alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Glenn Mahone/Bob JacobsHeadquarters, Washington           February 2, 2003(Phone: 202/358-1898/1600)RELEASE: 03-034NASA ANNOUNCES SPACE SHUTTLE COLUMBIAACCIDENT INVESTIGATION BOARD (THE GEHMAN BOARD)     NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe today announced the members of the Space Shuttle Mishap Interagency Investigation Board, which will provide an independent review of the events and activities that led up to the tragic loss of the seven astronauts Saturday on board the Space Shuttle Columbia.The board's first meeting is scheduled for tomorrow at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana.Retired U.S. Navy Admiral Harold W. Gehman, Jr., who co-chaired the independent commission that investigated the attack on the U.S.S. Cole in Aden, Yemen, Oct. 12, 2000, and once served as the commander-in-chief of U.S. Joint Forces Command, will chair the panel. "While the NASA family and the entire world mourn the loss of our colleagues, we have a responsibility to quickly move forward with an external assessment to determine exactly what happened and why," said Administrator O'Keefe. "We're honored to have such a distinguished panel of experts, led by Admiral Gehman."Other members of the investigative board includes:*  Rear Admiral Stephen Turcotte, Commander, U.S. Naval Safety Center, Norfolk, Va.*  Major General John L. Barry, Director, Plans and Programs, Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio*  Major General Kenneth W. Hess, Commander, U.S. Air Force Chief of Safety, Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M.*  Dr. James N. Hallock, Aviation Safety Division Chief, U.S. Department of Transportation, Cambridge, Mass.*  Steven B. Wallace, Director of Accident Investigation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington*  Brigadier General Duane Deal, Commander 21st Space Wing, Peterson Air Foce Base, Colo.Several senior NASA leaders also will be a part of the panel, including G. Scott Hubbard, Director, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. Bryan D. O'Connor, NASA Associate Administrator and former astronaut, Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Headquarters, will serve as Ex-Officio Member, and Theron Bradley, Jr., NASA Chief Engineer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, will be Executive Secretary."We need to be responsible, accountable, and extremely thorough in this investigation," added Administrator O'Keefe. "This panel is charged with a most difficult task, but I am confident in their ability, their integrity, and their dedication to doing what's right. Their findings will help push America's space program successfully into the future.""Currently, NASA is beginning an internal investigation, drawing on the extensive expertise throughout the agency. Public officials for NASA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and other federal, state, and local entities are coordinating talents to help find the cause of this tragedy," concluded Administrator O'KeefeAdditional information about the investigation and the STS-107 mission is available on the Internet at:http://www.nasa.govhttp://spaceflight.nasa.gov-end-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NORTHWEST BANCORPORATION, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,421
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               4
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,305
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,876
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             425
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               427
<LOANS>                                        117,710
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,011
<DEPOSITS>                                     133,922
<SHORT-TERM>                                    22,141
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,379
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,842
<OTHER-SE>                                         613
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  13,455
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,144
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,756
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   317
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,216
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,678
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,706
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,510
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      405
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,870
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    741
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         741
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       491
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.24
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,199
<LOANS-PAST>                                       280
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,129
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,480
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      267
<RECOVERIES>                                        29
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,647
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,647
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit I

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-9 Filed 10/25/17 Page 1 of 3
Deposition of:

Robert Ritchie , Ph.D.

August 4, 2017

In the Matter of:

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products

Liability

Veritext Legal Solutions

1075 Peachtree St. NE , Suite 3625

Atlanta, GA, 30309

800.808.4958 | calendar-atl@veritext.com | 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-9 Filed 10/25/17 Page 2 of 3
Robert Ritchie , Ph.D. August 4, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1 Q. But you haven't studied what Kuo found?

2 A. No.

3 Q. Okay. That's all I wanted to ask you about

4 Hyde. So now we will go to Mrs. Jones. And her

5 report is 6009.

6 She is an Eclipse filter?

7 A. Correct.

8 Q. We previously talked about Eclipse

9 modifications involving electropolishing --

10 A. Correct.

11 Q. -- in your last deposition.

12 A. Right.

13 Q. And you agree that that modification could

14 improve surface conditions and the centerless grind

15 issues that had been in the previous iterations of

16 filter, true?

