alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mary Lazenby,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04087-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Baron & Budd PC - Dallas, TX

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/7/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8962 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Victoria Overton,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00150-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9860 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 2, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00483

- CR

IN RE Darryl BUBAR

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On July 27, 201 7, Re lator filed a p etition for writ of mandamus. The court has

determined that it lacks jurisdiction to consider R elator’s petition. Accordingly, the petition for

writ of mandamus is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion wil l issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on August 2, 2017

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have her eunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of August, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 528310, styled State of Texas v. Darryl Bubar , pending in the County

Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Tommy Stolhandske presiding.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Kanina Sanders, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04019-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Osborne & Associates Law Firm, PA 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/2/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8732 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8732 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00178-CV

In re Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company, f/k/a Charter County Mutual Insurance

Company, named as Financial Indemnity Company

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The motion for temporary relief and the petition for writ of mandamus are denied.

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Henson

Filed: March 29, 2010
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

RAMZI YOUSEF, 

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 14-1255

(D.C. No. 1:12-CV-02585-RPM)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before PHILLIPS, BALDOCK, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

The court has received a request from appellant Ramzi Yousef asking that this 

appeal be dismissed. Upon consideration, we accept the motion for filing and grant the 

request. This matter is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 1, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-1255 Document: 01019424773 Date Filed: 05/01/2015 Page: 1
Order filed January 13, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00888-CV

____________

ROBERTO LUIS FRUTO GUEVARA, Appellant

V.

CONSUELA LEONA TSINNIJINNIE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 387th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-DCV-212348

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed November 3, 2014. The clerk’s 

record was filed December 16, 2014. To date, the filing fee of $195.00 has not 

been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See

Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $195.00 to the 

Clerk of this court on or before January 28, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 
appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  ATEL  Cash
Distribution Fund V, LP;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material  information  relating to the registrant is made known
     to us by others within the entity,  particularly during the period in which
     this report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal  quarter that has  materially  affected or is  reasonably  likely to
     materially   affect  the  registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
     over financial reporting.



Date:
May 11, 2004

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
------------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Principal Financial Officer of Registrant, Executive
Vice President of General Partner
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Flint Wild","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/flint-wildnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-118","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"9pVuqga8H2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-118\/\">STS-118<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-118\/embed\/#?secret=9pVuqga8H2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-118” — NASA\" data-secret=\"9pVuqga8H2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation, 

This Order relates to: 

CV17-0695 PHX DGC 

Alexandra M. Dixon v. C.R. Bard, et al., 

No. MDL 15-02641-PHX DGC 

EX PARTE ORDER 

The Court has received a stipulation for substitution of counsel filed by Plaintiff 

Alexandra M. Dixon’s attorneys, Stephen B. Murray, Jr. and Peyton P. Murphy. The 

motion does not comply with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.3(b) (formerly Local Rule 

1.7(b)). For this reason, the motion will be denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff=s 

counsel desires the Court to consider his request to withdraw, he shall file a motion that 

complies in all respects with Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.3(b). 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s attorney’s stipulation for substitution of counsel 

(Doc. 3) is denied without prejudice. If Plaintiff’s counsel chooses to refile the 

stipulation of substitution, counsel shall properly file the stipulation in the lead case 

(MDL 15-2641 PHX DGC) and shall not file it in the individual case (CV17-695 

PHX DGC). 

Dated this 14th day of November, 2017. 

cc: Stephen B. Murray 

 Peyton P. Murphy 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8849 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Gianine Figliozzi","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/gfiglioz\/","title":"NASA Ames\u2019 Contributions to OSIRIS-REx","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"CXoKQd1a7a\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-contributions-to-osiris-rex\/\">NASA Ames\u2019 Contributions to OSIRIS-REx<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-contributions-to-osiris-rex\/embed\/#?secret=CXoKQd1a7a\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Ames\u2019 Contributions to OSIRIS-REx” — NASA\" data-secret=\"CXoKQd1a7a\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/updatedtagpose.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":305}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements in the RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. Form 10-K for the
annual period ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          33,418
<SECURITIES>                                   262,216
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               381,258
<PP&E>                                          81,672
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 532,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,414
<BONDS>                                         70,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   532,144
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               653,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  666,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       660
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,027)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,027)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Biography

Angela Surgenor

Deputy Director, Transformative Aeronautics Concepts Program (TACP)

NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD)

Angela Surgenor is the deputy director for the Transformative Aeronautics Concepts 

Program (TACP) within the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) at 

NASA Headquarters in Washington, DC. Collaborating closely with the program 

director, Surgenor oversees the strategic planning, management, and assessment of 

ARMD’s initiatives aimed at fostering revolutionary concepts, tools, and technologies to 

drive the transformation of aviation.

Surgenor supports TACP’s role in soliciting and promoting innovative ideas, creating an 

environment conducive to research experimentation, exploring essential technologies, 

developing new computational and experimental tools, conducting ground and smallscale flight tests, embracing failures as learning opportunities, and catalyzing the 

transition of concepts into future capabilities.

Before assuming her current position, Surgenor served as associate director for TACP. 

In this capacity, she led efforts in technical integration, strategic planning, technology 

development, implementation, and evaluation. Additionally, she spearheaded the NASA 

Aeronautics annual imaginAviation networking and outreach event.

Prior to joining TACP, Surgenor spent four years as the technical integration manager of 

program performance within the Advanced Air Vehicles Program within ARMD. In this 

role, she was responsible for strategic planning, technical integration, and organizational 

alignment to achieve research project objectives in line with ARMD’s long-term 

strategic plans.

Earlier in her career, Surgenor served as a research engineer for nine years in the 

propulsion branch of NASA’s Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, focusing on lowemissions combustor technology development. She managed project milestones, budget 

planning, technical capabilities assessment, risk analysis, scheduling, and performance 

tracking. Before leading combustion research at NASA Glenn, she worked as a 

mechanical technician for seven years, gaining hands-on experience in combustion and 

turbomachinery test facilities.

Surgenor holds a Master of Engineering Management degree from Ohio University, 

a Bachelor of Applied Science in Mechanical Engineering from Cleveland State 

University, and an Associate of Applied Science in Mechanical Engineering Technology 

from Cuyahoga Community College.

Image Credit: NASA/ Sara Lowthian-Hanna