alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Net Lease Income &
Growth Fund XX Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-
Q  for  the  period  ended  March 31, 2008,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., the Managing General  Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., each certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 9, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              May 9, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,433,977
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,456,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (105,800)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,500,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,934,611
<PP&E>                                           1,209,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (750,237)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,838,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,422,950
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        353,057
<COMMON>                                           346,380
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,715,691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,838,078
<SALES>                                        114,490,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,490,400
<CGS>                                          105,864,629
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,651,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (170,057)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  20,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,144,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,509,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,635,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,635,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.28
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2548 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2548

                   For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2004

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Shigeru Yamada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SHIGERU YAMADA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Shigeru Yamada shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Shigeru Yamada enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Shigeru 
Yamada shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Shigeru Yamada, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Shigeru Yamada under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 
made available to natives of the country of birth of Shigeru Yamada 
under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Peter Parkman et al. *v.*M. W. Redd et al.

Street Improvement — Assessment of Property Covered by Railroad Track Ordinance.

The owners of property along a street, upon which runs a railroad track, cannot be required to pay for paving or otherwise improving so much of it as is covered by the railroad track, it being the duty of the owners of the track to keep it in order, consequently a general ordinance and the contract under it .for paving, curbing, macadamizing and gravelling that street, without excepting the track, is illegal and not enforeible.

*275Same.

But an amendatory ordinance requiring the improvement of so much of the street as is not touched by the railway track, is legal and binding against the property adjacent thereto.

Same.

An objection that in the commissioners ^report, or the petition that the “graveling” is not specified connot avail, as it is a part of the maeadmizing which the petition alleges was eompleteed according to contract.

Evidence — Prima Facie.

The report, estimates and apportionments of street paving by the commissioners under the charter of the city is prima facie evidence of the liability of the property owners for the amount of the contribution assessed,against them.

APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHAN. DIV..

Opinion of tub Court by

Judge Robertson :

As the owners of property on Grove street could not be required to pay for paving or otherwise improving so much of it as is covered by the railway track which it is the duty of the owners of the track to keep in order, consequently the general ordinance and the contract under it for paving, curbing, macadamizing and gravelling that street, without exceqiting the track, was illegal and not enforcible.

But on the 4th of April, 1866, before the work was done, so much of that ordinance as constructively embraced the whole street was repealed by an amendatory ordinance which restricted the required improvement so much' of the street as was not touched by the railway. And the work was done, reported and accepted according to the amendment; and the cost was estimated by the number of feet of the ground actually improved. And this wras all legalized by the amended ordinance and did no wrong or harm to any person, and entitled the contractor to the assessments as made against the apellants..

The report, and estimates and apportionments being, according to the charter, *prima facie*evidence and being untradicted, no other fact was necessary to the liability of the appellants for the amount of contribution assessed against them respectively.

The objection that no gravelling is specified in the report or the petition is unavailing. The required gravelling was only *276a part of tbe macadamizing which is alleged and reported to have been completed according to the contract. And there is also abundant proof by witnesses that the gravelling was done, and well done.

*Stirman, for appellant.*

*B. J.*Elliott, *for appellee.*

In this state of case we see no substantial objection to the judgment against the appellants for the amount assessed. against them.

Wherefore, as to each of them, the judgment is affirmed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CRAIG PRISTELL.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24579]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 10, 2014.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. BB&T Corporation, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; to merge with 
The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly 
acquire The Bank of Kentucky, Incorporated, both in Crestview Hills, 
Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 10, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-24579 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
AO 458 (Rev. 06/09) Appearance of Counsel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Case No.

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

.

