alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION 

No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO 

STRIKE AND RE-FILE CERTAIN 

EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL

The plaintiffs have filed an Unopposed Motion to Strike and Re-File Exhibits 

in Support of Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Re Relevancy and Discoverability of FDA 

Inspection and Warning Letter and Recovery Cone Removal System. Doc. 878. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The motion to strike and re-file (Doc. 878) is granted. 

2. Plaintiffs’ Exhibits in Support of Memorandum Re Relevancy and 

Discoverability of FDA Inspection and Warning Letter and Recovery Cone 

Removal System (Docs. 697-1 and 697-2) are stricken. Plaintiffs may re-file these 

documents as corrected. 

3. Plaintiffs may replace Exhibit 18. 

4. Exhibits 6 and 10 to that Memorandum, constitute “Confidential 

Information” under the stipulated protective order, and trade secrets or other 

confidential research, development of commercial information pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), and therefore warrant protection from public 

disclosure for a discovery related motion. 

/ / / 

/ / / 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 928 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 2
 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

5. Plaintiff may re-file Exhibits 6 and 10 under seal without further order 

of the Court. The Clerk is directed to accept filing under seal Exhibits 6 and 10. 

 Dated this 3rd day of March, 2016. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 928 Filed 03/03/16 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

RICHARD STANFORTH, JR.; HELEN 

LUCERO, for themselves and all others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

ARIZONA; FARMERS GROUP, INC.; 

MID-CENTURY INSURANCE 

COMPANY; FARMERS INSURANCE 

EXCHANGE; TRUCK INSURANCE 

EXCHANGE; BRISTOL WEST 

INSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY ADVANTAGE INSURANCE 

COMPANY; 21ST CENTURY 

ASSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY CASUALTY COMPANY; 

21ST CENTURY CENTENNIAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY OF 

THE SOUTHWEST; 21ST CENTURY 

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; 

21ST CENTURY NORTH AMERICA 

INSURANCE COMPANY; 21ST 

CENTURY PREMIER INSURANCE 

COMPANY; FOREMOST INSURANCE 

COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, 

MICHIGAN; FOREMOST PROPERTY & 

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; 

FOREMOST SIGNATURE INSURANCE 

COMPANY; MARYLAND CASUALTY 

COMPANY; WILLIAM B. TOBIN; 

DAVID ARAGON; JOHN AND JANE 

DOES, 1 through 250, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-2131

(D.C. No. 1:09-CV-01146-RB-RHS)

(D. N.M.)

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

November 16, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-2131 Document: 01019523828 Date Filed: 11/16/2015 Page: 1 
2

-----------------------------

GARON FULGENZI, 

 Objector - Appellant

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

GARON FULGENZI, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL SMITH, individually and as 

defendant class representative for a 

defendant class of insurance agents 

licensed to sell automobile liability 

insurance in New Mexico for, and on 

behalf of, Farmers Group, Inc., d/b/a 

Farmers Insurance Company of Arizona; 

FARMERS GROUP, INC., d/b/a Farmers 

Insurance Company of Arizona, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 14-2221

(D.C. No. 1:12-CV-01261-RB-SCY)

(D. N.M.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before HOLMES, McHUGH, and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted. See 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9) and Fed. R. 

App. P. Rule 42(b).

Appellate Case: 14-2131 Document: 01019523828 Date Filed: 11/16/2015 Page: 2 
3

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 14-2131 Document: 01019523828 Date Filed: 11/16/2015 Page: 3
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                                  SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                          CAPSTONE CAPITAL CORPORATION



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Name of Subsidiary                                            State of Organization
         ------------------                                            ---------------------

         <S>                                                           <C>
         Capstone Capital of Alabama, Inc.                                      Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Baytown, Inc.                                      Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Bonita Bay, Inc.                                   Alabama
         Capstone Capital of California, Inc.                                   Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Cape Coral, Inc.                                   Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Kentucky, Inc.                                     Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Las Vegas, Inc.                                    Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Massachusetts, Inc.                                Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Pennsylvania, Inc.                                 Pennsylvania
         Capstone Capital of Sarasota, Inc.                                     Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Texas, Inc.                                        Alabama
         Capstone Capital of Virginia, Inc.                                     Alabama
         Capstone Capital Properties, Inc.                                      Alabama
         Capstone Capital Senior Housing, Inc.                                  Alabama
         Capstone of Baytown, Ltd.                                              Alabama
         Capstone of Bonita Bay, Ltd.                                           Alabama
         Capstone of Los Angeles, Ltd.                                          Alabama
         Capstone of Cape Coral, Ltd.                                           Alabama
         Capstone of Las Vegas, Ltd.                                            Alabama
         Capstone of Sarasota, Ltd.                                             Alabama
         Capstone Capital of San Antonio, Ltd.                                  Alabama
         Capstone of Virginia Limited Partnership                               Alabama
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Michael A. Wilson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03501-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8768 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8768 Filed 11/09/17 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ETHEL WATERS.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ROYAL LIQUOR DISTRIBUTORS AND IMPORTERS v. BROWN-FORMAN DISTILLERS CORP.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 13.2
       In connection with for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Doron Abramovitch, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
    /s/ Doron Abramovitch

Doron Abramovitch

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,690
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                22,230 
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     70,902
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        170,363 
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 297,696
<DEPOSITS>                                     266,291
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,030
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,091
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 297,696
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,735
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,018
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   316
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,069
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,901
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,126
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      130
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  49
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    868
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         868
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.62
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    184
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,944
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      158
<RECOVERIES>                                        42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,958
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,958
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            999
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL J. DOUGHERTY.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RAFAEL M. RIVERA.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 232 *N.J.Super.*165)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Cristina R. Leguia, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03477-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8641 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED February
28, 1999.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Aug-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Feb-28-1999
<CASH>                                            3062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3062
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3272
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       8000
<COMMON>                                         10935
<OTHER-SE>                                      (17009)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3272
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4120
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (4120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (4120)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.002)

        

</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

 November 14, 2023

Reply to Attention of: General Law PracticeGroup

TO: 

FROM:

Distribution

Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the 

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Reception on November 

15, 2023

The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), a not-for-profit 

organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service Code, will hold a 

reception on November 15, 2023, at the Kennedy Caucus Room, 325 Russell Senate 

Office Bldg., in Washington, DC, from 5:30 p.m. – 7:00 p.m. AIAA is in control of the 

planning, organizing, and issuing invitations for this event. The event will provide an 

opportunity for informal discussion on general space topics as well as networking 

amongst the aviation arenas.

Approximately 550 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a 

diversity of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, 

representatives of the legislative branch, and representatives from academia and industry. 

The estimated cost of the event, including all food, beverages and items listed above, is 

approximately $15 per person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to 

exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the 

requirements of a "widely attended gathering" as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas 

and views pertaining to NASA's policies, programs and operations. NASA employees -

including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics 

pledge under Executive Order 13989 - who do not have a significant role in a matter

affecting the interests of AIAA may accept an invitation for free attendance for 

themselves and a guest to the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency' s 

interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may appear 

to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the sponsor, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate 
 2

determination from their local NASA ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the 

invitation.

Adam F. Greenstone
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,048,425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,321,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,269,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,855,787
<PP&E>                                       4,613,566
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,680,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,860,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,209,606
<BONDS>                                      2,258,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,097,368
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    46,307,927
<OTHER-SE>                                (47,614,964)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,860,405
<SALES>                                      8,219,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,219,586
<CGS>                                        9,836,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,836,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,248,779
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,769,853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,769,853)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,769,853)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.87)


</TABLE>