alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                     FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR FISCAL 2002

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Robert B. Goergen, Robert H. Barghaus and Bruce
D. Kreiger, and each of them, until July 31, 2002, his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and revocation,
for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Form 10-K Annual Report of Blyth, Inc. for the fiscal
year ended January 31, 2002, and any amendments thereto, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and
agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

<Table>
<Caption>
     Signature                        Title                                   Date
     ---------                        -----                                   ----
     <S>                              <C>                                     <C>
     /s/ Robert B. Goergen            Chairman, Chief Executive Officer       April 4, 2002
     ---------------------            and President, Director
        Robert B. Goergen             (Principal Executive Officer)

     /s/ Robert H. Barghaus           Vice President and Chief                April 4, 2002
     ----------------------           Financial Officer (Principal
        Robert H. Barghaus            Financial and Accounting Officer)

     /s/ Roger A. Anderson            Director                                April 4, 2002
     ---------------------
        Roger A. Anderson

     /s/ John W. Burkhart             Director                                April 4, 2002
     --------------------
        John W. Burkhart

     /s/ Pamela M. Goergen            Director                                April 4, 2002
     ---------------------
        Pamela M. Goergen

     /s/ Neal I. Goldman              Director                                April 4, 2002
     -------------------
        Neal I. Goldman

     /s/ John E. Preschlack           Director                                April 4, 2002
     ----------------------
        John E. Preschlack

     /s/ Howard E. Rose               Director                                April 4, 2002
     ------------------
        Howard E. Rose

     /s/ Frederick H. Stephens, Jr.   Director                                April 4, 2002
     ------------------------------
        Frederick H. Stephens, Jr.
</Table>
EXHIBIT 13

Ultrapar Participações S.A. and Subsidiaries

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on December 31, 2008 (the
Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Pedro Wongtschowski, the Chief Executive Officer, and Andre Covre, the Chief Financial Officer of Ultrapar Participações S.A., each
certifies that, to the best of their respective knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Ultrapar Participações S.A..

São Paulo, June 29, 2009



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Pedro Wongtschowski
|Name:  |  | Pedro Wongtschowski    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

São Paulo, June 29, 2009



|       |  |                                               
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ André Covre                               
|Name:  |  | André Covre                                   
|Title: |  | Chief Financial and Investor Relations Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.01 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John Murray, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of PLATO
Learning, Inc., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning,
Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors: (a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: June 14, 2004
    /s/ John MurrayChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Nancy J. Pekar","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/npekar\/","title":"NASA Challenge Seeks Tech to Shine Light on Precision Lunar Landings","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Zt42cawraN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-challenge-seeks-tech-to-shine-light-on-precision-lunar-landings\/\">NASA Challenge Seeks Tech to Shine Light on Precision Lunar Landings<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-challenge-seeks-tech-to-shine-light-on-precision-lunar-landings\/embed\/#?secret=Zt42cawraN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Challenge Seeks Tech to Shine Light on Precision Lunar Landings” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Zt42cawraN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/probes.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":337}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Dixie Dee Ruiz,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04245-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: VB Attorneys

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/20/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9047 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7652
In Re: DONALD EVANS, a/k/a Don Antonio Flournoy,

Petitioner.
On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (5:97-cr-00153) Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 27, 2006 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Evans, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Donald Evans, a/k/a Don Antonio Flournoy, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his “Motion for Preliminary Hearing, Motion for Revocation, Modification Hearing.” He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied Evans’ motion in an order entered on the district court’s docket on July 6, 2006. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Evans’ case, we deny the mandamus petit ion as moot. We grant Evans’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Johnnie Hogan,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04349-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: McGlynn, Glisson & Mouton

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/11/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9477 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9477 Filed 12/28/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Perfecting Alignment: NASA Tests System for Aircraft Positioning in Supersonic Flight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ku90nzosGp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/perfecting-alignment-nasa-tests-system-for-aircraft-positioning-in-supersonic-flight\/\">Perfecting Alignment: NASA Tests System for Aircraft Positioning in Supersonic Flight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/perfecting-alignment-nasa-tests-system-for-aircraft-positioning-in-supersonic-flight\/embed\/#?secret=Ku90nzosGp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Perfecting Alignment: NASA Tests System for Aircraft Positioning in Supersonic Flight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ku90nzosGp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/aligns3.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":294}
Exhibit 10.2.5

AMENDMENT NO. 4
                                                       NON-COMPETITION AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT NO. 4, dated as of June 22, 2003, among THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), CITIBANK (NEW
YORK STATE), a New York banking corporation ("NYS"), CITIGROUP INC., a Delaware corporation and the ultimate parent of NYS
("Citigroup" and, together with NYS, the "Parents").

WHEREAS, the Company, NYS and Citicorp, a Delaware corporation, have heretofore entered into a Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of
December 22, 1992, the term of which was extended pursuant to a letter agreement dated November 1, 1999, the term of which was
further extended pursuant to Amendment No. 1 dated as of June 22, 2000, Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 22, 2001 and Amendment No. 3
dated as of May 5, 2002, and Citigroup was substituted as a party in lieu of Citicorp (the Non-Competition Agreement, as so extended
and amended, being referred to here as the "Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, the parties to the Agreement wish to extend the term of the Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the Company, NYS and Citigroup hereby consent and agree as follows:

SECTION 1.  Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 4, all defined terms used in this Amendment No. 4 shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

SECTION 2.  The term of the Agreement (originally scheduled to expire on December 22, 1999, and previously extended to June 22, 2003)
shall be extended for an additional twelve (12) months to June 22, 2004.

SECTION 3.  This Amendment No. 4 may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

SECTION 4. From and after the date of this Amendment No. 4, all references in the Agreement to this "Agreement" shall refer to the
Agreement as amended hereby.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, NYS and Citigroup have each caused this Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement to be duly executed by
their respective officers as of the day and year first above written.

THE STUDENT LOAN CORPORATION

By/s/ Yiannis Zographakis       Name:  Yiannis Zographakis
          Title:  Chief Executive Officer

CITIBANK (NEW YORK STATE)

By/s/ Theodore Heinrich       Name:  Theodore Heinrich
          Title:  Chief Financial Officer

CITIGROUP INC.

By/s/ Ajay Banga       Name:  Ajay Banga
          Title:  Business Head