alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Octavia Starke, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03987-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/31/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8784 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8784 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-133","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qSfsVHGG9E\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-133\/\">STS-133<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-133\/embed\/#?secret=qSfsVHGG9E\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-133” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qSfsVHGG9E\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Exhibit B

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 983-3 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 2
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation 

MDL NO. 15-02641-PHX-DGC

This Document Relates to: 

ROBERT G. HARBRIDGE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. BARD, INC., a New Jersey 

Corporation; AND BARD PERIPHERAL 

VASCULAR INC., an Arizona 

Corporation, 

 Defendants.

Case No. CV-16-00008-PHX-DGC 

[Proposed] ORDER ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE 

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MASTER 

SHORT FORM COMPLAINT 

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Amended Master Short 

Form Complaint and accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and for good 

cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED and 

that Plaintiff’s February 12, 2016 amended short form complaint is stricken from the docket. 

DATED this _____ day of _____________________, 2016. 

______________________________________ David G. Campbell 

United States District Judge 

EXHIBIT B

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 983-3 Filed 03/04/16 Page 2 of 2
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Big City Radio, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul R. Thomson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul R. Thomson
------------------------------------
Paul R. Thomson
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 9, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRIAN C. PRINCE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-3112

(D.C. No. 2:98-CR-2005-KHV-1)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3112 Document: 01018437210 Date Filed: 06/09/2010 Page: 1
##### 



(Face of Note)
 14.75% SENIOR SUBORDINATED PIK ELECTION NOTE DUE 2015
 
 
 
   S-A-1




---



##### 



TOUSA, INC.By:Name:Title:By:Name:Title: 
 
 By:Authorized Signatory
  S-A-2




---



##### 



(Back of Note)
 14.75% SENIOR SUBORDINATED PIK ELECTION NOTE DUE 2015
      S-A-3




---



##### 



Issuer
  S-A-4




---



##### 



provided however
  Indenture Subsidiary
Guarantors
   S-A-5




---



##### 



Year
    
    Redemption2012
    
    
    107.375
    %2013
    
    
    103.688
    %2014 and thereafter
    
    
    100.000
    %
 plus
  (i)
    
    100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, and(ii)
    
    the sum of the present values of (1) the redemption price of the Notes at July
1, 2012 (as set forth above) and (2) the remaining scheduled payments of interest
from the redemption date to July 1, 2012, but excluding accrued and unpaid interest
to the redemption date, discounted to the redemption date at the Treasury Rate plus
50 basis points,
 plus
  provided however
 S-A-6




---



##### 



S-A-7




---



##### 



S-A-8




---



##### 



S-A-9




---



##### 



ASSIGNMENT FORM
  
  
 
 
 
  and irrevocably appoint
  
 Your Signature:(Sign exactly as your name appears on the face of this Note)Signature Guarantee:
 S-A-10




---



##### 



OPTION OF HOLDER TO ELECT PURCHASE
  o o o
   Your Signature:(Sign exactly as your name appears on the of this Note)Soc. Sec. or Tax IdentificationNo.:
 
 STAMP SEMP MSP
 S-A-11




---



##### 



SCHEDULE OF EXCHANGES OF INTERESTS IN THE GLOBAL NOTE
  Amount of
    
    
    
    Principal Amount
    
    Signature ofdecrease in
    
    Amount of increase
    
    of this Global Note
    
    authorized signatoryPrincipal Amount
    
    in Principal Amount
    
    following such
    
    of Trustee orDate of Exchange
    
    of this Global Note
    
    of this Global Note
    
    decrease (or increase)
    
    Note Custodian
 S-A-12
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50114

Summary Calendar

 

ED SALAZAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAN MORALES, Attorney General

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-743

- - - - - - - - - -

October 2, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Appellant Ed Salazar appeals the dismissal of his

Section 1983 complaint against Defendant-Appellee, Dan Morales. 

Assuming that the facts of Salazar’s complaint could be construed

as supporting a supervisory liability theory, the dismissal was

nonetheless warranted as Salazar has pleaded no facts showing

constitutional injury. Accordingly, we affirm on this ground. 

See Bickford v. International Speedway Corp., 654 F.2d 1028, 1031
No. 96-50114

- 2 -

(5th Cir. 1981). 

The pleadings, letters, and other communications he relies

upon as constitutionally protected speech were produced in his

role as assistant attorney general; they do not constitute the

speech of a private citizen upon matters of public concern. See

Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 147 (1983). Salazar’s free

association claim fails since he alleged no current political

rivalry between Morales and former attorney general Mattox. See

Correa v. Fischer, 982 F.2d 935, 933 (5th Cir. 1993). Salazar

cannot claim he was denied a liberty interest as his complaint

does not allege defamation. Mere discharge, without specific

defamatory charges, will not implicate a liberty interest. 

Rosenstein v. Dallas, 876 F.2d 392, 396 n.3 (5th Cir. 1989),

reinstated in pertinent part, 901 F.2d 61 (5th Cir. 1990)(en

banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 855 (1990). Finally, Salazar

cannot assert a property interest as the personnel policies of

the attorney general’s office state that an assistant attorney

general serves at the pleasure of the Attorney General and that

the personnel policies do not create a property right. Absent

state law, contract, or personnel policies conveying an

expectation of continued employment, no such expectation is

conveyed by the Constitution itself. Board of Regents v. Roth,

408 U.S. 564, 578 (1972).

AFFIRMED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Sarah Douglas","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/sschlied\/","title":"NASA Selects Winners of the Wildfire Climate Tech Challenge","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6OW7DLcvKv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/prizes-challenges-crowdsourcing-program\/center-of-excellence-for-collaborative-innovation-coeci\/coeci-news\/nasa-selects-winners-of-the-wildfire-climate-tech-challenge\/\">NASA Selects Winners of the Wildfire Climate Tech Challenge<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/prizes-challenges-crowdsourcing-program\/center-of-excellence-for-collaborative-innovation-coeci\/coeci-news\/nasa-selects-winners-of-the-wildfire-climate-tech-challenge\/embed\/#?secret=6OW7DLcvKv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Selects Winners of the Wildfire Climate Tech Challenge” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6OW7DLcvKv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/wildfire.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         245,842
<SECURITIES>                                       415
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,794
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               471,768
<PP&E>                                         122,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 665,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           967
<OTHER-SE>                                     495,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   665,965
<SALES>                                        543,106
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               543,106
<CGS>                                          413,605
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  524,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (52,600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,663
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,221
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .45


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Alivia R. Carruth","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/arcarrut\/","title":"STS-51F","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"LcsSKQItCB\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-51f\/\">STS-51F<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-51f\/embed\/#?secret=LcsSKQItCB\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-51F” — NASA\" data-secret=\"LcsSKQItCB\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Donald E. Klumb, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Management Network Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisAnnual Report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.          Date: March 28, 2008      BY: /s/ DONALD E. KLUMB   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER     
-64-
## This page has permanently moved.

### If redirect does not occur in 5 seconds, click the following link: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=1531
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 10.14(J)


                    AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT


         This Amendment is entered into as of May 2, 2001 by and between
Resource Bancshares Mortgage Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("RBMG"), and
Douglas K. Freeman and amends that certain Change of Control Agreement dated as
of January 10, 2000, as it may have been previously amended (the "Change of
Control Agreement").

         1. Section 9 (g) of the Change of Control Agreement is hereby amended
by changing the date set forth therein to December 31, 2002.

         2. As amended hereby, the Change of Control Agreement shall be
unchanged and shall remain in full force and effect.

         In witness whereof, the parties have executed this Amendment to Change
of Control Agreement as of the date first above written.


                                    RESOURCE BANCSHARES MORTGAGE
                                      GROUP, INC.



                                    By       /s/ John Currie
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                             John Currie
                                             Secretary


                                             /s/ Douglas K. Freeman
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                             Douglas K. Freeman