alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      BUILDING ONE SERVICES CORPORATION
                     COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
               (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                     Three Months Ended       
                                                                          March 31,           
                                                                    1999            1998      
                                                                -------------   ------------- 
<S>                                                             <C>             <C>           
Basic earnings per share:                                                                     
   Net income................................................    $    14,733     $     5,081  
   Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic...............     45,973,455      32,987,273  
                                                                 -----------     -----------  
   Net income per share - Basic..............................    $      0.32     $      0.15  
                                                                 ===========     ===========  
Diluted earnings per share:                                                                   
   Net income................................................    $    14,733     $     5,081  
                                                                 -----------     -----------  
   Weighted average shares outstanding - Basic...............     45,973,455      32,987,273  
   Convertible Non-Voting Common Stock.......................            --          500,000  
   Common stock equivalents from stock options and warrants..        277,080         588,603  
   Contingently issuable shares..............................      1,490,423             --   
                                                                 -----------     -----------  
   Total weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted.......     47,740,958      34,075,876  
                                                                 -----------     -----------  
   Net income per share - Diluted............................    $      0.31     $      0.15  
                                                                 ===========     ===========  
</TABLE> 


Outstanding stock options and warrants to purchase 5,974,775 shares of common
stock as of March 31, 1999 were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because the options' exercise prices were greater than the
average market price of the common shares during the period.
Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement of Post-Effective Amendment No.
1 on Form S-8 (No. 333-29407), the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.
333-45321), and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-66779) of Accent
Color Sciences, Inc. of our report dated March 22, 2000 appearing on page 21 of
this Form 10-K.






/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
--------------------------------------

