alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"NASA","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/nasamigrate\/","title":"NASA, Grad Students Work to Find Better Way to Recycle Water in Space","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"RNvNpDWCdO\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-grad-students-work-to-find-better-way-to-recycle-water-in-space\/\">NASA, Grad Students Work to Find Better Way to Recycle Water in Space<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/armstrong\/nasa-grad-students-work-to-find-better-way-to-recycle-water-in-space\/embed\/#?secret=RNvNpDWCdO\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA, Grad Students Work to Find Better Way to Recycle Water in Space” — NASA\" data-secret=\"RNvNpDWCdO\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/miro_upr_1.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Sophelia Johnson-Winfrey,

Plaintiff,

v.

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-04301-PHX-DGC

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for:

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.

Date: December 8, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Attorney's signature

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed name and bar number

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6000

Telephone number

(404 322-6050

FAX number

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 9391 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ANTHONY LANDOLFI.

September 24, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### Gail S. Fanelli, Appellant, v George C. Fanelli, Respondent.

[787 NYS2d 885]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Spolzino, J.), dated August 11, 2003, which, inter alia, equitably distributed the marital assets.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff contends that the trial court’s distribution of marital property was inequitable, because she received a greater proportion of the non-liquid assets in the form of retirement accounts, while the defendant received a greater proportion of the liquid assets in the form of proceeds from the sale of the marital residence *(see Filax v Filax,*176 AD2d 1194 [1991]; *Chirls v Chirls,*170 AD2d 641 [1991]; *Petrie v Petrie,*143 AD2d 258, 259-260 [1988]; *Tanner v Tanner,*107 AD2d 980 [1985]). The liquid or non-liquid character of marital property is one factor a court must consider when making a determination on equitable distribution *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [7]). The court should also consider the income and property of each party *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [1]), their probable future financial circumstances *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [8]), and any other factor which the court finds just and proper *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [13]). After taking into consideration the plaintiffs income, and the additional liquid assets in her possession, the court providently exercised its discretion in making the subject distributive awards *(see Petrie v Petrie, supra).*

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the trial court properly based its valuation of the defendant’s professional engineering license on his actual prior earnings, rather than on the *593estimated earnings of a hypothetical license holder *(see Grunfeld v Grunfeld,*94 NY2d 696, 704 [2000]; *McSparron v McSparron,*87 NY2d 275, 286 [1995]; *Morales v Morales,*230 AD2d 895 [1996]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Michael L. Murphy, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03526-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8776 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8776 Filed 11/10/17 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Mekeda Player,

Plaintiff,

v.

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC

Civil Action No. CV-17-03610-PHX-DGC

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

To: Flint Law Firm LLC

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/11/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.

Date: October 18, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr.

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599)

Printed Name

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363

Address

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com

E-mail Address

(404) 322-6155

Telephone number

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8320 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8320 Filed 10/20/17 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. ROLAND GEBERT.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
II 

Calendar No. 730 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2432 

[Report No. 108–371] 

To expand the boundaries of Wilson’s Creek Battlefield National Park, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2004 

Mr. TALENT (for himself and Mr. BOND) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment and an amendment to the 

title 

A BILL 

To expand the boundaries of Wilson’s Creek Battlefield 

National Park, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wilson’s Creek Na5 tional Battlefield Boundary Adjustment Act of 2004’’. 
2 

•S 2432 RS 

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF BOUNDARIES, WILSON’S CREEK NA2 TIONAL BATTLEFIELD, MISSOURI. 

3 (a) BOUNDARY EXPANSION.—The first section of 

4 Public Law 86–434 (16 U.S.C. 430kk) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ after ‘‘That’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(b)(1) The boundaries of the Wilson’s Creek Na8 tional Battlefield are revised to include land and interests 

9 in land consisting of 6 parcels totaling 615 acres and iden10 tified as parcels 1 through 6 on the map entitled ‘Wilson’s 

11 Creek National Battlefield Proposed Boundary’, numbered 

12 410/80,037 and dated January 27, 2004. 

13 ‘‘(2) The map referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 

14 maintained on file and available for public inspection in 

15 the appropriate offices of the National Park Service. 

16 ‘‘(3) The Secretary of the Interior may acquire by 

17 donation, purchase from willing sellers with donated or ap18 propriated funds, or exchange— 

19 ‘‘(A) land and interests in land referred to in 

20 paragraph (1); and 

21 ‘‘(B) personal property associated with, and ap22 propriate for, interpretation of the park designated 

23 under section 2.’’. 

