Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 200 / Thursday, October 16, 2014 / Notices 62101 

1See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 

79 FR 32915 (June 9, 2014) (Preliminary Results). 

2 Id., and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM) at 3–4. 

3 Id., 79 FR at 32915. 

4See the July 9, 2014, submission from Petitioner 

and Magnesita, ‘‘Petitioner’s Case Brief’’ (Case 

Brief). 

5See Appendix II. 

6See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 32915; see also 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum for a 

description of our methodology underlying our 

conclusions. 

7See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 32915. 

• Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. 

• Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong 

Guan) Co., Ltd. 

• Xiamen Yongquan Sci-Tech Development 

Co., Ltd. 

• Xilinmen Group Co. Ltd. 

• Yichun Guangming Furniture Co. Ltd. 

• Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd., 

Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

• Zhangjiagang Daye Hotel Furniture Co., 

Ltd. 

• Zhangjiang Sunwin Arts & Crafts Co., Ltd. 

• Zhangzhou Guohui Industrial & Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

• Zhong Shan Fullwin Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Zhongshan Fookyik Furniture Co., Ltd. 

• Zhongshan Golden King Furniture 

Industrial Co., Ltd. 

• Zhoushan For-Strong Wood Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24657 Filed 10–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–955] 

Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Final Rescission, in Part, 

of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) conducted an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on certain 

magnesia carbon bricks (MCBs) from the 

People’s Republic of China (PRC) 

covering the period of review (POR) 

January 1, 2012, through December 31, 

2012. On June 2, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results for 

this administrative review and invited 

interested parties to comment on it.1

Based on the analysis of the comments 

received, the Department has not made 

any changes to its Preliminary Results. 

The final subsidy rates are listed in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section 

below. 

DATED: Effective Date: October 16, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gene Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–3586. 

Background 

On June 2, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. The 

Department preliminarily determined to 

apply adverse facts available (AFA) to 

the sole mandatory respondent, Fengchi 

Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City 

and Fengchi Refractories Co., of 

Haicheng City (collectively, Fengchi), 

and the Government of the PRC (GOC), 

because these parties failed to cooperate 

to the best of their ability in this 

review.2 The Department also stated its 

preliminary intent to rescind the review 

for the following companies that timely 

certified that they had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR: RHI AG and its 

affiliates Liaoning RHI Jinding Magnesia 

Co.; RHI Refractories (Dalian) Co. Ltd.; 

RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd.; RHI 

Trading Shanghai Branch; and RHI 

Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd. (collectively, 

the RHI companies).3 The Department 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. 

On July 9, 2014, the Department 

received a timely filed joint case brief 

from Resco Products, Inc. (Petitioner) 

and a domestic producer of MCBs, 

Magnesita Refractories Company 

(Magnesita).4 No other party filed an 

administrative case or rebuttal brief. 

Scope of the Order 

The scope of the order includes 

certain MCBs. Certain MCBs that are the 

subject of this order are currently 

classifiable under the following 

subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 

6902.10.1000, 6902.10.5000, 

66815.91.0000, 6815.99.2000, and 

6815.99.4000. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and customs purposes, the written 

product description remains dispositive. 

A full description of the scope of the 

order is contained in the memorandum 

from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues 

and Decision Memorandum for Certain 

Magnesia Carbon Bricks from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the 2012 Administrative 

Review’’ (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum), which is dated 

concurrently with and hereby adopted 

by this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 

IA ACCESS is available to registered 

users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and to 

all parties in the Central Records Unit, 

Room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http:// 

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Issues and Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Methodology 

The Department conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, including 

our decision to apply facts otherwise 

available with an adverse inference to 

Fengchi and the PRC, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

With respect to the companies for 

which we initiated reviews and that did 

not file a no-shipments certification,5

consistent with the Preliminary Results, 

we assigned to entries made by these 

companies the all-others rate from the 

investigation.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case brief filed 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues raised 

is attached to this notice at Appendix I. 

