alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND>                      
                              CHILDROBICS, INC. and Subsidiaries
                              Financial Data Schedule
</LEGEND>
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         100,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (650,297)
<INVENTORY>                                    234,866
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,013,630
<PP&E>                                       4,301,105
<DEPRECIATION>                               (809,870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,616,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,554,977
<BONDS>                                         39,266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,550
<OTHER-SE>                                     968,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,022,400
<SALES>                                      7,179,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,179,958
<CGS>                                        6,470,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,470,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,773,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               653,292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,783,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,783,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (5,089,888)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,873,159)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($2.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($2.14)
        

</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF R.F.R.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 15


                           ACCOUNTANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT


We  acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form  S-3 (filed in October 2000 and March 2001) and Form S-8 (filed in November
1997)  of Penn Octane Corporation of our report dated June 2, 2003 which appears
on  page  3 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2003.


               /s/  BURTON  MCCUMBER  &  CORTEZ,  L.L.P.


Brownsville,  Texas
June  2,  2003


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            31,812
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       1,566
<MORTGAGE>                                       4,926
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   10,975
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  52,011
<CASH>                                           5,497
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,860
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,376
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 78,786
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                172
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,376
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,342
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                744
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   8
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,264
<BENEFITS>                                         818
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        469
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             1,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,829
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  53,006
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                818
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   2
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 8,655
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 45,167
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAKIE HAMMONDS

No. 65A01

(Filed 9 November 2001)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 141 N.C. App. 152, 541 S.E.2d 166 (2000), finding no error in a judgment imposing a sentence of life imprisonment entered by Hooks, J., on 10 March 1997 in Superior Court, Robeson County, upon a jury verdict finding defendant guilty of first-degree murder. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 October 2001.

*Roy A. Cooper, Attorney General, by Steven M. Arbogast, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.*

*Staples Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Janet Moore, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.*

*American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, Inc., by SethH. Jaffe, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit
4.1


 


DESCRIPTION
OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES


 


REGISTERED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE


 


SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


 


As
of April 2, 2021, Good Gaming, Inc. (the “Company”) has one class of its securities, common stock, registered under
Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).


 


The
Company’s authorized capital stock consists of:


 


	 	●	100,000,000
    shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share; and
	 	 	 
	 	●	2,250,350
    shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.


 


The
following description of our common stock is a summary and is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the
provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, copies of which are incorporated by reference as Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2,
respectively, to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.


 


Common
Stock


 


As
of April 2, 2021, there were 68,974,031 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Each holder of our common stock is entitled
to one (1) vote for each share held of record on all voting matters we present for a vote of stockholders, including the election
of directors. Holders of common stock have no cumulative voting rights or preemptive rights to purchase or subscribe for any stock
or other securities, and there are no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to our common stock.
All shares of our common stock are entitled to share equally in dividends from sources legally available when, and if, declared
by our Board of Directors. All outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable. As of April 2, 2021, our
common stock was quoted on the OTC Markets under the symbol “GMER.”
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONALD LEE HILL, a/k/a Popeye, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-5157

(D.C. No. 4:14-CR-00042-JHP-1)

(N.D. Okla.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before GORSUCH, MATHESON, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

The parties have filed a “Joint Motion to Remand for Resentencing” in which they 

ask this Court to remand this case “to allow the district court to address in the first 

instance the applicability of Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015).

Upon consideration, we grant the motion. This matter is remanded to the United 

States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma with instructions to consider 

whether the Supreme Court’s opinion in Johnson impacts the Defendant’s sentence, and 

if so, to vacate that sentence and resentence the Defendant accordingly.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 28, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-5157 Document: 01019466984 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 1 
2

The appeal is dismissed and the mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Chris Wolpert

 Chief Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 14-5157 Document: 01019466984 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 2
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Penn  Octane  Corporation (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q/A for the period ending October 31, 2003 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned,  Jerome B. Richter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ian
T.  Bothwell,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.
                                       /s/  Jerome  B.  Richter
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Jerome B. Richter, Chief Executive Officer
                             May 21, 2004


                                       /s/ Ian T. Bothwell
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Ian T. Bothwell, Chief Financial Officer
                             May 21, 2004


                                       42
<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Trico Marine Services, Inc. on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 333-07149 and 333-44221)
of our reports dated February 15, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of Trico Marine Services,
Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for the years ended
December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


                                                  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New Orleans, Louisiana
March 28, 2000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation

No. 2:15-MD-02641-DGC

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc.’s and Bard Peripheral Vascular, 

Inc.’s (collectively, “Bard”) Motion and Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 5

to Exclude Fact Evidence From Plaintiffs’ Expert, Dr. Thomas Kinney, Regarding His Work 

For Bard As An IVC Filter Consultant And Expert Witness, the Court hereby finds that the 

motion should be GRANTED. 

IT IS ORDERED that any evidence, testimony, or argument regarding that Plaintiffs’ 

expert witness, Dr. Thomas Kinney, was an expert witness for Bard in two prior IVC filter 

cases and a paid consultant to Bard pertaining to the design, testing, and use of its IVC filters, 

as described in Bard’s motion, shall be excluded from trial in this case.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9868-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Elizabeth Morgan,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04028-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Bighorn Law - Chandler, AZ

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/7/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8901 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Velma Moses,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04235-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9227 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
FRESH CHOICE, INC.                                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
(In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Twelve Weeks Ended          Thirty-six Weeks Ended
                                    -------------------------    --------------------------
                                    September 8,  September 3,   September 8,   September 3,
                                           1996          1995           1996           1995
                                    -----------   -----------    -----------    -----------
<S>                                 <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>     
Net income (loss)                       $   329       $  (228)       $  (442)       $(3,074)
                                        =======       =======        =======        =======
Weighted average
common shares outstanding                 5,646         5,509          5,619          5,493

Common share equivalents related
to stock options and warrants (1)            18          --             --             --
                                        -------       -------        -------        -------
Shares used in computation                5,664         5,509          5,619          5,493
                                        =======       =======        =======        =======

Net income (loss) per common and
common equivalent share                 $  0.06       $ (0.04)       $ (0.08)       $ (0.56)
                                        =======       =======        =======        =======
</TABLE>

(1)      Common share equivalents relating to stock options and warrants have
         been excluded from the computations for the twelve weeks ended
         September 3, 1995 and the thirty-six weeks ended September 8, 1996 and
         September 3, 1995 as they would be anti-dilutive and September 3, 1995
         as they would be anti-dilutive.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Urgo,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04470-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/5/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9311 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9311 Filed 12/13/17 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ELIJAH NICHOLSON.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


The Board of Directors
Fresh America Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 333-35019 and 333-3714) on Form S-8 of Fresh America Corp. of our report
dated February 23, 2001, except as to Note 5 which is as of September 5, 2001
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Fresh America Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 29, 2000 and December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 29, 2000, which report
appears in the December 29, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Fresh America
Corp.



                                                              KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
September 10, 2001