alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00082 - CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.S., A. S., AND M.S ., CHILDREN

----------

FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- J.S. attempt s to appeal from the trial court’s ― Order Holding Respondent in Contempt and for Commitment to County Jail ,‖ in which the trial court held appellant in contempt for failing to comply with certain provisions of temporary orders and an agreed divorce decree

. On February 29, 2012, w e notified

a ppellant of our concern that we m ight not have jurisdiction over this appeal
because the order he is attempting to appeal from does not appear to be a final judgment or appealable interlocutory order. We stated that unl ess a ppellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

continuing the appeal on or before March 12, 2012 , the appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. Appellant and ap pellee both filed responses; neither response show s grou nds for continuing this appeal. The general rule, with a few exceptions, is that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A final, appealable judgment is one that actually disposes of all claims and parties then before the court. Id. A contempt order, on the other hand, involves a court’s enforcement of its own orders. In re Of fice of the Attorney Gen. of Tex. , 215 S.W.3d 913, 915 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 2007, orig. proceeding). Consequently, contempt proceedings are not concerned with disposing of all claims and parties before the court. Id. A contempt judgment may be attacked by a petition for writ of habeas corpus (if the contemnor is confined) or a petition for writ of mandamus (if no confinement is involved); however, because a contempt order is not a final judgment, a remedy by appeal
does not lie. Id. at 915

– 16.
The order a ppellant is attempting to appe al is not a final, appealable order. Appellant cite s no authority, and we have found none, providing for an interlocutory appeal to be taken from a trial court’s contempt order. See generally Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a) ( West Supp. 2011 ) (listing appealable interlocutory orders and not including contempt orders). We3

thus lack subject matter jurisdiction over this appeal. See In re Office of the Attorney Gen. of Tex ., 215 S.W.3d at 915

– 16. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 2 See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). We deny a ppellee’s request for rule 45 damages.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON , C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER , JJ.
DELIVERED: March 22, 2012

2 Because we lack jurisdiction over the appeal, we also dismiss appellant’s ―Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal.‖
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"Adapter for Future NASA SLS Flights Readied for Testing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"77UpXGbnpB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/evolved-adapter-for-future-nasa-sls-flights-readied-for-testing\/\">Adapter for Future NASA SLS Flights Readied for Testing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/evolved-adapter-for-future-nasa-sls-flights-readied-for-testing\/embed\/#?secret=77UpXGbnpB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Adapter for Future NASA SLS Flights Readied for Testing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"77UpXGbnpB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/msfc-022224-usa-dta-shipment-from-dynetics-decatur-to-marshall-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getty Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Thomas Oberdorf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 12, 2007



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/    THOMAS OBERDORF                           
|Thomas Oberdorf                                  
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**97 TP 10-01653**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF RICKY BRYANT, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, RESPONDENT.

RICKY BRYANT, PETITIONER PRO SE.

ANDREW M. CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Anthony F. Shaheen, J.], entered May 19, 2010) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2348 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 480
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2348

                To extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2004

 Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced 
           the following bill; which was read the first time

                             April 27, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT.

    Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act (47 U.S.C. 151 
note) is amended by striking ``November 1, 2003'' and inserting ``June 
1, 2005.''.

                                                       Calendar No. 480

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2348

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

                To extend the Internet Tax Freedom Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 27, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         102,153
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,814
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,154
<PP&E>                                         130,119
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          257,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           410
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,770
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,787
<SALES>                                        724,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               724,185
<CGS>                                          575,083
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  682,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,885
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,690
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Gianine Figliozzi","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/gfiglioz\/","title":"NASA to Demonstrate\u00a0Miniature\u00a0CubeSat Swarm Technology\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"FrSQEPvWsB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/small-spacecraft-technology-program\/nasa-to-demonstrate-miniature-cubesat-swarm-technology\/\">NASA to Demonstrate\u00a0Miniature\u00a0CubeSat Swarm Technology\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/small-spacecraft-technology-program\/nasa-to-demonstrate-miniature-cubesat-swarm-technology\/embed\/#?secret=FrSQEPvWsB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Demonstrate\u00a0Miniature\u00a0CubeSat Swarm Technology\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"FrSQEPvWsB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/acd23-0129-015-2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":673}
#### ROBERT E. ANDREWS, ETC., ET AL. v. THOMAS H. KEAN, ETC., ET AL.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31223 Summary Calendar

DREY PUJOL, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE VENTURES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-619-J

-------------------- November 9, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Transocean Offshore Ventures, Inc. (“Transocean”), appeals the district court’s final judgment awarding Drey Pujol $123,993 in damages, plus interest, in his suit brought under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and general maritime law. Transocean requests a remittitur of the district court’s award of $100,000 in general damages, arguing that the award was unreasonably high. Transocean also argues that the district court erred in awarding $23,112 in past lost wages for a nine-month period in 1999. Finally, Transocean argues that the district court erred inNo. 00-31223 -2- awarding $881 in past medical expenses because Pujol incurred some of those expenses beyond his date of maximum cure. A remittitur of the $100,000 award for general damages is not warranted because the district court’s assessment of damages was not clearly erroneous and because the award did not exceed the greatest amount permitted under the maximum recovery rule.
See Bass v. Phoenix Seadrill/78, Ltd. , 749 F.2d 1154, 1169 (5th Cir. 1985); Caldarera v. Eastern Airlines, Inc. , 705 F.2d 778, 783, 784 (5th Cir. 1983). The district court likewise did not err in awarding $23,112 in past lost wages given (1) the court’s finding that Transocean’s offer of light-duty work would have disrupted Pujol’s ongoing treatment and physical-therapy regimen and (2) the court’s reliance on Dr. Paul Doty’s trial testimony indicating that Pujol was suffering from continuing pain and disability. See Williams v. Reading & Bates Drilling Co. , 750 F.2d 487, 490 (5th Cir. 1985). Finally, the district court did not err in awarding $881 in past medical expenses because, although medical expenses recoverable under maintenance and cure are limited to the point of maximum cure, the district court’s award was based on Transocean’s negligence and, as such, properly encompassed all medical expenses. See Fitzgerald v. U.S. Lines
Co. , 374 U.S. 16, 19 & n.7 (1963).
AFFIRMED.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE PROBATE OF THE ALLEGED WILL AND CODICIL OF MARIAN BATHGATE JACOBS, DECEASED.

September 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

I, Wayne A. Case, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SchmittIndustries, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  | August 27, 2003 | /s/ Wayne A.  Case                     |
|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------------|
|   |            | Wayne A.  Case, President/CEO/Director |
|        |                 |                                        |  |

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 8927]

In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended (“the Order”), I hereby determine that the individual known as Hakimullah Mehsud, also known as other aliases and transliterations, no longer meets the criteria for designation under the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke the designation of the aforementioned individual as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: September 29, 2014.

John F. Kerry,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-25164 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachael Whitefield","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rachaellwhitefield-2-2-2\/","title":"Michael Collins","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3MQP0DYVfk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/michael-collins\/\">Michael Collins<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/michael-collins\/embed\/#?secret=3MQP0DYVfk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Michael Collins” — NASA\" data-secret=\"3MQP0DYVfk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}