alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Adam Tran,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00535-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: March 2, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 955 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Hinchman,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00025-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Paglialunga & Harris, PS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/4/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9615 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9615 Filed 01/11/18 Page 2 of 2
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 :
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    Harris Preferred Capital Corporations other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Harris Preferred Capital Corporation and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to Harris Preferred Capital Corporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of Harris Preferred Capital Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in Harris Preferred Capital Corporations
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Harris Preferred Capital
Corporations most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect , Harris Preferred Capital Corporations internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    Harris Preferred Capital Corporations other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Harris
Preferred Capital Corporations auditors and the audit committee of Harris Preferred Capital
Corporations board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Harris Preferred Capital Corporations ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Harris Preferred Capital Corporations internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Pamela C. PiarowskiPamela C. PiarowskiChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                    RESOURCE BANCSHARES MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE,
                  PRIMARY and FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

                   ($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                   For the Quarter Ended
                                                       March 31, 1997
      ------------------------------------------------------------------

      Net income                                         $  4,470

      Net income per share (1)                           $   0.23

      Primary and fully diluted earnings per share (2)   $   0.23

1) The number of common shares outstanding used to compute net income per share
was 19,553,072. The provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 15,
"Earnings per Share" requires that the Company, effective for the first quarter
of 1997, prospectively commence to report net income per common share on a
primary earnings per share basis. Accordingly, the weighted average shares
outstanding for the first quarter of 1997 includes common stock equivalents.

2) Primary and fully diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended March 31,
1997, was calculated based on weighted average shares outstanding of 19,553,072
and 19,600,812, respectively, which assumes the exercise of options covering
1,394,587 shares and computes incremental shares using the treasury stock
method.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10901

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONNIE JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-3039-R

--------------------- June 10, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronnie Johnson, federal prisoner #23091-077, moves for recall of the mandate following the denial of his constructive motion for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to appeal from the denial of his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Johnson correctly contends that the COA requirement of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) should not have been applied to his case. See Lindh v. Murphy , 117 S. Ct. 2059 (1997). We construe Johnson’s motion as seeking panel review of a single-judge action pursuant to Fed. R. App. P.No. 96-10901 -2- 27(c). Johnson’s motion for panel review is GRANTED, and the order denying Johnson a COA is RESCINDED. No further briefing is necessary for the resolution of Johnson’s § 2255 appeal, and we proceed to consider its merits.
See Dickinson v. Wainwright , 626 F.2d 1184, 1186 (5th Cir. 1980). Johnson contends that his criminal prosecution was barred under the doctrines of res judicata and double jeopardy. These issues are foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Ursery , 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2149 (1996). We conclude that Johnson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. It is therefore dismissed. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).
MOTION FOR PANEL REVIEW GRANTED; ORDER DENYING COA RESCINDED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Ron Hadani, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q/A of Vision-Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thereport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablelikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|                                   | /s/ Ron Hadani          |   |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Dated:   March 18, 2005 | Ron Hadani              |
|                                   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                     2,022,000
<SECURITIES>                               9,094,000
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,480,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                (145,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  271,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          14,759,000
<PP&E>                                     2,226,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (980,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            20,016,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,753,000
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      47,000
<OTHER-SE>                                17,897,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              20,016,000
<SALES>                                    5,091,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          11,063,000
<CGS>                                      3,026,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              8,119,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (26)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            2,970,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               1,188,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,782,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,782,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .38



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMA-
                          TION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
                          CONTAINED IN THE FOTOBALL USA, INC. FORM 10-KSB 
                          FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS 
                          QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                  981,554
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         7,369,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                           2,081,206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     10,795,662
<PP&E>                                                1,706,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                          667,527  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       12,154,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3,956,822
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 26,767
<OTHER-SE>                                            8,031,771
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         12,154,336
<SALES>                                              25,997,162
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     25,997,162
<CGS>                                                18,468,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         5,567,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       38,843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       2,070,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                            795,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1,275,350
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,275,350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .47
                                               

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Gary Daines","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/gary-dainesnasa-gov\/","title":"GOES-U","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IE85H4Z5pJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/event\/goes-u\/\">GOES-U<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/event\/goes-u\/embed\/#?secret=IE85H4Z5pJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“GOES-U” — NASA\" data-secret=\"IE85H4Z5pJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/goes-u.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":334}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff 

Walter Lang and/or his counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily 

dismissed, without prejudice against the defendants, C.R. Card, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, 

Inc. 

Date: January 25, 2018 MARC J. BERN & PARTNERS LLP 

By: /s/ Debra J. Humphrey . 

Debra J. Humphrey 

One Grand Central Place 

60 East 42nd Street, Suite 950 

New York, New York 10165 

(212) 702-5000 

dhumphrey@bernllp.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

WALTER LANG 

Case No. 2:17-cv-03594-DGC 

 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9802 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"65 Years Ago: First Factory Rollout of the X-15 Hypersonic Rocket Plane","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hkh0bsMybo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/65-years-ago-first-factory-rollout-of-the-x-15-hypersonic-rocket-plane\/\">65 Years Ago: First Factory Rollout of the X-15 Hypersonic Rocket Plane<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/65-years-ago-first-factory-rollout-of-the-x-15-hypersonic-rocket-plane\/embed\/#?secret=hkh0bsMybo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“65 Years Ago: First Factory Rollout of the X-15 Hypersonic Rocket Plane” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hkh0bsMybo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/x-15-rollout-2-oct-15-1958-w-crossfield-x15life16.jpeg?w=530","thumbnail_width":530,"thumbnail_height":483}