alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Racquel Charlemagne,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00057-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Paglialunga & Harris, PS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/9/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9741 Filed 01/19/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9741 Filed 01/19/18 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS MASTERS.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Shaw Cowart, L.L.P.

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 499-8900

Ethan L. Shaw (TX Bar No. 18140480)

Matthew J. Riley (TX Bar No. 24070500)

Justin W. Fishback (TX Bar No. 24056736)

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

elshaw@shawcowart.com 

mriley@shawcowart.com

jfishback@shawcowart.com 

(512) 499-8900 telephone

(512) 320-8906 facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jai Jackson 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Jai Jackson,

 Plaintiff,

v.

C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

 Defendants.

No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

Civil Action No.: 2-16-CV-00552-DGC

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff, Jai Jackson hereby demands a trial by jury as to all issues so triable.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 1

st day of March, 2016.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 917 Filed 03/01/16 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

SHAW COWART, LLP

By: /s/ Ethan L. Shaw 

 Ethan L. Shaw (TX Bar No. 18140480)

Matthew J. Riley (TX Bar No. 24070500)

Justin W. Fishback (TX Bar No. 24056736)

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

1609 Shoal Creek Blvd., Ste. 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 499-8900 telephone

(512) 320-8906 facsimile

elshaw@shawcowart.com 

mriley@shawcowart.com

jfishback@shawcowart.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jai Jackson

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this 1

st day of March, 2016, I electronically transmitted the 

foregoing Demand for Jury Trial to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys who are registered with the Court’s 

electronic filing system.

/s/ Ethan L. Shaw

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 917 Filed 03/01/16 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"About Advanced Air Vehicles Program (AAVP)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BqeXz1PUVA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/about-advanced-air-vehicles-program-aavp\/\">About Advanced Air Vehicles Program (AAVP)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/about-advanced-air-vehicles-program-aavp\/embed\/#?secret=BqeXz1PUVA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“About Advanced Air Vehicles Program (AAVP)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BqeXz1PUVA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/aavp-high-res-16x9-Sep-24-2021.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
##### 



Exhibit 31.01 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER RULE 13a-14(a) ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael A. Morache, President and Chief Executive Officer of PLATO Learning, Inc., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning, Inc.2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report.4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors: (a) all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 14, 2005
    
    /s/ MICHAEL A. MORACHEMichael A. MorachePresident and Chief Executive
Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBBIE DEXTER MORGAN.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BUCA, Inc.





/s/    Joseph P. MicatrottoJoseph P. MicatrottoChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/    Greg A. GadelGreg A. GadelExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Bunnie Benita Finley,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04051-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Ashley, PC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/6/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8889 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

June 22, 2016 Session

STEVEN KEMPSON ET AL. V. PAMELA CASEY ET AL.

Appeal from the Circuit County Hamilton Court

No. 12C873, 12C1138 W. Neil Thomas, III, Judge

________________________________

No. E2015-02184-COA-R3-CV

FILED-NOVEMBER 2, 2016

_________________________________

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., dissenting.

I cannot concur in the majority’s decision. The issue of whether the collision of 

the vehicles “caused damage to the Plaintiffs” was fairly presented to the jury. The jury 

rejected the Plaintiffs’ theory that Mr. Kempson was injured in the accident. I would 

affirm the jury’s verdict in toto. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s 

decision to remand for a new trial on damages. 

_______________________________

 CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
#### Richard J. POISSANT, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Jo Anne BARNHART, Commissioner of The Social Security Administration, Defendant, Appellee.

No. 02-2674.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Aug. 28, 2003.

Michael James Kelley on brief for appellant.

Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, Lisa De Soto, General Counsel, Robert J. Triba, Chief Counsel, María A. Machín, Assistant Regional Counsel, and Rayford A. Farquhar, Assistant U.S. Attorney, on brief for appellee.

Before LYNCH, Circuit Judge, CAMPBELL and STAHL, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Richard J. Poissant has appealed a district court judgment affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Health and Human Services (“Commissioner”) which denied the claimant’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments. The claimant’s only argument on appeal is that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) failed to sufficiently support his finding that the claimant’s subjective complaints of pain were “not entirely credible.” One of the reasons the ALJ partially discounted the claimant’s testimony was because of “discrepancies between the claimant’s assertions and information contained in the documentary reports.” While a more detailed explanation of the discrepancies would have been preferable, *see Frustaglia v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs.,*829 F.2d 192, 195 (1st Cir.1987), we have examined the record and find substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s finding of discrepancies between the claimant’s testimony and the objective medical evidence. These discrepancies are significant and major. They amply support the ALJ’s conclusion that the claimant was not entirely credible in respect to his subjective complaints of pain.

The judgment of the district court is *affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Travis B. Sims,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04397-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/23/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9953 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9953 Filed 02/05/18 Page 2 of 2
### The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-3101

___________ Lonnie D. Snelling, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Montgomery County; John Whyte, * Appeal from the United States individually; John Doe, Deputy * District Court for the Sheriff, individually and * Eastern District of Missouri. officially; David Dowling, * individually; Marvin Cobb, * [UNPUBLISHED] individually; Glenn Cobb, * individually; Thomas A. * Westhoff, individually, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 3, 1996 Filed: May 10, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Lo nnieD. Snelling appeals the judgment of the District Court 1 dismissing his civil rights action. Having carefully reviewed the entire reco rdand the parties' submissions, we conclude the judgment of th e District Court was correct. Accordingly, we aff irm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The parties' motions for sanctions are denied.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Julia L. Bradshaw","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/julia-l-bradshawnasa-gov\/","title":"Langley Media Resources","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"HTzoTIjvQr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/langley-media-resources\/\">Langley Media Resources<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/langley-media-resources\/embed\/#?secret=HTzoTIjvQr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Langley Media Resources” — NASA\" data-secret=\"HTzoTIjvQr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/728108main-neo-full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":448}