24 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

25 3 of Public Law 86–434 (16 U.S.C. 430mm) is amend26 ed— 
3 

•S 2432 RS 

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ after ‘‘SEC. 3’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(b) There are authorized to be appropriated such 

4 sums as are necessary to carry out subsection (b) of the 

5 first section.’’. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to expand the 

boundaries of Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield, and 

for other purposes.’’. 
Calendar No. 730 

108TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2432 

[Report No. 108–371] 

A BILL 

To expand the boundaries of Wilson’s Creek 

Battlefield National Park, and for other purposes. 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 

Reported without amendment and an amendment to the 

title
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Terri StLawrence, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-04009-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8803 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE

JAMES M. GROSCH, ) ) C.C.A. NO. M 1999-00239-CCA- R3-PC Appellant, ) (No. 29,8 62 Be low) ) COFFEE COUNTY VS. ) ) The Hon. L. Craig Johnson STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) (Dismiss al of Post-Conviction Petition ) Appellee. ) ) AFFIRMED PU RSUANT TO R ULE 20 O R D E R Thi s matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion requesti ng that the judgmentin the above-styled cause be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Co urt of Criminal Appeals Rules. The petitioner opposes the motion. Having reviewed the state’s motio n, the petitioner’s brief and r esponse to the motion, and the recor d on appeal, th e Court finds that the motion is w ell taken.
It appears that on March 17, 1998, the petitioner pledguilty to one count of burglary of a buil ding, two counts of aggravated burgl ary, and one count of theft of property over $1000. Thereafter, on June 7, 1999, the petitioner filed his petition for post-convic tion relief, which the trial court dismissed as outside the statute of limitation s.

The petitioner concedes that thi s petition forpost-conviction rel ief was filed outside the sta tute of limitations. Howev er, he argues that he wa s under the mistaken impression that he would be released after serving 30% of

his sentence, and therefore, the statute of limitati ons should have been tolled unt il after he served 30% of his sentence. Accordin gly, th e petiti oner contends that the trial court should not have dismissed his petition without considering it on the merits.

Under the Post-Conviction

Procedure Act, a petition for post-conviction re lief must be filed within one year of the date of th e final action of the highest state appellate court to which an appeal i s taken, or if no appeal is tak en, within one

year of the dateon which the judgement became final. T.C.A. § 40-30-202(a). Un less one of the enumerated exceptionsapplies, a court does not have jurisdic tion to consider an untimely petition. See T.C.A. § 40-30-202(b). In the pres ent case, the post-conviction petition was filed outside



# FILED January 7, 2000 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk-2-

the statute of limitations, and the tr ial court properly held that the petitioner failed to show that one of the exceptions lis ted in the statute was appli cable.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that th e st ate’s motion to affirm the judgmentof the trial court under Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules, is granted, and the judgment of thetrial court is affirmed. It appearing that the petitioner is indigent, costs of these proc eedings are taxed to the s tate.

_____________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUD GE CONCUR:

_____________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDG E

_____________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"John Gould","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jgould4\/","title":"NASA Research Challenge Selects Two New Student-Led Teams","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"gOzSFUZa4N\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasa-research-challenge-selects-two-new-student-led-teams\/\">NASA Research Challenge Selects Two New Student-Led Teams<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasa-research-challenge-selects-two-new-student-led-teams\/embed\/#?secret=gOzSFUZa4N\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA Research Challenge Selects Two New Student-Led Teams” — NASA\" data-secret=\"gOzSFUZa4N\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/usrc-graphic-sep2023.png?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":402}
#### GABRIEL D. VALOS v. CITY OF GARFIELD.

May 22, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CHRISTOPHER BROWN.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"John Gould","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/jgould4\/","title":"NASA University Leadership Initiative\u2019s First Teams Reflect on 5 Years","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"G8fPSsU9PD\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasa-university-leadership-initiatives-first-teams-reflect-on-5-years\/\">NASA University Leadership Initiative\u2019s First Teams Reflect on 5 Years<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/aeronautics\/nasa-university-leadership-initiatives-first-teams-reflect-on-5-years\/embed\/#?secret=G8fPSsU9PD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NASA University Leadership Initiative\u2019s First Teams Reflect on 5 Years” — NASA\" data-secret=\"G8fPSsU9PD\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/lead-uli-q-and-a.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":410}