alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Barbara A. Simon,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03754-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8936 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,131
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              33
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,069
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,926
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             718
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               732
<LOANS>                                         93,071
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,986
<DEPOSITS>                                     117,796
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,104
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                881
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,513
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,850
<OTHER-SE>                                         843
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  10,693
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,198
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  448
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   136
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,782
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,052
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,180
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,603
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  94
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    321
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         321
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.05
<LOANS-NON>                                        398
<LOANS-PAST>                                       130
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   237
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,904
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,184
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       13
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,308
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,308
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2385

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal

Place in Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ‘‘Santiago E.

Campos United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2385 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SANTIAGO E. CAMPOS

2 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

3 The United States courthouse at South Federal Place

4 in Santa Fe, New Mexico, shall be known and designated

5 as the ‘‘Santiago E. Campos United States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘Santiago E. Campos United

11 States Courthouse’’.

Passed the Senate July 19, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2385

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse at

Courthouse’’.as the ‘‘Santiago E. Campos United StatesSouth Federal Place in Santa Fe, New Mexico,
**EXHIBIT 10.39**

SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 

Beginning in 2007 and until further notice, each of the non-employeedirectors of Monogram Biosciences, Inc. shall receive an annual retainer of $20,000, paid in equal quarterly installments, a fee of $2,000 for each Board of Directors meeting attended in person, a fee of $500 for each Board of Directors meetingattended by phone and a fee of $500 for each committee meeting attended by committee members. In addition, the chair of the Audit Committee will receive an annual retainer of $10,000 and the chair of the Compensation Committee will receive an annualretainer of $5,000.
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

NP-2021-4-659-GSFC 1/4

LASER COMMUNICATIONS 

RELAY DEMONSTRATION

Laser communications uses infrared 

light invisible to the human eye to 

send information from space to 

scientists on Earth. 
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

LASER COMMUNICATIONS 

RELAY DEMONSTRATION

LCRD needs clear skies to send 

data to Earth, so it will ‘talk’ to 

ground stations high above the 

clouds in the mountains of Hawaii 

and California. 

NP-2021-4-659-GSFC 2/4
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

NP-2021-4-659-GSFC 3/4

In 2021, LCRD will launch from 

Florida on a super speedy 

rocket and fly in space on a 

U.S. Space Force spacecraft.

LASER COMMUNICATIONS 

RELAY DEMONSTRATION
www.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

LCRD will use lasers to “talk” with the International 

Space Station, which gathers information from 

science instruments onboard. This information will 

then be beamed to LCRD and sent down to Earth.

LASER COMMUNICATIONS 

RELAY DEMONSTRATION

NP-2021-4-659-GSFC 4/4
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. STEVEN BARENBAUM.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
,

E OF TE Arinrxiu.TEX.AR 7S711

October 17, 1973 Honorable William H. Skelton Chairman Opinion No. H- 132 Board of Pardons andParoles Room 501JohnH. Reagan Bldg Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Mr. Skelton: Re: Effect of receipt of funds from Criminal Justice Council onappropriations tothe Board of Pardons and Paroles You have submitted to us the following questions;

“(1) Canthe Criminal Justice Council Grant No. 3-51-1688, Computerized Data Management, which has been approved andwill be effective September 1, 1973, to August 31, 1974, be implemented without the General Revenue Funds appropriated to the Board of Pardons and Paroles for 1978-74 year being reduced by the amount ofthe Grant?

“(2) Ifthe Computerized Data Management Project is refunded bythe Criminal Justice Council for fiscal year 1974~75, can the funds be used withoutthe General Revenue Funds appropriated to the Board of Pardons and Paroles for 1974-1975 being reduced by the amount of the Grant? ” The General Appropriations Act for fiscal 1974 (House Bill 139,
‘
. 63rd Legislature) states at page 111-110:

“In the event that Criminal Justice funds are available to the Board of Pardons and Paroles for continuing programs being funded during the fiscal year ending August 31, 1973, thenthe amount of

p. 634The Honorable William H, Skelton, page 2 (H-132)

General Revenue funds appropriated to the Board of Pardons andParoles shall be reduced during each year of the biennium, beginning September 1, 1973bythe amount of Criminal Justice funds available for these purposes. ” (emphasis added) The Criminal Justice Council approved Grant Control No. 3-51-1688, providing for Computerized Data Management for the Board of Pardons and Paroles for the period from September 1, 1973, to August 31, 1974, The Computerized Data Management, anautomated system designed to improve the flow andprocedures required to process the Board’s workload, is a newprogram andwas notfunded during fiscal 1973, endingAugust 31, 1973. The appropriations bill only provides “continuing programs being funded [by Criminal Justice Council grant4 during the fiscal yeariending August 31, 1973” will create a reduction ofthe General Revenue funds. The grant in question will not cause a reduction in General Revenue funds during fiscal 1974. Inaddition, it is our opinion that a refunding by the Criminal Justice Council of the Computerized Data Management program for fiscal 1975will not result ina reducti& in General Revenue funds for thatyear. The program will then be a “continuing program, ” but it stjll will not meet the condition of “being funded during the fiscal year endingAugust 31, 1973. ” SUMMARY A reduction inappropriations for the Board of Pardons andParoles provided for by the Appropriations Bill inthe event of refunding by the Criminal Justice Council of “continuing programs being funded during the fiscal year ending August 31, 1973, I’is not required where a newprogram is funded to commence September 1, 1973.

