REDACTED DOCUMENTS 

RELATED TO DOCKET 7944

7944 - Plaintiffs’ Controverting Statement of Facts in 

Opposition to Bard’s Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgement as to Doris Jones

REDACTED EXHIBITS:

Exhibit 5: Excerpts of 2/3/17 Deposition of Alfred Jones, Sr.; and

Exhibit 6: Excerpts of 8/5/17 Deposition of , M.D.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 1 of 10
Exhibit 5 

Filed Redacted

REDACTED DOCUMENTS 

RELATED TO DOCKET 7944

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 2 of 10
Alfred Jones , Sr. February 3, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

3

4

5 In re Bard IVC Filters Products

Liability Litigation

6

 NO. MD-15-02641

7 PHX-DGC

8

9

10

11 DEPOSITION OF

12 

13 February 3, 2017 - 10:08 a.m.

14 Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams

15 2 E. Bryan Street

16 Savannah, Georgia

17 Deborah K. Lingonis, RPR, CCR 2883

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 1

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 3 of 10
Alfred Jones , Sr. February 3, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 23

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 4 of 10
Alfred Jones , Sr. February 3, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 24

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 5 of 10
Alfred Jones , Sr. February 3, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Page 25

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 6 of 10
Exhibit 6 

Filed Redacted

REDACTED DOCUMENTS 

RELATED TO DOCKET 7944

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 7 of 10
Do Not Disclose - Subject to Further Confidentiality Review

Golkow Litigation Services Page 1

 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 2 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

 3

 4 IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS ) Case No.

 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

 5 ____________________________________________________

 6

 7

 8 DO NOT DISCLOSE

 9 SUBJECT TO FURTHER CONFIDENTIALITY REVIEW

 10

 11

 12 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF , M.D.

 13 August 5, 2017

 14 Winston-Salem, North Carolina

 15 8:03 a.m.

 16

 17

 18

 19

 20

 21

 22

 23 Reported by: Karen Kidwell, RMR, CRR

 24 GOLKOW LITIGATION SERVICES

 877.370.3377 ph | 917.591.5672 fax

 25 deps@golkow.com

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 8 of 10
Do Not Disclose - Subject to Further Confidentiality Review

Golkow Litigation Services Page 44

 1 in the course of her care would have been rather

 2 different than the course we did take. 

 

 

 5 Q. How did that direct the course that you

 6 took?

 7 A. It then allowed us to basically consult

 8 certain other physicians, specialists of vasculature

 9 and radiographic anatomy, 

 

 

 12 Q. Did the CT angiogram, including the

 13 impressions, provide you any information that helped

 14 you understand the complaints 

 15 

 16 A. 

 17 

 

 

 

 

 

 23 However, I would like to note that despite

 24 this, we still continued to work the patient up for

 25 very common presenting things, like a heart attack,

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 9 of 10
Do Not Disclose - Subject to Further Confidentiality Review

Golkow Litigation Services Page 47

 1 especially with contrast, such as this.

 2 Q. When you eventually eliminated the other

 3 conditions, 

 

 

 

 7 A. I will say that again, having never seen a

 8 presentation like this, and the medical literature

 9 not being very robust on these types of

 10 presentations, 

 

 

 

 

 

 16 Q. So what was your next step? Did you order

 17 additional tests, or what did you order?

 18 A. So having the tests available ahead of us,

 19 we felt that our next best step, given the fact that

 20 we saw 

 

 

 we felt it best to obtain counsel from an expert

 24 in the field of vasculature, anatomy, and radiology,

 25 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8385-1 Filed 10/24/17 Page 10 of 10