alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                     75
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           75
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                 4050
<OTHER-SE>                                              (3885)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              165
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         2250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (2,250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (2,250)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (2,250)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0



</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2660 

To provide for the monitoring of the long-term medical health of firefighters 

who responded to emergencies in certain disaster areas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2004 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide for the monitoring of the long-term medical 

health of firefighters who responded to emergencies in 

certain disaster areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Healthy Fire5 fighters Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MONITORING OF FIREFIGHTERS IN DISASTER 

7 AREAS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The United States Fire Adminis9 tration, after consultation with the National Institute for 

10 Occupational Safety and Health, shall contract with an 
2 

S 2660 IS 

1 appropriate, locally based medical research university to 

2 conduct long-term medical health monitoring of those fire3 fighters who responded to emergencies in any areas re4 ferred to in subsection (b). 

5 (b) AFFECTED FIREFIGHTERS.—An area referred to 

6 in this subsection is any area which is declared a disaster 

7 area by the Federal Government. 

8 (c) HEALTH MONITORING.—The long-term health 

9 monitoring referred to in subsection (a) shall include— 

10 (1) pulmonary illness, neurological damage, and 

11 cardiovascular damage, and 

12 (2) exposure documentation. 

13 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

14 are authorized to be appropriated to the United States 

15 Fire Administration to carry out this section, such sums 

16 as may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2005 through 

17 2009. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,047
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                       610
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,047
<PP&E>                                         129,956
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,974
<BONDS>                                         21,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,355
<SALES>                                         53,484
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,484
<CGS>                                           34,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   130
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,705
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,814
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    917
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,974
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CASIMIR USOWICZ, ETC.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jesse Yarbro,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04454-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9316 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 1
#### BONNET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. STAFFORD TOWNSHIP, ETC., ET AL.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### In the Matter of Christopher GG., Appellant, v Missy HH., Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 624]

*960Crew III, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Fulton County (Jung, J.), entered November 5, 2003, which, inter alia, dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 5, to vacate a prior order of filiation.

The parties ended their brief sexual relationship in December 1998 and, in July 1999, respondent gave birth to a daughter. Thereafter, in October 1999, upon petitioner’s admission of paternity, an order of filiation was entered declaring petitioner to be the father of the subject child.* Questions thereafter arose, however, as to whether petitioner indeed was the biological father of respondent’s child, prompting petitioner to commence this proceeding seeking, among other things, court-ordered DNA testing. Family Court denied petitioner’s application and this appeal ensued.

While this appeal was pending, a Herkimer County Support Magistrate ordered that the parties and the child submit to genetic marker testing. Inasmuch as petitioner has now obtained the primary relief sought in this proceeding, the instant appeal is moot. As we are unable to discern any exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]), petitioner’s appeal is dismissed.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

*

 As a transcript of the filiation proceeding is not contained in the record on appeal, it is unclear whether, prior to admitting paternity, petitioner was advised of his right to DNA testing pursuant to Family Ct Act § 532.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             869
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,559
<PP&E>                                          12,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,388
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,801
<OTHER-SE>                                    (14,733)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,518
<SALES>                                          5,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,997
<CGS>                                            1,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,035)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Nancy E. Brown,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00135-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: OLeary, Shelton, Corrigan, Peterson, Dalton & Quillin, LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/17/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9829 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9829 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GREGORY DAVIS.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re Commitment of Robert John Baker, * From the 142nd District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CV57854

.

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 223

- C V * June 27 , 202 4

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Joseph S. Goncalves, Jr., Petitioner, v James C. Berbary, as Superintendent of Collins Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[786 NYS2d 841]

*744Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violent conduct, harassment and making threats. The misbehavior report relates that when petitioner’s request for additional toilet paper was denied by a correction officer who was passing out supplies, petitioner threatened the correction officer and a bar of soap was thrown from the cell, hitting the correction officer in the leg. In addition to the misbehavior report, a videotape of the incident, although not conclusive, corroborates part of the misbehavior report. Although petitioner maintains that it was his cellmate who was involved in the incident, petitioner’s testimony and that of his cellmate establish that petitioner was in fact involved in an exchange with the correction officer. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report, videotape and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see *Matter of Porter v Goord,*7 AD3d 847 [2004]). Testimony at the hearing contradicting the events as set forth in the misbehavior report created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see *Matter of Nimmons v Goord,*7 AD3d 887 [2004]). We are also unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention of hearing officer bias inasmuch as a review of the record establishes that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the evidence adduced at the hearing and not from any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer *(see Matter of Brown v Selsky,*5 AD3d 905, 906-907 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                             173
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   173
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       8000
<COMMON>                                          4935
<OTHER-SE>                                      (13039)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       398
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   447
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (447)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (447)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (447)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.001)
                                                     

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Wilma Johnson-Yancy,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03654-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9239 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,200
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         173,602
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                81,538
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     58,323
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,173
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            38,563
<LOANS>                                      1,143,563
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,607,071
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,412,988
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             44,853
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,607,071
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 51,136
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,499
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 7,844
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                63,479
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              35,014
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,773
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           27,706
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,646
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,819
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      19,819
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,501
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.04
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,824
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,794
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,741
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,700
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,445
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              8,255
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         12,700


</TABLE>