alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James J. Duncan,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04680-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/20/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9443 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9443 Filed 12/22/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Annie Loomer *v.*Nathan Kliegman et al.

[Submitted and determined October 16th, 1913.]

The rule declared with respect to the issuing of writs of assistance in *Barton*v. *Beatty, 88 N. J. Eq. (1 Stew.) 1¡18,*and in *Board of Some Missions*y. *Davis, 10 N. J. Eq.*(4 *Robb.) 511,*followed in this suit.

On bill to foreclose. Hearing on petition for writ of assistance.

*Mr. Henry S. Alvord,*for the complainant.

*Mr. Austin H. Swaclchamer,*for the defendants.

Leaming, V. C.

I am convinced that this court is powerless to extend to petitioner the relief here sought.

The present controversy clearly falls within the principles defined in *Barton*v. *Beatty, 28 N. J. Eq. (1 Stew.) 412,*and *Board of Home Missions*v. *Davis, 70 N. J. Eq: (4 Robb.) 577.*

The evidence in behalf of the defendant named in the petition is clearly sufficient, standing alone, to make out a *prima facie*case of right of possession in him extending to the end of the present year by reason of the payment of rent by him to petitioner for that purpose subsequent to the sale; in consequence a well-defined and material issue is presented whether the person now in possession has a right to hold the land by reason of matter arising subsequent to the sale. That issue is surrounded by such doubt that its trial must be by another tribunal; its trial forms no part of the jurisdiction exercised by this court in awarding writs of possession.

*125The same principles obtain in an effort to give effect to or enforce the subsequent engagement to vacate on payment of an agreed amount.

I am obliged to deny the prayer oE the petitioner, but without costs.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2518 

To amend the Omnibus Low-Level Radioactive Waste Interstate Compact 

Consent Act to make the consent of Congress to certain compacts contingent on party states sharing the long-term liability for damages caused 

by radioactive releases from regional facilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2004 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Low-Level Radioactive Waste Interstate Compact Consent Act to make the consent of Congress to certain compacts contingent on party states 

sharing the long-term liability for damages caused by 

radioactive releases from regional facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY RADIO4 ACTIVE RELEASES FROM REGIONAL FACILI5 TIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 212 of the Omnibus Low7 Level Radioactive Waste Interstate Compact Consent Act 
2 

•S 2518 IS 

1 (42 U.S.C. 2021d note; Public Law 99–240) is amend2 ed— 

3 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 

4 the semicolon at the end; 

5 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

6 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

7 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(4) is granted only if the compact provides 

9 that all party states to the compact are jointly and 

10 severally liable for the cost of long-term liability in11 curred in connection with the radioactive release 

12 from a regional facility in a host state of the com13 pact (in excess of fund available from the extended 

14 care and long-term liability fund of the host State 

15 and from property and third-party liability insur16 ance), based on the proportionate share of the total 

17 volume of waste placed in the regional facilities by 

18 generators located in each party state, except that 

19 this paragraph shall not apply to a party state with 

20 a total volume of waste recorded on low-level radio21 active waste manifests for any year that is less than 

22 10 percent of the total volume recorded on those 

23 manifests for the region during the same year. ’’. 
3 

•S 2518 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) take effect on the date that is 3 years after 

3 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Andrew Wagner","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/acwagner\/","title":"Tech Today: Semiconductor Research Leads to Revolution in Dental Care\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"e6r79JFTZE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/tech-today-semiconductor-research-leads-to-revolution-in-dental-care\/\">Tech Today: Semiconductor Research Leads to Revolution in Dental Care\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/tech-today-semiconductor-research-leads-to-revolution-in-dental-care\/embed\/#?secret=e6r79JFTZE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Tech Today: Semiconductor Research Leads to Revolution in Dental Care\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"e6r79JFTZE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/gettyimages-158789220-edit.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":389}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John D. Gonzales,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04632-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9574 Filed 01/10/18 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Consolidated Graphics, Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-62317) on Form S-4, and registration statement (Nos. 333-87192,
333-13737, 333-18435 and 333-66019) on Form S-8 of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. of our reports dated May 30, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheet of Consolidated Graphics, Inc. as of March 31, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year
then ended, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the March 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Consolidated Graphics, Inc.

Our
report refers to a change in the accounting for goodwill and to our audit of the transitional disclosures added to revise the 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements, as more fully
described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial statements other
than with respect to such disclosures.

KPMG
LLP

Houston,
Texas
June 11, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES STRICKLAND.

June 27, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Theotrice P. Clements,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04500-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/4/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9757 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9757 Filed 01/19/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Mars,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04771-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9604 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,317
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,701
<INVENTORY>                                     21,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,737
<PP&E>                                          37,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,332
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,666
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,332
<SALES>                                         51,384
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,384
<CGS>                                           40,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (201)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,991)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,982)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.33)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brenda Roach,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03731-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8954 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Marcus Willis,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03759-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9154 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1