alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18E0026. CENSULLO v. CENSULLO.

Applicant’s Emergency Motion for an Extension of Time is hereby Granted.

Said application shall be filed on or before December 27, 2017.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 15, 2017

12/15/2017
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2768

To provide competitive status to certain Federal employees in the State 

of Alaska. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2004

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To provide competitive status to certain Federal employees 

in the State of Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thomas P. O’Hara 

5 Public Land Career Opportunity Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPETITIVE STATUS FOR CERTAIN FEDERAL EM7 PLOYEES IN THE STATE OF ALASKA. 

8 Section 1308 of the Alaska National Interest Lands 

9 Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 3198) is amended—
2

•S 2768 IS 

1 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 

2 subsections (d) and (e); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(c) COMPETITIVE STATUS.—An individual ap6 pointed to a permanent position under subsection (a) 

7 shall, after the completion of 1 year of service, be consid8 ered to have competitive status and shall enjoy the rights, 

9 privileges, and benefits of employees holding competitive 

10 status, including the rights, privileges, and benefits relat11 ing to promotion and transfer.’’.

Æ
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 DON PADILLA and GERI PADILLA, 2 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3

v. No. 29,223 4 BRENT P. TOWNSLEY and JANELL M. TOWNSLEY, 5 husband and wife, and SPECIALTY BUILDER, INC., 6 Defendants-Appellants. 7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Nan G. Nash, District Judge 9 Robert D. Gorman 10 Albuquerque, NM 11 for Appellees 12 Madison, Harbour & Mroz, P.A. 13 Gregory D. Steinman 14 Rachel A. Bayless 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Appellants 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION 18 VIGIL, Judge. 19 Defendants appealed from an order denying their moti ons in limine, and from 20 the district court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. This Court issued a 21 calendar notice proposing to dismiss the case because it was not an appeal from a final 222 order. In response to our calendar notice, Defendants have given notice to this Court 1 that they do not oppose summary dismissal in this case. Therefore, for the reasons 2 discussed in our calendar notice, we dismiss the appeal. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4
5 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 9

10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 11
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Early Career Faculty 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eAZ2PtQBfK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/early-career-faculty-2023\/\">Early Career Faculty 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/early-career-faculty-2023\/embed\/#?secret=eAZ2PtQBfK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Early Career Faculty 2023” — NASA\" data-secret=\"eAZ2PtQBfK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

ARSUS, LLC, Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC, Appellee

ANDREW HIRSHFELD, PERFORMING THE

FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER

SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF

THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________

2021

- 1648

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2020

- 00948.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

P ATRICK B RIGHT

, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Case: 21-1648 Document: 54 Page: 1 Filed: 11/16/2021D AVID C. S EASTRUNK

, Unified Patent s, LLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by R OSHAN
M ANSINGHANI , Chevy Chase, MD.

M ICHAEL S. F ORMAN

, Office of the Solicitor, UnitedStates Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by T HOMAS W.

K RAUSE

, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED ; M AUREEN
D ONOVAN Q UELER

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE h a ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, P ROST

, and T ARANTO

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 16, 2021

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 21-1648 Document: 54 Page: 2 Filed: 11/16/2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gallagher &

Kennedy, P.A.

2575 East Camelback Road

Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225

(602) 530-8000

Robert W. Boatman (009619) - rwb@gknet.com

Paul L. Stoller (016773) - paul.stoller@gknet.com

Shannon L. Clark (019708) - SLC@gknet.com

GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A.

2575 East Camelback Road

Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225

Telephone: (602) 530-8000

Ramon Rossi Lopez (CA Bar No. 86361)

(admitted pro hac vice)

LOPEZ McHUGH LLP

100 Bayview Circle, Suite 5600

Newport Beach, California 92660

rlopez@lopezmchugh.com

Co-Lead/Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

MD No. 02641

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF

AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT

ORDER NO. 5 RE: PLAINTIFF AND

DEFENDANT PROFILE FORMS

Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead/Liaison Counsel submit a proposed form of Amended Case

Management Order No. 5, to address plaintiff and defendant profile forms. The form of

order and attached profile forms are agreed and stipulated to by the parties.

DATED this 23rd day of February, 2016.

GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A.

By: /s/ Robert W. Boatman

Robert W. Boatman

Paul L. Stoller

Shannon L. Clark

2575 E. Camelback Road, Suite 1100

Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225

LOPEZ McHUGH LLP

Ramon Rossi Lopez (CA Bar No. 86361)

(admitted pro hac vice)

100 Bayview Circle, Suite 5600

Newport Beach, California 92660

Co-Lead/Liaison Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 876 Filed 02/23/16 Page 1 of 2
2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of February, 2016, I electronically transmitted

the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing.

