alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,829
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,685
<PP&E>                                          30,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,175
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,535
<SALES>                                        150,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,191
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,657
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,741
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,228
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
243 

OFFICE OF THE llTTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Eonarable Tom C. idrig 

Stat, auditor 

Austin, Texar 

opinfoa no. 011640 

ra ywr letter 

for the oozwidormtlon of 

irota : 

lleges, oa septe3P 

lwby it lewba l 

ration 

anda 4 arental 

a prioollege the 

a stipulated prioe 

al8 paid under the 

purchase prloe, 

iaioa in reg4rd te the follow3oard of Regsnt8 unpowered 

loam m&riot Sor a longer 

t tar which the approprdatioa, 

p$n” payaunt* are to be 

~ 3. PIb wao t uld b e thb l freat o f a fa ilure onthe part oi the cellqe to make any of 

tha paytuentr, rpeeified in the leaseW 
- ,244 

T’hs asaw ala8 of law whioh were deolared a plloaU,lr in this depeparbmnt*s Opinioa Ro. O-1629 and rel e erated in Oplnlan No. O-1060, are equally ap 

P 

Usable fo the 

faots abore ruBaittQdr Both OS these 

dresmd to y0u. 

opin ON weare adYou are a&n raqn3otfUlp referred to thm easea 

of Charlea saribner’8 Soas Y. fzarre, ll4 wex. ll 28b18 9. pT. 

723 (1924) and Ft. Zkmth Cavalry Club Y. She&d, -1e8 Tez. 

S39, t3S s. w. (Zd) 660 (1X36), both of rrhlahrere disauf~md 

In the opinion absre tlrrt olted. 

In the Ft. Worth Cavalry Club oam, tsupra, it uas 

spoifically held that the Adjutant Germs1 bnd no authority 

to bind the state on a rim-year leaning M)ntfaat, the oourt 

giving as onu of ita rewom the iaet that no approprlatiopt 

minted beyond a period of tao ywrs, and that any obllgatlon payable after the expiration at that period oonatitutsd 

a debt agalost the Stat*. Such a oontraet violated both Sea. 

40 of ?.rtlale IXI, and Seotlon 8 of utlole VIII of the 

State Conlrtitution, the court stated. 

In the light ol the holdlag ia that ease ad the 

declarations of the court’ In the Charles scrlbtler’o Sorm 

aa58, supra. it is t&3 OpiniOA Of this departam& tkat the 

2mid or-b&d3 ia not e-red to entar into a leas8 ooatraat for a longer period than that fcxr rhieh the appro rlation, out of whioh the rmkl paynmnts are to be .mde, % 

erreotlre, and you are 80 advised. This an8vws your first 

question. 

Tha Ft. -8orth Cavalry Club aam, llktiss, rupplies 

the answer to youp seoond qwstion. Xt ma there held that 

'wtu.t though the lesseras fez ii- year@, the atate agmoy 

becaiae a z&ire tsmnt &will. It la the o infoa of this department the% thla is t&e status M the oo E 6ge a8 of august 

31, 1939, is the inrtaat aam, and you me no advieed. 

AS a awn tenant at rrill the ooll~~ould be 

obligated to pap rental@ oa Sor &he 

lr 

riod cb tinm it 

shod@ to aoeupy the pr8zaim8. See 3l t. mmter, (Cirdpp.) 

lb7 s. v, 847, Krit 0r errcr refused. This 5nuldp16so your 

third question. 
245 

30 are attaohbt3 a. copy of 

ior your eollYenlen8.. 

0~ opini023 m.caa~ 

rdrrrr rery truly 

Robe’% q/K&k. 

AImiS tant
#### W. P. Noland et al *v.*Anna Elkins.

Administrator De Bonis Non — Debt Due From Himself.

Where an administrator de bonis non has acted improperly in not having an inventory of what came into his hands and thereby failing to preserve the evidence of the debt due by himself to his decedent, all reasonable presumption should be taken againsú him.

