Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices 62465 

1The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR § 207.2(f)). 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–523 and 731– 

TA–1259 (Preliminary)] 

Boltless Steel Shelving Units 

Prepackaged for Sale From China 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant 

to sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) 

and 1673b(a)) (‘‘the Act’’), that there is 

a reasonable indication that an industry 

in the United States is materially 

injured by reason of imports from China 

of boltless steel shelving units 

prepackaged for sale (‘‘boltless steel 

shelving’’), provided for in subheadings 

9403.10.00 and 9403.20.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States, that are alleged to be sold 

in the United States at less than fair 

value (‘‘LTFV’’) and that are allegedly 

subsidized by the Government of China. 

Commencement of Final Phase 

Investigations 

Pursuant to section 207.18 of the 

Commission’s rules, the Commission 

also gives notice of the commencement 

of the final phase of its investigations. 

The Commission will issue a final phase 

notice of scheduling, which will be 

published in the Federal Register as 

provided in section 207.21 of the 

Commission’s rules, upon notice from 

the Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative 

preliminary determinations in the 

investigations under sections 703(b) or 

733(b) of the Act, or, if the preliminary 

determinations are negative, upon 

notice of affirmative final 

determinations in those investigations 

under sections 705(a) or 735(a) of the 

Act. Parties that filed entries of 

appearance in the preliminary phase of 

the investigations need not enter a 

separate appearance for the final phase 

of the investigations. Industrial users, 

and, if the merchandise under 

investigation is sold at the retail level, 

representative consumer organizations 

have the right to appear as parties in 

Commission antidumping and 

countervailing duty investigations. The 

Secretary will prepare a public service 

list containing the names and addresses 

of all persons, or their representatives, 

who are parties to the investigations. 

Background 

On August 26, 2014, petitions were 

filed with the Commission and 

Commerce by Edsal Manufacturing Co., 

Inc., Chicago, Illinois, alleging that an 

industry in the United States is 

materially injured or threatened with 

material injury by reason of LTFV and 

subsidized imports of boltless steel 

shelving from China. Accordingly, 

effective August 26, 2014, the 

Commission instituted countervailing 

duty investigation No. 701–TA–523 and 

antidumping duty investigation No. 

731–TA–1259 (Preliminary). 

Notice of the institution of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public conference to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register of September 2, 2014 

(79 FR 52040). The conference was held 

in Washington, DC, on September 16, 

2014, and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these investigations to the 

Secretary of Commerce on October 10, 2014. 

The views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 4495 (October 2014), 

entitled Boltless Steel Shelving Units 

Prepackaged for Sale from China. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 10, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24650 Filed 10–16–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–884] 

Certain Consumer Electronics With 

Display and Processing Capabilities; 

Commission Determination Not to 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Intervenor Status to Google, 

Inc. 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) granting Google 

Inc.’s (‘‘Google’’) motion to intervene in 

the above-captioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on August 21, 2014, based on a 

Complaint filed by Enterprise Systems 

Technologies S.a.r.l. of Luxembourg 

(‘‘Enterprise’’). 79 FR 49537–38 (Aug. 

21, 2014). The Complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of communications or 

computing devices and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

5,870,610 (‘‘the ’610 patent’’); 6,594,366; 

6,691,302 (‘‘the ’302 patent’’); and 

7,454,201 (‘‘the ’201 patent’’). The 

Complaint further alleges the existence 

of a domestic industry. The 

Commission’s Notice of Investigation 

named several respondents, including 

HTC Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan 

and HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, 

Washington (collectively ‘‘HTC’’); LG 

Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Republic of 

Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of 

Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, and LG 

Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of 

San Diego, California (collectively 

‘‘LG’’); and Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd of Seoul, Republic of Korea, 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of 

Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, and 

Samsung Telecommunications America, 

L.L.C. of Richardson, Texas (collectively 

‘‘Samsung’’). The Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations was also named as 

a party to the investigation. 

On August 28, 2014, Google moved to 

intervene in the investigation with 

respect to the ’302, ’610, and ’201 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

62466 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 201 / Friday, October 17, 2014 / Notices 

patents. The motion noted that none of 

the named respondents opposed 

Google’s proposed intervention. On 

September 3, 2014, Enterprise filed a 

response to Google’s motion, indicating 

that it does not oppose the motion given 

Google’s assurance that it will not object 

to or oppose any discovery sought by 

Enterprise on the basis of intervenor 

status and on the condition that Google 

participate fully in discovery as if it 

were a named respondent. On 

September 8, 2014, the Commission 

investigative attorney filed a response 

indicating no opposition to Google’s 

motion. 

On September 9, 2014, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID, granting intervenor status 

to Google pursuant to section 210.19 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 210.19). The ALJ 

found that Google’s motion is timely 

and that Google has an interest in the 

investigation because Google products 

and services are identified in the 

Complaint in connection with the 

accused devices of HTC, LG, and 

Samsung. The ALJ also noted that the 

interests of those respondents will be 

centered on their own respective 

accused devices rather than on the 

particularities of the Android platform 

or Google’s proprietary products and 

services. The ALJ found, therefore, that 

denying Google the opportunity to 

intervene could impair or impede 

Google’s ability to protect its interest 

which would not be adequately 

represented by the existing parties. The 

ALJ further found no evidence that 

Google’s intervention will unduly delay 

or prejudice the adjudication of the 

original parties’ rights. 

No petitions for review of the subject 

ID were filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 10, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24638 Filed 10–16–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–895] 

Certain Multiple Mode Outdoor Grills 

and Parts Thereof; Notice of Request 

for Statements on the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the presiding administrative law judge 

has issued a Final Initial Determination 

and Recommended Determination on 

Remedy and Bonding in the abovecaptioned investigation. The 

Commission is soliciting comments on 

public interest issues raised by the 

recommended relief, specifically a 

limited exclusion order and/or cease 

and desist orders against certain 

infringing multiple mode outdoor grills 

and parts thereof imported by The 

Brinkmann Corporation of Dallas; 

Texas; Outdoor Leisure Products, 

Incorporated of Neosho, Missouri; 

Academy Ltd., d/b/a/Academy Sports + 

Outdoors of Katy, Texas; Dongguan 

Kingsun Enterprises Co., Ltd. of Hengli 

Town, Dongguan City, China; and 

Ningbo Huige Outdoor Products Co. of 

Fenghua City, Zhejiang Province, China; 

Char-Broil, LLC of Columbus, Georgia; 

and Keesung Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of 

Guangzhou 511475, China. This notice 

is soliciting public interest comments 

from the public only. Parties are to file 

public interest submissions pursuant to 

19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cathy Chen, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2392. The public version of the 

complaint can be accessed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides 

that if the Commission finds a violation 

it shall exclude the articles concerned 

from the United States: 

unless, after considering the effect of such 

exclusion upon the public health and 

welfare, competitive conditions in the United 

States economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the United 

States, and United States consumers, it finds 

that such articles should not be excluded 

from entry. 

19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar 

provision applies to cease and desist 

orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1). 

The Commission is interested in 

further development of the record on 

the public interest in these 

investigations. Accordingly, members of 

the public are invited to file 

submissions of no more than five (5) 

pages, inclusive of attachments, 

concerning the public interest in light of 

the administrative law judge’s 

Recommended Determination on 

Remedy and Bonding issued in this 

investigation on October 9, 2014. 

Comments should address whether 

issuance of a limited exclusion order 

and/or a cease and desist order in this 

investigation would affect the public 

health and welfare in the United States, 

competitive conditions in the United 

States economy, the production of like 

or directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the recommended 

orders are used in the United States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the recommended orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the recommended 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the limited exclusion 

order and/or cease and desist order 

would impact consumers in the United 

States. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business on 

Wednesday, November 5, 2014. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES