alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James D. Byirt,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03716-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9085 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 7, 2021

No. 04-18-00022-CR

Travis Leslie NORTON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR3975

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In an order issued October 5, 2021, we withdrew our February 13, 2019 opinion and 

judgment in accordance with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion, Ex parte Norton, 

No. WR-92,415-01, 2021 WL 1202422 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021). We hereby 

WITHDRAW the mandate that issued on April 25, 2019. The appeal is REINSTATED on the 

docket of this court.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
OFFICE OF THE All-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN** IL.
1. - 

### 425

~norable I. Predeckl &tttnty

**Awlitor** 00lveet’on county caeeetoa, Tezaa lki8r Sir: oplnlonBO. 0-3891 Ret Commis8ioners' Courts, oounty .ftma8 amI the Tea8 Defensr Guard This depetment h&s **roesired** yaur mpusst, for na opinion. Ee quote the body of yew. lettem

*An applleationhas b+n'rsoeited, from ths loeal unit OS the Texne Bone Defense Cum&
. by the Galveatoon

County Coudssionera Ceurt request1 &Alar8 (

3 an apprapriatfodof one thouseA 1000&C) **for** their use ad benefit. I em unable to locate eny la* whleh permite the County Commiesitmera:Cowt **t4zaeke** an ap proprfatlcnfor suah a purpes ; '.'% *Xindlp infonu 'iu~Kwimth&Z !wrk any legil euthorityto 8ign a warrant ie&md to thin orpiaiF&EtlOil.” **An** act imowma8 the Tern8 Defmse Sum& **bet, Aotr**  **lW, 47th**  **Legislature,** Housebill Ho. O:, authorlzea the Governorof the State to orgaW&wl maintain Wuoh IpiZitary ioroea be~the Qovarmr may aeon nrctmaary

### to defend tN8 Nate." This force la koorn a8 the Texan Defenee Quad.

Ssotion 4 of that sot j~mvlderr~ Txtc. 4. For the use of suoh foroas. the Governor is hareby authorieed to repulslt~cn from the Seijretary of Zar rrueh

arma az& eguipme ~&w$t@.$e in possession 02, end CM be sparea lQi>:the

Rkr Department

8 aml to wakeavailable to suah forma the faoilitlesof



### e&ate amoriss 

### ana tboir equipment

### and rush cthar State yraoliaoe ard **property** 8~ may **be** available. hutkorlzetion1~ heroby provided for school authorltiento permit the use OS eahool buildingsby the Terar Detmee @m-d; provided further that County Cosmtiesf~nsra 12ourte,

city authorities,oomntIQitls8, and clvlo 

### Ma ,natriotlo organicotr;iorm

are es~owwed and authorizsdby this Aot ta **provide** funds, amoritm, equipment, material trafugortation,or other agprnprlate .SWV~Q(I~ or facilities,to tho Tezao Lk3hsnse Wed.* Aooordingly,

you are rrspoatfulW aavfao# that the Texar Dt~ieoae

OuarQ **AOt** @ant8 you the neoaar~rfaythorlty to e&ip mob B warrant rm ia h+rsin dewr'ibed,mbbjeet,OS ooure8, to the qualificlation that in all o%hor r~ptieta, it Ir regular4

Se believe that this fiil.1~ **aasw4rB**yvur question. Youre very **truly**

n **A ’** **f?WURT**CWRERALOF TEXAS

**w** FLitSI’ ASTSTANT ATTCRN~Y GENERAL

BP

WI00 WA.’ T. Fusing u

**- Aea#&ia$i**
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24051]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0627]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; General Administrative Procedures: 
Citizen Petitions; Petition for Reconsideration or Stay of Action; 
Advisory Opinions

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``General Administrative Procedures: 
Citizen Petitions; Petition for Reconsideration or Stay of Action; 
Advisory Opinions'' has been approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations, 
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver 
Spring, MD 20993-0002, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#603032213314010606200604014e0808134e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c5c5e4d5f786d6a6a4c6a686d2264647f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 12, 2014, the Agency submitted a 
proposed collection of information entitled ``General Administrative 
Procedures: Citizen Petitions; Petition for Reconsideration or Stay of 
Action; Advisory Opinions'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0183. 
The approval expires on August 31, 2017. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: October 2, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-24051 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000894253
<NAME> PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         225,849
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,713
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               425,762
<PP&E>                                         128,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,463
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 497,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,676
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           895
<OTHER-SE>                                     272,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   497,524
<SALES>                                        274,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               274,368
<CGS>                                          210,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  251,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    44
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24


                                  POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature 
appears below constitutes and appoints Johan P. Finley and Steven M. Des 
Champs (with full power to act alone), as his true and lawful 
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full powers of substitution and 
resubstitutions, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all 
capacities, to sign any amendments to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PDS 
Financial Corporation, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and 
other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and 
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or 
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and 
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming 
all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or 
substitutes, lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


          Name                     Title     Dated

/s/ Johan P. Finley          President, Chief Executive         April 21, 1999
------------------------     Officer and Director
Johan P. Finley              


/s/ Steven M. Des Champs     Chief Financial Officer            April 21, 1999
------------------------
Steven M. Des Champs               


/s/ Peter D. Cleary          Director                           April 21, 1999
------------------------
Peter D. Cleary                         


/s/ Lona M. Finley           Director                           April 21, 1999
------------------------
Lona M.Finley                      


------------------------     Director                           April __, 1999
Charles R. Patterson

/s/ Joel M. Koonce
------------------------     Director                           April 21, 1999
Joel M. Koonce


------------------------     Director                           April __, 1999
James L. Morrell
<PAGE>   1
                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


The Board of Directors
Capstone Capital Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in registration statements No.
33-77788 and No. 33-97926 on Form S-3 and No. 333-21581 on Form S-8 of our
reports dated January 20, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Capstone Capital Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the period from June 30, 1994
(inception) to December 31, 1994, and all related schedules, which reports
appear in or incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-K of Capstone Capital Corporation.



