alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### J. F. Arnold, et al., *v.*C. M. Frantze.

Contracts — Aiding Rebellion — Right to Recover.,

The mere sale and delivery of property with a knowledge that the buyer intended it for the use of those who were in rebellion against the Government, without some participation in the act itself of giving aid to those in rebellion, was not sufficient to deprive the vendor of the right to recover.

APPEAL PROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT

January 22, 1868.

Raed, *for appellants.*

Gofer, *for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin :

This court decided in the case of Hedges vs.-Wallace, etc., Bush, that the mere sale and delivery of property with a knowledge that the buyer intended it for the use of those who were in rebellion against the Government of the United States without some participation or interest of the seller in the act itself of hus giving aid to those in rebellion, was not sufficient to deprive the vendor of the right to recover the price of the property. And according to that decision it seems to us the court below erred in overruling the demurrer of the plaintiff to the third paragraph of the defendant’s answer, which presented as a defense the facts only that plaintiff sold the laths to the defendant, knowing his object in buying it was to manufacture from it and supply to the Confederate army cartridges, boxes and other military equipage to be used in making war against the Federal government, without alleging that the plaintiff had any interest or participation in the defendant’s contract or undertaking, to furnish such articles to the Confederate Army.

According to this view also, the instruction marked “S” ought not to have been given, but it does not appear from the record that the ruling of the court in giving it was excepted to.

But the judgment is deemed erroneous, for the error in overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer as we have indicated.

Wherefore the judgment is. reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial and further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Safari Associates,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10K-SB for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities & Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  Fairly  presents,  in all
            material   respects,   the   financial   condition  and  results  of
            operations of the Company.


Dated: December 31, 2004                By: /s/ Morton Berger
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Morton Berger
                                            President, CFO and Chairman of the
                                            Board


Dated: December 31, 2004                By: /s/  Lillian Berger
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Lillian Berger
                                            Secretary, Treasurer and Director
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nikki Welch","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nikki-d-welchnasa-gov\/","title":"Meteorologist Turned Engineer Creates Clouds for Icing Research","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"yHemRF1Dxi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/meteorologist-turned-engineer-creates-clouds-for-icing-research\/\">Meteorologist Turned Engineer Creates Clouds for Icing Research<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/meteorologist-turned-engineer-creates-clouds-for-icing-research\/embed\/#?secret=yHemRF1Dxi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Meteorologist Turned Engineer Creates Clouds for Icing Research” — NASA\" data-secret=\"yHemRF1Dxi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/ps-03787-03-af-march-cover-tn2.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":320}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ronnie E. Leatherwood,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04744-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Osborne & Associates Law Firm, PA

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/16/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9842 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9842 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Artissia Lawson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04189-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/16/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8931 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

United States of America,

Plaintiff,

v. 

Brenwin Garice Kayquoptewa,

Defendant.

No. CR15-08194-001-PCT-SPL

ORDER

The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause 

hearing was waived and the detention hearing was submitted on the record. The Court 

finds probable cause to believe the defendant violated the terms of his supervised release 

as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that 

defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk 

or a danger.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further 

proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a 

danger, pending further revocation proceedings. 

Dated this 30th day of March, 2017.

Honorable Deborah M. Fine

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cr-08194-SPL Document 54 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Chad McConnell,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04658-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9421 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 1
#### TENNESSEE LAND CORPORATION, ET AL. v. E.J. HERRMANN, JR., ET AL.

September 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC   Document 997   Filed 03/07/16   Page 1 of 3

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC   Document 997   Filed 03/07/16   Page 2 of 3

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC   Document 997   Filed 03/07/16   Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.1

 

 

I, Alan B. Levan, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of BBX Capital Corporation; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Alan B. Levan

Alan B. Levan

Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 26, 2013

 

 

 

----
#### MOUNTAIN VIEW ASSOCIATES, ETC. v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MAHWAH, ET AL.

May 8, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2362 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2362

 To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
     instrumentation support control building and associated site 
       development on Kitt Peak, Arizona, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 29, 2004

Mr. Cochran (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
     instrumentation support control building and associated site 
       development on Kitt Peak, Arizona, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY INSTRUMENTATION 
              SUPPORT FACILITY.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to develop the site for a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
instrumentation support control building, including the installation of 
necessary utilities and equipment housings, and to construct such 
building on the site, for the purpose of supporting the collaborative 
Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) 
project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Arizona.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2005.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Amanda S. Vozeh","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/avozeh\/","title":"NASA Invites You to Share Excitement of Agency\u2019s SpaceX Crew-8 Launch","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kvDKjMFXvC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/get-involved\/virtual-guest-program\/nasa-invites-you-to-share-excitement-of-agencys-spacex-crew-8-launch\/\">NASA Invites You to Share Excitement of Agency\u2019s SpaceX Crew-8 Launch<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/get-involved\/virtual-guest-program\/nasa-invites-you-to-share-excitement-of-agencys-spacex-crew-8-launch\/embed\/#?secret=kvDKjMFXvC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Invites You to Share Excitement of Agency\u2019s SpaceX Crew-8 Launch” — NASA\" data-secret=\"kvDKjMFXvC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/nasas-spacex-crew-7-launch-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":357}
EXHIBIT 11
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Three Months Ended                   Twelve Months Ended
                                               September 30,                        September 30,
                                       --------------------------------   ---------------------------------

                                          1997               1996               1997               1996
                                       -------------   ----------------   ----------------   --------------

<S>                                       <C>            <C>                <C>                <C>       
Net Income.............................   $  413,197       $125,000         $1,591,193         $1,302,000

Primary and Fully Diluted

Average Shares Outstanding Net of
Unallocated ESOP Shares (54,667).......    1,083,379      1,079,715          1,082,216          1,112,697

Per Share Amount.......................   $      .38           $.12         $     1.47              $1.17
</TABLE>


         Earnings  per share of common  stock for the three  months  and  twelve
months ended  September  30, 1997 and 1996 have been  determined by dividing net
income for the periods by the weighted  average number of shares of common stock
outstanding net of unallocated ESOP shares.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DOMENICO CINO.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    15142
<ALLOWANCES>                                       976
<INVENTORY>                                        696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 16818
<PP&E>                                            1151
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   25879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16636
<BONDS>                                           3050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             3978
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                        1347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     25879
<SALES>                                          15206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 15206
<CGS>                                             2363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   562
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>