Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Notices 63165 

Issued: October 16, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25059 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–919] 

Certain Archery Products and Related 

Marketing Materials; Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Finding Respondent 

Ningbo Topoint Outdoor Sports Co., 

Ltd., To Be in Default; Request for 

Written Submissions on Remedy, the 

Public Interest, and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 11) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on 

September 16, 2014, finding the sole 

respondent, Ningbo Topoint Outdoor 

Sports Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo’’), to be in 

default. Accordingly, the Commission 

requests written submissions, under the 

schedule set forth below, on remedy, 

public interest, and bonding. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Needham, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on June 16, 2014, based on a complaint 

filed by Bear Archery, Inc. and SOP 

Services, Inc. (‘‘Complainants’’). 79 FR 

34356. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’), in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain archery 

products and related marketing 

materials by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 

RE38,096; U.S. Patent No. 6,978,775; 

U.S. Patent No. 7,226,375; U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 2,501,255; 

and U.S. Trademark Registration No. 

3,312,392. Id. The complaint further 

alleges the existence of a domestic 

industry. Id. The Commission’s notice 

of investigation named Ningbo as the 

respondent, and indicated that the 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 

participating in this investigation. Id. 

On June 11, 2014, the Commission 

attempted to serve Ningbo with the 

complaint and notice of investigation, 

but the notice was returned as 

undeliverable mail on July 23, 2014. On 

July 24, 2014, Complainants sought 

leave to attempt to effect personal 

service on Ningbo, and the leave was 

granted on July 30, 2014. On July 31, 

2014, Complainants filed proof that they 

had served Ningbo with the complaint 

and notice of investigation. 

On August 19, 2014, Complainants 

moved for an order directing Ningbo to 

show cause why it should not be found 

in default for its failure to respond to 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation, and, upon failure to show 

cause, for the issuance of an initial 

determination finding Ningbo in 

default. On August 20, 2014, 

Complainants filed a letter indicating 

that they did not seek a general 

exclusion order in the event of a default. 

On August 21, 2014, the Commission 

Investigative Attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a 

response supporting Complainants’ 

motion. 

On September 2, 2014, the ALJ 

granted the motion and ordered Ningbo 

to show cause why it should not be 

found in default. See Order No. 10. No 

response to Order No. 10 was filed. 

On September 16, 2014, the ALJ 

issued the subject ID finding Ningbo in 

default under Commission Rule 

210.16(a)(1). See Order No. 11. No 

petitions for review of the ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not to 

review the subject ID. 

Ningbo is the sole respondent in this 

investigation. Section 337(g)(1) and 

Commission Rule 210.16(c) authorize 

the Commission to order relief against a 

respondent found in default, unless, 

after considering the public interest, it 

finds that such relief should not issue. 

Complainants indicated that they were 

not seeking a general exclusion order 

pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.16(c)(2). 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

Commission may: (1) issue an order that 

could result in the exclusion of articles 

manufactured or imported by the 

defaulting respondent; and/or (2) issue 

a cease and desist order that could 

result in the defaulting respondent 

being required to cease and desist from 

engaging in unfair acts in the 

importation and sale of such articles. 

Accordingly, the Commission is 

interested in receiving written 

submissions that address the form of 

remedy, if any, that should be ordered. 

If a party seeks exclusion of an article 

from entry into the United States for 

purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or likely to do so. For 

background, see Certain Devices for 

Connecting Computers via Telephone 

Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC 

Pub. No. 2843, Comm’n Op. at 7–10 

(December 1994). 

If the Commission contemplates some 

form of remedy, it must consider the 

effects of that remedy upon the public 

interest. The factors that the 

Commission will consider include the 

effect that the exclusion order and/or 

cease and desists orders would have on 

(1) the public health and welfare, (2) 

competitive conditions in the U.S. 

economy, (3) U.S. production of articles 

that are like or directly competitive with 

those that are subject to investigation, 

and (4) U.S. consumers. The 

Commission is therefore interested in 

receiving written submissions that 

address the aforementioned public 

interest factors in the context of this 

investigation. 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the U.S. Trade 

Representative, as delegated by the 

President, has 60 days to approve or 

disapprove the Commission’s action. 

