issue
in the state court action. The complaint alleged that the trusts at issue had suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $89.4 billion, but the complaint did not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On March 22,
2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in federal court. In the amended complaint, in connection with 62 trusts governed by indenture agreements, plaintiffs asserted claims for breach of contract, violation of the TIA, breach of fiduciary duty,
and breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest. The amended complaint alleged that the trusts at issue had suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $9.8 billion, but the complaint did not include a demand for money damages in a sum
certain. On December 6, 2018, the court entered the parties stipulation voluntarily dismissing the action with prejudice. On
March 25, 2016, the BlackRock plaintiffs filed a state court action against DBTCA in the Superior Court of California, Orange County with respect to 513 trusts. On May 18, 2016, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint with respect to 465
trusts, and included DBNTC as an additional defendant. The amended complaint asserts three causes of action: breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; and breach of the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Plaintiffs purport to bring the action
on behalf of themselves and all other current owners of certificates in the 465 trusts. The amended complaint alleges that the trusts at issue have suffered total realized collateral losses of U.S. $75.7 billion, but does not include a demand
for money damages in a sum certain. On January 17, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification. On May 30, 2018, the court denied that motion. On June 8, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the denial of that
motion. On July 16, 2018, the court stayed all trial court proceedings during the pendency of Plaintiffs appeal from the denial of class certification. On December 6, 2018, the court entered the parties stipulation voluntarily
dismissing Plaintiffs appeal. On December 13, 2018, Plaintiffs submitted a notice of settlement and a request for dismissal. On January 11, 2019, the court dismissed the action with prejudice. On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF
Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third
amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue.  4




---

Plaintiffs third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and
breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs TIA Act claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act
claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of hundreds of
millions of dollars. On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly
with Commerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Both motions are being briefed by the parties. Discovery is ongoing. On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (Commerzbank) in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA
as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbanks second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of
contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed
Commerzbanks TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on
appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer hundreds of millions of dollars in losses, but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29,
2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a
motion for partial summary judgment. Both motions are being briefed by the parties. Discovery is ongoing. On December 30, 2015, IKB
International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, IKB), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC and
DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of New Yorks Streit Act, violation of
the Trust Indenture Act, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA,
together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice of discontinuance, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to three trusts. As of
January 17, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCAs motion to dismiss has been briefed and is awaiting decision by the court. On June 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to four additional
trusts. Certain limited discovery is permitted to go forward while the motion to dismiss is pending.  5




---

It is DBTCAs belief that it has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on
DBTCAs present evaluation, the litigation disclosed in the foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties as the trustee for the issuance trust and the master trust.  6




---

PART II The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10K:  Item 5:

Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.Item 6:

Selected Financial Data.Item 7:

Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Item 7A:

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Item 8:

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.Item 9:

Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.Item 9A:

Controls and Procedures. Item 9B. Other Information. None PART III The following Items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10K:  Item 10:

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.Item 11:

Executive Compensation.Item 12:

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.Item 13:

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.Item 14:

Principal Accounting Fees and Services. Substitute information provided in accordance with General Instruction J to Form 10K: Item1119 of Regulation AB: Affiliations and certain relationships and related transactions. Information required by Item 1119 of Regulation AB has been omitted from this report on Form 10-K
in reliance on the Instruction to Item 1119.  7




---

Item 1122 of Regulation AB: Compliance with applicable servicing criteria. Citibank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas have been identified by the registrant as parties participating in the servicing
function during the year ended December 31, 2018, with respect to Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust and Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I. Each of Citibank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas has delivered a report on an
assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to such party (each, an Assessment Report) as of, and for the year ended, December 31, 2018, which Assessment Reports are attached as exhibits 33.1 and 33.2,
respectively, to this Form 10-K. In addition, each of Citibank, N.A. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas has provided an attestation report (each, an Attestation Report) by KPMG LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, regarding its related Assessment Report. The Attestation Reports are attached as exhibits 34.1 and 34.2, respectively, to this Form 10-K. No Assessment Report or related Attestation Report has identified any material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria
identified in such Assessment Report as applicable to the related servicing participant. Platform-Level Reports: Regulations of
the SEC require that a servicing participant perform a platform level assessment for purposes of assessing servicing compliance. This means that the transactions covered in a report on an assessment of compliance should include
asset-backed securities transactions involving such servicing participant that are backed by the same asset type. Further guidance from the SEC staff identifies additional parameters which a servicing participant may apply to define and further
limit its platform. For example, a servicing participant may define its platform to include only transactions that were completed on or after January 1, 2006 (the effective date of Regulation AB) and that were registered with the SEC pursuant
to the Securities Act of 1933. Each servicing participant is responsible for defining its own platform, and each platform will naturally differ based on various factors, including the servicing participants business model, the transactions in
which it is involved and the range of activities performed in those transactions. The platform defined by Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas in its Assessment Report attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K includes transactions in addition to those conducted by Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust, and the range of activities performed by
Deutsche Bank in those other transactions is broader than the range of activities it performs in the Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust transactions. Accordingly, the servicing criteria addressed by Deutsche Bank in its Assessment Report include
criteria in addition to the criteria applicable specifically to the Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust transactions. Item 1123 of Regulation AB:
Servicer compliance statement. Citibank, N.A. has been identified by the registrant as the sole servicer with respect to the pool
assets held by each of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust and Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I. Citibank, N.A. has provided a statement of compliance relating to servicing activities for the year ended December 31, 2018, which has been
signed by an authorized officer of Citibank, N.A. and is attached hereto as exhibit 35.1.  8




