alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"A Story for Axel: NASA Drone Projects Achieve Critical Early Work","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6k3e7HW89l\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/a-story-for-axel-nasa-drone-projects-achieve-critical-early-work\/\">A Story for Axel: NASA Drone Projects Achieve Critical Early Work<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/a-story-for-axel-nasa-drone-projects-achieve-critical-early-work\/embed\/#?secret=6k3e7HW89l\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“A Story for Axel: NASA Drone Projects Achieve Critical Early Work” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6k3e7HW89l\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/envision-future-v4-red.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
M&F BANCORP, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY



Exhibit 32

M & F BANCORP, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of M & F Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                               
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Ronald Wiley              
|                      |  | Ronald Wiley                  
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer       
|                      | 
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Allan Sturges             
|                      |  | Allan Sturges                 
|                      |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer

---

|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KENNETH ELLERBEE.

July 2, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Janis M. Moore,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03647-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9096 Filed 12/04/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Heather Christiansen, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04002-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Miller Firm LLC 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/1/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8684 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8684 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

DOUGLAS A. WARF MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1086-96-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON JANUARY 28, 1997 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH John K. Moore, Judge Andrew G. Wiggin, Assistant Public Defender (Office of the Public Defender, on brief), for appellant. Linwood T. Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. Douglas A. Warf was convicted of grand larceny in violation of Code § 18.2-95. He appeals, contending that the Commonwealth did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the automobile with which he was found was actually stolen. We disagree and affirm. The parties are fully conversant with the record in the cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary. On appeal, the evidence must be viewed in a light most

favorable to the Commonwealth. See Higginbotham v. Commonwealth , 216 Va. 349, 352, 218 S.E.2d 534, 537 (1975). A judgment will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly wrong or without- 2 - evidence to support it. See Traverso v. Commonwealth , 6 Va. App. 172, 176, 366 S.E.2d 719, 721 (1988). The owner of the stolen car and the arresting officers all described the car variously as a red 1992 Geo Storm, a "little Geo," and a "red '92 Geo." The owner testified that she saw her car on July 18, 1995. The officers took the car from Warf on the same day. She testified that she had left a single key in the ignition. Warf told the officers that he had lost "the" key to the car he was driving. "When an accused is found in possession of goods of a type recently stolen, strict proof of identity of the goods is not required." Henderson v. Commonwealth , 215 Va. 811, 812-13, 213 S.E.2d 782, 783 (1975). "'It is not necessary that the identity of stolen property should be invariably established by positive evidence. In many such cases identification is impracticable, and yet the circumstances may render it impossible to doubt the identity of the property, or to account for the possession of it by the accused upon any reasonable hypothesis consistent with his innocence.'" Reese v. Commonwealth , 219 Va. 671, 673, 250 S.E.2d 345, 346 (1979) (quoting Gravely v. Commonwealth , 86 Va. 396, 402, 10 S.E. 431, 433 (1889)). All of the evidence in this case indicates that the car found with Warf is the same car recently stolen. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction. Affirmed.
Moonshot Summer Experience

Five-day Virtual Summer Experience

Students with a 70 percent or better overall HAS Online Course average will have an opportunity to 

participate in a five-day gamified virtual experience, Moonshot, at no cost.

Students collaboratively work with a team to plan an Artemis-themed mission to the Moon and Mars, 

engaging with:

• Mentors, NASA engineers and scientists who guide and facilitate research, design 

challenges, and preliminary design review presentation.

• Gamified virtual activities to support an Artemis-themed mission.

• Team challenges relating to the mission research

• Guidance in possible STEM careers

Upon completion of the virtual experience, each participant will receive the following:

• Certificate of completion for participating in HAS

• Supporting documentation to submit for Science elective credit

Two-day Onsite

Top teams have an opportunity to attend a four-day residential experience. The HAS team provides 

travel, lodging, meals and rules of conduct after invitation acceptance.

Science Credit

Each HAS experience aligns to the Engineering Design and Presentation course developed by the Texas 

Education Agency (TEA) and graded by certified Texas educators. Selected students, who successfully 

complete the online portion and summer virtual experience, receive a NASA letter for a full 1.0 Science 

elective credit that schools may award to the student. 

Note: It is at the discretion of each student's high school to award credit.
#### DEEM v. TREADAWAY & SONS PAINTING & WALLCOVERING, INC.

No. 180P01

Case below: 142 N.C. App. 472

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 2001.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"Meet Three NASA Women Working to Electrify Aviation","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Ym0OoHJujO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/meet-three-nasa-women-working-to-electrify-aviation\/\">Meet Three NASA Women Working to Electrify Aviation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/meet-three-nasa-women-working-to-electrify-aviation\/embed\/#?secret=Ym0OoHJujO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Meet Three NASA Women Working to Electrify Aviation” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Ym0OoHJujO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/lead-image-2-larger.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":386}
National Aeronautics And Space Administration 

Administrator A 

Daniel S. Goldin 

Deputy Administrator 

John R. Dailey (Acting) Associate Deputy Administrator 

Chief Scientist 

France A. Cordova 

Chief Engineer Vacant 

International hairs and Education Relations 

Yvonne E. Freeman Robert Clarke 

Counsel Off iced 

Comptroller 

Jeff Lawrence Spence M. Armslrwlg 

i I I I I I 

Improvement 

Assurance Utilization 

Public Affairs Systems and 

Facilities 

Benila A. Cooper Frederick Orewry Laurie A. Broedling Ralph C. Thomas 

Microgravity 

Applications 

Arnold D. AldM iE.rth1 Mission to Planet Space 

John M. Klinebeg 

SPJU Conlor 

ROY S. Ed- 

--I Aeronautics 

I 

Wesley L Hanis 

I I 

Kmah J. SUW 

-1 Space Science 

I 

We6 T. Huntress 

j Jsl Propulrion 

Laborrlory I 

Edward Slw 

DRAFT 

March 1094
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Astrid Albaugh","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/aalbaugh\/","title":"NASA Ames Astrogram – July\/August 2023","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"clzW4kES4E\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-astrogram-july-august-2023\/\">NASA Ames Astrogram – July\/August 2023<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/nasa-ames-astrogram-july-august-2023\/embed\/#?secret=clzW4kES4E\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Ames Astrogram – July\/August 2023” — NASA\" data-secret=\"clzW4kES4E\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/acd23-0066-049.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Albert A. Noa,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-16-00470-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Miller Weisbrod, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 2/22/2016, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: February 26, 2016 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

Albert A. Noa

Printed name of party waiving service

of summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 904 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By:

/s/    RANDALL L.
FEWELRandall L. Fewel President and
Chief Executive Officer





Date:  August 12, 2002
(January 18, 2005)

#### Michael Melnitzky, Appellant, v Elizabeth Besobrasow, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 655]

*396Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered November 26, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint with prejudice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

All issues and claims raised herein that were or could have been addressed in plaintiffs matrimonial action, particularly regarding the inventory of the safe deposit boxes, are barred, even if based on different theories or sought under a different remedy *(see Ryan v New York Tel. Co.,*62 NY2d 494 [1984]). Further, the claims of conversion, theft, damage to property, fraud, abuse of process, willful concealment and destruction of evidence, collusion, prima facie tort and request for an accounting have been raised and dismissed in previous litigation *(e.g. Melnitzky v Melnitzky,*284 AD2d 240 [2001]; *Melnitzky v LoPreto,*8 AD3d 4 [2004]). Plaintiffs remaining contention, that he has not received his equitable share of the contents of the safe deposit boxes, is not alleged in the complaint, and he has not established that this claim is ripe for judicial review. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.