alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of OncoVista Innovative
Therapies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Alexander L. Weis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The  information  contained in the Report
fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the
consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the
dates presented and consolidated  results of operations of the
Company for the periods presented.





Dated:
March 27, 2009





By:
                  /s/
      Alexander L. WeisAlexander
      L. WeisChief
      Executive Officer





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and will be retained OncoVista
Innovative Therapies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Emil Feherenback *v.*Andrew Strauss.

Land — Sheriff’s Sale — Quashal—Innocent Purchaser — Negligence in Seeking Relief — Estoppel.

The negligent failure to seek relief, from a sale of land, by a sheriff until his vendee has sold the property and the legal title having been conveyed to an' innocent purchaser without notice, will operate as an estoppel.

.APPEAL E^OM JEEEERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 24, 1867.

*Btite and Bullitt, for appellant. '*

*L. A. Wood, for appellee.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Robertson:

After the appellant’s negligent failure to seek relief from the sale of the house and lot until the sheriff’s vendee had sold to Wood, and the legal title had been feonveyed to Wood as an innocent purchaser, without presumable notice of any available defect in the sheriff’s sale or levy, and without any intimation or apparent cause of apprehension of a purpose by the appellant to disturb him, and after the appellant, in his petition in equity, had alleged, without qualification, that the sheriff had levied the execution on the house and lot, it is too late to move a quashal of the sale on the alleged ground of an illegal or insufficient levy. The appellant’s negligence and long and delusive acquiescence in the -levy, and his expressed, as well as implied, recognition of its validity, should now operate as an estoppel.

But he. has shown no essential defect in the levy. As indorsed on the execution, it is good. And as the sheriff notified the appellant that he would levy on the house and lot, that indorsement, whenever made on the execution in his hands, was sufficient to show authority to sell.

Wherefore the judgment dismissing the appellant’s motion to quash the sale is affirmed.
.

https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/artemis_1_map_october_2021.jpg

https://www.txstate-epdc.net/epdc_posts/space-loteria/

https://www.nasa.gov/specials/calliefirst/

www.nasa.gov/artemis
#### STATE v. STOKES

No. 467P89-2

Case below: 136 N.C. App. 668

Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 August 2001. Notice of appeal by defendant pro se pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question) dismissed ex mero motu 16 August 2001.
II 

Calendar No. 765

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2044

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2004

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

OCTOBER 4, 2004

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment 

A BILL

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical shall be held 

7 and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 

8 United States for permanent residence as of the date of 
2

S 2044 RS 

1 enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa 

2 fees. 

3 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

4 Upon the granting of permanent residence to 

5 Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, the Secretary of State 

6 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 

7 current fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

8 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

9 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

10 Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)). 

Calendar No. 765

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2044

A BILL

For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical. 

OCTOBER 4, 2004

Reported without amendment
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1874

To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, and reports 

in electronic form. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2003

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL

To require Senate candidates to file designations, statements, 

and reports in electronic form.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Senate Campaign Dis5 closure Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENATE CANDIDATES REQUIRED TO FILE ELEC7 TION REPORTS IN ELECTRONIC FORM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 304(a)(11)(D) of the 

9 Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 

10 434(a)(11)(D)) is amended to read as follows: 
2

•S 1874 IS 

1 ‘‘(D) As used in this paragraph, the terms 

2 ‘designation’, ‘statement’, or ‘report’ mean a 

3 designation, statement or report, respectively, 

4 which—

5 ‘‘(i) is required by this Act to be filed 

6 with the Commission, or 

7 ‘‘(ii) is required under section 302(g) 

8 to be filed with the Secretary of the Senate 

9 and forwarded by the Secretary to the 

10 Commission.’’ 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

12 (1) Section 302(g)(2) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 

13 432(g)(2)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or 1 working 

14 day in the case of a designation, statement, or re15 port filed electronically’’ after ‘‘2 working days’’. 

16 (2) Section 304(a)(11)(B) of such Act (2 

17 U.S.C. 434(a)(11)(B)) is amended by inserting ‘‘or 

18 filed with the Secretary of the Senate under section 

19 302(g)(1) and forwarded to the Commission’’ after 

20 ‘‘Act’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall apply to any designation, statement, or 

23 report required to be filed after the date of enactment of 

24 this Act.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

# SUMMARY:

A conference to identify issues surrounding evidence-based decision making for vitamin D in primary care will be held December 2-3, 2014, on the main campus of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland. It will also be broadcast as a webinar. The conference discussions will serve to highlight research gaps as well as data and methodological needs relevant to reducing uncertainties surrounding vitamin D in primary care practice. All persons are invited to attend, especially clinical educators, those who develop clinical recommendations, health care providers and researchers. Persons wishing to attend are required to register in advance of the conference.

