alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW 

MEXICO, 

 Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION AGENCY; GINA 

McCARTHY, Administrator, United States 

Environmental Protection Agency,

 Respondents.

------------------------------

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS; DINE 

CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR 

ENVIRONMENT; NATIONAL PARKS 

CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION; NEW 

ENERGY ECONOMY; SAN JUAN 

CITIZENS ALLIANCE; SIERRA CLUB,

 Intervenors.

------------------------------

THE NAVAJO NATION; AMERICAN 

COALITION FOR CLEAN COAL 

ELECTRICITY; PACIFICORP; UTILITY 

AIR REGULATORY GROUP, 

 Amici Curiae.

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

SUSANA MARTINEZ, Governor of the 

State of New Mexico; NEW MEXICO 

ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, 

No. 11-9557

(EPA No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0846)

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

August 19, 2015

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

Appellate Case: 11-9567 Document: 01019478006 Date Filed: 08/19/2015 Page: 1 
2

 Petitioners,

v.

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION AGENCY; GINA 

McCARTHY, Administrator, United States 

Environmental Protection Agency,

 Respondents.

------------------------------

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS; DINE 

CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR 

ENVIRONMENT; NATIONAL PARKS 

CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION; NEW 

ENERGY ECONOMY; SAN JUAN 

CITIZENS ALLIANCE; SIERRA CLUB, 

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW 

MEXICO, 

 Intervenors.

------------------------------

THE NAVAJO NATION; AMERICAN 

COALITION FOR CLEAN COAL 

ELECTRICITY; PACIFICORP; UTILITY 

AIR REGULATORY GROUP, 

 Amici Curiae.

No. 11-9567

(EPA No. EPA-R06-OAR-2010-0846)

_________________________________

ORDER

_________________________________

Before TYMKOVICH, EBEL, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

These matters are before the court on the environmental intervenors’ July 29, 

2015, status report, which we construed as a motion to dismiss on mootness grounds. We 

Appellate Case: 11-9567 Document: 01019478006 Date Filed: 08/19/2015 Page: 2 
3

also have the response to the motion, as construed, and the reply the environmental 

intervenors filed on August 18. Upon consideration, and noting no opposition, these 

proceedings are dismissed, with all parties to bear their own costs. See 10th Cir. R. 

27.2(A)(1)(b). A copy of this order shall stand as the mandate of the court. 

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk

Appellate Case: 11-9567 Document: 01019478006 Date Filed: 08/19/2015 Page: 3
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

HEADQUARTERS ORGANIZATION 

I ADMINISTRATOR I 

I 

A)IOClAlC ADMWISlRAl~ 

I 

HH INDUSIRV ISFAIRS 

I MAJOR FIE11 NSTALLATIONS VI U N
#### PHILIP BENYOLA v. CITY OF CLIFTON.

September 5, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADDED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christopher C. Jurey, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)  The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.





By:

/s/    CHRISTOPHER C.
JUREYChristopher C. Jurey Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





Date:  August 12, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DELBERT RAY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 80 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DELBERT RAY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 81 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DELBERT RAY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 82 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 83 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court
[80 WAL 2020, 81 WAL 2020, 82 WAL 2020 and 83 WAL 2020] - 2

DELBERT RAY WILLIAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
M&F BANCORP, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARY



Exhibit 32

M & F BANCORP, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of M & F Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB/A (Amendment No.1) of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-KSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                         
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------
|                         |  | 
|Dated: December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Kim D. Saunders     
|                         |  |  |  | Kim D. Saunders         
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|                         |  | 
|Dated: December 31, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Allan E. Sturges    
|                         |  |  |  | Allan E. Sturges        
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Accounting Officer



|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



82
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Tracy Marshall, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03523-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8817 Filed 11/10/17 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 366P01

Case below: 143 N.C. App. 719

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 November 2001.
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"NASA","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov","author_name":"Kelly M. Matter","author_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/author\/kmatter\/","title":"Back on Earth: NASA\u2019s Orion Capsule Put to the Test Before Crewed Mission","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"XPxz2Tjhu6\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/back-on-earth-nasas-orion-capsule-put-to-the-test-before-crewed-mission\/\">Back on Earth: NASA\u2019s Orion Capsule Put to the Test Before Crewed Mission<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/centers-and-facilities\/glenn\/back-on-earth-nasas-orion-capsule-put-to-the-test-before-crewed-mission\/embed\/#?secret=XPxz2Tjhu6\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Back on Earth: NASA\u2019s Orion Capsule Put to the Test Before Crewed Mission” — NASA\" data-secret=\"XPxz2Tjhu6\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/orion-arrival-14.jpg?w=600","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400}
Exhibit 32



M & F BANCORP, INC.



