1'/

Integrating reading instruction

~,

Incorporating OER

materials into Quick Start

~Y '

Hybrid and Canvas technology

~y+~ ;

"i}'

integration; flipped components

per ' - 3~ ~ ~ '~

- z 63l

Scaling-up Service-Learning in ALP

C~fCK Ft3R PAOF2~ INF~Rh~t.~TlQN

- ~ - 

_ 

:a

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 1 of 33
by the following people:

• Ramona Goth, English Department Chair - • Buffie Diglio, English Department Administrative Secretary

• Chris Hoeffler, Curriculum Technologist in charge of scheduling

Kathryn Kinney-Foe, English Dept. Administrative Secretary

• Diane Erdenberger, Admissions AdministrativeAssistant

Jennifer Vinca, Coordinator of Student Services and SOAR:.:

• Holly Rouse, Cashier's Office Bursar• Vicky Owen, HR Representative

Fuji, Dean of Instruction

• Gia Dean of Enrollment

• Fran Director of Admissions, Registration, and Records ``

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 2 of 33
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 3 of 33
J ~.

aY ~ O RDG~J71 p~a~~er~t~n~ -, ,~. t.,

1st semester

~ I~ ~ O8

•j ~ ~ ~~ ~ o,`~

•

~ ~~ 

~

~~~

AI( students begin in

accelerated RDG077 which

meets 4xs a week for the

firsfi 8 weeks of the semester

oea .:.~.:,,.~:,

4xs n week for fihe

last 8 weeks of the

semester

*Students receive grades in RD6071 after the first 8 weeks based

on comprehension assessmentswritten at lexi(e Levels:appropriate ~.

for.the course t For. the second 8 weeks, non passing stird'ents, :,.<.

retake.the:course,<wh~fe;pa'ss~n~students~~dvance;to R;DG081:AE1~•' .

2r~d ser~es~er

091 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

~

~ I~

Studenfs who successfully

completed 071 /481 enroll

in 16 week 091 that meets

2x a week.

~ ~3"t~ S~9~E'S~~P' a~~~9j

091

E c ~~~~~.

~~ ~~ ~~ 

X87

i Studenfis who successfully

i compteted 071 enroll ini accelerated, [inked 081 that

i meets 4xs a week #or the first

After successfully competing

RDG041, students graduate from

developmental reading.

~ 

~

p~~ The second 8 weeks students complete 991 or

~ 081 based on

