alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"60 Years Ago: NASA Selects Its Third Group of Astronauts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Mso1hZ0V2i\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/60-years-ago-nasa-selects-its-third-group-of-astronauts\/\">60 Years Ago: NASA Selects Its Third Group of Astronauts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/60-years-ago-nasa-selects-its-third-group-of-astronauts\/embed\/#?secret=Mso1hZ0V2i\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“60 Years Ago: NASA Selects Its Third Group of Astronauts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Mso1hZ0V2i\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/group-3-1-group-photo-s63-18765.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":302}
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

_______________________________

06-19-00254-CR

_______________________________

LAWRENCE MORGAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17F0521-005

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the reporter’s record and the clerk’s record indicates that they contain 

“sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home address, and the name 

of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” TEX.R. APP. P. 9.10(a)(3). 

The clerk’s record and volumes three, four, and five of the reporter’s record contain the name of a 

person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a 

court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any 

appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b).

Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper 

form or electronic form, without redaction.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the 

clerk’s record and volumes three, four, and five of the reporter’s record contain sensitive data, we 

order the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the 

electronically filed clerk’s record and volumes three, four, and five of the reporter’s record. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: August 31, 2020
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"474669main-boeing-sunrise-1083×812","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"q1k6RpDdnF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/474669main-boeing-sunrise-1083x812\/\">474669main-boeing-sunrise-1083×812<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/474669main-boeing-sunrise-1083x812\/embed\/#?secret=q1k6RpDdnF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“474669main-boeing-sunrise-1083×812” — NASA\" data-secret=\"q1k6RpDdnF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/474669main-boeing-sunrise-1083x812-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Woodberry, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 613]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 7, 1991 *(People v Wood-berry,*176 AD2d 770 [1991]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 15, 1989.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., S. Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24905]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Certification Notice--226]


Notice of Filing of Self-Certification of Coal Capability Under 
the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION:  Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On September 5, 2014, Panda Liberty LLC, as owner and 
operator of a new base load electric generating plant, submitted a coal 
capability self-certification to the Department of Energy (DOE) 
pursuant to Sec.  201(d) of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act 
of 1978 (FUA), as amended, and DOE regulations in 10 CFR 501.60, 61. 
FUA and regulations thereunder require DOE to publish a notice of 
filing of self-certification in the Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 8311(d) 
and 10 CFR 501.61(c).

ADDRESSES:  Copies of coal capability self-certification filings are 
available for public inspection, upon request, in the Office of 
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Mail Code OE-20, Room 8G-
024, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586-
5260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Title II of FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 
et seq.), provides that no new base load electric powerplant may be 
constructed or operated without the capability to use coal or another 
alternate fuel as a primary energy source. Pursuant to FUA in order to 
meet the requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such 
a facility proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) 
prior to construction, or prior to operation as a base load electric 
powerplant, that such powerplant has the capability to use coal or 
another alternate fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with 
FUA section 201(a) as of the date it is filed with the Secretary. 42 U. 
S. C. 8311.
    The following owner of a proposed new base load electric powerplant 
has filed a self-certification of coal-capability with DOE pursuant to 
FUA section 201(d) and in accordance with DOE regulations in 10 CFR 
501.60, 61:

Owner: Panda Liberty LLC
Capacity: 829 megawatts (MW)
Plant Location: Towanda, PA
In-Service Date: March 5, 2016

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 10, 2014.
Brian Mills,
Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2014-24905 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### The Acme Mortgage & Investment Co., Appellee, *v.*Bachelor, Jr., et al., Appellants.

(No. 1924

Decided February 20, 1947.)

*418
      *Mr. Harold E. Smock,*for appellee.

*Mr. J eróme T. Miller,*for appellants.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion of the plaintiff, appellee herein, for an order dismissing the appeal of defendants, appellants herein, on the ground that (1) the appellants have failed to file briefs or assignmeiTts of error as provided by Rule VII; (2) because of an insufficient or inadequate appeal bond; and (3) for want of prosecution.

