alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Crew Health and Safety","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"X4aTU21r8G\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/crew-health-and-safety\/\">Crew Health and Safety<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/general\/crew-health-and-safety\/embed\/#?secret=X4aTU21r8G\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Crew Health and Safety” — NASA\" data-secret=\"X4aTU21r8G\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/iss016e026125.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":408}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Vivian Monteiro,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03847-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8589 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Bruce Hall, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Mas Acquisition XIXCorp., for the annual period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Mas Acquisition XIX Corp.

By:/s/ Michael Bruce Hall          Michael Bruce Hall, Chief Financial Officer,          Chief Executive Officer, President & Director

Date:  October 28, 2004
**Exhibit 12.1**                       **For the Years Ended December 31,**   **2007**  **2006**  **2005**  **2004**  **2003**   (In thousands) **Fixed Charges (excluding interest on deposits)**                    Interest on borrowings $108,381  $109,027  $103,704  $59,841  $76,938 Rent  8,068   6,782   4,462   3,694   3,185                 **Total fixed charges**  116,449   115,809   108,166   63,535   80,123 (Loss) income from continuingoperations before income taxes  (57,584)  33,976   65,929   81,507   45,452                 **Total earnings (1)**  58,865   149,785   174,095   145,042   125,575                 **Ratio of earnings to fixed charges**  **0.51**   **1.29**   **1.61**   **2.28**   **1.57**                 **Fixed Charges (including interest on deposits)**                    Interest on borrowings  108,381   109,027   103,704   59,841   76,938 Interest on deposits  84,476   58,959   40,084   28,355   36,189 Rent  8,068   6,782   4,462   3,694   3,185                 **Total fixed charges**  200,925   174,768   148,250   91,890   116,312 (Loss) income from continuingoperations before income taxes  (57,584)  33,976   65,929   81,507   45,452                 **Total earnings (2)**  143,341   208,744   214,179   173,397   161,764                 **Ratio of earnings to fixed charges**  **0.71**   **1.19**   **1.44**   **1.89**   **1.39**                  (1) Total earnings is defined as (loss) income fromcontinuing operations plus fixed charges excludinginterest on deposits (2) Total earnings is defined as (loss) income fromcontinuing operations plus fixed charges includinginterest on deposits
Parcel Lease No. Bidder's Name Bid Amount Acreage $/Acreage Deposit Effective Date Expiration Date

C PBS2019KF001 $3,246.18 21.3888 $151.77 $500.00

D PBS2019KF001 $5,064.52 33.3697 $151.77 $500.00

Q PBS2019KF001 $31,434.13 120.0835 $261.77 $500.00

S PBS2019KF001 $14,547.89 55.5751 $261.77 $500.00

$54,292.72 $2,000.00 4/15/2019 12/31/2024

G PBS2019DM002 $23,757.00 100.0291 $237.50 $500.00 4/15/2019 12/31/2024

J PBS2019DM003 $19,050.00 79.3404 $240.10 $500.00

L PBS2019DM003 $10,680.00 39.8188 $268.22 $500.00

$29,730.00 $1,000.00 4/15/2019 12/31/2024

K PBS2019SS004 $15,486.00 57.7475 $268.17 $500.00 4/15/2019 12/31/2024

M PBS2019RF005 $17,000.00 61.7082 $275.49 $500.00

N PBS2019RF005 $15,200.00 54.9095 $276.82 $500.00

P PBS2019RF005 $17,700.00 64.0405 $276.39 $500.00

R PBS2019RF005 $15,000.00 54.4889 $275.29 $500.00

T PBS2019RF005 $6,000.00 32.6438 $183.80 $500.00

U PBS2019RF005 $9,100.00 33.4954 $271.68 $500.00

V PBS2019RF005 $12,000.00 47.3758 $253.29 $500.00

W PBS2019RF005 $11,000.00 71.1256 $154.66 $500.00

$103,000.00 $4,000.00 4/15/2019 12/31/2024

$226,265.72

FY19 Plum Brook Agricultural Leases

(b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4)(b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4) (b) (4)
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES CALVIN HILL.

May 2, 1989.

Petition for certification granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 249 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 249

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of 
   the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran after age 55 shall not 
    result in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation 
              otherwise payable to that surviving spouse.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2003

Mrs. Clinton (for herself and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide that remarriage of 
   the surviving spouse of a deceased veteran after age 55 shall not 
    result in termination of dependency and indemnity compensation 
              otherwise payable to that surviving spouse.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RETENTION OF DEPENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION FOR 
              SURVIVING SPOUSES REMARRYING AFTER AGE 55.

