alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-QSB filed by Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. (the
Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein. The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



|                   |  |                             |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | GREAT PEE DEE BANCORP, INC.
|                   |  |                            
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ Herbert W. Watts   
|                   |  |                             |  | Herbert W. Watts       
|                   |  |                             |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  |                            
|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | By:                         |  | /s/ John M. Digby      
|                   |  |                             |  | John M. Digby          
|                   |  |                             |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Great Pee Dee Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.15

Fingerhut Master Trust  Officer's Certificate Regarding Exhibit G to the Amended and Restated  Pooling and Servicing Agreement  May 12, 2003

The undersigned, being an officer of The Bank of New York (Delaware), hereby certifies that The Bank of New York (Delaware), as trustee (the "Trustee") for the
Fingerhut Master Trust, hereby acknowledges that Exhibit G to the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 18, 1998, by and among Fingerhut
Receivables, Inc., as Transferor, FMT Services, Inc., as Servicer, and the Trustee is as described below:

FORM OF ATTESTATION PROCEDCURES

The
Servicer shall cause to have a report from the Servicer's independent public accountant that the Servicer's maintained effective controls over the servicing and financial reporting procedures
provided by FMT to the Trust based on its compliance with the following items:

---

| |  | FMT SERVICES, INC.
| |  | ------------------
| |  | By:               

|ACCEPTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:                                                             |  |                                                                                
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee |  |                                                                                
|By:                                                                                    |  | /s/CATHERINE CERILLESName:    Catherine Cerilles
Title:Assistant Vice President

---

QuickLinks
Case 2:15-mj-01665-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01665-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/09/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01665-JFM Document 4 Filed 09/09/15 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sheila Watson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04788-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Burnett Law Firm

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/29/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9581 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9581 Filed 01/11/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 15 Heads Home to Earth","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"n4DHGdNN9H\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-15-heads-home-to-earth\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 15 Heads Home to Earth<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-15-heads-home-to-earth\/embed\/#?secret=n4DHGdNN9H\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 15 Heads Home to Earth” — NASA\" data-secret=\"n4DHGdNN9H\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/apollo_15_return_to_earth_1_tsiolkovsky_from_orbital_mapping_camera_as15-m-0757-sm_0.jpg?w=506","thumbnail_width":506,"thumbnail_height":506}
POWER OF ATTORNEY
                              
                              
                              
                              
     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the
undersigned does hereby appoint and constitute Richard J.
Coburn and Charles E. Buchheit and each of them as his agent
and attorney-in-fact to execute in his name, place and stead
(whether on behalf of the undersigned individually or as an
officer or director of Accent Color Sciences, Inc. or
otherwise) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Accent Color
Sciences, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998
an any and all amendements thereto and to file such Form 10-
K and any such amendment thereto with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.  Each of the said attorneys shall have
the power to act hereunder with or without the other.
   IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this
instrument this 22nd day of March, 1999.



/s/ Joseph T. Brophy
Joseph T. Brophy


/s/ Charles E. Buchheit
Charles E. Buchheit


/s/ Richard J. Coburn
Richard J. Coburn


/s/ Richard Hodgson
Richard Hodgson


/s/ Norman L. Milliard
Norman L. Milliard


/s/ Willard F. Pinney, Jr.
Willard F. Pinney, Jr.


/s/ Robert H. Steele
Robert H. Steele
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES LONNIE MCCOY.

May 8, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,347
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,270
<PP&E>                                           3,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,669
<BONDS>                                         16,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,941
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,395
<OTHER-SE>                                    (42,373)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,696
<SALES>                                          9,687
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,687
<CGS>                                            3,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,561
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  66
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,049)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,049)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,049)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ARBOR COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; ARBOR COMPANY, A NEVADA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; DARRELL JAMES GUZY, SR.; AND MARCIA 0. GUZY,

Appellants. vs. MARY ANN GUZY; AND MARK GUZY,

Respondents. No. 69371



# FILED APR 2 6 2016

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Cause appearing, appellants' motion for a voluntary dismissal of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. CLERK 

### OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K 

### LINDEMAN BY: 

### Al

i f
cc: Hon. Nathan Tod Young, District Judge Lansford Levitt, Settlement Judge Bowen Hall Guardian Law Group Heritage Law Group, PC Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Van Tassel Law Firm Douglas County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER
(0).- 1947 e 

# RP

- 1?)1 1

# I
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Brad Wolfe, certify that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 of FalconStor Software, Inc.;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June 23, 2020 | /s/ Brad Wolfe                                               
|------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Brad Wolfe                                                   
|                    | Chief Financial Officer
        (principal financial officer)
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of REGI U.S., Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G.
Robertson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | I have reviewed the Report;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by the Report; and
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|3. | based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
      other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash
      flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
      Report.                      

Date: August 7, 2008

/s/ John G. RobertsonJohn G. Robertson, President
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

---
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 2409

GREGORY G. WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. ( Tax Ct. No. 032187

- 15 )

Submitted : May 2 3 , 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING , AGEE , and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Gregory G. Williams , Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs , David Arthur Hubbert , Randolph Lyons Hutter , Tax Division, U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C. , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory G. Williams appeals the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of deficiencies and penalties with respect to Williams’ 2012 and 2013 federal income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma paupe ris and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the tax court. Williams v. Comm’r , Tax Ct. No. 032187

- 15 (U.S. Tax Ct. Nov. 18, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials b efore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                CONSENT OF NOVOGRADAC & COMPANY LLP, INDEPENDENT
                        REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
pertaining  to the  Supplemental  Stock Option Plan,  including  Amendment No. 1
(Form S-8 No. 333-09569),  the 1994 Stock Plan,  including  Amendment No.1 (Form
S-8 Nos. 333-39863,  333-66091 and 333-72678), the Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
including  Amendment  No. 1 (Form S-8 Nos.  333-66091 and  333-72678),  the 1997
Supplemental Stock Plan,  including Amendment No. 1 (Form S-8 Nos. 333-23901 and
333-66091), the Registration Statement,  including Amendment No. 1 thereto (Form
S-3 No. 333-24097) and in the related prospectus of Geoworks Corporation for the
registration of 1,282,754 common shares,  and the  Registration  Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-50746) and in the related prospectus of Geoworks Corporation for the
registration  of 3,377,437  common shares of our report dated June 5, 2004, with
respect  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Geoworks  Corporation
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2004.

                                        /s/ Novogradac & Company, LLP

Roswell, Georgia
August 10, 2004
```
EXHIBIT 12.01

CERTIFICATION

I, Roger A. Rached, Chief Executive Officer of International Hi-Tech Industries Inc., certify that:

(1) 	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of International Hi-Tech Industries Inc.;

(2) 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) 	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) 	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) 	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) 	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) 	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) 	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) 	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  

Date:   	June 30, 2005

/s/ Roger A. Rached
Exhibit 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the  incorporation by reference in  Post-Effective  Amendment
No. 1 to  Registration  Statement No. 33-55185 of Ferrellgas  Partners,  L.P. on
Form S-4 of our reports dated September 14, 1999, appearing in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. for the year ended July 31, 1999.

     We  also  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration  Statement No. 33-55185 of Ferrellgas  Partners,
L.P.  on Form S-4 of our  report on  Ferrellgas  Partners  Finance  Corp.  dated
September  14, 1999,  appearing in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Ferrellgas
Partners, L.P. for the year ended July 31, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
October 28, 1999
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.’s 33-80435, 333-38883, 333-56493 and 333-84871) of ITT Educational Services, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statementschedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Indianapolis, Indiana 

February 23, 2006