Date:

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9455 Filed 12/27/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katy Mersmann","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/katymersmann-2\/","title":"New Studies Increase Confidence in NASA’s Measure of Earth’s Temperature","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lXmZrXJ8a8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/new-studies-increase-confidence-in-nasas-measure-of-earths-temperature\/\">New Studies Increase Confidence in NASA’s Measure of Earth’s Temperature<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/new-studies-increase-confidence-in-nasas-measure-of-earths-temperature\/embed\/#?secret=lXmZrXJ8a8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Studies Increase Confidence in NASA’s Measure of Earth’s Temperature” — NASA\" data-secret=\"lXmZrXJ8a8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/GISS_20190523_temperature.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":391}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the financial statements in the RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. Form 10-K for the
annual period ending December 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         44,400
<SECURITIES>                                  201,926
<RECEIVABLES>                                  78,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              380,647
<PP&E>                                        105,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                 49,917
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                523,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         307,609
<BONDS>                                        43,313
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          187
<OTHER-SE>                                    157,356
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  523,213
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              816,912
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 797,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                28,393
<INCOME-TAX>                                   11,177
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            17,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   17,216
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.92



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-34466 and 333-56550), Form S-4 (Nos.333-97627) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-44221, 333-24095, and 333-07149) of Trico Marine Services, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated March 11, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appearin this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

New Orleans, Louisiana 

March 12, 2004
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant,

v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee,

v. TELES AG INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIEN, Cross Appellant.

__________________________ 2012-1513, -1514 (Reexamination No. 95/001,001)

__________________________Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

--------------------------------------------------------------- ------------
IN RE TELES AG INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIEN AND SIGRAM SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH Case: 12-1513 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2012CISCO SYSTEMS , INC

. v. KAPPOS 2

__________________________ 2012-1297 (Reexamination No. 90/010,017)

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Cisco Systems, Inc. moves without opposition to treat appeal no. 2012-1513, -1514 and appeal no. 2012-1297 as companion cases. Upon consideration thereof, I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. The above-captioned cases will be treated as companion cases and will be assigned to the same merits panel.

F OR T HE C OURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s25 Case: 12-1513 Document: 34 Page: 2 Filed: 12/10/2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Schultz,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04186-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9110 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
Envelope Details

https://reviewer.efiletexas.gov/EnvelopeDetails.aspx?envelopeguid=f159e04b-b77f-45e5-b2f8-66a49bb471f8[6/10/2015 11:05:01 AM]

Print this page

Case # PD-0542-15

Case Information

Location Court Of Criminal Appeals

Date Filed 06/08/2015 07:41:18 PM

Case Number PD-0542-15

Case Description

Assigned to Judge

Attorney Jason Horton

Firm Name Jason Horton Law Firm

Filed By Teresa Collins

Filer Type Not Applicable

Fees

Convenience Fee $0.00

Total Court Case Fees $0.00

Total Court Filing Fees $0.00

Total Court Service Fees $0.00

Total Filing & Service Fees $0.00

Total Service Tax Fees $0.00

Total Provider Service Fees $0.00

Total Provider Tax Fees $0.00

Grand Total $0.00

Payment

Account Name Jason Horton Law Firm

Transaction Amount $0.00

Transaction Response

Transaction ID 9176572

Order # 005592652-0

Petition for Discretionary Review

Filing Type EFileAndServe

Filing Code Petition for Discretionary Review

Filing Description Leavelle Franklin's Petition for Discretionary Review

Reference Number Franklin, Leavelle

Comments

Status Rejected

Fees

Court Fee $0.00

Service Fee $0.00

Rejection Information

Rejection

Reason Time Rejection Comment

Other

06/10/2015

09:52:31

The petition for discretionary review does not contain a certification in compliance

with T.R.A.P. 9.4(i)(3); it contains 5199 words exceeding the limit of 4500. You have
Envelope Details

https://reviewer.efiletexas.gov/EnvelopeDetails.aspx?envelopeguid=f159e04b-b77f-45e5-b2f8-66a49bb471f8[6/10/2015 11:05:01 AM]

AM ten days to file a corrected petition.

Documents

Lead Document Franklin - PDR 06-08-15.pdf [Original]

eService Details

Name/Email Firm Service Type Status Served Date/Time Opened

Jason Horton

jason@jasonhortonlaw.com EServe Sent Yes 06/08/201507:49:15 PM

Jerry Rochelle

jrochelle@txkusa.org EServe Sent Yes Not Opened

Lauren Sutton

lauren.sutton@txkusa.org EServe Sent Yes 06/09/201504:46:38 PM

State Prosecuting Attorney

information@spa.texas.gov EServe Sent Yes 06/09/201508:58:17 AM
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Blyth, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ROBERT H. BARGHAUSRobert H. Barghaus
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2008

This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

---



QuickLinks