alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"Keeping NASA Armstrong Aircraft Safe","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"JZrcg5ND9Q\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/keeping-nasa-armstrong-aircraft-safe\/\">Keeping NASA Armstrong Aircraft Safe<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/keeping-nasa-armstrong-aircraft-safe\/embed\/#?secret=JZrcg5ND9Q\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Keeping NASA Armstrong Aircraft Safe” — NASA\" data-secret=\"JZrcg5ND9Q\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/05\/afrc2023-0041-01-1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
#### BRIAN DOYLE v. FERDON EQUIPMENT COMPANY.

September 18, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than November 10, 2014.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:

                    1.                     *BB&T Corporation,*                     Winston-Salem, North Carolina; to merge with The Bank of Kentucky Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire The Bank of Kentucky, Incorporated, both in Crestview Hills, Kentucky.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, October 10, 2014.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2014-24579 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### A. H. Bowman et al. *v.*C. Utley et al.

Deed of Trust —Life Estate — Notice to Remaindermen.

The recording of a deed of trust, conveying a life estate, is constructive notice to remaindermen and will not be abrogated after being acted on for nine years without objection.

Executor — Payment of Legacy — Improvident Use.

The testator has the right to pay over to the legatee assets in his hands. If there is danger of improvident use and waste of the fund, the remaindermen had the right alone to prevent it.

•Same — Settlement with County Court — Fund Held as Trustee and not as Executor.

After a settlement with the County Court the executor holds funds belonging to the estate as trustee and not as executor.

APPEAL .FROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT.

June 30, 1867.

Ol'TNION OF THE COURT BY

JUDGE WILLIAMS :

.The deed of trust to Bobbins executed November 23, 1853, by Nancy Utley, the surviving relict of the testator, Josiah Utley, seems to have been made at the instance of some of those entitled to the remainder after her death; at least it was known by several and seems never to have been objected to by any of them until after her death and the insolvency of Bobbins, the trustee. It was witnessed by Jacob, the husband of the legatee Mary *Bouter;*some of the receipts for interest paid by Bobbins after said deed was made to the widow were witnessed by *others;*thus they had actual notice of the *deed;*besides all had constructive notice from the recording of it in the proper office.

After it had thus been made and acted on without objections on the part of those in remainder for a period of nine years it would take strong circumstances to authorize its abrogation, if indeed it could be done at all.

This is also fortified by the County Court settlement in the year of 1851 by Bobbins, as executor of the estate in which he was allowed the payment of $1,800, as witnessed by the widow’s receipt of .February *7,*1854, and which has been permitted to stand with*444out objection or attempt to reverse it and no attempt to surcharge it in this suit is now made.

As the widow was entitled under the will to a life estate to one-third of the real and personal estate of the testator the executor had the undoubted right to pay over to her one-third of the assets in his hands. If there was danger of her improvident use and waste of these funds the remaindermen had a legal remedy to prevent this as their rights alone would be violated; with this the executor had nothing to do hence had no remedy.

After the County Court settlement the fund belonging to her for life was in Robbins’ hands as trustee and not as executor, hence his ¿ureties in his executor’s bond are not liable for his defalcation as trustee, and as there was none, as executor made out, the judgment is radically erroneous. Wherefore, it is reversed with directions to dismiss absolutely appellee’s petition against Bowman and Lamme, and to render a personal judgment alone against Robbins,, as trustee, and not as executor.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Howard W. Lutnick,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of BGC Partners, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/S/ HOWARD W. LUTNICKHoward W. LutnickChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


Date: April 29, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000894245
<NAME> AEI NET LEASE INCOME & GROWTH FUND XX LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,310,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,349,585
<PP&E>                                      18,098,798
<DEPRECIATION>                               (800,208)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,648,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          548,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,099,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,648,175
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               508,090
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  172,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                374,066
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            374,066
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   374,066
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    15.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    15.66
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                                      INTERPHARM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer
of Interpharm Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1)      The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
         September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2004

/s/ Dr. Maganlal K. Sutaria
---------------------------
    Dr. Maganlal K. Sutaria
    Chief Executive Officer

/s/ George Aronson
---------------------------
    George Aronson
    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Interpharm Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Interpharm
Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                                                              28
<PAGE>

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
                                   EXHIBIT 21


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   Date and % of Voting Shares,
                                                                  Partnership Interests, Voting
                                                   Year &            Trust Certificates,
               Name & Address                    State Inc.          Capital Contributions               Description of Activity
               --------------                    ----------          ---------------------               -----------------------
<S>                                             <C>               <C>                             <C>
Home Federal Savings Bank                         Federal                     6/29/94               Federally Chartered Stock
101 North Broadway                                Charter         HMN owns 100% of voting shares    Savings Bank
Spring Valley, MN  55975

    Osterud Insurance Agency, Inc.                                        Bank owns 100%            Offers credit life and annuity
    101 North Broadway                               MN                                             products to the Bank's customers
    Spring Valley, MN 55975                                                                         and others

    MSL Financial Corporation(1)                                          Bank owns 100%            Offered annuity products to
    101 North Broadway                               IA                                             Marshalltown Financial
    Spring Valley, MN 55975

Security Finance Corporation                                                 12/29/95               Corporation invests in
101 North Broadway                                   MN           HMN owns 100% of voting shares    securities and loans
Spring Valley, MN  55975

HMN Mortgage Services, Inc.                                                   7/08/96               Mortgage Banking/
7101 Northland Circle, Suite 105                     MN                  HMN owns 100% of           Brokerage Office
Brooklyn Park, MN 55427                                                   voting shares
</TABLE>

(1) MSL Financial Corporation was dissolved on April 30, 1999 and its assets and
liabilities were transferred into the Bank.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ronell Smith,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04211-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Law Offices of Ben C Martin, LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 11/29/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9376 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9376 Filed 12/15/17 Page 2 of 2
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"About Integrated Aviation Systems Program (IASP)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RkzXG9CvAa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/integrated-aviation-systems-program-iasp\/\">About Integrated Aviation Systems Program (IASP)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/integrated-aviation-systems-program-iasp\/embed\/#?secret=RkzXG9CvAa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“About Integrated Aviation Systems Program (IASP)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"RkzXG9CvAa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/iasp-program-2015.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN RE BARD IVC FILTERS PRODUCTS )

LIABILITY LITIGATION, )

)

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) MDL Docket No. 2:15-md-2641-DGC

)

CV-17-2245-PHX-DGC ) Civil Action No. CV-17-02245-PHX-DGC

)

___________________________________ )

LILLIAN VERDE, )

) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE

)

v. )

)

C. R. BARD, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

______________________________________________________________________________

COMES NOW Plaintiff, Lillian Verde, and Defendants, C.R. Bard and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc. in the above entitled lawsuit and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(ii), agree that all claims of Lillian Verde in this action against C.R. Bard and Bard 

Peripheral Vascular, Inc. are dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs.

Dated: 10/18/17 Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/Thomas P. Cartmell 

Thomas P. Cartmell (MO Bar No. 45366 )

 (admitted pro hac vice)

Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP

4740 Grand Ave., Suite 300

Kansas City, MO 64112

(816) 701-1100

(816) 531-2372 (fax)

tcartmell@wcllp.com

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8225 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 2
By: /s/David C. DeGreeff 

David C. DeGreeff (MO Bar No. 55019)

 (admitted pro hac vice)

Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP

4740 Grand Ave., Suite 300

Kansas City, MO 64112

(816) 701-1100

(816) 531-2372 (fax)

ddegreeff@wcllp.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

I hereby certify that on this 18th day of October, 2017, I electronically transmitted 

the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and 

transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing.

/s/ David C. DeGreeff

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8225 Filed 10/18/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

ELIZABETH ANN BERTSCH, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OVERSTOCK.COM, 

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 14-4167

(D.C. No. 2:10-CV-00037-RJS)

(D. Utah)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted. See 10th Cir. R. 27.3(A)(9) and Fed. R. 

App. P. Rule 42(b).

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

June 10, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-4167 Document: 01019442761 Date Filed: 06/10/2015 Page: 1
NO. 07-00-0511-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 8, 2002

______________________________

GUADALUPE ALANIZ, APPELLANT

V.

WAYNE CROTWELL, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 121ST DISTRICT COURT OF TERRY COUNTY;

NO. 14,675; HONORABLE KELLY G. MOORE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant, Guadalupe Alaniz and the appellee, Wayne Crotwell, filed an Agreed

Motion to Dismiss Appeal on July 30, 2002. The Agreed Motion to Dismiss is signed by

both parties’ counsel. 

Without passing on the merits of the case, the parties’ Agreed Motion to Dismiss

Appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. All costs having

been paid, no order pertaining to the costs is made. Having dismissed the appeal at the
2

parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue

forthwith. 

Phil Johnson

 Justice

Do not publish.