alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between David Bernfeld, Appellant, and Prudential Securities Incorporated et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 865]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered September 12, 2003, which denied the petition for a permanent stay of arbitration of the underlying third-party claim by respondent Prudential Securities, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The broad arbitration agreements between petitioner and Prudential covered “any transaction” and “all controversies” between the parties. Although Prudential’s third-party claim concerns certain options trading conducted by petitioner, as attorney-in-fact, in the account of the underlying claimant, there is a “reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute and the general subject matter of the underlying contract” between petitioner and Prudential *(Matter of Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co. v Investors Ins. Co. of Am.,*37 NY2d 91, 96 [1975]). This is especially the case in light of profits and losses between petitioner and the underlying claimant that were allocated by transfers into and out of petitioner’s personal account, which is unquestionably subject to the arbitration agreements executed by petitioner. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Nardelli, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

KSTU, LLC; KUTV LICENSEE, LLC, 

d/b/a KUTV, a/k/a KMYU; FOX 

BROADCASTING COMPANY; 

NEXSTAR BROADCASTING 

COMPANY, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

AEREO, INC., 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-4020

(D.C. No. 2:13-CV-00910-DAK)

(D. Utah)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

This matter is before the court on the joint motion filed by the parties to dismiss 

the captioned appeal. The motion is granted. Each party shall bear its own costs.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 11, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-4020 Document: 01019428818 Date Filed: 05/11/2015 Page: 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FC Banc Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A. Wise, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as
enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Jeffrey A. Wise

Jeffrey A. Wise
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, October 27, 2014, 07:30 a.m. 
to October 28, 2014, 06:00 p.m., Doubletree Guest Suites Santa Monica, 
1707 Fourth Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90401 which was published in the 
Federal Register on October 06, 2014, 79 FR 60175.
    The meeting will start on October 27, 2014. The meeting time and 
location remains the same.
    The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: October 7, 2014.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-24380 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Trimax Corporation and Subsidiaries



We hereby consent to the use of our report dated December 20, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Trimax Corporation and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years then ended, which appears in the amendment #2 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Trimax Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 2006, filed with the SEC on May 27, 2008.



/s/ DNTW Chartered Accountants, LLP



DNTW Chartered Accountants, LLP

Markham, Canada

March 31, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

VIOLA M. JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

QUIN RIVERS AGENCY FOR

COMMUNITY ACTION, INCORPORATED;

MICHELLE N. GREENIDGE-MOORE,

Head Start Director, Quin Rivers

Agency for Community Action,

Incorporated; MARY V. WARE,

Executive Director of Quin Rivers

Agency for Community Action,

Incorporated,

Defendants-Appellees,

and  No. 01-1784

QUIN RIVERS EXECUTIVE BOARD OF

DIRECTORS; QUIN RIVERS AGENCY FOR

COMMUNITY ACTION, INCORPORATED

HEAD START POLICY COUNCIL; QUIN

RIVERS HEAD START PROGRAM;

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA HEAD

START PROGRAMS HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES; UNITED STATES

OFFICE OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT

SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HEAD

START PROGRAMS, HEAD START

BRANCH CHIEF,

Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CA-00-330-3)
Submitted: March 29, 2002

Decided: April 24, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Bernice Stafford-Turner, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Charles

G. Meyer, III, LECLAIR RYAN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Laura

Graham Fox, LAURA G. FOX, P.L.L.C., Warrenton, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Viola M. Johnson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Appellees on her employment discrimination claims raised under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.

2001). Johnson also seeks review of the district court’s orders denying numerous discovery requests. We have reviewed the parties’

briefs, the joint appendix, the supplemental joint appendix, and the

district court’s orders and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. 

We review the district court’s orders concerning discovery management for abuse of discretion. Wells v. Liddy, 186 F.3d 505, 518

2 JOHNSON v. QUIN RIVERS AGENCY
n.12 (4th Cir. 1999). We conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion when it denied Johnson’s numerous discovery requests. 