~~~ performance in

the first 8 weeks

~~~.'

'blind' section

Sched~Eing creates a'blind'section to place nonpassingstudents afrer the first 8 weeks. Students

have welcomed this opportunity to retake the

course prior to the end of the semester. They

remain with the originaE cohort and instructor. -- ln Fa112013 SCC made all RDG07l sections intensive, eight-week accelera'ed courses finkec{ with ROG081.

Completion rates in RDG071 improved from 78.6 to 84.2 and

subsequent successful course compfefion rates improved from T6~ to 63.9%, confirming that the intensive, accelerates model

was acce(era~ing stvdenfis successfully througr~ she sequence,

Faculty used Pearson anc! Townsend assessmenfis ro measure siudents' Lexi(e Levels and reading comprehensio^, in addition to

crmative classroom assessments, ~o assess students and verify college readiness.

Prepares by Sara Cameron, 5~e. rteaa~ng racuiry, sara.cameront.~scor.~oa~ecc.eou

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 4 of 33
RD:G08-1 placement;

1st semester

~ g 

~

~ 

~

~~,~ •~ 

~

~~ ~ ~~

AIE stvdenfis begin in acceterafed, finked

RDG081 whicE~ meets 4xs a week

.;.,,

J._; , `^

4xs a week for the Last 8

weeks of the semester

X91 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 

~

8 p ~ i~ 1~ / 

6

section

"Studenu receive grades in R~6481 after the first 8 weeks based on

comprehension assessmenu written at.Lexite.Leve(s,appropriate . for

the.course. For the secorSd,8•weeks;;non=passirigstudents ; retake the

course; while passing stnaerats~advance"to=:ftDG08~ AU studenfs

remain ~n::fhesame`class with fhe sarxie-msuuctor ~ ~r

RD.G091. p~ace.nnen~:~, : .:....

2DGQ91 at SCC received the Maricopa Millions OER grant. Ali residential faculty

are collaborating to design units that use five general education disciplines to

teach background knowledge, vocabulary development and reading skills to

students preparing to enroll or concurrently enrolled in 70U-level general

education courses. the units wif(be used by a!{faculty in RDG091, a 3 credif

course which meets Twice a week. When students graduate from The

developmental reading coursevrork, they Gre supported by counseling workshops

and our reading Learning~ssociafe in their 1fl0-level courses.

health sciences 

~S~ch~ jogs ~istor~ca~ c~t~~r

~

~rsiness

2nd semester

7after successfu3ly completing RDG091, sfudenfs

graduate from developmentaE reading.

16 weeks

2xs a week

091 m 

~ S#uden[s who successfully

~ ~`' ~.~ completed only 081 enrol! in 047

The new forma+ irr~proved

RDG081 completion

from 74.5% to 85.2%.

Successful course completion

unproved from X6.9% to 73.2 .

This unic}ue scheduling farmaf was develoQed and

supported by fhe fo1[owie~g peopEe:

Ramona Goth, English Department Chair

Buffie Digiio, English DepartmentAdministrative Secretary

Chris Hoeff(er, Cumcu(um Technalagist in charge of scheduSing

Kathryn Kinney-Foe, Eng:ish Dept Administrative Secretary

Diane Erden~erger, admissions Administrative Assistant

Jennifer Vinca, Coordinator of Student Services and SOAR

Holly Rouse, Cashier's Office Bursar

Vicky Owen, HR Representative ~ "You caRE.

Stephanie Fuji, Mean of instruction T:~Ev

Gia Taylor, Dean of Enrollment sucCE~c.~~

Fran Vitale, Director cf admissions, Registration, and Records

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 5 of 33
' 4 "s

E~I~C09~ jE:fiVC~ 101 ~4LP: ~ -. ''

Accelera#ed

.earning

9:00-10:15

1Q:30-21:45

1.2:00-1:15

The Communiy College of Ba rimore County creafied ALP using a format That in~egrated developmental English students

wish non-developmental st~den~s ~o improve student success. Whi(e CCSC nas been very s~ccessf~i using this approach,

SCC developed a similar approac'r, ;hat is more financi~ily sustainable. CCBC irteg~ aces a developmertai cohort o; ~

approxima~eiy 10 students in~c an rNG i O1 class of approximately 20 s~udenfis_ While students individual instruction, SCC

be~ieves that wTn services in place ,Wri~ing Cer~~r Learning Associa~es, instructor o~fice hours, efic.) nstruction can s~iE1 be

~~ individualized anc~ supported in a class of 20 students. T} .is saves money -or the college, districT, and ccmmunity. ~

Prepared by Sara Cameron, SCC Reading Faculty, sara.cameron@scottsdalecc.edu

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 6 of 33
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 7 of 33
President Saar and Members of the Board:

Re: MCCCD SECURITY BRACH

Here I am once a aln to Ealk fo you about the MCGC(~ security breach and how badly Elie adminisSration

is handling this issue and how it is affecting everyone in our community: students, parents, taxpayers,

faculty and staff. The clock is ticking, and every day, this fiasco and lack of transparency is unnecessarily

costing us all millions of taxpayer dollars.

Haw does this affect the MCCC[~?

- Our MCCCD reputation is at stake. it is affecting MCCCD's image in Maricopa County, Arizona and

nationally. In the past, MCCCD has always been noted as one of the best community colleges in the

nation —and now, with the present administration's leadership--aur MCCCD's image is tainted and has

received some very bad publicity throughout the nation. This Board cannot allow this issue to fester; the

Board has to take action now to stop this administration from costing taxpayers and students mlHions of

dollars more by their refusal to admit that Ehey themselves created this fiasco—not their IT staff who had

warned them of a potential breach. The damage has been done to students, parents, taxpayers, and

present and former 1T staff members who are experts in IT programs.

-The administration has created a hostile environment for its employees and one of mistnist and angst

amongst faculty and sta#f. We have lost 1T expert staff members because of the unfair and unjust

treatment by this administration. it's a shame that these present and former valuable, 1T staff members

who warned their superiors and top administrakors about passible breaches, were made scapegoats

because of the administration's inability to act at that crucial time. They ignored staff, aild tried to cover

up for their incompetent leadership. Some of the IT staff were consequently silenced 6y the administration

by firing some, demoting others, reprimanding, intimidating, humiliating, harassing and treating them

disrespectfully and unfairly--alt this for being responsible employees and just doing their job!

Unfortunately, some of our best and brightest IT experts, have now resigned because they had too much

integrity end could not work in this hostile environment.

-Lack of capital and operational dollars could leave MCCCD very vulnerable to a severe depletion of

resources for faculty, staff and students and escalate into much bigger financial problems. Less money

also means fewer investments in facilities and teaching and learning. Millions of dollars going to lawyers

could instead, be going to scholarships, school improvements etc.

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 8 of 33
-Scandals such as this one, could also jeopardize accreditafion for the MCCCD. Twa of the Items in the

accred(tation process caught my eye—and I quote:

-Integrity through competence, responsibilities and ethical practices.

-Evidence of financial stability.

aeciittu://~vtvtiv.accredf tedonlinecoile~es.com/vour-accreditatlon•answers/the~rocess-of-earninK•accreditation/

h ~v_~v_~y,accreditedonlinecolleges.com/youraccredltation-ans~v~[the•process-of•earning•accreditatlon/

-Liabilities and lawsuits could lower bond ratings--and lack of trust from taxpayers. i must admit thak for

now. I personally do not trust this administration and do nat support any bond or property tax increases

because they are fiscally irresponsible. Lawsuits will cost millions of dollars to defend and settle unless

the Governing t3oard intervenes end stops Wilsan E(ser from creating more havoc.

-Distractions, such as this one, could cost millions in lack of productivity. The staff, the governing Board,

The legal department, the Chance!!or and many others in the organization are all focused on lawsuits,

hearings and failing 1T sysfems rather than on core business.

-This administration seems intent on outsourcing; it is driving local talent out and allowing institutional

knowledge to leave MCCCD at unprecedented rates and will cost IT systems millions of dollars more. The

perfect example is the $18 million dollars to outsource IT that you are being asked to approve today. That

is just the beginning. This is only after last year's approval of nearly $30 million in IT projects which have

yet to be started. You are being asked to outsource because the Administration has driven everyone out

who had expertise and could have helpEd.

- Local taxpayer doNars leave the community as a result of outsourcing and privatization. They go to outof-state, corporate consultants who f7ave no vested interest in our college system. You will be asked to

pay millions to renew these contracts. The solution to iT problems is not that simple. That is a solution

people use when they don't Ecnow what they are doing. Systems in the CLOUD aren't any more secure;

on the contrary, it is putting all your information on the INTERNET.

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 9 of 33
F{ow does this af#ect the community and the press?

-The MCCCD's public reiations has been ciatnaged with the community and the press. The taxpayers

wil( not appreciate paying for this mess, an8 the press is clearly upset by your lack of transparency and

refusal to provide them requested materials relevant to the 1'f issue . As a result, !aw firms are filing

lawsuits and bringing matters in front of the courts because MCCCD is not cooperating—do they have

something to hide? The Administration is breaking public record laws and eroding the public's trust. Are

the administrators serving students anti the community or are they serving themselves?

Haw does this affeot IT at MCCCD7

IT at Maricopa is very weak, having lost 50% of resources and nearly all institut+onal knowledge. You

have enough information in your hands to know fhat people running IT today are on a lengthy, learning

curve and need training—which takes additional time and money. Peopla with little expertise or