# DATES:

December 2-3, 2014; 8:00 to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on first day and 8:00 to noon on second day.

# ADDRESSES:

National Institutes of Health, William H. Natcher Building; Natcher Conference Center, Building 45. Bethesda, Maryland, 20892.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Cindy Rooney, Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 3B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-7523, Email:                         *rooneyc@mail.nih.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The conference is sponsored by the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements along with co-sponsors from 10 federal agencies. Information about the conference agenda, registration procedures, and webinar arrangements can be found at:                     *https://events-support.com/​events/​Vitamin_​D_​Primary_​Care.*

                    Through its Vitamin D Initiative, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS) leads several efforts to advance scientific understanding of vitamin D and health:                     *http://ods.od.nih.gov/​Research/​VitaminD.aspx.*

Dated: October 8, 2014.

Lawrence A. Tabak,

Principal Deputy Director, NIH.

[FR Doc. 2014-24455 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION Case No. MDL 15-2641-PHX DGC 

 AMENDED ORDER 

This Document Relates to Plaintiff: 

Evan Hulick v. C.R. Bard Incorporated, et al., 

Civil Case No.: CV17-3178-PHX DGC 

 The Court has considered the Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice between the 

Parties. Doc. 9332. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECLARED that all claims of 

Plaintiff, Evan Hulick against Defendant Heraeus Medical Components, LLC, (improperly 

named as Defendant Neometrics, Inc.), in Civil Action No. MDL15-02641-PHX DGC (Member 

Case CV17-03178-PHX DGC) are dismissed in their entirety without prejudice, and each party 

shall bear its own costs. 

 Dated this 15th day of December, 2017. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9399 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"Jet Engine Installed on NASA\u2019s Quiet Supersonic X-59","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1RI65ifrE5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/jet-engine-installed-on-nasas-quiet-supersonic-x-59\/\">Jet Engine Installed on NASA\u2019s Quiet Supersonic X-59<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/jet-engine-installed-on-nasas-quiet-supersonic-x-59\/embed\/#?secret=1RI65ifrE5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Jet Engine Installed on NASA\u2019s Quiet Supersonic X-59” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1RI65ifrE5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/afrc2022-0146-60.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
California Community Bancshares, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-94763, No. 333-35974 and No. 333-35972) on Form S-8 of California
Community Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of California Community Bancshares, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of California
Community Bancshares, Inc.


                                      KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 23, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-2-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-2-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        429,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               429,524
<CGS>                                          386,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  386,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (514)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,921
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

(2) NASA contracts sourced in the state in FY21; see FY21 NASA Economic Impact Report (3) Categories are not additive. For more information on FY21 Sample Obligations, please visit: NASA Acquisition Internet Service (NAIS)

(1) For more information please visit: Value of NASA 

NASA Overall State Impact(1)

• Jobs Supported 802

• Economic Output $157,738,000

• State Tax Revenue $4,445,000

Moon to Mars Campaign State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 6

• Economic Output $1,556,000

• State Tax Revenue $40,000

Investments in Climate Change Research & 

Technology State Impacts

• Jobs Supported 462

• Economic Output $79,488,000

• State Tax Revenue $2,245,000

Sample Obligations(3)

Business $1,372,765 

• Other Than Small Business $56,500 

• Small Business $1,316,265 

 – 8(A) Program $0 

 – Economically Disadvantaged Women 

 Owned Small Business $0 

 – Historically Underutilized Business 

 (HUBZone) $0 

 – Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small

 Business $0 

 – Small Business Innovative Research $249,741 

 – Small Disadvantaged Business $148,555 

 – Veteran Owned Small Business $0 

 – Woman Owned Small Business $124,749 

 – Small Business Only $917,969 

Educational $23,594,001 

Government $0 

Non-profit Institutions $458,275 

Leading State-based NASA Business 

Contractors

XploSafe, LLC $754,226 

Raven 3D, LLC $148,555 

Structured Ions, LLC $134,992 

Amethyst Research, Inc. $124,749 

Braden Shielding Systems Construction, Inc. $97,050 

Leading State-based NASA Education Funding 

University of Oklahoma $13,739,407 

Oklahoma State University $9,854,594 

Space Grant Consortium 

University of Oklahoma $828,556 

OKLAHOMA

FY21 State Procurement Investments (2) $54.1 M
For more information about the

Economic Impact Report

for your state, go to:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NASA Headquarters

300 E Street, SW

Washington, DC 20546

www.nasa.gov/centers

www.nasa.gov

James Webb Space Telescope

Cycle 1 Hours of Access

NASA Astronauts

(Former)

Gordon Cooper

Owen Garriott

John Herrington

William Pogue

Thomas Stafford

There are 9 NASA Federal jobs and 541* contractors in the state 

of Oklahoma. 

