alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM DRYPERS CORPORATION FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 6/30/99 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,473,000               7,473,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               58,930,000              58,930,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,119,000               3,119,000
<INVENTORY>                                 30,120,000              30,120,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,612,000              33,612,000
<PP&E>                                     111,738,000             111,738,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,652,000              25,652,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             318,405,000             318,405,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      111,166,000             111,166,000
<BONDS>                                    145,943,000             145,943,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        18,000                  18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,964,000              46,964,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               318,405,000             318,405,000
<SALES>                                     91,536,000             175,618,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            91,536,000             175,618,000
<CGS>                                       59,195,000             113,068,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               90,342,000             172,952,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (1,452,000)             (1,681,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,318,000               9,627,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,672,000)             (5,280,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (529,000)             (1,239,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,143,000)             (4,041,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                (467,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,143,000)             (3,574,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.12)                   (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.12)                   (.20)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Takes Delivery of GE Jet Engine for X-59","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ciFwMS8dk7\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-takes-delivery-of-ge-jet-engine-for-x-59\/\">NASA Takes Delivery of GE Jet Engine for X-59<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-takes-delivery-of-ge-jet-engine-for-x-59\/embed\/#?secret=ciFwMS8dk7\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Takes Delivery of GE Jet Engine for X-59” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ciFwMS8dk7\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/afrc2020-0089-82.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Linda Bouch,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04722-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Anapol Weiss

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/21/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9552 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9552 Filed 01/09/18 Page 2 of 2
II 

Calendar No. 625 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2633 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide refunds for unjust and 

unreasonable charges on electric energy in the State of California. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 8, 2004 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JULY 9, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide refunds for 

unjust and unreasonable charges on electric energy in 

the State of California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electricity Gouging 

5 Refund Act of 2003’’. 
2 

S 2633 PCS 

1 SEC. 2. REFUNDS FOR EXCESSIVE CHARGES. 

2 Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

3 824e) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(e) REFUNDS FOR EXCESSIVE CHARGES.— 

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.— 

6 ‘‘(A) REFUNDS.—Notwithstanding any 

7 other provision of this section, not later than 60 

8 days after the date of enactment of this sub9 section, the Commission shall issue an order re10 quiring a refund of the portion of charges on 

11 the transmission or sale of electric energy that 

12 are or have been found by the Commission to 

13 be unjust or unreasonable. 

14 ‘‘(B) INTEREST.—A refund under subpara15 graph (A) shall include interest from the date 

16 on which the charges were paid. 

17 ‘‘(C) AMOUNT.—The total amount of re18 funds ordered under subparagraph (A) shall be 

19 not less than $8,900,000,000. 

20 ‘‘(2) APPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (1) applies to 

21 charges for electric energy transmitted or sold dur22 ing the period beginning on June 1, 2000, and end23 ing on June 19, 2001. 

24 ‘‘(f) RENEGOTIATION OF CONTRACTS.—Not later 

25 than 30 days after the date of enactment of this sub26 section, the Commission shall order the renegotiation of 
3 

S 2633 PCS 

1 the long-term electricity contracts entered into between 

2 the energy companies and the State of California between 

3 January 1 and May 31, 2001.’’. 
Calendar No. 625 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2633 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide reelectric energy in the State of California. funds for unjust and unreasonable charges on 

JULY 9, 2004 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2557

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, to strike the restriction 

on use of funds that requires a 24-hour time limit for destroying identifying information submitted in relation to a firearm background check. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2004

Mr. DURBIN (for himself Mr. REED, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. 

FEINSTEIN, Mr. CORZINE, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. SCHUMER, 

Mrs. CLINTON, and Mrs. BOXER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, to 

strike the restriction on use of funds that requires a 

24-hour time limit for destroying identifying information 

submitted in relation to a firearm background check.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RECORDS RELATING TO FIREARMS BACK4 GROUND CHECKS. 

5 Section 617 of title VI of division B of the Consoli6 dated Appropriations Act, 2004, is amended—

7 (1) in subsection (a)—
2

•S 2557 IS 

1 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)’’; and 

2 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘no more 

3 than 24 hours’’ and all that follows and insert4 ing a period; and 

5 (2) by striking subsection (b).

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

I, Alan B. Levan, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Alan B. Levan

Alan B. Levan

Chief Executive Officer

Date:
April 10, 2012
#### R. T. Young & Cornelius *v.*H. Woodward.

Evidence — Principal and Agent — Competency of Agent as Witness.

W. D. Dempsy was agent of Woodward to purchase tobacco for the market, and as such agent employed one Williams to make all purchases, which was done in the name of Dempsey, who took all obligations for delivery of the tobacco in the name of Dempsey. Afterwards, while Dempsey was still the agent of Woodward, and before the delivery of any of the tobacco or payment therefor, Dempsey told plaintiffs, who sold the tobacco, that all purchases were made for Woodward, that the tobacco would belong to Woodward who would make payment therefor'. Held, that this evidence would be competent to establish who was the real purchaser and who was responsible therefor.

Same.

The contract for the purchase being in the name of Dempsey, agent of appellee, without disclosing his agency, or the name of his principal, would render Dempsey personally responsible, but could not exempt his principal from liability.

APPEAL EEOM LOGAN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 26, 1868.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams :

It was established that W. D. Dempsy was the agent of appellee' *167to purchase and. put up tobacco for market, at Hundon near Valney’s Depot in Logan county, and that he employed Williams to make purchases and that the latter in Dempsy’s name purchased of appellants about 18,000 pounds and took appellants’ written obligation to deliver at the place and time and for the price therein named, dated March 16, 1865, and that afterwards whilst Dempsy was still acting as the agent of appellee and before the delivering or time of delivery, in talking about said tobacco and its delivery and the payment therefor between appellants and Dempsy he told plaintiffs that the tobacco was purchased for appellee and it was his tobacco, and he would pay for it on delivery, all this evidence was competent, not only as establishing the sale but as to who was the real purchaser, and responsible therefor; the contract being in the name of Dempsy, who was appellees agent, without disclosing his agency or the name of his principal, might render Dempsy personally responsible but could not exempt his principal from responsibility.

Underwood, *for appellant.*

The court erred in withdrawing this evidence from the jury, wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial and further proceedings consistent herewith.
#### JADEN ELECTRIC, DIVISION OF THE FARFIELD COMPANY, A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION v. ATLANTIC COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY.

August 7, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-93","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dFd1rwMPnN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-93\/\">STS-93<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-93\/embed\/#?secret=dFd1rwMPnN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-93” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dFd1rwMPnN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 99.1

PDS GAMING CORPORATION  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Yearly Report of PDS Gaming Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the yearly period ended December 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Johan P. Finley, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, and Peter D. Cleary, President,
Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|By:    |  | /s/JOHAN P. FINLEYJohan P. Finley                                                 |  | Dated: March 31, 2003
|------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman                                              |  |                      
|By:    |  | /s/PETER D. CLEARYPeter D. Cleary                                                 |  | Dated: March 31, 2003
|Title: |  | President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Interim Chief Financial Officer |  |                      

This
certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Robert J. Dahlstrom, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03462-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8792 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8792 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2