---

PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. (a)(1) Not Applicable. (a)(2)
Not Applicable. (a)(3) Not Applicable. (b) Exhibits Exhibit Index  ExhibitNumber

Description4.1

Second Amended and Restated Indenture for the Notes dated as of November 
10, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 20164.2

Third Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Citibank Credit Card Master Trust I dated as of November 
10, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 2016.4.3

Amended and Restated Series 2000 Supplement dated as of August 
9, 2011 (including the form of Collateral Certificate), to the Second Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 
9, 2011, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 20114.4

Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 
10, 2016, to the Amended and Restated Series 2000 Supplement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November
 10, 20164.5

Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust dated as of August 
9, 2011, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 20114.6

Asset Representations Review Agreement dated as of November 
18, 2016, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.8 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 2016.4.7

Terms Document, including the form of Note, relating to each publicly-offered subclass of notes of the Citiseries issued between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2018, inclusive, and outstanding during 2018, as identified
below, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of each Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Registrant with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the following dates:  9




---

Subclass

Filing
Date2007-A3

June 15, 20072007-A3 Reopen

August 15, 20072007-A4

June 15, 20072007-A4 Reopen

August 15, 20072008-A1

February 7, 20082008-A2

February 8, 20082008-A2 Reopen

February 25, 20082008-A7

May 20, 20082013-A2

May 30, 20132013-A4

August 8, 20132013-A7

September 23, 20132013-A9

September 23, 20132013-A7 1st Reopen

November 21, 20132013-A7 2nd Reopen

December 17, 20132014-A1

January 24, 20142013-A7 3rd Reopen

March 24, 20142014-A1 Reopen

March 26, 20142013-A2 Reopen

June 5, 20142014-A5

June 10, 20142014-A6

July 31, 20142014-A8

September 24, 20142014-A6 Reopen

November 12, 20142016-A1

December 8. 20162016-A2

December 8. 20162016-A3

December 19, 20162017-A1

January 26, 20172017-A2

January 26, 20172017-A3

April 11, 20172017-A4

April 11, 20172017-A5

May 2, 20172017-A6

May 22, 20172017-A3 Reopen

May 22, 20172017-A7

August 8, 20172017-A8

August 8, 20172017-A9

October 2, 20172018-A1

January 31, 20182018-A2

February 1, 20182018-A3

May 29, 20182018-A4

June 8, 20182018-A5

August 8, 20182018-A6

August 17, 20182018-A7

October 15, 2018  10




---

31.1

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and relevant rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission33.1

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria by Citibank, N.A.33.2

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas34.1

Attestation Report of KPMG LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria by Citibank, N.A.34.2

Attestation Report of KPMG LLP on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas35.1

Servicer Compliance Statement of Citibank, N.A. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 201899.1

Amended and Restated Series 2009 Supplement dated as of August 
9, 2011 (including the form of Series 2009 Certificate), to the Second Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 201199.2

Amendment No. 1 dated as of July 
10, 2012, to the Amended and Restated Series 2009 Supplement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July
 10, 201299.3

Amendment No. 2 dated as of November 
3, 2017, to the Amended and Restated Series 2009 Supplement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November
 3, 2017 (c) Not Applicable. Item 16. Form 10K Summary. Not Applicable.  11




---

SIGNATURES   Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  CITIBANK, N.A.,as Depositor of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust and Citibank Credit Card Master Trust IBy:

/s/ Bennett L. KyteBennett L. KyteVice President(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
 Dated: March 27, 2019  12