alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jennifer A. Harbaugh","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jharbaug\/","title":"Teams Develop Code to Coordinate Robots, Win $535,000 in Space Robotics Challenge","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zS17q5FBXE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/marshall\/teams-develop-code-to-coordinate-robots-win-535000-in-space-robotics-challenge\/\">Teams Develop Code to Coordinate Robots, Win $535,000 in Space Robotics Challenge<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/marshall\/teams-develop-code-to-coordinate-robots-win-535000-in-space-robotics-challenge\/embed\/#?secret=zS17q5FBXE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Teams Develop Code to Coordinate Robots, Win $535,000 in Space Robotics Challenge” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zS17q5FBXE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/src-phase-2-logo-final_0.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":564}
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                               FRESH AMERICA CORP.
                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS

                                December 28, 2001

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                      State of Incorporation
----------                                      -----------------------
<S>                                             <C>
Francisco Acquisition Corp.                             Texas

Fresh America Arizona, Inc.                             Texas

Fresh America Florida, Inc.                             Texas

Allied-Perricone, Inc., formerly known as
Sam Perricone Citrus Company                            California

1277649 Ontario Limited                                 Ontario, Canada

Ontario Tree Fruits Limited                             Ontario, Canada

Sarfog, Inc.                                            New Jersey

Fosar, Inc.                                             New Jersey

Trio Importing (No. 2) Company, Ltd.                    Ontario, Canada
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

FEMA gives notice that the minimum Project Worksheet Amount under the Public Assistance program for disasters and emergencies declared on or after October 1, 2014, will be increased.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 1, 2014, and applies to major disasters and emergencies declared on or after October 1, 2014.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Roche, Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3834.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 and 44 CFR 206.202(d)(2) provide that FEMA will annually adjust the minimum Project Worksheet amount under the Public Assistance program to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Department of Labor.

FEMA gives notice of an increase to $3,040 for the minimum amount that will be approved for any Project Worksheet under the Public Assistance program for all major disasters and emergencies declared on or after October 1, 2014.

FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.3 percent for the 6-month period from February 2014 to August 2014. This is based on information released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of Labor on September 17, 2014.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2014-24809 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cheryl Demuth-Kresser,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04074-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9270 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 1
#### M. W. Coffee v. F. B. Cook.

Title Bond — Assignment—Warranty of Title.

An assignment of a bond for a conveyance of land does import a warranty of the title.

Amended Answer — Hot Permitted to Filed — Bill of Exception.

Where the lower Court erred in not permitting the amended pleading to be filed, the error is not available in the Appellate Court as it was not made part of the record by a bill of exceptions or order of the Court identifying it.

January 15, 1868.

APPEAL PROM MORGVY CIRCUIT COURT.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hardin :

It is well settled that an assignment of a bond for a conveyance of land does not import a warranty of the tittle, and only imposes on the assignor the responsibility, ordinarily devolved on assignors resulting from a failure of the assignee after due diligence to compel a compliance with the terms of the bond. The notes in controversy in this case being given for part of the consideration of the assignment of the bond given by Williams as guardian of Ferguson it devolved on the defendant, in order to avail the notes, to show either a failure to enforce the covenanty of the bond by the prosecution of a suit thereon with due diligence or such other facts as would have entitled the appellant to a recovery against the appellee in consequence of the assignment if the *223entire consideration thereof had been paid such a ground for relief is not, in onr opinion, established on the part of the appellant in this case. The answer of Ferguson tendering his deed in compliance with the covenant of his late guardian is a sufficiene respone to the allegation that Williams was unable to have the title conveyed so far as it vested in Ferguson, and it does not appear that Ferguson had not such title at least as his guardian undertook to sell.

We do not perceive that there was any abuse of the discretion of the court in refusing to permit the amended answer and cross petition to be filed; bpt if there was, the error is not available in this court, for the reason that the paper copied by the clerk as the amended pleading is not made part of the record by any bill of exceptions or order of the court identifying it as that which was offered and rejected, the descriptive note of the clerk, for that purpose, being insufficient according to repeated decisions of this Court.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
Exhibit A

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 9
Examples of "Substantially Equivalent" Products 

Vena Tech LGM (B. 

Braun Medical)

Simon Nitinol Filter 

(NMT, Inc.)

Predicate Device New Device

Source: Simon Nitinol Filter 510(k) submission (K894703), 

submitted July 25, 1989, and cleared by FDA on April 20, 1990. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 9
Examples of "Substantially Equivalent" Products 

Mobin-Uddin

Umbrella (Edwards)

Simon Nitinol Filter 

(NMT, Inc.)

