alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,158
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,245
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        406
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,416
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,272
<LOANS>                                         81,959
<ALLOWANCE>                                        532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,447
<DEPOSITS>                                      66,695
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                290
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 102,447
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,895
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  238
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   104
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,237
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,621
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,889
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,348
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       98
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,027
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       655
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.15
<LOANS-NON>                                        310
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    229
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   444
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       10
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  532
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               410
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            122


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2851 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2851

 To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to establish certain conditions 
 under which a Farm Credit System institution can terminate its status 
                        as a System institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2004

  Mr. Daschle (for himself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Farm Credit Act of 1971 to establish certain conditions 
 under which a Farm Credit System institution can terminate its status 
                        as a System institution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF FARM CREDIT SYSTEM STATUS.

    Section 7.10 of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2279d) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Conditions for Certain Termination.--Notwithstanding 
subsections (a) and (b), if the Farm Credit Administration Board 
receives an official notification that a Farm Credit System institution 
seeks to terminate its status as a System institution, the Farm Credit 
Administration--
            ``(1) shall hold not less than 1 public meeting or hearing 
        in each of the States served, as of the date of receipt of the 
        notification, by the institution; and
            ``(2) shall not approve or disapprove the termination of 
        the institution as a System institution under subsection (a)(2) 
        until on or after the date that is 180 days after the date of 
        receipt of the notification.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,730
<SECURITIES>                                     4,985
<RECEIVABLES>                                      792
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (364)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,508
<PP&E>                                           9,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,943
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,852
<SALES>                                         10,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,231
<CGS>                                            9,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,688
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,959)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.19)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Jonathan A. Dessaules, State Bar No. 019439

F. Robert Connelly, State Bar No. 021031

Chelsea M. Kartler, State Bar No. 031848

DESSAULES LAW GROUP

5353 North 16th Street, Suite 110

Phoenix, Arizona 85016

Tel. 602.274.5400

Fax 602.274.5401

jdessaules@dessauleslaw.com

rconnelly@dessauleslaw.com

ckartler@dessaueslaw.com

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA

COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Trish Coury,

Plaintiff

vs.

Ekmark & Ekmark, LLC, an Arizona limited 

liability company, Kathryn Battock, Edith I. 

Rudder,

Defendant

No. 2:15-cv-01748-DMF

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff Trish Coury, by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), hereby dismisses, with prejudice, its action against 

Defendants Ekmark & Ekmark, LLC, Kathryn Battock, and Edith I Rudder. 

DATED this 14th day of December 2015.

DESSAULES LAW GROUP

By: /s/ Jonathan A. Dessaules

Jonathan A. Dessaules

F. Robert Connely

Chelsea M. Kartler

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:15-cv-01748-SPL Document 11 Filed 12/14/15 Page 1 of 2
 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 14, 2015 I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and for transmittal of 

Notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Ekmark & Ekmark, LLC

Kathryn Battock

Edith I. Rudder

6720 N. Scottsdale Road, Suite 261 

Scottsdale, AZ 85253 

 /s/ Jenna Pitchel

Case 2:15-cv-01748-SPL Document 11 Filed 12/14/15 Page 2 of 2
#### MILLER v. SHANOSKI

No. 451P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 716

Motion by defendant for temporary stay denied 14 September 2001. Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 14 September 2001. Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas and motion for temporary stay denied 14 September 2001.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

# AGENCY:

Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

# ACTION:

Notice of Renewal of Advisory Committee.

# SUMMARY:

The Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries announces the renewal of the charter of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations.

# FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patrick McDonough, 703-414-2173.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Advisory Committee on Examinations (Advisory Committee) is to advise the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries (Joint Board) on examinations in actuarial mathematics and methodology. The Joint Board administers such examinations in discharging its statutory mandate to enroll individuals who wish to perform actuarial services with respect to pension plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Advisory Committee's functions include, but are not necessarily limited to, considering and recommending examination topics, developing examination questions, recommending proposed examinations and pass marks, and as requested by the Joint Board, making recommendations relative to the examination program.

Dated: October 6, 2014.

David Ziegler,

Chairman, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

[FR Doc. 2014-24404 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID J. LAURICK.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification granted. (See 231 *N.J.Super.*464)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Donald Corcoran,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00318-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9997 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILFRED MEJIAS.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                        <C>          <C>         <C>           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS       6-MOS       3-MOS         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1997 DEC-31-1997   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                SEP-30-1997 JUN-30-1997 MAR-31-1997   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        5,242,481   9,854,465  14,250,390    20,288,535
<SECURITIES>                          0           0           0             0
<RECEIVABLES>                   459,750     215,769     129,997        13,669
<ALLOWANCES>                          0           0           0             0
<INVENTORY>                   4,994,912   4,106,275   4,232,148     3,362,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             11,117,594  14,696,063  19,188,678    24,191,891
<PP&E>                        4,504,932   4,329,782   3,906,582     3,283,601
<DEPRECIATION>                1,314,709   1,036,195     778,894       556,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               14,359,382  18,041,283  22,368,066    26,951,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         5,445,478   6,699,093   6,399,745     6,003,261
<BONDS>                         109,177     125,578     426,399     1,395,259
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0           0           0             0
<PREFERRED>                           0           0           0             0
<COMMON>                     40,628,307  38,499,490  38,499,490    38,499,490
<OTHER-SE>                  (32,260,418)(27,780,563)(23,250,572)  (19,154,547)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 14,359,382  18,041,283  22,368,066    26,951,465
<SALES>                       1,285,182     546,407           0             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,285,182     546,407           0             0
<CGS>                         4,443,353   2,528,436           0             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,443,353   2,528,436           0             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              6,735,083   4,366,039   3,062,668     8,204,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0           0           0             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              201,399     141,699      69,698       655,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>            (13,105,871) (8,626,016)  (4,096,025)  (13,165,358)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0           0           0             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>        (13,105,871) (8,626,016)  (4,096,025)  (13,165,358)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0           0           0             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0           0           0      (573,303)
<CHANGES>                             0           0           0             0
<NET-INCOME>               (13,105,871) (8,626,016)  (4,096,025)  (13,738,661)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    (1.29)       (.85)        (.40)        (1.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (1.29)       (.85)        (.40)        (1.93)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Judy A. Hill,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04107-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Flint Law Firm LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/9/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8991 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Shaw Cowart, L.L.P.

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 499-8900

Ethan L. Shaw (TX Bar No. 18140480)

Matthew J. Riley (TX Bar No. 24070500)

Justin W. Fishback (TX Bar No. 24056736)

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

elshaw@shawcowart.com 

mriley@shawcowart.com

jfishback@shawcowart.com 

(512) 499-8900 telephone

(512) 320-8906 facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiff Evan Laufer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Evan Laufer,

 Plaintiff,

v.

C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

 Defendants.

No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

Civil Action No.: 2-16-CV-00519-DGC

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, Evan Laufer, hereby demands a trial by jury as to all issues so triable.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 26

th day of February, 2016.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 890 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SHAW COWART, LLP

By: /s/ Ethan L. Shaw 

 Ethan L. Shaw (TX Bar No. 18140480)

Matthew J. Riley (TX Bar No. 24070500)

Justin W. Fishback (TX Bar No. 24056736)

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 499-8900 telephone

(512) 320-8906 facsimile

elshaw@shawcowart.com 

mriley@shawcowart.com

jfishback@shawcowart.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Evan Laufer

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this 26th day of February, 2016, I electronically transmitted the 

foregoing Demand for Jury Trial to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys who are registered with the Court’s 

electronic filing system.

/s/ Ethan L. Shaw

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 890 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 2
! 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

Adminiarcnor A 

Daniels Gddn 

Oepuy Administrator 

(Vacant) A8rociae De uty Adminietraor 

DanierR Mulville 

I I 

Smor Adws 

Batuch 

Chid 

Ed Ht 

Senia 

Spence M 

Chid E 

W. Bna 

Chief Health & 

Dr Arnauld I 

Chid Infan 

Lee B 

Chid ! I Kathie 

Arnold Holz Ebard A. Frankle 

I 

Human Resources -- and Education 

Ed Heffernan Vicki A Novak 

--- 

Lon Garwer Jeffrey€ Suttcn Frederick Gregory 

Earth Science 

Goddsd space Fligk Caw 

Aplmso V. Dlaz 

space Flight 

Joseph H Rothenberg 

Lyndon E. JohnSpaCaCWlICr 

-ge ws Abby 

John F. Kennedy 

space Carltw 

~YD 

Georp C. Mrahall 

Space Fluht Caner 

mur 0 €!e@enson 

John C. 9mni. 

sp#xcenler 

Roy s Bless 

w lnpeaar General 

Rolnta L Gross 

John D.Schumacher(Act) 

I 

GeorgeE Reese John D Sdwmacher 

I 

ThmasS Luedtke Peggy W dhick 

Michael D Christensen Ralph C Thomas 

Technology Space Science 

Samuel L Vennwi K athie L Orsen( Act) 

Keun Fetetsen 

Lag1 Research EL, &8remiah Creedm 

Danald J. Campdl 

as of Ncvernber, 2033 

'JPL IS a ccntrador-operated faolrty