alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and Space Ac 

Research Center 

lministration 

A 

Administrator 

Daniel S. Goldin 

Deputy Administrator 

(Vacant) 

Associate Deputy Administrator 

Daniel R. Mulville 

Chief Engineer 

W. Brian Keegan Chief Information Officer 

Lee B. Holcomb 

Chief Scientist 

Kathie L. Olsen 

NASA Advisory Roberta L. Gross 

External 

Relations 

Chief Financial 

Officer 

Human Resources 

and Education 

I I 

Arnold Holz Edward A. Frankle George E. Reese 

I I1 II I 

John D. Schumacher Ed Heffernan Vicki A. Novak 

z 

Policy and 

Plans 

H 

Procurement 

P 

Public Affairs Operations 

LUU 

Faci I it ies Assurance 

Thomas S. Luedtke Peggy Wilhide Lori Garver I I 

Jeffrey E. Sutton Frederick Gregory Michael D. Christensen 

I 

Smalland 

Disadvantaged 

Business 

Utilization 

Life and 

Microgravity 

Sciences and 

Applications 

Ralph C. Thomas 

I I 

Arnauld E. Nicogossian 

-7 Space Science 

I 

R 

Aero-Space 

Technology Earth Science Space Flight 

Samuel L. Venneri Edward J. Weiler 

Edward Stone 

1 Ame;Fzearch I 

Henry McDonald 

Flight Center 

George W.S. Abbey 

John F. Kennedy Space Center 

Alphonso V. Diaz 

I I Roy D. Bridges 

Arthur G. Stephenson 

Space Center 

Roy S. Estess 

Langley Research Center 

RZeEc:.$%G at 

ewis Field 

Donald J. Campbell 

Jeremiah Creedon 

as of February 2000 

*JPL is a contractor-operated facility.
* Pursuan t to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-31112

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-932)

February 5, 1999

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, POLITZ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *



### First N ational Bank of Commerce appeals an adverse judgment, after a bench

trial, in its contract and tort action against Caterpillar Financial Service

Corporation. Having considered the briefs of the parties and pertinent parts of the

record, and finding neither error nor abuse of discretion, the judgment appealed is

AFFIRMED.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cody S. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/codyslydon\/","title":"NASA Studies Human Pilots to Advance Autonomous Air Taxis","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UVuIxQXrpA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-studies-human-pilots-to-advance-autonomous-air-taxis\/\">NASA Studies Human Pilots to Advance Autonomous Air Taxis<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-studies-human-pilots-to-advance-autonomous-air-taxis\/embed\/#?secret=UVuIxQXrpA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Studies Human Pilots to Advance Autonomous Air Taxis” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UVuIxQXrpA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/pilot-scott-howe-testing-glasses-that-track-eye-movements-on-the-user-copy.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PREFERRED NETWORK RESTATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,634,691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,794,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (390,637)
<INVENTORY>                                  2,361,366
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               637,218
<PP&E>                                      32,745,990
<DEPRECIATION>                              (7,176,781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,360,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,616,668
<BONDS>                                     17,536,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       21,453,177
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    63,315,924
<OTHER-SE>                                 (38,562,080)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,360,078
<SALES>                                      3,894,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,664,477
<CGS>                                        3,232,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,351,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                62,731
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             326,583
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,321,763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,321,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.24)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, James M. McNeill, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pediatric Services of America, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 9, 2005 

 

/s/ James M. McNeill                                            

James M. McNeill 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Larry R. Houston, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03528-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8742 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8742 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
#### C. Ledwidge *v.*R. H. Short et al.

Damages — Value—Amount—Taken as True — Law and Facts Submitted to the Court.

The “Law and Facts having been submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury, and the court being advised etc, adjudged etc.” Held, that the foregoing recital very clearly implies that a trial by a jury was waived and the facts as. wel'1 as the law submitted to the court. Therefore, it will be presumed that every fact was proven necessary to authorize the judgment.

Motion for a New Trial — Reasons Therefore.

A motion for a new trial was made within the time prescribed, by law but no reasons therefore were filed; Held, that merely handing the ■ grounds for a new trial to the clerk is not sufficient; an order must be made showing- they were filed under the authority of the court.

APPEAL FROM FULTON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 15, 1868.

Opinion oe the Oourt by

Judge Peters:

It is insisted first, that under *Sec. 153 of Civ. Code*mere allegations of value, or amount of damages shall not be taken as true if not answered, and must be proved. The judgment recites in this case, that the “law, and facts arising herein being submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury, and the court being advised, &c., adjudged, &e.” The foregoing recital very clearly implies that a trial by a jury was waived by the agreement of parties, and the facts as well as the law submitted to the court, as they had a right to do under *Sec. 361 Civ. C.*and as the issues of *458fact were submitted, we must presume in the absence of any bill of exceptions, that every fact was proved necessary to authorize the judgment, including the amount of damages sustained.

. *James, for appellant.*

*Rodman, for appellee.*

A motion for a new trial may have been made within.the time prescribed, but no reasons therefor were filed, merely handing them to the clerk was not sufficient. The court must be notified, and an order made showing they were filed under the authority of the court, which is not done.

■ This court cannot decide that the amended answer was improperly rejected; it is not before us, no bill of exceptions was taken, incorporating the amendment offered, so as to identify the rejected paper, and the mere statement of the clerk is insufficient, as has often been held by this court.

No errors are perceived available for a reversal, and the judgment must be *affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Shrell Harris,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04190-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/16/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9203 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Roy Stith,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03682-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/12/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8330 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8330 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cody S. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/codyslydon\/","title":"NASA Offers Fly-Fix-Fly Testing for SmallSat Planetary Observation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GLSzn5OGNv\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-offers-fly-fix-fly-testing-for-smallsat-planetary-observation-2\/\">NASA Offers Fly-Fix-Fly Testing for SmallSat Planetary Observation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-offers-fly-fix-fly-testing-for-smallsat-planetary-observation-2\/embed\/#?secret=GLSzn5OGNv\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Offers Fly-Fix-Fly Testing for SmallSat Planetary Observation” — NASA\" data-secret=\"GLSzn5OGNv\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/techleap_launch_5-24-23_by_noah_nielsen.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}