alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"HiCAM Project Technical Highlights","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"tDVqroddfl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-hicam\/hicam-project-technical-highlights\/\">HiCAM Project Technical Highlights<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-hicam\/hicam-project-technical-highlights\/embed\/#?secret=tDVqroddfl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“HiCAM Project Technical Highlights” — NASA\" data-secret=\"tDVqroddfl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/nasa_bg_acp_lrc-b701_p-00039_copy.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":480}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Emma S. Douglas,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04355-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/4/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9660 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9660 Filed 01/16/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alicia L. Kuwik,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03831-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8398 Filed 10/27/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT BAUERNFEIND.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jesup & Lamont, Inc. (the
"Company") for fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan Weichselbaum,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ Alan Weichselbaum
                    
                    April
      14, 2009Alan
      Weichselbaum
                    
                    DateChief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE MANAGEMENT NETWORK
GROUP, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY FROM THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K
FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 1, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001094814
<NAME> THE MANAGEMENT NETWORK GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                          51,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                       350
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,364
<PP&E>                                             897
<DEPRECIATION>                                     191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,945
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,382
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,322
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    68
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   706
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,869
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,208
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,658
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    200
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,461
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
#### BETTY J. SOUTHER, Petitioner v. NEW RIVER AREA MENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAM, Respondent

No. 126A01

(Filed 5 October 2001)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 142 N.C. App. 1, 541 S.E.2d 750 (2001), affirming an order entered 21 May 1999 by Burke, J., in Superior Court, Wilkes County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 September 2001.

*Legal Services of the Blue Ridge, by Charlotte Gail Blake, for petitioner-appellee.*

*McElwee Firm, PLLC, by William H. McElwee, III, and Elizabeth K. Mahan, for respondent-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON                      |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert P. Johnson, President              |   |
|   | AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.              |   |
|   | Managing General Partner                  |   |
|   | August   12, 2011                    |   |
|   |                                      |   |
|   |                                      |   |
|   |                                      |   |
|   | /s/ PATRICK W KEENE                       |   |
|   | Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.              |   |
|   | Managing General Partner                  |   |
|   | August  12, 2011                     |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<CIK>                       0000893046
<NAME>                      RENT-WAY, INC.
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>              APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                        1,482,476
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                  32,390,910  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      0
<PP&E>                       11,386,041     
<DEPRECIATION>                2,925,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               92,399,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0
<BONDS>                      46,658,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0 
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                     28,927,632
<OTHER-SE>                    6,392,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 92,399,376
<SALES>                      21,814,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             24,832,433
<CGS>                         5,735,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                20,701,518   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 38,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,064,062
<INCOME-PRETAX>               3,027,950
<INCOME-TAX>                  1,422,144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                  1,605,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.20
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID MATTHEW ORTIZ, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00344-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D05092)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s Reply Brief second motion for extension of time 

within which to file the brief until March 13, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF WILL BE 

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jim Darnell, the Appellant’s Attorney, prepare the 

Appellant’s reply brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 13, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6

th day of January, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
**Exhibit 12.1**                       **For the Years Ended**    **2006** **2005** **2004** **2003** **2002****(In Thousands)**                    Earnings from continuing operationsbefore income taxes $33,976   65,929  $81,507   45,452  $32,782 Fixed interest charges  174,768   148,250   91,890   116,312   150,451                      Earnings (loss):                    Including fixed interest charges  208,744   214,179   173,397   161,764   183,233 Excluding interest expense on deposits  149,785   174,095   145,042   125,575   120,456 Fixed interest charges excluding interestexpense on deposits  115,809   108,166   63,535   80,123   87,674 Ratios:                    Earnings including fixed interest chargesto fixed interest charges  1.19   1.44   1.89   1.39   1.22 Earnings to fixed interest excludinginterest on deposits  1.29   1.61   2.28   1.57   1.37 Dollar deficiency of earnings to fixedinterest charges $—   —  $—   —  $—
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Richard N. White,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04459-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9369 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          32,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,204
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,616
<PP&E>                                          84,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 244,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           403
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,720
<SALES>                                        169,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               169,071
<CGS>                                          129,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  160,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,574)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,188
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

INTAMIN, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2010-1003 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge 

Gary A. Feess. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

TED S. WARD, Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, of Los 

Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

 

JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, 

LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee. 

With him on the brief were PAUL A. STEWART, JOSEPH S.

CIANFRANI, DAVID G. JANKOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER L.

ROSS. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and 

GAJARSA, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort W or th

_____ ______________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00055

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal fr om the 39 6t h Distri ct Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1213452D

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum O pinion 

### J EFF ER Y 

### L EE 

### M ANNS



### , Appellant

V



### .

T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered ap pellant ’ s mot ion to dismiss t h i s appeal

. We grant the

m otion and d ismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42

. 2 (a) , 4 3 .2( f ).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: April 28, 2022
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. LENZA OWENS.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### MELVIN FEILER, D.D.S. v. AMERICAN DENTAL CENTER, ET AL. AND ROBERT MASSA, D.D.S.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Theresa Reynolds-McDonnell,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00524-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: March 2, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 951 Filed 03/04/16 Page 1 of 1
#### Markle *v.*Steele, on Appeal.

Wednesday, *November*17.

STEELE, resident in another state, forwarded to *Markle*in *Indiana,*who was not an attorney at law, a note against *Hotchkiss*for 200 dollars, to be collected. *Markle*placed the note in the hands of an attorney at law for collection. The attorney collected the money, and left the country without paying it over to *Markle. Held,*that *Steele*could not, under these circumstances, sustain an áctjon for money had and received against *Markle. Held,*also, that if *Markle*could be made liable for the money in any form of action, it must be on one founded on his *345having acted fraudulently or imprudently in entrusting the note to the attorney; or on his having failed to use proper means to obtain the money from the attorney after its collection. Vide *Beardsley*v. *Root,*11 Johns. R. *464.—Duncan*v. *Littell,*2 Bibb, *424.—Lucket*v. *Bohannon,*3 Bibb, *378.—Duncan*v. *Skipwith,*2 Camp. *68.—Nightingal*v. *Devisme,*5 Burr. 2589.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Perot Systems Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Russell Freeman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
expressed in the Report. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate, effective as of May 3, 2005. /s/ Russell FreemanRussell FreemanVice President & Chief Financial Officer