alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Export Control Reform -

Extending International Space Station Export Control Relief 

2018-03-01 (RPC-01) 

Recommendation: 

NASA should make it a priority to lead an effort in collaboration with the Department of State and 

the Department of Commerce to expand the exceptions to the U.S. Munitions List (USML) and 

special provisions within the Commerce Control List (CCL) provided to the International Space 

Station (ISS) to explicitly include the Lunar Gateway, commercial habitats within the ISS program, 

NASA-led missions, and private sector platforms, regardless oflocation, including suborbital, orbital, 

cislunar, and deep space, which would benefit from the same relief from export control provisions 

that the ISS enjoys. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

This recommendation will avoid problematic export controls on habitats attached to the ISS, 

commercial space station(s), the Lunar Gateway, and other NASA missions. Such relief will bolster 

investment in and the safe operation of future space systems. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

Failure to act on the recommendation could have a chilling effect on investors otherwise willing to 

back commercial space activities and would hinder the operations and safety of Gateway and other 

future NASA missions. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with the recommendation to broaden the favorable export control treatment enjoyed 

by the International Space Station (ISS) to other space-based systems. NASA already has begun 

engaging with interagency partners as part of the broader efforts to streamline export control 

restrictions associated with Space Policy Directive 2. In particular, we have identified a number of 

technologies and sensors that, while important to current and future NASA missions, as well as future 

commercial endeavors in space, are not important from a national security perspective, and therefore 

merit less export control restrictions. 

Enclosure
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Max Fleming,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03649-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9121 Filed 12/05/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exchange National Bancshares,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Rose,
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 9, 2006


                                        /s/ Richard G. Rose
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Richard G. Rose
                                        Treasurer
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 521A01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 1

Motion by Attorney General for temporary stay allowed 18 September 2001.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Gerald L. Brickey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cowlitz Bancorporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report
any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect the registrants internal
control over financial reporting;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007



/s/ Gerald L. BrickeyGerald L. Brickey, Chief Financial OfficerCowlitz Bancorporation
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"LaToya Dean","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/latoya-d-deannasa-gov\/","title":"STEM Engagement at NASA Stennis","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"N0yXRcXU2d\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/stem-engagement-at-stennis\/\">STEM Engagement at NASA Stennis<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/stem-engagement-at-stennis\/embed\/#?secret=N0yXRcXU2d\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“STEM Engagement at NASA Stennis” — NASA\" data-secret=\"N0yXRcXU2d\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Laura Tanner, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03988-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8749 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   April 29, 2008
    
    /s/ George C. PlattDate
    
    George C. PlattChief Executive Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   (A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and(B)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   April 29, 2008       Date
    
    /s/ Laurie L. Latham

      Laurie L. LathamChief Financial Officer
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation, 

This Order refers to case: 

Drema June Ashley v. Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc. 

Case No. CV17-1619 PHX DGC 

No. MDL 15-02641-PHX DGC 

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Drema June Ashley’s motion to substitute 

party plaintiff. Doc. 8189. Counsel for Plaintiff Drema June Ashley filed a notice of 

suggestion of death (Doc. 7774) and an amended suggestion of death (Doc. 8573). 

Defendants having been contacted and do not object, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to substitute party plaintiff (Doc. 8189) 

is granted. Larry Joe Prather, Sr. shall be substituted for Drema June Ashley in Case No. 

CV17-1619 PHX DGC. 

 Dated this 29th day of November, 2017. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8979 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000894245
<NAME> AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,055,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,610    
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,061,879
<PP&E>                                      17,944,541
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,227,495)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,778,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          527,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,250,961
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,778,925
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,527,681
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  565,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,096,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,096,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,096,065
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    46.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    46.40
        

</TABLE>
#### Thomas Rudy *v.*Commonwealth.

Appeal and Error.

Errors by the trial court cannot be available in the Appellate Court, unless excepted to as allowed by section 275 Criminal Code.

Judgment — New Trial.

The refusal of the trial court to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was not sustained by the evidence, is not subject to revision by the Appellate Court. By section 349 Criminal Code, “an error in granting or refusing a, new trial,” is not one which is sufficient to reverse a judgment.

APPEAL EROM M’LEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

June 9, 1868.

