61052 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 

1See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck 

Tires from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation 

of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 79 FR 42292 

(July 21, 2014). 

1See Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From 

Mexico and the People’s Republic of China: 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 57257 (September 

20, 2010) (‘‘Order’’). 

2For a full description of the scope of the Order, 

see Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD Operations, to Paul 

Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

Preliminary Results of Third Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Magnesia Carbon 

Bricks From the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

(‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’) dated 

concurrently with these results and hereby adopted 

by this notice. 

3See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 78 FR 54235, 

(September 3, 2013). 

4See Letter to the Department from Resco 

Products, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’) and Magnesita 

Refractories Company (‘‘Magnesita’’), ‘‘Certain 

Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People’s Republic 

of China: Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review’’ (September 30, 2013); Letter to the 

Department from ANH Refractories Company 

(‘‘ANH’’), ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From 

the People’s Republic of China: Request for 

Administrative Review’’ (September 30, 2013). 

5See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 67104 

(November 8, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

6See Letter to the Department from Petitioner and 

Magnesita, ‘‘Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From 

the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Withdrawal Requests’’ 

(January 31, 2014). 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–016] 

Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light 

Truck Tires From the People’s 

Republic of China: Postponement of 

Preliminary Determination of 

Antidumping Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

DATES: Effective October 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VII, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–0176. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 14, 2014, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated 

the antidumping duty (AD) 

investigation of certain passenger 

vehicle and light truck tires from the 

People’s Republic of China.1 Currently, 

the preliminary determination is due no 

later than December 1, 2014. 

Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination 

Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 

CFR 351.205(b)(1) require the 

Department to issue the preliminary 

determination in an AD investigation no 

later than 140 days after the date on 

which the Department initiated the 

investigation. 

Pursuant to section 733(c)(1)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(2), the 

Department concludes that because of 

the extraordinary complexity of this 

case and the number of firms whose 

activities we must investigate, including 

over 80 separate rate applications, it is 

not practicable to complete the 

preliminary determination by the 

current deadline. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 733(c)(1)(B) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(2), the 

Department is postponing the deadline 

for the preliminary determination to no 

later than 190 days after the date on 

which it initiated this investigation. As 

a result of this postponement, the 

deadline for completion of the 

preliminary determination is now 

January 20, 2015. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). 

Dated: October 3, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24167 Filed 10–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–954] 

Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks From 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) is conducting the 

third administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain 

magnesia carbon bricks (‘‘bricks’’) from 

the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’),1 for the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’), September 1, 2012, to August 

31, 2013. The Department preliminarily 

determines that there are no reviewable 

entries during the POR. The Department 

invites interested parties to comment on 

these preliminary results. 

DATES: Effective October 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry 

Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4047. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

includes certain magnesia carbon bricks. 

Certain magnesia carbon bricks that are 

the subject of this order are currently 

classifiable under subheadings 

6902.10.1000, 6902.10.5000, 

6815.91.0000, 6815.99.2000 and 

6815.99.4000 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

is dispositive.2

Background 

On September 3, 2013, the 

Department published an opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order for bricks from 

the PRC.3 In September 2013, the 

Department received timely requests 

from interested parties to conduct an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on bricks from 

the PRC.4 Based upon these requests, on 

November 8, 2013, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the Order 

covering 162 companies.5

Partial Rescission of the Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if all parties 

who requested the review withdraw 

their requests within 90 days of the date 

of publication of notice of initiation of 

the requested review. On January 31, 

2014, Petitioner and Magnesita timely 

withdrew their request for an 

administrative review for all but two 

companies.6 Because ANH did not 

withdraw its request for review for three 

companies, requests for review for a 

total of five companies remain. Two of 

the companies for which Petitioner and 

Magnesita withdrew their request, RHI 

Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd. (‘‘RHI’’) 

and Yingkou New Century Refractories 

Ltd. (‘‘New Century’’), previously 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 61053 

7See, e.g., Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven 

Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 FR 

47363, 47365 (August 8, 2012), unchanged in 

Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2010– 

2011, 78 FR 10130 (February 13, 2013). 

8A change in practice with respect to the 

conditional review of the PRC-wide entity is not 

applicable to this administrative review. See 

Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of 

Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65964, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 

9See Letter to the Department from Fedmet, 

‘‘Magnesia Carbon Bricks From the People’s 

Republic of China, Case No. A–570–954: Entry of 

Appearance and APO Application’’ (November 18, 

2013). 

10 Id. 

11Fedmet Resources Corporation (‘‘Fedmet’’), 

Puyang Refractory Co., Ltd. (‘‘Puyang’’), Fengchi 

Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City 

(‘‘Fengchi’’), Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd. of Haicheng 

City, and Fengchi Refractories Corp. 

12See Fedmet’s letter dated January 2, 2014. 

13The PRC-wide entity includes the companies 

listed in Appendix I. 

14See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

15See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)–(2). 

16See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). 

17See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

established their entitlement to a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding. No other party requested a 

review of RHI and New Century. 

Accordingly, the Department is 

rescinding this administrative review 

with respect to RHI and New Century in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). 

For those companies named in the 

Initiation Notice for which all review 

requests have been withdrawn, but 

which were not eligible for separate-rate 

status at the initiation of this review, the 

Department’s practice is to refrain from 

rescinding the review with respect to 

these companies at this time.7 While the 

request for review of these companies 

was timely withdrawn, we preliminarily 

determine that the companies remain 

part of the PRC-wide entity. Those 

companies are listed at Appendix I. The 

PRC-wide entity is under review for 

these preliminary results as noted 

below.8 Thus, we are not rescinding this 

review with respect to these companies, 

but the Department will make a 

determination with respect to the PRCwide entity at the conclusion of this 

review. 

Fedmet stated that although the 

Initiation Notice included Fedmet as a 

producer of subject merchandise, it is 

not a PRC producer but a U.S. 

importer.9 Fedmet provided information 

from this and a previous segment to 

demonstrate its status as an importer.10

Based on the information available, the 

Department preliminarily determines 

that Fedmet’s entries will be subject to 

the appropriate exporter’s cash deposit 

requirements and assessment rates, as 

outlined below. Accordingly, we are 

preliminarily rescinding this review for 

Fedmet. 

Separate Rate Status 

For the five companies whose review 

requests remain,11 we preliminarily 

determine that only Fengchi 

demonstrated its continued eligibility 

for a separate rate because, as discussed 

below, it demonstrated that it had no 

shipments during the POR and thus will 

maintain its separate rate status from the 

date of the initiation of this 

administrative review. Puyang, Fengchi 

Mining Co., Ltd. of Haicheng City, and 

Fengchi Refractories Corp. did not 

submit a separate rate application or 

certification. Therefore, these four 

companies have not established their 

eligibility for a separate rate, and the 

Department preliminarily determines 

that they be considered part of the PRCwide entity. Accordingly the PRC-wide 

entity is under review. 

Preliminary Finding of No Shipments 

Fengchi submitted a timely-filed 

certification that it had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.12 The 

Department queried the import data 

from U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (‘‘CBP’’) and found no 

suspended antidumping or 

countervailing duty entries for Fengchi. 

The Department issued a no-shipment 

inquiry to CBP with respect to Fengchi, 

asking CBP to provide any information 

contrary to our findings of no 

suspended entries of subject 

merchandise exported by Fengchi 

during the POR. We received no 

contradictory information from CBP, 

indicating that there were suspended 

entries of subject merchandise into the 

United States exported by Fengchi. 

Therefore, we preliminarily determine 

that Fengchi had no shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Because Fengchi submitted a timely noshipment certification and CBP data 

indicated that there were no suspended 

antidumping or countervailing duty 

entries for Fengchi during the POR, we 

preliminarily determine that Fengchi 

will retain its separate-rate status from 

the date of the initiation of this 

administrative review. 

