alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Discrete Velocity Method for Simulating Rarefied Gas Flows with Plasma","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"0fo86xDE7n\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/discrete-velocity-method-for-simulating-rarefied-gas-flows-with-plasma\/\">Discrete Velocity Method for Simulating Rarefied Gas Flows with Plasma<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/discrete-velocity-method-for-simulating-rarefied-gas-flows-with-plasma\/embed\/#?secret=0fo86xDE7n\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Discrete Velocity Method for Simulating Rarefied Gas Flows with Plasma” — NASA\" data-secret=\"0fo86xDE7n\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/hubble_friday_06242016.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":374}
#### E. A. Henley *v.*J. G. Trimble.

Bills of Exchange — Pleading—Petition—Demurrer.

In a suit on a promissory note or bill of exchange, and the petition does not aver protest, and notice, either for non acceptance or non payment nor aver any excuse as that the drawer had no funds with, or authority from the drawer to draw upon him, the petition is subject to a general demurrer.

Bills of Exchange — Setoff and Counter Claim.

Setoffs and counter-claims between the original parties cannot be adjudged 1 againrt an asignee as to bills of exchange, which have gone into circulation in the regular course of business, for a valuable consideration.

Appeal and Error — Defective Pleadings in Court Below.

However defective a petition may be, after issue joined in the court below, no demurrer having been filed to correct the errors of pleading, it is too late to object for the first time in the Appellate Court, to the' defects, especially as no motion was made for a new trial.

APPEAL EROM WOLEE CIRCUIT COURT.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters:

The writings sued on, though styled and treated by both parties as notes, are really foreign bills of exchange, drawn at Cincinnati, Ohio, payable at Pit. Sterling, Kentucky, and which had been assigned to appellee. The petition does not aver protest and notice, either for non-acceptance or non-payment, nor does it aver any excuse, as that the drawer had no funds with or authority from the drawer to draw upon him, and would therefore have been liable to a general demurrer.

But appellant answered setting up defenses by way of set-off and counter-claim and issues thereon formed and submitted to the court and adjudged by it for $1,025.25, with interest from May 19, 1866 in appellee’s favor.

There is no bill of exceptions containing the evidence therefore, we must regard the defenses unsustained save so far only as not denied and treating the loaned buggy as not returned and worth the $75 as alleged, still the judgment does not amount to more, nor indeed as much as the court might have adjudged.

*272
      *Simpson, Hazelrigg*& *Winn, for appellant.*

*Elliott, for appellee.*

Even if it be conceded that under these issues cff-sets and counter-claims existing between the original- parties could be adjudged against the assignee, which cannot be done as to bills of exchange which have gone into circulation in regular course of business for a valuable consideration, still there is nothing in this case which authorized this court to reverse on this account. But it is insisted that no cause of action appears in the petition and that therefore the judgment should be reversed. However defective the petition might be, because of no' sufficient averment as to no. funds or authority to draw a claim, especially where no demurrer for either party was put in so as to illicit the judgment of the court below on the pleadings, it is too late to object for the first time in this court, no motion for a new trial being made below.

Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


The Board
of Directors


ViewCast.com,
Inc.:




We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form SB-2 No. 333-31947, S-8 No. 333-53159, S-8 No. 333-63799, S-8 No.
333-119104, S-3 No. 333-77923, S-3 No. 333-35662 and S-3 No.
333-40630  of our report dated March 31, 2010 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of ViewCast.com, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009, which report is included in the December 31, 2009 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of ViewCast.com, Inc.


/s/ BKD,
LLP


Dallas,
Texas


March 31,
2010
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Margeline Thomas","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/mthoma22\/","title":"New Video Highlights Accessibility and Inclusion at NASA\u00a0\u00a0","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"571TFb76Zk\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/msd\/new-video-highlights-accessibility-and-inclusion-at-nasa\/\">New Video Highlights Accessibility and Inclusion at NASA\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/msd\/new-video-highlights-accessibility-and-inclusion-at-nasa\/embed\/#?secret=571TFb76Zk\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“New Video Highlights Accessibility and Inclusion at NASA\u00a0\u00a0” — NASA\" data-secret=\"571TFb76Zk\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/msd-dav-banners.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":314}
Exhibit
23




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-156881) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-156882 and
333-53600) of our report dated March 18, 2010, on the consolidated
financial statements of MutualFirst Financial, Inc.
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, which report is included in MutualFirst Financial, Inc.’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/BKD,LLP




Indianapolis,
Indiana


March 18,
2010
IMAX CORPORATION
 EXHIBIT 10.9
 AMENDING AGREEMENT
  IMAX CORPORATION
  BRAD WECHSLER
 WHEREAS
 NOWTHEREFORE
  1.
    