On the merits, the district court properly found that Johnson failed

to establish a hostile work environment claim. See Causey v. Balog,

162 F.3d 795, 801 (4th Cir. 1998). Furthermore, Johnson’s discriminatory discharge and retaliation claims fail because she has failed to

show the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons Appellees offered for

terminating her were a pretext for discrimination. See Reeves v.

Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 137-39 (2000).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment on the reasoning of the district

court. Johnson v. Quin Rivers Agency for Community Action, Inc.,

No. CA-00-330-3 (E.D. Va. May 9, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

JOHNSON v. QUIN RIVERS AGENCY 3
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2347

To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to permanently 

authorize the public school and private school tuition assistance programs 

established under the Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2004

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. 

LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs 

A BILL

To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 

1999 to permanently authorize the public school and 

private school tuition assistance programs established 

under the Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION OF TUITION AS4 SISTANCE PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3(i) of the 

6 District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 

7 38—2702(i), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking 
2

•S 2347 IS 

1 ‘‘each of the five succeeding fiscal years’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘each succeeding fiscal year’’. 

3 (b) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5(f) of 

4 such Act (sec. 38—2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amend5 ed by striking ‘‘each of the five succeeding fiscal years’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘each succeeding fiscal year’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          19,934
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         220,162
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                38,921
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     48,430
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          42,366
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,203,785
<ALLOWANCE>                                     25,137
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,676,494
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,484,270
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             43,418
<LONG-TERM>                                     12,650
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,676,494
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 78,627
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,469
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                12,626
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                97,722
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              52,558
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,659
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           44,063
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   17,665
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 21,940
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,669
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      18,669
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,765
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.21
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,102
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,794
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,323
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               25,137
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,870
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             20,267
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         25,137


</TABLE>
#### Mary Birch et al *v.*George S. Miller's Admr. et al.

Jurisdiction over Cross-petition — Pleading.

Properly filing in the Circuit Court a petition for injunction and recission, gave to the court jurisdiction over a cross-petition, for a specific execution and an enforcement of the lien sought tó be enjoined.

APPEAL PROM MARION CIROUIT COURT.

December 4, 1868.

*A. H. Field, for appellant.*

*■ Noble, for appellee.*

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Robertson:

It is too late to inquire in tbis suit, into tbe validity or regularity of tbe judgment against Bircb and wife; and ber exoneration in tbis case, in consequence of ber coverture, cannot operate to bis prejudice.

Properly filing in tbe Marion circuit court the petition for injunction and rescission, certainly gave to tbat court jurisdiction over tbe cross petition for a specific execution and an enforcement of tbe lien. And we see no valid objection to tbe decree to tbat effect. Tbe land seems to have been sold by tbe tract, and dower is not in tbe way.

As tbe purchaser under tbat decree of sale will get all tbe title of both vendor and vendee, it cannot be material whether Miller’s deed was sufficient or not. But it appears to have passed'Miller’s title.

Wherefore, there being no substantial or available error in tbe judgment, it is affirmed.

Judge Hardin did not sit in tbis case.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2212

To amend title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide that the provisions 

relating to countervailing duties apply to nonmarket economy countries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2004

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. BAYH, Mrs. DOLE, and Mr. GRAHAM of South 

Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide 

that the provisions relating to countervailing duties apply 

to nonmarket economy countries.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Overseas 

5 Subsidies Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF COUNTERVAILING DUTIES TO 

7 NONMARKET ECONOMY COUNTRIES. 

8 Section 701(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

9 U.S.C. 1671(a)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘(including 
2

•S 2212 IS 

1 a nonmarket economy country)’’ after ‘‘country’’ each 

2 place it appears. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 The amendments made by section 2 apply to petitions 

5 filed under section 702 of the Tariff Act of 1930 on or 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Reply to Attn of:

National Aeronautics and
Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001

January 18, 2022

General Law Practice Group
TO: Distribution
FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the Space
Policy Institute/George Washington University Dinner on February 4, 2022

On February 4, 2022, the Space Policy Institute (SPI) of George Washington University’s
(GWU), a not-for-profit organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Service Code, will hold a dinner at the DACOR Bacon House in Washington, DC, from
6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. SPI is in control of the planning, organizing, and issuing invitations
for this event. The guest speaker at the event will be Derek Tournear, Director of the
Department of Defense, Space Development Agency on the recent achievements and
current challenges the Agency is facing.

Approximately 50 people are expected to attend the event. Attendees will have a diversity
of views or interests and will include personnel from other federal agencies, members of
the legislative branch, and representatives from academia, industry, and foreign entities.
The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is approximately $96 per
person. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange information
regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements of a
“widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2).

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the
event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and
views pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs and operations. NASA employees —
including NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to sign an ethics
pledge under Executive Order 13989 — who do not have a significant role in a matter
affecting the interests of SPI or GWU may accept an invitation for free attendance to the
event. In those circumstances, | find that the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs
any concern that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the
performance of their duties.

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting
the interests of the sponsor, such as procurement duties, program management, or
negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate determination
from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation.

EDL

Adam F. Greenstone
#### The State *v.*Hensley.—In error.

*Wednesday, January*1, 1845.

THE illegal selection of the grand jurors is no cause for quashing, an indictment on motion. *Bellair*v. *The*State, 6 Blackf. 104.
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officers of Trintech Group PLC (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Company’s Annual Report on Form20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

/s/ CyrilMcGuire                

CYRIL MCGUIRE

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

 

/s/ R. Paul Byrne                 

R. PAUL BYRNE 

Chief Financial Officer 

 

 

Dated: May 12, 2004 

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure to thisstatement 

 

A signed original this written statement required by 18 U.S.C.§ 1350 has been provided to Trintech Group PLC and will be retained by Trintech Group PLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN A FOIA REQUEST1 

 

Full name: Date: 

 Last First M.I. 

Organization: Job Title: 

 

Address: Phone: 

 Street address Apt/Unit # 

 Email: 

 City State Zip Code 

Requester Fee 

Category*: 

Willing to Pay All 

Fees?: 

Yes ☐ No ☐ Amount Willing 

to Pay: $ 

 

*You must select the proper Requester Category (i.e., Commercial, Educational Institution, Scientific Institution, Media, or All 

Other). Additional information about each category is available here. If you claim to be in the Educational, Scientific, or Media 

categories, you must provide evidence as described in our regulations at the above link.

 

 

Are you requesting a fee waiver**? Yes ☐ No ☐ 

**The NASA FOIA Regulations provide information regarding fees and can be found here. To qualify for a fee waiver, you must 

meet the requirements discussed in §1206.506(c) and (d). 

 

Fee Waiver Request Reason: 

Are you requesting expedited processing***? Yes ☐ No ☐ 

***The NASA FOIA Regulations provide information regarding expedited processing and can be found here. To qualify for 

expedited processing, you must meet the requirements discussed in §1206.400(b)(3). 

 

Expedited Request Reason: 

 

NASA Center to which you are submitting your request : 

** **A list of NASA Centers is available here. 

 

Detailed Description of Request: 

 

1 If submitting a request for records about you or someone else, you must also provide a certification of identity form completed by the individual 

about whom you seek records. A sample certification of identity form is available here.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         743,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,299,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (342,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,822,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,469,449
<PP&E>                                       3,759,949
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,530,324)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,604,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,989,032
<BONDS>                                      3,135,112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,664,809
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,249)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,604,973
<SALES>                                     13,062,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,062,486
<CGS>                                        7,778,780
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,746,833
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             483,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,919,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (107,144)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,812,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,812,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)
        

</TABLE>