alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Galberth, Appellant.

[788 NYS2d 109]

*421Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey M. Atlas, J., on dismissal motion; John A.K. Bradley, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered January 22, 2003, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s CPL 190.50 (5) motion to dismiss the indictment. There was no violation of defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury, because the record establishes that on the day that defendant was scheduled to testify, the court, at defense counsel’s request, properly ordered a psychiatric examination under CPL article 730. Therefore, the People were entitled to complete the grand jury presentation without defendant’s testimony (CPL 730.40 [3]; *People v Peterson,*11 AD3d 336 [2004]). The court’s order caused the statutory exception to become applicable, and the fact that the examination was delayed as a result of a clerk’s failure to complete paperwork does not warrant a different conclusion.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility, including its resolution of any conflicts in testimony. The evidence warrants the inference that defendant used physical force against the victim in order to help his accomplice retain possession of the stolen property, and that defendant thus shared his accomplice’s intent to commit robbery *(see People v Green,*277 AD2d 82 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 784 [2001]; *see also People v Durden,*5 AD3d 333 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 798 [2004] [codefendant’s case]).

The *Sandoval*ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion *(see People v Hayes,*97 NY2d 203 [2002]). The court permitted inquiry as to a portion of defendant’s very extensive criminal history, and the prior convictions and their underlying facts were relevant to defendant’s credibility since they tended to show that he placed his own interests above those of society. Moreover, defendant did not demonstrate, as he now urges, that such evidence would have been inflammatory.

We perceive no basis for a reduction in sentence.

*422Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
ENDOGEN, INC.

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1





                       Computation of Net Income Per Share
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three Months Ended                   Six Months Ended
                                                            November 30,                        November 30,
                                                       1997             1996               1997             1996
                                                   --------------   --------------     --------------   --------------
<S>                                                    <C>              <C>                <C>              <C>      
Weighted average number of shares outstanding          3,428,461        2,958,746          3,424,225        2,954,866

Shares deemed outstanding from the assumed
exercise of stock options and warrants                   262,933          298,830            213,761          295,799
                                                   --------------   --------------     --------------   --------------

Total                                                  3,691,394        3,257,576          3,637,986        3,250,665
                                                   ==============   ==============     ==============   ==============

Net income applicable to common shares           $       171,715  $       153,379    $       265,893  $       269,167
                                                   ==============   ==============     ==============   ==============

Net income per share of common stock             $          0.05  $          0.05    $          0.07  $          0.08
                                                   ==============   ==============     ==============   ==============
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Eddie L. Jones,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03720-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9054 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
#### SESSLER v. MARSH

No. 463P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 623

Motion by defendant for temporary stay allowed 4 October 2001. Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 November 2001. Petition by defendant for writ of supersedeas denied and temporary stay dissolved 8 November 2001.
****
 **Exhibit
13.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Radware Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Meir Moshe, acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
April 13, 2005
 /s/
      Meir
      Moshe
      Meir
      Moshe
      Chief
      Financial Officer
      (Principal
      Financial Officer)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 12-11201 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00255-JDW-TBM-3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLINGTON ALVAREZ-MOSQUERA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(August 27, 2012)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Case: 12-11201 Date Filed: 08/27/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
On July 20, 2007, Willington Alvarez-Mosquera pled guilty to conspiracy to

possess with intent to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine while on board

a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, in violation of 46 U.S.C.

§§ 70503(a) and 70506(a) and (b), and on November 20, 2007, the District Court

sentenced him to a prison term of 135 months, at the low end of the Guidelines

sentencing range of 135 to 168 months. 

1

On January 25, 2012, Alvarez-Mosquera, proceeding pro se, filed a motion

with the District Court styled MOTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) AND

U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINE§ 1B1.10(c) FOR REDUCTION OF

SENTENCE BASED ON POST CONVICTION REHABILITATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.S.G. § 3661. The body of the motion stated that he was

seeking a sentence reduction “pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth

Amendment and statute [18 U.S.C.] § 3661.” The District Court denied the

motion in a written order containing this statement: The court 

has no jurisdiction to modify a sentence other than (1) upon a motion

of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

3582(c), to the extent expressly permitted by statute, or (2) upon a

motion by the Government pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules

of Criminal Procedure. Defendant presents no basis under these

provisions supporting a modification of his term of imprisonment.

 At sentencing, he was held accountable for around 1394 kilograms of cocaine, which 1

yielded a total offense level of 33. 

