UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-KSB/A
                                AMENDMENT NO. 1

[X]  ANNUAL  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
     ACT  OF  1934

                  For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
                              -------------------

[ ]  TRANSITION  REPORT  PURSUANT  TO  SECTION  13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE  ACT  OF  1934

            For the transition period from _________ to ____________

                        Commission  File  No.  333-87111
                        --------------------------------

                                SENTICORE, INC.
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

                  Delaware                                    11-3504866
                  --------                                    ----------
     (State  or  other  jurisdiction  of                  (I.R.S.  Employer
      incorporation  or  organization)                  Identification  Number)

     2410  Hollywood  Blvd,  Hollywood, FL        33020      (954) 927-0866
     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    (Address  of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)   (Telephone  No.)

            2424 N. Federal Highway, Suite 350, Boca Raton, FL 33431

                  (Former Address principal executive offices)

Securities  registered  pursuant  to  Section  12(b)  of  the  Act: NONE

Securities  registered  pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:      COMMON STOCK


Check  whether  the  issuer  (l)  has  filed all reports required to be filed by
Section  13  or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter  period  that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has  been  subject  to  such  filing  requirements  for  the  past  90  days.
     [X]  YES
     [ ]  NO

Check  if  disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation
S-B  is  not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the
best  of  the  Registrant's  knowledge,  in  definitive  proxy  or  information
statements  incorporated  by  reference  in  Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any
amendment  to  this  Form  10-KSB.  [X]

We  had  no  revenues  during  our  most  recent  fiscal  year.

The  aggregate  market  value  of  voting  stock  and  non-voting equity held by
non-affiliates  of  the  Registrant was approximately $5,920,701 as of April 19,
2004.

There  were  53,824,554  shares  outstanding  as  of  April  28,  2004.

Documents  incorporated  by  reference:

Form  10-KSB  filed  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2002
===============================================================

CAVEAT  PERTAINING  TO  FORWARD  LOOKING  STATEMENTS  &  CONTEXT

The  Private  Securities  Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor"
for  forward-looking  statements.  Certain  of  the statements contained herein,
which  are  not historical facts, are forward-looking statements with respect to
events,  the  occurrence  of  which  involve  risks  and  uncertainties.  These
forward-looking  statements may be impacted, either positively or negatively, by
various  factors. Information concerning potential factors that could affect our
company  is  detailed  from time to time in our company's reports filed with the
Commission.  This  Report  contains "forward-looking statements" relating to our
company's  current expectations and beliefs. These include statements concerning
operations,  performance,  financial  condition,  anticipated  acquisitions  and
anticipated  growth.  For  this  purpose,  any statements contained in this Form
10-KSB,  Forms  10-QSB,  Forms  8-K, and other reports filed with the Commission
referred  to  herein  that  are  not  statements  of  historical  fact  are
forward-looking  statements.  Without  limiting the generality of the foregoing,
words  such  as  "may",  "will",  "would",  "expect",  "believe",  "anticipate",
"intend", "could", "estimate", or "continue", or the negative or other variation
thereof  or  comparable  terminology  are  intended  to identify forward-looking
statements.  These  statements  by  their  nature  involve substantial risks and
uncertainties,  which  are  beyond  our company's control. Should one or more of
these  risks  or  uncertainties  materialize  or should our company's underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes and results could differ materially
from  those indicated in the forward-looking statements. The information in this
report  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  the  entire Report;
consequently,  this  Report must be read in its entirety. Information may not be
considered  or  quoted  out  of context or without referencing other information
contained  in  this  Report  necessary  to  make the information considered, not
misleading.

The  information in this report is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
entire  report;  consequently, this report must be read in its entirety. This is
especially  important  in  light  of  material  subsequent  events  disclosed.
Information  may  not  be  considered  or  quoted  out  of  context  or  without
referencing  other  information  contained  in this report necessary to make the
information  considered,  not  misleading.


PART  1

ITEM  1.  DESCRIPTION  OF  BUSINESS  SUMMARY  OVERVIEW

The  Company  is  a  Delaware  corporation.  We  were  formed  as  an  Internet
professional  services  firm  specializing  in high end web site development. We
were  not  successful  in  developing  this  business model and had very limited
revenues.

In  April  2003,  former management resigned and was replaced by a new board and
new officers and directors led by Rohit Patel.  Recognizing the need to increase
shareholder  value,  the  new  Board has determined that the only way to enhance
shareholder  value  is  to  seek  potential  business opportunities and effect a
Business  Combination  with  a Target Business with significant growth potential
which,  in  the  opinion  of  our management, could provide a profit to both the
Company  and  our  shareholders.

We  intend to seek opportunities demonstrating the potential of long term growth
as  opposed  to  short  term earnings.  Our efforts in identifying a prospective
Target  Business  are  expected to emphasize businesses primarily located in the
United  States;  however,  we  reserve  the  right  to acquire a Target Business
located  primarily elsewhere. While we may, under certain circumstances, seek to
effect  Business Combinations with more than one Target Business, as a result of
our  limited  resources,  we will, in all likelihood, have the ability to effect
only a single Business Combination.  We may effect a Business Combination with a
Target  Business  which  may  be  financially unstable or in its early stages of
development  or  growth.  Though  our  emphasis  will  be  on real estate backed
transactions, we will not restrict our search to any specific business, industry
or  geographical  location,  and  we  may  participate  in a business venture of
virtually  any  kind or nature. Our management may become involved in management
of  the  Target  Business  and/or  may  hire  qualified  but as yet unidentified
individuals  to  manage  such  Target  Business. Presently, we do have plans and
agreements  to  acquire  or merge with two specific companies. See Item 6 herein
for  a  complete  discussion  of  the  two  proposed deals we have entered into.

Due  to  our  limited  capital  resources,  the  consummation  of  a  Business
Combination  will  likely involve the acquisition of, or merger or consolidation
with,  a  company  that  does  not need substantial additional capital but which
desires to establish a public trading market for its shares, while avoiding what
it  might  deem  to be the adverse consequences of undertaking a public offering
itself, such as the time delays and significant expenses incurred to comply with
the  various  federal  and  state  securities  laws that regulate initial public
offerings.  A  Target  Business  might  desire, among other reasons, to create a
public  market  for  their  shares  in  order  to  enhance liquidity for current
shareholders,  facilitate  raising capital through the public sale of securities
of  which a prior existence of a public market for our securities exists, and/or
acquire  additional  assets  through  the issuance of securities rather than for
cash.

We  cannot  estimate  the  time  that  it  will  take  to  effectuate a Business
Combination.  Additionally,  no  assurance  can  be made that we will be able to
effectuate  a  Business  Combination  on  favorable terms. We might identify and
effectuate  a  Business  Combination  with  a Target Business which proves to be
unsuccessful  for  any  number  of  reasons.

UNSPECIFIED  INDUSTRY  AND  TARGET  BUSINESS.

We  will  seek  to  acquire  a  Target  Business without limiting ourselves to a
particular  industry.  Management has experience in the hospitality industry and
despite the current economic outlook believes that there are still opportunities
for growth in this industry.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, we cannot commit at
this  time  to  limiting  our  search  for  target  companies to the hospitality
industry.

Most likely, the Target Business will be primarily located in the United States,
although  we  reserve  the  right to acquire a Target Business primarily located
outside  the  United  States.  In  seeking  a Target Business, we will consider,
without  limitation,  businesses  which  offer  or  provide services or develop,
manufacture or distribute goods in the United States or abroad. We are only able
to  make  general disclosures concerning the risks and hazards of effectuating a
Business  Combination with a Target Business since there is presently no current
basis  for us to evaluate the possible merits or risks of the Target Business or
the  particular  industry  in  which  we  may  ultimately  operate.

To  the extent that we effect a Business Combination with a financially unstable
company  or  an  entity  in  its early stage of development or growth (including
entities  without  established  records  of  sales  or earnings), we will become
subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially
unstable  and  early stage or potential emerging growth companies.  In addition,
to the extent that we effect a Business Combination with a Target Business in an
industry  characterized  by  a high level of risk, we will become subject to the
currently  unascertainable  risks  of that industry.  An extremely high level of
risk  frequently characterizes certain industries which experience rapid growth.
Although management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular
industry  or  Target  Business, there can be no assurances that we will properly
ascertain  or  assess  all  significant  risk  factors.

PROBABLE  LACK  OF  BUSINESS  DIVERSIFICATION.

As  a  result  of  our  limited  resources,  in all likelihood, we will have the
ability  to  effect  only  a  single  Business  Combination.  Accordingly,  our
prospects  for success will be entirely dependent upon the future performance of
a  single  business.

Unlike  certain  entities that have the resources to consummate several Business
Combinations  or  entities operating in multiple industries or multiple segments
of  a  single industry, it is highly unlikely that we will have the resources to
diversify  our operations or benefit from spreading risks or offsetting  losses.
Our  probable  lack  of  diversification  could subject us to numerous economic,
competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a material
adverse  impact  upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent
to  consummation  of  a Business Combination.  The prospects for our success may
become  dependent  upon  the  development  or  market  acceptance of a single or
limited number of products, processes or services.  Accordingly, notwithstanding
the possibility of management assistance to the Target Business by us, there can
be  no  assurance that the Target Business will prove to be commercially viable.

LIMITED  ABILITY  TO  EVALUATE  TARGET  BUSINESS'  MANAGEMENT.

While  our  ability  to  successfully  effect  a  Business  Combination  will be
dependent  upon  certain key personnel, the future role of such personnel in the
Target  Business cannot presently be stated with any certainty.  There can be no
assurance  that  current  management  will  remain associated in any operational
capacity with the Company following a Business Combination.  Moreover, there can
be  no  assurances that current management will have any experience or knowledge
relating  to  the  operations  of  the  particular Target Business. Furthermore,
although  we intend to closely scrutinize the management of a prospective Target
Business  in connection with evaluating the desirability of effecting a Business
Combination,  there  can be no assurances that our assessment of such management
will  prove  to  be  correct.

Accordingly,  we will be dependant, in some significant respects, on the ability
of  the  management of the Target Businesses as of the date hereof. In addition,
there  can  be no assurances that such future management will have the necessary
skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company. We may also seek
to  recruit  additional  managers  to supplement the incumbent management of the
Target  Business.  There  can  be no assurances that we will have the ability to
recruit such additional managers, or that such additional managers will have the
requisite  skill,  knowledge or experience necessary or desirable to enhance the
incumbent  management.

SELECTION  OF  A  TARGET  BUSINESS  AND  STRUCTURING  OF A BUSINESS COMBINATION.

We  anticipate that the selection of a Target Business will be complex and risky
because of competition for such business opportunities among all segments of the
financial  community.  The  nature of our search for the acquisition of a Target
Business  requires  maximum  flexibility  inasmuch  as  we  will  be required to
consider  various factors and circumstances which may preclude meaningful direct
comparison  among  the  various  business  enterprises,  products  or  services
investigated.  We  have  virtually  unrestricted  flexibility in identifying and
selecting  a  prospective Target Business.   In addition, in evaluating a Target
Business,  management  will  consider, among other factors, the following, which
are  not  listed  in  any  particular  order.

-    financial  condition  and  results  of  operation  of  the Target Business;

-    growth potential and projected financial performance of the Target Business
     and  the  industry  in  which  it  operates;

-    experience and skill of management and availability of additional personnel
     of  the  Target  Business;

-    capital  requirements  of  the  Target  Business;

-    the  availability  of a transaction exemption from registration pursuant to
     the  Securities  Act  for  the  Business  Combination;

-    the  location  of  the  Target  Business;

-    competitive  position  of  the  Target  Business;

-    stage  of  development  of  the  product,  process or service of the Target
     Business;

-    degree of current or potential market acceptance of the product, process or
     service  of  the  Target  Business;

-    possible proprietary features and possible other protection of the product,
     process  or  service  of  the  Target  Business;

-    regulatory  environment  of  the  industry  in  which  the  Target Business
     operates;

-    costs  associated  with  effecting  the  Business  Combination;  and

-    equity  interest  in  and  possible  management participation in the Target
     Business.

The  foregoing  criteria  are  not  intended  to  be  exhaustive; any evaluation
relating  to  the  merits of a particular Business Combination will be based, to
the extent relevant, on the above factors as well as other considerations deemed
relevant  by  us  in connection with effecting a Business Combination consistent
with  our  business  objective.  In  many  instances, it is anticipated that the
historical  operations of a Target Business may not necessarily be indicative of
the  potential  for  the  future because of the possible need to shift marketing
approaches  substantially, expand significantly, change product emphasis, change
or  substantially  augment  management,  or  make  other  changes.

In  connection  with our evaluation of a prospective Target Business, management
anticipates  that  it  will conduct a due diligence review which will encompass,
among  other  things,  meetings  with  incumbent  management  and  inspection of
facilities,  as  well  as review of financial or other information which will be
made  available  to  us.  The  time  and costs required to select and evaluate a
Target  Business  (including conducting a due diligence review) and to structure
and  consummate  the  Business  Combination  (including  negotiating  relevant
agreements  and  preparing requisite documents for filing pursuant to applicable
securities  laws  and state "blue sky" and corporation laws) cannot presently be
ascertained  with  any  degree  of  certainty.

However,  management will devote such time as they deem reasonably necessary, to
carry  out  the business and affairs of the Company, including the evaluation of
potential  Target  Businesses and the negotiation of a Business Combination and,
as  a  result,  the  amount of time devoted to our business and affairs may vary
significantly  depending  upon, among other things, whether we have identified a
Target Business or are engaged in active negotiations of a Business Combination.
Any  costs  incurred  in  connection with the identification and evaluation of a
prospective  Target Business with which a Business Combination is not ultimately
consummated  will  result  in  a  loss  to  the Company and reduce the amount of
capital  available  to  otherwise  complete  a  Business  Combination or for the
resulting  entity  to  utilize.  In  the  event we deplete our cash reserves, we
might  be forced to cease operations and a Business Combination might not occur.

We  anticipate  that  we  will  locate  and  make contact with Target Businesses
primarily  through  the  reputation  and  efforts  of  management, who will meet
personally  with  existing  management  and  key  personnel,  visit  and inspect
material  facilities, assets, products and services belonging to such prospects,
and  undertake  such  further reasonable investigation as they deem appropriate.
Management  has  a  network  of  business contacts and believes that prospective
Target  Businesses  will  be  referred  to the Company through these networks of
contacts.

We  also  expect  that many prospective Target Businesses will be brought to our
attention  from  various  other  non-affiliated  sources,  including  securities
broker-dealers,  investment  bankers,  venture  capitalists,  bankers, and other
members  of  the  financial community. Although there are no current plans to do
so,  we may engage the services of professional firms that specialize in finding
business  acquisitions  and  pay  a finder's fee or other compensation. Since we
have  no  current plans to utilize any outside consultants or advisors to assist
in  a  Business Combination, no policies have been adopted regarding use of such
consultants  or  advisors, the criteria to be used in selecting such consultants
or  advisors, the services to be provided, the term of service, or regarding the
total  amount  of  fees  that  may  be  paid.  However,  because  of our limited
resources, it is likely that any such fee we agree to pay would be paid in stock
and  not  in  cash.  In no event will we pay a finder's fee or commission to any
officer  or  director  or  to any entity with which they are affiliated for such
service.

As a general rule, Federal and state tax laws and regulations have a significant
impact  upon  the  structuring  of  business  combinations. We will evaluate the
possible  tax  consequences  of  any  prospective  Business Combination and will
endeavor to structure a Business Combination so as to achieve the most favorable
tax  treatment  for  us,  the Target Business and their respective stockholders.
There  can  be  no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service or relevant state
tax  authorities  will  ultimately  assent  to our tax treatment of a particular
consummated  Business  Combination.

To the extent the Internal Revenue Service or any relevant state tax authorities
ultimately  prevail  in  recharacterizing  the  tax  treatment  of  a  Business
Combination,  there  may  be adverse tax consequences to us, the Target Business
and  their respective stockholders. Tax considerations as well as other relevant
factors  will  be  valuated in determining the precise structure of a particular
Business Combination, which could be effected through various forms of a merger,
consolidation  or  stock  or  asset  acquisition.

There  are  currently  no limitations relating to our ability to borrow funds to
increase  the amount of capital available to us to effect a Business Combination
or otherwise finance the operations of the Target Business. However, our limited
resources and lack of operating history could make it difficult for us to borrow
additional  funds from other sources. The amount and nature of any borrowings by
us  will  depend on numerous considerations, including our capital requirements,
potential  lenders' evaluation of our ability to meet debt service on borrowings
and  the then prevailing conditions in the financial markets, as well as general
economic  conditions. We do not have any arrangements with any bank or financial
institution  to  secure  additional financing and there can be no assurance that
such  arrangements  if required or otherwise sought, would be available on terms
commercially  acceptable  or  otherwise  in our best interests. Our inability to
borrow  funds  required  to  effect  or facilitate a Business Combination, or to
provide  funds for an additional infusion of capital into a Target Business, may
have  a material adverse effect on our financial condition and future prospects,
including  the ability to effect a Business Combination. To the extent that debt
financing  ultimately  proves  to be available, any borrowings may subject us to
various risks traditionally associated with indebtedness, including the risks of
interest  rate  fluctuations and insufficiency of cash flow to pay principal and
interest.  Furthermore,  a  Target  Business  may  have  already  incurred  debt
financing  and,  therefore,  all  the  risks  inherent  thereto.

If  our  securities  are  issued  as part of an acquisition, such securities are
required to be issued either in reliance upon exemptions from registration under
applicable  federal  or  state  securities  laws  or  registered  for  public
distribution.  We  intend  to  primarily  target  only  those companies where an
exemption  from registration would be available; however, since the structure of
the  Business  Combination  has  yet to be determined, no assurances can be made
that  we  will  be  able  to rely on such exemptions. Registration of securities
typically  requires significant costs and time delays are typically encountered.

Due  to  our  small  size  and  limited  amount of capital, our ability to raise
additional  capital if and when needed could be constrained.  Until such time as
any  enterprise,  product  or  service  which  we  acquire  generates  revenues
sufficient  to  cover  operating  costs,  it  is  conceivable that we could find
ourselves  in  a  situation where it needs additional funds in order to continue
our  operations.  This  need  could arise at a time when we are unable to borrow
funds and when market acceptance for the sale of additional shares of our Common
Stock  does  not  exist.

COMPETITION

We expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business
objective  similar to ours. Many of these entities are well-established and have
extensive  experience  in  connection  with  identifying  and effecting business
combinations  directly or through affiliates.  Many of these competitors possess
greater  financial,  marketing, technical, personnel and other resources than us
and  there  can  be  no  assurances  that  we  will  have the ability to compete
successfully. Our financial resources will be extremely limited in comparison to
those  of  many  of  our competitors. This inherent competitive limitation could
compel  us  to  select  certain less attractive Target Businesses for a Business
Combination.  There can be no assurances that such Target Businesses will permit
us to meet our stated business objective. Management believes, however, that our
status  as  a reporting public entity could give us a competitive advantage over
privately held entities having a similar business objective to ours in acquiring
a  Target  Business  with  significant  growth  potential  on  favorable  terms.

CONTROLS  AND  PROCEDURES

(a)  On  December  31,  2003,  our  Chief  Executive Officer and Chief Financial
     Officer  made  an  evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures. In
     our  opinion,  the  disclosure controls and procedures are adequate because
     the  systems of controls and procedures are designed to assure, among other
     items,  that  1) recorded transactions are valid; 2) valid transactions are
     recorded; and 3) transactions are recorded in the proper period in a timely
     manner  to  produce financial statements which present fairly the financial
     condition,  results of operations and cash flows for the respective periods
     being  presented.  Moreover,  the evaluation did not reveal any significant
     deficiencies  or  material  weaknesses  in  our  disclosure  controls  and
     procedures.


(b)  There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other
     factors  that  could  significantly  affect  these  controls since the last
     evaluation.


UNCERTAINTY  OF  COMPETITIVE  ENVIRONMENT  OF  TARGET  BUSINESS

In  the  event  that we succeed in effecting a Business Combination, we will, in
all  likelihood,  become  subject to intense competition from competitors of the
Target Business. In particular, certain industries which experience rapid growth
frequently  attract  an  increasingly  larger  number  of competitors, including
competitors  with increasingly greater financial, marketing, technical and other
resources  than  the  initial  competitors  in  the  industry.  The  degree  of
competition  characterizing  the  industry  of  any  prospective Target Business
cannot  presently be ascertained. There can be no assurances that, subsequent to
a  Business  Combination,  we  will  have  the resources to compete effectively,
especially  to the extent that the Target Business is in a high-growth industry.

EMPLOYEES

We  have  three full time employees.  Mr. Carl Gessner, Mr. Rohit Patel, and Mr.
Jay  Patel  serve  on  a  full  time  basis.  The  need  for employees and their
availability will be addressed in connection with the decision whether or not to
acquire  or  participate  in  a  specific  Business  Combination.

ITEM  2.  PROPERTIES

FACILITIES

Our  principal office is located at 2410 Hollywood Blvd, Hollywood, Florida.  We
have agreed to sub-lease this space on a month-to-month basis from Telesource at
a  monthly  fee of $2,350. We expect to utilize these facilities until such time
as  a  business  combination occurs and may continue to utilize these facilities
thereafter.  The  management  and ownership of Telesource has no relation to the
management  or  primary  shareholders  of  Senticore.

ITEM  3.  LEGAL  PROCEEDINGS

None

ITEM  4.  SUBMISSION  OF  MATTERS  TO  A  VOTE  OF  SECURITY  HOLDERS.

In  the  fourth  quarter,  the majority of the shareholders voted to approve our
issuances of common stock to various officers, directors and outside consultants
for  services  received.

PART  II

ITEM  5.  MARKET  FOR  OUR  COMMON  EQUITY  AND  RELATED  STOCKHOLDER  MATTERS

Market  Information  -  Our  common  stock  is  currently traded on the National
Association  of  Securities  Dealers Automated Quotation System Over the Counter
Bulletin  Board  ("OTCBB")  under  the symbol "SNIO". As of April 19, 2004 there
were  53,824,554 common shares outstanding. There is limited trading activity in
our  securities,  and there can be no assurance a regular trading market for our
common  stock  will  be  sustained.

The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the bid price range of
our  common  stock.

                                            Low       High
                                          ------     ------
2002
Quarter  Ended  March  31,  2002          $0.080     $0.150
Quarter  Ended  June  30,  2002           $0.070     $0.180
Quarter  Ended  September  30,  2002      $0.040     $0.240
Quarter  Ended  December  31,  2002       $0.010     $0.050

2003
Quarter  Ended  March  31,  2003          $0.004     $0.023
Quarter  Ended  June  30,  2003           $0.011     $0.126
Quarter  Ended  September  30,  2003      $0.023     $0.083
Quarter  Ended  December  31,  2003       $0.036     $0.356

2004
Period  Ended  April  19,  2004           $0.080     $0.23

Such  market  quotations reflect the high bid and low prices as reflected by the
OTCBB  or by prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commissions and may not
necessarily  represent  actual  transactions. Some of the companies who serve as
market  makers  for our common stock include Hill Thompson Magid, Schwab Capital
Markets,  Knight  Securities,  Wien  Securities  and  M.H.  Meyerson  &  Co.

Our  shares are "Penny Stocks" within the Meaning of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934.

Our shares are "penny stocks" within the definition of that term as contained in
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, generally equity securities with a price of
less  than  $5.00.  Our  shares  will then be subject to rules that impose sales
practice  and  disclosure  requirements  on certain broker-dealers who engage in
certain  transactions  involving  a  penny  stock.

Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone
other  than an established customer or "accredited investor" must make a special
suitability  determination  for  the  purchaser and must receive the purchaser's
written  consent  to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer
is  otherwise  exempt.  Generally,  an  individual with a net worth in excess of
$1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 together
with his or her spouse is considered an accredited investor. In addition, unless
the  broker-dealer  or  the  transaction  is  otherwise  exempt, the penny stock
regulations  require  the  broker-dealer  to  deliver,  prior to any transaction
involving  a  penny  stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the Securities and
Exchange  Commission relating to the penny stock market. A broker-dealer is also
required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the Registered
Representative  and  current  bid  and  offer  quotations for the securities. In
addition  a  broker-dealer  is  required  to  send monthly statements disclosing
recent  price  information  with respect to the penny stock held in a customer's
account,  the  account's  value  and information regarding the limited market in
penny stocks. As a result of these regulations, the ability of broker-dealers to
sell  our  stock  may  affect  the  ability of Selling Security Holders or other
holders  to  sell  their  shares in the secondary market. In addition, the penny
stock  rules generally require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock, the
broker-dealer  make  a  special  written determination that the penny stock is a
suitable  investment  for  the  purchaser  and  receive  the purchaser's written
agreement  to  the  transaction.

These  disclosure  requirements  may  have  the  effect of reducing the level of
trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the
penny  stock  rules. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements
could  impede  the  sale  of  our  securities, if our securities become publicly
traded. In addition, the liquidity for our securities may be adversely affected,
with  concomitant  adverse  affects  on the price our securities. Our shares may
someday  be  subject to such penny stock rules and our shareholders will, in all
likelihood,  find  it  difficult  to  sell  their  securities.

     Holders.  As of April 19, 2004 there were approximately 715 stockholders of
record  of  our  common  stock.

(a)  Dividends. We have not paid any cash dividends since our inception, and the
     Board  of  Directors  does not contemplate doing so in the near future. Any
     decisions as to future payment of dividends will depend on our earnings and
     financial  position and such other factors, as the Board of Directors deems
     relevant.

Dividend  Policy

All  shares  of  common  stock  are  entitled  to  participate proportionally in
dividends  if  our  Board  of  Directors  declares them out of the funds legally
available. These dividends may be paid in cash, property or additional shares of
common  stock.  We have not paid any dividends since our inception and presently
anticipate  that  all  earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our
business.  Any  future  dividends  will  be  at  the  discretion of our Board of
Directors  and  will  depend  upon,  among  other  things,  our future earnings,
operating  and  financial  condition,  capital  requirements, and other factors.

(b)  Recent  Sale  of  Unregistered  Securities

Following  is a list of our securities that we have issued during this last year
which  have  not  been  previously  reported.

None.

ITEM  6.  MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION  AND  ANALYSIS  OR  PLAN  OF  OPERATION.

The  following  discussion  and  analysis should be read in conjunction with our
financial statements and the accompanying notes appearing subsequently under the
caption  "Financial Statements."  The following discussion and analysis contains
forward-looking  statements,  which  involve  risks  and  uncertainties  in  the
forward-looking  statements.  Our  actual  results may differ significantly from
the  results,  expectations and plans discussed.  We are presently a development
stage company conducting virtually no business operation, other than our efforts
to  effect  a  Business  Combination with a Target Business which we consider to
have  significant  growth  potential.  We  cannot  predict  to  what  extent our
liquidity  and capital resources will be diminished prior to the consummation of
a  Business  Combination  or whether our capital will be further depleted by the
operating  losses, if any, of the Target Business which we effectuate a Business
Combination  with.  The  continuation  of  our  business  is  dependant upon our
ability  to  obtain  adequate  financing  arrangements,  effectuate  a  Business
Combination  and  ultimately,  engage  in  future  profitable  operations.

