alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DANKA BUSINESS SYSTEMS PLC AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          42,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  471,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,037
<INVENTORY>                                    278,123
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               881,683
<PP&E>                                         609,866
<DEPRECIATION>                                 358,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,479,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          446,122
<BONDS>                                        690,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          215,616
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,997
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,479,640
<SALES>                                      1,068,852
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,068,852
<CGS>                                          746,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  746,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               323,098<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,769
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (75,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (14,407)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (61,418)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (61,418)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.17)
<FN>
<F1>Includes a restructuring charge credit of $8.2 million.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements in the RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc. Form 10-K for the
annual period ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          39,409
<SECURITIES>                                   208,281
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,024
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,624
<PP&E>                                         115,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                  57,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 508,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,086
<BONDS>                                         51,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           187
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   508,678
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               767,512
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  771,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   379
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jimmie Saunders,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04587-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9454 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Lighting Lab","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"R2PJrXBIUg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/lighting-lab\/\">Lighting Lab<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/lighting-lab\/embed\/#?secret=R2PJrXBIUg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Lighting Lab” — NASA\" data-secret=\"R2PJrXBIUg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/jsc2016e107123-alt.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### Samuel W. Langley *v.*S. G. Taylor.

Instructions — Abstract Proposition.

An instruction upon a mere abstract proposition of law should never be given without some evidence to authorize it.

APPEAL EROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

February 7, 1868.

*Turner*& *Tafton, for appellant.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters :

Evidence that appellee was a member of a company of a regiment that was attached to the Confederate Army, and that orders were frequently issued by the commanding officer to the officers of companies to have their men mounted by the impressment of horses, could furnish no sufficient authority to appellee to impress the horse of appellant. lie failed to produce an order direct to him by an officer of the regiment authorized to give such order, or to prove by any one that he received such order, and in the absence of such evidence there was nothing on which to base the instruction given, which, as a mere abstract proposition of law may be correct; but should not be given without some evidence to authorize it.

'Wherefore, the judgment is *reversed*and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consitsent herewith.
EXHIBIT
10.11





DIRECTOR
FEE ARRANGEMENTS FOR 2009





Exhibit
10.11




Director
Fee Arrangements for 2009




Each
director of MutualFirst
Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) also is a director of MutualBank (the
“Bank”).  For 2008, each non-employee director receives an annual fee
of $27,750 for serving on the Bank’s Board of Directors.  In addition
to this annual fee, Wilbur R. Davis receives a $6,000 annual fee for serving as
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Bank, Linn Crull receives a $5,000
annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee, Jerry McVicker
receives a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Compensation
Committee and Jon Kintner receives $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of
the Trust Management Committee.  Directors are not compensated for
their service on the Company’s Board of Directors.




The Bank
maintains deferred compensation arrangements with some directors which allows
them to defer all or a portion of their Board fees and receive income when they
are no longer active directors.  Deferred amounts earn interest at the
rate of 10 percent per year.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE STUDENT
LOAN CORPORATION CURRENT REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                     263
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        7,975,540
<ALLOWANCES>                             2,191
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0
<PP&E>                                     226
<DEPRECIATION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       8,234,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0
<BONDS>                              2,530,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   200
<OTHER-SE>                             416,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         8,234,994
<SALES>                                157,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       157,197
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          128,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           788
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         28,209
<INCOME-TAX>                            11,403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     16,806
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                            16,806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.84
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John P. Ferranti,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03853-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9107 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
      32.0




CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT, CEO (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER) AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sandston Corporation
      (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
      J.
      Dorman, as President, CEO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Daniel J. Dorman





Name:
            Daniel
                J. Dorman


Title:
            President,
                CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Principal Financial
                Officer


Date:
            November9,
                2007








This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q/A FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,113
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,539
<PP&E>                                          10,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,355
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,714)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,815
<SALES>                                          6,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,954
<CGS>                                              980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (295)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (888)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (888)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT 11.1
                                 PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.

                                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                            THREE MONTHS  ENDED DECEMBER  31,
                                                    -----------------------------------------------
                                                           PRIMARY               FULLY DILUTED
                                                    ----------------------   ----------------------
                                                      1996         1995         1996        1995
                                                    ----------  ----------   ----------  ----------
<S>                                                <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
Weighted average common stock
   outstanding during the period..................  6,247,567   5,719,361    6,247,567      6,042,917
Options and warrants..............................    184,870     321,162      188,122        319,520
                                                   ----------  ----------   ----------     ----------
Total.............................................  6,432,437   6,040,523    6,435,689      6,362,437
                                                   ==========  ==========   ==========     ==========

Net income attributable to
  common and common equivalent shares:
   Net Income..................................... $1,656,308  $1,489,440   $1,656,308     $1,489,440
   Less accretion on redeemable preferred stock...          -      (6,097)           -         (6,097)
   Less preferred stock dividend..................          -     (51,450)           -        (51,450)

Net income attributable to common and
    common equivalent shares...................... $1,656,308  $1,431,893   $1,656,308     $1,431,893
                                                   ==========  ==========   ==========     ==========
Net income per common and common equivalent
    share......................................... $     0.26  $     0.24   $     0.26     $     0.23
                                                   ==========  ==========   ==========     ==========
 
</TABLE>
#### Allen *v.*Clark and Others.

The settlement of an administrator’s accounts in the Probate Court is, *prima fade,*correct; and a Court of chancery will not interfere with it, except in clear cases of mistake or fraud.

ERROR to the *Franklin*Circuit Court.

*Saturday, November*13.

Blackford, J.

Bill in chancery hy the heirs of *Clark*against *Allen,*surviving administrator of *Clark.*The record shows that *Clark*died in 1816; that letters of administration were granted to *Allen, Bell,*and *Ii. Clark;*and that *Allen*was the acting and surviving administrator. It is shown that *Allen,*in 1819, made a settlement of his accounts in the Prohate Court; that a balance was found in his favour of 318 dollars and 90 cents; and that, in 1820, he received that sum in payment from *H. Clark,*one of the other administrators. The hill charges mistakes- and frauds in the defendant’s accounts, and prays a *344decree for the amount in his hands. The answer denies all fraud, and avers the account as settled in the Probate Court to be correct. The Circuit Court tried the cause upon bill, answer, and exhibits, and rendered a decree in favour of the complainants for 745 dollars and 58 cents.

*M’Kinney*and Caswell, for the plaintiff.

*Morris,*for the defendants.

It is contended *by*the plaintiff in error, that the Court of chancery has no jurisdiction in this case. In this he is mistaken. The settlement of accounts in the Probate Courtis an *ex parte*proceeding, and ought not to preclude all future investigation of the subject. The Probate Court, however, is a Court of record, specially invested by the legislature with jurisdiction in these cases, and its decisions are entitled to great respect. An account, settled in that Court, whilst the facts are of recent date, is *prima facie*correct. The Court of chancery can only interfere in clear cases of mistake or fraud; and the complainant must be held to strict proof. In this case, there are a few obvious mistakes, which it is proper to correct; but we are of opinion that the principal charges in the bill are not sufficiently supported. The result of our investigation of the cause is, that the decree of the Circuit Court should have been in favour of the complainants for the sum of 214 dollars, together with the costs of suit.

*Per*Curiam.

The decree, as to 214 dollars and the costs, is affirmed; and as to the residue, the decree is reversed.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF K.K.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.