alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"A Floridian Sunset","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gAuTtKhsMT\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/afs-8-101-486\/\">A Floridian Sunset<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/afs-8-101-486\/embed\/#?secret=gAuTtKhsMT\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Floridian Sunset” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gAuTtKhsMT\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/ksc-20240130-ph-jbs01-0012orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### JOHN H. LANDOR v. LINDA LANDOR.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ronell Smith,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04211-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9377 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25162]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8928]


In the Matter of the Designation of Qari Hussain as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of 
September 23, 2001, as amended (``the Order''), I hereby determine that 
the individual known as Qari Hussain, also known as other aliases and 
transliterations, no longer meets the criteria for designation under 
the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke the designation of the 
aforementioned individual as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist 
pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 10, 2014.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-25162 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachel H. Kraft","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rkraft\/","title":"NASA Collaborations Seek to Inspire Through Artemis","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dPJ6M7FTJK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/nasa-collaborations-seek-to-inspire-through-artemis\/\">NASA Collaborations Seek to Inspire Through Artemis<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/nasa-collaborations-seek-to-inspire-through-artemis\/embed\/#?secret=dPJ6M7FTJK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Collaborations Seek to Inspire Through Artemis” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dPJ6M7FTJK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/students_higher_ed.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
Case 2:15-cr-01356-DJH Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01356-DJH Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cr-01356-DJH Document 4 Filed 10/06/15 Page 3 of 3
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Monika Luabeya","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mluabeya\/","title":"NASA Astronauts Jasmin Moghbeli and Loral O\u2019Hara Read “First Woman”","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l2N37rd97z\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-astronauts-jasmin-moghbeli-and-loral-ohara-read-first-woman\/\">NASA Astronauts Jasmin Moghbeli and Loral O\u2019Hara Read “First Woman”<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/nasa-astronauts-jasmin-moghbeli-and-loral-ohara-read-first-woman\/embed\/#?secret=l2N37rd97z\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Astronauts Jasmin Moghbeli and Loral O\u2019Hara Read “First Woman”” — NASA\" data-secret=\"l2N37rd97z\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/iss070e064628orig.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
EXHIBIT 31.2


                  CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Lawrence Pemble, certify that:



     1.  I  have   reviewed   this  annual   report  on  Form  10-K  of  Chindex
International, Inc.;

     2. Based on my  knowledge,  this annual  report does not contain any untrue
statement of material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and presented in this annual report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the  disclosure  controls and  procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent year that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most  recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's  auditors  and the  audit
committee of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent function):

          a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


June 28, 2004


/S/ LAWRENCE PEMBLE
---------------------------
Lawrence Pemble
Executive Vice President, Finance and Business Development
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MPW
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,553
<INVENTORY>                                      7,672
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,587
<PP&E>                                          66,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,573
<BONDS>                                         55,185
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,390
<SALES>                                         68,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,251
<CGS>                                           45,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,551
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,866
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Roberto SORTO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-7551.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 18, 2005.

Decided: March 16, 2005.

*128Roberto Sorto, Appellant pro se.

Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Roberto Sorto seeks to appeal the district court’s amended order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as successive. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sorto has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule Contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
Company's December 31, 1998 Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,980
<INVENTORY>                                     24,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,806
<PP&E>                                         201,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,455
<BONDS>                                              0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,182
<SALES>                                        128,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,109
<CGS>                                          114,711
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,465
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,646
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,819
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.77
        


</TABLE>
Order entered May 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01220-CR

HUBERT WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-53043-M

ORDER

Appellant’s April 11, 2013 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is 

GRANTED. The time to file appellant’s brief is EXTENDED to THIRTY DAYS from the 

date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6018

ALPHONSO BELL, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MR. SESSION, Deputy Sheriff; SGT. ELIAS, Deputy Sheriff; MRS. PAGGOT, 

Nurse, RN; MR. JACKSON, Deputy Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01309-LMB-MSN)

Submitted: February 26, 2019 Decided: March 1, 2019

Before KING, THACKER, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alphonso Bell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alphonso Bell, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing without 

prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying as moot his subsequent 

motion to appoint counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 

(2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). Because the district court dismissed Bell’s complaint without prejudice to 

refiling his improperly joined claims in separate complaints, we conclude that the orders 

Bell seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral 

orders. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 

2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 

(4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.*

 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * Because Bell has since complied with the district court’s direction to file separate 

complaints, we need not remand with instructions to allow Bell to amend the instant

complaint. See Goode, 807 F.3d at 630.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Mark Benjamin HEMPHILL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-8013.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 10, 2005.

Decided: March 15, 2005.

Mark Benjamin Hemphill, Appellant pro se.

Marshall Prince, Office of the United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mark Benjamin Hemphill seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as untimely. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that *125Hemphill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Hemphill’s motion for production of documents, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM A. BUGLIONE.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 233 *N.J.Super.*110).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MYRON FINKELSTEIN.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
No. 86-6867.

#### Lowenfield *v.*Phelps, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections, et al., Murphy *v.*Aetna Life & Casualty et al., Daniels *v.*Secretary of Health and Human Services, Trapani *v.*CBS Records, Inc., et al., White *v.*Department of Justice,

No. 87-5587.

No. 87-5839.

No. 87-5904.

No. 87-6056.

484 U. S. 231; 484 U. S. 961; 484 U. S. 1016; 484 U. S. 1036; and 484 U. S. 1046. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Justice Kennedy took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.