alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTRAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCHMIDTT
INDUSTRIES, INC INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, REPORT AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS MAY 31, 1997, 1996, AND 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         504,662
<SECURITIES>                                   168,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,725,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,479,820
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,044,662
<PP&E>                                       2,231,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                 530,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,575,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          935,102
<BONDS>                                        150,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,952,411
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,976,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,515,253
<SALES>                                     10,541,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,541,972
<CGS>                                        3,875,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,370,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (56,564)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,352,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                   627,947
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,724,728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
No. 15,362.

#### The City of Elkhart *v.*Calvert.

Municipal *Corporation.*— Sale *of Intoxicating*Liquor.— *Validity of City Ordinance.*— Defence.—Pleading.—In an action for the violation of a city ordinance the complaint charged that the defendant, on the 4th day of July, was in charge of a certain place wherein intoxicating liquors were sold on secular days to be drank on the premises, and that he suffered a certain person to enter said place on said day in violation of certain sections named of a city ordinance.

*Held,*on demurrer, that the complaint was sufficient. Under section 3066 R. S. 1881, it is sufficient to recite the number of the sections violated, without filing a copy of the ordinance. The defendant must, if he claims that such ordinance is invalid, bring the question of invalidity forward by way of defence, and not by demurrer to the complaint.

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

P. *L. Turner,*for appellant.

*H. C. Dodge*and *J. S. Dodge,*for appellee.

Olds, J.

— This is an action brought by the appellant against the appellee for the violation of a city ordinance. The verified complaint alleges that the acts complained of were in violation of sections 14 and 45 of ordinance numbered 112, duly ordained by the common council of the city on the 24th day of April, 1887. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and the appellant reserved an exception to the ruling, and prosecutes this appeal.

In the case of *City of Frankfort*v. *Aughe,*114 Ind. 77, the court says, that “Under section 3066, R. S. 1881, it is not necessary to file a copy of the ordinance, or sections thereof alleged to have been violated, with the complaint; it is sufficient to recite the number of the section or sections violated. The effect of the statute above mentioned is to require the defendant, if he claims that the particular sections which he admits he violated, are invalid, to bring the matter of their invalidity forward by way of defence.”

Under this holding the affidavit in this case is clearly suf*7fieient. It is contended by counsel for appellee that as the complaint charges that the defendant, on the 4th day of July, 1887, was in charge of a certain place wherein intoxicating liquors were sold on secular days to be drank on the premises, and that he suffered a certain person (naming him) to enter said place on said day, such act is not one that can be made punishable by a city ordinance. The statute, section 3106, authorizes incorporated cities to regulate and license all places where intoxicating liquors are sold, and the appellee’s liability depends upon the validity of the particular ordinance which it is alleged he violated ; and to test its validity according to the holding in *City of Frankfort*v. *Aughe, supra,*the appellee must bring the question before the court by way of a defence.

Filed Nov. 12, 1890.

The court erred in sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

Judgment reversed, at costs of appellee, with instructions to overrule the demurrer to the complaint.
#### Georgia PATSY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF REGENTS of the State of Florida, a body corporate, for and on behalf of Florida International University, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79-2965.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 5, 1980.

Denis Dean, Sr., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams, Jeffrey H. Klink, Jacksonville, Fla., Mahoney, Hadlow & Adams, John W. Kozyak, Miami, Fla., for defendant-appellee.

Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, and BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON and THOMAS A. CLARK, Circuit Judges.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Feb. 28, 1980, 5 Cir., 1980, 612 F.2d 946).

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Sunburst Acquisitions IV, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mario Ayub, a Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



   1)   The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
	15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


   2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
	material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


By: /S/ MARIO AYUB


Mario Ayub, Director


Date: October 20, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 025180)

KENT LAW OFFICES

10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192

Phoenix, AZ 85028 

Telephone: (480) 247-9644

Facsimile: (480) 717-4781

E-mail: tkent@kentlawpc.com

Of Counsel to:

Nitzkin & Associates

22142 West Nine Mile Road

Southfield, MI 48033

Telephone: (248) 353-2882

Facsimile: (248) 353-4840

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

Jon Cadenhead

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jon Cadenhead,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

an Ohio corporation, Trans Union, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company; 

Equifax Information Services, LLC, a 

Georgia corporation; Arizona Public 

Service, an Arizona corporation; Bank of 

America, National Association, a North 

Carolina corporation; Capital One Bank, 

USA, NA, a National Association; and

Ally Financial, Inc., a Delaware 

corporation,

Defendants.

Case No.: CV-15-01990-PHX-JJT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AS TO 

DEFENDANT CAPITAL ONE 

BANK, USA, NA, ONLY

Case 2:15-cv-01990-JJT Document 107 Filed 08/08/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Plaintiff and Defendant, Capital One Bank, 

USA, NA, in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement. The parties 

anticipate filing a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Defendant Capital One 

Bank, USA, NA, ONLY, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) within 60 days.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 8

th day of August 2016.

 KENT LAW OFFICES

By: /s/ Trinette G. Kent 

Trinette G. Kent 

Attorney for Plaintiff,

Jon Cadenhead

Case 2:15-cv-01990-JJT Document 107 Filed 08/08/16 Page 2 of 2
#### Ramon GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 04-3125.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 15, 2005.

ORDER

Petitioner having filed the required Statement Concerning Discrimination it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.
----

**Exhibit 21**

As at December 31, 2008, unless otherwise indicated, Zi, orone or more of its subsidiaries, owns 100 percent of the outstanding shares ofthe subsidiary. 

| **Name of Subsidiary**                                 | **Country of**    |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                                                   | **Incorporation** |
| Multi-Corp International Ltd.                          | Barbados          |
| Zi (Bermuda) Corporation Ltd.                          | Bermuda           |
| 845162    Alberta Ltd.                                 | Canada            |
| Zi Corporation of    Canada, Inc.                      | Canada            |
| Huayu Zi    Software Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.(2) | China             |
| Zi Software Technology    (Beijing) Co., Ltd.          | China             |
| Asia    Translation & Telecommunications Limited   | Hong Kong         |
| Huayu Zi Software Technology    Limited.(1)            | Hong Kong         |
| Telecom    Technology Corporation Limited              | Hong Kong         |
| Zi Corporation (H.K.) Limited                          | Hong Kong         |
| Zi    Corporation of Hong Kong Limited                 | Hong Kong         |
| Zi Decuma AB                                           | Sweden            |
| Zi    Corporation of America, Inc.                     | USA               |

Notes:
(1) 

Zi Corporation (H.K.)Limited holds nearly eighty-five percent (85%) of Huayu Zi Software TechnologyLimited. One share of Huayu Zi Software Technology Limited is held by ZiCorporation of Hong Kong Limited. The balance of fifteen percent (15%) is heldby China Huayu (Hong Kong) Limited, a third party investor. 

(2) 

Huayu ZiSoftware Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., is wholly owned by Huayu Zi SoftwareTechnology Limited.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2895

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 

by pink lights in honor of breast cancer awareness month. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 5, 2004

Mr. TALENT (for himself and Mr. BOND) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL

To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to 

be illuminated by pink lights in honor of breast cancer 

awareness month.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ILLUMINATION OF GATEWAY ARCH IN HONOR 

4 OF BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH. 

5 In honor of breast cancer awareness month, the Sec6 retary of the Interior shall authorize the Gateway Arch 

7 in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated by pink lights 

8 for a certain period of time in October, to be designated 

9 by the Secretary of the Interior.

Æ
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael StaranMichael StaranChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2011/s/ John MicekJohn MicekChief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2011 This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001067701
<NAME>    UNITED RENTALS INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           19828
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   400373
<ALLOWANCES>                                     44781
<INVENTORY>                                     149267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         2357984
<DEPRECIATION>                                  486813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3891954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        1947876
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           300000
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                           716
<OTHER-SE>                                     1141023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3891954
<SALES>                                         895971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                895971
<CGS>                                           174703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   577916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 14220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               51306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  71394
<INCOME-TAX>                                     29283
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              42111
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     42111
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 22, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 22, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0585. ANDRE HOWARD v. THE CITY OF MACON.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On December 04, 2020, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than December 14, 2020. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
Case 2:15-mj-01722-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/02/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01722-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/02/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01722-JFM Document 3 Filed 10/02/15 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
       OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penwest
Pharmaceuticals Co. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Tod R. Hamachek, Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 3, 2004             /s/ Tod R. Hamacheck
                               ---------------------------------------------
                               Tod R. Hamachek
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF
GERHARD E. KURZ, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Seabulk International, Inc. (the Company)
hereby certifies that: 1. The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, to
which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: April 20, 2005 /s/ GERHARD E. KURZGerhard E. KurzApril 20, 2005
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EXE Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,Raymond R. Hood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kenneth R. Vines,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                         |   | /s/  RAYMOND R. HOOD  |   |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  August 14, 2002 |   | Raymond R. Hood            |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer    |
|                         |   |                       |
|                         |   |                       |
|                         |   | /s/  KENNETH R. VINES |   |
| Dated:  August 14, 2002 |   | Kenneth R. Vines           |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

----
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 333-103267-03 of Ferrellgas,
L.P. on Form S-3 of our report, which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to changes in accounting principles, dated October 12,
2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ferrellgas, L. P. for the year ended
July 31, 2004.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP

Kansas City, MissouriOctober
12, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Civil Cover Sheet

This automated JS-44 conforms generally to the manual JS-44 approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in 

September 1974. The data is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. 

The information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as 

required by law. This form is authorized for use only in the District of Arizona.

The completed cover sheet must be printed directly to PDF and filed as an 

attachment to the Complaint or Notice of Removal.

Plaintiff

(s):

GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation 

Defendant

(s):

VIAD CORP, a Delaware 

Corporation 

County of Residence: Outside the State of 

Arizona County of Residence: Maricopa

County Where Claim For Relief Arose: Outside 

the State of Arizona

Plaintiff's Atty(s): Defendant's Atty(s):

Suzanne R. Varco 

Opper & Varco LLP

225 Broadway, Ste. 1900

San Diego, California 92101

619-231-5858

II. Basis of Jurisdiction: 3. Federal Question (U.S. not a party)

III. Citizenship of Principal 

Parties (Diversity Cases Only)

Plaintiff:-N/A

Defendant:-N/A

IV. Origin : 1. Original Proceeding

V. Nature of Suit: 893 Environmental Matters

VI.Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. Section 1332; CERCLA Cost Recovery

VII. Requested in Complaint

Class Action:No

Page 1 of 2

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civil_js44.pl 9/8/2015

Case 2:15-cv-01820-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 2
Dollar Demand: excess of $75,000

Jury Demand:No

VIII. This case is not related to another case. 

Signature: Suzanne R. Varco

Date: 9/11/15

If any of this information is incorrect, please go back to the Civil Cover Sheet Input form using the Back button in 

your browser and change it. Once correct, save this form as a PDF and include it as an attachment to your case 

opening documents. 

Revised: 01/2014

Page 2 of 2

http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/generate_civil_js44.pl 9/8/2015

Case 2:15-cv-01820-DGC Document 1-1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 2 of 2