alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Anthropometry and Biomechanics","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Av2KvH4YGH\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/anthropometry-and-biomechanics\/\">Anthropometry and Biomechanics<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/anthropometry-and-biomechanics\/embed\/#?secret=Av2KvH4YGH\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Anthropometry and Biomechanics” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Av2KvH4YGH\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/540830main-mod-nbl1-35.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated March 26, 2004, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of ViewCast.com, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
ViewCast.com, Inc. on Forms SB-2 No. 333-31947, S-8 No. 333-53159, S-8 No.
333-63799, S-3 No. 333-77923, S-3 No. 333-35662 and S-3 No. 333-40630.


GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 26, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                              SkillSoft Corporation

                            20 Industrial Park Drive

                           Nashua, New Hampshire 03062

                                 April 24, 2002



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, SkillSoft
Corporation has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
("Andersen") stating that the audit of the consolidated financial statements of
SkillSoft Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2002 and 2001 and for
each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2002 was subject to
Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice
to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of
Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office
consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not
relevant to this audit.

Very truly yours,


/s/ Charles E. Moran

SkillSoft Corporation
Charles E. Moran
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### J. D. Osborne *v.*R. K. White & Selvage.

Street Improvement — Property Holders Expense — Each Front Liable.

Property fronting on more than one street, shall be taxed for such street improvements as made thereon, but only each front is liable for the improvements made on it, and not on- the other fronts. And the purchase of a long front, however narrow may be the lot, the purchaser must be Presumed to have known the burdens thus placed upon it, and find compensation for these in the reduction of the' consideration to be paid, or the prospective increase in value.

Same — Confiscation, Under Guise of. Taxation.

Particular circumstances might arise however which would forbid the holding of a long narrow front liable for improvements made on it, in that it might amount to the confiscation of the property, under the guise of taxation.

APPEAL PROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT.

February 13, 1868.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Williams:

Tbe city charter and amendments authorized the city council of Louisville, to have the streets improved at the expense of the property holders, and of course the property holder became personally liable for such an outlay, whatever may have been the measure of his responsibility, it was a personal obligation, secured also by a lien upon the property, the front of which might be so improved.

The evidence does .not authorize the conclusion that the city council transcended its legal authority in the improvement in this case, nor in the assessment of the expense thereon. Only corner lots can have three fronts, and as these have the benefit of three streets and which greatly enhances their value, we do not see why the front on each street shall not be taxed for the improvement of the street in its front, but only each front is liable for improvement made on it, and not on the other fronts, and if a man should see proper to purchase a long front, however narrow may be his lot, he must be presumed to purchase with a view to the burdens which by law may be imposed on it, and find compensation for *447these in the reduction of the consideration to be paid, or in the prospective increase in value. Whilst we do not intend to decide that there might not be peculiar circumstances which would forbid the holding of a long narrow front liable for the improvements made thereon, as this might amount to a confiscation of the property of the owner, under the guise of taxation, yet we . do decide that this case presents no such peculiar facts. This purchase was probably made by Osborne in full view that the council had determined to improve the street, and though his lot fronts Eighth street 269 feet and is only 35 feet deep, still it would be liable to the expense of improving this front even if Osborne knew nothing of the council’s determination to improve Eighth street, or if indeed the council had not then determined to have the street ~nproved.

Thompson, *for appellant.*

'White, Boone, *for appellees.*

Judgment affirmed.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation, 

This Order refers to case: 

Barbara Lagerman v. Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc. 

Case No. CV17-2520 PHX DGC 

No. MDL 15-02641-PHX DGC 

ORDER 

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Barbara Lagerman’s motion to substitute 

party plaintiff. Doc. 8878. Counsel for Plaintiff Barbara Lagerman filed a notice of 

suggestion of death on November 20, 2017. Defendants having been contacted and do 

not object, 

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to substitute party plaintiff and for leave 

to amend short form complaint (Doc. 8878) is granted. James Lagerman shall be 

substituted for Barbara Lagerman in Case No. CV17-2520 PHX DGC. Plaintiff may file 

an amended short form complaint on or before December 8, 2017. 

Dated this 29th day of November, 2017. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8980 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kathy J. Douglas,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04536-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9346 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
#### Washburn and Another *v.*Payne.

In an action of debt before a justice of the peace, on a bond in the penalty of 175 do!* lars conditioned for the delivery of property, the plaintiff, in the statement of his demand, claimed 81 dollars and 25 cents: *Held¡*that the justice had jurisdiction j the sum actually demanded not exceeding 100 dollars.

APPEAL from the *Vigo*Circuit Couri.—This was an action of debt by *Payne*against *Washburn*and *Richardson.*

*217*Judah,*for the appellants.

*Kinney,*for the appellee.

Tuesday, *May*5.

Scott, J.

-On a bond for 175 dollars, with condition for the delivery of certain property, an action was brought before a justice of the peace. The plaintiff below, in stating his cause of action before the justice, claimed 81 dollars and 25 cents, and had judgment to that amount. Defendant appealed to the Circuit Court, and thence to this Court. The statute of 1827 gives jurisdiction to a justice of the peace, where the sum *due*or *demanded*shall not exceed 100 dollars. From the phraseology of the statute, we are of opinion that the intention of the general assembly was to regulate the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace, not by the amount named in the bond on which suit might be brought, but by the amount actually claimed or demanded by the plaintiff. The amount claimed in this case, and alleged to be due to the plaintiff, is 81 dollars and 25 cents. This sum is clearly within a justice’s jurisdiction under the statute. For this sum judgment was rendered by the justice, and that judgment was correctly affirmed by the CircuiCourt (1).

