alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration

John F. Kennedy Space Center

Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899

April 22, 2024

Reply to Attn of: CC

TO: Distribution

FROM: CC/Acting Chief Counsel

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA Employees at the 2024 Monthly 

National Space Club Florida Committee (NSCFL) Luncheon

The NSCFL will host a luncheon once per month at the Radisson Resort at the Port, Cape 

Canaveral, Florida. The event is to enable networking and presentation/exchange of ideas 

common to the commercial and government Aerospace industry. 

The hosts have invited over 250 persons to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of views 

or interests and will include local Aerospace companies, elected officials, industry leaders, 

USAF, and NASA. The estimated cost of the event, including all food and beverages, is $40 

per person. All Points, ARES, ASRC Federal, Boeing, Chenega Infinity, Delaware North, 

Herndon Solutions Group, Jacobs, Lockheed Martin, SAIC, Sierra Lobo, and ULA are 

sponsors for the event. Attendance at this event will allow NASA attendees to exchange 

information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the event meets the requirements 

of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the 

event because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and 

views pertaining to NASA's policies, programs, and operations. 

NASA employees who do not have a significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the 

sponsors may accept an invitation for free attendance for themselves and a guest to the event. 

In those circumstances, I find that the Agency's interest in attendance outweighs any concern 

that the individual may be, or may appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of 

his or her duties. However, NASA employees in non-career positions who are required to 

sign the ethics pledge under Executive Order 13989 may attend the event only if they 

reimburse the sponsor the value of the event. 

NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the interests of 

All Points, ARES, ASRC Federal, Boeing, Chenega Infinity, Delaware North, Herndon 
2

Solutions Group, Jacobs, Lockheed Martin, SAIC, Sierra Lobo, and ULA, such as 

procurement duties, program management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act 

Agreement, should seek a separate determination from their local ethics counselor as to 

whether they may accept the invitation. 

Thomas M. Browder III 

Agency Designee

Thomas Browder Digitally signed by Thomas

Browder

Date: 2024.04.22 16:32:13 -04'00'
#### DOROTHY E. COOL v. THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF BERNARDSVILLE.

June 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lee Mohon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lee-a-mohonnasa-gov\/","title":"\u2018Show-Me State\u2019 Students Talk with Astronaut, Celebrate NASA Anniversaries","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5fWAZioZCg\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/marshall\/show-me-state-students-talk-with-astronaut-celebrate-nasa-anniversaries\/\">\u2018Show-Me State\u2019 Students Talk with Astronaut, Celebrate NASA Anniversaries<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/marshall\/show-me-state-students-talk-with-astronaut-celebrate-nasa-anniversaries\/embed\/#?secret=5fWAZioZCg\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“\u2018Show-Me State\u2019 Students Talk with Astronaut, Celebrate NASA Anniversaries” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5fWAZioZCg\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/ariss1_0.jpg?w=478","thumbnail_width":478,"thumbnail_height":602}
Exhibit 23.01

/Letterhead/                 Schvaneveldt & Company
                           Certified Public Accountant
                        275 East South Temple, Suite 300
                           Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
                                  801-521-2392

Darrell Schvaneveldt, CPA


                       Consent of Darrell T. Schvaneveldt
                               Independent Auditor




     I consent to the use, of our report dated March 21, 1998, on the Financial
Statements of The Quantum Group, Inc., and Subsidiaries, dated December 31,
1997, included herein and to the reference made to me.



/S/ Darrell T. Schvaneveldt
Salt Lake City, Utah
March 31, 1998
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 19

- 00141

- CR

Mark A. KRIST , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR5258 Honorable Jennifer Pe ñ a, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: April 10, 2019
DISMISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states “this criminal case is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appea l.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; Rule 25.2(a)(2) applies. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). This court must dis miss this appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” Id. R. 25.2(d); see Chavez v.
State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).04

- 19

- 00141

- CR

- 2

- On March 18 , 2019, we notified Appellant that this appeal would be dismissed under Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification showing that Appellant has the right of appeal is made part of the appellate record by April 8 , 2019. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also
Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174, 176 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.).
On March 26 , 2019, Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate counsel conceded that this court has no choice but to dismis s this appeal. Considering Rule 25.2(d)’s requirements, the record, and Appellant’s response, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 613.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
**Exhibit 24.6**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director and/or officer of eLoyalty Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Kelly D. Conway and William B. Noon, signing singly, as theundersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority and full power of substitution, re-substitution, or revocation, to: 

(a) execute for, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as a director and/or officer of the Company, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 26, 2009, together with any and all amendments thereto on Form 10-K/A deemed necessary, appropriate, or desirable (collectively, the “Form 10-K”), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rulesthereunder; 

(b) file the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or market or similar authority on which the Company’s Common Stock is listed for trading and any other governmental or regulatory authority, and otherwise to act for himand on his behalf in connection therewith; and 

(c) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connectionwith the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be required, appropriate, or desirable to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might orcould do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights andpowers herein granted. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power ofAttorney as of this 4th day of March 2010.
#### DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY v. CERAMI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
# Leif Erikson Day, 2014

At a time when much of the world remained unknown, Leif Erikson—a son of Iceland and grandson of Norway—left his Nordic homeland and sailed westward across an unrelenting ocean. Landing in present-day Canada more than 1,000 years ago, Erikson and his crew became the first Europeans known to reach North America. In this new world, they discovered a land rich with natural resources and established their first settlement, Vinland. Today, we recognize their courageous spirit and the daring exploration that forged a path for centuries of exchange, innovation, and opportunity.

                    More than 800 years after this historic voyage, a group of Norwegian immigrants boarded a ship named                     *Restauration,*                     and with the same sense of hope and determination shared by Erikson and his crew, they crossed the Atlantic in pursuit of the freedoms promised in America. On October 9, 1825, they arrived in New York City, becoming the first organized group of immigrants from Norway to reach the United States. Together, they wrote a chapter of our two countries' interconnected story and opened the doors to opportunity for the hundreds of thousands of Norwegians who would follow, enriching our communities and bettering our Nation.                

This year, we also celebrate the 200th anniversary of the adoption of Norway's constitution, a charter influenced by America's founding documents, and we are reminded of the powerful bonds between our two nations and the values and ideals our people embrace. As we reflect on our common past, we rededicate ourselves to preserving all that has brought us together: the story of a fearless leader who reached for new possibilities; our shared commitment to self-determination and freedom; and the simple truth that has drawn immigrants to our shores—in America, anyone who works hard should be able to get ahead.

Today, there is more work to do to strengthen these promises, and we require bold thinkers and explorers to achieve what we know can be possible. The far reaches of our universe and the depths of our oceans remain unexplored, and the next frontiers in science, medicine, and technology await a new generation of innovators and entrepreneurs. As a Nation, let us carry forward the spirit of Leif Erikson and seize the future together.

To honor Leif Erikson and celebrate our Nordic-American heritage, the Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88-566) approved on September 2, 1964, has authorized the President of the United States to proclaim October 9 of each year as “Leif Erikson Day.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 9, 2014, as Leif Erikson Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to honor our rich Nordic-American heritage.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand fourteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-ninth.

[FR Doc. 2014-24574

Billing code 3295-F5
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CURTIS SMITH.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
I

I I I I ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR FOR OFFICE OF 

GENERAL COUNSEL 

INVENTIONS AND OFFICE OF 

CONTRIBUTIONS LEGISLATIVE 

< 

ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I - --- 

NASA RESEARCH 

ADVl SORY 

OFFICE OF 

INTERNATIONAL OFFICE OF 

PLANS 8 PROGRAM 

ASS1 ST ANT 

ADMINISTRATOR FOR 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

BOARD PROGRAMS COMMITTEES I EVALUATION PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGEMENT 

DEVELOPMENT 

AFFAIRS 

OFFICE OF 

PROGRAMS 

I 

I I PROGRAM 

DEVELOPMENT I SCIENTIFIC L 

TECHNICAL 

INFORMATION 

PUBLIC SERVICES Ep!,iEyF 

SERVICES a INFORMATION 

PROGRAMS PROGRAMMING 

I 

I I 

I 

I 

OF SCIENCES 

SCIENCE AND SPACE FLIGHT 

APPLICATIONS SYSTEMS 

COORDINATION QUALITY 

ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR 

OFFICE OF TRACKING 

REPRESENTATIVE 8 DATA ACQUISITION 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 

I NATIONAL I I I PROGRAM I RANGE SUPPORT COORDINATION 

OFFICE OF 

ADMINISTRATION 

-- 

I I ROGRAM SUPPOR NETWORK 

8 ADVANCED OPE RAT1 ON S 

SYSTEMS 8 FACILITIES 

1 I 

LAUNCH VEHICLES 

8 PROPULSION SYSTEMS 

OFFICE OF r-l MANNED SPACE 

FLIGHT 

I I , AEROSPACE PROGRAM REVIEW 

MEDICINE 8 RESOURCES 

MANAGEMENT 

PRoPULSloN 

AND POWER 

GENERATION 

LAUNCH 

OPERATIONS I CENTER 1 Cocm kch, FIo. 

.ELECTRONICS I RESEARCH BIOTECHNOLOGY 8 HUMAN I RESEARCH a CONTROL 

OFFICE OF 

TECHNOLOGY 

TECH. PROGRAM ADVANCED RESEARCH AND COORDINATION 

1 AERONAUTICAL PROGRAM REVIEW y:S%: I I v~~~s I! 1 RESEARCH I 1 &RESOURCES 1 MANAGEMENT 

PROPULSION 

OFFICE 

Germontorn, Md. 

PERSONNEL INSPECTIONS 

STEERING 

OFFICE OF 

SPACE SCIENCES 

I I I 3 

GRANTS 8 GEOPHYSICS 8 LAUNCH VEHICLES PROGRAM REVIEW 

RESEARCH ASTRONOMY 8 RESOURCES 

CONTRACTS PROGRAMS PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT 

L PROPULSION 

I 1 LUNAR 8 

BIOSCIENCE PLANETARY 

PROGRAMS PROGRAMS 

I I I PACIFIC 

LAUNCH OPERATIONS I OFFICE 

OFFICE OF 

APPLICATIONS 

SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT 

FUTURE 

APPLICATIONS 

COMMUNICATIONS 

SYSTEMS 

STATION RESEARCH SPACECRAFT 

CENTER CENTER CENTER RESEARCH RESEARCH SPACE FLIGHT. SPACE FLIGHT LABORATORY 

CENTER CENTER CENTER CENTER (Contractor Opemted) 

Wollopl Irlond, vo. Mofhtt Field, Colif. Edwards, Colif. Huntsville, Ala. Greenbelt, Md. Podno, Colif. Hampton, Vo. Cleveland, Ohio Hourtm, Texor 

APPROVEh 

SU-EIYS C@T DATED WCH 1, 1W. 

GPO 933034
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the Annual Report of
Quovadx, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission)
on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certifies, to the best of her
knowledge and belief, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Gary T. ScherpingGary T. ScherpingExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer March 31, 2004
II 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2429 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to reallocate costs of the Pactola 

Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to reflect increased demands for 

municipal, industrial, and fish and wildlife purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2004 

Mr. DURBIN (Mr. DASCHLE (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON)) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to reallocate costs 

of the Pactola Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to 

reflect increased demands for municipal, industrial, and 

fish and wildlife purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pactola Reservoir Re5 allocation Authorization Act of 2004’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 
2 

•S 2429 IS 

1 (1) it is appropriate to reallocate the costs of 

2 the Pactola Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to 

3 reflect increased demands for municipal, industrial, 

4 and fish and wildlife purposes; and 

5 (2) section 302 of the Department of Energy 

6 Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7152) prohibits such a 

7 reallocation of costs without congressional approval. 

8 SEC. 3. REALLOCATION OF COSTS OF PACTOLA DAM AND 

9 RESERVOIR, SOUTH DAKOTA. 

10 The Secretary of the Interior may, as provided in the 

11 contract of August 2001 entered into between Rapid City, 

12 South Dakota, and the Rapid Valley Conservancy District, 

13 reallocate, in a manner consistent with Federal reclama14 tion law (the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388, chapter 

15 1093), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that 

16 Act (43 U.S.C. 371 et seq.)), the construction costs of 

17 Pactola Dam and Reservoir, Rapid Valley Unit, Pick18 Sloan Missouri Basin Program, South Dakota, from irri19 gation purposes to municipal, industrial, and fish and 

20 wildlife purposes. 

Æ
I INSPECTOR 

GENERAL 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

NatKnal Aeronautics and 

Space Admrnstratlon I 

D 

-a 

1 

A. 

A 

N 

co 

Y 

ASSOCIATE DISADVANTAGED 

4DMINISTRATOR - ------.I 

DEPUTY 

ADMINISTRATOR 

INSTITUTION ' AEROSPACE : 

ADVISORY I 

SAFETY 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

POLICY AND 

PLANNING 

CHIEF 

COUNSEL COMPTROLLER SCIENTIST 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR COMMERCIAL 

PROGRAMS 

ADMINISTRATOR 

COMMUNICATIONS 

ADMINISTRATOR 

RELATIONS 

SAFETY, RELIABILITY, 

MAINTAINABILITY, 6 

QUALITY ASSURANCE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

OPPORTUNITY PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR EQUAL 

I--

PROGRAMS 

I 

c ASSOCIATE 1 I ASSOCIATE 1 IASS I I 

- 

ASSOCIATE ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR 

OPERATIONS STATION 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE 

SCIENCE AND 

APPLICATIONS 

LABORATORY 

ADMINI RATOR 

SPACE 

FLIGHT 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR AERONAUTICS 

AND SPACE 

TECHNOLOGY 

AYES RESEARCH LYNDON 0. JOHNSON 

SPACECENTER 

GODDARD SPACE 

FLIGHT CENTER 

SPACE FLIGHT CENTER 

NATIONAL SPACE 

TECHNOLOW 

CENTER 

DATE: AB, 198 7
#### S.G. FRANTZ CO., INC. v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION.

September 18, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
October 27, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EXPRO AMERICAS, LLC, Appellant

NO. 14-10-00707-CV V.

SANGUINE GAS EXPLORATION, LLC, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee SANGUINE GAS 

EXPLORATION, LLC, signed July 1, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

We have inspected the record and find the trial court erred in part. We order that the 

portion of the trial court’s judgment in which it denied appellant EXPRO AMERICAS, 

LLC’s motion for summary judgment be AFFIRMED, the portion of the judgment in 

which the trial court granted appellee SANGUINE GAS EXPLORATION, LLC’s motion 

for summary judgment be REVERSED, and this case be REMANDED for further 

proceedings in accordance with this court’s opinion.

We order that each party pay its own costs incurred in this appeal. We further 

order this decision certified below for observance.
#### In the Matter of Jacqueline Agnew, Petitioner, v North Colonie Central School District et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 521]

*831Carpinello, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent North Colonie Central School District Board of Education which terminated petitioner’s employment.

Following an administrative hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, petitioner was terminated from her position as a teacher aide for stealing money from the kindergarten classroom to which she was assigned. She commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination, which has been transferred to this Court *(see*CPLR 7804 [g]). We now confirm.

As an initial matter, the applicable standard of review in this proceeding is the substantial evidence standard *(see*State Administrative Procedure Act § 306; *see also Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222, 230 [1974]). Petitioner’s claim that the proper standard of review should have been a fair preponderance of the evidence under the Court of Appeals decision in *Matter of Miller v DeBuono*(90 NY2d 783 [1997]) is rejected. Unlike the facts of that case, petitioner’s termination as a result of this proceeding neither prohibits her from future employment as a teacher aide nor subjects her to a public registry of any sort. In short, the “stigma plus” analysis applied in *Miller*is simply not triggered here *(see Matter of Williams v Nicoletti,*295 AD2d 353, 354 [2002]; *Matter of Suitor v Keller,*256 AD2d 1140 [1998]; *Matter of Malloch v Ballston Spa Cent. School Dist.,*249 AD2d 797 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 810 [1998]).

Applying the substantial evidence standard, we find that the record supports the Hearing Officer’s finding of guilt. As previously noted by this Court, “[a] decision is proper if it results from a hearing based on evidence from which an ‘inference of the existence of the fact found may be drawn reasonably’ and in which the facts provide a rational basis for the finding” *(Matter of Malloch v Ballston Spa Cent. School Dist., supra*at 798 [citations omitted]). Here, testimonial evidence established that the kindergarten teacher placed a white envelope containing a small *832amount of cash in the top drawer of a file cabinet one morning and that this envelope was missing from the cabinet one day later. A videotape surveillance camera captured petitioner removing a white envelope from the top drawer and placing it in her handbag during the intervening 24-hour period. Given this evidence, we conclude that the determination of guilt was rational and supported by substantial evidence.

Finally, we reject petitioner’s claim that the rescission of an offer of part-time summer employment amid the instant allegations denied her due process.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.