alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit A 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8229-1 Filed 10/18/17 Page 1 of 4
Deposition of:

Michael Streiff , M.D.

July 12, 2017

In the Matter of:

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products

Liability

Veritext Legal Solutions

1075 Peachtree St. NE , Suite 3625

Atlanta, GA, 30309

800.808.4958 | calendar-atl@veritext.com | 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8229-1 Filed 10/18/17 Page 2 of 4
Michael Streiff , M.D. July 12, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1 Q. And, and you are not basing that

2 statement on any kind of FDA regulation standard or

3 some law. That's just kind of a personal opinion?

4 A. Yeah, that's after looking at those

5 documents.

6 MR. O'CONNOR: Object to the form of the

7 question.

8 THE WITNESS: Sorry.

9 BY MR. LERNER:

10 Q. And, and when you say that manufacturers

11 should continuously apprise physicians of certain

12 information, again, that's not based on any

13 particular regulation, standard or law. It's based

14 on your personal opinion?

15 MR. O'CONNOR: Form.

16 THE WITNESS: True.

17 BY MR. LERNER:

18 Q. And when you use the term continuously

19 apprise, are you saying that manufacturers should

20 be providing information to doctors how often?

21 A. I would say that if you have a -- you

22 know, obviously, I'm -- this is -- I'm an outsider.

23 The whole FDA, the vice pros, you know, approval

24 process or drug approval process, because I haven't

25 been involved with that either, but if you have --

Page 277

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8229-1 Filed 10/18/17 Page 3 of 4
Michael Streiff , M.D. July 12, 2017

In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability

1 if a company has a reasonable certainty that their

2 drug or device may have problems that need to be

3 corrected, they ought to, as soon as they feel

4 reasonably certain about that ought to let, you

5 know, let providers know, particularly ones that

6 are placing the devices in this case.

7 Q. And, again, you're offering opinions,

8 your personal opinions that you and Dr. Garcia

9 have?

10 A. True.

11 MR. O'CONNOR: Object.

12 THE WITNESS: That's all personal -- oh,

13 sorry. All --

14 MR. O'CONNOR: I object to the form of

15 the question.

16 THE WITNESS: All personal opinions based

17 on reading the Kessler report.

18 BY MR. LERNER:

19 Q. Okay. And since you're not an expert in

20 FDA regulations, I assume you are not aware of what

21 information a device company can or cannot provide

22 to the public?

23 MR. O'CONNOR: Form.

24 THE WITNESS: That is true, yeah.

25 BY MR. LERNER:

Page 278

Veritext Legal Solutions

800.808.4958 770.343.9696

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8229-1 Filed 10/18/17 Page 4 of 4
#### VAN-RAD CONTRACTING CO., INC. v. ACTION BUILDERS CO., INC.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001094084
<NAME>                        COMSTOCK COAL COMPANY, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,642
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,398
<OTHER-SE>                      (5,040)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4,940)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Harvey McGinnis *v.*Eli Howard.

New Trial — Verdict not Sustained by Evidence.

The evidence must be palpably against the verdict to authorize a reversal on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence

New Trial — Newly Discovered Evidence.

Newly discovered evidence, disclosed after a trial, relating to matters which were contested on the trial and as to which several witnesses were examined, Held, not sufficient to authorrize a new trial.

APPEAL PROM GREENUP CIRCUIT COURT.

October 7, 1868.

Opinion or the Court by

Judge Hardin :

Whether or not the court below erred in refusing to grant the appellant a new trial either on the ground that the verdict of the *459jury was not sustained by the evidence, or for the discovery of evidence after the trial, is the only question in this case.

Ireland, *for appellant.*

Wadsworth, *for appellee.*

The evidence as to the identity of the mare in controversy is singularly conflicting and such as it was, it was the peculiar province of the jury to weigh. In such cases this court has repeatedly held, that the evidence must be palpably against the verdict to authorize a reversal on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. There is not, in our opinion, such a preponderance of the evidence against the verdict in this case. And as the newly discovered evidence disclosed after the trial, related to matters which were contested on the trial, and as to which several witnesses were examined, the court rightly refused on that ground to set aside the verdict.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, William Krebs, Chief Executive Officer, of
Voice Mobility International, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of Voice Mobility
      International, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report)
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Voice Mobility International, Inc.                                                               

Dated: July 6, 2010

/s/ William KrebsWilliam
Krebs, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Voice Mobility
International, Inc. and will be retained by Voice Mobility International, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of Merix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark R. Hollinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Mark R. HollingerMark R. HollingerChief Executive OfficerAugust 10, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Michael Silton, Chief Executive Officer of Rainmaker Systems, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    MICHAEL
SILTONMichael SiltonPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: March 11, 2008
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRIAN M. LAUB, 

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-3199

(D.C. No. 5:12-CR-40103-JAR-1)

(D. Kan.)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

This matter is before the court on Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal and 

Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to 10th Cir. R. 46.3(B). Upon 

consideration, the motions are granted. This appeal is dismissed.