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of M & F Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 24, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Lee Johnson, Jr.   
|                      |  |  |  |                        
|                      |  |  |  | Lee Johnson, Jr.       
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 24, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Fohliette W. Becote
|                      |  |  |  |                        
|                      |  |  |  | Fohliette W. Becote    
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



47
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

S .M. Beresford J D P. Donnelly 

AA 

--. -. . 

ADMINISTRATOR 

Dr. George M . Low 1 1 

Richard C. McCurdy 

I 

W. E. Lilly D. J . Harnett 

Dale D. Myers 

~ y!&E!:- i 

Dr. John E. Nougle 

- 

Officer I I 

ements 

--$q g&j Ah E:;z 

H. E. Clements C. E. Weakiey G. L. Roth 

(Act) 

A \DA 

*SSOCl*TE 

DWWTY 

ADMINISTIA,OI 

_-- 

Willis H. Shapley 

1 

~~~~ 

J. E. Smart A. W. Frutkin H . D. Grubb 

OFFICE OF APP,ICATlONS 

.j,c”,.l~ .“si*,ilS.l-il 

Charles W. Mathews 

I OFFICE OF 

Roy P. Jackson
#### Noland et al *v.*A. D. Shepherd.

Instructions.

It is error to instruct tile jury that they ought to take as true all the allegations in the petition, not denied by the defendant in his answer.

Same.

By this instruction questions of law were submitted to the jury— whether a fact which alleged in any part of the pleadings be material or immaterial to the matter in issue, is a question of law for the court.

Deposition — Notice—Misnomer

A notice-to take depositions was in the name of Greene, appellee, and in the caption, it stated that they are to be used in the case of Green assignee of Shepperd. Held, tnat it was not insufficient to authorize the court to exclude the depositions.

APPEAL EEOM ESTILL OIROUIT COUET.

December 10, 1867.

Opinion oe the Couet by

Judge Petees :

Although the weight of evidence inclines against the verdict, still the preponderance is not such as to authorize this court to interpose, and reverse the judgment on that account.

But instruction No. 2 *given*at the instance of appellee cannot be sustained. It is as follows:

> • “That upon the trial of this case the jury ought to take as true all the allegations in plaintiff’s petition, and amended petition, not denied by defendant in his answer, except the question of the value of the property or amount of damages claimed.”

This instruction is substantially the same that was. given in Tipton vs. Triplett, 1 Met., 571. Of which this court-said. By this instruction questions of law were submitted to the jury instead of being decided by the court, as they should have been. Whether a fact which is alleged in any part of the pleadings be material, or immaterial to the matters in issue, is a question of law. And whether it has been denied in the answer, or the response, is also a question of law- The court should determine not only what allegations have been specifically controverted, and 'inform the jury *155what facts are to be considered by them as true under the pleadings in the action.

*Harlan, for appellants.*

*Barnes, for appellee.*

The instruction referred to was calculated to mislead the jury, and appellant might well complain of it as prejudicial to him, especially in a case like the present when the important fact to entitle the appellee to a recovery is left by the evidence, to say the least of it, in great doubt.

The notice to take the depositions of the Greens is in the name of appellee, and the caption states they are to be used in the case of *Oreen assignee of Shepherd,*that was not insufficient to authorize the court to exclude the depositions.

No other error is perceived in giving or refusing instructions. But for the error suggested, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial and for further proceedings herewith.
#### MARILYN J. FUNK v. STURWOOD HAMLET ASSOCIATES.

May 16, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
BYLAW AMENDMENT

                       Approved by the Board of Directors
                                On April 6, 1998
                              Effective May 7,1998


Section 4(3)(1)(a) of the By-Laws of the Corporation is read in its entirety as
follows:


         "(a) The size of the Board of Directors shall be no more than twelve,
but not fewer than the number required by the Corporation's Articles of
Incorporation or by Maryland law, with such number to be determined from time to
time by a majority of the entire Board of Directors. The term of office of a
Director shall not be affected by any decrease in the authorized number of
Directors."
