alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2612 

To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain 

annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police 

and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the 

adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would otherwise 

be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the United 

States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division 

to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2004 

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself and Mr. SARBANES) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 

to permit certain annuitants of the retirement programs 

of the United States Park Police and United States 

Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants 

would otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion 

of members of the United States Park Police and United 

States Secret Service Uniformed Division to a new salary 

schedule under the amendments made by such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 2612 IS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Law Enforce3 ment Pension Adjustment Equity Act of 2004’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADJUSTMENTS IN PENSION BENEFITS 

5 FOR UNITED STATES PARK POLICE AND 

6 UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE UNI7 FORMED DIVISION ANNUITANTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 905 of the Law Enforce9 ment Pay Equity Act of 2000 (sec. 5–561.02, D.C. Offi10 cial Code) is amended by striking subsection (f). 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact13 ment of the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000. 

Æ
**Exhibit 12.1**                       **For the Years Ended**       (In thousands) **2005**  **2004**  **2003**  **2002**  **2001** Earnings from continuing operationsbefore income taxes $92,680  $110,678  $62,021  $28,201  $40,490 Fixed interest charges  156,941   97,957   123,059   157,229   192,765                 Earnings (loss):                    Including fixed interest charges  249,621   208,635   185,080   185,430   233,255 Excluding interest expense on deposits  209,537   180,280   148,891   122,653   147,587 Fixed interest charges excludinginterestexpense on deposits  116,857   69,602   86,870   94,452   107,097 Ratios:                    Earnings including fixed interestchargesto fixed interest charges  1.59   2.13   1.50   1.18   1.21 Earnings to fixed interest excludinginterest on deposits  1.79   2.59   1.71   1.30   1.38 Dollar deficiency of earnings to fixedinterest charges $—  $—  $—  $—  $—
Oyster Creek Group, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEET

                                                                  June 30, 2002
ASSETS

Current assets:                                                        -
Total current assets                                                  -


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - related party                           6,750

Total current liabilities                                          6,750

Stockholder's equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value,
25,000,000 shares
authorized, 4,500,000 shares issued
and outstanding as of 06/30/02                            4,500
Additional paid-in capital                                          75
(Deficit) accumulated during
development stage                                           (11,325)
                                                                       (6,750)
                                                                   $         -

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1
#### Frank Hester et al. v. F. H. Chambers, Associate Judge of the Recorder’s Court of Detroit.

*Condemnation proceedings*— Qualifications *of juror*— New *trial.*

1. Where a jury in condemnation proceedings disagree, and are discharged, the members of the panel are disqualified to sit as jurors in new proceedings to condemn the same land for the purposes mentioned in the first petition.

2. Where in such a case a juror, upon his examination as to his qualifications, denied having formed or expressed an opinion as to the necessity of taking the land for public use, and the contesting party was ignorant of his having acted as a member of the former panel, and of the submission of the question of such necessity to him as a member thereof, until after the second proceedings were ended, he is entitled to have the verdict set aside and to a new trial.

*Mandamus.*

Submitted January 21, 1891.

Granted February 12, 1891.

Kelators applied for *mandamus*to compel respondent to set' aside a verdict in condemnation proceedings. The facts are stated in the opinion.

*B. T. Wood,*for relators.

*John J. Speed,*for respondent.

*563Per Curiam.

The petition shows that several proceedings have been instituted on behalf of the Commissioners of Parks and Boulevards of Detroit to condemn lands for the opening and widening of that way.- In the condemnation of lands in cities and villages for the use and benefit of the public, the necessity for using such property, and the just compensation to be made therefor, must be ascertained by a jury of freeholders. Const. Art. 15, § 15; Id. Art. 18, § 2.

The sole question presented by the petition in this case is whether a juror who has been summoned and acted upon the jury in a proceeding to condemn a parcel of land, but in which the jury disagreed and were discharged, is competent and qualified to sit and act upon .a subsequent panel in proceedings to condemn the same parcel for the same purposes mentioned in the former petition. We think it clear that he is disqualified, and might have been challenged for cause; and when the juror, before being sworn, was examined as to his qualifications, and denied having formed or expressed an opinion as to the necessity of taking the land for public use, and the party was not aware that he had sat upon a former panel, and had the question submitted to him as a member thereof, and the party did not discover the fact until after the second proceedings had closed, the party is entitled to have the verdict set aside and á new trial before a disinterested and impartial jury.

The *mandamus*must issue as prayed for in the petition.
# - !GI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0652 6 r. • -



### JUN 2 8 2222 IN THE MATTER OF: Bovli ti Cleck of Court State of Montana C.L.D., ORDER

A Youth in Need ofCare.

