alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Larry D. Gertsch,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04432-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9715 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2659 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2659

To extend the temporary increase in payments under the medicare program 
          for home health services furnished in a rural area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2004

  Ms. Collins (for herself, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Bond, Mr. Feingold, Mr. 
Thomas, Mr. Conrad, and Mr. Burns) introduced the following bill; which 
        was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary increase in payments under the medicare program 
          for home health services furnished in a rural area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Rural Home Health Services 
Improvement Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY MEDICARE PAYMENT INCREASE FOR 
              HOME HEALTH SERVICES FURNISHED IN A RURAL AREA.

    Section 421 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 
Modernization Act of 2003 (42 U.S.C. 1395fff note) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``one-year'' and 
        inserting ``temporary''; and
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``2005'' and inserting 
        ``2007''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Henry J. Whittaker,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03551-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9076 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 10.15**TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.Compensation for Chief Administrative Officer, Vice President and General Counsel         ***Executive*** ***Title*** ***Base Salary*** ***Date in Effect***Rishi A. Varma ChiefAdministrativeOfficer, VicePresident andGeneral Counsel $250,000  March 21, 2007(1)           Vice President andGeneral Counsel $215,000  July 6, 2006(2)           General Counsel $190,000  May 2, 2005 (1) Salary increased as a result of promotion to Chief Administrative Officer as well asexisting General Counsel position (2) Salary increased as a result of promotion to Vice President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6262

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

HERMAN MANDELL BROWN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00015-H-2; 4:14-cv-00006-H)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 29, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Mandell Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Herman Mandell Brown seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order granting Brown’s counsel’s motion to withdraw from 

representation in Brown’s pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

proceeding. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 

545-46 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a 

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD L. CHISOLM.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
AMENDMENT TO THE FRONTIER AIRLINES 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN March 30, 2006 1. Plan Sponsor: Frontier
Airlines, Inc.,
a Colorado Corporation. 2.
Amendment of Plan: The
following Amendment to the Frontier Airlines 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is
hereby adopted, effective as provided in Paragraph 3: A.
Section 2(j)
is amended by replacing the existing Section 2(j) with the following new
Section 2(j):(j)
Share
  means a share of the common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Frontier
  Airlines Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or the number and kind of
  shares of stock or other securities which will be substituted or adjusted or
  such shares as provided in Section 11. 3.
Effective Date: The Effective
Date of this Amendment will be the date that Frontier Airlines Holdings, Inc.
common stock is first publicly traded. 4.
Terms and Conditions of Plan: Except for the above Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Plan are
unamended and remain in full force and effect. 5.
Execution: The Plan Sponsor
has executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above. FRONTIER
  AIRLINES, INC.Plan
  SponsorBy:Paul H. Tate
  Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2426 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2426

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
treatment of payment under the medicare program for clinical laboratory 
             tests furnished by critical access hospitals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2004

  Mr. Nelson of Nebraska (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
treatment of payment under the medicare program for clinical laboratory 
             tests furnished by critical access hospitals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Access to Clinical Lab 
Services Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PAYMENT FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY TESTS 
              FURNISHED BY CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(g)(4) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395m(g)(4)) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``No beneficiary cost-
        sharing for'' and inserting ``Treatment of''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``For 
        purposes of the preceding sentence and section 1861(mm)(3), 
        clinical diagnostic laboratory services furnished by a critical 
        access hospital shall be treated as being furnished as part of 
        outpatient critical access services without regard to whether--
                    ``(A) the individual with respect to whom such 
                services are furnished is physically present in the 
                critical access hospital at the time the specimen is 
                collected;
                    ``(B) such individual is registered as an 
                outpatient on the records of, and receives such 
                services directly from, the critical access hospital; 
                or
                    ``(C) payment is (or, but for this subsection, 
                would be) available for such services under the fee 
                schedule established under section 1833(h).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
NAC Aeronautics Committee Public Agenda (FINAL) 

November 29-30, 2023 

Glenn Research Center (GRC) 

Wednesday, November 29 (Sessions are public except as noted) 

1:00 to 1:10 PM Welcome and Announcements 

1:10 - 1:40 PM Glenn Research Center (GRC) Aeronautics 

Overview 

1:40 to 3:00 PM 2022 Committee Findings and Recommendations 

Response 

3:10 to 4:10 PM Verification & Validation (V&V) Complex Systems 

Support 

4:10 - 5:10 PM ARMD’s DEIA Plan, Efforts and Priorities 

5:10 to 5:30 PM Committee Deliberations 

5:30 PM Adjourn 

Thursday, November 30 (Sessions are public except as noted) 

9:00 AM to 9:10 AM Welcome and Announcements 

9:10 AM to 10:10 AM Sky4All 

10:10 AM to 11:10 AM Advanced Capabilities for Emergency Response 

Operations (ACERO) 

11:10 to 11:15 AM Public Comment Period 

11:15 to 11:45 AM Committee Deliberations 

11:45 AM to 12:00 PM Work Plan and Schedule Review 

12:00 PM Adjourn 

29-Nov-23 30-Nov-23 

JOIN VIRTUALLY 

Click here to join the meeting Click here to join the meeting 

Meeting ID: 220 552 520 822 290 574 399 741 

Passcode: H7SbsS nCvKCc 

JOIN BY PHONE 

US Toll: 1-216-230-8315 1-216-230-8315 

Phone Conference ID: 324 375 040# 426 245 902#
```

June 26, 2003

Frontier Airlines, Inc.
Denver, Colorado

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have audited the balance sheets of Frontier  Airlines,  Inc. (the Company) as of
March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year period ended March 31, 2003,
and have  reported  thereon  under date of May 22, 2003.  The  aforementioned  financial
statements  and our audit report  thereon are included in the Company's  annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003. As stated in note 1 to those financial statements,
the Company changed its method of accounting for the cost of major overhaul maintenance
activities from the accrual method of accounting to the direct-expense  method and states
that the newly adopted accounting  principle is preferable in the circumstances. Under the
new accounting method, maintenance costs are recognized as expense as maintenance services
are performed and as flight hours are flown for nonrefundable maintenance payments required
by lease  agreements.  Also, as stated in note 1, the Company believes the newly adopted
accounting  principle is preferable in the circumstances  because the maintenance  expense
is not recorded until there is an obligating  event (when the maintenance  event is actually
being performed or flight hours are actually flown),  the direct expense method eliminates
significant  estimates and judgments  inherent under the accrual method,  and it is the
predominant  method used in the airline industry.  In accordance with your request, we have
reviewed and discussed with Company officials the circumstances, business judgment, and
planning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based.

With regard to the aforementioned  accounting change,  authoritative criteria have not been
established for evaluating the  preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over
another  acceptable  method.  However,  for purposes of the Company's  compliance  with the
requirements  of the Securities and Exchange  Commission,  we are furnishing this letter.

Based on our review and discussion,  with reliance on management's  business judgment and
planning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the
Company's circumstances.

Very truly yours,

**KPMG LLP**
```
Exhibit 99.1

Trico Marine Services, Inc.

Form 10-K

Annual Report

Annual Period Ended December 31, 2002Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

            I, Victor M. Perez, Chief Financial Officer of Trico Marine Services, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:1. **       **the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. **      **the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by such Report. 
Date:  March 28, 2003  

 By:  

 /s/ Victor M. Perez
  Victor M. Perez  Vice President and CFO
#### RARITAN BRUNSWICK, ETC. v. HAROLD M. BRUSKIN, ETC., ET AL.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Ignite Solicitation 

 

PHASE II OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODCs) — SUPPLIES

Other Direct Costs (ODCs) - Supplies (if applicable) 

 

• Provide the requested information below for your Supplies ODC. 

• Complete this form for each Supplies ODC proposed for your R/R&D effort. If you need to include additional 

 Supplies ODCs, please start another version of this form and append the document title with the form number.

Year

Description Vendor

Quantity Total Cost

Exclusive for this contract?

Yes No

Competitively Sourced?

Yes No

Consumable?

Yes No

Does this ODC require the purchase of items from a foreign vendor?

Yes No

If yes, include the "Request to Use a Foreign Vendor/Purchase of Items from a Foreign Vendor" form 

as a PDF or Word document along with your submission files. The form can be found in Chapter 8 of 

the Ignite solicitation at https://sbir.nasa.gov/solicit/80089/detail?data=ch8.

Do you have additional supporting documents for this ODC?

Yes No

If yes, include the supporting documents along with your submission files. 

If no, provide supporting comments for this ODC.
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



I, Raju Vegesna, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
20-F of Sify Technologies Limited for the year ended March 31, 2017, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sify Technologies Limited.



|Date: June 15, 2017 |  |                                         
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                    |  |                                         
|                    |  | /s/ Raju Vegesna                        
|                    |  | Name: Raju Vegesna                      
|                    |  | Title: CEO, Chairman & Managing Director



The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,644,434
<SECURITIES>                                   921,091
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,934,799
<PP&E>                                         659,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                 392,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,467,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          824,872
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        319
<COMMON>                                       281,053
<OTHER-SE>                                   (976,058)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,467,426
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               291,784
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,584,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,159,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,159,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,159,041)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                              59
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17753
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1177
<INVENTORY>                                        612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19251
<PP&E>                                            1318
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   28465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16960
<BONDS>                                           3050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             2866
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                        4981
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     28465
<SALES>                                          27830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 27830
<CGS>                                             3956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 22831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1033
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (377)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (377)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-60623

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Demond Fleming, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:21-CR-99-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Haynes, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Demond Fleming challenges the substantive reasonableness of the 

160-month, above-guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea for 

possession of a firearm after a felony conviction and distribution of 

_____________________

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 1, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-60623 Document: 00516840951 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2023
No. 22-60623

2

methamphetamine. Our review is for an abuse of discretion. See HolguinHernandez v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 762, 766-67 (2020).

Although Fleming asserts that the sentence he received is much 

higher than the guidelines range that he expected would apply based on his 

plea agreement, he points to no authority suggesting that this would be a basis 

for deeming a sentence substantively unreasonable. We also disagree with 

his assertion that the district court gave too much weight to his criminal 

history. Considering Fleming’s lengthy criminal record, which included 

convictions that did not count toward his criminal history score, the court did 

not abuse its discretion in finding that his criminal history weighed in favor 

of an above-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 

708-09 (5th Cir. 2006). Additionally, despite Fleming’s dissatisfaction with 

the extent of the upward variance or departure, it is well within the range of 

those this court has affirmed. See, e.g., United States v. Key, 599 F.3d 469, 

475-76 (5th Cir. 2010); United States v. Zuniga-Peralta, 442 F.3d 345, 346-48 

(5th Cir. 2006).

We note as well that Fleming asks us to provide more guidance on 

what constitutes substantive reasonableness in sentencing, an invitation we 

decline. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-60623 Document: 00516840951 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/01/2023