alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 21


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF HARRIS INTERACTIVE INC.




|  |                                                                                
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | GSBC Ohio Corporation, an Ohio Corporation                                     
| 
| | Louis Harris & Associates, Inc., a New York Corporation                        
| 
| | Harris Interactive International Inc., a Delaware Corporation                  
| 
| | Harris Interactive U.K. Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation                  
| 
| | Romtec U.K. Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation                              
| 
| | Teligen U.K. Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation                             
| 
| | HI Europe Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation                                
| 
| | Novatris, S.A., a French Corporation                                           
| 
| | Wirthlin Worldwide, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company                  
| 
| | Wirthlin Worldwide Hong Kong, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
    Company    
| 
| | The Wirthlin Group International, LLC, a Delaware Limited
    Liability Company
| 
| | Wirthlin U.K. Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation                            
| 
| | Wirthlin Europe Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation                          
| 
| | Harris Belgium LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-81210) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-67650, 333-67436,
and 333-30356) of Quovadx, Inc. (formally XCare.net, Inc.) of our report dated
March 23, 2001 relating to the consolidated financial statements and
consolidated financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 22, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE 6 MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      11,124,434
<SECURITIES>                                22,034,286
<RECEIVABLES>                               23,783,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,212
<INVENTORY>                                  2,425,814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,608,304
<PP&E>                                       5,243,649
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,636,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,932,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,237,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,433
<OTHER-SE>                                  62,597,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,932,213
<SALES>                                     20,769,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,319,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130,171
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,340,707
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,340,707
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,340,707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 196 (Thursday, October 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24167]



[[Page 61052]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-016]


Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires From the People's 
Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination of 
Antidumping Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.

DATES: Effective October 9, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 14, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
initiated the antidumping duty (AD) investigation of certain passenger 
vehicle and light truck tires from the People's Republic of China.\1\ 
Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than December 
1, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the 
People's Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty 
Investigation, 79 FR 42292 (July 21, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Postponement of Preliminary Determination

    Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1) require the Department to issue the 
preliminary determination in an AD investigation no later than 140 days 
after the date on which the Department initiated the investigation.
    Pursuant to section 733(c)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.205(b)(2), the Department concludes that because of the 
extraordinary complexity of this case and the number of firms whose 
activities we must investigate, including over 80 separate rate 
applications, it is not practicable to complete the preliminary 
determination by the current deadline. Therefore, in accordance with 
section 733(c)(1)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(2), the 
Department is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination 
to no later than 190 days after the date on which it initiated this 
investigation. As a result of this postponement, the deadline for 
completion of the preliminary determination is now January 20, 2015.
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).

    Dated: October 3, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-24167 Filed 10-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (No. 333-41005) and the related Prospectus and in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-19389) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Option Plan,
1994 Equity Incentive Plan, Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan,
Nonstatutory Stock Options and Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CV Therapeutics,
Inc., of our report dated February 27, 1998, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of CV Therapeutics, Inc. included in its Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 27, 1998
January 12, 2024

NASA Aeronautics and Lockheed Martin 

Skunk Works will be unveiling the X-59, 

and you’re invited to host a watch party.

We’d like to celebrate with you as we reflect on the past five years 

of work on the X-59 and get ready for its first flight. The Rollout 

Ceremony will live stream the unveiling of the X-59 after it’s painted. 

We hope you can tune in virtually and host your very own watch party. 

We’ve built a virtual watch party map to highlight all of you planning to 

celebrate with us. 

If you’re interested and would like us to add you to our map, reach out 

to aeroSTEM@nasa.onmicrosoft.com. Hope you can join us!

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

Watch Party!

X-59
EXHIBIT 21.1

PDS Gaming Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries  Parent and Subsidiaries

|Name of Company                              |  | Organized Under
Laws of |  | Percentage of
Voting Securities
Beneficially Owned
By Registrant(1)
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Registrant:                                  |  |                         |  |                                                                    
|PDS Gaming Corporation                       |  | Minnesota               |  |                                                                    
|Consolidated Subsidiaries of the Registrant: |  |                         |  |                                                                    
|PDS Gaming CorporationNevada                |  | Nevada                  |  | 100                                                                
|PDS Casinos Reno, Inc.                       |  | Nevada                  |  | 100                                                                
|PDS Gaming CorporationMississippi           |  | Mississippi             |  | 100                                                                
|PDS Casinos Greenville, Inc.                 |  | Mississippi             |  | 100                                                                
|PDS Gaming CorporationColorado              |  | Colorado                |  | 100                                                                
|PDS Resorts LLC                              |  | Nevada                  |  | 100                                                                
|PDS FR LLC                                   |  | Nevada                  |  | 100                                                                

---

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James E. Pugh,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00255-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss, PLLC - Jackson, MS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/11/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 19, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 865 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1754

ANDREW A. GOGLIA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-3986-DKC) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew A. Goglia, Appellant Pro Se. George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Goglia v. United States Selective Serv. Sys. , No. CA-97-3986-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2363

To revise and extend the Boys and Girls Clubs of America. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 29, 2004

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. KOHL, and Mr. 

BIDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To revise and extend the Boys and Girls Clubs of America.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA. 

4 Section 401 of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 

5 (42 U.S.C. 13751 note) is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (a)(2)—

7 (A) by striking ‘‘1,200’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘1,500’’; 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘4,000’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘5,000’’; and 
2

•S 2363 IS 

1 (C) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2005’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2010’’; 

3 (2) in subsection (c)—

4 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2002, 

5 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010’’; and 

7 (B) in paragraph (2)—

8 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

9 ‘‘1,200’’ and inserting ‘‘1,500’’; and 

10 (ii) in subparagraph (B)—

11 (I) by striking ‘‘4,000’’ and in12 serting ‘‘5,000’’; and 

13 (II) by striking ‘‘2007’’ and in14 serting ‘‘2010’’; and 

15 (3) in subsection (e), by striking paragraph (1) 

16 and inserting the following: 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be 

18 appropriated to carry out this section—

19 ‘‘(A) $80,000,000 for fiscal year 2006; 

20 ‘‘(B) $85,000,000 for fiscal year 2007; 

21 ‘‘(C) $90,000,000 for fiscal year 2008; 

22 ‘‘(D) $95,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; 

23 and 

24 ‘‘(E) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2010.’’.

Æ
#### FARMERS MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF SALEM COUNTY v. DONALD BOGUSZ.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         496,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  344,064
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    362,742
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,295,088
<PP&E>                                       4,216,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                 925,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,406,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,828,147
<BONDS>                                        346,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,700
<COMMON>                                        52,050
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,177,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,406,842
<SALES>                                      2,546,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,546,493
<CGS>                                        2,752,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,752,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,627
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (687,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (687,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (687,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

____________________________________

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 2:15-md-15-02641-DGC

___________________________________ This Document Relates to Plaintiff(s) ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS

OF JANA LIGHTFOOT

Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-03075-DGC WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Jana Lightfoot _________________________________________ ORDER

Considering the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice of Jana Lightfoot, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECLARED that all claims of Plaintiff

Jana Lightfoot against Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. in Civil Action

No.: MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC (Member Case 2:17-cv-03075-DGC) are dismissed in its entirety

without prejudice as to the refiling of same, and each party shall bear its own costs.

Dated this 10th day of November, 2017.

HONORABLE DAVID G. CAMPBELL

Judge, United States District Court

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8813-1 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
#### CHAPPELL v. ROTH

No. 68A01

Case below: 353 N.C. App. 690

Petition by plaintiff to rehear pursuant to Rule 31 denied 16 August 2001.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1816

To designate the building located at 15 Henry Street in Binghamton, New 

York, as the ‘‘Kevin J. Tarsia Federal Building and United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 4, 2003

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To designate the building located at 15 Henry Street in 

Binghamton, New York, as the ‘‘Kevin J. Tarsia Federal 

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KEVIN J. TARSIA FEDERAL BUILDING AND 

4 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The building located at 15 

6 Henry Street in Binghamton, New York, shall be known 

7 and designated as the ‘‘Kevin J. Tarsia Federal Building 

8 and United States Courthouse’’. 
2

•S 1816 IS 

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the building referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Kevin J. Tarsia Federal 

5 Building and United States Courthouse.

Æ
National Aeronautics And Space Administration 

Administrator A 

Daniel S. Goldin 

Deputy Administrator 

John R. Dailey (Acting) Associate Deputy Administrator 

Aerospace Safety John R. Dailey 

Michael I. Mott 

Council Daniel R. Mulville 

Chief Information Officer 

John C. Lynn 

Chief Scientist 

France A. Cordova 

Assoc. Dep. Administrator (Tech) 

Chief Engineer 

Inspector General W 

Roberta L Gross 

I I I 

B G E 

Equal 0 portunity Chief Financial General 

Officer Counsel grog rams 

Arnold Holz Edward A. Frankle Yvonne 8. Freeman 

I I I 

H P 2 

Policy and 

Plans Procurement Public Affairs 

Deidre A. Lee Laurie Boeder Alan M. Ladwig 

I I I Yl I MI 

I I 1 

I L F 

Human Resources 

and Education 

External Le islative 

uuuuuRelations &fairs Spence M Armstrong John D. Schumacher Jeff Lawrence 

I 

J Q C 

Management Safety and Headquarters Systems and Mission Operations Facilities Assurance 

Benita A. Cooper Frederick Gregory Michael C. Christensen 

I Mission to Planet Space Flight I Earth I I 

I I 

X Smalland 

Business 

Utilization 

Disadvantaged Space Access and 

Technology 

Ralph C. Thomas John E. Mansfield 

I 

Joseph Rothenberg 

%ace Flight Center 

I 

Life and 

Space Microgravity Communications Sciences and 

Applications 

0 

Charles T. Force Harry C. Holloway 

Roy s. Estess 

Aeronautics Space Science 

I 

Robert Whitehead I Wes T. Huntress 

Ames Research Laboratory 'Jet Propulsion 

Ken K. Munechika Edward Stone 

Center 

Paul F. Hollowav 

I 4 Lewis Research 

Center I I 

Donald J. Campbell 

Research Center 

Kenneth J. Szalai 

September 1, 1995 

'JPL is a contractor-operated facility
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER
Appellate case name: In the Interest of A. S.

, a Child

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 985

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 7

- 0 0 333 J

Trial court: 3 13 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, L. G

. aka L.S. aka L.S ., has filed an unopposed motion for a second extension of time to file h er brief. The motion is granted

. Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with this Court no later than Friday , January 18 , 201 9

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.4(a), 38.6(d).

Th is appeal involve s the termination of the parent

- child relationship . A ccordingly

, this Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition within 180 days of October 3 0 , 201 8

, the date the notice of appeal w as filed

, so far as reasonably possible. See T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2, reprinted in T EX

. G OV ’ T

. C ODE A NN

. , tit. 2, su btit. F app. ( West 201 3 ). Accordingly, no further extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___ /s/ Russell Lloyd

____

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___ January 10, 2019

___