Methodology 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached to 

this notice in Appendix II. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

iaaccess.trade.gov, and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period September 1, 2012, through 

August 31, 2013: 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

PRC-Wide Entity 13 ......... 236.00 

Public Comment & Opportunity To 

Request a Hearing 

Interested parties may submit case 

briefs within 30 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results 

of review.14 Rebuttals to case briefs, 

which must be limited to issues raised 

in the case briefs, must be filed within 

five days after the time limit for filing 

case briefs.15 Parties who submit 

arguments are requested to submit with 

the argument (a) a statement of the 

issue, (b) a brief summary of the 

argument, and (c) a table of 

authorities.16 Parties submitting briefs 

should do so pursuant to the 

Department’s electronic filing system, 

IA ACCESS. 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.17 Hearing requests should 

contain the following information: (1) 

The party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Oral presentations will 

be limited to issues raised in the briefs. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

61054 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 

18See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

19See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

20For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

If a request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the time and date for 

the hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230.18

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

our analysis of all issues raised in the 

case briefs, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuance of the final results, the 

Department will determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.19 The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the publication date of the 

final results of this review. We intend to 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries 

containing subject merchandise 

exported by the PRC-wide entity at a 

rate equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin specified above. 

The Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement 

in practice, for entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. sales data submitted 

by companies individually examined 

during the administrative review, the 

Department will instruct CBP to 

liquidate such entries at the rate for the 

PRC-wide entity. Additionally, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

had no shipments of the subject 

merchandise, any suspended entries 

that entered under that exporter’s case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s cash 

deposit rate) will be liquidated at the 

rate for the PRC-wide entity.20 The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future cash deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

review for shipments of the subject 

merchandise from the PRC entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided by sections 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior completed 

segment of this proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all 

PRC exporters of subject merchandise 

that have not been found to be entitled 

to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate 

will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and 

(3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during the POR. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Department’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results are issued 

and published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: September 29, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

Companies Subject to the Administrative 

Review That Are Part of the PRC-Wide 

Entity 

1. ANH (Xinyi) Refractories Co. Ltd. 

2. Anyang Rongzhu Silicon Industry Co., Ltd. 

3. Barsan Global Lojistik Ve Gum. 

Mus.Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd. 

4. Beijing Tianxing Ceramic Fiber Composite 

Materials Corp. 

5. Benxi Iron & Steel (Group) International 

Economic & Trading Co. 

6. Changxing Magnesium Furnace Charge 

Co., Ltd. 

7. Changxing Wangfa Architectural & 

Metallurgical Materials Co., Ltd. 

8. Changzing Zhicheng Refractory Material 

Factory. 

9. China Metallurgical Raw Material Beijing 

Company. 

10. China Quantai Metallurgical (Beijing) 

Engineering & Science Co., Ltd. 

11. Chosun Refractories. 

12. Cimm Group of China. 

13. CNBM International Corporation. 

14. Dalian Cerax Co., Ltd. 

15. Dalian Dalmond Trading Co., Ltd. 

16. Dalian F.T.Z. Huaxin International. 

17. Dalian F.T.Z. Maylong Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

18. Dalian Huayu Refractories International 

Co., Ltd. 

19. Dalian LST Metallurgy Co., Ltd. 

20. Dalian Masoo International Trading. 

21. Dalian Mayerton Refractories Ltd. 

22. Dalian Morgan Refractories Ltd. 

23. Dashiqiao Bozhong Mineral Products Co., 

Ltd. 

24. Dashiqiao City Magnesite. 

25. Dashiqiao City Guangcheng Refractory 

Co., Ltd. 

26. Dashiqiao Jia Sheng Mining Co., Ltd. 

27. Dashiqiao Jinlong Refractories Co., Ltd. 

28. Dashiqiao RongXing Refractory Material 

Co., Ltd. 

29. Dashiqiao Sanqiang Refractory Material 

Co., Ltd. 

30. Dashiqiao Yutong Packing Factory. 

31. Dashiqiao Zhongjian Magnesia. 

32. Dengfeng Desheng Refractory Co., Ltd. 

33. DFL Minmet Refractories Corp. 

34. Duferco SA. 

35. Duferco BarInvest SA Beijing Office. 

36. Duferco Ironet Shanghai Representative 

Office. 

37. Eastern Industries & Trading Co., Ltd. 

38. Far Horizon Trading Limited. 

39. Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd of Haicheng 

City. 

40. Fengchi Refractories Co., of Haicheng 

City. 