Predicate Device New Device

Source: Simon Nitinol Filter 510(k) submission (K894703), 

submitted July 25, 1989, and cleared by FDA on April 20, 1990. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 3 of 9
Examples of "Substantially Equivalent" Products 

Simon Nitinol Filter 

(NMT, Inc.)

TrapEase Filter 

(Cordis Corp.)

Predicate Device New Device

Source: Cordis Corp. TrapEase Filter 510(k) Summary, dated July 

7, 2000. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 9
Examples of "Substantially Equivalent" Products 

Greenfield Filter 

(BSC)

Recovery® Filter (C. 

R. Bard, Inc.)

Predicate Device New Device

Source: Recovery® Filter 510(k) Summary (K022236). 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 5 of 9
 Leg span increased from 32mm to 40mm (increase of 25%)

Recovery® v. G2® 

Recovery® G2®

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 6 of 9
 Hooks thickened by 24% (from 0.0085” to 0.0105”)

Recovery® v. G2® 

Recovery® G2®

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 7 of 9
 Increase in curvature of arm wires coming out of apex

Recovery® v. G2® 

Recovery® G2®

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 8 of 9
 Longer arms (by 50%)

 Curved arm ends

Recovery® v. G2® 

Recovery® G2®

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9862-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 9 of 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Linda Butler,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03792-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/17/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8302 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8302 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Katherine Tarleton,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00045-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9707 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 21.1


                               FRESH AMERICA CORP.
                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS

                                 JANUARY 1, 1999



SUBSIDIARY                                        STATE OF INCORPORATION
----------                                       ------------------------
Fresh America California, Inc.                         Texas
                                                      
Fresh America Louisiana, Inc.                          Texas
                                                      
Fresh America Georgia, Inc.                            Texas
                                                      
Hereford Haven, Inc., d/b/a/ Martin Bros.              Texas
                                                      
Francisco Acquisition Corp.                            Texas
                                                      
Fresh America Arizona, Inc.                            Texas
                                                      
Fresh America Florida, Inc.                            Texas
                                                      
JNC Acquisition Corp.                                  Pennsylvania
                                                      
Columbia Marketing Services, Inc.                      Pennsylvania
                                                      
Eleanor Corporation                                    Pennsylvania
                                                      
Toronto Corporation                                    Pennsylvania
                                                      
Sam Perricone Citrus Company                           California
                                                      
1277649 Ontario Limited                                Ontario, Canada
                                                      
Ontario Tree Fruits Limited                            Ontario, Canada
                                                      
Sarfog, Inc.                                           New Jersey
                                                      
Fosar, Inc.                                            New Jersey
                                                      
Trio Importing (No. 2) Company, Ltd.                   Ontario, Canada
#### MORIN v. SHARP

No. 397P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 369

Petition by defendants (Sharp and Legion Insurance Company) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DANKA BUSINESS SYSTEMS PLC AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          74,028
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  560,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,819
<INVENTORY>                                    343,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,044,868
<PP&E>                                         728,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                 388,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,800,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          605,045
<BONDS>                                      1,006,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,758
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,800,312
<SALES>                                      1,265,988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,265,988
<CGS>                                          804,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  804,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               386,161
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,391
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,389
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,002
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Penn  Octane  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  Jerome B. Richter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ian
T.  Bothwell,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/  Jerome  B.  Richter
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Jerome B. Richter, Chief Executive Officer
                                      December 16, 2002


                                            /s/  Ian  T.  Bothwell
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Ian T. Bothwell, Chief Financial Officer
                                      December 16, 2002


                                       34
<PAGE>
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

DARRELL COMEAUX AND CARMEN 

COMEAUX, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON 

BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF AMIE 

COMEAUX 

VERSUS 

STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF 

LOUISIANA THROUGH THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

AND DEVELOPMENT 

CONSOLIDATED WITH 

IDA WATTIGNEY AND EVA 

FRANCOIS, AS DAUGHTER OF IDA 

WATTIGNEY 

VERSUS 

STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF 

LOUISIANA THROUGH THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

AND DEVELOPMENT 

fl . ; '0) 4 CW O O O 1 

MARCH 27, 2024 

- --------- -----

In Re: Louisiana Department of Tra:• 0 rortation and 

Development, applying for sup,::'nn, cry writs, 19th 

Judicial District Court, Parish ,-,t L', :;t Baton Rouge, 

No. 456518 c/w 456545. 

BEFORE: LANIER, HESTER, .AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT 

WIL 

CHH 

SMM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Josie Barlow,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04654-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9608 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 1