alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2043 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2043

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate a Federal building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the 
                  ``Ronald Reagan Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 228 Walnut 
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the 
``Ronald Reagan Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Ronald 
Reagan Federal Building.

            Passed the Senate March 12, 2004.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
108th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2043

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To designate a Federal building in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, as the 
                  ``Ronald Reagan Federal Building''.
```
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Suzanne Cisneros","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/suzanneecisneros-2-2\/","title":"Drone Flight Testing Above the Ames Campus","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"mGye4rhMsF\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/drone-flight-testing-above-the-ames-campus\/\">Drone Flight Testing Above the Ames Campus<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/drone-flight-testing-above-the-ames-campus\/embed\/#?secret=mGye4rhMsF\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Drone Flight Testing Above the Ames Campus” — NASA\" data-secret=\"mGye4rhMsF\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/small-unmanned-aircraft-systems-suas-drones-flight-test-at-ames.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":450}
GENERAL 

ADMINISTRATOR 

DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

B 

COMPTROLLER 

I ASSOCIATE DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

ASSISTANT DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR 

- 

0 ASSISTANT E ASSOCIATE ASSISTANT 

ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR 

QEMERAL FOR EQUAL FOR FOR 

COUNSEL OPPORTUNrrY EXTERNAL LEGISLATIVE 

PROGRAMS RELATIONS AFFAIRS 

1 i 

ADMINISTRATOR 

COMMERCIAL 

. 

PROGRAMS 

ADYNISTRATOR 

HEADWARTERS 

OPERATIONS 

ADMINISTRATOR FOR SAFEM 

MANAGEMENT OUALliV 

ADMINISTRATOR ADMINISTRATOR 

PROCUREMENT PUBUC AFFAIRS 

ASSOCIATE S 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE 

SCIENCE & 

APPLICATIONS 

I GODDARD SPACE 

FLIGHT CENTER 

I JET PROPULSION 1 LABORATORY 

.M ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE 

FLIGHT 

I LYNDON E. JOHNSON 

SPACE cmrm 

I GEORGE C. MARSHALL 

SPACE FUCHT CWER 

ASSOCIATE R 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR AERONAUTICS, 

EXPLORATION & 

TECHNOLOGY 

ASSOCIATE 

ADMINISTRATOR 

FOR SPACE -- OPERATIONS 

APPROVED 

c " 

c 

\o 

\o 

0
#### Harrington and Another, *v*. Ferguson.

An order by the Court of filiation and bastardy, may be enforced by scire facias or debt on the order against the putative father, or on the recognizance against those who have entered into it, in the name of the state, on the relation of the party entitled.

The scire facias or declaration, in such case, must describe the cause of action of the party claiming, show by what authority he has had the care of the child, and why he is entitled to the benefit of the order for maintenance.

APPEAL from the *Gibson*Circuit Court.

*Tuesday, May*8.

Blackford, J.

This was a motion by Ferguson, in the Circuit Court, for judgment against *Charles fy William*Harrington. There was no process nor pleadings; and, of course, there is no description on the record, by the plaintiff, of his cause of action. It appears, by a bill of exceptions, that *Ferguson*produced an order of the same Court of *September*term, 1818, against *Charle?*Harrington, to the following effect: That he was the father of a bastard child; that he should pay the mother 30 dollars in 30 days; and pay annually for the six succeeding years, 20 dollars, as the Court should direct, for the maintenance of the child, and enter into recognizance, with surety, for the performance of the order. It appears further, that a recognizance was entered into by *William Harrington. The*Circuit Court, upon this motion, with this order before them, gave judgment against *Charles*Harrington, the putative father, and *William*Harrington, the recognizor, for 120 dollars, the amount of the annual payments mentioned in the order.

The mode of proceeding in cases of bastardy, until tbe order by the Court of filiation and bastardy, is stated in *Woodkirk*v. Williams, *Nov.*term, 1820 (1). This case presents the question, as to the mode of enforcing the order. That may he done by scire facias or debt, upon the order, against the putative father, or upon the recognizance against those who have entered intq it, in the name of the state, on the relation of the party entitled. The scire facias, or declaration, must describe the cause of action of the party claiming, show by what authority he has had the care of the child, and why he is entitled to the benefit of the order for maintenance. An opportunity is thus given to *43the defendants to make their defence, if they have any, and the cause proceeds in the ordinary mode. That an action of debt lies on such an order, made by justices of the peace, and that the order is conclusive against the defendants, whilst unreversed, is decided in *Wallsworth*v. *Mead et al.*9 Johns. R. 367.

Hall, for the appellants.

*Húwk-,*for the appellee.

*Per*Curiam:

The judgment is reversed with costs.

(1)

 Vol. I. of these Rep. 110.
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


April 13, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2064


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2064 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-254129 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CO-PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jerry S. Rawls, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Finisar Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: June 28, 2011


/s/ Jerry S. RawlsJerry S. RawlsChairman of the BoardCo-Principal Executive Officer
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00346

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF J.M. AND J.M.,

C HILDREN §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 322nd District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 322

- 587871

- 15 )

March 24, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Wallach

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the order of the trial court is

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Mike Wallach

Ju stice Mike Wallach
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Christopher J. DeAngelis, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03532-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8636 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
23





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-07589, No. 333-31105, No. 333-83235, and No. 333-126876 each on Form S-8, of
our report dated March 6, 2009 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Heritage Oaks Bancorp and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.




/s/
      Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLPRancho
      Cucamonga, CaliforniaMarch
      6, 2009
#### Susan WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

No. 97-40947.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 7, 1999.

Nancy Louise DeLeon, Eloise V. Vellucci, Robles & Associates, Dallas, TX, for Wilson.

Ernest E. Figari, Jr., Monica L. Luebker, Figari & Davenport, Dallas, TX, for City of Plano, TX.

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded this case to our court for further consideration in the light of *Faragher v. City of Boca Raton,*624 U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2275, 141 L.Ed.2d 662 (1998), and *Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth,*524 U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 2257, 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998). Concluding, in the light of those cases, that this case presents issues that the parties should be permitted to develop further, including through additional discovery and supplemented motions for summary judgment, but without in any way intimating our view as to the merits of the claims by Susan Wilson, this ease is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings.

*REMANDED.*
Enclosure

NASA Advisory Council Recommendation 

Science Mission Directorate Engagement in Climate Science 

2022-02-07

Name of Committee: Science Committee 

Chair of Committee: Dr. Ellen Williams 

Date of Council Public Deliberation: August 10, 2022 

Short Title of Recommendation: Science Mission Directorate 

Engagement in Climate Science

Recommendation: 

The Council recommends that: 

 The Science Mission Directorate (SMD) emphasize improving spatial resolution, 

sensitivity to chemical species and concentrations, and environmental/human 

variables in detecting sources of greenhouse gas emissions and make the data publicly 

available. 

 SMD build on NASA’s historical role in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math 

(STEM) education and inspiration to augment the climate portfolio to include a 

segment on utilizing behavioral/social sciences to improve the communication of the 

science of climate change. 

 The climate portfolio overview include a nod to the climate impact NASA itself is 

having, and how this is being mitigated. Additionally, NASA climate goals and 

metrics could strengthen the renewed climate focus. 

Major Reasons for the Recommendation: 

 NASA’s assignment of the dual role of Senior Climate Advisor and Chief Scientist 

provides welcome extra emphasis to NASA’s commitment to the issues of Climate 

Change. 

 NASA’s collaborative work with other U.S. government agencies on the monitoring 

and use of climate data provides substantial opportunity to broaden the impact of its 

Climate Science programs. SMD should utilize such activities strategically to 

complement its science objectives. 