A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

by: Jane K. Castro

 Counsel to the Clerk

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

March 9, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 14-3199 Document: 01019395688 Date Filed: 03/09/2015 Page: 1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          OF CORPORATE GENERAL PARTNER

            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert A. Bourne, the President and Treasurer of CNL Realty
Corporation, the corporate general partner of CNL Income Fund XIV, Ltd. (the
"Partnership"), has executed this certification in connection with the filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Partnership's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the "Report"). The
undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:   November 10, 2004              /s/ Robert A. Bourne
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Robert A. Bourne
                                       Title:  President and Treasurer

                                      A   signed   original   of  this   written
                                      statement required by Section 906 has been
                                      provided to CNL Income Fund XIV,  Ltd. and
                                      will be  retained  by CNL Income Fund XIV,
                                      Ltd. and furnished to the  Securities  and
                                      Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon
                                      request.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

May 30, 2008

Mr. Brad M. LaMorgese

McCurley, Orsinger, McCurley, Nelson & Downing

5950 Sherry Lane, 8th Floor

Dallas, TX 75225

Honorable E. Lee Gabriel

367th District Court

1450 E. McKinney St., Ste. 3426

Denton, TX 76209-4524

Mr. Stephen W. Shoultz

Law Offices of Stephen W. Shoultz

900 Jackson Street, Suite 750, LB#7

Dallas, TX 75202-4425

Mr. G. David Heiman

Attorney at Law

401 E. Corporate Dr., Ste. 100

Lewisville, TX 75067

RE:Case Number:  07-0919

Court of Appeals Number:  02-07-00348-CV

Trial Court Number:  2001-50883-367

Style:IN RE  REZA ZANDI

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0919Page 1**
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresh Choice, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 21, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Everett F.
Jefferson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), that:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Everett
  F. Jefferson             
| | ---------------------------------------
| |                                        
| | Everett F.
  Jefferson                 
| | President
  and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6888

JAMES THEODORE ROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD BAKER, Superintendent; BROWN, Officer;

MS. HALL, Counselor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA99-1603-DKC)

Submitted: October 26, 1999 Decided: November 17, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Theodore Ross, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Ross’s informal brief in this Court recites the same facts

as his complaint in the district court but emphasizes the denial of

his request for a transfer within the facility. To the extent that

these claims were not fully addressed by the district court, we

conclude they provide no basis for relief.

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Ross v. Baker, No. CA-99-1603-DKC (D. Md. June 17,

1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Michael F. Manion, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Michael F. Manion

Michael F. ManionChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated: July 15, 2005

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sheffield Pharmaceuticals, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Mike Ulrich, as Vice President and Trust Officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, theTrustee, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofSanta Fe Energy Trust, for which JPMorgan Chase Bank serves as Trustee;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trustcorpus of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)), or for causing such procedures to be established and maintained,for the registrant and I have:

(a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Trustee’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosed in this report any change in the Trustee’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Trustee’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors:

(a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of the Trustee’s internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves any managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Trustee’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

In giving the foregoingcertifications, I have relied to the extent I consider reasonable on informationprovided to me by Devon Energy Production Company, L.P.

Date: November 5,2004
|        | /s/ MIKE  ULRICH                 |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Mike Ulrich                      |
|   | Vice President and Trust Officer |

 

----
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Abby Tabor","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/astabor\/","title":"Microbial Tracking","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"6dwWTyfPn6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/ames-science\/ames-space-biosciences\/microbial-tracking\/\">Microbial Tracking<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/ames\/ames-science\/ames-space-biosciences\/microbial-tracking\/embed\/#?secret=6dwWTyfPn6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Microbial Tracking” — NASA\" data-secret=\"6dwWTyfPn6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/iss-mo1_plates_dinning_table_2.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Jennifer Seavers,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04510-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9314 Filed 12/13/17 Page 1 of 1
#### WILLIS F. SAGE v. TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS. THEODORE Z. LORENC v. TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS.

April 10, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.