alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2463 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2463

            To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2004

  Mr. Brownback (for himself Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Craig, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
  Graham of South Carolina, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To terminate the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Code Termination Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986.

    (a) In General.--No tax shall be imposed by the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986--
            (1) for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2009, 
        and
            (2) in the case of any tax not imposed on the basis of a 
        taxable year, on any taxable event or for any period after 
        December 31, 2009.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to taxes imposed 
by--
            (1) chapter 2 of such Code (relating to tax on self-
        employment income),
            (2) chapter 21 of such Code (relating to Federal Insurance 
        Contributions Act), and
            (3) chapter 22 of such Code (relating to Railroad 
        Retirement Tax Act).

SEC. 3. NEW FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM.

    (a) Structure.--The Congress hereby declares that any new Federal 
tax system should be a simple and fair system that--
            (1) applies a low rate to all Americans,
            (2) provides tax relief for working Americans,
            (3) protects the rights of taxpayers and reduces tax 
        collection abuses,
            (4) eliminates the bias against savings and investment,
            (5) promotes economic growth and job creation, and
            (6) does not penalize marriage or families.
    (b) Timing of Implementation.--In order to ensure an easy 
transition and effective implementation, the Congress hereby declares 
that any new Federal tax system should be approved by Congress in its 
final form not later than July 4, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Brenda L. Barnes,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03746-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8949 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         794,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,322,027
<ALLOWANCES>                                   361,145
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,815,704
<PP&E>                                       7,771,916
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,788,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,346,543
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,825,235
<BONDS>                                      2,578,618<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,898
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,101,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,346,543
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,171,062
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,749,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,729,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               124,252
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             162,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                550,001
<INCOME-TAX>                                   220,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            329,601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   329,601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES CURRENT PORTION OF 1,076,918
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JEROME TINI PARRISH.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Janette Matthews, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03437-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8705 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dean L. Cash, ChiefExecutive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of ATEL CashDistribution Fund V, L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Partnership for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

 
| Date:     August 15,  2005 |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |
|                                                     |
| /s/ Dean L. Cash                                         |   |
| Dean L. Cash                                             |
| President and Chief  Executive                           |
| Officer of General Partner                               |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnershipand will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Document

Exhibit 10.1


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT


    THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT (“AMENDMENT”), is made and entered into by and between Sharps Compliance Corp., having its principal office at 9220 Kirby Drive, Suite 500, Houston, TX 77054 (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), and David P. Tusa, the Company’s President & Chief Executive Officer since September 30, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as the “Executive”).


WITNESSETH
    
For and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree to amend the Executive’s original executed employment agreement, dated July 14, 2003 and amended on, (i) October 1, 2004 (effective June 21, 2004), (ii) August 19, 2005, (iii) June 14, 2010, (iv) December 2, 2011 (effective November 17, 2011), (v) March 6, 2012 (effective March 1, 2012), and September 10, 2015 herein defined as the “Agreement”, as follows:


The Base Salary referred to in Article 1.3.1 (as amended) of $13,461.54 per pay period (twenty-six pay periods per year) is hereby changed to $15,384.62.


Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the cash portion of the severance payment referred to in section 2.2 shall be fixed at $525,000 which is applicable in the event of termination without cause, including agreement non-renewal, or termination following a change in control. All provisions of section 2.2 remain intact and are not affected by this change in cash severance.


The executive benefits referred to in section 1.3.4 include payment, by the Company, of Executive’s participation in the Company’s comprehensive employee group health and related benefits program offered to all full-time employees (“Benefits Program”). This is accomplished by increasing the Executive’s salary by the corresponding amount of the employee portion of the Benefits Program applicable to the Executive. 


IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first written below with the amended provisions noted above being effective April 8, 2021.
                        
			
	EXECUTIVE:
	By: /s/ David P. Tusa

	David P. Tusa
	Date: April 8, 2021
	
	COMPANY:
	By: /s/ Diana P. Diaz

	Diana Diaz
	Title: Chief Financial Officer
	Date: April 8, 2021
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

The Board of Directors
CarrAmerica Realty Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re: Registration Statements Nos. 333-22353, 333-53751, 333-50019, 333-18451,
333-04519, 333-80164, 333-89191, and 333-89193.

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our
awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 25, 2001 related to our
review of interim financial information.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
accountant, or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the
meaning of sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

                                                             /s/KPMG LLP

Washington, D.C.
November 13, 2001
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALEXANDER STEWART.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### W. J. Lewis *v.*James P. Nall.

Equity — Guardian and Ward — Necessities for Ward’s Maintenance.

A ward cannot hold her guardian responsible for necessities furnished her, beyond her annual revenue which he had a right to anticipate, in the belief that ultimately the aggregate outlay would not exceed the aggregate income.

Same.

The matrimonial outfit of the ward is held to be “necessities” in a suit by a ward against her guardian for recovery of amounts advanced her beyond her annual income.

