alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2441 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

108th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2441

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as the ``General John J. 
                        Pershing Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2004

 Mr. Bond (for himself and Mr. Talent) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 607 Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, as the ``General John J. 
                        Pershing Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 607 
Pershing Drive in Laclede, Missouri, shall be known and designated as 
the ``General John J. Pershing Post Office''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the General John J. Pershing Post 
Office.
                                 <all>
```
Applicant Eligibility Questions for USA Staffing:

Guidance for answering eligibility questions for different hiring authorities 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

On Nov. 2, 2020, NASA transitioned from the Staffing and Recruiting System (STARS) to USA Staffing (USAS) to 

recruit, evaluate, assess, certify, select, and onboard talent. USAS includes functionality to ask applicants questions 

about their eligibility for different hiring authorities. The NASA hiring process uses a variety of types of vacancy 

announcements and areas of consideration, depending on where a good applicant pool can be found. Due to this 

variety of announcements, the eligibility questions asked vary by type of announcement. Please carefully read and 

review each question and refer to the NASA Applicant Eligibility Questions Resource Guide for more information. 

More Information:

On the application process can be found through OPM’s USA Staffing Resource Center.

On qualifying conditions for Career Transition Assistance Plans: The Employee's Guide to Career Transition.

Background information

Important eligibility requirements

You should carefully read the eligibility 

questions and answer “Yes” to any that 

apply to your employment status with NASA. 

Your answers to these questions will 

determine if you are eligible for the position. Read carefully

You must answer “Yes” to one or more of 

these questions to be eligible for the 

position. If you think none of the below apply 

to you or have questions about which one 

applies, consult with your local human 

At least one resources staff for more information.

“Yes” 

NASA’s Office of Chief Human Capital Officer encourages all applicants to apply for any type of announcement for 

which they are eligible and qualified. Applicants may find this information by reviewing vacancy announcements on 

USAJOBs, like the example below. 

Am I eligible? Who is qualified?

We encourage applicants to carefully review the entire vacancy announcement for important information about 

the position, the application process, and other information.

To determine if you are 

eligible, review the “This 

job is open to” section.

To determine if you are qualified, 

review the “Requirements” section.

20210615_KK
#### Dartha Cunningham, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Adam E. Diers et al., Respondents.

[787 NYS2d 668]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Dartha Cunningham appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Emerson, J.), dated July 30, 2003, which denied her motion, denominated as one pursuant to CFLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate, which, in fact, was for leave to reargue that branch of the plaintiffs’ prior motion which was, in effect, to vacate so much of an order of the same court dated October 28, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendants’ prior motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted by her.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondents.

The order denying the appellant’s motion, denominated as one pursuant to CFLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate, which, in fact, was *529for leave to reargue that branch of the plaintiffs’ prior motion which was, in effect, to vacate so much of an order of the same court dated October 28, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendants’ prior motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted by her, is not appealable *(see Brenner v Cross County Shopping Ctr.,*308 AD2d 469, 470 [2003]; *Syed v Fedor,*302 AD2d 451 [2003]; *Lopez v Lincoln Appliances, Bedding & Furniture,*300 AD2d 451, 452 [2002]; *Agayeva v KJ Shuttle Serv.,*284 AD2d 488 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

Mary W. Jackson Building NASA Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

March 15, 2023 

Reply to Attn of: General Law Practice Group

TO: Distribution 

FROM: Agency Counsel for Ethics

SUBJECT: Determination Regarding Attendance by NASA employees at the Boeing & 

Virginia Museum of History & Culture Reception on March 18, 2023 

On March 18, 2023, the Boeing Company & Virginia Museum of History & Culture, a nonprofit 

organization under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, will host a To the Moon Gala at the 

Virginia Museum of History & Culture, 428 N. Arthur Ashe Blvd, Richmond, VA, from 6:30 p.m. 

to 9:00 p.m. The event is to explore the history of America’s mission to the Moon and the major 

role played by Virginia and Virginians, including work done at NASA’s Langley Research 

Center, the U.S. Space & Rocket Center, and other partners. 

Approximately 200 people have been invited to attend. Attendees will have a diversity of views 

or interests and will include legislators from federal, state, and local government, academia, 

industry, NASA personnel, media and non-profits. The estimated cost of the event, including all 

food and beverages, is $75 per person. The Virginia Museum of History & Culture is in control 

of the organizing, planning and invitations for this event. Attendance at this event will allow 

NASA attendees to exchange information regarding various NASA programs. I find that the 

event meets the requirements of a “widely attended gathering” as defined in 5 C.F.R. § 

2635.204(g)(2). 

I further determine that there is an Agency interest in having NASA personnel attend the event 

because it will provide an opportunity for the invited persons to exchange ideas and views 

pertaining to NASA’s policies, programs, and operations. NASA employees who do not have a 

significant role in a matter affecting the interests of the sponsor may accept an invitation for free 

attendance for themselves and a guest (if invited) to the event. In those circumstances, I find that 

the Agency’s interest in attendance outweighs any concern that the individual may be, or may 

appear to be, improperly influenced in the performance of their duties. However, NASA 

employees in non-career positions who are required to sign the ethics pledge under Executive 

Order 13989, may only attend the event if they reimburse the sponsor the value of the event. 

However, NASA employees who have a significant role in any pending matter affecting the 

interests of the Virginia Museum of History & Culture, such as procurement duties, program 

management, or negotiating or administering a Space Act Agreement, should seek a separate

determination from their local ethics counselor as to whether they may accept the invitation. 

Attendees are reminded to exercise any COVID-19 precautions appropriate to their individual 

situation. 

Adam F. Greenstone
```