experience in large systems, are running IT on a part-time basis. The Board was asked last year to

approve spending millions of dollars on (T, only to be asked this year again, to approve millions of dollars

more, in hiring staff to run those projects. Today, you are being asked again to approve over X18 million

dollars on IT spending using BOND dollars to build systems planned by individuals with limited knowledge,

limited staff--and limited experience. The Board needs to ask, "Why?"

Ifi the MCCCD Governing Board does not take action in the matter of IT, a much larger security breach

could take place, systems supporting the organization could fail, and IT could fail, making it impossible to

register students, disburse Financial Aid, get loans etc.

How does this affect Home Owners?

Taxpayers could see increases in the tax levy that was to be proposed to help with services for sfudents,

but now would be spent for mistakes made by the MCCCD Administration. !n my opinion, those

proposed tax dollars would b~ moved around so MCCCD can continue paying for the security Fiasco.

personally will not vote for a properly tax increase; I do not truss this administration, in my opinion, they

are fiscally irresponsible.

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 10 of 33
How does this affect employees?

Jobs far employees will be at risk if District runs out of dollars and needs to tap into operational dollars to

pay bills. Morale is at an all-time low. The entire IT department is in worse shape now than it has ever

been. We are at more risk today than we have ever been. People are retiring or resigning left and right. Is

this how you run an effective organization?

Conclusion:

( ask you to take action on behalf of the community. When the Board takes no act+on, the Administration

assumes that you support their ackions—and the Boarcl loses credibility with the public. Remember that

the Administration has either forced several lT staff to resign or retire, and as a consequence, Ehe

MCCCR may be facing additional personnel lawsuits, bad publicity and irreparable harm to the MCCCD,

1 ask you to take the following actions:

e Stop the one-sided employee hearings until the courts decide how to handle public records

requests now being dented by MGCCD.

o Seek your own outside independent counsel,

• Start being transparent with the med(a and your own employees.

• Stap spending money on l7 and stop wasting bond funds until you hire competent 1T sta#f.

Hold those a# the top of this organization accountable and don't let them use taxpayer dollars to

protect themselves.

o Stop the Administration from ruining the lives of employees and their families and protect and

defend the employees---and not the Administration.

• Stand sarong and speak for those who elected you and the communiiy you represent. ~ Already

this administration is attempting to raise student tuition to cover their IT expenses.

Respectfully Submitfed,

Rosie Lopez

Founder, Arizona Hispanic Community forum

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 11 of 33
3/25/2014

President Saar, members of the board, and staff, my name is Sandra Ortega. ! am here today

as a taxpayer and another member of the Hispanic community to ask this Board to take action

in the matter of the MCCCD security breach. It has been almost a year since the CBI notified

MCCCD that their information was compromised and this Board has remained silent on this

matter.

Millions of dollars have been unnecessarily wasted on lawyers and consultants to address this

issue. Nearly 50°!0 of the I7 department has resigned or has been forced to retire. The lives of

families forever changed and the image of this Distriot tarnished to save an Administration that

could have avoided this entire incident and is taking no responsibility whatsoever.

You CANNOT sit there and wait for excuses that employes matters must first be resolved.

You CANNOT sit there and wait for lawyers to handle this matter.

You CANNOT sit there and DO NOrHiNG.

While you walk, millions are being wasted to protect this Administration.

While you wait, lawyers are destroying MCCCD credibility with the media.

While you wart, you are lasing #rusf in the cnmrnunity.

While you wait, the image of MCCCD is be(ng tarnished.

While you wait, our system is being bankrupt.

While you wait, lawsuits are being filed,

While you wait, students are baing asked to pay more tuition.

While you wart, homeowners are being asked to pay more tars.

While you wait, the lives of employees are being ruined.

While yvu wait, the Administration is forcing people to quit, resign or retire to absolve

themselves of any guilt. Today, #hero are 2 individuals from IT in the termination Ifst who settled

with the Distt~ct and resigned. One of them is being terminated affective July 1st. Another

individual has also been forced to resign. Over the last several months rrtany more have left the

IT organization at an unprecedont~d rate. Do you see a problem hire? Who will be held

accountable when the truth finally comes out?

