alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCTS )

LIABILITY LITIGATION, ) 

 )

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: )

 )

Pharris Morgan, et al., ) MDL Docket No. 15-2641

C.A. No. CV-15-1925-PHX-DGC )

 ) 

 )

Pharris Morgan, et al., ) NOTICE

 ) 

 Plaintiff(s), ) 

 ) 

v. )

 )

C R Bard, Inc., et al., )

 )

 Defendant(s) )

 IN THE ABOVE MATTER, you are advised that the case listed 

above (formerly Eastern District of Texas 6:15-cv-603) is 

now consolidated with and part of MDL No. 2641 pursuant to the 

Transfer Order filed September 14, 2015. Therefore, future 

pleadings pertaining to the above case will be filed in MDL-No. 

2641, the title page of these documents should be prepared as shown

above. 

 

September 25, 2015 BRIAN D. KARTH 

 Date DCE/Clerk of Court

 s/M. Pruneau 

 Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 96 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk September 9 , 2020

16 1 682 ( 63 )

PREYDE ONE, LLC,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 161682

v COA: 346192

Ingham CC: 18

- 000003

- CB

HOFFMAN CONSULTANTS, LLC,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

G LASERS LUMBER and CONSOLIDATED

BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants

.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appell ant to extend the time

for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted

on or before September 1 5 , 2020.
EXHIBIT 32.2











Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to


Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, James Vandeberg, Chief Financial Officer of REGI U.S., Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of REGI U.S., Inc., for the year ended April 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of REGI U.S., Inc.




Richmond, BC, Canada


by: /s/ James Vandeberg


August 15, 2011


James Vandeberg


Chief Financial Officer











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to REGI U.S., Inc. and will be retained by REGI U.S., Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4440 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TOM TOLLISON, a/k/a Thomas C. Tollison,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.

(6:05-cr-707)

Submitted: December 21, 2006 Decided: December 29, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David B. Betts, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Regan

Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tom Tollison appeals his conviction and sentence

following a guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute 50 grams or

more of methamphetamine and 500 grams or more of a mixture or

substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1)(2000). Tollison’s attorney on appeal has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that

there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but raising as a

potential issue whether the district court complied with Fed. R.

Crim. P. 11 in accepting Tollison’s guilty plea. Tollison was

advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has

not done so. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Counsel raises the issue of whether the district court

fully complied with Rule 11, but identifies no error in the Rule 11

proceeding and concludes that there was full compliance with the

Rule. After a thorough review of the record, we similarly find

that the district court complied with the requirements of Rule 11.

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for

appeal. We therefore affirm Tollison’s conviction and sentence.

This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of

his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for

further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed,

but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then
- 3 -

counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from

representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof

was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: \u201cThree More Like Before\u201d \u2013 The Recovery of Apollo 12","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gCkux2fT9x\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-three-more-like-before-the-recovery-of-apollo-12\/\">50 Years Ago: \u201cThree More Like Before\u201d \u2013 The Recovery of Apollo 12<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-three-more-like-before-the-recovery-of-apollo-12\/embed\/#?secret=gCkux2fT9x\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: \u201cThree More Like Before\u201d \u2013 The Recovery of Apollo 12” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gCkux2fT9x\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/apollo_11_uss_hornet_cvs-12_dec_5_1968_us_navy_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":367}
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-30390 and Form S-4 No. 333-34716) of Seabulk
International, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February
6, 2002, (except for the third and fourth paragraphs of Note 18, as to which the
dates are March 15, 2002 and March 22, 2002), with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Seabulk International, Inc. included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.




                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Miami, Florida
March 29, 2002
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRED GAINER.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation, 

No. 2:15-MD-02641-DGC

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 

SEAL SUPPLEMENTAL 

INFORMATION REGARDING FDA 

INSPECTION AND WARNING 

LETTER 

Upon consideration of Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc.’s and Bard Peripheral Vascular, 

Inc.’s Motion to Seal and material submitted in support, and for good cause shown, the 

motion is hereby granted. The documents accompanying Bard’s Notice of Supplemental 

Information Regarding FDA Inspection and Warning Letter constitute “Confidential 

Information” under the Stipulated Protective Order, and trade secrets or other confidential 

research, development or commercial information pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), and therefore warrant protection from public disclosure for a 

discovery related motion. Accordingly, the documents are hereby sealed. 

23634292 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 990-1 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      751
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   142
<PP&E>                                           1,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,223)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,456
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,677
<COMMON>                                        70,352
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,940
<SALES>                                          2,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,774
<CGS>                                            1,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    140
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (395)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.010)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Justin Groves,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04789-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Johnson Becker, PLLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/28/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9569 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9569 Filed 01/10/18 Page 2 of 2
#### JERRY O. MACFARLANE, ET UX. v. DR. N. YATRAKIS.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2742 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2742

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
  To extend certain authority of the Supreme Court Police, modify the 
    venue of prosecutions relating to the Supreme Court building and 
  grounds, and authorize the acceptance of gifts to the United States 
                             Supreme Court.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 
POLICE TO PROTECT COURT OFFICIALS OFF THE SUPREME COURT GROUNDS.
    Section 6121(b)(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2008''.
SEC. 2. VENUE FOR PROSECUTIONS RELATING TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME 
COURT BUILDING AND GROUNDS.
    Section 6137 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Venue and Procedure.--Prosecution for a violation described 
in subsection (a) shall be in the United States District Court for the 
District of Columbia or in the Superior Court of the District of 
Columbia, on information by the United States Attorney or an Assistant 
United States Attorney.''.
SEC. 3. GIFTS TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
    The Chief Justice or his designee is authorized to accept, hold, 
administer, and utilize gifts and bequests of personal property 
pertaining to the history of the United States Supreme Court or its 
justices, but gifts or bequests of money shall be covered into the 
Treasury.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"Building on a Mission: The Lunar Receiving Laboratory","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JItVUHpB22\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/building-on-a-mission-the-lunar-receiving-laboratory\/\">Building on a Mission: The Lunar Receiving Laboratory<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/building-on-a-mission-the-lunar-receiving-laboratory\/embed\/#?secret=JItVUHpB22\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Building on a Mission: The Lunar Receiving Laboratory” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JItVUHpB22\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/building_on_a_mission_lrl_2_lrl_schematic_s67-00696_cropped.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":456}
#### VAN HOLTEN GROUP, ET AL. v. ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY.

May 16, 1989.

Petition for certification granted.
#### JOHN F. JACKSON, ET UX. v. CRANE PACKING COMPANY, ET AL., AND CAREY CANADA, INC.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Getty
Images, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Jonathan D. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 5, 2005



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    JONATHAN D. KLEIN                                
|Jonathan D. Klein Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Monaghan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-b-monaghannasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Commercial Communications Services","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WvF1IJQJrq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/nasas-commercial-communications-services\/\">NASA\u2019s Commercial Communications Services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/nasas-commercial-communications-services\/embed\/#?secret=WvF1IJQJrq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Commercial Communications Services” — NASA\" data-secret=\"WvF1IJQJrq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Photo_STGT_SGLTs-at-Dawn.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":258}