2

Case: 12-11201 Date Filed: 08/27/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
Alvarez-Mosquera now appeals the court’s order, claiming that the court could

have reduced his sentence based on his post-sentencing rehabilitation efforts and

the recent availability of a fast-track program within the Middle District of

Florida.

As the District Court stated, it has authority to reduce a defendant’s

sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) on motion by the Director of the Bureau of

Prisons or on motion by the Government under Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 35(b)(2). Neither is present here. The court may also reduce a sentence

under §3582(c)(2) when the Sentencing Commission has lowered the Guidelines

sentencing range under which the defendant was sentenced. That has not shown

to be the case here. The District Court’s order is accordingly

AFFIRMED.

3

Case: 12-11201 Date Filed: 08/27/2012 Page: 3 of 3
3

Gateway

What is Gateway?

The Artemis Program will land the first woman and person 

of color on the Moon for scientific discovery and to enable 

human missions to Mars. An important part of Artemis is 

NASA’s lunar-orbiting station called Gateway. Gateway is 

where astronauts from many countries will eat, sleep, rest, 

conduct science experiments, and get ready for their trips 

to the lunar surface. 

The first two pieces of Gateway are the Power and Propulsion 

Element, or PPE, and the Habitation and Logistics Outpost, 

or HALO, where astronauts will live. PPE and HALO will 

launch together from Earth to lunar orbit. 

www.nasa.gov/Gateway
Space word search

Can you find all the hidden space words?

6

Word Bank

Propulsion

Earth

Communication

Technology

Power

Sun

Flight

Science

Safety

Artemis

Engineer

Innovation

Orbit

Spacecraft

Astronaut

Universe

Moon

Exploration

Rocket

Discovery

NASA Gateway

A H O U F H H D L K M G P R W D C O P E D M I X T A R

G S U I M S I E W R Z Y X K M C U I A P A Z O M K D S

L B R U T X P S V G I O L A O T F N M I M S T X X Y Y

J D R N U H W D I X Q R T H G I L F D C N T I C P

J U V O X T B N H V Z V K T W G U S T W W J H R L

S T R E E N I G N E C E X E J B S N I K R F C P C

T V N G I C M U B X O R W V F W T N G N S M P R Z

D I Q S I M E T R A L O R U E J R X U E L S S D E

N O I T A V O N N I N A X Z S C I E N C E I U U P

T C T N N V R H B W V X D O S P R Y M H A J C

U S J C A X K C J C J E R E W O P L Q M S A B

P C I R M Q V Z A C I K O A S W H S Y K F C S

F N Z A X N I D S H T M K V C P D U D Y M N S

S F Z K H R R A T N I B T N I J A S G I Q

T Z Y X V E L S E O J T O Y R I Y B L T S

J G R Z U L L M S P A C E C R A F T H G S

V F O E Z T D E L Y E Q K L P V J P K J F

A M S M M X E C T K E A Q X T H Y O T

G C F J S A N L O A G W J A T Q E E G

O O F E Q A N G Y R E V O C S I D

D L V S Z S W O T A Q L P

V M B S K E B P A

O Z C

G O R B I T B E T Z U K C T N V N

F T O B C F A Z P M V O V

A N G A T E W A Y

S X K

www.nasa.gov/Gateway
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 23

- 00543

- CR

EX PARTE Juan Jose SANTIAGO VILLALOBOS

From the County Court

, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 31577

Honorable Susan D. Reed , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023

DISMISSED

On June 16, 2023, appellant Juan Jose Santiago Villalobos filed a motion to dismiss appeal.

Appellant’s motion references Texas Rule of Appella te Procedure 42.2, which provides:

At any time before the appellate court ’ s decision, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal upon the appellant ’ s motion. The appellant and his or her attorney must sign the written motion to dismiss and file it in dupl icate with the appellate clerk, who must immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). Appellant’s motion comp lies with Rule 42.2(a). Accordingly, we grant

the motion and dismiss this appeal

. See id

.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
she could see _________________________. She started on her task, 

a Moon rock

environment. RT hovered ____________________________ her, logging 

the information and 

time. After

_____________ ________________________ rocks, but 

diÿcult

she decided to 

and admire 

The Moon reminds her 

because of its plentiful ________________________________. As she 

returned to the 

[planet] 

[adverb] 

[number] 

[verb ending in -ing] 

