alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors
Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation:

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-42171) and Form S-8 (Nos.
333-43483 and 333-43495) of Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation of our report dated February 23, 2003, except for Note 2 which is as of March 17, 2002,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Hispanic Broadcasting Corporation. Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to
the adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141,Business Combinations,and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets.

Dallas, Texas
March 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 63118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-70-000]


Erie Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Erie Power, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is November 4, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2949780919dbcbebbbcb781a7a2a2bda0a692b4b7a0b1fcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f595a4d5c50717376717a4c6a6f6f706d6b5f797a6d7c31787069">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 15, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25064 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"45 Years Ago: NASA Selects 35 New Astronauts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"pIlDufLpj8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-nasa-selects-35-new-astronauts\/\">45 Years Ago: NASA Selects 35 New Astronauts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-nasa-selects-35-new-astronauts\/embed\/#?secret=pIlDufLpj8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“45 Years Ago: NASA Selects 35 New Astronauts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"pIlDufLpj8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/class_of_1978_1_montage_photo_s78-26481.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":620}
Order entered May 14, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00541
- CV
IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF J .A., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court a t Law No. 2

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19M
- 091



### O RDER This is an appeal from an order requiring court

- ordered mental health services. Pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code Section 574.070 and Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2, we ORD ER court reporter Sherry Hooper to file the reporter’s record no later than May 16, 2019

. See T EX
. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN
. § 574.070 (e) ; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2. We further ORDER appellant to file her brief within ten days of the filing of the reporter’s rec ord and appellee to file its brief within ten days of the filing of appellant’s brief. See T EX
. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN
. § 574.070 (e) ; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2. Because this is an accelerated appeal, extension requests will be disfavored.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Hooper and the parties. /s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                              BIG CITY RADIO, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31
                                                                                    ----------------------------
<S>                                                                                 <C>            <C>
                                                                                        1998           1997
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
 
Net loss..........................................................................  $  (3,286,000) $  (3,003,000)
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding--Basic Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding.......................................................     13,975,520      9,375,520
 
Dilutive effect of stock options after application of treasury stock method
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding.....................................     13,975,520      9,375,520
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
 
Net loss per share:
 
    Basic (a).....................................................................  $       (0.24) $       (0.32)
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
                                                                                    -------------  -------------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(a) In calculating diluted earnings per share, no potential shares of common
    stock are to be included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
    when a loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders
    exists. For the three months ended March 31, 1998, the Company had a loss
    from continuing operations.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7706

BRIAN E. ASHCRAFT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DAVID BALLARD, Warden,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, 

Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00011-JPB-DJJ)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian E. Ashcraft, Appellant Pro Se. Silas B. Taylor, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brian E. Ashcraft seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) 

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2)(A) (2006). When the district court 

denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard 

by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Ashcraft has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of 

appealability and the motion for appeal counsel, and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2866

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 24, 2004

Referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

AN ACT

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to clarify the authority of the Secretary of 

Agriculture and the Commodity Credit Corporation to 

enter into memorandums of understanding with a State 

regarding the collection of approved State commodity 

assessments on behalf of the State from the proceeds 

of marketing assistance loans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commodity Assess5 ment, Protection, and Reform Act’’.
2

S 2866 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS. 

2 Subtitle B of title I of the Farm Security and Rural 

3 Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7931 et seq.) is amend4 ed by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 1210. COLLECTION OF COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS. 

6 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF ASSESSMENT.—In this section, 

7 the term ‘assessment’ means funds that are— 

8 ‘‘(1) collected with respect to a specific com9 modity in accordance with this Act; 

10 ‘‘(2) paid by the first purchaser of the com11 modity in accordance with a State law or this title; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(3) not collected through a tax or other rev14 enue collection activity of a State. 

15 ‘‘(b) AUTHORITY TO COLLECT COMMODITY ASSESS16 MENTS FROM MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOANS.—The 

17 Secretary may collect commodity assessments from the 

18 proceeds of a marketing assistance loan made under this 

19 subtitle in accordance with an agreement between the Sec20 retary and the State.’’.

Passed the Senate November 21 (legislative day, November 20), 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
Exhibit 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors

Board of Directors
REGI U.S., Inc.

We  consent  to  the  use  of  our  report dated August 7, 2001 on the financial
statements of REGI U.S., Inc. as of April 30, 2001 that are included in the Form
10-KSB,  which  is  included,  by  reference  in  the  Company's  Form  S-8.

Dated this 13th day of August, 2001.

MANNING  ELLIOTT
Chartered  Accountants

/s/  Manning  Elliott


                                       45
<PAGE>
<PAGE>
                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                                                                      Exhibit 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement File Nos. 33-82158, 333-04995, 333-04959, 333-04963, 333-
04965, 333-52775, 333-71443 and 333-35815.


                                         /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin,
February 26, 1999.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"Training To Be An Astronaut","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RNMsMSqKSF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/training-to-be-an-astronaut\/\">Training To Be An Astronaut<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/training-to-be-an-astronaut\/embed\/#?secret=RNMsMSqKSF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Training To Be An Astronaut” — NASA\" data-secret=\"RNMsMSqKSF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/159333main_image_feature_665_ys_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
**Exhibit 10.41(a)**
**SPECIMEN**
**AMENDMENT TO NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS**
     This Amendment to each of the Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreements (the “Agreements”) by andbetween **Seabulk International, Inc.**, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and [                                        ] (“Employee”), with grant dates of[                                        ],[                                        ] and [                                        ], is enteredinto as of the 18th day of April, 2005.
     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee desire to amend each of the Agreements in certain respects;and
     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has authorizedthis amendment on April 18, 2005.
     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the mutual covenants setforth herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company andEmployee hereby amend each of the Agreements as set forth herein below, effective as of the datefirst set forth above:
 1.  Section 2.2 of each of the Agreements is hereby amended and restated bydeleting the text appearing therein in its entirety and inserting the following text inlieu thereof:
          “2.2 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in thisAgreement, in the event of any Termination of Employment, other than byreason of death or Disability, within two years following a Change inControl, this Option shall become one hundred percent (100%) Vested andexercisable. The Committee may, in its sole discretion, accelerate theexercisability of any unexercisable portion of this Option at any time.”
 2.  Section 6 of each of the Agreements is hereby amended and restated by deletingthe text appearing therein in its entirety and inserting the following text in lieuthereof:
     “6. *Intentionally left blank*.”
 3.  As so amended, each of the Agreements remains in full force and effect.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to beduly executed and delivered as of the date first set forth above.        SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.          Employee   By:[                                        ]
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Testing Electric Propulsion","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iHAjOW2lgM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/testing-electric-propulsion-2\/\">Testing Electric Propulsion<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-detail\/testing-electric-propulsion-2\/embed\/#?secret=iHAjOW2lgM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Testing Electric Propulsion” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iHAjOW2lgM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/gl10_test013_8-19-14.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
#### Russell L. LEE, Appellant, v. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, Appellee.

No. 03-7138.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 14, 2005.

Russell L. Lee, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Clarissa Thomas, Law Office of C. Thomas, Ch, Washington, DC, Paul Marc Rosenblatt, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE and GARLAND, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court *2for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed September 9, 2003, dismissing for lack of personal jurisdiction, be affirmed. The requisite minimum contacts between appellee and the District of Columbia are lacking. *See*D.C.Code § 13 — 423(a)(1); *Helmer v. Doletskaya,*393 F.3d 201, 206 (D.C.Cir.2004). Because the district court lacked personal jurisdiction, the court lacked authority to address the merits of appellant’s arguments relating to the matter of full faith and credit.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.