Counsel for N.J.D., the appellant parent ofC.L.D. filed a motion and briefasking to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to §46-8-103(2), MCA, andAnders v. Califbrnia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). N.J.D.was granted timeto file aresponse, but no response was filed. The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that could be raised in the appeal in this case. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the appellant parent personally. DATED this z day ofJune, 2022.
ChiefJustice 06/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0652

## , \ e? Justices

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1998.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                            4223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4223
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       8000
<COMMON>                                          1935
<OTHER-SE>                                       (7742)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4493
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2442
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2442)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"ISS Flight Crew Integration","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6wRgNaQZJC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/iss-flight-crew-integration\/\">ISS Flight Crew Integration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/iss-flight-crew-integration\/embed\/#?secret=6wRgNaQZJC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ISS Flight Crew Integration” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6wRgNaQZJC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jsc2009e134585.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":508}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF U.S. ELECTRICAR,  INC.
FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDED  JULY  31,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000922237
<NAME>                        U.S. ELECTRICAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         266
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,240
<PP&E>                                         318
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,941
<BONDS>                                        3,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    4,842
<COMMON>                                       68,742
<OTHER-SE>                                     (85,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,658
<SALES>                                        1,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,938
<CGS>                                          2,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (67)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,567)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,567)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (42)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,525)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
#### John C. Elrod *v.*W. Geo. Anderson et al.

Parol Lease — Evidence to Sustain a Resulting Lien.

Although a moral sub-lease from the lessee of minors, for the indefinite term of their minority was void, it is still available for.protecting the sub-lessee’s possession as a resulting lien for improvements made by him with the sanction of the lessee and agent of the infants in face of an assurance by them that he might enjoy the possession during said infancy.

New Trial — Testimony of Absent Witnesses.

Where an affidavit of defendant for a continuance manifests due dilligence in preparing for the defense, and shows that the testimony of his absent witnesses would be material for establishing his lien and the extent of it, a motion for a continuance should be sustained and where overruled, a new trial will be awarded by the appellate court.

APPEAL EROM JEEEERSON CIR0UIT COURT. COMMON PLEAS.

January 11, 1868.

*Brown, for appellant.*

*Bodley*& *Simrall, for appellees.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Eobertson :

While tbe oral sub-lease to the appellant Elrod by Dupont the lessee of Anderson as agent of the infant owners for the indefinite term of their minority was not enforcible, still, being void, it is available for protecting the appellant’s possession as a resulting lien for improvements (to an equitable extent) made by him with the sanction of both Anderson and Dupont in faith of an assurance that he might enjoy them during the said infancy.

The appellant’s affidavit for a continuance manifests due diligence in preparing for his defense and shows that the testimony of his absent witnesses would be material for establishing his lien and the extent of it.

It seems to this court therefore that the court below erred in overruling the appellant’s motion for a continuance.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
EXHIBIT 11

                            IPI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)


                                                     Year Ended November 30,
                                                     -----------------------
                                                      1996     1995     1994
                                                    ------   ------   ------
Primary and fully diluted earnings per share
   Weighted average of issued shares outstanding     4,734    4,684    4,075
Effect of:
   1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan                      --       --       --
   1994 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan     --       --       --
                                                    ------   ------   ------
Shares outstanding used to compute primary and fully
   diluted earnings per share                        4,734    4,684    4,075
                                                    ======   ======   ======
Net Income                                          $1,533   $1,360   $1,141
                                                    ======   ======   ======
Primary and fully diluted earnings per share        $  .32   $  .29   $  .28
                                                    ======   ======   ======
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joyce Skelton,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04570-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/12/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9483 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9483 Filed 12/28/17 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) TO BE FURNISHED BUT NOT FILED

               Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infocrossing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Zach
Lonstein and William J. McHale, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and Senior
Vice President of Finance & Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ ZACH LONSTEIN                          /s/ WILLIAM J. McHALE
------------------------------------       -------------------------------------
Zach Lonstein                              William J. McHale
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer       SVP - Finance and Chief Financial
                                           Officer
May 10, 2007                               May 10, 2007
Exhibit 10.41
 Schedule of Director Compensation Arrangements
   2007Annual Retainer
    
    $
    65,000Chair of Audit Committee Annual Retainer
    
    $
    10,000Chair of Compensation & Nominating and Governance Committee
Annual Retainer
    
    $
    5,000
  Director
    
    Restricted Stock Award(1)Ben Guill
    
    2,690Richard A. Bachmann
    
    2,690Kenneth M. Burke
    
    2,690Edward C. Hutcheson, Jr.
    
    2,690Myles W. (Bill) Scoggins
    
    2,690Per Staehr
    
    2,690
 
 (1)
    
    Equity awards granted on April 29, 2008 with a fair market value of $37.17 (closing
price as of April 29, 2008). Awards are intended to reflect equity in the amount of
$100,000 per director. Restrictions lapse 30 days from the date of grant  May 28, 2008.