alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4


 


ALLONGE TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


Allonge (this “Allonge”)
to that certain Note (the “Note”) attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and made a part hereof in the principal amount of $600,000
dated September 22, 2020, from Brain Scientific Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), in favor of Auctus Fund, LLC,
as Holder (the “Holder”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Note.


 


WHEREAS, the Note provides
that Principal payments shall be made in six (6) installments each in the amount of US$100,000.00 commencing one hundred and eighty (180)
days following the Issue Date and continuing thereafter each thirty (30) days for five (5) months.


 


WHEREAS, the next installment
payment of Principal under the Note in the amount of US$100,000.00 (the “April Installment”) is due and owing by the Company
to the Holder on April 21, 2021 (the “Payment Date”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Holder desire to extend the Payment Date of the April Installment until April 30, 2021.


 


The Company and the Holder
agree that the Note shall be revised as follows:


 


1. The
Payment Date of the April Installment is hereby extended until April 30, 2021.


 


2. The
Holder hereby waives any and all (if any) Events of Default or other breaches or defaults of the Note through the date hereof related
to the April Installment.


 


This Allonge is intended
to be attached to and made a permanent part of the Note.


 


Dated as of the 21st day of April,
2021.


 


	Company:	BRAIN SCIENTIFIC INC.


 


	 	By:	/s/ Boris Goldstein
	 	Name: 	Boris Goldstein
	 	Title:	Chairman


 


	 	AUCTUS FUND, LLC


 


Holder:


  


		By:	/s/ Lou Posner

	 	Name: 	Lou Posner
	 	Title:	Managing Director
EXHIBIT A

FEES FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS

Date of Service Subpoena/Order Process Server Fees

05/19/16 Subpoena – Isabel Flores Cherno Liddy Legal $88.95

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $13.50)

06/01/16 Subpoena – Carolyn Main Liddy Legal $132.36

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $15.60)

05/07/16 Subpoena – Noslen Trujillo Liddy Legal $163.73

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $17.28)

05/11/16 Subpoena – Toni Trott Liddy Legal $79.46

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $14.58)

04/04/16 Subpoena – ECS Chart Retrieval Liddy Legal $77.11

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $15.12)

04/05/16 Subpoena –Fresh 2 Def Liddy Legal $94.51

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $21.06)

04/04/16 Subpoena –Apple One Liddy Legal $108.91 

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $21.06)

04/04/16 Subpoena –TLK Group Liddy Legal $46.92

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $9.18)

04/04/16 Subpoena –Avalon School of Beauty Liddy Legal $63.98 

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $3.78)

04/04/16 Subpoena –RemX Special ty Staffing Liddy Legal $52.36

(excluding one day attendance $40 – mileage $7.56)

04/04/16 Subpoena –Tri-West Healthcare Liddy Legal $57.70 

(one day attendance $40 – mileage $12.96)

TOTAL: $965.99

Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 61 Filed 10/03/17 Page 1 of 2
EXHIBIT B

COURT REPORTER FEES FOR TRANSCRIPTS

Date of Depo Deponent Court Reporter Reporter’s Fees

05/23/16 Schaun Owens Griffin & Associates $1,532.14

06/13/16 Carolyn Main/ Griffin & Associates $1,018.56

Isabel Flores Cherno

06/20/16 Toni Trott/ Griffin & Associates $1,211.21

TOTAL $3,761.91

4691302.1

109883-4

Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 61 Filed 10/03/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.2









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Transitional Report of Power-Save Energy Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the transitional period ended December 31,
2007(the “Report”), I, Michael Forster, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






1) The
Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the Company's financial position and results of operations.







September
17, 2008




/s/ Michael
Forster


Michael
Forster


Principal
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**
Certification Required by 18 U.S.C.Section 1350(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
     I, Antonio B. Mon, as Chief Executive Officer ofTechnical Olympic USA, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to myknowledge:
     1. the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, 2003 (the “Report”), filed with theU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securitiesand Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     2. the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
 By: /s/ ANTONIO B. MON      ANTONIO B. MON     *Chief Executive Officer*
Date: October 31, 2003
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-20310 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. ALFONSO GONZALEZ, also known as Flaco, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-696-2

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Alfonso Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. C a l i f o r n i a , 386 U

. S

. 7 3 8 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 2 29 (5th Cir. 2011). G onzalez has not filed a response. Counsel’s motion to supplement the r e c o r d

on appeal with the a men d ed judgment and for this court to reconsider the Anders b rief and motion to withdraw is G RANTED. We h ave r eviewed c ounsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Aug ust 16, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-20310 Document: 00512344134 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2013No. 12-20310

counsel’s assessment that t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n onfrivolous issue for a ppellate review. The record does reveal a clerical error in the judgment. The written judgment p r ovides, confusingly, as to count three, that G o nzalez w as convicted of “[c]onspiracy to possess a firearm in relation t o a drug trafficking offense.” See U n i t e d S t ates v. Cooper , 714 F.3d 873, 877 (5th Cir. 2013). Count three of t h e indictment charged Gonzalez with c onspiracy to use and carry a f irearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking c r i m e , a s s e t forth in counts o ne and two, and to possess the firearm in furtherance of such crimes, and Gonzalez pleaded guilty to t he offense cha r g e d in the i ndictment. The judgment should be corrected to properly identify the offense of conviction on count three. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw i s G RANTED, counsel is excused from further r esponsibilities herein, a nd t h e A PPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. This matter is REMANDED for correction of the clerical error pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.