17 A. It will do that, yes.

18 Q. Okay. Where did Mrs. Jones' fracture?

19 A. It was an arm fracture.

20 Q. Do you know where?

21 A. Well, again, I don't know precisely where,

22 but I would imagine that it would be in the same

23 location, within a millimeter of the sheath, because

24 that's where all the arm fractures that I've seen

25 seem to occur.

Page 52

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8391-9 Filed 10/25/17 Page 3 of 3
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2174

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include podiatrists as 

physicians for purposes of covering physicians services under the medicaid 

program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2004

Mr. BUNNING (for himself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include 

podiatrists as physicians for purposes of covering physicians services under the medicaid program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUDING PODIATRISTS AS PHYSICIANS 

4 UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(a)(5)(A) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(5)(A)) is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘section 1861(r)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘para8 graphs (1) and (3) of section 1861(r)’’. 
2

•S 2174 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to services furnished on or after 

3 January 1, 2004.

Æ
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2191

To provide the venue for the judicial review of actions by certain Federal 

agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2004

Mr. THOMAS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To provide the venue for the judicial review of actions by 

certain Federal agencies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VENUE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ACTIONS BY 

4 CERTAIN FEDERAL AGENCIES. 

5 Section 1402 of title 28, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(e) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FINAL AGENCY ACTIONS

8 BY THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED

9 STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL PARK

10 SERVICE, AND FOREST SERVICE.—Any civil action seek-
2

•S 2191 IS 

1 ing judicial review under chapter 7 of title 5 of a final 

2 agency action by the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

3 through the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, 

4 the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Serv5 ice, or the Director of the National Park Service, or the 

6 Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the 

7 Forest Service, relating to the use of land administered 

8 by the Secretary, shall be brought only—

9 ‘‘(1) in the United States district court for the 

10 district in which the land is located; or 

11 ‘‘(2) if the land is located in more than 1 dis12 trict, in any of the districts in which the land is lo13 cated.’’.

Æ
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 16, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

KEITH V. WEATHERSBY, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-3059

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-02081-JWL)

 (D.C. No. 2:98-CR-20076-JWL-3)

(D. of Kansas)

ORDER

Before BRISCOE, HARTZ, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.

The court orders that this appeal be dismissed as untimely. 

To the extent Mr. Weathersby is appealing from the district court’s order

(dated October 9, 2009 and entered on October 13, 2009) denying his § 2255

motion for reconsideration, his appeal is untimely. Mr. Weathersby’s notice of

appeal from that order was due on or before December 14, 2009. See Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(B) (60 days for filing a notice of appeal in a civil case where the

United States is a party). It was not filed until February 24, 2010. The filing of

a timely notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement. Bowles v.

Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007). 

Appellate Case: 10-3059 Document: 01018404042 Date Filed: 04/16/2010 Page: 1
2

Although Mr. Weathersby states, in his response to this court’s March 3,

2010 show cause order, that he is actually seeking review of his sentence, the

district court’s docket shows that the judgment in his criminal case (imposing his

sentence) was entered on August 15, 2002. Under the version of the Rules of

Appellate Procedure in effect at that time, Mr. Weathersby’s notice of appeal

from his sentence was due within 10 days of entry of judgment. See former Fed.

R. App. P. 4 (b)(1)(A) (10 days for filing a notice of appeal in a criminal case). 

The timeliness requirement of Fed. R. App. P. 4 (b)(1)(A) is an inflexible claim

processing rule. See United States v. Garduño, 506 F.3d 1287, 1291 (10th Cir.

2007). Because Mr. Weathersby’s notice of appeal was filed more than seven

years after entry of the judgment imposing his sentence, this court may raise Rule

4 (b)’s time bar sua sponte. See United States v. Mitchell, 518 F.3d 740, 750

(10th Cir. 2008). The court also notes that Mr. Weathersby previously filed a

direct appeal from his conviction and sentence. See United States v. Weathersby,

89 Fed. Appx. 683 (10 Cir. 2004). th

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court 

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3059 Document: 01018404042 Date Filed: 04/16/2010 Page: 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TERRENCE ANTONIO TUMBLIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2791

[March 31, 2022]

Appeal from order denying rule 3.850 motion in the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence Mirman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562012CF001122B.

