alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Earth’s Trip Around the Sun

Each year, Earth makes a complete trip around the Sun! Learn about our planet’s journey and important 

points along its orbit. Visit the two websites listed to find clues to solve this crossword puzzle!

SciJinks: What’s a Solstice? https://scijinks.gov/solstice/

Space Place: What Causes the Seasons? https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/seasons/en/

Across

1. Northern Hemisphere season that begins in 

March

3. Month when Earth is farthest from the Sun

5. Earth’s farthest point from the Sun

7. When the Sun is directly overhead at noon on 

the equator

9. No sunset here on summer solstice (two words)

10. Earth’s closest point to the Sun

Down

1. Southern Hemisphere season that begins in 

December

2. Earth’s orbit is not a perfect ______________

3. Month when Earth is closest to the Sun

4. Shortest day in Northern Hemisphere (two 

words)

6. Invisible line around Earth’s waist

8. Earth’s _______ of rotation is tilted 23.5°
ANSWER KEY

Earth’s Trip Around the Sun

Each year, Earth makes a complete trip around the Sun! Learn about our planet’s journey and important 

points along its orbit. Visit the two websites listed to find clues to solve this crossword puzzle!

SciJinks: What’s a Solstice? https://scijinks.gov/solstice/

Space Place: What Causes the Seasons? https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/seasons/en/

Across

1. Northern Hemisphere season that begins in 

March

3. Month when Earth is farthest from the Sun 

5. Earth’s farthest point from the Sun

7. When the Sun is directly overhead at noon on 

the equator

9. No sunset here on summer solstice (two words)

10. Earth’s closest point to the Sun

Down

1. Southern Hemisphere season that begins in 

December

2. Earth’s orbit is not a perfect ______________

3. Month when Earth is closest to the Sun

4. Shortest day in Northern Hemisphere (two 

words)

6. Invisible line around Earth’s waist

8. Earth’s _______ of rotation is tilted 23.5°
Robert MirelsonHeadquarters, Washington       February 2, 2003(Phone: 202/358-4495)RELEASE: 03-038HANDLE SPACE SHUTTLE DEBRIS WITH CAUTION     Debris from the Space Shuttle Columbia may be dangerously contaminated with toxic substances and cause serious injury if handled. Individuals who think they may have come in contact with Shuttle debris should take a shower with soap and water and then seek medical attention.Individuals are advised to avoid all additional contact with the suspected Shuttle material.  Clothing that may have come in contact with the suspected debris should be removed with care to avoid skin contact with cloth that may have been contaminated.  Place the clothing in a plastic bag for later analysis.If your physician has any questions, please have him or her contact the NASA Emergency Action Center at 281/483-3388.More information is available on the Internet at:http://www.nasa.gov/columbia/-end-
NATIONAL AERO 

POLICY 

COORDINATION 6 

INTERNATIONAL 

RELATIONS 

dAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

HUMAN 

EDUCATION 

LEGISLATIVE RESOURCES 8 AFFAIRS 

ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSISTANT DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AERONAUTICS 6 

SPACETECHNOLOGY 

CHIEF FINANCIAL 

COMPTROLLER PHOGRAMS 

SPACE 

COMMUNICATIONS 

Irll I 

SPACE SYSTEMS 

DEVELOPMENT 

I 

SPACE SCIENCE 6 

APPLICATIONS 

GOODARO SPACE 

FLffitiT CENTER 

INSPECTOR 

I I 1 

11 II 1 

MISSION QUALITY FACILITIES 

SPACE FLIGHT 

SPACECENTER 

I GEORGE C. MARSHALL i SPACE FLIGHT CENTER 

JOHN C. STENNIS 

SPACE CENTER 

AMES RESEARCH 

CENTER 

-1RESELIIR"TERI
IA 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2322 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2004 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To amend chapter 90 of title 5, United States Code, to 

include employees of the District of Columbia courts 

as participants in long term care insurance for Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 2322 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. LONG TERM CARE INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR 

2 EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

3 COURTS. 

4 Section 9001(1) of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

8 and inserting a semicolon and ‘‘and’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(E) an employee of the District of Colum11 bia courts.’’. 

