alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0              16,029,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0              46,898,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0             (2,317,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0              27,114,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0              29,811,000
<PP&E>                                               0             100,294,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0              21,906,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0             292,874,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0              77,052,000
<BONDS>                                              0             146,024,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                  18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0              54,837,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0             292,874,000
<SALES>                                     86,394,000             245,791,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,394,000             245,791,000
<CGS>                                       52,772,000             147,688,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               83,427,000             238,219,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,987,000)             (2,262,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,530,000              12,433,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                424,000             (2,599,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (277,000)               1,270,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            701,000             (3,869,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   701,000             (3,869,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04                   (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04                   (.25)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60277 Summary Calendar

__________________ DANIEL WHEAT, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus PORTER WILKINSON, STEVE W. PUCKETT, A.K. SHOWERS, CHRISTOPHER EPPS Defendant-Appellants,
AND TERRY WINTERS, ET AL., Defendants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94CV171-B-A - - - - - - - - - - March 1, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellants appeal the interlocutory order denying their motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. Because the magistrate judge found that there exist genuine issues of material fact, we lack jurisdiction and the appeal isNo. 95-30654 -2- DISMISSED.
#### IN THE MATTER OF THE CONTEMPT OF JOHN GRILLO, SR.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Lillian Gipson","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/lillian-gipson-1nasa-gov\/","title":"La movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada tiene como objetivo reducir el tiempo de viaje","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"5Hesdga6Yl\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/es\/la-movilidad-a%c3%a9rea-avanzada-tiene-como-objetivo-reducir-el-tiempo-de-viaje\/\">La movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada tiene como objetivo reducir el tiempo de viaje<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/es\/la-movilidad-a%c3%a9rea-avanzada-tiene-como-objetivo-reducir-el-tiempo-de-viaje\/embed\/#?secret=5Hesdga6Yl\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“La movilidad a\u00e9rea avanzada tiene como objetivo reducir el tiempo de viaje” — NASA\" data-secret=\"5Hesdga6Yl\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/aam_traveltime_still.jpeg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2089 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2089

  To allow aliens who are eligible for diversity visas to be eligible 
             beyond the fiscal year in which they applied.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 2004

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow aliens who are eligible for diversity visas to be eligible 
             beyond the fiscal year in which they applied.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIVERSITY LOTTERY VISAS.

    (a) Procedure for Granting Immigrant Status.--Section 
204(a)(1)(I)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1154(a)(1)(I)(ii)) is amended by striking subclause (II) and inserting 
the following:
    ``(II) An immigrant visa made available under section 203(c) may be 
issued, or adjustment of status under section 245(a) based upon the 
availability of such visa may be granted, to an eligible qualified 
alien who has properly applied for such visa or adjustment of status in 
the fiscal year for which the alien was selected, notwithstanding the 
end of the fiscal year. Such visa or adjustment of status shall be 
counted against the worldwide level set forth in section 201(e) for the 
fiscal year for which the alien was selected, except that with respect 
to applications properly filed in 2003, such visa or adjustment of 
status shall not be counted against the worldwide level set forth in 
section 201(e), and a visa shall be deemed to be available with respect 
to such applications.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to--
            (1) immigrant visas made available for fiscal year 2004 and 
        each subsequent fiscal year; and
            (2) immigrant visas made available for fiscal years 1998 
        through 2003, provided that the denied alien applicant, the 
        Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, or the 
        Attorney General moves to reopen the alien's case pursuant to 
        procedures or instructions which shall be provided by the 
        Secretary of Homeland Security, the Secretary of State, or the 
        Attorney General as may be appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.7


RENEWAL


PARTIES:


This
Lease Extension is dated this 26th day of May 2020, by and between, KST FAMILY TRUST, Lessor and DOUGLAS HELDOORN, AN
INDIVIDUAL AND DPH SUPPLEMENTS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, JOINTLY & SEVERALLY, Lessee for the premises known as 1620
COMMERCE STREET, SUITES A & B, CORONA, CA 92880.


RECITALS:


Lessor
and Lessee, being
parties to that certain Standard
Industrial/Commercial Multi-Tenant Lease-Gross dated August
27, 2018, hereby express
their mutual desire and intent
to extend,
modify, and
amend by this writing those
terms, covenants, and conditions
contained in TERM, RENT, SECURITY
DEPOSIT, AND GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE of
that certain
lease mentioned above.


AMENDMENTS:


TERM
shall hereinafter additionally
provide as follows:


The
term of this lease
shall be
extended for twenty-four
(24) months
commencing on September 1, 2020
and ending on August 31,
2022.


RENT
shall hereinafter
additionally provide as follows:


The
base monthly rent for each month
of the
renewal period
shall be
as follows:


September
1, 2020
through August
31, 2021:
$12,153.00 per month; 


September
1, 2021
through August 31,
2022: $ 12,545.00
per month.


SECURITY
DEPOSIT shall
hereinafter additionally
provide as
follows:


Lessee
shall deposit an additional
sum of $1,000.00 to bring
the total
Security Deposit to$13,000.00.


GENERAL
LIABILITY INSURANCE shall hereinafter additionally provide as
follows:


Pursuant
to Paragraph 8.2(a) Liability
Insurance Carried
by Lessee; Lessee shall
obtain and keep in force at
all times,
a Commercial General Liability
Policy of insurance
protecting Lessee and Lessor,
at the minimum
of $1,000,000.00
per occurrence and $2,000,000.00
aggregate, with Lessor named
as additional insured. Failure
to provide the required
insurance will result
in a 10% late fee as stated in
Paragraph 8.9 Failure to Provide Insurance.


INCORPORATION


Except
as modified herein, all
other terms and conditions of the
Lease between the parties
above described
shall continue in
full force and effect.


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor
and Lessee have executed
this amendment
as of the day, month, and year
beside their respective signatures.


LESSOR:KST
FAMILY TRUST


By:
/s/ Sharon Tressen                                              Date: 8/30/2020


Trustee


LESSEE:
DOUGLAS HELDOORN, AN INDIVIDUAL AND DPH SUPPLEMENTS INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, JOINTLY & SEVERALLY


 




By:
/s/ Douglas Heldoorn                                                 Date: 6/17/2020


Douglas
Heldoorn, an Individual


By:
/s/ Douglas Heldoorn                                                 Date: 6/17/2020


Douglas
Heldoorn, CEO &CFO
# FILED
December 11, 1996 Cecil W. Crowson Ap pellate Cou rt Clerk 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE
RICKY HEMBREE, ) ) Plaintiff /Appella nt, )

) Davidson Chancery ) No. 95-2874-I VS. ) ) Appeal N o. ) 01A01-9607- CH-00335 CHARLES TR

AUGHBER, ) CHAIRMAN, TENNESSEE ) BOARD OF PAROLES, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. )



## CONCURRING OPIN ION

I conc ur that the

Board of P aroles had the discr etion to gra

nt or deny Mr . Hembree parole under the facts of this case. However, circumstances may arise wher ei n the board’ s discreti on is not so broad. See Totty v. Tenne ssee Dep ’t of Correction , App. No
. 01A01-9504- CV-00013, 1995 WL 700205 ( Tenn. C t. App. Nov. 29, 1995).

____________ __ ______________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reportings to be designed under our supervision to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/  Ian T. BothwellIan T. BothwellChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                         0000893771
<NAME>              American Risk Management Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1
<CURRENCY>                                           USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                           108,782
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    749,914
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      408,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,339,735
<PP&E>                                         1,029,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                    83,774
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,622,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,440,735
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,473
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,039,316
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,622,764
<SALES>                                        3,170,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,170,814
<CGS>                                          1,896,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,896,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,997,191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,221,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,943,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,943,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,555,028)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2509 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 2509

To extend the water service contract for the Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills 
         Division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, Nebraska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2004

