alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A STORY ABOUT ARTEMIS

COMPREHENSION GUIDE

READ THE STORY AND DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

1. How long has it been since astronauts explored the Moon?

Answer: Over 50 years.

2. What is the name of the spacecraft that takes astronauts to

the Moon during Artemis?

Answer: Orion.

3. What is the name of the rocket that will carry Orion into

space?

Answer: Space Launch System or SLS for short.

4. The SLS is taller than what famous landmark?

Answer: Statue of Liberty.

5. How fast will SLS travel to get to the Moon?

Answer: 25,000 miles per hour or 50 times faster than an

airplane.

6. What firsts will the world celebrate when Artemis

Astronauts walk on the Moon?

Answer: The first woman and first person of color to step

on the Moon.

7. What is the name of the spaceship NASA will build to orbit

the Moon?

Answer: Gateway.

8. What topics do astronauts learn about during their training?

Answers will vary. Meteorology, engineering, piloting a

spacecraft, etc.

9. What would you see when looking up at the sky from

the Moon?

Answers will vary. See the Earth. See lots of stars.

10. What kinds of equipment will be at the Artemis base camp?

Answers will vary. Garden, house, laboratory, rover, etc.

11. What do you think astronauts will do at the Artemis

base camp?

Answers will vary. Explore. Grow fruits and vegetables.

Live and work.

12. Why are people interested in space exploration?

Answers will vary. Learn about the universe. Learn about

Earth. Discover new things.

13. What kinds of traits do we need in the Artemis Generation?

Answers will vary. Imagination, creativity, and

determination.

WRITING EXTENSION EXERCISE:

Imagine leading a one-week expedition to the Moon and write an essay that tells all about it.

Imagine leading a one-week expedition at the Moon’s South Pole — with the whole world cheering you on. Write an essay that tells 

us about the types of skills, attributes, and/or personality traits that you would want your crew to have and why. How many would be in 

your crew? Also describe one machine, robot, or technology that you would leave on the Moon to help future astronauts explore. 

ART EXTENSION EXERCISE:

Tell us what you’d say if you stepped foot on the Moon and create an image of your footprint (photo or artwork).

When Neil Armstrong first stepped foot on the Moon in 1969, he famously said, “That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for 

mankind.” Now over 50 years later, NASA’s Artemis program will return astronauts to the Moon. What does it mean to you? Your 

challenge is to create an image of your footprint (photo or artwork) and what you would say, in 20 words or less, if you were the next 

person to step foot on the Moon. 

www.nasa.gov | #Artemis

National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

NP-2021-11-3002-HQ
# Y3/-/5" Y32-/S* CCA # 13-13-00544-CR 

## OFFENSE: Habeas Corpus 

# V33-/5
STYLE: Ex Parte Markus Antonius Green v. COUNTY: De Witt TRIAL COURT: 24th District Court MOTION 

### TRIAL COURT#: 90-1-7951 & 90-1-7951- FOR REHEARING IS: A 

### DATE: March 12, 2015 

### TRIAL COURTJUDGE: Hon. KemperStephen JUDGE: ChiefJusticeVald<ez Williams 

### DISPOSITION: Affirmed DATE: 

### JUSTICE: PC S PUBLISH: DNP: SUPPCLKRECORD X CLK RECORD: X RPT RECORD: X SUPPRPTRECORD X STATE BR: SUPPBR APPBR: PROSE BR X



### IN THE COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

# PRO SE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# ^Faj>SA 

# £
JUDGE: 

### CCA# 

### Disposition: DATE: JUDGE: 

### SIGNED:, PUBLISH: 

# V33-/.T

PC: DNP: MOTION FOR REHEARING IN MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS: CCA IS: JUDGE: ON ON JUDGE:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS Case No.: 15-MD-02641-PHX-DGC

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL NO: 2641

This Document Relates to: 

2:15-CV-01666

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

TO: The Clerk of the court and all parties of record:

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this Court, and I appear in this case 

as counsel for:

Plaintiff Melissa Ebert.

Dated: September 25, 2015.

