alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Ron Hadani, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in the report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   |            | /s/ Ron Hadani          |   |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Dated: | August 12, 2005 | Ron Hadani              |
|   |            | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAUREL MICHELLE SCHLEMMER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 444 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL SANTUCCI.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 15



                           ACCOUNTANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT


We  acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form  S-3  (filed  in  October  2000  and  March  2001) and  Form  S-8 (filed in
November  1997)  of  Penn  Octane Corporation of our report dated August 3, 2005
which  appears  on  page  3  of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended  June  30,  2005.


                             /s/  BURTON MCCUMBER & CORTEZ, L.L.P.


Brownsville, Texas
August 19, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"Astronaut Bob Hines","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uuzfHYMJyD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/bobhines-fon-52257560772-244c61aeef-k\/\">Astronaut Bob Hines<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/bobhines-fon-52257560772-244c61aeef-k\/embed\/#?secret=uuzfHYMJyD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Astronaut Bob Hines” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uuzfHYMJyD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/bobhines-fon-52257560772-244c61aeef-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**eMAGIN
      CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of eMagin Corporation (the Company) on
      Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary W. Jones, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      eMagin Corporation and will be retained by eMagin Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











**eMAGIN
                CORPORATION**Date:
                November 14, 2005By:
            /s/  Gary
                JonesGary
                Jones*Chief
                Executive Officer and President*
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 134776 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 134776 COA: 276122 Wayne CC: 89-010455-01 PHILIP SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 17, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Tabor","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/astabor\/","title":"NASA Helps Emerging Space Companies \u2018Take the Heat\u2019","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8oPH8ob11f\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-helps-emerging-space-companies-take-the-heat\/\">NASA Helps Emerging Space Companies \u2018Take the Heat\u2019<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-helps-emerging-space-companies-take-the-heat\/embed\/#?secret=8oPH8ob11f\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Helps Emerging Space Companies \u2018Take the Heat\u2019” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8oPH8ob11f\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/varda-capsule-with-parachute.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### Jay GRIFFITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan PERKINS, in his official capacity; City of Sanger Texas, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-40212.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 2, 2005.

Jay Griffith, Denton, TX, pro se.

Paul King Pearce, Jr., Robert Jacob Davis, Matthews, Carlton, Stein, Shiels, Pearce, Dunn & Knott, Dallas, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jay Griffith was issued a speeding ticket by Jonathan Perkins, a police officer for the City of Sanger, Texas (the City). Griffith filed suit against Perkins and the City alleging that Perkins violated his constitutional rights by acting as a police officer without having filed the necessary oath of office with the Secretary of State of Texas. The district court dismissed the claims against Perkins, granted summary judgment in favor of the City, and awarded the City attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Griffith contests that award.

The district court granted summary judgment against Griffith because he failed to present a prima facie case. Griffith’s appeal of the summary judgment was dismissed for failure to prosecute. *Griffith v. Perkins,*No. 03-41040 (5th Cir. Nov. 4, 2003) (unpublished) The district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to the City because Griffith failed to present a prima facie case of liability by the City. *See Myers v. City of West Monroe,*211 F.3d 289, 293 (5th Cir. 2000).

Griffith argues that the district court made an evidentiary error in awarding attorney’s fees because the fee information was not submitted by a valid affidavit. This claim is raised for the first time on appeal and will not be considered. *Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co.,*183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir.1999).

The ruling of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4757

To designate the North/South Center as the Dante B. Fascell North-South

Center.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 1998

Mr. GILMAN (for himself, Mr. HAMILTON, Mr. BEREUTER, Mr. LANTOS, Mr.

SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. BERMAN, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mrs. MEEK of

Florida, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida,

Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, Mr. MICA, Mr. YOUNG of Florida,

and Mr. WEXLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on International Relations

A BILL

To designate the North/South Center as the Dante B. Fascell

North-South Center.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NORTH/SOUTH CENTER AS

4 THE DANTE B. FASCELL NORTH-SOUTH CEN5 TER.

6 Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization

7 Act, Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993 (22 U.S.C. 2075) is

8 amended—
2

•HR 4757 IH

1 (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the

2 following:

3 ‘‘(a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the

4 ‘‘Dante B. Fascell North-South Center Act of 1991’’;

5 (2) in subsection (c)—

6 (A) by amending the section heading to

7 read as follows: ‘‘DANTE B. FASCELL NORTH8 SOUTH CENTER.—’’; and

9 (B) by striking ‘‘known as the North/

10 South Center,’’ and inserting which shall be

11 known and designated as the Dante B. Fascell

12 North-South Center,’’; and

13 (3) in subsection (d) by striking ‘‘North/South

14 Center’’ and inserting ‘‘Dante B. Fascell North15 South Center’’.

16 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

17 (a) CENTER.—Any reference in any other provision

18 of law to the educational institution in Florida known as

19 the North/South Center shall be deemed to be a reference

20 to the ‘‘Dante B. Fascell North-South Center’’.

21 (b) SHORT TITLE.—Any reference in any other provi22 sion of law to the North/South Center Act of 1991 shall

23 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dante B. Fascell

24 North/South Center Act of 1991’’.

Æ
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 249

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of the 

surviving spouse of a deceased veteran after age 55 shall not result 

in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable to that surviving spouse. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2003

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mrs. HUTCHISON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that 

remarriage of the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran 

after age 55 shall not result in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation otherwise payable to 

that surviving spouse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RETENTION OF DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY 

4 COMPENSATION FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES 

5 REMARRYING AFTER AGE 55. 

6 (a) EXCEPTION TO TERMINATION OF BENEFITS

7 UPON REMARRIAGE.—Section 103(d)(2)(B) of title 38, 
2

•S 249 IS 

1 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘1311 or’’ 

2 after ‘‘under section’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) shall take effect on—

5 (1) the first day of the first month that begins 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act; or 

7 (2) the first day of the fiscal year that begins 

8 in the calendar year in which this Act is enacted, if 

9 later than the date specified in paragraph (1). 

10 (c) RETROACTIVE BENEFITS PROHIBITED.—No ben11 efit may be paid to any person by reason of the amend12 ment made by subsection (a) for any period before the 

13 effective date specified in subsection (b).

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","title":"Mars 2020 Heat Shield Arc Jet Testing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"43VrCAcw7m\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pica_top_2-2\/\">Mars 2020 Heat Shield Arc Jet Testing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/pica_top_2-2\/embed\/#?secret=43VrCAcw7m\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Mars 2020 Heat Shield Arc Jet Testing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"43VrCAcw7m\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/pica_top_2.gif?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6488

DEMARCUS M. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRETT EDMONDS; N. COMER; DANIEL BRAXTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District

Judge. (CA-03-132-7)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demarcus M. Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Demarcus M. Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Edmonds, No. CA03-132-7 (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 25, 2003 & entered Feb. 26, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR DELCO REMY INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,455
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,054
<INVENTORY>                                    198,871
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               403,219
<PP&E>                                         214,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 722,146
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          168,501
<BONDS>                                        423,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   722,146
<SALES>                                        232,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               232,785
<CGS>                                          191,013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  191,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,388
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,388
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>