alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kenneth Cole
Productions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth D. Cole, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                     | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ KENNETH D. COLE                                                                                  | 
|                                                                                                     | 
|                                                                                                     | 
|Kenneth D. Cole
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc 
 March 7, 2008 | 

---
Oyster Creek Group, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

                                     For the years ended        August 19, 1999
                                     June 30,                    (Inception) to
                                     2002              2001       June 30, 2002
CASH FLOWS
FROM
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
Net (loss)                   $(5,550)                -         $(9,325)
Increase in
accounts
payable                        5,550                 -            6,750

Net cash
(used) by
operating
activities                     -                         -           (2,575)

CASH FLOWS
FROM
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from
stock issuances         -                             -          2,575

Net cash
provided by
financing
activities                    -                            -            2,575

Net increase
in cash                                                                    -
Cash   beginning                                                       -
Cash   ending                                                           -

Supplemental
disclosures:
Interest paid              -                                  -           -
Income taxes
paid                          -                                 -            -

Non-cash
transactions:
Shares issued
for dividend                -                                 -          2,000

Number of
shares issued
for dividend               -                               -         2,000,000
The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2107

To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for mental health courts 

through fiscal year 2009. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2004

Mr. DEWINE (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL

To authorize an annual appropriation of $10,000,000 for 

mental health courts through fiscal year 2009.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 Section 1001(a)(20) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

5 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

6 3793(a)(20)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2001 

7 through 2004’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2004 through 

8 2009’’.

Æ
TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC.
                            
                            EXHIBIT 11.1

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

               (in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


                                               Years Ended
                                               December 31,
                                           ____________________
                                              1996        1995
                                           __________  _________

Net income (loss) before 
  extraordinary item                          10,891      (1,299)

Extraordinary item, net of taxes                (917)           - 
                                           __________   _________
Net income (loss)                              9,974      (1,299)
                                           ==========   =========

Computation of weighted average
  name of shares outstanding:

     Issued:  7,764,964 

     Weighted average shares outstanding   5,522,442    3,050,521

     Add:  Incremental shares applicable
       to stock options based on the
       Treasury Stock method using
       average market price                  668,009            -
                                          ____________  ___________

     Weighted average common shares
       and equivalents outstanding         6,190,451     3,050,521
                                          ============  ============

Earnings per common share and 
 equivalent outstanding:

      Income (loss) before 
       extraordinary item                  $    1.76     $   (0.43)

      Extraordinary item                        (0.15)            -
                                           _____________ ____________

      Net income (loss)                    $     1.61    $    (0.43)
                                           ============= =============
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                    RESOURCE BANCSHARES MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.
               STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE,
                      BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE


                   ($ in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       For the Six Months Ended     For the Quarter Ended
                                                             June 30, 2001               June 30, 2001
                                                       -------------------------    ---------------------
<S>                                                    <C>                          <C>
Net income                                                      $8,669                     $7,750

Net income per common share from continuing
operations-Basic(1)                                             $ 0.53                     $ 0.48


Net loss per common share from continuing
operations-Diluted(2)                                           $ 0.52                     $ 0.47
</TABLE>


(1)      The number of common shares used to compute the net income per share
         above was 16,416,477 for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.

(2)      The number of common shares used to compute the net income per share
         above was 16,615,330 for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



                                  [LETTERHEAD]



The Board of Directors
Sify Limited (formerly known as Satyam Infoway Limited)
Tidel Park
2nd Floor
No. 4, Canal Bank Road
Taramani
Chennai 600 113
India

29 June 2004

Dear Sirs

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Registration Statement Nos. 333-101322 and 333-107938) on Form S-8 and the
registration statements (Registration Nos. 333-101915) on Form F-3 of Sify
Limited, of our report dated 19 April 2004, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Sify Limited (Formerly known as Satyam Infoway Limited) as of
31 March 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statement of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended 31 March 2004, which report appears in the
Form 20-F of Sify Limited dated 29 June 2004.

Yours faithfully

/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP
#### Long *v.*Long, on Appeal.

*Friday, November*13.

DEBT on a writing obligatory for the payment of *one hundred and twenty dollars.*The declaration set forth the sum in words as above. The note, when produced on oyer, showed a promise to pay *$120.-, the*sum *being*expressed in figures. Held, that the variance was immaterial.

Plea, in this case, that the obligation had been given to the plaintiff in part payment of a tract of land purchased of him by the defendant, which land had been previously devised to the plaintiff; that the plaintiff knew of the will, and had had it under his control, for three years next ensuing the testator’s death, but had not, within that time, caused the same to be proved and recorded. *Held,*on demurrer, that the plea was insufficient. ■
<PAGE>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints each of Lawrence Martinez and David E. Hill, with full
power to each to act without the other, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and
agent with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead,
in any and all capacities, to sign the Crop Growers Corporation Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, and any or all amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and to file
the same with such state commissions and other agencies as necessary, granting
unto each attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform
each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each such attorney-in-fact and
agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on this 25th day
of March, 1997, by the following persons.

