alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

ADMINISTRATOR
DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR catia
al I | I ASSISTANT DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR | [ l I H
OO i
ofFice oF ortice oF orrice oF orrice oF EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE orrice oF office oF oFrice oF Poucy H
Lecistarive nternaTionat | | MANAGEMENT GENERAL OFFICER SECRETARY Pouicy TECHNOLOGY Puauic PLANNING i
AFFAIRS AFFAIRS. DEVELOPMENT COUNSEL PLANNING UTILIZATION AFFAIRS BOARD !
I
| I
|
ASSOCIATE if Mi
| | ADMINISTRATOR l l 1 SPace Science Ff
[Nate acaoemy {7
1 oF sciences |
office oF INVENTIONS & bepury orrice oF
INDUSTRY P~“]CONTRIBUTIONS| OFFICE OF DEFENSE OFFICE OF
moustay rage PROGRAMMING. DEFENSE ADMINISTRATION
WESTERN
OPERATIONS ‘OFFICE OF
orice TRACKING
sonia mone. Colt AND DATA
acquisition
{ 1
OFFICE OF OFFICE OF OFFICE OF
MANNED: ‘SPACE SCIENCE ADVANCED RESEARCH
SPACE FLIGHT AND APPLICATIONS . AND TECHNOLOGY

es a | es |

GEORGE C. MARSHALL MANNED GODDARD JET PROPULSION AMES FLIGHT RESEARCH
SPACE FLIGHT CENTER SPACECRAFT CENTER SPACE FLIGHT CENTER LABORATORY RESEARCH CENTER CENTER
(cOnTEAcTOR OPERATED)
Muntwlle Ale Howson Tex Greenbelt, Md Posodeno, Colt Mofelt Fel, Colt Eewords, Cali
JOHN F. KENNEDY PACIFIC LAUNCH LANGLEY Lewis
SPACE CENTER OPERATIONS OFFICE WALLOPS STATION RESEARCH CENTER RESEARCH CENTER
Cocco tye, Fo tompos, Cali Wolo ond, Vo onplan, Yo Clerlond, Oho

ELECTRONICS
RESEARCH CENTER

Combrdge, Moss

‘APPROVED:

“ADMINISTRATOR:

cnccrve off De tubed 12 196 o4

(Supersedes chgrt dated Nov. 1, 1963) US. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1964 OF— 742-574
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Shaw Cowart, L.L.P.

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 499-8900

Ethan L. Shaw (TX Bar No. 18140480)

Matthew J. Riley (TX Bar No. 24070500)

Justin W. Fishback (TX Bar No. 24056736)

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

elshaw@shawcowart.com 

mriley@shawcowart.com

jfishback@shawcowart.com 

(512) 499-8900 telephone

(512) 320-8906 facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiff Teresa Browning obo Cora Browning

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Teresa Browning obo Cora Browning,

 Plaintiff,

v.

C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

 Defendants.

No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

Civil Action No.: 2-16-CV-00516-DGC

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, Teresa Browning obo Cora Browning, hereby demands a trial by jury as to all 

issues so triable.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 26

th day of February, 2016.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 888 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SHAW COWART, LLP

By: /s/ Ethan L. Shaw 

 Ethan L. Shaw (TX Bar No. 18140480)

Matthew J. Riley (TX Bar No. 24070500)

Justin W. Fishback (TX Bar No. 24056736)

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 499-8900 telephone

(512) 320-8906 facsimile

elshaw@shawcowart.com 

mriley@shawcowart.com

jfishback@shawcowart.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Teresa Browning obo Cora Browning

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this 26th day of February, 2016, I electronically transmitted the 

foregoing Demand for Jury Trial to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys who are registered with the Court’s 

electronic filing system.

/s/ Ethan L. Shaw

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 888 Filed 02/26/16 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-98","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Gpv2WCHhq8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-98\/\">STS-98<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-98\/embed\/#?secret=Gpv2WCHhq8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-98” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Gpv2WCHhq8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/0100629\/0100629~large.jpg?w=600&h=1920&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1920}
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-121328, 333-19389, 333-44717,333-98195 and 333-109333) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Equity Incentive Plan, the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the Nonstatutory Stock Options, the 2000 Nonstatutory Incentive Plan, the 2000 Equity IncentivePlan and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CV Therapeutics, Inc., and the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-38528, 333-53202, 333-59318, 333-109427, 333-109428 and 333-118805) and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated March 8,2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CV Therapeutics, Inc., CV Therapeutics Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting of CV Therapeutics, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG, LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

March 22, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

William Johnson,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03728-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9235 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tama Gordon,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03653-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Pogust Braslow & Millrood, LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/11/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8339 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8339 Filed 10/23/17 Page 2 of 2
NASA ORGANIZATION CHART 

I I . I 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR EQUAL 

OPPORTUNITY 

PA 00 RAMS 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

PROCUREMENT 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

HEAWUARTERS 

OPERATIONS - 

ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSOCIATE DEPUTV ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSlSlANl DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

