alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14.3  CODE OF CONDUCT FOR CONTROLLER

In my role as Controller of First Choice Health Network,

I recognize that I hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance.
I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that stakeholders' interests are
appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this Code
provides principles to which I am expected to adhere and advocate. The Code
embodies rules regarding individual and peer responsibilities, as well as
responsibilities to the company, the public and other stakeholders.

I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and
responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.

To the best of my knowledge and ability:

1.  I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts
    of interest in personal and professional relationships, including in
    connection with disclosure included in reports and other documents filed
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in other public
    communications.

2.  I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete,
    objective, relevant, timely and understandable.

3.  I comply with laws, rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and
    local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory
    agencies.

4.  I act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence, and
    diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my
    independent judgment to be subordinated.

5.  I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
       my work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to
       disclose.  Confidential information acquired in the course of my work is
       not used for personal advantage.

6.  I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my
    constituents' needs.

7.  I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
       peers in my work environment and community.

8.  I achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources
    employed or entrusted to me.

9.  I will report known or suspected violations of this Code to the Chairman
    of the Audit Committee.

10. I will be accountable for adhering to this code. Violations of this Code,
    including failures to report potential violations by others, will be viewed
    as a severe disciplinary matter that may result in personnel action,
    including termination of employment.

/s/
---------------------------------------
Sharon Waymire, Controller
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Elizabeth E. Keller","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/eekeller\/","title":"Space Biosciences Tri-Valley Innovation Fair 2024","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6uXc10upoR\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/space-biosciences-tri-valley-innovation-fair-2024\/\">Space Biosciences Tri-Valley Innovation Fair 2024<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/space-biosciences-tri-valley-innovation-fair-2024\/embed\/#?secret=6uXc10upoR\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Biosciences Tri-Valley Innovation Fair 2024” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6uXc10upoR\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/tri-valley-fair-1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":333}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"CPEX Science Team Observes Convective Clouds Over the Caribbean","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VzlqAKlWwA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/cpex-science-team-observes-convective-clouds-over-caribbean\/\">CPEX Science Team Observes Convective Clouds Over the Caribbean<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/cpex-science-team-observes-convective-clouds-over-caribbean\/embed\/#?secret=VzlqAKlWwA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“CPEX Science Team Observes Convective Clouds Over the Caribbean” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VzlqAKlWwA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/dc-8_convective_clouds.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON GUERRA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 474 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    WILLIAM V. CAREYWilliam V. Carey Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BUDGET GROUP, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          57,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  416,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                  3,179,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,653,781
<PP&E>                                         215,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,082,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          585,825
<BONDS>                                      3,637,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          291,460
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           373
<OTHER-SE>                                     567,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,082,518
<SALES>                                      2,349,457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,349,457
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,195,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             208,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (54,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (23,826)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (49,888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (14,652)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (64,540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.37)
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE REPORTED NET OF ALLOWANCES FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS ON THE
BALANCE SHEET
<F2>PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT IS REPORTED NET OF ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION ON
THE BALANCE SHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Aviones de movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada: un viaje suave en el futuro","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"D11IsBZbGA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/drones\/aviones-de-movilidad-aerea-avanzada-un-viaje-suave-en-el-futuro\/\">Aviones de movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada: un viaje suave en el futuro<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/drones\/aviones-de-movilidad-aerea-avanzada-un-viaje-suave-en-el-futuro\/embed\/#?secret=D11IsBZbGA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Aviones de movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada: un viaje suave en el futuro” — NASA\" data-secret=\"D11IsBZbGA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/ride_quality_c.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAYMOND COLLIER.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification granted and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed and the matter is remanded to the trial court for reconsideration of the sentence in light of *State v. Yarbough,*100 *N.J.*627 (1985); *State v. Miller,*108 *N.J.*112 (1987); *State v. Baylass,*114 *N.J.*169 (1989); and *State v. Molina,*114 *N.J.*181 (1989).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS LEE GRAY.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Rodrigo Contreras-Ramirez,

Defendant/Movant, 

v. 

USA, 

Plaintiff/Respondent.

No. CV-15-01692-PHX-GMS (BSB)

ORDER 

 Pending before the Court is the Government’s Motion to Dismiss Movant’s claims 

of ineffective assistance of counsel and United States Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade’s 

Report and Recommendation (“R&R”). Docs. 2, 24. The R&R recommends that the 

Court grant the Motion. Doc. 24 at 3. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they 

had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections 

could be considered a waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 16 (citing 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, 6(a), 6(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th 

Cir. 2003)). 

 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 

review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 

(1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 

not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 

determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 

Case 2:15-cv-01692-GMS-BSB Document 27 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is welltaken. The Court will accept the R&R and grant the Motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 

(stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 

findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The 

district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further 

evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). 

IT IS ORDERED:

 1. Magistrate Judge Bade’s R&R (Doc. 24) is accepted. 

 2. The Government’s Motion to Dismiss Movant’s claims of ineffective 

assistance of counsel (Doc. 22) is granted. 

 4. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the 

event Movant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability 

because reasonable jurists would not find the Court’s procedural ruling debatable. See 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 

 Dated this 14th day of November, 2016. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:15-cv-01692-GMS-BSB Document 27 Filed 11/14/16 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00245-CR

CRYSTAL LOUISE MCCOVERY 

A/K/A CRYSTAL MCCOVERY

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Less than a year after the trial court placed Appellant Crystal Louise 

McCovery a/k/a Crystal McCovery on four years’ deferred-adjudication 

community supervision for the offense of burglary of a habitation, the State 

moved to adjudicate her guilt and revoke her community supervision. Appellant 

pled true to the State’s motion and, in writing, waived her right to appeal the trial 

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

court’s adjudication of her guilt and revocation of her community supervision. 

The trial court granted the State’s motion and sentenced Appellant to three years’ 

confinement. Appellant now attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment.

The trial court’s certification states that Appellant has waived her right of 

appeal.2

 We have notified Appellant of our concern that her appeal would be 

dismissed unless by a date certain she or any party desiring to continue the 

appeal filed with the court a response showing grounds for doing so. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 44.3. The date certain has passed, and no response showing 

grounds for continuing the appeal has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d 239, 242–43 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 

2005, no pet.); Adams v. State, No. 02-11-00151-CR, 2012 WL 858609, at *1

(Tex. App.––Fort Worth Mar. 15, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 15, 2013

 2

A valid waiver of appeal prevents a defendant from appealing without the 

trial court’s consent. Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2003).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Studying Arctic Ice","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8zwG7ko2th\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/studying-arctic-ice\/\">Studying Arctic Ice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/studying-arctic-ice\/embed\/#?secret=8zwG7ko2th\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Studying Arctic Ice” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8zwG7ko2th\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/7348420132-79aab0d0d9-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131432 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131432 COA: 265769 Oakland CC: 1996-148962-FC DANIEL G. PRINTZ, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing en titlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk