alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24562]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-55-000]


Blackwell Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Blackwell Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is October 28, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b5d5e495854757772757e486e6b6b74696f5b7d7e6978357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="33757661707c5d5f5a5d56604643435c414773555641501d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: October 8, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-24562 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-169232) of BGC Partners, Inc.,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-167953) of BGC Partners, Inc.,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-166564) of BGC Partners, Inc.,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (4) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-52154) of BGC Partners, Inc.,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (5) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-34324) of BGC Partners, Inc.,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (6) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49056) of BGC Partners, Inc.,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (7) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-119121) of BGC Partners, Inc.,
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (8) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-162362) of BGC Partners, Inc., and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (9) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-163897) of BGC Partners, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of BGC Partners, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of BGC
Partners, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of BGC Partners, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Ernst &
Young LLP

New York, New York

March
16, 2011



1
#### Owen *v.*Moore, Administrator.

If a suit in a justice’s Court, in which the defendant is entitled to the general issue, be certified to the Probate Court, the trial in the latter Court should be by jury though the defendant fail to appear there.

ERROR to the *Fayette*Probate Court.

Dewey, *J.*

Moore, the administrator of *Reed,*sued *Owen*before a justice of the peace in assumpsit on an account in favour of the intestate for 30 dollars and 57 cents. The defendant filed a set-off of 25 dollars. He was also entitled to the benefit of the general issue. The plaintiff- required the justice to certify the cause to the Probate Court, which was done. Tne defendant failed to appear in that Court, which, after hearing evidence, assessed the damages, and rendered a judgment against the defendant for the amount of the plaintiff’s claim, and for costs.

The statute in force when this suit was commenced and tried, and which required causes like this to be certified by the justice to the Probate Court, provided that the latter Court should hear and determine the transferred suit in the *80same manner as if it had been originally commenced there. Laws of 1832, p. 251. And by another statute issues of fact, in causes commenced in the Probate Court, were required to be tried by a jury, unless a jury were waived by the parties. R. S. 1838, p. 174. As the defendant was entitled to the benefit of the general issue, his non-appearance in the Probate Court did not dispense with a jury. The cause should have proceeded in the same manner as if he had appeared. *Maddox*v. *Pulliam,*5 Blackf. 205. The judgment is therefore erroneous.

*J. Ryman*and *P. L. Spooner,*for the plaintiff.

*C. B. Smith,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
#### Alcorn *v.*Hooker.

*Saturday, January*20, 1844.

Slander for calling the plaintiff a whore. The words were laid to have been spoken in 1842. Plea, that the plaintiff while sole and unmarried, on the 1st of *January,*1834, had carnal connection with one *U.*Replication, that the plaintiff, before, and at the time mentioned in the plea, was betrothed to the said FJ.; that afterwards, on the 6th of *June,*1834, she was lawfully-married to him; that she lived with him a virtuous life until the 1st of *JLugusi,*1836, when he died; and that she had ever since continued to live in innocent and virtuous widowhood. *Held,*on general demurrer, that the replication was insufficient.

APPEAL from the *Marion*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

— This was an action of slander for calling the plaintiff below a w--e. The words are alleged to have been spoken in 1842. Pleas, general issue, and a justification. The latter alleges that the plaintiff, while sole and unmarried, on the 1st of January, 1834, had carnal connection with one *William Hooker.*Replication, that the plaintiff, before, and at the time mentioned in the plea, was betrothed in marriage to the said *Hooker;*that after-wards, on the 6th of June, 1834, she was lawfully married to him; that she lived with him a virtuous life until the 1st of August, 1836,when he died; and that she had ever since continued to live in innocent and virtuous widowhood. General demurrer to the replication overruled. Jury triaV on the general issue; verdict and judgment for the plajihtiff. ■ /

The only question in this cause is as to the sufficiency of the replication.

The statute, which makes it actionable to impute to a *59female a want of chastity, subjects the charge to the same rules and regulations which govern an accusation subjecting the accused to criminal punishment. R. S. 1838, p. 452. Had the charge been that the plaintiff was a thief, and the defendant had justified by alleging a specific larceny committed many years before speaking the words, there • can. be no doubt it would not do to reply, that the theft was committed under circumstances of great temptation ; that the stolen goods had been returned; and that the plaintiff had lived an honest life ever since. We can see no distinction in principle between such a case, and that presented by the record; nor do we believe the cause of public morals would be subserved by introducing a distinction. There is no greater hardship in the one instance than in the other. In both, malice may occasionally disturb the peace of a reformed and virtuous life by adverting to the past. But this is a penalty which vice, though abandoned and repented of, must pay. The replication is no answer to the plea; it neither denies, nor confesses and avoids it. We think the Circuit Court erred in overruling the demurrer.

*H. O'Neal*and *W.*Quarles, for the appellant.

*W. W. Wick*and *L.*Barbour, for the appellee.

Sullivan, J., dissented.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Russ Pool at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6542.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Wednesday, November 19, 2014, at 12 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Russ Pool. For more information please contact Mr. Pool at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6542, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other issues related to written communications from the IRS.

Dated: October 7, 2014.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2014-24408 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Justin Wayne Heath,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04224-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Offices of Ben C Martin, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/21/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9133 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES HENRY TURNER.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Joseph Orlando, Appellant, v Audax Construction Corp. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[788 NYS2d 173]

*501In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated August 5, 2003, as granted the cross motion of the defendants Audax Construction Corp. and Big N Equipment Rental Corp. and the separate cross motion of the defendant City of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, respectively.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries after he tripped and fell on an unpaved and unlevel portion of a roadway which was under construction. The defendants Audax Construction Corp. and Big N Equipment Rental Corp. cross-moved, and the defendant City of New York separately cross-moved, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the alleged defect was not inherently dangerous, and was readily observable by the reasonable use of one’s senses. The Supreme Court granted both cross motions.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the respondents demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the alleged defect was not inherently dangerous and was readily observable by the reasonable use of one’s senses *(see Jang Hee Lee v Sung Whun Oh,*3 AD3d 473 [2004]; *Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48 [2003]; *Persing v City of New York,*300 AD2d 641 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the respondents. Florio, J.P., Adams, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"NASA’s Sonic Boom Research Takes “Shape”","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"K40m0FtANx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasas-sonic-boom-research-takes-shape\/\">NASA’s Sonic Boom Research Takes “Shape”<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasas-sonic-boom-research-takes-shape\/embed\/#?secret=K40m0FtANx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA’s Sonic Boom Research Takes “Shape”” — NASA\" data-secret=\"K40m0FtANx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/quieting_the_boom-cover_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24294]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-WASO-NRNHL-16747; PPWOCRADI0, PCU00RP14.R50000]


National Register of Historic Places; Notification of Pending 
Nominations and Related Actions

    Nominations for the following properties being considered for 
listing or related actions in the National Register were received by 
the National Park Service before September 13, 2014. Pursuant to 
section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60, written comments are being accepted 
concerning the significance of the nominated properties under the 
National Register criteria for evaluation. Comments may be forwarded by 
United States Postal Service, to the National Register of Historic 
Places, National Park Service, 1849 C St. NW., MS 2280, Washington, DC 
20240; by all other carriers, National Register of Historic Places, 
National Park Service, 1201 Eye St. NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC 
20005; or by fax, 202-371-6447. Written or faxed comments should be 
submitted by October 29, 2014. Before including your address, phone 
number, email address, or other personal identifying information in 
your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including 
your personal identifying information--may be made publicly available 
at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your 
personal identifying information from public review, we cannot 
guarantee that we will be able to do so.

    Dated: September 23, 2014.
J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks 
Program.

MISSOURI

Crawford County

Cuba City Jail, (Cuba, Missouri MPS), Jct. of Prairie St. & 300 blk. 
of S. Main St., Cuba, 14000880

Cuba Lodge No. 312 A.F. and A.M., (Cuba, Missouri MPS), 201 N. Smith 
St., Cuba, 14000881

Hamilton, George B., House, (Cuba, Missouri MPS), 401 E. Washington 
St., Cuba, 14000882

Hotel Cuba, (Cuba, Missouri MPS), 600 E. Main St., Cuba, 14000883

Munro, John Manson, House, (Cuba, Missouri MPS), 305 W. Washington 
Ave., Cuba, 14000884

St. Charles County

Midtown Neighborhood Historic District, Roughly bounded by Clark, 
Madison, Jefferson, Kingshighway, 2nd & 3rd Sts., St. Charles, 
14000885

NORTH CAROLINA

Guilford County

United States Post Office and Court House, 324 W. Market St., 
Greensboro, 14000886

WISCONSIN

Ozaukee County

Kendall Cabinet Shop, W4128 Mill St., Fredonia, 14000887

[FR Doc. 2014-24294 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-51-P
TAKE A RIDE, INC.

            INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE OF NEVADA
        20,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED, $.001 PAR VALUE
THIS
CERTIFIES
THAT                                                   SEE REVERSE FOR
                                                       CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

IS THE OWNER OF


          FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF
                            TAKE A RIDE, INC.

     transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly
 authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.
This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws
of this State of Nevada, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
  of the Corporation, as now hereafter amended.  This certificate is not
 valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent.  WITNESS the facsimile
seal of the Corporation and the signature of its duly authorized officers.

DATE

                            TAKE A RIDE, INC.
                              Corporate Seal
                                  Nevada
                                                              SECRETARY