*Per*Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with 5 *per cent,*damages and costs.

(1)

 “In all actions of *debt*or *assumpsit,*wherein the sum *due*or *demanded*shall be *over 50*dollars and not exceed 100 dollars, exclusive of interest and costs, justices and Circuit Courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction.” R. C. 1831, p. 297.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Danka Business
Systems PLC (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ A.D. Frazier       
|A.D. Frazier           
|Chief Executive Officer

November 6, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### NEWARK MILK AND CREAM CO. OF NEWARK, N.J. v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF PARSIPPANY-TROY HILLS.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
0

HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Server: nginx
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 03:35:25 GMT
Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 73
Connection: keep-alive
X-Robots-Tag: noindex
Link: <https://www.nasa.gov/wp-json/>; rel="https://api.w.org/"
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Access-Control-Expose-Headers: X-WP-Total, X-WP-TotalPages, Link
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Authorization, X-WP-Nonce, Content-Disposition, Content-MD5, Content-Type
Allow: GET
X-rq: mdw1 96 185 443
Age: 1
X-Cache: hit
Vary: Accept-Encoding, Origin
Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000

{"code":"oembed_invalid_url","message":"Not Found","data":{"status":404}}
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14154 and #14155]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-4197-DR), dated 10/06/2014. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         07/27/2014 through 08/05/2014. *Effective Date:*
                         10/06/2014. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/05/2014. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/06/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to:  U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 10/06/2014, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Guadalupe, Rio Arriba, San Miguel, and the Pueblo of Acoma. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14154B and for economic injury is 14155B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2014-24523 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Heather Christiansen, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04002-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8685 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 1
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

I 

ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

1 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMlN ISTRATOR 

FOR 

SPACE 

SCIENCE 

ASSOCIATE 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSISTANT FOR SPECIAL PROJECTS 

AMES 

RESEARCH 

CENTER 

CHIEF 

SCIENTIST ' 

JET 

PROPULSION 

LABORATORIES 

GEORGE C 

MARSHALL 

SPACE FLIGHT 

CENTER 

GODDARD 

SPACE FLIGHT 

CENTER 

DRYDEN 

FLIGHT 

RESEARCH 

CENTER 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

AERONAUTICS 

AND SPACE 

TECHNOLOGY 

LANGLEY LEWIS 

RESEARCH RESEARCH :g CENTER CENTER 

El COMPTROLLER 

SPACE 

TECHNOLOGIES 

LABORATORIES 

WALLOPS 

FLIGHT 

CENTER 

LYNDON B 

JOHNSON 

SPACE 

CENTER 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

SPACE AND 

TERRESTRIAL 

APPLICATIONS 

~ 

CHIEF 

ENGINEER 

I I I 

DIRECTOR r-l SMALL & DISADV. 

BUSINESS UTlL 

I I I 

STAFF ADVISORS I I 

I 

I I ! AEROSPACE I 

' SAFETY i 

I 

I DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC I DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL I 

AFFAIRS I ADVISORY I PANEL I 

AFFAIRS I I 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

MANAGEMENT 

OPERATIONS 

Dr. Alan M. Lovelace 

February 13, 1980 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

EXTERNAL 

RELATIONS 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

SPACE 

TRANSPORTATION 

SYSTEMS 

ASSOCIATE I 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

SPACE 

TRANSPORTATION 

OPERATIONS 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR 

SPACE 

TRACKING SYSTEMS a DATA 

71
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11



                      HAMILTON BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                        CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)


                                                   Three Months Ended
                                                         March 31,
                                               --------------------------
                                                   1998           1997
                                               ----------      ----------
Basic
Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding                     9,844,915       5,716,915

Net income                                     $    4,905      $    2,822

Basic earnings per share                       $     0.50      $     0.49

Diluted:

Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding                     9,844,915       5,716,915

Common equivalent shares
  outstanding - options                           363,850         236,613
                                               ----------      ----------

Total common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding                10,208,765       5,953,528

Net income                                     $    4,905      $    2,822

Diluted earnings per share                     $     0.48      $     0.47
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**HMN FINANCIAL, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of HMN Financial, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael McNeil, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   3/25/2003 |                          | /s/ Michael McNeil |   |   |
|------------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------|--------|--------|
|                   | Michael McNeil,               |               |
|                   | President                     |               |
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer) |               |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

1

----
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1337

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Delmonte M. Wilson lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________ Submitted: August 2, 2023 Filed: August 15, 2023 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Delmonte Wilson appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pled guilty to a firearm offense. The plea came pursuant to a plea agreement in which

1 The Honorable Greg Kays, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.Wilson waived his right to an appeal. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw

and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable, and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing validity and applicability of appeal waiver de novo); United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (enforcing appeal waiver if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and it would not result in miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal based on the appeal waiver and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-