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

March 29, 2000
--------------








                                       41
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Geoworks  Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended  March 31,  2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Mark E.  Schwarz,
Principal  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Mark E. Schwarz
-------------------
Mark E. Schwarz
Principal Executive Officer
August 12, 2004
```
Return
      to Main Document


**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the quarterly report of Mexoro Minerals Ltd.. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Tracy
      A.
      Moore, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company's financial position and results of
      operations.











By:
                /S/
                Tracy A. MooreTracy
                Moore, Chief Financial Officer




January
      16,
      2007
EXHIBIT 23.2



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-27141) of IOS Capital, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated October 25, 1999, except for the first
sentence of the fourth paragraph of note 5, as to which the date is December 9, 1999, with respect to the financial statements of IOS Capital, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30, 2001, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

December 21, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Gerard Poliquin, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Gerard Poliquin,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-24961 Filed 10-16-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert F. Mahek,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00086-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Saunders & Walker, PA

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/11/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9745 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9745 Filed 01/19/18 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         309,590
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               476,173
<PP&E>                                         590,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,142,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          176,808
<BONDS>                                        764,011
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       101,518
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,142,803
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,711
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,062
<EPS-BASIC>                                     111.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   110.12


</TABLE>
Note: Administrator may delegate direct reports to Deputy Administrator at his/her discretion.

* Center functional office directors report to Agency functional AA or Chief. Deputy and below report to Center leadership. 

** NMO oversees the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and other Federally Funded Research and Development Center work 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

November	2015	

Human Exploration 

and Operations 

Mission Directorate 

Chief, Safety and 

Mission Assurance 

Kennedy Space 

Center 

Marshall Space 

Flight Center 

Langley Research 

Center 

Stennis Space 

Center 

Johnson Space 

Center 

Armstrong Flight 

Research Center 

Goddard Space 

Flight Center 

Glenn Research 

Center 

Jet Propulsion 

Laboratory 

Ames Research 

Mission Support Center 

Directorate 

Administrator 

Deputy Administrator 

Associate Administrator 

Chief of Staff 

Deputy Associate Administrator 

Associate Deputy Administrator 

Associate Administrator for Strategy 

 and Plans

Chief Engineer 

Chief Health and 

Medical Officer 

Chief Financial Officer* 

Chief Information Officer* 

Chief Scientist 

Chief Technologist 

Diversity and Equal 

Opportunity 

Legislative and 

Intergovernmental Affairs* 

International and 

Interagency Relations 

Education Communications* 

Small Business 

Programs 

Advisory Groups 

NAC and ASAP 

Inspector General 

Human Capital Management 

Strategic Infrastructure 

Headquarters Operations 

NASA Shared Services Center 

Procurement 

Protective Services 

Aeronautics 

Research Mission 

Directorate 

www.nasa.gov 

Repor&ng		Structure	

Administrator	

Associate	Administrator	

Space Technology 

Mission Directorate 

Office of Strategy 

and Policy 

Office of Agency 

Council Staff 

NASA Management 

Office** 

General Counsel 

Science Mission 

Directorate
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Peabodys Coffee Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in
the capacities and on the date indicted below,  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:


     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          materials  respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
          of the Company.



August 19, 2003                By: /s/ Todd Tkachuk
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Todd Tkachuk
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Chief Financial Officer
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.

EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES



The following is a list of all Subsidiaries of Trico
Marine Services, Inc. (the "Parent").



|Company                                  | Ownership                                                                    | Jurisdiction of
      Incorporation
|---------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------
|Trico Marine Assets, Inc.                | 100% owned by Parent                                                         | Delaware                           
|Trico Marine Operators, Inc.             | 100% owned by Parent                                                         | Louisiana                          
|Trico Marine International, Ltd.         | 100% owned by Parent                                                         | Cayman Islands                     
|Trico Marine International Holdings B.V. | 100% owned by Parent                                                         | Netherlands                        
|Trico Marine International, Inc.         | 100% owned by Trico Marine Assets, Inc.                                      | Louisiana                          
|Trico Supply ASA                         | 100% owned by Trico Marine
      International Holdings B.V.                 | Norway                             
|Trico Shipping AS                        | 100% owned by Trico Supply ASA                                               | Norway                             
|Trico Supply (UK) Limited                | 100% owned by Trico Supply ASA                                               | England and Wales                  
|Albyn Marine Limited                     | 100% owned by Trico Supply (UK) Limited                                      | England and Wales                  
|Trico Servicos Maritimos Ltda.           | 99.99% owned by Parent and 0.01%
      owned by Trico Marine Operators, Inc. | Brazil
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PERNELL MCKINLEY MORRIS.

September 25, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 4, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135649 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135649 COA: 271442 St. Clair CC: 05-002683-FC 05-002854-FC DARRYL VON JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 27, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0528 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 4, 2008

Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"LaToya Dean","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/latoya-d-deannasa-gov\/","title":"SLS Core Stage Installation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3RSODq79M6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-dsc_2492\/\">SLS Core Stage Installation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-dsc_2492\/embed\/#?secret=3RSODq79M6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“SLS Core Stage Installation” — NASA\" data-secret=\"3RSODq79M6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/DSC_2492\/DSC_2492~large.jpg?w=600&h=1280&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1280}
## United States Court of App eals
F O R T H E E I G H T H C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 10 37

__ __ __ __ __ _ Fred Mo or e, *
* App el la nt , *
* App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ct Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn * Dis tri ct of M is so ur i. USA 80 0, i n i ts off

ic ia l ca pa ci ty; Tom * Dav is , in hi s o ffi ci al an d i nd iv id ua l * [UNPUBLISHED] cap aci ty; Dan Lak e, in hi s o ffi ci al *
an d i nd iv id ua l ca pa ci ty; Tracy * Hatf ie ld , in he r of

fic ia l an d i nd iv id ua l * cap aci ty, *
* App el le es
. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: Ju ly 3, 20 12 Fi le d: Ju ly 11, 2 01 2

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re BYE, COLLOTON, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.

Fred Mo or e fil ed a no ti ce o f ap pe al de si gn at in g v ari ou s i nt erl oc ut or y di st ric t
co ur t or de rs in hi s pe nd in g em pl oym en t di sc riminat io n act io n. Howev er, th e no ti ce 1

The Hon or ab le Sco tt O. W rig ht , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.of ap pe al is un ti m el y as to m os t of th e or de rs , Mo or e is no t ap pe a l i n g f r o m a fin al

or de r as req ui red fo r juri sd ic ti on un de r 28 U.S.C. § 12 91 , a nd we can fin d no ba si s up on whi ch to en te rta in an in te rlo cu to ry ap pe al

. See Kas su el ke v. All ia nt Tech sys., In c., 22 3 F.3 d 92 9, 93 0- 31 (8 th Ci r. 20 00 ). Acco rd in gl y , we di sm is s th is ap pe al fo r la ck of ju ris di ct io n.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-