alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dylan Connell","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbconne1\/","title":"A Home for Astronauts around the Moon","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ZZfE8SbVi9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/a-home-for-astronauts-around-the-moon\/\">A Home for Astronauts around the Moon<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/a-home-for-astronauts-around-the-moon\/embed\/#?secret=ZZfE8SbVi9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Home for Astronauts around the Moon” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ZZfE8SbVi9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/halo-shell-illuminatedorig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,827
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,150
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,827
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,055)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2476

To amend the USA PATRIOT Act to repeal the sunsets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2004

Mr. KYL (for himself, Mr. MILLER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. 

CHAMBLISS, Mr. GRAHAM of South Carolina, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the USA PATRIOT Act to repeal the sunsets.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF USA PATRIOT ACT SUNSETS. 

4 Section 224 of the USA PATRIOT Act (18 U.S.C. 

5 2510 note) is repealed.

Æ
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PETER FOSTER.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 254

AN ACT

To revise the boundary of the Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau National

Historical Park in the State of Hawaii, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau

5 National Historical Park Addition Act of 2003’’.
 †

2

S 254 ES

1 SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO KALOKO–HONOKO ̄ HAU NATIONAL

2 HISTORICAL PARK.

3 Section 505(a) of Public Law 95–625 (16 U.S.C.

4 396d(a)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) In order’’ and inserting

6 ‘‘(a)(1) In order’’;

7 (2) by striking ‘‘1978,’’ and all that follows and

8 inserting ‘‘1978.’’; and

9 (3) by adding at the end the following new

10 paragraphs:

11 ‘‘(2) The boundaries of the park are modified

12 to include lands and interests therein comprised of

13 Parcels 1 and 2 totaling 2.14 acres, identified as

14 ‘Tract A’ on the map entitled ‘Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau

15 National Historical Park Proposed Boundary Ad16 justment’, numbered PWR (PISO) 466/82,043 and

17 dated April 2002.

18 ‘‘(3) The maps referred to in this subsection

19 shall be on file and available for public inspection in

20 the appropriate offices of the National Park Serv21 ice.’’.
 †

3

S 254 ES

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

3 as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the Senate March 4, 2003.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 254

AN ACT

To revise the boundary of the Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau

National Historical Park in the State of Hawaii,and for other purposes.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jamie Groh","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jgroh1\/","title":"NOAA\u2019s GOES-U Arrives in Florida for Processing Ahead of Launch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hvAsRS9S0h\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/smd\/joint-agency-satellite-division\/noaa\/noaas-goes-u-arrives-in-florida-for-processing-ahead-of-launch\/\">NOAA\u2019s GOES-U Arrives in Florida for Processing Ahead of Launch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/smd\/joint-agency-satellite-division\/noaa\/noaas-goes-u-arrives-in-florida-for-processing-ahead-of-launch\/embed\/#?secret=hvAsRS9S0h\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NOAA\u2019s GOES-U Arrives in Florida for Processing Ahead of Launch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hvAsRS9S0h\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/ksc-20240123-ph-ilw02-0107.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4846

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction

allowed for interest on education loans.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 15, 1998

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the deduction allowed for interest on education loans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION ALLOWED FOR IN4 TEREST ON EDUCATION LOANS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The table contained in paragraph

6 (1) of section 221(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of

7 1986 (relating to general rule for maximum deduction) is

8 amended to read as follows:

‘‘In the case of taxable years The dollar

beginning in: amount is:

1999 ....................................................................... $2,000

2000 ....................................................................... $3,000
2

•HR 4846 IH

2001 ....................................................................... $4,000

2002 or thereafter ................................................. $5,000.’’.

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply to interest due and paid after De3 cember 31, 1998.

Æ
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Lonnie Ray Swartz, 

 Defendant. 

CR 15-1723-TUC-RCC (DTF)

O R D E R 

CONTINUING PLEA DEADLINE 

AND TRIAL 

 

 This case is presently set for trial on February 21, 2017. The Defendant filed 

a motion to continue and, for the reasons set forth therein, additional time is required 

to adequately prepare for trial. The Government has no objection to a continuance. 

 The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh 

the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial because, for the reasons 

set forth in the motion, failure to grant the continuance is likely to result in a miscarriage 

of justice if the Defendant is required to go to trial on the present trial date. 

 IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The date by which the referred magistrate judge hears the change of plea must 

be no later than June 2, 2017 by 3:00 p.m. 

 2. All motions, unless made during a hearing or trial, shall be in writing and shall 

be made sufficiently in advance of trial to comply with the time periods set forth in 

LRCiv. 7.2 and any court order and to avoid any delays in the trial. Pretrial motions may 

be heard before a magistrate judge and a Report and Recommendation will be provided to 

the district judge assigned to the case. 

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 92 Filed 01/30/17 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 3. This matter is RESET for trial on June 19, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel are to 

be present at 9:00 a.m. 

 4. Excludable delay under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7) is found to commence on 

February 22, 2017 and end on June 19, 2017. Such time shall be in addition to other 

excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act and shall commence as of the day following 

the day that would otherwise be the last day for commencement of trial. 

 5. That any and all subpoenas previously issued shall remain in full force and 

effect through the new trial date. 

 6. Any motion or stipulation to continue the scheduled trial date and change 

of plea deadline shall be filed with the Clerk of Court no later than 5:00 p.m., 

Monday, June 5, 2017. Alternatively, by that same deadline, if after consultation 

between government and defense counsel it is determined that a motion to continue 

the scheduled trial date and change of plea deadline will not be filed, government 

counsel shall notify the Court by an email to the chambers email address that the 

case and counsel are ready to proceed to trial on the scheduled trial date. The 

notification shall also include the estimated number of trial days needed to complete 

the trial.

 Dated this 30th day of January, 2017. 

Case 4:15-cr-01723-RCC-DTF Document 92 Filed 01/30/17 Page 2 of 2
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0
- 0107 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL ALLEN ZEIMER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 14
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 14 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 24 2021

08/24/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0107
#### LAST CHANCE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP, ETC., ET AL. v. THOMAS H. KEAN, ETC., ET AL.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification granted. (See 232 *N.J.Super.*115)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Virginia L. Williams,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03515-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9228 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6238** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GERALD GARDNER , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00619

- JFM

- 1 ; 1:11

- cv - 01904

- JFM )

Submitted : April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Gerald Gardner , Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon , Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prec edent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gerald Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appe alability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) . When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner s atisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gardner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"DC-8 Airborne Laboratory in flight over Mt. Whitney","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6u5ojpLeSF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ec98-44444-007\/\">DC-8 Airborne Laboratory in flight over Mt. Whitney<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amf-ec98-44444-007\/embed\/#?secret=6u5ojpLeSF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“DC-8 Airborne Laboratory in flight over Mt. Whitney” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6u5ojpLeSF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/EC98-44444-007\/EC98-44444-007~large.jpg?w=600&h=1535&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1535}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERTO BOTA VASQUEZ.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
AMENDED CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Power-Save Energy Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis Fox, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


.

















/s/ Louis Fox


By: Louis Fox


Principal Financial Officer





Dated: December 23, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.