alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
3.1(i)
 CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 FIVE
STAR PRODUCTS, INC.
 (as
amended)
 
 1.           The
name of the corporation is FIVE STAR PRODUCTS, INC.
 
 2.           The
address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is
Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of
Wilmington, County of New Castle.  The name of its registered agent at
such address is The Corporation Trust Company.
 
 3.           The
nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted is to engage in
any lawful act or activity for which the corporation may be organized under the
General Corporation Law of Delaware.
 
 4.           The
Corporation shall have authority to issue a total of Thirty Million One Hundred
Thousand (30,100,000) shares of stock consisting of Thirty Million (30,000,000)
shares of Common  Stock, par value $.01 per share and one hundred
thousand (100,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per
share.
 
 5.           The
board of directors is authorized to make, alter or repeal the by-laws of the
corporation.  Election of directors need not be by written
ballot.
 
 6.           The
name and mailing address of the sole incorporator is:
 
 M. A. Brzoska
 1209 Orange Street
 Wilmington,
Delaware 19801
 
 7.           A
director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to the corporation or
its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director
except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the
corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for  acts or omissions not in
good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv)
for any transaction from which the director derived any improper personal
benefit.
 
 8.           The
corporation shall indemnify its officers, directors, employees and agents to the
extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of Delaware.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2847 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2847

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
        To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH.

    (a) General Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 104(f)(1) of 
the Water Resources Research Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(f)(1)) is 
amended by striking ``$9,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, $10,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and $12,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2004 and 2005'' and inserting ``$12,000,000 for the period of 
fiscal years 2005 through 2008 and $13,000,000 for the period of fiscal 
years 2009 and 2010''.
    (b) Appropriations for Research Focused on Water Problems of 
Interstate Nature.--Section 104(g)(1) of the Water Resources Research 
Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10303(g)(1)) is amended by striking ``$3,000,000 
for fiscal year 2001, $4,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 and 2003, and 
$6,000,000 for fiscal years 2004 and 2005'' and inserting ``$6,000,000 
for the period of fiscal years 2005 through 2008 and $7,000,000 for the 
period of fiscal years 2009 and 2010''.

            Passed the Senate October 11, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2847

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

        To reauthorize the Water Resources Research Act of 1984.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Thomas C. Stacey, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03495-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8804 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8804 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"Amazonian Leaders Visit “Space for Earth”","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uBKzOxKlCo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amazonian-leaders-discuss-using-nasa-data-to-protect-the-amazon\/\">Amazonian Leaders Visit “Space for Earth”<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/amazonian-leaders-discuss-using-nasa-data-to-protect-the-amazon\/embed\/#?secret=uBKzOxKlCo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Amazonian Leaders Visit “Space for Earth”” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uBKzOxKlCo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/53338630408-71a4da967c-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":509}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000922521
<NAME>                        Network Peripherals Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         23,523
<SECURITIES>                                   22,350
<RECEIVABLES>                                   9,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,154)
<INVENTORY>                                     8,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5,399
<PP&E>                                          8,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,869)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 71,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,577
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           12
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                     59,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   71,434
<SALES>                                        53,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               53,080
<CGS>                                          28,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               37,529
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,294)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      608
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,902)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.01)
        


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-97","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fzQbXR3oe7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-97\/\">STS-97<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-97\/embed\/#?secret=fzQbXR3oe7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-97” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fzQbXR3oe7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getty Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 12, 2007



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/    JONATHAN D. KLEIN              
|Jonathan D. Klein                     
|Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lavette Jackson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00288-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Offices of Lawrence S. Paikoff

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 9/21/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9887 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9887 Filed 02/01/18 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of ITT Educational Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Daniel M. Fitzpatrick

Chief Financial Officer

February 23, 2007
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

DANNY E. BEAUCLAIR, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARK NORRIS, eye doctor, in his 

individual and official capacity; DAVID 

MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional 

Facility, in his individual and official 

capacity; RAY ROBERTS, Secretary of 

Corrections for Kansas Department of 

Corrections, in his individual and official 

capacity, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-3194

(D.C. No. 5:12-CV-03189-SAC)

(D. Kan.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

3.3(B) and 10th Cir. R. 42.1. Appellee Norris’ Motion to Dismiss is denied as moot.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 26, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-3194 Document: 01019405688 Date Filed: 03/26/2015 Page: 1
#### George Kaye *v.*Henry Duncan.

Lease — Contract of Landlord and Tenant — Improvements.

A lease containing that the lessee should “keep $2,000 insured on the premises for the exclusive benefit of the lessor, during its continuance,” held to mean that $2,000 was the amount of improvements kept on the premises by the landlord, and the tenant, in a final settlement should account therefor.

APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

February 3, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

January 1, 1856, Fred A. Kaye, appellant’s deceased father, leased to appellee a house and lot in Louisville for thirteen years, at an annual rent, payable quarterly, of three hundred dollars for first eight years and four hundred the remaining five years, also a bonus of $200 cash paid and $62.50 back rents on Metcalf’s lease.

The lessee was to “keep *two thousand dollars insured*on the premises for the *exclusive benefit*of the. party of the first part during the continuance of the lease, the party of the first part to pay fifteen dollars per year in part for the insurance,” Another provision of the lease is that should the lessor desire to sell, the .lessee is to have “the preference to purchase the lot, *also improvements belonging to the party of the first part.”*

*564*Brown & Rodman, for appellant..*

*Thompson &*Booth, *for appellee.*

Another covenant is that at the expiration of the lease that “the party of the second part is to have the privilege to *sell his portion of the improvements.”*

These provisions of the lease attest beyond donbt that both parties were to be interested'in the improvements.

The evidence establishes that there was a brick dwelling and stable on the premises and that Duncan’s object was to erect a different house out of these.

The provision as to insurance witnesses the amount of Kaye’s interest in the improvements to be made by Duncan and as this interest was to be kept assured by insurance explains why the covenant, as originally in the draft of the lease, was stricken out before assigned that Duncan should restore the premises with its improvements to Kaye, for if’ destroyed it would be unjust for Kaye to recover therefor from the insurance company and also from his lessee, Duncan.

The arbitrators having found that the whole improvements were worth only $2200 when Duncan restored the premises and $2000 of this belonging to the lessor left Duncan only two hundred dollars of interest therein.

The chancellor erred, therefore, in decreeing to appellant only the value of the old materials which he fixed at $450 — as the covenants of the lease fixed Kaye’s interest in the improvements to be made by Duncan at two thousand dollars, probably the conventional value of the buildings then on the premises, but whether for this or other considerations fixed it at that sum.

As this is the only perceivable error the judgment is reversed with directions to correct it as to this.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

James Randall, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Autovest LLC, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-01594-PHX-DLR

ORDER 

 The Court having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice, 

(Doc. 27), and good cause appearing, 

IT IS ORDERED dismissing this action with prejudice, each party to bear its own 

attorney’s fees and costs. 

 Dated this 21st day of April, 2016. 

Douglas L. Rayes 

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01594-DLR Document 28 Filed 04/22/16 Page 1 of 1