    Term.The term of the Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and run through the
earlier of (i) such date that Chairman is not re-elected to the Board, and (ii) April 1, 2013
(the Term") provided, however, that the Board agrees to use its best efforts
to cause Chairman to be re-elected to the Board in 2013 provided the Agreement has been
renewed for an additional term, unless Chairman has engaged in activity that would have
constituted dismissal for Cause as that term is defined in the Employment Agreement.2.
    
    General.Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and unamended.DATEDas of February 14, 2011.
 AGREED AND ACCEPTED:/s/ Bradley J. WechslerBradley J. Wechsler IMAX CORPORATIONPer
    /s/ Garth M. GirvanName:
    Garth M. GirvanTitle:
    Director
LOAN December 23, 2020

   
 LOAN
 AGREEMENT
 December 23, 2020
  
 Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) of 11750 Fairtide Road, Ladysmith, BC V9G 1K5, advanced CDN$7,500 (the “Principal Sum”) to Cell MedX (Canada) Corp. (the “Borrower”) of 820 1130 Pender Street West. Vancouver, BC V6E 4A4. The Lender advanced the funds on December 23, 2020.

  
 The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) calculated from December 23, 2020 (the “Effective Date”). The Borrower is liable for repayment of the Principal Sum, accrued Interest, and any additional costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the amount owed to him under the terms of this Loan Agreement.
  
 The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.
  
 	 LENDER
	 BORROWER

	 Richard N. Jeffs
	 Cell MedX (Canada) Corp.

	  
	  

	 Per:
	 Per:

	  
	  

	  
	  

	 /s/ Richard N. Jeffs
	 /s/  Yanika Silina

	 Richard N. Jeffs
	 Yanika Silina, Director


  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
  
 
  
 PROMISSORY NOTE
  
 	 Principal Amount: CDN$7,500
	 December 23, 2020


  
  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED Cell MedX (Canada) Corp., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Richard N. Jeffs (the “Lender”) the sum of $7,500 lawful money of Canada (the “Principal Sum”) together with the Interest accrued on the Principal Sum calculated from December 23, 2020 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.
  
 For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year. Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.
  
 The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum, and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.
  
 The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.
  
  
 BORROWER
 Cell MedX (Canada) Corp.
  
 Per:
  
  
 /s/ Yanika Silina
 Yanika Silina, Director
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed

December 6 , 2011.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 11
- 01012
- CR NO. 14
- 11
- 01013
- CR

IN RE TERRY J. BECK , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 179th District Court Harris County Trial Court Cause Nos. 56,4661
- E & 56,4662
- E 

### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On November 28, 2011 , relator Terry J. Beck filed petition for writ of mandamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator ask s this c ourt to compel the Honorable Randy Roll , presiding judge of the 179th District Court of Harris C ounty to grant relief requested in his post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus
. In 1990, relator was convicted of indecency with a child. See Beck v. State , No s
. 10

- 03

- 00060

- CR & 10

- 03

- 00061

- CR ; 2004 WL 1794478 (Tex. App.

— Waco Aug. 11,2

2004, no pet.) (not released for publication). 1 In 2003, relator’s motion for DNA testing was denied, and the denial affirmed by the court of appeals. Id. According to his petition for writ of mandamus, relator filed a post

- conviction writ of habeas corpus in the trial court on September 22, 2010. He asks this court to direct the trial court to ―address and grant the relief sought in the petition for writ of habeas corpus and/or grant a live hearing on the petition for relief[.]‖ While the courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appea ls has jurisdiction over matters related to final post

conviction felony proceedings. Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991). This court has no authority to issue a writ of mandamus to compel a district court judge to rule on ma tters seeking post

- conviction relief from final felony convictions. See In re McAfee , 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex .App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Instead, the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to compel a trial court judge to act on a post

- conviction petition for habeas corpus relief

. McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W.2d 578, 578

– 79 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). Because relator is seeking to compel the trial court to address and grant post

conviction relief, we conclude that we do not have jur isdiction over th ese proceeding s
. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition s for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Seymore, and Jamison. Do Not Publish

— T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).

1 Pursuant to section 73.001 of the Texas Government Code appellant’s appeals were transferred to the Tenth Court of Appeals after having been filed in this court.
Schedule of FOIA Fees as of January 2024

NASA will charge for processing requests under the FOIA in accordance with the Agency’s 

FOIA regulations and the Office of Management and Budget's Guidelines. If fees exceed the 

statutory entitlements, we will collect all applicable fees before sending copies of records to you. 

