alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2362

AN ACT

To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astrophysical

Observatory instrumentation support control building

and associated site development on Kitt Peak, Arizona,

and for other purposes.
 †

2

S 2362 ES

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SMITHSONIAN ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY

4 INSTRUMENTATION SUPPORT FACILITY.

5 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution

6 is authorized to develop the site for a Smithsonian Astro7 physical Observatory instrumentation support control

8 building, including the installation of necessary utilities

9 and equipment housings, and to construct such building

10 on the site, for the purpose of supporting the collaborative

11 Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array Sys12 tem (VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near Tucson, Ari13 zona.

14 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

15 There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out

16 this Act $1,000,000 for fiscal year 2005.

Passed the Senate June 14, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2362

AN ACT

To authorize construction of a Smithsonian Astroon Kitt Peak, Arizona, and for other purposes. control building and associated site development physical Observatory instrumentation support
**Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuantto**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

 

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Harris & Harris Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Douglas W. Jamison,as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Daniel B. Wolfe, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)	The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ Douglas W. Jamison	

Name: Douglas W. Jamison

Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 8, 2012

 

 

/s/ Daniel B. Wolfe	

Name: Daniel B. Wolfe

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 8, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Technical Information Service


National Technical Information Service Advisory Board

AGENCY: National Technical Information Service, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the next meeting of the National 
Technical Information Service Advisory Board (the Advisory Board), 
which advises the Secretary of Commerce and the Director of the 
National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on policies and 
operations of the Service.

DATES: The Advisory Board will meet on Friday, October 31, 2014 from 
9:00 a.m. to approximately 1:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Advisory Board will be held in Room 116 of the NTIS 
Facility at 5301 Shawnee Road, Alexandria, Virginia 22312. Please note 
admittance instructions under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 
this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bruce Borzino, (703) 605-6405, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f290909d80889b9c9db29c869b81dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16747479646c7f78795678627f6538717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NTIS Advisory Board is established by 
Section 3704b(c) of Title 15 of the United States Code. The charter has 
been filed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.).
    The first session will review of NTIS performance and 
accomplishments in Fiscal Year 2014. The second session will focus on 
NTIS strategic direction in Fiscal Year 2015. A final agenda and 
summary of the proceedings will be posted at the NTIS Web site as soon 
as they are available (http://www.ntis.gov/about/advisorybd.aspx).
    The NTIS Facility is a secure one. Accordingly persons wishing to 
attend should call the NTIS Visitors Center, (703) 605-6040, to arrange 
for admission. If there are sufficient expressions of interest, up to 
one-half hour will be reserved for public comments during the afternoon 
session. Questions from the public will not be considered by the Board 
but any person who wishes to submit a written question for the Board's 
consideration should mail or email it to the NTIS Visitor Center, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed8f8282869e99829f88ad8399849ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="44262b2b2f37302b3621042a302d376a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>, not later than October 17, 2014.

    Dated: October 7, 2014.
Bruce Borzino,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-24354 Filed 10-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, John R. Christman, the Chief Executive Officer of FC BANC CORP.., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of FC BANC CORP..;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ John R. Christman  
|                      |  | John R. Christman      
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
PORTAGE PARTNERS, LTD.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEET

                                                                  June 30, 2002
ASSETS

Current assets:                                                        -
Total current assets                                                  -


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts Payable                                                260
Accounts payable - related party                         1,627

Total current liabilities                                        1,887

Stockholder's equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value,
25,000,000 shares
authorized, 4,500,000 shares issued
and outstanding as of 06/30/02                           4,500
Additional paid-in capital                                        75
(Deficit) accumulated during
development stage                                          (6,462)
                                                                     (1,887)
                                                                   $      -

The accompanying notes are an intregal part of these financial statements.

Page 1
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Health Systems Solutions,
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Susan Baxter Gibson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/
                Susan Baxter Gibson Susan
                  Baxter Gibson
 Principal
                  Financial Officer
 March
        29,
        2006
EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                               MERIX CORPORATION

                      CALCULATIONS OF NET INCOME PER SHARE

                                                                 Year Ended May 31,
                                ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         1997                          1996                          1995
                                --------------------------     -------------------------     --------------------------
                                 Primary     Fully Diluted      Primary    Fully Diluted      Primary     Fully Diluted
                                --------------------------     -------------------------     --------------------------
<S>                             <C>               <C>          <C>              <C>          <C>               <C>     
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding for the Period         6,147             6,147        6,182            6,182        6,061             6,061

Dilutive Common Stock
Options Using the Treasury
Stock Method                         113               116          267              279          279               367
                                --------------------------     -------------------------     --------------------------

Total Shares Used for Per
Share Calculations                 6,260             6,263        6,449            6,461        6,340             6,428
                                ==========================     =========================     ==========================

Net Income                      $    321          $    321     $ 12,793         $ 12,793     $ 10,564          $ 10,564
                                ==========================     =========================     ==========================

Earnings Per Share              $   0.05          $   0.05     $   1.98         $   1.98     $   1.67          $   1.64
                                ==========================     =========================     ==========================
</TABLE>
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. WILLIAM CHRISTENSEN.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### In the Matter of Peter G. Ford, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[787 NYS2d 906]

Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1983 and maintains a law office in the Town of Colonie, Albany County.

By order of this Court dated October 22, 2001, respondent was suspended from practice for a period of two years, which suspension was stayed upon condition that respondent submit semiannual reports by a certified public accountant confirming that he is maintaining his escrow account and preserving clients’ funds in accordance with the applicable provisions of the attorney discipline rules *(Matter of Ford,*287 AD2d 870 [2001]). By order dated March 18, 2004, respondent’s stayed suspension was continued for a period of nine months during which period he was to distribute all inactive escrow account funds and withdraw all personal funds from his escrow account.

Respondent now applies to terminate the suspension period. It appears that he has complied with the conditions of the stayed suspension and has taken and passed the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination during the suspension period. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.

*934We grant respondent’s application and terminate the period of suspension, effective immediately *(see e.g. Matter of Sullivan,*307 AD2d 642 [2003]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that the period of stayed suspension imposed by this Court’s decisions dated October 22, 2001 and March 18, 2004, is terminated, effective immediately.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2243

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of a hydroelectric project in the State of Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 2243 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY

2 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT.

3 Notwithstanding the time period specified in section

4 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would

5 otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Com6 mission project numbered 11480, the Commission may, at

7 the request of the licensee for the project, and after rea8 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili9 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and

10 the Commission’s procedures under that section extend

11 the time period during which the licensee is required to

12 commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive

13 2-year periods beyond the date that is 4 years after the

14 date of issuance of the license.

Passed the Senate September 15, 2004.

Attest:

Secretary.
108TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2243

AN ACT

To extend the deadline for commencement of conof Alaska. struction of a hydroelectric project in the State
Inside Wallops -March 1989 

Retiree’s Corner 

Warren Keller retired on February 24 after more than 

30 years of government service. As Director of the 

Suborbital Projects and Operations Directorate, he 

was the senior official at Wallops for about seven 

years. 

Warren came to Wallops from NASA Headquarters 

where he held a number of positions over a period of 

20 years. During this period, he served, first, in the 

Office of Advanced Research and Technology as 

Chief of Space Vehicle Environmental Factors. Then, 

in the Office of Space Science, he served as Program 

Manager for the Voyager mission, Program Manager 

for the Hubble Space Telescope and, finally, as 

Deputy Director of the Solar Terrestrial and 

Astrophysics Division. Of his 30 plus years of 

Government service 28% have been with NASA. 

A native of Knoxville, Tennessee, Keller began his 

NASA career at the Marshall Space Flight Center in 

Huntsville, Alabama, in 1960. At Marshall he headed 

the Nuclear Physics Section, carrying out in-house 

and contract efforts in nuclear engineering and 

charged particle shielding. 

Under Keller’s leadership, NASA’s suborbital 

programs carried out at Wallops have undergone a 

significant expansion as reflected by a tripling of the 

R&D budget during his time here. Many successful offrange campaigns have been completed, such as the 

PageThree 

recent scientific studies of the Supernova 1987A from 

Australia. When the heavy-lift balloon programs were 

crippled with a high failure rate a few years ago, the 

Wallops organization initiated an R&D program that 

has led to an unprecedented success rate. 

Keller has received numerous awards. For his 

contributions to the Voyager program, he received the 

NASA Outstanding Leadership Medal and a special 

American Astronautical Society Award. Recently, he 

was honored in receiving a 1988 Presidential Rank 

Award of Meritorious Executive. Only 5% of 

Government Senior Executive Service personnel may 

be chosen each year for this award. 

Keller attended the University of Tennessee where 

he received a B.S.in Engineering Physics in 1953, an 

M.S. in Physics in 1957, and held membership in 

Sigma Xi, Tau Beta Pi, Phi Kappa Phi, and Sigma Pi 

Sigma honorary societies. He and his wife, Carolyn, 

live in Salisbury. He has served as an ex-officio 

member of the Greater Salisbury Committee, is a 

member of the board of directors of the Wicomico 

Education Foundation, and is a member of the 

Salisbury Rotary Club. 

