alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|Exhibit 13.2                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Silver
Standard Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                      
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the registrant.

Date: March 31, 2011

|/s/ Tom S.Q.
      Yip      | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Tom S.Q. Yip                | 
|Vice President, Finance and | 
|Chief Financial Officer     | 

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Patricia Delmont,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03736-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9161 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-60633

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGER FRANKLIN HOLTZCLAW,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:95-CV-283PS

- - - - - - - - - -

August 20, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roger Franklin Holtzclaw appeals from the district court’s

denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Holtzclaw's speedytrial contentions were properly dismissed. See Buckelew v.

United States, 575 F.2d 515, 517-18 (5th Cir. 1978) (a matter

that has already been determined on direct appeal need not be

reconsidered in a § 2255 motion). Holtzclaw's contentions that
No. 95-60633

- 2 -

counsel was ineffective at trial and on appeal were also properly

dismissed as Holtzclaw made no showing that counsel was deficient

or that he was prejudiced by the alleged errors. Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Lockhart v. Fretwell, 506

U.S. 364, 369 (1993).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2444

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to treat drug offenses involving 
    crystal meth similarly to drug offenses involving crack cocaine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2004

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to treat drug offenses involving 
    crystal meth similarly to drug offenses involving crack cocaine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PENALTIES FOR CRYSTAL METHAMPHETAMINE.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Crystal Meth 
Act of 2004''.
    (b) Amendments to Controlled Substances Act.--Section 401(b)(1) of 
the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by amending subparagraph (A)(viii) to read as follows:
            ``(viii) 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance 
        containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, 
        isomers, or salts of its isomers,''; and
            (2) by amending subparagraph (B)(viii) to read as follows:
            ``(viii) 5 grams or more of a mixture or substance 
        containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, its salts, 
        isomers, or salts of its isomers,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### ESTATE OF WATERS v. JARMAN

No. 370P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 98

Petition by defendant (Lenoir Memorial Hospital, Inc. d/b/a/ Lenior Memorial Hospital) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 August 2001.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.22

Bank of America

                                                          Amendment to Documents


                   AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

   This Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment") dated as of  December 8, 1998, is
                                                       ----------  ----
between Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association (the "Bank") and
Variflex, Inc. (the "Borrower").

                                   RECITALS
                                   --------

   A.  The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan Agreement
dated as of January 23, 1998, (the "Agreement").

   B.  The Bank and the Borrower desire to amend the Agreement.

                                   AGREEMENT
                                   ---------

   1.  Definitions.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment
       ------------
shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

   2.  Amendments. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
       -----------

       2.1  In Paragraph 1 .2 of the Agreement, the date "March 31, 1999" is
       substituted for the date "December 31, 1998."

   3.  Representations and Warranties. When the Borrower signs this Amendment,
       ------------------------------
the Borrower represents and warrants to the Bank that: (a) there is no event
which is, or with notice or lapse of time or both would be, a default under the
Agreement except those events, if any, that have been disclosed in writing to
Bank or waived in writing by the Bank, (b) the representations and warranties in
the Agreement are true as of the date of this Amendment as if made on the date
of this Amendment, (c) this Amendment is within the Borrower's powers, has been
duly authorized, and does not conflict with any of the Borrower's organizational
papers, and (d) this Amendment does not conflict with any law, agreement, or
obligation by which the Borrower is bound.

   4.  Effect of Amendment. Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the
       --------------------
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

   This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of this
   Amendment.



Bank of America                                   Variflex, Inc.
National Trust and Savings
Association


X /s/ Timothy J. Egan                             X /s/ Roger M. Wasserman
  -------------------                               ----------------------
By: Timothy J. Egan, Vice President               By: Roger M. Wasserman, CFO

                                      -1-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Debra A. Kane,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03658-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9038 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
#### MARILYN RHYNE HERR v. CHARLES RYMAN HERR, JR.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Shameka Andrea Smith v. Aldine Independent School District

Appellate case number: 01

- 17

- 00 700

- C V

Trial court case number: 2007

- 32410

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

The en banc court has voted to deny appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration. It is

ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied

.

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland,

Massengale, Brown, Lloyd, and Caughey.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: January 25

, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Sheila Ann Casino, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03989-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8797 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Amy Barra","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/abarra\/","title":"NASA Wallops Signs Space Act Agreement to Support STEM Outreach","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zMDIUfzvHo\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/wallops\/nasa-wallops-signs-space-act-agreement-to-support-stem-outreach\/\">NASA Wallops Signs Space Act Agreement to Support STEM Outreach<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/wallops\/nasa-wallops-signs-space-act-agreement-to-support-stem-outreach\/embed\/#?secret=zMDIUfzvHo\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Wallops Signs Space Act Agreement to Support STEM Outreach” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zMDIUfzvHo\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/img-8280.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James Urgo,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04470-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9312 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Eric Odome, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 513]

Cardona, P.J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

In our view, the misbehavior report, the positive urinalysis test results and related documentation, together with the testimony of the training officer and the correction officer who performed the tests, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Graziano v Selsky,*9 AD3d 752, 752 [2004]; *Matter of McCorkle v Bennett,*8 AD3d 918, 919 [2004]). Contrary to petitioner’s claims, the requirements of 7 NYCRR 1020.4 were satisfied. The chain of custody of the urine sample was properly established as the correction officer who performed the test had possession of the sample at *976all times *(see*7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e] [1] [i]; *Matter of Williams v New York State Dept. of Correction,*8 AD3d 920, 921 [2004]). Although petitioner was not taken to an infirmary or a clinic to provide the sample, that was not required *(see*7 NYCRR 1020.4 [d] [1]). Likewise, there is no requirement that the second test be conducted by a different officer *(see*7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e] [1] [iv]).

In addition, there is no merit to petitioner’s claim that he was denied the right to have certain inmate witnesses testify at the hearing. All three witnesses refused to testify. Although only one executed a witness refusal form, none of them provided reasons for their refusal. The correction officer who attempted to secure their testimony indicated the circumstances of their refusal, and it was not incumbent on the Hearing Officer to personally ascertain the reasons *(see Matter of Berry v Portuondo,*6 AD3d 848, 850 [2004]; *Matter of Matos v Goord,*293 AD2d 855, 856 [2002]). Because petitioner’s assistant failed to, among other things, provide him with certain requested documentation, petitioner asserts that he was denied adequate employee assistance. However, inasmuch as these omissions were remedied at the hearing, any prejudice was alleviated *(see Matter of Otero v Selsky,*9 AD3d 631, 632 [2004]). Furthermore, the record does not indicate that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias *(see Matter of Salaam v Goord,*8 AD3d 776, 777 [2004]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his challenge to the penalty imposed, and find them to be unpersuasive.

Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Daniel Hoffpauir","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/dhoffpau\/","title":"Protecting the Future of Spaceflight by Preserving the Columbia Legacy","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1hl8oERaJ9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nesc\/protecting-the-future-of-spaceflight-by-preserving-the-columbia-legacy\/\">Protecting the Future of Spaceflight by Preserving the Columbia Legacy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/nesc\/protecting-the-future-of-spaceflight-by-preserving-the-columbia-legacy\/embed\/#?secret=1hl8oERaJ9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Protecting the Future of Spaceflight by Preserving the Columbia Legacy” — NASA\" data-secret=\"1hl8oERaJ9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/shuttle-michael-ciannilli.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":427}