alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00407-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. F19-546-431

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Wallach, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

CHRISTOPHER CHASE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Christopher Chase appeals from his conviction and sentence for

assault–family violence. We affirm.

A jury found Chase guilty of third-degree felony assault–family violence, which 

was enhanced by a prior felony conviction that increased the punishment range for 

the offense to that of a second-degree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.33, 

12.42(a), 22.01(a), (b)(2). The jury assessed Chase’s punishment at five years’

confinement, and the trial court sentenced Chase and entered judgment accordingly.

Chase’s court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as 

counsel and a brief in support of that motion. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 

744–45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967). Counsel’s brief and motion meet the 

requirements of Anders, which requires presenting a professional evaluation of the 

record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Id., 87 S. Ct. at 

1400. Chase was provided a copy of the record and filed a pro se response, but his 

response does not show any arguable grounds for appeal. The State declined to file a 

brief.

We have independently examined the record, as is our duty upon the filing of 

an Anders brief. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays 

v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.); see also Penson 

v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). After carefully reviewing the 

record, we agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. 
3

Our independent review of the record reveals nothing further that might arguably 

support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005); see also Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.

/s/ Mike Wallach

Mike Wallach

Justice

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: August 26, 2021
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

May 1, 2024 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics 

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Space Policy 

Institute, George Washington University Dinner on May 1, 2024 

On May 1, 2024, the Space Policy Institute (SPI), George Washington University (GWU), a 

nonprofit organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a dinner at the 

DACOR Bacon House, 1801 F Street NW, Washington, DC, from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The 

guest speaker is Damon Wells, Director for Policy and Strategy, National Reconnaissance 

Office. 

Approximately 110 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of 

views or interests and will include representatives from the legislative branch, state and local 

government officials, representatives from industry, employees of Federal agencies, 

academia, media and members of the public. The estimated cost of the event, including all 

food and beverages, is $127 per person. SPI is in control of the organizing, planning and 

invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange 

information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements 

of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees, including 

NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under 

Executive Order 13989, who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests 

of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free attendance to the event. In those 

circumstances, I find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the 

individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their 

duties. 

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the SPI/GWU, such as procurement duties, program management, or negotiating 

or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their 

local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Registration: Siemens 
Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., applied to be registered 
as a manufacturer of certain basic classes of controlled substances. 
The DEA grants Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc. registration as a 
manufacturer of those controlled substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By notice dated May 2, 2014, and published 
in the Federal Register on May 15, 2014, 79 FR 27936, Siemens 
Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., Attn: RA, 100 GBC Drive, Mailstop 514, 
Newark, Delaware 19702, applied to be registered as a manufacturer of 
certain basic classes of controlled substances. No comments or 
objections were submitted to this notice.
    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., to manufacture the basic classes 
of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest and 
with United States obligations under international treaties, 
conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971. The DEA 
investigated the company's maintenance of effective controls against 
diversion by inspecting and testing the company's physical security 
systems, verifying the company's compliance with state and local laws, 
and reviewing the company's background and history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 
CFR 1301.33, the above-named company is granted registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Controlled substance                       Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)...............  I
Ecgonine (9180)............................  II
Morphine (9300)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to produce the listed controlled substances in 
bulk to be used in the manufacture of reagents and drug calibrator 
controls which are DEA exempt products.
    In reference to drug code 7370 the company plans to bulk 
manufacture a synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol. No other activity for 
this drug code is authorized for this registration.

    Dated: October 1, 2014.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-24035 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EXHIBIT 21.1

                               FRESH AMERICA CORP.
                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARY CORPORATIONS

                                DECEMBER 31, 1999

SUBSIDIARY                                     STATE OF INCORPORATION
----------                                     ----------------------
Fresh America California, Inc.                        Texas

Fresh America Louisiana, Inc.                         Texas

Fresh America Georgia, Inc.                           Texas

Hereford Haven, Inc., d/b/a/ Martin Bros.             Texas

Francisco Acquisition Corp.                           Texas

Fresh America Arizona, Inc.                           Texas

Fresh America Florida, Inc.                           Texas

JNC Acquisition Corp.                                 Pennsylvania

Columbia Marketing Services, Inc.                     Pennsylvania

Eleanor Corporation                                   Pennsylvania

Toronto Corporation                                   Pennsylvania

Allied-Perricone, Inc., formerly known as
Sam Perricone Citrus Company                          California

1277649 Ontario Limited                               Ontario, Canada

Ontario Tree Fruits Limited                           Ontario, Canada

Sarfog, Inc.                                          New Jersey

Fosar, Inc.                                           New Jersey

Trio Importing (No. 2) Company, Ltd.                  Ontario, Canada
EXHIBIT
      32.0




CERTIFICATION
      OF PRESIDENT, CEO (PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER) AND


PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sandston Corporation
      (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel J. Dorman,
      as
      President, CEO and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:




|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
      Daniel J. Dorman





Name: Daniel
      J.
      Dorman


Title: President,
      CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Principal Financial Officer


Date: May
      9,
      2008








This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.
ADMINISTRATOR 

DR ROBERT A FROSCH A 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

DR ALAN M LOVELACE AD I 

CHIEF SCIENTIST 

VACANT 

I EOUAL 

OPPORTUNITY 

I INSPECTOR 

GENERAL 

I I 

GENERAL COUNSEL 

I I 

COMPTROLLER 

I 

t 1 1 

ASSOCIATE R ASSOCIATE ’ ASSOCIATE ’ 

ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR 

CHIEF ENGINEER 

DR WALTER c 

I 

r----,-,-L-------T 

STAFF ADVISORS 

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

SMALL & OISAOV. VACANT 

BUSINESS UTIL. DIRECTOR OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS 

K J KiER KENNETH s PEDERSEN 

L----------------l 

1 1 

ASSOCIATE M ASSOCIATE T 

ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR 

I WALLOPS I r NATIONAL SPACE I
#### Abner Perkins *v.*Samuel Smith et al.

