alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"Artemis II Crew\u2019s SLS Visit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dbIzg8uCdX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/artemis-ii-crews-sls-visit\/\">Artemis II Crew\u2019s SLS Visit<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/artemis-ii-crews-sls-visit\/embed\/#?secret=dbIzg8uCdX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Artemis II Crew\u2019s SLS Visit” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dbIzg8uCdX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/maf-20231116-cs2-astronautvisit02orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BASILIO ORTIZ.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                        Of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




William H. Hardman, Jr., the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary of Delta Mills, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2004
          of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of complying with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350) and may not be relied upon by anyone for any other purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaims any undertaking to update such certification
except as required by law.







Date     May 11, 2004                       By: /s/ W. H. Hardman, Jr.
      ----------------------------          ------------------------------------
                                            W.H. Hardman, Jr.
                                            Chief Financial Officer



A signed copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2521 

To suspend temporarily the duty of certain rayon staple fibers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2004 

Ms. COLLINS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rayon staple 

fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN RAYON 

4 STAPLE FIBERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.55.04 Viscose filament rayons having a decitex 

of less than 5.0 and a multi-limbed 

cross-section, the limbs having a lengthto-width aspect ratio of at least 2:1 (provided for in subheading 5504.10.00) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 
2 

•S 2521 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-20713) pertaining to the Ambassador Apartments,
Inc. (formerly Prime Residential, Inc.) (the "Company") Stock Incentive Plan
and the Company's Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-28283) and related
Prospectus relating to the registration of its common stock, of our report
dated January 30, 1998 (except Note 19, as to which the date is March 5, 1998)
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Ambassador Apartments, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                  Ernst & Young LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 19, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2415 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2415

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4141 Postmark Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, as the ``Robert J. Opinsky 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT J. OPINSKY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4141 Postmark Drive, in Anchorage, Alaska, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Robert J. Opinsky Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. 
Opinsky Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate June 9, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2415

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4141 Postmark Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, as the ``Robert J. Opinsky 
                        Post Office Building''.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the "Form 10-Q") for
the period ended March 31, 2003 of MPW Industrial Services Group, Inc. (the
"Issuer"). I, Monte R. Black, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
that:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated:  May 15, 2003

                                               /s/ Monte R. Black
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                                   Monte R. Black
                                    Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DOUGLAS ERNST.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 230 *N.J.Super.*238).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Brooks,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00162-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/17/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9811 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9811 Filed 01/25/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"Artemis I Prelaunch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"rbVmHaZJGv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/artemis-i-prelaunch-5\/\">Artemis I Prelaunch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/artemis-i-prelaunch-5\/embed\/#?secret=rbVmHaZJGv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Artemis I Prelaunch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"rbVmHaZJGv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/52481756807-f1d16d6418-o.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":308}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2853 

To require a report on the methodologies utilized for National Intelligence 

Estimates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Select Committee on Intelligence 

A BILL 

To require a report on the methodologies utilized for 

National Intelligence Estimates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL REPORT 

4 ON METHODOLOGIES UTILIZED FOR NA5 TIONAL INTELLIGENCE ESTIMATES. 

6 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act, the National Intelligence 

8 Council shall submit to Congress a report that includes 

9 the following: 
2 

•S 2853 IS 

1 (1) The methodologies utilized for the initiation, 

2 drafting, publication, coordination, and dissemina3 tion of the results of National Intelligence Estimates 

4 (NIEs). 

5 (2) Such recommendations as the Council con6 siders appropriate regarding improvements of the 

7 methodologies utilized for National Intelligence Esti8 mates in order to ensure the timeliness of such Esti9 mates and ensure that such Estimates address the 

10 national security and intelligence priorities and ob11 jectives of the President and the Director of Central 

12 Intelligence. 

13 (b) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) shall be 

14 submitted in an unclassified form, but may include a clas15 sified annex. 

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC.:


We consent to the incorporation herein by reference in the registration 
statements Nos. 333-13333 and 333-31389 on Form S-8 and No. 333-07699 on Form 
S-3 of Frontier Airlines, Inc. of our report dated June 16, 1998, relating to 
the balance sheets of Frontier Airlines, Inc. as of March 31, 1998 and 1997, and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for 
each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1998, which report
appears in the March 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Frontier Airlines,
Inc.



                                        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                        KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Denver, Colorado
July 9, 1998
Exhibit 4.8


 


Amendment No. 3


to the


JBG SMITH Properties 


2017 Omnibus Share Plan


 


The 2017 Omnibus Share
Plan of JBG SMITH Properties, effective July 17, 2017 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows, subject to and effective
upon approval by the Company’s shareholders:


 


1.                  
The first sentence of Section 2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“Subject to the provisions of this
Section 2 or any adjustment as provided in Section 18, effective April 29, 2021, awards may be granted under the Plan with respect to
18,330,200 Share Equivalents (as defined below), which, in accordance with the share counting provisions of this Section 2, would result
in the issuance of up to a maximum of 18,330,200 common shares, par value $.01, of beneficial interest in the Trust (the “Shares”)
if all awards granted under the Plan were Full Value Awards (as defined below) and 18,330,200 Shares if all awards granted under the Plan
were not Full Value Awards.”
#### Fernando FERNANDEZ-CABRERA and Yazmin Andrade Peredo, Petitioners, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 03-72980.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.**

Decided Feb. 22, 2005.

*315Howard R. Davis, Esq., Van Nuys, CA, for Petitioners.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Douglas E. Ginsburg, Esq., William C. Peachey, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Fernando Fernandez-Cabrera and Yazmin Andrade Peredo, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss in part and grant in part the petition for review, and remand for further proceedings.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to demonstrate “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.” *See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft,*327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). We do not consider whether petitioners established ten years of continuous physical presence because failure to establish hardship is dis-positive. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l); *Romero-Torres,*327 F.3d at 889.

We also lack jurisdiction over petitioners’ contention that the agency applied an incorrect legal standard in determining hardship because it is not a colorable due process claim. *See Sanchez-Cruz v. INS,*255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001).

The BIA failed to consider petitioners’ contention that the IJ’s interruption of their testimony violated their due process rights. We remand so that the BIA may in the first instance determine whether alleged procedural errors deprived petitioners of a full and fair hearing. *See Silva-Calderon v. Ashcroft,*371 F.3d 1135, 1137 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part, GRANTED in part, and REMANDED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**EXHIBIT21.1**

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF

FERRELLGAS PARTNERS, L.P.

 

Ferrellgas, L.P., a Delawarelimited partnership

Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp., a Delaware Corporation

 

SUBSIDIARIES OF

FERRELLGAS, L.P.

 

Ferrellgas Real Estate, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Ferrellgas Receivables, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

Ferrellgas Finance Corp., a Delaware Corporation

Blue Rhino Canada, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Blue Rhino Global Sourcing, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Uni Asia, Ltd, a Seychelles limited company

 

----
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9804 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European
Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William V. CareyWilliam V. CareyChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2009
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF J.E.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.