alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 24.2


<PAGE>



                             BLYTH INDUSTRIES, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, the undersigned Secretary of BLYTH INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation, certify that the attached is a true copy of resolutions adopted by
the Board of Directors of Blyth Industries, Inc. on March 30, 2000, at a meeting
throughout which a quorum was present, and that the same is still in full force
and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of
Blyth Industries, Inc. this 28th day of April, 2000.

                                    /s/ BRUCE D. KREIGER
                                    --------------------
                                    Name:       Bruce D. Kreiger
                                    Title:      Secretary

                             BLYTH INDUSTRIES, INC.

                          Board of Directors Resolution

                                 March 30, 2000

                                      * * *

                                    FORM 10-K

RESOLVED, that the form, terms, and provisions of the Annual Report on Form 10-K
(the "Form 10-K") in substantially the draft form presented to and reviewed by
this Board, are approved and that Robert B. Goergen, Howard E. Rose and Richard
T. Browning be, and each of them with full power to act without the other hereby
is, authorized (i) to sign the Form 10-K on behalf of the Corporation and any
amendments thereto as either of them may approve on behalf of the Corporation,
in such form as the officer executing the Form 10-K or any such amendment may
approve, with any changes from the form presented to this meeting as he may
approve, such execution to be conclusive evidence of such approval, and (ii) to
file the Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission"); and be it further

RESOLVED, that each of the directors, the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, the Vice Chairman and the Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, of the Corporation, are each hereby authorized to execute in their
respective capacities, a power of attorney in favor of Robert B. Goergen, Howard
E. Rose, Richard T. Browning and Bruce D. Kreiger designating each of them as
the true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents of the signatory with full
power and authority to execute and to cause to be filed with the Commission the
Form 10-K for fiscal 2000 with all exhibits and other documents in connection
therewith as such attorneys-in-fact, or any one of them, may deem necessary or
desirable; and to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or
desirable to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and
purposes as such officers and directors could do themselves.
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gary T. Scherping, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quovadx, Inc. (the“Registrant”);
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual reportbased on such evaluation;  (c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors:
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date:March 31, 2004                                                      /s/ Gary T. Scherping   Gary T. Scherping   Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000921450
<NAME> THE QUANTUM GROUP, INC., AND SUBSIDIARIES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,781,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,065,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,200,802
<PP&E>                                         120,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,056
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,835,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,471,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,400
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,319,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,835,144
<SALES>                                      2,952,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,952,900
<CGS>                                        1,761,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,264,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (80,058)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (80,058)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (100,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cody S. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/codyslydon\/","title":"Advanced Air Mobility Aids in Cargo Delivery","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VNsEbkaVAm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/advanced-air-mobility-aids-in-cargo-delivery-2\/\">Advanced Air Mobility Aids in Cargo Delivery<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/advanced-air-mobility-aids-in-cargo-delivery-2\/embed\/#?secret=VNsEbkaVAm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Advanced Air Mobility Aids in Cargo Delivery” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VNsEbkaVAm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/cargo_aam.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6163

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ABDI WALI DIRE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. 

(2:10-cr-00056-MSD-FBS-3; 2:13-cv-00717-MSD)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdi Wali Dire, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin L. Hatch, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Abdi Wali Dire seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Dire has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY J. CHIARULLI.

September 6, 1989.

Petition for certification denied. (See 234 *N.J.Super.*192).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Faron Demarrias,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03646-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9063 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Catherine G. Manning","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/cgmannin\/","title":"Goldstone Apple Valley Radio Telescope (GAVRT)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qBKD4uarXk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/goldstone-apple-valley-radio-telescope-gavrt\/\">Goldstone Apple Valley Radio Telescope (GAVRT)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/somd\/space-communications-navigation-program\/goldstone-apple-valley-radio-telescope-gavrt\/embed\/#?secret=qBKD4uarXk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Goldstone Apple Valley Radio Telescope (GAVRT)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qBKD4uarXk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/05\/gavrt_juno_team.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-92557, No. 333-93237, No. 333-91144, and No. 333-117547 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 13, 2009, April 9, 2010 as to the effects of the immaterial restatement  described in Note 1, and the effects of the adoption of new accounting guidance for the presentation and disclosure of noncontrolling interests discussed in Note 2, relating to the January 31, 2008 and 2009 consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Blyth, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blyth, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended January 31, 2010.








/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP








Stamford, CT


April 9, 2010
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

April 15, 2024 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Crowell & 

Moring’s 9th Annual Women in Government Reception on April 16, 2024 

On April 16, 2024, Crowell & Moring will host an event at the Crowell & Moring LLP, DC 

Office, 9th floor, 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C., 20004 from 5:30 to 7:30 

p.m. The event is to provide a forum for discussion on innovation and technology. Crowell 

& Moring is in control of all the arrangements and invitations for the event. 

Approximately 150 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity 

of views or interests and will include members from the legislative branch, personnel from 

federal agencies, and industry representatives. The estimated value of the event, including all 

food and drink, is approximately $41.10 per person. Attendance at this event will allow 

NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the 

event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 

2635.204(g)(2). I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA 

personnel attend the event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to 

exchange ideas and views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the 

sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest (if invited) to 

the event. In those circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs 

any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the 

performance of their duties. However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are 

required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989, may only attend the event if 

they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event. 

Additionally, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting 

the interests of the Crowell & Moring, such as procurement duties, program management, or 

negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination

from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XIII,  Ltd. at March 31,  1999,  and its  statement  of
income for the three  months  then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference  to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XIII,  Ltd.  for the three  months
ended March 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         687,717
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  69,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                   817
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         25,052,982
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,210,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 34,518,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     33,567,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   34,518,383
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               836,768
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,992
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                668,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            668,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   668,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Due  to the  nature of its  industry,  CNL Income  Fund  XIII,  Ltd.  has an
unclassified  balance  sheet;  therefore,  no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>