Interest.

It was error to compound i:-terest against the administrator with biennial rests.

APPEAL PROM ESTILL CIECUIT COUET.

December 12, 1867.

*145
      *TIarlan, Barnes*& *Lily, for appellants.*

*Burnam, for appellee.*

OPINION OE THE 0OURT BY

JUDGE WlXLIAMS :

As it was tbe sworn duty of tbe appraisers and administrator of Zacbariab Elkins, deceased, to report tbe personal estate on tbe appraisement bills, and they did report tbe note on Noland at fonr hundred dollars, this was competent evidence and *prima facie*established tbe amount of tbe debt, and which should prevail over tbe vague and uncertain recollections of witnesses in bis behalf, be having become administrator *de bonis*non, and thereby become possessed of tbe evidence of tbe debt against him; bad be acted properly be would have returned an inventory of what came to bis band, and preserved tbe evidence of tbe debts due bis decedent from himself, not having done this, all reasonable presumptions should be taken tbe more strongly against him. It was, however, erroneous to compound tbe interest with biennial rests. Tbe Statute, Section 25, Chapter 37, 1 Stant., 507, only makes tbe administrator liable for interest after two years, unless be negatives tbe presumption that be used tbe assets.

It was erroneous to adjudge to tbe widow tbe entire debt, as she was legally entitled to but a third, yet as tbe distributees were parties, this would have barred them from any future recovery, and, therefore, was no injurious error to appellant, yet as tbe judgment must be reversed, upon both tbe appeal and cross-appeal, for the-first and second errors named, it would be well for tbe court in any subsequent judgment to correct this.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed upon tbe original and cross-appeals, without costs to either party, with directions to tbe court below for further proceedings as herein indicated.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cody S. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/codyslydon\/","title":"Flying with NASA \u2013 Digital-Fly-By-Wire","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8nwrFSiJ3p\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/flying-with-nasa-digital-fly-by-wire\/\">Flying with NASA \u2013 Digital-Fly-By-Wire<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/flying-with-nasa-digital-fly-by-wire\/embed\/#?secret=8nwrFSiJ3p\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Flying with NASA \u2013 Digital-Fly-By-Wire” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8nwrFSiJ3p\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/dfbw_f8.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":471}
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 19, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

SOLOMON BEN-TOV COHEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

FRED BUSCH, Agent, US Capitol Police, 

 Defendant - Appellee.

 No. 10-1076

 (D.C. No. 1:08-CV-02188-LTB-CBS)

ORDER

Before KELLY, HARTZ, and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.

Solomon Cohen, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s March 12, 2010 Order

denying his request for certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). We dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction. 

The district court order denying Plaintiff Cohen’s Rule 54(b) certification does not

constitute a final or immediately appealable decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 or under any

recognized exception to the final judgment rule. See McCall v. Deeds, 849 F.2d 1259, 1259

(9th Cir. 1988) (district court order denying Rule 54(b) certification is not appealable);

Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., 692 F.2d 172, 174 (1th Cir. 1982) (same). 

