alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Prince Anthony James Kelly,

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01632-001-TUC-RM (JR)

ORDER 

At a Final Disposition Hearing held on December 17, 2019, the Court revoked 

Defendant Prince Anthony James Kelly’s supervised release and sentenced him to an 18-

month term of imprisonment, with credit for time served but with the sentence to run 

consecutive to Defendant’s sentence imposed in Maricopa County Superior Court case 

number CR2017-130678-001. (Doc. 179.) The Supervised Release Disposition Report 

states that Defendant served 61 days in custody as of the date of his Final Disposition 

Hearing. (Doc. 176; see also Doc. 167.) 

On December 6, 2021, Defendant filed a pro se Motion, complaining that his 

disposition and commitment paperwork does not reflect that he “waited” five months. 

(Doc. 180.)

The Judgment in this case appropriately reflects that Defendant was given credit 

for time served. (Doc. 179.) The credit for time served includes the period of time prior 

to Defendant’s Final Disposition Hearing in which Defendant was detained on the 

supervised release violation in this case following the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus 

Case 4:15-cr-01632-RM-JR Document 183 Filed 02/11/22 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ad prosequendum. (See Docs. 167, 176.) The Court ordered Defendant’s sentence in this 

case to run consecutive to his sentence in Maricopa County Superior Court case number 

CR2017-130678-001, and therefore Defendant is not entitled to any credit in this case for 

time that he served in Maricopa County Superior Court case number CR2017-130678-

001.

As the docket reflects that Defendant was detained 61 days on the supervised 

release violation in this case prior to his Final Disposition Hearing—rather than the five 

months that he claims in his Motion—his Motion will be denied.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s pro se Motion (Doc. 180) is denied without 

prejudice and with leave for former defense counsel to file a renewed motion if she has 

any further information regarding the computation of Defendant’s term of incarceration.

Dated this 11th day of February, 2022.

Case 4:15-cr-01632-RM-JR Document 183 Filed 02/11/22 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jermaine Walker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwalke32\/","title":"Canberra 34-meter Antenna","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1DU7P7zlGL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-complex-06-2\/\">Canberra 34-meter Antenna<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-complex-06-2\/embed\/#?secret=1DU7P7zlGL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Canberra 34-meter Antenna” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1DU7P7zlGL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/canberra-complex-06-1.jpg?w=523","thumbnail_width":523,"thumbnail_height":784}
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60388

(Summary Calendar) 

 

OMAR MOHAMMED TOBEH,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

(A94-011-027)

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

November 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Omar Mohammed Tobeh, a Jordanian citizen, petitions for review

of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Tobeh

contends that he has shown that he was persecuted in Kuwait and

Jordan and is, therefore, entitled to asylum in the United States

or, in the alternative, that he has a clear probability of

persecution if returned to Jordan and is, therefore, eligible for
2

withholding of deportation.

The BIA concluded that Tobeh did not prove persecution while

in Kuwait or Jordan and is not entitled to asylum. Further, the

BIA found that Tobeh did not show any persecution in Jordan or

prove that any future persecution would take place and was not

entitled to withholding of deportation. A review of the record

indicates substantial evidence to support the BIA’s decision and no

compelling evidence in favor of Tobeh. See Castillo-Rodriguez V.

INS, 929 F.2d 183, 184 (5th Cir. 1991); INS v. Elias-Zacharias, 502

U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). Thus, Tobeh failed to carry his burden

and, accordingly, he was denied asylum and withholding of

deportation.

This petition for review is 

DENIED.
#### HOWARD, STALLINGS, FROM & HUTSON, P.A. v. FRANK DOUGLAS

No. 223A01

(Filed 9 November 2001)

Judgments— default judgment—letter by counsel—not appearance

The decision of the Court of Appeals in an action to recover legal fees is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that a letter sent by defendant’s attorney to plaintiff’s attorney after the complaint was filed but before service of the complaint was not an appearance which required three days’ notice to defendant before default judgment could be entered against him.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 143 N.C. App. 122, 545 S.E.2d 470 (2001), reversing and remanding an order entered 2 March 2000 by Gessner, J., in District Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 October 2001.

*Howard, Stallings, From & Hutson, P.A., by E. Cader Howard, John N. Hutson, Jr., and Colleen M. Crowley, for plaintiff - appellant.*

*Rudolph Maher Widenhouse & Fialko, by Thomas K. Maher, for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge Timmons-Goodson.

REVERSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-31204

 

ASTORIA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

EDWIN W. EDWARDS, ET AL.,

Defendants,

EDWARD J. DEBARTOLO, JR.; ROBERT GUIDRY;

BOYD KENNER, INC.; LOUISIANA GAMING

ENTERPRISES, INC; BOYD LOUISIANA LLC;

CROWN GROUP, INC.; BOOMTOWN, INC.;

BOYD GAMING, INC.

Defendants-Appellants.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans

98-CV-3359-K

--------------------

January 7, 2003

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants appeal from the determination of the district

court that it would not exercise jurisdiction over state law

claims after dismissing all of the federal claims. When a matter

is still in the pleadings stages of litigation, the general rule
2

is to dismiss pendant state claims if all the federal claims are

dismissed. See McClelland v. Gronwaldt, 155 F.3d 507, 519 (5th

Cir. 1998)(citing Wong v. Stripling, 881 F.2d 200, 204 (5th Cir.

1989)); cf. Batiste v. Island Records Inc., 179 F.3d 217, 227-28

(5th Cir. 1999) (holding that the district court did abuse its

discretion by dismissing pendant state law claims when the case

had moved beyond the pleadings, substantial discovery had taken

place, and trial was one month away). Here, it is undisputed

that no discovery has taken place in this matter and the

litigation is still in the pleadings stage. Given these

circumstances, we find that the district court did not abuse its

discretion. Accordingly, the determination of the district court

is AFFIRMED.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION II

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of

JORDAN MATTHEW DOUGLAS

,

Petitioner. No. 56610

- 9

- II

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

W ORSWICK

, J.

— Jordan Matthew Douglas seeks relief from personal restraint imposed

following his 2015 plea of guilty to unlawful possession of controlled substances under RCW

69.50.4013(1). He argues that his conviction is void under State v. Blake , 197 Wn.2d 170, 481

P.3d 521 (2021) . The State concedes that Douglas’s conviction is void. We accept the S tate’s

concession, grant Douglas ’s petition , and remand to the trial court to vacate his judgment and

sentence

. We deny his request for appointment of counsel for this petition.

A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be prin ted in the

Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW

2.06.040, it is so ordered.

Worswick, J.

We concur:

Glasgow, A.C.J.

Veljacic, J. Filed

Washington State

Court of Appeals

Division Two

March 22, 2022
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danka Business
Systems PLC (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Edward K. Quibell  
|Edward K. Quibell      
|Chief Financial Officer

February 6, 2008

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



44
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Schmitt Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Wayne A. Case and Jeffrey T Siegal,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/S/    WAYNE A.
CASE                             
|Wayne A. Case                                    
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2011                                   
|                                                 
|/S/    JEFFREY T
SIEGAL                          
|Jeffrey T Siegal                                 
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer            
|August 9, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the period ended March 31, 2004 of MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the Issuer) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on this date hereof. I, Robert Valentine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14, 2004



/s/    ROBERT VALENTINERobert ValentineVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"nasa_technology1","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EjPnSJeWgH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa_technology1\/\">nasa_technology1<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/nasa_technology1\/embed\/#?secret=EjPnSJeWgH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“nasa_technology1” — NASA\" data-secret=\"EjPnSJeWgH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/nasa_technology1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":396}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Tabor","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/astabor\/","title":"NASA Takes on Wildfires with Flight Demonstration","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yNrcxccc4P\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-takes-wildfires-with-flight-demonstration\/\">NASA Takes on Wildfires with Flight Demonstration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-takes-wildfires-with-flight-demonstration\/embed\/#?secret=yNrcxccc4P\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Takes on Wildfires with Flight Demonstration” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yNrcxccc4P\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/nhq202105050038.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
#### GASPARE RAGUSA, ET AL. v. DR. CHI YEUNG LAU, ET AL.

May 8, 1989.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly M. Matter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kmatter\/","title":"Engaging Students at Gallery Opening","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nfgEP7KiOz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/engaging-students-at-gallery-opening\/\">Engaging Students at Gallery Opening<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/engaging-students-at-gallery-opening\/embed\/#?secret=nfgEP7KiOz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Engaging Students at Gallery Opening” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nfgEP7KiOz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/grc-2024-cn-00038.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}