alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jennifer D. Wright,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03531-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9102 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Timothy Roberts,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04426-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9951 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9951 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Silver
Standard Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                      
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the registrant.

Date: March 30, 2012



|/s/ John
      Smith                  | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|John Smith                            | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 

---
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STANLEY BRANCH.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

John H. Glenn Research Center
Lewis Field
Cleveland, OH 44135-3191

xX

Barfield & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Jim Barfield

435 Sims Way

Merritt Island, FL 32952

Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request No. GRC-06-036
In response to the subject FOIA request, enclosed is a copy of the source selection statement for

NASA solicitation #NNCOSGESS2 (GESS2). NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) has
performed a thorough review of the requested document, and has determined that the document

is releasable in full.

There is no charge for providing this information since the applicable fees do not meet the
established threshold.

If you have any questions, you may call the undersigned at (216) 433-2813.

Angela L. Pierce
FOIA Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brenda Green,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03695-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8947 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jarvis A. Griffin,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00132-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9805 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 1
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 254

To revise the boundary of the Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau National Historical Park 

in the State of Hawaii, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2003

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To revise the boundary of the Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau National 

Historical Park in the State of Hawaii, and for other 

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau 

5 National Historical Park Addition Act of 2003’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO KALOKO–HONOKO ̄ HAU NATIONAL 

7 HISTORICAL PARK. 

8 Section 505(a) of Public Law 95–625 (16 U.S.C. 

9 396d(a)) is amended—
2

S 254 IS 

1 (1) by striking ‘‘(a) In order’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘(a)(1) In order’’; 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘1978,’’ and all that follows and 

4 inserting ‘‘1978.’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraphs: 

7 ‘‘(2) The boundaries of the park are modified 

8 to include lands and interests therein comprised of 

9 Parcels 1 and 2 totaling 2.14 acres, identified as 

10 ‘Tract A’ on the map entitled ‘Kaloko-Honoko ̄hau 

11 National Historical Park Proposed Boundary Ad12 justment’, numbered PWR (PISO) 466/82,043 and 

13 dated April 2002. 

14 ‘‘(3) The maps referred to in this subsection 

15 shall be on file and available for public inspection in 

16 the appropriate offices of the National Park Serv17 ice.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

19 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

20 as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Buis,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03563-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8283 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachel Hoover","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rlhoove1\/","title":"Into the Belly of the Rover: VIPER\u2019s Final Science Instrument Installed\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"j9s9432prB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/into-the-belly-of-the-rover-vipers-final-science-instrument-installed\/\">Into the Belly of the Rover: VIPER\u2019s Final Science Instrument Installed\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/into-the-belly-of-the-rover-vipers-final-science-instrument-installed\/embed\/#?secret=j9s9432prB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Into the Belly of the Rover: VIPER\u2019s Final Science Instrument Installed\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"j9s9432prB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/jsc2024e006254.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHN MATKINS.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2123 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 

State of Arkansas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2004 

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

to prohibit the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the State of Arkansas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE 

4 COMPARATIVE COST ADJUSTMENT (CCA) 

5 PROGRAM IN ARKANSAS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860C–1(b) of the Social 

7 Security Act, as added by section 241 of the Medicare Pre8 scription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 
2 

•S 2123 IS 

1 2003 (Public Law 108–173), is amended by adding at the 

2 end the following: 

3 ‘‘(3) NO CCA AREAS WITHIN ARKANSAS.—A 

4 CCA area shall not include an MSA any portion of 

5 which is within the State of Arkansas.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact8 ment of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 

9 and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173). 

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Goes Live with Surrogate eVTOL Flight Tests in Texas","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"em6Pi9Go30\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-goes-live-with-surrogate-evtol-flight-tests-in-texas\/\">NASA Goes Live with Surrogate eVTOL Flight Tests in Texas<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-goes-live-with-surrogate-evtol-flight-tests-in-texas\/embed\/#?secret=em6Pi9Go30\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Goes Live with Surrogate eVTOL Flight Tests in Texas” — NASA\" data-secret=\"em6Pi9Go30\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/north_texas_cohort_bell_textron_flight_test_october_2022_in-feature_version.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":402}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2467 

To clarify the calculation of per-unit costs payable under expiring annual 

contributions contracts for tenant-based rental assistance that are renewed in fiscal year 2004. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 20, 2004 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. REED, Mr. DODD, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. KOHL, Mr. 

CORZINE, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. CARPER, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. JEFFORDS, 

Mrs. BOXER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. LIEBERMAN, and Mr. 

JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the calculation of per-unit costs payable under 

expiring annual contributions contracts for tenant-based 

rental assistance that are renewed in fiscal year 2004. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF PER-UNIT COSTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of the item relat5 ing to the Housing Certificate Fund in title II of the De6 partments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 

7 Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations 
2 

•S 2467 IS 

1 Act, 2004 (Division G of Public Law 108–199; 118 Stat. 

2 372) is amended— 

3 (1) by inserting ‘‘in each calendar quarter’’ 

4 after ‘‘and by applying’’; and 

5 (2) by inserting ‘‘in the most recent quarter for 

6 which the public housing agency has submitted such 

7 actual per unit cost information to the Secretary’’ 

8 after ‘‘actual per unit cost’’. 

9 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub10 section (a) shall apply to all expiring section 8 tenant11 based annual contributions contracts renewed pursuant to 

12 the paragraph referred to in subsection (a), whether such 

13 renewal occurs before, on, or after the date of enactment 

14 of this Act. 

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2018

No. 04-17-00652-CV

Ruben RIOS,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017W0521

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Second Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to May 4, 2018. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of April, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court