*Owen,'for appellant.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin :

If tbe court erred in any ruling as to instructions, asked or given in this case, the error is not available in this CQurt, since such ruling -does not appear to have been excepted to, as allowed by section 275, Criminal Code, (Barnes vs. Commonwealth, 3 Met. 13.)

Nor is the action of the coiirt in refusing to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was not sustained bj the evidence, subject to revision in this court. By section 349, Criminal Code, “an error in granting or refusing a new trial” is not one which is sufficient to reverse a judgment. (Murphy vs. Commonwealth, 1 Met. 366.)

The judgment is therefore affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14498-001]


Lucid Energy, Inc. and The City of Portland Water Bureau, Conduit 
3, LLC; Notice of Transfer of Exemption

    1. By letter filed September 2, 2014 and supplemented on October 3, 
2014, Lucid Energy, Inc. and The City of Portland Water Bureau informed 
the Commission that the exemption from licensing for the Conduit 3 
Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 14498, originally issued June 3, 
2013,\1\ has been transferred from Lucid Energy, Inc. and The City of 
Portland Water Bureau as co-exemptees to Conduit 3, LLC and The City of 
Portland Water Bureau as co-exemptees. The new co-exemptee is wholly 
owned by Lucid Energy, Inc. The proposed project would be located on 
The City of Portland Water Bureau's Conduit 3 pipeline, an existing 50-
inch diameter water supply pipeline, in the City of Portland, Multnomah 
County, Oregon. The transfer of an exemption does not require 
Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 143 FERC ] 62,164, Order Granting Exemption from Licensing 
(Conduit).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Conduit 3, LLC and The City of Portland Water Bureau are now the 
co-exemptees of the Conduit 3 Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 14498. 
All correspondence should be forwarded to: Mr. Greg Semler, President 
and CEO, Lucid Energy, Inc. 2420 NE Sandy Blvd., Suite 203, Portland, 
OR 97232.

    Dated: October 7, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-24344 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Anthony Deanda,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04254-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/28/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9255 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9255 Filed 12/11/17 Page 2 of 2
National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

www.nasa.gov

 Foreign Travel Coordinators (Updated: 12/1/2023) 

Center Name Phone Email 

ARC

Vanessa Hidalgo*

Danielle Andrade*

650-604-1645

650-604-4864

vanessa.hidalgo@nasa.gov

danielle.r.andrade@nasa.gov

arc-dl-ftc@mail.nasa.gov

AFRC Priscilla Wright* 661-276-5376 priscilla.m.wright@nasa.gov

GRC Maria Wendling* 216-433-3158 maria.m.wendling@nasa.gov

GSFC

Jennifer Chesshir*

Elizabeth Sabatino*

Apryl Bradley

301-286-1308

301-286-3812

301-286-9189

gsfc-travel-office@mail.nasa.gov

HQ

Jennifer Dahlgren*

James Summers*

N/A

202-358-0637

jennifer.r.dahlgren@nasa.gov

james.c.summers@nasa.gov

hq-dl-foreign-travel-coordinators@mail.nasa.gov

JPL Marie Chinn* 818-354-2808

marie.chinn@jpl.nasa.gov

fto@jpl.nasa.gov

JSC Krystin Mitchell 281-483-7418

krystin.l.mitchell@nasa.gov

Backup: jsc-intertra@mail.nasa.gov*

KSC

Ginny Rosenberger*

Joanna Slater*

Heather Hitchcock

Ryan Richards

321-867-0731

321-867-1255

321-867-7168

321-867-3680

ginny.l.rosenberger@nasa.gov

joanna.slater@nasa.gov

heather.m.hitchcock@nasa.gov

ryan.g.richards@nasa.gov

LARC

Darlene Jones *

Tawanica Robinson *

757-864-4456

757-864-7431

darlene.r.jones@nasa.gov

Tawanica.robinson@nasa.gov

MSFC

Louise Catalfamo*

Nicki Allison*

Jeneal Young*

Ariel Wilson*

Jessica Jackson**

256-544-4574

256-544-7336

256-544-8050

256-961-4905

256-961-0197

louise.e.catalfamo-1@nasa.gov

nicki.allison@nasa.gov

jeneal.young@nasa.gov

ariel.m.wilson@nasa.gov

jessica.a.jackson-1@nasa.gov

SSC NONE N/A N/A

• Indicates FTCs who process country clearances