alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL DATA  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S  UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000894096
<NAME> TRANSCOR WASTE SERVICES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          2,115,510
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,364,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,073,929
<PP&E>                                            558,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                    245,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,837,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,511,514
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            4,010
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,050,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,837,468
<SALES>                                         2,541,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,541,886
<CGS>                                           2,262,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,262,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  218,851
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 66,606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   126,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                       49,291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                77,365
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,397,191)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,319,826)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.33)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Ron Hadani, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in the report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   |              | /s/ Ron Hadani          |   |
|--------|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Dated: | February 14, 2005 | Ron Hadani              |
|   |              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7669
JUAN DEMOND WRIGHT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDALL E. LEE; EDWARD A. JACKSON; ABDUR RAHMAN Y. SYKES; JEAN JOYNER, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-552-5-H) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juan Demond Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Juan Demond Wright appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wright v. Lee , No. CA-98-552-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kendall Murphy","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kfmurph2\/","title":"CubeSat Set to Demonstrate NASA\u2019s Fastest Laser Link from Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RauC6ItlYv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/cubesat-set-to-demonstrate-nasas-fastest-laser-link-from-space\/\">CubeSat Set to Demonstrate NASA\u2019s Fastest Laser Link from Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/cubesat-set-to-demonstrate-nasas-fastest-laser-link-from-space\/embed\/#?secret=RauC6ItlYv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“CubeSat Set to Demonstrate NASA\u2019s Fastest Laser Link from Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"RauC6ItlYv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/tbird_downlink_to_ogs-1_graphic.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
##### 



HMN FINANCIAL, INC.
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 Date:   March 1, 2007
    
    /s/ Michael McNeilMichael McNeilPresident/Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Jon EberleJon EberleSenior Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit10.9(a)**

 

Amendment No. 1 to the BlythIndustries, Inc.

1994 Employee Stock Option Plan

(as Amended and Restated as ofMarch 30, 2000)

 

# 1.                           The last paragraph of Section 1 of theBlyth Industries, Inc. 1994 Employee Stock Option Plan (as Amended and Restatedas of March 30, 2000) (the “Plan”) shall be amended and restated asfollows:

#  

“This amended and restated planincreases the number of shares issuable upon exercise of options granted underthe Plan by (i) 1,000,000 shares to 2,880,000 shares and (ii) on an annualbasis on each of February 1, 2001, February 1, 2002 andFebruary 1, 2003.”

 

# 2.                           Section 3(a) of the Plan shall beamended and restated as follows:

#  

“Subject to the provisions ofSection 9 (relating to adjustments upon changes in capital structure andother corporate transactions), the number of shares of Common Stock subject atany one time to Options granted under the Plan, plus the number of shares ofCommon Stock theretofore issued and delivered pursuant to the exercise ofOptions granted under the Plan shall not exceed the sum of (i) 2,880,000 sharesplus (ii) an additional number of shares, which are to be added on each ofFebruary 1, 2001, February 1, 2002 and February 1, 2003, equalto the lesser of (A) three-quarters of one percent (0.75%) of the totaloutstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation on the applicableAnniversary Date and (B) 600,000 shares. In no event may the number of sharesof Common Stock subject at any one time to Options granted under the Plan, plusthe number of shares of Common Stock theretofore issued and delivered pursuantto the exercise of Options granted under the Plan exceed 4,680,000 shares.”

 

# 3.                           The first sentence of Section 5(a) ofthe Plan shall be amended and restated as follows:

#  

“Options may be granted under thePlan at any time and from time to time on or prior to May 31, 2003.”

 

# 4.                           Section 12 of the Plan shall be amendedand restated to read in its entirety as follows:

#  

“EXPIRATION AND TERMINATION OFTHE PLAN.

 

Except with respect to Options thenoutstanding, the Plan shall expire on June 1, 2003 (the “ExpirationDate”).  Any Options outstanding as ofthe Expiration Date shall remain in effect until they have been exercised orterminated or have expired by their respective terms.”

 

# 5.                           This Amendment shall be effective as ofJune 1, 2003, subject to the approval of the majority of the stockholdersof the Corporation of the Corporation’s 2003 Incentive Plan.  In the event that a majority of the stockholdersof the Corporation do not approve the Corporation’s 2003 Incentive Plan, thisAmendment shall be void, ab initio.

#  

# 6.                           Except as specifically provided herein, thePlan shall remain in full force and effect.

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard Weir, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 368]

*448Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered February 21, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and petit larceny, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 years, 3 to 6 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly declined to charge justification since there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to defendant, that when he used a knife against unarmed store security guards, he reasonably believed the guards were using or about to use deadly force against him *(see People v Morales,*11 AD3d 259 [2004]). There was also no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant used anything other than deadly physical force. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. McNeill, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James M. McNeillJames M. McNeill Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




Date: May 11, 2004
#### ROY E. BAGGETT and PATRICIA BAGGETT, Individually and d/b/a BOUTIQUE HOUSE-PORT OF SWANSBORO v. SUMMERLIN INSURANCE AND REALTY, INC., CHARLES W. SUMMERLIN, and CHARLES W. SUMMERLIN, JR., d/b/a SUMMERLIN INSURANCE CENTER and CHARLES W. SUMMERLIN, JR.

No. 248A01

(Filed 9 November 2001)

Insurance— flood coverage—agent’s failure to procure—summary judgment for defendants

A decision of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment for defendant insurance agent arid defendant insurance agency in an action for negligent failure to obtain flood insurance for plaintiffs is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that defendants satisfied their duty to procure an insurance policy with similar coverage to plaintiffs’ existing all-risk policy which specifically excluded flood coverage and that plaintiffs were contributorily negligent in failing to read the policy obtained for them by defendants.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 143 N.C. App. 43, 545 S.E.2d 462 (2001), reversing and remanding an order for summary judgment entered 7 February 2000 by Cobb, J., in Superior Court, Onslow County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 October 2001.

*Ellis, Hooper, Warlick & Morgan, L.L.P., by John D. Warlick, Jr., for plaintiff-appellees.*

*Manning, Fulton & Skinner, P.A., by Michael T. Medford, for defendant-appellants.*

*Bailey & Dixon, L.L.P., by Gary S. Parsons and Dayatra T. King, on behalf of Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,*■ *amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Tyson, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Lawrence P. Ward, Chief Executive Officer,certify that:

 

1.          I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Heritage Oaks Bancorp;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d) for theregistrant and we have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)Intentionally Left Blank

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction);

 

a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  March 17, 2004 |                    |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Lawrence P. Ward    |   |
|                       | Lawrence P. Ward        |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GEORGE E. NEEDHAM, JR.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, as adopted), William D. Young, the Chief Executive Officer of ViroLogic,
Inc. (the "Company"), and Karen J. Wilson, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

1.      The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
        2002 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
        "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or Section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.      The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company.

Dated:  March 31, 2003

/s/ William D. Young                                    /s/ Karen J. Wilson
William D. Young                                        Karen J. Wilson
Chief Executive Officer                                 Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Chase Aircraft Gets a Facelift","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xWeDZ4pCW8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasas-chase-aircraft-gets-a-facelift\/\">NASA\u2019s Chase Aircraft Gets a Facelift<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasas-chase-aircraft-gets-a-facelift\/embed\/#?secret=xWeDZ4pCW8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Chase Aircraft Gets a Facelift” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xWeDZ4pCW8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/afrc2023-0038-345.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}