alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Remy International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kerry A. Shiba,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Kerry A. Shiba       
|Kerry A. Shiba           
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer  

August 8, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Remy International, Inc. and will be retained by Remy International, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WALTER T. SIMMS.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                       CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




William H. Hardman, Jr., the Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary of Delta Mills, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the
best of his knowledge:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27,
          2003  of  the  Company  (the   "Report")   fully   complies  with  the
          requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of  the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

The foregoing certification is made solely for the purpose of complying with the
requirements  of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350)  and  may not be  relied  upon  by  anyone  for  any  other  purpose.  The
undersigned  expressly  disclaims any  undertaking to update such  certification
except as required by law.







Date    November 11, 2003                     By: /s/ W. H. Hardman, Jr.
      -----------------------------------     ---------------------------------
                                              W.H. Hardman, Jr.
                                              Chief Financial Officer



A  signed  copy  of  this  written  statement  required  by  section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Walter Lang,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03594-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8352 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 8, You are Go for TLI!","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Lg7J1y1DH1\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-8-you-are-go-for-tli\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 8, You are Go for TLI!<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-8-you-are-go-for-tli\/embed\/#?secret=Lg7J1y1DH1\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 8, You are Go for TLI!” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Lg7J1y1DH1\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S68-56531\/S68-56531~large.jpg?w=600&h=1379&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1379}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>                           
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE THE TRUSTS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                1,000
       
<S>                     <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                106
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      106
<PP&E>                             87,276
<DEPRECIATION>                     51,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     36,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   0
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                         36,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       36,073
<SALES>                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    6,085
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      266                
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0                
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        5,819                
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Joe R. Davis, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 29, 2009 /s/ Joe R. Davis
Joe R. Davis
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer  3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10612

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIX GUTIERREZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-508-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Felix Gutierrez-Martinez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Gutierrez-Martinez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10612 Document: 00513472229 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-10612

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10612 Document: 00513472229 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERIC CRUZ.

September 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 232 *N.J.Super.*294).
**Exhibit 10.32**The Compensation Committee then discussed the Company’s current charitable giving matchingprogram. After this discussion the Committee approved that the following levels be approved by thefull Board of Directors:     • Chairman $50,000 calendar year limit (from current $30,000)• Board of Directors $30,000 calendar year limit (from $20,000)• Senior Vice Presidentsand 1st Vice Presidents $10,000 calendar year limit (from zero)Charitable contributions will continue to be matched dollar for dollar for charitableorganization(s) recognized by the Internal Revenue Service (deductions allowed under section 501(c)3 if the IRS code) The Committee asked that management review for discussion after the publicoffering is complete the possible design of a charitable matching program for all employees.
Exhibit 10.10

                          Agreement of Debt Forgiveness


                  I,  Carl D.  Perry,  an  individual  am the  holder  of  three
Promissiory Notes, dated December 26, 1996,  February 21, 1997 and June 30, 1996
respectively in the amounts of $900,000,  $400,000,  and  $3,000,000.  As of the
date of this Agreement, said Notes are in default. Without any consideration,  I
do hereby resolve to forgive the sum total of $2,693,506 in accrued interest and
principal with respect to the aforementioned Notes payable from U.S. Electricar,
Inc.

        Said amount shall be forgiven as follows:

        Note dated December 26, 1996       -- Accrued Interest of $    266,150

        Note dated February 21, 1997       -- Accrued Interest of $    110,689

        Note dated June 30, 1996           -- Accrued Interest of $  1,016,667

        Note dated June 30, 1996           -- Principal of        $  1,300,000
                                                                  ------------

                                           Total                  $  2,693,506


All  other  terms  of  said  Notes  shall  remain  in  full  force  without  any
modifications to maturity,  default status,  collaterization,  rate or any other
terms and conditions as stated in the original loan agreements.  Said rate shall
remain at the default rate of twelve percent per annum.

Signed this 30th day of July 1999 at Torrance, California.



/s/Carl D. Perry
-----------------------
Carl D. Perry
#### FRANK J. HOERST, III, SALEM COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. JOSEPH DYER, ET AL.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies
that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of BUCA, Inc.

Dated: May 4, 2006



/s/ Wallace B. DoolinWallace B. DoolinChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kaye R. OLearyKaye R. OLearyChief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Tucker,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04557-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Johnson Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/8/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9507 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9507 Filed 12/29/17 Page 2 of 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129692 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129692 COA: 262644 Wayne CC: 04-003787-01 ANTONIO PETER JEMISON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0123 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 30, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Central European Distribution Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Chris BiedermannChris Biedermann Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer May 10, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE REGISTRANT FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE REGISTRANT'S
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,402
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    262,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               278,336
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 334,390
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,951
<BONDS>                                        165,695
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           115
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   334,390
<SALES>                                        136,426
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               136,426
<CGS>                                          113,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,614
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,329
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,005
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,324
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Aviation Beyond 2040","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ABGga7AYxJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/aviation-beyond-2040\/\">Aviation Beyond 2040<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/aviation-beyond-2040\/embed\/#?secret=ABGga7AYxJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Aviation Beyond 2040” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ABGga7AYxJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/nasa_hwb_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":451}