alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"55 Years Ago: Four Months Until the Moon Landing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wJ1IaUCKCm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-four-months-until-the-moon-landing\/\">55 Years Ago: Four Months Until the Moon Landing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-four-months-until-the-moon-landing\/embed\/#?secret=wJ1IaUCKCm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“55 Years Ago: Four Months Until the Moon Landing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wJ1IaUCKCm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/moon-landing-l-4-months-26-apollo-9-astronauts-w-shatalov-yeliseyev-paris-air-show-1969.jpg?w=510","thumbnail_width":510,"thumbnail_height":420}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2866 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2866

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 24, 2004

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to clarify 
the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture and the Commodity Credit 
  Corporation to enter into memorandums of understanding with a State 
  regarding the collection of approved State commodity assessments on 
  behalf of the State from the proceeds of marketing assistance loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commodity Assessment, Protection, 
and Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS.

    Subtitle B of title I of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 
of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7931 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``SEC. 1210. COLLECTION OF COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS.

    ``(a) Definition of Assessment.--In this section, the term 
`assessment' means funds that are--
            ``(1) collected with respect to a specific commodity in 
        accordance with this Act;
            ``(2) paid by the first purchaser of the commodity in 
        accordance with a State law or this title; and
            ``(3) not collected through a tax or other revenue 
        collection activity of a State.
    ``(b) Authority to Collect Commodity Assessments From Marketing 
Assistance Loans.--The Secretary may collect commodity assessments from 
the proceeds of a marketing assistance loan made under this subtitle in 
accordance with an agreement between the Secretary and the State.''.

            Passed the Senate November 21 (legislative day, November 
      20), 2004.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
EX-4.68




 Exhibit 4.68 

CONFIRMATION LETTER 
 As a shareholder of
SpaceTime (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), I hereby confirm, represent and guarantee that my successor, guardian, creditor, spouse or any other person that may be entitled to assume rights and interests in the equity
interest of the Company held by myself upon death, incapacity, divorce or any circumstances that may affect my ability to exercise my shareholder’s rights in Company will not, in any manner and in any circumstances, carry out any act that may
affect or hinder the fulfillment of my obligations under each of the contractual agreements (including the Equity Interest Pledge Agreement, the Power of Attorney, Exclusive Option Agreement which were executed by myself on September 14, 2020,
as well as the Exclusive Technical Consulting and Management Services Agreement and the Business Operation Agreement which were executed by myself on September 14, 2020) (the “Contractual Agreements”). I further confirm and
undertake that the Contractual Agreements and all of my rights and obligations thereunder shall be equally effective and binding upon my heir and successor. 

I hereby further covenant that, I shall unwind the Contractual Agreements as soon as the applicable laws of the People’s Republic of China
(“PRC”) allow Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd. to operate the business operated by the Company (which includes but not limited to the business of Network Information Service) without the Contractual Agreements. Subject
to the applicable PRC laws, I shall return to the Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd. or the entity designated by Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd. any consideration I receive from Beijing Momo Information Technology Co., Ltd.
for its acquisition of the equity interest of Company at the time when the Contractual Agreements are terminated. 
  

			
	Yu Dong
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Yu Dong

	
	September 14, 2020
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Amended  Annual  Report of Enova  Systems,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Carl D. Perry,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Larry B.  Lombard,
Acting Chief Financial Officer, of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/  Carl D. Perry
------------------
Carl D. Perry
Chief Executive Officer
June 25, 2004


/s/   Larry B. Lombard
----------------------
Larry B. Lombard
Acting Chief Financial Officer
June 25, 2004


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2780 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2780

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize the amount 
                    of the medicare part B premium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 8, 2004

  Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Dayton, 
Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Corzine, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Reid, and Mr. 
Leahy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                      to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to stabilize the amount 
                    of the medicare part B premium.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep the Promise of Medicare Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. STABILIZATION OF MEDICARE PART B PREMIUM.

    Section 1839(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395r(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``Notwithstanding the preceding sentences, the monthly 
premium rate determined under this paragraph for each month in 2005 may 
not exceed an amount equal to the monthly premium rate determined under 
this paragraph for each month in 2004 adjusted by the percentage change 
in the average Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical 
Workers (CPI-W) for the third quarter of 2003 to the third quarter of 
2004.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roman ALARID, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-50010.

D.C. No. CR-02-02549-NAJ.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 2005.

Decided Feb. 17, 2005.

*295Steve Müler, AUSA, USSD — Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Wfiliam Braniff, Law Offices of Wiliam Braniff, San Diego, CA, for Defendant Appellant.

Before HUG, FERGUSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Roman Alarid pled guüty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and was sentenced to 130 months in prison. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s imposition of a two-level enhancement for firearms possession under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l) as both an improper application of the sentencing guidelines and a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to jury determination of the facts underlying the enhancement.

The government urged that this appeal be dismissed, citing a waiver of appellate rights contained in Alarid’s plea agreement. On *de novo*review, *United States v. Smith,*389 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir.2004), however, we find the waiver unenforceable. Although the district court mentioned the possibility of such a waiver during the plea colloquy, it failed to discuss the specific terms of the waiver and ensure Alarid’s understanding as required by Fed. R.Crim.P. ll(b)(l)(N). This omission was plain error. *See United States v. Arellano-Gallegos,*387 F.3d 794, 797 (9th Cir. 2004). Because the waiver was not knowingly and voluntarily made, *see id.*at 796, it cannot be enforced.

Alarid’s 130-month sentence was within the range that could have been imposed even without the firearms enhancement challenged on appeal. However, we cannot conclude whether this is the sentence that the district judge would have imposed had the guidelines not been considered mandatory at the time. On the limited record before us, we decline to decide in the first instance whether this sentence was reasonable. Instead, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with the discretion announced in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William V. CareyWilliam V. CareyChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 11, 2009
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-30390 and Form S-4 No. 333-34716, and Form S-8 No. 333-61806)
of Seabulk International, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated
February 25, 2003, (except for the second and third paragraphs of Note 17, as to
which the dates are March 7, 2003 and March 27, 2003, respectively, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Seabulk International, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Miami, Florida
March 31, 2003
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Catherine G. Manning","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/cgmannin\/","title":"GPS","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"fakFS2wgkr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/gps\/\">GPS<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/gps\/embed\/#?secret=fakFS2wgkr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“GPS” — NASA\" data-secret=\"fakFS2wgkr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/what-is-gps-header.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":176}
#### UNITED STATES Of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marchello Jimmy LOVERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-6120.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 1, 2005.

Tony R. Arvin, Asst. U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Memphis, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen B. Shankman, Fed. Public Defender, J. Patten Brown, III, Asst. F.P. Defender, Needum L. Germany, Asst. F.P. Defender, Randolph W. Alden, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Memphis, TN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KENNEDY, DAUGHTREY, and COOK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Marchello Jimmy Lover-son, appealed his sentence to this court, challenging the four-level enhancement imposed by the district court pursuant to USSG § 2B3.1(b)(4)(A) for commission of an abduction in connection with the underlying offense of car-jacking. We affirmed the district court’s sentencing order, in a decision released prior to the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in *United States v. Booker,*— U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, — L.Ed.2d-(2005). On January 24, 2005, the Supreme granted the defendant’s application for a writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and remanded the case to us for reconsideration under *Booker.*

Upon reconsideration, we conclude that the district court’s sentencing order must be vacated and the case remanded for re-sentencing.

SO ORDERED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Tod F. Schleier, SBN 004612

SCHLEIER LAW OFFICES, P.C.

3101 North Central Avenue, Suite 1090

Phoenix, AZ 85012

(602) 277-0157

(602) 230-9250 Fax

tod@schleierlaw.com

Kevin Koelbel, SBN 016599

LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN KOELBEL, P.C.

7303 W. Boston Street

Chandler, AZ 85226

(480) 705-7550

(480) 705-7503 Fax

kevin@koelbellaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cleopatria Martinez,

Plaintiff,

v.

Maricopa County Community College 

District, a political subdivision of the state, 

and Rufus Glasper and Debra Glasper, 

husband and wife, 

Defendants.

Case No. 2:15-CV-01759-NVW

NOTICE OF FILING VERIFIED 

AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and LRCiv. 15.1 Plaintiffs gives notice of filing an 

amended complaint. 

Dated this 4th day of November 2015,

SCHLEIER LAW OFFICES, P.C.

By: s/Tod F. Schleier

Tod F. Schleier

LAW OFFICES OF KEVIN KOELBEL, P.C.

By: s/Kevin Koelbel

Kevin Koelbel

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 13 Filed 11/04/15 Page 1 of 2
(480) 705-7550

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 4th day of November 2015, I electronically transmitted 

the attached document to the Clerk’s office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a notice of Electronic Filing to the following CM/ECF registrants:

Pavneet Singh Uppal

Shayna H. Blach

FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP

201 E Washington Street, Suite 1450

Phoenix AZ 85004-3401

s/ Joni Moore

Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 13 Filed 11/04/15 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Computationally Tractable Reachability Subspace Surfaces Applied to Space Operations","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"2JvKEDTyBC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/computationally-tractable-reachability-subspace-surfaces-applied-to-space-operations\/\">Computationally Tractable Reachability Subspace Surfaces Applied to Space Operations<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/computationally-tractable-reachability-subspace-surfaces-applied-to-space-operations\/embed\/#?secret=2JvKEDTyBC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Computationally Tractable Reachability Subspace Surfaces Applied to Space Operations” — NASA\" data-secret=\"2JvKEDTyBC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/brew_julian.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 No. 333-65188, dated July 16, 2001;
No. 333-60702, dated May 11, 2001; No. 333-49436, dated November 7, 2000; No. 333-88645, dated October 8, 1999;
No. 333-79463, dated May 27, 1999; No. 333-79457, dated May 27, 1999; No. 333-74555, dated March 17, 1999;
No. 333-56473, dated June 10, 1998; and No. 333-15069, dated October 30, 1996 pertaining to various employee benefit plans of Main Street
Banks, Inc. (formerly First Sterling Banks, Inc.) of our report dated January 30, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Main Street Banks, Inc. and
Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

|                                |  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2002 |  |                      

---

QuickLinks