alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ivy Miller *v.*E. C. Combs et al.

Lien — Unpaid Purchase Money — Waiver.

Where one, claiming a purchase money lien on land, is present at a transfer of a deed thereto by the parties, to another purchaser, and does not make known or claim his lien, held to waive any right he may have had, to enforce his lien.

Same.

A fortiori, where a suit for the amount of the lien had been filed in the Quarterly Court, instead of the Circuit Court where he could have enforced his lien.

APPEAL EROM MCLEAN CIRCUIT COURT.

*660October 8, 1868.

*Little*& McFarland, *for appellant.*

*Bickers, for appellee.*

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Peters:

The able argument of appellant’s learned.' counsel has been read with pleasure, and we hope not without profit, but we cannot concur in his conclusions.

The title bond of Hendrick with the assignment is not filed; but it is not alleged that the assignment contained a statement that the purchase money from Combs to appellant, or any part of it remained unpaid.

Moreover the opportunity was not wanting to appellant to have secured a lien on the lot for his unpaid purchase money, for Hendrick proves that he hesitated, and refused to make the deed to Combs, or his wife, until he consulted appellant on the subject, and he directed him to make the deed either to Combs or his wife, until he consulted appellant on the subject, and he directed him to express in the deed that the purchase money was not paid, which instruction would doubtless have been obeyed, as Hendrick was not willing to make the deed to his assignee, or to his order until he first consulted Miller.

Another fact is worthy of notice. Appellant first sued Combs in the quarterly court, and why if he supposed he had a lien on the lot for his money, he did not bring his action in the circuit' court to enforce his lien is not explained. This circumstance, with what he said to Hendrick, on the subject of making the deed, indicated a purpose to waive his lien; or an indifference about securing, and retaining it.

The judgment must be *affirmed.*
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

1 ADMINISTRATOR 1 

DEPUTY 

ADMINISTRATOR 

1ECUlIVI OFFICfR 

11N16TRATOK 

(PLANNING) 

ASYSlANl ADMINlSllAlOR FOR 

PLANNING ASS', ADMINISTPATOR 

OFFICE OF 

ORGANIZATION 

AND MANAGEMENT 

ASSOCIATE mwNisrwiou 

OFFICE OF 

MANNED I SPACE FLIGHT b<<rY,ATF A"UiNl~iSlT"R I 

MANNID 

SPACECKMl CENlER 

JOHN F KENNEDY 

SPACE CENTER 

K."xd, I-' C.n*r. 

OFFICE OF 

SPACE SCIENCE 

AND APPLICATIONS AIIOCIATt ADMlN4S7MTOR 

0 0 D D A K D 

SPACE FLIGHT CENTE 

JET PKOPULSION 

LABOlA1OR.l 

(Contmrbr op.ro*4 

SlAlION 

Vll,~ l,lmd, YO 

n , J 

APPROVED 

ASSOCIATE 

DEPUTY 

ADMINISTRATOR 

I 

I I I - 1 OFFICE 07 OFFICE OF OFFICE OF OFFICE OF 

LEGISLATIVE PUILlC 

AFFAIRS AFFAIRS AFFAIRS 

ASST *DM,N1ITi(AlOl *SI T ADMINIITIIATOP pss.r m+.iNisrmron 

IMERNAIIONAL 000 a IYltRAGENCI 

AFFAIRS 

61 r ADMINISIRATOR 

mmm8 

8 

8 

I 

I 

OFFICE OF 

TRACKING AND 

DATA ACQUISITION 

.iSX .c7rrw..rlsni?. 

OFFICE OF 

ADVANCED RESEARCH 

AND TECHNOLOGY 

LANOLfl 

If- CfNlfR 

*anpta. vo 

FLIGWl 

RfSfNCH CENTER 

ElEClRONICS 

IESfARCH CfNlfI 

NASA-HQ
#### Milton Witty *v.*The Town of Edmonton.

Pleadings — Defective Petition — Suit to Enforce Payment for License as Coffee House Keeper — Liquors.

In a suit to enforce payment for a license to sell liquor, the allegasions in the petition must show that the town trustees had the lawful authority to require of defendant the sum alleged owing for the license, and the defendant had promised to pay therefor.

APPEAL EROM METCALEE CIRCUIT COURT.

December 14, 1868.

James, *for appellant.*

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters :

The petition in this case is fatally defective.

Without stating when the license to keep a coffee-house was granted, but leaving all the dates in blank, it is alleged that the predecessors of the then trustees did grant him a license to keep a coffee-house in said town for the term of one year at the rate of one hundred dollars per year; the meaning of which is uncertain, and ambiguous, and is rendered still more obscure and uncertain by the following sentences, viz: They state that said Witty under the understanding with said trustees of said town, did sell liquor as a coffee-house keeper in said town, and it was due and owing said trustees for the use of the town of Edmonton the sum of $75, $25 having been paid by him to said trustees.

There is no allegations that the trustees had the lawful authority to require of appellant the sum of one hundred dollars for a license to keep a coffee-house, nor that if they had the power they exercised it, nor that he -promised or agreed to pay it. Such pleadings did not entitle the appellees to a judgment. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the causé remanded, with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion, and if appellees do not amend their petition on the return of the cause the same should be dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
California Community Bancshares, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-94763) on Form S-8 of California Community Bancshares, Inc. of our
report dated March 17, 2000, relating to the consolidated statement of
financial condition of California Community Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31,
1999, annual report on Form 10-K of California Community Bancshares, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Sacramento, California
April 14, 2000
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Aircraft Design and Identification Activities

Painting an aircraft is a big deal, and after years of designing and building the X-59, this experimental aircraft is no 

exception. When an aircraft gets painted this becomes 

their uniform, or their livery. An adaptation of the original 

use of the word, which was used for uniform-style clothing, 

livery for an aircraft includes the color(s), graphics, and 

other symbols that have been added to it for identification, 

marketing, commemoration of a special day, or simply a 

way to express uniqueness. This is an important moment 

in history for the plane and the crew that had a hand in its 

creation. If multiple companies, agencies, or people are 

involved in an aircraft’s design and construction, designs, 

colors, logos, and other details are carefully designed and 

debated over, so everyone’s needs are met. 

To commemorate NASA’s newest experimental aircraft, 

the X-59 and the X-66, we have compiled a few of our 

STEM activities to help students express their creativity, 

learn more about aircraft livery and designs, and help 

us celebrate exciting milestones in NASA’s aeronautics 

research. Most recently, the X-59 has been moved to the 

“paint barn” to get its first coat of paint. 

Help NASA celebrate our newest X-planes and designs with 

the activities below. 

Learn more about NASA’s X-59 and the Quesst mission. 

Learn about NASA’s sustainable aviation work and the X-66.

Make Your Own X-59

Design your paper airplane: 

Use this template to fold your 

own X-59 paper airplane and 

add design and color. 

X-59 3D Printing

X-59 3D model: Print the 3D 

model with colorful or white 

filament, then use acrylic or 

enamel paints to design your 

own livery on the X-59 (or 

replicate our paint scheme). 

X-59 Coloring Page

With this coloring page, create 

your own design of the X-59. 

Show off your graphic design 

skills by drawing an insignia 

or other images to make this 

X-59 your own. 

X-66 Coloring Page

Before the X-66 had its X-plane 

designation, it was called the 

Transonic Truss-Braced Wing. 

Have some fun creating colors 

and designs for the TTBW 

(now called the X-66).

Color by Number

Looking for a coloring page 

with more of a challenge. 

Try this color by number of a 

Schlieren image of the X-59. 

Put your own spin on the 

colors you choose. 

Name that Plane

N-Numbers and aircraft 

identification: When you 

register your aircraft and 

give it an N-Number, you 

are adding to its uniqueness. 

Try this activity and give 

your own X-59 design some 

proper identification. 

www.nasa.gov

ACTIVITIES
#### Fanny Ray et al *v.*Ray, Admr. et al.

Commissioner’s Report — Judgment of Court — Appeal and Error.

Where a commissioner finds against a defendant, contrary to the rules given by the trial judge in referring matters to the commissioner for an equalization among heirs, such part of the commissioner’s report as is violative of the judgment of the presiding judge, will be set aside by the appellate court, on the face of the pleadings.

APPEAL EROM GARRARD CIRCUIT COURT.

January 13, 1868.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Williams:

In the judgment rendered August 31, 1865, the Circuit Court, among other directions to the commissioner as to the manner of dividing the land among the heirs so as to equalize them, says that it is *"of opinion that Zach. Ray sjiall not be charged with rents for 186U and 1865 ”*yet as the commissioner to whom had been *40referred the question of advancements Had found and reported as to Zacb. for negroes, Horse, furniture, etc., $1,030; rent for 1864, $200, and for 1865, $125, making $1,355, tbe subsequent commissioners appointed to equalize tbe Heirs and divide tbe land, took tbe report of tbe former commissioner without observing tbe direction of tbe court, Hence tbe error; as. there is no appeal from tbe judgment of tbe court disallowing tbe rents for 1864 and 1865, we now think that these rents should be disallowed in toto, and that tbe land should'be assigned appellants on tbe basis of an advancement of $1,030 to Zacb. Kay, instead of $1,355; and tbe opinion of tbe court is so modified as to direct another allotment of tbe land to appellants on tbe basis of an advancement to Zacb. Ráy by bis father of $1,030, and that what may be coming to him over this sum in land be assigned to appellants, observing tbe directions of tbe Circuit Court that tbe personal estate is not to be included in this division, save that small sums may be used to equalize tbe different allotments of tbe land.

Bradley, *for appellant.*

*Dunlap &*Anderson, *for appellee.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Willie Moon, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03995-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Skikos, Crawford, Skikos & Joseph, LLP 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/31/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8831 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8831 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
#### SHERBROOK AT GLENSIDE ASSOCIATION v. TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HEIGHTS.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

May 20, 2010

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR., 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF WASHINGTON; UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA; DISTRICT

OF COLUMBIA; TERRITORY OF

WASHINGTON, 

Respondents - Appellees.