Consequences of No Action on the Recommendation: 

There are numerous Climate Change initiatives in other government agencies, and also 

related activities amongst other NASA Mission Directorates. Failure to completely 

coordinate such activities within NASA risks duplication of efforts and resources. Moreover, 

failure to reach out to seek similar or related Climate Change activities amongst other 

government agencies such as the Department of Defense, the National Science Foundation, 
2

and the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, misses an opportunity 

to leverage the resources and ideas that could influence the success of the NASA Climate 

Change program. 

NASA Response: 

NASA concurs with this overall recommendation and has been working along these lines. 

These topics are addressed in the Agency’s Climate Strategy which was released on 

March 29, 2023, and we have provided a copy to the NAC.
##### 



Exhibit 10.54
 NOTE
 $5,000,000
    
    New York, New York
July 26, 2007
         - 1 -




---



##### 



THE
BORROWER HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE RIGHT TO
TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
RELATING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY TO THE LOAN EVIDENCED HEREBY, THIS NOTE, OR THE OTHER LOAN
DOCUMENTS OR ANY ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF LENDER, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, DIRECTORS OR AGENTS IN
CONNECTION HEREWITH OR THEREWITH.
  THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK WITHOUT REGARD TO ITS RULES PERTAINING TO CONFLICTS OF LAWS.
 Rio Vista Energy Partners L.P.By: Rio Vista GP LLC, its General PartnerBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Ian Bothwell

Ian BothwellTitle:
    
    Acting Chief Executive Officer
  - 2 -
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) TO BE FURNISHED BUT NOT FILED

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Infocrossing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Zach
Lonstein and William J. McHale, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and Senior
Vice President of Finance & Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



 /s/ ZACH LONSTEIN                             /s/ WILLIAM J. McHALE
------------------------------------          ----------------------------------
Zach Lonstein                                 William J. McHale
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer          SVP - Finance and Chief Financial
                                                  Officer
August 9, 2007                                August 9, 2007
Exhibit 99.01



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of eSAFETYWORLD, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward A. Heil, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Edward A. Heil

Edward A. Heil
Chief Executive Officer
October 11, 2002
#### Middlewood *v.*Nevitt.

Saturday, *January*20, 1844

A constable having in his hands *n fi. fa.,*issued under the statute of 1842, may, on finding no goods on which to levy, return the execution before the return-day.

ERROR to the *Dearborn*Circuit Court.

Sullivan, *J.*

— Sci?-e *facias*by the plaintiff against the defendant as replevin-bail for one *Belding.*The suit was commenced before a justice of the peace. The cause was appealed to the Circuit Court, and on motion of the defendant the Circuit Court dismissed the suit. It appears that the execution, on the original judgment in favour of the plaintiff against Belding, was returned in less than 120 days from its date, and a bill of exceptions informs us that the cause was dismissed for that reason.

These proceedings were had under the act of 1842, the 4th .section of which provides that *u*all executions, issued by a justice of the peace, shall be made returnable at the expiration of 120 days and not sooner, so that not more than three executions shall be issued by a justice of the peace in any case in a period of twelve months.” Acts of 1842, p. 65. Previously to the enactment of that statute the law was, that executions issued from a justice’s Court should be made returnable in 30 days. Under that law we decided, in a. case somewhat analogous to the present, that a constable was not bound to take all the time allowed by law before he returned an execution *nulla bona;*but that having made a full examination for goods without success, he was at liberty to return it. *Wilcox*v. *Ratliff, 5*Blackf. 561. The act of 1842 is not inconsistent with that decision. It is imperative as to the number of executions to be issued within twelve months, and that an execution shall not be made returnable sooner than four months from its date, thereby intending to *52prevent defendants from being unnecessarily harassed; but it does not compel the constable to hold the writ in his hands until the return-day, if there be no goods of the execution-defendant on which to levy it.

*J.*Dumont, for the plaintiff.

*J. Ryman*and *P. L.*Spooner, for the defendant.

We think the officer was at liberty to make the return when he did, and that the return laid the foundation for a suit against the bail, which the plaintiff might prosecute immediately.

*Per Curiam.*

— The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER L. DAVIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 567 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER L. DAVIS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 568 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.