alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of PDS Gaming Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-79523), Form S-8 (File No.
33-85966) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-49199) of our report dated February 13, 2002, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of PDS Gaming Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
2001 and 2000, and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PIERCY,
BOWLER, TAYLOR & KERN
Certified Public Accountants and Business Advisors,
A Professional Corporation

Las
Vegas, Nevada
March 25, 2002

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32

M&F BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

M & F BANCORP, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of M & F Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) certify that the annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                         |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: March 22, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Kim D. Saunders     |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Kim D. Saunders         |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Dated: March 22, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Lyn Hittle          |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Lyn Hittle              |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 



|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8850 Filed 11/14/17 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8850 Filed 11/14/17 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Chester Flanders, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[788 NYS2d 617]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Executive Department of the respondent, New York State Division of Parole, dated June 16, 2003, confirming a determination of the respondent, New York State Division of Parole, dated May 15, 2002, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s request to be released on parole, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (McGuirk, J), dated October 29, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner challenges a May 15, 2002, determination. Since then, he has reappeared before the respondent, New York State Division of Parole (hereinafter the Board), his parole request has been denied again, and he is being held pursuant to the subsequent determination. Consequently, this appeal has been rendered academic *(see Matter of Lloyd v New York State Div. of Parole,*217 AD2d 548 [1995]; *Matter of Lee v Russi,*211 AD2d 720 [1995]).

In any event, we would have affirmed the judgment because the Board’s determination was made in accordance with law and did not show “irrationality bordering on impropriety” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000]; *see Matter of Mata v Travis,*8 AD3d 570 [2004];. *Matter of Kirkpatrick v Travis,*5 AD3d 385 [2004]; *Matter of Colon v Travis,*305 AD2d 407 [2003]; *Matter of Romer v Travis,*299 AD2d 553 [2002]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Krausman and Spolzino, JJ, concur.
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Quick Start

Guide to

Payload Design

ACRONYMS

March 2, 2022
ACRONYM MEANING REFERENCED IN 

GUIDE SECTION(S)

ABS Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene Payload Engineering

ATCS Active Thermal Control System Payload Engineering

C Centigrade Payload Engineering

CoFR Certification of Flight Readiness Payload Safety

COTS Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Payload Engineering

CSE Client Payload Engineer Payload Safety

CSS Client Service+Satisfaction (Team) FAQs

DFMR Redundant or Designed for Minimum Risk Payload Engineering

EDMS Electronic Document Management System FAQs

EEE Electrical, Electronic, and

Electromechanical

Payload Engineering

EMC Electromagnetic Compatibility Payload Engineering

EMI Electromagnetic Interference Payload Engineering

EPDC Electrical Power Distribution and

Control

Payload Engineering

EPS Electrical Power System Payload Engineering

FAQs Frequently Asked Questions Getting Started / FAQs

FEP Fluorinated ethylene propylene Payload Engineering

FIT Failure-in-Time Payload Engineering

IPL Integrated Payload List Getting Started

ISRP ISS Safety and Review Panel Payload Engineering / 

Payload Safety

ISS International Space Station Getting Started / FAQs 

/ Payload Engineering / 

Payload Safety

Acronyms

What does that mean again?
Quick Start Guide to Payload Design: Acronyms 3

IT Information Technology FAQs

ITCS Internal Thermal Control System Payload Engineering

JSC Johnson Space Center Payload Engineering

Li-ion Lithium ion Payload Engineering

LTL Low Temperature Loop Payload Engineering

MAPTIS Materials and Processes Technical Information SystemPayload Engineering

MTL Moderate Temperature Loop Payload Engineering

NASA National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Getting Started / FAQs 

/ Payload Engineering / 

Payload Safety

NDC NASA Domain Credential FAQs

ORBIT OZ Requirements Baselining and

Integration Tool

FAQs

OZ ISS Research Integration Office’s Mail Code 

OZ at NASA/Johnson Space Center

FAQs

PD Payload Developer FAQs / Payload Engineering / Payload 

Safety

PDI Payload Data Integrator FAQs

PET Polyethylene terephthalate Payload Engineering

PFA Perfluoroalkoxy Payload Engineering

PIA Payload Integration Agreement Getting Started / Payload Engineering

PIM Payload Integration Manager Getting Started / FAQs 

/ Payload Engineering / 

Payload Safety

PSE Safety Payload Engineer Payload Safety

PTCS Passive Thermal Control System Payload Engineering

PVC Polyvinyl Chloride Payload Engineering

RPM Research Portfolio Manager FAQs / Payload Safety

RSA

SecurID

A two-factor authentication technology used 

to protect network resources

FAQs

S&M Structures and Mechanisms Payload Engineering

SDP Safety Data Package Payload Safety

SSP Space Station Program Payload Safety

TFE Tetrafluoroethylene Payload Engineering

TIM Technical Interchange Meeting Payload Safety

VV Visiting vehicle Payload Safety
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAMON TORRES-MARIN, a/k/a Ramon 

MaleneTorres, a/k/a Ramon Maring Torres, 

a/k/a Ramon Torres Morin, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-5146

(D.C. No. 4:13-CR-0234-GKF-1)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

The captioned appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 

42.1.