Final Rescission, in Part, of the 

Administrative Review 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that a final decision regarding whether 

to rescind this review with respect to 

the RHI companies would be made in 

the final results of this review.7 We 

continue to find no evidence on the 

record indicating that the RHI 

companies had sales of subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. Accordingly, and pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department is 

rescinding this review with respect to 

the RHI companies for these final 

results. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
62102 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 200 / Thursday, October 16, 2014 / Notices 

8See Appendix II. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine the countervailable 

subsidy rates for the POR are as follows: 

Company 

Ad valorem net 

countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City and Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng City (collectively, Fengchi) .... 66.27 

Rate Applicable to the Remaining Companies Under Review 8 ................................................................................................. 24.24 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the 

Department intends to issue appropriate 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) 15 days after the 

publication of these final results of 

review in the Federal Register. The 

Department will instruct CBP to assess 

countervailing duties on POR entries in 

the amounts shown above. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The Department also intends to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown above for entries of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse for 

consumption, on or after the date of 

publication of these final results in the 

Federal Register. For all non-reviewed 

firms, we will instruct CBP to continue 

to collect cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the all others 

rate established in the investigation. 

Accordingly, the cash deposit rates that 

will be applied to companies covered by 

the order, but not examined in this 

review, are those established in the most 

recently completed segment of the 

proceeding for each company. These 

cash deposit rates shall apply to all nonreviewed companies until a review of a 

company assigned these rates is 

requested and completed. These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

These final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: October 7, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Issues Discussed in the Decision 

Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether the Department 

Should Apply AFA to the NonMandatory Respondents 

Comment 2: Whether the Department Also 

Should Apply the AFA Rate to the NonMandatory Respondents Because the 

GOC Failed to Respond in this 

Administrative Review 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Remaining Companies Under Review 

ANH (Xinyi) Refractories Co. Ltd 

Anyang Rongzhu Silicon Industry Co., Ltd 

Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd 

Beijing Tianxing Ceramic Fiber Composite 

Materials Corp 

Changxing Magnesium Furnace Charge Co., 

Ltd 

Changxing Wangfa Architectural & 

Metallurgical Materials Co., Ltd 

Changzing Zhicheng Refractory Material 

Factory 

China Metallurgical Raw Material Beijing 

Company 

China Quantai Metallurgical (Beijing) 

Engineering & Science Co., Ltd 

Cimm Group of China 

CNBM International Corporation 

Dalian Dalmond Trading Co., Ltd 

Dalian F.T.Z. Huaxin International 

Dalian F.T.Z. Maylong Resources Co., Ltd 

Dalian Huayu Refractories International Co., 

Ltd 

Dalian LST Metallurgy Co., Ltd 

Dalian Masoo International Trading 

Dalian Mayerton Refractories Ltd 

Dalian Morgan Refractories Ltd 

Dashiqiao Bozhong Mineral Products Co., Ltd 

Dashiqiao City Guangcheng Refractory Co., 

Ltd 

Dashiqiao Jia Sheng Mining Co., Ltd 

Dashiqiao RongXing Refractory Material Co., 

Ltd 

Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Material Co., 

Ltd 

Dashiqiao Yutong Packing Factory 

Dengfeng Desheng Refractory Co., Ltd 

DFL Minmet Refractories Corp 

Duferco BarInvest SA Beijing Office 

Duferco Ironet Shanghai Representative 

Office 

Eastern Industries & Trading Co., Ltd 

Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd of Haicheng City 

Fengchi Refractories Corp 

Haicheng City Qunli Mining Co., Ltd 

Haicheng City Xiyang Import & Export 

Corporation 

Haicheng Donghe Taidi Refractory Co., Ltd 

Haicheng Ruitong Mining Co., Ltd 

Haiyuan Talc Powder Manufacture Factory 

Henan Boma Co. Ltd 

Henan Kingway Chemicals Co., Ltd 

Henan Tagore Refractories Co., Ltd 

Henan Xinmi Changzxing Refractories, Co., 

Ltd 

Hebei Qinghe Refractory Group Co. Ltd 

Huailin Refractories (Dashiqiao) Pte. Ltd 

Hualude Hardware Products Co. Ltd 

Jiangsu Sujia Group New Materials Co., Ltd 

Jiangsu Sujia Joint-Stock Co., Ltd 

Jinan Forever Imp. & Exp. Trading Co., Ltd 

Jinan Linquan Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd 

Jinan Ludong Refractory Co., Ltd 

Kosmokraft Refractory Limited 

Kuehne & Nagel Ltd. Dalian Branch Office 

Lechang City Guangdong Province SongXin 

Refractories Co., Ltd 

Liaoning Fucheng Refractories Group Co., 

Ltd 

Liaoning Fucheng Special Refractory Co., Ltd 

Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Minerals Ltd 

Liaoning Jinding Magnesite Group 

Liaoning Mayerton Refractories Co., Ltd 

Liaoning Mineral & Metallurgy Group Co., 

Ltd 

Liaoning Qunyi Group Refractories Co., Ltd 

Liaoning Qunyi Trade Co., Ltd 

Liaoning RHI Jinding Magnesis Co., Ltd 

LiShuang Refractory Industrial Co., Ltd 

Lithomelt Co., Ltd 

Luheng Refractory Co., Ltd 

Luoyang Refractory Group Co., Ltd 

Mayerton Refractories 

Minsource International Ltd 

Minteq International Inc 

National Minerals Co., Ltd 

North Refractories Co., Ltd 

Orestar Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd 

Oreworld Trade (Tangshan) Co., Ltd 

Puyang Refractories Co., Ltd 

Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. (HQ) 

Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. (Manufacturing) 

Qingdao Almatis Trading Co., Ltd. (Sales 

Office) 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 200 / Thursday, October 16, 2014 / Notices 62103 

1See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of the New Shipper 

Review of Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Co., Ltd. and 

Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd., 79 

FR 28895 (May 20, 2014) and its accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum (Preliminary 

Results). 

2 Id. 

3Petitioners in this new shipper review are the 

Fresh Garlic Producers Association and its 

individual members: Christopher Ranch L.L.C., The 

Garlic Company, Valley Garlic, and Vessey and 

Company, Inc. 

4See Letter from petitioners, ‘‘21st New Shipper 

Review of Fresh Garlic from the People ’s Republic 

of China—Petitioners’ Comments on Surrogate 

Value Workbook,’’ dated June 30, 2014. 5See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations from Hilary E. 

Sadler, Esq., Senior International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, Office VII, Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Fresh Garlic from 

the People’s Republic of China: Extension of 

Deadline for the Final Results of the Reviews of 

Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd. and 

Jinxiang Merry Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.’’ dated 

July 23, 2014. 

6See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, regarding ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 2011–2012 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Fresh 

Garlic from the People’s Republic of China,’’ issued 

concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

Qingdao Blueshell Import & Export Corp 

Qingdao Fujing Group Co., Ltd 

Qingdao Huierde International Trade Co., Ltd 

RHI Refractories (Dalian) Co., Ltd 

RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd 

RHI Trading Shanghai Branch 

RHI Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd 

Rongyuan Magnesite Co., Ltd. of Dashiqiao 

City 

Shandong Cambridge International Trade Inc 

Shandong Lunai Kiln Refractories Co., Ltd 

Shandong Refractories Corp 

Shanxi Dajin International (Group) Co., Ltd 

Shanxi Xinrong International Trade Co. Ltd 

Shenyang Yi Xin Sheng Lai Refractory 

Materials Co., Ltd 

Shinagawa Rongyuan Refractories Co., Ltd 

Sinosteel Corporation 

SMMC Group Co., Ltd 

Tangshan Success Import & Export Trading 

Co., Ltd 

Tianjin New Century Refractories, Ltd 

Tianjin New World Import & Export Trading 

Co., Ltd 

Tianjin Weiyuan Refractory Co., Ltd 

Vesuvius Advanced Ceramics (Suzhou) Co. 