Birmingham, Alabama
August 29, 1997
                                                        KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS No. MD-15-02641-PHX-DGC

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

____________________________________

This Document Applies to Plaintiff(s):

Lawrence Vincent Schmidt and

Jodi Ann Schmidt

No. CV-17-4616-PHX-DGC

_____________________________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice before this Court, and I appear in this case

as lead counsel for: Lawrence Vincent Schmidt and Jodi Ann Schmidt.

DATED: December 15, 2017

Respectfully submitted, 

THE NATIONS LAW FIRM

 /s/ Howard L. Nations

Howard L. Nations

Texas Bar No. 14823000

3131 Briarpark Dr., Suite 208

Houston, TX 77042-3795

(713) 807-8400

(713) 807-8423 (Fax)

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS

-1-

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9336 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was electronically filed on this

15th day of December, 2017. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the

Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the court’s system. Copies

will be delivered by other means to the following parties not served by the Court’s ECF system.

 /s/ Howard L. Nations

Howard L. Nations

-2-

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9336 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
#### BIVENS v. DELTA WOODSIDES/DELTA MILLS

No. 319P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 715

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001. Conditional petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 16 August 2001.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTONIO BARBA DUENAS,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00022-CR

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20100D02223)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s third motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until October 11, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Leonard Morales, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before October 11, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of September., 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50324

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-1929-ALL-PM

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Luis

Hernandez-Garcia concedes that the arguments raised are

foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for

further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance

in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED,

and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
#### Court Nicholas *v.*A. J. Oldham.

Nonresident — Judgment—Appeal—Affirmance.

A judgment against a non-resident, constructively summoned, can not he affirmed unless by appeal.

APPEAL PROM JEPPERSON CIRCUIT COURT.

October 1, 1867.

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Williams:

Whatever may be the errors in the proceedings against Joseph Knapp, we cannot consider them, because he was only constructively summoned, if indeed so brought before the court, and he can proceed under the Code to re-open and re-try the cause, else prosecute an appeal, but until he proceeds one way or the other, we cannot determine the alleged errors as to him.

We perceive no error in the proceedings or judgment as to appellant, therefore an affirmance must be avoided.
#### LIPE v. STARR DAVIS CO.

No. 152P01

Case below: 142 N.C. App. 213

Petition by defendant (Starr Davis Company) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 November 2001. Motion by plaintiff to dismiss petition for discretionary review dismissed as moot 8 November 2001. Justice Edmunds recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000894245
<NAME> AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,714,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,763,147
<PP&E>                                      18,568,856
<DEPRECIATION>                               (889,208)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,442,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          526,538
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,916,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,442,795
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,006,277
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  369,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                675,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            675,177
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   675,177
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    28.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    28.26
        


</TABLE>
AD M IN1 STRATO R NalcoaI Amnaulcs ard 

Space Adminslralm 

ASST. DEPUTY ADMl DEPUTY ADMlNlSTnATOn 

ASSOCIATE ASS 0 CIA T E 

DEPlJTY DEPUTY 

ADMltllSTRATOR - ADMItlISTRATOR . 114s TI 1 UT ION POLICY 

INSPECTOR 

GENERAL 

DlllEClUR 

SfJALL At10 

' D1SAI)VAtiTACED 

UUSltlt5S I 

I + 

I I 

I 

I I ASSOCIATE 1 I I I 

GENERAL 

COUNSEL 

ADMlf4lS TRA TOR A Dhl IN1 S T A A TOR A 0 MlFl IS T R A TOR A 01.11 HIS TR A TOR AD1AlNlSTRATOR FOR SPACF FOR AERONAUTICS Cna CDArF 

I N~~~ I I 1 ADMIH~~~ATOR CHIEF 

COMP~R~LLE" I I SCIEHTIST 

I SCIENCE KD 1 1 AND SPACE I 1 SPACE I I SPACE 1 1 &"~;;;O'F;~ 1 

A PPLlC AT IONS TECIINOLOGY FLlGIi r STATION 

I I I I 

1' ASSOCIA I E 

ASS IS T A N T ASSOCIATE ADhlINISrnATOR FOR 

ASSISTANT 

ADMItJISTRATOR 

FOR EOUAL 

OPPORTUNITY 

PROGRAMS 

ADMINISTnATon SAFETY. nELIAt3ILIlY. 

0 IJ A L I T Y ASS U H A P4CE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

PROCUREMENT 

FOR FOR MAIfllAIflABILITY, 8 

MANAGEMENT 

AI.lE5 IltStAblClI 

CttlTEI1 

I I I 

ASSOCIA I€ ' ASSOCIATE ASS I ST ANT 

A 0 f,l I f.1 I S T R A T 0 R 

COM hllJPIl C AT IONS 

AD M I N I S T R AT 0 R 

PROGRAMS 

ADM I NIS r RA T on 

FOR FOR FOR COMMERCIAL 

EXTERNAL 

FIEL A TlOtI S 1L 

ccii rtn 

CEll It11 APPRO 

DATE 

c 

t 

d 

W " 

d 

a 

m 

v 

I ASSISTANT 

AOM~NISTRATOR 

FOR I EXPLORATION 

Z! D s! j