alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nikki Welch","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nikki-d-welchnasa-gov\/","title":"Neil Armstrong Test Facility","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Mblg6CGfzM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/neil-a-armstrong-test-facility\/\">Neil Armstrong Test Facility<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/neil-a-armstrong-test-facility\/embed\/#?secret=Mblg6CGfzM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Neil Armstrong Test Facility” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Mblg6CGfzM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.2

RF MONOLITHICS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906

OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, Harley E Barnes III, Chief Financial Officer of RF Monolithics, Inc. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to
be executed this 24th day of November, 2009.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Harley E Barnes III

Name: Harley E Barnes III

Title: Chief Financial Officer



|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ** **

# **EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

 

We have issuedour report dated July 11, 2003, accompanying the financial statements includedin the Annual Report of Schmitt Industries, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended May 31, 2003.  We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8(No. 333-3910).

 

 
| Grant  Thornton LLP |
|---------------------|
|                |
| Portland,  Oregon   |
| August 27,  2003    |

 

1

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"Test in the Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at NASA’s Ames Research acd16-0013-027-0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"W48R4CJte7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/acd16-0013-027-0\/\">Test in the Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at NASA’s Ames Research acd16-0013-027-0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/acd16-0013-027-0\/embed\/#?secret=W48R4CJte7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Test in the Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at NASA’s Ames Research acd16-0013-027-0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"W48R4CJte7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/acd16-0013-027-0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":443}
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-60265

In the Matter of: STEPHEN PAUL SMITH, JESSICA NICHOLE SMITH,

 Debtors

STEPHEN PAUL SMITH; JESSICA NICHOLE SMITH, also known as 

Jessica Nichole Miles, also known as Jessica Nichole Burk, 

 Appellants

v.

MID-SOUTH MAINTENANCE, INCORPORATED, AN OKLAHOMA 

CORPORATION; MID-SOUTH MAINTENANCE, INCORPORATED, 

MEMPHIS, A TENNESSEE CORPORATION; WORLDWIDE STEEL 

WORKS, INCORPORATED, AN OKLAHOMA CORPORATION, 

 Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

Northern District of Mississippi

USDC 3:18-CV-111

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, STEWART, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 9, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-60265 Document: 00515265462 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/09/2020
This appeal comes to us from the district court, which reviewed decisions 

by the bankruptcy court. “We review a district court’s affirmance of a 

bankruptcy court decision by applying the same standard of review to the 

bankruptcy court decision that the district court applied.” UTSA Apts. L.L.C. 

v. UTSA Apts. 8, L.L.C. (In re UTSA Apts. 8, L.L.C.), 886 F.3d 473, 485 (5th 

Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). 

Here, the district court appropriately reviewed the bankruptcy court’s 

post-trial findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo. 

Smith v. Mid-S. Maint., Inc., 363 F. Supp. 3d 701, 703 (N.D. Miss. 2019); In re 

UTSA Apts. 8, L.L.C, 886 F.3d at 485 (reviewing district court’s findings of fact 

for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo). Essentially for the reasons 

explained by the district court, we agree that the bankruptcy court did not err 

in denying Stephen and Jessica Smith’s motion to dismiss the adversary 

complaint filed by the Mid-South creditors in this case. Burk v. Smith (In re 

Burk), 583 B.R. 655, 674 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2018), aff’d sub nom. Smith, 363 

F. Supp. 3d at 702–10. Nor did the bankruptcy court err in finding—in a 

thoroughly-reasoned 35-page opinion following a three-day trial—that the 

Smiths’s debts to the Mid-South creditors are nondischargeable under 11 

U.S.C. sections 523(a)(2)(A) and 523(a)(6). See id. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

 Case: 19-60265 Document: 00515265462 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/09/2020
Exhibit 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEER


    As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the use of our
    name included herein or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K by
    McMoRan Oil & Gas Co. and to the reference to our estimates of reserves
    and present value of future net reserves as of  December 31, 1997, into
    McMoRan Oil & Gas Co.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Form
    S-8 (File Nos. 33-82866, 33-80369, 33-80371 and 333-44561).


                                              By:/s/Ryder Scott Company
                                                    Petroleum Engineers      

                                                 RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                                 PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

    Houston, Texas
    March 24, 1998
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 13 Review Board Report","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4jIXTpzmdC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-13-review-board-report\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 13 Review Board Report<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-13-review-board-report\/embed\/#?secret=4jIXTpzmdC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 13 Review Board Report” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4jIXTpzmdC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/apollo_13_ed_cortwright_apr_28_1970_s70-36331.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":702}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2678 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 644
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2678

 To ensure that Members of Congress do not receive better prescription 
               drug benefits than medicare beneficiaries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2004

Mr. Dayton introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                             July 19, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure that Members of Congress do not receive better prescription 
               drug benefits than medicare beneficiaries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taste of Our Own Medicine Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFITS OF MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) Limitation on Benefits.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the actuarial value of the prescription drug benefits of any 
Member of Congress enrolled in a health benefits plan under chapter 89 
of title 5, United States Code, may not exceed the actuarial value of 
basic prescription drug coverage (as defined in section 1860D-2(a)(3) 
of the Social Security Act, as added by section 101(a) of the Medicare 
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public 
Law 108-173)).
    (b) Regulations.--The Director of the Office of Personnel 
Management shall promulgate regulations to carry out this section.

                                                       Calendar No. 644

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2678

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To ensure that Members of Congress do not receive better prescription 
               drug benefits than medicare beneficiaries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 19, 2004

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### NEW JERSEY BUILDERS ASSOCIATION v. THE TOWNSHIP OF CHESTER, ETC., ET AL.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification granted. (See 232 *N.J.Super.*182)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Henry O. Kennedy, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03458-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8688 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8688 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00026-CR

Santos Reina

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

25th District Court of Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-1069-CR-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 20, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          21,665
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,814
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                48,150
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    748,164
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        880,027
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,756,333
<DEPOSITS>                                     992,961
<SHORT-TERM>                                    35,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,409
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                           264  
<OTHER-SE>                                     302,699
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,756,333
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,761
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               26,614
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   429
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                56,804
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,872
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,230
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,574
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,350
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,074
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,348
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,348
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,374
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.06
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,100
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,276
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      163
<RECOVERIES>                                        23
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,486
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,486
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,594
        

</TABLE>