Ltd 

Wonjin Refractories Co., Ltd 

Xiyuan Xingquan Forsterite Co., Ltd 

Yanshi City Guangming High-Tech 

Refractories Products Co., Ltd 

YHS Minerals Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Dalmond Refractories Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., Ltd. 

(YGR) 

Yingkou Heping Samwha Minerals Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Jiahe Refractories Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Jinlong Refractories Group 

Yingkou Kyushu Refractories Co., Ltd 

Yingkou New Century Refractories Ltd 

Yingkou Qinghua Group Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Qinghua Refractories Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Sanhua Refractory Materials Co., 

Ltd 

Yingkou Tianrun Refractory Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Wonjin Refractory Material Co., Ltd 

Yingkou Yongji Mag Refractory, Ltd 

Yixing Runlong Trade Co., Ltd 

Yixing Xinwei Leeshing Refractory Materials 

Co., Ltd 

Yixing Zhenqiu Charging Ltd 

Zhejiang Changxing Guangming Special 

Refractory Material Foundry, Co., Ltd 

Zhejiang Deqing Jinlei Refractory Co., Ltd 

Zhejiang Huzhou Fuzilin Refractory Metals 

Group Co., Ltd 

Zhengzhou Annec Industrial Co., Ltd 

Zhengzhou Huachen Refractory Co., Ltd 

Zhengzhou Huawei Refractories Co., Ltd 

Zibo Lianzhu Refractory Materials Co., Ltd 

[FR Doc. 2014–24659 Filed 10–15–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of the 

Semiannual Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review of Jinxiang Merry 

Vegetable Co., Ltd. and Cangshan 

Qingshui Vegetable Foods Co., Ltd.; 

2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On May 20, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (Department) 

published its preliminary results of the 

2012–2013 semiannual new shipper 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on fresh garlic from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC).1 This review 

covers two companies: Jinxiang Merry 

Vegetable Co., Ltd. (Merry) and 

Cangshan Qingshui Vegetable Foods 

Co., Ltd. (Qingshui). We invited 

interested parties to comment. Based on 

our analysis of the comments received, 

we made no changes to the margin 

calculations for these final results. We 

continue to find that each of these 

companies sold subject merchandise at 

less than normal value. 

DATED: Effective Date: October 16, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sean Carey and Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3964 and (202) 482–4340, 

respectively. 

Background 

On May 20, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this new shipper review.2 The review 

covers two new shippers, Merry and 

Qingshui. The period of review (POR) is 

November 1, 2012, through April 30, 

2013. On June 19, 2014, the respondents 

requested a hearing and submitted a 

joint case brief. Petitioners 3 did not file 

a case brief. On June 24, 2014, 

petitioners submitted rebuttal 

comments. On June 30, petitioners 

submitted timely comments on the 

calculations of the preliminary results.4

On July 23, 2014, the Department 

extended the deadline for these final 

results to October 10, 2014, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) 

and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2).5 On 

September 4, 2014, the Department held 

a public hearing regarding this review. 

Scope of the Order 

The products subject to this 

antidumping duty order are all grades of 

garlic, whole or separated into 

constituent cloves, whether or not 

peeled, fresh, chilled, frozen, 

provisionally preserved, or packed in 

water or other neutral substance, but not 

prepared or preserved by the addition of 

other ingredients or heat processing. 

Fresh garlic that are subject to the order 

are currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) 0703.20.0010, 

0703.200020, 0703.20.0090, 

0710.80.7060, 0710.80.9750, 

0711.90.6000, and 2005.90.9700. 

Although the HTSUS numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written product 

description remains dispositive. A full 

description of the scope of the order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that are raised in the 

briefs and addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is in the 

appendix of this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES