alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Space Suits and Exploration Operations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"z5FecHJFuQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/space-suits-and-exploration-operations\/\">Space Suits and Exploration Operations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/space-suits-and-exploration-operations\/embed\/#?secret=z5FecHJFuQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Space Suits and Exploration Operations” — NASA\" data-secret=\"z5FecHJFuQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/748544main-iss035e037030-full.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 0 434 LT Case No. 1 6 -2 022 -CT-0 05296 -AXXX

_____________________________ M ARIO A NTOINE C ASON , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the County Court for Duval County. Emmet Ferguson, III, Judge. Charlie Cofer, Pub lic Defender, and Elizabeth H ogan Webb, Assistant Public Defender, Jackson ville, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Benjamin Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee. Ma rch 19, 202 4

P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED
. W ALLIS , H ARRIS and M AC I VER , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Royal Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Narberth, Pennsylvania



         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-129894 and File No. 333-25855) of Royal
Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2006, relating
to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of Royal
Bancshares of Pennsylvania, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting,
which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                              /s/ Beard Miller Company LLP



Beard Miller Company LLP
Reading, Pennsylvania
March 14, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of The Newark Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Mullen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financialcondition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods presented. 

Dated: March 9,2007 

 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure statement. 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on S-8 (No.333-73047; 333-68871; 333-58753;333-57893;333-56823;333-08025;333-87315;333-82489;333-45680;333-56798;333-90136;333-127501) of BankAtlanticBancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPFort Lauderdale, Florida
#### Weeden Lawson *v.*James W. Hopkins.

Attachments — Burden of Proof.

The grounds of attachment having been controverted by the answer, the burden of proving it thus devolved on the plaintiff.

APPEAL FROM BULLITT CIRCUIT COURT.

September 30, 1869.

*W. H.*Thompson, *for appellant.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hardin:

The appellant sued out his attachment on the 25th of April, 1867, on the grounds that the defendant was “about to sell, convey and dispose of his property with the fraudulent intent to cheat, hinder and delay his creditors.” This was controverted by the answer, and the burden of proving it thus devolved on the plaintiff.

It seems to this court that there was no sufficient evidence before the court to sustain said grounds of attachment, and the court, therefore, properly adjudged that the plaintiff’s attachment created a lien only from the 8th day of February, 1869, when his supplemental affidavit was filed.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 11, 2014

NO. 03-10-00348-CR

Michael Cooper, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART ON REMAND --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the trial 

court’s judgments of conviction as to Counts II and IV. Therefore, the Court vacates the trial 

court’s judgments of conviction for aggravated robbery in Counts II and IV and affirms the trial 

court’s judgments of conviction for aggravated robbery as to Counts I, III, and VII. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2856

AN ACT

To limit the transfer of certain Commodity Credit Corporation funds between conservation programs for technical

assistance for the programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2856 ES

1 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1241 of the Food Security

3 Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3841) is amended by striking sub4 section (b) and inserting the following:

5 ‘‘(b) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—Effective for fiscal

6 year 2005 and each subsequent fiscal year, Commodity

7 Credit Corporation funds made available for each of the

8 programs specified in paragraphs (1) through (7) of sub9 section (a)—

10 ‘‘(1) shall be available for the provision of tech11 nical assistance for the programs for which funds

12 are made available; and

13 ‘‘(2) shall not be available for the provision of

14 technical assistance for conservation programs speci15 fied in subsection (a) other than the program for

16 which the funds were made available.’’.

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

18 subsection (a) takes effect on October 1, 2004.

