alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Edwin O. Riddell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Enova Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  controls over financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant  deficiencies and financial  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial data; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006

   /s/   Edwin O. Riddell
-----------------------------
Edwin O. Riddell ,
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STUDENT
LOAN CORPORATION CURRENT REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     243
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        8,958,178
<ALLOWANCES>                             2,405
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                   1,005
<DEPRECIATION>                             544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       9,238,894
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                              4,505,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   200
<OTHER-SE>                             481,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         9,238,894
<SALES>                                171,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       172,349
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          114,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        17,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         39,660
<INCOME-TAX>                            16,524
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     23,136
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            23,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                             1.16
        


</TABLE>
#### C. D. Shean *v.*M. L. Gist et ux.

Pleading — Sufficiency of Answer.

. An answer, purporting to be a counter-claim and set-off which fails to specifically deny the allegations of the bill, held, not to be sufficient to avoid a judgment theretofore rendered by default.

Same.

It is not error to refuse the filing of an answer to a petition, at the succeeding term of the Court, at which judgment by default had been rendered.

APPEAL PROM T-IARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 15, 1868.

An action ordinary was instituted in February, 1866, against Shean by appellees to recover $1,050 rent on 104 acres of land for a period of five years, which Shean had in use, and in April, 1866, an amended petition, was filed, alleging an indebtedness of $1,075 for hire of personal property. At the June, 1866, term of court, the petition first filed was read, and no answer having been filed, judgment by default was rendered, and at the December term, 1866, no answer having been filed to the amended petition, judgment by default was rendered on that; on motion of defendant at the same term, this latter judgment was set aside, and a summons awarded him against plaintiffs to show cause why the judgment at the June term should not be set aside, and on the same day defendant filed his answer in which no denial is made of the alleged use of the land as- shown by the original petition, but says “he used a piece of land near by his own, which was worth about $25 per year, etc.,” and alleges as a set-off, numerous small improvements in the way of ditching, fencing, etc., but makes a positive denial, supported by affidavits, to the amended petition. Summons was issued against appellees on the defendants answer and counter-claim, which was sent to Jefferson county, but were not returned. In February, 1867, a motion was made by appellees for an attachment against the property of appellant to satisfy the 'judgment of June, 1866, and certain property levied on by the *543sheriff-to satisfy same. Whereupon an appeal is prosecuted by defendant, from said judgment of June, 1866.

Shean, *ITrinter smith, for appellant.*

*Stirinan, for appellee.*

Opinion oe ti-ie Court by

Judge Robertson :

The failure to answer the petition in proper time authorized the judgment as rendered. There was no available error in refusing the answer when offered. It did not show the ground of the suit to which it referred, nor did it present on its own face any good ground for changing or suspending the judgment which the petition of the appellees was seeking to enforce.

We see no error in the judgment appealed from. It is therefore affirmed.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Sheetal Patel, mother of deceased adult 

Nishma Kanabar on behalf of herself and 

the other beneficiaries of the estate of 

Nishma Kanabar; Mahendra Kanabar, 

father of Nishma Kanabar; Sabian Rios, 

surviving natural son of Nishma Kanabar, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Corizon Health, Inc., a Delaware 

Corporation; Corizon, Inc., a Missouri 

Corporation; Corizon, LLC, a Missouri 

limited liability company; Vicente and Jane 

Doe Enciso; Timothy and Jane Doe 

Johnson; A and John Doe Nunn; A and Joh 

Doe Burns; C and John Doe Reiter; John 

and Jane Does 1 – 100; White Partnerships 

1-100; Black Corporations 1-100, 

Defendants. 

No. CV-15-01613-PHX-NVW

ORDER 

 Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulated Motion to Extend Dismissal Deadline 

(Doc. 123). Good cause appearing, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting the parties’ Stipulated Motion (Doc. 123). 

 

/ / / 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:15-cv-01613-NVW Document 125 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED this action will be dismissed by the Clerk’s Office 

without further notice on May 15, 2017, unless prior thereto a judgment or order of 

dismissal is entered. 

