alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-41319

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODRIGO PERDOMO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:13-CR-310-1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodrigo Perdomo

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perdomo has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 29, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-41319 Document: 00512750968 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
No. 13-41319

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-41319 Document: 00512750968 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,320,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,010,844
<PP&E>                                       2,530,136
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,270,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,461,924
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,221,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       224,797
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,690,177
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,461,924
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,165,808
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,739,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (239,506)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (343,813)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (343,813)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (343,813)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Brenda H. Smith, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MainStreet BankShares, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15e) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision; to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



(b) N/A



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this annual
report any change in the registrantis internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The
registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|              |  |                         
|------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: 3/21/05 |  | /s/ Brenda H. Smith     
|              |  | Brenda H. Smith         
|              |  | Executive Vice President
|              |  | Chief Financial Officer 
|              |  | Corporate Secretary     



61
WS-2023-06-01-ARC

Ames Research Center, one of 10 NASA 

field centers, is located in California’s Silicon 

Valley. For more than 80 years, Ames has been 

a leader in cutting-edge world class research 

and development.

Location: California’s Silicon Valley, 1,900 acres 

of NASA property located on and adjacent to 

Moffett Federal Airfield; 40 miles south of San 

Francisco; 12 miles north of San Jose, between 

Mountain View and Sunnyvale.

Jobs: Approximately 3,200 on-site employees 

and contractors.

NASA California Economic Impact:

$4.5 billion procurement investment; 66,236

NASA jobs supported state-wide with total

economic impact of $15.2 billion. (Source: 

NASA 2021 Economic Impact Report)

Established: Dec. 20, 1939, as part of the 

National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics 

(NACA); became part of NASA in 1958.

Missions: Ames’ one-of-a-kind facilities 

and areas of expertise are vital to numerous 

NASA missions. These include Artemis and 

the pathfinding small satellite CAPSTONE, the 

International Space Station, James Webb Space 

Telescope, Mars Sample Return, Dragonfly, and 

HelioSwarm – to name a few. Ames is the lead 

center for NASA’s first robotic lunar rover, VIPER 

(Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover), 

which will launch in 2024. The center continues 

to build on its 30-year expertise and leadership 

in air traffic management to advance aeronautics research and technologies. 

NASA Research Park

NASA Ames hosts the NASA Research Park

which includes major partners USGS, Carnegie 

Mellon University and University of California, 

Berkeley and numerous industry partners. 

NRP is a world-class shared use R&D hub for 

industry, academia, and non-profits partnered 

with NASA to meet mission needs.

Ames Technology:

Ames provides NASA with advancements 

in these core areas of expertise:

Air Traffic Management: Transforming the 

way we fly and revolutionizing the way we 

use our airspace.

Entry Systems: Safely delivering spacecraft 

to Earth and other celestial bodies.

Supercomputing: Enabling NASA’s advanced 

modeling and simulation.

Intelligent / Adaptive Systems: Enabling 

aviation and space missions with increasing 

autonomy and human-systems integration.

Cost-effective Space Missions: Enabling 

high-value science to low-Earth orbit and 

the Moon.

Aerosciences: Modeling and testing on the 

ground before we take to the sky and space.

Astrobiology and Life Sciences: 

Understanding life on Earth – and in space.

Space and Earth Sciences: Understanding 

our planet, the Moon, our solar system, and 

everything beyond.

NASA’s center in Silicon Valley

NASA’s Ames Research Center

Aerial view of 

NASA’s Ames 

Research Center. 

The image was 

stitched together 

from four photos 

taken from a drone. 

Credit: NASA/Jonas 

Jonsson and 

Zachary Roberts
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Willie Dunn, Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 317]

*365Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J., on dismissal motion; Lewis Bart Stone, J, at jury trial and sentence), rendered June 19, 2003, convicting defendant of grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts), criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 9 to 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

The People’s summation did not deprive defendant of a fair trial *(see People v Overlee,*236 AD2d 133 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 976 [1998]; *People v D'Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 884 [1993]). The remarks that defendant challenges as straying from the record constituted efforts to draw reasonable inferences from the evidence, and the remarks that defendant challenges as denigrating the defense were within the bounds of permissible rhetoric. Defendant failed to preserve his other challenges to the summation, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find them unavailing. In any event, even if some of the prosecutor’s remarks were inappropriate, any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt.