/s/ Nancy Jo Koenes

5254285v1/26997-0001

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 876 Filed 02/23/16 Page 2 of 2
#### WAYNE E. PICKERING v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-77","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VpJArthuN8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-77\/\">STS-77<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-77\/embed\/#?secret=VpJArthuN8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-77” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VpJArthuN8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GAIL RICE.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 14 Lands at Fra Mauro","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DUM9X7NkFr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-14-lands-at-fra-mauro\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 14 Lands at Fra Mauro<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-14-lands-at-fra-mauro\/embed\/#?secret=DUM9X7NkFr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 14 Lands at Fra Mauro” — NASA\" data-secret=\"DUM9X7NkFr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/as14-0933-s71-17610-2.4.71.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":413}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert F. Mahek,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00086-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9746 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 1
#### BETH MIKE, ET AL. v. THE MALL AT IV GROUP, ETC., ET AL.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
1 The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.
2 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3746

___________ Richard L. Krone, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States District * Court for the District of Minnesota. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 17, 1999 Filed: July 21, 1999

___________ Before BRIGHT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and REASONER, 1 District Judge.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Richard L. Krone appeals from a judgment of the district court 2 upholding a denial of social security disability insurance benefits. We affirm.-2-

In 1993 Krone applied for benefits, alleging a disability beginning on January 14, 1991, due to disabling pain resulting from a 1983 automobile accident in which he sustained muscle strain. After two hearings, an administrative law judge (ALJ) denied benefits. Contrary to Krone's argument on appeal, the ALJ did not err in failing to develop the record as to a possible mental impairment. An ALJ is not required "to order a consultative evaluation of every alleged impairment." Matthews v. Bowen , 879 F.2d 422, 424 (8th Cir. 1989). Despite some evidence of a possible mental impairment in 1984, Krone continued to work and thus any impairment was not disabling. In fact, at oral argument, Krone's counsel indicated if this court were to remand, all he wanted was the opportunity to present evidence from Krone's treating doctor, who had noted depression and anxiety in 1993 and 1994, which was after the expiration of Krone's insured status in March 1992. Even assuming this evidence is of some relevance, it is not helpful since in a 1994 assessment the doctor indicated Krone could work. Nor did the ALJ err in applying the factors set forth in Polaski v. Heckler , 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir. 1984) (subsequent history omitted) in discounting Krone's allegations of disabling pain. As the ALJ noted, there were many inconsistencies between Krone's testimony and medical records indicating Krone was working and his pain medication was effective and had no significant side effects. Finding no error of law or fact, we affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.-3-

Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-34466 and 333-56550), Form S-4 (Nos.333-97627) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-44221, 333-24095, and 333-07149) of Trico Marine Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated March 11, 2004 except for Note 1, paragraph 4, and Notes 3, 4, 9 and 20 which are as of August 6, 2004 relatingto the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

New Orleans,Louisiana 

August 6, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Condensed  Consolidated  Financial  Statements of the  Registrant  for the three
months  ended March 31, 1999 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to
such Condensed  Consolidated  Financial Statements contained in the Registrant's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         3,056
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  210,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             221,906
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               269,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         21,604
<BONDS>                                      143,504
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                         115
<OTHER-SE>                                    91,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 269,970
<SALES>                                       92,832
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              92,832
<CGS>                                         78,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 78,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              11,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,163
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,995
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .17
        


</TABLE>
BRANDON DUNNELL,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2011

Opinion filed July 28, 2014.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Brandon Dunnell, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is granted a belated appeal of the June 13, 2013, judgment and 

sentence in Duval County Circuit Court case number 16-2013-CF-000120-AXXXMA. Upon issuance of mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided 

to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(c)(6)(D). If petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall 

appoint counsel to represent petitioner on appeal.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 04, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 04, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20D0172. IN THE INTEREST OF M. W. S., JR. et al., CHILDREN (FATHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1900297 1900298 1900299 1900300 1900301 1900302
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 203 (Tuesday, October 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD510


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Surfclam 
and Ocean Quahog Fisheries; Notice That Vendor Will Provide 2015 Cage 
Tags

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of vendor to provide fishing year 2015 cage tags.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS informs surfclam and ocean quahog individual transferable 
quota (ITQ) allocation holders that they will be required to purchase 
their fishing year 2015 (January 1, 2015--December 31, 2015) cage tags 
from the National Band and Tag Company. The intent of this notice is to 
comply with regulations for the Atlantic surfclam and ocean quahog 
fisheries and to promote efficient distribution of cage tags.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Macan, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9165; fax (978) 281-9161.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Atlantic surfclam and ocean 
quahog fishery regulations at 50 CFR 648.77(b) authorize the Regional 
Administrator of the Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, to specify in the 
Federal Register a vendor from whom cage tags, required under the 
Atlantic Surfclam and Ocean Quahog Fishery Management Plan (FMP), shall 
be purchased. Notice is hereby given that National Band and Tag Company 
of Newport, Kentucky, is the authorized vendor of cage tags required 
for the fishing year 2015 Federal surfclam and ocean quahog fisheries. 
Detailed instructions for purchasing these cage tags will be provided 
in a letter to ITQ allocation holders in these fisheries from NMFS 
within the next several weeks.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-24960 Filed 10-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P