alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Heisenberg vortex for light-weight refrigeration of liquid hydrogen","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1u6zPIwUxc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/heisenberg-vortex-for-light-weight-refrigeration-of-liquid-hydrogen\/\">Heisenberg vortex for light-weight refrigeration of liquid hydrogen<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/heisenberg-vortex-for-light-weight-refrigeration-of-liquid-hydrogen\/embed\/#?secret=1u6zPIwUxc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Heisenberg vortex for light-weight refrigeration of liquid hydrogen” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1u6zPIwUxc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/bunge_carl.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":602}
EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-41005) and the related Prospectus and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-19389 and 333-44717)
pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan, 1994 Equity Incentive Plan,
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, Nonstatutory Stock Options and
the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CV Therapeutics, Inc., of our report
dated February 26, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of CV  Therapeutics, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended  December 31, 1998.

                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California 
March 18, 1999
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"ULI Contacts","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sjETFwteDK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/tacp\/armd-tacp-ui\/armd-tacp-ui-uli\/uli-contacts\/\">ULI Contacts<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/tacp\/armd-tacp-ui\/armd-tacp-ui-uli\/uli-contacts\/embed\/#?secret=sjETFwteDK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“ULI Contacts” — NASA\" data-secret=\"sjETFwteDK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/uli-contact.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          68,256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  143,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,436
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,462
<PP&E>                                         125,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 331,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          213,009
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   331,622
<SALES>                                        452,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               452,712
<CGS>                                          359,891
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  425,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,144
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SAMANTHA RIEMENSCHNEIDER, 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF 

DAVID SCOTT MACLEARY, PETITONER

v.

D. SABATELLI, INC.AND ANTHONY 

SABATELLI,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 174 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### In the Matter of Carla Biundo, Respondent, v New York Central Mutual, Appellant.

[789 NYS2d 195]

In a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 75 to compel arbitration of an underinsured motorist claim, New York Central Mutual appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Harkavy, J.), entered June 8, 2004, as, after a hearing, determined that the petitioner was an insured person pursuant to a certain insurance policy issued by it and denied that branch of its motion which was to dismiss the proceeding.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court’s determination, made after a hearing, that the petitioner was a resident of her parents’ household on the date of the accident and thus an insured person under the *560SUM endorsement of their automobile liability policy was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence and will not be disturbed *(see e.g. Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Paolicelli,*303 AD2d 633 [2003]; *Greenpoint Sav. Bank v Patel,*267 AD2d 204 [1999]). The testimony at the hearing demonstrated that the petitioner and her husband continued to reside with her parents until the extensive renovations to their newly purchased residence were completed. Thus, on the date of the accident the petitioner actually resided in the insured household with some degree of permanence and with the intention to remain for an indefinite period of time *(see Matter of Aetna Life & Cas. Co. [Schurr],*149 Misc 2d 717, 719 [1991]; *see also Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Rapp],*7 AD3d 302, 303 [2004]; *cf. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Kowalski,*195 AD2d 940, 941 [1993]; *Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Paolicelli, supra).*Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Cozier and S. Miller, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Michael Skorupski,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04121-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/10/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8998 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,305
<SECURITIES>                                    41,721
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                       188
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,063
<PP&E>                                           7,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,413
<BONDS>                                        140,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,723
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,361
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,148
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                      ----------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc.on Form S-8 (File No. 33-90608, 333-33293 & 333-
33317) of our reports dated February 9, except for Note 13 for which date is
March 9, 2000, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedules of RightCHOICE Managed Care, Inc., which reports are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri
March 9, 2000
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                              BIG CITY RADIO, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                               MARCH 31,
<S>                                                                                   <C>            <C>
                                                                                          1999           1998
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
Net loss............................................................................  $  (6,215,000) $  (3,286,000)
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding--basic:
  Weighted average number of common shares outstanding..............................     14,069,275     13,976,520
Dilutive effect of stock options after application of treasury stock method.........             --             --
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding.......................................     14,069,275     13,976,520
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
Net loss per share:
  Basic and dilutive (a)............................................................  $       (0.44)         (0.24)
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
                                                                                      -------------  -------------
</TABLE>
 
------------------------
 
(a) In calculating diluted earnings per share, no potential shares of common
    stock are to be included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
    when a loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders
    exists. For the three months ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company had
    a loss from continuing operations.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alea Taylor,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04469-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9252 Filed 12/11/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Nuclear Thermal Propulsion: Game Changing Technology for Deep Space Exploration","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mjcRRBSc68\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/tech-demo-missions-program\/nuclear-thermal-propulsion-game-changing-technology-for-deep-space-exploration\/\">Nuclear Thermal Propulsion: Game Changing Technology for Deep Space Exploration<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/tech-demo-missions-program\/nuclear-thermal-propulsion-game-changing-technology-for-deep-space-exploration\/embed\/#?secret=mjcRRBSc68\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Nuclear Thermal Propulsion: Game Changing Technology for Deep Space Exploration” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mjcRRBSc68\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/05\/photo-3-ntp-researchers.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":401}
EXHIBIT 10.20B

                                  AMENDMENT ONE
                             TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



        This Amendment One to that certain Employment Agreement between
Infocrossing, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Zach Lonstein
(the "Executive") is effective as of May 9, 2007 (the "Amendment One Effective
Date"). Except as otherwise indicated herein, capitalized terms in this
Amendment One shall have the same meaning as ascribed to such terms in the
Agreement.

                                     RECITAL

         Whereas, the Company and the Executive desire to modify the amount of
the Normal Retirement Benefit as defined in the Agreement.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

     I.  The Normal Retirement Benefit as defined in Section 7(e)(i) of the
         Agreement shall be increased from semi-monthly payments of seven
         thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) to nine thousand five hundred
         eighty three dollars and thirty three cents ($9,583.33).

         Except as amended herein, all terms, covenants, and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict
between the terms of the Agreement without giving effect to this Amendment One
and this Amendment One, this Amendment One will control. This Amendment One may
be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an
original but all of which taken together will constitute one and the same
instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Amendment One as of
the Amendment One Effective Date.


Infocrossing, Inc.                             Zach Lonstein



By:   /s/ ROBERT B. WALLACH                     /s/ ZACH LONSTEIN
    -----------------------------              -------------------------
       Robert B. Wallach
       President