alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**OF CITIBANK, N.A.**

**FORTHE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2021**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Citibank, N.A., as Servicer under theThird Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 10, 2016 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), as supplemented by the Amended and Restated Series 2000 Supplement thereto dated as of August 9,2011, as further amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of November 10, 2016 (the “Series 2000 Supplement” and, together with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the “Agreement”), each between Citibank, as Sellerand Servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee; and as Managing Beneficiary of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust (the “Issuing Entity”) under the Second Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of November 10,2016 (the “Indenture”), between the Issuing Entity and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, does hereby certify that: 

1. Citibank is the Servicer under the Agreement and the Managing Beneficiary of the Issuing Entity. 

2. A review of the servicing activities of Citibank during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance under the Agreement and the Indenture was conducted under my supervision. 

3. To the best of my knowledge, based onsuch review, Citibank has fulfilled all of its servicing obligations under the Agreement and the Indenture in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 30th day of March, 2022. 

 

/s/ Donna L. VanBockern
Donna L. VanBockernVice President**
Exhibit 31.2

I, Valerie C. Toalson, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Valerie C. Toalson 
|Valerie C. Toalson     
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: April 13, 2011
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00350-CV

DEE SIREK,

Appellant

v.

SOUTHWESTERN CORRECTIONAL, LLC 

D/B/A LASALLE CORRECTIONS, LLC,

Appellees

From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-C202100256

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Dee Sirek, filed a notice of appeal in this Court on November 6, 2023. 

On December 5, 2023, and again on January 8, 2023, we received notice from the Johnson 

County Clerk's Office stating that the Clerk has not received payment for the clerk's 

record.

On February 13, 2024, we notified Appellant that, if he desires to proceed with this

appeal, he must pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee and notify this Court of 
Sirek v. Southwestern Correctional, LLC d/b/a LaSalle Corrections, LLC Page 2

the actions taken within twenty-one days after the date of the letter. We warned that the 

failure to do so could result in dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. More than 

twenty-one days have passed since our February 13, 2024 letter, and we have not received 

any response from Appellant regarding the Clerk's Record.

If an appellant fails to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for 

preparation of the record, this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). To date, the record does not reflect that Appellant has paid or 

arranged to pay for the Clerk's Record or that Appellant is entitled to proceed without

payment of costs.

Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Appeal dismissed

Opinion issued and filed March 21, 2024

[CV06]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

David Medlin,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04607-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Flint Law Firm LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/13/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9429 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9429 Filed 12/21/17 Page 2 of 2
#### STANLEY GURSKI v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.

May 16, 1989.

Leave to appeal granted; and it is further

ORDERED that the motion for summary remand to the trial court is granted, for review and clarification of that portion of its order of October 14, 1988, that denied the State’s motion for summary judgment, said review to be conducted in the light of the objective good faith standard set forth in *Kirk v. City of Newark,*109 *N.J.*173 (1988).

Jurisdiction is not retained.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sandra L. Johnson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sandra-l-johnsonnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-81","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QAN02bcFcp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-81\/\">STS-81<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-81\/embed\/#?secret=QAN02bcFcp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-81” — NASA\" data-secret=\"QAN02bcFcp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Roxana Bardan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dbardan\/","title":"NASA Technologies Receive Multiple Nods in TIME Inventions of 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XOEOgEk57B\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-technologies-receive-multiple-nods-in-time-inventions-of-2023\/\">NASA Technologies Receive Multiple Nods in TIME Inventions of 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-technologies-receive-multiple-nods-in-time-inventions-of-2023\/embed\/#?secret=XOEOgEk57B\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Technologies Receive Multiple Nods in TIME Inventions of 2023” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XOEOgEk57B\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/nasa-tempo-cover-image.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":573}
#### DOMINGA GONZALEZ v. CITY OF LONG BRANCH.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA Celebrating 90 Years: Robert Goddard\u2019s Rocket and the Launch of Spaceflight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tdAaHHuWbm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-celebrating-90-years-robert-goddards-rocket-and-the-launch-of-spaceflight\/\">NASA Celebrating 90 Years: Robert Goddard\u2019s Rocket and the Launch of Spaceflight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/nasa-celebrating-90-years-robert-goddards-rocket-and-the-launch-of-spaceflight\/embed\/#?secret=tdAaHHuWbm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Celebrating 90 Years: Robert Goddard\u2019s Rocket and the Launch of Spaceflight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tdAaHHuWbm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/03\/recreated-goddard-launch-1976.gif?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":465}
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00585-CR

Damian ESCALANTE, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR8181

Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 14, 2011

AFFIRMED

A grand jury indicted appellant, Damian Escalante, Jr., for sexual assault. At trial, 

appellant appeared pro se with stand-by counsel. The jury convicted appellant of second degree 

sexual assault (repeater) and assessed punishment at confinement for forty-five years. We 

affirm. 
04-10-00585-CR

- 2 -

CONDUCT OF TRIAL JUDGE

In his first issue, appellant argues the trial judge committed judicial misconduct. He lists 

several pleadings he filed, but he does not articulate his complaint with regard to those pleadings, 

some of which are not in the record. “It is incumbent upon appellant to cite specific legal 

authority and to provide legal arguments based upon that authority.” Bell v. State, 90 S.W.3d 

301, 305 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). Merely citing general legal doctrine is insufficient. Id. 

Accordingly, appellant’s first issue is overruled. 

CONDUCT OF PROSECUTOR

In his second issue, appellant argues the prosecutor committed prosecutorial misconduct 

by (1) defaming appellant in the media, (2) suborning perjured testimony at trial, and (3) 

authorizing a wire tap. However, appellant fails to identify any evidence in the record in support 

of his claims. “It is a long standing principle that [appellate courts] cannot review contentions 

which depend upon factual assertions outside of the record.” Janecka v. State, 937 S.W.2d 456, 

476 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly, appellant’s second issue is overruled. 

CONCLUSION

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Do not publish
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-100","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"uHSHdgrvnJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-100\/\">STS-100<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-100\/embed\/#?secret=uHSHdgrvnJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-100” — NASA\" data-secret=\"uHSHdgrvnJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF MULTIMEDIA ACCESS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         439,791
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,663,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                   823,500
<INVENTORY>                                  3,110,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,449,060
<PP&E>                                       2,313,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                 931,662
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,611,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,996,282
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         73
<COMMON>                                         1,132
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,254,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,611,590
<SALES>                                      7,876,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,027,948
<CGS>                                        4,181,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,181,128
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,017,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               771,596
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             877,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,542,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,542,638)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,542,638)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### EARL BURROUGHS v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, ET AL.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 234 *N.J.Super.*208).
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DONNIE RITTENHOUSE.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### EDUARDO ABAD, ET UX. v. THOMAS OBROTKA, M.D.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.