41. Fengchi Refractories Corp. 

42. Ferro Alliages & Mineraux Inc. 

43. Firma. 

44. Haicheng City Qunli Mining Co., Ltd. 

45. Haicheng City Xiyang Import & Export 

Corporation. 

46. Haicheng Donghe Taidi Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

47. Haicheng Ruitong Mining Co., Ltd. 

48. Haiyuan Talc Powder Manufacture 

Factory. 

49. Henan Boma Co. Ltd. 

50. Henan Kingway Chemicals Co., Ltd. 

51. Henan Tagore Refractories Co., Ltd. 

52. Henan Xinmi Changzxing Refractories, 

Co., Ltd. 

53. Hebei Qinghe Refractory Group Co. Ltd. 

54. Huailin Refractories (Dashiqiao) Pte. Ltd. 

55. Hualude Hardware Products Co. Ltd. 

56. Indian Technomac Co., Ltd. 

57. Jfe Refractories Corporation. 

58. Jiangsu Sujia Group New Materials Co., 

Ltd. 

59. Jiangsu Sujia Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. 

60. Jinan Forever Imp. & Emp. Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

61. Jinan Linquan Imp. & Emp. Co. Ltd. 

62. Jinan Ludong Refractory Co., Ltd. 

63. Kosmokraft Refractory Limited. 

64. Kuehne & Nagel Ltd. Dalian Branch 

Office. 

65. Kumas Sanayi Urunleri Ve Insaat Paz. 

66. Lechang City Guangdong Province 

SongXin Refractories Co., Ltd. 

67. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories Group Co., 

Ltd. 

68. Liaoning Fucheng Special Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

69. Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Minerals Ltd. 

70. Liaoning Jinding Magnesite Group. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 196 / Thursday, October 9, 2014 / Notices 61055 

1See Solid Urea from the Russian Federation: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 40063 

(July 11, 2014) (Preliminary Results). 

2See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). 

71. Liaoning Mayerton Refractories Co., Ltd. 

72. Liaoning Mineral & Metallurgy Group 

Co., Ltd. 

73. Liaoning Qunyi Group Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

74. Liaoning Qunyi Trade Co., Ltd. 

75. Liaoning RHI Jinding Magnesis Co., Ltd. 

76. Liaoning Zhongxing Mining Industry 

Group Co., Ltd. 

77. LiShuang Refractory Industrial Co., Ltd. 

78. Lithomelt Co., Ltd. 

79. Lua Viet Bestref Joint Venture Co. 

80. Luheng Refractory Co., Ltd. 

81. Luoyang Refractory Group Co., Ltd. 

82. Mayerton Refractories. 

83. Minsource International Ltd. 

84. Minteq International Inc. 

85. National Minerals Co., Ltd. 

86. Navis Zufall Ueberseespeditions. 

87. North Refractories Co., Ltd. 

88. Orestar Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd. 

89. Oreworld Trade (Tangshan) Co., Ltd. 

90. Puyang Refractories Co., Ltd. 

91. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. (HQ). 

92. Qingdao Almatis Co., Ltd. 

(Manufacturing). 

93. Qingdao Almatis Trading Co., Ltd. (Sales 

Office). 

94. Qingdao Blueshell Import & Emport Corp. 

95. Qingdao Fujing Group Co., Ltd. 

96. Qingdao Huierde International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

97. Refratechnik Cement GmbH. 

98. Refratechnik Steel GmbH. 

99. RHI AG. 

100. RHI GLAS GmbH. 

101. RHI Refractories Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd. 

102. RHI Refractories (Dalian) Co., Ltd. 

103. RHI Trading Shanghai Branch. 

104. RHI Trading (Dalian) Co., Ltd. 

105. Rongyuan Magnesite Co., Ltd. of 

Dashiqiao City. 

106. Shandong Cambridge International 

Trade Inc. 

107. Shandong Lunai Kiln Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

108. Shandong Refractories Corp. 

109. Shanghai Pudong Imp. & Exp. Co. Ltd. 

110. Shanghai Vista Packaging Co., Ltd. 

111. Shanxi Dajin International (Group) Co., 

Ltd. 

112. Shanxi Xinrong International Trade Co. 

Ltd. 

113. Shenyang Shenghui Refractory Imp. 

114. Shenyang Yi Xin Sheng Lai Refractory 

Materials Co., Ltd. 

