alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Barbara A. Simon,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03754-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8935 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 
  





 
 CONFIDENTIAL 

March 26, 2020 
 Pay Change Memo 

Dear Bryce, 
 Effective 3/16/2020, you have agreed to reduce
your base compensation in light of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Your base pay for the remainder for 2020 will be $45,000. Below you will find details of this change: 
  

					
	 Title
	  	 	CEO	 
	 Current Base Salary
	  	$	350,000.00	 
	 Effective as of 3/16/2020
	  	$	45,000.00	 

 This memo only affects your base pay for 2020. You will be paid in accordance with TaskUs’ standard payroll practices and
subject to all withholdings and deductions as required by law. All other terms and conditions of your employment remain the same. 
 I have read and
understand the provisions of this memo. 
 Agreed to and accepted by: 
  

					
	 /s/ Bryce Maddock
	 	 	 	 3/27/2020

	Bryce Maddock	 		 	Date
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

William Fitzpatrick,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03568-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Curtis Law Group

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/11/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8355 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8355 Filed 10/23/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Marlin Paveleck,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03628-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8319 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Victoria Heath,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03909-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 26, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8585 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE FLOYD GAITHER.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 26, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(202) 317-3332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Wednesday, November 26, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time 
via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Notification of intent to 
participate must be made with Mr. Simpson. For more information please 
contact Otis Simpson at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3332 or write TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509-National Office, 
Washington, DC 20224, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: October 7, 2014.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2014-24407 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT ROSE, JR.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 06-165V

(Not to be published)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

*

LAIRD R. JONES and *

SVITLANA V. BUDZHAK-JONES, *

legal representatives of a *

minor child, W.O.J., *

*

Petitioners, * 

* Filed: November 24, 2014

v. *

* Decision on Attorney’s

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * Fees and Costs

HUMAN SERVICES *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

DECISION (ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS)

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program,1I issued a 

decision on August 20, 2014. On November 21, 2014, the parties filed a joint stipulation of fact 

concerning attorney’s fees and costs in this matter. The parties’ stipulation requests a total 

payment of $35,087.51, representing attorney’s fees and costs for work performed by the law 

firm of Robert J. Krakow. 

I find that this petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a reasonable basis 

for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and appropriate. 

Accordingly, I hereby award the total $35,087.51 as a lump sum in the form of a check 

payable jointly to petitioners and petitioners’ counsel, Robert J. Krakow.

 

1 The applicable statutory provisions defining the program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2006). 
In the absence of a timely-filed motion for review filed pursuant to Appendix B of the 

Rules of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in 

accordance herewith.2

IT IS SO ORDERED

 /s/ George L. Hastings, Jr. 

 George L. Hastings, Jr.

 Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by filing a joint notice renouncing the 

right to seek review.
EXHIBIT 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE
15D-14(A)

PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Alfred G. Merriweather, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Monogram Biosciences, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2009                          
|                                              
|/S/    ALFRED G.
MERRIWEATHER                 
|Alfred G. Merriweather Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 20, 2012

t1113

Order 

November 20, 2012

145728

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145728

COA: 310817 

Lenawee CC: 11-015634-FH

CHARLES PAUL MILLER, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Morris,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03608-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: McGlynn, Glisson & Mouton

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/12/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8284 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8284 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTONIO BARBA DUENAS

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 022

- C R

Appeal from the

41 st District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20100D02223 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the b rief until October 1 1

, 201 8

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELLANT ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Leonard Morales

, the Appellant ’ s attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before October 11 , 201 8

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 th day of September

. , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2954

___________ Thomas R. Louden, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States City of Minneapolis; Sharon Sayles * District Court for the Benton, Mayor; Council Members, * District of Minnesota. prior and seated Alice Rainville; * Barbara Johnson; Bureaucrats; Jim * [UNPUBLISHED] Moncure; Oren Larson; Gerry Takumi; * Rebecca Caulfield; Philip D. Bush, * Judge; Jane Dows; John Dows, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 1998 Filed: November 4, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States Distr ict Court for 1 the District of Mi nnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable JonathanG. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota
. -2- Thomas R. Louden appeals the district court’s dismissal of his action. Having 1 carefully reviewe d the record we conclude no error of law appears, and we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A.

2575 East Camelback Road

Phoenix, Arizona 85016-9225

(602) 530-8000

Michael T. Gallagher

Federal ID: 5395

The Gallagher Law Firm

2905 Sackett Street

Houston, Texas 77098

(713) 222-8080

(713) 222-0066 - Facsimile

donnaf@gld-law.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates To: 

Angela Maynard 

Civil Case # 2:17-cv-04653-PHX-DGC

No. MDL-15-02641-PHX-DGC

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff demands trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 

the Seventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

Dated: December 15, 2017 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michael T. Gallagher

Michael T. Gallagher

Federal ID: 5395

The Gallagher Law Firm

2905 Sackett Street

Houston, Texas 77098

(713) 222-8080

(713) 222-0066 - Facsimile

donnaf@gld-law.com

The Gallagher Law Firm, LLP

2905 Sackett Street

Houston, TX 77098

(713) 222-8080

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9384 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
-2-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 15, 2017 a true and accurate copy of the foregoing was filed 

electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system, and thereby served on all parties who have filed a notice 

of appearance using the CM/EFC system. 

/s/ Michael T. Gallagher

Michael T. Gallagher

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9384 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, v. CURTIS NICKLOW.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM DARNELL WILSON.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.