alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"University Teams Selected as Finalists to Reimagine Aviation Energy Sources of the Future","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"iyA3lQaoZJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/university-teams-selected-as-finalists-to-reimagine-aviation-energy-sources-of-the-future\/\">University Teams Selected as Finalists to Reimagine Aviation Energy Sources of the Future<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/university-teams-selected-as-finalists-to-reimagine-aviation-energy-sources-of-the-future\/embed\/#?secret=iyA3lQaoZJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“University Teams Selected as Finalists to Reimagine Aviation Energy Sources of the Future” — NASA\" data-secret=\"iyA3lQaoZJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/blue-skies-nasa-feature-story-banner-1041-x-320-px.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":184}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Andria Burden,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03725-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8926 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KEITH SCRUGGS.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

October 15, 2014

No. 10-15-00331-CR

WILLIAM ARTHUR McINTOSH

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20087CR

**JUDGMENT**

	This appeal has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction of the appeal, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 824**  **8**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ERIC AARON LYLES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 8:03

- cr - 00484

- PJM

- 4; 8:08

- cv - 03425

- PJM )

Submitted : May 20, 2010 Decided: May 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curi am opinion
. Eric Aaron Lyles, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Simms, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eric Aaron Lyles seeks to appeal the distric t court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2009 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will no t issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find tha t the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the pr isoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lyles has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court a nd argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly M. Matter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kmatter\/","title":"Tri-C Students Shadow NASA Professionals\u00a0\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mcwHSFi1RE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/tri-c-students-shadow-nasa-professionals\/\">Tri-C Students Shadow NASA Professionals\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/tri-c-students-shadow-nasa-professionals\/embed\/#?secret=mcwHSFi1RE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Tri-C Students Shadow NASA Professionals\u00a0\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mcwHSFi1RE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/grc-2024-c-00997.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":375}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2015

To prohibit energy market manipulation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2004

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Mr. FEINGOLD, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To prohibit energy market manipulation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Electricity Needs Rules 

5 and Oversight Now (ENRON) Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF ENERGY MARKET MANIPULATION. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—Part II of the Federal Power Act 

8 (16 U.S.C. 824 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following: 
2

•S 2015 IS 

1 ‘‘SEC. 215. PROHIBITION OF MARKET MANIPULATION. 

2 ‘‘It shall be unlawful for any person, directly or indi3 rectly, to use or employ, in connection with the purchase 

4 or sale of electric energy or the purchase or sale of trans5 mission services subject to the jurisdiction of the Commis6 sion, any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance 

7 in contravention of such regulations as the Commission 

8 may promulgate as appropriate in the public interest or 

9 for the protection of electric ratepayers.’’. 

10 (b) RATES RESULTING FROM MARKET MANIPULA11 TION.—Section 205(a) of the Federal Power Act (16 

12 U.S.C. 824d(a)) is amended by inserting after ‘‘not just 

13 and reasonable’’ the following: ‘‘or that result from a ma14 nipulative or deceptive device or contrivance’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE  

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

EVAN HULICK, 

   Plaintiff, 

 v. 

C. R. BARD, INC., a New Jersey Corporation;  

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., an 

Arizona Corporation, and; NEOMETRICS, 

INC., 

   Defendants. 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC  

Civil Action No. CV-17-03178-PHX-DGC 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 In accordance with LRCiv 5.5 and the Court’s Administrative Policies and Procedures 

Manual, I certify that the accompanying Stipulation of Dismissal, without prejudice, and 

proposed Order were electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF 

system which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record.  I further certify that a 

copy of these documents have been sent to the Hon. David G. Campbell, U.S.D.J. at United 

States District Court, Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Courthouse, Suite 263, 401 West Washington 

Street, SPC 58, Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2156 via regular mail. 

Date: December 14, 2017    s/Fiona J. Dugan     

       Fiona J. Dugan, Paralegal 

ARCHER & GREINER, P.C. 

