alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2315 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2315

    To amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to extend the 
           deadline for the INTELSAT initial public offering.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 8, 2004

  Mr. Burns  introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 to extend the 
           deadline for the INTELSAT initial public offering.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF IPO DEADLINE.

    Section 621(5)(A)(i) of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962 
(47 U.S.C. 763(5)(A)(i)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``December 31, 2003,'' and inserting ``June 
        30, 2005,''; and
            (2) by striking ``June 30, 2004;'' and inserting ``December 
        31, 2005;''.
                                 <all>
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"From the NACA to NASA: 95 Years of Innovation in Flight","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"dlhUkWUWKs\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/from-the-naca-to-nasa-95-years-of-innovation-in-flight\/\">From the NACA to NASA: 95 Years of Innovation in Flight<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/from-the-naca-to-nasa-95-years-of-innovation-in-flight\/embed\/#?secret=dlhUkWUWKs\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“From the NACA to NASA: 95 Years of Innovation in Flight” — NASA\" data-secret=\"dlhUkWUWKs\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/naca_testpilot_1600x1200_1600-1200.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly M. Matter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kmatter\/","title":"NASA Participates in \u201cOhioans in Space\u201d Painting Unveiling","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"sBDoK15njC\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-participates-in-ohioans-in-space-painting-unveiling\/\">NASA Participates in \u201cOhioans in Space\u201d Painting Unveiling<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/nasa-participates-in-ohioans-in-space-painting-unveiling\/embed\/#?secret=sBDoK15njC\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Participates in \u201cOhioans in Space\u201d Painting Unveiling” — NASA\" data-secret=\"sBDoK15njC\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/grc-2024-cn-00033.webp?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":451}
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Astrid Albaugh","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aalbaugh\/","title":"NASA Ames Astrogram – February 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"osgUhQpDz9\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-astrogram-february-2023\/\">NASA Ames Astrogram – February 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-astrogram-february-2023\/embed\/#?secret=osgUhQpDz9\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Ames Astrogram – February 2023” — NASA\" data-secret=\"osgUhQpDz9\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/screen_shot_2023-02-15_at_12.24.33_pm.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":453}
#### VORELCO, INC. v. BOROUGH OF ENGLEWOOD CLIFFS.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lisa Durkee,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03790-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8307 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of American Golden Century Investments, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), Hong Ma, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By: /s/ Hong Ma

--------------------------

Hong Ma

Chief Executive Officer

April 18, 2006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Cindy Terry,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00220-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss, PLLC - Jackson, MS

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/8/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to 

do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 10, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 838 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 1
Oyster Creek Group, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY


                                                            (Deficit)
                              Common   Add'tnl    Accumulated      Total
                              Stock      Paid         During            Stock-
Paid-in                   Shares      In           Development     holder's
                             Amount    Capital       Stage              Equity


August 20, 1999     2,500,000
Founders shares     $2,500      $75            $  -                $2,575


August 20, 1999
Shares issued      2,000,000
Stock dividend      2,000                         (2,000)                  -

Net (loss)
August 19, 1999
(inception) to
June 30, 2000                                          -                      -

Balance,
June 30, 2000      4,500,000
                            $4,500       $75          $(2,000)           $2,575

Net (loss)
For the year ended
June 30, 2001                                           (3,775)         (3,775)


Balance,           4,500,000
June 30, 2001       4,500            75             (5,775)          (1,200)

Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2002                                            (5,550)        (5,550)

Balance,          4,500,000
June 30, 2002       4,500             75           (11,325)        (6,750)

Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2003                                               (460)         (460)
                       4,500,000
                          $4,500            $75        $(11,785)     $(7,210)


Page 1


Net (loss)
For the year
ended
June 30, 2004                                              (1,105)      (1,005)
                       4,500,000
                          $4,500            $75          $(12,790)    $(8,215)



The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the Performance Review Board of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lisa M. Williams, Chief Human Capital Officer, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street NE., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663-4306.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Publication of the Performance Review Board (PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, and makes recommendations to the Chair, EEOC, with respect to performance ratings, pay level adjustments and performance awards.

