alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-117","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JEUzx34AU0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-117\/\">STS-117<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-117\/embed\/#?secret=JEUzx34AU0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-117” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JEUzx34AU0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of
Interpharm Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 14, 2006

/s/ Cameron Reid
--------------------------------
Cameron Reid
Chief Executive Officer

/s/George Aronson
---------------------
George Aronson
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interpharm Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Interpharm
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John
Murray, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 15, 2003 |  | /s/ John Murray        
|                         |  |                        
|                         |  | President and          
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Net Lease Income &
Growth Fund XX Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-
QSB  for  the  period  ended June 30, 2006,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., the Managing General  Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., each certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 4, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              August 4, 2006
#### Galletly *v.*The Board of Justices of Owen County.

In an action on a title-bond conditioned to make a deed for real estate on payment of the purchase-money, the declaration averred a payment of the money and a failure to make the deed. Plea, that, before the commencement of the suit, the defendant had lenderei) the deed which was refused; that lie had always been ready, and was still ready, &c. *jHeld,*on demurrer, that the plea was good; it not appearing but that the payment was made on the day the deed was tendered.

ERROR to the *Ornen*Circuit Court.

*Tuesday, May*5.

*Kinney,*for the plaintiff.

*Whitcomb,*for the defendants.

Scott, J.

*Samuel Fain,*as county agent, gave his bond to make *Galletly*a deed for a lot in the town of Spencer, on the payment of the purchase-money; with a proviso, that no deed was to be made prior to the 17th of *October,*1822. At the *May*term, 1828, *Galletly*brought suit on the bond, and assigned as a breach that he had fully paid the price of the lot, yet the said agent, though often requested, had not made the deed, ése. The defendants pleaded a tender of a deed before the commencement of the suit, to wit, on the 16th of *May,*1827, and a refusal by the plaintiff to accept the same, and that since that time they have been always ready and are still ready, ése. Demurrer to the plea, and joinder, and judgment for the defendants. The record shows no failure on the part of the defendants. *No time is*mentioned in the declaration when the alleged payment was made. For aught that appears in the record, it might have been on the same day on which the deed was tendered. The demurrer was correctly overruled (1).

*Per*Curiam.—The

judgment is affirmed with costs.

(1)

 The plaintiff, in the case in the text, could not recover, unless he had demanded a deed before the commencement of the suit. Vide *Sheets*v. *Andrews, Nov.*term, 1829, post.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements indicated below and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,682,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  159,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,937,270
<PP&E>                                         139,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,301,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          279,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,440
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,015,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,301,928
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (810,348)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (810,348)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (810,348)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
GATEWAY

Humanity’s First

Lunar Space Station
NP-2023-07-004-JSC

www.NASA.gov/Gateway

@NASA_Gateway

https://www.facebook.com/NASAGateway

Gateway Space Station

Science

Crew destination

Access Lunar surface

Mars preparation

Permanent deep space 

presence

International partnerships

SCAMPI

You can use the acronym

to remember Gateway 

highlights in deep space:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Monaghan","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-b-monaghannasa-gov\/","title":"SCaN Sponsored Outreach Programs and Exhibits","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tNtA6OmiFw\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/scan-sponsored-outreach-programs-and-exhibits\/\">SCaN Sponsored Outreach Programs and Exhibits<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/scan-sponsored-outreach-programs-and-exhibits\/embed\/#?secret=tNtA6OmiFw\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“SCaN Sponsored Outreach Programs and Exhibits” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tNtA6OmiFw\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/irene_tzinis_canberra_deep_space_communications_complex_vistor_centers_2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
#### Usher *v.*Stewart.

*Thursday, December*12.

Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, &c. Plea of payment, alleging that the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant in a certain sum for money had and received, &c. Replication in denial of the plea. *Held,*that a promissory note given by the plaintiff to a third person, and indorsed to the defendant before the suit was commenced, might be read in evidence by the defendant under the plea,

ERROR to the *Vigo*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, J.

— Assumpsit by *Stewart*against *Usher*for board, washing, and lodging, and goods sold and delivered. *311Pleas, 1. Non assumpsit; 2. The statutory plea of payment, setting forth that the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant in the sum of 100 dollars, for so much money before then had and received by the plaintiff for the defendant’s use, &c. *Similiter*to the first plea, and replication in denial of the second. Yerdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

*W. D.*Griswold, for the plaintiff.

*R. W. Thompson*and *C. W.*Barbour, for the defendant.

On the trial, the defendant proved the execution of a promissory note, given by the plaintiff to *B. Booth*for the sum of 32 -dollars and 92 cents, due *January*5th, 1842, and the indorsement of it to himself before suit brought, and offered to read the note in evidence to the jury in support of his second plea; but the Court, on motion of the plaintiff, rejected the evidence. This is the only error complained of.

We have heretofore decided, that an action for money had and received may be maintained by the indorsee against the maker of a promissory note, and that in such action the note and indorsement are evidence to support the suit. *Indianapolis Ins. Co.*v. *Brown et al.*6 Blackf. 378. The same rule of evidence applies, where money had and received by the plaintiff to the use of the defendant is made the foundation of a defence. ' The statute, which authorizes this mode of pleading, requires the contract, on which the defendant relies, to be set out in his plea; hence, it is argued by the defendant in error, that the general mode of pleading adopted in this case is not embraced by the statute. But in this conclusion he is evidently mistaken. There is a difference between the contract, and the evidence by which it may be proved. A plaintiff in his declaration must set out the contract on which he relies with legal certainty, and he must prove it as stated. If the plaintiff in error had brought an action for money had and received against the maker of the note offered in evidence, and if he could have supported it by the note and the indorsement, it is difficult to perceive why the same evidence will not support the identical contract when set up as a matter of defence. The plaintiff need not be taken by surprise by this general mode of pleading, because he may, before replying, demand a bill of particulars.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Order entered May 10, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 01220

- CR

HUBERT WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Ca use No. F11

- 53043

- M



### O RDER

Appellant’s April 11, 2013 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is

GRANTED . The time to file appellant’s brief is EXTENDED to THIRTY DAYS from the

date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Zachary J. Pohto","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/zacharypohto-2\/","title":"Enterprise Services","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LJkXDGvC7u\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nssc\/enterprise-services\/\">Enterprise Services<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nssc\/enterprise-services\/embed\/#?secret=LJkXDGvC7u\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Enterprise Services” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LJkXDGvC7u\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/esd-image.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
**EXHIBIT 32**

Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of
*MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. (the "Registrant") that the Annual Report
of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant at
the end of such period and the results of operations of the Registrant for such
period.

|Date:   June 7, 2005 | By: | /s/ David W. HeeterDavid W. HeeterPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:   June 7, 2005 | By: | /s/ Timothy J. McArdleTimothy J. McArdleTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)*
|-------------------- | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### MICHAEL BELL v. GUERINO CARLOMAGNO.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Human Systems Engineering","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"svghcBmusH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/human-systems-engineering\/\">Human Systems Engineering<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/human-systems-engineering\/embed\/#?secret=svghcBmusH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Human Systems Engineering” — NASA\" data-secret=\"svghcBmusH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss040e006343.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":902}
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 22

- 00183

- CV

IN RE Susanne FLORES

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 1, 2022

, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019

- CI

- 11269 , styled In t he Matter of t he Marri age of Susanne Flores and

Jerold Ortega , pending in the 224th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable H. Paul Canales

presiding.