alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                         HVIDE MARINE INCORPORATED

                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                                    1994       1995       1996
                                                                                 ---------   --------   --------
                                                                                          (IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                                                              <C>         <C>        <C>
Income (loss) before extraordinary item and
   cumulative effect...........................................................  $     358   $   (360)  $  6,033
Less:  Class A Preferred Stock cash dividends..................................        222         --         --
                                                                                 ---------   --------   --------
Adjusted income (loss) applicable to common
   shares-- primary............................................................        136       (360)     6,033
Plus:  Interest on Junior Note net of income tax effect........................        192        807        515
                                                                                 ---------   --------   --------
Adjusted income applicable to common shares -- fully
   diluted.....................................................................  $     328   $    447   $  6,548
                                                                                 =========   ========   ========

Weighted average shares outstanding............................................      1,962      2,535      5,672
   If-converted dilutive effect of Convertible Class B
     Preferred Stock...........................................................      3,340         --         --
   Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options................................         --         --        146
                                                                                 ---------   --------   --------
Common shares used in earnings (loss) per share
   calculation-- primary.......................................................      5,302      2,535      5,818
If-converted dilutive effect of Junior Note....................................        314      1,244        681
Incremental dilutive effect of outstanding stock
   options.....................................................................         --         --        146
                                                                                 ---------   --------   --------
Common shares used in earnings per share
   calculation-- fully diluted.................................................      5,616      3,779      6,645
                                                                                 =========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 24 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk May 24 , 2017

152448 (1 43 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 152448

v COA: 317892

St. Clair CC: 10

- 002936

- FC

TIA MARIE

- MITCHELL SKINNER,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Fair Punishment Project to file a

late amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief will be accepted for filing if

submitted on or before June 16, 2017.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"45 Years Ago: Historic Handshake in Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cDcgHoxxfr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-historic-handshake-in-space\/\">45 Years Ago: Historic Handshake in Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-historic-handshake-in-space\/embed\/#?secret=cDcgHoxxfr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“45 Years Ago: Historic Handshake in Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cDcgHoxxfr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/astp_docking_soyuz_before_docking_ast-01-056.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":595}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-105","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OZUOnYENxu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-105\/\">STS-105<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-105\/embed\/#?secret=OZUOnYENxu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-105” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OZUOnYENxu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Ernest E. Davis *v.*State of Indiana.

[No. 2-874A200.

Filed December 12, 1974.]

*Palmer W. Ward,*of Indianapolis, for appellant.

*Theodore L. Sendak,*Attorney General, *Wesley T. Wilson,*Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

Robertson, P.J.

The defendant-appellant (Davis) is appealing his conviction of first degree burglary by raising the issue of whether the trial court’s judgment was supported by sufficient evidence. We hold that it was.

The facts favorable to the State are: After checking to ascertain that all the doors and windows were closed Mrs. Orton retired for the night. At about 3:45 A.M. she was awakened by a noise downstairs. She then heard someone start and drive away in her brother-in-law’s automobile which was parked in front of her house. Mrs. Orton went downstairs and found the front door and a dining room window open. A number of items were missing from the house.

Davis was arrested later in the day while driving the stolen car. The items missing from the Orton’s home were in the car,

*402Additionally, Davis fingerprints were.found, on the opened dining room window.

Davis argues that there was a failure to prove an actual breaking and that the Orton’s home was a place of human habitation, both being essential elements of first degree burglary as defined by 1C 1971, 35-13-4-4(a), Ind. Ann. Stat. § 10-701 (a) (Burns 1956).

The breaking is properly inferred from Davis’ fingerprints on the opened window which he had not been authorized to enter. The slightest force may constitute breaking. *Cockerham v*. *State*(1965), 246 Ind. 303, 204 N.E.2d 654.

We further hold that the evidence was sufficient to allow the trier of fact to determine the Orton’s home was a “dwelling house or other place of human habitation” as evidenced, for example, that Mrs. Orton and her entire family slept there. *See Holding*v. *State*(1963), 244 Ind. 75, 190 N.E.2d 660.

Judgment affirmed.

Lowdermilk and Lybrook, J J., concur.

Note. — Reported at 319 N.E.2d 673.
#### Benjamin A. GIBBS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA; Henry McMaster, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 04-7410.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 25, 2005.

Decided March 17, 2005.

*133Benjamin A. Gibbs, Appellant pro se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, John William McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Samuel Creighton Waters, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Benjamin A. Gibbs seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to respondents on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).

The district court’s judgment denying § 2254 relief was entered on the docket on July 1, 2004. The notice of appeal was filed on August 23, 2004. *See Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). Because Gibbs failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. Gibbs’ motion to proceed on appeal in for-ma pauperis is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7354

ROGER D. YOUNG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KEITH HESTER; W. V. RITCHIE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CA-93-717-CT-5-F)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger D. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Mark J. Pletzke, NORTH CAROLINA

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Young v. Hester, No. CA-93-717-CT-5-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 3,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

Calendar No. 752 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2866 

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to clarify 

the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture and the Commodity Credit 

Corporation to enter into memorandums of understanding with a State 

regarding the collection of approved State commodity assessments on 

behalf of the State from the proceeds of marketing assistance loans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. 

