alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Technology","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WZaXeG5kt9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/nasa-technology\/\">NASA Technology<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/nasa-technology\/embed\/#?secret=WZaXeG5kt9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Technology” — NASA\" data-secret=\"WZaXeG5kt9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS**
**AUSTIN**

January 25, 1939

Hon. John F. May **County** Attorney Karnes county Karnes City, Texas
DearMr. Kay: OpinionNo. O-62 '~..~.~~ Re: Compensationpayable~County,. Clerk, indexing and preserving birth and death certificates.; This will acknowledgereceipt. of your letter or January 7th,pertaining to compensationpayable to the County Clerkunder Article 4477, Rule./53a,and in which you Set forth faots applying-toyour looal condition.

Your questionsread asrollows:
"1. fs the County Clerk entitled to the compensation<allowed,bythe Commissioners' Court for Indexing suoh bErth and death certificates fil'ad him.,while he was on a fee !:si xing aqtuallybeing done after ha,

began“being'oolHpensated on a salary ,basla olrshould\this.moneybe turned in to the O?ficgr@ Salaryfind of Karnes County?

c "2.< \

\.Should

all of the compensation re- \eeived ror such indexingbe paid by said bounty cle'rk~,,into the Ofticerst Salary Fund?" ~., ' ArtiOii 4477 Rule 53a the local registrar ani the relating to fees payable to lattdr paragraphwhich pertain t0 the above questionsand which, evidently, you had inmind IS set forth a8 roliows:

"...And provided further, that the Local Registrar shall submit to the CmmiSSionerS Court or the CountyAuditor, as the casemay be, a true and accurate copy of each birth and each death certificateriledwith him, and such CoPieSHon. John F. May, January 25, 1939, Page 2

shallbe,deposited in the County Clerk's office, and the County Clerk shall be paid for indexing and pree6rving such records, such compensrjtion as may be decidedupon by the Commissioners Court.."
The above provision of the 1929 Act of theFortyFourth Legislature imposed the duty upon the County Clerk to receive for deposit in his offlce copies of birth and death certificates and required the commissioners'court t0 pay compensation (theamount payable within the discretion of the court), for indexing and preserving such records.

ted in the

By requiring these records to be filed and deposioffice of the County Clerk, certainly the Legislature intended that they shouldbe indexed and preserved. Vo special time, it seems, is required in which these records are to be indexed nor is any penalty applicableunder the rules of the sanitary code. The law presumes that a person, duly qualified and elected to a:.public office,will faithfullydischarge and perform the duties **of thst**  office.

Although the County Clerk may be dilatory in the performance of his duties, it is to be presumed that the commissionerscourt, in paying him compensetionunder the authority of the above section Of the act, approved such work as it was within their discretion to have refusedpayment until suchwork was performed. Having, of course,performed the work for which he had lawfully been paid, it is my opinion that such compensation .paidbelongs to the County Clerk. Trusting that the above answers both **Or** your questions, I remain Very truly yours

hK:AW ~~TTCRXEY CKR-iGUL

OF TEXAS (signed) BY ?7m.Ii.

King Assistant
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-51B","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zYU8FwzGhC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-51b\/\">STS-51B<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-51b\/embed\/#?secret=zYU8FwzGhC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-51B” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zYU8FwzGhC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2385 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2385

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SANTIAGO E. CAMPOS UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at South Federal Place in Santa Fe, 
New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Santiago E. Campos 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Santiago E. 
Campos United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate July 19, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2385

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      35,163,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  319,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (53,903)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,506,176
<PP&E>                                       9,913,787
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,882,738)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,246,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,776,655
<BONDS>                                     38,989,164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       15,587,986
<PREFERRED>                                  3,000,000
<COMMON>                                         2,663
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,079,522)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,246,571
<SALES>                                         26,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               899,951
<CGS>                                            9,996
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,595,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,658,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,603,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,603,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,603,610)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (33.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (33.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### Harris *v.*Cobb and Others.—In error.

*Monday*, *November*24.

DECREES in chancery for money were repleviable under the act of 1840. Stat. 1840, p. 49. They may also be replevied under the act of 1843. R. S. 1843, p. 846.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jennifer Ross-Nazzal","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jennifer-m-ross-nazzalnasa-gov\/","title":"From NASA\u2019s First Astronaut Class to Artemis II: The Importance of Military Jet Pilot Experience","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Qzca43Jdoh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/mercury-7-to-artemis-ii\/\">From NASA\u2019s First Astronaut Class to Artemis II: The Importance of Military Jet Pilot Experience<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/mercury-7-to-artemis-ii\/embed\/#?secret=Qzca43Jdoh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“From NASA\u2019s First Astronaut Class to Artemis II: The Importance of Military Jet Pilot Experience” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Qzca43Jdoh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/s69-01060-e1710364665486.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":440}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sarah D. McClelland,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04405-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9926 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9926 Filed 02/02/18 Page 2 of 2
#### Orion W. Damon *v.*Sim DeBar and Otto Frelitz.

*Bills and notes—Promise to receive chattels in payment—Consideration.*

A promise by the payee in a note, made after its maturity, to receive in payment 200 posts for $10, and apply the same upon the note, the maker agreeing to get out the posts as soon' as-his fall’s work was done, and have them ready for delivery upon his farm, is without consideration, and of no validity until performed by the delivery and acceptance of the posts.

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.)

Argued November 11, 1890.

Decided November 14, 1890.

*Assumpsit.*Plaintiff brings error.

Reversed.

The-facts are stated in the opinion.

*Lawson Q. Holden,*for appellant.

*Trash & Smith,*for defendants.

Grant, J.

This case originated in justice’s court upon a promissory note for $25, dated May 8, 1888. Plaintiff recovered judgment for $10.28, being the balance due upon the. note. Defendants appealed to the circuit court, where verdict and judgment were rendered in their favor, and plaintiff appealed to this Court.

The only defense is that the plaintiff promised, after the note became due, to receive in payment 200 posts for $10, and apply the same upon the note, and that defendant DeBar promised to get them out as soon as his fall work was done, and to have *them ready*upon his (De Bar’s) farm. This was a mere naked promise without any consideration, and was of no validity until it had been fully performed by the delivery of the posts, and *263the acceptance by plaintiff. While the posts were lying with others in DeBaNs field, according to his testimony, they were burned. There had been no acceptance by plaintiff of these posts in payment. The circuit judge should, therefore, have instructed the jury to render a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and new trial ordered.

The other Justices concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
     ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               3,342
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      139,702
<ALLOWANCES>                                           443
<INVENTORY>                                          2,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   154,420
<PP&E>                                              19,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                      15,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     236,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               90,260
<BONDS>                                            150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                29
<OTHER-SE>                                          (6,787)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       236,091
<SALES>                                            254,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   255,416
<CGS>                                              223,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      261,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (1,315)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,869)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> NOT REQUIRED TO PRESENT EPS AS LONG AS THE COMPANY IS NOT
PUBLICLY HELD.
</FN>




</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Rodrick Harris,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00145-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9919 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Mowen, Appellee, v. De Dario, Appellant.

(No. 4013

Decided April 1, 1947.)

*442
      *Mr. Richard T.*Savage,-for appellee.

*Mr. David T. Keating,*for appellant.

By the Court.

This cause is submitted on motion by the appellee for an order either (a) to dismiss this appeal, which is not from a final order or (b) that appellant be required to file a new bond in sufficient amount in accordance with the provisions of Section 12223-16, General Code.

The record discloses that on February 27, 1947, an entry was signed in the Common Pleas Court dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution. On March 3, 1947, the appellant filed a motion for a rehearing, which we consider is a motion for a new trial. To that application the appellee made reply asking the Court of Common Pleas to deny the application and to award damages to the appellee in accordance with the provisions of Section 12223-35, General Code. Such application and reply thereto are still pending in the Court of Common Pleas and have never been ruled upon. The notice of appeal is directed to the order of dismissal under date of February 27.

Since the motion for a rehearing is still pending-in the Common Pleas Court, the order of dismissal of February 27 has not become a final order, and the notice of appeal was prematurely filed. See Section 12223-7, General Code.

The motion to dismiss is sustained and the costs of this appeal are to be taxed against'the appellant.

*Motion sustained.*

Wiseman, P. Ju Miller and Hornbeck, JJ., concur.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WALTER D. GALLIGAN.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.