T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OSE L UI S C HA LE - RODRI GU EZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70775 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 402- 724 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jose L ui s C hal e- R od ri gu ez , nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f P eru, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea lfr om an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s ( “ I J ” ) d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l, an dr e lie f

u n d e rth e C o n v e n tio n A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) .



# FI LED FEB 24 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70775 2 W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i alevi dence f a c tu a l f in d in g s , I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 5 0 2 U. S . 4 7 8 , 4 8 1 & n . 1 ( 1 9 9 2 ) , an dwe r e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , V a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 324 F . 3d 1105, 1 1 0 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T h e r e c o r dd o e s n o t c o m p e l th e c o n c lu s io n th a t C h a le - R o d r ig u e z ’s u n tim e ly a s y lu m ap p lic a tio n is e x c u s e db ye x tr a o r d in aryc ir c u m s tan c e s . See 8 U . S. C. § 1 1 5 8 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( D ) ; T

oj -Cul pa tan v. H

older , 61 2 F . 3d10 88 , 10 91 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( per c u r iam ) . W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to c o n s id e rC h a le - R o d r ig u e z ’s c o n te n tio n th a t h is u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n is e x c u s e db yc h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s b e c au s e it is u n e x h au s te d . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 3 5 8 F . 3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) . T h u s , we f urthe rr e j e c tC ha l e - R odr i gue z ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe a ge nc yvi ol a t e d hi s due p r o c e s s r ig h ts b yn o t c o n s id e r in g c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s . Se e La ta v . I NS , 204 F .3 d1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) ( p e titio n e rm u s t s h o w e rr o ran dp r e ju d ic e to e s tab lis h adu e p r o c e s s v io la tio n ) . A c c o r d in g ly , C h a le - R o d r ig u e z ’s a s y lu m c la im f a ils . S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatC hal e- R od ri gu ez f a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e pa s tpe r s e c ut i on ba s e d on the thr e a t s , har a s s m e nt , and r o b b e ryC h a le - R o d r ig u e z an dh is f am ilys u f

f e r e d . Se e Na g o u lko v . I NS , 333 F . 3d 1012, 1016- 18 ( 9th C i r . 2003) . I n a ddi t i on, s ubs t ant i a le vi de nc e s upport s the08- 70775 3 agency ’ s f

i nd i ng thatC hal e- R od ri gu ez fa i l ed t o sho w a c l ear probabi l i ty of f uture pers ec ut i on fr om the S endero L um i no so because, w hi l e hi s s i m i l ar l y s i tuat ed father h a s r e c e iv e dth r e a ts , th e S e n d e r o L u m in o s o h a s n o t h arm e dh is f a th e r . See L i m v. I NS , 2 2 4 F .3 d9 2 9 , 9 3 8 (9 thC ir. 2 0 0 0 ). A cc o rd in g ly, C h ale- R o d rig u ez ’s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce al so sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se C ha l e - R odr i gue z ha s note s t abl i s he d al i ke l i hood of t ortur e byorw i th the a c qu ie s c e n c e o f

th e P e ru v ian g o v e rn m e n t. See Si laya v. Mukasey , 524 F . 3d 1066, 1 0 7 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.