The following are the names and titles of executives appointed to serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 12-month term, which begins on November 19, 2014.

*PRB Chair:*

Mr. Dexter R. Brooks, Director, Federal Sector Programs, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

*Members:*

Mr. Kevin J. Berry, Director, New York District Office, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission;

Ms. Katherine E. Bissell, Deputy Solicitor for Regional Enforcement, Department of Labor;

Ms. Kathryn A. Ellis, Assistant General Counsel, Division of Educational Equity and Research, and Agency Dispute Resolution Specialist, Department of Education;

Ms. Gwendolyn Y. Reams, Associate General Counsel, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission;

*Alternate:*

Ms. Delner Franklin-Thomas, Director, Birmingham District Office, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

By the direction of the Commission.

Dated: October 3, 2014.  

Jenny R. Yang, 

Chair.

[FR Doc. 2014-24448 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
#### IN RE COOPER

No. 473P01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 502

Petition by respondent (Marcia Bean Cooper) for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         734,595
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  447,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,554,336
<PP&E>                                         870,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                 312,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,112,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,469,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 20,710,256
<COMMON>                                         2,848
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,070,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,112,388
<SALES>                                      4,190,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,190,547
<CGS>                                          757,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,108,659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             421,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,183,372
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,183,372)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,183,372)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (11.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (11.98)


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. CONRAD

No. 315P01

Case below: 137 N.C. App. 588

Petition by defendant pro se for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 August 2001. Justice Edmunds recused.
#### Massey *v.*Chance.

Debt on a writing- obligatory, by which the defendant, for value received, promised to pay the plaintiff 162 dollars and 75 cents with interest from the date, to be paid on or before the session of the commissioners’ Court of *Grant*county then next ensuing, provided that if the defendant proved to the satisfaction of said board that he had paid the plaintiff said money on an order given by said commissioners, at, &c., to one *Webster*and by him *161assigned to the plaintiff, then the obligation to be void, or so much thereof to be void as the defendant should prove had been paid on said order over and above the credits indorsed on it. *Held,*that debt was the proper form-of action.

*Thursday, June*6.

ERROR to the *Grant*Circuit Court.

Blackford, J.

— This was an action of debt for 162 dollars and 76 cents. The declaration was substantially as follows : The defendant, on, See., at, &c., by his writing obligatory, sealed with his seal, &c., for value received, promised to pay the plaintiff the sum of 162 dollars and 75 cents with interest from the date, on the following condition, to wit, to be paid on or before the session of the commissioners’ Court of *Grant*county then next ensuing, provided that if the defendant proved, to the satisfaction of the board of said commissioners, that he had paid the plaintiff said sum of money, on an order given by said commissioners at their *September*term, 1839, to one *Webster*and by him assigned to the plaintiff, then the obligation to be void, or so much thereof to be void as the defendant should prove had been paid on said order over and above the credits indorsed on it. Averment, that after the execution of said writing obligatory there was a session of said commissioners’ Court, but that the defendant did not then or at any other time prove, to the satisfaction of the board of said commissioners, that he had paid said money or any part of it, or that any part of said order had been paid over and above the credits indorsed on it; and that the defendant, though often requested, had not paid the said sum of 162 dollars and 75 cents or any part thereof, &c., to the • plaintiff’s damage, &c.

General demurrer to the declaration, and judgment for the defendant.

It is contended that covenant and not debt was the proper remedy in this case; but we are of a different opinion. If the averments in the declaration be true, the defendant is liable to the plaintiff on the obligation, not for unliquidated damages, but for a certain sum of money, to wit, 162 dollars and 75 cents with interest; which shows that the form of action is unobjectionable.

*162*D. D.*Pratt, for the plaintiff.

*J. Smith*and *J.*Brownlee, for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.