YOU ARE in charge. You create policy and you can CHANGE it if it does not fit the

organizatianl You hlif2ED the Chancellor and Legal Counsel, You can fire the Chancellor and

Legal counsel If they are no longer serving the organization and the community you represent.

The Chancellor and Vice Chancellor of IT were told over 12 times in 2012 that there were

problems in IT. They were told #hat there were security issues that had #o be addressed. They

were asked to take action and refused. Responsibility for these events transferred to them

when employees sent Them Several letters and filed the IT grievance.

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 12 of 33
Take the time to read what's available online that speaks of fhe atrocities the lawyers you've

hired are committing to protect the Administration.

Employees are beir►g asked to sign non-disciosua'e agreements. These agreements are meant

to forever seal any evidence againsf the Administration and prevent the public from knowing fhe

Truth. Employees are being told they cannot use witnesses in their own defense that the District

dogs nat approve. Employees are being told whaf evidence they can and cannot use. Lawyers

are blatantly lying. ~mpioyees are being setup for termination in a one-sided hearing and

completely C?is#rict-driven hearing. ~mploy~es can't even get copies of the(r own employes

records. This is denying employees due process, and therefore violating paliay!

Employees, the media and members of the community are being denied every single request

made for public records(

When an organixa#Ton is not 6ein~ transparent is because they have something to hide,

pure and simple, and are using our money to protect themselves.

Aii these documents they are trying to seal incriminate the Chancellor, the Vice-Chancellor of (T,

and the Acting Vice-Chancellor of f~IR and other people. That is why millions are being spent in

lawyers. That is why today you are baing asked to extend the contract for these lawyers.

It is time for The Board to take action and stop the lawyers from Wilson Elser who are only in it

for the money and bringing this organization to banitruptcy. p0 NO? REPI~W '~W~IR

CONTRACT TOMGH7 AND START MAKING CHANGES IN THE ADPWINiS7RA71d1~.

Rebuild the trust from the community. 4t is time for this BARD to take action and hold the

Chancellor, MR and Legal Department accountable for the way they have handled this situation.

You have enough information in your hands to clearly see what's taking place. fake the

time to read 4he many documents #hat have been sent to yault fake 4he time to view atl

the news articles printed in the newspapers and online newsietters~ 1"he taxpayers are

watching the 'N reports and reading the articles. You wRll f~ave 4o answer to them at

election timel

~e Transparent[ Take Action! Don't wait until it's too fatal

2

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 13 of 33
March 25, 2014

President Dana Saar, Members of the Board, Dr. Clasper, Members of the GEC and guests, my

name is:

Dr. Cfeopatria Martinez

Mathematics Instructor at Phoenix College

Speaking as a member of the community

have been employed as a mathematics professor by the Maricopa Community Coifege District for 29

years.

have always loved my job as a teacher.

During my three decades of hard work for the district, I have never been disciplined and have

otherwise never been in any trouble.

As you are aware, the president of Phoenix College recently attempted to terminate me, but a hearing

committee unanimously rejected the recommended termination.

Although the Chancellor ultimately accepted the hearing committee's recommendation not to

terminate me, the Chancellor is now attempting to suspend me #or 14 1/2 months.

{ want to keep my job and for that reason I have followed orders from the administration which have

grossly violated ~y academic freedom and have affected my ability to perform my job. Although there

are several examples, due to time constraints, I'm just going to give you two examples:

1) f was not allowed to use the variable ' < ~~ 

,~ m math formulas. My request for copies of a list of math

formulas was denied until t replaced the variable "u" with the variable "x".

2) For the past four years I was not allowed to use any lecture notesliesson plans I wrote to guide my

daily lectures. I had to memorize ail lectures and hoped I did not forget anything.

Writing course materials for students is one of the duties of MCCCD faculty, and because these

materials are faculty generated, PC is obligated to absorb the cost to make copies for students. In

spring 2013 t selected my colleague's unpublished material in lieu of a published textbook---the

material had been approved by the Mathematics Department for this purpose and it had been used

for several semesters. The PC administration refused to make copies of #his unpublished material,

and t was told to have the students make their own copies at their own expense.

The first day of class, 4 told the students they were responsible for making themselves a copy of the

material at their home, in the PC Library, at Kinkos, Staples, or anywhere else they could do so.

