alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,057
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,113
<PP&E>                                           7,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,009
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,548
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,618
<SALES>                                        125,156
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,156
<CGS>                                           69,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (256)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,349
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,475
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 12.1

                HISPANIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (in thousands except ratio)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Three Months
                                                 Year Ended December 31,              Ended      Year Ended
                                       -----------------------------------------   December 31,  September 30,
                                         2000       1999       1998       1997         1996          1996
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------   -----------   ------------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>           <C>
EARNINGS:
  Income (loss) from continuing
    operations before income taxes     $ 68,591   $ 57,989   $ 44,624   $ 31,389     $  2,164      $(29,092)
  Fixed charges                           2,481      3,054      3,292      4,863        2,965        11,793
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------     --------      --------
  Earnings as adjusted (A)             $ 71,072   $ 61,043   $ 47,916   $ 36,252     $  5,129      $(17,299)
                                       ========   ========   ========   ========     ========      ========

FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest expense                     $    819   $  1,607   $  2,046   $  3,947     $  2,867      $ 11,241
  Interest portion of rental
   expense (1)                            1,662      1,447      1,246        916           98           552
                                       --------   --------   --------   --------     --------      --------
Total fixed charges (B)                $  2,481   $  3,054   $  3,292   $  4,863     $  2,965      $ 11,793
                                       ========   ========   ========   ========     ========      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
  (A) divided by (B)                       28.6       20.0       14.6        7.5          1.7             -
Deficiency of earnings to cover
  fixed charges (B) minus (A)          $      -   $      -   $      -   $      -     $      -      $ 29,092
</TABLE>

(1)  Management of the Company believes one-third of rent expense is
     representative of the interest component of rent expense.
!"

#$%&#!!'#(

&#	#

!)*)*+,-


!-.)/",)*/012

#3"!	34!

'!5



	6#7!!!8'&38'#9!":3;!))<#

=3&
&	+-9%<

	"!;!'#!3&3#'#3#&!3'7&!'#"!$3







>;.!5 	#'

 
3"$&!3

3=?7&!

@ABCD

EFGHIHJKL

MNBBOPQDROCSTPBCSU FQVQPNFSWN@XYYCXBV

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 116 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remy International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rajesh K. Shah, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/    Rajesh K. Shah

---

Rajesh K. Shah

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer





August 5, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Remy
International, Inc. and will be retained by Remy International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Susan K. Robinson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04287-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Bertram & Graf LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/27/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9211 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Richard J. Fitzpatrick, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cowlitz Bancorporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report
any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect the registrants internal
control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ Richard J. FitzpatrickRichard J. Fitzpatrick, Chief Executive OfficerCowlitz Bancorporation
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Aviation West Charters LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Star Marketing and Administration 

Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-01614-PHX-PGR

ORDER 

 This action was originally filed in Maricopa County Court and removed to this 

Court based on diversity jurisdiction. Because there is a question regarding whether there 

is complete diversity between the parties and thus whether this Court has diversity 

jurisdiction over this matter, the Court will vacate the upcoming scheduling conference 

and require the Plaintiff to show cause why the allegedly improperly joined Defendant 

should not be dismissed. 

 In the Notice of Removal, Defendants admitted that there would not be complete 

diversity if Defendant Trustmark Services Company is considered because both 

Defendant Trustmark and Plaintiff are citizens of Delaware. Defendants contend, 

however, that Trustmark has been improperly joined to defeat diversity jurisdiction. 

(Doc. 1 at 3-4.) Defendants’ contention appears to be supported by the allegations of the 

complaint, which do not include claims against Trustmark (Doc. 1-1 at 4-9.). 

 Although Plaintiff indicates its belief that “there is complete diversity of 

citizenship between the parties” (Doc. 10 at 3), Plaintiff does not provide any explanation 

Case 2:15-cv-01614-PGR Document 11 Filed 10/28/15 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

as to how there can be complete diversity if both Plaintiff and Defendant Trustmark are 

citizens of Delaware. Further, Plaintiff does not explain why Trustmark has been joined 

in the matter as a defendant or contest Defendants’ position that Trustmark has been 

improperly joined. 

 The Court must, before proceeding in this matter, determine whether it has 

jurisdiction to do so. Accordingly, the Court will require Plaintiff to show cause why 

Defendant Trustmark Services Company should not be dismissed as improperly joined. 

 IT IS ORDERED that that the Scheduling Conference, set for November 5, 2015, 

is vacated. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file, no later than November 13, 

2015, a brief showing cause as to why Defendant Trustmark Services Company should 

not be dismissed from this action as improperly joined. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file, no later than 

November 30, 2015, a response to Plaintiff’s show-cause brief. 

 Dated this 28th day of October, 2015. 

Case 2:15-cv-01614-PGR Document 11 Filed 10/28/15 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Susan C. Konkel, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03539-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8800 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8800 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EXE Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Joseph L. Cowan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Kenneth R. Vines, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 14, 2003
    
    /s/  Joseph L. CowanJoseph L. CowanChief Executive OfficerDated: November 14, 2003
    
    /s/  Kenneth R. VinesKenneth R. VinesChief Financial Officer


34
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

19839 Nordhoff Street 

Northridge, California 91324 

(818) 886 2525

Lisa Counters, SBN 016436 lisa@countersfirm.com 

The Counters Firm, P.C. 

7303 W. Boston Street 

Chandler, AZ 85226 

(602) 490-0030 (voice) 

(888) 683-8397 (fax) 

Glenn R. Kantor, State Bar No. 122643, 

Admitted Pro Hac Vice 

E-mail: gkantor@kantorlaw.net 

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

19839 Nordhoff Street 

Northridge, California 91324 

(818) 886 2525 (Tel) 

(818) 350 6272 (Fax) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

WILLIAM CULBERSON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

WILLIAM CULBERSON, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

UNITEDHEALTHCARE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, THE 

PROCTOR & GAMBLE RETIREE 

HEALTH PLAN, AND PROCTOR & 

GAMBLE COMPANY. 

Defendants. 

Case No.: CV-15-1651-PHX-JAT

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY 

DISMISSAL WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1)(i), plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action 

without prejudice. 

Dated: April 7, 2016 THE COUNTERS FIRM, P.C. 

By: /s/ Lisa J. Counters Lisa Counters 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, 

 WILLIAM CULBERSON 

/ / / 

Case 2:15-cv-01651-JAT Document 23 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 2 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

19839 Nordhoff Street 

Northridge, California 91324 

(818) 886 2525

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP 

By: /s/ Glenn R. Kantor 

 Glenn R. Kantor 

 Admitted Pro Hac Vice

 Attorney for Plaintiff, 

 WILLIAM CULBERSON 

Case 2:15-cv-01651-JAT Document 23 Filed 04/07/16 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                       657
<INVENTORY>                                     22,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,443
<PP&E>                                          49,347
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,968
<BONDS>                                          7,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           119
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,513
<SALES>                                         90,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,141
<CGS>                                           65,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    84
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>