alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,627
<SECURITIES>                                    37,040
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                       214
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,524
<PP&E>                                           7,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,054
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,118
<BONDS>                                        144,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,474)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,484
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,453
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   106
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,755)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.91)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                EXHIBIT 11.1

                      CONSOLIDATION CAPITAL CORPORATION
                     COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                  (In thousands, except per share amounts)

                                                                Three Months
                                                                    Ended
                                                                    1998
                                                                -------------

Basic earnings per share:
   Net income................................................    $     5,263
   Weighted average shares outstanding.......................     31,696,546
                                                                 -----------
   Net income per share - Basic..............................    $      0.17
                                                                 ===========
Diluted earnings per share:
   Net income................................................    $     5,263
                                                                 -----------
   Weighted average shares outstanding.......................     31,696,546
   Convertible Non-Voting Common Stock.......................        500,000
   Common stock equivalents from stock options and warrants..        473,487
                                                                 -----------
   Total weighted average shares outstanding.................     32,670,033
                                                                 -----------
   Net income per share - Dilutive...........................    $      0.16
                                                                 ===========
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Richard G. Rose, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Exchange National
Bancshares, Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: August 13, 2003     /s/ Richard G. Rose
                              ---------------------
                              Richard G. Rose
                              Treasurer


                                       39
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Daniel Gutierrez,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04726-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Shrader & Associates, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/21/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9543 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9543 Filed 01/09/18 Page 2 of 2
#### Lefavour and Another *v.*Yandes and Another.

Assumpsit by partners for work and labour. *Held,*that evidence of the statements of one of the partners, made after the dissolution of the partnership, so far'as they tended to show a new contract destroying the partnership claim, and giving to each "paitnera separate demand for his part of the debt, was not admissible; but that ihe statements ó'f such partner, so far as they showed a payment made fo himself, tnighf be proved.

APPEAL from the *Marion*Circuit Court.—Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. Yerdict and judgment for the defendants.

*Friday, May*15.

Scott, J.

An action was brought in the name' of *Lefavour*and *Shryock*against *Yandes*and Wilson, for work and labour in erecting a mil]. The defendants introduced evidence to prove that Shryock, one of the plaintiffs, disclaimed the action, and acknowledged that he had received satisfaction in full for his part of the labour, and that an agreement had been made, by and between the plaintiffs and the defendants, subsequently fo the completion of the work, that the defendants 'were to pay each of the partners his part severally. On this evidence the Court instructed'the jury, ffthat if there was an acknowledgjnent by one qf the partners, after the dissolution of the partnership, that an agreement was made by the parties, subsequently to the completion of the work, that the defendants were to arr.ange, satisfy, and pay each of the plaintiffs, as they could agree with each of them severally; and that they did accordingly pay one of the partners .in full fpr his part; the other partner rnust bring a separate suit for his part.” To this instruction the plaintiffs excepted,"and their bill of exceptions is spread on the record.

Had the defendants proved such an agreement by a disinterested witness, or other legal proof, they might have defeated ,an action in the partnership name; but the objection here is to 'the kind of proof which is introduced to establish the agreement. Had *Lefavour*brought his action separately for his part of the claim, proof of *ShryoclJs*acknowledgment would have been insufficient to show the separation of interest; and the reason is equally strong, that it should not have been received to defeat an action in the partnership name. On this ground, *241we think the judgment for the defendants in the Circuit Court is erroneous. Several other exceptions were taken in the course of the trial below, which need not now be noticed. From a view of the whole case, we are of opinion theft the action in the name of the partners should be sustained. *Shryock's*admissions are admissible to prove the payment made to himself but not to change the contract (1).

Brown, for the appellants.

*Fletcher*and Gregg, for the appellees.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, and the verdict set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

(1)

 The declarations of one partner, as to the payment subsequently to a dissolution of a debt due to the partnership, are admissible against the other partner. Russell *&*Mylne, 191, per Brougham, Chancellor.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                       606
<INVENTORY>                                     22,703
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,313
<PP&E>                                         102,323
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,534)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,331
<BONDS>                                        165,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,864
<COMMON>                                        38,469
<OTHER-SE>                                   (112,283)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,078
<SALES>                                         41,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,238
<CGS>                                           29,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,029)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,029)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.72)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katy Mersmann","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/katymersmann-2\/","title":"West Virginia NASA Facility Renamed After Agency Icon","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"YUdlfKktNN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/west-virginia-nasa-facility-renamed-after-agency-icon\/\">West Virginia NASA Facility Renamed After Agency Icon<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/west-virginia-nasa-facility-renamed-after-agency-icon\/embed\/#?secret=YUdlfKktNN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“West Virginia NASA Facility Renamed After Agency Icon” — NASA\" data-secret=\"YUdlfKktNN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/ivv-bldg2.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"AETC Hypersonic Facilities","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4VTUJxdUJk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/armd-aetc\/aerosciences-evaluation-and-test-capabilities-aetc-portfolio-hypersonic-facilities\/\">AETC Hypersonic Facilities<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/armd-aetc\/aerosciences-evaluation-and-test-capabilities-aetc-portfolio-hypersonic-facilities\/embed\/#?secret=4VTUJxdUJk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“AETC Hypersonic Facilities” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4VTUJxdUJk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/htt-prw-scramjet-test-2-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":420}
#### GARY SHAMLEY v. ITT CORPORATION, ET AL.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         TRO LEARNING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                         AND EQUIVALENT SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

                   (UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 


                                                                              THREE MONTHS                  NINE MONTHS
                                                                             ENDED JULY 31,                ENDED JULY 31,
                                                                       -------------------------     -------------------------
                                                                           1997          1996           1997           1996
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------

AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:

<S>                                                                   <C>             <C>           <C>            <C>      
1.   Weighted average number of shares of common stock 
          outstanding during the period. . . . . . . . . . . . .          6,229          6,138          6,212          6,106

2.   Net additional shares assuming stock options exercised.                ---            575            ---            ---
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------

3.   Weighted average number of shares and equivalent
        shares of common stock outstanding during the period              6,229          6,713          6,212          6,106
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------

INCOME (LOSS):

4.   Net income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $ (1,080)       $   725       $ (5,676)      $ (1,312)
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------

PER SHARE AMOUNTS:

Net income (loss) (line 4/line 3). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $  (0.17)       $  0.11       $  (0.91)      $  (0.21)
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------
                                                                       ----------      ---------     ----------     ----------

</TABLE>
 





















                                          15