No. 03-14-00593-CVIn the Third Court of AppealsAustin, TexasCOMED MEDICAL SYSTEMS, CO., LTD. d/b/a GEMSS MEDICAL andGEMSS NORTH AMERICA INC., f/k/a GEMSS USA INC.,Appellants,v.AADCO IMAGING, LLC and AADCO MEDICAL, INC.Appellees.On Appeal from Cause No. 14-0486-C26In the 26thDistrict Court of Williamson County, TexasNOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES'AADCO IMAGING, LLC AND AADCO MEDICAL, INC.Kenneth J. FergusonDavid N. ColeTexas Bar No. 6918100New Hampshire Bar No. 429Email: KFerguson@gordonrees.comVermont Bar No. 1986Bradley B. BushEmail: dcole@colelaw.comTexas Bar. No. 24057787Law Office of David N. ColeEmail: bbush@gordonrees.com35 South Main StreetGordon & Rees, LLPHanover, NH 03755-2047816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1510Telephone: .603.643.4500Austin, TX 78701Facsimile: 603.643.5297Telephone: 512.391.0197Facsimile: 512.391.0183ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEESNOTICE OF APPEARANCE1ACCEPTED03-14-00593-CV3687076THIRD COURT OF APPEALSAUSTIN, TEXAS1/7/2015 4:29:51 PMJEFFREY D. KYLECLERKNOW COMES, Appellees AADCO Imaging, LLC and AADCO Medical,Inc., and hereby notifies the Honorable Court and all parties of the following:Mr. Kenneth J. Ferguson and Mr. Bradley B. Bush of Gordon & Rees, LLPenter their appearance for Appellees AADCO Imaging, LLC and AADCOMedical, Inc. Mr. Ferguson is a member in good standing of the State Bar ofTexas. Mr. Bush is a member in good standing of the State Bar of Texas.Respectfully submitted,GORDON & REES, L.L.P.By: Is!Kenneth I FergusonKenneth J. FergusonState Bar No. 6918100Email: KFerguson@gordonrees.comBradley B. BushState Bar. No. 24057787Email: bbush@gordonrees.com816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1510Austin, TX 78701Telephone: 512.391.0197Facsimile: 512.391.0183ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTSAADCO IMAGING, LLC andAADCO MEDICAL, INC.NOTICE OF APPEARANCE•-)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEI hereby certify that on January 7, 2014, a true and correct copy of theforegoing instrument was electronically filed with the Court causing a copy to beserved on the following counsel of record listed below. A courtesy copy was alsosent via email to the following counsel:Simon W. Hendershot, IIIChristy L. Martin1800 Bering Drive, Suite 600Houston, Texas 77057trey@k-hpc.comcmartin@k-hpc.comDavid N. Cole, Esq.35 South Main StreetHanover, New Hampshire 03755-2047dcole@colelaw.comIs! Kenneth J. FergusonKenneth J. Ferguson/21816447v. 1NOTICE OF APPEARANCE3
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., 

Appellant, 

v. 

DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES 

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, 

Appellee,

v. 

TELES AG INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIEN, 

Cross Appellant.

__________________________ 

2012-1513, -1514 

(Reexamination No. 95/001,001) 

__________________________ 

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

IN RE TELES AG 

INFORMATIONSTECHNOLOGIEN AND SIGRAM 

SCHINDLER BETEILIGUNGSGESELLSCHAFT 

MBH 

Case: 12-1513 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 12/10/2012
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. KAPPOS 2

__________________________ 

2012-1297 

(Reexamination No. 90/010,017) 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION 

__________________________ 

O R D E R 

Cisco Systems, Inc. moves without opposition to treat 

appeal no. 2012-1513, -1514 and appeal no. 2012-1297 as 

companion cases. 

 Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. The above-captioned cases 

will be treated as companion cases and will be assigned to 

the same merits panel. 

 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk 

s25 

Case: 12-1513 Document: 34 Page: 2 Filed: 12/10/2012
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (a) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by Northwest Bancorporation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:

/s/    RANDALL L.
FEWELRandall L. Fewel, President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 7, 2003
#### ALAN SCHWARTZ, D.V.M. v. NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS.

June 12, 1984.

Petition for certification denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM IMNET
SYSTEMS, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       7,445,770
<SECURITIES>                                 2,320,172
<RECEIVABLES>                               39,578,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,357,782
<INVENTORY>                                  2,141,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,106,236
<PP&E>                                      10,274,325
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,499,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,681,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,970,639
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,184
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,943,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,681,729
<SALES>                                     37,230,711
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,819,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,242,142
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,106,758)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,940,478)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,166,280)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,166,280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.32)
        

</TABLE>
#### CLEMENT RUGGERIO v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO.

May 30, 1978.

Petition for certification denied.