alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Accompanying Form 10-K Report

of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Chapter 63, Title 18
U.S.C. §1350(a) and (b))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63, Title 18 U.S.C.
§1350(a) and (b)), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011 of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 28, 2012 |  |  |  | /S/ BRUCE W. DUNCAN                                  
|                         |  |  |  | Bruce W. Duncan                                      
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



|                         |  |  |  |                                                      
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 28, 2012 |  |  |  | /S/ SCOTT A. MUSIL                                   
|                         |  |  |  | Scott A. Musil                                       
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The information contained in this written statement shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference to such filing.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1350


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning, Inc. (the "Company") for the first quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Rueckl, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 12, 2010
/s/ Robert J. RuecklRobert J. RuecklVice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Darrick Mitchell,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04001-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9787 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DEWEY LOUIS INNOCENZI.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Lloyd B. KREUZER v. Terese L. KREUZER.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 230 *N.J.Super.*182)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH D. SCHMIDT.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,203
<SECURITIES>                                     1,713
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                       126
<INVENTORY>                                     10,475
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,545
<PP&E>                                           3,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                     717
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,878
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,557
<SALES>                                         20,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,822
<CGS>                                           12,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,214
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,828
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,828
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"John Gould","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jgould4\/","title":"NASA Releases STEM Toolkit for Advanced Air Mobility","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JE0vLE5w9l\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/aam-stem-toolkit-released\/\">NASA Releases STEM Toolkit for Advanced Air Mobility<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/aam-stem-toolkit-released\/embed\/#?secret=JE0vLE5w9l\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Releases STEM Toolkit for Advanced Air Mobility” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JE0vLE5w9l\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/careerday-blank.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

JOHN RUSSELL LOWE,

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. BARD INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04466-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as 

counsel for: 

Defendant C. R. Bard, Inc. 

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney’s signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Ste. 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

(404) 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9248 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. GREEN

No. 505P01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 715

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay allowed 10 September 2001 pending the determination of the State’s petition for discretionary review. Petition by Attorney General for writ of supersedeas denied 4 October 2001. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001. Temporary stay dissolved 4 October 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE SECOND
QUARTER 2000 10Q FILING AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                                          12,614
<SECURITIES>                                     1,958
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,669
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,613
<PP&E>                                          94,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,101
<BONDS>                                          1,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,166
<SALES>                                         56,522
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,522
<CGS>                                           14,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,461
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,251
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,251
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

HEADOUARTERS 

OPERATIONS 

NASA ORGANIZATION CHART 

I INSPECTOR 

GENERAL 

ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 1 

DIRECTOR. 

SMALL AN0 

BUSINESS UTlLllAllON ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR DlSlOVANTAGfD 

I I I I 

1 1 

I. ------- 

L,,, 

I AEROSPACE I 

SAfETY I ADVISORY I 

'I I EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

PROCUREMENT 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR EQUAL 

OPPORTUNITY 

ASSOCIATL * 

ADMINISTRATOR 

MANAGEMENT 

I :%TROLLER I I ~~~~~:~ 1 I FOR 

I I 

I 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE 

SCIENCE AND 

APPLICATIONS 

I 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMlNlSTR ATOR 

FOR AERONAUTICS 

AND SPACE 

I 

ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSISTANT 

ADMlNlSTR ATOR 

-- COMMERCIAL PROGRAMS EXPLORATION 

AbMlNlSTR ATOR 

COMMUNlCATlONS 

ADMINISTRATOR FOR ADMINISTRATOR 

SAFETY, RELIABILITY, 

MAINTAINABILITY, L 

QUALITY ASSURANCE RELATIONS 

SSOCl 

DMINISTRATOR 

Ate 

1 

PACE FLIGHT 

ASSOCIATC ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE 

SPACE STATION In 1 OPERATIONS 

I FOR 

APPROV 

DATE 1 November 28, 1988
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Anthony May,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-02765-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Bertram & Graf LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/22/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9554 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9554 Filed 01/10/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kitty Dorn,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04272-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/28/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9347 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9347 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Holford v. The State.

indictment for receiving stolen goods knowing them to -be stolen. Held, that the timo and place, when and where the goods were stolen, need not .he staled in the indictment, nor proved at the tiial.

ERROR to the *Dearborn*CircuifCourt.

Saturday, *November*17,

Scott, J.

*Holford*was indicted in the *Dearborn*Circuit Court for receiving stolen goods.,- on which indictment there was a verdict of conviction, and judgment; The errors assigned are, that the indictment does not allege any time and place when and where the goods were stolen; and that, on the trial, there was no evidence to prove that the said goods were stolen within the state of *Indiana.*

To test the validity of the errors .assigned, it is necessary only to revert to the statute creating the offence. The words of the statute are as follows, to wit, “every person who shall buy or receive stolen goods, knowing the same to he stolen, shall upon conviction be punished,” &c. R. C. 1824, p. 140. In an indictment, every material fact ought to he alleged with *104the certainty of time and place; and every fact is material, which is necessary to constitute the crime charged in the indictment. That the goods mentioned were stolen goods, and that the defendant received them, knowing them to he such, were material facts to he alleged and proved; because they are the facts which constitute the offence: hut the time and place of stealing the goods need not be alleged; because the defendant is not charged with the larceny. If it were necessary, by averment and proof, to connect the time and place of the stealing with the act of receiving, it would, for the same reason, he necessary also to connect the same circumstances with his knowledge of the fact, that the goods were stolen. If such were the law, no offender could he convicted, under this statute, without proof, not only of his having received stolen goods, knowing them to be such, but also of his knowledge of the precise time and place of the original larceny. And yet it is easy to conceive a case, in which a man might be guilty of the offence of knowingly receiving stolen goods, without either the offender, or the witnesses, having any knowledge of the time and place of the felonious taking. If these positions he correct, it clearly follows that any evidence which might have arisen in this case, going to show the time and place of the original larceny, was unnecessary to support the charge in the indictment.

Howard, for the plaintiff.

Whitcomb, for the state.

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.
#### IN RE DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR ADMIN. HEARING

No. 607P01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 258

Petition by petitioner (Karen Keltz) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 December 2001.