alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Gianine Figliozzi","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/gfiglioz\/","title":"What is the Lunar Explorer Instrument for Space Biology Applications?","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gbIZlpk6WK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/what-is-the-lunar-explorer-instrument-for-space-biology-applications\/\">What is the Lunar Explorer Instrument for Space Biology Applications?<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/what-is-the-lunar-explorer-instrument-for-space-biology-applications\/embed\/#?secret=gbIZlpk6WK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“What is the Lunar Explorer Instrument for Space Biology Applications?” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gbIZlpk6WK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/acd23-0020-002.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHARLES E. MILLER.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
1

Filed 11/22/21 In re J.B. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin)

----

In re J.B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court 

Law.

C094135

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

J.B.,

Defendant and Appellant.

(Super. Ct. No. 

JJCJVDE20200000364)

This appeal comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and In 

re Kevin S. (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 97. Having reviewed the record as required by 

Wende and Kevin S., we affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

The minor’s, J.B., mother found minor, who was 15 years old, with his hand down 

the front of his five-year-old stepsister’s, A.A., underwear. A.A. said the minor touched 
2

her “[i]n [her] bottom” and he made her put her mouth on his penis. A petition was filed 

against the minor under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging the minor 

committed a lewd or lascivious act with a child under 14 years old. (Pen. Code, § 288, 

subd. (a).) 

On December 18, 2020, the minor filed a motion to dismiss the petition because of 

a delay in obtaining the body camera video from the investigating police officer. After 

briefing and oral argument, the trial court denied the motion. 

The juvenile court held a contested jurisdiction hearing over several days taking 

testimony from A.A., the mother, and the investigating police officer. On May 14, 2021,

the juvenile court found the charge true beyond a reasonable doubt and declared the

minor a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The juvenile 

court transferred the case to Contra Costa County for disposition because that was the 

minor’s county of residence. 

II. DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent the minor on appeal. Counsel filed an opening 

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and 

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 

25 Cal.3d 436; In re Kevin S., supra, 113 Cal.App.4th 97.) The minor was advised by 

counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the 

opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication 

from the minor.

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error 

that would result in a disposition more favorable to the minor. 
3

III. DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

/S/

 

RENNER, J.

We concur:

/S/

 

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

/S/

 

HULL, J.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Eastman N. ‘Jake’ Jacobs","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"4fZEsFh6GU\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/eastman-n-jake-jacobs\/\">Eastman N. ‘Jake’ Jacobs<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/langley\/eastman-n-jake-jacobs\/embed\/#?secret=4fZEsFh6GU\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Eastman N. ‘Jake’ Jacobs” — NASA\" data-secret=\"4fZEsFh6GU\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/eastman-n-jacobs.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":770}
II 

Calendar No. 577 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2255 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New York, as the ‘‘Maxine S. 

Postal United States Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 30, 2004 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported by Ms. COLLINS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 695 Marconi Boulevard in Copiague, New 

York, as the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal United States Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 2255 RS 

1 SECTION 1. MAXINE S. POSTAL UNITED STATES POST OF2 FICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 695 Marconi Boulevard in 

5 Copiague, New York, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal United States Post Office Build7 ing’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the Maxine S. Postal 

12 United States Post Office Building. 

Calendar No. 577 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2255 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostUnited States Post Office Building’’. Copiague, New York, as the ‘‘Maxine S. Postal al Service located at 695 Marconi Boulevard in 

JUNE 7, 2004 

Reported without amendment
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          35,529
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         151,398
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                94,697
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           295,772
<LOANS>                                      1,119,765
<ALLOWANCE>                                     20,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,758,952
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,550,951
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             52,099
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,758,952
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,405
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,052
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,544
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                37,001
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              20,166
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,475
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,526
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,349
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,867
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      12,867
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.35
<LOANS-NON>                                     16,476
<LOANS-PAST>                                     6,906
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                21,411
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,629
<RECOVERIES>                                        43
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               20,575
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,280
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             17,295
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         20,575


</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Habitability Design","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"i8FiGey5zj\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/habitability-design\/\">Habitability Design<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/habitability-design\/embed\/#?secret=i8FiGey5zj\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Habitability Design” — NASA\" data-secret=\"i8FiGey5zj\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/hhp-habitability-outside-sev-mockup-jsc2011e017470.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 7, 2021 No. 04-18-00022-CR Travis Leslie NORTON , Appellant
v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR3975 Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R In an order issued October 5, 2021, we withdrew our February 13, 2019 opinion and judgment in accordance with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion, Ex parte Norton , No. WR-92,415-01, 2021 WL 1202422 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 31, 2021). We hereby WITHDRAW the mandate that issued on April 25, 2019. The appeal is REINSTATED on the docket of this court.

_________________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of October, 2021.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### BENJAMIN GOLDFARB v. CHARLES POSPISIL AND THOMAS QUIGG.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"HiCAM Technical Portfolio","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"ATH0X0qKd0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-hicam\/hicam-technical-portfolio\/\">HiCAM Technical Portfolio<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/aavp\/armd-aavp-hicam\/hicam-technical-portfolio\/embed\/#?secret=ATH0X0qKd0\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“HiCAM Technical Portfolio” — NASA\" data-secret=\"ATH0X0qKd0\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/boeing_mcf16-0041_274_large_res_copy.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":901}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ERNEST WILSON.

July 11, 1989.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Susan Christine Cole,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04583-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Offices of Ben C Martin, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/12/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9519 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9519 Filed 12/29/17 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Exchange National Bancshares,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Rose,
Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 9, 2005

                                                    /s/ Richard G. Rose
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Richard G. Rose
                                                    Treasurer

                                       47
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0716

_____________________________

DAVID RANDOLPH PICKARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

October 23, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.