115. Shinagawa Refractories Co., Ltd. 

116. Shinagawa Rongyuan Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

117. Sinosteel Corporation. 

118. SMMC Group Co., Ltd. 

119. Store System Inc. O B Dongning Shunf. 

120. Syndicate Exp. Pvt., Ltd. 

121. Tangshan Success Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

122. Tianjin New Century Refractories, Ltd. 

123. Tianjin New World Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

124. Tianjin Weiyuan Refractory Co., Ltd. 

125. The Economic Trading Group of 

Haicheng Huoying Corporation Ltd. 

126. Vereeniging Refractories (Pty). 

127. Vesuvius Advanced Ceramics (Suzhou) 

Co. Ltd. 

128. Wonjin Refractories Co., Ltd. 

129. Wuxi Tian Liang Foreign Trade Co., Ltd. 

130. Xiyuan Xingquan Forsterite Co., Ltd. 

131. Yanshi City Guangming High-Tech 

Refractories Products Co., Ltd. 

132. YHS Minerals Co., Ltd. 

133. Yingkou Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd. 

134. Yingkou Bl Mining Co., Ltd. 

135. Yingkou Dalmond Refractories Co., Ltd. 

136. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

137. Yingkou Guangyang Refractories Co., 

Ltd. (YGR). 

138. Yingkou Heping Samwha Minerals Co., 

Ltd. 

139. Yingkou Jiahe Refractories Co., Ltd. 

140. Yingkou Jinlong Refractories Group. 

141. Yingkou Kyushu Refractories Co., Ltd. 

142. Yingkou Qinghua Group Imp. & Emp. 

Co., Ltd. 

143. Yingkou Qinghua Refractories Co., Ltd. 

144. Yingkou Sanhua Refractory Materials 

Co., Ltd. 

145. Yingkou Tianrun Refractory Co.,Ltd. 

146. Yingkou Wonjin Refractory Material Co., 

Ltd. 

147. Yingkou Yongji Mag Refractory, Ltd. 

148. Yixing Runlong Trade Co., Ltd. 

149. Yixing Xinwei Leeshing Refractory 

Material Co., Ltd. 

150. Yixing Zhenqiu Charging Ltd. 

151. Zhejiang Changxing Guangming Special 

Refractory Material Foundry, Co., Ltd. 

152. Zhejiang Deqing Jinlei Refractory Co., 

Ltd. 

153. Zhejiang Huzhou Fuzilin Refractory 

Metals Group Co., Ltd. 

154. Zhengzhou Annec Industrial Co., Ltd. 

155. Zhengzhou Huachen Refractory Co., Ltd. 

156. Zhengzhou Huawei Refractories Co., 

Ltd. 

157. Zibo Lianzhu Refractory Materials Co., 

Ltd. 

Appendix II 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum: 

1. Background 

2. Scope of the Order 

3. Preliminary Finding of No Shipments 

4. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2014–24158 Filed 10–8–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–801] 

Solid Urea From the Russian 

Federation: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On July 11, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on solid 

urea from the Russian Federation 

(Russia).1 For the final results, we 

continue to find that MCC EuroChem 

has not sold subject merchandise at less 

than normal value during the period of 

review (POR). 

DATES: Effective October 9, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jerrold Freeman or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0180, and (202) 

482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 11, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results. The 

POR is 7/1/2012 through 6/30/2013. We 

invited interested parties to comment on 

the Preliminary Results. We received no 

comments. 

The Department conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is solid urea, a high-nitrogen content 

fertilizer which is produced by reacting 

ammonia with carbon dioxide. The 

product is currently classified under the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the 

United States (HTSUS) item number 

3102.10.00.00. Previously, such 

merchandise was classified under item 

number 480.3000 of the Tariff 

Schedules of the United States. 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to the order is 

dispositive. 

Final Results of the Review 

The Department made no changes to 

its calculations announced in the 

Preliminary Results. As a result of our 

review, we determine that a weightedaverage dumping margin of 0.00 percent 

exists for MCC EuroChem for the POR. 

Assessment Rates 

In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212 

and the Final Modification,2 the 

Department will instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES