alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 





AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO DEBENTURE


This Amendment No. 5 to Debenture (this “Amendment”)
dated this 20th day of April, 2021, by and among Bespoke Extracts, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Berlique
Labs LLC (the “Holder”).


WHEREAS, the Holder is the holder of an outstanding
original issue discount convertible debenture of the Company, in the outstanding principal amount of $400,000, with an original issue
date of December 24, 2019, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated May 28, 2020, Amendment No. 2 thereto, dated August 21, 2020,
Amendment No. 3 thereto, dated December 10, 2020, and Amendment No. 4 thereto, dated January 15, 2021 (as amended, the “Debenture”);


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire to
amend the Debenture as more particularly set forth below;


WHEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree as follows:


1.       The Maturity Date of
the Debenture is hereby amended to be May 31, 2021. For the avoidance of doubt, no default will be deemed to have occurred, and no default
interest will be deemed to have accrued or be owed, since the original issuance of the Debenture to the date of this Amendment.


2.       Except as modified herein,
the terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect.


3.       This Amendment may be
executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and shall be binding upon all
parties, their successors and assigns, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. A signature delivered
by facsimile or email shall constitute an original.


[Signature Page Follows]






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


 


BESPOKE EXTRACTS, INC.


 


By: /s Danil Pollack


Name: Danil Pollack


Title: Chief Executive Officer


 


 


 


BERLIQUE LABS LLC


 


By: /s/ Ber Mitchell


Name: Ber Mitchell


Title: Manager
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                             475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,722
<INVENTORY>                                        666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,555
<PP&E>                                           1,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,899
<BONDS>                                          2,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,979
<SALES>                                         35,903
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,903
<CGS>                                            4,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,795
<INCOME-TAX>                                       610
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,185
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DANIEL RAE GREGORY.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-129","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iKbzQaLCeW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-129\/\">STS-129<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-129\/embed\/#?secret=iKbzQaLCeW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-129” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iKbzQaLCeW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SECHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DANKA BUSINESS SYSTEMS PLC AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          45,911
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  635,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,921
<INVENTORY>                                    545,215
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,277,785
<PP&E>                                         581,221
<DEPRECIATION>                                 195,140
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,234,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          784,324
<BONDS>                                        900,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,741
<OTHER-SE>                                     484,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,234,429
<SALES>                                      1,666,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,666,351
<CGS>                                        1,040,661
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,040,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               533,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,814
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,623
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,191
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7341

WILLIAM JAMISON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-98-838-H)

Submitted: November 5, 1998 Decided: November 23, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Jamison, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gwynn X. Kinsey, Jr., Assistant Attorney General,

David Jonathan Taube, Assistant Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Jamison seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We find that Jamison’s petition was not timely

filed in the district court. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West Supp.

1998); Brown v. Angelone, 150 F.3d 370, 374-76 (4th Cir. 1998).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 21**

 

 

**Subsidiaries**

 

The following table sets forth the information on our subsidiaries that is required to be reported under Item 601 of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

 

 

|  

**Name**   |   | **State of Incorporation****or Organization** |   | **Name Under Which Business is Conducted** |
|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| ESI Service Corp.  |   | Delaware                                      |   | ESI Service Corp.                          |
| ESI Maryland Corp. |   | Maryland                                      |   | ITT Technical Institute                    |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZIYAUL HAQUE,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-70318

Agency No. A089-302-869

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 22, 2014** 

Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Ziyaul Haque, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s

(“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction

FILED

AUG 4 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations

created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th

Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

The agency concluded Haque was not credible for a number of reasons,

including the lack of detail in his testimony regarding the Bharatiya Janata Party

and the All India Muslim Unity Front, and Haque’s inability to explain his

simultaneous membership in these two groups. Substantial evidence supports the

agency’s adverse credibility determination. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility

determination was reasonable under the totality of circumstances). Haque’s

explanations do not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241,

1245 (9th Cir. 2000). We reject Haque’s contention that the IJ unreasonably

rejected his explanations. In the absence of credible testimony, Haque’s asylum

and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153,

1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Finally, Haque’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same

statements found not credible, and Haque points to no other evidence to compel the

finding that it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the consent

2 12-70318
or acquiescence of the Indian government. See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 12-70318
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**eMAGIN
      CORPORATION**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      K.C.
      Park, the Chief Executive Officer of eMagin Corporation (the "Company"),
      certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
      (d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      eMagin Corporation and will be retained by eMagin Corporation and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


**Company
              Name**Dated:  August
                14, 2007
            By:
            /s/ K.C.
              ParkK.C.
              Park*Chief
              Executive Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             341
<SECURITIES>                                   185,762
<RECEIVABLES>                                  302,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               495,993
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 495,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               91
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    250,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     245,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   495,993
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,045
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    4,409
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    4,409
        

</TABLE>
No. 87-6211.

#### Senjudo *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Abraham Assadi,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03717-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8918 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Understanding and Mitigating the Charging Behavior of Next Generation Complex and Active Spacecraft","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GpTaNccT0z\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/understanding-and-mitigating-the-charging-behavior-of-next-generation-complex-and-active-spacecraft\/\">Understanding and Mitigating the Charging Behavior of Next Generation Complex and Active Spacecraft<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/understanding-and-mitigating-the-charging-behavior-of-next-generation-complex-and-active-spacecraft\/embed\/#?secret=GpTaNccT0z\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Understanding and Mitigating the Charging Behavior of Next Generation Complex and Active Spacecraft” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GpTaNccT0z\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/leon_omar.jpg?w=245","thumbnail_width":245,"thumbnail_height":368}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2703 

To provide for the correction of a certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System map. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 21, 2004 

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To provide for the correction of a certain John H. Chafee 

Coastal Barrier Resources System map. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORRECTIONS TO JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

7 shall make any corrections to the map described in sub8 section (b) that are necessary to ensure that the map is 

9 consistent with the map entitled ‘‘Corrections to Coastal 

10 Barrier Resources System Map Unit T–10’’, dated June 
2 

•S 2703 IS 

1 lllll, 2004, and on file with the Secretary and the 

2 Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Sen3 ate. 

4 (b) MAP DESCRIBED.—The map described in this 

5 subsection is the map that is subtitled ‘‘Four Mile Hill 

6 Unit TX–16P, North Padre Island Unit T10/T10P’’, 

7 which is included in the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Bar8 rier Resources System’’ and dated October 24, 1990. 

9 (c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

10 shall keep the map described in subsection (b) on file and 

11 available for public inspection in accordance with section 

12 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

13 3503(b)). 

Æ