alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Regina Anderson,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04740-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Wendt Law Firm, PC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/12/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9833 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9833 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Waneva Morris,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04513-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9319 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. OLLIS

No. 582P01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. Ill

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 November 2001.
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9535 Filed 01/08/18 Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

FELTON V ALENTE JORDAN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 18

- 1346

[ July 19, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 0 0 from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 31

- 2007

- CF

- 000802

- A and 31

- 2007

- CF

- 000803

- A

.
Felton Valente Jordan, M ilton , pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Conlin,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03733-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9123 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 1
#### D. B. Dunlevy & Co. *v.*J. B. O’Bannon & Son.

Pleading — Petition on Merchants Account — Price of Goods — Agreement.

The allegations, in a petition on a merchants account, that the debtor is indebted to him in the sum of fifty-five dollars for goods and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, the particulars of which are set out in an account filed therewith imparts prima facie, that the price had also been agreed upon or that they were reasonably worth it, and must be deemed setting out a cause of action.

Same — Averments in Answer Denied by Law.

The answer averred that the tea was not of the' quality authorized to be purchased by them and that they had offered to return it. Held, that this averment stands denied by law, nor is this deficit supplied by the offer in the answer to return it.

APPEAL EBOM jebbebson oibouit court, c. p.

*671January 13, 1869.

*Brown, for appellants.*

Hays, *for appellees.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Williams:

The allegation that the appellees were indebted to appellants in the sum of three hundred and fifty-five dollars and fifty-two cents for goods and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendants the particulars of which are set out in an account filed herewith, impart *prima facie*that the price had also been agreed as charged or that they were reasonably worth it and must be deemed as setting out a cause 'of action, especially when the defendants instead of demurring answered and made an issue which was found against them.

The answer averred that the tea, which was sent, by appellants to appellees at the instance of the agents of the latter, was not of the quality authorized to be purchased by them and that they had notified appellants thereof and offered to return the tea to them, but this averment stands denied by law and there was no proof of such notification or offer, nor is this deficit supplied by the offer in the answer again to return it.. The verdict in appellant’s favor on the first trial was right and the pleadings and proof, and no valid cause for a new trial being shown it was erroneous to set aside the judgment and verdict and grant a new trial.

A portion of Reinhart’s deposition was suppressed on exceptions by appellees, before the trial but if any portion which had been suppressed were afterwards permitted to go to the jury the record shows no objection by appellees or exception thereto and after it had been permitted to go to the jury without objection and had been considered by them it was too late to ask a new trial by reason thereof.

As the court erred in setting aside the first judgment and verdict we need not examine the other alleged errors.

Wherefore, the last judgment is reversed with instructions to the court to set aside the order granting a new trial on the first judgment and transference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            18,286
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       1,653
<MORTGAGE>                                       5,162
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    9,707
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  38,580
<CASH>                                           3,801
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               3,045
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,145
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 63,808
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              3,913
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,082
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,145
<PREMIUMS>                                       5,180
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,991
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (171)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,417
<BENEFITS>                                       3,117
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,194
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,590
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,010
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  53,006
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              2,513
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  634
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 112
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                23,381
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 32,660
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          (634)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Operating Partners 1992-B, Ltd., was in the process of
liquidation as of March 31, 2000 and as such is governed by liquidation basis
accounting.  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Swift Energy Operating Partners 1992-B, Ltd's statement of net assets
in process of liquidation and statement of operations contained in its
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         224,087
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  283,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               530,974
<PP&E>                                         2,978,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,813,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          35,990
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        219,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               223,425
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  123,395<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,776,145
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,776,145
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,776,145
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"Ingenuity Mars Helicopter","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"hV53Z1VN00\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/ingenuity-mars-helicopter\/\">Ingenuity Mars Helicopter<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/ingenuity-mars-helicopter\/embed\/#?secret=hV53Z1VN00\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Ingenuity Mars Helicopter” — NASA\" data-secret=\"hV53Z1VN00\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/PIA24466\/PIA24466~large.jpg?w=600&h=1627&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1627}
Exhibit 24.2

BLYTH, INC.    CERTIFICATION

I, the undersigned Secretary of BLYTH, INC., a Delaware corporation, certify that the attached is a true copy of resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of
Blyth, Inc. on April 1, 2003, at a meeting throughout which a quorum was present, and that the same is still in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of Blyth, Inc. this 1st day of May, 2003.

| |  | /s/BRUCE D. KREIGERName: Bruce D. Kreiger
Title: Secretary
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                           
| |  | BLYTH, INC.                                               
| |  |                                                           
| |  | Board of Directors Resolution                             
| |  |                                                           
| |  | April 1, 2003                                             
| |  |                                                           
| |  | * * *                                                     
| |  |                                                           
| |  | Form 10-K                                                 

RESOLVED, that the form, terms, and provisions of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") in substantially the draft form presented to and
reviewed by this Board, are approved and that Robert B. Goergen and Robert H Barghaus be, and each of them with full power to act without the other hereby is, authorized (i) to sign the Form 10-K on
behalf of the Corporation and any
amendments thereto as either of them may approve on behalf of the Corporation, in such form as the officer executing the Form 10-K or any such amendment may approve, with any changes from the form
presented to this meeting as he may approve, such execution to be conclusive evidence of such approval, and (ii) to file the Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission");
and be it further

RESOLVED, that each of the directors, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and the Vice
President and General Counsel, of the Corporation, are each hereby authorized to execute in their respective capacities, a power of attorney in favor of Robert B. Goergen, Robert H. Barghaus and Bruce
D. Kreiger designating each of them as the true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents of the signatory with full power and authority to execute and to cause to be filed with the Commission the Form
10-K for fiscal year 2003 with all exhibits and other documents in connection therewith as such attorneys-in-fact, or any one of them, may deem necessary or desirable; and to do and perform each and
every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as such officers and directors could do themselves.

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DANKA BUSINESS SYSTEMS PLC AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          21,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  285,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,487
<INVENTORY>                                    277,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               596,249
<PP&E>                                          83,303
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,244,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          304,797
<BONDS>                                        440,730
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,721
<OTHER-SE>                                     469,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,244,463
<SALES>                                        822,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               822,483
<CGS>                                          495,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  495,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,335
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,607
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             28,728
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,728
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>