alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11
Capstone Capital Corporation
Computation of Net Income Per Common Share



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                                                                                          From
                                                                                                               June 30, 1994
                                                                    Year Ended          Year Ended             Inception) to
                                                                    December 31,         December 31,           December 31,
                                                                       1996                 1995                    1994
                                                                    -----------         -----------            -------------
<S>                                                               <C>                  <C>                      <C>
PRIMARY:
        Weighted average shares outstanding                         11,086,086           6,271,242               5,980,000
        Net income                                                $ 18,913,689         $ 9,708,391              $4,762,734
        Net income per common share                               $       1.71         $      1.55              $     0.80

FULLY DILUTED:
        Weighted average shares outstanding                         11,086,086           6,271,242               5,980,000
        Net effect of assumed conversion of convertible debt         2,073,127           2,325,421                       -
                                                                  ------------         -----------              ----------
        Total weighted average shares and common stock
          equivalents outstanding                                   13,159,213           8,596,663               5,980,000
                                                                  ============         ===========              ==========
        Net income                                                $ 18,913,689         $ 9,708,391              $4,762,734
        Convertiblle debt interest expense                           3,219,427           3,867,364                       -
                                                                  ------------         -----------              ----------
        Adjusted Net Income                                       $ 22,133,116         $13,575,755              $4,762,734
                                                                  ============         ===========              ==========
        Net income per common share                               $       1.68         $      1.58              $     0.80
                                                                  ============         ===========              ==========
</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES KOEDATICH.

June 27, 1989.

Leave to appeal granted.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Monica Staggs, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC, 

Defendant.

No. CV-15-01695-PHX-GMS

ORDER 

 On November 4, 2015, the Court was advised that this case had settled (Doc. 9). 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter will, without further Order of this Court, be 

dismissed with prejudice within 14 days of the date of this Order unless a stipulation to 

dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate this 

matter on January 19, 2016 without further leave of Court. 

 Dated this 5th day of January, 2016. 

Honorable G. Murray Snow

United States District Judge

Case 2:15-cv-01695-GMS Document 10 Filed 01/05/16 Page 1 of 1
#### HEATHER RIDGE, II, ETC. v. GEORGE FREEMAN, ET UX.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Prasith LONG, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Respondent.

No. 02-3203.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 29, 2003.

Decided Sept. 3, 2003.

Subhash Chandra, Omaha, NE, for Petitioner.

Robert M. Loeb, Michele Y.F. Sarko, Papú Sandhu, Ara B. Gershengorn, Judy Forrest, John C. Cunningham, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, a Lao citizen, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. He argues that the BIA erred in denying his application because the BIA “blurred” his statutory basis for asylum, inadequately addressed whether he suffered past persecution, and relied exclusively on the State Department’s country report to distort the political situation in Laos. After careful review of the record, we deny the petition. *See Navarijo-Barrios v. Ashcroft,*322 F.3d 561, 562 (8th Cir.2003) (standard of review).

Even assuming petitioner established past persecution, his testimony, along with the State Department’s country report, support the BIA’s conclusion that he lacks a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See Francois v. INS,*283 F.3d 926, 930-31 (8th Cir.2002). He was not harassed during the nine years before he left Laos, his wife was not bothered after he left, and there is no indication that his two daughters who remain in Laos have been harmed. In addition, petitioner and his wife were issued passports and were permitted to leave the country, *see id.*at 932; *Manivong v. Dist. Dir., U.S. Dep’t of Justice,*164 F.3d 432, 433 (8th Cir.1999), and the country report indicates that conditions in Laos have improved, exit visas and passports are generally easy to obtain, the government does not interfere with emigration, and former citizens who fled the *683regime have been welcomed back, *see Perinpanathan v. INS,*310 F.3d 594, 599 n. 1 (8th Cir.2002).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7781

HUGH R. EPPS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-96-178)

Submitted: February 11, 1997 Decided: August 19, 1997

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hugh R. Epps, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's* order denying relief

on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No.

104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the magistrate judge. Epps v. Baskerville, No. CA-96-

178 (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT E. CAMPBELL, SR.

September 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
#### CRAIG v. CTY. OF CHATHAM

No. 270PA01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 30

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 16 August 2001. Conditional petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 16 August 2001.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-14-036]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

 October 23, 2014 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731-TA-1229 and 1230 (Final) (Monosodium Glutamate from China and Indonesia). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on November 4, 2014.

5. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-505 and 731-TA-1231, 1232, 1235, and 1237 (Final) (Grain-Oriented Electrical Steel from China, Czech Republic, Korea, and Russia). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on November 4, 2014.

6. Outstanding action jackets: none.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

 Issued: October 15, 2014.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-24894 Filed 10-15-14; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OFSECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATEDS CODE)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of theundersigned officers of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge,that the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March31, 2003 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

 
| Dated: May 15,  2003 | /s/ Charles M. Fernandez |   |
|----------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                 |                     |   |
|                 | Charles M. Fernandez     |   |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                 |                     |   |
|                 |                     |   |
| Dated: May 15,  2003 | /s/ Paul R. Thomson      |   |
|                 |                     |   |
|                 | Paul R. Thomson          |   |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer  |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Kurt Bordian, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Mexoro Minerals Limited; 

 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) omitted;  

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: March 1, 2010
    /s/ Bruce W. DuncanBruce W. DuncanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies
that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of BUCA, Inc.

Dated: November 7, 2007



/s/ Wallace B. DoolinWallace B. DoolinChairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Kaye R. OLearyKaye R. OLearyChief Financial Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jamie Groh","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jgroh1\/","title":"NASA, DOD Seek Universities to Develop CubeSats for Launch\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UaHWp8dZ5c\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/launch-services-office\/lsp\/nasa-dod-seek-universities-to-develop-cubesats-for-launch-2\/\">NASA, DOD Seek Universities to Develop CubeSats for Launch\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/launch-services-office\/lsp\/nasa-dod-seek-universities-to-develop-cubesats-for-launch-2\/embed\/#?secret=UaHWp8dZ5c\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA, DOD Seek Universities to Develop CubeSats for Launch\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UaHWp8dZ5c\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/iss038e044916large.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":399}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Janet K. James,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03708-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9094 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Mark A. Garcia","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/markagarcia\/","title":"Expedition 69 Image Gallery","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"3DxxuWmp6O\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/expedition-69-image-gallery\/\">Expedition 69 Image Gallery<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/expedition-69-image-gallery\/embed\/#?secret=3DxxuWmp6O\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Expedition 69 Image Gallery” — NASA\" data-secret=\"3DxxuWmp6O\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/iss069e018537\/iss069e018537~large.jpg?w=600&h=1280&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1280}