alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Blyth, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert B. Goergen, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  | /s/ Robert B. GoergenRobert B. Goergen
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
May 1, 2003
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of ConsolidatedGraphics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, G. Christopher Colville, Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial and Accounting Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

# (1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

#  

# (2)           Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

#  

Dated:    June10, 2005

 
|   |                                                                                                     |   | /s/ G. Christopher Colville |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   | G. Christopher Colville  Executive Vice President, Chief Financial  and Accounting Officer and Secretary |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Elanora Carr,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03707-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9058 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
#### John Casey *v.*Hiram Klette.

Ejectment — Notice to Tenant — Hostile Possession — Landlord and Tenant.

In an action of ejectment, where a tenant, repudiating his lease and claiming title to the land, changed the possession from a friendly to a hostile holding, it is not necessary for the owner to give notice to vacate the premises. *J*

APPEAL PROM KENTON OIR.CUIT COURT.

September 24, 1868.

This was a suit for ouster of appellant from certain lands -held by him under lease from Merritt ITodges. Klette was the original owner of the land, and his tenants allowed ITodges, some 10 or 12 years before, to come into possession of same, under an alleged lease from Klette, and three years before the institution of this action Hodges placed John Casey in possession as his tenant, who refused to vacate, claiming title to the lands. The evidence showed *553Hodges to bave been an intruder, having gone to the agent of Klette and asked to lease the premises, and was informed that he would have to see Klette in person. Several days later Hodges returned and informed the agent that he had seen Klette and it was all right, and thereupon took possession.

*Carlisle*& *O'Hara, for appellant.*

*Stevenson*& Myers, *for appellee.*

The instruction to the jury was “That if they believed from all the evidence that the defendant Casey entered on the land in controversy under Merritt Hodges, and that said Hodges entered on the land as tenant of the plaintiff Klette, they must find for the plaintiff.”

Krom a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

JüDGE PETERS:

It appears from the evidence that appellee had been possessed of the land claimed in this suit for many years; that Hodges ten or twelve years ago occupied the land claiming to have entered under appellee, and a short time before the bringing of this suit he put Casey on the land as his tenant, and renounced his allegiance to appellee.

The length of possession of appellee was sufficient of itself to enable him to maintain the action, and the repudiation of his right by Hodges, and his tenant, changed the possession from a friendly to a hostile holding, and they were not entitled to' *a notice*to quit theretofore.

The evidence authorized the verdict, and there is no available objection, or error in the instruction.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dacia Massengill","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/daciamassengill-2\/","title":"NASA’s Artemis III Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"NTj5gloXbd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/event\/artemis-iii-launch\/\">NASA’s Artemis III Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/event\/artemis-iii-launch\/embed\/#?secret=NTj5gloXbd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s Artemis III Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"NTj5gloXbd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/hls-eva-apr2020.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2608 

To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of clock radios. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 6, 2004 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the reliquidation of certain entries of clock 

radios. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ENTRIES OF SOUNDSPA CLOCK RA4 DIOS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 514 of 

6 the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other pro7 vision of law, upon proper request filed with the United 

8 States Customs Service within 180 days after the date of 

9 the enactment of this Act, the Customs Service shall liq10 uidate or reliquidate each entry described in subsection 

11 (c), containing merchandise which at the time of the origi-
2 

•S 2608 IS 

1 nal liquidation was classified under subheading 

2 8527.19.50, at the rate of duty that would have been ap3 plicable to such merchandise if such merchandise had been 

4 classified under subheading 8527.19.10 on the date of 

5 such entry. 

6 (b) REFUND OF AMOUNTS OWED.—Any amounts 

7 owed by the United States pursuant to a request for liq8 uidation or reliquidation of an entry under subsection (a) 

9 shall be paid with interest not later than 180 days after 

10 the date on which the request is made. 

11 (c) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

12 subsection (a) are as follows: 

Entry number 

110–1199345–7 

110–1199542–9 

110–1199558–5 

110–1201694–4 

110–3759754–8 

110–3759785–2 

101–4082299–9 

101–4088073–2 

101–4089053–3 

101–4120875–0 

101–4133671–8 

101–4138302–5 

101–4145092–3 

101–4148477–3 

101–4153108–6 

101–4159322–7 

101–4158601–5 

101–4163243–9 

101–4164448–3 

101–4168318–4 

101–4172197–6 

101–4172489–7 

101–4193123–7 

101–4264820–2 

101–4271724–7 

101–4277850–4 

101–4287672–0 

101–4301588–0 
3 

•S 2608 IS 

101–4306238–7 

101–4306235–3 

101–6011727–0 

101–6012796–4 

101–6015492–7 

101–6021099–2 

101–6026903–0 

101–6024120–3 

101–6028079–7 

101–6027052–5 

101–6036728–9 

101–6048069–4 

101–6079830–1 

101–6082949–4 

101–6115954–5 

101–6119379–1 

101–6127048–2 

101–6150035–9 

101–6148556–9 

101–6172630–1 

101–6172406–6 

101–6186497–9 

101–4208407–7 

101–6035939–3 

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gennifer R. Sapp,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04260-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9298 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH THOMAS.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Rebecca Hall, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04010-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/31/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8790 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8790 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





Heritage
Oaks Bancorp


Annual
Report on Form 10-K


For the
year ended December 31, 2009





Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that (i) the
Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Annual Report”), to
which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the
information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:  March
      31, 2010
              /s/ Lawrence P. WardLawrence
      P. Ward,President
      and Chief Executive Officer
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2373

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of certain 

rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial names. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2004 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. 

GRAHAM of Florida, Mr. ENSIGN, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. 

LAUTENBERG, Mr. GRAHAM of South Carolina, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. KYL, and Mr. GREGG) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States 

courts of certain rights relating to certain marks, trade 

names, or commercial names.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION. 

4 Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Re5 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 

6 section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105–277; 112 

7 Stat. 2681–88) is amended— 
2

•S 2373 IS 

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘by a des2 ignated national’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘by a des4 ignated national or its successor-in-interest’’; 

5 (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub6 section (e); 

7 (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall 

10 apply only if the person or entity asserting the rights knew 

11 or had reason to know at the time when the person or 

12 entity acquired the rights asserted that the mark, trade 

13 name, or commercial name was the same as or substan14 tially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name 

15 that was used in connection with a business or assets that 

16 were confiscated.’’; and 

17 (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 

18 striking ‘‘In this section:’’ and all that follows 

19 through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘In this sec20 tion, the term’’.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Michele Ostovar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/michele-e-ostovarnasa-gov\/","title":"Apollo 9","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"R8MargeejO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/apollo-9\/\">Apollo 9<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/apollo-9\/embed\/#?secret=R8MargeejO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Apollo 9” — NASA\" data-secret=\"R8MargeejO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSAY v. SAMUEL DE PAUL.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
ADMINISTRATOR A 

JAMES M BEGGS 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR AD 

HANS MARK 

I DI 

CHIEF 

ENGINEER 

DR. MILTON & SdLVElRA 

OR. HARRlETT G. JENKlNS STUART .I. EVANS JUNE GIBES BROWN JOHN F. MURPHY CHARLES T. NEWMAN 

OR. FRANK 8. MCDONALD 

COMPTROLLER 

JS. NElL HOSENBALL PATRKK A. TEMPLETON PHILIP E. CULBERTSON 

Y NATIONAL SPACE 

TECHNOLOGY 

LABORATORIES I 

I NASA’s current organizational chart, July 1983. 1
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, George Aronson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interpharm Holdings,
Inc. ("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) [omitted in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers' internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: February 14, 2006


------------------------------
George Aronson
Chief Financial Officer