alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) TO BE FURNISHED BUT NOT FILED

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infocrossing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Zach
Lonstein and William J. McHale, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Senior
Vice President of Finance, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.



/s/ ZACH LONSTEIN                           /s/ WILLIAM J. McHALE
------------------------------------       -------------------------------------
Zach Lonstein                              William J. McHale
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer       Senior Vice President of Finance
May 10, 2005                               May 10, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LENNON HOBART BURNS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-4530

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

AND ALICIA MARIE HAGEN,

Appellee.

/

Opinion filed July 29, 2016

Administrative Appeal from the

Department of Revenue.

Lennon Hobart Burns, Citrus Springs,

pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee,

for Appellee.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the Notice of Confession of Error filed by the Department of Revenue, 

we reverse the Final Modified Administrative Support Order, dated December 15, 2015,

and remand for further proceedings. 

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PALMER, EVANDER, and BERGER, JJ., concur.
#### STATE v. GRAY

No. 556A93-2

Case below: Lenoir County Superior Court

Motion by defendant to delay ruling dismissed 18 December 2001.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Delivers on Making Gate to Gate Flights More Efficient","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zLXuz9hCJs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-delivers-on-making-gate-to-gate-flights-more-efficient\/\">NASA Delivers on Making Gate to Gate Flights More Efficient<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-delivers-on-making-gate-to-gate-flights-more-efficient\/embed\/#?secret=zLXuz9hCJs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Delivers on Making Gate to Gate Flights More Efficient” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zLXuz9hCJs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/atd-feature-mar-2022.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":406}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,236,558
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  551,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,235,293
<PP&E>                                       2,405,086
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,238,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,592,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,167,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       224,797
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,847,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,592,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,296,848
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,559,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (86,331)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (186,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (186,257)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (186,257)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Gina Tressler,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04071-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Curtis Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/27/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9301 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9301 Filed 12/13/17 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Wilfredo Diaz, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 919]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged with possession of contraband and possession of a weapon after a search of his cell uncovered an altered toothbrush with a small piece of metal melted onto the end along with a two-inch nail bent at the end. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charge of possession of contraband and, after the disciplinary hearing, was also found guilty of possession of a weapon. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the nature *979of the altered toothbrush and admission by petitioner that he made and possessed the item, provides substantial evidence to support the determination finding him guilty of possession of a weapon *(see Matter of Zhang v Murphy,*1 AD3d 784, 784-785 [2003]; *Matter of Matthews v Goord,*275 AD2d 841 [2000]). Although petitioner maintained that the item was only meant to be used as a screwdriver, it was within the discretion of the Hearing Officer to assess petitioner’s credibility *(see Matter of Hernandez v Goord,*295 AD2d 737, 738 [2002], *lv dismissed*100 NY2d 529 [2003]). Moreover, petitioner’s exculpatory explanation for possessing the item does not preclude a finding that the altered item could be classified as a weapon in a prison setting *(see id.*at 738).

We are also unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that he was improperly denied the right to call character witnesses without a written explanation inasmuch as the record establishes that the requested witnesses had no personal knowledge of the incident *(see Matter of Krivoi v Selsky,*284 AD2d 677, 678 [2001]; *Matter of Bonez v Senkowski,*265 AD2d 713 [1999]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for our review *(see Matter of Cameron v Goord,*10 AD3d 795, 796

[2004] ).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
II 

Calendar No. 578 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2291 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary Ann 

Collura Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 7, 2004 

Mr. CORZINE (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New 

Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 14–24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, 

6 and known as the Fair Lawn Main Post Office, shall be 
2 

•S 2291 RS 

1 known and designated as the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Of2 fice Building’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

6 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

7 to the ‘‘Mary Ann Collura Post Office Building’’. 

Calendar No. 578 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2291 

A BILL 

To redesignate the facility of the United States 

Collura Post Office Building’’. Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Mary Ann Postal Service located at 14–24 Abbott Road in 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
SAINT FRANCIS UNIVERSITY

Space Sciences and Engineering Mobile 

Interactive Exhibit for Rural Areas: Earth to 

Moon

Dr. Lanika Ruzhitskaya

2/01/22 - 7/01/23

Space Sciences and Engineering Mobile Interactive 

Exhibit for Rural Areas: Earth to Moon was built by 

Saint Francis University’s engineering faculty and 

students to be displayed in public libraries in the rural 

region of the Appalachian Mountains in Central 

Pennsylvania. The exhibit aims to inspire children’s 

natural curiosity about the world around them, excite 

the Artemis generation about space exploration, and 

engage them in creative thinking and problem solving. 

