alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. OLIVER WATTS.

June 13, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2615 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to eliminate the consumptive demand 

exception relating to the importation of goods made with forced labor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 7, 2004 

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to eliminate the consumptive demand exception relating to the importation of 

goods made with forced labor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GOODS MADE WITH FORCED OR INDENTURED 

4 LABOR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of section 

6 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) is amend7 ed by striking ‘‘; but in no case’’ and all that follows to 

8 the end period. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 2615 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the date that is 

2 15 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL TRAPP.

May 9, 1989.

Leave to appeal granted. (See 231 *N.J.Super.*66)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"45 Years Ago: ASTP Soyuz Returns Home","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"D7zvdPRABW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-astp-soyuz-returns-home\/\">45 Years Ago: ASTP Soyuz Returns Home<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/45-years-ago-astp-soyuz-returns-home\/embed\/#?secret=D7zvdPRABW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“45 Years Ago: ASTP Soyuz Returns Home” — NASA\" data-secret=\"D7zvdPRABW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/astp_soyuz_landing_capsule_on_parachute.jpg?w=159","thumbnail_width":159,"thumbnail_height":213}
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S U N T A R I S R I ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70673 A ge nc yN os . A 095- 176- 943

A 095- 177- 925 A 095- 177- 926 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S unt ar i S r i and he rf

a m i l y , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i on f

or r e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng the i rm ot i on t o reopen. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for an ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n , T

ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 538 F . 3d 988, 992 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , and 

# FI LED MA R 02 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70673 2 we d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to re op en as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erfour ye ar s a ft erthe B IA ’ s f i nal o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and p et i t i on er s f ai l ed t o est abl i sh changed c ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d o n e s iato q u a lif yf o rth e r e g u la to rye x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim it f o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; se e al so M al t y v . A s h c r o ft , 38 1 F . 3d 94 2, 94 5 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( “ T he cr i t i ca l qu es t i on i s . . . w hether c i r c um s t anc e s ha ve c hange d s uf f i c i e nt l ytha tape t i t i one rw ho pr e vi ous l ydi d not have a l egi t i m at e c l ai m for a sy l um no w has aw el l -f ou nd ed fe arof future pers ec ut i on . ”) . W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew pet i t i on er s’ cont ent i on thatthe di sf avored gr oup ana l y s i s appl i e s t o the c hange d c i r c um s t anc e s e xc e pt i on t o the t i m e l i m i tf or m o tio n s to r e o p e n b e c au s e th e is s u e w a s n o t e x h au s te db e f o r e th e B I A . See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o

ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelli Mars","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kelli-l-marsnasa-gov\/","title":"50 Years Ago: Apollo 15 Home from the Moon","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8eGDzV67Kt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-15-home-from-the-moon\/\">50 Years Ago: Apollo 15 Home from the Moon<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/history\/50-years-ago-apollo-15-home-from-the-moon\/embed\/#?secret=8eGDzV67Kt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“50 Years Ago: Apollo 15 Home from the Moon” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8eGDzV67Kt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/apollo_15_splashdown_1_earth_from_40_000_miles_aug_7_1971_as15-96-13136.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":601}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kelly S. Miller,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00051-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Babbitt & Johnson, PA

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/22/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9815 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9815 Filed 01/25/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Patricia H. Johnson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-02999-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8787 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT      21**

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF THE REGISTRANT**

----

**SUBSIDIARIES      OF THE REGISTRANT**

| Parent                                                                                                                                 |   | Subsidiary |                                                                                                                                | Percentage                  of                  Ownership |   | State                  of Incorporation                  or                  Organization |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| *MutualFirst*                  Financial, Inc.                                                                                         |   |       | Mutual                  Federal Savings Bank                                                                                        |                                                      |   | 100%                                                                                      |   |   | United                  States |   |
| *MutualFirst*                  Financial, Inc.                                                                                         |   |       | Indiana                  Title Insurance Co., LLC                                                                                   |                                                      |   | 26.9%                                                                                     |   |   | Indiana |   |
| Mutual                  Federal Savings BankMutual                  Federal Savings BankMutual                  Federal Investment Co. |   |       | First                  M.F.S.B. CorporationMutual                  Federal Investment Co.Mutual                  Federal REIT, Inc. |                                                      |   | 100%100%100%                                                                              |   |   | IndianaNevadaMaryland |   |

----
Document

Exhibit 10.4







Amendment No. 3 to Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 2018-10




January 26, 2021




Insurance Commissioner, State of California
c/o Chief, Securities Transaction Unit
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700


Greetings:


As directed by Insurance Commissioner, State of California, the beneficiary, and for the account of Employers Preferred Insurance Company, Reno, Nevada, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco hereby amends its Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. 2018-10 (the “Letter of Credit”), dated March 9, 2018, by decreasing the Credit Amount (as defined in the Letter of Credit) from $125,000,000 to $10,000,000. 


This document and the document first establishing the Letter of Credit (including any amendments) together constitute the Letter of Credit. Except as specifically amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Letter of Credit remain in full force and effect.






Very truly yours,




Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco


By                Title
 /s/ John “JJ” Jaravata     Associate Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robin Carter,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00047-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: McGlynn, Glisson & Mouton

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 1/16/2018, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9837 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9837 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Tucker,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04620-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Offices of Robert J Fenstersheib

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/15/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9447 Filed 12/22/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9447 Filed 12/22/17 Page 2 of 2
#### MELVIN FEILER, D.D.S. v. AMERICAN DENTAL CENTER, ET AL. AND MICHAEL J. ARMONE, D.D.S.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### COMMUNITY ADVERTISING CORPORATION v. THE COLUMBUS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### RICHARD DESTASIO v. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.