The People did not violate defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury. Defendant received a reasonable opportunity to testify *(see People v Sawyer,*274 AD2d 603 [2000], *affd*96 NY2d 815 [2001]), but instead of availing himself of that opportunity, he attempted to place meritless conditions on his waiver of immunity *(see*CPL 190.45 [4]). Furthermore, it is clear defendant was very familiar with grand jury procedures as the result of his prior cases *(see People v Dunn,*248 AD2d 87, 96 [1998], *lv withdrawn*93 NY2d 1002 [1999]), and knew or should reasonably have known that he was not entitled to limit his waiver of immunity to the crimes charged in the felony complaint. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Nardelli, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2385 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2385

  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 2004

 Mr. Bingaman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SANTIAGO E. CAMPOS UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse at South Federal Place in Santa Fe, 
New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Santiago E. Campos 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Santiago E. 
Campos United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Stacey L. Horton, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03542-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8799 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1992-C,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         141,707
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               391,873
<PP&E>                                         7,285,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,445,293)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,232,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,805
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,223,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,232,230
<SALES>                                        596,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               604,521
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,384<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                210,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            210,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   210,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EX-10.18





 Exhibit 10.18 

Amendment No. 1 to Master Agreement for Manufacturing Services 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”), effective as of June 16, 2020, amends certain provisions of the Master Agreement
for Manufacturing Services dated March 16, 2020, between Artiva Biotherapeutics, Inc. (“Company”), having its principal place of business at 4747 Executive Drive, Suite 1150, San Diego, CA 92121 and Green Cross Cell Corporation, a
Korean corporation (“Manufacturer”), with its principal place of business located at 107, lhyeon-ro 30 beon-gil, Giheung- gu,
Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do, 16924, Republic of South Korea (hereinafter the “Original Agreement”). 

WHEREAS, Artiva and Manufacturer find it in their respective interests to amend the provisions of the Original Agreement as set forth
below. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for consideration duly given, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
hereby agree to the following: 
  

	 	1.	 Except as expressly amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall continue to remain in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms. 


  

	 	2.	 Section 10.2 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following: 


 “Termination of Agreement At Will. Artiva may terminate this
Agreement at any time without cause upon six (6) months’ prior written notice to Manufacturer. Artiva may terminate any Work Order at any time without cause upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice to Manufacturer.” 

 

	 	3.	 This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which
shall constitute together the same document. The Parties agree that signatures transmitted by electronic means (e.g. facsimile or a scanned version of the executed agreement in PDF format attached to an
e-mail) shall bind the Parties. This Amendment is otherwise governed by the terms and conditions of the Original Agreement, except as amended hereby. 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned parties have had this Amendment executed by its
duly authorized representatives. 
  

									
	ARTIVA BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.	 		  	MANUFACTURER
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Thomas J. Farrell
	 	        	  	By:	  	 /s/ Duckjoo Lee

	Printed Name:     Thomas J. Farrell	 		  	Printed Name:     Duckjoo Lee
	Title:                   President & CEO	 		  	Title:                   CEO

 Amendment No. 1 —Master Agreement for Manufacturing Services
end-rilaxind3x21






END-RILA-IND(3/21)  1      PRUDENTIAL ANNUITIES LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION, PHOENIX ARIZONA    ENDORSEMENT    ANNUITY NUMBER: [001-00001]    EFFECTIVE DATE: [Contract Issue Date]    This Endorsement is made a part of your Annuity.      The purpose of this Endorsement is to modify the definition of “Index” in your contract as follows:    Index: The underlying Index or exchange-traded fund used to value the Index Return based on the  performance of the Index Strategies.    No other terms, conditions or benefits of your Annuity are modified by this Endorsement.    PRUDENTIAL ANNUITIES LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION      [                     Secretary                   ]
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24404]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES


Renewal of Charter of Advisory Committee on Actuarial 
Examinations

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal of Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries announces the 
renewal of the charter of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial 
Examinations.

FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick McDonough, 703-414-2173.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Advisory Committee on 
Examinations (Advisory Committee) is to advise the Joint Board for the 
Enrollment of Actuaries (Joint Board) on examinations in actuarial 
mathematics and methodology. The Joint Board administers such 
examinations in discharging its statutory mandate to enroll individuals 
who wish to perform actuarial services with respect to pension plans 
subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The 
Advisory Committee's functions include, but are not necessarily limited 
to, considering and recommending examination topics, developing 
examination questions, recommending proposed examinations and pass 
marks, and as requested by the Joint Board, making recommendations 
relative to the examination program.

    Dated: October 6, 2014.
David Ziegler,
Chairman, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.
[FR Doc. 2014-24404 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### STANLEY YOKA v. HAZEL MC GLORY.

May 2, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.
#### ROSEMARY DEMPSEY BELMONT v. EDWARD BELMONT.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### JOSEPH SIMODIS v. EMHART CORPORATION.

July 12, 1984.

Certification is granted, and the matter is summarily remanded to the Appellate Division, for reconsideration in light of *Green v. Sterling Extruder,*95 *N.J.*263 (1984).

Jurisdiction is not retained.