OUR  OPERATIONS  DURING  2003

We  were  not able to secure required financing to continue with a number of our
planned  operations in 2003. The web site development market became increasingly
competitive.  Due  to  lack of financing, we were not able to secure independent
contractors  to  work  on  planned  projects  nor  were  our former officers and
directors  able  to  continue  to  finance  ongoing operations. The inability to
finance our planned expansion in the web design market required us to reevaluate
our planned operations. With few assets and no revenues, it became clear that we
must  implement  a  new  business  strategy  and in furtherance thereof, we have
decided  that  our  emphasis  for  the coming year will be to identify potential
acquisition  candidates.

We  evaluated, identified, and signed agreements to acquire two potential Target
Businesses  within  the  timber  industry  during the fourth quarter of 2003 and
during the first quarter of 2004. Forms 8-K was filed for both transactions, and
Form  14-C was filed for the Smith Forestal acquisition, with the Commission and
we  still  await  approval  of  the  proposed  transaction.  The  following is a
description  of  both  transactions.

First,  On October 31, 2003, the Registrant (Senticore, Inc.), Smith Forestal, a
corporation  organized  and  existing under the laws of Costa Rica ("Forestal"),
and  the two shareholders of Forestal (the "Forestal Stockholders"), executed an
Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger  (the  "Merger  Agreement"),  pursuant to which
Forestal  will  merge with and into us, with the Forestal Stockholders receiving
in  the  aggregate 18,924,861 shares of common stock and 7,500 shares of Class A
Voting  Convertible  Preferred  Stock  of  the  Registrant in exchange for their
shares  of  Forestal.  The  shares of Class A Voting Convertible Preferred Stock
issued in the Merger are convertible into two hundred (200) shares of fully paid
and non-assessable shares of common stock, and they have a class vote to approve
or  disapprove  any  merger,  sale  of  assets,  combination  or  reorganization
involving  us,  or  other  fundamental  corporate  transaction involving us. Our
Certificate  of  Incorporation will be amended prior to the Closing (as defined)
to  establish the Class A Voting Convertible Preferred Stock series. An executed
copy  of  the  Merger  Agreement,  together  with the Class A Voting Convertible
Preferred  Stock  designation,  is attached to Form 8-K which is incorporated by
reference  hereto.


The  Closing  under  the Merger Agreement will occur on the second day after the
satisfaction  or  waiver  of all conditions to the obligations of the parties to
consummate  the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The Merger is
conditioned  on,  among  other  things,  us  and  Forestal obtaining the written
consent  of  a  majority  of  their  shareholders  to  approve  the transactions
contemplated  by the Merger Agreement, as well as the satisfactory completion by
each  of us and Forestal of a due diligence investigation The split was affected
The  obligations  of the Registrant to consummate the Merger are conditioned on,
among  other  things,  an  affiliate  of  us  being  issued  3,600,000 shares of
restricted common stock and 7,500 shares of Class A Voting Convertible Preferred
Stock.  Our  obligations  to  consummate  the Merger are further conditioned on,
among  other  things, our receipt of an Opinion to the effect that the terms and
conditions  of the Merger are fair to our shareholders from a financial point of
view.


Secondly,  On  February  13  ,  2004,  the  Registrant (Senticore, Inc.), Westar
South  America  S.A.,  a  corporation  organized  and existing under the laws of
Venezuela  ("Westar"),  and  the  two  shareholders  of  Westar  (the  "Westar
Stockholders"),  executed  an  Agreement  and  Plan  of  Merger  (the  "Merger
Agreement"),  pursuant  to  which  all  outstanding  shares of common  stock  of
Westar  will be exchanged for 29,000,000 shares of our common stock to be issued
by  us  to  the  Westar Stockholders in a transaction designed  to  be  tax-free
pursuant  to  Section  368(a)(1)(B)  of  the  Internal  Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended.  As  a  result  of  the  Merger,  Westar  will  become our wholly-owned
subsidiary.  An executed  copy  of  the  Merger  Agreement  is  attached  as  an
exhibit  to  Form  8-K  which  is  incorporated  by  reference  herein.

The  Closing  under  the Merger Agreement will occur on the second day after the
satisfaction  or  waiver  of  all conditions precedent to the obligations of the
parties to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The
Merger  is  conditioned  on,  among  other  things, us and Westar obtaining  the
written  consent  of all of the members of their Board of Directors and  holders
of  a  majority  of  the  outstanding  shares  of  common  stock  to approve the
transactions  contemplated  by  the  Merger  Agreement.  Such actions by written
consent  have  been taken by the respective Board of Directors and shareholders,
and,  accordingly, the Merger Agreement and the Merger have been approved by all
necessary  corporate  action.  In  addition,  the  Merger  is conditioned on the
satisfactory  completion  by  each  of  us  and  Westar  of  a  due  diligence
investigation.  Further, our obligations to consummate the Merger are subject to
the  delivery  at closing to Rohit Patel, our affiliate, of 14,500,000 shares of
our  common  stock and the delivery to Saroj Patel, our affiliate, of 14,500,000
shares  of our common stock, in each case as compensation for the services which
they  rendered  in connection with negotiating and structuring the Merger and as
compensation  in  the nature of a finder's fee for their role in identifying and
working  with  Westar  in  order  to  bring  the  Merger  to  fruition.

Subject  to the timely filings and approvals of filings by the Commission on the
aforementioned  acquisitions  in  Costa  Rica,  our  new  focus  will be timber.

Any  common  shares  that have already been issued can, and will be, canceled in
the  event  audited  financial  statements,  acceptable  to  the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission,  have not been delivered to us. Any cancellation of common
shares  will  thus increase the share ownership percentages of each shareholder.

PLANNED  OPERATIONS  FOR  2004

If we are successful in closing on the aforementioned acquisitions, there can be
no  assurance,  that  the scale of our operations will increase significantly or
that  the  acquisition  will  result  in a profitable operation.  An increase in
operations  will  include  the  hiring of additional personnel in all functional
areas  and  will result in significantly higher operating expenses. There can be
no assurance that the increase in operating expenses will be offset by a similar
increase in revenues. Expansion of our operations may cause a significant strain
on  our  management, financial and other resources. Our ability to manage future
growth,  should  it  occur,  will  depend  upon  a  significant expansion of our
accounting  and  other  internal  management  systems and the implementation and
subsequent  improvement  of a variety of systems, procedures and controls. There
can be no assurance that significant problems in these areas will not occur. Any
failure to expand these areas and implement and improve such systems, procedures
and controls in an efficient manner at a pace consistent with our business could
have  a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of  operations.  As  a  result  of  such  expected expansion and the anticipated
increase  in  our  operating  expenses, as well as the difficulty in forecasting
revenue  levels, we expect to continue to experience significant fluctuations in
our  revenues, costs and gross margins, and therefore our results of operations.

RESULTS  OF OPERATIONS - FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AS COMPARED TO THE
YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  2002.


REVENUES

We  had  no revenues in 2003 and in 2002. Our principal expense for the past two
years  has been non-cash stock compensation and interest of $467,724 in 2003 and
professional  fees of $15,000 in 2002. We incurred a net loss of $719,935 during
the  year  ended  December 31, 2003 and a net loss of $18,009 for the year ended
December  31, 2002. The increase in the net loss is attributable to the increase
in  the  aforementioned non-cash stock expenses 2003 compared to 2002 and equity
in  loss  of  the  subsidiary  of  $109,000  in  2003  compared to $-0- in 2002.

ASSETS  AND  LIABILITIES

Total  assets  as  of  December  31,  2003  and  2002  were $143,584 and $1,611,
respectively  while  total  liabilities were $807,908 and $31,846, respectively.
Our  stockholders' deficit was $664,324 at December 31, 2003 compared to $30,235
at  December  31,  2002.  The  increase in stockholders' deficit is attributable
mainly  to  the  $719,935  net  loss  in  2003.


Presently,  we  are  not  in  a  position  to meet our cash requirements for the
remainder  of  our fiscal year or for the next 12 months. We do not generate any
cash  revenue  or receive any type of cash flow. In the event we cannot meet our
operating  costs  prior  to  the  effectuation of a business combination, we may
cease  operations  and  a  business  combination  may  not  occur.

Prior  to  the occurrence of a business combination, we may be required to raise
capital through the sale or issuance of additional securities in order to ensure
that  we  can  meet our operating the effectuation of a business combination. No
commitments  of  any  kind  to  provide  additional  funds  have  been  made  by
management,  other  present shareholders or any other third person. There are no
agreements  or  understandings  of  any kind with respect to any loans from such
persons  on  our  behalf.  Accordingly,  there  can  be  no  assurance  that any
additional  funds  will be available to us to allow it to cover our expenses. In
the  event  we can no longer borrow funds from management, and we elect to raise
additional  capital  prior  to  the  effectuation  of a business combination, it
expects  to  do so through the private placement of restricted securities rather
than  through  a  public  offering.

Liquid  Market

There  is currently a limited trading market for our shares of Common Stock, and
there can be no assurance that a more substantial market will ever develop or be
maintained. Any market price for our shares of common stock is likely to be very
volatile, and numerous factors beyond our control may have a significant adverse
effect.  In addition, the stock markets generally have experienced, and continue
to  experience,  extreme  price  and volume fluctuations which have affected the
market price of many small capital companies and which have often been unrelated
to  the  operating  performance  of  these  companies.  These  broad  market
fluctuations,  as  well  as  general economic and political conditions, may also
adversely  affect  the  market  price  of our common stock. Further, there is no
correlation between the present limited market price of our common stock and our
revenues, book value, assets or other established criteria of value. The present
limited  quotations  of  our common stock should not be considered indicative of
the  actual  value  of  our  common  stock.

Critical  Accounting  Policies

Our  critical  accounting  policies  including  the  assumptions  and  judgments
underlying  them are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. We have
consistently  applied  these policies in all material respects. At this stage of
our  development,  these  policies  primarily  address  matters  of  expense
recognition.  Management  does  not  believe  that  our  operations to date have
involved uncertainty of accounting treatment, subjective judgment, or estimates,
to  any  significant  degree.

Dividends

We  have  not  paid  any  cash  dividends  to  date  and  does not anticipate or
contemplate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future until earnings would
generate  funds  in excess of those required to provide for our growth needs. WE
currently  intend  to  retain  any  future  earnings to fund the development and
growth  of  its  business.

Impact  of  Inflation

We  believe  that  inflation  has had a negligible effect on operations over the
past two years. We believe that it can offset inflationary increases in the cost
of  labor  by  increasing  sales  and  improving  operating  efficiencies.

ITEM  7  -  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS:

Attached  hereto  and  incorporated  by this reference are the Company's audited
consolidated  financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and for the two years
ended  December  31,  2003.



                         INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS'  REPORT
                         ------------------------------

To  the  Board  of  Directors  and  stockholders  of  Senticore,  Inc.:

We  have  audited  the  accompanying  balance sheet of Senticore, Inc., formerly
known  as  Hojo Holdings, Inc, a development stage enterprise (the "Company") as
of  December  31,  2003  and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
(deficit)  and  cash  flows for the year then ended.  These financial statements
are  the  responsibility  of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to
express  an  opinion  on  these  financial  statements  based  on  our  audit.

We  conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in  the  United  States  of  America.  Those  standards require that we plan and
perform  the  audit  to  obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a
test  basis,  evidence  supporting  the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as evaluating the overall
financial  statement  presentation.  We  believe  that  our  audit  provides  a
reasonable  basis  for  our  opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all  material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31,
2003  and  the results of its operations and cash flows for the  year then ended
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of  America.

The  accompanying  financial  statements  have  been  prepared assuming that the
Company  will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Notes A and B to the
financial  statements,  the  Company  is in the development stage, has recurring
losses  from  operations,  working  capital  and  stockholders'(  deficits)  and
requirements  for  a significant amount of capital financing to proceed with its
business  plan.  These  factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the
Company's  ability to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard
to  these matters are also described in Note B.  The financial statements do not
include  any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



/s/  Stark  Winter  Schenkein  &  Co.,  LLP
-------------------------------------------
Stark  Winter  Schenkein  &  Co.,  LLP


April  17,  2004
Denver,  Colorado




<PAGE>


                         INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS'  REPORT
                         ------------------------------

To  the  Board  of  Directors  and  stockholders  of  Senticore,  Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying statements of operations, stockholders' deficit
and  cash  flows  of  Senticore, Inc, formerly known as Hojo Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company"), a development stage enterprise, for the year ended December 31, 2002
and for the period January 5, 1999 (date of incorporation) to December 31, 2002.
These  financial  statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on  our  audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in  the  United  States  of  America.  Those  standards require that we plan and
perform  the  audits  to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a
test  basis,  evidence  supporting the amounts and disclosures in the  financial
statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant  estimates  made  by  management,  as well as evaluating the overall
financial  statement  presentation.  We  believe  that  our  audits  provide  a
reasonable  basis  for  our  opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all  material  respects, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company
for  the  year ended December 31, 2002, and for the period January 5, 1999 (date
of  incorporation) to December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles
generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of  America.

The  accompanying  financial  statements  have  been  prepared assuming that the
Company  will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Notes A and B to the
financial  statements,  the  Company  is in the development stage, has recurring
losses  from  operations,  a  stockholders'  deficit  and  requirements  for  a
significant  amount  of  capital  financing  to  proceed with its business plan.
These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to  continue  as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard to these matters
are  also  described  in  Note  B.  The  financial statements do not include any
adjustments  that  might  result  from  the  outcome  of  this  uncertainty.



/s/  Kingery, Crouse, & Hohl, P.A.
----------------------------------
Kingery, Crouse, & Hohl, P.A.


