alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,891
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                      5,321
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,768
<PP&E>                                         253,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,113
<BONDS>                                        161,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,088)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,925
<SALES>                                        142,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,889
<CGS>                                           39,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,892
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   307<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (715)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (340)
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The provision for doubtful accounts and notes is presented within operating
expenses in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and is included
in total costs above.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JUSTO ALONSO.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE PROBATE COURT NO 1 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on September 9, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

For the Best Interest and Protection of A.S., a Mentally Ill Person, Appellant

V.

No. 04-15-00217-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2015-MH-0851

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the

trial court is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on November 18, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-15-00217-CV

For the Best Interest and Protection of A.S., a Mentally Ill Person

v.

(NO. 2015-MH-0851 IN PROBATE COURT NO 1 OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTER'S

RECORD

FILING

$28.00

$195.00

PAID

INDIGENT

BEXAR COUNTY

N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this November 18, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SECOND
QUARTER 10-Q FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                           1,942
<SECURITIES>                                    17,762
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,434
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,972
<PP&E>                                          46,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,236
<BONDS>                                          1,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           106
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,648
<SALES>                                         30,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,007
<CGS>                                            8,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,545
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,487)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)


</TABLE>
(January 24, 2005)

#### Jamir Ali, Plaintiff, and Waseca Cook, Respondent, v Anani Agboglo et al., Defendants, and Robert Day, Appellant.

[789 NYS2d 222]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Robert Day appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), entered July 21, 2003, which *581denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Waseca Cook on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Although the defendant Robert Day (hereinafter the appellant) made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Waseca Cook (hereinafter the respondent) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]), the affidavit of the respondent’s chiropractor submitted in opposition to the motion was sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. The respondent’s chiropractor stated that upon his examination of her, he found diminished deep tendon reflexes in the right upper and lower extremities, and diminished sensation along the L5 and S1 dermatomal patterns in the right lower extremity. In addition, he found that the ranges of motion of the cervical spine and lumbar spine were restricted in all directions, and quantified those restrictions.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"ACCESS II: Preparing to Descend","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Qzuf4FofiQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/access-ii-preparing-descend\/\">ACCESS II: Preparing to Descend<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/access-ii-preparing-descend\/embed\/#?secret=Qzuf4FofiQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ACCESS II: Preparing to Descend” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Qzuf4FofiQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/hu-25c_sampling_5-9-14.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":448}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"The Crew of the Space Shuttle Challenger STS-51L Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"v8EFLkhxD0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/the-crew-of-the-space-shuttle-challenger-sts-51l-mission\/\">The Crew of the Space Shuttle Challenger STS-51L Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/the-crew-of-the-space-shuttle-challenger-sts-51l-mission\/embed\/#?secret=v8EFLkhxD0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Crew of the Space Shuttle Challenger STS-51L Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"v8EFLkhxD0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S86-30460\/S86-30460~large.jpg?w=600&h=1309&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1309}
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AS AMENDED



I, Edgardo Mercadante, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of DrugMax, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period of this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and



c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which area reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 15, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Edgardo Mercadante 
|                      |  |     |  | Edgardo Mercadante     
|                      |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Wallene Kingston-O'Reilly,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04423-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9956 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:15-cr-01118-SPL Document 146 Filed 07/21/16 Page 14 of 14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Boyd,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03652-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9175 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, John G. Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer of REGI U.S., Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of REGI U.S., Inc., for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of REGI U.S., Inc. Richmond, BC, Canadaby: /s/ John G. RobertsonJuly 28, 2010John G. RobertsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to REGI U.S., Inc. and will be retained by REGI U.S., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.