alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)






| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q/A of the
    Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the
    Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and
    Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
    of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                            



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ ANTONIO B. MON     
| |                        
| | Antonio B. Mon         
| | Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. VIRGIL POPESCU.

June 19, 1984.

Certification is granted, the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily modified and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, Law Division, for a hearing on defendant’s competence to stand trial and to commit contempt; and it is further

*642ORDERED that Cynthia Jacob, Esquire, shall continue to represent the defendant in all proceedings resulting from this remand.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kristy Hepfer,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00048-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9713 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Giles Bartosch,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00058-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Office Of Christopher K Johnston LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/8/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9668 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9668 Filed 01/16/18 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 29, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-29-1999
<CASH>                                           5,874
<SECURITIES>                                     7,507
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                       237
<INVENTORY>                                      6,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,080
<PP&E>                                         113,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,544
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,194
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,383
<SALES>                                        113,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,982
<CGS>                                          110,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,906
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,675)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,681)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,681)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (3.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.30)


</TABLE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation, 

No. MDL15-2641 PHX DGC 

ORDER 

 

 Pending before the Court are numerous motions to seal. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The second amended motion to seal (Doc. 7355) is granted. If unredacted 

documents represented by redacted Docs. 7330, 7331, 7332, 7333, 7340, 7343, 7345 

have not been filed under seal on the Court’s docket, counsel shall file these unredacted 

documents under seal on the Court’s docket. 

 2. Motions to seal (Doc. 7851, 7949, 7951, 8123, 8184, 8232, 8444) are 

granted. 

 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to accept for filing under seal the documents 

lodged on the Court’s docket as Docs. 7371, 7815, 7816, 7817, 7818, 7819, 7820, 7821, 

7822, 7823, 7824, 7825, 7826, 7950, 7952, 7953, 7954, 7955, 7956, 7957, 7958, 7959, 

7960, 7961, 7962, 7963, 7964, 7965, 7966, 7967, 7968, 7969, 7970, 7971, 7972, 7973, 

7974, 7975, 8009, 8186, 8233. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9692 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 2
‐ 2 ‐ 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 4. Plaintiffs’ notice of lodging exhibits (Doc. 8860) is received and accepted. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to accept for filing under seal the document lodged on the 

Court’s docket as Doc. 8861. 

 Dated this 17th day of January, 2018. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9692 Filed 01/17/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jason Davis,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00096-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9679 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core Project Overview","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"BBE17He4xp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-hytec\/about-hybrid-thermally-efficient-core-project\/\">Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core Project Overview<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-hytec\/about-hybrid-thermally-efficient-core-project\/embed\/#?secret=BBE17He4xp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Hybrid Thermally Efficient Core Project Overview” — NASA\" data-secret=\"BBE17He4xp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/hytec_titlecard.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":776}
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Antonio B. Mon, as Chief Executive Officer of Technical Olympic USA, Inc.
(the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my
knowledge:

1.     the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

2.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and does not
constitute a part of the Report.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                   |  |                                       
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2003 |  | /s/ Antonio B. Mon                    
|                   |  |                                       
|                   |  | Antonio B. Mon
Chief Executive Officer
#### PATRICIA A. NEGROTTI v. MATTEO PETER NEGROTTI.

June 12, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
Return
      to Main Document




Exhibit
      32.1


Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
      connection with
      the quarterly report of Mexoro Minerals Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
      for
      the period ending November 30, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Robert Knight, CEO of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1)
      The Report fully
      complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
      The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
      financial position and results of operations.








January
      14,
      2008





/s/Robert
      Knight


__________________________


Robert
      Knight, CEO,
      CFO and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

ALETA T. FLOYD,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. BARD INC., 

Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04600-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as 

counsel for: 

Defendant C. R. Bard, Inc. 

Date: December 21, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney’s signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Ste. 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

(404) 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9408 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ESTEBAN ORTIZ.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lawrence Vincent Schmidt,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04616-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9488 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 1
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00531-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Jeffrey Don Grays, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY AT LAW NO. 1 OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. 2017CR1315, HONORABLE RANDAL C. GRAY, JUDGE PRESIDING 

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

The State of Texas has filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order granting

Jeffrey Don Grays’s motion to suppress evidence. Before filing its notice of appeal, the State filed

a request for the trial court’s entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The State subsequently

filed a notice of past due findings of fact and conclusions of law. No findings or conclusions were

filed before the filing of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record with this Court.1

Although the trial court signed findings and conclusions on August 27, 2018, which have 1

been forwarded here in a supplemental record, we may not consider these because the date of

signature was after the filing of the record in this appeal, which vested jurisdiction in this Court. See

Green v. State, 906 S.W.2d 937, 940 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (noting that trial court’s findings

entered after filing of trial record were “null and void” because once trial record was filed “the trial

court no longer ha[d] jurisdiction to adjudicate the case”); see also Berry v. State, 995 S.W.2d 699,

701 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) (concluding that trial court’s supplemental findings made after receipt

of trial record were “null and void, and should not have been considered by the court of appeals”).
A trial court must state its essential findings upon the request of the losing party

on a motion to suppress. State of Tex. v. Saenz, 411 S.W.3d 488, 495 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

“Essential findings” are the “findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide an appellate

court with a basis upon which to review the trial court’s application of the law to the facts.” Id.

When, as here, a trial court is required to make findings of fact but has lost jurisdiction to do so, the

trial court’s authority to take action may be revived by abatement. Green v. State, 906 S.W.2d 937,

940 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(g) (stating that, unless otherwise provided

by law or appellate rules, further proceedings in trial court are suspended once record has been filed

in appellate court).

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for its entry

of findings of fact and conclusions of law. A supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings

of fact and conclusions of law shall be filed with this Court no later than October 1, 2018. The

appeal will be reinstated once the supplemental clerk’s record is filed.

It is ordered September 11, 2018.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Abated and Remanded

Filed: September 11, 2018

Do Not Publish

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Loni L. Farfan,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00274-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Zonies Law LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/26/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9898 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9898 Filed 02/01/18 Page 2 of 2