2 Case: 12-20310 Document: 00512344134 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2013
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Forms S-8 No. 333-107246, dated July 22, 2003; No. 333-102209, dated December 26, 2002; No. 333-101079, dated November 7, 2002; No. 333-65188, dated July 16, 2001;No. 333-60702, dated May 11, 2001; No. 333-49436, dated November 7, 2000; No. 333-88645, dated October 8, 1999; No. 333-79463, dated May 27, 1999; No. 333-79457, dated May 27, 1999;No. 333-74555, dated March 17, 1999; No. 333-56473, dated June 10, 1998; and No. 333-15069, dated October 30, 1996 pertaining to various employee benefit plans of Main Street Banks, Inc. and on Form S-3No. 333-111505 of our reports dated March 13, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Main Street Banks, Inc., Main Street Banks, Inc.’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Main Street Banks, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 13, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brian VanBrocklin,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00523-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: March 2, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 959 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 98 Filed 09/18/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 98 Filed 09/18/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 98 Filed 09/18/15 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 1 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 2 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 3 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 4 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 5 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 6 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 7 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 8 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 9 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 10 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 11 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 12 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 13 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 14 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 15 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 16 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 17 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 18 of 19
Case 2:15-cv-01769-SPL Document 51-4 Filed 10/04/16 Page 19 of 19
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Messod C. Bendayan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mbendaya\/","title":"Seven Facts You May Not Know About Sharks Near NASA\u2019s Florida Spaceport","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"7kagcbBYii\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/seven-facts-you-may-not-know-about-sharks-near-nasas-florida-spaceport\/\">Seven Facts You May Not Know About Sharks Near NASA\u2019s Florida Spaceport<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/seven-facts-you-may-not-know-about-sharks-near-nasas-florida-spaceport\/embed\/#?secret=7kagcbBYii\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Seven Facts You May Not Know About Sharks Near NASA\u2019s Florida Spaceport” — NASA\" data-secret=\"7kagcbBYii\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/shark_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":429}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Stacy Holtz","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/stacy-a-holtznasa-gov\/","title":"STS-66","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"jwFk9SGAzn\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-66\/\">STS-66<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-66\/embed\/#?secret=jwFk9SGAzn\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-66” — NASA\" data-secret=\"jwFk9SGAzn\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of eMagin Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:  October 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Paul CampbellPaul CampbellChief Financial Officer(Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation and for GOOD CAUSE shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant TD is dismissed with prejudice, 

with each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. The case is to be 

dismissed in its entirety. 

 Dated this 20th day of September, 2016. 

 

 

Leonard Ceder, 

Plaintiff, v. 

Experian Information Solutions, 

Inc. and TD Bank USA N.A. 

 Defendant.

CASE NO: 2:15-CV-01635-SRB 

 ORDER 

Case 2:15-cv-01635-SRB Document 57 Filed 09/20/16 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALBERT DICKENS, JR.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 192 *N.J.Super.*290)
#### ERIKA P. REED AND EARL F. REED, JR. v. JOSEPH R. SALADINO, M.D.

May 3, 1989.

The parties having stipulated to a dismissal of this matter, it is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. (See 113 *N.J.*335 (1988)).
#### Sweny and Others *v.*Ferguson, Administratrix, and Others. In Chancery.

*Tuesday, May*6.

THE heirs of *Sweny*filed a bill in chancery against the administratrix and the heirs of *Ferguson.*The bill states that *Ferguson,*deceased, was the administrator of the estate of the complainants’ father; that he sold the property which came into his hands as administrator for a large amount, the most of which he converted to his own use; and that his estate is insolvent. It further states that *Ferguson,*in his life-time, conveyed a certain *tract of*land to his son, one of the defendants, for the purpose of defrauding the complainants. The prayer of the bill is, that a decree be rendered for the amount of the *130complainants’ claim, and that the land so fraudulently conveyed be sold to satisfy the same. The bill was taken *pm cmfesso.*

The *Court,*on examination of the bill, allegations, and proofs, decreed that the defendants should pay to the complainants the sum of 491 dollars; and, if the same were not paid on sen-vice of a copy of the decree, the land should be sold, &c.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7338 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICKY CAMPBELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00013) Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 5, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ricky Campbell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). As noted by the district court, civil procedural rules are inapplicable for Campbell’s criminal proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Campbell’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Campbell , No. 5:05-cr-00013 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMA-
                          TION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                          CONTAINED IN THE FOTOBALL USA, INC. FORM 10-QSB
                          FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS
                          QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.  THIS FDS HAS BEEN REFILED
                          REFLECTING THE RESTATEMENT OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          DATA IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS 128.

                                                      RESTATED

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                        APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                                3,184,726
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         5,350,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                           1,834,288
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     11,010,331
<PP&E>                                                1,460,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                          564,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       12,494,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4,342,904
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 26,617
<OTHER-SE>                                            8,002,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         12,494,877
<SALES>                                              15,153,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     15,153,860
<CGS>                                                10,380,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2,746,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       16,577
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       2,102,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                            844,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1,258,771
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1,258,771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               .46


</TABLE>