See Presidential Memorandum of July 

21, 2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). 

During this period, the subject articles 

would be entitled to enter the United 

States under bond, in an amount 

determined by the Commission and 

prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Treasury. The Commission is therefore 

interested in receiving submissions 

concerning the amount of the bond that 

should be imposed if a remedy is 

ordered. 

Written Submissions: Parties to the 

investigation, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties are encouraged to file written 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

63166 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 204 / Wednesday, October 22, 2014 / Notices 

submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding. 

Complainants and the IA are requested 

to submit proposed remedial orders for 

the Commission’s consideration. 

Complainants are also requested to state 

the HTSUS numbers under which the 

accused products are imported, and to 

state the dates that the patents expire. 

Written submissions and proposed 

remedial orders must be filed no later 

than the close of business on October 

30, 2014. Reply submissions must be 

filed no later than the close of business 

on November 6, 2014. No further 

submissions on these issues will be 

permitted unless otherwise ordered by 

the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadline 

stated above and submit eight true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary 

pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). 

Submissions should refer to the 

investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 337– 

TA–919’’) in a prominent place on the 

cover page and/or the first page. (See 

Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ 

secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. A redacted 

nonconfidential version of the 

document must also be filed 

simultaneously with any confidential 

filing. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 16, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–25051 Filed 10–21–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1190–0018] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Extension of a 

Currently Approved Collection 

AGENCY: Civil Rights Division, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 30-day Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice, 

Civil Rights Division, Office of Special 

Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair 

Employment Practices, will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget for review and 

approval in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register, Volume 79, Number 159, page 

48765, on August 18, 2014, allowing for 

a 60-day comment period. 

DATES: The purpose of this notice is to 

allow for an additional 30 days for 

public comment until November 21, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

To ensure that comments on the 

information collection are received, 

OMB recommends that written 

comments be faxed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

OMB, Attn: DOJ Desk Officer, Fax: 202 

395–5806, or emailed to oira_

submission@omb.eop.gov. All 

comments should be identified with the 

OMB control number [1190–0018]. Also 

include the DOJ docket number found 

in brackets in the heading of this 

document. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

are requested from the public and 

affected agencies concerning the 

proposed collection of information. 

Your comments should address one or 

more of the following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the function of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology 

(e.g., permitting electronic submission 

of responses). 

The information collection is listed 

below: 

(1) Type of information collection: 

Extension of Currently Approved 

Collection. 

(2) The title of the form/collection: 

Office of Special Counsel for 

Immigration-Related Unfair 

Employment Practices Charge Form 

[OSC Charge Form]. 

(3) The agency form number and 

applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection. 

Form OSC–1. Office of Special Counsel 

for Immigration-Related Unfair 

Employment Practices, Civil Rights 

Division, U.S. Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

to respond, as well as a brief abstract: 

Primary: The Office of Special Counsel 

for Immigration-Related Unfair 

Employment Practices (OSC) enforces 

the anti-discrimination provision 

(§ 274B) of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1324b. 

Individuals alleging discrimination by 

public and private entities based on (1) 

citizenship or immigration status 

discrimination in hiring, firing, or 

recruitment or referral for a fee, (2) 

national origin discrimination in hiring, 

firing, or recruitment or referral for a 

fee, (3) unfair documentary practices 

during the employment eligibility 

verification (Form I–9 and E-Verify) 

process, and (4) retaliation or 

intimidation for asserting rights covered 

by the statute. The Department’s Civil 

Rights Division, Office of Special 

Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair 

Employment Practices (OSC), 

investigates and, where reasonable 

cause is found, litigates charges alleging 

discrimination. OSC also initiates 

independent investigations, at times 

based on information developed during 

individual charge investigations. 

Independent investigations normally 

involve alleged discriminatory policies 

that potentially affect many employees 

or applicants. These investigations may 

result in complaints alleging a pattern or 

practice of discriminatory activity. If the 

Department lacks jurisdiction over a 

particular charge but believes another 

agency has jurisdiction over the claim, 

the charge is forwarded to the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES