alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 68354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-1882-000]


Golden Valley Wind Park, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

October 28, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Golden Valley Wind Park, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4a2a1b6a7ab8a888d8a81b79194948b9690a482819687ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e282b3c2d21000207000b3d1b1e1e011c1a2e080b1c0d40090118">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27952 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 206TH DISTRICT COURT of HIDALGO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 4th day of

December, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Jose Fernando Cervantes, Appellant,

v.

The State of Texas Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-14-00134-CR (Tr.Ct.No. CR-1286-12-D)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court orders

the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 24th day of February, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Darrel Martemus, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04050-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8643 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

HERITAGE OAKS BANCORP

 

Annual Report on Form 10KSB

for the Year ended December 31,2003

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to18 USC Section 1350, that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10KSB for the yearended December 31, 2003, as filed by the Company with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Annual Report”), to which this Certification is anExhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 17, 2004 | /s/ Lawrence  P. Ward                  |   |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Lawrence P.  Ward,                     |
|                        | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM
     CARRAMERICA  REALTY  CORPORATION AND  SUBSIDIARIES  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED
     BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND FROM CARRAMERICA  REALTY CORPORATION
     AND  SUBSIDIARIES  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
     THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000893577
<NAME>                        CarrAmerica Realty Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         56,226
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  43,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         2,554,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                 194,424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,044,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        1,309,878
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    96
<COMMON>                                       600
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,559,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,044,627
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,967
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                53,056
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            53,056
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   44,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.59
<FN>
<F1>
Notes & accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful
accounts as the allowance is immaterial.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERNIE ARAFAT.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1956

ADAM K. PEARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROBINHOOD MARKETS, INC.; VLADIMIR TENEV; BAIJU BHATT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:22-cv-00533-JAG)

Submitted: January 13, 2023 Decided: February 2, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adam K. Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1956 Doc: 29 Filed: 02/02/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Adam K. Pearson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint 

without prejudice and for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See 

Pearson v. Robinhood Mkts., Inc., No. 3:22-cv-00533-JAG (E.D. Va. Aug. 8, 2022; 

Aug. 9, 2022). We also deny Pearson’s “Untitled Motion for Appropriate Relief.” We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1956 Doc: 29 Filed: 02/02/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
IMAX CORPORATION
 EXHIBIT 24
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
  rd
 Signature
    
    Title/s/ Bradley J. Wechsler
    
    Chairman of the Board & DirectorBradley J. Wechsler/s/ Richard L. Gelfond
    
    Chief Executive OfficerRichard L. Gelfond
    
    (Principal
Executive Officer)/s/ Neil S. Braun
    
    DirectorNeil S. Braun/s/ Kenneth G. Copland
    
    DirectorKenneth G. Copland/s/ Eric A. Demirian
    
    DirectorEric A. Demirian/s/ Garth M. Girvan
    
    DirectorGarth M. Girvan/s/ David W. Leebron
    
    DirectorDavid W. Leebron/s/ Marc A. Utay
    
    DirectorMarc A. Utay/s/ Joseph Sparacio
    
    Chief Financial OfficerJoseph Sparacio
    
    (Principal
Financial Officer)/s/ Jeffrey Vance
    
    ControllerJeffrey Vance
    
    (Principal
Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Rebecca Sebold,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04579-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9502 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc. (the "Company") for the period
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Ron Hadani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Yoav M.
Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



Dated: August 14, 2008

/s/RON HADANIRon Hadani Chief Executive OfficerDated: August 14, 2008

/s/YOAV M. COHENYoav M. Cohen Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 04-2635

AMERICAN EMPLOYERS' INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

SWISS REINSURANCE AMERICA CORPORATION,

Defendant, Appellee.

The opinion of this court issued on June 27, 2005, is amended

as follows:

On the cover sheet, replace "[Hon. William G. Young, U.S.

District Judge]" with "[Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District

Judge]".
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Joanna Darwactor, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03548-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8719 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8719 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned
officers of Rent-Way, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2004, (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                         |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Dated:      August 5, 2004                     /s/William E. Morgenstern |  | 
|William E. Morgenstern,                                                  | 
|Chief Executive Officer                                                  | 
|                                                                        
|Dated:     August 5, 2004                     /s/William A. McDonnell    |  | 
|William A. McDonnell,                                                    | 
|Chief Financial Officer                                                  | 

This certification is being furnished
solely to accompany this Form-10Q pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company unless such
incorporation is expressly referenced herein.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                     Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and Engineering (CISE) (1115).                

*Date/Time:*                     November 13, 2014: 12:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., November 14, 2014: 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Carmen Whitson, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1105,                           ( print page 62473)                        Arlington, Virginia 22230; Telephone 703/292-8900.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, programs and activities on the CISE community. To provide advice to the Assistant Director for CISE on issues related to long-range planning, and to form ad hoc subcommittees and working groups to carry out needed studies and tasks.                

*Agenda:*

Overview and update of CISE budget and activities

Working group breakout session: Growing number of students enrolled in computer science and engineering courses

Presentation and discussion of the CISE Committee of Visitors report

Panel discussion on data science activities

Discussion with NSF Director, Dr. France Córdova

Closing remarks and wrap-up.

Dated: October 10, 2014.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting, Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-24691 Filed 10-16-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 6739** 

JASON NATHANIEL GILMER ,
Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
DR. SMITH, Head Physician of KMCC ,
Defendant

– Appellant,

and

MR. A. WHITED, R.N.C.B. of KMCC; L. FLEMING, Warden of KMCC ,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Norman K. Moon , Senior District Judge. ( 7:14

- cv

- 00111

- NKM

- RSB )

Submitted : August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN , KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mary Foil Russell, HALE, LYLE & RUSSELL, PC , Bristol, Tennessee, for Appellant. Jason Nathaniel Gilmer, Appell ee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Dr. Happy Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration in Jason Gilmer’s 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action . This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ),
and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.

Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The order Smith seeks
to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

DISMISSED