alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13** 
**- 2268** 

VERNON J. LEFTRIDGE , JR. ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

JOHN DOE, K

- 9 Officer Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Over

- the

air Communication Officer Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Internal Affairs Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, in his individual capacity and official capacity as a law enforcement officer of Wicomico County Sheriff ’ s Department; JOHN DOE, Internal Affairs Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Dispatch Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Dispatch Officer of Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Maryland State Trooper; JOHN DOE, Maryland State Trooper; JANE DOE, Internal Affairs Officer Wicomico County; JOHN DOE, Salisbury Police Officer; MICHAEL KELLY MATTHEWS; BENJAMIN CHARLES PARSONS; HOWARD LEE BOWDEN; JANE DOE, Salisbury Police Officer ,
Defendants

– Appellees ,
and

MICHAEL LEWIS ,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv
- 03499

- ELH )

Submitted : March 28, 2014 Decided: April 8, 20142 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER , and MOTZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr ., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 P ER CURIAM:
Vernon J. Leftridge , Jr., appeals the district court ’ s

order s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint
and denying his motion for reconsideration . We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Leftridge v.

Matthews , No. 1:11

- cv
- 03499

- ELH (D. Md. filed Sept. 30, 2013,

entered Oct. 1, 2013 ; filed Oct. 10, 2013, entere d Oct. 11,

2013 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 202 (Monday, October 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]


Notice of Adjustment of Minimum Project Worksheet Amount

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the minimum Project Worksheet Amount 
under the Public Assistance program for disasters and emergencies 
declared on or after October 1, 2014, will be increased.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2014, and applies to major disasters 
and emergencies declared on or after October 1, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Roche, Recovery Directorate, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-3834.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 and 44 CFR 206.202(d)(2) 
provide that FEMA will annually adjust the minimum Project Worksheet 
amount under the Public Assistance program to reflect changes in the 
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the 
Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice of an increase to $3,040 for the minimum amount 
that will be approved for any Project Worksheet under the Public 
Assistance program for all major disasters and emergencies declared on 
or after October 1, 2014.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price 
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.3 percent for the 6-month period 
from February 2014 to August 2014. This is based on information 
released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of 
Labor on September 17, 2014.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-24809 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2873

AN ACT

To extend the authority of the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Iowa to hold court in Rock

Island, Illinois.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2873 ES

1 SECTION 1. HOLDING OF COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DIS2 TRICT OF IOWA.

3 Section 11029 of the 21st Century Department of

4 Justice Appropriations Authorization Act (28 U.S.C. 95

5 note; Public Law 107–273; 116 Stat. 1836) is amended

6 by striking ‘‘July 1, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘July 1, 2006’’.

7 SEC. 2. HOLDING OF COURT AT CLEVELAND, MISSISSIPPI.

8 Section 104(a)(3) of title 28, United States Code, is

9 amended in the second sentence by inserting ‘‘and Cleve10 land’’ after ‘‘Clarksdale’’.

11 SEC. 3. PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN TEXARKANA, TEXAS,

12 AND TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS.

13 Sections 83(b)(1) and 124(c)(5) of title 28, United

14 States Code, are each amended by inserting after ‘‘held

15 at Texarkana’’ the following: ‘‘, and may be held anywhere

16 within the Federal courthouse in Texarkana that is lo17 cated astride the State line between Texas and Arkansas’’.

18 SEC. 4. PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN THE NORTHERN DIS19 TRICT OF NEW YORK.

20 Section 112(a) of title 28, United States Code, is

21 amended by striking ‘‘and Watertown’’ and inserting

22 ‘‘Watertown, and Plattsburgh’’.
†

3

S 2873 ES

1 SEC. 5. PLACE OF HOLDING COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF

2 COLORADO.

3 Section 85 of title 28, United States Code, is amend4 ed by inserting ‘‘Colorado Springs,’’ after ‘‘Boulder,’’.

Passed the Senate November 19, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2873

AN ACT

To extend the authority of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa to

hold court in Rock Island, Illinois.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              233,400
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,369,563
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,602,963
<PP&E>                                            2,498,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (5,404)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,095,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               790,858
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            160,617
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,144,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4,095,843
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        280
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    555,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (554,855)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy (DOE).

# ACTION:

Notice of request for information.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Energy (DOE) today gives notice of a request for information regarding the possible technical areas of research in the area of photovoltaic module recycling. DOE intends to understand the current state of recycling technology and the areas of research that could lead to impactful recycling technologies to support the developing photovoltaic industry. The intent of this RFI is to generate discussion related to planning for the end of life of photovoltaic modules and to create a list of high impact research topics in photovoltaics recycling. Details regarding the RFI and instructions for submitting responses to the RFI can be found at the following                               ( print page 62948)                            URL address:                         *https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/​.*

# DATES:

 Responses to this RFI must be received by November 14, 2014.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The RFI and instructions for submitting responses to the RFI can be found at the following URL address:                         *https://eere-exchange.energy.gov/​.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions may be directed to—                        *pv-recycling-rfi@ee.doe.gov*.                    

