alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  of
Powerchannel, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, I, Steven Lampert, Chief
Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of  PowerChannel,  Inc.  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period  ended June 30,  2005,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The  information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2004,  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of PowerChannel, Inc.

Dated: August 22, 2005

                                            POWERCHANNEL, INC.



                                            By: /s/ Steven Lampert
                                                -------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

LORENZO LEE WILLIAMS, DOC #127304, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D16-4911 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed March 23, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Peter F. Estrada, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Lorenzo Williams appeals the order revoking his probation in circuit court case numbers 15-438 and 15-494 after a hearing. We affirm without comment the trial court's finding that Williams willfully violated condition five and special condition four of his probation by committing new law offenses and contacting the victim and the court's revocation of Williams' probation. However, we reverse the revocation order to the2

extent that it incorrectly states that Williams admitted the violations, and we remand for the trial court to correct this scrivener's error. See Hamilton v. State, 128 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with instructions.
VILLANTI, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sherri Hughes,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04243-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Lopez McHugh LLP - Newport Beach, CA

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/4/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9386 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9386 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00203-CR

DANNY RAY NALLEY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Voluntary Dismiss Appeal 

Pursuant To Texas Rules Of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (A).” The motion 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 22, 2013
HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
                       STATEMENT OF PER SHARE NET LOSS

EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Three Months Ended
                                            December 31,
                                         ------------------
                                         1996         1995
                                         ----         ----
<S>                                   <C>          <C>

  Net income (loss)                   $   55,181   $ (204,565)
                                      ========================
Net income (loss) per share           $     0.00   $    (0.06)
                                      ========================

Weighted average shares outstanding    7,623,933    3,162,000
                                      =======================
</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana, Relator

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 063

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 1 7

- 54046

Trial court: 1 52nd District Court of H a rri s County

On January 25 , 201 9 , r elator, Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana , filed a petition

for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent trial judge to rule on its pending motion to compel appraisal and the cross

- motions for summary judgment within seven days of this Court’s judgment. Relator has not filed an emergency motion, but it requests an expedited ruling from this Court because trial has been set for February 18, 2019.

Relator has also attached a sw orn record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.7(a)(1). On January 30, 2019, real party in interest J. Douglas Sutter filed a response in opposition to the petition.

Although relator’s petition notes that motion hearings were held on March 9, 2018,

for the motion to compel appraisal, and on June 29, 2018, on the cross

- motions for summary judgment, it neither attached the hearing t r anscripts nor state d that the se records have been ordered or that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained

. Se e T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.7(a)(2). A ccordingly, we ORDER the relator, within

3 days of the date of this order, to file a statement that no relevant testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained or else to provide evidence of requesting the reporter’s record s for th e March 9, 2018 and June 29, 2018 hearing s and payment for

, or arrangements to pay for

, the reporter’s fee to prepare the se record s

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

52. 7(a)(2), (b)

.

It is so ORDERED

. Judge’s signature:

___

/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

______ x Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: ___ February 5, 2019

____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Michael A. Wilson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03501-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8769 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 1
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00575-CR

ESTEBAN COLEMAN

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-CR-3137-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by 

this Court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 2, 2016
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"Dryden Aeronautical Test Range","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"VK0Z1VRVZN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/dryden-aeronautical-test-range\/\">Dryden Aeronautical Test Range<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/dryden-aeronautical-test-range\/embed\/#?secret=VK0Z1VRVZN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Dryden Aeronautical Test Range” — NASA\" data-secret=\"VK0Z1VRVZN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/mof1_in_oregon.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      12,319,036
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,528,850
<PP&E>                                       1,416,730
<DEPRECIATION>                               (594,890)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,524,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,053,096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        612
<COMMON>                                       109,601
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,271,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,524,581
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,964
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,273,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               330,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,729,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,729,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (4,729,145)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,729,145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)


</TABLE>
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                              --------------------

                                    FORM 10-Q

                              --------------------

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                 [X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                    For the Quarter Ended September 30, 1996

              [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  For the Transition Period from_____ to _____

                         Commission File Number 0-22710

ATEC  GROUP,  INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware                                             13-3673965
(State or other jurisdiction of                      (I.R.S. Employer
 corporation or organization)                         Identification Number)

1952 Jericho Turnpike, East Northport, New York      11731
(Address of principal executive offices)             (Zip Code)

Issuer's telephone number, including area code (516) 462-2832

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                               YES _X_     NO ___

As of the close of business on September 30, 1996, there were 17,066,797  shares
of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding.

<PAGE>

                                   Signatures
                                   ----------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                   ATEC GROUP, INC.
                                   (REGISTRANT)

   
Dated: November 12, 1996

                                   By: /s/ Ashok Rametra 
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Ashok Rametra, in the capacity of both
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    



                                       11
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Julia L. Bradshaw","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/julia-l-bradshawnasa-gov\/","title":"Langley Celebrates Black History Month: Clayton Turner","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"31vPPhg9LX\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/langley-celebrates-black-history-month-clayton-turner\/\">Langley Celebrates Black History Month: Clayton Turner<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/langley-celebrates-black-history-month-clayton-turner\/embed\/#?secret=31vPPhg9LX\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Langley Celebrates Black History Month: Clayton Turner” — NASA\" data-secret=\"31vPPhg9LX\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/bhm-clayton-p.-turner.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Student Loan
      Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      Report), Michael J. Reardon, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
      Daniel P. McHugh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
                of the Company.





/s/
                Michael J. ReardonMichael
                J. ReardonChief
                Executive OfficerNovember
                07, 2007/s/
                Daniel P. McHughDaniel
                P. McHughChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                07, 2007








This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### JOHN DUBAK, JR., ETC., ET AL. v. BURDETTE TOMLIN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ET AL., AND H. SEZER KOKNAR, M.D., ET AL.

April 19, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132811 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132811 

 COA: 261377 

Macomb CC: 04-002102-FC 

ANTOINE DESHAWN HINES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk