alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Advanced Air Mobility National Campaign Partners","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"8FIwlKQIrj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/advanced-air-mobility-national-campaign-partners\/\">Advanced Air Mobility National Campaign Partners<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/advanced-air-mobility-national-campaign-partners\/embed\/#?secret=8FIwlKQIrj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Advanced Air Mobility National Campaign Partners” — NASA\" data-secret=\"8FIwlKQIrj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/aam-mission-current-aam-industry-partners.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":600}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RICHARD BROWN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 530 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

132051 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132051 COA: 271341 Missaukee CC: 05-102025-FH 05-102026-FH THOMAS LAFOREST, JR. Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Michael F. Manion, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Michael F. Manion

Michael F. ManionChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated: October 11, 2006

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ellen Bausback","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/ebausbac\/","title":"NASA Glenn Employees Chosen as Outstanding Hispanic STEM Professionals","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"aaHXs0azSr\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-glenn-employees-chosen-as-outstanding-hispanic-stem-professionals\/\">NASA Glenn Employees Chosen as Outstanding Hispanic STEM Professionals<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-glenn-employees-chosen-as-outstanding-hispanic-stem-professionals\/embed\/#?secret=aaHXs0azSr\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Glenn Employees Chosen as Outstanding Hispanic STEM Professionals” — NASA\" data-secret=\"aaHXs0azSr\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/microsoftteams-image-4-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
ACCEPTED

01-15-00197-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/12/2015 1:35:39 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/12/2015 1:35:39 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

This Document Relates to Plaintiff: 

EVAN HULICK 

Civil Case No.: 2:17-cv-03178-DGC 

REQUEST FOR REMOVAL FROM SERVICE LIST 

AND WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE 

TO: Clerk of the Court and all parties of record 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Kira S. Dabby, Esquire, of the firm of Archer & Greiner, 

A Professional Corporation, hereby withdraws her appearance for Defendant HERAEUS 

MEDICAL COMPONENTS, LLC, improperly named as Defendant NEOMETRICS, INC. in 

Civil Action No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC (Member Case 2:17-cv-03178-DGC), and requests that 

she be removed from the master service list, and that no further notices, pleadings or other 

documents, including, but not being limited to all ECF Notices, be served upon her on behalf of 

Defendant HERAEUS MEDICAL COMPONENTS, LLC, improperly named as Defendant 

NEOMETRICS, INC. pursuant to the Amended Ordered dismissing Plaintiff Evan Hulick’s 

complaint against said Defendant, which was entered by this Court on December 15, 2017 (Dkt. 

Entry No. 9399). 

Dated: January 17, 2018 By: /s/ Kira S. Dabby 

 Kira S. Dabby (No. KD0902) 

ARCHER & GREINER 

A Professional Corporation 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9693 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 2
Riverview Plaza 

10 State Route 35 

Red Bank, New Jersey 07701 

732.268.8000 (phone) 

732.345.8420 (fax) 

E-mail: kdabby@archerlaw.com

Attorneys for Heraeus Medical 

Components, LLC, improperly pleaded 

as, Neometrics, Inc. 

 

213796977v2 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9693 Filed 01/17/18 Page 2 of 2
Portable, Wearable Powered Upper Extremity Robotic Device

A NEW CO-DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

Reference No: 80JSC021PUERD

Potential Commercial Applications: Department of Defense (DoD); medical 

rehabilitation; industrial and construction worker safety, injury prevention, and 

assistance; PPE offloading

Keywords: exoskeleton, powered orthotic, rehabilitation, stroke, traumatic brain injury,

biofeedback, PPE, robotic assistance, wearable robotics, sensing

Purpose:

NASA JSC seeks parties interested in co-developing technology associated with its

Armstrong powered upper extremity robotic device to improve reliability, enhance 

coordinated control, increase range of motion, and improve comfort and fit. The Center

has developed many wearable robotic technologies for targeted use cases that have 

contributed to the medical, industrial, and space domains. The agency seeks to advance 

the state-of-the-art of its current Armstrong wearable powered robotic device.

By co-advancing this multi-use technology, NASA JSC and interested parties may be 

able to extend and enhance the current capabilities related to limb range of motion, 

control, customization of assistance, and biofeedback. These advancements would 

thereby create a more advanced wearable robotic device with the ability to contribute 

toward increases in mission performance and decreases in injury rate and fatigue in 

space; rehabilitate the neural pathways of those surviving stroke, traumatic brain injury 

(TBI), or other neurological injuries; and augment industrial and construction workers for 

safety and efficiency.

Technology:

NASA JSC’s goal is to improve the current wearable robotic device design to create a 

fully customizable device whose multi-domain technology will improve life on Earth as 

well as help contribute to astronaut safety and effectiveness.

R&D Status:

NASA JSC’s current Armstrong wearable was initially designed as a rehabilitation 

device for survivors of TBI. The technology has been evaluated on multiple TBI subjects, 

whereby safety and feasibility were demonstrated. Component technology has shown 

promise for a lightweight spacesuit augmentation solution. The actuated garment has the 

ability to control the shoulder and elbow either to assist an able-bodied person or provide 

desired real-time control of the limb to aid in rehabilitation. Real-time feedback is 

available to assist physical therapists. Armstrong’s adaptable control software makes 

custom therapy and assistance routines easy to realize.

Intellectual Property (IP):

Multiple individual technologies associated with robotics are currently available for codevelopment and licensing. Visit Robonaut 2 and click on Licensing Opportunities.

This co-development project may produce new IP that could be jointly owned by NASA 

and the partner or may become the property of the partner.
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-326-CR

DAVID ASATI ANUNDA APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 396 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TH

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The

motion is granted. We withdraw the opinion and judgment of October 30,

2008, and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(b); Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: CAYCE, C.J.; WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: November 20, 2008
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"La seguridad es fundamental para la movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"UvJMViDgwL\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/es\/la-seguridad-es-fundamental-para-la-movilidad-aerea-avanzada\/\">La seguridad es fundamental para la movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/es\/la-seguridad-es-fundamental-para-la-movilidad-aerea-avanzada\/embed\/#?secret=UvJMViDgwL\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“La seguridad es fundamental para la movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada” — NASA\" data-secret=\"UvJMViDgwL\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/aam-playbook-ep-09-cover-pic-04-es-1.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2115 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the 

State of South Dakota. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2004 

Mr. DASCHLE (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part C of title XVIII of the Social Security Act 

to prohibit the comparative cost adjustment (CCA) program from operating in the State of South Dakota. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON OPERATION OF MEDICARE 

4 COMPARATIVE COST ADJUSTMENT (CCA) 

5 PROGRAM IN SOUTH DAKOTA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860C–1(b) of the Social 

7 Security Act, as added by section 241 of the Medicare Pre8 scription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 
2 

•S 2115 IS 

1 2003 (Public Law 108–173), is amended by adding at the 

2 end the following: 

3 ‘‘(3) NO CCA AREAS WITHIN SOUTH DAKOTA.— 

4 A CCA area shall not include an MSA any portion 

5 of which is within the State of South Dakota.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact8 ment of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 

9 and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108–173). 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. at June 30, 1998, and its statement of
income for the six months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the Form 10Q of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. for the six months ended
June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         941,877
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,376
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      24,485,938
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,893,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,200,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,267,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,200,074
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,510,722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  318,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,313,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,313,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,313,726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for current
assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### N. E. Mitcheson *v.*J. Weir, Trustee.

Land Sold on Installments — Interest Reserved in Note not Usury.

The reservation of ten Per cent interest, for one year, in a note for the purchase price of land, in the event of non-payment when due, was a part of the consideration and not usury.

APPEAL PROM DAVIES CIRCUIT COURT.

October 7, 1868.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Bobertson:

The recital of the consideration in the conveyance of the title identified the note now sued on as for the last installment of the consideration, and the note itself shows the same fact.

Consequently these filed documents alone, without any averment, show that the provisions of the note constituted stipulations in the contract of sale of the land, and of course prove that the reservation of ten per cent interest for one year in the event of non*456payment when due, and of an election by the obligor to postpone payment for a year, was a part of the consideration of the sale of the land, and not an usurious exaction for forbearance for money loaned.

*Bay*& *Hardin, for appellant.*

*Weir, for appellee.*

The circuit court having so adjudged, and there being no other objection to the judgment as rendered than that it overruled the claim of alleged usury, the judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Joan Moon,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04564-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9474 Filed 12/28/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      $1,875,247
<SECURITIES>                                        $0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $6,370,327
<ALLOWANCES>                                ($397,789)
<INVENTORY>                                         $0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           $10,814,234
<PP&E>                                     $37,930,071
<DEPRECIATION>                           ($11,955,079)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $44,967,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      $12,769,627
<BONDS>                                             $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0
<COMMON>                                        $4,010
<OTHER-SE>                                 $12,982,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $44,967,693
<SALES>                                     $3,122,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $3,122,585
<CGS>                                       $2,622,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $2,622,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $148,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           ($71,386)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $423,885
<INCOME-TAX>                                  $165,315
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $258,570
<DISCONTINUED>                              ($411,804)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0
<NET-INCOME>                                ($153,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.04
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALFRED KUSHMIDER.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.