alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"X-59 Resembles Actual Aircraft","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"xJWfXkYrTg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/x-59-resembles-actual-aircraft\/\">X-59 Resembles Actual Aircraft<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/x-59-resembles-actual-aircraft\/embed\/#?secret=xJWfXkYrTg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-59 Resembles Actual Aircraft” — NASA\" data-secret=\"xJWfXkYrTg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/08\/x59_plate_004.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":394}
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant
to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Harris & Harris Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September
30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Douglas W. Jamison,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Patricia N. Egan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.











|/s/ Douglas W. Jamison            | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|Name:  Douglas W. Jamison         | 
|Title:    Chief Executive Officer | 
|Date:    November 12, 2013        | 
|                                  | 
|/s/ Patricia N. Egan              | 
|Name:  Patricia N. Egan           | 
|Title:    Chief Financial Officer | 
|Date:    November 12, 2013        | 



2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIE LEE BROWN.

June 21, 1978.

Petition for certification granted. (See 157 *N. J. Super.*110)
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

Office of the Administrator 

Aerospace Safety ............. 

Sean O’Keefe, Administrator 

Frederick D. Gregory, Deputy Administrator 

Courtney Stadd, Chief of Staffand White House Liaison 

Daniel R. Mulville, Associate Deputy Administratorfor Technical Programs 

, James L. Jenninns, - Associate Deputy .. Administrator for Institutions & Asset Management I 

Spence M. Armstrong, Senior Advisor 

Theron M. Bradley, Jr., Chief Engineer 

Vacant, Chief Technologist 

Patrick A. Ciganer, Program Executive Oflicer for Integrated Financial Management 

Richard S. Williams, Chief Health & Medical Officer 

Paul A. Strassmann, Chief Information Officer (Acting) 

Shannon W. Lucid, Chief Scientist 

Council 

,... ........................................ 

i Inspector General (W) ! . Robert W. Cobb 

.............. 

............................................. 

I 

r I I 

Chief Financial Equal Opportunity Human Resources & 

Officer (B) Programs (E) Education (F) 

Vacant George E. Reese Vicki A. Novak 

CFO Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator 

I I 

External Relations (1) 

John D Schumacher Ralph C Thomas, 111 

General Counsel (C) Procurement (H) 

Paul G. Pastorek Thomas S. Luedtke 

General Counsel Assistant Administrator 

HQ Operations 

Office (C) 

Timothy M. Sullivan 

I I 1 

Security Management 

Legislative Affairs (L) Public Affairs (P) and Safeguards (X) 

Charles T. Homer, 111 Glenn Mahone David A.Saleeba 

Assistant Administrator Assistant Administrator Assistant Adnnlinistrator - 

Space Flight (M) Technology (R) Space Science (S) 

William F. Readdy Jeremiah F. Creedon Edward J. Weiler 

L 

’ Lyndon B. Johnson 

Space Center 

Jefferson D. Howell, Jr. 

John F. Kennedy Space 

Center 

Roy D. Bridges, Jr. 

George C. Marshall 

Space Flight Center 

Arthur G. Stephenson 

’ John C. Stennis Space 

Center 

William W. Parsons, Jr. 

Ames Research Center i * Jet Propulsion 

G. Scott Hubbard i . Laboratory * 1 Dryden Flight i Charles Elachi 

Research Center 

Kevin Petersen 

Langley Research 

Center 

Delma C. Freeman, Jr. 

(Acting) 

John H. Glenn 

Research Center at 

Lewis Field 

Donald 1. Campbell 

I 

Biological and Physical 

Research (U) 

Mary E. Kicza 

Associate Administrator 

Earth Science (Y) 

Ghassem R. Asrar 

Associate Administrator 

9 Goddard Space 

Flight Center 

Alphonso V. Diaz 

Safety and Mission 

Assurance (0) 

Bryan D. O’Connor 

November 22,2002 

* JPL is A contractor-operated facility.
Second Department,

January, 2005

(January 10, 2005)

#### Julio Abreu, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 150]

*470In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), entered July 18, 2003, which, upon the denial of its motion to dismiss the complaint, made at the close of the plaintiffs case, upon a jury verdict finding it 80% at fault and the plaintiff 20% at fault in the happening of the accident, and upon a separate jury verdict awarding damages in the total sum of $120,000, is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $96,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On January 18, 1996, the plaintiff was injured when he fell into a catch basin located on a Queens street. At trial, the plaintiff presented testimony from an engineer that the iron grating of the catch basin caved in because, when it was installed, the soil surrounding and supporting it was not correctly compacted.