**p. 635** I

The Honorable William H. Skelton, page 3 (H-132)

APPROHED:

Opinion Committee

p. 636
Third District Court of Appeal 

State of Florida 

Opinion filed April 17, 2024. 

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-0087 

Lower Tribunal Nos. F18-18794, F18-18798

________________

Braulio Gonzalez, 

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, 

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.

Rachael Reese, P.A., and Rachael E. Reese (Tampa), for appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.7


 


 






    1


     


    

 


 






    2


     


    

 


 



    3


     


    

 


 



    4


     


    

 


 



    5


     


    

 


 



    6


     


    

 


 



    7


     


    

 


 



    8


     


    

 


 



    9


     


    
 


 



    10


     


    

 


 



    11


     


    

 


 



    12


     


    

 


 



    13


     


    

 


 



    14


     


    

 


 



    15


     


    

 


 



    16


     


    

 


 



    17


     


    

 


 



    18


     


    

 


 



    19


     


    

 


 



    20


     


    

 


 



    21


     


    
 


 



    22


     


    

 


 



    23


     


    

 



    24


     


    
 


 



    25


     


    
 


 



    26


     


    
 


 



    27
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hawthorn Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, James E. Smith, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 9, 2007                                                                      /s/ James E. Smith   James E. Smith   Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer
Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 25, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129564-67 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129569-72 & (70) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, JOEANN BATES, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129564-67 

 COA: 252022, 252047, 

252792, and 252793

DR. SIDNEY GILBERT, Wayne CC: 03-308969-NH 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

D&R OPTICAL CORPORATION, 

d/b/a HEALTH CENTER OPTICAL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

JOEANN BATES, 

Plaintiff-Appellee/

Cross-Appellant, 

v SC: 129569-72 

 COA: 252022, 252047, 

252792, and 252793

DR. SIDNEY GILBERT, Wayne CC: 03-308969-NH 

Defendant-Appellant/ 

Cross-Appellee,

and 

D&R OPTICAL CORPORATION, 

d/b/a HEALTH CENTER OPTICAL,

Defendant-Appellee/ 

Cross-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the August 16, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to 

grant the applications or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

argument, the parties shall address whether the requirements of MCL 600.2912d(1)(a)-(d) 

are satisfied if: (1) a plaintiff files a single affidavit of merit that is signed by a health 

professional who plaintiff’s counsel reasonably believes is qualified under MCL 

600.2169 to address the standard of care, but who is not also qualified to address 

causation; or (2) a plaintiff files a single affidavit of merit that is signed by a health 

professional who plaintiff’s counsel reasonably believes is qualified under § 2169 to 

address causation, but who is not also qualified to address the standard of care. The 

parties shall also address whether § 2912d(1) permits or requires a plaintiff to file 

multiple affidavits, signed by different health professionals, when a single health 

professional is not qualified under § 2169 to testify about both the standard of care and 

causation. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this 

order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in 

their application papers. 

d1018 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 25, 2006 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated August 14, 2007,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Merix Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedMay 26, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Merix Corporation on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-87344, 333-76367 and 333-59672) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-132857, 333-90374, 333-111740,333-112288 and 333-32616). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Portland,Oregon 

August 14, 2007
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA\u2019s ER-2 No. 806 Returns to Flight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gxcLdPiguG\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasas-er-2-no-806-returns-to-flight\/\">NASA\u2019s ER-2 No. 806 Returns to Flight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasas-er-2-no-806-returns-to-flight\/embed\/#?secret=gxcLdPiguG\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s ER-2 No. 806 Returns to Flight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gxcLdPiguG\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/afrc2022-0042-33_medium-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      $2,115,510
<SECURITIES>                                        $0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $6,845,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                ($547,389)
<INVENTORY>                                         $0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $9,485,748
<PP&E>                                     $37,907,838
<DEPRECIATION>                           ($12,846,420)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $41,847,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      $12,132,122
<BONDS>                                             $0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               $0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0
<COMMON>                                        $4,010
<OTHER-SE>                                 $11,050,944
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $41,847,179
<SALES>                                    $12,342,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           $12,342,968
<CGS>                                       $9,893,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $9,893,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            $2,107,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $308,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                $33,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                   $12,970
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            $20,285
<DISCONTINUED>                                      $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     $0
<CHANGES>                                           $0
<NET-INCOME>                                   $20,285
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.01
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Percy L. Boyd, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03497-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8789 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONDENSED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     5,421,662
<SECURITIES>                                                 350,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           5,870,113
<PP&E>                                                       297,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                               211,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             5,961,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      1,186,685
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      1,250,000
<PREFERRED>                                                      115
<COMMON>                                                     268,534
<OTHER-SE>                                                 3,256,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               5,961,665
<SALES>                                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             350,000
<CGS>                                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          13,569,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            86,211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (13,303,121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (13,303,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (13,303,121)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.67)
        

</TABLE>