CORNYN, Ms. CANTWELL, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. 

CRAIG, and Mr. DASCHLE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

the first time 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act 

of 2002 to clarify the authority of the Secretary of 

Agriculture and the Commodity Credit Corporation to 

enter into memorandums of understanding with a State 

regarding the collection of approved State commodity 

assessments on behalf of the State from the proceeds 

of marketing assistance loans.
2

•S 2866 PCS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commodity Assess5 ment, Protection, and Reform Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS. 

7 Subtitle B of title I of the Farm Security and Rural 

8 Investment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 7931 et seq.) is amend9 ed by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 1210. COLLECTION OF COMMODITY ASSESSMENTS. 

11 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF ASSESSMENT.—In this section, 

12 the term ‘assessment’ means funds that are— 

13 ‘‘(1) collected with respect to a specific com14 modity in accordance with this Act; 

15 ‘‘(2) paid by the first purchaser of the com16 modity in accordance with a State law or this title; 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(3) not collected through a tax or other rev19 enue collection activity of a State. 

20 ‘‘(b) AUTHORITY TO COLLECT COMMODITY ASSESS21 MENTS FROM MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOANS.—The 

22 Secretary may collect commodity assessments from the 

23 proceeds of a marketing assistance loan made under this 

24 subtitle in accordance with an agreement between the Sec25 retary and the State.’’. 
Calendar No. 752 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2866 

A BILL

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment 

assistance loans. half of the State from the proceeds of marketing of approved State commodity assessments on bederstanding with a State regarding the collection Corporation to enter into memorandums of unretary of Agriculture and the Commodity Credit Act of 2002 to clarify the authority of the SecSEPTEMBER 30, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 9 Countdown Begins","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IG6wYQSxRW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-9-countdown-begins\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 9 Countdown Begins<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-9-countdown-begins\/embed\/#?secret=IG6wYQSxRW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 9 Countdown Begins” — NASA\" data-secret=\"IG6wYQSxRW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/apollo9_lm-3.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":313}
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906
OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       /s/ James E. FerrellJames E. FerrellChairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Ferrellgas, Inc., the Partnership's general
partner/s/ Kevin T. KellyKevin T. KellySenior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Ferrellgas, Inc., the Partnership's
general partner 
 *
    
    As required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, a signed original of this written statement has been provided
to the Partnership.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MARIO SALVADOR.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
|   | **Exhibit 23** |
|--------|----------------|

 

 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.'s 33-80435, 333-38883, 333-56493, 333-84871 and 333-133915) of ITT Educational Services, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana

February 23, 2007
II 

Calendar No. 623 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2631 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to monitor and investigate gasoline 

prices under certain circumstances. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 8, 2004 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JULY 9, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to monitor and 

investigate gasoline prices under certain circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INVESTIGATION OF GASOLINE PRICES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—If, based on weekly data published 

5 by the Energy Information Administration of the Depart6 ment of Energy, the average price of regular grade gaso7 line in a State increases 20 percent or more for at least 

8 seven days during any 3-month period, the Federal Trade 
2 

S 2631 PCS 

1 Commission shall initiate an investigation into the retail 

2 price of gasoline in that State to determine if the price 

3 of gasoline is being artificially manipulated by reducing 

4 refinery capacity or by any other form of manipulation. 

5 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 14 days after the initi6 ation of the investigation described in subsection (a), the 

7 Federal Trade Commission shall report to Congress the 

8 results of the investigation. 

9 (c) PUBLIC MEETING.—Not later than 14 days after 

10 issuing the report described in subsection (b), the Federal 

11 Trade Commission shall hold a public hearing in the State 

12 in which the retail price of gasoline was investigated as 

13 described in subsection (a) for the purpose of presenting 

14 the results of the investigation. 

15 (d) ACTION ON PRICE INCREASE.— 

16 (1) FINDING OF MARKET MANIPULATION.—If 

17 the Federal Trade Commission determines that the 

18 increase in gasoline prices in a State is a result of 

19 market manipulation, the Federal Trade Commis20 sion shall, in cooperation with the Attorney General 

21 of that State, take appropriate action. 

22 (2) NO FINDING OF MARKET MANIPULATION.— 

23 If the Federal Trade Commission determines that 

24 the increase in gasoline prices in a State is not the 

25 result of market manipulation, the Federal Trade 
3 

S 2631 PCS 

1 Commission shall notify the Secretary of Energy, 

2 who shall, within 2 weeks of such notification, decide 

3 if the Strategic Petroleum Reserve should be used to 

4 assure adequate supplies of gasoline. 

5 (e) TERMINATION.—This section shall cease to apply 

6 on the date that is 5 years after the date of enactment 

7 of this Act. 
Calendar No. 623 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2631 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Trade Commission to moncircumstances. itor and investigate gasoline prices under certain 

JULY 9, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar