alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 1996
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF G&W FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE 1996 SECOND
QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          93,224
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,232,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,586,340
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,089,724
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,025,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,674,774)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,025,705
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               913,497
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,989,829
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             888,959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,015,951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,015,951)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,015,951)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK IS HELD BY THE PARENT COMPANY AND IT IS NOT PUBLICLY
TRADED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Samuel Moore and Thomas J. Kenney *v.*James M. Stone.

Highways — Abandonment of Public Road.

The close proximity of a public road, constantly used, to one beneficial only to a few nearby private individuals, where it is shown that there is not sufficient labor, to keep in repair both, • will justify the abandonment of the lesser used road by order of the court.

Words and Phrases — Description.

The use of the words “about ten feet north” in a suit for a discontinuance of a public road, to designate the terminus of the part of the road sought to have abandoned, is held sufficiently certain as a description of the point it was desired to discontinue at.

APPEAL EROM SCOTT CIROUIT OOURT.

December 13, 1867.

This was an action brought in the Scott county court to close a certain road, which is alleged to be little traveled, and expensive to keep in repair. The road was less than a mile in length, and only two parties lived on same, one of whom was in favor of closing it. Another public road, was within a short distance, paralleling it within a half to three-quarters of a mile. The evidence showed that the road would be of no particular injury except to appellant Kenney, and would only affect him to the extent of causing him to drive about half a mile further to reach the turnpike, to which both roads lead, in a parallel line. That the road had *485not been worked for years, was travelled but little; not in condition for vehicles to travel it, with safety, and if compelled to be worked, sufficient bands could not be found to keep it in repair without neglect to the other and more traveled public road, running parallel thereto, and which was constantly used by the public generally.

*Darnaby, for appellant.*

*Beclc Prewitt, for appellee.*

From a judgment, ordering the closing of the road, defendants appeal.

OPINION OK THE C/OUR.T BY

JüDG-E WILLIAMS:

The almost entire neglect to work and improve the mill-road for several years and its almost wholly unfitness for passage of carriages, wagons or other vehicles, strongly indicate its public insignificance. Besides the evidence preponderates to establish that few, if ever, horseback travellers used this road.

The close contiguity of this road to other more used public roads and the necessity to concentrate the labor so as to improve the more important ones, so as to make these safe and convenient for the public, authorized the circuit court to adjudge discontinuance. We also think that *“about ten feet north”*of a designated gate is sufficiently certain as a description of the point it was desired to discontinue at; this literally signifies *“near to”*a point ten feet from the gate, and means less than a foot either over or under ten, and legally means ten feet from the gate as heretofore decided by this court.

Judgment affirmed.
The Mission:

Space shuttle Atlantis’ STS-135 mission will be NASA’s last space shuttle flight.

Atlantis will carry four astronauts and the multi-purpose logistics module Raffaello

to the International Space Station. 

During the 12-day flight, mission specialists will use the shuttle’s robotic arm to lift 

Raffaello from the shuttle’s payload bay and hand it off to the station’s robotic arm 

for temporary attachment to the Harmony node segment. Raffaello contains logistics, 

supplies and hardware for transfer to the station. Atlantis also will carry a system to 

investigate the potential for robotically refueling existing satellites and return a failed 

ammonia pump to help NASA better understand the failure mechanism and improve 

pump designs for future systems. 

STS-135 is Atlantis’ 33rd and final flight, the 135th and final space shuttle mission, 

and the 37th U.S. flight to the space station. 

The Crew:

Commander Chris Ferguson will lead the STS-135 crew on his third spaceflight. 

Doug Hurley will serve as pilot on his second spaceflight. Mission specialists are 

Sandy Magnus and Rex Walheim. Both are making their third spaceflight.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10386 

Conference Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TIMOTHY EMMETT DAMRON,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CR-345-D

- - - - - - - - - -

December 20, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Timothy Emmett Damron appeals the denial of his motion to

dismiss his indictment for interstate transportation of stolen

motor vehicles on the ground that the district court lacked

federal jurisdiction. Damron argues that federal agents may not

manufacture federal jurisdiction by demanding that a defendant

deliver the stolen vehicles across state lines solely to

establish the interstate element of the offense.
No. 95-10386

-2-

As the appellant acknowledges, we have held that such a

demand by federal agents does not destroy federal jurisdiction. 

United States v. Clark, 62 F.3d 110, 114-15 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Therefore, the district court did not err.

AFFIRMED.
#### LeGRANDE v. STATE

No. 462A01-6

Case below: Stanley County Superior Court

Claim by plaintiff against the State of North Carolina for erroneous convictions, imprisonments and sentence to death in capital case 95CRS567, 847 from Stanly County dismissed 18 December 2001. Claim by plaintiff against the State for malicious and deliberate erroneous convictions, imprisonments and sentence to death in capital case 95CRS567, 847 from Stanly County dismissed 18 December 2001.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



The following is a listing of subsidiaries of the Registrant, including
significant subsidiaries of a subsidiary of the Registrant, their states or
other jurisdictions of incorporation or organization, and the name under which
they do business. Each is a wholly owned. Certain subsidiaries are not listed
since, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, they would not
constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2004.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                          STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
                                                                         INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>     <C>                                                           <C>
1.      Rogue Wave Software, Inc.                                     Delaware
          -  Rogue Wave Software GmbH                                   -  Germany
          -  Rogue Wave Software SARL                                   -  France
          -  Rogue Wave Software UK Ltd.                                -  United Kingdom
          -  Rogue Wave Software SRL                                    -  Italy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.      CareScience, Inc.                                             Pennsylvania

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.      Quovadx Limited                                               United Kingdom

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.      Healthcare.com Corporation                                    Georgia

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.      Confer Software, Inc.                                         California

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"About Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD)","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KiZjOj3xDu\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/integrated-aviation-systems-program\/armd-iasp-lbfd\/about-low-boom-flight-demonstrator-lbfd\/\">About Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD)<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/directorates\/armd\/integrated-aviation-systems-program\/armd-iasp-lbfd\/about-low-boom-flight-demonstrator-lbfd\/embed\/#?secret=KiZjOj3xDu\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“About Low Boom Flight Demonstrator (LBFD)” — NASA\" data-secret=\"KiZjOj3xDu\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/phase2c.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":453}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0533

_________________

STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non-profit 

Corporation; CLINTON DECKER; JESSICA 

DECKER; MARTIN NORUNNER; APRIL MARIE 

DAVIS; MORGEN HUNT; GABRIEL EARLE;

ERICK PRATHER; BRADFORD CAMPBELL; 

MEAGAN CAMPBELL; and JARED ORR,

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v.

MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 

ELEMENTARY DISTRICT NO. 1, HIGH SCHOOL 

DISTRICT NO. 1, MISSOULA COUNTY, STATE OF 

MONTANA; TARGET RANGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 

NO. 23; and HELLGATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 

DISTRICT NO. 4,

 Defendants and Appellees.

STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non-profit 

corporation; JASMINE ALBERINO, TIMOTHY 

ALBERINO, VICTORIA BENTLEY, WESLEY 

GILBERT, KATIE GILBERT, KIERSTEN GLOVER, 

RICHARD JORGENSON, STEPHEN PRUIETT, 

LINDSEY PRUIETT, ANGELA MARSHALL, SEAN 

LITTLEJOHN, and KENTON SAWDY,

 Plaintiffs and Appellants,

 v.

BOZEMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7,

MONFORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 27,

and BIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 72,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jason T. Marks, District Judge.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 25 2022

05/25/2022
National Aeronautics ant 

I 

External 

Relations 

Space Administration 

L 

Le islative 

hairs 

Administrator A 

Daniel S. Goldin 

Deputy Administrator 

John R. Dailey (Acting) 

Associate Deputy Administrator 

John R. Dailey 

Assoc. Dep. Administrator (Tech) 

Michael I. Mott 

Chief Engineer 

Daniel R. Mulville 

Chief Information Officer 

Ronald S. West 

Chief Scientist 

(Vacant) 

Chief Technologist 

Samuel L. Venneri 

Council Roberta L. Gross 

I 

Human Resource 

and Education 

Chief Financial 

Officer Counsel 

I II I 

Arnold Holz Edward A. Frankle George E. Reese I II I 

John D. Schumacher Jeff Lawrence Spence M. Armstrong 

Headquarters 

Operations 

Michael D. Christensen 

Management r- Systems and 

Facilities 

Safety and 

Mission 

Assurance 

Procurement Public Affairs 

Deidre A. Lee Peggy Wilhide Alan M. Ladwig 

I II I 

Benita A. Cooper Frederick Gregory 

Smalland 

Disadvantaged 

Business 

Utilization 

M icrogravity Sciences and 

Ralph C. Thomas Arnauld E. Nicogossian 

r-l Space Flight -7 Space Science Mission to Planet 

William F. Townsend 

Space 

Transportation 

Technology Y Wil Trafton Robert Whitehead 

I 

Wes T. Huntress 

(Acting) 

Flight Center H Space Center I Lyndon B. Johnson I 1 Ames Research 

Center 

Edward Stone Joseph Rothenberg 

Space Center 

Jeremiah Creedon [-I as of June 1997 

*JPL is a contractor-operated facility. 

Space Center I I 

Roy S. Estess Donald J. C%pbell
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"Payload Adapter Testing: A Key Step for Artemis IV Rocket\u2019s Success","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bOUjzUVKHN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/marshall\/payload-adapter-testing-a-key-step-for-artemis-iv-rockets-success\/\">Payload Adapter Testing: A Key Step for Artemis IV Rocket\u2019s Success<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/marshall\/payload-adapter-testing-a-key-step-for-artemis-iv-rockets-success\/embed\/#?secret=bOUjzUVKHN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Payload Adapter Testing: A Key Step for Artemis IV Rocket\u2019s Success” — NASA\" data-secret=\"bOUjzUVKHN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/msfc-01302024-bldg-4708-pla-install-wide-angle-4833.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
Exhibit 12.2
 
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal
controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: September 28, 2009
    
    /s/ M P Vijay Kumar

Name: M P Vijay KumarTitle: Chief Financial Officer
stg-ex456_209.htm



 Exhibit 4.56

 

 

Spousal Consents

 

I, FANG Wen, (Citizen of the People's Republic of China; ID Card No.:                   ), is the lawful spouse of HAN Wei (Citizen of the People's Republic of China; ID Card No.:                   , the “My Spouse”). I hereby confirm and agree that the equity held by My Spouse presently and in the future (hereinafter referred to as “Equity and Interest”) is the personal property of My Spouse, do not form the common property of me and My Spouse and can be disposed solely by My Spouse:

 

1) The equity of Wuhan Jiayan Online Education Technology Co. (the “Wuhan Jiayan”);

 

I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably waive any foregoing Equity and Interest, or any rights or Equity and Interest of the corresponding assets thereof which may be granted to me by any applicable laws, promise not to propose any claim regarding the foregoing Equity and Interest and the corresponding assets thereof, including proposing that the any of the foregoing Equity and Interest and its corresponding assets constitute the common property of me and My Spouse, and based upon such proposition, further claiming to participate in the routine operation management of the Shareholding Platform or Wuhan Jiayan or affecting in any manner any decision made by My Spouse.

 

I further confirm, promise and warrant that under any circumstance, My Spouse shall have the right to independently dispose any of the foregoing Equity and Interest he holds, and that I will not take any action that may affect or prevent the performance by My Spouse of the obligations under any transaction or transaction documents in connection with the foregoing Equity and Interest (including but not limited to, the series of controlling agreements signed by Wuhan Jiayan and its shareholders and Wuhan Studyvip Online Education Co. Limited).

 

The conclusion, validity, interpretation, performance, modification, termination and dispute settlement shall be governed by the laws of China. All parties to this Letter agree that any dispute arising out of the interpretation and performance of this Spousal Consents shall be firstly settled through amicable negotiations, or in case it cannot be settled within Thirty (30) days after one party issues a written notice to the other parties to the effect of requesting settlement through negotiations, either party may submit the dispute to China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission for arbitration subject to its then-currently effective arbitration rules. The arbitration shall be conducted at Beijing. The language of the arbitration shall be in English. The arbitration award shall be final and binding upon the parties.

 

 

This Spousal Consents is signed on the August 5, 2020.

 

 

 

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]

 



[This page is the signature page to the Spousal Consents]

 

Signature:/s/ FANG Wen

Name: FANG Wen

 

 

HAN Wei hereby agrees and accepts this Spousal Consents:

Signature: /s/ HAN Wei 

Name: HAN Wei

 

 

 

 

Spousal Consents - Signature Page