Tampa,  FL
April  11,  2003




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                SENTICORE, INC.
                                ---------------
                            F/K/A HOJO HOLDINGS, INC
                            ------------------------
                        (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
                        --------------------------------

                      BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003
<S>                                                               <C>


                                     ASSETS
                                     ------

CURRENT ASSETS:
      Total current assets                                        $            -
                                                                  --------------

   Investment in Land                                             $      141,000
   Deposit                                                                 2,000
   Furniture and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation
     of $4,425)                                                              584
                                                                  --------------

      TOTAL                                                       $      143,584
                                                                  ==============


                      LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
                      -------------------------------------

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
   Note payable                                                   $      250,000
   Stockholder advances                                                  287,758
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                              270,150
                                                                  --------------
      Total current liabilities                                          807,908

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
   Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares
     authorized                                                                -
   Common stock - $.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares
     authorized; 40,039,861 shares issued and outstanding                 40,040
   Additional paid-in capital                                            492,256
   Deferred stock and interest compensation                             (314,950)
  (Deficit) accumulated during the development stage                    (881,670)
                                                                  --------------
      Total stockholders' (deficit)                                     (664,324)
                                                                  --------------

      TOTAL                                                       $      143,584
                                                                  ==============

                       See notes to financial statements.


</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                SENTICORE, INC.
                                ---------------
                            F/K/A HOJO HOLDINGS, INC.
                            -------------------------
                        (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
                        --------------------------------
                            STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS




                                 For the Year Ended   For the Year Ended    For the Period January 5, 1999
                                 December 31, 2003    December 31, 2002       (date of incorporation) to
                                                                                   December 31, 2003
                                 ------------------   ------------------    ------------------------------
<S>                              <C>                  <C>                   <C>

REVENUE                          $                -   $                -    $                        5,275

EXPENSES:
   Stock based compensation                 373,424                    -                           423,424
   Stock based interest                      94,300                    -                            94,300
   (Loss) in Equity  of LLC                 109,000                    -                           109,000
   Other selling, general and
     administrative expenses                143,211               18,009                           260,221
                                 ------------------   ------------------    ------------------------------
      Total expenses                        719,935               18,009                           886,945
                                 ------------------   ------------------    ------------------------------

      NET (LOSS)                 $         (719,935)  $          (18,009)   $                     (881,670)

Net (Loss) Per Share-
Basic and Diluted                $             (.05)  $             (.00)

Weighted Average Number of
Shares Outstanding - Basic
and Diluted                              14,156,400           14,400,000


                       See notes to financial statements.

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                SENTICORE, INC.
                                ---------------
                            F/K/A HOJO HOLDINGS, INC.
                            -------------------------
                        (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
                        --------------------------------

                  STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

                                                                                  (Deficit)
                                                                 Deferred Stock   Accumulated
                                                   Additional    And Interest     During the
                               Common Stock        Paid-In       Compensation     Development
                           Shares      Par Value   Capital                        Stage            Total
                        ------------   ---------   ----------    --------------   -----------    ---------
<S>                     <C>            <C>         <C>           <C>              <C>            <C>

Initial issuance of
common stock on
January 5, 1999
(inception)                7,500,000   $   7,500   $   (5,000)   $            -   $         -     $  2,500

Net (loss) for the
period January 5, 1999
to December 31, 1999               -           -            -                 -       (10,286)     (10,286)
                        ------------   ---------   ----------    --------------   -----------    ---------

Balances, December
31, 1999                   7,500,000       7,500       (5,000)                -       (10,286)      (7,786)

Issuance of common
stock for cash             2,566,071       2,565       40,203                 -             -       42,768

Conversion of affiliate
advances to common stock   1,333,929       1,335       20,897                 -             -       22,232

Issuance of common stock
for services rendered      3,000,000       3,000       47,000                 -             -       50,000

Contribution of services
by employee                        -           -        6,000                 -             -        6,000

Net (loss)                         -           -            -                 -       (98,651)     (98,651)
                        ------------   ---------   ----------    --------------   -----------    ---------

Balances, December
31, 2000                  14,400,000      14,400      109,100                 -      (108,937)      14,563

Contribution of
services by employee               -           -        6,000                 -             -        6,000

Net (loss)                         -           -            -                 -       (34,789)     (34,789)
                        ------------   ---------   ----------    --------------   -----------    ---------

Balances, December
31, 2001                  14,400,000      14,400      115,100                 -      (143,726)     (14,226)

Contribution of
services by employee               -           -        2,000                 -             -        2,000

Net (loss)                         -           -            -                 -       (18,009)     (18,009)
                        ------------   ---------   ----------    --------------   -----------    ---------

Balances, December 31,
2002                      14,400,000      14,400      117,100                 -      (161,735)     (30,235)

Shares canceled           (1,140,000)     (1,140)       1,140                 -             -            -

Capital  contribution              -           -       19,846                 -             -       19,846

Stock based consulting
expense - option issued
to consultants                     -           -       60,000                 -             -       60,000

Issuance of common stock:
For cash                     500,000         500       35,250                 -             -       35,750

For consulting services    1,055,000       1,055      152,145           (79,250)            -       73,950

For interest and
collateral for note
payable                    4,800,000       4,800      127,200          (235,700)            -     (103,700)

For acquisition of
Smith Forestal
(see Note A)               8,424,861       8,425       (8,425)                -             -            -

For other reasons
- shares subsequently
canceled                  12,000,000      12,000      (12,000)                -             -            -

Net (loss)                         -           -            -                 -      (719,935)    (719,935)
                        ------------   ---------   ----------    --------------   -----------    ---------

Balances, December 31,
2003                      40,039,861   $  40,040   $  492,256    $     (314,950)  $  (881,670)   $(664,324)


                       See notes to financial statements.

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                SENTICORE, INC.
                                ---------------
                            F/K/A HOJO HOLDINGS, INC.
                            -------------------------
                        (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
                        --------------------------------

                            STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                                 For the Year Ended   For the Year Ended    For the Period January 5, 1999
                                 December 31, 2003    December 31, 2002       (date of incorporation) to
                                                                                   December 31, 2003
                                 ------------------   ------------------    ------------------------------
<S>                              <C>                  <C>                   <C>

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
   Net (loss)                    $         (719,935)  $          (18,009)   $                     (881,670)
   Adjustments to reconcile
   net (loss) to net cash (used by)
   operating activities:
      Depreciation                            1,027                1,296                             4,425
     (Loss) in equity of LLC                109,000                    -                           109,000
      Stock based expenses                  467,724                    -                           517,724
      Other non- cash compensation                -                2,000                            14,000
      Increase in accrued
      Liabilities                            44,553               11,713                            56,553
      Increase in deposit                    (2,000)                   -                            (2,000)
                                 ------------------   ------------------    ------------------------------

      NET CASH FLOWS USED IN
      OPERATING ACTIVITIES                  (99,631)              (3,000)                         (181,968)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES-
   Purchases of furniture and equipment           -                    -                            (5,009)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
   Proceeds from issuance of
   common stock                              35,750                    -                            81,018
   Capital contribution                      19,846                    -                            19,846
   Proceeds from borrowings under
   short term debt                          250,000                    -                           250,000
   Repayments of short-term debt           (250,000)                   -                          (250,000)
   Net increase in advances
   from stockholders                         44,035                3,000                            86,113
                                 ------------------   ------------------    ------------------------------

      NET CASH PROVIDED BY
      FINANCING ACTIVITIES                   99,631                3,000                           186,977

      NET CHANGE IN CASH                          -                    -                                 -

CASH,  BEGINNING OF PERIOD                        -                    -                                 -

CASH, END OF PERIOD              $                -   $                -    $                            -
                                 ------------------   ------------------    ------------------------------

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
   Cash paid for interest        $                -   $                -    $                            -
   Cash paid for income taxes    $                -   $                -    $                            -
                                 ==================   ==================    ==============================



                       See notes to financial statements.


</TABLE>



                                SENTICORE, INC.
                            F/K/A HOJO HOLDINGS, INC.
                        (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                DECEMBER 31, 2003
================================================================================

NOTE  A  -  FORMATION  AND  OPERATIONS  OF  THE  COMPANY

Senticore,  Inc.  fka Hojo Holdings, Inc. (collectively "we", "us", "our").  was
incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on January 5, 1999.  We are
considered  to  be  in  the development stage as defined in Financial Accounting
Standards  Board  Statement  No.  7,  and  accordingly,  most  of our accounting
policies  and  procedures  have  not  yet  been  established.

In  April  2003,  the holders of a majority of our issued and outstanding shares
approved  the  amendment  to  our  articles  of incorporation to provide for the
authorization of 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock.  In addition, on November
3,  2003,  our  Board  of Directors announced a three for one stock split of our
common  stock  for each share of common stock held as of November 28, 2003.  The
shareholders  also  approved  an  increase  in the total number of common shares
authorized  from 20,000,000 to 200,000,000 shares. As a result of the above, all
references  to the number of shares in the accompanying financial statements and
notes  thereto  have  been  adjusted  to reflect the stock split and increase in
number  of shares authorized as though all such changes had been completed as of
January  5,  1999  (date  of  incorporation).

We  initially  intended  to  become  an  internet  professional  services  firm
specializing  in high-end web site development, however for various reasons, our
Board  decided  that  it  was  in the best interests of our shareholders to seek
other  opportunities  by merging and/or acquiring other companies.  Towards this
goal,  we  executed  the  following  letters  of  intent  in  2003  and  2004:


-    On October 31, 2003, we entered into an "Agreement and Plan of Merger" with
     the  stockholders  of  Smith Forestal ("Forestal"), a corporation organized
     and  existing under the laws of Costa Rica. Pursuant to this agreement, and
     subject  to  regulatory approval, each share of Forestal common stock shall
     be converted into 94,623 shares of our common stock and 112.5 shares of our
     Class  A  Voting  Convertible Preferred Stock (which shares are convertible
     into  our  common  stock  at the rate of 200 common shares to one preferred
     share).  In  the  aggregate, we have issued 18,924,861 shares of our common
     stock  (8,424,861  which  were  issued  prior to December 31, 2003) for the
     benefit of the Forestal stockholders and are required to issue 7,500 shares
     of  our  Class A Convertible Preferred Stock. The common shares issued must
     represent  at least 51% of our outstanding common shares. The common shares
     issued  are  being  held  by  a  third  party  intermediary  pending  the
     consummation  of  the  merger.  If  the  transaction is not consummated the
     shares  will  be returned to us. At the time of closing we may not have any
     outstanding  options  or  warrants. As consideration for various consulting
     services  incident  to  the merger with Forestal, at the time the merger is
     consummated,  we  have  also agreed to issue 3,600,000 shares of our common
     stock  and  22,500  shares  of  our  Class  A  Convertible  Preferred Stock
     (convertible  into 4,500,000 shares of our common stock) to the chairman of
     our  Board. The shares we anticipate issuing to our Chairman had a value of
     approximately $.23 on October 31, 2003 or $1,863,000 in total. As a result,
     we  may  be  required  to record stock based compensation of this amount in
     2004.  The  transaction  has  not  yet  closed.

-    On  February  13,  2004, we executed an "Agreement and Plan of Merger" with
     the  shareholders  of  Westar  South  America S.A. of Venezuela ("Westar").
     Pursuant  to  this  agreement  and  subject  to  regulatory  approval,  we
     anticipate  issuing  29,000,000 shares of our common stock as consideration
     for  all  of  the  outstanding  common shares of Westar. In addition to the
     shares  that  we  anticipate  issuing to the shareholders of Westar, if the
     merger  is  consummated,  we have also agreed to issue 29,000,000 shares of
     our  common  stock  to  our  Chairman  and his wife as compensation for the
     services  they  rendered  in  connection  with  finding,  negotiating  and
     structuring  the  merger.  The shares we anticipate issuing to our Chairman
     and  his  wife  had  a  value of $.09 on February 13, 2004 or $2,610,000 in
     total.  As  a result, we may be required to record stock based compensation
     of  this  amount  in  2004.  The  transaction  has  not  yet  closed.



Revenue  Recognition
--------------------

The  Company  recognizes  revenue  when  services  are  provided or products are
shipped  and  presented  net  of  returns.

Cash  and  Cash  Equivalents
----------------------------

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three  months  or  less  to  be  cash  equivalents.

Financial  Instruments
----------------------

Fair  value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions
and  pertinent  information available to management as of December 31, 2003. The
respective  carrying  value  of  certain  on-balance-sheet financial instruments
approximated  their  fair  values.  These financial instruments include accounts
payable  and  notes  payable.  Fair  values were assumed to approximate carrying
values for these financial instruments because they are short term in nature and
their  carrying  amounts  approximate  fair  values.

Income  Taxes
-------------

The  Company  follows  Statement  of  Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") 109
"Accounting  for  Income  Taxes"  for  recording the provision for income taxes.
Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  computed based upon the difference
between  the  financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities
using  the  enacted  marginal  tax  rate  applicable  when  the related asset or
liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or
benefits  are  based  on  the  changes in the asset or liability each period. If
available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or
all  of  the  deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is
required  to  reduce  the  deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included
in  the  provision  for  deferred  income  taxes  in  the  period  of  change.

Property  and  Equipment
------------------------

Property  and  equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated or amortized using
the  straight-line  method  over  the  estimated  useful  lives of 3 to 5 years.

Impairment  of  Long  Lived  Assets
-----------------------------------

Long  lived  assets  and  certain  identifiable intangibles held and used by the
Company  are  reviewed  for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances
indicate  the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable or is impaired.

Stock-Based  Compensation
-------------------------

The  Company  accounts  for  equity instruments issued to employees for services
based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and accounts for equity
instruments  issued  to  other  than  employees  based  on the fair value of the
consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments, whichever is
more  reliably  measurable.

