alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"Exobiology Deputy Branch Chief Melissa Kirven-Brooks","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"le4Ek2wEkv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/exobiology-deputy-branch-chief-melissa-kirven-brooks\/\">Exobiology Deputy Branch Chief Melissa Kirven-Brooks<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/exobiology-deputy-branch-chief-melissa-kirven-brooks\/embed\/#?secret=le4Ek2wEkv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Exobiology Deputy Branch Chief Melissa Kirven-Brooks” — NASA\" data-secret=\"le4Ek2wEkv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/melissakirvenbrooks-acd24-0032-002.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
October 8, l999

C.E. "Rick" Strattan

Cyclodextrin Technologies Development Inc.
3713-3 SW 42nd Avenue
Gainesville, FL  32608


Dear Mr. Strattan:

You may extend your lease for the above premises for two additional years at the
current rate of $21,888 per year, beginning November 1, l999. This extension
includes the purchase option.

If you agree, please sign below.

Sincerely,


/s/ Lowell D. Chesborough            10/7/99
---------------------------------  -------------------
Lowell D. Chesborough
General Partner
The Activity Center, Ltd.

I Agree,

/s/ C.E. Rick Strattan                10/7/99
---------------------------------  ------------------
C.E. "Rick" Strattan
Individually and as President, CTD, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000922408
<NAME> AMERICAN DRUG COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         119,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,327,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,630,000
<INVENTORY>                                 22,446,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,291,000
<PP&E>                                         985,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (173,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,179,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,596,000
<BONDS>                                      5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       130,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,179,000
<SALES>                                     17,080,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,547,000
<CGS>                                       13,686,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,307,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             611,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (40,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (204,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (664,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joyce Stanton,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00039-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9689 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 1
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert Vivacqua, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Trimax
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

|January 16, 2006               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|/s/ Robert
      Vivacqua      | 
|Robert Vivacqua                | 
|Acting Chief Financial Officer | 

---
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 

 Having considered the parties’ stipulation, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. That the Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 23) is granted; 

2. That Defendant Maricopa Skill Center is dismissed without prejudice; 

3. That each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees; and 

4. That the Clerk of Court shall terminate Defendant Maricopa Skill Center as a 

party in this action. 

 Dated this 25th day of January, 2016.

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

Schaun Owens, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Maricopa County Community College 

District, et al., 

Defendants. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-15-01769-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 24 Filed 01/25/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 12





IOS CAPITAL, LLC





RATIO OF EARNINGS TO
FIXED CHARGES


(dollars in thousands)





Fiscal Year Ended September 30,2002

2001

2000

1999

1998EarningsNet income

$
102,389

$
84,738

$
79,416

$
88,327

$
63,122Add:Provision for income taxes


71,282


52,428


48,446


54,910


46,194Fixed charges


149,580


159,800


151,822


121,531


115,699Earnings, as adjusted (A)

$
323,251

$
296,966

$
279,684

$
264,768

$
225,015Fixed chargesOther interest expense, including interest on capital leases

$
148,414

$
159,138

$
151,295

$
120,917

$
115,026Estimated interest component of rental expense


1,166


662


527


614


673Total fixed charges (B)

$
149,580

$
159,800

$
151,822

$
121,531

$
115,699Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (A) divided by (B)


2.2


1.9


1.8


2.2


1.9
EXHIBIT 2 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 2 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 3 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 4 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 5 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 6 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 7 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 8 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 9 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 10 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 11 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 12 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 13 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 14 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 15 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 16 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 17 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 18 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 19 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 20 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 21 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 22 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 23 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 24 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 25 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 26 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 27 of 28
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 994-2 Filed 03/04/16 Page 28 of 28
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Antonio Alonso-Salinas, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01066-PHX-SRB

DETENTION ORDER 

 On February 4, 2016, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 5th day of February, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-cr-01066-SRB Document 30 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



         EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002


                  In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Royal
         Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc ("Royal") on Form 10-K for the period
         ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey T. Hanuscin,
         Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
         as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
         that:

               1    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
                    Act of 1934; and

               2    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of Royal as of the dates and for the periods
                    expressed in the Report.







                                               /s/ Jeffrey T. Hanuscin
                                               -----------------------
                                               Jeffrey T. Hanuscin
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               June 8, 2006.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

vs.

Osvaldo Vergara-Grimaldo, 

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-15-1263-PHX-SPL

ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant appeared before this Court on a Petition for Revocation of Supervised

Release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court considered the

Petition and file in determining whether defendant should be released on conditions set by

the Court.

The Court finds that defendant has failed to carry his burden of establishing that he

does not pose a serious flight risk or danger to any other person or to the community pursuant

to Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The Court concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a serious

flight risk and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure his appearance at future proceedings.

The Court also concludes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant is a

danger and that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will reasonably assure

the safety of the community.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant be detained pending further

proceedings.

DATED this 10th day of April, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jesse Yarbro,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04454-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Lopez McHugh LLP - Newport Beach, CA

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/4/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9315 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9315 Filed 12/13/17 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

September 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00201

- CV

BANK OF AMERICAN, N.A . as Trustee of Bettye Baker Brown Trust, u/w, f/b/o William David Deiss, Bettye Baker Brown Trust u/w, f/b/o Diane Elizabeth Mysliweic, Bettye Baker Brown Trust u/w/, f/b/o Paula Jane Roberts, Dorothy Baker Shaw 1966 Trust, Baker E. Shaw, as Trustee of the Dorothy Ann Roos Testamentary Trust, and Cliff Hoskins, Inc. as Intervenor Appellant s

v.

PRIZE ENERGY RESOURCES, L.P. , Prize Operating Company, Gruy Petroleum Management Company n/k/a Cimarex Energy Co. of Colorado, Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc.,

Cimarex Energy Co., Hunter Gas Gathering, Inc., Pat R. Rutherford Jr., Michael G. Rutherford,

Rutherford Oil Corporation, Stevan D. Rutherford, Patrick R. Rutherford III, Mary Elizabeth Rutherford, Paul Maroney Rutherford, David Traylor Rutherford, Michae l G. Rutherford Jr., John Richard Rutherford, and Sally Ann Rutherford Appellees

From the 343rd Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas Trial Court No. M05

- 0002

- CV

- C Honorable Michael E. Welborn, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On August 29 , 2014, this court issued its opinion and judgment

. On September 4 , 2014, Appellees filed a n unopposed motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing until
October 15 , 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1, 49.7, 49.8.

Appellees’ motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellees’ motion is due to be
filed with this court on October 15 , 2014.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 12th day of September, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Todd N. Tkachuk, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of Peabodys Coffee, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: March 28, 2005



/s/ Todd N. Tkachuk
Todd N. Tkachuk
Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Case 2:15-mj-01692-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01692-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/18/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01692-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/18/15 Page 3 of 3