Coroner’s Deed — Evidence of Title — Authority to Execute — Peremptory Instructions.

Where neither the judgment, nor execution under which a coroner’s deed perports to have been made, even offered in evidence, which was necessary to render the deed competent, a peremptory instruction is proper.

APPEAL PROM RUSSELL CIRCUIT COURT.

September 19, 1867.

Opinion or the Court by

Judge Hardin :

The coroner’s deed offered in evidence by the plaintiff having been rejected, and, thus consequently being no evidence of title in the plaintiff before the jury, the peremptory' instruction of the court to find for the defendants was manifestly right But the main question to be determined is, whether or not the court erred in refusing to permit said deed to be read. Neither the judgments, nor executions under which the coroner’s deed purports to have been made, were made, or offered to be made in evidence. It was clearly necessary to do so to render the deed competent evidence of *408title. This principle has been repeatedly and authoritatively recognized by this court. Smith v. Moreman, 1 Monroe, 154. Stephens, etc., vs. Robertson, etc., 3 Monroe, 99, and Riggs vs. Dooly, etc., 7 B. Monroe *238.*

*Vanuiinhle & Hays, for appellants.*

*Alexander, for appellee.*

It is deemed unnecessary here to enquire to what extent or under what circumstances a coroner is clothed with the authority,of a sheriff to sell and convey lands under execution, as the deed, had it been made by a sheriff should not have been made without the production also of the judgment, execution and return of sale which could alone have authorized the conveyance.

The judgment is *affirmed.*
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Suzanne Cisneros","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/suzanneecisneros-2-2\/","title":"Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) drone flights at Moffett Field","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"vkY4oPPxwr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/unmanned-aircraft-systems-uas-drone-flights-at-moffett-field\/\">Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) drone flights at Moffett Field<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/unmanned-aircraft-systems-uas-drone-flights-at-moffett-field\/embed\/#?secret=vkY4oPPxwr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) drone flights at Moffett Field” — NASA\" data-secret=\"vkY4oPPxwr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/p1010945-0.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED SECOND AMENDED MASTER SHORT FORM COMPLAINT FOR 

DAMAGES FOR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 

1

Timothy E. Grochocinski (IL Bar#6295055)

NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.

15020 S. Ravinia Ave., Suite 29

Orland Park, IL 60462

T: 708-675-1975

tim@nelbum.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTER PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to Plaintiff

JOY DENTON

Case No.2:15-MD-02641-DGC

Civil Case No.: 2:17-cv-04111-DGC

NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED 

SECOND AMENDED MASTER SHORT 

FORM COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES 

FOR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS AND 

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 15.19(b), Plaintiff Joy Denton respectfully 

submits this Notice of Filing Amended Second Amended Master Short Form Complaint for 

Individual Claims and Demand for Jury Trial. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of the amended 

complaint that indicates in which respect it differs from the original complaint. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8846 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED SECOND AMENDED MASTER SHORT FORM COMPLAINT FOR 

DAMAGES FOR INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 

2

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 14th day of November, 2017.

NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C

By: Timothy E. Grochocinski

 Timothy E. Grochocinski

 15020 S. Ravinia Ave., Suite 29

 Orland Park, IL 60462

 T: 708-675-1975

 F: 708-675-1786

 tim@nelbum.com

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 14th day of November, 2017, I electronically transmitted the attached 

document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of the Notice 

of Electronic Filing. 

/s/Timothy E. Grochocinski

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8846 Filed 11/14/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Janet Baird, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03978-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8701 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 62195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24571]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO956000 L14200000.BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is 
publishing this notice to inform the public of the intent to officially 
file the survey plat listed below and afford a proper period of time to 
protest this action prior to the plat filing. During this time, the 
plat will be available for review in the BLM Colorado State Office.

DATES: Unless there are protests of this action, the filing of the plat 
described in this notice will happen on November 17, 2014.

ADDRESSES: BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield 
Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor 
for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.
    Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may 
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to 
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or 
question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during 
normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The plat and field notes of the dependent 
resurvey and survey in Township 51 North, Range 13 West, New Mexico 
Principal Meridian, Colorado, were accepted on October 2, 2014.

Randy Bloom,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2014-24571 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Tim Dean,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03567-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8346 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains summary financial information extracted from Penn Octane
Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April
30,  2000  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by reference to such Financial
Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                     1195447
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4952925
<ALLOWANCES>                                512067
<INVENTORY>                                5263327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          13283041
<PP&E>                                    17505325
<DEPRECIATION>                             1891083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            30244529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     17801951
<BONDS>                                    2843266
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    133780
<OTHER-SE>                                 9465532
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              30244529
<SALES>                                   60661528
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          60661528
<CGS>                                     58661806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             58661806
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2423558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1036598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1606060
<INCOME-TAX>                                 80042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1526018
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               1526018
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .10


</TABLE>