alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.01


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 UNDER 18
U.S.C. 1350
 PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906
 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PLATO Learning, Inc. (the
"Company") for the first quarter ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent
P. Riera, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
      March 12, 2009
                  /s/ Vincent P. RieraVincent
      P. RieraPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Jim Banke","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jim-bankenasa-gov\/","title":"“Airplanes” or “Langleys” and Other Tales of the NACA","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"Kw952tz39E\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/airplanes-or-langleys-and-other-tales-of-the-naca\/\">“Airplanes” or “Langleys” and Other Tales of the NACA<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/airplanes-or-langleys-and-other-tales-of-the-naca\/embed\/#?secret=Kw952tz39E\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"““Airplanes” or “Langleys” and Other Tales of the NACA” — NASA\" data-secret=\"Kw952tz39E\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/nasca-2015.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Chamber V-20 is a 20-foot thermal vacuum facility located at the NASA Marshall Space Flight 

center (MSFC) Environmental Test Facility (ETF) in huntsville, Al. The pumping system for V-20 

includes three 36-inch cryopumps, and three turbopumps. With its large vacuum capacity, V-20 

is manifolded to other chambers to enable simulation of rapid depressurization typical of a vehicle

 launch. Chamber V-20 previously housed the International Space Station (ISS) Common Berthing 

Mechanism (CBM). This test setup was responsible for the assembly-level qualification test 

of the CBM required prior to its purchase from boeing by NASA. During missions utilizing a 

CBM, V-20 was brought to conditions simulating the ISS orbit, and the CBM inside was used 

to simulate activities on orbit. Any problems encountered on orbit could be quickly simulated 

and resolved at MSFC, thereby providing real-time guidance to the ISS astronauts. the ETF 

and boeing supported three successful missions in this manner.

More recently, this chamber was also used to perform leak test on the Orion Composite Crew Module.

ETF V20
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cody S. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/codyslydon\/","title":"NASA Sets Table for Safe Air Taxi Flights","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gMHlrBAQuh\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-sets-table-for-safe-air-taxi-flights-2\/\">NASA Sets Table for Safe Air Taxi Flights<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-sets-table-for-safe-air-taxi-flights-2\/embed\/#?secret=gMHlrBAQuh\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Sets Table for Safe Air Taxi Flights” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gMHlrBAQuh\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/vtol_airtaxi_lane.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":338}
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) FRESH
CHOICE, INC.'S REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 8. 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-17-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-08-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,510
<PP&E>                                          40,736
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,336)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,221
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,022
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,776
<SALES>                                         18,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,644
<CGS>                                            5,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    329
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles Obst *v.*H. Kohnhorst

Judgment — Damages Assessed by Jury — Justice Court — Trespass.

In an action for trespass, before a justice of the peace, a failure to have the damages assessed by a jury, will not make the judgment void, but voidable only.

Same — Appeal.

Such a judgment can only be corrected on appeal from the Justice Court to the proper tribunal, and not by objection in the Court of Appeals that judgment was void.

Jurisdiction of Justice Courts — Jefferson County.

An action for trespass quare clausum fregit, though by implication is an assertion of actual possession, does not come within the prohibition of the act of 4th of March 1866, Myers, Suppt. 575, regulating the jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace for Jefferson and Kenton counties.

APPEAL PROM JEEEERSON CIROUIT COURT. COMMON PLEAS.

October 20, 1868.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Bobertson:

The appellee sued the appellant for $99.50 before a justice of *570the peace of tbe city of Louisville, for trespass *quare clausum fregit*and recovered a judgment for tbe amount claimed in tbe warrant. On an appeal to tbe court of common pleas, tbe appellant failing to appear, that court affirmed tbe judgment of tbe justice, and this appeal seeks a reversal on two grounds: 1, That the justice’s judgment was rendered without a jury. 2, That tbe justice bad no jurisdiction, because tbe title to land might have been involved in tbe action.

Riley, *for appellant.*

Pope, *for appellee.*

Neither ground is available in tbis court.

1. Failing to have tbe damages assessed by a jury, though apparently erroneous, did not make tbe judgment void. And tbe only way to correct that error was by tbe appeal taken to tbe common pleas. But the e^ror was waived in that court which properly affirmed tbe judgment under tbe authority of tbe 853rd section of tbe Code of Practice providing that “if tbe appellant fails to prosecute bis appeal from tbe justice it shall be at tbe option of tbe appellee either to proceed to trial on tbe appeal or have judgment rendered for tbe amount of tbe original judgment or costs where it was in bis favor.” Tbe elective judgment was accordingly rendered in tbis case; and it is now too late to object, for tbe first time, that tbe damages were assessed without a jury.

2. An act of tbe dth of March, 1866 (Myer’s Suppt. 575), gave to tbe justices of tbe peace for Jefferson and Kenton counties jurisdiction over *all common law actions*“regardless of tbe kind or nature of tbe action'when tbe matter in controversy, or sued for, exclusive of interest or costs, does not exceed one hundred dollars, qualified only by tbe *proviso*that they shall not have jurisdiction in any case where tbe title to real estate is involved, or an action to enforce a mortgage or lien.” Tbe action in tbis case did not assert a title to real estate. By implication it asserted actual possession, but did not imply title to tbe clause intruded on. Apparently, therefore, title to real estate was not, by warrant or plea, involved. Consequently tbe amount claimed’ being less than $100, tbe justice bad jurisdiction.

Wherefore, the judgment of tbe common pleas court is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Thomas Arkle,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03583-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8342 Filed 10/23/17 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 10.57
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
LINE LETTER
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LINE LETTER
 W I T N E S S E T H:
    Section 1. Amendments .
   provided provided
 Section 2. Effectiveness of Amendment .
   - 1 -




---



##### 



Section 3. Effect of Amendment; Ratification; Representations; etc.
    (i)
    
    the representations and warranties of the Borrower set forth in
the Line Letter and in the other Loan Documents are true and correct, and(ii)
    
    no Event of Default or event or condition that, with the giving
of notice or passage of time or both, would constitute an Event of Default has
occurred and is continuing.
 Section 4. New York Law .
  Section 5. Severability .
   - 2 -




---



##### 



Section 6. Counterparts .
   PENN OCTANE CORPORATION
    
    RZB FINANCE LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Ian Bothwell
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Pearl GeffersName: Ian Bothwell
    
    
    
    Name: Pearl GeffersTitle: Acting Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Title: First Vice PresidentBy:
    
    /s/ Nancy ReminiName: Nancy ReminiTitle: Vice President
  - 3 -
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Cody S. Lydon","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/codyslydon\/","title":"NASA Armstrong takes Weather Instrumentation to New Heights","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OWZncaoO5g\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-armstrong-takes-weather-instrumentation-to-new-heights\/\">NASA Armstrong takes Weather Instrumentation to New Heights<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-armstrong-takes-weather-instrumentation-to-new-heights\/embed\/#?secret=OWZncaoO5g\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Armstrong takes Weather Instrumentation to New Heights” — NASA\" data-secret=\"OWZncaoO5g\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/afrc2022-0098-16.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50458

Summary Calendar

GRANT TREVARTHEN; CLARE TREVARTHEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the Registered 

Holders of the Structured Asset Securities Corporation, Structured Asset 

Investment Loan Trust, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2003-BC 

6; FIELDSTONE MORTGAGE COMPANY; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, (MERS); BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CV-154

Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs-Appellants Grant and Clare Trevarthen, husband and wife, 

appeal the Rule §12(b)(6) dismissal with prejudice of their suit against

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 6, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-50458 Document: 00512490773 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2014
No. 13-50458

Defendants-Appellees. This action, originally filed in state court and removed 

therefrom, involved the foreclosure on their residence in Cedar Park, Texas. 

