alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

EXHIBIT 32.2 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO CERTIFICATION SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Cambior Inc. (the "Company") is filing itsannual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I,Bryan A. Coates, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| */s/ Bryan A. Coates*                           |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| Bryan A. Coates                                 |
| Vice President and Chief      Financial Officer |
| March 29, 2005                                  |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MPW
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,601
<INVENTORY>                                      8,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,044
<PP&E>                                          71,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,572
<BONDS>                                         63,599
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,875
<SALES>                                        106,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,398
<CGS>                                           71,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,951
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sarah Douglas","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sschlied\/","title":"Solver Spotlight: Shobhana Gupta","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kRCdusgvkC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/prizes-challenges-crowdsourcing-program\/center-of-excellence-for-collaborative-innovation-coeci\/coeci-news\/solver-spotlight-shobhana-gupta\/\">Solver Spotlight: Shobhana Gupta<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/prizes-challenges-crowdsourcing-program\/center-of-excellence-for-collaborative-innovation-coeci\/coeci-news\/solver-spotlight-shobhana-gupta\/embed\/#?secret=kRCdusgvkC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Solver Spotlight: Shobhana Gupta” — NASA\" data-secret=\"kRCdusgvkC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/shobhana-gupta-jpg.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":657}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        388
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,745
<PP&E>                                          97,636
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,850
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,176
<SALES>                                         93,698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,698
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,339
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEROME MARTIN.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sarah Merrifield,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00525-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Brenes Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/26/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: March 2, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

 Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 976 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2693 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2693

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 1475 Western Avenue, Suite 45, in Albany, New York, as the 
                ``Lieutenant John F. Finn Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2004

 Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
        bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
        Governmental AffairsYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 1475 Western Avenue, Suite 45, in Albany, New York, as the 
                ``Lieutenant John F. Finn Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT JOHN F. FINN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1475 Western Avenue, Suite 45, in Albany, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lieutenant John F. Finn Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Lieutenant 
John F. Finn Post Office.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s DC-8 Completes Final Mission, Set to Retire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AOfsoNe4rq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasas-dc-8-completes-final-mission-set-to-retire\/\">NASA\u2019s DC-8 Completes Final Mission, Set to Retire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasas-dc-8-completes-final-mission-set-to-retire\/embed\/#?secret=AOfsoNe4rq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s DC-8 Completes Final Mission, Set to Retire” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AOfsoNe4rq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/AFRC2024-0048-06\/AFRC2024-0048-06~large.jpg?w=600&h=1280&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1280}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         215,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,476
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,855
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,582
<PP&E>                                          64,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,217
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,157,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,445
<BONDS>                                          1,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            54
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,026,199
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,157,138
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,920
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,869
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,813
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,176
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,176
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66


</TABLE>
#### Tsige DEGE, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES,* Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-74156.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 2005.**

Decided Feb. 22, 2005.

Tsige Dege, San Jose, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Margot L. Nadel, DOJ— U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, GRABER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

“Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

**

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

Tsige Dege, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under former 8 U.S.C. § 1105. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *Iturribama v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Dege filed her motion to reopen more than a year after the BIA dismissed her appeal, and well beyond the statutorily required 90 day period. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2); *Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 895. Although we have applied equitable tolling in cases involving ineffective assistance of counsel, Dege offers no explanation for why she did not file the motion until over a year after she obtained new counsel. *See Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 897, *314899 (requiring due diligence and concluding limitations period began when petitioner met with new counsel). Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying as untimely Dege’s motion to reopen. *See id.*at 894.

Because Dege’s motion to reopen was untimely, we do not reach the merits of her ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Meagan Chappell","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mchappe3\/","title":"The Next Accident: How Do We Prevent It?\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zhgZ2qHuaU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nesc\/the-next-accident-how-do-we-prevent-it\/\">The Next Accident: How Do We Prevent It?\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nesc\/the-next-accident-how-do-we-prevent-it\/embed\/#?secret=zhgZ2qHuaU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Next Accident: How Do We Prevent It?\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zhgZ2qHuaU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/techup2023-pg5-art.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### Samuel Reynolds *v.*Q. A. Keith’s Admr. et al.

Railroads — Written Proposition to Sell Lot to Railroad — Long Occupancy Without Objection — Parol Evidence.

The circumstances established go to fortify the parol evidence that appellant made a written proposition to the railroad to sell the lot sued for which was accepted and paid for. The appellant permitted the railroad company to build its depot on the lot and use it'for twelve years without objection: Held, that the judgment ^dismissing the petition was right.

APPEAL FROM KENTON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 11, 1869.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

The circumstances established in this case go to fortify the parol evidence that appellant made a written proposition to the railroad company to sell the lot now sued for, which was accepted and the sale fully made, and that the company paid him for the lot, hence, he permitted the railroad company to build its depot on said lot and to use it some twelve or fifteen years before bringing this suit without complaint or demand for rent, and this, too, with his full knowledge, as he lived within about 200 yards of it during all this time, and was often at the depot and passed it *647almost daily; therefore, the judgment dismissing the petition absolutely was right, and is *affirmed.*

*Carlisle &*O’Hara, *for appellant.*

*Stevenson &*Myers, Benton, *for appellee.*
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BRYANT KEITH BRANNON.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.