Passed the Senate June 24, 2004. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10(xi)







                       UNITED DOMINION REALTY TRUST, INC.
                            EXECUTIVE DEFERRAL PLAN

                                    SUMMARY




                     GENERAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PLAN

     The United Dominion Realty Trust, Inc. Executive Deferral Plan (the "EDP")
is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for key executives of the Company.
Participants may defer a portion of salary or bonuses into the EDP on a pre-tax
basis.  Participants may direct investment of their deferrals into selected
funds, which mirror those provided under the Company's 401(k) and Profit Sharing
Plan. The Plan is administered by the 401(k) Committee of the Board of Directors
of the Company (the "Committee").  The Board of Directors may amend or terminate
the EDP, provided that no amendment may cause a reduction in participants'
accounts.  If the EDP is terminated, no future contributions may be made to the
EDP, but all participant accounts existing at the time of termination will
continue to be governed by the terms of the EDP until paid out.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.8A


                             FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                  GRAPHIC PACKAGING SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN
               (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997)


1. PLAN SPONSOR: Graphic Packaging International Corporation.

2. AMENDMENT OF PLAN: The following amendment to the Graphic Packaging Savings
and Investment Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1997) (the
"Plan") is adopted effective March 24, 2003.

3. SECTION 3.2(a)(vi) OF THE PLAN SHALL BE AMENDED TO READ IN FULL AS FOLLOWS:

         (vi)     Effective for Plan Years beginning on and after January 1,
                  2000, the allocation of Company Matching Contributions on
                  behalf of each Participant for the payroll period shall be
                  equal to 60% of the Participant's Participant Contributions
                  for the Plan Year, up to a maximum allocation of 3.6% of the
                  Participant's Compensation for the payroll period. Prior to
                  March 24, 2003, Company Matching Contributions made pursuant
                  to this Section 3.2(a)(vi) shall be initially invested in
                  Graphic Packaging Stock. Effective March 24, 2003, Company
                  Matching Contributions made pursuant to this Section
                  3.2(a)(vi) may be made in Graphic Packaging Stock or cash, as
                  determined by the Company in its sole discretion.

4. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PLAN. Except for the above amendment, all terms and
conditions of the Plan are unamended and shall remain in full force and effect.

                                                   GRAPHIC PACKAGING
                                                   INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION


                                                   By:
                                                       -------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Charlene Carl, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03464-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8624 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pediatric Services of America, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. McNeill, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James M. McNeillJames M. McNeill Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


Date: February 5, 2004
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 28, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERMELL L. FERGUSON,

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 10-3042

(D.C. Nos. 2:09-CV-02272-JWL & 2:06-

CR-20069-JWL-3) )

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R.

42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3042 Document: 01018448311 Date Filed: 06/28/2010 Page: 1
#### JOHN ALTIMAS v. SOL BERGER.

September 18, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Wm. M. Starks *v.*Reuben, Lorb & Bloom.

Lasches — Attorney and Client — Duty of Client to Look After His Cause of Action.

It is the duty of a defendant to inform the court of the illness of his attorneys, where su&h facts are within his own knowledge, and to he present in court in person to see that no advantage was taken of him. And in the face of such facts a petitioner will not he acquitted of culpable negligence, or indifference and inattention t° his interests.

APPEAL EROM MCCRACKEN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 22, 1868.

Opinion oe the Oourt by

Judge Peters :

It is uot alleged in the petition that both the attorneys employed by appellees during the whole term of the court were prevented 'from attending to their clients’ eases by sickness, nor that they were for that cause prevented from being in court on the day on which the action was set for trial, or afterwards during the term, and were thereby prevented from discovering that a judgment had been rendered against him, until after the expiration of the term of the court.

But if appellant’s counsel were both sick and unable to attend to his case, which would have been a sufficient reeason for a continuance of it at that term of the court, if the judge had been informed of the fact, still it was the duty of appellant to be in court himself, when the case was called, to inform the court of the sickness of his counsel, and to see that no advantage was taken of him. He, however, fails to state that he was at any time present in court, or that he gave any attention whatever to the suits, and offers no excuse or reason for this absence, or his failure to inquire after the case.

The answer was not in the papers of the action in which the judgment was rendered, and there was no motion to consolidate the two actions, and it is not alleged that the court was informed that the answer lodged with the clerk was intended to apply to both actions.

