alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Davis T. Crockett, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03550-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8648 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8648 Filed 11/06/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of MainStreet BankShares, Inc., certify that to the best of our knowledge and belief the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of MainStreet BankShares, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of 18 USC, Section 1350 of the United States Code and is subject to
the knowledge and willfulness qualifications contained in Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350(c).



|               |  |  |  |                                                                     
|-------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: 03/17/11 |  |  |  | /s/ Larry A. Heaton                                                 
|               |  |  |  | Larry A. Heaton                                                     
|               |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                               
|               |  | 
|Date: 03/17/11 |  |  |  | /s/ Brenda H. Smith                                                 
|               |  |  |  | Brenda H. Smith                                                     
|               |  |  |  | Executive Vice President
Chief Financial Officer Corporate
Secretary



76
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

___________________________________ 

IN RE: BARD IVC FILTERS 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION No. 2:15-MD-02641-DGC 

____________________________________ 

This Document Relates to: 

VINCENT ANGELINA

Civil Case # 2:16-cv-04467-DGC

____________________________________ 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs VINCENT 

ANGELINA and Defendants C.R. BARD, INC., and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, 

INC., through their undersigned counsel, that the above-captioned action is 

voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)

(A)(ii), and without costs or fees to any party. 

Dated this 8th day of January 2018.

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Robert Luke

Robert Luke, TX Bar #00789463

THE LUKE LAW FIRM

1201 Shepherd Drive

Houston, TX 77007

(713) 457-6300 – telephone (713)

621-5900 – facsimile

/s/ Daniel Barton

Daniel Barton, TX Bar #00789774

BARTON LAW FIRM

1201 Shepherd Drive Houston, TX 

77007(713) 457-6300 – telephone 

(713) 621-5900 – facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9539 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 8th day of January, 2018, I electronically transmitted the

attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System which will automatically 

send email notification of such filing to all attorneys of record. A copy of the foregoing was also 

served via Email to the following:

Richard B. North, Jr.

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

Matthew B. Lerner

matthew.lerner@nelsonmullins.com 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th Street, NW

Suite 1700

Atlanta, GA 30363

/s/ Robert Luke

Robert Luke

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9539 Filed 01/09/18 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Chad Jenkins, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03496-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8622 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
#### William S. Green *v.*Beriah McGoffin.

Option of Purchase — Right of Holder to Rescind.

One who directs an investment in a speculative enterprise must elect the option of purchase within a reasonable time. The conventional reservation of an option to reject the purchase cannot be reasonably interpreted so as to allow him an indefinite time to accept, which would give him the injust advantage of holding the interest so long as it was in value, and repudiate it if it should depreciate.

APPEAL EROM JEEEEBSON CIRCUIT COURT. CITY.

September 26, 1868.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Robertson:

McGoffin having vested the $2,500 in the purchase of 1-36th of LaCrescent City and had the right transferred to Green on the books, kept for that purpose by the company of stockholders, thereby fulfilled the trust he had undertaken to make on investment. Green, when notified of the investment as made, seemed to approve it and, though for more than a year after such notification he could have sold his interest for considerably more than cost, he preferred to retain it as an excellent speculation. After all this it was too late for him to renounce the investment and claim a restitution of the $2,500. The conventional reservation of an option to do so cannot be reasonably interpreted so as to *583allow him an indefinite time for an election which would have given him the unjust advantage of holding the interest as long as it rose in value and the right to repudiate it if it should ever become worthless or depreciated below par. He had a right to elect at any time before confirmation. But after he chose to approve his *locus in quo*was gone.

*Barrett*& Roberts, *for appellant.*

*Bullitt, for appellee.*

Consequently having attempted repudiation too late he has no right to enforce restitution.

Wherefore, the judgment dismissing his petition is affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Lance Cain, )

)

Plaintiff, ) MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

)

C.R. Bard, Inc., et al., ) Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00446-DGC

)

Defendant. )

ORDER ON APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY FOR

ADMISSION TO PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE

The Application of Eric D. Holland for Admission to Practice Pro Hac Vice in the abovecaptioned action is granted.

Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing from a FEDERAL Bar. 