/s/ Sheila M. Bossier 

Sheila M. Bossier

FREESE & GOSS, PLLC

1520 North State Street

Jackson, MS 39202

Telephone: (601) 961-4050

Facsimile: (601) 352-5452

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 25, 2015, a copy of the foregoing was served 

electronically, and notice of the service of this document will be sent to all parties by operation 

of the Court’s electronic filing system to CM/ECF participants registered to receive service in 

this matter. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

/s/ Sheila M. Bossier

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 93 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 1
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 219

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to clarify the adjustments to be made 

in determining export price and constructed export price. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. CRAIG (for himself, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. LOTT, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Ms. SNOWE, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. BURNS, 

and Mr. MILLER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to clarify the adjustments 

to be made in determining export price and constructed 

export price.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPORT PRICE AND CONSTRUCTED EXPORT 

4 PRICE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 772(c)(2)(A) of the Tariff 

6 Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677a(c)(2)(A)) is amended by 

7 inserting ‘‘(including countervailing duties imposed under 

8 this Act)’’ after ‘‘duties’’. 
2

•S 219 IS 

1 (b) APPLICATION TO CANADA AND MEXICO.—Pursu2 ant to article 1902 of the North American Free Trade 

3 Agreement and section 408 of the North American Free 

4 Trade Agreement Implementation Act, the amendment 

5 made by this section shall apply with respect to goods from 

6 Canada and Mexico. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply with respect to determinations 

9 made under title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 that—

10 (1) are made with respect to investigations ini11 tiated or petitions filed after the date of enactment 

12 of this section; or 

13 (2) have not become final as of the date of en14 actment of this section.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Vicente BALTIERRA-FRAUSTO, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 72-2946.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1973.

Certiorari Denied May 7, 1973.

See 93 S.Ct. 2160.

*598Gordon Thompson, Jr., District Judge Lewis A. Wenzell (argued), San Diego, Cal., for defendant and appellant.

Douglas G. Hendricks, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Stephen G. Nelson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff and appellee.

Before CHAMBERS and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, Senior District Judge.*

*

 Honorable William M. Byrne, Sr., United States Senior District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

This case of conspiracy to import marijuana is affirmed. The whole defense concerned the admission into evidence of the defendant’s oral confession. We find the ruling admitting the statements was quite proper. The Miranda warning was adequate and given twice. On the first warning, the waiver was equivocal. But the oral waiver was not equivocal on the second warning. There was no duty to give a third warning or to lecture the defendant on the elements of the warning.

Therefore, the trial judge’s hearing of some evidence from the co-defendant with Baltierra-Frausto absent was not prejudicial, although it was improper procedure. Cf. Singleton v. United States, 381 F.2d 1, 9 Cir., 1967, cert. denied 389 U.S. 1024, 88 S.Ct. 601, 19 L.Ed.2d 673, 1967.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000893235
<NAME> OHSL FINANCIAL CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,798
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             100
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   557
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,058
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          89,408
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            85,660
<LOANS>                                        179,187
<ALLOWANCE>                                        564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,940
<DEPOSITS>                                     208,080
<SHORT-TERM>                                    17,497
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,190
<LONG-TERM>                                     32,227
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 287,940
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,458
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,658
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,116
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,504
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,137
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,979
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    764
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         764
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       436
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0.285
<LOANS-NON>                                         48
<LOANS-PAST>                                        74
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   564
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  564
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               384
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            180


</TABLE>
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

Office of Public Office Of 

f 

Walter T. kwley A-Id 7. Prutkin I John A. JohnsOU 

WICe w MB MmmImm Administrator 

T. Keith Glemln 

Depu t, Admini. t r* tor 

Hug.! L. Dryden 

AII.i.Llmt8 

AIIaociate Addnistrator 

Richard E. -mer 

AII..l.Unt. 

EXECUTIVE 

DIRECTION 

I 

4 Research Advisory 

C-ittees 

and Space Reaearch 

Director 

Ira H. AbOtt Director I Albert P. Siepert )(LMpeYr.t Anel. 

I Pacilities Coocd. 

Budget and 

Pincnl Division , Aew-ica nad 

Fligbt lkLecb.oiCS 

Asst. Director 

Mi1toc a. hes 

Power Plants 1 

Audit Division 

Thou. K. Yarbrough 

Procurepent and 

supply Division 

Ernest Y. Ilrackett 

Division 

Goberr L. Bell 

PROGRAMING 

OPERATIONS 

t Asst. Director DivlBIon 

Robert J. Lackien 

Division 

Bertrm A. lhicahy 

.4dministr*tive 

services Division I Sldaey G. UeVm 

RESEARC SPACE FLIGHT CENTERS 

I 

CENTERS 

1 WESTERN OPEEATIONS OFFICE 1 ~msley Field. Ye. mffett Pieid, Caiif. 

FIELD 

ACTIVITIES Henry J. hid I Robert Y. ] I kith J. DeFranZe 

nm =sen PLIGXI SUTlM 

edverds. Cllif. 