Because it was so important that students get these copies ASAP, I said I would help them by having

them copied and bound at Staples on my own time for any student who would reimburse me for the

cost of the copies. The entire class opted to do this and they reimbursed me $11,00. The Phoenix

College administration accused me of allegedly violating the MCCC[~ cash handling policy. They said

was to pay for the student copies out of my ow~i pocket.

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 14 of 33
The administration proceeded to dismiss rne. I appeased fhe dis►nissal, presented my case to an

appeals committee. This Faculty Hearing Committee found that PC had failed to carry its burden of

proof. They found no violation of the cash handling policy but ChancelEor s#iii has suspended me for

14 %z months because i would not pay for the students' course materials. tVo faculty member is

responsible for purchasing instructional materials for students and I believe i should not have to

either.

It is for this one time effort on my part to help students that I am being suspended without pay for an

unacceptably long length of time and 1 have not broken any policies.

Like most working people, I cannot economically survive a 14 month suspension of pay. The

Chancel{ors suspension will aVsa cause me to lose my health insurance, because I may not be able to

afford to pay my contribution towards continued health care coverage. Under the circums#antes, the

Chancellors 14 month suspension of me, is the functional equivalent of termination from the district.

As you are aware, under the RF'P, only this board has the authority to #erminate an employee.

While I was never found guilty of violating MCCCD regulations or policy, I am unfairly being punished.

i~am no#guilty of violating any MCCCD policy or regulation including cash handling, i was not

afforded due process

s~~tcsp en s; o,~

Accordingly, I askee5l the board to intervene in my case to rescind the Chancellor's i~ssae~~+ and at

the very minimum allow me to present proof of what I have stated here.

Thank you,

..~

Cieopairia Martinez, PhD

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 15 of 33
~!~ EO 13-14 F10

~, Associatei! Students of Mesa Commtmity CoiEege

.~~~~`,~

E~ecu~l~e CJ~der

s Proposed Tuition Increase

2 By; Lucas Bodine, President of ASMCC

3 Today we have three previous Presidents of the Associated Students of Mesa Commurii#.y College as

4 they stand in unison with myself, the current ASMCC president to show the impact we have seen with

5 tuition proposals. We address the board to state that in times of past and tonight the Associated

6 Students of Mesa Community Co{lege has made important. statements about this matter and we would

7 hope that you take into consideration what MCC students feel abaut.this proposal.

8 With discussion of this proposal it is important to note the kind of backgrounds that our students have.

9 According to the Community College Survey of Student,Engagement approximately 579o,of students

10 work for pay anywhere, from 21-3D+ hours a week .69 % ot.,our students are declared as part time

~.1 students. Of.all undergraduate students from 2011; 2012 39%. of students received.P.e.11 Grants..This

12 proposal would directly impact those studehts wor~Cing many hours., a week to provide for,themselyes

13 and their edu.cat~gn Tliis.is a large ma~orityof students at our campus and, across the district, those ,

14 try9ng to`afford an education white providing for themselves then families

`',

15 We wquld invite the board fo ask t}~emselves what percentage of funds are bung aliotted:to each

16 college as well at the district level and ask 'if those allotted funds help cultivate teaching and learning to

17 the students.

18 We caution,the board to avoid a history of tuition increases. each time tuition is increased means that ..:;

19 the availability and access to getting an education is limited. We believe that community colleges should

20 make affordability a key staple so that as many people as possible have the privilege of receiving a,. ::~. ~`.

21 collegiate, education.

22 Much change..has taken place in the district and once completed, the incentives will be a benefit,for

23 students. :However wiehthese incentives we rriust keep in mind affordability to the student.,We suppose

24 that there are xefevant and important means to a proposed tuition increase but the tuition increase will

25 not be a long term fix to the districts finical situation. l'he current student body at MCC is.not m favor of

26 the tuition increase

27 In response to this,proposai we encourage moreciialog and creativity to alternative sources of funding

28 and processes. We would encourage the district to discuss a flafi rate tuition and various payment plans

29 and options.

30 Thank you for your consideration and time in listening to our concerns about this proposal.

31

32

33

34

35

36

'; Assocl'att-ed S:tudentsf}o~~Mesa Community.College Spr~ngSemeste~1314

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 16 of 33
~~~ EO 13-14 F10

