alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 235 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 235

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 
   dependent care assistance programs sponsored by the Department of 
     Defense for members of the Armed Forces of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2003

 Ms. Landrieu introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 
   dependent care assistance programs sponsored by the Department of 
     Defense for members of the Armed Forces of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. CLARIFICATION OF THE TREATMENT OF CERTAIN DEPENDENT CARE 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 134(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (defining qualified military benefit) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Clarification of certain benefits.--For purposes of 
        paragraph (1), such term includes any dependent care assistance 
        program (as in effect on the date of the enactment of this 
        paragraph) for any individual described in paragraph (1)(A).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 134(b)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
        1986 is amended by inserting ``and paragraph (4)'' after 
        ``subparagraphs (B)''.
            (2) Section 3121(a)(18) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``or 129'' and inserting ``, 129, or 134(b)(4)''.
            (3) Section 3306(b)(13) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``or 129'' and inserting ``, 129, or 134(b)(4)''.
            (4) Section 3401(a)(18) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``or 129'' and inserting ``, 129, or 134(b)(4)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
ACCEPTED 01-15-00197-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/12/2015 1:35:39 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ana Guzman","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ana-d-guzmannasa-gov\/","title":"Benefits for Humanity: Your Orbiting Laboratory","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mcuDo4ZpIu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/benefits-your-orbiting-laboratory\/\">Benefits for Humanity: Your Orbiting Laboratory<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/benefits-your-orbiting-laboratory\/embed\/#?secret=mcuDo4ZpIu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Benefits for Humanity: Your Orbiting Laboratory” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mcuDo4ZpIu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/51870205773-dffa82aa13-k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"John Stack","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nKMIYTtG0Y\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/john-stack\/\">John Stack<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/john-stack\/embed\/#?secret=nKMIYTtG0Y\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“John Stack” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nKMIYTtG0Y\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/john-stack.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":748}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-49-000.
    Applicants: Lake Charles LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation per 154.602: Cancel entire Third 
Revised Volume No. 1-A to be effective 10/14/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20141014-5290.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-1208-001.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Compliance Filing-RCC 
Updates to be effective 10/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20141014-5337.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-173-001.
    Applicants: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Compliance Filing to 
Remove Costs From Rates to be effective 10/15/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/14/14.
    Accession Number: 20141014-5313.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR Sec.  385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 15, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25063 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Bettie Jane Forbes,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04755-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Offices of Ben C Martin, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/27/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9565 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9565 Filed 01/10/18 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DRYPERS CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 9/30/99 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,098,000               6,098,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               70,063,000              70,063,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,251,000               3,251,000
<INVENTORY>                                 32,951,000              32,951,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           130,261,000             130,261,000
<PP&E>                                     114,917,000             114,917,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,311,000              26,311,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             324,495,000             324,495,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      120,483,000             120,483,000
<BONDS>                                    145,915,000             145,915,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        18,000                  18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,371,000              44,371,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               324,495,000             324,495,000
<SALES>                                     93,946,000             269,564,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,946,000             269,564,000
<CGS>                                       57,354,000             170,422,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               90,732,000             263,684,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (134,000)             (1,814,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,711,000              14,338,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,363,000)             (6,644,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (579,000)             (1,818,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (784,000)             (4,826,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (229,000)                238,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,013,000)             (4,588,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.05)                   (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.05)                   (.26)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: One Week to Apollo 10","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gFOdIamMpc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-one-week-to-apollo-10\/\">50 Years Ago: One Week to Apollo 10<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-one-week-to-apollo-10\/embed\/#?secret=gFOdIamMpc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: One Week to Apollo 10” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gFOdIamMpc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/apollo_10_crew_in_front_of_saturn_v_post_cddt_may_6_1969_s69-34329.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":750}
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50324 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-03-CR-1929-ALL-PM

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Luis Hernandez-Garcia concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
**
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Tami R. Berens,certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided on Form10-D with respect to the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 
4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

 
5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as exhibits to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, Ihave reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas. 

Date: March 29, 2023

 

/s/ Tami R. Berens
Name: Tami R. BerensTitle: Vice President, Citibank, N.A.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
 
**
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                                                   ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     2002          2001          2000          1999          1998
                                                   --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
<S>                                                <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
(In Thousands)

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
  before income taxes and extraordinary items      $ 57,569      $ 53,622      $ 39,932      $ 46,898      $ 16,712
Fixed interest charges                              164,078       196,905       219,011       170,863       153,930
                                                   --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
Earnings (loss):
  Including fixed interest charges                  221,647       250,527       240,228       217,761       170,642
  Excluding interest expense on deposits            158,870       164,859       148,505       140,886       103,928
Fixed interest charges excluding interest
  expense on deposits                               101,301       111,237       120,801        93,988        87,216
Ratios:
Earnings including fixed interest charges
  to fixed interest charges                            1.35          1.27          1.13          1.27          1.11
Earnings to fixed interest excluding
  interest on deposits                                 1.57          1.48          1.23          1.50          1.19
Dollar deficiency of earnings to fixed
  interest charges                                 $     --      $     --      $     --      $     --      $     --
                                                   ========      ========      ========      ========      ========


</TABLE>