 Dated this 13th day of March, 2017. 

Neil V. Wake

Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01613-NVW Document 125 Filed 03/14/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leslie Keith Sheffield,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04288-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9490 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  WORKFORCE  SYSTEMS  CORP.  FOR THE SIX  MONTHS  ENDED
DECEMBER  31,  1996  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          98,466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  628,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,799,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,505,935
<PP&E>                                       4,215,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                 189,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,038,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,409,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,030
<COMMON>                                         2,421
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,935,844
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,038,034
<SALES>                                      2,348,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,348,782
<CGS>                                        1,360,961  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,360,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               451,087
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                536,734
<INCOME-TAX>                                   177,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            359,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   359,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15

        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jane M. Dhaene,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04351-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/4/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9676 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9676 Filed 01/16/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 17 Heads Home to Earth","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"c03AvrRvC3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-17-heads-home-to-earth\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 17 Heads Home to Earth<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-17-heads-home-to-earth\/embed\/#?secret=c03AvrRvC3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 17 Heads Home to Earth” — NASA\" data-secret=\"c03AvrRvC3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/apollo_17_return_to_earth_1_post_eva3_as17-145-22224.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"New Tests Evaluate Mission Readiness of Astronauts Upon Landing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6KehMNmW7r\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/new-tests-evaluate-mission-readiness-of-astronauts-upon-landing\/\">New Tests Evaluate Mission Readiness of Astronauts Upon Landing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/new-tests-evaluate-mission-readiness-of-astronauts-upon-landing\/embed\/#?secret=6KehMNmW7r\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Tests Evaluate Mission Readiness of Astronauts Upon Landing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6KehMNmW7r\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/nasa-astronaut-obstacle-course-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2745 

To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area and Black 

Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to rename the Colorado Canyons 

National Conservation Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2004

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To amend the Colorado Canyons National Conservation Area 

and Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act of 2000 to 

rename the Colorado Canyons National Conservation 

Area as the McInnis Canyons National Conservation 

Area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MCINNIS CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION 

4 AREA. 

5 (a) PURPOSE.—The Colorado Canyons National Con6 servation Area and Black Ridge Canyons Wilderness Act 

7 of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 460mmm et seq.) is amended in sec-
2

•S 2745 IS 

1 tion 2(b) by striking ‘‘Colorado Canyons’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’. 

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3 of such Act is amend4 ed—

5 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘Colorado’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘McInnis’’; and 

7 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘Colorado’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘McInnis’’. 

9 (c) COLORADO CANYONS NATIONAL CONSERVATION

10 AREA.—Section 4 of such Act is amended—

11 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘COLORADO’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘MCINNIS’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘Colorado 

14 Canyons’’ and inserting ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’. 

15 (d) ADVISORY COUNCIL.—Section 8(a) of such Act 

16 is amended by striking ‘‘Colorado Canyons’’ and inserting 

17 ‘‘McInnis Canyons’’. 

18 (e) SHORT TITLE.—Section 1 of such Act is amended 

19 by striking ‘‘Colorado’’ and inserting ‘‘McInnis’’. 

20 (f) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg21 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

22 States to the ‘‘Colorado Canyons National Conservation 

23 Area’’ shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘McInnis 

24 Canyons National Conservation Area’’. 
3

•S 2745 IS 

1 (g) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend2 ments made by this section take effect on January 1, 

3 2005.

Æ
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANN SIMMONS.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2501 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

73 South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New York, as the ‘‘Perry B. 

Duryea, Jr. Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 3, 2004 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 73 South Euclid Avenue in Montauk, New 

York, as the ‘‘Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERRY B. DURYEA, JR. POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 73 South Euclid Avenue in 

6 Montauk, New York, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Perry B. Duryea, Jr. Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
2 

•S 2501 IS 

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the Perry B. Duryea, Jr. 

3 Post Office. 

Æ