The  Company  accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123,
"Accounting  for  Stock-Based  Compensation."  The  provisions of SFAS 123 allow
companies  to  either  expense  the  estimated fair value of stock options or to
continue to follow the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting Principles
Board  Opinion  25,  "Accounting  for  Stock  Issued  to Employees" (APB 25) but
disclose  the  pro  forma effects on net income (loss) had the fair value of the
options  been  expensed.  The Company has elected to continue to apply APB 25 in
accounting  for  its  stock  option  incentive  plans.


Use  of  Estimates
------------------

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates
and  assumptions  that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements.  The  reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period may be affected by the estimates and assumptions we are required to make.
Estimates that are critical to the accompanying financial statements include the
amount of  interest expense we recorded under the note payable discussed at Note
E.  If we are unable to pay the note prior to May 31, 2004, our interest expense
may  increase  significantly  in  2004 as a result of the possible forfeiture of
certain  shares  of  our  common  stock  held  as  collateral  for  the  note.

Recent  Pronouncements
----------------------


In  May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS 150,
"Accounting  for  Certain  Financial  Instruments  with  Characteristics of both
Liabilities  and  Equity."  SFAS 150 changes the accounting guidance for certain
financial  instruments  that,  under  previous  guidance, could be classified as
equity or "mezzanine" equity by now requiring those instruments to be classified
as  liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) on the balance sheet. Further,
SFAS  150  requires  disclosure  regarding  the  terms  of those instruments and
settlement  alternatives.  SFAS  150  is  generally  effective for all financial
instruments  entered  into  or  modified  after  May  31, 2003, and is otherwise
effective  at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15,
2003. The adoption of SFAS 150 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 has not had a
material  impact  on  the Company's financial position, results of operations or
cash  flows.

In  April  2003,  the  FASB  issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative  Instruments  and  Hedging  Activities".  SFAS 149 amends SFAS 133 to
clarify  the  definition  of  a  derivative  and  incorporate  many  of  the
implementation  issues  cleared  as  a  result of the Derivatives Implementation
Group  process.  This  statement  is  effective  for  contracts  entered into or
modified  after  June  30,  2003, and should be applied prospectively after that
date.  The  adoption  of SFAS 149 has mot had a material effect on the financial
statements.

In  December  2002,  the  FASB  issued  SFAS  148  "Accounting  for  Stock-Based
Compensation--Transition  and  Disclosure--an  amendment  of SFAS 123." SFAS 148
provides  alternative  methods  of transition for a voluntary change to the fair
value  based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation from the
intrinsic  value-based  method of accounting prescribed by APB 25. As allowed by
SFAS 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based
method  of  accounting, and has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123.
The  Company  currently does not anticipate adopting the provisions of SFAS 148.

In  July  2002,  the FASB issued SFAS 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with
Exit  or Disposal Activities." SFAS 146 provides new guidance on the recognition
of  costs  associated  with  exit  or disposal activities. The standard requires
companies  to  recognize  costs associated with exit or disposal activities when
they  are  incurred rather than at the date of commitment to an exit or disposal
plan.  SFAS  146  supercedes  previous  accounting guidance provided by the EITF
Issue  No. 94-3 "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits
and  Other  Costs  to  Exit  an  Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a
Restructuring)."  EITF  Issue No. 94-3 required recognition of costs at the date
of  commitment  to  an  exit  or  disposal  plan.  SFAS  146  is  to  be applied
prospectively  to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
Early  application is permitted. The adoption of SFAS 146 by the Company has not
had  a  material  impact  on  the  Company's  financial  position,  results  of
operations,  or  cash  flows.

In  April  2002, the FASB issued SFAS 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4,
44,  and  64,  Amendment  of  FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections."
Among  other  things,  this  statement rescinds FASB Statement No. 4, "Reporting
Gains  and  Losses  from  Extinguishment  of  Debt" which required all gains and
losses from extinguishment of debt to be aggregated and, if material, classified
as  an  extraordinary  item,  net of related income tax effect. As a result, the
criteria  in  APB  Opinion  No.  30,  "Reporting  the  Results  of Operations --
Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary,
Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions," will now be used to
classify  those  gains  and  losses.  The  provisions of SFAS 145 related to the
classification  of  debt  extinguishment are effective for years beginning after
May  15,  2002.  The  adoption of SFAS 145 by the Company has not had a material
impact  on  the  Company's  financial  position,  results of operations, or cash
flows.


Reclassifications
-----------------

Certain amounts in the prior period financials have been reclassified to conform
to  the  presentation  in  the  2003  financial  statements.

NOTE  B  -  GOING  CONCERN

Our  consolidated  financial  statements  have  been prepared on a going concern
basis,  which  contemplates  the  realization  of assets and the satisfaction of
liabilities  in  the  normal course of business.  We have incurred net operating
losses  since  our  inception  of  $881,670  and have a stockholders' deficit of
$664,324  and  working  capital  deficit  of  $807,908  at December 31, 2003. In
addition,  we have no revenue generating operations.  Our ability to continue as
a  going  concern is ultimately contingent upon our ability to attain profitable
operations  through  the  successful  development or integration of an operating
business.  In  addition,  our  ability  to  continue  as a going concern must be
considered  in  light  of  the  problems,  expenses and complications frequently
encountered by entrance into established markets and the competitive environment
in  which we operate.  Our plans include consummating the transactions discussed
at  Note  A.  In the interim, we plan to continue to fund our operating expenses
through  the  issuance  of  our  common  stock  for  services and/or cash and to
continue  to  borrow  from  certain  shareholders or unrelated parties. However,
there  is  no  assurance  that  we  will  be  successful in our efforts to raise
capital, and/or in our efforts to complete the transactions discussed at Note A,
or  to  locate  and merge with, acquire, or develop any other suitable business.
These  factors,  among  others,  indicate that we may be unable to continue as a
going  concern for a reasonable period of time.  Our financial statements do not
include  any  adjustments  relating  to the recoverability and classification of
recorded  asset  amounts  or  the amounts and classification of liabilities that
might  be  necessary  should  we  be  unable  to  continue  as  a going concern.

NOTE  C  -  INVESTMENT  IN  LAND

In  July 2003, we purchased a 60% interest in Ecats Development, LLC (the "LLC")
from  an  entity  related  to  us  by  virtue  of one of our officer's ownership
interest.  As  consideration,  we  issued  a 6% note payable for $250,000, which
amount  approximated  the  cost  of  the  investment on the books of the related
entity.  The  note  was  paid in November 2003, however interest was waived.  In
November  2003,  the  LLC was dissolved, and we received twenty residential lots
located  in  Sebring, Florida in exchange for our LLC interest.   The lots had a
cost  of  approximately $141,000 at the date of the dissolution, and accordingly
our  expenses  include  a $109,000 charge representing the reduction in value of
our  investment.   At  the time of the dissolution, we entered an agreement with
an unrelated developer, whereby such developer has agreed to secure construction
financing and build residences on our lots. Pursuant to our agreement, we are to
split any profits from the sales of the homes on a 50/50 basis.  At December 31,
2003,  three  of the lots having a cost basis of approximately $21,000 have been
pledged  as  collateral  for  such  construction  loans.

NOTE  D  -  INCOME  TAXES

We  recognized  losses for both financial and tax reporting purposes during each
of the periods in the accompanying statements of operations. In addition, we had
no  significant  temporary differences at December 31 2003 or 2002. Accordingly,
no  provisions  for  income taxes and/or deferred income taxes payable have been
provided  for  in  the  accompanying  financial  statements.
Assuming  they  are  not  limited and/or lost as a result of "change in control"
provisions  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code,  at  December 31, 2003, we had net
operating  loss carryforwards of approximately $695,000 for income taxes.  These
carryforwards  expire in various periods through December 31, 2023. The deferred
income  tax  asset  arising  from  these  net  operating  loss  carryforwards of
approximately $271,000 is not recorded in the accompanying balance sheet because
we  established  a  valuation  allowance  to  fully  reserve  such asset, as its
realization did not meet the required asset recognition standards established by
SFAS  109.  The valuation allowance increased by approximately $217,000 in 2003.
The  principal difference between the net operating loss for income tax purposes
and  book  purposes  relates  to  stock  based  compensation  to  officers.

NOTE  E  -  NOTE  PAYABLE


At  December  31,  2003, we are obligated under a note payable for $250,000 as a
result  of  the repayment of the note described in Note C.  As consideration for
this  note,  we  provided the creditor with 1,500,000 shares of our common stock
(approximately  900,000 of which were  provided by certain of our stockholders).
As  a result of this transaction, we will record total non-cash interest expense
of $330,000 based on the fair market value of the shares issued, during the term
of  the note.  At December 31, 2003, $94,300 of this amount has been included in
the  accompanying  2003  statement  of operations; the remaining amount has been
reflected  as  deferred stock and interest compensation and will be amortized to
expense  in  2004.

The  note  payable  matures on May 31, 2004, and was initially collateralized by
4,500,000  shares  of  our  common  stock  (approximately  300,000 of which were
provided  by  certain of our stockholders).  Subsequent to December 31, 2003, we
provided additional collateral of 3,000,000 shares to this creditor.  If we fail
to  pay  the  note  at  maturity,  the creditor shall have the right to retain a
significant  portion  of the collateral as additional interest.  If this occurs,
we  will  be  required  to  record additional expense at the date of the default
based  on  the  fair  market  value  of  our  common  stock  at  that  time.

We also provided the creditor with an option to purchase the 4,200,000 shares of
restricted  common stock held as collateral for the greater of $.33 per share or
of  the  market  price of the our stock on the date the option is exercised.  In
order  for  the exercise, to occur, our stock must maintain a market price of at
least  $.667  per share for twenty consecutive days, at which time, the creditor
will  have forty five days to exercise his option.    Because it is not probable
that  these options will vest, no stock based compensation has been recorded for
this  option.  If  the  creditor is ultimately able to elect exercise, we may be
required to record additional expense, depending on the fair market value of our
stock  at  the  date  of  exercise.


NOTE  F - SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES

During  the  year  ended  December 31, 2000, common stock and additional paid-in
capital  increased  by  $445 and $21,787, respectively when $22,232 of affiliate
advances  were  converted  to  common  stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, we had the following non-cash investing
and  financing  activities:

-    In  July 2003, we issued a note payable of $250,000 as consideration for an
     interest  in  the  LLC  (see  Note  C).

-    In  November  2003,  we  received  certain  land  as  consideration for our
     investment  in  the  LLC  (see  Note  C).


-    In  December  2003,  we issued 12,000,000 shares of our common stock, which
     were  subsequently  canceled  (see  Note  K).

-    In  December  2003,  we issued 8,424,861 shares of our common stock for the
     pending  Forestal  acquisition  discussed  at  Note  A.

-    Deferred  stock and interest compensation increased by $314,950 as a result
     of  the issuance of our common shares, and/or granting of our common shares
     by  certain  stockholders  (see Notes E and I), for interest and consulting
     services  that  relate  to  future  years.

-    Accrued  expenses  declined by $25,877 and due to stockholders increased by
     such  amount  as  a  result of certain stockholders transferring stock to a
     creditor  for  legal  fees.

-    Used  proceeds aggregating $35,750 to directly repay and officers loan (see
     Note  I).


NOTE  G-  LOSS  PER  SHARE

We  compute  net  loss  per  share in accordance with SFAS No. 128 "Earnings per
Share"  ("SFAS  No.  128")  and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 98 ("SAB 98").
Under the provisions of No. 128 and SAB 98, basic net loss per share is computed
by  dividing the net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted
net  loss  per  share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the
number  of  common  and  common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.
There  were no common equivalent shares outstanding during the period January 5,
1999  (date  of  incorporation)  to  December  31,  2002.  During the year ended
December  31, 2003, certain stock options and warrants have been issued, however
they  are  ignored in the loss per share calculations as they are anti-dilutive.
Accordingly  basic  and diluted net loss per share are identical for each of the
periods  in  the  accompanying  statements  of  operations.

NOTE  H  -  COMMITMENT

Prior  to  July  2003, we operated out of an officers' home and/or certain space
subleased  to  us from an entity related to us by virtue of one of our officer's
previous  ownership  of  such  entity.  No consideration was paid for the use of
this  space,  nor  has  any been recorded in the financial statements because of
insignificance.  In  July  2003, we entered an operating lease agreement for our
administrative  facility  that requires monthly payments of approximately $2,350
(including  sales tax).  The lease terminates upon ninety days written notice by
either  party.  Rent expense under this lease during the year ended December 31,
2003  approximated  $15,400.

NOTE  I  -  OTHER  COMMON  STOCK  TRANSACTIONS


During  the periods covered by these financial statements and subsequent thereto
we  issued  shares of common stock without registration under the Securities Act
of 1933. Although we believe that the sales did not involve a public offering of
its securities and that the we did comply with the "safe harbor" exemptions from
registration,  we could be liable for rescission of the sales if such exemptions
were  found  not  to apply and this could have a material negative impact on our
financial  position  and  results  of  operations.

On  August  12, 2003, we engaged a consulting firm to provide investor relations
and  other
services  for  a  period  of  six months, and as consideration for such services
issued 300,000 shares of our common stock.   The approximate fair value of these
shares $15,000 has been included in stock based compensation in the accompanying
December  31,  2003  statement of operations.   In addition, the consulting firm
received  300,000  options  to  purchase  shares of our common stock at $.08 per
share,  which  price approximated the fair value of our common stock at the date
of  issuance.  The options are subject to cancellation under certain conditions,
as  specified  in  the  agreement.


