alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10Q FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,568
<PP&E>                                          11,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,367
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,621)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,903
<SALES>                                         20,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,974
<CGS>                                            3,549
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,549
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    341
<INCOME-TAX>                                        87
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                254
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24477]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD550

North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Charter 
Implementation Committee will convene October 29, 2014, from 9-5 p.m. 
via teleconference. Listening site, North Pacific Fishery Management 
Council conference room 205 or dial 907-271-2896.

DATES: The teleconference will be held on October 29, 2014, 9 a.m.-5 
p.m. (AKDT).

ADDRESSES: The teleconference will be held at the North Pacific Fishery 
Management Council, 605 W 4th Avenue, Room 205, Anchorage, AK.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave. Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve MacLean, Council staff; 
telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda is to identify a range of 
potential management measures for the Area 2C and Area 3A charter 
halibut fisheries in 2015, using the management measures in place for 
2014 as a baseline. For Area 2C, the baseline management measure is a 
daily limit of one fish less than 44 inches or greater than 76 inches 
in length. For Area 3A, the baseline management measure is a daily 
limit of two fish, one fish of any size, and a second fish which must 
be 29 inches or less in length. Committee recommendations will be 
incorporated into an analysis for Council review in December 2014. The 
Council will recommend preferred management measures for consideration 
by the International Pacific Halibut Commission at its January 2015 
meeting, for implementation in 2015.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues of this notice that require emergency action under section 
305(c)of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 
provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to take 
final action to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 
working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: October 9, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-24477 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2315 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2315

                       One Hundred Eighth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to extend the deadline 
                for the INTELSAT initial public offering.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF IPO DEADLINE.

    Section 621(5)(A)(i) of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 
(47 U.S.C. 763(5)(A)(i)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``December 31, 2003,'' and inserting ``June 30, 
    2005,''; and
        (2) by striking ``June 30, 2004;'' and inserting ``December 31, 
    2005;''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60192

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES WILSON BROCK, also known 

as Tobert Sones Brock Jr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3-97-CR-56-ALL-LN

- - - - - - - - - -

June 1, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Wilson Brock was convicted of conspiracy to defraud

the Government of claims in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286. 

Brock’s court-appointed counsel, Cynthia A. Stewart, has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brock was sent a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
No. 99-60192

-2-

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

We previously ordered Stewart to file a copy of the

Memorandum of Understanding referenced in her motion and brief as

providing for a waiver of Brock’s right to appeal. She has not

done so but has filed a letter indicating that she does not have

a signed copy of such document. Although Stewart stated that she

reviewed this memorandum and represented to the court that Brock

waived his right to appeal his guilty plea and sentence, the

record is devoid of any evidence that Brock waived his right to

appeal. Stewart is, therefore, ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why she

should not be sanctioned for making material misrepresentations

to this court. Stewart shall have until June 15, 2000, to file

with the Clerk of this Court under oath her response to this show

cause order.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ISSUED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating  Partners  1992-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and statement of operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         267,639
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  308,297
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               598,378
<PP&E>                                         9,080,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,705,196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,295,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          90,433
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,815,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,295,447
<SALES>                                        274,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               282,529
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  235,852<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (30,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (30,943)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (30,943)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11


                       HAMILTON BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                                ----------------------------------
                                                                    2000                   1999
                                                                -----------            -----------
<S>                                                              <C>                    <C>
Basic
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             10,081,147             10,056,111

Net income                                                           $7,203                 $6,069

Basic earnings                                                       $ 0.71                 $ 0.60

Diluted:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             10,081,147             10,056,111

Potential common shares outstanding - options                       139,974                227,124
                                                                 ----------             ----------
Total common and potential common shares outstanding             10,221,121             10,283,235

Net income                                                           $7,203                 $6,069

Diluted earnings per share                                           $ 0.70                 $ 0.59


</TABLE>
#### Eduardo Labarca et al., Appellants, v Abdul Rauf et al., Defendants, and Irina Belova, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 889]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for property damage, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), dated January 6, 2004, as denied their motion for a default judgment against the defendant Irina Belova upon her failure to appear or answer the complaint and granted the cross motion of that defendant to the extent of vacating her default in answering the complaint and permitting her to answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To successfully oppose the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment against her, the respondent was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default in answering and a meritorious defense *(see Dinstber v Fludd, 2*AD3d 670, 671 [2003]; *Albano v Nus Holding Corp.,*233 AD2d 280, 281 [1996]). The respondent made that showing. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment, vacating the respondent’s default, and permitting her to answer. Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mindy Sue Patton,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04110-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Weitz & Luxenberg, PC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/8/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8966 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cristal Morris,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00233-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss, PLLC - Jackson, MS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/8/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 10, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 823 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
#### The State *v.*Leak and Others.—In error.

*Wednesday, July*23.

DEBT by the state on a judgment of the *Owen*Circuit Court obtained on a forfeited recognizance; the declaration not showing whether the recognizance had been taken in a civil or criminal case. *Held,*that a plea that the debt had been remitted by the governor, must show that the forfeiture had been incurred in proceedings arising out of a violation of the penal laws.

If in debt payment of the whole be pleaded and issue be joined on the plea, the whole and not a part of the issue should be tried.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2394 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the expensing 

of environmental remediation costs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2004 

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself and Mr. BAYH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

the expensing of environmental remediation costs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF EXPENSING OF ENVIRON4 MENTAL REMEDIATION COSTS. 

5 (a) PROVISION MADE PERMANENT.—Section 198 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expensing 

7 of environmental remediation costs) is amended by strik8 ing subsection (h). 

9 (b) EXPANSION OF ELIGIBLE CONTAMINATES.— 
2 

•S 2394 IS 

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 198(c)(1)(B) of the 

2 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified 

3 contaminated site) is amended by striking ‘‘haz4 ardous substance’’ and inserting ‘‘hazardous or toxic 

5 substance, or in which is located 1 or more struc6 tures in which such substance is found or of which 

7 such substance is a part’’. 

8 (2) HAZARDOUS OR TOXIC SUBSTANCE.—Sec9 tion 198(d)(1) of such Code (defining hazardous 

10 substance) is amended— 

11 (A) by inserting ‘‘or toxic’’ after ‘‘haz12 ardous’’ in the matter preceding subparagraph 

13 (A), 

14 (B) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub15 paragraph (A), 

16 (C) by striking the period at the end of 

17 subparagraph (B) and inserting a comma, and 

18 (D) by adding at the end the following new 

19 subparagraphs: 

20 ‘‘(C) any substance which is listed as an 

21 extremely hazardous substance under section 

22 302(a) of the Emergency Planning and Com23 munity Right-to-Know Act of 1986, and 

24 ‘‘(D) any oil (as defined in section 

25 1001(23) of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990).’’. 
3 

•S 2394 IS 

1 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

2 (A) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 

3 198(b) of such Code are each amended by in4 serting ‘‘or toxic’’ after ‘‘hazardous’’. 

5 (B) Section 198(d)(2) of such Code is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘of such Act’’ and all that 

7 follows and inserting ‘‘of the Comprehensive 

8 Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

9 Liability Act of 1980 by reason of subpara10 graph (A) or (C) of subsection (a)(3) thereof.’’. 

11 (C) The heading for section 198(d) of such 

12 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘or Toxic’’ after 

13 ‘‘Hazardous’’. 

14 (c) ELIMINATION OF RECAPTURE ON SALE.—Section 

15 198 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 

16 striking subsection (e) and by redesignating subsections 

17 (f) and (g) as subsections (e) and (f), respectively. 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply to expenditures paid or incurred 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years 

21 ending after such date. 

Æ