alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"About Aerosciences Evaluation and Test Capabilities Portfolio Office","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Voqo6xztxc\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/armd-aetc\/about-aerosciences-evaluation-and-test-capabilities-aetc-portfolio-office\/\">About Aerosciences Evaluation and Test Capabilities Portfolio Office<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/armd-aetc\/about-aerosciences-evaluation-and-test-capabilities-aetc-portfolio-office\/embed\/#?secret=Voqo6xztxc\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“About Aerosciences Evaluation and Test Capabilities Portfolio Office” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Voqo6xztxc\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/07\/650354main_ACD10-0063-002_1600_full.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
#### In the Matter of Susan Winkler, Appellant, v Michael Nussenblatt, Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 413]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Bogacz, J.), dated September 23, 2003, as vacated an order of the same court (Gartner, H.E.), dated December 20, 2002, directing the father to pay $50 a week in child support, and (2) an order of the same court (Bogacz, J.), also dated September 23, 2003, as denied her objections to an order of the same court (Gartner, H.E.), dated March 24, 2003, suspending the father’s child support obligations.

Ordered that the orders dated September 23, 2003, are affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Where a separation agreement is clear and unambiguous on its face, the intent of the parties must be gleaned from within *516the four corners of the agreement, and not from extrinsic evidence *(see Rainbow v Swisher,*72 NY2d 106 [1988]). Here there was no ambiguity in the parties’ separation agreement regarding the father’s child support obligation in the event that he failed to designate the children as beneficiaries of his Social Security Disability benefits. Thus, the order erroneously determining that the agreement implied a support obligation on the father regarding those benefits was properly vacated. The mother is free to apply to the Family Court, Queens County, for a determination of the father’s child support obligation under Family Court Act § 413.

The mother’s remaining argument is not properly before this Court. Ritter, J.P., Smith, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




HERITAGE
      OAKS BANCORP




Annual
      Report on Form 10K


for
      the
      Year ended December 31, 2005




**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
      undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
      “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that (i) the
      Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed by
      the
      Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Annual Report”), to
      which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the
      information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: March
                  1, 2006
                
                /s/ Margaret
                  A. TorresMargaret A. Torres
                  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                    Officer
  89
#### J. T. Williamson *v.*O. E. Jones.

Land — Judgment of Sale — Affidavit as to Personal Property.

It is error to adjudge the sale of land in the absence of an affidavit that the defendant has no personal property.

Same — Reasonable Time for Exepting to Report of Sale.

Less than three days has never been recognized as a reasonable time to accept a report of sale.

Resersal of Judgment of Sale — Restitution.

Upon the reversal of a judgment of sale of land the owner is entitled to restitution, where the creditor is the purchaser notwithstanding he has transferred his purchase to a stranger.

APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT.

July 2, 1867.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Bobertson:

The appellee’s house and two lots, worth, as we may infer, at least $1,000, were sold for about $127 by an unusually precipitate procedure against him as a non-resident, without actual notice. The judgment for the sale and confirmation of it was erroneous for at least two reasons: First, there was no affidavit that the appellee had no personal property sufficient to pay the debt, as required by the 251st section of the Oode of Practice, and a decision thereon in Payne against Witherspoon cited in the notes. Second — Beasonable time for excepting to the report of sale was not allowed. This court has never recognized less than three days as reasonable time; but, in this case¿ the report was prematurely confirmed the day after it was filed.

Wherefore, the judgments of sale and confirmation were erroneous, and are therefore reversed. The creditor having been the purchaser, this reversal would entitle the appellee to restitution of the property sold, had there been no transfer to the appellant. And, as he was only substituting as the purchaser, he must, as hitherto adjudged, be considered and treated as standing in his shoes.

*98Wherefore, the Circuit Court properly vacated the conveyance to him; and we see no error in the allowance of rents.

Wherefore, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

Office of the Administrator 

I 1 

I NASA Advisory 

Council 

, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inspector General (w) i............. 

i Robert W. Cobb i 

Sean O’Keefe, Administrator 

Frederick D. Gregory, Deputy Administrator 

John D. Schumacher, Chiefofstaff 

James L. Jennings, Associate Deputy Administrafor for Institutions and Asset Managemt 

Michael A. Greenfield, Associate Deputy Administrator for Technical Programs 

Theron M. Bradley, Jr., Chief Engineer 

Patrick A. Ciganer, Program Executive Officer for Integrated Financial Management 

J.T. Jezierski, White House Liaison 

Richard S. Williams, Chief Health & Medical Officer 

Patricia L. Dunnington, Chief Information Officer 

John M. Grunsfeld, Chief Scientist 

I 1 Chief Financial Equal Opportunity 

fOfficer(B;f 

I I I I I I 11 Programs(E) I I Human Resources (F) I 

Gwendolyn Brown Dorothy Hayden-Watkin Vicki A. Novak 

Chie Financial 0 icer Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator 

General Counsel (C) Procurement (H) 

Thomas S. Luedtke 

Assistant Administrator 

Paul G. Pastorek 

HQ Operations (C) 

James J. Frelk 

External Relations (I) 

Michael F. O’Brien 

Management 

Systems (J) 

Jeffrey E. Sutton 

Small and Disadvantaged 

Business Utilization (K) 

Ralph C. Thomas, 111 

Assistant Administrator 

Legislative Affairs 0.) 

D. Lee Forsgren 

Assistant Administrator 

I 

Public Affairs (P) 

Glenn Mahone 

Assistant Administrator 

Security Management 

and Safeguards (X) 

David ASaleeba 

Assistant Administrator 

I 

Space Flight (M) 

William F. Readdy 

4ssociate Administrator 

Lyndon B. Johnson 

Suace Center 

Jefferson D. Howell, Jr 

Space Center 

James W Kennedy 

* George C Marshall 

Space Flight Center 

David A King 

John C Stennis 

Space Center 

Michael Rudolphi 

(Acting) 

* John F Kennedy 

Safety and Mission 

Bryan D. O’Connor 

Education (N) Assurance (Q) 

Adena Williams Loston 

Biological and Physical 

Edward J. Weiler Mary E. Kicza Ghassem R. Asrar J. Victor Lebacqz 

* Ames Research Center I Jet Propulsion 

G. Scott Hubbard . i Laboratory* 

Dtyden Flight i Charles Elachi 

Research Center 

Kevin Petersen 

- Langley Research 

Center 

Roy D. Bridges 

John H. Glenn 

Research Center at 

Lewis Field 

Julian M. Earls * JPL is a contractor-operatedfacility. 

Goddard Space 

Flight Center 

Alphonso V. Diaz 

January 5,2004
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atec Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A-1 for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
J. Charles, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                       /s/ JAMES J. CHARLES
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       James J. Charles
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       April 22, 2003


                                       23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Richard N. White,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04459-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/4/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9368 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9368 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
Robert Mirelson
Headquarters, Washington          Feb. 1, 2003
(Phone: 202/358-1600)

RELEASE: 03-030

NASA STATEMENT ON LOSS OF COMMUNICATIONS WITH COLUMBIA

     A Space Shuttle contingency has been declared in 
Mission Control, Houston, as a result of the loss of 
communication with the Space Shuttle Columbia at 
approximately 9 a.m. EST Saturday as it descended toward a 
landing at the Kennedy Space Center, Fla.  It was scheduled 
to touchdown at 9:16 a.m. EST.

Communication and tracking of the shuttle was lost at 9 a.m. 
EST at an altitude of about 203,000 feet in the area above 
north central Texas. At the time communications were lost. 
The shuttle was traveling approximately 12,500 miles per 
hour (Mach 18).  No communication and tracking information 
were received in Mission Control after that time.

Search and rescue teams in the Dallas-Fort Worth and in 
portions of East Texas have been alerted.  Any debris that 
is located in the area that may be related to the Space 
Shuttle contingency should be avoided and may be hazardous 
as a result of toxic propellants used aboard the shuttle. 
The location of any possible debris should immediately be 
reported to local authorities.

Flight controllers in Mission Control have secured all 
information, notes and data pertinent to today's entry and 
landing by Space Shuttle Columbia and continue to 
methodically proceed through contingency plans.

