alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Astrid Albaugh","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aalbaugh\/","title":"NASA Ames Astrogram \u2013 November\/December 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"qnc5KZq5J8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-astrogram-november-december-2023\/\">NASA Ames Astrogram \u2013 November\/December 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-astrogram-november-december-2023\/embed\/#?secret=qnc5KZq5J8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Ames Astrogram \u2013 November\/December 2023” — NASA\" data-secret=\"qnc5KZq5J8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/screenshot-2023-11-15-at-1.09.09-pm.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":545}
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the  corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30,  2003 (the  "Report").  The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.






Date:   August 5, 2003                    /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                          Title: President and Treasurer

                                          A  signed  original  of  this  written
                                          statement  required by Section 906 has
                                          been  provided to CNL Income Fund XIV,
                                          Ltd.  and  will  be  retained  by  CNL
                                          Income Fund XIV, Ltd. and furnished to
                                          the Securities and Exchange Commission
                                          or its staff upon request.
#### NATIONAL TELEPHONE DIRECTORY CORPORATION v. DONALD BIGLEY.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### JOHN ALTOBELLI v. TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6857

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HENRY ANTOINE SAUNDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:03-cv-00484-DKC-2)

Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Antoine Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Sujit Raman, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry Antoine Saunders filed a motion for reduction of 

sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012), a request for default 

judgment, a request for a show cause hearing, and two requests 

to correct the record. He filed a notice of appeal from what he 

characterizes as the district court’s implicit denial of the 

§ 3582(c) motion and subsequent requests, given that the 

district court has not acted. Because the district court has 

not entered an order—final or otherwise—addressing Saunders’ 

recent filings, we dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 

1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). We deny Saunders’ 

motions for entry of default and for bail or release pending 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2571 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2571

 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 23 (legislative day, June 22), 2004

   Mr. Enzi introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
 referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs with instructions that if 
 the Committee reports, the bill be referred pursuant to the order of 
 May 27, 1988, to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 
                   for a period not to exceed 60 days

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the loan guarantee authority under title VI of the Native 
    American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeownership Opportunities for 
Native Americans Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL GUARANTEES FOR FINANCING FOR TRIBAL HOUSING ACTIVITIES.

    Section 601 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-
Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4191) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(d) Limitation on Percentage.--A guarantee made under this title 
shall guarantee repayment of 95 percent of the unpaid principal and 
interest due on the notes or other obligations guaranteed.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

I, Louis G. Lange, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of CV Therapeutics, Inc.; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 6,
2009



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|/S/ LOUIS G. LANGE, M.D., PH.D.                    
|Louis G. Lange, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robin L. Eldridge,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-18-00139-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: January 24, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9840 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 1
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-1337

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Delmonte M. Wilson

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

 ____________

 Submitted: August 2, 2023

Filed: August 15, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Delmonte Wilson appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled

guilty to a firearm offense. The plea came pursuant to a plea agreement in which

1The Honorable Greg Kays, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
Wilson waived his right to an appeal. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw

and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

sentence.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the appeal waiver is valid, enforceable,

and applicable to the issues raised in this appeal. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d

702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing validity and applicability of appeal waiver de

novo); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

(enforcing appeal waiver if appeal falls within scope of waiver, defendant knowingly

and voluntarily entered into plea agreement and waiver, and it would not result in

miscarriage of justice). We have also independently reviewed the record under

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for

appeal falling outside the scope of the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal based on the appeal waiver and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
#### ARTHUR DIAMOND v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied..
##### 



(i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Partnership.
 May 11, 2007
    By
    /s/ Dennis J. TietzDennis J. Tietz, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Cronos Capital Corp.,

General Partner of the Partnership/s/ John KallasJohn Kallas, Chief Financial Officer of CronosCapital Corp., General Partner of the Partnership A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 *
    
    This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other than as
required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission or subject to
the rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Scott Babcock,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03651-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9195 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Louis Harold Hadley, Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04617-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Nations Law Firm - Houston, TX

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/15/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9496 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9496 Filed 12/28/17 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6018
ROBERT PAYNE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge, Robert S. Carr, Magistrate Judge. (CA-94-3464-18AJ) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Payne, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Payne v. Moore , No. CA-94-3464-18AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 27, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and disp ense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability 

Litigation 

____________________________________ 

This Document Relates to: 

Elizabeth Schnur v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al. 

Civil Action No.: 2:17-cv-03225 

No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 

COMES NOW, Plaintiff Elizabeth Schnur (“Plaintiff”) and hereby provides notice, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), of the voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the 

above-styled lawsuit. 

Dated: December 18, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 

 BERTRAM & GRAF, L.L.C. 

 /s/ Blair B. Matyszczyk 

 Blair B. Matyszczyk, MO Bar #66067 

 4717 Grand Avenue, Suite 800 

 Kansas City, MO 64112 

 Telephone: (816) 523-2205 

 Facsimile: (816) 523-8258 

 blair@bertramgraf.com

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on December 18, 2017, a copy of the foregoing was served 

electronically and notice of the service of this document will be sent to all parties by operation of 

the Court’s electronic filing system to CM/ECF participants registered to receive service in this 

matter. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system. 

 

 /s/ Blair B. Matyszczyk 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9404 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Thomas F. Garner III,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03702-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9222 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1