alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2023 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2023

      To limit Department of Defense contracting with firms under 
  investigation by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2004

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To limit Department of Defense contracting with firms under 
  investigation by the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTING WITH FIRMS 
              UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) Limitation.--No official of the Department of Defense may enter 
into a contract with, or otherwise procure any property or services 
from, a person while such person is under investigation by the 
Inspector General of the Department of Defense, unless the selection of 
such person for such contract or other procurement is made with full 
and open competition.
    (b) Waiver Authority.--
            (1) Authority.--The President may waive the applicability 
        of subsection (a) to a person in the case of any contract or 
        other procurement of the Department of Defense if the President 
        determines that it is necessary to enter into such contract or 
        other procurement with such person in the national security 
        interests of the United States.
            (2) Notification requirement.--Not later than 15 days 
        before granting a waiver under paragraph (1), the President 
        shall transmit a notification of the waiver to Congress. The 
        notification shall include a description of the procurement to 
        which the waiver relates, the person from whom the procurement 
        is to be made, and the justification for granting the waiver.
    (c) Full and Open Competition Defined.--In this section, the term 
``full and open competition'' has the meaning given such term in 
section 4 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 
403).
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 1462

JACQUELINE PIDANICK , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. PAUL C. LAROSA, III, individually and in his official capacity; CHRIS SANKOWSKI, individually and in his official capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 9:18

- cv
- 01534

- DCN

- MGB )

Submitted : January 13, 2020 Decided: January 30, 2020

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jacqueline Pidanick, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Lilley Jackson, SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are no t binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jacqueline Pidanick appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Pidanick’s amended complaint alleging
constitutional violations under 42 U.S .C. § 1983 (201 8 ) and related claims . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pidanick v. LaRosa , No. 9:18

- cv
- 01534

- DCN

- MGB (D.S.C. Apr. 22, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-46008, 333-66434, 333-113692, 333-117003, and 333-137458), Form S-3 (Nos. 333-110067,
333-102436, 333-76144, 333-115245, 333-115247, and 333-118823), and Form SB-2/Amended on Form S-3
(No. 333-47240) and related prospectuses of our report dated March 31, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule which appears
in this Form 10-K.

Miami, Florida

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLPMarch 31, 2009

Certified Public Accountants


1

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10.11





Director Fee Arrangements for 2011





Each director ofMutualFirst Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) also is a director of MutualBank.  For 2011, each non-employee director will receive an annual fee of $27,750 for serving on MutualBank’s Board of Directors as well as Board meeting fee of $200 per meeting attended.  In addition to this annual fee, Wilbur R. Davis will receive a $6,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors, Linn Crull will receive a $5,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee, Jerry McVicker will receive a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and Jon Kintner will receive a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Trust Management
Committee.  Directors are not compensated for their service on the Company’s Board of Directors.





MutualBank maintains deferred compensation arrangements with some directors that previously allowed them to defer all or a portion of their Board fees in order to receive income when they are no longer active directors.  Previously deferred amounts earn interest at the rate of 10 percent per year.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2467 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2467

  To clarify the calculation of per-unit costs payable under expiring 
annual contributions contracts for tenant-based rental assistance that 
                    are renewed in fiscal year 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2004

    Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Reed, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. 
    Clinton, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Lautenberg, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Kohl, Mr. 
  Corzine, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Carper, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Jeffords, Mrs. 
    Boxer, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Johnson) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the calculation of per-unit costs payable under expiring 
annual contributions contracts for tenant-based rental assistance that 
                    are renewed in fiscal year 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF PER-UNIT COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of the item relating to the Housing 
Certificate Fund in title II of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and 
Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations 
Act, 2004 (Division G of Public Law 108-199; 118 Stat. 372) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``in each calendar quarter'' after ``and 
        by applying''; and
            (2) by inserting ``in the most recent quarter for which the 
        public housing agency has submitted such actual per unit cost 
        information to the Secretary'' after ``actual per unit cost''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to all expiring section 8 tenant-based annual contributions 
contracts renewed pursuant to the paragraph referred to in subsection 
(a), whether such renewal occurs before, on, or after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.10
  Amendment th Landlord Tenant
  Building Lease
    Term
 Demise  Existing Space Exhibit A Third Additional Space Leased Premises
 Tenant Improvements
 (a)
    
    The phrase Lease Commencement Date shall be modified to read Third Additional
Space Commencement Date. The Third Additional Space
Commencement Date is scheduled for September 1, 2005.(b)
    
    Landlords monetary obligation for construction of Leasehold improvements to the
Third Additional Space shall be $51,755.00 (Allowance).(c)
    
    In the event Tenant does not utilize all or any portion of the Allowance, the
Allowance shall be forfeited.(d)
    
    The Tenant acknowledges the Landlords agent, Trammell Crow Company, shall be
providing construction management services and a five percent (5%) fee based on the
hard costs shall be charged to Tenant.(e)
    
    Tenant plans to be submitted to Landlord for approval and attached to this lease
amendment as Exhibit B.




