alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------

           Each director and/or officer of FindWhat.com (the "Company") whose
signature appears below hereby appoints Phillip R. Thune and/or Craig A.
Pisaris-Henderson as the undersigned's attorney to sign, in the undersigned's
name and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Form 10-KSB") for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2001, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any
and all amendments to the Form 10-KSB, and the Company hereby also appoints such
person as its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form
10-KSB and any amendments thereto granting to such attorney-in-fact full power
of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such
attorney-in-fact or the undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 21st day of
March, 2002.

SIGNATURE                                 TITLE


/s/ Craig A. Pisaris Henderson            President, Chief Executive Officer,
-------------------------------           Secretary and Director
Craig A. Pisaris Henderson

/s/ Courtney P. Jones                     Chairman and Director
-------------------------------
Courtney P. Jones

/s/ Robert D. Brahms                      Vice-Chairman and Director
-------------------------------
Robert D. Brahms

/s/ Phillip R. Thune                      Chief Financial Officer, Chief
-------------------------------           Operating Officer, Treasurer and
Phillip R. Thune                          Director

/s/ David M. Medinis                      Director
-------------------------------
David M. Medinis

/s/ Peter V. Miller                       Director
-------------------------------
Peter V. Miller

/s/ Kenneth E. Christensen                Director
-------------------------------
Kenneth E. Christensen

/s/ Martin G. Berger                      Director
-------------------------------
Martin G. Berger

/s/ Robert J. Mylod, Jr.                  Director
-------------------------------
Robert J. Mylod, Jr.

/s/ Frederick E. Guest                    Director
-------------------------------
Frederick E. Guest

/s/ Rupinder Sidhu                        Director
-------------------------------
Rupinder Sidhu
NUMBER 13-20-00078-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

ERIC KYUBIN SHIM, Appellant,

v.

RAMIRO SALAZAR, Appellee.

On appeal from the 361st District Court 

of Brazos County, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment entered by the 361st District 

Court on October 18, 2019.1 Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the 

appeal on grounds that he no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to an Order 

from the Supreme Court of Texas dated December 20, 2019, Misc. Docket No. 19-9120. See TEX. GOVT’

CODE ANN. § 73.00
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed 

motion to withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and his appeal is hereby 

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent 

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having 

dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, 

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GREGORY T. PERKES

Justice 

Delivered and filed the

12th day of March, 2020.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Clifton James Polk Sr.,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04131-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Nations Law Firm - Houston, TX

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/10/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8895 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


        Each director and/or officer of FindWhat.com (the "Corporation") whose
signature appears below hereby appoints Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson, Phillip R.
Thune and Brenda Agius as the undersigned's attorneys or any of them
individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's name
and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Form 10-KSB") for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission
any and all amendments to the Form 10-KSB, and the Corporation hereby also
appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its
attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-KSB and any
amendments thereto granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of
substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such
attorney-in-fact or the undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.













                            Signature Page to Follow

<PAGE>

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 4th day of
March, 2003.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature                                          Title
<S>                                                <C>

   /s/ Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson                  Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary
----------------------------------------           and Chairman of the Board of Directors
    Craig A. Pisaris-Henderson


   /s/ Courtney P. Jones                           Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
----------------------------------------
    Courtney P. Jones


   /s/ Robert D. Brahms                            Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
----------------------------------------
    Robert D. Brahms


   /s/ Phillip R. Thune                            Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating
----------------------------------------           Officer and a Director
    Phillip R. Thune


   /s/ Kenneth E. Christensen                      Director
----------------------------------------
    Kenneth E. Christensen


   /s/ Frederick E. Guest II                       Director
----------------------------------------
    Frederick E. Guest II


   /s/ Robert J. Mylod, Jr.                        Director
----------------------------------------
    Robert J. Mylod, Jr.


   /s/ Rupinder Sidhu                              Director
----------------------------------------
    Rupinder Sidhu
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sybil Boyd,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04142-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9214 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
Congressman Dana Rohrabacher

Opening Statement

America once again has had to endure the tragedy of losing a Space Shuttle crew. The hard working 

and patriotic people of NASA have known all too well the risks associated with space exploration, 

especially manned missions. Unfortunately, twice in the past 17 years we have been reminded of 

the dangers of human space flight with the destruction of the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1986 and 

now the Columbia. Seventeen years ago, we took a step back after the tragedy and to our 

satisfaction pinpointed and corrected at least the technical causes of the loss. Today I am confident 

Admiral Gehman and his commission will get to the truths that will help us understand Columbia's 

fatal accident.

Many of the questions that need to be addressed, however, transcend the immediate technical and 

managerial problems of this tragedy. The lack of long-term goals, or a unifying vision for America's 

space effort, for example, needs to be addressed. This failing weakened efforts that would have led 

to the replacement of the Shuttle system long before age became a factor, and age was a factor. This 

gives us as an opportunity to revisit the fundamentals and make recommendations that will chart 

America's future space endeavors.

NASA's leadership has faced, and will continue to face, the challenge of exercising responsible 

stewardship of limited resources, while providing a coherent blueprint of what is to be 

accomplished and how. Hopefully, forward-looking strategies will lead us to incremental 

technological advances. A new propulsion system might be a good start. But before we can move 

forward, we must fully understand why seven heroes perished.