Associated Students aFA4esa Comruunity College

.~~ I~.~, ~~~cu~~~e C~~°de~

37

38 X

39

Qp Lucas Bocilne

4~ President, AShtCC

42 Lucas Bodine, President

43 Matthew Faulkner, Executive Vice President

44 Alexandra Kol(er, Vice President of Communication

45 : _' Ryne O'Reify, Vice President of Fiscal Affairs

46

47 The.Executive.6oard

48

;i'

,' ,

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 17 of 33
~+~ . R 

'ti . .w ~."i ~,.:,~.r,F to v^ ~ ~y'~ 

.C,,"i+ hF,>~F.~Gv;r' ~ ~~

z a~ a ~'~~+.'

~~

~ ~y~F 2k ~ r y ..

x3 ,~ N

OU~ ~P~'F~R j'R",~b `Y~e ~~5~•:.~..; ~J a~ 'gyp y~i

x ..~ ~s 

~i ~ ~ w,

_ J '~!

~ I ~h

"h v'

j~~¢iq

~

~ ~' ~~-7f~~;'~`cP b "~ ~

i

R~

~~ ~ fi

~ k~ t yix

~

13 ,

~'

Sr 3 Pte"

~

~ ..

d~~{. 'k

~ ~ d ~ 2y {' 3t t5' 

S~~~~~ 

y

.~} f

~ ~ ~ :.t.. f 'h„ rih~~~~~ s

Y

~~~~~.i

~ KM1~~.~, 2 1 ~ y

~~ i

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 18 of 33
Meet &Confer (January -April)

h~nc~~1~r

Budged Recommendations (February)

Tuition &Fees {February}

~h~n~~ll~~'s E~~~~tive ~~~n~i~

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 19 of 33
H 2

~~

3

1

w 3 ,~~. J 1 "Lc' ~

~ E 

Cx~~l~~~

~ 5

b >'

Mf k f

~3S 3j ~ ~ ,~ b y ~~1;. ~a 2 ~

rs.. 1 R >..~ :e~ .,-,`tea

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 20 of 33
■ 

■

T~~u~o

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 21 of 33
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 22 of 33
There is a $15.1 mi#lion decline in our FY 2015 Pant

Fund budget as we continue moving toward

completion of the 2004 Capital Development

Program ,

..

U ~~ μ

_ _. _ __ _.x. -. 31`. was

Board Approved Series A - E issued; bringing the

total to $951 million.

~t ~~ n ~...._ ..,.q _y ~"~y"~Dl' }` wn C~ v~m~em rr~:

... a, ,~ .. ~ ~ ~ . _ m.~. ~~ ~ _a,~. ~ ~ ~ _ ~ W .~,. ..

The Secondary Tax Levy will increase from $80.9 to

$84.5 million; an increase of $3.6 million.

z ~.. ,..:+~ .M..~ei:._c.~. 3~~" :~:~... _ ._. .saase-0` anv °'' k~.. t ~ ~ .fie _R .~dh. '

The Secondary Tax Rate will increase from .2459 to

.2364, a n drop of .0095

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 23 of 33
& ~ ~Jy 'r

~~ i i i s r ~ ' ' F 1 i; ' ' I Y ~ ~ , —~

',- .<:

z

.., ~7 z .. .~+ _,

_. ___, ,1.~ _ .',

i

.~

~

___.___...,.__.,._'___' '__'_._.__ _ ~ .. _ ., 4_' ....,.__ _ ~... _ _. f 

_ ~ ( ~ .0 :.~z

y ~' o- . ~'~ "~ `fir .~ r «~'.

Artizona State Retirement System - $d.2

• Employee Manual increases - $1.0• Operating Cost for New Building - $0.6

• Operating Cost for !T Maintenance - $1.0

• Flex Benefits (Board Approved) - $0.6

_ _..

• Scholarships - $0.5

• Seamless Student Experience - $0.8• Student Success Initiatives - $2.1• Maricopa Corporate College - $0.7

Move Prop 301 Faculty - $0.4

• Faculty inversion - $3.3

• New Residential Faculty - $3.3

• Other Possible Program NeedsjSaiary Adjustment - TBD

Amounts in Millions

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 24 of 33
~~ R~~ident Tuition would increase by X5.00 per credit h~u~

r~:~ ,~~~~~ ~~~~ r~~~~~n~stua~r~~tak~r~g~~ ~r~c~it Hours ~~r

academic year would pay $2,58.

~~ Out-of-state students pay both ~n out-of-~ta~e ~urcha~g~

~r~d 1~uitio~; heir tat~l would go from $322 to $327 per

credit hour.

{~~ A full ~.im~ ~~t-ofi-~t~~t~ student t~ki~g 3Q ~r~dit ~aurs per

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 25 of 33
_ °~~ me ~ ,. _ _~ _ ~ .o -.~

a

~:

~~~ ~ i i , ~ r = c ~ ! ~

~~

c ~ ~ k i ~ ~ ~

'C~

1 ~

i i~ pi J ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~,, ~ ~ t

E i_

..._

7 i ~~

~ _. ; . ^—

A i F ~ N C _ ~ i ~ _ i .~ -.a-.-r-

~ ~ - ~i~

~:: !r&b~~

~ ~?'

~ 

.:. 

, 

ism ~~ ~1~&8 

R 

.+~, 

~ 

. ,

To maintain the existing FY2414 tax Iry in FY2015, the tax rate

would decrease because the property values used to calculate

the tax increased.

A 2% increase in the tax levy would mean homeowners who

paid $128.96 this year would pay an additional $2.57 next year.

Primary Tax Rate 1.2896 1.2573 1.2824

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 26 of 33
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 27 of 33
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 28 of 33
7

~.r 

y ~.

State Aid..

Dec~~nes

:Cut.. Gut Cud. Enroll. Enroll. ~~60.8} ($17,6m) ($5.8 m) _ ($35.4 m) $1.4m ($0.4)

Prop 301 ~~ 13} ($1.1) $0.2 $0.5 $0.3 (Sales tax)

New

_ $65.5m

Construction $18.2m $14.2m $11.3m $7.Om $6.5m $8.3m incr/Rate

Taxes Declines

Property Tax 2% levy ~ 3% Levy 2% levy 3 Times

Levy lncr. ~6.8m $11.4m $7.9m $26.1m

Tuition Rate X6.00/cr $5.00/cr $5.00/cr 3 Times

Increase $13o4m $12.9m _ $13.8m $40,Om

One Time

Federa I $15.1m 1 &Done

Stimulus

$11.2 million of the FY08-9 reduction in state aid is capital state aid

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 29 of 33
~ +•~

.~n +t~c~v+~ „~F~ 

x~~st

n~¢ y*~s~~ ; ~~

*

i ~ •

~ ~1 ~~`~

~

*h s~~~~~ 

J $

't ,~ a

c

..~ y a 2 S ~t~

.. 3°~,x~ ,.~`.~' ~h'"sj~~~f~~

~ ~., ~.

^~,,`~`55~~`:

. +~ ; C

t ~

i

yr=K Q✓ Ac',E

Y ~ H y `rki~,~ ". k5 

4tE-`. k ! .~ ~.

~, ~ < ~

~ ~` #t ,~~: 1 '

y+'

~~"R+~ i'~1~~y'r" "-A ~SrO s 4t~f"y~~' TI$' S~r 

+'~^''~" y

'~ +M1~.PX..,. ...~.h~~.Mf1P.~. ~n ~i'.T.. M~4~X ~~Y,'b 

h`~fYh.'~Z~'F').~5+'c..

Y~' .:~3. .., t,.. a...

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20°/fl

10%

~/o a

FY07-S FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14

Miscellaneous

Fund

B a I a n ce/ Ca r ryf o rwa rd

Tu itio n &Fees

State Aid

~~ Property Taxes/SRP

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 30 of 33
FY 2010 - $10.2 m~ilion

,~ ~~,., 1y

:~~L FY 2011- $8.6 million

.«, ~~'~ r - .-

~~

FY 2012-$1.5 million

FY 2013 - $15.0 million

GFTotal $35.3 million

P/us another ~~1.2 m in capita/ reductions ,brings the

Tota/ to X46.5 mi/lion

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 31 of 33
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 32 of 33
~ a ~~

s

m

°~

y

~;;~

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 73-11 Filed 03/03/17 Page 33 of 33