alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 Pursuant to the Court’s Order (Doc. 6) setting a Rule 16 Case Management 

Conference, the parties were required to jointly develop and file a Joint Rule 26(f) Case 

Management Report and a Joint Proposed Rule 16 Case Management Order no later than 

November 23, 2015. To date, no such joint filings have been submitted. Rather, 

Defendants have unilaterally submitted these filings and noticed the Court that Plaintiff 

failed to confer and participate as ordered. (Docs. 7, 8.) 

 Consequently, the Court will strike Defendants’ filings and require Plaintiff to 

show cause why this action should not be dismissed due to her failure to comply with this 

Court’s Order and prosecute this action as directed.1

 Accordingly, 

 1

 Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it.” The district court also has the inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute, for failure to comply with court orders, or for failure to follow the local rules. See Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 

626, 629-31 (1962) (recognizing that even though the language of Rule 41(b) requires a motion, the district court has sua sponte power to dismiss for failure to prosecute); 

Schaun Owens, 

 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

Maricopa County Community College 

District, et al., 

Defendants. 

 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

No. CV-15-01769-PHX-SPL

ORDER 

Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 9 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 2
2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. That the Proposed Rule 16 Case Management Order (Doc. 7) and Rule 

26(f) Case Management Report (Doc. 8) are stricken;

2. That the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for December 

3, 2015 is vacated; and

3. That Plaintiff must show cause in writing why this action should not be 

dismissed for failure to comply with this Court’s Order and prosecute this action no later 

than December 9, 2015. Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely comply with this order 

will result in the dismissal of this case.

Dated this 30th day of November, 2015.

Honorable Steven P. Logan

United States District Judge

 

 Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (failure to comply with local rules is a 

proper ground for dismissal); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (1992) (a district 

court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with an order of the court); Wanderer v. 

Johnson, 910 F.2d 652, 656 (9th Cir. 1990). 

Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 9 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"Festive Northern Lights","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dJjtPSFjFY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss053e023965orig\/\">Festive Northern Lights<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/iss053e023965orig\/embed\/#?secret=dJjtPSFjFY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Festive Northern Lights” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dJjtPSFjFY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/iss053e023965orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 9 Completes its Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uaJON2SABL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-9-completes-its-mission\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 9 Completes its Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-9-completes-its-mission\/embed\/#?secret=uaJON2SABL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 9 Completes its Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uaJON2SABL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/apollo_9_s_065_san_diego.jpg?w=330","thumbnail_width":330,"thumbnail_height":325}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROOSEVELT MOORE.

April 5, 1989.

Petition for certification granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the trial court for resentencing in light of *State v. Baylass,*114 *N.J.*169 (1989), and *State v. Molina,*114 *N.J.*181 (1989).
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 94 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 94 Filed 11/15/17 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01759-NVW Document 94 Filed 11/15/17 Page 3 of 3
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2621 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend the pilot 

program for alternative water source projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 8, 2004 

Mr. GRAHAM of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to extend 

the pilot program for alternative water source projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PILOT PROGRAM FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER 

4 SOURCE PROJECTS. 

5 Section 220(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

6 Act (33 U.S.C. 1300(j)) is amended in the first sentence— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘$75,000,000’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$125,000,000’’; and 
2 

•S 2621 IS 

1 (2) by striking ‘‘2002 through 2004’’ and in2 serting ‘‘2005 through 2009’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Royal Bancshares of
Pennsylvania, Inc ("Royal") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Jeffrey T. Hanuscin, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and

         2    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Royal as of the dates and for the periods expressed
              in the Report.

                                                  /s/ Jeffrey T. Hanuscin
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Jeffrey T. Hanuscin
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  March 14, 2006.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michelle Zajac","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mzajac\/","title":"International Space Station Program Deputy Chief Scientist Meghan Everett","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jQTj8zvYlh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/international-space-station-program-deputy-chief-scientist-meghan-everett\/\">International Space Station Program Deputy Chief Scientist Meghan Everett<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/international-space-station-program-deputy-chief-scientist-meghan-everett\/embed\/#?secret=jQTj8zvYlh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“International Space Station Program Deputy Chief Scientist Meghan Everett” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jQTj8zvYlh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/meghaneverett-jsc2024e019923.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Tabor","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/astabor\/","title":"NASA Astronaut, Congresswoman Discuss STEM Careers with Students","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pRuPtR2ShA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/astronauts\/nicole-aunapu-mann\/nasa-astronaut-congresswoman-discuss-stem-careers-with-students\/\">NASA Astronaut, Congresswoman Discuss STEM Careers with Students<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/astronauts\/nicole-aunapu-mann\/nasa-astronaut-congresswoman-discuss-stem-careers-with-students\/embed\/#?secret=pRuPtR2ShA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronaut, Congresswoman Discuss STEM Careers with Students” — NASA\" data-secret=\"pRuPtR2ShA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/acd24-0002-004-crop.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":448}
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated April 13, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2064 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-254129) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration
Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 13, 2021
#### Dickerson v. Gray, in Error.