Passed the Senate October 11, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2856

AN ACT

To limit the transfer of certain Commodity Credit

grams for technical assistance for the programs.Corporation funds between conservation pro-
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"The night lights of the southeast Chinese port city of Xiamen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"skOTA0XVJx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/the-night-lights-of-the-southeast-chinese-port-city-of-xiamen\/\">The night lights of the southeast Chinese port city of Xiamen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/the-night-lights-of-the-southeast-chinese-port-city-of-xiamen\/embed\/#?secret=skOTA0XVJx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The night lights of the southeast Chinese port city of Xiamen” — NASA\" data-secret=\"skOTA0XVJx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/iss069e027389.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. KENNETH EMIL MEYERS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 611 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 27th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Michael Camino Johnson, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01216-PHX-DJH

DETENTION ORDER 

 On July 3, 2019, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for revocation 

of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The Court 

considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be released on 

conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that 

he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released pursuant 

to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 U.S.C. § 

3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 3rd day of July, 2019. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-28","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6Nf7Ghvmml\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-28\/\">STS-28<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-28\/embed\/#?secret=6Nf7Ghvmml\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-28” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6Nf7Ghvmml\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Order entered December 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00594-CR

JOSE ANGEL JASSO JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F09-72432-P

ORDER

The Court ORDERS court reporter Debi Harris to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the 

date of this order, a supplemental record containing State’s Exhibit no. 5, a DVD.

The record before the Court does not contain the trial court’s certification of appellant’s 

right to appeal, which is required in every criminal case in which a defendant appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State, 2013 WL 5220904 (Tex. Crim. App. Sept. 18, 

2013). Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of 

this order, a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects the trial court 

proceedings.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Teresa Hawthorne, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judicial District Court; Debi Harris, 
Auxiliary Court Reporter; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40975 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. PEDRO ESTRADA

- RODRIGUEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 328

- 1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Pedro Estrada

- Rodriguez raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Morales

Mota , 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 133 S. Ct. 2374 (2013). In Morales

- Mot a , 704 F.3d at 412, this court, relying upon its holding in United States v. Joslin , 487 F. App’x 139, 141

- 43 (5th Cir. 2012) (unpublished) , cert. denied , 133 S. Ct. 1847 (2013), rejected the argument that the Texas offense of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40975 Document: 00512598111 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014No. 13

- 40975 “burglary of a habitation” is outside the generic, contemporary definition of

“ burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G

. § 2L1.2(b)(1) (A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person with a “greater right to possession.” Accordingly, Estrada

- Rodriguez’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-40975 Document: 00512598111 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,058,676
<SECURITIES>                                 1,991,658
<RECEIVABLES>                                  127,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (67,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,697,924
<PP&E>                                         714,604
<DEPRECIATION>                               (154,368)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,952,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,340,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,524,561
<OTHER-SE>                                         989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,952,357
<SALES>                                      1,299,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,299,024
<CGS>                                          678,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  678,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,143,083
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,237,252)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (154,790)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,082,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 300,474
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (781,988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
I

105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4854

To declare certain Amerasians to be citizens of the United States.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 19, 1998

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To declare certain Amerasians to be citizens of the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CITIZENSHIP FOR CERTAIN AMERASIANS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding title III of the

5 Immigration and Nationality Act, or any other provision

6 of law, each eligible alien (as defined in subsection (b))

7 is declared to be a citizen of the United States as of the

8 date of the enactment of this Act.

9 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term

10 ‘‘eligible alien’’ means an alien—
2

•HR 4854 IH

1 (1) having the status of an alien lawfully admit2 ted for permanent residence (as defined in section

3 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8

4 U.S.C. 1101(a)) before the date of the enactment of

5 this Act;

6 (2) who was granted that status when the alien

7 was under the age of nine years; and

8 (3) who—

9 (A)(i) was granted that status pursuant to

10 a petition filed under section 204(f) of such Act

11 (8 U.S.C. 1154(f)) (or any predecessor provi12 sion); and

13 (ii) was adopted by a United States citizen;

14 or

15 (B)(i) was admitted to the United States

16 under section 584 of the Foreign Operations,

17 Export Financing, and Related Programs Ap18 propriations Act, 1988 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note);

19 (ii) is an alien described in subsection

20 (b)(1)(A) of such section; and

21 (iii) was adopted by a United States citi22 zen.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: February 23, 2011
    /s/ Scott A. MusilScott A. MusilChief Financial Officer