WlS 

Cleveland, Ohio 

Supercede. chart dated My 1. 1959 II. N. COY% E. L. Yriegrr I Administrator. NASA 

Date: september 15. 1959 

Paul P. Hikle Edward 8. Sharp
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-04-00552- CR

Da nie l Ja so n Spr y, App e lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF BELL CO UNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 49683 , HO NORAB LE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Ap p el l an tDa n i el J as o nS p ry p l ea d edgu i l ty

t o ag grava

ted assault. S

eeTex. P en. Code Ann. § 2 2. 02 (We st Su

pp . 2 00 4- 05 ). Th e c ourt

de fe rr e d a dju dic atio n a

nd pla c e d h im o n c omm

un ity supervision. L ater , afte r appe llant admitted the violations alleg ed in the State’s motion to adjudicate, the cour t adjudg ed him g uilty

and sente nced him to ten y ear s in prison and a $500 fine
. Ap pe lla nt’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ing

that th e a

pp e a l is frivolous and without mer it. The brief me ets the re quirements of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by p re s en t i n ga prof essional eva luation of the re cord de monstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be adva nced. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); Hi gh v . S tate , 573 S.W. 2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 68 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 4 3 6 S. W. 2 d

1 3 7 ( T e x.2

Cr im. Ap p. 19 69 ). App e lla nt r e c e ive d a

c op y of c ouns e l’ s b ri e f a

nd wa s a dv ise d o f h is r ig ht t o examine the appellate rec ord and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed. We have r eviewe d the re c o r d and counse l’s brief a

nd ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the r ecor d that might arguably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pury ear Affir med Filed: Mar ch 10, 2005 Do No t Pu

bli sh
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 235

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 

dependent care assistance programs sponsored by the Department of 

Defense for members of the Armed Forces of the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the treatment of dependent care assistance programs 

sponsored by the Department of Defense for members 

of the Armed Forces of the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. CLARIFICATION OF THE TREATMENT OF CER4 TAIN DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE PRO5 GRAMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 134(b) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified military benefit) 
2

•S 235 IS 

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(4) CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN BENEFITS.—

4 For purposes of paragraph (1), such term includes 

5 any dependent care assistance program (as in effect 

6 on the date of the enactment of this paragraph) for 

7 any individual described in paragraph (1)(A).’’. 

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

9 (1) Section 134(b)(3)(A) of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘and 

11 paragraph (4)’’ after ‘‘subparagraphs (B)’’. 

12 (2) Section 3121(a)(18) of such Code is amend13 ed by striking ‘‘or 129’’ and inserting ‘‘, 129, or 

14 134(b)(4)’’. 

15 (3) Section 3306(b)(13) of such Code is amend16 ed by striking ‘‘or 129’’ and inserting ‘‘, 129, or 

17 134(b)(4)’’. 

18 (4) Section 3401(a)(18) of such Code is amend19 ed by striking ‘‘or 129’’ and inserting ‘‘, 129, or 

20 134(b)(4)’’. 

21 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

23 December 31, 2001.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Carter,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03635-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9105 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-10614

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 0:17-cv-61567-BB

DENNIS HAYNES, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PANDA EXPRESS, INC., 

a foreign corporation, 

 Defendant-Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(July 12, 2018)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 18-10614 Date Filed: 07/12/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
2

The district court’s judgment is VACATED and REMANDED for 

reconsideration in light of Haynes v. Hooters of Am., LLC, No. 17-13170, ___ 

F.3d ___, 2018 WL 3030840 (11th Cir. 2018).

Case: 18-10614 Date Filed: 07/12/2018 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains summary financial information extracted from Penn Octane
Corporation's  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  for the quarterly period ended
October 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial
Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                     1811348
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              3983047
<ALLOWANCES>                                521067
<INVENTORY>                                1108232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           6422612
<PP&E>                                     5297897
<DEPRECIATION>                             1775424
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            11421928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      5784718
<BONDS>                                     188034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    128842
<OTHER-SE>                                 5320334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              11421928
<SALES>                                   15970900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          15970900
<CGS>                                     14965012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             14965012
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            567438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           66027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             375951
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         375951
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                375951
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .02


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russ Pool at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-
220-6542.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Wednesday, November 19, 
2014, at 12 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited 
to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Russ Pool. For more information please contact Mr. 
Pool at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6542, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd 
Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174, or contact us at the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other 
issues related to written communications from the IRS.

    Dated: October 7, 2014.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2014-24408 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P