alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 2192

One Hundred Eighth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the twentieth day of January, two thousand and four

An Act

To amend title 35, United States Code, to promote cooperative research involving

universities, the public sector, and private enterprises.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS ON CLAIMED INVENTIONS.

Section 103(c) of title 35, United States Code, is amended

to read as follows:

‘‘(c)(1) Subject matter developed by another person, which qualifies as prior art only under one or more of subsections (e), (f),

and (g) of section 102 of this title, shall not preclude patentability

under this section where the subject matter and the claimed invention were, at the time the claimed invention was made, owned

by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to

the same person.

‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, subject matter developed

by another person and a claimed invention shall be deemed to

have been owned by the same person or subject to an obligation

of assignment to the same person if—

‘‘(A) the claimed invention was made by or on behalf of

parties to a joint research agreement that was in effect on

or before the date the claimed invention was made;

‘‘(B) the claimed invention was made as a result of activities

undertaken within the scope of the joint research agreement;

and

‘‘(C) the application for patent for the claimed invention

discloses or is amended to disclose the names of the parties

to the joint research agreement.

‘‘(3) For purposes of paragraph (2), the term ‘joint research

agreement’ means a written contract, grant, or cooperative agreement entered into by two or more persons or entities for the

performance of experimental, developmental, or research work in

the field of the claimed invention.’’.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by this Act shall

apply to any patent granted on or after the date of the enactment

of this Act.

(b) SPECIAL RULE.—The amendments made by this Act shall

not affect any final decision of a court or the United States Patent
S. 2192—2

and Trademark Office rendered before the date of the enactment

of this Act, and shall not affect the right of any party in any

action pending before the United States Patent and Trademark

Office or a court on the date of the enactment of this Act to

have that party’s rights determined on the basis of the provisions

of title 35, United States Code, in effect on the day before the

date of the enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Aerospace Safety I Advisory Panel h 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

AS 

1 

NASA Advisory Council - I 

Administrator 

Daniel S. Goldin 

Deputy Administrator 

(Vacant) 

isociate Deputy Administrs 

Daniel R. Mulville 

Chief Engineer 

Keith L. Hudkins (Act) 

Chief Information Officer 

Lee B. Holcomb 

Chief Scientist 

Kathie L. Olsen 

Chief Technologist 

Samuel L. Venneri 

I I I 

Chief Financial 

Officer Counsel 

I II II 1 

Arnold Holz Edward A. Frankle George E. Reese Flmm r I I 

Public Affairs 

I I1 I1 I 

Thomas S. Luedtke Peggy Wilhide Lori Garver 

Disadvantaged 

Business 

Utilization -- Ralph C. Thomas 

Space Flight I1 Earth Science 

I, I 

Ghassem Asrar I Joseph H. Rothenberg 

Flight Center I I 

Alphonso V. Diaz 

Lyndon B. Johnson 

Space Center 

George W.S. Abbey 

Roy D. Bridges 

Arthur G. Steohenson 4 John C. Stennis 

Space Center I 

Roy S. Estess 

itor 

A 

W 

Inspector General 

I I 

Roberta L. Gross 

I 

1 

11 I LI I F 

Human Resources 

and Education 

John D. Schumacher Ed Heffernan Vicki A. Novak 

Systems and Operations Facilities Assurance 

I I 

Jeffrey E. Sutton Frederick Gregory Michael D. Christensen 

Microgravity 

Sciences and 

Arnauld E. Nicogossian 

Space Science Aero-Space 

Technology 

Spence M. Armstrong Edward J. Weiler 

Ames Research 'Jet Propulsion Laboratory 

Henrv McDonald Edward Stone 

Dryden Flight 

Research Center I I 

Kevin Petersen 

Jeremiah Creedon 

Donald J. Campbell 

as of January 2000 

*JPL is a contractor-operated facility
#### Muhammed Anwar et al., Respondents, v Hellman Management et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Stephen McCauly, Respondent, v Ulrik Holding, Ltd., et al., Appellants. (Action No. 2.) Mohammed Manir et al., Respondents, v Ulrik Holding, Ltd., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 3.) Douglas Hampton et al., Respondents, v *471Ulrik Holding, Ltd., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 4.)

[790 NYS2d 133]

In four related actions, inter alia, to recover damages for negligent maintenance of a building, (1) the defendants Hellman Management, Marvin Heilman, Ulrik Holding, Ltd., and Rozmar Realty Co. appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated September 3, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in action No. 1 insofar as asserted against them, (2) the defendants Ulrik Holding, Ltd., and Heilman Management appeal from an order of the same court also dated September 3, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in action No. 2, (3) the defendants Ulrik Holding, Ltd., and Heilman Management appeal from an order of the same court also dated September 3, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in action No. 3 insofar as asserted against them, and (4) the defendants Ulrik Holding, Ltd., Heilman Management, and Rozmar Realty Co. appeal from an order of the same court also dated September 3, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in action No. 4 insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

A party moving for summary judgment must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New*York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Here, the appellants demonstrated the absence of a triable issue of fact with respect to their negligence in the occurrence of the collapse of the building in which the plaintiffs either resided or housed their businesses. Therefore, the appellants’ motions were sufficient to make out a prima facie case for summary judgment *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851 [1985]; *Zuckerman v City of New York, supra).*However, in opposition, the plaintiffs raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the appellants’ alleged improper maintenance of the building was a proximate cause of the collapse. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motions.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Cozier and S. Miller, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

George H. Baker, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03472-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/26/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8672 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8672 Filed 11/07/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Bobby Stokes,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03706-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: November 27, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8946 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 1
www.nasa.gov

1. Cut around the outside of the square (line 1).

2. Fold the square in half diagonally, along line 2. Make sure you fold it so the side with the number is on the outside.

3. Fold the triangle in half along line 3. Make sure you fold it, so the outline of the plane is visible after folding.

4. Fold along line 4, making sure that the outline of the plane is visible after folding.

5. Fold along line 5, making sure that the outline of the plane is visible after folding. Cut the bottom of the tail.

6. Cut along the dashed lines. Be sure to leave the space on the wingtips.

7. Carefully unfold.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

WINTER BREAK ACTIVITY:

X-59 Snowflake Patterns

Paper snowflake template and die/laser cutting and engraving files available on page 2.

INSTRUCTIONS: (See page 2 for images)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

www.nasa.gov

X-59 Snowflake Patterns

WINTER BREAK ACTIVITY:

Step 3.

Step 5b.

Step 4.

Step 6.

Step 5.

Step 7.

FILES FOR CUTTING/LASER MACHINES

If you would like to use an Outlined or Filled form, select from the links below to download and use these files for die-cutting and laser cutting and/or engraving to create something fun.

Outline Files (ZIP)

Contains a SVG and BMP file.

Filled Files (ZIP)

Contains a SVG and BMP file.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Judy R. Chaney,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03617-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Marc J Bern & Partners LLP

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/13/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8286 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8286 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of
Quovadx, Inc. of our report dated April 13, 2005, with respect
to Quovadx, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of Quovadx, Inc. included
in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year
ended December 31, 2004: 1) No. 333-30356
2) No. 333-67436
3) No. 333-113781
    
    4) No. 333-88408
5) No. 333-104184
    
    6) No. 333-67650
7) No. 333-110388
 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Denver, Colorado
April 13, 2005
#### JOSEPH MOGAR v. BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOOKS-A-
MILLION, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED AUGUST 1, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,844
<ALLOWANCES>                                       290
<INVENTORY>                                    172,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,287<F1>
<PP&E>                                         111,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,280<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,801
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,280
<SALES>                                        152,424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,424
<CGS>                                          114,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,603
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (308)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (504)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)<F5>
<FN>
<F1><OTHER CURRENT ASSETS>                       5,300
<F2><OTHER ASSETS>                               1,552
<F3><LONG TERM DEBT>                            46,917
<F4><DEFERRED INCOME TAXES>                      1,503
<F5>SEE OTHER EXHIBITS - THE EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER
SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The  undersigned,  Robert A. Bourne,  the  President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation,  the corporate  general  partner of CNL Income Fund XIII, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"),  has executed this  certification  in connection with the filing
with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  of the  Partnership's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date:    November 7, 2002                     /s/ Robert A. Bourne
         --------------------                 -------------------------
                                              Name:  Robert A. Bourne
                                              Title: President and Treasurer
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 11

                       OURPET'S COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

               STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET (LOSS) PER SHARE
          For the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       2001         2000
                                                                    -----------  -----------
<S>                                                                 <C>          <C>
Income from continuing operations.................................. $    93,770  $    31,671
Preferred Stock dividend requirements..............................      98,747      100,000
                                                                    -----------  -----------
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders $    (4,977) $   (68,329)
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding...............  10,697,212   10,510,944
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Loss per common share from continuing operations................... $        --  $     (0.01)
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Loss from operations of discontinued subsidiary.................... $        --  $   (55,138)
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Loss per common share from operations of discontinued subsidiary... $        --  $        --
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Loss on disposition of discontinued subsidiary..................... $        --  $  (121,377)
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Loss per common share from disposition of discontinued subsidiary.. $        --  $     (0.01)
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Net income (loss).................................................. $    93,770  $  (144,844)
Preferred Stock dividend requirements..............................      98,747      100,000
                                                                    -----------  -----------
Net loss attributable to common stockholders....................... $    (4,977) $  (244,844)
                                                                    ===========  ===========
Net loss per common share.......................................... $        --  $     (0.02)
                                                                    ===========  ===========
</TABLE>