We affirm.

Like the district court before us, we have reviewed the Motion to Dismiss 

filed by Defendants-Appellants, the response of the Trevarthens, and the reply 

thereto of Defendants-Appellants, as well as the appellate briefs of the parties 

and the record on appeal. As a result, we are satisfied that the district court 

nailed this one precisely in the concluding paragraph of its Order of April 26, 

2013. After noting that this is “not the first time Grant Trevarthen has 

appeared before this Court in frivolous foreclosure litigation” and after 

identifying prior cases of that ilk, the court concluded that “the spurious 

allegations and baseless causes of action asserted indicate this suit is simply 

more legal gamesmanship by the Trevarthans in their ongoing campaign to 

abuse the legal system and win a free house.” We agree, adding only that the 

instant appeal is equally spurious and contumacious.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-50458 Document: 00512490773 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/07/2014
Exhibit
32.1




Heritage
Oaks Bancorp


Annual
Report on Form 10-K


For the
year ended December 31, 2008




Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Heritage Oaks Bancorp (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, that (i) the
Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Annual Report”), to
which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the
information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:  March
      6, 2009
              
              /s/
      Lawrence P. WardLawrence
      P. Ward,President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Dougherty *v.*Humpston, on Appeal.

*Tuesday November 3.*

*A.*SOLD to *B.*a tract of land, and gave him a title-bond conditioned for the execution of a deed for the land, when a patent for the same should be obtained from the *United States. A.*had paid to the *United States*one-fourth of the purchase-money. *B.*executed his notes to *A.*for the price of the land, payable part in labour and part in money, and agreed to complete the payments due to the *United States*on the land. *A.*afterwards assigned the land-office certificate for the land to C., who had notice of *BA*title-bond; and *C.*paid the balance of the purchase-money due to the *United States,*and obtained a patent for the land. *B.*filed a bill in chancery against *C.,*setting out the above facts; averring a performance of the labour, and a payment of part of the money payable to *A.;*and praying for a conveyance of the land. *Held,*that as the bill did not show a payment or tender of all the money payable to *A.*by the contract, and a payment or tender to *C.*of the balance of the purchase-money paid by him to the *United States,*it should be dismissed for want of equity.

A bill for a specific performance of a contract, is addressed *274to the discretion of the Court; and it should always show that the complainant had done all which could be equitably required of him.

When a conveyance is decreed to be executed in such a case, the usual form is, to require the person who has the legal title to execute the conveyance, if he is of legal discretion and within the jurisdiction of the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 61867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24448]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


SES Performance Review Board--Appointment of Members

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members to the 
Performance Review Board of the Equal Employment Opportunity 
Commission.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa M. Williams, Chief Human Capital 
Officer, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street 
NE., Washington, DC 20507, (202) 663-4306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Publication of the Performance Review Board 
(PRB) membership is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB reviews 
and evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance 
by the supervisor, and makes recommendations to the Chair, EEOC, with 
respect to performance ratings, pay level adjustments and performance 
awards.
    The following are the names and titles of executives appointed to 
serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 12-month term, 
which begins on November 19, 2014.

PRB Chair:
    Mr. Dexter R. Brooks, Director, Federal Sector Programs, Office of 
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Members:
    Mr. Kevin J. Berry, Director, New York District Office, Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission;
    Ms. Katherine E. Bissell, Deputy Solicitor for Regional 
Enforcement, Department of Labor;
    Ms. Kathryn A. Ellis, Assistant General Counsel, Division of 
Educational Equity and Research, and Agency Dispute Resolution 
Specialist, Department of Education;
    Ms. Gwendolyn Y. Reams, Associate General Counsel, Equal Employment 
Opportunity Commission;
Alternate:
    Ms. Delner Franklin-Thomas, Director, Birmingham District Office, 
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

    By the direction of the Commission.

    Dated: October 3, 2014.
Jenny R. Yang,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2014-24448 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P