alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

         EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report, as amended, of Royal Bancshares a
Pennsylvania ("Royal") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph P. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Royal as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
            Report.






                                                         /s/ Joseph P. Campbell
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Joseph P. Campbell
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         June 8, 2006.

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
LOUIS ROBERT SANTIAGO, as Trustee of the Louis Robert Santiago

Revocable Living Trust dated November 17, 1999, as amended, and

YONG HWAN SANTIAGO, as Trustee of the Yong Shimabukuro Revocable

Living Trust dated July 25, 1996, as amended,

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, 

vs. 

RUTH TANAKA, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 

 

 

Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-11-0000697 

15-JAN-2016 

12:23 PM 

SCWC-11-0000697 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS 

(CAAP-11-0000697; CIVIL NO. 08-1-0094) 

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATON 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
 

Upon consideration of Respondent/DefendantAppellee/Cross-Appellant Ruth Tanaka’s motion for 

reconsideration, filed on January 6, 2016, the papers in support 

thereof, and the records and files herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted in 

part as reflected in the modifications to footnotes 37 and 40 in 
 

the amended opinion filed herewith; otherwise, the motion is 

denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, January 15, 2016. 

Gary Victor Dubin and

Frederick J. Arensmeyer

for petitioner 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

Robert Goldberg 

for respondent 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson 

2
Order entered July 2, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00890
- CR
CURTIS DEWIGHT NELSO N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th J udicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 068322 

### O RDER
When a ppellant’s brief

, initially due on December 26, 2018 , was not filed, we abated the appeal for a hearing to determine why the brief had not been filed. The trial court held a hearing and made findings, including that appellant was indigent and entitled to counsel. The trial court then appointed Don Jarvis (former retained counsel) to represent appellant on appeal. Because appellant had been found indigent, we ordered t he court reporter to file the reporter’s record ; it

was filed April 8, 2019. We granted a motion for extension of time to file the brief, making the brief due May 16, 2019. When the brief was not filed, we notified c ounsel by postcard dated May 20, 2019 and directed him to file the brief and a motion to extend time within ten days. We cautioned that the failure to do so would result in the appeal being abated for a hearing. To date, no brief has been filed and we have had no communication from appellate counsel.Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosec ute this appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeals.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8( b ). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing,
the trial court shall conduct the hear ing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copi es of this order to the Honorable Larry Phillips, Presiding Judge, 59th Judicial District Court; to Don Jarvis, Jr.; and to the Grayson County District Attorney’s Office.
Th is appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

a ppeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier

.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 8928]

In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended (“the Order”), I hereby determine that the individual known as Qari Hussain, also known as other aliases and transliterations, no longer meets the criteria for designation under the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke the designation of the aforementioned individual as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                 

Dated:  October 10, 2014. 

John F. Kerry,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-25162 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Miguel F. Di Nanno, Principal Executive Officer of Pan American GoldfieldsLtd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: January 14, 2011





/S /Miguel F. Di Nanno


_________________________________


Miguel F. Di Nanno


Title: President
EXHIBIT 99.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Recycling Sciences, Inc.,
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Ehrenfried Liebich, Chief Executive Officer and John F. Pope,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
     (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and result of
     operations of the Company.



Date: May 14, 2003                /S/ Ehrenfried Liebich
                                  ______________________________________
                                  Ehrenfried Liebich,
                                  Chief Executive Officer



Date: May 14, 2003                /S/ John F. Pope
                                  ______________________________________
                                  John F. Pope,
                                  Chief Financial Officer
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4831

AN ACT

To temporarily reenact chapter 12 of title 11 of the

United States Code.
105TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 4831

AN ACT

To temporarily reenact chapter 12 of title 11 of the United

States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 4831 EH

1 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY REENACTMENT OF BANKRUPTCY

2 PROVISIONS RELATING TO FAMILY FARMERS.

3 (a) REENACTMENT.—Chapter 12 of title 11 of the

4 United States Code, as in effect on September 30, 1998,

5 is hereby reenacted for the period beginning on October

6 1, 1998, and ending on April 1, 1999.

7 (b) CONTINUATION OF CASES.—All cases commenced

8 or pending under chapter 12 of title 11, United States

9 Code, as reenacted under subsection (a), and all matters

10 and proceedings in or relating to such cases, shall be con11 ducted and determined under such chapter as if such

12 chapter were continued in effect after April 1, 1999. The

13 substantive rights of parties in connection with such cases,

14 matters, and proceedings shall continue to be governed

15 under the laws applicable to such cases, matters, and pro16 ceedings as if such chapter were continued in effect after

17 April 1, 1999.

18 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

19 This Act shall take effect on October 1, 1998.

Passed the House of Representatives October 15,

1998.

