alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Teresa Osborne,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04599-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Paglialunga & Harris, PS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/13/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9521 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9521 Filed 12/29/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Metrics","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iiYUEs49qu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nssc\/metrics\/\">Metrics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nssc\/metrics\/embed\/#?secret=iiYUEs49qu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Metrics” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iiYUEs49qu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### STEVEN YOUNG v. RICHARD S. LATTA, ET AL.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 233 *N.J.Super.*520).
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**HMN FINANCIAL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of HMN Financial, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael McNeil, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  March 12, 2004 | /s/ Michael  McNeil                |   |
|---------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                            | Michael McNeil,                    |
|                            | President/Chief  Executive Officer |
|                            | (Principal  Executive Officer)     |

 

----
**Exhibit 35.1**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**OF CITIBANK, N.A.**

**FORTHE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Citibank, N.A., as Servicer under the SecondAmended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 9, 2011 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) as supplemented by the Amended and Restated Series 2000 Supplement thereto dated as of August 9, 2011(the “Series 2000 Supplement” and, together with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the “Agreement”) each between Citibank, as Seller and Servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee; and as ManagingBeneficiary of Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust (the “Issuing Entity”) under the Amended and Restated Indenture dated as of August 9, 2011 (the “Indenture”) between the Issuing Entity and Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Trustee, does hereby certify that: 

1. Citibank is the Servicer under the Agreement and the Managing Beneficiary of theIssuing Entity. 

2. A review of the servicing activities of Citibank during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Agreement and the Indenture was conducted under my supervision. 

3. To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, Citibank has fulfilled all of its servicing obligations under the Agreement and the Indenture in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 28th day of March, 2014.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Beth Ridgeway","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/angela-b-ridgewaynasa-gov\/","title":"Marshall Gallery","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TJl9lUtDsV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/marshall-space-flight-gallery\/\">Marshall Gallery<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/marshall-space-flight-gallery\/embed\/#?secret=TJl9lUtDsV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Marshall Gallery” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TJl9lUtDsV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/ceb-5599.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":445}
Exhibit 31.1

I, Alan B. Levan, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Alan B. Levan      
|Alan B. Levan          
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: April 13, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 220 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 220

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
          of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 11214, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section--
            (1) reinstate the license for the construction of the 
        project as of the effective date of the surrender of the 
        license; and
            (2) extend the time period during which the licensee is 
        required to commence the construction of the project for 3 
        consecutive 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years 
        after the date of issuance of the license.

            Passed the Senate April 7, 2003.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 220

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To reinstate and extend the deadline for commencement of construction 
          of a hydroelectric project in the State of Illinois.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0255 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALEK RICHARD EGGETT,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 1 5 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 10 2023

10/10/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0255
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT E. DITTMAR, SR.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Evaluation of Additively-Manufactured, Consumable Structure Options for Small Spacecraft Propulsion Systems","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1K6lMwGM7W\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/evaluation-of-additively-manufactured-consumable-structure-options-for-small-spacecraft-propulsion-systems\/\">Evaluation of Additively-Manufactured, Consumable Structure Options for Small Spacecraft Propulsion Systems<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/evaluation-of-additively-manufactured-consumable-structure-options-for-small-spacecraft-propulsion-systems\/embed\/#?secret=1K6lMwGM7W\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Evaluation of Additively-Manufactured, Consumable Structure Options for Small Spacecraft Propulsion Systems” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1K6lMwGM7W\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/chamberlain_britany.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":800}
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
AND OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
OF



ENERGY EAST CORPORATION



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



We, Wesley W. von Schack, Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, and Robert D. Kump, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Energy East Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) Energy East Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Energy East Corporation.

|Date: July 31, 2008 | /s/Wesley W. von Schack        Wesley W. von Schack
        Chairman, President & 
        Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | /s/Robert D. Kump        Robert D. Kump
        Senior Vice President and 
        Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sharon Dixon,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04498-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9750 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 1
FILED

December 11, 1996

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

RICKY HEMBREE, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

) Davidson Chancery

) No. 95-2874-I

VS. )

) Appeal No.

) 01A01-9607-CH-00335

CHARLES TRAUGHBER, )

CHAIRMAN, TENNESSEE )

BOARD OF PAROLES, )

)

Defendant/Appellee. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur that the Board of Paroles had the discretion to grant or deny Mr.

Hembree parole under the facts of this case. However, circumstances may arise

wherein the board’s discretion is not so broad. See Totty v. Tennessee Dep’t of

Correction, App. No. 01A01-9504-CV-00013, 1995 WL 700205 (Tenn. Ct. App.

Nov. 29, 1995).

____________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"A New Market Emerges","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"IzPQXt5Qnk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/a-new-market-emerges\/\">A New Market Emerges<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/humans-in-space\/a-new-market-emerges\/embed\/#?secret=IzPQXt5Qnk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A New Market Emerges” — NASA\" data-secret=\"IzPQXt5Qnk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/blueoriginenginetest.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation

No. 2:15-MD-02641-DGC

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc.’s and Bard Peripheral Vascular, 

Inc.’s (collectively, “Bard”) Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 2

to Exclude Irrelevant and Prejudicial Evidence Regarding the Development of the Recovery® 

Filter, the Court hereby finds that the motion should be GRANTED. 

IT IS ORDERED that any evidence, testimony, or argument regarding the 

development of the Recovery® Filter, as described in Bard’s motion, shall be excluded from 

trial in this case.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9863-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

General Mills, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bug Emergency Incorporated, et al., 

Defendants.

No. CV-15-08174-PCT-ESW

ORDER 

 The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 7). 

The Plaintiff requests the right to reopen this case by motion to enforce settlement should 

the Defendant default on a settlement payment at some time in the future. The request 

will be denied. Upon dismissal of this case with prejudice, the case is terminated. 

Enforcement of the settlement contract must be sought through the initiation of an 

appropriate cause of action. 

 Therefore, 

 IT IS ORDERED granting the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7). The Complaint is 

dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. The 

request for leave to reopen this case is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate 

this case. 

 Dated this 12th day of January, 2016. 

Honorable Eileen S. Willett

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:15-cv-08174-ESW Document 10 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 1