alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert R. Blaise,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03538-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9370 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9370 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135207 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135207 COA: 270062 Wayne CC: 05-012119-01 CARL WINFRED BROOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2008

Clerk
#### TRONG B. CHAI v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION ON CIVIL RIGHTS, DEPARTMENT OF LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY.

July 21, 1978.

Petition for certification denied. (See 160 *N. J. Super.*176) •
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                         TRO LEARNING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                         AND EQUIVALENT SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

                   (Unaudited, In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       THREE MONTHS                  SIX MONTHS
                                                                      ENDED APRIL 30,              ENDED APRIL 30,
                                                                  ---------------------         ----------------------

                                                                   1997           1996           1997            1996
                                                                  ------         ------         ------          ------

<S>                                                            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:

1.  Weighted average number of shares of common stock
        outstanding during the period......................        6,225          6,100          6,203          6,090

2.  Net additional shares assuming stock options exercised.          ---            ---            ---            ---
                                                               ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

3.  Weighted average number of shares and equivalent
      shares of common stock outstanding during the period         6,225          6,100          6,203          6,090
                                                               ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
                                                               ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

INCOME (LOSS):

4.  Net loss.............................................      $  (2,281)     $    (988)     $  (4,596)     $  (2,037)
                                                               ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
                                                               ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

PER SHARE AMOUNTS:

Net loss (line 4/line 3).................................      $   (0.37)     $   (0.16)     $   (0.74)     $   (0.33)
                                                               ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------
                                                               ---------      ---------      ---------      ---------

</TABLE>
                                               15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Francis Thomas,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04329-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/29/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9293 Filed 12/12/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9293 Filed 12/12/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          11,890
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         181,942
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          69,249
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        167,113
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 274,341
<DEPOSITS>                                     242,733
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,343
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,091
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 274,341
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,076
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,572
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,648
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,486
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,516
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,132
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      432
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,860
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,869
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.07
<LOANS-NON>                                        512
<LOANS-PAST>                                       512
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   573
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,668
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,999
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      572
<RECOVERIES>                                       186
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,018
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,018
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,064
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Carlyn Coffee, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03457-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8617 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8617 Filed 11/06/17 Page 2 of 2
C ite as 2 7 I&N Dec. 227 ( A.G. 201 8 ) Interim Decision # 3918

227 

### Matter of A

- B

- , Respondent

Decided by Attorney General March 7, 2018

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Attorney General

The Attorney General referred the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals to himself for review of issues relating to whether being a victim of private criminal activity constitutes a cognizable “particular social group” for purposes of an application for asylum and withholding of removal , ordering that the case be stayed during the pendency of his

review.



### BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.l(h)(l)(i) (2017) , I direct the Board of

I mmigration Appeals ( “ Board ” ) to refer this case to me for review of its

decision. The Board ’ s decision in this matt er is automatically stayed pend ing
my review. See Matter of Haddam , A.G. Order No. 2380

- 2001 (Jan. 19,

2001). To assist me in my review, I invite the parties to the se proceedings
and interested amici to submit briefs on points relevant to the disposition of
this case, including:

Whether, and under what circumstances, being a victim of private criminal activity
constitutes a cognizable “ particular social group ” for purposes of an application for
asylum or withholding of removal

.

The parties ’ briefs shall not exceed 15,000 words and shall be filed on or
before April 6, 2018. Interested amici may submit briefs not exceeding 9,000
words on or before April 13, 201 8. The parties may submit rep ly bri efs not
exceeding 6,000 words on or before April 20, 2018. All filings shall be
accompanied by proof of service and shall be submitted electronically to
AGCertification@usdoj.gov, and in triplicate to:

United States Department of Justice
Office of the Attorney Gen eral, Room 5114
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530

All briefs must be both submitted electronically and postmarked on or
before the pertinent deadlines. Requests for extensions are disfavored.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Net Lease Income &
Growth Fund XX Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-
QSB  for  the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., the Managing General  Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., each certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2007



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 9, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"30 Years Ago: STS-26 Returns Shuttle to Flight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xZm23VdLxY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/30-years-ago-sts-26-returns-shuttle-to-flight\/\">30 Years Ago: STS-26 Returns Shuttle to Flight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/30-years-ago-sts-26-returns-shuttle-to-flight\/embed\/#?secret=xZm23VdLxY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“30 Years Ago: STS-26 Returns Shuttle to Flight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xZm23VdLxY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/S87-40673\/S87-40673~large.jpg?w=600&h=1536&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1536}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2567 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2567

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the State of 
                              California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Redwood National Park Boundary 
Adjustment Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. REDWOOD NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    Section 2(a) of the Act of Public Law 90-545 (16 U.S.C. 79b(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``(a) The area'' and 
        all that follows through the period at the end and inserting 
        the following: ``(a)(1) The Redwood National Park consists of 
        the land generally depicted on the map entitled `Redwood 
        National Park, Revised Boundary', numbered 167/60502, and dated 
        February, 2003.'';
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) (as designated by 
        paragraph (1)) the following:
    ``(2) The map referred to in paragraph (1) shall be--
            ``(A) on file and available for public inspection in the 
        appropriate offices of the National Park Service; and
            ``(B) provided by the Secretary of the Interior to the 
        appropriate officers of Del Norte and Humboldt Counties, 
        California.''; and
            (3) in the second sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the 
                following:
    ``(3) The Secretary''; and
                    (B) by striking ``one hundred and six thousand 
                acres'' and inserting ``133,000 acres''.

            Passed the Senate October 10, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2567

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To adjust the boundary of Redwood National Park in the State of 
                              California.
```