   Mr. Hagel introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the water service contract for the Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills 
         Division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, Nebraska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AINSWORTH UNIT, SANDHILLS DIVISION, PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI 
              BASIN PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall extend for the 
period described in subsection (b) the water service contract for the 
Ainsworth Unit, Sandhills Division, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, 
Nebraska, consisting of--
            (1) the water service contract entered into by the 
        Secretary of the Interior under--
                    (A) section 9(e) of the Reclamation Project Act of 
                1939 (43 U.S.C. 485h(e));
                    (B) section 9(c) of the Act of December 22, 1944 
                (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665);
                    (C) the Act of August 21, 1954 (68 Stat. 757, 
                chapter 781); and
                    (D) the Act of May 18, 1956 (70 Stat. 160, chapter 
                285); and
            (2) the water service contract for the set project located 
        in Cherry, Brown, and Rock Counties, Nebraska, for the use of a 
        part of the waters of the Snake River, a tributary of the 
        Niobrara River.
    (b) Period of Extension.--The water service contract described in 
subsection (a) shall be extended for 4 years after the date on which 
the contract expires under the water service contract and law in 
existence before the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

t- NASA Advisory I Council 

............................................ 

i Inspector General (W) i............. 

i Robert W. Cobb i 

Office of the Administrator 

Sean O’Keefe, Administrator 

Frederick D. Gregory, Deputy Administrator 

John D. Schumacher, Chiefofstaff 

James L. Jennings, Associate Deputy Administrator for Institutions & Asset Management 

Michael A. Greenfield, Associate Deputy Administrator for Technical Programs 

Theron M. Bradley, Jr., ChiefEngineer 

Vacant, Chief Technologist 

Patrick A. Ciganer, Program Executive Officer for Integrated Financial Management 

J. T. Jezierski, White House Liaison 

Richard S. Williams, Chief Health & Medical Ofricer 

Patricia L. Dunnington, Chief Information Ofricer 

Shannon W. Lucid, ChiefScientist 

I 

Chief Financial Equal Opportunity 

Human Resources (F) 

Dorothy Hayden-Watkin Vicki A. Novak 

General Counsel (C) 

Paul G. Pastorek 

General Counsel 

Procurement (H) 

Thomas S. Luedtke 

HQ Operations (C) 

James J. Frelk 

Director 

External Relations (I) 

Michael F. O’Brien 

Small and Disadvantaged 

Business Utilization (K) 

Jeffrey E. Sutton Ralph C. Thomas, 111 

Legislative Affairs (L) 

Charles T. Homer, 111 

Assistant Administrator 

Security Management 

Public Affairs (P) and Safeguards (X) 

Glenn Mahone David ASaleeba 

I 

Space Flight (M) 

William F Readdy 

Issociate Administrator 

Lyndon B Johnson 

Space Center 

Jefferson D Howell, Jr 

John F Kennedy 

Space Center 

Roy D Bridges, Jr 

George C Marshall 

Space Flight Center 

David A King 

John C Stennis 

Space Center 

Michael Rudolphi 

(Acting) 

Education (N) 

Adena Williams Loston 

Associate Administrator 

Technology (R) 

J. Victor Lebacqz Assurance (Q) 

Bryan D. O’Connor (Acting) 

+-l 

Space Science (S) 

Edward J. Weiler 

* Jet Propulsion 

Laboratory * 

Charles Elachi 

* Ames Research Center 

G. Scott Hubbard 

Dryden Flight 

Research Center 

Kevin Petersen 

Langley Research 

Center 

Delma C. Freeman, Jr. 

John H. Glenn 

Research Center at 

Lewis Field 

Donald J. Campbell 

Research (U) Earth Science (Y) 

Mary E. Kicza Ghassem R. Asrar 

Goddard Space 

Flight Center 

Alphonso V. Diaz 

July 7,2003 

* JPL is a contractor-operated facility.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-43114) pertaining to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2000
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of ViroLogic, Inc. and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-70562) and related Prospectus of ViroLogic, Inc. of
our report dated March 28, 2002, except for Notes 6 and 8 as to which the date
is March 26, 2002 with respect to the financial statements of ViroLogic, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                            /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 26, 2002
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00155-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-DCL-4441

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 29, 2021