More information will be released as it becomes available. 

-end-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is publishing this notice to inform the public of the intent to officially file the survey plat listed below and afford a proper period of time to protest this action prior to the plat filing. During this time, the plat will be available for review in the BLM Colorado State Office.

# DATES:

Unless there are protests of this action, the filing of the plat described in this notice will happen on November 17, 2014.

# ADDRESSES:

BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.

Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The plat and field notes of the dependent resurvey and survey in Township 51 North, Range 13 West, New Mexico Principal Meridian, Colorado, were accepted on October 2, 2014.

Randy Bloom,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.

[FR Doc. 2014-24571 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROBERT FARLOW.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 10.3


 


SACHEM CAPITAL CORP.


698 Main Street


Branford, Connecticut 06405


 


April 12, 2021


 


Mr. Peter J. Cuozzo


Executive Vice President and


Chief Operating Officer


Sachem Capital Corp.


8944 St. Lucia Drive, Suite 102


Naples, FL 34114


 


Dear Peter,


 


I am pleased to inform you that the Compensation
Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Sachem Capital Corp. (the “Company”) has authorized the
following compensation package for you for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2021:


 


		·	A base salary of $250,000.00, payable in accordance
with the Company’s usual payroll practices applicable to employees, including withholding for federal, state and local income taxes.
Your base salary is subject to adjustment on or after January 1, 2022 in the discretion of the Committee.



 


		·	A one-time bonus equal to $25,000.00, payable
in one lump sum as soon as practicable following your execution and delivery of a copy of this letter to the Company.



 


		·	A “time-based” equity award equal
to the result obtained by dividing $25,000.00 by the closing price of one (1) common share of the Company as reported on the NYSE American
on the date hereof. Such shares shall vest in three equal installments on each of January 1, 2022, 2023 and 2024. The shares will be granted
pursuant to the Company’s Incentive Compensation Plan. The issuance of the shares shall be subject to your execution and delivery
of a Restricted Stock Agreement in form and substance satisfactory to the Committee and Company counsel. The Agreement shall include provisions
restricting their transfer and will provide for the forfeiture of any unvested shares in the event you voluntary resign your positions
as an employee of the Company without “Good Reason” or your employment is terminated for “Cause,” as such terms
are defined in your Employment Agreement (as defined below).



 


The program outlined above will remain in effect
until amended or modified by the Committee at any time in its sole discretion.


 


The compensation package described above is intended
to satisfy and supersede the Company’s obligations to you pursuant to Section of your Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1,
2020 (the “Employment Agreement”). You hereby acknowledge that all amounts payable to you under the Employment Agreement
through December 31, 2020 have been paid in full. Except as otherwise set forth in this letter, the Employment Agreement shall remain
in full force and effect.


 






    


     


    

 


Peter J. Cuozzo


April 12, 2021


Page Two


 


Please countersign and date the enclosed copy
of this letter in place provided below as an indication of your acceptance of the terms hereof.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ Leslie Bernhard


Leslie Bernhard


Chair, Compensation Committee





 


AGREED TO ACKNOWLEDGED:


 


	/s/ Peter J. Cuozzo	 
	Peter J. Cuozzo	 
	April 12, 2021
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Dede Dinius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/darin-l-diniusnasa-gov\/","title":"Armstrong Image Gallery","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bQ8VtkAPpU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/armstrong\/\">Armstrong Image Gallery<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/armstrong\/embed\/#?secret=bQ8VtkAPpU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Armstrong Image Gallery” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bQ8VtkAPpU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/images-assets.nasa.gov\/image\/AFRC2023-0038-345\/AFRC2023-0038-345~large.jpg?w=600&h=1280&fit=clip&crop=faces%2Cfocalpoint","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":1280}
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23


                 [VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP LETTERHEAD]


             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To:  Heritage Oaks Bancorp


We consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 2, 2000 on the
consolidated financial statements of Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for each of three years in the period
ended December 31, 1999, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 1999.






/s/ VAVRINEK, TRINE, DAY & CO., LLP


Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Rancho Cucamonga, California
March 20, 2000