No. 10-3055

(D.C. No. 5:09-CV-03277-RDR)

(D. of Kansas)

ORDER

On April 23, 2010, this court issued an order denying the appellant leave to

proceed pro se in this appeal and advising him that this appeal would be

dismissed unless counsel entered an appearance on his behalf within 14 days. 

The 14-day period has expired and no attorney has entered an appearance

on the appellant’s behalf. 

Therefore, pursuant to the court’s order of April 23, 2010, and in

accordance with the filing restrictions imposed by this court in Demos v. Keating,

33 Fed. Appx. 918 (10 Cir. 2002), this appeal is dismissed. 

th

Appellate Case: 10-3055 Document: 01018425745 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 Page: 1
2

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of this court. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH SHUMAKER, Clerk of Court

By:

Christine Van Coney

 Counsel to the Clerk

Appellate Case: 10-3055 Document: 01018425745 Date Filed: 05/20/2010 Page: 2
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADM

HUMAN RESOURCES

AND EDUCATION (F)

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR

GENERAL

COUNSEL (G)

MANAGEMENT

SYSTEMS AND

FACILITIES (J)

SAFETY AND MISSION 

ASSURANCE (Q)

HEADQUARTERS

OPERATIONS (C)

AEROSPACE SAFETY 

ADVISORY PANEL

NASA ADVISORY

COUNCIL

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY

PROGRAMS (E)

LEGISLATIVE 

AFFAIRS (L)

PROGRAM OFFICES

STAFF OFFICES

CHIEF

FINANCIAL OFFICER (B)

EARTH SCIENCE (Y) SPACE FLIGHT (M)

*JPL is a contractor-op

(see par. 102

PROCUREMENT (H)

GODDARD SPACE

FLIGHT CENTER

SPACE SC

POLICY AND

PLANS (Z)

CENTERS

GEORGE C. MARSHALL

SPACE FLIGHT CENTER

LYNDON B. JOHNSON

SPACE CENTER

JOHN F. KENNEDY

SPACE CENTER

JOHN C. STENNIS

SPACE CENTER

*JET PRO

LABOR

LIFE & MICROGRAVITY 

SCIENCES & APPLICATIONS 

(U)
#### STATE v. McCAIL

No. 546P01

Case below: Caldwell County Superior Court

Application by defendant for writ of habeas corpus denied 1 October 2001.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 2014 / Presidential Documents 60943 

Proclamation 9187 of October 3, 2014 

German-American Day, 2014 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

America is and always has been a Nation of immigrants, and from our 

earliest days, German Americans have contributed to our national identity. 

Germans were among the first settlers in the original 13 Colonies, bringing 

their talents and ideas across the ocean to a new and unfamiliar world. 

And today, with their descendants and all who followed in their path, 

we continue to perfect our Union together. On German-American Day, we 

recognize their distinctive identity and the ways they enrich our country. 

German Americans helped build our Nation, and every day they contribute 

to its growth. As they teach in our schools, farm in our heartland, and 

serve in our Armed Forces, their German roots offer a sense of their place 

in the American story. From a land of poets and thinkers, they brought 

passion for music, science, and art, fortifying our culture and broadening 

our understanding of the world. Our greatest cities and our biggest advances 

reflect their daring spirit and diverse contributions. 

As we consider our German-American history, we are also reminded that 

the United States and Germany are vital partners. With the 25th anniversary 

of the fall of the Berlin Wall approaching, our security and prosperity 

remain interwoven, and our friendship continues as we work together in 

pursuit of a more peaceful, stable world. On this occasion, may citizens 

from both sides of the Atlantic draw strength from the legacy of our Nation’s 

earliest immigrants who boldly pushed forward in unforgiving times. May 

our shared past continue to inspire us as we face new challenges in our 

own time. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2014, 

as German-American Day. I encourage all Americans to learn more about 

the history of German Americans and reflect on the many contributions 

they have made to our Nation. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
60944 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 8, 2014 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this third day of 

October, in the year of our Lord two thousand fourteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-ninth. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24216 

Filed 10–7–14; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICESOB#1.EPS</GPH>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

No. 98-10736

Summary Calendar

________________________________

MARY T. DODEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LOCKHEED MARTIN VOUGHT SYSTEMS; STEVE BARANOWSKI,

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-1525-T)

---------------------------------

December 15, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant, Mary T. Doden (“Doden”), appeals from an

adverse summary judgment dismissing her claim brought

pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.

§§ 12101-12117 (“ADA”). Rather than determine whether the

ADA would permit a cause of action for a hostile work

environment, the district court assumed that such an action

would be available and found the actions complained of were
2

insufficient to constitute a claim for harassment. We agree

and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court’s

order granting summary judgment dated May 20, 1998. See

also McConathy v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Corp., 131 F.3d 558,

563 (5th Cir. 1998).

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          59,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  346,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (23,407)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               599,342
<PP&E>                                         605,950
<DEPRECIATION>                               (179,421)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,134,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,404,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     1,351,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,786,241)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,134,879
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               379,014
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  323,723
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,080
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,135
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,897)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
#### MARCELLA FORD v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY.

June 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Clifton James Polk Sr.,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04131-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8894 Filed 11/28/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Reita Gaston,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04084-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8971 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1