The allegations of the petition are insufficient to acquit appellant *60of culpable negligence, or at least of indifference and inattention his interest, such as courts cannot favor. •

Harlan, *for appellant.*

Yersie, *for appellee-.*

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4813** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TERRELL LEE JONES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern D istrict of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. W. Earl Britt , Senior District Judge. ( 5:10

- cr - 00284

- BR

- 1 )

Submitted : December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22,2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Reversed and remanded by un published per cur iam opinion
. G. Alan DuBois, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terrell Lee Jones was convicted following his conditional guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). The district court sentenced Jones to forty

- six months’ impr isonment. Jones reserved the right to appeal the district court’s determination that his prior North Carolina conviction for attempted larceny from the person qualified as a felony for the purpose of adjudging him guilty under § 922(g)(1). Jones timely a ppealed. Prior to submitting an opening brief, Jones moved to vacate his conviction and to remand the case to the district court, arguing that his North Carolina conviction was not punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year and, thus, that t he conviction could not serve as the necessary predicate for the § 922(g)(1) charge. The Government does not oppose Jones’ motion. In light of our decision in United States v. Simmons , 649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc), we reverse and remand. Unde r 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), it is unlawful for any person convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year to possess a firearm. Jones’ prior North Carolina conviction was not punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one y ear. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A

1340.17(c)

- (d) (2009) (setting out minimum and maximum sentences3 applicable under North Carolina’s structured sentencing scheme). When Jones raised this argument in the district court, it was foreclosed by our decision in U nited States v. Harp , 406 F.3d 242, 246 (4th Cir. 2005). Subsequently, however, we overruled Harp with our en banc decision in Simmons , in which we sustained a similar argument in favor of the defendant. In view of our holding in Simmons , we reverse Jone s’ conviction, deny as moot his motion to vacate, and remand the case to the district court for further proceedings. * The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat ely presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

REVERSED AND REMANDED

* We of course do not fault the Government or the district court for their reliance upon, and application of, unambiguous circuit aut hority at the time of Jones’ indictment and conviction.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Rodger E. Rees, Chief Financial Officer of Empire Financial Holding
Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Empire Financial Holding
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such controls
   and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
   information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
   subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
   particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
   procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
   effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this report and based on such evaluation;

   c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
   control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
   recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
   reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
   summarize and report financial information; and

   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
   over financial reporting.

Date: May 1, 2006

/s/ Rodger E. Rees
-------------------
Rodger E. Rees,
Chief Financial Officer
BELL MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY & PLANETARIUM

A Charge Forward: Activating the Nation's 

Planetariums to Excite the Public About

Human Space Exploration of the Moon and 

Beyond

Holly Menninger 

7/01/20 - 12/31/24

The Bell Museum at the University of Minnesota aims 

to strengthen interest and engagement in STEM and 

STEM careers in a diverse set of students (grades 4-8), 

their caregivers and the public by developing a fulldome planetarium production focused on the human 

factors of long-duration space flight. The Bell leveraged 

its expertise in museum and planetarium accessibility to 

develop the planetarium show and a toolkit of related 

informal science activities that is relevant and 

accessible to a diverse audience. This project required 

the close collaboration and expertise of the Bell, NASA, 

UNC’s Morehead Planetarium and Science Center, and 

Karen Peterman Consulting Company, and relies on 

the network of over 1600 planetariums across the US. 

In addition to freely distributing project deliverables 

(show, toolkit) and evaluating their impact on audiences 

through this national planetarium network, we 

conducted and published a demographic study of 

planetarium audiences to fill a critical knowledge gap in 

the field. Working together, the Bell-led project team will 

enhance the public’s STEM understanding and 

excitement about NASA’s new era of sustainable 

human space exploration, including long-distance 

spaceflight to Moon and Mars.

List of Partners:

• Johnson Space Center

• U.S. Regional Planetarium Associations

• University Of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

A game was developed to accompany the 

planetarium show

Credits: Sarah Karnas, Bell Museum

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC20M0028, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

h0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145030

TERRY WILSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 145030

COA: 305590

CVSC: 10

- 001359

CRIME VICTIM SERVICES COMMISSION,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**WARRENRESOURCES, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Warren Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy A. Larkin, ExecutiveVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Timothy A. Larkin               |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   |
| Timothy A. Larkin                   |   |
| *Executive Vice President,*         |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*           |   |
| *And Principal Accounting  Officer* |   |
|                                |   |
| May 5, 2010                    |   |

 

1

----