This order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 31, 2014

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-5146 Document: 01019363407 Date Filed: 12/31/2014 Page: 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Abraham Assadi,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03717-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/14/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8917 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of New China Homes, Ltd., a Cayman Islands
company (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Denny Chi Hing Chan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Denny Chi Hing Chan
------------------------------------
Denny Chi Hing Chan
Chief Financial Officer
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 234

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing services on the 

Island of Diego Garcia shall be entitled to tax benefits in the same 

manner as if such services were performed in a combat zone, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To provide that members of the Armed Forces performing 

services on the Island of Diego Garcia shall be entitled 

to tax benefits in the same manner as if such services 

were performed in a combat zone, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 234 IS 

1 SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN TAX BENEFITS FOR 

2 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES PER3 FORMING SERVICES ON THE ISLAND OF 

4 DIEGO GARCIA. 

5 (a) GENERAL RULE.—In the case of a member of the 

6 Armed Forces of the United States who is entitled to spe7 cial pay under section 310 of title 37, United States Code 

8 (relating to special pay: duty subject to hostile fire or im9 minent danger), for services performed on the Island of 

10 Diego Garcia as part of Operation Enduring Freedom (or 

11 any successor operation), such member shall be treated 

12 in the same manner as if such services were in a combat 

13 zone (as determined under section 112 of the Internal 

14 Revenue Code of 1986) for purposes of the following provi15 sions of such Code: 

16 (1) Section 2(a)(3) (relating to special rule 

17 where deceased spouse was in missing status). 

18 (2) Section 112 (relating to the exclusion of 

19 certain combat pay of members of the Armed 

20 Forces). 

21 (3) Section 692 (relating to income taxes of 

22 members of Armed Forces on death). 

23 (4) Section 2201 (relating to members of the 

24 Armed Forces dying in combat zone or by reason of 

25 combat-zone-incurred wounds, etc.). 
3

•S 234 IS 

1 (5) Section 3401(a)(1) (defining wages relating 

2 to combat pay for members of the Armed Forces). 

3 (6) Section 4253(d) (relating to the taxation of 

4 phone service originating from a combat zone from 

5 members of the Armed Forces). 

6 (7) Section 6013(f)(1) (relating to joint return 

7 where individual is in missing status). 

8 (8) Section 7508 (relating to time for per9 forming certain acts postponed by reason of service 

10 in combat zone). 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para13 graph (2), this section shall take effect on Sep14 tember 11, 2001. 

15 (2) WITHHOLDING.—Subsection (a)(5) shall 

16 apply to remuneration paid after September 10, 

17 2001.

Æ
#### TAYLOR v. TAYLOR

No. 575P01

Case below: 146 N.C. App. Ill

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 18 December 2001.
Exhibit C 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8229-3 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 3
Deposition of:

Derek Muehrcke , M.D.

July 24, 2017

In the Matter of:

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products

Liability

Veritext Legal Solutions

1075 Peachtree St. NE , Suite 3625

Atlanta, GA, 30309

800.808.4958 | calendar-atl@veritext.com | 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8229-3 Filed 10/18/17 Page 2 of 3
Derek Muehrcke , M.D. July 24, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1 apologize for being a little slow here.

2 Q The sixth line down on the second paragraph.

3 The first complete paragraph on that page.

4 A Yes. She's also at risk of her Eclipse filter

5 fragment to perforate her pulmonary artery.

6 Q She now remains at high risk for PE. Are you

7 on page 8?

8 A Yeah.

9 Q The paragraph that begins: Mrs. Jones suffered

10 pain...

11 A Suffered pain, yes.

12 Q Go down six lines.

13 A She is also at risk for her Eclipse filter

14 fragmentation to perforate her pulmonary artery.

15 Q The sentence before that.

16 A Okay.

17 Q She now remains at high risk for PE.

18 That is what you said; correct?

19 A Yes, yes.

20 Q What's your basis for saying that?

21 A Well, her history of DVT's and PE's and her

22 contraindication of anticoagulation, and the loss of a

23 -- her filter's not in place.

24 Q Do you know whether any physician has

25 recommended her to have another filter implanted?

Page 136

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8229-3 Filed 10/18/17 Page 3 of 3
{"agency":"NASA","generated":"2013-01-31 15:23:21","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"}],"value":"2013"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Repoeting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q1"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"7"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["ARC","DFRC","GRC","GSFC","JSC","LaRC","MSFC","JPL","NSSC","OIG","SSC","KSC","OGC","HQ"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["16","5","35","23","8","30","5","4","5","2","17","43"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["12","1","7","25","31","8","16","3","4","4","2","19","41"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["6","10","1","1","1","12"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2013","quarter":"Q1"}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Thomas Arkle,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03583-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/13/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8341 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8341 Filed 10/23/17 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Net Lease Income &
Growth Fund XX Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-
Q  for  the  period ended September 30, 2009, as filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President  of  AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., the Managing General  Partner  of  the
Partnership, and Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI
Fund  Management XX, Inc., each certify, pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2009



                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XX, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              November 10, 2009