On  November  17,  2003,  we  engaged a consultant to provide financial advisory
services  for a period of two years.  As a result of this transaction, we agreed
to  issue  300,000  shares of our common stock and will record total stock based
compensation of $57,000 during the term of the agreement, which amount was based
on the number, and fair value, of shares issued. At December 31, 2003, $4,750 of
this  amount has been included in the accompanying 2003 statement of operations;
the  remaining amount has been reflected as deferred stock compensation and will
be amortized to expense in 2004 and 2005.  In addition, we granted the following
consideration  and/or  potential  future  consideration  to  this  consultant:

-    300,000  options  to purchase shares of our common stock at a price of $.50
     per  share  at  any  time  through  November  16,  2008.

-    A  financing fee equal to 10% of any indebtedness or equity we issue and/or
     obtain  as  a  result  of  this  consultant's efforts and/or relationships.

-    A  quarterly  finder's  fee  ranging from 5% to 1% of any gross revenues we
     generate  through  or as a result of a introduction we receive through this
     consultant's  efforts. The fee starts at 5% and is reduced as sales dollars
     increase.

-    A  transaction  fee ranging from 5% to 1% of any merger, acquisition, joint
     venture,  private  placement  or other similar transaction we enter through
     this  consultants'  efforts.

On  December  17,  2003,  we  issued  300,000  shares  of  our common stock to a
consultant  for  investor  relations  services  for a period of six months. As a
result  of  this  transaction,  we will record total stock based compensation of
$27,000  during the term of the agreement, which amount was based on the number,
and  fair  value,  of  shares  issued.  In  addition,  we agreed to provide cash
compensation  of  $4,000  per  month  during  the term of the agreement. We have
recognized  $4,000  of  cash  based  consulting expense in the accompanying 2003
statement  of  operations,  and  deferred the entire stock based compensation of
$27,000.  This  amount  will  be  amortized  to  expense  in  2004.

In  addition,  we  satisfied  various other expenses via the issuance of 155,000
shares  of  our  common  stock.  As  a  result  of this transaction, we recorded
$54,200  of  stock  based  compensation  in  2003.

On December 29, 2003, we sold 500,000 shares of our common stock under a private
placement to an individual investor for cash of $35,750 (or $.07 per share).  In
addition,  we  granted  this  individual 500,000 warrants to purchase our common
stock  for  a  price  of  $.143 per share, which warrants expire on December 31,
2004, provided that our stock price and volume equals or exceeds certain defined
targets.  If  such  targets  are  not  achieved  in 2004 and/or at various other
subsequent  expiration  dates,  then  the  warrants  can potentially be extended
through  December  31,  2008.  The proceeds from this sale were used to directly
repay  a  loan  from  an  officer.

At  December 31, 2003, outstanding common shares includes 12,000,000 shares that
were  canceled  subsequent to such date. We had instructed our transfer agent to
issue  these  shares in 2003 as we anticipated entering a financing arrangement,
however  no  agreement  was  entered  into,  and  no  expense  was  applicable.

During  the year ended December 31, 2003, we canceled 1,140,000 shares of common
stock  that  had  been  previously  reflected as outstanding because the related
consideration  was  never  paid  for  the  shares.


Stock  Options  and  Warrants
-----------------------------

During  the year ended December 31, 2003 the Company issued options and warrants
to  purchase  shares  of common stock to certain consultants. Compensation costs
related  to  these  options  charged  to  operations  was  $60,000  in  2003.

SFAS  123  requires  the  Company to provide pro-forma information regarding net
income  and  earnings  per share as if compensation cost for the Company's stock
option  plans had been determined in accordance with the fair value based method
prescribed  in SFAS 123. The fair value of the option grants is estimated on the
date  of  grant  utilizing  the  Black-Scholes  option  pricing  model  with the
following weighted average assumptions for grants during the year ended December
31  2003: expected life of options of 1 to 5 years, expected volatility of 630%,
risk-free  interest  rate of 3% and no dividend yield. The weighted average fair
value  at  the  date of grant for options granted during the year ended December
31,  2003  approximated $.10 per option. These results may not be representative
of those to be expected in future years. The pro-forma results of operations for
2003  are  not materially different than the historical results of operations as
the  entire  fair  value  of  the  options of $60,000 was charged to operations.


A  summary  of  stock  option  activity  is  as  follows:

                                            Weighted     Weighted
                                Number      average      average
                                  of        exercise     fair
                                shares      price        value
                               --------     --------     --------
     Balance  at
       December  31,  2001
       and  2002                      -
     Granted                    600,000     $    .29     $    .10
     Exercised                        -            -            -
     Forfeited                        -            -            -
                               --------     --------     --------
     Balance  at
       December  31,  2003      600,000     $    .29     $    .10
                               ========     ========     ========

The  following  table summarizes information about stock options at December 31,
2003:

                          Outstanding     Exercisable
           Weighted       Weighted        Weighted-
           Average        Average         Average
Exercise   Number         Contractual     Exercise       Number         Exercise
Prices     Outstanding    Life            Price          Exercisable    Price
--------   -----------    -----------     -----------    -----------    --------

$  0.080       300,000    1.00  years     $     0.080        300,000    $  0.080

$  0.500       300,000    5.00  years     $     0.500        300,000    $  0.500
--------   -----------    -----------     -----------    -----------    --------
               600,000                                       600,000
           ===========                                   ===========


NOTE  J  -  OTHER  RELATED  PARTY  TRANSACTIONS

We recognized $2,000 of employee compensation during the year ended December 31,
2002.  We  believe this amount represents the fair value of services provided to
us  by  our  president during this year.   Because this compensation will not be
paid,  now  or  in  the  future, the amount has been reflected as an increase in
additional  paid-in  capital.

In  2003,  we recognized approximately $235,500 of compensation to our officers,
which  liability  was  satisfied  in  2004 through the issuance of approximately
3,837,500 shares of our common stock.  Because this compensation was paid in the
form  of  common  stock  in  lieu  of  cash,  the
normal compensation for these officers was increased by a factor of 25% prior to
determining  the  number  of  shares  to  be  issued.

We periodically receive advances from various stockholders.   The net balance of
these  advances,  which are reflected as due to stockholders in the accompanying
balance  sheet,  are  unsecured,  non-interest  bearing  and  due  on  demand.

Our  Chairman  contributed  $19,846  to  our  capital  in  2003.

NOTE  K  -  OTHER  SUBSEQUENT  EVENTS

Stock  Option  Plan
-------------------

In  February  2004, our Board of Directors approved the 2004 Non-Qualified Stock
Option  Plan  (the  "Plan").   The  Plan permits the following separate types of
grant:

-    Options  may  be  granted  to  purchase  shares  of  our  common  stock
-    Stock  awards  may  be  granted  and
-    Opportunities  to  make  direct  purchases  of  our stock may be authorized

The  aggregate  number  of shares which could initially be issued under the Plan
was  5,000,000  (in  March 2004, we amended the Plan to provide for the issuance
there  under  of an additional 7,500,000 shares of our common stock.  However if
any  option granted under the Plan  terminates or expires for any reason without
having  been  exercised in full, or if we reacquire any non-vested shares issued
pursuant  to  awards  or  purchases  as  mentioned  above,  the  un-purchased
shares subject to such options, or such non-vested shares reacquired shall again
be  available  for
grants  of stock rights under the Plan.  Our Board of Directors shall administer
the  Plan,  and  determine  the  purchase  price  per  share of the common stock
deliverable  upon  exercise  of  an  option.

Stock  Based  Consulting
------------------------

On  February  5, 2004, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of 2,000,000
shares  of  our  common  stock  having  a  value  of  $.11 per share for various
consulting services to be provided in 2004 (however 400,000 shares were canceled
due  to  non-performance  by one of the consultants).  The 1,600,000 shares will
result  in  total  stock  based  consulting  expense  of approximately $176,000.

On  February 10, 2004, our Board of Directors approved the issuance of 1,925,000
shares  of  our  common  stock  having  a  value  of  $.10 per share for various
consulting  services  to  be  provided  in
2004  (however  900,000  of  these  shares  are  being  held  by  a  third party
intermediary, and we do not anticipate issuing such shares to the consultant due
to  a lack of performance on their part).   Depending on the ultimate resolution
of  the  900,000  shares,  we will record stock based consulting expense ranging
from  $102,500  to  $192,500  in  2004.

In  addition,  on  February  13,  2004, we agreed to issue 250,000 shares of our
common  stock  for  investor  and public relations services to be provided for a
period  of  one  year.  The  shares had a value of approximately $22,500 on such
date,  and  this  amount  will be recorded as stock based consulting expenses in
2004.   In addition, we granted this person an option to buy 250,000 shares at a
price  per  share  of  $.25.

In  addition  to  the  above, during the first quarter of 2004, we issued and/or
have  agreed  to issue the following shares of our common stock as consideration
for  certain  consulting  services  (the  issuance  of this stock will result in
recording  of  stock  based  consulting  in  2004):

-    1,000,000  shares  to  a minority stockholder, whereby such stockholder has
     agreed to serve as our representative to the Latin American timber industry
     on  a  consulting  basis.  The  shares  were  registered  in the S-8 filing
     discussed  above,  and  serve as compensation for a maximum of 500 hours of
     the consultant's time in 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. The consultant
     also  received  an  additional  500,000  shares  of  our  common  stock for
     additional  consultation  work  after  the  first  quarter  of  2004.

-    185,000  shares  to  attorneys  and  consultants for certain legal services

-    570,000  shares  for  various  consulting  services to be rendered in 2004.

Additional  Borrowings
----------------------

In  March  2004, we borrowed $250,000 under a note payable requiring interest at
20%  and  payable  within  one  year  from  the  date  of the note.  The note is
collateralized  by  2,500,000 shares of our common stock and 2,500,000 shares of
our  common  stock  held  by  affiliates.

Stock  issued  to  Officers
---------------------------

In  addition  to the shares issued for compensation accrued at December 31, 2003
(see  Note  J), during the first quarter of 2004 we issued approximately 404,200
shares  of  our  common  stock  to  our  officers  as  consideration  for  their
compensation  for  the  for  the  first  two  months  of  2004.    Because  this
compensation  was  paid  in the form of common stock in lieu of cash, the normal
compensation  for  these  officers  was  increased  by  a factor of 25% prior to
determining  the  number  of  shares  to  be  issued.


ITEM  8.  CHANGES  IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING FINANCIAL
          DISCLOSURE

     Effective  January  13,  2004,  the  client-auditor  relationship  between
Senticore,  Inc.  and  Kingery,  Crouse  & Hohl, P.A., ("Kingery") ceased as the
former  accountant resigned. On March 9, 2004, we engaged Stark Winter Schenkein
&  Co.,  LLP,  ("Stark") as our principal independent public accountant to audit
our financial statements. The decision to change accountants was approved by our
board of directors. Kingery had served as our auditor since inception on January
5,  1999.

     Stark  is  succeeding  Kingery.  Kingery  audited  our  balance sheet as of
December  31,  2001  and  December  31,  2002  and  the  related  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  deficit,  and  cash  flows for the years then ended.
Kingery's report on our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December
31, 2001 and December 31, 2002 did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer
of  opinion  and  was  not  qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope
or  accounting principles except for concerns about our ability to continue as a
going  concern.

     We  had  no  disagreements with Kingery during the engagement. Prior to the
engagement of Stark, we did not discuss any application of accounting principles
to  a  specific  completed  or  contemplated  transaction,  or the type of audit
opinion  that  might  be  rendered  by  Stark.

ITEM 8A.  CONTROLS  AND  PROCEDURES

Quarterly  Evaluation  of Controls.  As of the end of the period covered by this
annual  report  on Form 10-KSB, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of (i) our disclosure controls and procedures ("Disclosure Controls"),
and  (ii)  our  internal control over financial reporting ("Internal Controls").
This  evaluation  ("Evaluation")  was  performed  by  our  President  and  Chief
Executive  Officer,  Jay Patel ("CEO"), and by Carl Gessner, our Chief Financial
Officer  ("CFO"). In this section, we present the conclusions of our CEO and CFO
based  on  and  as  of  the  date  of  the  Evaluation,  (i) with respect to the
effectiveness of our Disclosure Controls, and (ii) with respect to any change in
our  Internal  Controls that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that
has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to materially affect our
Internal  Controls.

CEO and CFO Certifications. Attached to this annual report, as Exhibits 31.1 and
31.2,  are  certain  certifications  of  the  CEO and CFO, which are required in
accordance  with  the  Exchange Act and the Commission's rules implementing such
section  (the  "Rule  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)  Certifications"). This section of the
annual  report contains the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in
the  Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications. This information should be read in
conjunction with the Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications for a more complete
understanding  of  the  topic  presented.

Disclosure  Controls  and  Internal Controls. Disclosure Controls are procedures
designed  with  the  objective  of  ensuring  that  information  required  to be
disclosed  in our reports filed with the Commission under the Exchange Act, such
as  this  annual  report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the  time  period  specified  in  the  Commission's  rules and forms. Disclosure
Controls  are  also  designed  with  the  objective  of  ensuring  that material
information  relating  to  us  is  made  known to the CEO and the CFO by others,
particularly during the period in which the applicable report is being prepared.
Internal Controls, on the other hand, are procedures which are designed with the
objective  of  providing  reasonable  assurance  that  (i)  our transactions are
properly  authorized,  (ii)  the  Company's  assets  are  safeguarded  against
unauthorized  or  improper use, and (iii) our transactions are properly recorded
and  reported,  all to permit the preparation of complete and accurate financial
statements  in  conformity  with accounting principals generally accepted in the
United  States.