Attest:

Clerk.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"John J. Uri","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/juri\/","title":"40 Years Ago: Columbia Returns to Space on the STS-2 Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"V8riZhfsXB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/40-years-ago-columbia-returns-to-space-on-the-sts-2-mission\/\">40 Years Ago: Columbia Returns to Space on the STS-2 Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/40-years-ago-columbia-returns-to-space-on-the-sts-2-mission\/embed\/#?secret=V8riZhfsXB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“40 Years Ago: Columbia Returns to Space on the STS-2 Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"V8riZhfsXB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S81-34641\/S81-34641~large.jpg?w=600&h=1535&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1535}
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ryan O’Neil LITTLE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7890.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 23, 2005.

Decided March 11, 2005.

Ryan O’Neil Little, Appellant pro se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*114PER CURIAM.

Ryan O’Neil Little, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ.P. 60(b) of the court’s prior order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2258(c)(1) (2000); *see Reid v. Angelone,*369 F.3d 363, 368-69, 374 n. 7 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S. Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Little has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Ramon Rossi Lopez - rlopez@lopezmchugh.com (California Bar Number 86361; admitted pro hac vice) 

Lopez McHugh LLP 

100 Bayview Circle, Suite 5600 

Newport Beach, California 92660 

949-812-5771 

Mark Stephen O’Connor (011029) – mark.oconnor@gknet.com Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. 

2575 East Camelback Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225 

602-530-8000 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

In Re Bard IVC Filters Products 

Liability Litigation 

No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF LODGING 

EXHIBIT A UNDER SEAL REGARDING 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE 

NO. 4 

Pursuant to LRCiv 5.6(d), Plaintiff submits this Notice of Lodging Exhibit Under 

Seal regarding Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion in Limine No. 4. 

Plaintiff provides notice that, pursuant to LRCiv 5.6(d), she has lodged with the 

Court: BPV-17-01-00188522, Exhibit A to Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Motion in 

Limine No. 4 to Exclude Testimony and Evidence Regarding Photograph of Bard 

Employee Michael Randall. 

Defendants contend that Exhibit A is confidential and should be filed under seal. 

As required under LRCiv 5.6(d), Plaintiff certifies that on February 2, 2017, the parties 

met and conferred in good faith and were unable to agree about whether the documents 

are confidential under the Protective Order and should be filed under seal. Plaintiff does 

not believe that the disputed documents warrant continued confidential treatment as 

proprietary or sensitive trade secret information. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9912 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 1st day of February, 2018. 

GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A. 

By:/s/ Mark S. O’Connor 

Mark S. O’Connor 

2575 East Camelback Road 

Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225 

LOPEZ McHUGH LLP 

Ramon Rossi Lopez (CA Bar No. 86361) 

(admitted pro hac vice) 

100 Bayview Circle, Suite 5600 

Newport Beach, California 92660 

Counsel for Plaintiffs 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 1st day of February 2018, I electronically transmitted 

the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing. 

/s/ Gay Mennuti 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9912 Filed 02/01/18 Page 2 of 2
#### John R. H. Palmore *v.*Nancy Chapman et al.

Contract — Parent and Child.

An alleged contract, by parol agreement between father and son, no writing of any kind having ever been made, held too vague for judicial action and unenforcible.

APPEAL PROM MONROE CIRCUIT COURT.

October 13, 1868.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters :

There is ho written memorial of any contract between appellant, and his father as to the terms upon which he went to live with the old man, and the parol evidence of what those terms were is far from being satisfactory, and when the whole evidence in the case is considered, the transaction is clouded with too much doubt, and uncertainty to found judicial action on it.

In the last two years, or 18 months of the old gentleman’s life he was to a great extent helpless; and for some months previous to his death required much attention, and nursing, which perhaps apart from the filial duty appellant owed his father .would have been irksome, and evpn too disagreeable to be hired to perform; hut for many years after he went to reside with his father, he continued to labor, and even within a year before his death he attended a horse mill on the place, and appellant received all the proceeds of his .labor, and the products of the farm; which would contribute, if not completely to remunerate him for his care and attention’to his father in his last illness.

Moreover, if the contract was made as alleged, it is a fact worthy of notice that there is not only no written evidence of it, but there is no reason offered for failing to have such a writing.

Appellant can derive no benefit from the patent he procured to be issued to himself for the land, his father purchased it and had held it for more than 20 years claiming it adversely before he went there to live, the presumption is that it had been patented long before the date of appellant’s patent, and he entered and held under his father.

*654
      *Rodman, for appellant.*

*W. S. Maxey, for appellee.*

Judgement *affirmed.*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**eMAGIN
      CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Gary
      W. Jones, the Chief Executive Officer of eMagin Corporation (the "Company"),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal year ended March
      31,
      2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or 15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      eMagin Corporation and will be retained by eMagin Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
                May 15, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Gary
              W.
              JonesGary
                W. Jones*Chief
              Executive Officer*
<PAGE> 1


Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification for Gary R. Gannaway,
             Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my
  knowledge this Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004,
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report
  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
  results of operations of First Choice Health Network, Inc. and Subsidiary.


      By:  /s/  Gary R. Gannaway
           --------------------------------------
            Gary R. Gannaway,
            President and Chief Executive Officer
            December 6, 2005





























                                            1