alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2410 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2410

                To promote wildland firefighter safety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2004

  Ms. Cantwell (for herself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                To promote wildland firefighter safety.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wildland Firefighter Safety Act of 
2004''.

SEC. 2. WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER SAFETY.

    (a) Definition of Secretary.--In this section, the term 
``Secretary'' means--
            (1) the Secretary of the Interior, with respect to public 
        lands (as defined in section 103 of the Federal Land Policy and 
        Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1702)), the surface of which 
        is administered by the Secretary of the Interior, acting 
        through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management; and
            (2) the Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to land of 
        the National Forest System (as defined in section 11(a) of the 
        Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 
        (16 U.S.C. 1609(a))) administered by the Secretary of 
        Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service.
    (b) Firefighter Safety and Training Budget.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) track funds expended for firefighter safety and 
        training programs and activities; and
            (2) include a line item for such expenditures in each 
        budget request submitted after the date of enactment of this 
        Act.
    (c) Annual Report to Congress.--The Secretaries shall, on an annual 
basis, jointly submit to Congress a report on the implementation and 
efficacy of wildland firefighter safety and training programs and 
activities.-
    (d) Safety Qualification of Private Contractors.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretaries shall ensure that any 
        Federal contract or agreement entered into with a private 
        entity for wildland firefighting services requires the entity 
        to provide firefighter training that is consistent with 
        qualification standards established by the National Wildfire 
        Coordinating Group.
            (2) Compliance.--The Secretaries shall develop a program to 
        monitor and enforce compliance with the requirements of 
        paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
#### Dexter Greenwood, Respondent, v Charles W. Tuzzolo et al., Appellants.

[788 NYS2d 618]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Skelos, J.), dated January 6, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The findings of the defendants’ examining neurologist were insufficient to establish a prima facie case in their favor *(see Meiheng Qu v Doshna,*12 AD3d 578 [2004]; *Rodriguez v J & K Taxi, Inc.,*12 AD3d 434 [2004]). Under these circumstances, it *652is unnecessary to consider the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s opposition to the defendant’s motion *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Boland v Dig Am.,*277 AD2d 337, 338 [2000]; *Mariaca-Olmos v Mizrhy,*226 AD2d 437, 438 [1996]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Fisher, JJ., concur.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADM

HUMAN RESOURCES

AND EDUCATION (F)

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

GENERAL

COUNSEL (G)

MANAGEMENT

SYSTEMS (J)

SAFETY AND MISSION 

ASSURANCE (Q)

HEADQUARTERS

OPERATIONS (C)

AEROSPACE SAFETY 

ADVISORY PANEL

NASA ADVISORY

COUNCIL

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY

PROGRAMS (E)

LEGISLATIVE 

AFFAIRS (L)

PROGRAM OFFICES

STAFF OFFICES

CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFICER (B)

EARTH SCIENCE (Y) SPACE FLIGHT (M)

*JPL is a contractor-op

(see par. 102

PROCUREMENT (H)

GODDARD SPACE

FLIGHT CENTER

SPACE SC

POLICY AND

PLANS (Z)

CENTERS

GEORGE C. MARSHALL

SPACE FLIGHT CENTER

LYNDON B. JOHNSON

SPACE CENTER

JOHN F. KENNEDY

SPACE CENTER

JOHN C. STENNIS

SPACE CENTER

*JET PRO

LABOR

LIFE & MICROGRAVITY 

SCIENCES & APPLICATIONS 

(U)

As of 4/29/99
#### J. T. Robinson et al *v.*L. R. Steele et al.

Appearance — Exceptions to Commissioner’s Report Regarded as Sufficient— Service.

, ■ The filing of exceptions to a master commissioner’s report, by an administrator, who had not been served with process to the suit is held to be a sufficient appearance.

APPEAL PROM GALLITJN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 17, 1868.

Opinion op ti-ie Court by

Judge Williams:

Robinson being administrator *de bonis*non, with tbe will, an nexed, of Upton Steele, and having received assets from the executors who first undertook the execution of the will, and having failed to pay the bequests to the minor plaintiff, Letitia Steele, who sues by her guardian, and her brother, W. B. Steele, they brought suit for a settlement and for judgment for the amount coming to them.

After the answer of the administrator was filed, A. Gibson’s children, by petition, were made parties and'asserted claim and asked judgment for the legacy due them; to this the administrator made no response and had no service of process.

The cause, however, was referred to a commissioner for proof and to state the accounts of the administrator and these claimants, and he reported the amount due each respectively.

To this report the administrator took various exceptions, not only to the allowance to the Steeles, but also to the Gibsons, and this must be regarded as an appearance to the latter’s suit, even if the proceedings in their behalf had been irregular.

The court overruled his exceptions, and he asks a correction of the judgment.

After regarding all the exceptions, we find but the following errors:

> The assets to be distributed are set- down by the .commissioner at.........................$18,451.07

> One-fifth of which is ...................... 3,690.21-

> Whilst he reports it at ..................... 3,879.17

*307
      *Winslow, for appellants.*

This evidently being a mistake of calculation, and perhaps might be regarded a misprision, but for an exception to it, and which is also overruled; when this is corrected,

