alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's condensed consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter
ended December 27, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                           3,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                       672
<INVENTORY>                                     79,195
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,642
<PP&E>                                         278,297
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,910
<BONDS>                                        210,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,652
<SALES>                                        234,726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,726
<CGS>                                          203,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   206
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,573
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    55.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    55.73
        

</TABLE>
Order entered July 26 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 17 - 00088 - CV EASTON RUTKOSKI, KYL E PALMER, ROBERTO GO NZALEZ, EPIC ERA INCORPORATED, ECOSWA Y USA, INC. GLE N JENSEN AND JEFFREY ALDOUS, Appellant s V. EVOLV HEALTH, LLC, E VOLV HEALTH INTERNAT IONAL, LLC, AND EVOLVHEALTH MEXICO S ERVICOS, S. DE R.L. DE C.V., Appellee s

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 1 3 - 13499



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee s ’ July 21, 2017 unopposed motion for withdrawal and substitution of counsel. We GRANT appellees’ motion. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to remove Robert B. Gilbreath, Lawrence J. Friedman, Carter Boisvert, a nd Michael L. Gaubert and substitute Charles “Chad” Baruch as attorney of record for appellant. All future correspondence should be sent to Charles “Chad” Baruch ; Johnson Tobey Baruch PC; 3308 Oak Grove Avenue; Dallas, Texas 75204; telephone: (214) 741

- 62 60; facsimile: (214) 741

- 6248; email: chad@jtlaw.com

.Also before the Court is appellees’ July 21, 2017 unopposed first motion for extension of

time to file their brief. We GRANT their motion and ORDER appellees to fi le their brief on or before August 26, 2017.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ryan D. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rlydon\/","title":"NASA is Creating an Advanced Air Mobility Playbook","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mP2m9As9j5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-is-creating-an-advanced-air-mobility-playbook-2\/\">NASA is Creating an Advanced Air Mobility Playbook<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-is-creating-an-advanced-air-mobility-playbook-2\/embed\/#?secret=mP2m9As9j5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA is Creating an Advanced Air Mobility Playbook” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mP2m9As9j5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/aam-design4-new-image-2-24-2021-3.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

July 18, 2023

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Space 

Foundation Reception on July 19, 2023

On July 19, 2023, the Space Foundation, a nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3) of the 

Internal Revenue Code, will host a Capitol Hill reception at 216 Hart Senate Office Building, 

in Washington, DC, from 5:45 pm to 7:30 pm. The international panel will consist of a 

representative from the Japanese Space Agency (JAXA), European Space Agency (ESA), 

Indian Space Agency (ISRO), French Space Agency (CNES), German Space Agency (DLR), 

and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) and moderated by Thomas Dorame from the Space 

Foundation. 

Approximately 1,000 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local 

government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, and 

members from the foreign government space agencies. The estimated cost of the event, 

including all food and beverages, is $40 per person. The Space Foundation is in control of the 

organizing, planning and invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow 

NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the 

event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. §

2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including 

NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under 

Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests 

of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the 

individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the Space Foundation, such as procurement duties, program management, or 
2

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination 

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brian G. W. Thompson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04571-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Driscoll Firm, PC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9975 Filed 02/06/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9975 Filed 02/06/18 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24644]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-822]


Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Notice of 
Correction to the Final Results of the 2012-2013 Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis McClure, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-5973.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 28, 2014, the Department of 
Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the final 
results of the 2012-2013 administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Thailand.\1\ The period 
of review is February 1, 2012, through January 31, 2013. Footnote 11 in 
the published Federal Register notice \2\ contained an inadvertent 
error related to the order in which certain antidumping duty margins 
were stated; the correct antidumping duty margins in this footnote 11 
were reversed. The footnote should read:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 
Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 
2012-2013, 79 FR 51306 (August 28, 2014) (Final Results).
    \2\ See id.,79 FR at 51307 n.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This cash deposit rate is based on the combined sales of Thai Union 
and Pakfood after the companies were collapsed (i.e., sales made during 
the period April 23, 2012, through January 31, 2013). The rates 
calculated for Thai Union and Pakfood for the period February 1, 2012, 
through April 22, 2012, are 2.09 percent and zero percent, 
respectively. The calculations for the period February 1, 2012, through 
April 22, 2012, will be used for assessment purposes only, as noted in 
the ``Collapsing of Thai Union and Pakfood'' section of the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.
    As a result, we now correct the final results of the 2012-2013 
administrative review as noted above.
    This correction to the final results of administrative review is 
issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

    Dated: October 8, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-24644 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 265

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include sports utility vehicles 

in the limitation on the depreciation of certain luxury automobiles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2003

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

sports utility vehicles in the limitation on the depreciation of certain luxury automobiles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SUV Business Tax 

5 Loophole Closure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF SPORTS UTILITY VEHICLES IN LIMI7 TATION ON DEPRECIATION OF CERTAIN LUX8 URY AUTOMOBILES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 280F(d)(5)(A) of the In10 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining passenger auto-
2

•S 265 IS 

1 mobile) is amended by striking clause (ii) and all that fol2 lows and inserting the following new clause: 

3 ‘‘(ii)(I) except as provided in sub4 clause (II) or (III), which is rated at 6,000 

5 pounds unloaded gross vehicle weight or 

6 less, 

7 ‘‘(II) in the case of a truck or van, 

8 which is rated at 6,000 pounds gross vehi9 cle weight or less, or 

10 ‘‘(III) in the case of a sports utility 

11 vehicle not described in subclause (I), 

12 which is rated at more than 6,000 pounds 

13 but not more than 14,000 pounds gross ve14 hicle weight.’’. 

15 (b) DEFINITION.—Section 280F(d)(5) of the Internal 

16 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

17 the following new subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(C) SPORTS UTILITY VEHICLES.—The 

19 term ‘sports utility vehicle’ does not include any 

20 vehicle which—

21 ‘‘(I) does not have the primary 

22 load carrying device or container at23 tached, 

24 ‘‘(II) has a seating capacity of 

25 more than 12 individuals, 
3

•S 265 IS 

1 ‘‘(III) is designed for more than 

2 9 individuals in seating rearward of 

3 the driver’s seat, 

4 ‘‘(IV) is equipped with an open 

5 cargo area, or a covered box not read6 ily accessible from the passenger com7 partment, of at least 72.0 inches in 

8 interior length, or 

9 ‘‘(V) has an integral enclosure, 

10 fully enclosing the driver compartment 

11 and load carrying device, does not 

12 have seating rearward of the driver’s 

13 seat, and has no body section pro14 truding more than 30 inches ahead of 

15 the leading edge of the windshield.’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jacob Williams","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jwilli32\/","title":"Copernicus Trajectory Design and Optimization System","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WVZh25ih9H\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/copernicus\/\">Copernicus Trajectory Design and Optimization System<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/copernicus\/embed\/#?secret=WVZh25ih9H\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Copernicus Trajectory Design and Optimization System” — NASA\" data-secret=\"WVZh25ih9H\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/copernicus-gtoc.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":301}
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00295-CR

EX PARTE MIGUEL GOMEZ

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. 36,514

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Miguel Gomez filed a writ of habeas corpus which was denied by the trial court. 

Gomez appealed that denial but has now filed a motion requesting this Court to dismiss 

the appeal. Gomez personally signed the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed 

Opinion delivered and filed January 12, 2011

Do not publish 

[CR25]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Leslie Dixon,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04236-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/21/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9143 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of 
Trico Marine Services, Inc. on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 333-07149 and 333-44221) 
of our reports dated February 17, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated 
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Trico Marine Services, 
Inc.and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended 
December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which reports are included in this Annual 
Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 26, 1999