    (a) Exception to Termination of Benefits Upon Remarriage.--Section 
103(d)(2)(B) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
``1311 or'' after ``under section''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on--
            (1) the first day of the first month that begins after the 
        date of the enactment of this Act; or
            (2) the first day of the fiscal year that begins in the 
        calendar year in which this Act is enacted, if later than the 
        date specified in paragraph (1).
    (c) Retroactive Benefits Prohibited.--No benefit may be paid to any 
person by reason of the amendment made by subsection (a) for any period 
before the effective date specified in subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2639 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 693
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2639

                          [Report No. 108-339]

              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2004

Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Craig, Mr. Baucus, and Mr. 
    Durbin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

                           September 14, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE CONGRESSIONAL AWARD ACT.

    (a) Extension of Requirements Regarding Financial Operations of 
Congressional Award Program; Noncompliance With Requirements.--Section 
104(c)(2)(A) of the Congressional Award Act (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)) is 
amended by striking ``and 2004'' and inserting ``2004, 2005, 2006, 
2007, 2008, and 2009''.
    (b) Termination.--Section 108 of the Congressional Award Act (2 
U.S.C. 808) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2004'' and inserting 
``October 1, 2009''.
    (c) Technical Amendments.--The Congressional Award Act is amended--
            (1) in section 103(b)(3)(B) (2 U.S.C. 803(b)(3)(B)), by 
        striking ``section'' each place it appears and inserting 
        ``subsection''; and
            (2) in section 104(c)(2)(A) (2 U.S.C. 804(c)(2)(A)), by 
        inserting a comma after ``1993''.

                                                       Calendar No. 693

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2639

                          [Report No. 108-339]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

              To reauthorize the Congressional Award Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 14, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
No. A-779.

#### Roggio *v.*United States.

Application for release on bond, addressed to Justice Brennan and referred to the Court, denied.
`Exhibit 32

                                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Frontier  Airlines,  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned as the Company's  principal  executive officer
and principal  financial officer certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:   June 11, 2004

By:/s/ Jeff  S. Potter
   Jeff S. Potter
   President and Chief Executive Officer


By:/s/ Paul H. Tate
   Paul H. Tate
   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer`
#### DAVID D. HAMMOND v. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM.

May 30, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Connie A. Berryhill,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04357-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/4/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 12, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9634 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9634 Filed 01/12/18 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"STS-111","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XDngPXLgHi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-111\/\">STS-111<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/sts-111\/embed\/#?secret=XDngPXLgHi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STS-111” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XDngPXLgHi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### REID v. TOWN OF MADISON

No. 459PA01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 146

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 November 2001.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 10.10(d)

                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


              THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") is made
December 22, 1999 by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the
"Corporation") and Richard N. Anderson (the "Executive").

              WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that
certain Employment Agreement effective as of March 18, 1992, as amended on
December 22, 1994, December 15, 1995 and December 11, 1998 (the "Employment
Agreement"); and

              WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the
Employment Agreement to extend the term of employment under the Employment
Agreement.

              NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the parties
hereto agree as set forth below.

              1. The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement
shall be amended to read as follows:

                    "The Executive's Annual Base Salary ("Annual Base Salary"),
              payable on a biweekly basis, shall be at the annual rate of not
              less than $335,000 effective January 1, 2000."

              2. All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

              3. This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement,
contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof.

              IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused
this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written.


                                                   VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                                   By:
                                                      --------------------------
                                                   Name:
                                                        ------------------------
                                                   Title:
                                                         -----------------------

                                                   -----------------------------
                                                         Richard N. Anderson
#### Addison P. Brewer v. Allen Gerow, Commissioner of Highways, and Joshua Wilson, Clerk, of the Township of Sheridan.

*Highways—Proceedings to establish—Town-line road.*

Proceedings for laying out a township-line road must be *taken jointly*by the highway commissioners, under How. Stat. §§ 1296, 1305, and such action by one commissioner is void.

*Certiorari*to review proceedings in laying out a township-line highway.

Argued October 31, 1890.

Proceedings quashed November 14, 1890.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*G. W. Perry,*for petitioner.

Morse, J.

The proceedings to be reviewed in this *251case were taken for the purpose of laying out and establishing a highway on the town line, between the townships of Sheridan and Grant,'in the county of Clare.

The petition, which is the foundation of the proceedings, was signed by the requisite number of freeholders from each of the townships, but the further action taken was by the commissioner of highways of the township of Sheridan alone, and to whom the petition was directed.

The statute provides that highways upon township lines must be laid out by the joint action of the commissioners of both townships, and the proceedings of such commissioners must be filed and recorded in both townships, with the township clerk. How. Stat. §§ 1296, 1305.

The proceedings are illegal and void, and must be quashed, with costs.

The other Justices Concurred.
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 99 Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 99 Filed 09/22/15 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 99 Filed 09/22/15 Page 3 of 3