alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000894253
<NAME> PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         207,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  161,839
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,692
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               426,740
<PP&E>                                         125,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,014
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           903
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   523,428
<SALES>                                        556,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               556,624
<CGS>                                          429,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  510,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,063
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,095
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 72-1 Filed 03/03/17 Page 24 of 24
#### JOSE ROSA v. DUNKIN DONUTS OF PASSAIC, CARMEL ADITYA, ETC., ET AL.

July 7, 1989.

Petition for certification granted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21

- 0533

_________________ STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non

- profi t Corporati on; CLINTON DECKER; JESSICA DECKER; MARTIN NORUNNER; APRIL MARIE DAVIS; MORGEN HUNT; GABRIEL EARLE; ERICK PRATHER; BRADFORD CAMPBELL ; MEAGAN CAMPBELL; and JARED ORR,

Pl aint iffs and Appellants,

v. MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ELEMENTARY DISTRICT NO. 1, HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, MISSOULA COUNTY, STATE OF MONTANA; TARGET RANGE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23; and HELLGATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 4,

Defendants and Appellees. STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non

- profi t corporati on; JASMINE ALBERINO, TIMOTHY ALBERINO, VICTORIA BENTLEY, WESLEY GILBERT, KATIE GILBERT, KIERSTEN GLOVER, RICHARD JORGENSON, STEPHEN PRUIETT, LINDSEY PRUIETT, ANGELA MARSHALL, SEAN LITTLEJOHN, and KENTON SAWDY,

Pl aint iffs and Appellants,

v. BOZEMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7, MONFORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 27, and BIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT N O . 72,

Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ 

### Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five

- justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to p rovide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Jason T

. Marks , District Judge

. Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 25 2022

05/25/2022
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William V. CareyWilliam V. CareyChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 8, 2007
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Douglas Wilkerson, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

EGS Customer Care Incorporated, 

Defendant. 

No. CV-15-01656-PHX-DJH

ORDER 

 This matter is before the Court on the Response to 12/15/16 Order (Doc. 27) and 

Renewed Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement Agreement and Stipulation to Dismiss 

All Claims with Prejudice (Doc. 30) and an attached Settlement Agreement and Release 

of Liability (Doc. 30-1). 

 Upon review by the Court, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, 

IT IS ORDERED granting the Joint Motion and Stipulation (Doc. 30). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement and Release of 

Liability is approved in its entirety and is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties’ 

bona fide dispute. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby dismissed, with 

prejudice, with the parties to bear their respective attorneys’ fees and costs. 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED directing the Clerk of Court to terminate this 

action. 

 Dated this 10th day of January, 2017. 

Honorable Diane J. Humetewa

United States District Judge 

Case 2:15-cv-01656-DJH Document 31 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Jeremy Edwards, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03443-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8715 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8715 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
#### KAREN A. D’AMICO (BOCKER) v. RONALD LOUIS D’AMICO.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification granted.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William V. CareyWilliam V. Carey Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer August 8, 2006




31
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"New Name, Same Great Supersonic Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xtAOSFISPJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/new-name-same-great-supersonic-mission\/\">New Name, Same Great Supersonic Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/new-name-same-great-supersonic-mission\/embed\/#?secret=xtAOSFISPJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Name, Same Great Supersonic Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xtAOSFISPJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/quesst_mark_reveal_hangar_iod_middle_grey2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, into Budget Group,
Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 333-41093, 333-47079,
333-49819, 333-58477, 333-59049, 333-59385, 333-61429, 333-82501, 333-82749,
333-38306, 333-50080 and 333-50086.


                                             /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Orlando, Florida
April 2, 2001
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LAWRENCE GAINES.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-57","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"O4iyjrGZqV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-57\/\">STS-57<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-57\/embed\/#?secret=O4iyjrGZqV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-57” — NASA\" data-secret=\"O4iyjrGZqV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 1 2

- 00385

- CR

Edwin Herbert Phelps III

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarrant County (0784025D )

May 16, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DIST RICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. AL-TARIQ WITCHER.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Trajectory Design in a Combined Low-Thrust Multi-Body Environment","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VEec9E1KAn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/trajectory-design-in-a-combined-low-thrust-multi-body-environment\/\">Trajectory Design in a Combined Low-Thrust Multi-Body Environment<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/trajectory-design-in-a-combined-low-thrust-multi-body-environment\/embed\/#?secret=VEec9E1KAn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Trajectory Design in a Combined Low-Thrust Multi-Body Environment” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VEec9E1KAn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/cox_andrew.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":668}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS CASE NO. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL 2641

_______________________________________ 

This Document Relates to Plaintiff,

Shelly Sowers

Case No. 2:17-cv-003157-DGC

_______________________________________ 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW attorney, Brian S. Katz, of the Flint Law Firm, LLC, and enters his 

appearance on behalf of the Plaintiff(s) in the above referenced action. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

FLINT LAW FIRM LLC 

/s/ Brian S. Katz

Brian S. Katz, KY Bar No. 86633 

FLINT LAW FIRM, LLC 

2226 Broadway, Suite 1 

Post Office Box 2903 

Paducah, Kentucky 42002-2903 

Phone: (270) 575-3939 

Fax: (270) 575-3936 

bkatz@flintfirm.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8371 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 1
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2357

To direct the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 

to maintain a minimum quantity of stored water in certain reservoirs 

in the vicinity of the upper portion of the Missouri River. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2004

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Army, acting through the 

Chief of Engineers, to maintain a minimum quantity 

of stored water in certain reservoirs in the vicinity of 

the upper portion of the Missouri River.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UPPER MISSOURI RIVER WATER STORAGE. 

4 (a) WATER STORAGE.—Notwithstanding any project 

5 or activity carried out by the Secretary of the Army, acting 

6 through the Chief of Engineers, under the Pick-Sloan Mis7 souri River Basin Program authorized by section 9 of the 

8 Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 891), or any other 
2

•S 2357 IS 

1 law, the Secretary shall cease to support water releases 

2 for navigation purposes at any time at which the total vol3 ume of water stored in the reservoirs described in sub4 section (b) is less than 44,000,000 acre-feet. 

5 (b) RESERVOIRS.—The reservoirs referred to in sub6 section (a) are the following reservoirs located in the vicin7 ity of the upper portion of the Missouri River: 

8 (1) Fort Peck Lake. 

9 (2) Lake Sakakawea. 

10 (3) Lake Oahe. 

11 (4) Lake Sharpe. 

12 (5) Lake Francis Case. 

13 (6) Lewis and Clark Lake.

Æ