To meet these goals, three interrelated displays were 

created: (1) Missions to the Moon, (2) Living on the 

Moon, and (3) The surface of the Moon. Each display 

includes high resolution images, 3D fabricated models 

of the lunar surface and human-engineered 

constructions, learning materials, and hands-on 

activities during which children explore lunar rocks and 

craters, purify water, and observe Earth’s phases from 

the surface of the Moon.

List of Partners:

• Appalachia Intermediate Unit 8

• Claysburg Education Foundation

• Claysburg Area Public Library

• Hollidaysburg Area Public Library

• Patton Public Library

• Portage Public Library

Students from Saint Michael School at the exhbit 

grand opening

Credits: Saint Francis University

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC22K0444, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
Exhibit 10.1


 


AMENDMENT TO THE SYNAPTOGENIX, INC. 2020 EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN


 


AMENDMENT


TO


SYNAPTOGENIX, INC.


2020 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


In accordance with those certain
resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors and stockholders of Synaptogenix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
the Synaptogenix, Inc. 2020 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.             Section
3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to increase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock,
par value $0.0001 per share, reserved for issuance under the Plan as follows:


 


“(a)         The
number of Shares which may be issued from time to time pursuant to this Plan shall be 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock.”


 


2.             Unless
otherwise expressly provided for in this Amendment to the Plan (this “Amendment”), all capitalized words, phrases,
or defined terms used in this Amendment will have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Plan.


 


3.             Except
as expressly set forth in this Amendment, there have been no other changes or modifications to the Plan, and the Plan remains otherwise
unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


4.             This
Amendment shall be effective as of April 7, 2021.


 


 


[signature page follows]


 




     


     


    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused
this Amendment to be executed effective as of the date set forth above.


 


 


	 	SYNAPTOGENIX, INC.,
	 	A Delaware corporation
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Alan J. Tuchman
	 	 	Alan J. Tuchman, Chief Executive Officer


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


[Signature Page to Amendment to the Plan]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

2

-1- 

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

Barbara Van Sciver, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

 Defendants. 

MDL No. 2:15-md-02641 -DGC 

Civil Action No.: 2:16-cv-00386-DGC

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 

Plaintiff Barbara Van Sciver hereby demands a trial by jury as to all issues so triable. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of February, 2016. 

By: /s/ Wendy R. Fleishman 

Wendy R. Fleishman 

Daniel E. Seltz 

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & 

BERNSTEIN, LLP

250 Hudson St., 8th Floor 

New York, NY 10013 

Phone: (212) 355-9500 

Fax: (212) 355-1008 

wfleishman@lchb.com 

dseltz@lchb.com 

Annesley H. DeGaris 

DEGARIS LAW GROUP, LLC

3179 Green Valley Road, 235 

Birmingham, AL 35243 

Phone: (205) 558-9000 

Fax: (205) 647-3354 

adegaris@degarislaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 867 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1292344.1 -1- 

REED SMITH LLP 

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 19th day of February, 2016, I electronically transmitted the 

foregoing Demand for Jury Trial to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing 

and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the attorneys who are registered with the 

Court’s electronic filing system. 

/s/ Wendy R. Fleishman 

Wendy R. Fleishman 

 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 867 Filed 02/19/16 Page 2 of 2
No. 87-1077.

#### Millang *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of CryptoLogic Limited (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies solely for purposes of 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:    March 16, 2012
/s/ Huw SpiersHuw SpiersChief Financial Officer




This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Student Loan Corporation (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael J. Reardon,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Daniel P. McHugh, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities                   Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the                    financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael J. ReardonMichael J. ReardonChief Executive
OfficerAugust 6, 2004



/s/ Daniel P. McHughDaniel P. McHughChief Financial
OfficerAugust 6, 2004

This certification
accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.