alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,588
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,749
<INVENTORY>                                     83,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,242
<PP&E>                                         175,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 380,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,279
<BONDS>                                        118,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   380,913
<SALES>                                        659,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               659,405
<CGS>                                          499,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  632,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98
        

</TABLE>
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  R ICHARD C RAIG K ESSER ,

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 02-15475

v. 

#  D.C. No. CV-96-03452-PJH S TEVEN J. C AMBRA , J R ., Warden,

Respondent-Appellee. 

# 

 J ENNIFER G AYLE L EAHY , No. 01-17467

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 

#  CV-97-01407-PJH T EENA F ARMON , Warden, ORDER

Respondent-Appellee. 

# 

Filed October 14, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheardby the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The threejudge panel opinion in Kesser v. Cambra , No. 02-15475, shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

14343PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joann White,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03645-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9104 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             604
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,383
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        362
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,569
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,585
<LOANS>                                         60,921
<ALLOWANCE>                                        446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,091
<DEPOSITS>                                      37,988
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                144
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  69,091
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,228
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  133
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   130
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,491
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 976
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 976
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,515
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       96
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    893
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       553
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.51
<LOANS-NON>                                        385
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     21
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   354
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  446
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               335
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            111
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jerry Colen","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jcolen\/","title":"Ames Research Center","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BlcrGFyUww\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/ames\/\">Ames Research Center<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/ames\/embed\/#?secret=BlcrGFyUww\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ames Research Center” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BlcrGFyUww\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/acd23-0109-006.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6888

JAMES THEODORE ROSS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD BAKER, Superintendent; BROWN, Officer; MS. HALL, Counselor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA99-1603-DKC) Submitted: October 26, 1999 Decided: November 17, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Theodore Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Ross’s informal brief in this Court recites the same facts as his complaint in the district court but emphasizes the denial of his request for a transfer within the facility. To the extent that these claims were not fully addressed by the district court, we conclude they provide no basis for relief. 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief onhis 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ross v. Baker , No. CA-99-1603-DKC (D. Md. June 17, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Exhibit 32.2

# CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

# Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, the (Report), I,
Deborah F. Ricci, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 906 1350, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Deborah F. RicciDeborah F. Ricci
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

May 16, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will
be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

23
EXHIBIT 32.1



CREDENCE SYSTEMS CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of Credence Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Graham J. Siddall, Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2004                     
|                                         
|/s/ GRAHAM J. SIDDALL                    
|                                         
|Graham J. Siddall Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DAVID PROBASCO.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"40 Years Ago: STS-4, Columbia\u2019s Final Orbital Flight Test","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"p6P1mykggM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/40-years-ago-sts-4-columbias-final-orbital-flight-test\/\">40 Years Ago: STS-4, Columbia\u2019s Final Orbital Flight Test<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/40-years-ago-sts-4-columbias-final-orbital-flight-test\/embed\/#?secret=p6P1mykggM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“40 Years Ago: STS-4, Columbia\u2019s Final Orbital Flight Test” — NASA\" data-secret=\"p6P1mykggM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/sts_4_1_crew_s82-31207.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
EXHIBIT 3.4

                           CONSOLIDATED GRAPHICS, INC.
                              (A TEXAS CORPORATION)
                                 (THE "COMPANY")

                           APRIL 27, 1998 AMENDMENT TO
                             BY-LAWS OF THE COMPANY

      Pursuant to a Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of the
Company dated April 27, 1998, it was RESOLVED that subsection (m) of Section 15
of the By-Laws of the Company be amended to correct "acquisition" in line 8
thereof to "acquisitions" and to increase the value of shares that may be issued
by the Executive Committee as consideration for the acquisition of printing
companies from $10,000,000 to $25,000,000, so that subsection (m) of Section 15
shall read as follows:

      (m) ISSUANCE OF STOCK. The executive committee shall have and may exercise
      the authority of the Board of Directors with respect to the issuance of
      shares of the Company, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT the executive committee
      shall have such authority only with respect to authorized shares of the
      common stock of the Company AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT the executive
      committee may only issue or cause to be issued such shares as
      consideration for the acquisitions of printing companies that have been
      approved pursuant to authority delegated to the executive committee by the
      Board of Directors AND PROVIDED FURTHER THAT the executive committee may
      in no circumstances issue or cause to be issued any such shares in any
      individual acquisition in which the aggregate consideration, whether
      consisting of debt assumption, the payment of cash, the issuance of notes
      or equity securities or any combination of the foregoing, exceeds
      $25,000,000.
#### IN RE MORRILL

No. 615A01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 748

Motion by Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 18 December 2001. Motion by respondent to deny Attorney General’s motion to dismiss, dismissed as moot 18 December 2001. Motion by respondent for stay denied 18 December 2001. Motion by respondent for stay of appeal denied 18 December 2001.
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-4 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-4 Filed 09/01/15 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-4 Filed 09/01/15 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:15-cv-08166-JAT Document 1-4 Filed 09/01/15 Page 4 of 4
#### In the Matter of Stacey Knight, Petitioner, v Michael McGinnis, as Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 920]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

As the result of an authorized mail watch, correction officials discovered correspondence indicating that petitioner had agreed to assault another inmate in return for a monetary payment. He was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats, engaging in violent conduct and violating facility correspondence procedures. He was found guilty of these charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the absence of an unusual incident report does not render the evidence insufficient as the directive he relies upon does not require the preparation of such a report with respect to the charges at issue. The misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it, together with the correspondence intercepted through the mail watch, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Schuler v McCray,*8 AD3d 777, 778 [2004]; *Matter of Umber v Murphy,*304 AD2d 931, 932 [2003]). Therefore, we decline to disturb it.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,153
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             237
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,250
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         54,127
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,934
<DEPOSITS>                                      81,002
<SHORT-TERM>                                       745
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,676
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 114,934
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,174
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  328
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                11,502
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,414
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,966
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,536
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,151
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,471
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,471
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (651)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.46
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,394
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,625
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   357
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,229
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,187
<RECOVERIES>                                       271
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,464
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,464
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>INCOME ON DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS OF 387 AND LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS OF 1038 ARE SHOWN UNDER EXTRAORDINARY ITEM.
</FN>


</TABLE>