alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2612 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2612

 To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain 
annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police 
  and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the 
    adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would 
 otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the 
 United States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed 
  Division to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 7, 2004

 Ms. Mikulski (for herself and Mr. Sarbanes) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act of 2000 to permit certain 
annuitants of the retirement programs of the United States Park Police 
  and United States Secret Service Uniformed Division to receive the 
    adjustments in pension benefits to which such annuitants would 
 otherwise be entitled as a result of the conversion of members of the 
 United States Park Police and United States Secret Service Uniformed 
  Division to a new salary schedule under the amendments made by such 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Law Enforcement Pension 
Adjustment Equity Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING ADJUSTMENTS IN PENSION BENEFITS FOR UNITED STATES 
              PARK POLICE AND UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE UNIFORMED 
              DIVISION ANNUITANTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 905 of the Law Enforcement Pay Equity Act 
of 2000 (sec. 5-561.02, D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking 
subsection (f).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Law Enforcement Pay 
Equity Act of 2000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,169
<SECURITIES>                                     7,356
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,278
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,393
<PP&E>                                          10,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                     382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,640
<BONDS>                                        156,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           145
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,738)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   138,740
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,259
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (61)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    53
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (550)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,656)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"LIFA: Lightweight Fiber-based Antenna for Small Sat-Compatible Radiometry","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"n7QEsN3e3I\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/lifa-lightweight-fiber-based-antenna-for-small-sat-compatible-radiometry\/\">LIFA: Lightweight Fiber-based Antenna for Small Sat-Compatible Radiometry<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/lifa-lightweight-fiber-based-antenna-for-small-sat-compatible-radiometry\/embed\/#?secret=n7QEsN3e3I\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“LIFA: Lightweight Fiber-based Antenna for Small Sat-Compatible Radiometry” — NASA\" data-secret=\"n7QEsN3e3I\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/2024-ph-i-zhang-graphic.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":425}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

Order 

November 7, 2014

147640-1

JAMES PERKINS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147640

COA: 310473

Grand Traverse CC: 

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE 2011-028699-NF

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY

COMPANY and STATE FARM

MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendants,

and

PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________/

JAMES PERKINS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147641

COA: 312674

Grand Traverse CC: 

AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE 2011-028699-NF

COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY

COMPANY, STATE FARM MUTUAL 

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 7, 2014

h1104

2

Clerk

and PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. Defendant Auto-Owners 

Insurance Company argued that because plaintiff, an out-of-state driver, was injured 

while operating a vehicle that was not insured by an insurer authorized to issue 

automobile liability insurance in Michigan, he was not entitled to personal protection 

insurance benefits under Michigan law. MCL 500.3113(c). Despite defendant’s 

argument ultimately having been rejected by the trial court, defendant bore the obligation 

to pay plaintiff’s attorney fees only if its argument was “unreasonable.” MCL 

500.3148(1). Thus, the dispute here does not pertain to whether defendant’s argument 

should have prevailed, but only to whether it was “unreasonable.” In my judgment, it 

was not in the slightest.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice of a decision to designate a class of employees from the General Atomics facility in La Jolla, California, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On September 25, 2014, the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

                            “All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked for General Atomics at its facility in                                   ( print page 62622)                                La Jolla, California, during the period from January 1, 1960, through December 31, 1969, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.”                        

                        This designation will become effective on October 25, 2014, unless Congress provides otherwise prior to the effective date. After this effective date, HHS will publish a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         reporting the addition of this class to the SEC or the result of any provision by Congress regarding the decision by HHS to add the class to the SEC.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, NIOSH, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2014-24827 Filed 10-17-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
#### CYNTHIA CIAMBRONE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 233 *N.J.Super.*101).
Grant of Extension of Time PAGE 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20 - 0520 IN THE MATTER OF: G.H ., Youth in Need of Care.

**ORDER GRANT**  **ING MOTION FOR F**  **IRST EXTENS**  **ION OF TIME** Upon consideration of Appellant’s moti on for extension of time, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant Mother is granted an extension of time until February 8, 2021 , to prepare, serve, and file her Opening Brief. No further extensions will be grant ed.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 23 2020

12/23/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0520
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-112","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xmXP7CIRL2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-112\/\">STS-112<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-112\/embed\/#?secret=xmXP7CIRL2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-112” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xmXP7CIRL2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
Note: 

* Center functional office directors report to Agency functional AA. Deputy and below 

report to Center leadership. 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

February 2013 

Human Exploration 

and Operations 

Mission Directorate 

Chief, Safety and 

Mission Assurance 

Kennedy Space 

Center 

Marshall Space 

Flight Center 

Langley Research 

Center 

Stennis Space 

Center 

Johnson Space 

Center 

Dryden Flight 

Research Center 

Goddard Space 

Flight Center 

Glenn Research 

Center 

Jet Propulsion 

Laboratory

Ames Research 

Mission Support Center 

Directorate 

Administrator 

Deputy Administrator 

Associate Administrator 

Chief of Staff 

Associate Deputy Administrator 

Associate Deputy Administrator for 

Strategy and Policy 

 Assistant Associate Administrator 

Chief Engineer 

Chief Health and 

Medical Officer 

Chief Financial Officer* 

Chief Information Officer* 

Chief Scientist 

Chief Technologist 

Diversity and Equal 

Opportunity 

Legislative and 

Intergovernmental 

Affairs* 

International and 

Interagency Relations 

Education Communications* 

Small Business 

Programs 

General Counsel 

Advisory Groups 

NAC and ASAP 

Inspector General 

Internal Controls and 

Management Systems 

Human Capital Management 

Strategic Infrastructure 

Headquarters Operations 

NASA Shared Services Center 

Procurement 

Protective Services 

NASA Management Office 

Aeronautics 

Research Mission 

Directorate 

www.nasa.gov 

Reporting Structure 

Administrator 

Deputy Administrator 

Associate Administrator 

Science Mission 

Directorate 

Space Technology 

Mission Directorate
#### Foureman et al., Appellees, *v.*Foureman et al., Appellants, et al., Appellees.

(No. 647

Decided December 14, 1946.)

*Mr. T. A. Billingsley*and *Mr, Floyd D. Smith,*for appellees Roy B. Foureman and Alma B. Foureman.

*Mr. Walter F. Rhynard,*for appellants.

*Mr. George W. Porter,*for appellee The Peoples Savings Bank of Greenville, Ohio.

*357By the Court.

The cause is submitted on motion to have this matter heard by a three-judge court. At the time this matter was submitted to the court it was stated in open court that Judge Miller had decided not to participate for valid reasons. Thereupon the presiding judge asked counsel whether they were willing to submit the matter to a two-judge court. All counsel, in open court, agreed to do so. We find nothing improper or illegal in that procedure. The agreement of counsel appears in the record. The constitutional provision (Section 6, Article IV) requiring a concurrence of all three judges in a reversal of the judgment of the trial court on the facts has no application here, as the judgment of the trial court was affirmed and not reversed. Furthermore, this appeal was one on questions of law and the questions raised were not factual. The weight of the evidence was not involved.

The application will be denied.

*Application*denied.

Hornbeok, P. J., and Wiseman, J., concur.

Miller, J., not participating.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 68325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28065]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA006


Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; 
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements; Public Workshops

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS, Alaska Region, will present a workshop on seaLandings, a 
consolidated electronic means of reporting landings and production of 
commercial groundfish to multiple management agencies for Federal and 
State fisheries off Alaska, and 2011 recordkeeping and reporting 
requirements for the Alaska groundfish fisheries and Individual Fishing 
Quota fisheries.

DATES: The workshop will be held on November 29, 2010, 9 a.m. to 4 
p.m., Pacific Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: The workshop will be held at the Swedish Cultural Center 
located at 1920 Dexter Ave., N. Seattle, WA, in the Svea Room located 
on the Main level.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Hall, 907-586-7462.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The workshop will include a discussion of 
2011 recordkeeping and reporting requirements for Alaska groundfish 
fisheries and Individual Fishing Quota fisheries, and instructions for 
completing and submitting required reports and logbooks using 
seaLandings.
    NMFS will provide a demonstration of the new version of seaLandings 
for at-sea catcher/processors and motherships, and training on how to 
submit daily production reports, and landing reports with and without 
Individual Fishing Quota.
    Beginning in 2011, new regulations implementing Amendment 91 to the 
Fishery Management Plan for groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian 
Islands Area require American Fisheries Act catcher/processors and any 
catcher/processor harvesting Community Development Quota pollock to use 
a NMFS approved electronic logbook in lieu of using the NMFS catcher/
processor trawl gear Daily Fishing Logbook. At this workshop, NMFS will 
provide a demonstration of the trawl catcher/processor electronic 
logbook in seaLandings.

Special Accommodations

    These workshops will be physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Susan Hall, 907-586-7462, at least 
5 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: November 2, 2010.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-28065 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ TINNUS ENTERPRISES, LLC, ZURU LTD., Plaintiffs

- Appellees

v.

TELEBRANDS CORPORATI ON, BED BATH &

BEYOND, INC., FRY'S ELECTRONICS, INC., KOHL'S DEPARTMENT ST ORES, INC., THE KROGER COMPANY, SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION, TOYS 'R' US

- DELAWARE, INC., WALGREENS BOOTS ALLI ANCE, INC., Defendants

- Appellants

______________________
2017

- 1175, 2017

- 1760, 2017

- 1811

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No s . 6:16

- cv

- 00033

- RWS

JDL, 6:16

- cv

- 00034

- RWS

- JDL, Judge Robert Schroeder
, III.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
T HOMAS M ANSFIELD D UNLAP , Dunlap Bennett & Lu dwig PLLC, Leesburg, VA, argued for plaintiffs

- appellees. Also represented by D AVID L UDWIG , E RIC L ORENZ O LAVSON , R OBERT D. S PENDLOVE ; J EFFREY A HDOOT , Was h-ington, DC; B RIAN M. K OIDE , Vienna, VA; C ORTLAND C HRISTOPHER P UTBRESE , Richmond, VA.

D AVID M ICHAEL U NDERHILL , Boies, Schiller & Flexner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants

- appellants. Also represented by S TACEY K. G RIGSBY , E RIC J. M AURER ; E LANA A RAJ , R OBERT T HOMAS M ALDONADO , Cooper & Dunham, LLP, New York, NY.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , R EYNA , and C HEN , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20068 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JERRY DEVERY PORTER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-206-2

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, CHIEF JUDGE, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, CIRCUIT JUDGES. PER CURIAM: * Jerry Porter contends that the district court erred in imposing a $5,000 fine in connection with his conviction and sentence for armed bank robbery. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Porter had the potential ability to pay the fine in the future and did not abuse its discretion in imposing the fine. United States v. Fair , 979 F.2d 1037, 1040-42 (5th Cir. 1992); United States v. Altamirano , 11 F.3d 52, 53 (5th Cir. 1993).No. 95-20388 -2- AFFIRMED.
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9332 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9332 Filed 12/14/17 Page 2 of 2