For every NASA federal job located in Oklahoma, an additional 

88.1** jobs are supported in the state economy. For every 

million dollars’ worth of economic output generated by NASA 

federal jobs, an additional $34.5** million worth of output is 

sustained throughout the state economy.

* Indirect effects are the purchases of goods and services by 

government agencies and private sector contractors, as well as by 

the industries that supply them.

** Multiplier based on IMPLAN Input Output (I-O) model. To learn more, 

please visit: https://blog.implan.com/understanding-implan-multipliers

OKLAHOMA

802

NASA Jobs

Supported

Four Oklahoma suppliers contributed 

to NASA’s Artemis program. An 

example of the state’s contributions 

is the manufacturing of circuit card 

assemblies. The systems help control 

and monitor the propulsion systems 

in the SLS core stage and can provide 

emergency saving capability.

Oklahoma Institutions

132.2

Hours
EXHIBIT 15




                           ACCOUNTANT'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT


We  acknowledge the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form  S-3  (filed  in  October  2000  and  March  2001) and  Form  S-8 (filed in
November  1997)  of  Penn  Octane Corporation of our report dated April 25, 2005
which  appears  on  page  3  of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended  March  31,  2005.


          /s/  BURTON MCCUMBER & CORTEZ, L.L.P.


Brownsville, Texas
May 20, 2005
### 243

OFFICE OF THE llTTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Eonarable TomC. idrig Stat, auditor Austin, Texar

opinfoa no. 011640

ra ywr letter for the **oozwidormtlon of**  **irota :**  **lleges, oa**  septe3P 

### lwbyitlewba l ration anda arental 4 a prioollege the a stipulated prioe al8 paid under the purchase prloe, iaioa in reg4rd te the follow3oard of Regsnt8 unpowered 

### loam m&riot Sor a longer t tar which the approprdatioa, p$n” payaunt* are to be

~ 3. PIbat would be thb l freat of

afailure onthe part oi the cellqe to makeany of tha paytuentr, rpeeified in the leaseW- 

### ,244

T ’hs asaw ala8 of law whioh were deolared a plloaU,lr in this depeparbmnt*s Opinioa Ro. O-1629 and rel ere **ated** in Oplnlan No. O-1060, are equally apP Usable fo the faots abore **ruBaittQdr** Both OSthese dresmd to y0u. opin ON weareadYou are a&n raqn3otfUlp referred to thm easea of Charlea saribner’8 Soas Y. fzarre, ll4 wex. ll 28b18 9. pT. 723 (1924) and Ft. Zkmth Cavalry Club Y. She&d, -1e8 Tez. S39, t3Ss. w. (Zd) 660 **(1X36),** both **of rrhlahrere**  disauf~md In the opinion absre tlrrt olted.

In the Ft. Worth Cavalry Club oam, tsupra,it uas spoifically held thatthe Adjutant Germs1 

### bndno authority to bind the state on a rim-year leaning M)ntfaat, the oourt giving as onu of ita rewom the iaet that no approprlatiopt minted beyond a period of tao ywrs, and that any obllgatlonpayable after the expiration at that period oonatitutsd a debt agalost the Stat*. Such a oontraet violated both Sea. 40 of ?.rtlale IXI, and Seotlon 8 of utlole VIII of the State Conlrtitution, the court stated.

In the light ol the holdlag ia that ease ad the declarations of the court’In the Charles scrlbtler’o Sorm aa58, supra. **it is**  **t&3** OpiniOA Of **this departam&**  tkat the 2mid or-b&d3 ia not e-red to entar into a leas8 ooatraat for a longer period than that fcxrrhieh the appro 

### rlation, out of whioh the rmkl paynmnts are to be .mde, % 

### erreotlre, andyou are 80 advised. This an8vws your first question. Tha Ft. -8orth Cavalry Club aam, llktiss, rupplies the answer to youp seoond qwstion. Xt ma there held that 'wtu.t though the lesseras fez ii- year@, the atate agmoy **becaiae** a z&ire tsmnt &will. It lathe o infoaof this department the% thla is t&e status M the ooE 6ge a8 of august 31, 1939, is the inrtaat aam, and you me no advieed.

AS a awn tenant at rrill the ooll~~ould be 

### obligated to pap rental@ 

### oa Sor &he lr riod cb tinm it shod@to aoeupy the pr8zaim8. See 3l t. mmter, (Cirdpp.) lb7 s. v, 847, Krit 0r errcr refused. This 5nuldp16so your 

### third question.

### 245

30 are attaohbt3 a.copy of ior your eollYenlen8.. 0~ opini023 m.caa~
rdrrrr rery truly

Robe’%q/K&k. AImiS

## tant
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY IN THE INTEREST OF M.T.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.