Limitations  on  the  Effectiveness  of Controls. Our management does not expect
that our Disclosure Controls or our Internal Controls will prevent all error and
all  fraud.  A  control  system,  no matter how well developed and operated, can
provide  only  reasonable, but not absolute assurance that the objectives of the
control  system are met.  Further, the design of the control system must reflect
the  fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must
be  considered  relative  to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in
all  control  systems,  no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance
that  all  control  issues and instances so of fraud, if any, within the Company
have  been  detected.  These  inherent  limitations  include  the realities that
judgments  in  decision-making  can  be  faulty,  and  that breakdowns can occur
because  of  simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented
by  the  individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or
by  management  override of the control. The design of a system of controls also
is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and  there  can  be  no  assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated  objectives under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may
become  inadequate  because  of  changes in conditions, or because the degree of
compliance  with  the  policies  or  procedures  may deteriorate. Because of the
inherent  limitations  in  a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to
error  or  fraud  may  occur  and  not  be  detected.

Scope of the Evaluation. The CEO and CFO's evaluation of our Disclosure Controls
and  Internal  Controls  included a review of the controls' (i) objectives, (ii)
design,  (iii)  implementation,  and  (iv)  the  effect  of  the controls on the
information  generated  for  use  in  this  annual  report. In the course of the
Evaluation,  the  CEO  and CFO sought to identify data errors, control problems,
acts  of  fraud,  and they sought to confirm that appropriate corrective action,
including process improvements, was being undertaken. This type of evaluation is
done  on  a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning the effectiveness
of  our  controls  can  be  reported in our quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB and
annual  reports  on  Form  10-KSB. The overall goals of these various evaluation
activities are to monitor our Disclosure Controls and our Internal Controls, and
to  make  modifications  if  and as necessary. Our external auditors also review
Internal  Controls  in  connection  with their audit and review activities.  Our
intent  in this regard is that the Disclosure Controls and the Internal Controls
will  be  maintained  as dynamic systems that change (including improvements and
corrections)  as  conditions  warrant.

Among other matters, we sought in our Evaluation to determine whether there were
any  significant  deficiencies  or material weaknesses in our Internal Controls,
which  are reasonably likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process,
summarize  and  report  financial  information, or whether we had identified any
acts  of fraud, whether or not material, involving management or other employees
who  have  a  significant  role  in  our Internal Controls. This information was
important  for  both  the  Evaluation,  generally,  and  because  the  Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)  Certifications,  Item  5,  require  that  the  CEO  and CFO
disclose that information to our Board (audit committee), and to our independent
auditors, and to report on related matters in this section of the annual report.
In the professional auditing literature, "significant deficiencies" are referred
to  as  "reportable  conditions".  These  are  control  issues  that  could have
significant  adverse  affect  on  the  ability to record, process, summarize and
report  financial  data  in  the  financial statements. A "material weakness" is
defined  in  the  auditing  literature  as  a  particularly  serious  reportable
condition where the internal control does not reduce, to a relatively low level,
the  risk  that  misstatement  cause by error or fraud may occur in amounts that
would  be  material  in relation to the financial statements and not be detected
within  a  timely  period  by  employee in the normal course of performing their
assigned  functions.  We  also sought to deal with other controls matters in the
Evaluation,  and  in  each case, if a problem was identified, we considered what
revisions,  improvements  and/or  corrections  to  make  in  accordance with our
ongoing  procedures.

Conclusions. Based upon the Evaluation, the Company's CEO and CFO have concluded
that,  subject  to  the  limitations  noted  above,  our Disclosure Controls are
effective  to  ensure  that material information relating to the Company is made
known  to  management, including the CEO and CFO, particularly during the period
when our periodic reports are being prepared, and that our Internal Controls are
effective  to  provide  reasonable  assurance  that our financial statements are
fairly  presented  inconformity with accounting principals generally accepted in
the  United  States.  Additionally,  there  has  been  no change in our Internal
Controls that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely  to  affect,  our  Internal  Controls.

PART  III

ITEM  9.  DIRECTORS  AND  EXECUTIVE  OFFICERS  OF  THE  COMPANY

OFFICERS  AND  DIRECTORS

The  executive  officers  and  directors of the Company and their ages as of the
date  of  this  Annual  Report  to  Shareholders  are  as  follows:

NAME     AGE     POSITION

Rohit  Patel     57     Chairman
Jay  Patel       32     Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
Carl  Gessner    56     President/Chief  Financial
                        Officer/Secretary/Treasurer/Director

ROHIT  PATEL,  CHAIRMAN

Mr.  Patel has been an active investor in the hospitality and retail sectors for
the  past fifteen years, including hotels, gas stations, convenience stores, and
video  stores. Prior to his involvement in this venture, he owned and operated a
manufacturing  company,  Precise  Lapping  &  Grinding  Co.,  for  7  years that
specialized  in  diamond  polishing  various  components  in  the  electronic,
aerospace, auto and machinery industries. In 1982, Pratt & Whitney a division of
United  Technologies acquired Mr. Patel's company. Following the acquisition, he
held the position as a Technical Advisor for Pratt & Whitney/United Technologies
for  a period of 7 years.  Additionally, Mr. Patel served as a plant manager for
the  Lapping  Department  of Ultra Precision Mfg Co. for a period of 5 years. He
earned a bachelor's degree in Chemistry from India's Gujarat State University in
1970.

CARL  A.  GESSNER,  PRESIDENT,  SECRETARY,  TREASURER,  DIRECTOR

Mr.  Gessner  has  over  20  years  of  business experience and over a decade of
service  as  a  law enforcement officer in the state of New Jersey. From 1982 to
1995,  Mr.  Gessner  worked as a realtor in New Jersey and Florida.  He has held
the  following  positions  since  1995:  From  1995 to 1997, he served as office
business  manager  of  two  sister  stock brokerage companies: Wall Street Money
Center  Corporation  and Wall Street Money Management Group, Inc. in Boca Raton,
FL,  where  he  was  responsible  for  budgeting,  purchasing,  payroll,  human
resources,  and other day-to-day office functions. From 1997 to May 1999, he was
promoted  to  Financial Operations Principal at the same companies, where he was
responsible  for  all  operations  and  financial reporting functions, including
service  as compliance officer for the firms. He became chief compliance officer
for  Traderight  Securities  in May 2001, where he served until his promotion to
Vice President in 2002.  Mr. Gessner earned a bachelor's degree in business from
Rider  College  in  1968.

JAY  R.  PATEL,  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  AND  OPERATING  OFFICER,  DIRECTOR

Jay  Patel has been a licensed professional and principal of a brokerage firm in
the securities industry for over a decade.  During the past five years Mr. Patel
owned  and  operated  TradeRight  Securities  based  in  southern  Florida.
TradeRight's primary focus included proprietary trading.  Throughout his career,
Mr.  Patel has specialized in investment banking and trading, including systems,
software  and  analysis.  He  has managed or owned active trading firms offering
direct  access  trading to both professional traders and active retail accounts.
Through an investment banking transaction, Mr. Patel originally assisted the new
management team acquire Senticore, Inc.  Upon selling his interest in TradeRight
Securities in 2003, Mr. Patel has joined the Senticore executive team full time,
and  today,  he  directs  all of his focus towards making Senticore a successful
real  estate holding company.  Mr. Patel majored in Finance and Economics at the
University  of  Illinois  in  Chicago.

COMMITTEES  OF  THE  BOARD  OF  DIRECTORS

We  presently do not have an audit committee, compensation committee, nominating
committee,  an  executive  committee  of  our  board  of  directors,  stock plan
committee or any other committees. However, our board of directors may establish
various  committees  during  the  current  fiscal  year.

COMPENSATION  OF  DIRECTORS

Our  directors  do not receive cash compensation for their services as directors
or  members  of committees of the board, but are reimbursed for their reasonable
expenses  incurred  in  attending  board  or  committee  meetings.

TERMS  OF  OFFICE

Our  directors  are  appointed for terms of one year.  Our current Board members
will  continue  to  retain  their  position  until  the next annual shareholders
meeting.

     AUDIT  COMMITTEE  FINANCIAL  EXPERT

The  Company  does  not  have  a separately designated standing audit committee.
Pursuant  to  Section  3(a)(58)(B)  of  the  Exchange  Act,  the entire Board of
Directors  acts  as  an  audit  committee  for  the  purpose  of  overseeing the
accounting  and  financial  reporting processes, and our audits of the financial
statements.  The  Commission  recently adopted new regulations relating to audit
committee  composition and functions, including disclosure requirements relating
to  the  presence  of an "audit committee financial expert" serving on its audit
committee.  In  connection  with  these new requirements, our Board of Directors
examined  the  Commission's definition of "audit committee financial expert" and
concluded  that  we  do  not  currently  have a person that qualifies as such an
expert.  Presently,  there are only four (4) directors serving on our Board, and
we  are  not  in  a  position  at  this  time  to attract, retain and compensate
additional  directors  in order to acquire a director who qualifies as an "audit
committee  financial expert", but we intend to retain an additional director who
will qualify as such an expert, as soon as reasonably practicable. While neither
of  our  current  directors  meets  the  qualifications  of  an "audit committee
financial  expert",  each  of  our  directors,  by virtue of his past employment
experience,  has  considerable  knowledge  of financial statements, finance, and
accounting,  and  has  significant  employment  experience  involving  financial
oversight  responsibilities.  Accordingly, we believe that our current directors
capably  fulfill  the  duties  and responsibilities of an audit committee in the
absence  of  such  an  expert.

     CODE  OF  ETHICS

We  are  presently working with our legal counsel to prepare and adopt a code of
ethics  that  applies  to  our  principal  chief  executive  officer,  principal
financial  officer,  principal  accounting  officer  or  controller,  or persons
performing  similar  functions  (the  "Code  of Ethics"). A draft of the Code of
Ethics  is attached hereto as Exhibit 14.1. The Code of Ethics is being designed
with  the  intent  to  deter  wrongdoing,  and  to  promote  the  following:

Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent
conflicts  if  interest  between  personal  and professional relationships Full,
fair,  accurate,  timely  and understandable disclosure in reports and documents
that  a  small  business issuer files with, or submits to, the Commission and in
other  public  communications  made by the small business issuer Compliance with
applicable  governmental  laws,  rules  and  regulations  The  prompt  internal
reporting  of  violations  of  the  code  to  an  appropriate  person or persons
identified  in  the  code  Accountability  for  adherence  to  the  code

There have been no events under any bankruptcy act, any criminal proceedings and
any  judgments  or  injunctions  material  to  the evaluation of the ability and
integrity  of  any  director  or  executive  officer  during  the  past 5 years.

SECTION  16(A)  BENEFICIAL  OWNERSHIP  REPORTING  COMPLIANCE

Under  Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, all executive officers, directors, and
each  person who is the beneficial owner of more than 10% of the common stock of
a  company  that  files  reports pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, are
required  to  report  the  ownership  of  such  common stock, options, and stock
appreciation  rights  (other  than  certain cash-only rights) and any changes in
that  ownership  with  the Commission. Specific due dates for these reports have
been  established,  and  the Company is required to report, in this Form 10-KSB,
any  failure  to comply therewith during the fiscal year ended December 2003. We
believe  that  all  of these filing requirements were satisfied by our executive
officers,  directors and by the beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common
stock.  In  making  this  statement,  we  have  relied  solely  on copies of any
reporting  forms  received  by it, and upon any written representations received
from reporting persons that no Form 5 (Annual Statement of Changes in Beneficial
Ownership)  was  required  to be filed under applicable rules of the Commission.

ITEM 10.  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


None of our current officers or directors received cash compensation during 2003
and  2002.  We  do  not  anticipate  paying  salaries until such time as we have
sufficient  assets or revenues as a result of a business combination. Until such
time  as  we  have  sufficient  capital  reserves  or  revenues, salaries to the
executive  officers  will  be  paid  in  shares  of  stock.

In  2003,  we recognized approximately $235,500 of compensation to our officers,
which  liability  was  satisfied  in  2004 through the issuance of approximately
3,837,500 shares of our common stock.  Because this compensation was paid in the
form  of common stock in lieu of cash, thenormal compensation for these officers
was increased by a factor of 25% prior to determining the number of shares to be
issued.


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

There are no employment agreements between us and any of our management.

ITEM 11.  SECURITY  OWNERSHIP  OF  CERTAIN  BENEFICIAL  OWNERS  AND  MANAGEMENT

The  following  table sets forth information concerning the beneficial ownership
of  the Common Stock as of the date of the Prospectus, for (a) each person known
to the Company to be a beneficial owner of the Common Shares; (b) each director;
(c)  each  executive  officer  designated  in  the  section  captioned
MANAGEMENT--Executive Compensation; and (d) all directors and executive officers
as  a  group. Except as otherwise noted, each person named below had sole voting
and  investment  power  with  respect  to  such  securities.


                                        BENEFICIAL  OWNERSHIP  (1)

NAME  AND  ADDRESS                        SHARES         PERCENT
                                        ---------        -------

Rohit  Patel  (2)(3)                    7,556,026          14.1%

Jay  Patel  (3)                         1,434,076           2.7%

Carl  Gessner  (3)                        954,468           1.8%

All directors and executive officers
as a group (2 persons)                  8,510,494          15.9%

(1)  Under  Rule  13d-3,  a  beneficiary owner of a security includes any person
     who,  directly  or  indirectly,  through  any  contract,  arrangement,
     understanding,  relationship  or otherwise has or shares: (1) voting power,
     which  includes the power to vote, or to direct the voting shares; and (ii)
     investment  power,  which  includes  the  power  to  dispose  or direct the
     disposition  of  shares.

(2)  Mr.  Patel  specifically  disclaims  beneficial  ownership of any shares of
     common stock which may be owned by any family member except for those which
     may  from  time  to  time  be  owned  by  his  wife  and/or  children.

(3)  All  officers  and  directors  can  be contacted at the Company's principal
     place of business located at 2410 Hollywood Blvd, Hollywood, Florida 33020.