Questions

1) The Space Shuttle is based on a 30-year-old design concept and it was the best we could do at 

the time. Given the age of the Shuttle and NASA's restructured space transportation program, 

should we be accelerating alternatives to the Shuttle, and if not, why?

2) NASA has had a poor record on trying to develop new technologies to replace the Shuttle. For 

example, X-33, X-34, X-38, NASP, the National Launch System, ALS, etc. have all been 

disappointments. In light of the Columbia accident, what steps are you taking to ensure your 

new space transportation plan also does not become a disappointment?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

JaHazel Grayson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04012-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/1/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8698 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8698 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
#### Willis Field *v.*Ambrose Young et al.

Trusts — Jurisdiction of Circuit Court.

A circuit court has jurisdiction to effectuate a trust by the sale of land to relieve it of encumbrance and to reinvest the surplus for the beneficiaries.

Same — Mode and Time of Sale — Discretion of the Court — Consent of Infants.

No other law than the deed of trust and the sound discretion of the court prescribes the mode or time of sale. The court has the power to make a sale without the consent of the infant beneficiaw.es.

Deed of Trust — Grantor’s Capacity — Purchaser at Decretal Sale Secure — Impeachment.

When the evidence preponderates in favor of the grantor’s capacity, and there is no implication of fraud or improper influence and the court having so adjudged, the purchaser will be secure against any probable impeachment of the deed hereafter.

APPEAL EROM WOODEORD CIRCUIT COURT.

September 20, 1867.

Opinion oe ti-ie Oourt :by

Judge Robertson :

The Circuit Oourt had jurisdiction to effectuate the trust by a sale of the land to relieve it of encumbrances, and to reinvest the surplus for the use of the beneficiaries. And no other law than the deed itself, and the sound discretion of the court, prescribed the mode or time of. sale.' The mode and time adopted by the decree of sale seem to have been reasonable and proper, and were not illegal. The sale itself seems to have been fair to all parties, *91and to have been substantially conformable with the order of sale.

*McLeod^ for appellant.*

*Kinhead &*Buchner, *Porter &*Greathouse, *for appellee.*

The proceeding was not under statutory authority for the benefit of infants. The court had power to make the sale, without the consent of the *infant*beneficiaries, but they were parties, and will be *concluded.*

The evidence, intrinsic and extrinsic, preponderates in favor of the grantor’s capacity; and there is no implication or fraud or improper influence, and the court, having so adjudged, the purchaser will be secure against any probable impeachment of the deed hereafter.

Nor do we consider any other exception to the sale to be available.

Wherefore, the judgment overruling all the exceptions and confirming the sale is approved and affirmed.
II 

Calendar No. 534

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2448

To coordinate rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and 

Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 with other Federal laws. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2004

Mr. GREGG introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

MAY 20, 2004

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL

To coordinate rights under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 with other 

Federal laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Uniformed Services 

5 Differential Pay Protection Act’’. 
2

•S 2448 PCS 

1 SEC. 2. COORDINATION OF USERRA WITH OTHER FEDERAL 

2 LAWS. 

3 (a) TREATMENT OF DIFFERENTIAL PAYMENT AS

4 WAGES FOR PURPOSES OF INCOME TAX WITH5 HOLDING.—Section 4302 of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(c)(1) For purposes of chapter 24 of the Internal 

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to collection of income tax 

9 at source on wages), any differential wage payment shall 

10 be treated as a payment of wages by the employer to the 

11 employee. 

12 ‘‘(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term ‘dif13 ferential wage payment’ means any payment which—

14 ‘‘(A) is made by an employer to an employee 

15 with respect to any period during which the em16 ployee is performing service in the uniformed serv17 ices while on active duty for a period of more than 

18 30 days, and 

19 ‘‘(B) represents all or a portion of the dif20 ference between the wages the employee would have 

21 received from the employer if not performing service 

22 in the uniformed services and the wages paid for 

23 performing such service.’’. 

24 (b) CONTINUED CONTRIBUTIONS TO PENSION

25 PLANS.—Section 4318 of title 38, United States Code, is 

26 amended by adding at the end the following: 
3

•S 2448 PCS 

1 ‘‘(d) For purposes of the Employee Retirement In2 come Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code 

3 of 1986, any employer or employee contributor to an em4 ployee pension benefit plan to which this section applies 

5 with respect to any period during which the employee is 

6 performing service in the uniformed services while on ac7 tive duty for a period of more than 30 days shall be treat8 ed as a contribution with respect to a current employee 

9 of the employer.’’. 
Calendar No. 534

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2448

A BILL

To coordinate rights under the Uniformed Services 

1994 with other Federal laws. Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 

MAY 20, 2004

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Anthony Greicius","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/anthony-greicius-116962jpl-nasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Activates Deep Space Atomic Clock","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Zs5MrgL4pW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/jpl\/nasa-activates-deep-space-atomic-clock\/\">NASA Activates Deep Space Atomic Clock<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/jpl\/nasa-activates-deep-space-atomic-clock\/embed\/#?secret=Zs5MrgL4pW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Activates Deep Space Atomic Clock” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Zs5MrgL4pW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/08\/dsac20190826.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}