alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE KENNETH
COLE PRODUCTIONS, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                  765
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        29,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                            (65)
<INVENTORY>                                          31,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     63,988
<PP&E>                                               13,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                        3,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       75,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                23,421
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                132
<OTHER-SE>                                           49,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         75,444
<SALES>                                              44,910
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     45,966
<CGS>                                                27,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        27,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       5,420
<INCOME-TAX>                                          2,168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   3,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          3,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .24



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 60848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24024]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9917-65-OARM; EPA-HQ-OA-2014-0113]


National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, 
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a public 
teleconference of the National Advisory Council for Environmental 
Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice to the EPA 
Administrator on a broad range of environmental policy, technology, and 
management issues. NACEPT members represent academia, industry, non-
governmental organizations, and local, state, and tribal governments. 
The purpose of this committee meeting is for NACEPT to continue 
developing sustainability strategies to strengthen the Agency's core 
business principles and practices outlined in the FY2014-2018 EPA 
Strategic Plan. A copy of the meeting agenda will be posted at http://www2.epa.gov/faca/nacept.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a public teleconference on Monday, November 3, 
2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. EPA, William Jefferson 
Clinton Federal Building East, 1201 Constitution Ave. NW., Room 1132, 
Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Green, Acting Designated 
Federal Officer, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9decbdcdcd797dcccdedcd7dcf9dcc9d897ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3c4d1c6c6cd8dc6d6c4c6cdc6e3c6d3c28dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>, (202) 564-2432, U.S. EPA, Office 
of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach (1601M), 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public with 
limited seating and requests to provide oral and/or written comments to 
NACEPT should be sent directly to Eugene Green by Monday, October 27, 
2014.
    In addition, members of the public wishing to participate in-person 
or via teleconference should follow the same procedure as noted above.
    Accessibility/Accommodations: Individuals with disabilities 
requesting reasonable accommodations should submit requests to Eugene 
Green at least 10 days in advance of the scheduled meeting.

    Dated: September 29, 2014.
Eugene Green,
Acting Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-24024 Filed 10-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 99.1**

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

 

 Board ofDirectors and Stockholders FC Banc Corp.

 We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of FC Banc Corp. (the "Company") and subsidiary as of June 30, 2003, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, and the consolidated statement of stockholders' equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, and theconsolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

 We conducted ourreview in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries ofpersons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression ofan opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that shouldbe made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

We have previously audited, inaccordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for theyear then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated January 10, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 /s/ S.R. Snodgrass,A.C.

 Wexford, PA August 11, 2003

29
#### CHRISTOPHER v. CHERRY HOSP.

No. 524P01

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 427

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 November 2001.
**EXHIBIT 21**



|Parent                        | Subsidiary                       | PercentageofOwnership | State ofIncorporationorOrganization
|----------------------------- | -------------------------------- | --------------------- | -----------------------------------
|*MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. | Mutual Federal Savings Bank      | 100%                  | United States                      
|*MutualFirst* Financial, Inc. | Indiana Title Insurance Co., LLC | 26.9%                 | Indiana                            
|Mutual Federal Savings Bank   | First M.F.S.B. Corporation       | 100%                  | Indiana                            
|Mutual Federal Savings Bank   | Third M.F.S.B. Corporation       | 100%                  | Indiana                            

*Liquidated effective January 1, 2004.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mary Smith,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03774-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9156 Filed 12/06/17 Page 1 of 1
#### McLAUGHLIN, Appellant, v. FISCHER.

Division One,

May 24, 1905.

APPEAL: Dismissal: No Abstract or Bill. Where the plaintiff-appellant has failed to file and serve an abstract as required by the statute and the rule of court, or failed to file his bill of exceptions within the time allowed by the trial court, his appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — How. *Selden P. Spencer,*Judge.

Appeal dismissed.

*Warren Hilton*for appellant.

*Rassieur, Schnurmacher <§> Rassieur*for respondent.

BRACE., P. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the St. Louis City Circuit Court, quashing an execution and setting aside a sheriff’s sale of real estate under a judgment in favor of the city of St. Louis in an action on a ■ special taxbill against the respondent. The appellant claiming under the purchaser at such sale, appealed to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, and *547thence the case was transferred to this court. The appellant filed a transcript in the court of appeals, which has been transmitted to this court, but has entirely failed to file or serve an abstract thereof, as required by the statute, Revised Statutes 1899, section 813, and Rules 12 and 13 of this court. Besides, it appears from the transcript that the bill by which it was sought to preserve exceptions to the action of the court on the motion was not filed within the time allowed by the court, so that there is nothing for us to review even if there was an abstract. In this state of the record nothing remains to be done except to dismiss the appeal, and it is accordingly so ordered.

All concur.
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Student Loan
      Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
      Michael J. Reardon, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Daniel P.
      McHugh, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financialcondition
                and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Michael J. ReardonMichael
                J. ReardonChief
                Executive OfficerAugust 8,
                2006/s/
                Daniel P. McHughDaniel
                P. McHughChief
                Financial OfficerAugust 8,
                2006








This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Thomas Boykin,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04485-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 12/5/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9329 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9329 Filed 12/14/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1992
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1992
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,949
<OTHER-SE>                                    (347,849)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               237,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (237,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (237,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (237,600)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### JOAN AHERN v. ANTHONY G. DOMENICK.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Eileen R. Yager, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03474-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8667 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCTS )

LIABILITY LITIGATION, ) 

 )

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: )

 )

Denise O’Neil, ) MDL Docket No. 15-2641

C.A. No. CV-15-1926-PHX-DGC )

 ) 

 )

Denise O’Neil, ) NOTICE

 ) 

 Plaintiff(s), ) 

 ) 

v. )

 )

C R Bard, Inc., et al., )

 )

 Defendant(s) )

 IN THE ABOVE MATTER, you are advised that the case listed 

above (formerly Southern District of Texas 2:15-cv-316) is 

now consolidated with and part of MDL No. 2641 pursuant to the 

Transfer Order filed September 14, 2015. Therefore, future 

pleadings pertaining to the above case will be filed in MDL-No. 

2641, the title page of these documents should be prepared as shown

above. 

 

September 25, 2015 BRIAN D. KARTH 

 Date DCE/Clerk of Court

 s/M. Pruneau 

 Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 97 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 1
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00575

- CR

ESTEBAN COLEMAN

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 15

- CR

- 3137

- F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 2, 20 16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jennifer D. Wright,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03531-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9101 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1