alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2433 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2433

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow self-employed 
    individuals to deduct health insurance costs in computing self-
                           employment taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2004

  Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Thomas) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow self-employed 
    individuals to deduct health insurance costs in computing self-
                           employment taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equity for Our Nation's Self 
Employed Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS IN COMPUTING SELF-
              EMPLOYMENT TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Section 162(l) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to special rules for health insurance costs of self-
employed individuals) is amended by striking paragraph (4) and by 
redesignating paragraph (5) as paragraph (4).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kenneth THUNDERBIRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert LAMPERT, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional Institution; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-36146.

D.C. No. CV-01-06080-AI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*836Submitted Sept. 8, 2003.*

Decided Sept. 16, 2003.

Kenneth Thunderbird, pro se, Ontario, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kim Marie Thunderbird, pro se, Wilson-ville, OR, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Patrick G. Ward, Esq., DOJ-Oregon Department of Justice, Salem, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before PREGERSON, THOMAS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Oregon state prisoner Kenneth Thunderbird appeals pro se summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Oliver v. Keller,*289 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Thunderbird’s first amendment claims because any infringement on Thunderbird’s speech and expression caused by the prison’s regulation of inmate-to-inmate correspondence, or books containing transferable tattoos, was reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. *See Turner v. Safley,*482 U.S. 78, 92-93, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Thunderbird’s equal protection claims because the prison rules that he challenges are facially neutral and Thunderbird failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendants acted with an intent to discriminate against him based upon his membership in a protected class. *See Lee v. City of Los Angeles,*250 F.3d 668, 686 (9th Cir.2001).

Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity on Thunderbird’s claim that prison officials violated his rights by not making a Native American translator available to him because prison officials had not violated any clearly established constitutional right. *See Saucier v. Katz,*533 U.S. 194, 200, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001).

We have carefully examined the remaining issues on appeal and find that they are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

EXECUllVf 

SECRETARIAT 

SPECIAL 

ASSISlANlS 

CONSULTANTS LXENTIVEYCLEIARY 

OFFICE OF ASSOCIATE 

GfNfRAL ADMINISTRATOR COUNSfL 

OTNERAL COUNSEL 

I 

ADMINISTRATOR 

fXECUllVE OFFICER 

I= 

--J 

HEADOUAKIER~ OFFICE OF AfROSPACf PERSONNfL 

DEVELOPMfNl WORKING CO~~UNICA~~ON~ MANAGfMENl SAFETY INIfRlM MANAGEMfNl 

REVlfW 

COMMIllfE CEYTER 

SECIALASllSTANT ASST ADMINISTRATOR 

PROGRAM PLANS 

AND ANALYSIS POLICY 

Ass7 ADMINISTUTOR 

I OFFICE OF 

ORGANIZATION I AND MANAGEMENT 

DEPUTY 

ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSOCIATE 

DEPUTY 

ADMINISTRATOR 

L 

"1 

I 

I 

I I OFFICE OF OFFICE OF OFFICE OF OFFICE OF 

PUBLIC 

AFFAIRS 

.,ST ADhl,N,~'P410R 

LEGISLAlIVf 

AFFAIRS DOD & ~ lNlfRNAllONAL OFFICE OF 

AFFAIRS AFFAIRS UNlVfRSllY INITIAGTNC" 

ASS, ADMINISIPJlOR ASS i AD*(lNI~TnAIOI! ASST ADMINISlPJtTOII ASST ADMINISTRATO* 

ASSKIATE ADMINISTRA~OR 

OFFICE OF OFFICE OF SIICIAL COIlllACII 1fCHNOLOGY LllOOIlAIlON 4 UlILIZAllON INDUSTRY 

AFFAIRS .EWE* 

OFFICE OF OFFICE OF 

ADMlNlSTRAllON 

____- ASS'l ADMINISWATOR ASS'T AMIINISTIUTOI mMiNIsrmou AS~ mmmwroI( 

I I 

OFFICE OF OFFICE OF 

OFFICE OF OFFICE OF ADVANCED RESEARCH TRACKING AND 

DATA ACQUISITION AND TECHNOLOGY SPACE SCIENCE 

AND APPLICATIONS 4 WCIATE ADNlNliis*lO1 

MANNED 

SPACE FLIGHT Ai5OC,A,L ADMINISTSATOS ASSOCIATE &DMINISlIU.TOR ASIOCIAlt ADMINISTRATOR 

I I I 

SVACE CCNIER 

Krnrrdl +'e irnt.,. 

I 

WALLOPS SlAIlON 

W.ilOpl ,.land, "0.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



The undersigned executive officer of FC BANC CORP.. (the
Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Robert W. SiegelName:

Robert W. SiegelTitle:

Vice President,Chief Financial Officer




Date: August 13, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to FC BANC CORP.. and will be retained by FC BANC CORP.. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Ignite Solicitation 

 

AUDIT INFORMATION

Has a Federal agency ever audited your accounting system?

Yes No

Agency Name Office Location

POC First Name POC Last Name

POC Phone POC Email

Was your accounting system approved by the auditing agency?

Yes No

If yes, provide the date of approval:

Was a rate agreement negotiated with the auditing agency?

Yes No

If yes, provide the date of rate negotiation:

Was an overhead and/or cost audit performed?

Yes No

If yes, provide the date of overhead audit or cost audit:
Are the rates from the audit agreement used for this firm's proposal?

Yes No

If no, please provide an explanation why other rates are being used.

If a Federal agency has ever audited your accounting system, include a copy of the audit information as a 

PDF or Word document along with your submission files.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lauren Louise Schebor,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03780-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8299 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1**CertificationsFurnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes — Oxley Act of2002I, Richard P. Nespola, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Management NetworkGroup, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period endedDecember 29, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Date: March 28, 2008      BY: /s/ RICHARD P. NESPOLA   CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD   AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER   I, Donald E. Klumb, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of The Management Network Group, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period endedDecember 29, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Date: March 28, 2008      BY: /s/ DONALD E. KLUMB   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER      
-65-
{"agency":"NASA","generated":"2015-04-21 07:50:59","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"},{"label":"2015","value":"2015"}],"value":"2015"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q2"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["AFRC","ARC","GRC","GSFC","HQ","JPL","JSC","KSC","LaRC","MSFC","NSSC","OGC","OIG","SSC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["4","13","11","38","63","23","52","38","15","24","8"," ","6","7"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["3","22","11","37","58","29","46","41","15","24","10"," ","6","6"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":[" "," "," ","1"," "," ","1"," "," ","1"," "," "," "," "]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2015","quarter":"Q2"}
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ALFREDO THORNE.

July 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Earnestine Riley,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04065-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/6/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8897 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhbit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  David  Ward, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Blue Moon Investments for the year ended
September 30, 2009(the  "Report")  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Blue  Moon
Investments.

Dated: February 11, 2010

/s/ David Ward
--------------
David Ward
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Blue Moon Investments

A  signed  original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in  typed  form  within the electronic version of  this  written
statement required by Section 906,  has  been provided to Blue Moon Investments
and will be retained by Blue Moon Investments  and  furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Center Disability Program Managers

Ames Research Center: ARC-ODEO@mail.nasa.gov

Armstrong Flight Research Center: gaby.olson-1@nasa.gov

Glenn Research Center: grc-dl-eeo-customer-service@mail.nasa.gov 

Goddard Space Flight Center: Merechia.n.davis@nasa.gov

NASA Headquarters: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/hq/eodm/reasonable_accommodations

Johnson Space Center: JSC-OEOD@mail.nasa.gov 

Kennedy Space Center: edward.wroblinski@nasa.gov

Langley Research Center: larc-odeo@mail.nasa.gov 

Marshall Space Flight Center: natasha.d.stanton@nasa.gov

NASA Shared Services Center/Stennis Space Center: nssc-odeo@mail.nasa.gov
#### MARY MORAVSKI v. ROBERT J. MORAVSKI.

May 8, 1984.

Cross-petition for certification denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
****CERTIFICATIONS**I, David W. Heeter, certify that: 1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of *MutualFirst*Financial, Inc.; 2.         Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.         The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a)         designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c)         presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5.         The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a)         all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b)         any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 6.         The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report whether there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent tothe date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.Date: March 15, 2004By:/s/ David W. HeeterDavid W. HeeterPresident and Chief Executive Officer**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1992-C,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         249,738
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  149,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               413,328
<PP&E>                                         6,978,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,861,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,530,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,910
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,522,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,530,246
<SALES>                                        211,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,286
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,960<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                22,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            22,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   22,307
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>