[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2230 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

 108th CONGRESS
   2d Session
                                S. 2230

  To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to include shifts in production, for 
  purposes of trade adjustment assistance, to countries to which the 
      United States has extended permanent normal trade relations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 24, 2004

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to include shifts in production, for 
  purposes of trade adjustment assistance, to countries to which the 
      United States has extended permanent normal trade relations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Workers Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. SHIFTS IN PRODUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 222(a)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Trade Act of 
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2272(a)(2)(B)(ii)(II)) is amended by inserting before 
the semicolon the following: ``or a country to which the United States 
has extended permanent normal trade relations''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on October 1, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 24.4**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director and/or officer of eLoyalty Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints each of Kelly D. Conway and William B. Noon, signing singly, as theundersigned’s true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power and authority and full power of substitution, re-substitution, or revocation, to: 

(a) execute for, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in the undersigned’s capacity as a director and/or officer of the Company, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended December 26, 2009, together with any and all amendments thereto on Form 10-K/A deemed necessary, appropriate, or desirable (collectively, the “Form 10-K”), pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rulesthereunder; 

(b) file the Form 10-K, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and any stock exchange or market or similar authority on which the Company’s Common Stock is listed for trading and any other governmental or regulatory authority, and otherwise to act for himand on his behalf in connection therewith; and 

(c) take any other action of any type whatsoever in connectionwith the foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be required, appropriate, or desirable to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might orcould do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact, or such attorney-in-fact’s substitute or substitutes, shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney and the rights andpowers herein granted. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed this Power ofAttorney as of this 6th day of March 2010.
II 

Calendar No. 3

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 224

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for an increase 

in the Federal minimum wage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2003

Mr. DASCHLE (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. DODD, Mr. HARKIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. EDWARDS, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. 

BAYH, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BYRD, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

CORZINE, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, 

Mr. KERRY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. 

REID, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. 

STABENOW, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mrs. 

BOXER, and Mr. PRYOR) introduced the following bill; which was read 

the first time 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 

for an increase in the Federal minimum wage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 224 PCS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Minimum Wage 

3 Act of 2003’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MINIMUM WAGE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor 

6 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is amended 

7 to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(1) except as otherwise provided in this sec9 tion, not less than—

10 ‘‘(A) $5.90 an hour, beginning on the 60th 

11 day after the date of enactment of the Fair 

12 Minimum Wage Act of 2003; and 

13 ‘‘(B) $6.65 an hour, beginning 12 months 

14 after that 60th day;’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect 60 days after the date of 

17 enactment of this Act. 

18 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY OF MINIMUM WAGE TO THE COM19 MONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA 

20 ISLANDS. 

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6 of the Fair Labor 

22 Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206) shall apply to the 

23 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

24 (b) TRANSITION.—Notwithstanding subsection (a), 

25 the minimum wage applicable to the Commonwealth of the 

26 Northern Mariana Islands under section 6(a)(1) of the 
3

S 224 PCS 

1 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) 

2 shall be—

3 (1) $3.55 an hour, beginning on the 60th day 

4 after the date of enactment of this Act; and 

5 (2) increased by $0.50 an hour (or such lesser 

6 amount as may be necessary to equal the minimum 

7 wage under section 6(a)(1) of such Act), beginning 

8 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act 

9 and every 6 months thereafter until the minimum 

10 wage applicable to the Commonwealth of the North11 ern Mariana Islands under this subsection is equal 

12 to the minimum wage set forth in such section. 
Calendar No. 3

108TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 224

A BILL

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

to provide for an increase in the Federal minimum wage. 

