alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NAC Aeronautics Committee Public Agenda
 

Tuesday, July 24, 2012
 

Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
 

(Building 34, Room 120A)
 

Tuesday, July 24 (Sessions are public except as noted)
 

8:00 am to 8:10 am Welcome and announcements
 

8:10 am to 9:10 am National Aeronautics Research Agenda
 

9:10 am to 10:00 pm Non­traditional International Partner engagement 

/ International Forum for Aviation Research

10:00 am to 11:15 am Next­Gen Research and Development Activities
 

11:15 am to 12:15 am UAS Subcommittee Outbrief
 

12:15 pm to 1:00 pm  Lunch (non­public)
 

1:00 pm to 2:00 pm ARMD Education and Public Outreach Activities 

(joint session with NAC E/PO Committee)

2:00 pm to 2:45 pm Committee Deliberations
 

2:45 pm to 3:00 pm Public Comment Period
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1904 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1904

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 400 North Miami 
   Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ``Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United 
                          States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 400 North Miami Avenue in 
Miami, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Wilkie D. 
Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilkie D. 
Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate March 12, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1904

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 400 North Miami 
   Avenue in Miami, Florida, as the ``Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United 
                          States Courthouse''.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Tabor","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/astabor\/","title":"President Biden Lands at NASA Ames, Tours California Storm Damage","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"TsDlaCBVBA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/president-biden-lands-at-nasa-ames-tours-california-storm-damage\/\">President Biden Lands at NASA Ames, Tours California Storm Damage<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/president-biden-lands-at-nasa-ames-tours-california-storm-damage\/embed\/#?secret=TsDlaCBVBA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“President Biden Lands at NASA Ames, Tours California Storm Damage” — NASA\" data-secret=\"TsDlaCBVBA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/acd23-0003-016.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":466}
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Joseph D. Sansone, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pediatric Services of America, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation ; and 

 

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a)    All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 11, 2004
(January 18, 2005)

#### Michael Anderson, Appellant, v Olympia & York Tower B Company, Sued Herein as Olympia & York Battery Park Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Kelly Trane Service Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[789 NYS2d 190]

*521In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 23, 2003, which denied his motion for partial summary judgment and granted the motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff and the cross motion of the third-party defendant Kelly Trane Service Agency, Inc., sued herein as Kelly Trane Service Company, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiff, an air-conditioning technician, was injured when he hit his hip against an air-handling unit as he attempted to climb on top of it in order to replace worn-out bearings. The work performed by the plaintiff at the time of the accident involved the replacement of worn-out parts in a nonconstruction and nonrenovation context, and did not constitute “erection, demolition, repairing, altering, painting, cleaning or pointing of a building” within the meaning of Labor Law § 240 (1) so as to bring him within the protective ambit of the statute *(see Smith v Shell Oil Co.,*85 NY2d 1000, 1002 [1995]; *Jani v City of New York,*284 AD2d 304 [2001]; *Rowlett v Great S. Bay Assoc.,*237 AD2d 183, 184 [1997]).

The Supreme Court also properly dismissed the Labor Law § 241 (6) cause of action since the accident did not occur in connection with construction, demolition, or excavation work *(see Nagel v D & R Realty Corp.,*99 NY2d 98, 103 [2002]). Further, the Industrial Code sections relied upon either establish a general safety standard that does not give rise to a duty under Labor Law § 241 (6) *(see Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,*81 NY2d 494, 505 [1993]) or are not applicable to the facts presented here.

Finally, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiff s Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims. In opposition to the prima facie establishment of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs affidavit contained feigned issues of fact which were designed to avoid the consequences of his earlier deposition testimony and were insufficient *522to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Mestric v Martinez Cleaning Co.,*306 AD2d 449 [2003]). Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Madison Olson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/madison-c-arnoldnasa-gov\/","title":"NASA to Demonstrate First-of-its-Kind In-Space Manufacturing Technique for Telescope Mirrors","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gxVQL1Hpye\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/nasa-to-demonstrate-first-of-its-kind-in-space-manufacturing-technique-for-telescope-mirrors\/\">NASA to Demonstrate First-of-its-Kind In-Space Manufacturing Technique for Telescope Mirrors<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/nasa-to-demonstrate-first-of-its-kind-in-space-manufacturing-technique-for-telescope-mirrors\/embed\/#?secret=gxVQL1Hpye\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA to Demonstrate First-of-its-Kind In-Space Manufacturing Technique for Telescope Mirrors” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gxVQL1Hpye\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/teacher-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":463}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Linda Brown,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03769-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9349 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9349 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology Project Overview","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"25YSBgfLTD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-rvlt\/revolutionary-vertical-lift-technology-project-overview\/\">Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology Project Overview<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-rvlt\/revolutionary-vertical-lift-technology-project-overview\/embed\/#?secret=25YSBgfLTD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology Project Overview” — NASA\" data-secret=\"25YSBgfLTD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/aam-rvlt-003_vertiport_sunset_landing.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":336}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2327 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that per diem payments 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs for the care of veterans in 

State homes shall not be used to offset or reduce other payments made 

to assist veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify that per 

diem payments by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

for the care of veterans in State homes shall not be 

used to offset or reduce other payments made to assist 

veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 2327 IS 

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

2 AFFAIRS PER DIEM PAYMENTS TO STATE 

3 HOMES FOR VETERANS. 

4 Section 1741 of title 38, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(e) Payments to States pursuant to this section shall 

8 not be considered a liability of a third party, or otherwise 

9 be utilized to offset or reduce any other payment made 

10 to assist veterans.’’. 

Æ
#### Lavinia St. John *v.*Mart St. John.

Divorce.

A divorce, a mensa et thoro, where the proof shows that though for some years her husband had been habitually drunk and had treated her cruelly, yet, within the statutory period of five years before institution of her suit, his intemperance was only occasionally and unaccompanied by maltreatment, neglect or essential waste, and had attempted a reconciliation and restitution of conjugal rights, is held to be all that the evidence justifies.

APPEAL PROM LIVINGSTON CIRCUIT COURT.

September 14, 1868.

*Bush*& *Bush, for appellant.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Robertson :

It seems to this court that, by the decree for alimony and a divorce *a*mensa, the appellant has obtained at least as much as the record authorized her to claim or expect. Her claim to a divorce *a vinculo*is not satisfactorily sustained;. for, though for some years preceding the statutory bar of five years before the institution of her suit, the appellee seemed to have been habitually drunk and to have treated her cruelly, yet within the said period of five years it seems that his intemperance was only occasional and unaccompanied by maltreatment, neglect or essential waste; and the charge of settled aversion is repelled by the fact that, after she left him contrary to an agreement to continue this co-habitation, he urged, more than once, a reconciliation and restitution of conjugal rights and relations.

Wherefore, the judgment of the circuit court is, on her appeal, affirmed.
#### Nathaniel DelGadillo et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 885]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered April 29, 2002, which denied their motion, inter alia, to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs failed to show, inter alia, the existence of a meritorious cause of action *(see generally Castillo v City of New*York, 6 AD3d 568 [2004]; *Basetti v Nour,*287 AD2d 126, 133-135 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.