/s/ Paul T. Horn                                      /s/ David E. Hill
--------------------                               -------------------------
Paul T. Horn                                         David E. Hill

/s/ Lawrence Martinez                               /s/ Manuel Sanchez
---------------------                              -------------------------
Lawrence Martinez                                    Manuel Sanchez

/s/ John M. Meuschke                                 /s/ Thomas M. Vertin
---------------------                               -------------------------
John M. Meuschke                                     Thomas M. Vertin
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PER SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ICOP Digital, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, January L. Miller, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                               
|-------------------------------
|                               
|/s/ January Miller             
|January Miller                 
|Interim Chief Financial Officer

March 20, 2009
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC   Document 872   Filed 02/22/16   Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"NASA\u2019s Quesst: Reassessing a 50-Year Supersonic Speed Limit","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l2P4x4BGDe\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasas-quesst-reassessing-a-50-year-supersonic-speed-limit\/\">NASA\u2019s Quesst: Reassessing a 50-Year Supersonic Speed Limit<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasas-quesst-reassessing-a-50-year-supersonic-speed-limit\/embed\/#?secret=l2P4x4BGDe\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA\u2019s Quesst: Reassessing a 50-Year Supersonic Speed Limit” — NASA\" data-secret=\"l2P4x4BGDe\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/quesst-x-59-overland-vertical-2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":900}
EXHIBIT 10.5

CONSOLIDATED GRAPHICS, INC.    LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANThird Amendment

Consolidated Graphics, Inc., a Texas corporation (the "Corporation"), having established the Consolidated Graphics, Inc. Long-Term
Incentive Plan as adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation effective March 26, 1994, as amended by those certain First and Second Amendments (the "Plan"), and having reserved the
right under Section 11 thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the first sentence of Section 4 of the Plan, effective as of the date approved by the Board of Directors and the
holders of a majority of shares of Common Stock present, or represented, and entitled to vote at a meeting of the Corporation's shareholders, as follows:



This
Third Amendment to the Corporation's Long-Term Incentive Plan was approved by the Corporation's Board of Directors on June 12, 2002 and by its shareholders at the
Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on July 24, 2002.

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 TENTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL T. VERBURG, 

 Petitioner – Appellant, 

v. 

BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF; 

BUREAU OF PRISONS REGIONAL 

OFFICE, 

 Respondents - Appellees. 

No. 14-3268 

(D.C. No. 5:14-CV-03204-RDR) 

(D. Kan.) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before MATHESON, O’BRIEN, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. 

 Michael T. Verburg, a prisoner at the Federal Prison Camp in Yankton, South 

Dakota and acting pro se,1

 appeals from the U.S. District Court for the District of 

Kansas’s denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. Mr. Verburg had asked the court 

to order the Bureau of Prisons staff in Kansas City, Kansas to ask the U.S. District Court 

 

*After examining Appellant=s brief and the appellate record, this panel has 

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination 

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is 

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not 

binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and 

collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. 

R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

1

 Because Mr. Verburg is proceeding pro se, we construe his filings liberally. See 

Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam); Garza v. Davis, 596 F.3d 1198, 

1201 n.2 (10th Cir. 2010). 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

March 6, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-3268 Document: 01019394693 Date Filed: 03/06/2015 Page: 1 
2 

for the District of South Carolina to correct his judgment of conviction for mail fraud 

because it was based on fabricated evidence. The federal court in South Carolina had 

previously denied relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Verburg v. United States, Cr. No. 

5:07-45, 2011 WL 2036343 (D.S.C. May 24, 2011). We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. 

 On appeal, Mr. Verburg fails to address whether the district court erred in denying 

his petition. He instead alleges various defects in the proceedings leading to his 

judgment of conviction in the South Carolina federal court. 

The federal court in Kansas correctly dismissed the writ of mandamus. Mr. 

Verburg had an adequate alternative means to challenge his conviction through direct 

appeal or his § 2255 motion. “To ensure that mandamus remains an extraordinary 

remedy, petitioners must show that they lack adequate alternative means to obtain the 

relief they seek.” Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for S.D. Ia., 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989) 

(quotations and citations omitted); accord Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 

367, 380-81 (2004). 

We therefore affirm. We deny Mr. Verburg’s request to proceed in forma 

pauperis. Mr. Verburg's motion to compel discovery is denied. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT 

Scott M. Matheson, Jr. 

Circuit Judge 

Appellate Case: 14-3268 Document: 01019394693 Date Filed: 03/06/2015 Page: 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Ryan D. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/rlydon\/","title":"Envisioning a Future Airspace with Advanced Air Mobility","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"kD3MUY5S3e\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/envisioning-a-future-airspace-with-advanced-air-mobility\/\">Envisioning a Future Airspace with Advanced Air Mobility<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/envisioning-a-future-airspace-with-advanced-air-mobility\/embed\/#?secret=kD3MUY5S3e\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Envisioning a Future Airspace with Advanced Air Mobility” — NASA\" data-secret=\"kD3MUY5S3e\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/future_airspace.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
----

|  Name      of Subsidiary                       | Jurisdiction      of Incorporationand      Incorporation Date  |  Date      Acquired  |  Our      Interest  |
|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| 777666      B.C. Ltd.                               | British      Columbia; December 19, 2006                       | December      19, 2006    | 100%                     |
| Reliant      Ventures S.A.C.                        | Peru,      October 24, 2002                                    | November      2007        | 55%                      |
| Mina      Pirquitas, Inc.                           | Delaware,      USA; September 8, 1994                          | October      22, 2004     | 100%                     |
| Pacific      Rim Mining Corporation Argentina S.A.  | Argentina;      October 1, 1993                                | December      14, 2001    | 100%                     |
| Silver      Standard Durango S.A. de C.V.           | Mexico;      January 21, 2004                                  | January      21, 2004     | 100%                     |

----