alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Schmitt Industries, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the Fiscal year ended May 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Wayne A. Case and Robert C. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 

Wayne A. Case

Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2004

 

Robert C. Thompson

Chief Financial Officer

August 11, 2004

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.6
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED RECEIVABLE INTEREST
SALE AGREEMENT
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED RECEIVABLE INTEREST SALE AGREEMENT, Amendment Originator Buyer Existing Agreement Agreement. Unless defined
elsewhere herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to such
terms in Exhibit I to the Existing Agreement.
 W I T N E S S E T H :
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 Amendments
  Pool Receivables
 Pool Receivables Pool Receivable




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties
    Conditions Precedent
 Miscellaneous
 CHOICE OF LAW
 Counterparts
 Ratification of Agreement
 <
Signature pages follow>
 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
  Ferrellgas, Inc.
 By:Name:Title:FERRELLGAS RECEIVABLES, LLCBy:Name:Title:
 3




---



##### 



By its signature below, the Agent, on behalf of the Purchasers, hereby consents to the foregoing
Amendment as of the date first above written:
  By:Name:Title:
 4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 3, 2019

No. 04-18-00918-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.O.M. AND K.R.M., CHILDREN,

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008CI09446

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief and appendix were due to be filed by May 1, 2019. Appellants’ brief 

was timely filed, but the appendix was filed at 12:01 a.m. on May 2, 2019. Later on May 2, 2019, 

appellants filed a Notice of Filing of Joint Appellants’ Appendix, stating the appendix was latefiled due to “technical difficulties” and seeking guidance regarding whether appellants should 

file a motion for extension of time to file the appendix. In the interest of justice, it is ORDERED 

that appellants’ late-filed appendix is accepted. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of May, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"Gemini VI","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iSzwJXK6va\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/gemini-vi\/\">Gemini VI<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/gemini-vi\/embed\/#?secret=iSzwJXK6va\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Gemini VI” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iSzwJXK6va\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S65-55983\/S65-55983~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

The following Commission meeting has been cancelled. No earlier announcement of the cancellation was possible.

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 22, 2014.

# PLACE:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (entry from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *DQ Fire and Explosion Consultants,*                         Docket Nos. WEVA 2011-952-R, et al. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in ruling that the violation of the order in question was the result of high negligence.).                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,

Administrative Assistant.

[FR Doc. 2014-25379 Filed 10-21-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) No. CR 02-508-PHX-ROS

) CR 98-292-PHX-ROS

Justin Ryan Scott, )

) ORDER OF DETENTION

Defendant. )

_________________________________)

In accordance with the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the issue of detention

was addressed at a hearing on August 15, 2007. The Court was informed that the defendant

is subject to other custody and is not eligible for release at this time.

The Court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is subject to

other custody and should be similarly detained in this case. If circumstances change such

that defendant is no longer in custody in the other matter, defendant shall have leave to

request that the matter of detention be reopened in this case.

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further proceedings. The

defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated

representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable,

from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The

Case 2:98-cr-00292-ROS Document 57 Filed 08/17/07 Page 1 of 2
2

defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with defense

counsel. On order of the Court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility shall deliver the defendant to the

United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a Court

proceeding.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should a motion for review/reconsideration of this

detention order be filed, it is counsel's responsibility to deliver a copy of the motion for

review/reconsideration to Pretrial Services at least one day prior to the hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a release to a third party is to be considered, it

is counsel's responsibility to notify Pretrial Services sufficiently in advance of the hearing

to allow Pretrial Services an opportunity to interview and investigate the potential third party

custodian.

DATED this 16th day of August, 2007.

Case 2:98-cr-00292-ROS Document 57 Filed 08/17/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2882 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 2882

To make the program for national criminal history background checks for 
                      volunteer groups permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2004

 Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Biden) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make the program for national criminal history background checks for 
                      volunteer groups permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VOLUNTEER GROUP ACCESS TO CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (Public Law 108-21) is 
amended by striking ``an 18-month'' and inserting ``a''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Joseph W. Cottingham *v.*R. B. Hoss.

Warranty, Breach of — Evidence to Establish.

To establish a breach of warranty without a judicial eviction, the evidence must be of a clear and preponderating character.

APPEAL FROM LEWIS CIRCUIT COURT.

January 19, 1870.

*G. M.*Thomas, Phister, *for appellant.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The petition and amended petition only charge a general warranty of the title of the horse sold by appellant to appellee and Latle and against the title of the United States Government and its officers.

As the horse had been sold by a quarter-master of the United States army and purchased by appellant he became possessed of the government title which could not be impaired because the proper brand indicating it had been condemned was not placed on it.

Even if the U. S. brand on the shoulder should be regarded as *prima facie*title in the government the proof of sale by the quarter-master repels this presumption.

To establish a breach of warranty without a judicial eviction on the mere claim of military officers who were generally not well versed in the law or its administration, nor in the private personal rights of the citizen would violate the great protection thrown around them.

Where there is no judicial eviction to authorize a recovery upon the warranty of title the evidence must be of a clear and satisfactory character which it is not in this case being mainly the *prima facie*presumption arising from the brand which is fully repelled by the proof of sale by the proper officer.