Although he will be enjoying visiting his new 

grandchildren, Warren will continue to stay busy in the 

business world. He has accepted a position with the 

BDM Corporation located in Columbia, Maryland. 0 

Memories, mementos, and fond farewells.
#### John Bruce *v.*D. M. Kittinger.

Trial — Parties to Suit — Summons.

In actions by equitable proceedings plaintiff shall be entitled to a trial at the first term after summons has been served on all the defendants, .as provided by section 137 and section 395 Civ. C., where no issue of fact is made by the pleadings, or wheTe the plaintiff consents that the statements in the answer may be taken as true. The service of process on one of the defendants and judgment thereon is error, other co-defendants not having been summoned.

APPEAL PROM MCLEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

January 18, 1868.

Opinion op the Court bt

Judge Peters:

This action was brought in equity to attach a fund, or rather a debt, alleged to be owing by Bruce and wife to James Tichener, the insolvent debtor of appellee, as he alleges, and the proceeding is a regular suit in equity sleeking to subject the debt alleged by Bruce and wife to said Tichener to the payment of appellee’s debt *pro tanto.*Silas and James Tichener, Bruce and wife, and one Beckham were all made defendants. Summons was not served, either actual or constructive, on any of the defendants except Bruce and wife, and in that state of preparation judgment was rendered against Bruce for $300, and he prosecutes this appeal.

By section 395, Civil Code, it is provided that the plaintiff shall be entitled to a trial in actions by equitable proceedings at the first term'after the summons has been served on all the defendants, as provided in Sec. 137, where no issue of fact is made by the pleadings, or where the plaintiff consents that the statements of the answer may he taken as true.

By reference to this *section*it is apparent that appellee was not entitled to a trial at the term of the court at which the cause was heard. Tichener, his alleged debtor, should have been before the Court, and a judgment rendered against him, to authorize an appropriation of the debt owing to him by Bruce, to the satisfaction of his debt. Wherefore the judgment is *reversed,*and the *54cause remanded, with directions for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

*Sweeney &*Stuart, *for appellant.*

Bickers, *for appellee.*
Exhibit 10.8

                   AWARD OF STOCK OPTIONS TO OUTSIDE DIRECTORS

               WHEREAS, the Board of Directors believes that it is advisable and
      in the  best  interests  of the  Company  and its  stockholders  to  award
      non-employee  directors options to purchase common stock of the Company in
      order to increase the  ownership  interest in the Company of  non-employee
      directors  whose  services  are  considered  essential  to  the  Company's
      continued progress, to align such interests with those of the stockholders
      of the Company and to provide a further  incentive  to serve as a director
      of the Company; and

               NOW THEREFORE,  BE IT RESOLVED, that effective February 23, 2000,
      Martin Abrahams,  Kenneth J. Duffy,  John R. Dunne and William F. Galtney,
      Jr. are each hereby awarded  non-qualified stock options to purchase 7,500
      shares of Common Stock at the average of the highest and lowest sale price
      of the Common Stock as reported on the Composite  Transaction  Tape of the
      New York Stock  Exchange on February 23, 2000, or if no sale of the Common
      Stock is reported for such date, the next preceding day for which there is
      a reported sale; and

               FURTHER RESOLVED,  that each award of options as set forth in the
      preceding  resolution  shall be  evidenced by an award  agreement  setting
      forth the number of shares of Common Stock  subject to the award and other
      terms and conditions applicable to the award and that no person shall have
      any rights  under any award unless and until the person to whom such award
      shall have been granted  shall have  executed and delivered to the Company
      an award agreement,  provided,  however that the execution and delivery of
      such an award agreement  shall not be a  pre-condition  to the granting of
      such award; and

               FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that the form of Stock Option  Agreement  for
      Non-Employee  Directors  dated  March 31, 1999 (copy  attached  hereto and
      ordered  filed in the  minute  book) is  hereby  approved  for each of the
      awards set forth in the preceding resolutions; and

               FURTHER  RESOLVED,  that the  officers  of the Company are hereby
      authorized to execute and deliver Stock Option Agreements for Non-Employee
      Directors  in the  form  approved  in the  next  preceding  resolution  on
      February 23, 2000  evidencing  the awards  approved  herein,  and to do or
      cause  to be done  all  acts  and  things  necessary  and  appropriate  to
      effectuate the intent and purposes of this and the  immediately  preceding
      resolutions.