In the notice of appeal it is stated that ‘ ‘ said appeal is on questions of law and fact.” Rule VII controls appeals on questions of law, and has no application to appeals on questions of law and fact.

In the entry fixing the appeal bond there is a recital that the appellants had deposited one hundred and nineteen ($119) dollars with the clerk of courts and the court thereupon fixed the appeal bond at one hundred ($100) dollars. The record shows that in addition to the one hundred and nineteen ($119) dollars, which had already been deposited, the appellants complied with the order of the court and deposited an additional one hundred ($100) dollars. If it is contended that this bond is insufficient, appellee should file a motion under Section 12223-16, General Code. On the state of the record the court cannot order a dismissal of the appeal.

The notice of appeal having been filed on December 13, 1946, and Rule VII not being applicable, it does not appear that there has been a want of prosecution which would justify a dismissal.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal will be overruled.

*Motion overruled.*

Wiseman, P. J., Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
PERIODIC REPORT I, Jeff S. Potter, president and chief executive
officer of Frontier Airlines Holdings, Inc. (the Company), certify pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1)
  the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for
  the year ended  March 31, 2006 (the
  Report) fully complies with the
  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
  the information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
  of  operations of the Company.  Dated: May 26, 2006
  /s/ Jeff S. PotterJeff S. PotterPresident and CEO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jarvis A. Griffin,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00132-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Office Of Christopher K Johnston LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/12/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9803 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9803 Filed 01/25/18 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT FLATH, JR.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

KENNETH EMIL MEYERS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 611 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Exhibit 10.6


 


MOUNTAIN CREST ACQUISITION CORP. III

311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor

New York, NY 10036


 


[_______], 2021


 


Mountain Crest Holdings III LLC

311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor

New York, NY 10036


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm our
agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement (the “Registration
Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Mountain Crest Acquisition
Corp. III (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial
business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date
hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”), Mountain Crest Holdings III LLC (“Sponsor”)
shall make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial and administrative services as may be required by the Company from
time to time, situated at 311 West 43rd Street, 12th Floor, New York, NY 10036 (or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the
Company shall pay Sponsor a sum not to exceed $10,000 per month, respectively, on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter
until the Termination Date. Sponsor hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies
that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established by the Company for the
benefit of the Company’s public stockholders upon the consummation of the IPO as described in the Registration Statement (“Claim”)
and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with
the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	MOUNTAIN CREST ACQUISITION CORP. III
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Suying Liu
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer


  


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	MOUNTAIN CREST HOLDINGS III LLC	 
	 	 
	By: 	 	 
	Name:	Suying Liu	 
	Title:	Member
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 99-8015

WASTE MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

ROBERT MOWBRAY, ON HIS OWN BEHALF AND ON 

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,

Respondent.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 31, 2000 is

corrected as follows:

On page 20, lines 1-3, delete the sentence that begins

"Eisen may place . . ."

On page 20, line 3, delete "Nor does" and insert "does not"

after "fairly read," and before "foreclose".

On page 20, line 6, insert "the Court's subsequent opinion

in" before "General Telephone".
Exhibit 99.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Danka Business Systems PLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, P. Lang Lowrey, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | 
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                        |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|/s/ P.LANGLOWREY                                        |  |  | 
|                                                        |  |  | 
|P. Lang Lowrey Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14,
2002 |  |  |
#### Phillip Thurmond *v.*N. R. Black.

Set Off — Counter Claim — Statutes of Limitation.

The statutes of limitation may run against a set off but not against a counter claim.

APPEAL FROM CRITTENDEN CIRCUIT COURT.

November 21, 1867.

Harlan, *for appellant.-*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

As Black owed Thurmond on notes, when he rendered the professional services established by the evidence, the value of those services should be applied to the payment of said debts, regardless of the statute of limitations set up by appellant to appellee’s set-off and counter claim. But as the statute of limitations does bar a recovery on appellee’s set-off, no judgment should be rendered in his behalf thereon.

The judgment being in accordance with these views, it is affirmed, both on the original and cross appeal.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Donald F. Detampel, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Raindance
Communications, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: August 9, 2004 /s/ Donald F. Detampel, Jr.