alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 3, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67720-67721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27910]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

[[Page 67721]]

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
November 10, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available. In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

     October 14, 2010

B. New Business

     Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking--Disclosure to 
Shareholders and Investors on Senior Officer Compensation

Closed Session*

Reports

     Office of Management Services Quarterly Report

    Dated: October 28, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-27910 Filed 11-1-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
II 

Calendar No. 634

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2436

[Report No. 108–306] 

To reauthorize the Native American Programs Act of 1974. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2004

Mr. INOUYE (for himself and Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

JULY 15, 2004

Reported by Mr. CAMPBELL, with amendments 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL

To reauthorize the Native American Programs Act of 1974.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIVE AMERICAN PROGRAMS ACT OF 1974.

4 (a) INTRA-DEPARTMENTAL COUNCIL ON NATIVE

5 AMERICAN AFFAIRS.—Section 803B(d)(1) of the Native 

6 American Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2991b–2(d)(1)) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘There’’ and all that follows and 
2

•S 2436 RS 

1 inserting the following: ‘‘There is established in the Office 

2 of the Secretary the Intra-Departmental Council on Native 

3 American Affairs. The Commissioner and the Director of 

4 the Indian Health Service shall serve as co-chairpersons of 

5 the Council. The co-chairpersons shall advise the Secretary 

6 on all matters affecting Native Americans that involve the 

7 Department.’’.

8 (a) IN GENERAL.— (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPRO9 PRIATIONS.—Section 816 of the Native American Pro10 grams Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d) is amended—

11 (1) by striking subsections (a) through (c) and 

12 inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There are authorized to be ap14 propriated—

15 ‘‘(1) to carry out section 803(d), $8,000,000 

16 for each of fiscal years 2005 through 2009; and 

17 ‘‘(2) to carry out provisions of this title other 

18 than section 803(d) and any other provision having 

19 an express authorization of appropriations, such 

20 sums as are necessary for each of fiscal years 2005 

21 through 2009. 

22 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—Not less than 90 percent of the 

23 funds made available to carry out this title for a fiscal 

24 year (other than funds made available to carry out sec25 tions 803(d), 803A, 803C, and 804, and any other provi-
3

•S 2436 RS 

1 sion of this title having an express authorization of appro2 priations) shall be expended to carry out section 803(a).’’; 

3 (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub4 section (c); and 

5 (3) by striking subsection (e). 

6 (b) (c) REPORTS.—Section 811A of the Native Amer7 ican Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992–1) is amend8 ed—

9 (1) by striking the section heading and all that 

10 follows through ‘‘each year,’’ and inserting the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 811A. REPORTS. 

13 ‘‘Every 5 years, the Secretary shall’’; and 

14 (2) by striking ‘‘an annual report’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘a report’’. 
Calendar No. 634

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2436

[Report No. 108–306] 

A BILL

To reauthorize the Native American Programs Act 

of 1974. 

JULY 15, 2004

Reported with amendments
#### TAMARA ENTERPRISES, INC. v. J.A.M. ICE CREAM, INC.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
1

Filed 11/22/21 In re J. B. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin)

----

In re J.B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court

Law. C094135

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

J.B.,

Defendant and Appellant. (Super. Ct. No.

JJCJVDE2020 0000 364)

This appeal comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and In

re Kevin S . (2003) 113 Cal. App.4th 97. Having reviewed the record as required by

Wende and Kevin S ., we affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

The m inor’s , J.B., mother found minor, who was 15 years old, with his hand down

the front of his five

- year

- old stepsister’s, A.A., underwear . A.A. said the minor touched2

her “[i]n [her] bottom” and he made her put her mouth on his penis. A petition was filed

against the minor under W elfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging the minor

committed a lewd or lascivious act with a child under 14 years old

. ( Pen. Code, § 288,

subd. ( a )

. )

On December 18, 2020, the minor filed a motion to dismiss the petition because of

a delay in obtaining the body camera video from the investigating police officer. After

briefing and oral argume nt, the trial court denied the motion.

The juvenile court held a contested jurisdiction hearing over several days taking

testimony from A.A.

, the mother

, and the investigating police officer

. On May 14, 2021,

t he juvenile court found the charge true beyond a reasonable doubt and declared the

minor a ward of the court under W elfare and Institutions Code section 602. The juvenile

court transferred the case to Contra Costa County for disposition because that wa s t he

minor’s county of residence.

II. DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent the minor on appeal. Counsel filed an opening

brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and

determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende, supra

,

25 Cal. 3d 436; In re Kevin S., supra , 113 Cal. App.4th 97.) The minor was advised by

counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the

opening brief. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication

from the minor.

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error

that would result in a disposition more favorable to the minor.3 III. DISPOSITION

The j udgment is affirmed.

/S/

RENNER, J.

We concur:

/S/

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

/S/

HULL, J.
#### STATE v. HILL

No. 418P01

Case below: 144 N.C. App. 450

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 18 December 2001.
#### Jorge Luis Cruz, Appellant-Respondent, v Board of Managers of 140 West End Avenue Condominium et al., Respondents, and Insignia Residential Group, Respondent-Appellant.

[787 NYS2d 872]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered March 24, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 insofar as to dismiss the complaint against defendants-respondents, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Cross appeal of defendant Insignia Residential Group from that portion of the same order denying it relief unanimously dismissed as abandoned, without costs.

*433Plaintiff, allegedly, was injured when, while working as a handyman at defendant condominium, he fell from a defective ladder supplied by defendant Insignia, the condominium’s managing agent. Inasmuch as defendant condominium was plaintiff’s employer at the time of the accident, his claims against the condominium, its board, and plaintiffs fellow employee, the building superintendent, are not permissible *(see*Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 [6]). The complaint was also properly dismissed as against defendant Brown, an Insignia employee. The wholly conclusory allegations of negligence against Brown do not make out a sustainable claim against her individually. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. BERNARD S. REID.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2071

To expand the definition of immediate relative for purposes of the 

Immigration and Nationality Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2004

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To expand the definition of immediate relative for purposes 

of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE DEFINITION. 

4 Section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Na5 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by 

6 inserting after ‘‘at least 21 years of age.’’ the following: 

7 ‘‘In the case of a parent of a citizen of the United States 

8 who has a child (as defined in section 101(b)(1)), the child 

9 shall be considered, for purposes of this subsection, an im-
2

•S 2071 IS 

1 mediate relative if accompanying or following to join the 

2 parent.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-87344, 333-76367 and 333-59672) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-132857, 333-90374, 333-111740, 333-112288 and 333-32616)****of Merix Corporation of our report****dated August 23, 2006relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

August 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2234

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure that 
 prescription drug card sponsors pass along discounts to beneficiaries 
  under the medicare prescription drug discount card and transitional 
                          assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2004

  Mr. Daschle (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Reed, Mr. Feingold, Mr. 
 Kohl, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Graham of Florida, Mr. Reid, and 
   Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure that 
 prescription drug card sponsors pass along discounts to beneficiaries 
  under the medicare prescription drug discount card and transitional 
                          assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug Discount Card Improvement Act 
of 2004''.

