alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2506

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow additional transit systems 

greater flexibility with certain mass transportation projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2004

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow additional 

transit systems greater flexibility with certain mass 

transportation projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transit System Flexi5 bility Protection Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GENERAL AUTHORITY. 

7 Section 5307(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

8 is amended by adding at the end the following: 
2

•S 2506 IS 

1 ‘‘The Secretary may make grants under this section 

2 to a transit system to finance the operating cost of equip3 ment and facilities for use in mass transportation in an 

4 urbanized area with a population of more than 200,000 

5 if such transit system operates less than 100 buses on 

6 fixed route service during peak service hours.’’.

Æ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Tom Giles, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03517-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8815 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 21, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

EUGENE K. McCRARY,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STEVEN TURLEY, Utah Prison

Warden; CURTIS L. GARNER,

Chairman; JESSE GALLEGOS;

KEITH N. HAMILTON; CHERYL

HANSEN; CLARK A. HARMS;

UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS &

PAROLE,

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-4058

(D.C. No. 2:08-CV-00600-TS)

ORDER

Appellant has submitted a letter to this court, captioned “Voluntary

Withdrawal of Petitioners Notice of Appeal.” The letter is construed as a motion

for voluntary dismissal of this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 (b). As so

construed, the motion is granted. This appeal is dismissed. 

Appellate Case: 10-4058 Document: 01018406468 Date Filed: 04/21/2010 Page: 1
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court, 

by:

Christine Van Coney

Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-4058 Document: 01018406468 Date Filed: 04/21/2010 Page: 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

James E. Pugh,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00255-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 19, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 858 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    190,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               455,700
<PP&E>                                       1,449,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               (277,700)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,801,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          613,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     222,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,801,900
<SALES>                                        594,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               594,800
<CGS>                                          492,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.51


</TABLE>
#### Carpenter and Others *v.*Montgomery.

*Thursday, June*5.

The legislature may declare statutes in force from and after their passage in oases of emergency ; and of the existence of the emergency, the legislature is the judge.

The clerks of the Circuit Courts are not authorized to make a final record in any cause, at the costs of the losing party, except in certain cases, unless such party direct the record to he made.

ERROR to the *Gibson*Circuit Court.

Dewey, J.

— Motion to tax costs. The following are the facts: At the *March*term, 1843, of the *Gibson*Circuit Court, an action of assumpsit between *Carpenter*and others, who are the plaintiffs in error, and *Montgomery*and others, was tried, and the verdict and judgment were for the defendants. The clerk of the Court, who is the defendant in error, without any directions from the plaintiffs, made up a final record of the cause, and taxed against them the usual fees for so doing. Afterwards, on the 8th day of *May,*1843, the statutes of that year were deposited in the office of the clerk of the *Gibson*Circuit Court. At the *March*term, 1844, the plaintiffs, having given the clerk due notice, moved the Court to disallow the fees charged for the final record. The parties appeared; the motion was heard and overruled.

We think the decision was wrong. By a statute passed in *January,*1843, it was provided, that no final record should be made by the clerks of the Circuit Courts, at the costs of the losing party, in any cause, except in criminal cases, cases in chancery on final hearing, in actions in which the title to real estate had been tried and determined, or in which heirs, executors, administrators, or guardians were parties, unless *416the losing party should direct the record to be made. The act was declared to be in force from and after its passage. Laws, 1843, 68, 69. The cause in which the clerk made up the final record was not within any of the exceptions of the statute. By the constitution of this state, statutes are not to be in force until they are published in print, unless in cases of emergency. Of the existence of the emergency the legislature must necessarily be the judges; and when they deem it to exist, they have the right to declare a statute in force from and after its passage. They have exercised that right with regard to the law under consideration. Consequently, as the clerk made up the final record after the passage of the act, and without instructions to do so, he had no right to charge fees for it. The motion to disallow that charge should have been granted.

*C. I. Battell*and *C.*Baker, for the plaintiffs.

*W. W. Wick*and *L. Barbour,*for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Robert E. Lewis","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/robert-e-lewisnasa-gov\/","title":"Biostatistics and Data Science","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"utHppTEXe4\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/biostatistics-and-data-science\/\">Biostatistics and Data Science<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/esdmd\/hhp\/biostatistics-and-data-science\/embed\/#?secret=utHppTEXe4\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Biostatistics and Data Science” — NASA\" data-secret=\"utHppTEXe4\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/biostatistics-photo-wordcloud-full-e1683213839949.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":563}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CARL CESTARI.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/ Randall L. FewelRandall L. Fewel,President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001094360
<NAME> RETEK INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          83,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,940)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,800
<PP&E>                                          12,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           465
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,233
<SALES>                                         69,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                69,159
<CGS>                                           22,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,399
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,066)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,697)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,369)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE  SHEET  OF   MULTIMEDIA   ACCESS   CORPORATION   AND
     SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
     OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                  US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,117,202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,260,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,762,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,341,001
<PP&E>                                       1,428,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 550,920
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,211,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,793,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           900
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,417,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,211,415
<SALES>                                      3,269,331
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,360,922
<CGS>                                        1,695,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,695,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,050,315
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                67,619
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             290,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,827,405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,827,405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,827,405)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.75)
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Charles J. Castelli,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03779-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9013 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

John Morris,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03608-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8285 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm














We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:





|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | Registration Statement (Forms S-8 No. 333-163240 and No. 333-172927) pertaining to the Rudolph Technologies, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan and the Rudolph Technologies, Inc. 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,




|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | Registration Statement (Forms S-8 No. 333-149705, No. 333-129773, and No. 333-104349) pertaining to the Rudolph Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan and the Rudolph Technologies, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,




|    |                                                                                                                              
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-132283) pertaining to the August Technology Corporate 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, and




(4)   Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-92443) pertaining to the Rudolph Technologies, Inc. 1996 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Rudolph Technologies, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan and the Rudolph Technologies, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan;








of our reports dated February 28, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP





Metropark, New Jersey


June 24, 2011