JANUARY 29, 2003

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
#### C. J. Thornton et al. *v.*R. G. Beverly.

Sale of Trust Property — Purchaser’s Title.

Where a trustee sells property with the knowledge and consent of the beneficiary, the purchaser acquires an absolute indefeasible title.

APPEALED EROM HENDERSON CIROUIT COURT.

December 6, 1866.

Opinion oe the Court by

Judge Peters:

The deed of the 5th of August, 1841, under which appellants claim, provided, in express terms, that Churchill J. Thornton, with the consent of his wife, Lucy M. Thornton, and Hopkins, the trustee, may sell any of the slaves named in said deed, of whom the woman Matilda was one, and vest the proceeds in such other property or estate as may be advantageous to the parties concerned, such other property to be held and disposed of in the same manner that said slaves would have been under the previous stipulations in said deed.

Such being the terms and provisions of the deed under which appellants claim, it is very clear that if appellee purchased the woman Matilda and her children of Churchill J. Thornton, with the knowledge and consent of Mrs. Lucy M. Thornton and the trustee, Hopkins, he thereby acquired the absolute indefeasible title to them.

We think the evidence preponderates strongly to the conclusion that the sale of the slaves to appellee was made by Thornton and wife and the trustee.

Brent Hopkins proves that he saw a bill of sale in 1845, executed by Thornton and wife and the trustee, Hopkins, to appellee for the slaves; the said bill of sale with the trust deeds having been submitted to his law partner and himself for their legal opinion by appellee as to the sufficiency of his title.

Moreover, the parties all resided in the same town from the date of the sale up to the institution of this suit. Appellee claimed the slaves absolutely during the whole time, a period of over fifteen year's; during all of this time his right was not questioned or disputed. C. J. Thornton died in 1845, and his widow, who is still living, has never asserted any claim to the slaves.

*21
      *Vance &*Turner, *for appellants.*

Dallam, *for appellee.*

Lots were purchased in tbe town of Henderson bj Thornton in his lifetime, improvements made thereon, suitable for a residence for himself and family, and they were occupied as such by them during the life of Thornton, the title thereto secured to Mrs. Thornton and children, and they still own and retain the? property. The evidence conduces to show that Thornton had not-the means to pay for the lots or the improvements of himself, and! to enable him to make said purchases and improvements it was, necessary to sell a part of the trust slaves; that fact is recited in? the conveyance of the city property to Hopkins in trust for appellants and to which Mrs. Thornton is a party.

We are satisfied that appellee acquired by his purchase and held the legal title in fee to the slaves, and as the verdict and judgment accord with this view, and upon the whole case as made out are correct, it is unnecessary to enter upon a discussion of the propriety of the instructions given and refused.

Wherefore, the judgment is *affirmed.*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Mark Parrish, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C. R. 

Bard, Inc., et al., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03979-PHX-DGC 

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL 

To: The clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: 

Defendants C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Attorney's signature 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed name and bar number 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6000 

Telephone number

(404 322-6050 

FAX number 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8761 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE 

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 

Juan L. Barrientez, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

C. R. Bard Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MDL Case No. 2:15-md-02641-DGC 

Civil Action No. CV-17-03499-PHX-DGC 

WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS 

To: Freese & Goss PLLC - Birmingham, AL 

(Name of plaintiff’s attorney or unrepresented plaintiff) 

I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two 

copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you. 

I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case. 

I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court’s 

jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service. 

I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 

60 days from 10/30/2017, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail 

to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent. 

Date: November 6, 2017 /s/ Richard B. North, Jr. 

Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party 

C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral 

Vascular, Inc.

Printed name of parties waiving service of 

summons 

Richard B. North, Jr. (Ga. Bar No. 545599) 

Printed Name 

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP 

201 17th St., NW, Suite 1700, Atlantic Station, Atlanta, GA 30363 

Address 

richard.north@nelsonmullins.com 

E-mail Address 

(404) 322-6155 

Telephone number 

Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a 

summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff 

located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure. 

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8730 Filed 11/08/17 Page 1 of 2
2

“Good cause” does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has 

no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant’s property. 

If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of 

a summons or of service. 

If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the 

plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been 

served.

Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC Document 8730 Filed 11/08/17 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61884-61885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Minority Health and 
Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIMHD Support for 
Conferences and Scientific Meeting (R13).
    Date: November 6, 2014.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Hui Chen, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, 
National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-7784, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#26454e43484e534f664b474f4a08484f4e08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99faf1fcf7f1ecf0d9f4f8f0f5b7f7f0f1b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.



[[Page 61885]]


    Dated: October 7, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-24393 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>