alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hamilton *v.*Wort.

*Monday, May*26.

An award for a certain sum of money carries interest, by the statute of 1831, from the time the money was payable by the award.

If an award be silent as to the costs, a judgment for them is erroneous.

ERROR to the *Washington*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

— The parties in this suit entered into bonds, submitting certain matters in difference between them to arbitration ; and an award was made in favour of *Wort. The*award states, among other things, that *Hamilton*should pay *Wort*a certain sum of money within five months from the date of the award; but it is silent as t'o the costs of the suit. The Court, on motion of *Wort,*granted a rule on *Hamilton*to show cause why the award should not be made the judgment of the Court. No sufficient cause being shown in answer to the rule, judgment was rendered on the award, with interest from the time the money was payable by the 'award, and also for costs.

The judgment is objected to on two *grounds:*First, because it is in favour of the plaintiff, not only for the sum awarded to be due him, but also for interest. Secondly, because it is in favour of the plaintiff for costs.

The first objection is not tenable. We think that according to the spirit of the statute of 1831, which governs this case, the sum awarded carried interest from the time it was payable. R. C. 1831, p. 290. The second objection is valid. The award being silent as to costs, the judgment for them is erroneous. *Jacobs*v. *Moffatt,*3 Blackf. 395.

*349
      *H. P. Thornton,*for the plaintiff.

*A. C. Griffith,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment as to the costs is reversed, and affirmed as to the residue.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-152370) pertaining to the 2008 Global Stock Plan and the Amended 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Soapstone Networks, Inc.,
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145441) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the
Amended and Restated 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, and the Amended 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Soapstone Networks, Inc.,
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-116179) pertaining to the 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, the Amended 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Amended 2000
Stock Option and Incentive Plan of Soapstone Networks, Inc.,
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53560) pertaining to the 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Soapstone Networks,
Inc., and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-48178) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, the 2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, the 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
Plan, and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Soapstone Networks, Inc.;
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 10, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Soapstone Networks, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Soapstone Networks, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008.

Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 10, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S JUNE 30, 2000 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,145,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,047,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                 47,222,804
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,098,450
<PP&E>                                      35,379,123
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,577,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,200,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,091,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,770
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,978,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,200,799
<SALES>                                     44,090,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,090,986
<CGS>                                       30,371,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,437,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (83,240)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,365,453
<INCOME-TAX>                                   943,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,422,453
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,422,453
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2291 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 578
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2291

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14-24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ``Mary Ann 
                    Collura Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 7, 2004

 Mr. Corzine (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

                              June 7, 2004

               Reported by Ms. Collins, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14-24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ``Mary Ann 
                    Collura Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14-24 
Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, and known as the Fair Lawn Main 
Post Office, shall be known and designated as the ``Mary Ann Collura 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mary Ann Collura Post Office 
Building''.

                                                       Calendar No. 578

108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2291

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 14-24 Abbott Road in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, as the ``Mary Ann 
                    Collura Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 7, 2004

                       Reported without amendment
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"Women\u2019s History Month: Meet Denise Ryan","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"wATX6nCVBV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/womens-history-month-meet-denise-ryan\/\">Women\u2019s History Month: Meet Denise Ryan<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/womens-history-month-meet-denise-ryan\/embed\/#?secret=wATX6nCVBV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Women\u2019s History Month: Meet Denise Ryan” — NASA\" data-secret=\"wATX6nCVBV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/womenshistorymonth-social-1080x1080-2024-deniseryan.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, David C. Owen, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A-4 of ICOPDigital, Inc.;

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and

 

c. Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors: 

 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
|                    |                                    |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                    | /s/  DAVID C. OWEN                      |
|                    | David  C. Owen                          |
|                    | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                    | * *                                |
| Date: July 5, 2005 | * *                                |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe have issued our report dated March 31, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsincluded in the Annual Report of ViewCast.com, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatements of ViewCast.com, Inc. on Forms SB-2 No. 333-31947, S-8 No. 333-53159, S-8 No. 333-63799,S-8 No. 333-119104, S-3 No. 333-77923, S-3 No. 333-35662 and S-3 No. 333-40630./s/ KBA GROUP LLP
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129665 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

FRANCIS TULL,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129665 

 COA: 252683 

Genesee CC: 02-072773 

WTF, INC., d/b/a J.J. SHAKERS, 

Defendant,

Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant,

and 

RICKY JOE ROLLAND, 

 Defendant, Cross-Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0419 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 26, 2006 

Clerk
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2508

To redesignate the Ridges Basin Reservoir, Colorado, as Lake Nighthorse. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2004

Mr. DOMENICI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL

To redesignate the Ridges Basin Reservoir, Colorado, as 

Lake Nighthorse.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RENAMING OF RESERVOIR. 