Wherefore .the judgment is_ reversed with directions for a new trial.
II 

Calendar No. 683 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2508 

[Report No. 108–327] 

To redesignate the Ridges Basin Reservoir, Colorado, as Lake Nighthorse. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. ALLARD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

AUGUST 25, 2004 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of July 22, 2004, by Mr. 

DOMENICI, with an amendment 

[Insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Ridges Basin Reservoir, Colorado, as 

Lake Nighthorse. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RENAMING OF RESERVOIR. 

4 The reservoir known as the ‘‘Ridges Basin Reservoir’’ 

5 located on Basin Creek, a tributary of the Animas River 
2 

•S 2508 RS 

1 in Colorado, constructed under section 6(a) of the Colo2 rado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988 

3 (102 Stat. 2975; 114 Stat. 2763A–260), shall be known 

4 and designated as ‘‘Lake Nighthorse’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the reservoir 

8 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

9 to Lake Nighthorse. 

Calendar No. 683 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2508 

[Report No. 108–327] 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Ridges Basin Reservoir, 

Colorado, as Lake Nighthorse. 

AUGUST 25, 2004 

Reported with an amendment
IGJ 

I KAR D G 0 L DEN J 0 N ES PC 

August 17, 2015 

Via e-filing 

Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Clerk of the Third Court of Appeals 

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 

209 West 14th Street, Room 101 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Re: Cause No. 03-13-00790-CV, Trial Court No. D-1 -GN-07-002328; T. Mark 

Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted M Anderson, and Christine 

Anderson, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Ted M Anderson v. Richard T 

Archer, David R. Archer, Carol Archer Bugg, John V Archer, Karen 

Archer Ball, and Sherri Archer, In the Court of Appeals for the Third 

District of Texas at Austin, Texas 

Dear Mr. Kyle: 

In response to the Court's August 4, 2015 letter, please be advised that Laurie Ratliff will 

present oral argument for Appellees/Cross-Appellants on September 2, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. 

By separate motion, Appellees/Cross-Appellants set out their requested allotment of time. 

Very truly yours, 

~~ LR/tm 

CC: Clients 

Gerald Mcfarlen, via e-mail 

T:\ARCHER 3 2007 TORTIOUS !NTERFERENCE\APPEAL\CORRESPONDENCE\20 15-08- 17 Ltr to Clerk re Oral Argument.doc 

400 West 15t h St . I Su ite 975 I Aust in , TX 78701 I T 512 472 6695 I F 512 472 3669 I igjlaw.com 

ACCEPTED

03-13-00790-CV

6528086

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/17/2015 3:36:02 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/17/2015 3:36:02 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9866-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections                           ( print page 63137)                        552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Services Conflict.                    

*Date:*                         November 4, 2014.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Karen Gavin-Evans, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 6153, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2356,                         *gavinevanskm@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 16, 2014.

Carolyn A. Baum,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-25046 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Edward Sodens et al *v.*E. P. Watkins' Admr.

Debtor and Creditor — Off-Set.

A fund, conmg into the hands of a commissioner, appointed by the court, is subject to the orders of the court, and unless, upon dissolving the commission, the plaintiff move for an order of payment over to him, the relation of creditor and debtor will govern.

Same.

Any off-set the debtor thus had, could be used in settlement of accounts between the parties.

APPEAL FROM CALDWELL CIRCUIT COURT.

March 8, 1870.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Tinsley administered upon the estate of Thomas Sodens, deceased, and by some legal proceedings the land and slaves of said decedent were ordered to be sold, when Tinsley became the purchaser.

The decedent, Watkins, was appointed the commissioner to make this sale, collect the money, etc., and Tinsley had paid him a portion or all of the purchase price, when, at the instance of some interested party, the said sale was set aside on the development that Tinsley had over four thousand dollars of personal assets of the estate in his hands.

No order was made disposing of the money paid by Tinsley to Watkins when the sale was annulled. A suit was then brought *662against Tinsley for a settlement and judgment for whatever should be found in his hands belonging to Sodens’ estate.

*Calvert & Darby, for appellants.*

*Marble, for appellee.*

Watkins having died and his personal estate being insufficient to pay his debts, his administrator brought suit to have a settlement with his creditors, etc.

Tinsley owed Watkins within less than three hundred dollars of the amount which he had paid Watkins on the purchase of the Sodens land and slaves and his administrator claimed an off-set. Tinsley being insolvent, the Sodens heirs also claim a priority as to this fund so in Watkins’ hands, as they had attached it in their proceedings against Tinsley, and the court having rejected their prior claim this is the sole question for our determination.

It is true the money was paid by Tinsley to Watkins as commissioner on said sale, and purchase, but when the sale was set aside the money became Tinsley’s own private funds, and he could have obtained an order for the commissioner to return it, and this being in his hands as an officer of the court, any private claims of his against Tinsley would have been left to the results of a private litigation. But as Tinsley did not seek or obtain an order of restitution, he thereby left it to be governed by the usual rules regulating the relation of mutual creditors and debtors.

If ad this been a common indebtedness existing mutually between these parties there can be no doubt of Watkins’ right of set-off which would have over-reached any attachment or other process by another creditor. Tinsley’s failure to obtain an order of restitution left him to recover the money from Watkins by the ordinary proceedings as for money received to his use in which proceedings Watkins could set up and establish his set-off.

The court, therefore, properly adjudged against Watkins’ administrator only the balance due Tinsley on a settlement of their mutual indebtedness.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*