Applicant has requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for 

Plaintiff in the above-entitled action.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the 

case in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 872-2 Filed 02/22/16 Page 1 of 1
I ASA 0 R G AN I ZATl 0 N 

CHIEF SCIENTIST 

1 D1zEr I 1 DIREpF 1 1 DIRzoR 1 PROCUREMENT LEGISLATIVE 

OPWRTUNllY AFFAIRS 

-1 GENERAL COUNSEL Fi 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE AND 

TERRESTRIAL 

APPLICATIONS 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE SCIENCE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE TECHNOLOGY 

r I I 

AMES DXYDEN FLIGHT GODDARD SPACE 

RESEARCHCENTER RESEARCH CENTER FLIGHT CENTER 

~ LFwr LYxOm JMN 

RESEARCH CENTER RESEARCHCENTER SPACE CENTER 

CHIEFENGINEER I 

I ' DlRECTDROFPUBLlC*FFAIRS I ' I DIRECTOROF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS I I A~~~~~

I STAFF ADVISORS i ~ AEROSPACE 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

EXTERNAL RELATIONS 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

MANAGEMENT 

OPERATIONS 

I I 

ASSOCIAit ASSOCIATE ASSOC~TE ~ 

ADMINISIRIITOR ADMINISTRATOR ADMlNlSTRnTOR /^" 

SPACE F.IGnl CEhTER I SPALFCENTER 

FLIGHT CENTER ECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana, Relator

Appellate case number: 01-19-00063-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-54046

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

On January 25, 2019, relator, Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana, filed a petition 

for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent trial judge to rule on its pending 

motion to compel appraisal and the cross-motions for summary judgment within seven 

days of this Court’s judgment. Relator has not filed an emergency motion, but it requests 

an expedited ruling from this Court because trial has been set for February 18, 2019. 

Relator has also attached a sworn record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(1). On January 30, 

2019, real party in interest J. Douglas Sutter filed a response in opposition to the petition.

Although relator’s petition notes that motion hearings were held on March 9, 2018, 

for the motion to compel appraisal, and on June 29, 2018, on the cross-motions for 

summary judgment, it neither attached the hearing transcripts nor stated that these records 

have been ordered or that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter 

complained. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). Accordingly, we ORDER the relator, within 

3 days of the date of this order, to file a statement that no relevant testimony was adduced 

in connection with the matter complained or else to provide evidence of requesting the 

reporter’s records for the March 9, 2018 and June 29, 2018 hearings and payment for, or 

arrangements to pay for, the reporter’s fee to prepare these records. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.7(a)(2), (b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes______

 x Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: ___February 5, 2019____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Kevin Morris,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04390-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: February 1, 2018 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9884 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 1
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"X-56B Begins New Flight Series","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WgtfoLEtUi\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/x-56b-begins-new-flight-series\/\">X-56B Begins New Flight Series<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/x-56b-begins-new-flight-series\/embed\/#?secret=WgtfoLEtUi\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“X-56B Begins New Flight Series” — NASA\" data-secret=\"WgtfoLEtUi\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/afrc2021-0052-04-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atec Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A-1 for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ashok
Ramerta, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                       /s/ ASHOK RAMETRA
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Ashok Rametra
                                       President
                                       April 22, 2003


                                       24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Darryl L. Walker,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03513-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 20, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9427 Filed 12/21/17 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,369,340
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,075,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,815
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,688,339
<PP&E>                                       7,099,161
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,407,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,958,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,195,062
<BONDS>                                        746,341<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,622
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,739,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,958,646
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,216,595
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,620,995
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,812,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                89,570
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              48,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                874,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                   384,346
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            490,538
<DISCONTINUED>                                (60,509)<F2>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,030,950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53<F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<FN>
<F1>CURRENT PORTION OF LONG TERM DEBT = 487,630
<F2>IN ADDITION, THERE IS A GAIN ON THE SALE OF THE PAYROLL DIVISION IN THE AMOUNT
OF $1,600,921.
<F3>THIS IS BASIC EPS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00076-CR

Candelario Cerda, Jr., Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-10-0912, HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Candelario Cerda, Jr. filed his notice of appeal on January 21, 2014. Cerda

requested and received 120 days of extension of time to file his brief, but he has exceeded that time

and the brief has not been filed.

On December 5, 2014, Cerda’s retained counsel, Daniel H. Wannamaker, filed

another motion for extension of time requesting an additional 60 days to file appellant’s brief. We

grant the motion in part and order Daniel H. Wannamaker to file appellant’s brief on or before

January 20, 2015. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel may be required to show cause why

he should not be held in contempt of court.

It is ordered on December 12, 2014.

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Do Not Publish
#### FRANK LOPAS v. TOWNSHIP OF HAZLET.

July 2, 1984.

Certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily reversed and the matter is remanded to the Law Division for a new trial on the merits.

Jurisdiction is not retained.
EXHIBIT
32-2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX
CREDITS III, L.P.; (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie
R. Wenk, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates,
Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R.
WENK


Melanie
R. Wenk


Vice
President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date:
February 16, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DAVID HATCHIGIAN,

Petitioner

v.

RAYMOND QUAGLIA, ARNOLD 

DRANOFF, DRANOFF & PATRIZIO, P.C., 

STEVEN G. LEVENTHAL, REGER RIZZO 

& DARNALL, AND TRAVELERS 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 270 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.