alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Aviation Upgrade Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Torbjorn B. Lundqvist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                                 /s/  Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Torbjorn B. Lundqvist
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 March 27, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00543-CR

EX PARTE Juan Jose SANTIAGO VILLALOBOS

From the County Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 31577

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023

DISMISSED

On June 16, 2023, appellant Juan Jose Santiago Villalobos filed a motion to dismiss appeal. 

Appellant’s motion references Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2, which provides:

At any time before the appellate court’s decision, the appellate court may dismiss 

the appeal upon the appellant’s motion. The appellant and his or her attorney must 

sign the written motion to dismiss and file it in duplicate with the appellate clerk, 

who must immediately send the duplicate copy to the trial court clerk.

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Appellant’s motion complies with Rule 42.2(a). Accordingly, we grant 

the motion and dismiss this appeal. See id.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000893771
<NAME>                            American Risk Management
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                             USD

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             132,726
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      577,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        406,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,249,226
<PP&E>                                             978,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                     153,588
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,067,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,337,739
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             6,473
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,476,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,067,713
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,786,578
<CGS>                                            1,128,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,098,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   964,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,124,110)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors of FC Banc Corp.
Bucyrus, Ohio

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-25689
on Form S-8 of our report dated January 17, 2001, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of FC Banc Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2000, which report appears in the 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of FC Banc
Corp.

/s/ Dixon, Francis, Davis & Company


Granville, Ohio
May 11, 2001
#### Peck and Others *v.*Braman and Others, in Error.

Wednesday, *May*7.

AN infant, after his guardian’s death, has a right to compel a settlement of Ms accounts as if he were of age; the guardian’s trust being personal, and terminating at his death. Bac. Abr. tit. Guardian.

In the case of a guardianship until the ward is of full age, the general rule is, that the ward must be of age before he can require his guardian to account; yet, in chancery, a ward may, during his minority, call such a guardian to account, if any thing should occur which makes it necessary. Ib.

The guardianship of minors, and the adjustment of their accounts, form a conspicuous branch of chancery jurisdiction. Ib.—2 Fonb. Eq. *225—251.—Beaufort*v. Berty, 1 Peere Wms. 702.—1 Bl. Comm. 463.

The extension of the jurisdiction of Courts of law, in modern *142times, to cases which were formerly subjects of equitable jurisdiction only, has not destroyed the jurisdiction of Courts of equity. *Kemp*v. Pryor, 7 Ves. 249.

When accounts are intricate and difficult, a bill in equity is ihe more usual and suitable proceeding to compel an account; being best calculated to do justice between the parties; since the plaintiff can thereby obtain a discovery of books and papers, and have the benefit of the defendant’s oath; who, on the other hand, is entitled to all both legal and equitable allowances. Paley on Agency, 57.

The heirs of A., some of whbm were infants, and his represeqtatives, filed a bill in chancery against the heirs and representatives of *B.*The bill stated that *B.,*the guardian of *A.'s*heirs, having contracted *to*sell their land to C., procured an order of the Court in *Conneclicul,*where the land was situated, authorising its sale by *D.:*that *D.,*pursuant to the order, sold and conveyed the land to C. for 1,500 dollars, which amount had nearly all been received by *B.:*that bonds to the Court were executed by *D.*and *É.,*conditioned that *B.*should vest the purchase-money hr other land for the heirs of *A.,*or lay it out for their nurture, education, or advancement, and should account to the Court when required, or to the heirs when they should come of age: that *B.*having married the widow and administratrix of *A.,*became possessed of the intestate’s personal estate to a considerable amount: that *B.*afterwards removed from *Connecticut*to *Indiana,*purchased land here with the money of *Ais*h.eirs received as aforesaid, took the title in his own name, and died without accounting to them,' Or leaving personal property sufficient to pay their claim. The bill prayed for a discovery, relief, &c.

*Held,*that a demurrer to the bill, on the ground of the complainant’s remedy being at law, could not be sustained; the' case being within the jurisdiction of a Court of chancery.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         103,620
<SECURITIES>                                    33,393
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200,921
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,036,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,920,643
<PP&E>                                          49,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,971,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,713,957
<BONDS>                                          6,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           316
<OTHER-SE>                                     251,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,971,951
<SALES>                                         25,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,637
<CGS>                                           30,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,452
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,386
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Loura Hall","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/loura-hallnasa-gov\/","title":"Development and Testing of Autonomous On-Orbit Assembly and Servicing Systems Using the SPHERES Testbed","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"B2bpTn3exz\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/development-and-testing-of-autonomous-on-orbit-assembly-and-servicing-systems-using-the-spheres-testbed\/\">Development and Testing of Autonomous On-Orbit Assembly and Servicing Systems Using the SPHERES Testbed<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/stmd\/space-tech-research-grants\/development-and-testing-of-autonomous-on-orbit-assembly-and-servicing-systems-using-the-spheres-testbed\/embed\/#?secret=B2bpTn3exz\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Development and Testing of Autonomous On-Orbit Assembly and Servicing Systems Using the SPHERES Testbed” — NASA\" data-secret=\"B2bpTn3exz\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/hubble_friday_06242016.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":374}
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                      PEDIATRIC SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                    ----------------------------------------------
                                              BASIC                 DILUTED
                                    ----------------------  ----------------------
                                        1998       1997        1998        1997
                                    ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                 <C>         <C>         <C>         <C> 
Weighted average common stock 
 outstanding during the period...    7,021,533   6,256,949   7,021,533   6,256,949
Options..........................            0           0     159,708     179,514
Effect upon weighted average of
 shares issued in acquisitions...       53,018           0      53,018           0
                                    ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Total............................    7,074,551   6,256,949   7,234,259   6,436,463
                                    ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

Net income attributable to common
 and common equivalent shares:
   Net income....................   $2,134,354  $1,733,137  $2,134,354  $1,733,137
                                    ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
Net income per common and common
 equivalent share................   $     0.30  $     0.28  $     0.30  $     0.27
                                    ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Robert C. Riddick,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03657-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9177 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark R. Hollinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/    Mark R. HollingerMark R. Hollinger Chief
Executive Officer August 19, 2003
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Blyth, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert H. Barghaus, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Robert H. BarghausRobert H. BarghausVice President and Chief Financial OfficerApril 8, 2011






This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


UNDER 18 U.S.C. 1350


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning, Inc. (the "Company") for the third quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent P. Riera, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes
of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: September 9, 2009
/s/ Vincent P. RieraVincent P. RieraPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 9, 2009 

1215 

Order 

 

January 9, 2009 

137305 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137305 

 COA: 283337 

Wayne CC: 99-009228-FC 

MATTHEW BELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 22, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

 HATHAWAY, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Jurey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (a) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By

/s/ Christopher C. JureyChristopher C. Jurey, Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 9, 2007