alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 5, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Pertl,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

October 20, 2004

| | /s/ David E.
  Pertl                                    
| | --------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                         
| | David E.
  Pertl                                        
| | Executive
  Vice President and Chief
  Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          Subsidiaries of the Company


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

Company                                                 State or Jurisdiction of Incorporation
<S>                                                     <C> 
Trico Marine Assets, Inc.                               Delaware
Trico Marine Operators, Inc.                            Louisiana
Trico Marine International, Inc.                        Louisiana
Trico Marine International, Ltd.                        Cayman Islands
Trico Marine International Holdings, B.V.               The Netherlands
Saevik Supply ASA                                       Norway
Saevik Shipping AS                                      Norway
Saevik Supply (UK) Limited                              England
Albyn Marine Limited                                    Scotland
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2521

    To suspend temporarily the duty of certain rayon staple fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 2004

  Ms. Collins introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain rayon staple fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN RAYON STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.55.04        Viscose filament        Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           rayons having a                                                   31/2008          ''
                           decitex of less than                                                                .
                           5.0 and a multi-
                           limbed cross-section,
                           the limbs having a
                           length-to-width
                           aspect ratio of at
                           least 2:1 (provided
                           for in subheading
                           5504.10.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D 20 2 2

- 3836

_____________________________

M ICHAEL A. T ORREY ,
Appellant,

v.

W ARDEN P AYNE G ULF C. I.; R ICKY D. D IXON , Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the C ircuit Court for Gulf County

. Devin Collier , Judge

.
August 9, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

R OBERTS , W INOKUR , and L ONG , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael A. Torrey, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Dan Johnson, Interim General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee s

.
#### BRUNO SALVATORE v. WAYNE K. THOMAS.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 04, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 04, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0172. IN THE INTEREST OF M. W. S., JR. et al., CHILDREN (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1900297 1900298 1900299 1900300 1900301 1900302
**EXHIBIT 32.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William J. Clifford, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my knowledge:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ WILLIAM J. CLIFFORD   |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | William J. Clifford       |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer* |
|   | August 8, 2013       |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Marcelo Dasilva","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mdasilva\/","title":"MAF Announcement – NEPA Public Notice","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3oyvsX2mAu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/michoud\/maf-announcements\/maf-announcement-nepa-public-notice\/\">MAF Announcement – NEPA Public Notice<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/michoud\/maf-announcements\/maf-announcement-nepa-public-notice\/embed\/#?secret=3oyvsX2mAu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“MAF Announcement – NEPA Public Notice” — NASA\" data-secret=\"3oyvsX2mAu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
ON REHEARING

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6977

RASHI’D QAWI’ AL-AMI’N,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:10-cv-00381-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: January 30, 2012 Decided: February 10, 2012

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rashi’d Qawi’ Al-Ami’n, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson 

Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rashi’d Qawi’ Al-Ami’n petitions for panel and en banc 

rehearing of his appeal. For reasons appearing to the court, we 

grant panel rehearing and vacate our initial opinion. AlAmi’n’s petition for en banc rehearing is denied.

Al-Ami’n seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The district 

court’s order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Al-Ami’n has not made the requisite showing. 
3

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Fonda Bethke,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04530-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9665 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) TO BE FURNISHED BUT NOT FILED

               Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infocrossing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Zach
Lonstein and William J. McHale, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Senior
Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



 /s/ ZACH LONSTEIN                        /s/ WILLIAM J. McHALE
------------------------------------     ---------------------------------------
Zach Lonstein                            William J. McHale
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer     SVP - Finance and Chief Financial
                                             Officer
May 10, 2006                             May 10, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Roy Stith,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03682-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8331 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Naomi Hartono","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/naomi-hartonojpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"How NASA Spotted El Ni\u00f1o Changing the Saltiness of Coastal Waters","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"AmwvPS8nDU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/earth\/oceans\/how-nasa-spotted-el-nino-changing-the-saltiness-of-coastal-waters\/\">How NASA Spotted El Ni\u00f1o Changing the Saltiness of Coastal Waters<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/earth\/oceans\/how-nasa-spotted-el-nino-changing-the-saltiness-of-coastal-waters\/embed\/#?secret=AmwvPS8nDU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“How NASA Spotted El Ni\u00f1o Changing the Saltiness of Coastal Waters” — NASA\" data-secret=\"AmwvPS8nDU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/1-coastal-waters.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### ALFRED PINE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ET AL.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2729

STEPHEN BECKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JEFFREY KENT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA96-3044-S)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 25, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen Becker, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Kent, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for reconsideration in a civil action arising under the Fair

Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681a-t (1994). We have reviewed

the district court's opinion and find that the motion was meritless. However, we note that the district court should have based

its denial on this court's holding in Yohay v. City of Alexandria,

827 F.2d 967, 971-72 (4th Cir. 1987), where we stated that users of

consumer credit reports may be civilly liable for violations of the

Fair Credit Reporting Act if the violations are willful. Because

Appellee obtained Appellant's credit report for a legitimate business reason, and not under false pretenses, Appellee did not commit

a willful violation. Id.; see 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681n, o, q (1994).

Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief, albeit on different

grounds than those relied upon by the district court. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT
      23**




CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
      333-07589, No. 333-31105, No. 333-83235, and No. 333-126876 each on Form S-8,
      of
      our report dated March 1, 2007 on our audits of the consolidated financial
      statements of Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries and management’s assessment
      of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/
      Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP





Rancho
      Cucamonga, California


March
      1,
      2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DRYPERS CORPORATION FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      2,804,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                              51,473,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                3,627,000
<INVENTORY>                                33,828,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           33,432,000
<PP&E>                                    117,033,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             33,465,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            293,363,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     110,349,000
<BONDS>                                   145,807,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,003,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              293,363,000
<SALES>                                   264,458,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          264,458,000
<CGS>                                     174,653,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             279,584,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (3,271,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         17,959,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (36,356,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  447,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (36,833,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                              (36,833,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.07)


</TABLE>