alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jermaine Walker","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwalke32\/","title":"Canberra 34-meter Antenna","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"doXMgXNt9v\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-dss-35-02\/\">Canberra 34-meter Antenna<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/canberra-dss-35-02\/embed\/#?secret=doXMgXNt9v\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Canberra 34-meter Antenna” — NASA\" data-secret=\"doXMgXNt9v\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/canberra-dss-35-02.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
#### Perkins and Another *v.*Smith, in Error.

*Tuesday, May*13.

DEBT on a bond, and judgment by default. The plaintiff Suggested, that the bond was conditioned for the delivery of property taken on execution, and assigned as a breach that the condition was broken. Judgment, without a jury, for the amount of the execution. Heldfthat, supposing the assignment *172of the breach to be only informal, and the want of a judgment the penalty to be unavailing in error, yet the breach should have been found, and the damages assessed, by a jury. R. C. 1824, p. *293.—Clark*v. *Goodwin,*1 Blackf. 74(1).

(1)

*Glidewell v. M'Gaughty, Nov.*term, 1830, poist.-R. *C.*1831, p. 404.— *Morris*v. Price, Nov. term, 1831, post.
#### Atlantic City National Bank *v.*Mary D. Thompson and Estate of Robert L Brownfield, deceased.

[Submitted June 2d, 1913.

Decided June 25th, 1913.]

1. A bank which received a note from a depositor for collection for the latter’s use, and which enters the note in her individual pass-book for collection and credit to |her account, thereby creates the relation of bailor and bailee between the depositor and the bank, and the bank may not inter-plead her with one claiming the fund by paramount title.

2. Bailees, agents or tenants may interplead their bailors, principals or landlords and a third person setting up an opposing claim only wheie the title o£ the opposing claimant is derivative and not antagonistic, and paramount to that of the bailor, principal or landlord.

Bill of interpleader with, prayer for injunction. Hearing at return of order to show cause for injunction.

*Mr. John G.*Slape, for the complainant.

*Mr. Lee F. Washington*and *Mr. Chcuies G.*Babcock, for the defendants.

Leaming, *V.*C.

I think it clear that complainant is not entitled to enjoin the further prosecution of the suit at law by defendant Mary D. Thompson.

By the verified answer of that defendant it appears that she deposited the note with complainant bank for collection for her own use, and that the bank entered the note in her individual pass-book for collection and credit to her account. That transaction created the relationship of bailor and bailee between her and the bank, and the bank is not, in consequence, now privi*112legecl to interplead her with one claiming the fund by a paramount title. The case of the *First National Bank of Morristown v.*Beninger, *26 N. J. Eq. (11 C. E. Gr.) 345,*is conclusive to that effect. The case of *Third National Bank of Boston v.*Skillings, *132 Mass. 410,*is to the same effect, and is practically identical with the present case.

The only instances in which bailees, agents or tenants are permitted to interplead their bailors, principals or landlords and a third person setting up an opposing claim to the thing, fund or duty appears to be in cases in which the title of the opposing claimant is derivative under, and not antagonistic and paramount to, that of the bailor, principal or landlord; that is, where the adverse claim originates from some act of the bailor, principal or landlord done or suffered after the commencement of the bailment, agency or tenancy and causing a dispute as to which of the parties is entitled to the thing, fund or duty. This is clearly set forth in *Pom. Eq. Jur.*§ *1327,*and in *1 Pom. Eq. Rem.*§ 54. I am unable to adopt-the view that a privity of contract can be found in the circumstances antecedent to the bailment as set forth in the bill.

I will advise an order discharging the order to show1 cause.
#### James F. HARDISON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. William L. WILLIAMS, Warden; Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 04-8029.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 18, 2005.

Decided March 10, 2005.

James F. Hardison, Appellant pro se. Ann Norman Bosse, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

James F. Hardison seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hardison has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Roosevelt Burt,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03710-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9192 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62647-62648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24806]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]


Notice of Maximum Amount of Assistance Under the Individuals and 
Households Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice of the maximum amount for assistance under 
the Individuals and Households Program for emergencies and major 
disasters declared on or after October 1, 2014.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2014, and applies to emergencies and 
major disasters declared on or after October 1, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Millican, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 212-1000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 408 of the Robert T. Stafford 
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (the Stafford Act), 42 
U.S.C. 5174, prescribes that FEMA must annually adjust the maximum 
amount for assistance provided under the

[[Page 62648]]

Individuals and Households Program (IHP). FEMA gives notice that the 
maximum amount of IHP financial assistance provided to an individual or 
household under section 408 of the Stafford Act with respect to any 
single emergency or major disaster is $32,900. The increase in award 
amount as stated above is for any single emergency or major disaster 
declared on or after October 1, 2014. In addition, in accordance with 
44 CFR 61.17(c), this adjustment includes the maximum amount of 
available coverage under any Group Flood Insurance Policy (GFIP) 
issued.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.7 percent for the 12-month period, 
which ended in August 2014. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. 
Department of Labor released the information on September 17, 2014.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.048, Federal Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared 
Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs.


W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-24806 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James A. Tracy, certify that:

 

2.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Vision-Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in the report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(a)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|                               |   | /s/ James A. Tracy      |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Dated:   March 18,  2005 |   | James A Tracy           |
|                               |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

29

----
#### BERTHA RAKOFF v. ASSOCIATED PODIATRIC SURGEONS.

May 8, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-61A","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WS6WLnHE0M\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-61a\/\">STS-61A<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-61a\/embed\/#?secret=WS6WLnHE0M\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-61A” — NASA\" data-secret=\"WS6WLnHE0M\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF
VINCENT J. deSOSTOA, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(b)
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) The undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Seabulk International, Inc. (the Company) hereby
certifies that:  1.
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, to which
this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ VINCENT J. deSOSTOAVincent J. deSostoaMarch 11, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          2,655
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          2,791
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     9,244
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          4,616
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            4,601
<LOANS>                                       116,771
<ALLOWANCE>                                       678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                139,089
<DEPOSITS>                                    103,612
<SHORT-TERM>                                    6,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               856
<LONG-TERM>                                     9,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          114
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                139,089
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 9,297
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 796
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  187
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               10,280
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              4,302
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,167
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           5,113
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 16
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 3,041
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,565
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      2,565
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,591
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   4.02
<LOANS-NON>                                       518
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  650
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      73
<RECOVERIES>                                        1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 678
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           678
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



QUALITY DISTRIBUTION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned in connection with this Annual Report of Quality Distribution, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigneds knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2005                             
|                                                 
|/s/ Thomas L. Finkbiner                          
|THOMAS L. FINKBINER                              
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER            
|                                                 
|Date: March 31, 2005                             
|                                                 
|/s/ Timothy B. Page                              
|TIMOTHY B. PAGE                                  
|SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Quality Distribution, Inc. and will be retained by Quality Distribution, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



E-6