[adjective] 

[plural noun] 

 

 

 

N Y 

A Day in the Lunar Life of Callie 

When Callie woke up that morning, she knew it was going to be a/an _______________________ day. She 

[adjective] 

got out of bed and enjoyed some _________________________ and dehydrated ______________________. She put on 

[noun] [noun] 

her bright _____________________ uniform and prepared to go out on the lunar surface. Outside, she could 

[color] 

see Earth, which looked like a/an _______________________ from her angle, and if she squinted, she thought 

[noun] 

which involved ________________________________________ [verb ending in -ing]

to determine daily changes in the Moon’s 

[preposition] 

___________________________________ at the same 

[verb ending in -ing]

recording, she attempted to juggle 

they were as 

[adjective]

to catch as a slippery ___________________. Finally, 

[noun] 

___________________________ around the Moon 

[verb] 

the ______________________ atmosphere she lives in. 

[adjective] 

of ___________________________, sometimes, 

[place] 

finally 

[plural noun] 

base, she thought about what a 

_______________________ day she’d had. 

nasa.gov/calliefirst
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed August 27, 2014

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-376

Lower Tribunal No. 10-32188

________________



### Anthony P. Ledea,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Nushin G. Sayfie

, Judge.

Anthony P. Ledea

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, LAGOA, and LOGUE, JJ.

LAGOA, J.

Anthony P. Ledea appeals an order denying his Motion to Mitigate, Modify

or Reduce Sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c).Such an order, however, is not appealable. See Smith v. State

, 4 So. 3d 1254 (Fla.

3d DCA 2009); Lusskin v. State

, 717 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

2
#### VORNADO, INC. v. POTTER. IN THE MATTER OF JACK DASHOSH CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT.

May 30, 1978.

Cross-Petition for certification denied. (See 159 *N. J. Super.*33)
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Hillary Smith","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/hsmith10\/","title":"NASA Leadership, Congresswomen Visit Ames, See Wildfire Fighting Tech","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"nMgYMa1ZJe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/drones\/nasa-leadership-congresswomen-visit-ames-see-wildfire-fighting-tech\/\">NASA Leadership, Congresswomen Visit Ames, See Wildfire Fighting Tech<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/drones\/nasa-leadership-congresswomen-visit-ames-see-wildfire-fighting-tech\/embed\/#?secret=nMgYMa1ZJe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Leadership, Congresswomen Visit Ames, See Wildfire Fighting Tech” — NASA\" data-secret=\"nMgYMa1ZJe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/nasa_meatball_1_2.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 10, 2014

Order 

Clerk

June 10, 2014

147700(52)

INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED 

AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND 

AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS 

OF AMERICA, UAW LOCAL 6000,

MICHIGAN CORRECTIONS 

ORGANIZATION SEIU LOCAL 526, 

MICHIGAN PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SEIU 

LOCAL 517M, and MICHIGAN STATE 

EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AFSCME, 

LOCAL 5,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 147700

v COA: 314781

NINO ERWIN GREEN, EDWARD D.

CALLAGHAN, ROBERT LABRANT,

GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, and 

ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Chamber of Commerce

to participate as an amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on June 4, 

2014 is accepted for filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM ADVANCED MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS, INC. FORM 
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>        
        
<S>                                  <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
                    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1997
                    <PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
                    <CASH>                                  7,635
                    <SECURITIES>                                0
                    <RECEIVABLES>                           2,780
                    <ALLOWANCES>                                0
                    <INVENTORY>                               481
                    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                          218
                    <PP&E>                                  2,046
                    <DEPRECIATION>                         (1,090)
                    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                         15,985
                    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,652
                    <BONDS>                                     0
                    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
                    <PREFERRED>                                 0
                    <COMMON>                                  437
                    <OTHER-SE>                             12,383
                    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           15,985
                    <SALES>                                11,608
                    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                       11,845
                    <CGS>                                   8,369
                    <TOTAL-COSTS>                           8,369
                    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                        3,875
                    <LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
                    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        950
                    <INCOME-PRETAX>                       (11,599)
                    <INCOME-TAX>                               63
                    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (11,536)
                    <DISCONTINUED>                             58
                    <EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
                    <CHANGES>                                   0
                    <NET-INCOME>                          (11,478)
                    <EPS-PRIMARY>                           (.28)
                    <EPS-DILUTED>                           (.28)
                             

</TABLE>