alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gene Owings,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03643-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9067 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM ADVANCED MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS, INC. FORM 
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>        
        
<S>                                  <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
                    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1997
                    <PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
                    <CASH>                                  1,284
                    <SECURITIES>                                0
                    <RECEIVABLES>                               0
                    <ALLOWANCES>                                0
                    <INVENTORY>                             1,175
                    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,467
                    <PP&E>                                    647
                    <DEPRECIATION>                           (44)
                    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,314
                    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,219
                    <BONDS>                                     0
                    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
                    <PREFERRED>                                 0
                    <COMMON>                                   85
                    <OTHER-SE>                                531
                    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3,314
                    <SALES>                                     0
                    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0
                    <CGS>                                       0
                    <TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
                    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                          987
                    <LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
                    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
                    <INCOME-PRETAX>                         (990)
                    <INCOME-TAX>                            (990)
                    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (990)
                    <DISCONTINUED>                              0
                    <EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
                    <CHANGES>                                   0
                    <NET-INCOME>                            (990)
                    <EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.18)
                    <EPS-DILUTED>                           (.18)
                             


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Smith,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04327-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9340 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
I 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1718

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2003

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prairie Village, 

Kansas, as the ‘‘Senator James B. Pearson Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1718 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SENATOR JAMES B. PEARSON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3710 West 73rd Terrace in Prai4 rie Village, Kansas, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Senator James B. Pearson Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the Senator James B. Pear10 son Post Office.

Passed the Senate October 29, 2003. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. HAMLET M. CARDENAS.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains summary financial information extracted from Penn Octane
Corporation's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter period ended April
30,  1999  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by reference to such Financial
Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                      675804
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2174292
<ALLOWANCES>                                418796
<INVENTORY>                                 483797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3429682
<PP&E>                                     4820839
<DEPRECIATION>                             1659398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             8471964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5447829
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    111889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    900
<OTHER-SE>                                 2911346
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               8471964
<SALES>                                   23672837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          23672837
<CGS>                                     21256379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             21256379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           1745531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          428025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1232755
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1232755
<DISCONTINUED>                             (275488)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                957267
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .08


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             362
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  594,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (25,588)
<INVENTORY>                                    188,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               868,529
<PP&E>                                         599,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,842,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          442,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,348,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (129,279)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,842,962
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               676,231
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                81,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,129)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (565)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2502 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2502

 To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new Form 1040S.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 2004

   Mr. Craig introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new Form 1040S.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Simple Tax for Seniors Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. FORM 1040S FOR SENIORS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary's 
delegate) shall make available a form, to be known as ``Form 1040S'', 
for use by individuals to file the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Such form shall be as similar as 
practicable to Form 1040EZ, except that--
            (1) the form shall be available to individuals who have 
        attained age 65 as of the close of the taxable year,
            (2) the form may be used even if income for the taxable 
        year includes--
                    (A) social security benefits (as defined in section 
                86(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986),
                    (B) distributions from qualified retirement plans 
                (as defined in section 4974(c) of such Code), annuities 
                or other such deferred payment arrangements,
                    (C) interest and dividends, or
                    (D) capital gains and losses taken into account in 
                determining adjusted net capital gain (as defined in 
                section 1(h)(3)), and
            (3) the form shall be available without regard to the 
        amount of any item of taxable income or the total amount of 
        taxable income for the taxable year.
    (b) Effective Date.--The form required by subsection (a) shall be 
made available for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Curtisteen McNeal,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03642-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9026 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 11

HAMILTON BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                   ---------------------------------
                                                                      2001                  2000
                                                                   -----------           -----------
<S>                                                                <C>                   <C>
Basic:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                10,081,147            10,081,147
Net income                                                         $     2,539           $     5,417
Basic earnings                                                     $      0.25           $      0.54

Diluted:
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                10,081,147            10,081,147
Potential common shares outstanding - options                               --               139,974
                                                                   -----------           -----------
Total common and potential common shares outstanding                10,081,147            10,221,121
                                                                   ===========           ===========
Net income                                                         $     2,539           $     5,417
Diluted earnings per share                                         $      0.25           $      0.53
</TABLE>


                                       31
1

The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2171

___________

William G. Carter, and others similarly *

situated, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Julia Hassell, (SA); Jay Englehart; *

Dillian Hogan; Janet Sidebottom, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 21, 2005

 Filed: October 25, 2005

___________

Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

William G. Carter, confined to the Missouri Sexual Offender Treatment Center,

brought an action alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. On

defendants’ motion, the district court1

 dismissed the complaint for failure to state a

claim. Having reviewed the record and appellate submissions, see Atkinson v. Bohn,

91 F.3d 1127, 1128 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam) (de novo review), we agree Carter’s
-2-

federal claims were barred by the Eleventh Amendment because he named defendants

only in their official capacities. See Randolph v. Rogers, 170 F.3d 850, 859 (8th Cir.

1999) (Eleventh Amendment bars federal court from ordering state officials to

conform conduct to state law); Morstad v. Dep’t of Corr. & Rehab., 147 F.3d 741,

743-44 (8th Cir. 1998) (Eleventh Amendment immunity bars § 1983 lawsuit against

state official in official capacity even if state entity is moving force behind

deprivation of federal rights); Murphy v. Arkansas, 127 F.3d 750, 754 (8th Cir. 1997)

(without clear statement that officials are being sued in personal capacities, complaint

is interpreted as including only official-capacity claims).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. However, we modify the

dismissal of the state-law malpractice claim--over which the district court implicitly

refused to exercise jurisdiction, see Franklin v. Zain, 152 F.3d 783, 784-86 (8th Cir.

1998)--to be a dismissal without prejudice, Labickas v. Ark. State Univ., 78 F.3d 333,

334-35 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 968 (1996). 

______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Thomas W. Moldovan, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03521-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8809 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8809 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2