alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 3 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 5 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 6 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 7 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 8 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 9 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 10 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 11 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 12 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 13 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 14 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 15 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 16 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 17 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 18 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 19 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 20 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 21 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 22 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 23 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 24 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 25 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 26 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 27 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 28 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 29 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 30 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 31 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 32 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 33 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 34 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 35 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 36 of 37
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9874-3 Filed 01/26/18 Page 37 of 37
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY STEPHENS.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-33","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XFRgQa1C3Q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-33\/\">STS-33<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-33\/embed\/#?secret=XFRgQa1C3Q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-33” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XFRgQa1C3Q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S89-45737\/S89-45737~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Henry Altschuh,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03999-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9801 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 1
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 203

To open certain withdrawn land in Big Horn County, Wyoming, to locatable 

mineral development for bentonite mining. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2003

Mr. ENZI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To open certain withdrawn land in Big Horn County, Wyoming, to locatable mineral development for bentonite 

mining.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPENING OF CERTAIN WITHDRAWN LAND IN 

4 WYOMING TO LOCATABLE MINERAL DEVEL5 OPMENT FOR BENTONITE MINING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law and subject to subsection (c), the land de8 scribed in subsection (b) shall be open to locatable mineral 

9 development for bentonite mining. 
2

•S 203 IS 

1 (b) COVERED LAND.—The land referred to in sub2 section (a) is approximately 40 acres of previously with3 drawn land located in Big Horn County, Wyoming, at the 

4 sixth principal meridian, T. 56 N., R. 95 W., Sec. 32. 

E1⁄2E1⁄2SE1 5 ⁄4, adjacent to Pit No. 144L covered by State 

6 of Wyoming Mining Permit No. 321C. 

7 (c) CLOSURE.—The Secretary of the Army may close 

8 the land opened by subsection (a) at any time if the Sec9 retary determines that the closure of the land is required 

10 by reason of a national emergency or for the purpose of 

11 national defense or security.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lisa Robles,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00553-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Shaw Cowart, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 3/1/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: March 2, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

 Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 979 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2285 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2285

  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a parcel of real 
                    property to Beaver County, Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 6, 2004

Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Bennett) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a parcel of real 
                    property to Beaver County, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE TO BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall, without consideration and 
subject to valid existing rights, convey to Beaver County, Utah, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
approximately 200 acres depicted as ``Parcel A'' on the map entitled 
``Minersville Reservoir Conveyance'' and dated February 15, 2003, for 
use for public recreation.
    (b) Reconveyance by Beaver County.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) 
and (c), Beaver County may sell, for not less than fair market value, a 
portion of the property conveyed to it under this section, if the 
proceeds of such sale are used by Beaver County solely for maintenance 
of public recreation facilities located on the remainder of the 
property conveyed to it under this section.
    (c) Reversion.--
            (1) In general.--All property conveyed under subsection 
        (a), except any portion of the property that is sold by Beaver 
        County under subsection (c), shall revert to the United States 
        upon--
                    (A) use of the property by Beaver County for any 
                purpose other than public recreation or sale under 
                subsection (b); or
                    (B) use of any proceeds of a sale under subsection 
                (b) other than for maintenance in accordance with 
                subsection (b).
            (2) Repayment of proceeds.--Upon any reversion under this 
        subsection, Beaver County shall pay to the United States the 
        proceeds of any sale of property by Beaver County under 
        subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
#### Anthony CHAMBLEY, Plaintiff. N. C. Monroe Construction Co., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA STEEL INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. N. C. MONROE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA STEEL, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 79-3322

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 16, 1980.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1980.

*145Falligant, Kent & Toporek, Arthur Martin Kent, Savannah, Ga., for defendant and third party plaintiff-appellant.

Freeman & Hawkins, J. Bruce Welch, Rosemary Lawlor, Atlanta, Ga., for third party defendant-appellee.

Before GODBOLD, REAYLEY and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.

*

 Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir. R. 18.

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge.

The primary issue in this case is whether Georgia Steel, a subcontractor, must indemnify Monroe Construction, the general contractor, for money that Monroe paid in settlement to Chambley, an injured employee. Based upon the jury’s answers to special interrogatories, the district court entered judgment in favor of Georgia Steel. The only question raised in Monroe’s appeal is whether the district court erred in admitting testimony about telephone conversations between Monroe and Georgia Steel that occurred before they entered into their written contract.

Under the terms of the contract as interpreted in accordance with Georgia law, Georgia Steel has a duty to indemnify Monroe if Georgia Steel’s negligence contributed in any way to the accident that injured Chambley. *See Charter Builders, Inc. v. Sims Crane Service, Inc.,*150 Ga.App. 100, 256 S.E.2d 678 (1979); *Georgia Ports Authority v. Central of Georgia Ry.,*135 Ga.App. 859, 219 S.E.2d 467 (1975). The first step in determining whether Georgia Steel was negligent was to ascertain the scope of its duty. This could be done by looking to its contract with Monroe to see which party was required to provide personnel who knew how to assemble the crane which broke here. *See Benson Paint Co.*v. *Williams Construction Co.,*128 Ga.App. 47, 195 S.E.2d 671 (1973). The contract on its face is ambiguous on this point, referring both to Georgia Steel’s duty to supervise and to Monroe’s power to direct. As a result, it was proper to admit the testimony regarding the prior telephone conversations over Monroe’s objections. *See*Ga. Code Ann. §§ 20-704(1), 38-502.

In instructing the jury, the district judge pointed out that this was a negligence case, not a breach of contract case, and that the jury should consider the telephone conversations as part of the overall circumstances to be considered on the issue of negligence. This was somewhat cryptic and arguably compressed too much the analysis the jury was required to make, but Monroe did not object to these instructions, *146and they did not amount to plain error. Fed.R.Evid. 103(d).

The judgment is AFFIRMED.
S. 2640

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1050 North

Hills Boulevard in Reno, Nevada, as the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial Post

Office Building’’ and to authorize the installation of a plaque at such site, and

for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GUARDIANS OF FREEDOM MEMORIAL

POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Post Office

located at 1050 North Hills Boulevard in Reno, Nevada, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial

Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF PLAQUE.

(a) AGREEMENT.—The Postmaster General may enter into an

agreement with the Office of Veterans’ Services of the State of

Nevada under which the Office of Veterans’ Services of the State

of Nevada agrees—

(1) to install a plaque to be displayed at the Guardians

of Freedom Memorial Post Office Building referred to in section

1(a); and

(2) to maintain and update such plaque, as appropriate

and in accordance with subsections (b) and (c).

(b) INSCRIPTIONS.—

(1) DEDICATION.—The plaque installed pursuant to subsection (a) shall bear the following inscription: ‘‘This post office

building is dedicated in the memory of those men and women

of the State of Nevada who have lost their lives while serving

in the Armed Forces of the United States in the Global War

on Terrorism and in Operation Iraqi Freedom.’’.

(2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—The plaque installed pursuant to subsection (a) shall also include with respect to the

men and women of the Armed Forces referred to in paragraph

(1) inscriptions containing the names, ranks, branches of

service, hometowns, and dates of death of such men and women.
S. 2640—2

(c) EXPENDITURE OF COSTS.—The agreement referred to in subsection (a) shall provide that the Office of Veterans’ Services of

the State of Nevada shall have sole responsibility for the expenditure of all costs associated with the installation, maintenance, and

updating of the plaque.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 :
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Harris Preferred Capital Corporation as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    Harris Preferred Capital Corporations other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Harris Preferred Capital Corporation and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to Harris Preferred Capital Corporation, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of Harris Preferred Capital Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in Harris Preferred Capital Corporations
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Harris Preferred Capital
Corporations most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect Harris Preferred Capital Corporations internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    Harris Preferred Capital Corporations other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Harris
Preferred Capital Corporations auditors and the audit committee of Harris Preferred Capital
Corporations board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
Harris Preferred Capital Corporations ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Harris Preferred Capital Corporations internal controls over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Pamela C. PiarowskiPamela C. PiarowskiChief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 38

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 278

[Report No. 108–23] 

To make certain adjustments to the boundaries of the Mount Naomi 

Wilderness Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2003

Mr. BENNETT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MARCH 19, 2003

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL

To make certain adjustments to the boundaries of the Mount 

Naomi Wilderness Area, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mount Naomi Wilder5 ness Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 
2

S 278 RS

1 SEC. 2. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS. 

2 (a) LANDS REMOVED.—The boundary of the Mount 

3 Naomi Wilderness is adjusted to exclude the approxi4 mately 31 acres of land depicted on the Map as ‘‘Land 

5 Excluded’’. 

6 (b) LANDS ADDED.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

7 the boundary of the Mount Naomi Wilderness is adjusted 

8 to include the approximately 31 acres of land depicted on 

9 the Map as ‘‘Land Added’’. The Utah Wilderness Act of 

10 1984 (Public Law 98–428) shall apply to the land added 

11 to the Mount Naomi Wilderness pursuant to this sub12 section. 

13 SEC. 3. MAP. 

14 (a) DEFINITION.—For the purpose of this Act, the 

15 term ‘‘Map’’ shall mean the map entitled ‘‘Mt. Naomi Wil16 derness Boundary Adjustment’’ and dated May 23, 2002. 

17 (b) MAP ON FILE.—The Map shall be on file and 

18 available for inspection in the office of the Chief of the 

19 Forest Service, Department of Agriculture 

20 (c) CORRECTIONS.—The Secretary of Agriculture 

21 may make technical corrections to the Map. 

Calendar No. 38

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 278

[Report No. 108–23] 

A BILL

To make certain adjustments to the boundaries of 

the Mount Naomi Wilderness Area, and for other purposes. 

MARCH 19, 2003

Reported without amendment