alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14.3  CODE OF CONDUCT FOR VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE

In my role as Vice President, Finance of First Choice Health Network,

I recognize that I hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance.
I am uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that stakeholders' interests are
appropriately balanced, protected and preserved. Accordingly, this Code
provides principles to which I am expected to adhere and advocate. The Code
embodies rules regarding individual and peer responsibilities, as well as
responsibilities to the company, the public and other stakeholders.

I certify to you that I adhere to and advocate the following principles and
responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct.

To the best of my knowledge and ability:

1.  I act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts
    of interest in personal and professional relationships, including in
    connection with disclosure included in reports and other documents filed
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission or in other public
    communications.

2.  I provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete,
    objective, relevant, timely and understandable.

3.  I comply with laws, rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and
    local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory
    agencies.

4.  I act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence, and
    diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my
    independent judgment to be subordinated.

5.  I respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of
       my work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to
       disclose.  Confidential information acquired in the course of my work is
       not used for personal advantage.

6.  I share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my
    constituents' needs.

7.  I proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
       peers in my work environment and community.

8.  I achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources
    employed or entrusted to me.

9.  I will report known or suspected violations of this Code to the Chairman
    of the Audit Committee.

10. I will be accountable for adhering to this Code. Violations of this Code,
    including failures to report potential violations by others, will be viewed
    as a severe disciplinary matter that may result in personnel action,
    including termination of employment.

/s/
---------------------------------------
Stacy Kessel, Vice President, Finance
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10901

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RONNIE JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CV-3039-R

---------------------

June 10, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ronnie Johnson, federal prisoner #23091-077, moves for

recall of the mandate following the denial of his constructive

motion for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal from

the denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

Johnson correctly contends that the COA requirement of the

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) should not

have been applied to his case. See Lindh v. Murphy, 117 S. Ct.

2059 (1997). We construe Johnson’s motion as seeking panel

review of a single-judge action pursuant to Fed. R. App. P.
No. 96-10901

-2-

27(c). Johnson’s motion for panel review is GRANTED, and the

order denying Johnson a COA is RESCINDED. 

No further briefing is necessary for the resolution of

Johnson’s § 2255 appeal, and we proceed to consider its merits.

See Dickinson v. Wainwright, 626 F.2d 1184, 1186 (5th Cir. 1980).

Johnson contends that his criminal prosecution was barred under

the doctrines of res judicata and double jeopardy. These issues

are foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v.

Ursery, 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2149 (1996). 

We conclude that Johnson’s appeal is without arguable merit

and is frivolous. It is therefore dismissed. Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

MOTION FOR PANEL REVIEW GRANTED; ORDER DENYING COA

RESCINDED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"University Student Research Challenge","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xCKHqm3uZ1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/tacp\/armd-tacp-ui\/usrc\/\">University Student Research Challenge<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/tacp\/armd-tacp-ui\/usrc\/embed\/#?secret=xCKHqm3uZ1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“University Student Research Challenge” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xCKHqm3uZ1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/usrc-logo_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David Adams,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04717-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Moody Law Firm, Inc.

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/9/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9650 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9650 Filed 01/16/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

JOHN RUSSELL LOWE,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. BARD INC., 

Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04466-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Murphy Law Firm LLC 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entities I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entities I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/04/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entities I represent. 

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. 

Printed name of party waiving service 

of summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9247 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Jupiter\u2019s Great Red Spot: A Rose By Any Other Name","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IP5FSQT0C9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/jupiters-great-red-spot-rose-by-any-other-name\/\">Jupiter\u2019s Great Red Spot: A Rose By Any Other Name<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/jupiters-great-red-spot-rose-by-any-other-name\/embed\/#?secret=IP5FSQT0C9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Jupiter\u2019s Great Red Spot: A Rose By Any Other Name” — NASA\" data-secret=\"IP5FSQT0C9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/pia23804-16.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":410}
EXHIBIT 5

TO

PLAINTIFF’S CONTROVERTING STATEMENT OF FACTS 

IN RESPONSE TO

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 80-5 Filed 04/17/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 14-12 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 2 Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 80-5 Filed 04/17/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 14-12 Filed 11/04/15 Page 2 of 2 Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 80-5 Filed 04/17/17 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Daniel J. Kohl, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pediatric Services of America, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 8, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2724 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2724

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2004

              Referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend section 33(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657c(a)) to 
clarify that the National Veterans Business Development Corporation is 
                           a private entity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL VETERANS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

    Section 33(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 657c(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Corporation is a private entity and is not an 
agency, instrumentality, authority, entity, or establishment of the 
United States Government.''.

            Passed the Senate July 22, 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
**Exhibit 21**

 

**DRUGMAX, INC.**

**LIST OFSUBSIDIARIES**

 

As of January 1, 2005, the Registrantdirectly or indirectly owned the following subsidiaries. Certain subsidiaries, which in the aggregate do not constitute significant subsidiaries, may be omitted. 

 

Familymeds Holdings, Inc., a Connecticut corporation 

Familymeds, Inc., a Connecticut corporation 

Arrow Prescription Leasing Corp., aConnecticut corporation 

DrugMax, Inc., a Florida corporation 

Discount Rx, Inc., a Louisiana corporation 

Discount Rx, Inc., a Nevada corporation 

Valley Drug Company, an Ohio corporation 

Valley Drug Company South, a Louisiana corporation 

Desktop Media Group, Inc., a Florida corporation 

VetMall, Inc., a Florida corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         462,835
<DEPRECIATION>                                  63,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 399,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,510,249
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,327,490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   399,268
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               409,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (413,495)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (413,495)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (413,495)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mindy Sue Patton,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04110-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8965 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1