> the amount due W. B. Steele is................$344.70

> instead of the adjudged amount of ............. 439.18

> there is due the minor L. Steele................ 495.10

> instead of the adjudged amount of.............. 589.59

> And there is due the Gribsons.................. 408.72

> instead of the sum adjudged................... 597.68

Bor these errors, the judgment is reversed, with directions to the court below to correct them.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Christopher R. Smith,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04185-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/16/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9021 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Terri StLawrence, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04009-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/1/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8802 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8802 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of registration.
 SUMMARY: Austin Pharma, LLC applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. The DEA grants Austin Pharma, LLC registration as a manufacturer of those controlled substances.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated May 28, 2014, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on June 4, 2014, 79 FR 32322, Austin Pharma, LLC, 811 Paloma Drive, Suite C, Round Rock, Texas 78665-2402, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or objections were submitted to this notice. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Austin Pharma, LLC to manufacture the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, and reviewing the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to manufacture bulk synthetic active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for distribution and new product development to its customers. The company plans to bulk manufacture a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol. In reference to drug code 7360, the company plans to manufacture a synthetic cannabinol in bulk for sale to its customers. The controlled substance will be further synthesized to bulk manufacture a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol (7370). No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. Dated: October 2, 2014. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2014-24018 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Olivia F. Littleton","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/olittlet\/","title":"NASA Balloons Head North of Arctic Circle for Long-Duration Flights","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Fi9QbXi4qN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/wallops\/nasa-balloons-head-north-of-arctic-circle-for-long-duration-flights\/\">NASA Balloons Head North of Arctic Circle for Long-Duration Flights<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/wallops\/nasa-balloons-head-north-of-arctic-circle-for-long-duration-flights\/embed\/#?secret=Fi9QbXi4qN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Balloons Head North of Arctic Circle for Long-Duration Flights” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Fi9QbXi4qN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/sweden-balloon.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MAXWELL MELVINS.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

- - - - - - - -

denied

NO. 15-0379

NADER DARYAPAYMA AND

FARIBA DARYAPAYMA

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK

MELLON F/K/A THE BANK OF

NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR

THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF

THE CWABS, INC., ASSET-BACK

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-15 §

§

§

§

§

§ Dallas County,

5th District.

September 11, 2015

Petitioner s' petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

October 30, 2015

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

         

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE

, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, NADER DARYAPAYMA AND FARIBA

DARYAPAYMA, pay all costs incurred on this petition.WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 30th day of October, 2015

.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation, 

No. MDL 15-02641-PHX DGC 

ORDER 

Plaintiff has filed a motion to seal. Doc. 8166. 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to seal (Doc. 8166) is granted. The Clerk is 

directed to accept for filing under seal the documents lodged on the Court’s docket as 

Docs. 8167, 8168, 8169, and 8171. 

Dated this 17th day of November, 2017. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8856 Filed 11/17/17 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit
10.49
 ESCROW AGREEMENT
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 ARTICLE I
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
 1.1 Establishment of Funds.
 1.2 Treatment of Funds.
 A.
 B.
 1.3 Escrow Procedure and Payment Instruction.
 A.




---



##### 



B.
    2




---



##### 



1.4 Termination.
 1.5 Rights of Lender.
 ARTICLE II
PROVISIONS AS TO THE ESCROW AGENT
 2.1 Limitation of the Escrow Agents Capacity.
 A.
 B.
 2.2 Authority to Act.
 A.
 B.
 C.
  3




---



##### 



D.
 E.
 2.3 Compensation/Indemnification.
 A.
 B.
 2.4 Miscellaneous.
 A.
 B.
 C.
  4




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 3.1 Discharge of the Escrow Agent.
 3.2 Escrow Instructions.
 3.3 Notice.
 (A)
    
    If to the Escrow Agent, addressed to:First Capital Bank4222 Cox Road, Suite 200Glen Allen, Virginia 23060Attn: Escrow Department(B)
    
    If to Buyer or the Surviving Corporation, addressed to:Rio Vista Energy Partners L.P.Attn: Ian T. Bothwell, Acting Chief Executive Officer840 Apollo Street, Suite 313El Segundo, California 90245andRegional Enterprises, Inc.Attn: Chief Executive Officer410 Water StreetHopewell, Virginia 23860andRZB Finance LLC1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, New York 10036Attn: Ms. Nancy Reminiwith copies, which shall not constitute notice, to:Law Offices of Kevin FinckAttn: Kevin W. Finck, Esq.Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1670San Francisco, California 94111andChristian & Barton, L.L.P.Attn: Henry R. Pollard, V, Esq.909 East Main Street, Suite 1200Richmond, Virginia 23219-3095
  5




---



##### 



(C)
    
    If to Shareholders Agent, addressed to:W. Gary Farrar Jr.10803 Stoney Creek DriveRichmond, Virginia 23233with a copy, which shall not constitute notice, to:Cantor Arkema, P.C.Attn: Grant S. Grayson, Esq.1111 E. Main StreetP. O. Box 561Richmond, Virginia 23218-0561(D)
    
    If to Lender, addressed to:RZB Finance LLC1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, New York 10036Attn: Ms. Nancy Remini
  3.4 Governing Law.
 3.5 Construction.
 3.6 Amendment.
 3.7 Force Majeure
 3.8 Written Agreement.
 3.9 Counterparts.
   6




---



##### 



RIO VISTA ENERGY PARTNERS L.P.By:
    
    Rio Vista GP LLC, General PartnerBy:
    
    /s/ Ian T. BothwellPrint Name: Ian T. BothwellTitle: Acting Chief Executive OfficerREGIONAL ENTERPRISES, INC.By:
    
    /s/ Ian T. BothwellPrint Name: Ian T. BothwellTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ W. Gary Farrar, Jr.W. Gary Farrar, Jr., Shareholders Agent
  FIRST CAPITAL BANKBy:
    
    /s/ Katherine K. WagnerName: Katherine K. WagnerTitle: Senior VP and Chief Operating Officer
  7
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 11, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 11, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0377. IN THE INTEREST OF D. W., A CHILD (FATHER).
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1700840