alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3




 Exhibit 10.3 

EXECUTION VERSION 
 TERMINATION
AGREEMENT 
 This TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered as of April 16, 2021, by and between Agilon Health
Holdings, Inc. (f/k/a CD&R Vector Topco, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Primary Provider Management Co., Inc., a California corporation (“Opco”) and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“CD&R Manager”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto are party to a Consulting
Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2016 (the “Consulting Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to terminate
the Consulting Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and agreements set forth herein and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

Section 1. Termination of Consulting Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of the Consulting Agreement to the contrary
(including any provisions that purport to survive the termination thereof), effective as of the date hereof, the Consulting Agreement is hereby terminated without any obligation surviving such termination. Each party hereto hereby waives any notice,
consent or other requirement in connection with such termination of the Consulting Agreement. As a matter of precaution each party hereto waives, effective as of the date hereof, any claims it may have against the other party under the Consulting
Agreement. 
 Section 2. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York, without regard to
the principles of conflicts of law thereof. 
 Section 3. Binding on Successors. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. 
 Section 4. Counterparts. This Agreement may
be executed in counterparts (including via facsimile or scanned pages), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

[Signature page follows] 











 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first above
written. 
  

					
	CLAYTON, DUBILIER & RICE, LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Theresa A. Gore
		 	Name:	 	Theresa A. Gore
		 	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
	
	AGILON HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kenneth Bellendir
		 	Name:	 	Kenneth Bellendir
		 	Title:	 	Vice President and Secretary
	
	PRIMARY PROVIDER MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Kenneth Bellendir
		 	Name:	 	Kenneth Bellendir
		 	Title:	 	Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary


 [Signature Page to Termination Agreement (for CD&R Consulting Agreement)]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE KENNETH
COLE PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              13,824  
<SECURITIES>                                             0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                       24,551  
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (125) 
<INVENTORY>                                         32,957  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    73,660  
<PP&E>                                              24,343  
<DEPRECIATION>                                       8,172  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      96,680  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               17,016  
<BONDS>                                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0  
<PREFERRED>                                              0  
<COMMON>                                               134  
<OTHER-SE>                                          78,523  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        96,680  
<SALES>                                            219,781  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   228,138  
<CGS>                                              129,403  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      129,403  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    72,145  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (404) 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     26,994  
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10,663  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 16,331  
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        16,331  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.24  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.20   
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in the following listed Registration Statements (Nos. 333-157382, 333-157298, 033-83492, 333-000366, 333-01420, 333-138883, 333-23669, 333-59643, 333-83667, 333-83689, 333-34912, 333-58530, 333-84612, 333-104021, 333-113885, 333-137439,333-138887 and 333-141612) on Form S-8 and on Form S-3 (No. 333-138883) of RF Monolithics, Inc. of our report dated November 21, 2011 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form10-K of RF Monolithics, Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2011. 

/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

November 21, 2011
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vision-Sciences, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Ron Hadani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and KatherineL. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)                                  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 14, 2008 | /s/ RON HADANI                                                   |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Ron Hadani                                                       |
|                          | *Chief Executive Officer*                                        |
|                          |                                                             |
| Dated: November 14, 2008 | /s/ KATHERINE L. WOLF                                            |
|                          | Katherine L. Wolf                                                |
|                          | *EVP, Corporate Development & Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-87315; 333-56798; 333-90136; 333-127501), Form S-3 (333-164896) and Form S-1 (333-169233) of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March31, 2011 relating to the financial statements****and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Miami, Florida 

March 31, 2011
#### IN RE THE ADOPTION OF W.L.D., III.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification dismissed as moot.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Melanie Payne,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00075-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/10/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9728 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9728 Filed 01/18/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nikki Welch","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nikki-d-welchnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Glenn Interns Take Space Washing Machine Designs for a Spin","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"SqRTwFS23r\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-glenn-interns-take-space-washing-machine-designs-for-a-spin\/\">NASA Glenn Interns Take Space Washing Machine Designs for a Spin<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-glenn-interns-take-space-washing-machine-designs-for-a-spin\/embed\/#?secret=SqRTwFS23r\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Glenn Interns Take Space Washing Machine Designs for a Spin” — NASA\" data-secret=\"SqRTwFS23r\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/wm_graphics.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":455}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWIN VIENTOS.

September 26, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERNEST HEINTZ.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2549 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2549

   For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 
                              Plascencia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2004

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   For the relief of Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria Del Refugio 
                              Plascencia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALFREDO PLASCENCIA LOPEZ AND 
              MARIA DEL REFUGIO PLASCENCIA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Alfredo Plascencia Lopez 
and Maria Del Refugio Plascencia shall each be eligible for the 
issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 
alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of that 
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and Maria 
Del Refugio Plascencia enter the United States before the filing 
deadline specified in subsection (c), Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and 
Maria Del Refugio Plascencia shall be considered to have entered and 
remained lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of immigrant 
visas or the application for adjustment of status are filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of 
immigrant visas or permanent residence to Alfredo Plascencia Lopez and 
Maria Del Refugio Plascencia, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next following 
fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 
203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2362 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2362

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
     instrumentation support control building and associated site 
       development on Kitt Peak, Arizona, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY INSTRUMENTATION 
              SUPPORT FACILITY.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to develop the site for a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
instrumentation support control building, including the installation of 
necessary utilities and equipment housings, and to construct such 
building on the site, for the purpose of supporting the collaborative 
Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) 
project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Arizona.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this Act 
$1,000,000 for fiscal year 2005.

            Passed the Senate June 14, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2362

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory 
     instrumentation support control building and associated site 
       development on Kitt Peak, Arizona, and for other purposes.
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert Tucker,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04557-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9506 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 1
#### JOHN W. PACKARD v. PACKARD-BAMBERGER, CO., INC. AND PETER W. PACKARD.

July 12, 1984.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
#### David A. Edmonson *v.*Thomas Summers.

Judgment By Default — Surety—Pleading.

In a suit' for a devastavit tlie petition neither alleges the amount of assets nor its sufficiency to pay off the debts sued for, but leaves the amount blank and refers to the appraisement and sale bills to show its sufficiency. Neither of these documents were filed as exhibits. Held that a judgment by default against the surety, the only party served with a summons, was void.

APPEAL PROM MONTGOMERY OIROUIT COURT.

January 10, 1868.

*Reid, for appellant.*

*liazelrigg & Winn, for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Bobertson :

In this- suit for a *devastavit*tbe petition neither alleges the amount of assets nor it’s sufficiency to pay the debt sued for. The petition leaves the amount blank and refers to the appraisement and sale bills to show it’s sufficiency. But neither of these documents was filed. • The judgment by default against the surety, who was the only party served with a summons, was unauthorized by the record as presented to this court. The judgment is therefore apparently erroneous.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT DUNNE.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification granted.