alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Christina Dunn,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03776-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9018 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
#### MADELINE VARADY v. EXXON COMPANY, U.S.A.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 30, 2021

NO. 03

- 19

- 00437

- CR

Jerson Ramiro Sanchez , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRN E, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewe d

t he record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
### NUMBER 13

- 20

- 00 0 78

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– 

## EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ERIC KYUBIN SHIM, Appellant,

v.

RAMIRO SALAZAR, Appellee

.

On a ppeal from the 361st District Court

of Brazos County, Texas



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment entered by the 361st District

Court on October 18, 2019. 1 Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the

appeal on grounds that he no longer wishes to pursue this appeal.

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to an Order

from the Supreme Court of Texas dated December 20, 2019, Misc. Docket No. 19

- 9120. See T EX

. G OVT ’

C ODE A NN

. § 73.002 The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and his appeal is hereb y

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be entert ained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GREGORY T. PERKES

Justice

D elivered and filed the

12th day of March, 2020.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40326

Summary Calendar

STATE OF TEXAS; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF GEORGIA; 

 STATE OF IDAHO; STATE OF INDIANA, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs–Appellees,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,

Defendants,

MITCHELL WILLIAMS,

Movant–Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:14-CV-254

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 21, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40326 Document: 00513316351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/21/2015
No. 15-40326

2

Mitchell Williams requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis

(“IFP”) in his appeal of the denial of his pro se motion to intervene. A movant 

seeking leave to proceed IFP on appeal must show that he is a pauper and that 

the appeal is taken in good faith, i.e., that it presents nonfrivolous issues. 

Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Frivolous is defined as 

“lack[ing] an arguable basis in law or fact.” Taylor v. Johnson, 257 F.3d 470, 

472 (5th Cir. 2001). “A ruling denying intervention of right is reviewed de 

novo.” Edwards v. City of Houston, 78 F.3d 983, 995 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The district court did not err in denying Williams’s request to intervene 

because, inter alia, he does not have an “interest relating to the property or 

transaction that is the subject of the action.” FED. R. CIV. P. 24(a)(2). An 

intervenor fails to show a sufficient interest where he seeks to intervene solely 

for economic reasons. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc. v. United Gas Pipe Line 

Co., 732 F.2d 452, 466 (5th Cir. 1984) (en banc). Williams’s motion to intervene 

was based on an asserted economic interest; thus, it was insufficient to merit 

intervention of right. See id. 

Accordingly, the motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED, and the

appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

 Case: 15-40326 Document: 00513316351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/21/2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Terry J. Mahoney,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03696-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9217 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Leslie Sheffield, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03438-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8754 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8754 Filed 11/09/17 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15

William A. Roskin
Senior Vice President
Human Resources and Administration

TEL 212-258-6230
FAX 212-846-1716


                                                                        VIACOM


                                       December 1, 1998



Mark Gilman
413 Martel Lane
Coppell, TX   75019


Dear Mark:

     This is to confirm our understanding that your employment agreement dated
as of December 16, 1996, as amended, shall be further amended to change the last
day of the employment term from April 30, 2000 to April 30, 2001.  Except as
amended hereby, your employment agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     Please sign and return the attached copy of this letter to indicate your
agreement with the foregoing.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ William A. Roskin

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


/s/ Mark T. Gilman
------------------------
    Mark T. Gilman
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2331 

For the relief of Fereshteh Sani. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2004 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Fereshteh Sani. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 FERESHTEH SANI. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Fereshteh Sani shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status to law12 ful permanent resident. 
2 

•S 2331 IS 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Fereshteh Sani en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified 

3 in subsection (c), Fereshteh Sani shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

5 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act as of the date of enactment 

7 of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Fereshteh Sani, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of birth of Fereshteh Sani under section 203(a) of the 

20 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the 

21 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

22 to natives of the country of birth of Fereshteh Sani under 

23 section 202(e) of that Act. 

Æ
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jason Costa","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jason-p-costanasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Facility Builds on Space Station Legacy at Kennedy","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"zqAa7ViqQW\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/nasa-facility-builds-on-space-station-legacy-at-kennedy\/\">NASA Facility Builds on Space Station Legacy at Kennedy<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/nasa-facility-builds-on-space-station-legacy-at-kennedy\/embed\/#?secret=zqAa7ViqQW\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Facility Builds on Space Station Legacy at Kennedy” — NASA\" data-secret=\"zqAa7ViqQW\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/ksc-20231128-ph-jbs01-0004-copy.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 231 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 231

To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information 
 clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to 
                       defibrillation in schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2003

  Mr. Feingold (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the use of certain grant funds to establish an information 
 clearinghouse that provides information to increase public access to 
                       defibrillation in schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Automatic Defibrillation in Adam's 
Memory Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

    Subsection (c) of section 312 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 244), as amended by Public Law 107-188, is amended--
            (1) at the end of paragraph (5), by striking ``and'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (6) as paragraph (7); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (5) the following:
            ``(6) establish an information clearinghouse that provides 
        information to increase public access to defibrillation in 
        schools; and''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50154 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR LUIS MARQUEZ-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-02-CR-54-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Relying on Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), Oscar Luis Marquez-Gomez argues that the district court erred by imposing a sentence based on facts that were neither admitted nor found by a jury beyond reasonable doubt. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief because the issue is foreclosed in this circuit under United States v. Pineiro , No. 03-30437, 2004 WL 1543170, at *1 (5th Cir. July 12, 2004). The issue is indeed foreclosed. The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-50154 -2- Government’s motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14143 and #14144]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Arizona dated 10/02/2014. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         09/08/2014. *Effective Date:*
                         10/02/2014. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/01/2014. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/02/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Maricopa. *Contiguous Counties:* Arizona; Gila; La Paz; Pima; Pinal; Yavapai; Yuma. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.125Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.063Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14143 6 and for economic injury is 14144 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Arizona. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: October 2, 2014. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2014-24195 Filed 10-9-14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P