Appellate Case: 10-1076 Document: 01018405064 Date Filed: 04/19/2010 Page: 1
2

Appellee-Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeal is DISMISSED

for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

Entered for the Court,

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-1076 Document: 01018405064 Date Filed: 04/19/2010 Page: 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INLAND NORTHWEST BANCORPORATION, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,259
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              65
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,712
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     26,424
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             818
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               832
<LOANS>                                         91,471
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,524
<DEPOSITS>                                     123,877
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,409
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,354
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,734
<OTHER-SE>                                         604
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  10,338
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,724
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,329
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   587
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,640
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,415
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,785
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,855
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      355
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    964
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         964
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.30
<LOANS-NON>                                        492
<LOANS-PAST>                                       195
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    34
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,796
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,085
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      148
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,292
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,292
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Cawley","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/james-j-cawleynasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Researchers Gain Valuable Data from OSCAR\u2019s Second Flight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bCQDYsxqTE\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-researchers-gain-valuable-data-from-oscars-second-flight\/\">NASA Researchers Gain Valuable Data from OSCAR\u2019s Second Flight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-researchers-gain-valuable-data-from-oscars-second-flight\/embed\/#?secret=bCQDYsxqTE\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Researchers Gain Valuable Data from OSCAR\u2019s Second Flight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bCQDYsxqTE\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/oscar_use_this_1_0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe have issued our report dated April 2, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsincluded in the Annual Report of ViewCast.com, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatements of ViewCast.com, Inc. on Forms SB-2 No. 333-31947, S-8 No. 333-53159, S-8 No. 333-63799,S-3 No. 333-77923, S-3 No. 333-35662 and S-3 No. 333-40630./s/ KBA GROUP LLPDallas, Texas
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Operating Partners 1992-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         148,789
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  530,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               689,031
<PP&E>                                         9,549,856
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,030,306)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,667,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          42,254
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,122,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,667,240
<SALES>                                        559,917
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               565,475
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  289,857<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                225,855
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            225,855
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   225,855
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH GREEN v. NEW JERSEY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION.

June 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Jose Fonseca, Appellant, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority et al., Respondents.

[788 NYS2d 99]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered September 18, 2003, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the complaint reinstated.

Flaintiff s testimony at his deposition and at his General Municipal Law •§ 50-h hearing sufficiently established a prima facie case of negligence against defendants. The 81-year-old plaintiff testified that he was injured when the bus he had just boarded “stopped hard,” causing him and other passengers to fall. Flaintiff s injuries included a hip fracture and a fracture of his left femur, resulting in permanent loss of use of the left hip and leg and a lengthy confinement to a wheelchair, cerebral trauma, and damage to his dentures, which were expelled from his *398mouth. The injuries allegedly destroyed plaintiffs prior ability to run errands, shop and to otherwise conduct his day-to-day affairs independently. The bus driver gave a conflicting account of the incident. While admitting that he heard but did not see plaintiff fall, he stated that he observed plaintiff and his packages strewn on the floor of the bus, and that he immediately went to plaintiffs assistance.

Plaintiffs testimony did not merely characterize the bus’s stop as sudden or violent. “It also provided objective evidence of the force of the stop sufficient to establish an inference that the stop was extraordinary and violent, . . . different . . . than the jerks and jolts commonly experienced in city bus travel and, therefore, attributable to the negligence of defendant” *(Urquhart v New York City Tr. Auth.,*85 NY2d 828, 830 [1995]). Hence it raised questions of fact that should be determined in the light of surrounding circumstances *(Harris v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*138 AD2d 56, 58 [1988]), such as whether defendants were negligent in the operation of the bus and whether such negligence caused plaintiffs injuries. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Oyster Creek Group, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY


                                                            (Deficit)
                              Common   Add'tnl    Accumulated      Total
                              Stock      Paid         During            Stock-
Paid-in                   Shares      In           Development     holder's
                             Amount    Capital       Stage              Equity


August 20, 1999     2,500,000
Founders shares     $2,500      $75            $  -                $2,575


August 20, 1999
Shares issued      2,000,000
Stock dividend      2,000,                        (2,000)                  -

Net (loss)
August 19, 1999
(inception) to
June 30, 2000                                          -                      -

Balance,
June 30, 2000      4,500,000
                            $4,500       $75          $(2,000)           $2,575

Net (loss)
For the year ended
June 30, 2001                                           (3,775)         (3,775)


Balance,           4,500,000
June 30, 2001       4,500            75             (5,775)        (1,200)

Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2002                                            (5,550)        (5,550)

Balance,          4,500,000
June 30, 2002       4,500             75            (11,325)       (6,750)

Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2003                                               (460)        (460)
                       4,500,000
                          $4,500            $75         $(11,785)   $(7,210)

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1