4 The reservoir known as the ‘‘Ridges Basin Reservoir’’ 

5 located on the Animas River in Colorado, constructed 

6 under section 6(a) of the Colorado Ute Indian Water 

7 Rights Settlement Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2975; 114 Stat. 

8 2763A–260), shall be known and designated as ‘‘Lake 

9 Nighthorse’’. 
2

•S 2508 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the reservoir 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to Lake Nighthorse.

Æ
[786 NYS2d 871]

#### In the Matter of Thomas A. Lenkiewicz, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Fifth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

December 30, 2004

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Anthony J. Giglioti, Principal Counsel, Fifth Judicial District Grievance Committee,*Syracuse, for petitioner.

*William R. Morgan,*Syracuse, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court *152on March 26, 1981, and maintains an office for the practice of law in Syracuse. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of misconduct including neglect. Respondent filed an answer admitting certain material allegations of the petition, and outstanding issues of fact were thereafter resolved by stipulation. Respondent appeared before this Court and submitted matters in mitigation.

Respondent admits that he failed to respond to inquiries from clients in criminal matters, resulting in the untimely filing of notices of appeal in two such matters. He also admits that he failed to respond to correspondence and directives from this Court regarding the criminal matters of five clients. Finally, respondent admits that, during the disciplinary investigation, he failed to comply with the Grievance Committee’s request that he provide written responses to client complaints.

We conclude that respondent has violated the following Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility:

> DR 1-102 (a) (5) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [5])—engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;

> DR 1-102 (a) (7) (22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a] [7])—engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer; and

> DR 6-101 (a) (3) (22 NYCRR 1200.30 [a] [3])—neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him.

We have considered the matters submitted by respondent in mitigation, including that, at the time of the misconduct, he suffered from adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, for which he has sought treatment. Accordingly, after consideration of all of the factors in this matter, we conclude that respondent should be censured.

Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ., concur.

Order of censure entered.
#### M’Glimmery *v.*Brush, in Error.

*Wednesday, May*6.

AN action of slander was brought by *Brush*against Ji’Gfo*mery,*for words charging the plaintiff with stealing, ancTíbiwords charging him and his family with murder. *The*defendant pleaded not guilty. *Held,*that words charging the *“Brush*.family” with stealing, or with murder, might be proved by the plaintiff to show malice; but that no slanderous words spoken of the plaintiff’s wife alone were admissible as evidence in this action.
Exhibit
10.43


 


BONE
BIOLOGICS CORPORATION


 


AMENDMENT
TO CONVERTIBLE SECURED TERM NOTES


 


This
Amendment to Convertible Secured Term Notes (this “Amendment”)
is entered into as of October 1, 2019, by and between Bone Biologics Corporation,
a Delaware corporation (the “Maker”), and Hankey Capital,
LLC (the “Payee”).


 


Recitals


 


Whereas,
the Maker and the Payee are parties to those
certain Convertible Promissory Notes issued by the Maker to the Payee (each a “Note” and collectively
the “Notes”) as follows: (a) Note dated October 24, 2014, as amended, in the principal amount of $5,000,000;
(b) Note dated May 24, 2015, as amended, in the principal amount of $2,000,000; (c) Note dated February 24, 2016 in the principal
amount of $2,000,000; (d) Note dated March 19, 2019 in the principal amount of $2,000,000; and (e) Note dated September 19, 2019
in the principal amount of $1,100,000;


 


Whereas,
the Maker and the Payee desire to amend each
of the Notes as set forth herein.


 


Agreement


 


Now,
Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing
and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby
agree as follows:





 


1.Amendment
to Notes.


 


A.
Section 3.1 of each Note is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“3.1
Interest. Effective October 1, 2019, interest hereon shall accrue and be payable on the Maturity Date as defined below.


 


B.
3.2 Section 3.2 of each Note is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:


 


“3.2
Maturity Date. The entire unpaid principal amount of this Note, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon and
all other amounts payable hereunder or under any of the other Loan Documents, shall be due and payable, if not sooner paid, on
December 31, 2021 or an earlier date as a result of a maturity, whether by acceleration or otherwise, pursuant to the terms of
the Loan Documents (the “Maturity Date”).”


 




    	 	 	 



    	 



    




 


2.
Miscellaneous.


 


A.
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument. The delivery of facsimile or electronic signatures shall be as effective as the delivery
of original signatures.


 


B.
Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, each of the Notes shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


C.
Payee hereby acknowledges that no Event of Default has occurred under the Notes.


 


[Signature
page follows]


 




    	 	 	 



    	 



    

 


In
Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed
this Amendment as of the date set forth in the first paragraph above.


 


	 	Bone Biologics Corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	                 
	 	Name:
    	 
	 	Title:
    	 
	 	 	 
	 	Payee:
	 	 	 
	 	Hankey Capital, LLC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:
    	 
	 	Title: