alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Alphonzo A. McFarland,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03771-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8921 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.01

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Student Loan Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yiannis
Zographakis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Yiannis Zographakis
----------------------------------

Yiannis Zographakis
Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2002


                                       19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,420,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,657,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,013,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,663,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,861,000
<PP&E>                                      40,125,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,166,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,660,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,317,000
<BONDS>                                     44,079,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         7,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (17,546,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,660,000
<SALES>                                    152,929,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           152,929,000
<CGS>                                       93,306,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,306,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            53,249,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,611,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (237,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   374,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (611,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (611,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.02





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1350


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning, Inc. (the "Company") for the third quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Rueckl, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 9, 2009
/s/ Robert J. RuecklRobert J. RuecklVice President and Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Donald Meeks,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03732-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9049 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Utilization of Self-Healing Materials in Thermal Protection System Applications","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"juVbyln5cm\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/utilization-of-self-healing-materials-in-thermal-protection-system-applications\/\">Utilization of Self-Healing Materials in Thermal Protection System Applications<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/utilization-of-self-healing-materials-in-thermal-protection-system-applications\/embed\/#?secret=juVbyln5cm\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Utilization of Self-Healing Materials in Thermal Protection System Applications” — NASA\" data-secret=\"juVbyln5cm\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/skolnik_nathaniel.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":800}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         226,312               2,112,552
<SECURITIES>                                 1,594,382              16,409,932
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,107               2,307,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,929,011              21,033,576
<PP&E>                                         342,679                 686,986
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,286                 131,795
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,382,977              21,685,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          549,954                 954,640
<BONDS>                                        265,836                 319,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          125,000                       0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,318                       0
<COMMON>                                           920                   6,637
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,410,198              33,497,843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,382,977              21,685,790
<SALES>                                          9,799                  51,681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,799                  51,681
<CGS>                                            2,200                  27,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,200                  27,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,721,925               5,351,204
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,989                  58,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,676,270)             (4,550,626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,676,270)             (4,550,626)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,676,270)             (4,550,626)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.92)                  (2.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.92)                  (2.20)
        

</TABLE>
OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
                     SERVICER'S ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

                        OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
                 SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                 SERIES 1999-D



Pursuant to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (May 1999 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated August 1, 1999 among Oakwood Mortgage Investors, Inc., Oakwood
Acceptance Corporation (the "Servicer") and Chase Manhattan Trust Co., the
undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the period October 1, 1999 through September
30, 2000 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.


By:  /s/ Earl C Brewer Jr
-------------------------
Name: Earl C Brewer Jr
----------------------
Title: Vice President
---------------------
Date: September 30, 2000
------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Bernard Pikal,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00201-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss, PLLC - Jackson, MS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/8/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 10, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 828 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
The Mission

Space shuttle Endeavour will deliver the last 

major NASA module, the Tranquility node, 

and cupola to the International Space

Station. During the 13-day mission, crew 

members will perform three spacewalks to 

attach Tranquility to the Unity node on the 

station. The cupola’s seven windows will 

provide an almost 360-degree view of space 

and will be used as a control room for 

robotics and living section for crew members.

This is the 130th space shuttle flight, 

Endeavour’s 24th flight and the 32nd 

shuttle flight to the space station.

S T S-130 is the first space shuttle flight 

for Virts.

SP-2010-1-003-KSC

+ =
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.121


                       ASSIGNMENT AND PAYMENT DIRECTION

                                June 30, 1997

Geneva Assurance Syndicate, Inc.,
 in Liquidation
222 Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1450
Chicago, Illinois 60654

Alpine Insurance Company
2029 Village Lane
Solvang, California 93464

        Re: Assignment of Income Stream and Payment Direction

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to (i) that certain Promissory Note dated June 30, 1997
(the "TCO Note") in the original principal amount of $2,500,000 made by the
undersigned, TCO Holdings, Inc., an Illinois corporation ("TCO"), payable to
Geneva Assurance Syndicate, Inc., in Liquidation ("Geneva") and (ii) the
Service Agreement effective as of April 1, 1997 (the "Service Agreement")
between Alpine Insurance Company, an Illinois corporation ("Alpine"), and the
undersigned.

     TCO hereby assigns to Geneva, and authorizes and directs Alpine to pay to
Geneva, 73.33% of the amounts payable to TCO by Alpine from time to time under
the Service Agreement, until all unpaid principal under the TCO Note and all
accrued and unpaid interest thereon is paid in full.

     The foregoing assignment, authorization and direction by TCO may not be
revoked or rescinded without the prior written consent of Geneva.


                                              TCO HOLDINGS, INC.



                                              By:    /s/ Steven C. Shinn
                                                    ---------------------------
                                              Name:  Steven C. Shinn
                                                    ---------------------------
                                              Title: President
                                                    ---------------------------
* Local rule 47.5 provides: “The publication of opinions that have no precedential value

and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settle d principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60143 Summary Calendar

ALFRED O. OPARA, Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (A24 810 084)

December 21, 1995

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, GARWOOD and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alfred Onwudiegwu Opara, a citizen of Nigeria who obtained permanent resident

status in 1982, was convicted of forgery in 1990 and of use of a false social security card in

1991. Based thereon, an immigration judge determined that Opara was deportable under

section 241(a)(92)(A)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and that he was not entitled

to a waiver of deportability under section 212(c). His appeal to the Board of Immigration2

Appeals was dismissed and the instant petition for review was timely filed.

We review the BIA’ s denial of section 212(c) relief under the abuse of discretion

standard. Our examination of the record in that light discloses no basis for a conclusion that

the BIA abused its discretion herein and the petition for review is therefore DENIED.