alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND FOOTNOTES
THERETO AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    929,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,468,500
<PP&E>                                         669,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 388,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,797,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,301,200
<BONDS>                                         17,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,200
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,797,500
<SALES>                                      2,270,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,988,000
<CGS>                                        2,490,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,490,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              82,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,360,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,360,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,360,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Hector Mario Gonzalez v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00394-CR

Trial court case number: 1397723

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s brief was due on June 18, 2015. A motion for extension of time was filed on 

July 14, 2015, but the motion requested an extension until July 14, 2015 and no brief was tendered 

with the motion or subsequently filed. On September 22, 2015, this court issued an order, directing 

the trial court to hold a hearing to determine if appellant wished to prosecute his appeal or if 

appointed counsel, J. Sidney Crowley had abandoned the appeal or, if not, when counsel would 

file the brief. 

On October 14, 2015, appellant’s brief was received and appellant’s counsel filed a motion 

to reinstate. Accordingly, we grant the motion to reinstate, vacate our order of September 22, 

2015, order the appeal reinstated, and order appellant’s brief filed. The State’s brief will be due 

30 days from the date of this order. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 20, 2015
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael Staran

Michael StaranChief Executive OfficerMarch 26, 2010
 /s/ Jarett Fenton

Jarett FentonChief Financial OfficerMarch 26, 2010
 This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Polar Resources Ice Mining Experiment-1 (PRIME-1)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"j4pbPsHIXl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/polar-resources-ice-mining-experiment-1-prime-1-2\/\">Polar Resources Ice Mining Experiment-1 (PRIME-1)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/polar-resources-ice-mining-experiment-1-prime-1-2\/embed\/#?secret=j4pbPsHIXl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Polar Resources Ice Mining Experiment-1 (PRIME-1)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"j4pbPsHIXl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/prime_20200310_-_5.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Peabodys Coffee Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2002 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the capacities and on the date indicted below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          materials  respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
          of the Company.


November 14, 2002                       By: /s/ Todd Tkachuk
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Todd Tkachuk
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer,
                                            Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11307 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MAURICE JEFFRIES, also known as David Wayne Smith, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:02:CR-97-ALL-J

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Maurice Jeffries has appealed the sentence imposed following his jury conviction of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and cocaine base. Jeffries was sentenced to a 235-month term of imprisonment and to a five-year period of supervised release. Jeffries contends that his sentence should be vacated because it was imposed pursuant to an unconstitutional mandatory guidelines system, contrary to United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738, 768–69 (2005), a so-called Fanfan error. See UnitedNo. 04-11307 -2- States v. Martinez-Lugo , 411 F.3d 597, 600 (5th Cir. 2005). As Jeffries concedes, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511, 520–21 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Under the third prong of the plain-error analysis, Jeffries must show that the error affected his substantial rights. See Martinez-Lugo , 411 F.3d at 600. Jeffries does not contend that the error affected the outcome of the proceedings and a review of the record does not suggest otherwise. See United States v. Inman , 411 F.3d 591, 595 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Bringier , 405 F.3d 310, 317 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 26, 2005) (No. 05-5535). Jeffries contends that prejudice should be presumed or that a showing of prejudice should not be required because the error was structural. We have previously rejected this contention. See Martinez-Lugo , 411 F.3d at 601; see also United States v. Malveaux , 411 F.3d 558, 560 n.9 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (July 11, 2005) (No. 05-5297). Jeffries has not shown that his substantial rights were affected because the district court sentenced him pursuant to a mandatory guideline scheme. See Martinez-Lugo , 411 F.3d at 601. The judgment is
AFFIRMED. Jeffries has filed a pro se motion for substitution of counsel. The motion is DENIED. Because Jeffries is not entitled to hybrid representation, the substantive issues raised byNo. 04-11307 -3- Jeffries in his pro se filings have not been considered. See United States v. Ogbonna , 184 F.3d 447, 449 & n.1 (5th Cir. 1999); 5 TH C IR . R. 28.7. AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Perkins & Marie Callender’s Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended April 18, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph F. Trungale, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 7, 2010


BY:/s/ Joseph F. TrungaleJoseph F. TrungalePresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### PATERSON POLICE PBA, LOCAL NO. 1 v. CITY OF PATERSON, ETC.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Explorer 1","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wfVI40TjUV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/explorer-1\/\">Explorer 1<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/explorer-1\/embed\/#?secret=wfVI40TjUV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Explorer 1” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wfVI40TjUV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7764

JOHN J. SIMMONS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JIM DUNN, Former Solicitor of the Georgetown

County Solicitor's Office; NELSON BROWN,

Georgetown Police Officer; LARRY C. BATSON,

SCDC General Counsel; JOHN G. NORRIS, Chief of

SCDC Offender Records Branch; FLORA BROOKS

BOYD, Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-93-1443-2-8AJ)

Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John J. Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Peterson Groves, Sr.,

Carol Brittian Ervin, YOUNG, CLEMENT, RIVERS & TISDALE, Charleston,

South Carolina; Arrigo Paul Carotti, John Betts McCutcheon, Jr.,

MCCUTCHEON, MCCUTCHEON & BAXTER, P.A., Conway, South Carolina, for

Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simmons v. Dunn,

No. CA-93-1443-2-8AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET--MARCH 31, 1999 AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. </LEGEND>

       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Mar-31-1999
<CASH>                                     294,438,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           347,839,000
<PP&E>                                     253,973,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,028,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             702,718,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      186,099,000
<BONDS>                                    583,956,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       527,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (70,258,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               702,718,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,523,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,440,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,761,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (108,112,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (108,112,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (108,112,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.05)
        


</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF LOUIS B. YOUMANS, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

Decided January 25, 1990.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Emergent Suspension With Restraints

The Office of Attorney Ethics having petitioned the Supreme Court for an order temporarily suspending Louis B. Youmans of Wall Township from the practice of law pursuant to *R.*1:20— 5(b), and for restraints on the disbursal of funds from all accounts maintained pursuant to A. 1:21-6, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Louis B. Youmans of Wall Township admitted to practice in this State in 1977, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such protective action pursuant to A.l:20-ll(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of Louis B. Youmans wherever situate, pending further order of this Court; and it is further

*401ORDERED that all funds, if any, presently existing in any New Jersey financial institution pursuant to *R.*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Louis B. Youmans show cause before this Court on Jan. 30., 1990, at 2:00 p.m. in the Supreme Court courtroom, why the temporary suspension and restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any complaints against him and until further order of the Court and further why the trust funds maintained by Louis B. Youmans, restrained from disbursement by this Order, should not be transmitted by the financial institutions which are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the respondent may move prior to the return date of this Order to Show Cause, on an application for good cause shown, for modification of this Order or the restraints contained herein; and it is further

ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, shall present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Louis B. Youmans be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics governing suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PAUL SYLVESTER.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, October 23, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Correction and Approval of Minutes for October 9, 2014
Draft Advisory Opinion 2014-16: Connecticut Democratic State Central 
Committee
Proposed Final Audit Report on the Democratic Party of Illinois (A11-
15)
Management and Administrative Matters

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, 
at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-25015 Filed 10-16-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P