Issued in Washington, on October 14, 2014.

Marie Mapes,

Program Manager, Solar Energy Technologies Office.

[FR Doc. 2014-24969 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### Lindy Ray MATTHEWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles SPEIER, Division Director; Bettie Wells, Agent, DPO Central Parole Supervision; Others, Address Unknown; Maria Ramirez, Supervisor DPO, San Antonio I, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-50183.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 18, 2005.

*612Lindy Ray Matthews, Seagoville, TX, pro se.

Marjolyn Carol Gardner, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before DAVIS, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lindy Ray Matthews, a federal prisoner (# 97243-079), appeals the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, based on the applicable two-year Texas limitations statute, in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action challenging Matthews’s prior state custody.

In his pro se complaint, which was filed in April 2003, Matthews alleged that he was falsely imprisoned for 10 months during 1996 and 1997, after the defendants failed to notify him of the revocation of his “blue warrant,” which had been issued an executed in 1996 based on Matthews’s alleged violation of the terms of his state parole.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment to defendants on the ground that Matthews’s claim was barred by the applicable Texas limitations statute. The summary-judgment evidence reflected that Matthews’s claim had accrued by late 1998, by which time Matthews’s parole officer had informed him that the blue warrant had actually been revoked in May 1997, 10 months before Matthews was initially informed of the rev*613ocation and released on bond. *See Jacobsen v. Osborne,*133 F.3d 315, 319 (5th Cir.1998); *Celotex Corp. v. Catrett,*477 U.S. 317, 325, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). The limitations period expired two years after the claim accrued in late 1998. *Hitt v. Connell,*301 F.3d 240, 246 (5th Cir.2002). Matthews was not entitled to state-law tolling for “fraudulent concealment,” because he was aware of the facts necessary to know that the claim existed. *See Booker v. Real Homes, Inc.,*103 S.W.3d 487, 493 (Tex.Ct.App.2003).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Matthews’s motion for appointment of counsel, *see Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t,*811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir.1986); his motion to compel discovery, *see King v. Dogan,*31 F.3d 344, 346 (5th Cir.1994); and his motion for leave to amend his complaint. *See Ashe v. Corley,*992 F.2d 540, 542 (5th Cir.1993).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 31.2

I, Valerie C. Toalson, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Valerie C. Toalson

Valerie C. Toalson

Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 10,
2012
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

WO 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Elijah Shane Silva, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01215-001-PHX-JJT

DETENTION ORDER 

 On August 24, 2017, Defendant appeared before this Court on a petition for 

revocation of supervised release. The issue of detention was submitted to the Court. The 

Court considered the petition and file in determining whether Defendant should be 

released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds that Defendant, having previously been convicted and placed on 

supervised release, and having appeared before the Court in connection with a petition to 

revoke his supervised release, has failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that he is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of the community if released 

pursuant to Rule 46(d), and Rule 32.1(a)(6), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 

U.S.C. § 3143. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 24th day of August, 2017. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Thomas M Lanfor, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Charles L Ryan, et al., 

Respondents.

No. CV-15-01832-PHX-ROS

ORDER 

 On August 31, 2016, Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett issued a Report and 

Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be 

denied. (Doc. 11). No objections were filed. 

 A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 

recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party 

has filed timely objections to the R&R, the district court’s review of the part objected to 

must be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district court need not 

conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 

2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted in full. 

 Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) is ADOPTED and 

the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the petition is justified 

Case 2:15-cv-01832-ROS Document 12 Filed 10/26/16 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling 

debatable. 

 Dated this 25th day of October, 2016. 

Honorable Roslyn O. Silver

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01832-ROS Document 12 Filed 10/26/16 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63136-63137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections

[[Page 63137]]

552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Services Conflict.
    Date: November 4, 2014.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Karen Gavin-Evans, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 6153, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-2356, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#157274637c7b7063747b667e785578747c793b7b7c7d3b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddadccbd4d3d8cbdcd3ced6d0fdd0dcd4d193d3d4d593dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Carolyn A. Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-25046 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  132,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,380
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,830
<PP&E>                                         100,950
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,087
<SALES>                                        556,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               556,867
<CGS>                                          437,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  534,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,324)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,667
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,058
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,609
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>