alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lisa Durkee,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03790-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/17/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8306 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8306 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
[784 NYS2d 465]

#### Jane Doe et al., Appellants, v HMO-CNY et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Fourth Department,

November 19, 2004

*111APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Sullivan Oliverio & Gioia LLP,*Buffalo *(B.P. Oliverio*of counsel), for appellants.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse *(John G. McGowan*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hurlbutt, J.

Same opinion by Hurlbutt, J., as in *Doe v HMO-CNY*(14 AD3d 102 [2004]).

Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine and Scudder, JJ., concur.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Candi Carroll,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04606-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Flint Law Firm LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/13/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9418 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9418 Filed 12/21/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Leonora Gangi et al., Appellants, v DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al., Respondents.

[788 NYS2d 406]

In an action, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated April 21, 2004, which granted the motion of the defendants DaimlerChrysler Corporation and DaimlerChrysler Motors Corporation, and the separate motions of the defendants Bay Ridge Chrysler Flymouth Jeep Eagle, Inc., and Buteau Motor Corp. pursuant to CFLR 510 (3), to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Delaware County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants’ motions pursuant to CFLR 510 (3) to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Delaware County. The papers submitted by the defendants contained (1) the names, addresses, and occupations of the prospective witnesses, (2) the facts to which the witnesses will testify at trial, (3) a statement that the witnesses are willing to testify, and (4) a statement that the witnesses would be greatly inconvenienced if the venue of the action was not changed *(see Professional Veh. Leasing v Continuing Dev. Servs.,*275 AD2d 313, 314 [2000]; *Chimirri v Evergreen Am. Corp.,*211 AD2d 743, 744 [1995]; *O'Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp.,*207 AD2d 169, 172-173 [1995]). Moreover, contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the motions were timely, since a motion to change venue can be made at any time before the trial *(see Gennaro v Grossfeld,*186 AD2d 718 [1992]; *Korman v City of New York,*89 AD2d 888 [1982]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
#### DIAMOND JIM, INC. v. THE UNITED FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY.

May 8, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ARTHUR L. JOHNSON.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Troy Holmes,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03841-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8581 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 1
#### Cellular Telephone Company, Also Known as AT&T Wireless, Respondent, v 210 East 86th Street Corp., Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 284]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered June 20, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment, declaring plaintiffs exercise of the renewal option in the lease valid and effective, and directing defendant to extend the term of the lease for a second five-year term commencing January 1, 2003, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

*306Since the gravity of the loss was out of proportion to the gravity of the breach, the motion court properly allowed equity to intervene under the circumstances presented *(see J.N.A. Realty Corp. v Cross Bay Chelsea,*42 NY2d 392 [1977]; *Restoration Realty Corp. v Robero,*87 AD2d 301 [1982], *affd*58 NY2d 1089 [1983]). Plaintiff paid rent for each of the four months in question, inadvertently failing to pay only the nominal cost-of-living increase, and invested substantial funds to improve the premises in reliance on its right to exercise the option. Moreover, the premises have been one of plaintiffs top producing retail locations, and defendant failed to establish that any prejudice resulted from the breach. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Saxe, Ellerin, Nardelli and Marlow, JJ.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2397

To adjust the boundary of the John Muir National Historic Site, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2004

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To adjust the boundary of the John Muir National Historic 

Site, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John Muir National 

5 Historic Site Boundary Adjustment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 (a) HISTORIC SITE.—The term ‘‘Historic Site’’ 

8 means the John Muir National Historic Site established 

9 by the Act of August 31, 1964 (78 Stat. 753; 16 U.S.C. 

10 461 note). 
2

•S 2397 IS 

1 (b) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map entitled 

2 ‘‘Boundary Map, John Muir National Historic Site’’, 

3 numbered PWR–OL 426–80,044a, and dated August 

4 2001. 

5 (c) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the 

6 Secretary of the Interior. 

7 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT. 

8 (a) ACQUISITION OF LAND.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire 

10 the land or any interests in the land depicted as the 

11 ‘‘Boundary Adjustment Area’’ on the map for addi12 tion to the Historic Site. 

13 (2) MEANS.—An acquisition of land or interest 

14 in land under paragraph (1) may be made by dona15 tion, purchase from a willing seller with donated or 

16 appropriated funds, or exchange. 

17 (b) ADJUSTMENT.—The boundary of the Historic 

18 Site shall be adjusted to reflect the acquisition of land 

19 under subsection (a). 

20 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary shall admin21 ister any land or interests in land acquired under sub22 section (b) as part of the Historic Site in accordance with 

23 any laws applicable to the Historic Site.

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Olivia F. Littleton","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/olittlet\/","title":"NASA C-130 Makes First-Ever Flight to Antarctica for GUSTO Balloon Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ypy2yQ8ste\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/wallops\/nasa-c-130-makes-first-ever-flight-to-antarctica-for-gusto-balloon-mission\/\">NASA C-130 Makes First-Ever Flight to Antarctica for GUSTO Balloon Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/wallops\/nasa-c-130-makes-first-ever-flight-to-antarctica-for-gusto-balloon-mission\/embed\/#?secret=ypy2yQ8ste\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA C-130 Makes First-Ever Flight to Antarctica for GUSTO Balloon Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ypy2yQ8ste\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/20231028-181707.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":231}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Katherine Schauer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ksschaue\/","title":"NASA Enables Future of Science Observation through Tri-band Antennas","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zxSewxVVEt\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/nasa-enables-future-of-science-observation-through-tri-band-antennas\/\">NASA Enables Future of Science Observation through Tri-band Antennas<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/nasa-enables-future-of-science-observation-through-tri-band-antennas\/embed\/#?secret=zxSewxVVEt\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Enables Future of Science Observation through Tri-band Antennas” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zxSewxVVEt\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/nika-carousel-1920x1100-1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":344}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Unaudited Financial Statements for the Period Ended September 30, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,419,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  630,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,835,013
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,627
<PP&E>                                         483,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                 236,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,230,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,434,513
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        920
<COMMON>                                         1,344
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,499
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,230,278
<SALES>                                      1,618,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,618,282
<CGS>                                          961,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  961,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               671,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 265
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (655,845)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (655,845)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-0109 

LT Case No. 16-2016-CF-010093-AXXX 

_____________________________ 

WILLIAM SCOTT HOWELL, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Adrian G. Soud, Judge. 

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Ryan Edward McFarland, of Kent & McFarland, Jacksonville, 

for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

October 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

JAY, BOATWRIGHT, and PRATT, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John P. Ferranti,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03853-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9108 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. MASON

No. 388P01

Case below: 126 N.C. App. 318

Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 August 2001.