alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

 

Securities andExchange Commission

Washington, DC

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of ICOP Digital, Inc.on Form S-8 (No. 333-121219) of our report dated March 11, 2004,except as to notes 1, 7, 10 and 11, which are dated June 21, 2005 appearing inthe Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A4 for the year ended December 31,2004.

 

 
| /s/  Cordovano and Honeck, LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| Denver,  Colorado              |
| July 5, 2005                   |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6045

BRUCE CEDRIC HEATH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY KEYSER; RON ANGELONE; RICHARD A. YOUNG;

GENE M. JOHNSON; LAUREL A. CORNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-1389-R)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 2, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Cedrick Heath, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Heath v. Keyser, No. CA-95-1389-R (W.D. Va. Dec.

29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James D. Byirt,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03716-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9086 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEROME RYLAND.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### JAMES FISCHER v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification granted. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*113)
#### N. S. Anderson et al *v.*John Glenn.

Sales — Failure to Advertise as Required in the Judgment.

A failure to advertise land for sale as required by the juagmeur ox sale, is error in that it may prevent competition by reason of the time and place not being known.

Conveyance to Prefer Creditors — Failure to File Suit in Time.

In order that a mortgage, alleged to have been given to prefer creditors, may be attacked, action must be commenced within the time required by 1 v. R. S. page 553 by some creditor.

APPEAL PROM DAVIESS CIRCUIT COURT.

October 9, 1868.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Peters:

It is shown by tbe weight of evidence that tbe sale of tbe land was not advertised as required in tbe judgment, and tbe sum bid for it was not more than one-fourth of its value; tbe under value at which it was bid off may be accounted for, on tbe ground that tbe time and place of tbe -sale were not known, and competition, prevented thereby; tbe court, therefore, correctly set aside tbe sale on exceptions filed by appellee before tbe same bad been confirmed.

By tbe mortgage of Travis to Glenn, tbe latter was invested with tbe title to tbe land subject to tbe lien of Murphy acquired by bis attachment. That mortgage was made ten months prior to tbe appellant’s petition, and even if it bad been made to prefer Glenn to other creditors, no petition bad been' filed by a creditor *510within the time prescribed by the act of 1856 *1 V. R. S. p.*553, to bring it within the operation of that statute. Consequently Glenn’s right to be indemnified out of the land after Murphy was paid was superior to all other claims. Glenn had an interest in the matters in litigation in the- action of Murphy vs. Travis, and if not made a party by the plaintiff in that action, he had a right to come in by petition, and if the court had refused to order him to be made a party it would have been an error available for reversal in this court.

*Sweeney*& Stuart, *for appellant.*

*Bay*& *Hardin, for appellee.*

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Cawley","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/james-j-cawleynasa-gov\/","title":"Kennedy Scientist Leading Team to Combat Lunar Dust","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wXcPC6xCcq\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/kennedy-scientist-leading-team-to-combat-lunar-dust\/\">Kennedy Scientist Leading Team to Combat Lunar Dust<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/kennedy-scientist-leading-team-to-combat-lunar-dust\/embed\/#?secret=wXcPC6xCcq\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Kennedy Scientist Leading Team to Combat Lunar Dust” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wXcPC6xCcq\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/carlos_calle_2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SHAWN DERESE BRYANT

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 15

- 2347

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 19, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for St . Johns County

, J. Michael Traynor , Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender,

and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, Andrea K. Totten, Assistant

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM

We affirm without prejudice to Appellant's right to file a timely, facially sufficient

motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

AFFIRMED.

PALMER , WALLIS and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Forget Movie Magic, NASA Armstrong has the Real Thing","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4bu0S54Nqg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/forget-movie-magic-nasa-armstrong-has-the-real-thing\/\">Forget Movie Magic, NASA Armstrong has the Real Thing<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/forget-movie-magic-nasa-armstrong-has-the-real-thing\/embed\/#?secret=4bu0S54Nqg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Forget Movie Magic, NASA Armstrong has the Real Thing” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4bu0S54Nqg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/darkstar-large.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":327}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Hinchman,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00025-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9616 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

         COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:
 -----------

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of the Corporation (the "Board")
adopted resolutions proposing and declaring advisable the following amendments
to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation pursuant to Section 242
of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL"), and

         RESOLVED, that Section 4.1 of Article 4 of the Corporation's
Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                   "4.1 AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK. The total number of shares of
                   stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is
                   53,000,000, consisting of 3,000,000 shares of preferred
                   stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Preferred Stock"), and
                   50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
                   ("Common Stock")."

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that Article 11 of the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation be deleted and the remaining Articles will be renumbered.

         SECOND: That the shareholders of the Corporation, at a meeting duly
held, consented to such amendments by the affirmative vote of the majority of
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon.

          THIRD:  That the aforesaid amendments were duly adopted in accordance
with the applicable provisions
of the DGCL.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its President, Robert B. Wallach, and attested by its Secretary,
Nicholas J. Letizia, duly authorized, on May 8, 2000.


                                            COMPUTER OUTSOURCING SERVICES, INC.


                                            By           /s/
                                                ------------------------
                                                Name:  Robert B. Wallach
                                                Title:  President

ATTEST:


By               /s/
    --------------------------
    Name:  Nicholas J. Letizia
    Title:  Secretary
Exhibit 23.1
  
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-92557, No. 333-93237, No. 333-91144, and No. 333-117547) on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 8, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Blyth, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Blyth, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2011.
 
 
 /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
 Stamford, Connecticut
 April 8, 2011
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sarah Douglas","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sschlied\/","title":"NASA Names Winners in Lunar Gateway Packing and Storing Challenge","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"B0Pcnx5oCM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/prizes-challenges-crowdsourcing-program\/center-of-excellence-for-collaborative-innovation-coeci\/coeci-news\/winners-lunar-gateway-packing-storing-challenge\/\">NASA Names Winners in Lunar Gateway Packing and Storing Challenge<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/prizes-challenges-crowdsourcing-program\/center-of-excellence-for-collaborative-innovation-coeci\/coeci-news\/winners-lunar-gateway-packing-storing-challenge\/embed\/#?secret=B0Pcnx5oCM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Names Winners in Lunar Gateway Packing and Storing Challenge” — NASA\" data-secret=\"B0Pcnx5oCM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/05-qasis-ctbs-solo.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":570}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Donna M. Day,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00440-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Fleming, Nolen, & Jez LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/17/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 19, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 864 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lori Barrett,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04481-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9355 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
#### GARRISON ex rel. BURTIS v. MEDVESKY

No. 404A01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 448

Notice of appeal by defendant pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 4 October 2001.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joseph Yarrington,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00557-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: March 2, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 967 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1