Terrence Antonio Tumblin, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Milly H. Dean *v.*Maransey Beall.

Wills — Revocation—Writing Must he Executed — Proof.

A paper cannot he regarded as a revocation of a will previously made, unless it was in fact a will or codicil, or a writing declaring an intention to revoke the former will, and executed in the manner in which a will is required to he executed, and that without proof of the contents of the paper, it could not constitute a valid revocation in either of those iorms.

APPEAL PROM PENDLETON CIRCUIT COURT,

June 22, 1868.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Hardin :

This was a controversy as to the validity of a paper purporting to be the will of William Angelí, which was propounded by the appellee, Maransey Beall, and contested by Milly H. Dean, the testator’s daughter and only heir at law.

It was proved in the circuit court that both the body and signature of said paper was in the hand-writing of AATlliam Angelí, and the evidence as to his capacity to make a will at the time does not admit of controversy.

But the ground relied on for setting the will aside appears to have been that, in the fall of 1866 and nearly ten years after the date of the will, the testator constructively revoked it by the execution of another will.

There is proof in the record that the testator in the fall of 1866, complained that Mrs. Beall had secreted his will, and that he wrote a paper which he represented to be another will, and which was afterwards destroyed either by him or Mrs. Beall. But although one of the witnesses seems to have read some part of it, it does not appear to have been offered for probate, nor are there such facts discl'osd in this record as to authorize its establishment as a will. And although it sufficiently appears that William Angelí wrote the last named paper, and spoke of it as his will, it is not entirely certain from the evidence that he did not do so for the purpose of alarming or restraining Mrs. Beall, whom he charged with having become unkind to him, after the date of his former *289will, in, which a provision was made for her, rather than to make a valid testamentary paper to be preserved and carried out as his will.

*Lee, for appellant.*

*Ireland & Duncan, for appellee.*

But whatever may have been his intention, in writing that paper, and however it may have been destroyed, it is plain that it could not be established as a will upon the evidence in this cause for the reason that its contents are not disclosd.

According to sections 9 and 10, of chapter 106, of the Eevised Statutes, said paper could not be regarded as a revocation of the will previously made, unless it was in fact a will or codicil, or a writing declaring an intention to revoke the will, and executed in the manner in which a will is required to be executed. And it is clear that without proof of the contents of the paper it could not constitute a valid revocation of the will in either of those forms.

It seems to us, therefore, that the judgment establishing the paper propounded as the last will and testament of William Angelí, deceased, is in conformity with the law and facts of the case, and consequently said judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A forthe year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 

 
|              | /s/  DAVID C. OWEN                      |
|-------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|              | David  C. Owen                          |
|              | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|              | * *                                |
| June 9, 2005 | * *                                |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ICOPDigital, Inc. and will be retained by ICOP Digital, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nancy J. Pekar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/npekar\/","title":"NASA-Supported Optical Fiber Manufacturing Arrives at Space Station","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"79b2VDsDqQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-supported-optical-fiber-manufacturing-arrives-at-space-station\/\">NASA-Supported Optical Fiber Manufacturing Arrives at Space Station<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-supported-optical-fiber-manufacturing-arrives-at-space-station\/embed\/#?secret=79b2VDsDqQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA-Supported Optical Fiber Manufacturing Arrives at Space Station” — NASA\" data-secret=\"79b2VDsDqQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/iss067e189054large.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### THOMAS ANZALONE v. JEROME L. HAMLIN, CITY OF LONG BRANCH.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Adeona Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




(1)
              the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant for the
      quarter period September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.


Date:
November 14, 2008




By:
  /s/ Nicholas
Stergis


Name:
Nicholas Stergis


Title:
Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. Kohl, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 7, 2007