alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Erica McNamee","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/emcnamee\/","title":"PACE Off: NASA Goddard Acoustics Chamber and U.S. Marine Band Turn Up the Volume","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4mAxqstgkV\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/pace-off-nasa-goddard-acoustics-chamber-and-u-s-marine-band-turn-up-the-volume\/\">PACE Off: NASA Goddard Acoustics Chamber and U.S. Marine Band Turn Up the Volume<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/pace-off-nasa-goddard-acoustics-chamber-and-u-s-marine-band-turn-up-the-volume\/embed\/#?secret=4mAxqstgkV\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“PACE Off: NASA Goddard Acoustics Chamber and U.S. Marine Band Turn Up the Volume” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4mAxqstgkV\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/gsfc_20230503_pace_014701.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Bratcher,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03585-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/13/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8276 Filed 10/19/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8276 Filed 10/19/17 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2110
MICHAEL COLBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1695-A) Submitted: January 20, 1998 Decided: January 30, 1998 Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Colbert, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen William Robinson, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, McLean, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant in his employment discriminationaction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Colbert v. Inova Health Care , No. CA-96-1695-A (E.D. Va. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### JOSEPH SAWYER v. JACK R. COWLES.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

 

Kathy K. Ackerman,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03519-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

 I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 9, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8747 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 1
#### SHAMMA v. ALKHALDI

No. 590P01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. 447

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 November 2001.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. MICHAEL SANTIAGO.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of CV Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                             |  |                                             
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 25, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    DANIEL K.
SPIEGELMAN
|                         |  |  |  |                             |  | Daniel K. Spiegelman Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS NO. 2:15-MD-02641-PHX-DGC 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION 

 

This document relates to: 

Rosemarie Marengo 2:16-cv-02991-DGC 

 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY’S 

Jillian Nava 2:16-cv-03099-DGC CHANGE OF ADDRESS

 

NOTICE OF ATTORNEY’S CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil 

Procedure, the undersigned counsel files this Notice of Attorney’s Change of Address, effective 

October 30, 2017. All phone numbers and emails remain the same; the new address is as follows: 

Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC 

Marathon Oil Tower 

5555 San Felipe St., Suite 900 

Houston, TX 77056 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 18th day of October, 2017. 

By: /s/ K. Camp Bailey 

K. Camp Bailey 

Texas Bar No. 24006782 

Bailey Peavy Bailey Cowan Heckaman PLLC 

The Lyric Centre 

440 Louisiana Street, Suite 2100 

Houston, Texas 77002 

713-425-7100 Telephone 

713-425-7101 Facsimile 

bailey-svc@bpblaw.com

Attorneys for the Plaintiffs

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8228 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on this 18th day of October, 2017, a true and correct copy of this Notice 

of Change of Address was furnished via electronic filing, using the CM/ECF system for filing and 

transmittal of Notice of Electronic Filing. 

 /s/ K. Camp Bailey ________________ 

 K. Camp Bailey 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8228 Filed 10/18/17 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2419 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2419

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide additional relief 
          for members of the Armed Forces and their families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 2004

 Mr. Pryor (for himself and Mr. Baucus) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide additional relief 
          for members of the Armed Forces and their families.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Relief for Americans in Combat 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EARNED INCOME INCLUDES COMBAT PAY.

    (a) Child Tax Credit.--Section 24(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (relating to portion of credit refundable) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``For purposes of 
subparagraph (B), any amount excluded from gross income by reason of 
section 112 shall be treated as earned income which is taken into 
account in computing taxable income for the taxable year.''.
    (b) Earned Income Tax Credit.--Subparagraph (B) of section 32(c)(2) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to earned income) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of clause (iv),
            (2) by striking the period at the end of clause (v) and 
        inserting ``, and'', and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(vi) any amount excluded from gross 
                        income by reason of section 112 shall be 
                        treated as earned income.
                Any taxpayer may elect to not apply clause (vi) with 
                respect to any taxable year ending after the date of 
                the enactment of such clause and before 2005.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
{"agency":"NASA","generated":"2014-04-14 08:50:00","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"9"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["ARC","DFRC","GRC","GSFC","HQ","JPL","JSC","KSC","LaRC","MSFC","NSSC","OGC","OIG","SSC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["17","4","5","36","44","11","33","14","9","21","6"," ","11","2"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["13","6","6","36","53","14","30","16","9","23","4"," ","10","3"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["7"," "," ","4"," "," ","2","2"," "," "," "," "," "," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q2"}
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Bruce Sobol, Deceased. Lydia Wagner, Respondent; Walter Drobenko et al., Appellants. Kevin H. Cohen, Nonparty Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 100]

*427Order, Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Eve Preminger, S.), entered on or about November 13, 2003, which appointed a receiver to manage decedent’s business, Madison Avenue Caviarteria, Inc., pending a final determination of whether the preliminary letters testamentary issued to Walter Drobenko should be revoked, and authorized the receiver to collect a $500,000 life insurance payment on behalf of the business, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to appellants’ assertion, the Surrogate did not effectively revoke the preliminary letters testamentary that had been issued. Appellant Drobenko was permitted to continue to serve as preliminary executor of decedent’s will; the temporary receiver displaced appellants only with respect to the operation of decedent’s business and the collection of life insurance proceeds on the business’s behalf. In any event, it does not appear that the Surrogate exercised her discretion unsoundly in appointing the temporary receiver *(see 64 B Venture v American Realty Co.,*194 AD2d 504 [1993]). There is no dispute that the viability of the business was at risk and Drobenko, by his own admission, found the day-to-day management of the business onerously time-consuming. In addition, it appears that Drobenko was a creditor of the decedent’s estate, and that circumstance along with evidence showing that he was disposed to put the decedent’s business into bankruptcy and had failed to answer inquiries of parties interested in investing in the business, raised the inference of a conflict of interest on his part sufficient to place the business at risk. The need for a temporary receiver to avert the danger of irreparable loss and damage to the estate’s property was adequately made out *(see Dolgoff v Projectavision, Inc.,*235 AD2d 311, 312 [1997]).

We have considered appellants’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   10-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      11,255,099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,739,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                   242,750
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,585,607
<PP&E>                                       7,079,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             143,244,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,787,247
<BONDS>                                      1,215,673
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  6,500,000
<COMMON>                                   148,056,611
<OTHER-SE>                                 (34,176,237)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               143,244,256
<SALES>                                      2,259,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,259,751
<CGS>                                        1,913,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,979,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             670,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (22,390,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (22,390,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (4,518,760)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (26,908,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.34)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Stacey L. Horton, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03542-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8798 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8798 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATON OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

# Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of Hemagen Diagnostics,
Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, (theReport), I,
William P. Hales, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ William P. Hales
William
P. Hales President and Chief
Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)

February 14, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and will
be retained by Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

20