Same — Accounting—Waiver of Rights.

A settlement with a guardian by his ward and her husband, based on the cómmisisoner’s report, is held to waive her right of action against the guardian for payments to her upon her order, though they exceed her annual, income.

APPEAL EEOM MALEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

October 9, 1868.

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

JUDGE K.OBERTSON

In equity the ward cannot hold her guardian responsible for the supply of necessaries, and especially, in her matrimonial outfit, beyond her annual revenue which he had a right to anticipate on such occasions, when her prospective income before the abolition, of slavery justified the belief that ultimately the aggregate outlay would not exceed her aggregate income.

. Nor can she justly hold him liable for her one-fifth of the price *560for which, the slave Baily was. sold. The sale was apparently prudent and rightful; the administrator who held him concurring with the guardian of all the wards. And there does not appear to have been any culpable negligence in failing to collect the debt.

*Bickers, for appellant.*

Moreover the settlement by the commissioner brought the ward in debt to the guardian and the settlement with him by herself and husband waived all those matters and left them in his debt, which they attempted to pay by an order on the administrator.

Under all these circumstances the appellants have no just cause to complain of the judgment dismisisng their petition and allowing the appellee nothing, which is affirmed.
Access to Redstone Arsenal 

Marshall Space Flight Center is located on the U.S. Army’s Redstone Arsenal in Huntsville, Ala. 

Access to Redstone Arsenal requires a decal and badge, and prior approval of the hosting 

organization. For more information about visiting Marshall, please visit the Visitor Information page: 

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/about/visitor.html

If you have prior approval for a visit, you may enter through the Redstone Arsenal Visitor’s Center at 

Gate 9 on Rideout Road where decals and badges may be obtained for approved visitors. You 

can find a map of the Redstone Arsenal gates and gate hours at: 

http://www.garrison.redstone.army.mil/sites/about/gates.asp

You can click on this map link to see our proximity to Memphis, Nashville, Knoxville, Chattanooga, 

Birmingham and Atlanta: 

You can also click on this map link to see more detail about Redstone Arsenal and the Marshall 

Center: 
Driving Directions 

To enter the Redstone Arsenal Gate 9 Visitor Center from Huntsville International Airport: 

Follow signs along Houston Goodson Way / Glenn Hearn Blvd to I-565 East. At Exit 14, turn right onto 

ramp (AL-255 / Rideout Rd / Gate 9) and follow the Gate 9 Visitor Center signs. A Marshall visitor 

without a badge and decal must stop at the Visitor Center.
#### MARY SPEAKS v. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied. (See 193 *N.J.Super.*405)
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.9


SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
PENN NATIONAL GAMING, INC. 
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


WHEREAS, Penn National Gaming, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Penn National Gaming, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan"); and


WHEREAS, Section 12.2 of the Plan provides that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Compensation Committee") may amend the Plan with respect to significant Plan design changes and/or any changes having a significant economic impact on the Company or on senior executives of the Company; and


WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee wishes to amend the Plan to cease annual Company contributions thereto effective as of April 1, 2020.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of April 1, 2020, as follows:


1.Section 3.5 is amended by adding the following after the first sentence therein:


"Effective April 1, 2020, no amounts shall be credited to the Company Contribution Account of any Participant pursuant to the preceding sentence with respect to any compensation received by a Participant on or after April 1, 2020."


2.In all other respects, the Plan shall remain as previously written.


Accordingly, this Sixth Amendment has been adopted this 24th day of March, 2020.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### SEP 18 2003 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 03-1078 HORACIO RODRIGUEZ-VILLALBA, Defendant-Appellant. (D.C. No. 02-CR-222-B) (D. Colorado)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before KELLY , BRISCOE , and LUCERO , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Defendant Horacio Rodriguez-Villalba pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and was sentenced to a term2

of imprisonment of 78 months. He appeals from his conviction and sentence. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and affirm. Defendant’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), asserting there are no legitimate challenges to the validity of defendant’s guilty plea or to his sentence. Counsel has also filed a motion to withdraw from his representation of defendant. Counsel provided defendant with a copy of the brief. Neither defendant nor the government has filed a response to the Anders brief. Pursuant to our duty under Anders , we have conducted an independent review of the record and agree with defendant’s counsel that the appeal is frivolous. There was a factual basis for defendant’s plea and it was knowing and voluntary. In sentencing defendant, the district court properly calculated the offense level and the criminal history category. The sentence imposed was the lowest allowable under the applicable guideline range. We find no issue that properly might be the subject of an appeal. AFFIRMED. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Entered for the Court Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Quarterly Report of
Quovadx, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Commission") on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certifies, to the
best of his knowledge and belief, that:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


    /S/ GARY T. SCHERPING
----------------------------
Gary T. Scherping
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 17, 2004