IN THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

‐‐‐‐ooOoo‐‐‐‐

State of Utah, in the interest of R.C.,

N.C., and Z.C., persons under eighteen

years of age.

____________________________________

A.C.,

Appellant,

v.

State of Utah,

Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PER CURIAM DECISION

Case No. 20120658‐CA

F I L E D

(November 1, 2012)

2012 UT App 311

‐‐‐‐‐

Second District Juvenile, Ogden Department, 1047485

The Honorable Jeffrey J. Noland

Attorneys: Jonathan B. Pace, Ogden, for Appellant

Mark L. Shurtleff and John M. Peterson, Salt Lake City, for Appellee

Martha Pierce, Salt Lake City, Guardian Ad Litem

‐‐‐‐‐

Before Judges Orme, Thorne, and Christiansen.

¶1 A.C. (Mother) appeals the termination of her parental rights.  We affirm.

¶2 Mother asserts that the juvenile court erred when it determined that it was in the

children’s best interests to terminate her parental rights.  We construe this issue as a

challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.  However, Mother failed to request

transcripts of the necessary proceedings, and she informed this court that transcripts

would not assist her in the furtherance of her appeal.

¶3 It is an appellant’s obligation to provide transcripts of the parts of the proceeding

necessary to determine the issues on appeal.  See Utah R. App. P. 54.  Pursuant to rule

54(b), if an appellant intends to assert that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by, or
20120658‐CA 2

is contrary to the evidence, the appellant must include in the record a transcript of all

evidence relevant to such finding or conclusion.  See id.  “Neither the court nor the

appellee is obligated to correct appellant’s deficiencies in providing the relevant

portions of the transcript.”  Id.

¶4 In the absence of an adequate record, this court cannot reach the issues presented

for appeal.  “Parties claiming error below and seeking appellate review have the duty

and responsibility to support their allegations with an adequate record.”  Gorostieta v.

Parkinson, 2000 UT 99, ¶ 16, 17 P.3d 1110.  Where, as in this case, a record on appeal is

inadequate, this court must assume the regularity of the proceedings below.  See id.

¶5 The juvenile court determined that Mother was an unfit parent due to her

continued drug abuse or failure to participate in drug testing, and that Mother has been

unable or unwilling to remedy the circumstances that caused the children to be in an

out‐of‐home placement.  The juvenile court found sufficient evidence that Mother made

only token efforts to support her children and to eliminate the risk of serious physical,

mental, or emotional abuse.  The juvenile court also determined that there was clear and

convincing evidence that it was in the children’s best interests to terminate Mother’s

parental rights so that they may be adopted by parents that will provide a stable, loving

environment.

¶6 Absent a complete record, this court cannot reach Mother’s assertion that the

juvenile court erred by determining that it was in the children’s best interests to

terminate Mother’s parental rights.

¶7 Accordingly, the juvenile court’s order terminating Mother’s parental rights is

affirmed.

____________________________________

Gregory K. Orme, Judge

____________________________________

William A. Thorne Jr., Judge

____________________________________

Michele M. Christiansen, Judge