Riverview Plaza 

10 State Route 35 

Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 

732.268.8000 (phone) 

732.345.8420 (fax)  213659661v1 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC   Document 9332-2   Filed 12/14/17   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,243,349
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,504,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (105,800)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,585,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,590,078
<PP&E>                                           1,017,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (545,994)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,730,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,475,017
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,353,068
<COMMON>                                           218,765
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,357,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,730,954
<SALES>                                         25,639,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,639,086
<CGS>                                           23,258,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,675,169
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    38,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    687,203
<INCOME-TAX>                                       286,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                400,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       400,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.02
        


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

GT/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID M. SHIPP,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary,

Department of Health and Human

Services,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-35168

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-01460-RAJ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2010 ** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

FILED

MAR 08 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
GT/Research 2 09-35168

David Matthew Shipp, a former federal employee, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his action against the Department of Health

and Human Services (“Department”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review for clear error the district court’s factual findings relevant to its

determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, Autery v. United States, 424

F.3d 944, 956 (9th Cir. 2005), and review de novo the district court’s legal

determination, see Washington v. Garrett, 10 F.3d 1421, 1428 (9th Cir. 1993). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Shipp’s action for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction because Shipp sought review of a decision of the Merit System

Protection Board (“MSPB”) that did not adjudicate the merits of Shipp’s

discrimination claims against the Department. See id. (“[O]nly the Court of

Appeals for the Federal Circuit can review MSPB decisions in cases that do not

entail discrimination claims[.]”); Sloan v. West, 140 F.3d 1255, 1261-62 (9th Cir.

1998) (discussing importance of uniformity of MSPB-related case law).

Shipp’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We deny all pending motions.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                       5

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    4,079,353
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             2,125,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0
<PP&E>                                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           59,527,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             0
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                               39,335,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             59,527,647
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          7,211,721
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          4,344,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            138,570
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          716,903
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           2,012,016
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       2,012,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                              2,012,016
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0


</TABLE>
No. 87-860.

#### Woods et al. *v.*Federal Home Loan Bank Board et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each director of MIVA, Inc. (the "Corporation") whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Peter A. Corrao
and Michael Cutler as the undersigned's attorneys-in-fact, or any of them individually as the undersigned's attorney-in-fact, each with full power of
substitution and revocation, to sign, in the undersigned's name and on his behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Form 10-K"), and likewise to sign and file
with the Commission any and all amendments to the Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said attorney-in-fact, or their substitutes, may do
or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands as dated below.

Date

Signature

TitleMarch 31, 2009

/s/ LAWRENCE WEBER Lawrence Weber

Chairman of the Board of DirectorsMarch 30, 2009

/s/ GERALD W. HEPP Gerald W. Hepp

DirectorMarch 31, 2009

/s/ JOSEPH P. DURRETT Joseph P. Durrett

DirectorMarch 31, 2009

/s/ ADELE GOLDBERG Adele Goldberg

DirectorMarch 31, 2009

/s/ LEE S. SIMONSON Lee S. Simonson

Director


1

---



QuickLinks
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 2014 / Presidential Documents 60949 

Executive Order 13678 of October 3, 2014 

Conversion Authority for Criminal Investigators (Special 

Agents) of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including sections 3301 and 3302 

of title 5, United States Code, and section 301 of title 3, United States 

Code, it is hereby ordered as follows: 

Section 1. Providing Conversion Authority. I find that conditions of good 

administration (specifically, the need to make the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice (ATF), competitive 

in recruiting high quality special agents by giving the ATF an authority 

held by other Federal law enforcement agencies) make necessary an exception 

to the competitive examination rules for appointment to certain positions 

in the Federal civil service. 

Criminal Investigators of the ATF, who have been appointed under Schedule 

B, and who have completed 3 years of fully satisfactory service, may be 

converted non-competitively to career appointments if they meet qualifications and other requirements established by the Director of the Office of 

Personnel Management. 

Sec. 2. Implementation. The Director of the Office of Personnel Management 

shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to implement this 

order. 

Sec. 3. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed 

to impair or otherwise affect: 

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or 

the head thereof; or 

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
60950 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 2014 / Presidential Documents 

(b) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, 

substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party 

against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, 

employees, or agents, or any other person. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 3, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24218 

Filed 10–7–14; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULESOB#1.EPS</GPH>