Additionally, NASA can charge search and review costs even if no records are found or the 

record reviewed is ultimately not disclosed. 

As of January 1, 2024: 

(16% benefits are not included in the chart below but will be added to the rate) 

 Quarter Hour Rate Hourly Rate 

Clerical 

(GS-7 and below) $6.87 $27.48 

Professional 

(GS-8 through GS-12) $11.89 $47.56 

Managerial 

(GS-13 and above) $17.25 $69.00 

Duplication 

(Copy/Scan Standard Size) .15 cents per page .15 cents per page 

Direct Costs Incurred for 

Non-standard Work or 

Duplication 

TBD TBD 

Fees for requests received and perfected before January 1, 2024: 

(16% benefits are not included in the chart below but will be added to the rate)

 Quarter Hour Rate Hourly Rate 

Clerical 

(GS-7 and below) $6.53 $26.12 

Professional 

(GS-8 through GS-12) $11.29 $45.16 

Managerial 

(GS-13 and above) $16.38 $65.52 

Duplication 

(Copy/Scan Standard Size) .15 cents per page .15 cents per page 

Direct Costs Incurred for 

Non-standard Work or 

Duplication 

TBD TBD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL CROSSEY, DWAYNE THOMAS, IRVIN WEINREICH, BRENDA WEINREICH,

AND THE PENNSYLVANIA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS,

Appellants

v.

KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH, AND JESSICA MATHIS, DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF ELECTION SERVICES AND NOTARIES,

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 32 MAP 2020

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No

. 266 MD 2020 dated May 28, 2020

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4 th day of June , 2020

, the appeal is dismissed as MOOT

.
#### DUNKIN’ DONUTS OF AMERICA, INC. v. MIDDLETOWN DONUT CORP.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
**Exhibit23**

 

 

**IndependentAuditors’ Consent**

 

 

The Board of Directors

HMN Financial, Inc.:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference of our report dated March 12,2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HMN Financial, Inc. as ofDecember 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income,comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears inthe December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of HMN Financial, Inc., in thefollowing Registration Statements of HMN Financial, Inc.: Nos. 33-88228,33-94388, 33-94386 and 333-64232 on Form S-8. Our report refers to the adoptionof Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 142, *Goodwill and OtherIntangible Assets*.

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP           |
|------------------------|
|                   |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota |
| March 12, 2004         |

 

----
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATON
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to


§
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending March 31, 2008, the (“Report”), I ,Catherine M. Davidson, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 906 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.














/s/Catherine M.
Davidson


Catherine
M. Davidson


Financial
Officer


(Principal
Financial Officer)








May 14,
2008




















A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc.  and will be retained by Hemagen
Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### N.J. INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, INC. v. Y.C. & V.L., INC.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.
# USACE installs blue roofs on over 90 apartment buildings in the New Orleans area

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers installs temporary roofing, or Blue Roofs, on a low-income apartment building in New Orleans Oct. 24. In total USACE installed Blue Roofs on 90 buildings at four sites within the greater New Orleans area. This was a special request approved through the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the state of Louisiana and is equivalent to installing more than 300 blue roofs on individual homes.

**NEW ORLEANS**, La.— The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers installed temporary roofing, or Blue Roofs, on a low-income apartment building in New Orleans recently. In total USACE installed Blue Roofs on 90 buildings at four sites within the greater New Orleans area. This was a special request approved through the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the state of Louisiana and is equivalent to installing more than 300 blue roofs on individual homes.

“Taking care of survivors is what our Operation Blue Roof program is all about,” said USACE Hurricane Ida Response Commander Col. Zachary Miller. “Knowing that we are able to touch so many families by being able to put a temporary roof on their home is humbling. With a roof over their head, these survivors are now able to stay in their neighborhood and begin the rebuilding process without having to move to another community.”

The USACE Operation Blue Roof program aims to provide homeowners in disaster areas with fiber-reinforced sheeting to cover their damaged roofs until permanent repairs are made. This program is a free service to homeowners and protects property, reduces temporary housing costs, and allows residents to remain in their homes while recovering from a storm.

**To cancel a request**, residents are urged to send an email to roe-cancel@usace.army.mil. Survivors can also cancel a request or report a quality concern by calling our customer service team at 888-ROOF BLU.

Operation Blue Roof in support of the Hurricane Ida recovery is no longer accepting homeowner applications for the program. USACE has installed more than **33,200**to date. There are **33,799**total valid request.

DVIDS drone Broll of blue roof building installations:

area

DVIDS photos of blue roof building installations:

-area

-area

 

--end--

**Contact**

Release no. 21-096

Hurricane Ida

USACE

Blue Roof Mission