---



##### 



Base Rent
 Date
    
    Monthly Rent
    
    Yearly Rent
    
    Approximate Rentper Square Foot7/1/05-8/31/05
    
    $
    0.00
    
    
    $
    0.00
    
    
    $
    0.009/1/05-8/31/06
    
    $8,233.75 per month
    
    $
    98,805.00
    
    
    $
    21.009/1/06-8/31/07
    
    $8,429.79 per month
    
    $
    101,157.50
    
    
    $
    21.509/1/07-8/31/08
    
    $8,625.83 per month
    
    $
    103,510.00
    
    
    $
    22.009/1/08-8/31/09
    
    $8,821.88 per month
    
    $
    105,862.50
    
    
    $
    22.509/1/09-8/31/10
    
    $9,017.92 per month
    
    $
    108,215.00
    
    
    $
    23.00
  Excess Tenant Improvements
 Tenants Square Footage
 Additional Rent Share
 Parking 19.
 Option Period Option Period Renewal Notice Market Base Rent




---



##### 



Right of First Offer ROFO
Space Landlords ROFO Notice
    Landlord Notice Address
 Ratification




---



##### 



Landlord:
    
    Tenant:NEWTOWER TRUST COMPANYMULTI-EMPLOYER PROPERTY TRUST, atrust organized under 12 C.F.R. Section 9.18
    
    The Network Management Group, Inc.BY: Kennedy Associates Real Estate Counsel, Inc.,Authorized Signatory
 By
    
    /s/ Mark D. Reinikka
    
    
    
    By
    
    /s/ Don KlumbName:
    
    Mark D. Reinikka
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Don KlumbTitle:
    
    V.P.
    
    
    
    Its:
    
    CFO




---



##### 



Exhibit A




---



##### 



Exhibit B
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Collegiate teams to focus on natural disasters in 2024 Gateways to Blue Skies Competition","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"54TrbNzHup\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/collegiate-teams-to-focus-on-natural-disasters-in-2024-gateways-to-blue-skies-competition\/\">Collegiate teams to focus on natural disasters in 2024 Gateways to Blue Skies Competition<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/collegiate-teams-to-focus-on-natural-disasters-in-2024-gateways-to-blue-skies-competition\/embed\/#?secret=54TrbNzHup\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Collegiate teams to focus on natural disasters in 2024 Gateways to Blue Skies Competition” — NASA\" data-secret=\"54TrbNzHup\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/52953540566_82e2c18348_k.jpg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":240}
Exhibit 10.14

AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE  DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN  OF WATER PIK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Recitals

WHEREAS, Water Pik Technologies, Inc. ("Employer") has adopted an executive deferred compensation plan for
the benefit of its executive employees;

WHEREAS, effective July 2, 2001, the plan was amended and restated by adoption of the CORPORATEplan for Retirement Select Plan
Document (eff. Date 04/11/94), as sponsored by Fidelity Management & Research Company; and

WHEREAS, the Employer wishes to amend said amended and restated plan, the Employer hereby adopts the following amendment, effective
January 1, 2003.

Amendment

Modify the Adoption Agreement section,1.05. CONTRIBUTIONSas follows:

1.05(b)Matching Contributions.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has caused this Amendment to be executed effective as of the 1st day of January, 2003.

|EMPLOYER: |  | Water Pik Technologies, Inc.                                            
|--------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|BY:       |  | /s/ THERESA HOPE-REESETheresa Hope-Reese
Vice President, Human Resources

---

QuickLinks
ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

DIRECTOR 

GENERAL LEGISLATIVE ENGINEER 

INSPECTOR OF CHIEF DIRECTOR DIRECTOR 

OF 

EQUAL OF 

OPPORTUNITY AFFAIRS 

I 

ASSOCIATE ASSOCl ATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

EXTERNAL 

RELATIONS 

COMPTROLLER FOR DEPUTY GENERAL 

COUNSEL ADMINISTRATOR 

LYNDON B. JOHNSON 

SPACE CENTER 

JOHN F. KENNEDY 

SPACE CENTER 

GEORGE C.MARSHAL1 H SPACE FLIGHT 

CENTER 

TECHNOLOGY 

LABORATORIES 

APPRO$’ g4&/ ED
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                             
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2005 |  | /s/ DANIEL K. SPIEGELMAN                    
|                      |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman Chief Financial
Officer
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JOHNNIE LEE KEARNY.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Donna Cathey,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03730-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9051 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0550

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA ALLEN BALDWIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 30, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 13 2023

09/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0550
Exhibit 13

Ultrapar Participações S.A. and Subsidiaries

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in
connection with the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Pedro Wongtschowski, the Chief Executive Officer, and
André Covre, the Chief Financial Officer of Ultrapar Participações S.A., each certifies that, to the best of their respective knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ultrapar Participações S.A.

São Paulo, June 30, 2011



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Pedro Wongtschowski
|Name:  |  | Pedro Wongtschowski    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

São Paulo, June 30, 2011



|       |  |                                               
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ André Covre                               
|Name:  |  | André Covre                                   
|Title: |  | Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Takeshi Uchiyamada, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 23, 2017



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/    TAKESHI
UCHIYAMADA         
|Takeshi Uchiyamada                
|Chairman of the Board of Directors
|Toyota Motor Corporation          



---

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Osamu Nagata, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Toyota Motor Corporation (the Company); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 23, 2017



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/    OSAMU NAGATA               
|Osamu Nagata                      
|Executive Vice President, Director
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CLARENCE TOLBERT.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.