alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Reginald Jackson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04733-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Van Wey Law, PLLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/4/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9609 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9609 Filed 01/11/18 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7764
JOHN J. SIMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JIM DUNN, Former Solicitor of the Georgetown County Solicitor's Office; NELSON BROWN, Georgetown Police Officer; LARRY C. BATSON, SCDC General Counsel; JOHN G. NORRIS, Chief of SCDC Offender Records Branch; FLORA BROOKS BOYD, Warden, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1443-2-8AJ) Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John J. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr., Carol Brittian Ervin, YOUNG, CLEMENT, RIVERS & TISDALE, Charleston, South Carolina; Arrigo Paul Carotti, John Betts McCutcheon, Jr., MCCUTCHEON, MCCUTCHEON & BAXTER, P.A., Conway, South Carolina, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Dunn , No. CA-93-1443-2-8AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

I I I 

Chief Financial Equal Opportunity Human Resources & 

Officer (B) Programs (E) Education (F) 

Stephen J. Varholy George E. Reese Vicki A. Novak 

CFO (Acting) Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator 

Office of the Administrator 

I 1 

General Counsel (C) Procurement (H) 

Thomas S. Luedtke 

Assistant Administrator 

Paul G. Pastorek 

General Counsel 

~~ ~_____ 

Sean O’Keefe, Administrator 

Vacant, Deputy Administrator 

Daniel R. Mulville, Associate Deputy Administrator 

Michael D. Christensen, Associate Deputy Adntinistrator, Institutions 

Courtney Stadd, Chief of StafSand While House Liaison 

Spence M. Armstrong, Senior Advisor 

Theron M. Bradley, Jr., Chief Engineer 

Samuel L. Venneri, Chief Technologist 

Patrick A. Ciganer, Program Executive Ofleerfor Integrated Financial Management 

Richard S. Williams, Chief Health & Medical Officer 

Paul A. Strassmann, Chief Information Oflcer (Acting) 

Shannon W. Lucid, Chief Scienlist 

.........- 

I 

Legislative Affairs (L) 

Charles T Homer, 111 

Assistant Administrator 

Security Management 

Public Affairs (P) and Safeguards (X) 

Glenn Mahone David A Saleeba 

Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator 

............. Advisory Panel 

NASA Advisory 

, ........................................... 

Inspector General (W) ............. i Robert W. Cobb i ............................................. 

HQ ( -1erations 

Office (C) 

Timothy M. Sullivan 

Management 

Systems (J) Business Utilization (K) External Relations (1) 

John D. Schumacher Jeffrey E. Sutton Ralph C. Thomas, 111 

Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator 

I I I I I I 1 

Biological and Physical 

Research (U) 

Mary E. Kicza 

Safety and Mission 

Bryan D. O’Connor 

Earth Science Cy) Assurance (Q) 

Ghassem R. Asrar 

Goddard Space 

Flight Center 

Alphonso V. Diaz 

Space Flight (M) Technology (R) Space Science (S) 

Edward J. Weiler 

L 

Ames Research Center 

Henry McDonald 

* Dryden Flight 

Research Center 

Kevin Petersen 

Langley Research 

Center 

Delma C. Freeman, Jr. 

(Acting) 

* John H. Glenn 

Research Center at 

Lewis Field 

Donald J. Campbell 

Jet Propulsion 

Laboraiory * 

Charles Elachi 

Lyndon E. Johnson 

Space Center 

Jefferson I). Howell, Jr. 

* John F. Kennedy Space 

Center 

Roy D. Bridges, Jr. 

* George C. Marshall 

Space Flight Center 

Arthur G. Stephenson 

* John C. Stennis Space 

Center 

Roy S. Estess 

July 19,2002 

* JPL is a conrracfor-operatedfci[ity.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

In Re Bard IVC Filters Products 

Liability Litigation 

No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

SHERR-UNA BOOKER, an individual, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C.R. BARD, INC., a New Jersey 

corporation and BARD PERIPHERAL 

VASCULAR, an Arizona corporation, 

Defendants. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine #3 and Memorandum In 

Support to Exclude Descriptions of Filters as “Lifesaving” or “Life-Extending” Devices, 

the Court hereby GRANTS the motion. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9867-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Albert A. Noa,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00470-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Miller Weisbrod, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/22/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 26, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Albert A. Noa

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 908 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 12
 
                               IKON CAPITAL, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                         1996    1995    1994    1993    1992
                                       -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
<S>                                    <C>      <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
EARNINGS
  Income from continuing operations    $ 31,512 $17,860 $15,631 $ 9,336 $ 6,547
  Add:
    Provision for income taxes........   23,150  14,476   9,794   6,218   4,033
    Fixed charges.....................   63,538  38,263  25,673  22,807  20,146
                                       -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
  Earnings, as adjusted(A)............ $118,200 $70,599 $51,098 $38,361 $30,726
                                       ======== ======= ======= ======= =======
FIXED CHARGES
  Other interest expense, including
   interest on capital leases.........  $63,125 $37,945 $25,559 $22,701 $20,068
  Estimated interest component of
   rental expense.....................      413     318     114     106      78
                                       -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
  Total fixed charges(B)..............  $63,538 $38,263 $25,673 $22,807 $20,146
                                       ======== ======= ======= ======= =======
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  (A) divided by (B)..................      1.9     1.8     2.0     1.7     1.5
                                            ===     ===     ===     ===     ===
</TABLE>
#### JOSE CRUZ, ETC., ET AL. v. REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY AND FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           5,404
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,352
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,492
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,507
<PP&E>                                          17,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,540
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,637
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,160
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,635
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,319
<DISCONTINUED>                                     626
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Lanson Dosela,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 CR-98-196-02-PHX-ROS

DETENTION ORDER

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure.

The Court concludes, therefore, by a preponderance of the evidence, that

defendant is a serious flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of

conditions that will reasonably assure his appearance at future proceedings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings. 

DATED this 8th day of October, 2010.

Case 2:98-cr-00196-ROS Document 117 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra L. Johnson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-l-johnsonnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-89","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2WJMX3KnIG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-89\/\">STS-89<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-89\/embed\/#?secret=2WJMX3KnIG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-89” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2WJMX3KnIG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D2022

- 1701

_____________________________
D AVID G. J EMISON and A NN D. J EMISON , Appellant s ,

v.

D RAKE E NTERPRISES OF R USTON , LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company, R ESOURCE B ANK , and C OMMUNITY T RUST B ANK , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Jeffrey E. Lewis , Judge

.

November 7, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
K ELSEY , N ORDBY , and L ONG , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael J. Henry and Gary A. Shipman of Dunlap & Shipman, P.A., Santa Rosa Beach, for Appellant s

. Douglas L. Smith and Gregory J. Philo of Burke Blue, P.A., Panama City, for Appellee s

.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MIGUEL DIAZ.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-11014

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CLYDE ROWE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-2-ALL

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgmentin a Criminal Case, Clyde Rowe raises arguments

that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005),

which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether

the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion

for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 2, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-11014

2
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification Required by 18 U.S.C.Section 1350****(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**
I, Antonio B. Mon, as Chief Executive Officer ofTechnical Olympic USA, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to myknowledge:
     1. the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2004 (the “Report”), filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securitiesand Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2. the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: May 10, 2004
 By: /s/ ANTONIO B. MON      ANTONIO B. MON     *Chief Executive Officer*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cody S. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/codyslydon\/","title":"NASA Pilots Get Dunked","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5nq41Hh16o\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-pilots-get-dunked-2\/\">NASA Pilots Get Dunked<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-pilots-get-dunked-2\/embed\/#?secret=5nq41Hh16o\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Pilots Get Dunked” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5nq41Hh16o\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/nasa_pilot_scott_howe_underwater_in_egress_cage_during_faa_pilot_dunker_safety_training.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":390}