alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tara Leach,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00199-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Zonies Law LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/19/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9853 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9853 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 205 (Thursday, October 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke; Special Emphasis Panel, NINDS T32 Training program.
    Date: December 1-2, 2014.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: One Washington Circle, One Washington Circle NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Natalia Strunnikova, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-402-0288, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3bdb2a7b2bfbab2fda0a7a1a6bdbdbab8bca5b293bdbabbfdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f111e0b1e13161e510c0b0d0a1111161410091e3f11161751181009">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 17, 2014.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-25177 Filed 10-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00245 - CR

CRYSTAL LOUISE MCCOV ERY A/K/A CRYSTAL MCCOVE RY APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Less than a year after the trial court placed Appellant Crystal Louise McCovery a/k/a Crystal McCovery on four years’ deferred

- adjudication community supervision for the offense of burglary of a habitation , the State moved to adjudicat e her guilt and revoke her community supervision. Appellant pled true to the State’s motion and, in writing , waived her right to appeal the trial

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 court’s adjudication of her guilt and revocation of her community supervision. The trial court granted the S tate’s motion and sentenced Appellant to three years’ confinement. Appellant now attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment

. The trial court’s certification states that Appellant has waived her right of appeal. 2 W e have notified Appellant of our concern that he r appeal would be dismissed unless by a date certain s he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for doing so

. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. The date certain has passed , and n o response show ing grounds for continuing the appeal has been fi led. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Jackson v. State , 168 S.W.3d 239, 242

– 43 (Tex. App.

–– Fort Worth 2005, no pet.); Adams v. State , No. 02

- 11

- 00151

- CR, 2012 WL 858609, at *1 (Tex. App.

–– Fort Worth Mar. 15, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).

PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: August 15, 2013

2 A valid waiver of appeal prevents a d efendant from appealing without the trial court’s consent. Monreal v. State , 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael D. Boyd,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03705-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9126 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"Gus Grissom","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iOHC8eNacZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/gus-grissom\/\">Gus Grissom<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/gus-grissom\/embed\/#?secret=iOHC8eNacZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Gus Grissom” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iOHC8eNacZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2687 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2687

To provide coverage under the Railway Labor Act to employees of certain 
                air and surface transportation entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2004

  Mr. Harkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide coverage under the Railway Labor Act to employees of certain 
                air and surface transportation entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Express Carrier Employee Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT.

    Section 201 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 181) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``All'' and inserting ``(a) In General.--
        All'';
            (2) by inserting ``and every express carrier'' after 
        ``common carrier by air''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Express Carriers.--The employees of an express carrier shall 
be covered by this Act only if they are licensed airmen, licensed 
aircraft maintenance technicians, or licensed aircraft dispatchers, and 
only if they perform duties for the express carrier pursuant to the 
privileges of the appropriate license. All other employees of an 
express carrier shall be covered by the provisions of the National 
Labor Relations Act.
    ``(c) Definition.--In this section, the term `express carrier' 
means any company (or companies affiliated through common control or 
ownership) that has an integrated network of air and surface 
transportation for the purpose of the express shipment of packages.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,366
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,329
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   131
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        419
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,511
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,434
<LOANS>                                         87,271
<ALLOWANCE>                                        539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,692
<DEPOSITS>                                      73,699
<SHORT-TERM>                                     7,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                449
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 106,692
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,666
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  105
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   126
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,897
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 956
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,078
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              819
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    303
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       190
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.28
<LOANS-NON>                                        213
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    224
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   555
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       16
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  539
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               539
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
McMoRan OIL & GAS CO.


                               SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE


               I, Michael C. Kilanowski, Jr., Secretary of Freeport-McMoRan
          Copper & Gold Inc.  (the "Corporation"), a Delaware  corporation,
          do hereby certify that the following resolution was duly  adopted
          by the Board of Directors of the Corporation at a meeting held on
          January 31,  1995 esolution  has not  been amended,  modified  or
          rescinded and is in full force and effect:

                    RESOLVED,  that   any  report,   registration
                    statement or other  form filed  on behalf  of
                    this corporation pursuant  to the  Securities
                    Exchange Act  of 1934,  or any  amendment  to
                    such report, registration statement or  other
                    form, may be signed on behalf of any director
                    or officer of this corporation pursuant to  a
                    power of attorney  executed by such  director
                    or officer.

               IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto  signed my  name  and
          affixed the seal of  the Company on this  the  27th day of  March,
          1998.


          (Seal)                               /s/ Michael C. Kilanowski, Jr.  
                                               ------------------------------ 
                                                  Michael  C.  Kilanowski, Jr.
                                                         Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62642-62643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Omnibus SEP-11.
    Date: November 18, 2014.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 7W610, Rockville, MD 20850, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Caterina Bianco, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Research Programs Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 
Room 7W610, Bethesda, MD 20892-9750, 240-276-6459, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1d7f747c737e727e5d707c747133737475337a726b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e1c171f101d111d3e131f17125010171650191108">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 62643]]


    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/sep/sep.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 14, 2014.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-24786 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK A. LEE.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division for reconsideration of its judgment in light of an apparent confusion in the record in respect of this defendant’s background and that of his co-defendant.
1 WO 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

9 United States of America, No. CR15-08938-01-PCT-JJT 

10 Plaintiff, ORDER 

11 V. 

12 Rick Drake, 

13 Defendant. 

14 

15 The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

16 hearing was waived and the detention hearing was submitted on the record including a 

17 proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

violated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further 

finds, pursuant to Rule 32. l(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and 

convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 12th day of February, 2019. 

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Perkins & Marie
Callender’s Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended October 5, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Fred T. Grant, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
November 19, 2008


BY:/s/ Fred T. Grant, Jr.Fred
      T. Grant, Jr.Chief
      Financial Officer