ITEM 12.  CERTAIN  RELATIONSHIPS  AND  RELATED  TRANSACTIONS

The  following  information  pertains  to  all  transactions during the last two
years, or proposed transactions, to which the Company was or is to be a part, in
which  any  of  our  former  or  current  officers or directors, or nominees for
appointment as an officer or director, any material shareholder listed above and
any  member  of  the  immediate  family  (including  spouse,  parents, children,
siblings  and  in-laws  )  of  any  of  the  foregoing  persons.


We recognized $235,500 and $2,000 of employee compensation during the respective
years  ended  December 31, 2003 and 2002. We believe these amounts represent the
fair  value of services provided to us by our officers during these years, which
2003  liability  was  satisfied  in  2004  through the issuance of approximately
3,837,500 shares of our common stock.  Because this compensation was paid in the
form of common stock in lieu of cash, the normal compensation for these officers
was increased by a factor of 25% prior to determining the number of shares to be
issued.    No  amounts  have  been  ascribed  to  the  use  of  a portion of our
president's  home  for office space in the accompanying statements of operations
because  the  value  of  such  office  space  was  not  considered  significant.

On  August  12, 2003, we engaged a consulting firm to provide investor relations
and  other  services  for  a period of six months, and as consideration for such
services issued 300,000 shares of our common stock.  The value of these services
of  approximately  $15,000,  which  amount,  has  been  included  in stock based
compensation  in the accompanying December 31, 2003 statement of operations.  In
addition, the consulting firm received 300,000 options to purchase shares of our
common  stock  at $.08 per share, which price approximated the fair value of our
common  stock  at the date of issuance.  The options are subject to cancellation
under  certain  conditions,  as  specified  in  the  agreement.

On  November  17,  2003,  we  engaged a consultant to provide financial advisory
services  for a period of two years.  As a result of this transaction, we agreed
to  issue  300,000  shares of our common stock and will record total stock based
compensation of $57,000 during the term of the agreement, which amount was based
on  the  number,  and  fair  value, of shares issued (share prices represent the
price  at  which other shares were sold at the date the services were rendered).
At  December  31,  2003,  $4,750  of  this  amount  has  been  included  in  the
accompanying  2003  statement  of  operations;  the  remaining  amount  has been
reflected  as  deferred  stock  compensation and will be amortized to expense in
2004  and  2005.  In  addition,  we  granted  the following consideration and/or
potential  future  consideration  to  this  consultant:

-    300,000  warrants to purchase shares of our common stock at a price of $.16
     per  share  at  any  time  through  November  16,  2008.
-    A  financing fee equal to 10% of any indebtedness or equity we issue and/or
     obtain  as  a  result  of  this  consultant's efforts and/or relationships.
-    A  quarterly  finder's  fee  ranging  from 5 to 1% of any gross revenues we
     generate  through  or as a result of a introduction we receive through this
     consultant's  efforts. The fee starts at 5% and is reduced as sales dollars
     increase.
-    A  transaction  fee  ranging from 5 to 1% of any merger, acquisition, joint
     venture,  private  placement  or other similar transaction we enter through
     this  consultants'  efforts.

On  December  17,  2003,  we  issued  300,000  shares  of  our common stock to a
consultant  for  investor  relations  services for a period of six months.  As a
result  of  this  transaction,  we will record total stock based compensation of
$27,000  during the term of the agreement, which amount was based on the number,
and  fair  value,  of  shares  issued (share prices represent the price at which
other  shares were sold at the date the services were rendered). In addition, we
agreed  to  provide cash compensation of $4,000 per month during the term of the
agreement.  We  have  recognized  $4,000 of cash based consulting expense in the
accompanying  2003  statement of operations, and deferred the entire stock based
compensation  of  $27,000.  This  amount  will  be amortized to expense in 2004.

In  addition,  we  satisfied  various other expenses via the issuance of 155,000
shares of our common stock. As a result of this transaction, we recorded $54,200
of  stock  based  compensation  in  2004.

On December 29, 2003, we sold 500,000 shares of our common stock under a private
placement to an individual investor for cash of $35,750 (or $.07 per share).  In
addition,  we  granted  this  individual 500,000 warrants to purchase our common
stock  for  a  price  of  $.143 per share, which warrants expire on December 31,
2004, provided that our stock price and volume equals or exceeds certain defined
targets.  If  such  targets  are  not  achieved  in 2004 and/or at various other
subsequent  expiration  dates,  then  the  warrants  can potentially be extended
through  December  31,  2008.

At  December 31, 2003, outstanding common shares includes 12,000,000 shares that
were  canceled  subsequent to such date. We had instructed our transfer agent to
issue  these  shares in 2003 as we anticipated entering a financing arrangement,
however  no  agreement  was entered, and no expense was applicable.  Because the
shares  were  never  issued, the transaction has been recorded as an increase in
prepaid  expenses  and  common  stock  in the accompanying financial statements.

During  the year ended December 31, 2003, we canceled 1,140,000 shares of common
stock  that  had  been  previously  reflected as outstanding because the related
consideration  was  never  paid  for  the  shares.

Our  Chairman  contributed  approximately  $19,800  to  us  in  2003  for  no
consideration.

In  July 2003, we purchased a 60% interest in Ecats Development, LLC (the "LLC")
from  an  entity  related  to  us  by  virtue  of one of our officer's ownership
interest.  As  consideration,  we  issued  a 6% note payable for $250,000, which
amount  approximated  the  cost  of  the  investment on the books of the related
entity.  The  note  was  paid  in November 2003, however interest was waived. In
November  2003,  the  LLC was dissolved, and we received twenty residential lots
located  in  Sebring,  Florida  in exchange for our LLC interest. The lots had a
cost  of  approximately $141,000 at the date of the dissolution, and accordingly
our  expenses  include  a $109,000 charge representing the reduction in value of
our  investment. At the time of the dissolution, we entered an agreement with an
unrelated  developer,  whereby  such developer has agreed to secure construction
financing and build residences on our lots. Pursuant to our agreement, we are to
split  any profits from the sales of the homes on a 50/50 basis. At December 31,
2003,  three  of  the  lots  having  a  value of approximately $21,000 have been
pledged  as  collateral  for  such  construction  loans.


We  have not entered into any type of employment agreement or other compensation
program  or  other  agreement  with  any  current officer or director and do not
expect  that  we  will  enter into such agreement until we consummate a business
acquisition.

PART  IV

ITEM 13.  EXHIBITS  AND  REPORTS  ON  FORM  8-K

(A)  INDEX  TO  EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT                            DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
-------   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
3.01*     Articles  of  Incorporation  of  Company

3.03*     Bylaws  of  Company

4.01*     Form  of  Common  Stock  Certificate

14.1*     Code  of  Ethics

31.1.     Rule  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)  Certifications  of  Chief Executive Officer

31.2.     Rule  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)  Certifications  of  Chief Financial Officer

32.1.     Section  1350  Certifications  of  Chief  Executive  Officer

32.2.     Section  1350  Certifications  of  Chief  Financial  Officer

*    Previously  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  and
incorporated  by  reference

(b)  Reports  on  Form  8-K

During  2003,  we  filed  8-K's  disclosing  the  following:

On  October  31,  2003,  Senticore,  Smith Forestal, a corporation organized and
existing  under the laws of Costa Rica ("Forestal"), and the two shareholders of
Forestal (the "Forestal Stockholders"), executed an Agreement and Plan of Merger
(the  "Merger  Agreement"),  pursuant to which Forestal will merge with and into
us,  with the Forestal Stockholders receiving in the aggregate 18,924,861 shares
of  common  stock and 7,500 shares of Class A Voting Convertible Preferred Stock
of  the Registrant in exchange for their shares of Forestal. The shares of Class
A  Voting  Convertible Preferred Stock issued in the Merger are convertible into
two  hundred  (200)  shares  of  fully  paid and non-assessable shares of common
stock,  and  they have a class vote to approve or disapprove any merger, sale of
assets,  combination  or  reorganization  involving  us,  or  other  fundamental
corporate  transaction  involving  us.  Our Certificate of Incorporation will be
amended  prior  to  the  Closing  (as  defined)  to establish the Class A Voting
Convertible  Preferred  Stock  series. An executed copy of the Merger Agreement,
together  with  the  Class  A Voting Convertible Preferred Stock designation, is
attached  to  Form  8-K  which  is  incorporated  by  reference  hereto.

The  Closing  under  the Merger Agreement will occur on the second day after the
satisfaction  or  waiver  of all conditions to the obligations of the parties to
consummate  the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. The Merger is
conditioned  on,  among  other  things,  us  and  Forestal obtaining the written
consent  of  a  majority  of  their  shareholders  to  approve  the transactions
contemplated  by the Merger Agreement, as well as the satisfactory completion by
each  of  us  and  Forestal  of  a due diligence investigation. In addition, the
obligations of Forestal to consummate the Merger are conditioned on, among other
things, our canceling its previously announced forward stock split and issuing a
press  release  with  respect  thereto.  The  obligations  of  the Registrant to
consummate  the  Merger  are conditioned on, among other things, an affiliate of
ours  being  issued 1,200,000 shares of restricted common stock and 7,500 shares
of Class A Voting Convertible Preferred Stock. Our obligations to consummate the
Merger are further conditioned on, among other things, our receipt of an Opinion
to  the  effect  that  the  terms  and  conditions of the Merger are fair to our
shareholders  from  a  financial  point  of  view.

ITEM 14.  PRINCIPAL  ACCOUNTANT  FEES  AND  SERVICES

     FEES  BILLED  FOR  AUDIT  AND  NON-AUDIT  SERVICES

The  following table represents the aggregate fees billed for professional audit
services  rendered  to  the  independent  auditors,  Kingery,  Crouse  &  Hohl
("Kingery")  and  Stark, Winter, Schenkein & Co. ("Stark") for our audits of the
annual  financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2003, and
all  fees  billed  for other services rendered by Kingery and Stark during those
periods.


Year  Ended  December  31                2003             2002
-------------------------             ----------       ----------
                                         Stark           Kingery*
                                      ----------       ----------
Audit  Fees  (1)                      $    6,000  (2)  $    2,366  (3)
Audit-Related  Fees  (2)                      --               --
Tax  Fees  (3)                                --              475
All  Other  Fees  (4)                         --            1,524
Total Accounting Fees and Services    $    6,000       $    4,365


(*)  Kingery  resigned  on January 13, 2004 but provided review services for the
     first three quarters of 2003 for which the fees included in 2003 relate to.
(1)  Audit  Fees.  These are fees for professional services for our audit of the
     annual financial statements, and for the review of the financial statements
     included  in our filings on Form 10-QSB, and for services that are normally
     provided  in  connection  with  statutory  and  regulatory  filings  or
     engagements.
(2)  Audit-Related  Fees.  These are fees for the assurance and related services
     reasonably  related  to  the  performance of the audit or the review of our
     financial  statements.
(3)  Tax  Fees.  These  are  fees  for professional services with respect to tax
     compliance,  tax  advice,  and  tax  planning.
(4)  All  Other  Fees.  These  are  fees for permissible work that does not fall
     within  any  of  the  other fee categories, i.e., Audit Fees, Audit-Related
     Fees,  or  Tax  Fees.

PRE-APPROVAL  POLICY  FOR  AUDIT  AND  NON-AUDIT  SERVICES

We  do  not  have  a  standing  audit committee, and the full Board performs all
functions  of  an  audit  committee, including the pre-approval of all audit and
non-audit  services before we engage an accountant. All of the services rendered
to the Company by Stark and Kingery were pre-approved by our Board of Directors.

We are presently working with our legal counsel to establish formal pre-approval
policies  and  procedures  for  future  engagements  of our accountants. The new
policies  and  procedures  will  be  detailed as to the particular service, will
require  that  the  Board  or  an  audit  committee  thereof be informed of each
service,  and  will  prohibit the delegation of pre-approval responsibilities to
management. It is currently anticipated that our new policy will provide (i) for
an  annual  pre-approval,  by  the  Board  or  audit  committee,  of  all audit,
audit-related  and non-audit services proposed to be rendered by the independent
auditor  for  the  fiscal  year,  as  specifically  described  in  the auditor's
engagement  letter,  and  (ii) that additional engagements of the auditor, which
were  not  approved in the annual pre-approval process, and engagements that are
anticipated  to  exceed  previously  approved thresholds, will be presented on a
case-by-case  basis,  by  the  President  or  Principal  Accounting Officer, for
pre-approval  by  the  Board  or  audit committee, before management engages the
auditors  for any such purposes. The new policy and procedures may authorize the
Board  or  audit  committee  to  delegate,  to  one  or more of its members, the
authority to pre-approve certain permitted services, provided that the estimated
fee  for  any  such  service  does  not  exceed a specified dollar amount (to be
determined).  All  pre-approvals shall be contingent on a finding, by the Board,
audit  committee,  or  delegate,  as  the case may be, that the provision of the
proposed  services  is  compatible  with  the  maintenance  of  the  auditor's
independence  in  the  conduct  of its auditing functions. In no event shall any
non-audit  related  service  be  approved  that  would result in the independent
auditor  no  longer  being considered independent under the applicable rules and
regulations  of  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission.



                           --Signature Page Follows--

                                   SIGNATURES

In  accordance  with  Section  13  or  15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                               SENTICORE,  INC.:


     APRIL  28,  2004          /S/  JAY  PATEL
     ----------------          ---------------
                               JAY  PATEL,  / CEO  AND  COO





     APRIL  28,  2004          /S/  CARL  GESSNER
     ----------------          ------------------
                               CARL  GESSNER,
                               PRESIDENT/TREASURER/SECRETARY/DIRECTOR/CFO

<PAGE>