SEC. 2. ENSURING THAT PRESCRIPTION DRUG CARD SPONSORS PASS ALONG 
              DISCOUNTS TO BENEFICIARIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-31(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-141(e)(1)(A)(ii)), as added by section 
101 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization 
Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173; 117 Stat. 2071), is amended by 
striking ``take into account'' and inserting ``reflect at least 90 
percent of all''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of section 101 of the Medicare 
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public 
Law 108-173; 117 Stat. 2066).
                                 <all>
```
CARNEGIE INSTITUTE

Blueprints to Blast Off: Making Our Way to 

the Moon to Mars

Jon Doctorick

4/01/20 - 6/30/24

Blueprints to Blast Off immerses students grades 4-8 in 

a suite of programs that highlight the innovation 

required to sustain human spaceflight to the Moon and 

Mars: (1) a live, theatrical planetarium show that is 

delivered onsite at the Carnegie Science Center or at 

schools in a portable dome, as well as distributed for 

free around the world, (2) a 45-minute theatric scienceon-stage assembly plus ten hands-on Adventure 

Stations that travels to schools in a dedicated van, and 

(3) three 45-minute workshops for 4th-8th graders 

delivered at annual festivals with accompanying 

teacher professional development and materials 

distributed for free on the Carnegie Science Center’s 

online STEMisphere platform.

List of Partners:

• NASA Ames Resarch Center

• Aliquippa, Duquense, and Clarion City School 

Districts

• Toronto City Schools

• Live Interactive Planetarium Symposium

Carnegie Science Center

Credits: Carnegie Institute

The material contained in this document is based upon 

work supported by a NASA grant or cooperative 

agreement award #80NSSC20M0031, under the Teams 

Engaging Affiliated Museums and Informal Institutions 

(TEAM II) activity of NASA’s Next Gen STEM Project.

Explore TEAM II Products 

https://www.nasa.gov/learning-resources/search/

www.nasa.gov
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT,
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in connection with the Annual Report of Quovadx, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Registrant hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Harvey A. WagnerHarvey A. WagnerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) March 9, 2005
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |                                   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | /s/                Alexander L. Weis   |   |
|   |   |   | Alexander                L. Weis       |   |
|   |   |   | Chief                Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |   |                                   |   |
|   |   |   | October                22, 2007        |   |

----
IMAX CORPORATION
  Summary of Directors Compensation
 1.
    
    In respect of each year during which an Eligible Director serves as a Director of the
Corporation, he shall receive:
 a.
    
    $20,000 (Cdn.) per year payable quarterly in arrears provided that an
Eligible Director may elect, at the commencement of each year of office, or as soon as
practicable thereafter, to receive such number of options to purchase an equivalent
number of Common Shares of the Corporation under the terms of the IMAX Stock Option
Plan (the Plan). The options will be granted annually and will vest in equal amounts
quarterly, in arrears;b.
    
    $1,500 (Cdn.) for every Board meeting attended in which an Eligible Director
participates whether in person or by telephone;c.
    
    $1,200 (Cdn.) for any Committee of the Board meetings in which the Eligible
Director participates, whether in person or by telephone;d.
    
    at the commencement of each year of office or upon joining the Board, or as
soon as practicable thereafter, a grant of options to purchase 8,000 Common Shares of
the Corporation under the terms of the IMAX Stock Option Plan at an exercise price
equal to the Fair Market Value of the shares, as defined in the Plan; ande.
    
    reimbursement of any expenses incurred by the Eligible Director in connection
with participation in Board or Committee meetings.
 2.
    
    The Chair of the Audit Committee shall receive $8,000 (Cdn.) per year payable quarterly, in
arrears.3.
    
    The annual compensation for Directors, as set out above, shall remain in effect until it is
amended or revoked by further resolution.
 August 11, 2005
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kate D. Ramsayer","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kramsaye\/","title":"NASA Wants to Identify Phytoplankton Species from Space. Here\u2019s Why.","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"cgosk4KuBZ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/nasa-wants-to-identify-phytoplankton-species-from-space-heres-why\/\">NASA Wants to Identify Phytoplankton Species from Space. Here\u2019s Why.<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/goddard\/nasa-wants-to-identify-phytoplankton-species-from-space-heres-why\/embed\/#?secret=cgosk4KuBZ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Wants to Identify Phytoplankton Species from Space. Here\u2019s Why.” — NASA\" data-secret=\"cgosk4KuBZ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/phytoplanktonsweden.jpeg?w=320","thumbnail_width":320,"thumbnail_height":318}
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30277

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALVARO GERMAN SALGADO CABALLERO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 89-CR-452-5-A

- - - - - - - - - -

June 17, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Alvara German Salgado Caballero, federal inmate # 21378-034,

appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion

purportedly filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(2). Caballero

argues that his sentence was improperly enhanced because the

Government did not comply with 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1). Caballero

argues for the first time that the district court should have

reduced his offense level for being a minor participant.

As the district court noted, § 3742(a)(2) does not authorize
No. 98-30277

-2-

the relief that Caballero seeks. 18 U.S.C. § 3742; see United

States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 142 (5th Cir. 1994) (the

“provisions for modification of a sentence under § 3742 are

available to a defendant only upon direct appeal of a sentence or

conviction”). Caballero’s arguments sound under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255; however, as Caballero has filed at least one prior motion

for § 2255 relief and has not obtained this court’s authorization

to file a second or successive § 2255 motion, the district court

did not err by failing to construe his claims under § 2255. The

district court properly dismissed Caballero’s motion for lack of

jurisdiction. The district court’s denial of the motion is

AFFIRMED.