alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles T. Bawcom,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04631-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 5, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9580 Filed 01/11/18 Page 1 of 1
#### Fanny Ray et al *v.*Daniel Ray's Administrator et al.

Decedant’s Estate — Memorandum Book — Evidence.

A memorandum book kept by the intestate as- to advancements is competent evidence.

Parol Gift.

The memorandum, “I intend him to have the tract he lives on, which is to be surveyed and valued,” establishes a parol gift of the land.

APPEAL EROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

December 16, 1867.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

If it was technically erroneous to adjudge a division of the estate of the intestate among his heirs without Zachary Ray’s children being parties, they being minors and beneficiaries in the deed he made to the trustee for the use and benefit of his wife and children, to all his interest in and to his father’s estate, although both Zachary and the trustee were parties, yet as these minor children and their mother were parties before the report of the commissioner dividing the estate was confirmed, and they took various exceptions to its confirmation and were heard before their exceptions were adjudicated, and as the adjudication was correct-with the single exception of allowing two hundred dollars rent against Zachary Ray for the year 1864, we see no reason to disturb said judgment further than to correct this single item. The memorandum book kept by the intestate as to the advancements made to his children was both competent and credible evidence, and the court properly charged Zach Ray with the items so charged against him, the memorandum made in said book by intestate that “I intend him to have the tract of land he lives on, supposed to contain 100 acres, which is to be surveyed and valued, together with the continued occupancy of said land down to his father’s death establish a parol gift of the land, the survey and *132valuation contemplated were merely to ascertain the quantity and what amount he should be charged therefor by way of advancements.

*Bradley j for appellants.*

*Dunlap &*Anderson, *for appellees.*

As the'heirs might either confirm or repudiate this gift, he should not be charged with rents until some unequivocal notification that the gift would not be ratified, which, in this instance, was by the bringing of the suit January 9, 1865. As this two hundred dollars overcharge against Zach Kay and which affects his wife and children can be adjusted out of the personal assets, it will be unnecessary to disturb the division of the land. Judgment reversed.
II 

Calendar No. 776

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2668

For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2004

Mr. GRAHAM of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Reported by Mr. Hatch without amendment 

A BILL

For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Griselda Lopez Negrete shall be held and 

7 considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United 

8 States for permanent residence as of the date of enact9 ment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees. 
2

•S 2668 RS 

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Gri3 selda Lopez Negrete, as provided in section 1, the Sec4 retary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce 

5 by the appropriate number during the current fiscal year 

6 the total number of immigrant visas available to natives 

7 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

8 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

9 1153(a)). 

Calendar No. 776

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2668

A BILL

For the relief of Griselda Lopez Negrete. 

OCTOBER 7, 2004

Reported without amendment
|   | (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:      March  25, 2010 | By:      /s/ Louis Fox            |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Louis      Fox                                                                           |
|                                   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                             |
#### Hershey, Appellee, *v.*Jacobs, Appellant.

(No. 1095

Decided March 19, 1947.)

*Mr. Alton H. Etling*and *Mr. Raymond O. Morgan,*for appellant.

*Mr. Willis Horn*and *Mr. Karl E. Hoover, contra.*

Doyle, P. J.

The following motion is before this court *for*ruling:

“Now comes D. G. Jacobs, appellant, and moves the court for an order to stay execution of the final judgment in this proceeding, to reverse which an appeal has been filed:”

' It appears that this court affirmed a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Wayne county, which ordered the restitution of certain lands and buildings to the petitioner and awarded the sum of $1,000 as rent for the premises. The judgment of affirmance in this court also “ordered that a special mandate be sent to the Court of Common Pleas of Wayne county to carry this judgment into execution,” in accordance with the provisions of Section 12223-40, General Code.

The above motion and a supersedeas bond, regular on its face, is now presented to this court, with the request that, upon the filing of the said bond in this court, *350the “execution of final judgment * * * be stayed until determination of this case by the Supreme Court of Ohio.” It is claimed by the movant’s adversary that this court is without authority to order a stay of execution upon the filing of a supersedeas bond under the statutes extant; that only the trial court or the Supreme Court has such right.

We do not think i't necessary to set forth the historical background of' the law regulating the stay of execution of judgments. Suffice it to say that the statute now regulating such procedure is in this language (Section 12223-9, General Code):

“No appeal shall operate as a stay of execution except as hereinafter provided, unless and until a super- • sedeas bond be executed on the part of the appellant to the adverse party with sufficient surety in such sum, not loss than the amount of the judgment and interest, *as is directed by the court making the order which is sought to be superseded*or by the court to which the appeal is taken, conditioned as hereinafter provided in Section 12223-14.” (Italics ours.)

Section 12223-14, General Code, speaks of the conditions of such bond only.

The order “which is sought to be superseded’ ’ by the present notice of appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio is the judgment of this Court of Appeals, which affirmed the judgment rendered in the Court of Common Pleas. It therefore follows that the statute authorizes the filing of the bond in this court, and that this court is empowered to issue such stay.

It appearing that a sufficient bond is presented and filed, the motion will be sustained.

*Motion sustained.*

Hunsicker, J., concurs.

Stevens, J., not participating.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"55 Years Ago: Three Months Until Apollo 1","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SljeEbb1im\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-three-months-until-apollo-1\/\">55 Years Ago: Three Months Until Apollo 1<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/55-years-ago-three-months-until-apollo-1\/embed\/#?secret=SljeEbb1im\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“55 Years Ago: Three Months Until Apollo 1” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SljeEbb1im\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/apollo_1_l-3_months_1_as1-0027-s66-41851-command_module_construction_at_downey_apr_18_1966.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":478}
Exhibit 31.2

                 CERTIFICATION OF ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Larry B. Lombard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Enova Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  controls over financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and financial weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial data; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date:  March 30, 2004

   /s/   Larry B. Lombard
------------------------------
Larry B. Lombard,
Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. FRANK MOSLEY.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Donald Kent “Deke” Slayton","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aNnOalgNfc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/donald-kent-deke-slayton\/\">Donald Kent “Deke” Slayton<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/donald-kent-deke-slayton\/embed\/#?secret=aNnOalgNfc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Donald Kent “Deke” Slayton” — NASA\" data-secret=\"aNnOalgNfc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. PORFIRIO VELEZ.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1
 FIRST INDUSTRIAL REALTY TRUST, INC.
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 State/Provinceof IncorporationName
    
    Formation
    
    Registered Names in Foreign JurisdictionsFirst Industrial, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    First Industrial (Alabama), Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial (Michigan), Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial (Minnesota), Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial (Tennessee), L.P.First Industrial Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial Financing Partnership, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    First Industrial Financing Partnership, Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial Financing Partnership, (Alabama), Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial Financing Partnership, (Minnesota), Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial Financing Partnership, (Wisconsin), Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial Pennsylvania, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFirst Industrial Harrisburg, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFirst Industrial Securities, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    First Industrial Securities, Limited PartnershipFirst Industrial Mortgage Partnership, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    First Industrial MP, L.P.First Industrial Indianapolis, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFI Development Services, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    FIDS (Arizona) L.P.FI Development Services, Limited PartnershipFI Development Services of Delaware, L.P.First Industrial Investment II, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFirst Industrial Texas, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Investment Properties, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR JH 10, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Massachusetts 7, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR E2 Property Holding, LP
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR JH 12, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Ontario Acquisition, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR ABC, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR York Property Holding, LP
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Dallas Houston, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Kenosha, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR 200 Cascade, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AHuntington Vaughan Acquisition Trust II
    
    Ontario
    
    N/AFR CO/TEX CUNA, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Crossroads I, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR National Life, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR AZ/TX, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFI New Jersey Exchange, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Bolingbrook, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Randolph Drive, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Hagerstown, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFRV CO, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Menomonee Falls, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Cumberland, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Georgia, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR 30311 Emerald Valley Parkway, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/APewaukee Maple Grove, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/AFR Southgate Washington, LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    N/A
#### CATHERINE SLACK v. RICHARD B. GRUBER, D.D.S.

June 13, 1989.

The parties having stipulated to a dismissal of this matter, it is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

(117 *N.J.*90 (1989))
#### IN RE ORDER FOR PAYMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOSEPH KAHN.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,919
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,173
<ALLOWANCES>                                       395
<INVENTORY>                                      1,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,317
<PP&E>                                          31,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,231
<BONDS>                                         19,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           131
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,426
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,174
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,079
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,476
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Rachel H. Kraft","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rkraft\/","title":"Our Artemis Crew","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TyRGZFuuTN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/feature\/our-artemis-crew\/\">Our Artemis Crew<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/feature\/our-artemis-crew\/embed\/#?secret=TyRGZFuuTN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Our Artemis Crew” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TyRGZFuuTN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}