The evidence was legally sufficient to support the jury verdict *(see Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]; *Kiley v Almar, Inc.,*1 AD3d 570 [2003]). The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence for a rational juror to conclude that the defendant’s affirmative act of negligence in the installation and construction of the catch basin created the dangerous condition which proximately caused the accident, thereby obviating the need for prior written notice to the defendant of the dangerous condition *(see Amabile v City of Buffalo,*93 NY2d 471, 473-475 [1999]; *Combs v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport,*139 AD2d 688, 689 [1988]; *cf. Corey v Town of Huntington,*9 AD3d 345, 346 [2004]; *Arias v City of New York,*284 AD2d 354, 355 [2001]; *Toohey v Town of Brunswick,*191 AD2d 858 [1993]). In this regard, we reject the defendant’s argument that the plaintiffs expert’s testimony was speculative. Such testimony was fairly inferable from the evidence *(see Tate v Freeport Union School Dist.,*7 AD3d 695, 696 [2004]; *Kozma v Biberfeld,*264 AD2d 817, 818 [1999]; *Toohey v Town of Brunswick, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Linda Butler,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03792-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8303 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Howard Durham Jr.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03757-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9080 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
{"agency":"NASA","generated":"2018-04-11 14:59:01","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"},{"label":"2016","value":"2016"},{"label":"2017","value":"2017"},{"label":"2018","value":"2018"}],"value":"2018"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"9"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["AFRC","ARC","GRC","GSFC","HQ","JPL","JSC","KSC","LaRC","MSFC","NSSC","OGC","OIG","SSC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["1","15","4","17","86","18","47","14","8","9","5","5","18","3"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["2","12","6","16","66","14","52","14","8","9","5","6","15","3"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["1","4"," ","6","14","2","3","2"," "," "," ","1","9"," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2018","quarter":"Q2"}
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51228 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILBERTO LUNA-MADRID, also known as Ramiro M. Martinez, also known as Juan Ramirez,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-01-CR-594-ALL-DB

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gilberto Luna-Madrid appeals his con v iction based on his

guilty plea for illegal reentry following deportation. He asserts

that the district court coerced him into pleading guilty and denied

him his right to counsel and to a jury trial by denying his request

for substitution of counsel.

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in denying Luna’s request, particularly given the late1 See United States v. Ramos , 71 F.3d 1150, 1155-56 (5th Cir. 1995);

United States v. Silva , 611 F.2d 78, 79 (5th Cir. 1980) (per curiam).

2 Cf. United States v. Lampazianie , 251 F.3d 519, 524 (5th Cir. 2001).

2 stage of the proceedings. 1 Contrary to Luna’s contentions, the

district court did not require him to ple ad guilty or forbid him

from proceeding to a trial by jury. Luna has failed to show that

he was coerced to plead guilty by the acti ons of the district

court. 2

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Michael F. Manion, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Michael F. Manion

Michael F. ManionChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated: July 15, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JULIUS MOSES.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00183-CV

IN RE Susanne FLORES

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2022

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 1, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, 

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CI-11269, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Susanne Flores and 

Jerold Ortega, pending in the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable H. Paul Canales

presiding.
F I LED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 13, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM HENRY SHERRATT,

Plaintiff ! Appellant,

v.

UTAH STATE PRISON; UTAH STATE

PRISON MAILROOM; UTAH

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants ! Appellees.

No. 10-4041

(D.C. No. 2:09-CV-00367-TC)

ORDER

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 

10th Cir. R. 42.1.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court,

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-4041 Document: 01018401558 Date Filed: 04/13/2010 Page: 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONDENSED   FINANCIAL   STATEMENTS  FOR THE  QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1997  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                               539,287
<SECURITIES>                                                         174,407
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     818,114
<PP&E>                                                               329,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       189,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     1,072,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                945,499
<BONDS>                                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              3,212,136
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                             119,883
<OTHER-SE>                                                       (3,216,455)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       1,072,853
<SALES>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                      21,747
<CGS>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   3,441,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     2,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  (3,421,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               (3,421,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     (3,421,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          (.29)
        

</TABLE>
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2315 

To amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to extend the deadline 

for the INTELSAT initial public offering. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2004 

Mr. BURNS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to extend the deadline for the INTELSAT initial public offering. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF IPO DEADLINE. 

4 Section 621(5)(A)(i) of the Communications Satellite 

5 Act of 1962 (47 U.S.C. 763(5)(A)(i)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2003,’’ and in7 serting ‘‘June 30, 2005,’’; and 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘June 30, 2004;’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘December 31, 2005;’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of AIMS Worldwide, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Patrick J. Summers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Patrick J. Summers Patrick J. Summers, Chief Financial Officer April 15, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0196 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL PAUL SULLIVAN,

Defendant and Appellant

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 22 , 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 13 2024

03/13/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0196
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EVERETT HOLLOWAY.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE v. ROBINSON

No. 261A92-6

Case below: Bladen County Superior Court

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Bladen County, denied 16 August 2001.