alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Polymer Derived Ceramic Nanocomposites for Advanced Thermoelectrics","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"EzhUtv2X2q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/polymer-derived-ceramic-nanocomposites-for-advanced-thermoelectrics\/\">Polymer Derived Ceramic Nanocomposites for Advanced Thermoelectrics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/polymer-derived-ceramic-nanocomposites-for-advanced-thermoelectrics\/embed\/#?secret=EzhUtv2X2q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Polymer Derived Ceramic Nanocomposites for Advanced Thermoelectrics” — NASA\" data-secret=\"EzhUtv2X2q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/barrios_elizabeth.png?w=431","thumbnail_width":431,"thumbnail_height":361}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-30-1996
<CASH>                                  4,266,168
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              61,047
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                 6,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        4,333,531
<PP&E>                                  3,035,929
<DEPRECIATION>                             71,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          8,026,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,260,419  
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                   34,096
<OTHER-SE>                              5,822,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            8,026,736
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        3,314,112 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         86,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (3,076,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (3,076,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          (305,301)
<CHANGES>                                       0 
<NET-INCOME>                           (3,382,160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.72)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dacia Massengill","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/daciamassengill-2\/","title":"NASA Administrator Bill Nelson announces Blue Origin as the company selected to develop a sustainable human landing system","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Gs6uh9UClw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52909813294-3fad4afcf4-k\/\">NASA Administrator Bill Nelson announces Blue Origin as the company selected to develop a sustainable human landing system<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/52909813294-3fad4afcf4-k\/embed\/#?secret=Gs6uh9UClw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Administrator Bill Nelson announces Blue Origin as the company selected to develop a sustainable human landing system” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Gs6uh9UClw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/52909813294-3fad4afcf4-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"Former Astronaut Buzz Aldrin","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ALRFnAPl4U\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/buzz-aldrin\/\">Former Astronaut Buzz Aldrin<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/buzz-aldrin\/embed\/#?secret=ALRFnAPl4U\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Former Astronaut Buzz Aldrin” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ALRFnAPl4U\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
No. 87-6404.

#### Smith *v.*Brigham.

Sup. Jud. Ct. Me. Certiorari denied.
1The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 00-3023NE

_____________

McArthur Johnson, *

*

Appellant, * On Appeal from the United

* States District Court

v. * for the District of

* Nebraska.

Union Pacific Railroad Company, a *

Corporation, * [Not To Be Published]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 25, 2001

 Filed: August 2, 2001

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

McArthur Johnson appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Union Pacific

Railroad, his former employer, in his Americans with Disabilities Act case. Upon a

thorough review of the record--and of Johnson’s appellate brief, which does not present

us with any specific legal challenge to the jury verdict or to the trial--we conclude that

the District Court’s1 judgment should be affirmed.
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Johnson’s motion

for appointment of counsel.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 13.02

CERTIFICATION OF 
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Owen A. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer of International Hi-Tech Industries Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) 	the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) 	the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|By:
Name:
Title:
Date: | /s/ Owen A. Anderson                
Owen A. Anderson
Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2005
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Thomas Earl GREENE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-7898.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 24, 2005.

Decided: March 9, 2005.

Thomas Earl Greene, Appellant pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Earl Greene appeals the district court’s order accepting and adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim and failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Greene that failure to timely file specific, written objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Greene failed to file specific objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Greene’s filed objections were entirely general and conelusory.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review' of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. *See Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845^46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Am,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Greene has waived appellate review by failing to file objections with any specificity after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 25, 2008
    /s/ Joseph S. CompofeliceJoseph A. CompofelicePresident, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board (Principal
Executive Officer)Date: February 25, 2008
    /s/ Geoff A. JonesGeoff A JonesVice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER



I, David D. Duncan, Principal Accounting Officer of Main Street Banks, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                               |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 14, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/ DAVID D. DUNCAN                          
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | David D. Duncan, Principal Accounting Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eugene McCleveland,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04146-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Johnson Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/13/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9059 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9406-2 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9406-2 Filed 12/19/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert C. Riddick,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03657-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9178 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
___________________________________________________________________________ 

SUGGESTION OF DEATH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Bonita Jean Wilde 

Civil Action No.: 2:17-cv-01525-DGC 

No. 2:15-MD-02641 -DGC 

SUGGESTION OF DEATH 

Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 25 of the Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby informs this Honorable Court of the death of Plaintiff Bonita 

Jean Wilde, which occurred on or about October 14, 2016. Plaintiff respectfully informs this 

Court that a Motion for Substitution of Parties will be filed by the appropriate representative of 

Bonita Jean Wilde’s estate within the appropriate time period. 

Dated: December 18, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

LOPEZ McHUGH LLP

By /s/Matthew R. Lopez 

Ramon Rossi Lopez (CA Bar No. 86361) 

 (admitted pro hac vice) 

Matthew Ramon Lopez (CA Bar No. 263134 

 (admitted pro hac vice) 

100 Bayview Circle, Suite 5600 

Newport Beach, California 92660 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9403 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 2
___________________________________________________________________________ 

SUGGESTION OF DEATH 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 18th day of December, 2017, I electronically transmitted 

the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing. 

/s/Matthew R. Lopez 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9403 Filed 12/18/17 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00073-CR

Jose M. FLORES,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR8346W

Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 28, 2018

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure provides that an appeal “must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant 

has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d). The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not 

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, 

the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that defendant has no right of appeal. See
04-18-00073-CR

- 2 -

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). In addition, appellant’s counsel has filed a document in which he states 

that he has reviewed the clerk’s record and can find no right of appeal for Appellant; counsel 

concedes that the trial court’s certification stating the defendant has no right of appeal is correct. 

In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel that the defendant has no right 

of appeal; therefore, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. TEX.R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH