alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit99.2**

 

HERITAGEOAKS BANCORP

 

AnnualReport on Form 10KSB

forthe Year ended December 31, 2002

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Heritage OaksBancorp (the “Company”), hereby certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form10KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed by the Company with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Annual Report”), to which thisCertification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements ofSection 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information containedin this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  March 18, 2003 | /s/ Margaret A. Torres                               |   |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                        | Margaret A. Torres                                   |
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CARRAMERICA
REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND FROM CARRAMERICA REALTY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          82,914
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,039,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                 312,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,636,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,680,175
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         95
<COMMON>                                           668
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,698,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,636,875
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               549,580
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  482,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 78,823
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,760)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,968
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31


</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Derek Pepler, certify that

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Trimax
Corporation.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

|January 16, 2006               | 
|------------------------------ | 
|                               | 
|/s/Derek Pepler                | 
|Derek Pepler                   | 
|Acting Chief Executive Officer | 

---
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

April 13, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CALVIN L. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Nut Case,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-3085

(D.C. No. 6:07-CR-10142-JTM-20)

(D. Kansas)

ORDER

This criminal appeal is before the court based on a “motion to dismiss appeal” filed

by court-appointed counsel for Appellant-Defendant Calvin Williams. See Fed. R. App. P.

42(b); 10th Cir. R. 46.3(B). Attached to the “motion to dismiss” is a signed statement by

Defendant Williams requesting dismissal of the appeal. 

Upon consideration, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeal is

DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Elisabeth A. Shumaker, Clerk

Kathleen T. Clifford

Attorney - Deputy Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3085 Document: 01018401829 Date Filed: 04/13/2010 Page: 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jason Costa","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jason-p-costanasa-gov\/","title":"NASA Helps Create Space for All Through Mentorship","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"QdJeb3LqaY\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/nasa-helps-create-space-for-all-through-mentorship\/\">NASA Helps Create Space for All Through Mentorship<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/kennedy\/nasa-helps-create-space-for-all-through-mentorship\/embed\/#?secret=QdJeb3LqaY\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Helps Create Space for All Through Mentorship” — NASA\" data-secret=\"QdJeb3LqaY\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/ksc-20231114-ph-geb01-0001.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Carolyn Warren,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03285-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Baird Brown Law Firm

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/12/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8218 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8218 Filed 10/18/17 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. EDWARD ASH.

June 19, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### SIGMA CONSTR. CO. v. GUILFORD CTY. BD. OF EDUC.

No. 347P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 376

Motion by plaintiff to amend petition for discretionary review denied 8 November 2001. Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 dismissed as moot 8 November 2001.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         632,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  704,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,658
<INVENTORY>                                  2,258,456
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,047,810
<PP&E>                                       2,613,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                 784,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,876,899
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,171,307
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,836
<COMMON>                                         3,539
<OTHER-SE>                                     949,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,876,899
<SALES>                                      3,665,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,665,982
<CGS>                                        2,589,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,589,340
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,370,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,393,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,393,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,393,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (2.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.45)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Earnestine Riley,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04065-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8896 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atec Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Balwinder Singh Bathla, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                       /s/ BALWINDER SINGH BATHLA
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Balwinder Singh Bathla
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       November 5, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

      ( print page 60522)    
                    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on Thursday, October 9, 2014, in Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC. The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open at 9:30 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's Web site at                     *www.sec.gov.*

On September 17, 2014, the Commission issued notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-9647), indicating that the meeting is open to the public (except during portions of the meeting reserved for meetings of the Committee's subcommittees), and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a quorum of the Commission may attend the meeting. It was determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The agenda for the meeting includes: Remarks from Commissioners; a discussion of a recommendation of the Investor as Purchaser subcommittee and Investor Education subcommittee on the definition of accredited investor; a discussion of a recommendation of the Investor as Owner subcommittee on impartiality in the disclosure of preliminary voting results; an update on possible recommendations of the Market Structure subcommittee on the settlement cycle; a briefing by Commission staff on municipal finance bond market transparency; a discussion of issuer adoption of fee-shifting bylaws for intra-corporate litigation; and nonpublic subcommittee meetings.

For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: October 3, 2014.

Kevin M. O'Neill,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-23990 Filed 10-3-14; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40916 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ELMER IVAN GARTH-DAVINSON CANALES, also known as Arnoldo Canales, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CR-398-1

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Elmer Ivan Garth-Davinson Canales has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Davinson was notified of counsel’s motion, but he has not filed a response. Our review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. The motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.