alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THE STATE v. KELLY, Appellant.

Division Two,

May 16, 1905.

INFORMATION: No Verification. Where an information is not verified as reauired hy statute, and this fact is called to the trial court’s attention hy a motion to quash, and later in the motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment, which motions are overruled, the judgment will he reversed, and the cause remanded.

Appeal from St. Lonis City Circuit Court. — How. *O’Neill Ryan,*Judge.

Reversed and remanded.

*Charles F. Krone*for appellant.

*Herbert 8. Hadley,*Attorney-General, for the State.

FOX, J.

This cause is here hy an appeal from a conviction in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis upon the charge of perjury.

This prosecution was begun upon an information, filed by the circuit attorney of the city of St. Louis, charging the defendant with the offense of perjury. The information was not properly verified as required by section 2477, Revised Statutes 1899, and this failure was called to the attention of the trial court by motion to quash, and later complained of in the motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment.

This information, before trial, could have been amended, but as no steps were taken to amend it, the overruling of the motion to quash was error. [State v. Bonner, 178 Mo. 424; State v. Hicks, 178 Mo. 445; State v. Schnettler, 181 Mo. 173; State v. Brown, 181 Mo. 192.]

The judgment in this cause is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Gantt, J.,*concurs; *Burgess, P. J.,*absent.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2441

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as the ‘‘General John J. 

Pershing Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2004

Mr. BOND (for himself and Mr. TALENT) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as 

the ‘‘General John J. Pershing Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘General John J. Per7 shing Post Office’’. 
2

•S 2441 IS 

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

4 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

5 to the General John J. Pershing Post Office.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Carl F. Karboski,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03693-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9011 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,537
<SECURITIES>                                     8,560
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                       322
<INVENTORY>                                      8,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,431
<PP&E>                                         116,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,845
<BONDS>                                         44,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,360
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,449
<SALES>                                        156,184
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,184
<CGS>                                          134,328
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,328
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,835
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    291
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (30)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                321
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
**Form of Rule 13a-14(a) [Section 302] Certification for Form 10-K (CFO)**
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Charles Chao, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K of SINA Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release33-8238.]  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
/s/ Charles Chao
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Anita Cochran,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04042-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8885 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, November 20, 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley or Patti Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section                           ( print page 61942)                        10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 20, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Ellen Smiley or Ms. Patti Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley or Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The committee will be discussing various issues related to Taxpayer Communications and public input is welcome.

Dated: October 7, 2014.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2014-24405 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

____________________________________

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 2:15-md-15-02641-DGC

___________________________________ This Document Relates to Plaintiff(s)

Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-03075-DGC

Jana Lightfoot _________________________________________

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned parties,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that the above-captioned case be

dismissed without prejudice, each party to bear its own costs.

Dated this 10th day of November, 2017.

By: /s/David P. Matthews By: /s/ Richard North

David P. Matthews Richard North

MATTHEWS & ASSOCIATES NELSON MULLINS RILEY &

2905 Sackett Street SCARBOROUGH LLP

Houston, TX 77098 201 17TH Street, NW, Suite 1700

Telephone: (713) 522-5250 Atlanta, GA 30363

Facsimile (713) 535-7184 Telephone: (404) 322-6000

dmatthews@thematthewslawfirm.com Facsimile: (404) 332-6397

matthewsivc@thematthewslawfirm.com richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

Attorneys for Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc., and

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

FREESE & GOSS, PLLC

Richard Freese

Calle M. Mendenhall

FREESE & GOSS, PLLC

1901 6th Avenue N., Suite 3120

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8813 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that this 10th day of November, 2017, a copy of the foregoing Joint

Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice was transmitted electronically to the Clerk’s Office

using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing.

/s/ David P. Matthews

David P. Matthews

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8813 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
CITY OF MANHATTAN KS

Flying Cleaner and Faster: Connecting 

Kansas Kids to the Future of Aviation

Sally Dreher

5/15/23 - 5/14/24

A series of three sequential STEM education activities 

tied to the Mission Aerospace traveling exhibit and 

NASA’s aeronautics communication themes with a 

particular focus on the X-57 Maxwell electric aircraft 

and the X-59 supersonic Quesst mission. A new pair of 

aeronautics summer camps for grades 4-6 will feature 

aeronautics-based experiential activities such as 

battery science, material science, and 

soundwaves/doppler effect. A free hands-on STEM 

“Aerospace Day” will be held in partnership with 

Kansas State University Salina Aerospace & 

Technology Campus, and utilizing NASA support and 

resources. The day will include a professional flight 

simulator, hands-on experience with UAVs and model 

airplanes, flight experiments, access to Mission 

Aerospace, and virtual interaction with NASA experts. 

Finally, staff will leverage these experiences to develop 

an aeronautics-themed field trip program to be 

delivered at no cost to a select grade at seven local 

Title I elementary schools. 

List of Partners:

Manhattan-Ogden USD 383 school district

Kansas State University Salina Aerospace and 

Technology Campus

Kansas State University, College of 

Engineering, Manhattan, KS

•

•

•

Flint Hills Discovery Center

Credits: Flint Hills Discovery Center

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC23K0803, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 8, 2013.

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00548

- CR

SHER EE ESPINOSA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 004

- 85977

- 2012



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Ju stices Moseley, Lang, and Brown

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s counsel has approved the

motion. Th e Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS th at th e appeal DISMISSED and this

decision be certified below for observance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47

130548F.U05
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Heather Deiss","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/heather-s-deissnasa-gov\/","title":"Former Astronaut Eileen Collins","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6V0DPlyzv5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/former-astronaut-eileen-collins\/\">Former Astronaut Eileen Collins<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gallery\/former-astronaut-eileen-collins\/embed\/#?secret=6V0DPlyzv5\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Former Astronaut Eileen Collins” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6V0DPlyzv5\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ronald O. Lee,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04222-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/17/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9189 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
#### KEYES MARTIN & COMPANY v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF PURCHASE AND PROPERTY, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification granted.