*Friday, May*8.

THE prosecution, under the statute for the support of illegitimate children, should be in the name of the state (1).

In all cases in which the state takes an obligation from an individual for the performance of any duty, it should he by recognizance, unless the law otherwise direct.

The order of the Court, in a case of bastardy, after stating what sum the father must pay for the maintenance of the child, should be,—that the defendant pay the money to the person who shall maintain the child, or become entitled to the same by law; and that he enter into a recognizance witb one or more sureties, for the performance of the order.

(1)

*State v. Bradley,*Vol. 1. of these Rep. *83.—Woodkirk*v. *Williams,*id. 110.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3151

WILLIAM B. WILEY,

Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

SF0831090055-1-1.

ON MOTION

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) moves to reform the caption to name

the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent. OPM states that the Board

consents to this motion. William B. Wiley opposes.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent

when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The

employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of

the underlying case. In this case, the Board dismissed the appeal because OPM

rescinded its decision and advised that it would be issuing a new decision. Wiley's

argument that the dismissal was improper does not change the fact that the Board did not

reach the merits of the underlying case. Thus, pursuant to the statute, the Board is

designated as the respondent.
Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted. The official caption is reflected above.

FOR THE COURT

MAY 19 2009	/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Peter B. Broida, Esq.

Sameer P. Yerawadekar, Esq.

Jeffrey Gauger, Esq.

s19

imegiStor

MAY 19 2009

JAN liORNALY

CLERK

2009-3151	 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-2732.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Argued March 2, 2005.

Decided March 8, 2005.

Matthew P. Brookman, Office of the United States Attorney, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David J. Scacchetti, Scacchetti & Scacchetti, Cincinnati, OH, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HBAUER, EASTERBROOK, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Robert Johnson was convicted after a jury trial of possession with intent to distribute in excess of 500 grams of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(ii)(II), and sentenced to 130 months’ imprisonment and 4 years’ supervised release. On appeal Johnson challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop where a dog alerted to the presence of drugs, arguing that his consent to allow the dog to walk around his van was involuntary.

A recent Supreme Court case makes it irrelevant whether Johnson’s consent for the dog sniff was voluntary. *See Illinois v. Caballes,*— U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 834, 838, 160 L.Ed.2d 842 (2005) (holding that no legitimate privacy interest is implicated by allowing a drug-detection dog to sniff the exterior of a vehicle during a lawful traffic stop). The trooper at the scene had not finished writing the warning ticket when the officer walked the dog around Johnson’s van, so Johnson’s consent was irrelevant. *Cf. Knowles v. Iowa,*525 U.S. 113, 117-118, 119 S.Ct. 484, 142 L.Ed.2d 492 (1998). At argument, Johnson could not distinguish his case from *Caballes,*and neither can we.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                                   AS ADDED BY
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Royal Bancshares a Pennsylvania
("Royal") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph P. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
              and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Royal as of the dates and for the periods expressed
              in the Report.

                                                       /s/ Joseph P. Campbell
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Joseph P. Campbell
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                                       March 14, 2006.

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Targets 2024 for First Flight of X-59 Experimental Aircraft","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"23vXVjq1vP\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasa-targets-2024-for-first-flight-of-x-59-experimental-aircraft\/\">NASA Targets 2024 for First Flight of X-59 Experimental Aircraft<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasa-targets-2024-for-first-flight-of-x-59-experimental-aircraft\/embed\/#?secret=23vXVjq1vP\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Targets 2024 for First Flight of X-59 Experimental Aircraft” — NASA\" data-secret=\"23vXVjq1vP\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/p23-092-02.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}