alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2258

To revise certain requirements for H–2B employers for fiscal year 2004, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2004

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. CHAMBLISS, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. GREGG, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL

To revise certain requirements for H–2B employers for fiscal 

year 2004, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Summer Operations 

5 and Services (SOS) Relief and Reform Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS ON H–2B WORKERS. 

7 Section 214(g) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following: 
2

•S 2258 IS 

1 ‘‘(9) Any alien who has already been counted, within 

2 the 2 years prior to the approval of a petition for a tem3 porary worker described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(B), 

4 toward the numerical limitations of paragraph (1)(B) shall 

5 not again be counted toward those limitations.’’. 

6 SEC. 3. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY. 

7 The Secretary of Homeland Security may delegate to 

8 the Secretary of Labor, if the Secretary of Labor agrees, 

9 any authority to investigate fraud or misrepresentation on 

10 the part of an alien or an employer in connection with 

11 a visa described in section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(B) of the Im12 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

13 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(B)). 

14 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATES. 

15 This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall 

16 take effect as if enacted on October 1, 2003, and shall 

17 expire on October 1, 2004.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remy International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajesh K. Shah, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|/s/ |  | Rajesh K. Shah              
|   
|    |  | Rajesh K. Shah              
|    |  | Executive Vice President and
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer     











November 4, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Remy International, Inc. and will be retained by Remy International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dacia Massengill","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/daciamassengill-2\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Boeing Starliner Crew Flight Test","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tDx9LyqX21\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/event\/boeing-cst-100-starliner\/\">NASA\u2019s Boeing Starliner Crew Flight Test<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/event\/boeing-cst-100-starliner\/embed\/#?secret=tDx9LyqX21\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Boeing Starliner Crew Flight Test” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tDx9LyqX21\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/boeings-starliner-crew-ship-approaches-the-space-station-52096388014-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9871-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Paragon Group GP Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Paragon Group LP Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Paragon Group L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

Paragon Residential Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Summer Place II Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Summerset Bend Apartments I Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Summer Place Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Parsons Run Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

4th St. Station III Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Fourth Street Station I Associates Limited, a Florida limited partnership

Lookout Pointe Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Lookout Pointe II Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Coco West Associates Limited, a Florida limited partnership

Coco West II Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Greenhouse Associates Limited, a Florida limited partnership

Charlotte Eastchase Associates Limited, a North Carolina limited partnership

Lake George I Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Lake George II Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Southwood Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Landtree Apartments Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Charleston Westchase Associates, a South Carolina limited partnership

Irving Fairlane Associates, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership

Paragon Group-Glen Partners, a North Carolina limited partnership

Paragon-Ott Apartments II, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership

Paragon Group - Spanish Trace Partners, a Missouri general partnership

Paradim Charlotte I L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Paradim Tampa I L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Paradim Dallas I L.P., a Texas limited partnership

Orlando Summer Place Company, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Orlando Landtree Apartments Co., Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Tampa Sheldon Road Apartments II Company, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Sheldon Road Apartments II Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Brandon Parsons Run Company, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Orlando Summer Place III Company, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Charlotte Eastchase Company Limited, a North Carolina limited partnership

Tampa Greenhouse Company Limited, a Florida limited partnership

Irving Fairlane Company, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership

St. Petersburg 4th Street Station Company Limited, a Florida limited partnership

Charleston Westchase Company, a South Carolina limited partnership

St. Petersburg 4th St. Station III Co., Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Tampa Sheldon Road Apartments I Co., Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Tampa Summerset Bend Apartments I Co., Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Sheldon Road Apartments I Associates, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership

Paradim, Inc.

Paradim Greensboro I L.L.C.

Paradim GP Dallas I, Inc.

Paradim LP Dallas I, Inc.
NUMBER 13-22-00274-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

JORGE AGUILAR ZANNATA, Appellant,

V.

PH QUALITY PRODUCE, LLC, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

On June 15, 2022, appellant Jorge Aguilar Zannata filed a notice of appeal 

regarding a final judgment rendered in favor of appellee PH Quality Produce, LLC. On 

June 21, 222, the Clerk of this Court requested appellant to remit the $205.00 filing fee 

for the appeal within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by 
2

statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for 

filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court 

may enforce this rule by any order that is just.”); TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 51.207

(delineating the required fees and costs in an appellate court). Appellant did not pay the 

filing fee.

On July 14, 2022, the Clerk notified appellant that he was delinquent in paying the 

filing fee for the appeal. The Clerk advised appellant that the appeal would be dismissed 

if the filing fee was not paid within ten days. See id. R. 42.3(c). Appellant did not pay the 

filing fee.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal and 

subsequent events, is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed. This Court has 

the authority to dismiss an appeal because the appellant has failed to comply with a 

requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a 

response or other action within a specified time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); Smith v. DC 

Civil Constr., LLC, 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017, no pet.). Here, 

appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the Clerk’s 

directives. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

25th day of August, 2022.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROMEO WEBB.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Stephen E. Tessier,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04365-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9943 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9943 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Marvin Livesay,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04534-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Blankenship Law Firm

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/6/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9462 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9462 Filed 12/28/17 Page 2 of 2
II 

Calendar No. 661 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2673 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1001 Williams Street, Ignacio, Colorado, as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2004 

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JULY 22, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1001 Williams Street, Ignacio, Colorado, as 

the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEONARD C. BURCH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1001 Williams Street, Ignacio, 
2 

•S 2673 RS 

1 Colorado, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Leonard 

2 C. Burch Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 661 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2673 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Ignacio, Colorado, as the ‘‘Leonard C. Burch al Service located at 1001 Williams Street, 

JULY 22, 2004 

Reported without amendment
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2775

For the relief of Raheela Naz Khan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2004

Mr. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Raheela Naz Khan.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RAHEELA 

4 NAZ KHAN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Raheela Naz Khan shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 
2

•S 2775 IS 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Raheela Naz Khan 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Raheela Naz Khan shall be consid4 ered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be 

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enact7 ment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Raheela Naz Khan, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of birth of Raheela Naz Khan under section 

20 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli21 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of birth of Raheela Naz 

23 Khan under section 202(e) of that Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Sheila Ann Casino, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03989-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Law Office Of Christopher K Johnston LLC 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8796 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8796 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEFAN MARTALICS.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.