I 1 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

EXPLORATION 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

COMMERCIAL 

PROQRAMS 

SMAU AND 

DIUWANTAGED 

I 

11m.1-111-1 

I AEROSPACt I 

SALFETT. (INSTITUTION) I 

I ADVIWRY I 

EXECUTIVE OFFICER L,,-,,J PANEL 

L--- 

COMPTROLLER SAFETY, REUABIUTV, 

OUALITV ASSURANCE COMMUNICATIONS MANAOEMENT MAINTAINABIUTV, L EXTERNAL 

RE U TI 0 N S 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE 

SCIENCE AND 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE 

AOMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR 

SPACE FUOW SPACE STATION OPERATIONS 

FOR AERONAUTICS 

AND SPACE 

TECMNOLOOV 

I 

1 i
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-14-00076- CR
Candelario Cerda, Jr., A ppellan t

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F H AY S CO UNTY, 22ND J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. CR-10 -09 12, H ONO RAB LE R. B RUCE B OY ER, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R P ER CURIAM

Appellant Candelar io Cerda, J r. filed his notice of appea l on J anuar y 21, 2014. Cerda reque sted and rec eived 120 day s of extension of time to file his brief, but he has exceede d that time and the br ief ha s not been filed.

On Dec ember 5, 20 1 4 , Cerda’ s reta ined counsel, Daniel H. Wannamaker , filed another motion for extension of time reque sting an additional 60 day s to file appellant’ s brief. We g rant the motion in part and order Daniel H. Wannamaker to fi l e ap pellant’s brief on or befor e J anuar y 20, 2015. I f the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be require d to show cause why he should not be held in conte mpt of court.

I t is ordere d on Dec ember 12, 2014.

Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Do Not Publish
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TYDARIAN MARCUS MOORE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-1457

August 30, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Donna Marie Padar 

and Thomas Krug, Judges.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Ann Fitz, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P, Hurley, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
2

__________________________

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
- !GI 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0652 

6 r. • - 

JUN 2 8 2222 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

Bovli ti 

Cleck of Court 

State of Montana 

C.L.D., ORDER 

A Youth in Need of Care. 

Counsel for N.J.D., the appellant parent of C.L.D. filed a motion and brief asking to 

be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find 

any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v. 

Califbrnia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). N.J.D. was granted time to file a response, 

but no response was filed. 

The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), 

MCA, and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that 

could be raised in the appeal in this case. 

Therefore, 

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

the appellant parent personally. 

DATED this z day of June, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

06/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0652
,\e? 

Justices 

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ella M. Gorby,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04344-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9659 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000894245
<NAME> AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         662,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,781
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               689,316
<PP&E>                                      19,271,869
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,830,749)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,130,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          568,038
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,562,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,130,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               545,876
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                349,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            349,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   349,343
<EPS-BASIC>                                      14.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    14.93



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(No. 33-91954, No. 333-50011, No. 333-92557, No. 333-93237,No. 333-91144 and No. 333-117547) and Form S-3(No. 333-59847 and No. 333-105911) of our reports dated April 13,2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Blyth, Inc., and management’s report on the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report onthe Form 10-K of Blyth, Inc. as of and for the year ended January 31,2007.

/s/ *DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP*

Chicago, IllinoisApril 13, 2007

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,243
<PP&E>                                          11,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,788
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,367
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,578
<SALES>                                         10,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,800
<CGS>                                            1,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (180)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (541)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (541)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Donald Meeks,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03732-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9050 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
#### Cooper v. Adams and Another, in Error.

TO an action for false imprisonment against a justice of the peace and a constable, the defendants pleaded in justification, that an affidavit had been made before the justice, charging the plaintiflf with having violently assaulted, *beaten, and*wounded the deponent, wherefore the justice had issued his warrant, &c. *Held,*that the plea was not objectionable, after a verdict in favour of the defendants, for not showing that the assault and battery were charged to have been *unlawfully*made.

The arresting of an offender, and the re-taking of him on fresh pursuit after an escape, constitute but one effective arrest.

The warrant of a justice of the peace, on a charge of an as - sault and battery, commenced as follows: “The state of *Indiana, Allen*county, ss: To *William Brown,*constable of *Adams*township, greeting:” *Held,*that no objection could *be*made to the warrant, on account of its not repeating, in the mandatory part of it, the name of the state.

A person arrested on a justice’s warrant for a breach of the peace, cannot maintain an action of false imprisonment against *295the justice or constable,in consequence of a mere informality in the warrant; provided the justice have jurisdiction.

It is always presumed by this Court, that all the evidence necessary to sustain the verdict was given to the jury, unless the contrary be shown by the record.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
PDS Financial Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-85966 and 333-79523) and Form
S-3 (File No. 333-49199) of our report dated February 23, 1999, on our audit of
the consolidated financial statements of PDS Financial Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
March 23, 2001