alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6309

In Re: WENDALL A. JONES,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-566)

Submitted: June 17, 2005 Decided: July 18, 2005

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wendall A. Jones, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000), the parties consented

to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Wendell A. Jones petitions for writ of mandamus, asking

this court to direct the magistrate judge* to compel discovery in

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) action and to defer or set aside any

judgment in that action until discovery has occurred. He also

seeks an order compelling the magistrate judge to respond to his

motion for partial summary judgment and an extension of time to

respond to the respondent’s motion to dismiss. 

Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in

extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is available only when

there are no other means by which the relief sought could be

granted, In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may

not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re Catawba Indian Tribe,

973 F.2d 1133, 1136 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus

relief bears the heavy burden of showing that he has no other

adequate means to obtain the relief sought and that his entitlement

to relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v.

Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). 

Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals

that, after Jones filed his mandamus petition, the magistrate judge

denied Jones’ motion for partial summary judgment and dismissed his
- 3 -

§ 2254 petition. Therefore, Jones’ mandamus petition is moot.

Moreover, to the extent that Jones seeks to set aside the

magistrate judge’s final order, he has another available remedy;

namely, an appeal from that order.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny Jones’ petition for writ of mandamus. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: March 2, 2009

/s/
Bruce W. DuncanBruce W. DuncanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Todd Brooks, certify that:

| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 of FalconStor Software, Inc.;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: June 23, 2020 | /s/ Todd Brooks                                                            
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Todd Brooks                                                                
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer
        (principal executive officer)
Case 2:15-mj-01660-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/03/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01660-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/03/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-mj-01660-JFM Document 3 Filed 09/03/15 Page 3 of 3
# Fourth C ourt of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 24, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00452

- CR

Jose Guadalupe AGUIRRE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR7206

Honorable Lorina I. R ummel, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee ’ s motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of February, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Terrance Levo Carrington,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04550-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Johnson Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/8/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9509 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9509 Filed 12/29/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Christine Darden: From Human Computer to Engineer","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UFLuTQtfoX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/christine-darden-from-human-computer-engineer\/\">Christine Darden: From Human Computer to Engineer<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/image-article\/christine-darden-from-human-computer-engineer\/embed\/#?secret=UFLuTQtfoX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Christine Darden: From Human Computer to Engineer” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UFLuTQtfoX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/christine_darden_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Chris BiedermannChris BiedermannVice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 8, 2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Margaret R. Brenner,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04502-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9723 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 1
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00026

- CR

Santos Reina v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 25th District Court of Guadalupe County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- 1069

- CR

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 20, 2023
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH VAN NOTE.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Sharilyn Rae Martinez, 

Defendant.

No. CR-15-01028-001-PHX-JJT

ORDER 

 On March 11, 2016, Defendant appeared before the Court on a Petition for Action 

on Conditions of Pretrial Release and submitted the issue to the Court. The Court 

considered the information provided to the Court in determining whether the Defendant 

should be released on conditions set by the Court. 

 The Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendant violated her 

conditions of release and based on the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), there are 

no conditions or combination of conditions that will assure that the Defendant will not 

flee or pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community. The Defendant 

is unlikely to abide by any condition or combination of conditions of release. 

 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending further 

proceedings. 

 Dated this 11th day of March, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:15-cr-01028-JJT Document 34 Filed 03/14/16 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jennifer M. Fadoul","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jfadoul\/","title":"The Ocean Touches Everything: Celebrate Earth Day with NASA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nAoMSqe6Qg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/earth\/earth-day\/the-ocean-touches-everything-celebrate-earth-day-with-nasa\/\">The Ocean Touches Everything: Celebrate Earth Day with NASA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/earth\/earth-day\/the-ocean-touches-everything-celebrate-earth-day-with-nasa\/embed\/#?secret=nAoMSqe6Qg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“The Ocean Touches Everything: Celebrate Earth Day with NASA” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nAoMSqe6Qg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2024-earthday-desktop-white-4k.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":375}
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                             |  |                                              |  | 
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: February 27, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN
|                         |  |  |  |                             |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman Chief Financial
Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001046442
<NAME> NEXT GENERATION, INC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1173475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2337293
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (255053)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4697632
<PP&E>                                        25956856
<DEPRECIATION>                               (8504374)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23460716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7892078
<BONDS>                                       39583441
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    1480000
<COMMON>                                         89196
<OTHER-SE>                                  (25583999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23460716
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7099844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 29780516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                281320
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5197763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (27440961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (27440961)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (27440961)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.48)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6617

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROHAN ALEXANDER WALTERS, a/k/a Rohan Williams,

a/k/a Dave,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin,

District Judge. (2:97-cr-00157-2; 2:04-cv-00758)

Submitted: December 8, 2006 Decided: January 18, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rohan Alexander Walters, Appellant Pro Se. Gary L. Call, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rohan Alexander Walters appeals the district court's

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Walters’ motion for a

certificate of appealability and affirm the denial of Walters’

§ 3582 motion for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Walters, No. 2:04-cv-00758 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 14, 2006).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED