alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
31.2**
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I,
Margaret A. Torres, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
  1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
      Heritage Oaks Bancorp;  2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
 
 3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;
 
 4.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d) for the registrant and we
      have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
 to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the
 period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Intentionally Left Blank
 
 c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function);
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 19, 2005
    
    /s/ Margaret A.
    TorresMargaret A. TorresChief Financial
      Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7367

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FELTON TABOR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-01-50, CA-03-2079-6-20)

Submitted: December 11, 2003 Decided: December 22, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melisa White Gay, GAY & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Mt. Pleasant, South

Carolina, for Appellant. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Felton Tabor seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

and the court’s order denying his motion to reconsider pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The orders are appealable only if a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Tabor has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1
                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Safari Associates,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10K-SB for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities & Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  Fairly  presents,  in all
            material   respects,   the   financial   condition  and  results  of
            operations of the Company.


Dated: December 31, 2004                By: /s/ Morton Berger
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Morton Berger
                                            President, CFO and Chairman of the
                                            Board


Dated: December 31, 2004                By: /s/  Lillian Berger
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Lillian Berger
                                            Secretary, Treasurer and Director
1.
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30,
2008 (the Report), filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 26, 2009
    
    /s/ John Boken

John BokenChief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Clair R. Hipkins,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04348-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9983 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9983 Filed 02/06/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Newest Astronauts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Q12do6dwi3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasas-newest-astronauts\/\">NASA\u2019s Newest Astronauts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasas-newest-astronauts\/embed\/#?secret=Q12do6dwi3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Newest Astronauts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Q12do6dwi3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/jsc2024e017822.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA’s “Meatball” Logo","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kGcgrc8wp1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/nasas-meatball-logo\/\">NASA’s “Meatball” Logo<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/nasas-meatball-logo\/embed\/#?secret=kGcgrc8wp1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s “Meatball” Logo” — NASA\" data-secret=\"kGcgrc8wp1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/ksc-20200623-ph-jbs02-0001orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
DENY; and Opinion Filed February 27, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00229-CV

IN RE JAMES MCCOY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13955-B

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice Brown

Relator files this writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to rule on his motion 

to compel service of process. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not 

recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is 

entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 

839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus.

140229F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Pertains to:

Case No.: 2:15-cv-02308-DGC

Case No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

COME NOW the Plaintiff in the above referenced action and move that David P.

Matthews, and the firm of MATTHEWS & ASSOCIATES, and Richard M. Freese, Calle M.

Mendenhall and the firm of FREESE & GOSS, PLLC, be substituted as counsel of record; and,

in conjunction therewith, that Julia Reed Zaic, and the firm of HEAVISIDE REED ZAIC be

withdrawn as counsel of records in this action. The above referenced Plaintiff as well as the

attorneys of MATTHEWS & ASSOCIATES, FREESE & GOSS, PLLC and HEAVISIDE

REED ZAIC consent to the proposed substitution and withdrawal. MATTHEWS & ASSOCIATES FREESE & GOSS, PLLC

/s/ David. P. Matthews /s/ Richard M. Freese

David P. Matthews Richard M. Freese,

2905 Sackett St. Calle M. Mendenhall

Houston, TX 77098 1901 6th Ave. N, Ste. 3120

Tel. (713) 522-5250 Birmingham, AL 35203

Fax (713) 535-7184 Tel. (205) 871-4144

matthewsivc@thematthewslawfirm.com Fax (205) 871-4104

dmatthews@thematthewslawfirm.com rich@freeseandgoss.com

calle@freeseandgoss.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9619 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 2
HEAVISIDE REED ZAIC

/s/ Julia Reed Zaic

Julia Reed Zaic

312 Broadway St., Ste. 203

Laguna Beach, CA 92651

Tel. (949)715-5120

Julia@hrzlaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing was filed and served on all counsel of

record by way of the Court’s CM/ECF filing system this 11th day of January, 2018.

/s/ David P. Matthews

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9619 Filed 01/11/18 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's condensed consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter
ended December 27, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           3,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                       672
<INVENTORY>                                     79,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,642
<PP&E>                                         278,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,910
<BONDS>                                        210,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,652
<SALES>                                        234,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,726
<CGS>                                          203,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   206
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    55.73                                
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    55.73
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      99.3**











CITIBANK
      CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST I





SERVICING
      OFFICER CERTIFICATE





The
      undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Citibank (South Dakota),
      National Association, as Servicer (the "Bank"), pursuant to a Pooling and
      Servicing Agreement dated as of May 29, 1991, as Amended and Restated as of
      October 5, 2001 (as amended and supplemented through the date hereof, the
      "Agreement"), between the Bank, as Seller, Servicer and successor by merger
      to
      Citibank (Nevada), National Association, as Seller, and Deutsche Bank Trust
      Company Americas, as Trustee (the "Trustee"), does hereby certify that:





1.
      The
      Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement. Capitalized
      terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings as set forth
      in
      the Agreement.





2.
      The
      undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the
      Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.





3.
      A
      review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December
      31, 2006 and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my
      supervision.





4.
      Based
      on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in
      all
      material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year
      and
      no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing
      except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.





5.
      The
      following is a description of each default in the performance of the Servicer's
      obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been
      made
      by the Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2006, which description
      sets
      forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken,
      if
      any, by the Servicer to remedy each such default and (iii) the current status
      of
      each such default:





None.








IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 9th
      day
      of March, 2007.








/s/
      Andrew J. Lubliner


___________________________


Andrew
      J.
      Lubliner


Servicing
      Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Clair R. Hipkins,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04348-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9984 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sabra L. Vaughn,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04391-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9921 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 1